25. GENERAL INDEX

A.

N or Sinaitic MS., 2, 196.

Accident, 8; pure A., 24-35.

Addition, 166-7, 270.

Ages, earliest, 2.

Alexandrian error, 45; readings, App. II. 258, 284.

Alford, *passim*.

Ammonius, 200.

Antiquity, our appeal always made 10, 194-5.

Apolinarius, or -is (or Apoll.), 224, 257.

Arians, 204, 218.

Assimilation, 100-127; what it was, 101-2; must be delicately handled, 115.

Attraction, 123-7.

B.

B or Vatican MS., 2, 8, 196; kablygraphy of, 64 note: virtually with N the 'Neutral' text, 282.

Basilides, 195, 197 9, 218 note 2.

Blunder, history of a, 24-7.

Bohairic Version, 249, and *passim*.

C.

Caesarea, library of, 284.

Cerinthus, 201.

Clement of Alexandria, 193.

Conflation, 266-82.

Correctors of MSS., 21.

Corruption, first origin of, 3-8; classes of 8-9, 23; general, 10-23; prevailed from the first, 12; the most corrupt authorities, 8, 14; in early Fathers, 193-4. Curetonian Version, *passim*. See Traditional Text.

Cursive MSS., a group of eccentric, 282; Ferrar group, 282.

D.

D or Codex Besae, 8.

A, or Sangallensis, 8.

Damascus, 5.

Diatossarons, 89, 96-8, 101. See Tatian.

Doxology, in the Lord's Prayer, 81-8.

E.

Eologadion, 69.

Epiphanius, 205, 211-2.

Erasmus, 10.

Error, slight clerical, 27-31.

Euroclydon, 46.

Evangelistaria (the right name), 67.

F.

Falconer's St. Paul's voyage, 46-7.

Fathers, *passim*: earliest, 193.

Faustinus, 218.

Ferrar group of Cursives, 282.

Field, Dr., 28 note 5, 30 and note 2.

G.

Galilee of the Gentiles, 4-5.

Genealogy, 22. See Traditional Text.

Glosses, 94-5, 98, 172-90; described, 172.

Gospels, the four, probable date of, 7.

Guardian, review in, Pref., 150-2, 283 note.

Gwilliam, Rev. G. H., 115 note.

H.

Harmonistic influence, 89-99.

Heracleon, 190, 202, 204, 215 note 2.

Heretics, corruptions by, 199-210; not always dishonest, 191; very numerous, 199 &c.

Homoeoteleuton, 36-41; explained, 8.

GENERAL INDEX.

I.

Inadvertency, 21, 23.

Internal evidence, Pref.

Interpolations, 166-7.

Irenaeus, St., 193.

Itacism, 8, 56-86.

J.

Justin Martyr, St., 193.

L.

L or Codox Rogius, 8.

Lachmann, passim.

Last Twelve Verses, 72, 129-30.

Latin MSS., Old, passim; Low-Latin, 8. See Traditional Text.

Lectionaries, 67-81; ecclesiastical phrases to, 71.

Lewis MS., passim. 194.

Liturgical influence, 67-88.

M.

Macedonians, 204.

Manes, 207.

Manicbacans, 206.

Manuscripts, six classes of, 12; existing number of, 12; frequent inaccuracies in, 12; more serious faults, 20 1; and passim. Marcion, 70, 195, 197, 199, 200, 219.

Matrimony, 208.

Menologion, 69.

N.

Naaseni, 204.

'Neutral Text,' 267, 282-6.

O.

Omissions, 128-156; the largest of all classes, 128; not 'various readings,' 128; prejudice in favour of, 130 1; proof of, 131-2; natural cause of corruption, 270. Origen, 53-5, 98, 101, 111-3, 190, 193, 209.

Orthodox, corruption by, 211-31, misguided, 211.

P.

Papyrus MSS., 2. See Traditional Text.

Parallel passages, 95.

Pella, 7.

Pericope de Adultera, 232-65.

Peshitto Version, passim. See Traditional Text.

Porphyry, 114.

R.

Revision, 10-13.

Rose, Rev. W. F., 61 note 3.

S.

Σαββατοκυριακί, 68.

Sahidic Version, 194.

Saturninus, or Saturnilus, 208 and note 3.

Scrivener's Introduction (4th Ed.), Miller's, passim.

Semiarianism, 2.

Substitution, 164-5, 270, 277.

Synaxarion, 69.

T.

Tatian's Diatessaron, 8, 98, 101, 196, 200.

Textualism of the Gospels, different from T. of profane writings, 14.

Theodotus, 205, 214.

Tisohendorf, 112-3, 176, 182, and passim; misuse of Assimilation, 118.

Traditional Text, 1-4; not Re-ceived Text, 1. See Volume on it.

Transcriptional Mistakes, 55.

Transposition, 157-63; character of, 163, 270.

Tregolles, 34, 136, 138.

U.

Uncials, 42-55.

V.

Valentinus, 197-9, 201, 202-5, 215, 218 note 2.

Various readings, 14-16.

Vellum, 2.

Vercellone, 47 note.

Versions, passim.

Victorinus Afer, 218.

W.

Western Readings or Text, 6, 266-85.

Z.

Z or Dublin palimpsest, 8.

INDEX II.

PASSAGES OF THE NEW TESTAMENT DISCUSSED.

| ST. MATTHEW: | PAGE | ST. MARK: | PAGE | ST. LUKE (cont.): | PAGE |

| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

| i. 19 | 209 | i. 2 | 111-5 | vii. 3 | 174 |

| iii. 6 | 102 | 5 | 157-8 | 21 | 50 |

| 16 | 170-1 | ii. 3 | 158-9 | ix. 1 | 74 |

| iv. 23 | 51-2 | iv. 6 | 63-4 | 10 | 275-6 |

| v. 44 | 144-53 | v. 36 | 188 | 54-6 | 224-31 |

| vi. 13 | 81-8 | vi. 11 | 118-9, 181-2 | x. 15 | 28 |

| 18 | 171 | 32 | 32-3 | 25 | 75 |

| vii. 4 | 102 | 33 | 271-3 | xi. 54 | 276-7 |

| viii. 9 | 102 | vii. 14 | 35 | xii. 18 | 277-8 |

| 13 | 167-8 | 19 | 61-3 | 29 | 155 |

| 26 | 103 | 31 | 72-3 | xiii. 9 | 160-1 |

| 29 | 102 | viii. 1 | 34 | xiv. 3 | 117 |

| ix. 24 | 104 | 26 | 273-4 | xv. 16 | 117 |

| 35 | 74 | ix. 38 | 271 | 17 | 43-5 |

| x. 12 | 103 | 49 | 275 | 24 | 61 |

| xi. 23 | 27 | x. 16 | 48 | 32 | 61 |

| xii. 10 | 117 | xii. 17 | 48 | xvi. 21 | 40 |

| xiii. 36 | 173 | x.v. 40 | 48 | 25 | 60 |

| 44 | 80-1 | 41 | 182-3 | xvii. 37 | 48-9 |

| xv. 8 | 136-44 | 70 | 119-22 | xix. 21 | 103 |

| xvi. 8 | 103 | xv. 6 | 32 | 41 | 212 |

| xix. 9 | 39 | 28 | 75-8 | xxii. 67-8 | 210 |

| 16 | 103 | xvi. 9-20, 72, 129-30 | | xxiii. 11 | 50-1 |

| xx. 24 | 103 | | | 27 | 51 |

| 28 | 175 | | | 42 | 57 |

| xxi. 9 | 99 | ST. LUKE: | | xxiv. 1 | 92-4 |

| 44 | 134 6 | i. 66 | 188-9 | 7 | 161 |

| xxii. 23 | 49-30 | ii. 14 | 21-2, 31-2 | 53 | 278 |

| xxiii. 14 | 38 | 15 | 36 | | |

| xxiv. 15 | 116 | iii. 14 | 201 | ST. JOHN: | |

| 31 | 179-80 | 29 | 165 | i. 3-4 | 203 |

| 36 | 169 70 | iv. 1-13 | 94 | 18 | 215-8, 165 |

| xxv. 13 | 171 | v. 7 | 108 | ii. 40 | 212-4 |

| xxvii. 15 | 103 | 14 | 104 | iii. 13 | 223-4 |

| 17 | 53-5 | vi. 1 | 132-3 | iv. 15 | 48 |

| 25-6 | 91 | 4 | 167 | v. 4 | 50 |

| 35 | 171 | 26 | 153 | 27 | 162 |

II.

U

INDEX II.

| ST. JOHN (cont.): | FACE | ST. JOHN (cont.): | FACE | 2 COR.: | FACE |

| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

| v. 44 . . . . 45 | | xvi. 16 . . . . 105 | | iii. 3 . . . 125-7 | |

| vi. 11 . . . . 37-8 | | xvii. 4 . . . 186 8 | | | |

| 15 . . . 39, 178 | | xviii. 14 . . . 180-1 | | TITUS: | |

| 55 . . . 153-4 | | xx. 11 . . . 90-2 | | ii. 5 . . . 65-6 | |

| 71 . . . 124 | | | | | |

| viii. 40 . . . 214-5 | | ACTS: | | | |

| ix. 22 . . . 183 | | ii. 45-6 . . . 159 | | HEB.: | |

| x. 14-15 . . . 206-8 | | iii. 1 . . . 78-80 | | vii. 1 . . . 53 | |

| 29 . . . 24-7 | | xviii. 6 . . . 27 | | | |

| xii. 1, 2 . . . 57-9 | | xx. 4 . . . 190 | | 2 PET.: | |

| 7 . . . 184-6 | | 24 . . 28, 124-5 | | i. 21 . . . 52-3 | |

| 13 . . . 99 | | xxvii. 14 . . . 46-7 | | | |

| viii. 21-5 . . . 106-11 | | 37 . . . 27 | | | |

| 24 . . . 179 | | xxviii. 1 . . . 28 | | REV. | |

| 25 . . . 60 | | | | i. 5 . . . 59-60 | |

| 26 . . . 124 | | 1 COR.: | | | |

| 37 . . . 35 | | xv. 47 . . . 219-23 | | | |

THE END.

BY THE SAME AUTHOR AND EDITOR.

Demy 8vo, 10s. 6d. net.

The Traditional Text of the Holy Gospels,

VINDICATED AND ESTABLISHED.

OPINIONS OF THE PRESS.

'One of the most elaborate treatises on Textual Criticism that has ever been produced.'—Times.

'All scholars, whether they agree or not with Mr. Miller, will feel a debt of gratitude to him for his painstaking labour, and the skill and learning which he has brought to bear. It is no light achievement to have made a book of this kind so readable to the ordinary public; while the scholar will find nothing assumed, and nothing slurred over, but a solid weight of learning and a reserve of strength underneath its pleasant periods. There are copious references and careful indices. And everything is brought up to the most recent date. . . . 'We wish Mr. Miller good speed in the arduous task yet before him of bringing out to the world the further materials towards a true apprehension of the Textual Problem left behind him by Dean Burgon.'—Church Times. 'It is impossible to do justice to the elaborate arguments of such a book as this within the compass of an ordinary review, but we trust that they will receive the fullest and most patient examination. Criticism is the careful weighing of evidence with a view to decision, not the tabulating of a series of axioms or the employment of evidence which to many scholars is so much subjectivity . . . . It is a most able and learned defence of the Traditional Text, and presents, we feel convinced, an exceedingly strong case, which will require very weighty arguments if it is to be confuted.'—Record. 'Any who are interested in the text of the Scriptures—and who is not?—should make themselves acquainted with Dean Burgon's views.'—Rock. 'From this mass of material Mr. Miller has produced, on the whole very successfully, a continuous and orderly treatise.'—Tablet. 'The book contains much interesting information, and Mr. Miller shows that he has thoroughly studied the subject.'—Athenaeum. OPINIONS OF THE PRESS.

'A body of evidence . . . which from many points of view appears to be unanswerable.'—*Morning Post*. 'A brilliant argument for the Traditional Text.'—*Church Bells*.

'Mr. Miller, who was thoroughly in sympathy with Dean Burgon's methods of work, and with the general conclusions at which he had arrived, has now published a volume made up in part of the Dean's papers, with large additions from his own stores; and for his work every student of the Gospels will be grateful. . . . No one can have anything but welcome for a full discussion of the whole question. . . . We hope that it may be widely read, and that it may stimulate fresh independent study in the region of textual criticism.'—Dr. J. H. Bernard in *Expository Times*. 'We gladly acknowledge the care, industry, and ability with which Dean Burgon's case has been prepared and presented by Mr. Miller. Those who desire to see it at its best should read this book.'—*Methodist Recorder*. 'The reader will find the arguments in favour of the antiquity of the Traditional Text stated and set forth in this volume with great learning and ability.'—*Scotsman*. 'It is impossible not to recognize the enormous labour which has been spent upon the task.'—*Manchester Guardian*. 'The book before us is a fresh effort in this direction, and in clearness of style, in simplicity of arrangement, and in brilliancy of language, it forms a favourable contrast to anything that has proceeded from the opposite school.' C. E. S. M. in *Chichester Diocesan Gazette*. 'This is a patient and lucid exposition of the views of that school of criticism of which the late Dean Burgon was the great leader. It is most interesting, and Mr. Miller has done his part with singular ability and sincerity.'—*Bookselling*. 'While it would be presumptuous in us, who do not pretend to be qualified to pronounce on such matters, to declare that the author and editor of this book have proved their case against the upholders of the supreme authority of the old uncial versions, we may at least say that their criticism appears to us to have a special importance, in that it shows a greater appreciation of the value of historical evidence than will be found in the work of the scholars of the other party. We shall look forward with interest to the appearance of a second volume, which is promised, on the 'Causes of the Corruption of the Traditional Text.'—*Journal of Education*. LONDON:

GEORGE BELL & SONS, York Street, Covent Garden.