067. QUESTIONS ON CHAPTER 30.

QUESTIONS ON CHAPTER 30.

1. Who have been the advocates of the scheme of justification by the imputation of Christ’s active and passive obedience?

2. In what does this differ from the Antinomian plan?

3. Have Arminians admitted the use of the phrase “imputed righteousness” at all?

4. What is the real point of difference between Calvinists and Arminians on this subject?

5. How does is appear that this scheme either confounds in an unscriptural manner the active and passive righteousness of Christ, or provides us a righteousness unadapted to our condition?

6. Does this scheme imply the same absurd fiction as the former one?

7. How does it appear that it is perfectly gratuitous?