Menu
Chapter 3 of 24

03 From the Flood to Abraham

4 min read · Chapter 3 of 24

From the Flood to Abraham HEBREW SAMARITAN SEPTUAGENT

NAMES.

Age at birth of son.

Rest of life

Whole life

Age at birth of son.

Rest of life

Whole life

Age at birth of son.

Rest of life

Whole life

Shem - - -

100

500

600

100

500

600

100

500

600

From the Flood

2

2

2

Arphaxad -

35

403

438

135

303

438

135

400

535

Arphaxad -

430*

565

Καινᾶν, - -

130

330

460

Salah - - -

30

403

433

130

303

433

130

33o

460

Eber - - -

34

430

464

134

270

404

134

270

404

Eber - - -

370*

504

Peleg - - -

30

209

239

130

109

239

130

209

339

Reu - - -

32

207

239

132

107

239

132

207

339

Serug - - -

30

200

230

130

100

230

130

200

330

Nahor - -

29

119

148

79

69

148

179

125

304

Nahor - -

79*

120

208

Terah - -

70

135

205

70

75

145

70

135

205

Abram - -

His Call -

75

75

75

Total - -

367

1017

1247

* The smaller figures are from the Alexandrian copy of the LXX. In this table also (from Genesis 11:1-32) it will be seen that there are several alterations of 100 years, evidently made purposely, and not by accident. For the reasons already given we feel bound to take the Hebrew. But besides these alterations, the LXX. has a Cainan, with 130 years, which is not in the Hebrew or the Samaritan. A very grave question arises, Ought this to be inserted? If there was no such person, how has it crept into the LXX.? If there was such a person, how is it that it is omitted from the Hebrew? Were this the whole question, we should feel bound at once to reject it, and keep to the Hebrew; but this very name is quoted in Luke 3:1-38, and it therefore cannot be so easily disposed of. The genealogical list of which this second Cainan (so called to distinguish him from Cainan the son of Enos) forms a part, occurs four times in the Old Testament: namely, Genesis 10:24; Genesis 11:12; 1 Chronicles 1:18; 1 Chronicles 1:24. This Cainan does not occur in the Hebrew in any of these places, so that if it had been left out in one place by mistake, it must have been purposely omitted in the other three places to make them all agree. But this is a very grave fault to suppose. And further, it is not in the Samaritan Pentateuch, or in any of the early translations. In the LXX. it is in only three of the places (being omitted from 1 Chronicles 1:24), which thus makes the LXX. inconsistent in itself.

It is said, too, that it was not in the copies of the Bible used by such early writers as Berosus, Eupolemus, Polyhister, Josephus, Philo, Theophilus of Antioch, Africanus, Origen, and Jerome.* (*See Smith’s "Dictionary of the Bible:" Cainan.)

How it came to be copied into Luke 3:36 is really the difficulty. We have seen that where the LXX. gave the same sense as the Hebrew it was often quoted; but this would not be the case if no such person as this Cainan had existed. But it must be observed that in Luke it does not say that it is a quotation from Scripture, so that the list may be some accredited genealogical list known in the apostles’ days (which was not inspired, and which was merely copied - though copied by inspiration - as it stood); and not be taken from the Old Testament at all. Or it may be an error of an early copyist. The word Cainan occurs in Luke 3:37, and his eye may have caught that word by mistake, and being copied he would not spoil his manuscript by an erasure. And it must be noticed that it is wanting in one of the earliest Greek manuscripts of Luke. In whatever way it got into Luke, it may from thence have been copied into the LXX. by those who were anxious for a longer chronology; and if they did not hesitate to alter the Scripture by adding the various hundred years, they would not be slow to add another name to which they could put a hundred and thirty additional years. Bearing in mind, too, that many held the inspiration of Scripture so loosely that it would not seem to them nearly so grave a fault as it surely was. On the whole, then, we feel bound to reject this Cainan, and to keep to the Hebrew just as it stands.

There is still one point in the table that demands a word: it is the age of Terah when Abraham was born. From Genesis 11:26, it would appear that Terah was seventy years old when Abraham was born (as is given in the table), but Abraham may not have been Terah’s first-born, but have been put first because he became God’s chosen man. And this would appear to be the case if we compare Genesis 11:32; Genesis 12:4, with Acts 7:4; because (1), Abraham left Haran after his father’s death; (2), his father died 205 years old; (3), Abraham was seventy-five years old at that time; and (4), therefore Terah must have been 130 years old when Abraham was born.

Years

Then from the Flood to the call of Abraham, as in the Table, is

367

Terah, when Abraham was born

130

In Table

70

Difference

60

From the Flood to the call of Abraham

427

The moral links are ̶ Noah steps forth into the new earth; and God establishes His covenant with him and with every living creature, and sets His bow in the cloud. Noah’s descendants seek to become great in the earth and build cities; and, that they may get to themselves a name, they build the tower of Babel. God confounds their language, and scatters them - setting their bounds according to the number of the then future children of Israel (Deuteronomy 32:8-9). Idolatry now appears (see Joshua 24:2), and God calls out Abraham, and makes an unconditional covenant with him and his seed.

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate