The second book of Clement’s great trilogy (after the Exhortation). Here the Instructor is Christ the Word, who trains new Christians in daily life. Book 1 describes who the Instructor is and how he deals with us as children of God. Books 2 and 3 apply his teaching to eating and drinking, furniture and entertainment, dress and jewellery, marriage, and how Christians should behave in the city, in bath and at the banquet. The work ends with a short hymn to Christ.
Alexandriansc. AD 190–200Clement of AlexandriaGreekModern English: CC BY-SA 4.0
A note for readers. Much of the Instructor is practical advice for wealthy Christians in Alexandria around AD 200: what to eat, how to dress, whether to wear jewellery or visit the baths. Clement draws on Stoic ideas about nature and self-control as well as on Scripture, and some of his rules (and his remarks about the body and about women) belong to his time. Read the long sections on food and dress as a window into daily church life, not as a rulebook.
⚑ Possible scanning error in the digital Greek (A., B., E., F., Z., H.). Check it against the printed edition.
(the older translation has no table of contents here)
Chapter headings of the first book. 1. What the Instructor promises. 2. That the Instructor takes charge of us because of our sins. 3. That the Instructor loves humanity. 4. That the Word is Instructor equally of men and of women. 5. That all who devote themselves to the truth are children before God. 6. Against those who suppose that the names “children” and “infants” point to teaching of the first elementary lessons. 7. Who the Instructor is, and about his instruction. 8. Against those who think that what is just is not good. 9. That it belongs to the same power to do good and to punish justly, and in this chapter, what the manner of the Word’s instruction is. 10. That the same God, through the same Word, both holds humanity back from sins by his threats and saves it by his encouragement. 11. That the Word gave instruction through the law and the prophets. 12. That the Instructor, in keeping with a father’s disposition, uses both sternness and kindness. 13. That just as right conduct comes about by right reason, so, conversely, sin is contrary to reason.
The Office of the Instructor.As there are these three things in the case of man, habits, actions, and passions; habits are the department appropriated by hortatory discourse the guide to piety, which, like the ship's keel, is laid beneath for the building up of faith; in which, rejoicing exceedingly, and abjuring our old opinions, through salvation we renew our youth, singing with the hymning prophecy, "How good is God to Israel, to such as are upright in heart! All actions, again, are the province of preceptive discourse; while persuasive discourse applies itself to heal the passions. It is, however, one and the self-same word which rescues man from the custom of this world in which he has been reared, and trains him up in the one salvation of faith in God.
What the Instructor promises. A foundation of truth has been laid for ourselves, you children: an unbreakable base of knowledge for the holy temple of the great God. It is a good exhortation, a longing for eternal life through reasonable obedience, laid down in a field of the mind. Now there are three things in a human being: character, actions and passions. The Exhortation has been given charge of his character. It guides us into reverence for God, and as a keel is laid beneath a ship, this Word is laid beneath us for the building up of faith. We rejoice greatly in it, renounce our old opinions and are made young again for salvation. We sing along with the prophecy that says in its psalm, “How good is God to Israel, to those who are upright in heart.” The Word that gives counsel oversees all our actions, and the Word that comforts heals our passions. Yet it is one and the same Word throughout. He snatches a person away from the habit that grew up with him and from the custom of the world, and trains him toward the single way of salvation, faith in God.
When, then, the heavenly guide, the Word, was inviting men to salvation, the appellation of hortatory was properly applied to Him: his same word was called rousing (the whole from a part). For the whole of piety is hortatory, engendering in the kindred faculty of reason a yearning after true life now and to come. But now, being at once curative and preceptive, following in His own steps, He makes what had been prescribed the subject of persuasion, promising the cure of the passions within us. Let us then designate this Word appropriately by the one name Tutor (or Poedagogue, or Instructor). The Instructor being practical, not theoretical, His aim is thus to improve the soul, not to teach, and to train it up to a virtuous, not to an intellectual life. Although this same word is didactic, but not in the present instance. For the word which, in matters of doctrine, explains and reveals, is that whose province it is to teach. But our Educator being practical, first exhorts to the attainment of right dispositions and character, and then persuades us to the energetic practice of our duties, enjoining on us pure commandments, and exhibiting to such as come after representations of those who formerly wandered in error.
So when the heavenly guide, the Word, was calling people to salvation, his name was “Exhorter.” This stirring-up side of his work is singled out, so that the whole Word is named from a part. All true devotion to God is exhortation, because it produces in our kindred reason a longing for the life that now is and the life to come. But now he is both healer and counselor at once. Following his own earlier steps, he advises the one who has already been turned toward him, and above all he promises healing for the passions within us. So let us fittingly call him by one name, Instructor. He leads us on in practice and does not simply teach a method. His aim is to make the soul better, not to teach it, and to lead us into a self-controlled life, not a scholarly one. The same Word is indeed a teacher as well, but not here. The teaching Word is the one who explains and reveals in matters of doctrine. The Instructor is practical. First he urged us toward a settled disposition of good character. Now he calls us also to do what we ought, handing on pure counsels and showing to those who come later pictures of those who earlier went astray.
Both are of the highest utility,-that which assumes the form of counselling to obedience, and that which is presented in the form of example; which latter is of two kinds, corresponding to the former duality,-the one having for its purpose that we should choose and imitate the good, and the other that we should reject and turn away from the opposite. Hence accordingly ensues the healing of our passions, in consequence of the assuagements of those examples; the Paedagogue strengthening our souls, and by His benign commands, as by gentle medicines, guiding the sick to the perfect knowledge of the truth. There is a wide difference between health and knowledge; for the latter is produced by learning, the former by healing. One, who is ill, will not therefore learn any branch of instruction till he is quite well. For neither to learners nor to the sick is each injunction invariably expressed similarly; but to the former in such a way as to lead to knowledge, and to the latter to health.
Both are most helpful. One is the form of counsel, which leads to obedience. The other is taken in the role of example, and it too is twofold, like the first pair. One kind of example is for us to imitate by choosing what is good. The other is for us to turn away by rejecting the opposite. From this the healing of the passions follows. The Instructor strengthens our souls through the comfort the examples bring. With his kindly counsels, as with gentle medicines, he puts the sick on a regimen that leads to full knowledge of the truth. Health and knowledge are not the same thing. Knowledge is gained by learning, health by healing. So a person who is still sick could not first learn any of the teachings before he is completely well. Nor is each instruction always spoken in the same way to those who are learning and to those who are sick. To the first it is spoken for knowledge, to the second for healing.
As, then, for those of us who are diseased in body a physician is required, so also those who are diseased in soul require a paedagogue to cure our maladies; and then a teacher, to train and guide the soul to all requisite knowledge when it is made able to admit the revelation of the Word. Eagerly desiring, then, to perfect us by a gradation conducive to salvation, suited for efficacious discipline, a beautiful arrangement is observed by the all-benignant Word, who first exhorts, then trains, and finally teaches.
Just as sick bodies need a physician, so those who are weak in soul need an instructor to heal our passions. After that, a teacher will take over. He prepares the soul to be clean and fit for knowledge, able to receive the revelation of the Word. The Word, who loves humanity in every way, is eager to bring us to perfection by a step suited to salvation and to effective discipline. So he follows this fine arrangement: first he urges us on from the beginning, then he trains us, and finally he teaches us fully.
Our Instructor's Treatment of Our Sins.Now, O you, my children, our Instructor is like His Father God, whose son He is, sinless, blameless, and with a soul devoid of passion; God in the form of man, stainless, the minister of His Father's will, the Word who is God, who is in the Father, who is at the Father's right hand, and with the form of God is God. He is to us a spotless image; to Him we are to try with all our might to assimilate our souls. He is wholly free from human passions; wherefore also He alone is judge, because He alone is sinless. As far, however, as we can, let us try to sin as little as possible. For nothing is so urgent in the first place as deliverance from passions and disorders, and then the checking of our liability to fall into sins that have become habitual.
Our Instructor watches over us because of our sins. He is like his Father, God, whose Son he is. You, my children, are the ones he instructs. He is sinless, blameless, and free from passion in his soul. He is God in human form, undefiled, serving his Father’s will. He is the Word who is God, who is in the Father and at the Father’s right hand, and who is God even in the form he took. He is our spotless image, and we must try with all our strength to make our souls like him. He is completely free from human passions. That is why he alone is judge, because he alone is without sin. We, as far as we are able, must try to sin as little as possible. For nothing is so urgent as, first, to be rid of our passions and sicknesses, and then to stop ourselves from slipping easily into the habit of sin.
It is best, therefore, not to sin at all in any way, which we assert to be the prerogative of God alone; next to keep clear of voluntary transgressions, which is characteristic of the wise man; thirdly, not to fall into many involuntary offences, which is peculiar to those who have been excellently trained. Not to continue long in sins, let that be ranked last. But this also is salutary to those who are called back to repentance, to renew the contest. And the Instructor, as I think, very beautifully says, through Moses: "If any one die suddenly by him, straightway the head of his consecration shall be polluted, and shall be shaved," designating involuntary sin as sudden death. And He says that it pollutes by defiling the soul: wherefore He prescribes the cure with all speed, advising the head to be instantly shaven; that is, counselling the locks of ignorance which shade the reason to be shorn clean off, that reason (whose seat is in the brain), being left bare of the dense stuff of vice, may speed its way to repentance.
It is best, then, not to sin at all, in any way. We say that this belongs to God alone. Second best is never to commit a wrong deliberately, which is the mark of a wise person. Third is not to fall into very many unintended offences, which belongs to those who have been well and nobly trained. Not to linger long in sins let us put last. Even this is a saving thing for those who are called back to repentance, so that they can take up the fight again. The Instructor, it seems to me, speaks very well through Moses: “If anyone dies suddenly beside him, at once the head of his vow will be defiled, and it shall be shaved.” He calls unintended sin “sudden death.” He says it defiles because it stains the soul. So he prescribes the cure at once, with all speed, advising that the head be shaved immediately. He is urging us to wipe away the hair of ignorance that shades the reasoning mind. Then the mind, which has its seat in the brain, is left bare of the thick growth of wickedness and can run back to repentance.
Then after a few remarks He adds, "The days before are not reckoned irrational," by which manifestly sins are meant which are contrary to reason. The involuntary act He calls "sudden, " the sin He calls "irrational. Wherefore the Word, the Instructor, has taken the charge of us, in order to the prevention of sin, which is contrary to reason. Hence consider the expression of Scripture, "Therefore these things saith the Lord; "the sin that had been committed before is held up to reprobation by the succeeding expression "therefore," according to which the righteous judgment follows. This is shown conspicuously by the prophets, when they said, "Hadst thou not sinned, He would not have uttered these threatenings. "Therefore thus saith the Lord; "Because thou hast not heard these words, therefore these things the Lord; "and, "Therefore, behold, the Lord saith.
Then, after a few words in between, he adds, “The former days were without reason.” This clearly points to sins that were not done according to reason. The unintended act he called “sudden,” and sinning he called “irrational.” This is why the Word, the Instructor, has taken charge over us: to prevent irrational sin. Notice also this phrase in Scripture: “Therefore thus says the Lord.” The earlier sin is exposed by the words that follow, since just judgment comes after it. The prophets show this plainly. It is as if they were saying, “If you had not sinned, he would not have threatened this.” So they say, “Therefore thus says the Lord,” and “Because you did not listen to these words, therefore thus says the Lord,” and “Therefore, behold, says the Lord.”
For prophecy is given by reason both of obedience and disobedience: for obedience, that we may be saved; for disobedience, that we may be corrected. Our Instructor, the Word, therefore cures the unnatural passions of the soul by means of exhortations. For with the highest propriety the help of bodily diseases is called the healing art-an art acquired by human skill. But the paternal Word is the only Paeonian physician of human infirmities, and the holy charmer of the sick soul. "Save," it is said, "Thy servant, O my God, who trusteth in Thee. Pity me, O Lord; for I will cry to Thee all the day. For a while the "physician's art," according to Democritus, "heals the diseases of the body; wisdom frees the soul from passion. But the good Instructor, the Wisdom, the Word of the Father, who made man, cares for the whole nature of His creature; the all-sufficient Physician of humanity, the Saviour, heals both body and soul.
This is why there is prophecy: because of obedience and disobedience. Through obedience we are saved, and through disobedience we are corrected. So our Instructor, the Word, heals through his exhortations the passions of the soul that are against nature. Strictly speaking, help for bodily diseases is called medicine, an art that human wisdom can teach. But the Word of the Father alone is the healer of human sicknesses, and the holy charmer who sings over the sick soul. “Save your servant, my God, who hopes in you,” it says. “Have mercy on me, Lord, for I will cry to you all day long.” For as Democritus says, “Medicine heals the diseases of the body, but wisdom takes the passions from the soul.” The good Instructor, who is Wisdom, the Word of the Father who made humanity, cares for his whole creation. He is the Physician who can cure every ill of humankind, and he heals both body and soul.
"Rise up," He said to the paralytic; "take the bed on which thou liest, and go away home; " and straightway the infirm man received strength. And to the dead He said, "Lazarus, go forth; " and the dead man issued from his coffin such as he was ere he died, having undergone resurrection. Further, He heals the soul itself by precepts and gifts-by precepts indeed, in course of time, but being liberal in His gifts, He says to us sinners, "Thy sins be forgiven thee. We, however, as soon as He conceived the thought, became His children, having had assigned us the best and most secure rank by His orderly arrangement, which first circles about the world, the heavens, and the sun's circuits, and occupies itself with the motions of the rest of the stars for man's behoof, and then busies itself with man himself, on whom all its care is concentrated; and regarding him as its greatest work, regulated his soul by wisdom and temperance, and tempered the body with beauty and proportion. And whatever in human actions is right and regular, is the result of the inspiration of its rectitude and order.
The Savior says to the paralyzed man, “Get up, take the bed you are lying on, and go home.” At once the sick man was made strong. And to the dead man he said, “Lazarus, come out.” The dead man came out of the tomb as he had been before he suffered, having practiced resurrection. He also heals the soul itself by commandments and by gifts of grace. As for his counsels, he perhaps holds them back for a time. But he is rich in gifts, and he says to us sinners, “Your sins are forgiven.” As soon as we thought of it, we became children, receiving the best and most secure order from his own good order. This order is first at work about the world and the heaven, the circuits of the sun, the circles and courses of the other stars, all for man’s sake. Then it is at work about man himself, on whom all its zeal is spent. Counting him its greatest work, it set his soul straight with prudence and self-control. It blended his body with beauty and fine proportion. And into the actions of mankind it breathed its own right-doing and good order.
The Philanthropy of the Instructor.The Lord ministers all good and all help, both as man and as God: as God, forgiving our sins; and as man, training us not to sin. Man is therefore justly dear to God, since he is His workmanship. The other works of creation He made by the word of command alone, but man He framed by Himself, by His own hand, and breathed into him what was peculiar to Himself. What, then, was fashioned by Him, and after He likeness, either was created by God Himself as being desirable on its own account, or was formed as being desirable on account of something else. If, then, man is an object desirable for itself, then He who is good loved what is good, and the love-charm is within even in man, and is that very thing which is called the inspiration [or breath of God; but if man was a desirable object on account of something else, God had no other reason for creating him, than that unless he came into being, it was not possible for God to be a good Creator, or for man to arrive at the knowledge of God. For God would not have accomplished that on account of which man was created otherwise than by the creation of man; and what hidden power in willing God possessed, He carried fully out by the forth-putting of His might externally in the act of creating, receiving from man what He made man; and whom He had He saw, and what He wished that came to pass; and there is nothing which God cannot do.
The Instructor loves humankind. The Lord benefits everything and helps everything, both as man and as God. As God he forgives our sins; as man he trains us along the way so that we do not sin. It is fitting, then, that man is a friend to God, since man is his own creation. The other things he made simply by command, but man he shaped with his own hands, and he breathed into him something of his own. Now what was formed by him and after his own pattern was either made by God because it was desirable for its own sake, or fashioned because it was desirable for the sake of something else. If man is desirable for his own sake, then God, being good, loved what is good. The love-charm is then within man himself, and this is what is called the breath of God. But if man became desirable for the sake of other things, God had no other reason for making him than this: without man it was not possible for one to be a good Creator, or for the other to arrive at the knowledge of God. (For God would not have accomplished the purpose for which man was made unless man had been made.) The power God had hidden within him, his willing, he carried further through the power that works outside him in making. He took from man what he made man; he saw what he had, and what he willed came to be. There is nothing that God cannot do.
Man, then, whom God made, is desirable for himself, and that which is desirable on his account is allied to him to whom it is desirable on his account; and this, too, is acceptable and liked. But what is loveable, and is not also loved by Him? And man has been proved to be loveable; consequently man is loved by God. For how shall he not be loved for whose sake the only-begotten Son is sent from the Father's bosom, the Word of faith, the faith which is superabundant; the Lord Himself distinctly confessing and saying, "For the Father Himself loveth you, because ye have loved Me; " and again, "And hast loved them as Thou hast loved Me? " What, then, the Master desires and declares, and how He is disposed in deed and word, how He commands what is to be done, and forbids the opposite, has already been shown.
Man, then, whom God made, is desirable for his own sake. What is desirable for its own sake is close to the one for whom it is so, and it is welcome and lovable to him. But can something be lovable to someone and yet not be loved by him? Man has been shown to be lovable, so man is loved by God. For how could he not be loved, for whose sake the only-begotten Word of faith is sent down from the Father’s bosom? Here is faith in overflowing measure: the Lord himself plainly confesses it and says, “For the Father himself loves you, because you have loved me.” And again he says, “And you have loved them, as you have loved me.” What the Instructor wants and promises is already clear. He is engaged in deed and word, directing what must be done and forbidding the opposite.
Plainly, then, the other kind of discourse, the didactic, is powerful and spiritual, observing precision, occupied in the contemplation of mysteries. But let it stand over for the present. Now, it is incumbent on us to return His love, who lovingly guides us to that life which is best; and to live in accordance with the injunctions of His will, not only fulfilling what is commanded, or guarding against what is forbidden, but turning away from some examples, and imitating others as much as we can, and thus to perform the works of the Master according to His similitude, and so fulfil what Scripture says as to our being made in His image and likeness. For, wandering in life as in deep darkness, we need a guide that cannot stumble or stray; and our guide is the best, not blind, as the Scripture says, "leading the blind into pits. But the Word is keen-sighted, and scans the recesses of the heart.
It is clear that the other kind of discourse is the teaching kind. It is plain and spiritual and concerned with exact statement. It belongs to the higher vision of divine things, and we will set it aside for now. What is fitting for us is to love in return the one who leads us, lovingly, to the best life. We should live according to the ordinances of his will. We should not only carry out what is commanded and keep from what is forbidden. We should also turn away from some of the examples set before us and imitate others as closely as we can. In this way we do the works of the Instructor in his likeness, so that “in the image and in the likeness” may be fulfilled. For we wander through life as in deep darkness, and we need a guide who does not stumble and who is exact. The best guide is not blind, as the Scripture says, leading the blind into the pit. He is the Word, who sees sharply and looks through the hidden things of the heart.
As, then, that is not light which enlightens not, nor motion that moves not, nor loving which loves not, so neither is that good which profits not, nor guides to salvation. Let us then aim at the fulfilment of the commandments by the works of the Lord; for the Word Himself also, having openly become flesh, exhibited the same virtue, both practical and contemplative. Wherefore let us regard the Word as law, and His commands and counsels as the short and straight paths to immortality; for His precepts are full of persuasion, not of fear.
There is no light that does not give light, nothing that moves without moving something, nothing that loves without loving. In the same way nothing is good that does not do us good and guide us toward salvation. So let us love the commandments by way of the works of the Lord. For the Word himself became flesh and showed us plainly the same virtue, both in practice and in contemplation. Let us take the Word as our law, and let us recognize his commandments and counsels as short, direct roads to eternity. For his orders are full of persuasion, not of fear.
Men and Women Alike Under the Instructor's Charge.Let us, then, embracing more and more this good obedience, give ourselves to the Lord; clinging to what is surest, the cable of faith in Him, and understanding that the virtue of man and woman is the same. For if the God of both is one, the master of both is also one; one church, one temperance, one modesty; their food is common, marriage an equal yoke; respiration, sight, hearing, knowledge, hope, obedience, love all alike. And those whose life is common, have common graces and a common salvation; common to them are love and training. "For in this world," he says, "they marry, and are given in marriage," in which alone the female is distinguished from the male; "but in that world it is so no more. There the rewards of this social and holy life, which is based on conjugal union, are laid up, not for male and female, but for man, the sexual desire which divides humanity being removed.
(Heading: That the Word is Instructor of men and women alike.) Let us, then, embrace this good obedience all the more and give ourselves to the Lord. Let us fasten on to the surest cable, which is faith in him, and understand that the virtue of a man and of a woman is the same. If God is one for both, the Instructor is also one for both. There is one church, one self-control, one modesty. Their food is shared, and marriage is a yoke they bear together. Breathing, sight, hearing, knowledge, hope, obedience and love are all alike. Those whose life is shared also share grace and salvation, and so their virtue and their training are shared too. “For in this age,” he says, “they marry and are given in marriage.” Only in this age is the female distinguished from the male. “But in that age it is so no longer.” There the rewards of this shared and holy life, which comes from the union of marriage, are kept in store not for male and female but for the human being, who is set free from the desire that divides him.
Common therefore, too, to men and women, is the name of man. For this reason I think the Attics called, not boys only, but girls, paida/rion, using it as a word of common gender; if Menander the comic poet, in Rhapizomena, appears to any one a sufficient authority, who thus speaks:- "My little daughter; for by nature The child (paida/rion) is most loving. 3Arnej, too, the word for lambs, is a common name of simplicity for the male and female animal. Now the Lord Himself will feed us as His flock forever. Amen. But without a sheperd, neither can sheep nor any other animal live, nor children without a tutor, nor domestics without a master."
So the name “human being” is common to men and women. For this reason, I think, the Attic Greeks used the word “paidarion” (“little child”) of both sexes, not only of boys but of girls, if the comic poet Menander in his play *The Girl Who Was Slapped* seems reliable to anyone. He says something like: “my little daughter . . . for the little child (paidarion) is by nature very affectionate.” In the same way, “lambs” is a common name, expressing harmlessness, for the male and the female animal. And “the Lord himself shepherds us” forever. Amen. “Without a shepherd, neither sheep nor anything else is to live, nor children without an instructor, nor servants without a master.”
All Who Walk According to Truth are Children of God.That, then, Paedagogy is the training of children (pai/dwn a0gwgh/), is clear from the word itself. It remains for us to consider the children whom Scripture points to; then to give the paedagogue charge of them. We are the children. In many ways Scripture celebrates us, and describes us in manifold figures of speech, giving variety to the simplicity of the faith by diverse names Accordingly, in the Gospel, "the Lord, standing on the shore, says to the disciples"-they happened to be fishing-"and called aloud, Children, have ye any meat? " -addressing those that were already in the position of disciples as children. "And they brought to Him," it is said, "children, that He might put His hands on them and bless them; and when His disciples hindered them, Jesus said, Suffer the children, and forbid them not to come to Me, for of such is the kingdom of heaven. What the expression means the Lord Himself shall declare, saying, "Except ye be converted, and become as little chidren, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven; " not in that place speaking figuratively of regeneration, but setting before us, for our imitation, the simplicity that is in children.
(Heading: That all who devote themselves to the truth are children with God.) It is clear from the name itself that paidagogia (“instruction”) is the training of children. What remains is to consider the children whom Scripture has in view, and then to put the Instructor in charge of them. We are the children. Scripture praises us in many ways and speaks of us in many figures, varying the simplicity of faith with different names. In the Gospel, for example, it says: “The Lord stood on the shore before the disciples (they happened to be fishing) and called out, ‘Children, do you have anything to eat?’” Here he addresses as children those who were already settled in the state of disciples. It also says: “They brought children to him” so that he might lay his hands on them in blessing. When the disciples tried to stop them, Jesus said, “Let the children be, and do not hinder them from coming to me, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” The Lord himself makes clear what this means when he says, “Unless you turn and become like these children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven.” He is not speaking here in a figure about regeneration. He is setting before us the simplicity found in children, so that we may become like them.
The prophetic spirit also distinguishes us as children. "Plucking," it is said, "branches of olives or palms, the children went forth to meet the Lord, and cried, saying, Hosanna to the Son of David! Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord; " light, and glory, and praise, with supplication to the Lord: for this is the meaning of the expression Hosanna when rendered in Greek. And the Scripture appears to me, in allusion to the prophecy just mentioned, reproachfully to upbraid the thoughtless: "Have ye never read, Out of the mouths of babes and sucklings Thou hast perfected praise? " In this way the Lord in the Gospels spurs on His disciples, urging them to attend to Him, hastening as He was to the Father; rendering His hearers more eager by the intimation that after a little He was to depart, and showing them that it was requisite that they should take more unsparing advantage of the truth than ever before, as the Word was to ascend to heaven.
The prophetic Spirit also singles out the children. It says: “The children cut branches of olive or palm and went out to meet the Lord, and they cried out, ‘Hosanna to the Son of David! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.’” This is light, glory and praise offered to the Lord with supplication, for this is what “Hosanna” means when it is interpreted in the Greek language. And it seems to me that Scripture, hinting at the prophecy mentioned before, rebukes the careless: “Have you never read that out of the mouth of infants and nursing babies you have perfected praise?” In the same way the Lord in the Gospel goads his disciples, urging them to give heed to him as one already hurrying to the Father. He makes his hearers more eager by telling them beforehand that he will soon be gone. They must gather the fruit of the truth without holding back, he shows them, since the Word was just about to go up to heaven.
Again, therefore, He calls them children; for He says, "Children, a little while I am with you. And, again, He likens the kingdom of heaven to children sitting in the market-places and saying, "We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have mourned, and ye have not lamented; " and whatever else He added agreeably thereto. And it is not alone the Gospel that holds these sentiments. Prophecy also agrees with it. David accordingly says, "Praise, O children, the Lord; praise the name of the Lord. It says also by Esaias, "Here am I, and the children that God hath given me. Are you amazed, then, to hear that men who belong to the nations are sons in the Lord's sight? You do not in that case appear to give ear to the Attic dialect, from which you may learn that beautiful, comely, and freeborn young maidens are still called paidi/skai, and servant-girls paidiska/ria; and that those last also are, on account of the bloom of youth, called by the flattering name of young maidens.
So again he calls them children, for he says, “Children, I am with you a little while longer.” And again he compares the kingdom of heaven to children “sitting in the marketplaces and saying, We piped for you, and you did not dance; we sang a funeral song, and you did not beat your breasts,” and whatever else he added that fits with this. It is not only the Gospel that thinks this way; prophecy agrees with it. David, for example, says, “Praise the Lord, you children; praise the name of the Lord.” And through Isaiah he says, “Look, I and the children whom God has given me.” Are you surprised to hear that men from the Gentiles are children before the Lord? You do not seem to understand the Attic Greek idiom. From it you can learn that beautiful, blooming and free-born young women are called “paidiskai,” and slave girls “paidiskaria,” who are also young women, honored with a diminutive form because of the fresh bloom of youth.
And when He says, "Let my lambs stand on my right," He alludes to the simple children, as if they were sheep and lambs in nature, not men; and the lambs He counts worthy of preference, from the superior regard He has to that tenderness and simplicity of disposition in men which constitutes innocence. Again, when He says, "as suckling calves," He again alludes figuratively to us; and "as an innocent and gentle dove," the reference is again to us. Again, by Moses, He commands "two young pigeons or a pair of turtles to be offered for sin; " thus saying, that the harmlessness and innocence and placable nature of these tender young birds are acceptable to God, and explaining that like is an expiation for like. Further, the timorousness of the turtle-doves typifies fear in reference to sin. And that He calls us chickens the Scripture testifies: "As a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings. Thus are we the Lord's chickens; the Word thus marvellously and mystically describing the simplicity of childhood.
And when he says, “Let my little lambs stand on my right,” he is hinting at the simple-hearted, who are children, like lambs, and not grown men, like sheep by nature. He thought the little lambs worthy of special privilege, because he valued most highly the gentleness among people, the simplicity of mind, the freedom from malice. Again, when he says, “like suckling calves,” he is speaking of us figuratively once more; and “like a dove, without malice and without gall,” again he means us. Through Moses he also commands that two young doves, or a pair of turtledoves, be offered for sin. He is saying that the sinlessness, the harmlessness, and the readiness to forget wrongs of these tender young birds are acceptable to God, and he is showing that like cleanses like. The timidity of turtledoves also pictures a careful fear of sins. That he calls us the young birds, Scripture is witness: “As a hen gathers her chicks under her wings,” so we are the Lord’s chicks. In this wonderful and mysterious way the Word sketches the simplicity of the soul as the age of childhood.
For sometimes He calls us children, sometimes chickens, sometimes infants, and at other times sons, and "a new people," and "a recent people. "And my servants shall be called by a new name" (a new name, He says, fresh and eternal, pure and simple, and childlike and true), which shall be blessed on the earth. And again, He figuratively calls us colts unyoked to vice, not broken in by wickedness; but simple, and bounding joyously to the Father alone; not such horses "as neigh after their neighbours' wives, that are under the yoke, and are female-mad; " but free and new-born, jubilant by means of faith, ready to run to the truth, swift to speed to salvation, that tread and stamp under foot the things of the world.
For in one place he calls us children, in another young birds, sometimes infants, elsewhere sons, and often offspring, and a young people and a new people. “My servants,” he says, “will be called by a new name” (by “new name” he means what is new and everlasting, undefiled, simple, childlike and true), “which will be blessed on the earth.” Speaking figuratively, he also calls us colts: free from the yoke of vice, untamed by wickedness, simple, and leaping only toward the Father himself. We are not “the horses that neigh after their neighbors’ wives,” the yoked beasts mad after females, but free and newborn colts, proud because of faith, running well toward the truth, quick toward salvation, trampling and stamping on the things of the world.
"Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Sion; tell aloud, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh, just, meek, and bringing salvation; meek truly is He, and riding on a beast of burden, and a young colt. It was not enough to have said colt alone, but He added to it also young, to show the youth of humanity in Christ, and the eternity of simplicity, which shall know no old age. And we who are little ones being such colts, are reared up by our divine colt-tamer. But if the new man in Scripture is represented by the ass, this ass is also a colt. "And he bound," it is said, "the colt to the vine," having bound this simple and childlike people to the word, whom He figuratively represents as a vine. For the vine produces wine, as the Word, produces blood, and both drink for health to men-wine for the body, blood for the spirit.
“Rejoice greatly, daughter of Zion; proclaim it, daughter of Jerusalem. Look, your king is coming to you, righteous and saving, and gentle himself, mounted on a beast of burden and a young colt.” It was not enough for him to say “colt” alone; he added “young,” showing the youthfulness of humanity in Christ, and a simplicity that is eternal and never grows old. We little ones are such young colts, and our divine colt-tamer brings us up. Even if the young animal in Scripture is an ass, it is still a colt, the foal of an ass. “And he tied the colt to a vine.” He tied this simple, childlike people to the Word, whom he pictures as a vine. For the vine bears wine, as the Word bears blood, and both are a drink for people’s salvation: the wine for the body, the blood for the spirit.
And that He also calls us lambs, the Spirit by the mouth of Isaiah is an unimpeachable witness: "He will feed His flock like a shepherd, He will gather the lambs with His arm," -using the figurative appellation of lambs, which are still more tender than sheep, to express simplicity. And we also in truth, honouring the fairest and most perfect objects in life with an appellation derived from the word child, have named training paidei/a, and discipline paidagwgi/a. Discipline (paidagwgi/a) we declare to be right guiding from childhood to virtue. Accordingly, our Lord revealed more distinctly to us what is signified by the appellation of children. On the question arising among the apostles, "which of them should be the greater," Jesus placed a little child in the midst, saying, "Whosoever, shall humble himself as this little child, the same shall be the greater in the kingdom of heaven. He does not then use the appellation of children on account of their very limited amount of understanding from their age, as some have thought. Nor, if He says, "Except ye become as these children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of God," are His words to be understood as meaning "without learning.
That he calls us lambs as well, the Spirit is a reliable witness through Isaiah: “Like a shepherd he will tend his flock, and with his arm he will gather the lambs.” Here lambs, even more tender than sheep, are a figure for simplicity. And indeed we ourselves honor the finest and most perfect things in life by a word taken from the child: we have named instruction “paideia” and guidance “paidagogia.” We hold that “paidagogia” is good guidance toward virtue, beginning from childhood. The Lord reveals the meaning of the name “child” to us more clearly. When a dispute arose among the apostles about which of them was greater, Jesus set a child in the middle and said, “Whoever humbles himself like this child, he is greater in the kingdom of heaven.” So he does not use the name “children” as though it meant the age of those who cannot reason, as some have thought. And when he says, “Unless you become like these children, you will not enter the kingdom of God,” it must not be taken in an ignorant way.
We, then, who are infants, no longer roll on the ground, nor creep on the earth like serpents as before, crawling with the whole body about senseless lusts; but, stretching upwards in soul, loosed from the world and our sins, touching the earth on tiptoe so as to appear to be in the world, we pursue holy wisdom, although this seems folly to those whose wits are whetted for wickedness. Rightly, then, are those called children who know Him who is God alone as their Father, who are simple, and infants, and guileless, who are lovers of the horns of the unicorns. To those, therefore, that have made progress in the word, He has proclaimed this utterance, bidding them dismiss anxious care of the things of this world, and exhorting them to adhere to the Father alone, in imitation of children. Wherefore also in what follows He says: "Take no anxious thought for the morrow; sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof. Thus He enjoins them to lay aside the cares of this life, and depend on the Father alone.
So we who are infants no longer roll on the ground, and we no longer crawl on the earth as we did before, like snakes, wriggling with our whole body after senseless desires. Instead we stretch upward in mind, separated from the world and from sins, “touching the earth with only a small foot,” just enough to seem to be in the world, and we pursue holy wisdom. To those whose wits are sharpened for cunning, this seems foolishness. Rightly, then, those who know God alone as Father are called children: plain, infantile and pure, lovers of the horns of the unicorns. To those who have advanced in the Word he proclaimed this saying. He told them to be free of worry about the things of this world and urged them to give their attention to the Father alone, imitating children. So in the verses that follow he says, “Do not worry about tomorrow, for its own evil is enough for the day.” In this way he commands them to lay aside the cares of life and cling to the Father alone.
And he who fulfils this commandment is in reality a child and a son to God and to the world,-to the one as deceived, to the other as beloved. And if we have one Master in heaven, as the Scripture says, then by common consent those on the earth will be rightly called disciples. For so is the truth, that perfection is with the Lord, who is always teaching, and infancy and childishness with us, who are always learning. Thus prophecy hath honoured perfection, by applying to it the appellation man. For instance, by David, He says of the devil: "The Lord abhors the man of blood; " he calls him man, as perfect in wickedness. And the Lord is called man, because He is perfect in righteousness.
Whoever fulfils this commandment is truly an infant and a child, both to God and to the world: to the world as one who is deluded, and to God as one who is loved. Scripture says, “There is one teacher in heaven,” and this is agreed. So all those on earth will rightly be called disciples. For this is the truth: perfection belongs to the Lord, who always teaches, while childhood and infancy belong to us, who are always learning. For this reason prophecy honors the perfect by giving them the name “man.” For example, through David it says of the devil, “The Lord abhors a man of bloodshed.” It calls him a man because he is perfect in evil. And the Lord is also called man, because he is perfect in righteousness.
Directly in point is the instance of the apostle, who says, writing the Corinthians: "For I have espoused you to one man, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ," whether as children or saints, but to the Lord alone. And writing to the Ephesians, he has unfolded in the clearest manner the point in question, speaking to the following effect: "Till we all attain to the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ: that we be no longer children, tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine, by the craft of men, by their cunning in stratagems of deceit; but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up to Him in all things," -saying these things in order to the edification of the body of Christ, who is the head and man, the only one perfect in righteousness;
So, for instance, the apostle writes to the Corinthians: “For I betrothed you to one husband, to present you as a pure virgin to Christ.” Whether he means them as infants or as holy ones, they are still presented to the Lord alone. Writing to the Ephesians, he explains the point at issue most clearly, speaking in this way: “until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of God, to a perfect man, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, so that we may no longer be infants, tossed by waves and carried about by every wind of teaching, by the dice-play of men, by craftiness aimed at the scheming of error; but, speaking the truth in love, let us grow up in all things into him.” He says this “for the building up of the body of Christ,” “who is the head,” and who is the man who alone is perfect in righteousness.
and we who are children guarding against the blasts of heresies, which blow to our inflation; and not putting our trust in fathers who teach us otherwise, are then made perfect when we are the church, having received Christ the head. Then it is right to notice, with respect to the appellation of infant (nh/pioj), that to\ nh/pion is not predicated of the silly: for the silly man is called nhpu/tioj: and nh/pioj is neh/pioj (since he that is tender-hearted is calledh !pioj), as being one that has newly become gentle and meek in Conduct. This the blessed Paul most clearly pointed out when he said, "When we might have been burdensome as the apostles of Christ, we were gentle (h !pioi) among you, as a nurse cherisheth her children. The child (nh/pioj) is therefore gentle (h !pioj), and therefore more tender, delicate, and simple, guileless, and destitute of hypocrisy, straightforward and upright in mind, which is the basis of simplicity and truth.
But we who are infants must guard against the winds of the heresies, which blow upon us to puff us up. We must not put our trust in those who lay down other fathers for us. We are made perfect when we are the church, having received Christ as our head. Here it is right to look closely at the word “infant.” The Greek nēpion is not applied to fools. The foolish person is nēpytios, but nēpios comes from neēpios, just as ēpios is the tender-minded person. That is, the infant is one who has newly become gentle and mild in manner. The blessed Paul pointed this out most clearly when he said, “Though we could have been a burden to you as apostles of Christ, we became gentle among you, as a nurse cherishes her own children.” So the infant is gentle, and for that reason all the more tender: delicate, simple, guileless and without hypocrisy, straight and upright in purpose. This is the very substance of simplicity and truth.
For He says, "Upon whom shall I look, but upon him who is gentle and quiet? " For such is the virgin speech, tender, and free of fraud; whence also a virgin is wont to be called "a tender bride," and a child "tender-hearted. And we are tender who are pliant to the power of persuasion, and are easily drawn to goodness, and are mild, and free of the stain of malice and perverseness, for the ancient race was perverse and hard-hearted; but the band of infants, the new people which we are, i.s delicate as a child. On account of the hearts of the innocent, the apostle, in the Epistle to the Romans, owns that he rejoices, and furnishes a kind of definition of children, so to speak, when he says, "I would have you wise toward good, but simple towards evil. For the name of child, nh/pioj, is not understood by us privatively, though the sons of the grammarians make thenh a privative particle.
“For on whom,” it says, “will I look, but on the gentle and quiet?” Such is the virgin word: tender and unfeigned. This is why a virgin bride is customarily called “tender” (atalē), and a child “tender-minded.” We are tender when we are soft toward persuasion, ready to be shaped toward goodness, free of bitterness, and unmixed with malice and crookedness. For the old generation was crooked and hard-hearted, but the company of infants, we who are the new people, is delicate like a child. In the letter to the Romans the apostle confesses that he rejoices over “the hearts of the innocent.” He also gives what we might call a definition of infants when he says, “I want you to be wise for what is good, but innocent for what is evil.” For we do not understand the name “infant” as expressing a lack, even though the pupils of the grammarians lay down that nē- is a negative prefix.
For if they call us who follow after childhood foolish, see how they utter blasphemy against the Lord, in regarding those as foolish who have betaken themselves to God. But if, which is rather the true sense, they themselves understand the designation children of simple ones, we glory in the name. For the new minds, which have newly become wise, which have sprung into being according to the new covenant, are infantile in the old folly. Of late, then, God was known by the coming of Christ: "For no man knoweth God but the Son, and he to whom the Son shall reveal Him. In contradistinction, therefore, to the older people, the new people are called young, having learned the new blessings; and we have the exuberance of life's morning prime in this youth which knows no old age, in which we are always growing to maturity in intelligence, are always young, always mild, always new: for those must necessarily be new, who have become partakers of the new Word.
If those who run down childhood call us fools, see how they blaspheme against the Lord, since they take those who have fled to God for refuge to be fools. But if, as is rather the sense we should hear, they themselves take “children” to mean the simple, then let us rejoice in the name. For the new minds are “childlike” in the old folly: they have only just become wise, and they have dawned under the new covenant. God, at any rate, has only recently been known, through the coming of Christ. “For no one has known God except the Son, and the one to whom the Son reveals him.” So the new people are young, in contrast to the older people, because they have learned new blessings. Our age has its fullness in this youth that never grows old. In it we are always at our prime for understanding, always young, always gentle, always new. For those who have shared in a new Word must be new.
And that which participates in eternity is wont to be assimilated to the incorruptible: so that to us appertains the designation of the age of childhood, a lifelong spring-time, because the truth that is in us, and our habits saturated with the truth, cannot be touched by old age; but Wisdom is ever blooming, ever remains consistent and the same, and never changes. "Their children," it is said, "shall be borne upon their shoulders, and fondled on their knees; as one whom his mother comforteth, so also shall I comfort you. The mother draws the children to herself; and we seek our mother the Church. Whatever is feeble and tender, as needing help on account of its feebleness, is kindly looked on, and is sweet and pleasant, anger changing into help in the case of such: for thus horses' colts, and the little calves of cows, and the lion's whelp, and the stag's fawn, and the child of man, are looked upon with pleasure by their fathers and mothers. Thus also the Father of the universe cherishes affection towards those who have fled to Him; and having begotten them again by His Spirit to the adoption of children, knows them as gentle, and loves those alone, and aids and fights for them; and therefore He bestows on them the name of child.
What shares in eternity tends to become like the incorruptible. So for us the name of childhood means a springtime for the whole of life, because the truth in us is ageless, and our character is poured out toward the truth. Wisdom is ever-blooming, always the same in the same way, and never changing. “Their children,” it says, “will be lifted on their shoulders and comforted on their knees. As a mother comforts someone, so I will comfort you.” The mother draws her children to herself, and we look for our mother, the Church. Everything weak and tender, since in its weakness it needs help, is welcome, sweet and delightful, and God does not withhold help from such as these. Fathers and mothers take more pleasure in seeing the foals of horses, the little calves of cattle, a lion’s cub, a deer’s fawn, and a human child. In the same way the Father of all welcomes those who have fled to him for refuge. He has been born them again by the Spirit into adoption as sons, and he knows them as gentle. He loves only these, helps them and fights on their behalf, and for this reason he calls them “child.”
The word Isaac I also connect with child. Isaac means laughter. He was seen sporting with his wife and helpmeet Rebecca by the prying king. The king, whose name was Abimelech, appears to me to represent a supramundane wisdom contemplating the mystery of sport. They interpret Rebecca to mean endurance. O wise sport, laughter also assisted by endurance, and the king as spectator! The spirit of those that are children in Christ, whose lives are ordered in endurance, rejoice. And this is the divine sport. "Such a sport, of his own, Jove sports," says Heraclitus. For what other employment is seemly for a wise and perfect man, than to sport and be glad in the endurance of what is good-and, in the administration of what is good, holding festival with God? That which is signified by the prophet may be interpreted differently,-namely, of our rejoicing for salvation, as Isaac.
I also trace Isaac back to the child. Isaac means “laughter.” The prying king saw him playing with his wife and helper, Rebecca. The king (his name was Abimelech) seems to me to represent a wisdom above the world, watching closely the mystery of the play. They interpret Rebecca as “endurance.” What a wise play this is: laughter helped by endurance, with the king looking on! The spirit of the children in Christ, who live as citizens in endurance, rejoices, and this too is the divine play. Heraclitus says that his Zeus plays a play like this. For what other work is fitting for a wise and perfect person than to play and rejoice together in the endurance of what is good, and in the ordering of what is good, keeping festival together with God? The prophecy can also be understood in another way: that we, like Isaac, laugh and rejoice in salvation.
He also, delivered from death, laughed, sporting and rejoicing with his spouse, who was the type of the Helper of our salvation, the Church, to whom the stable name of endurance is given; for this cause surely, because she alone remains to all generations, rejoicing ever, subsisting as she does by the endurance of us believers, who are the members of Christ. And the witness of those that have endured to the end, and the rejoicing on their account, is the mystic sport, and the salvation accompanied with decorous solace which brings us aid. The King, then, who is Christ, beholds from above our laughter, and looking through the window, as the Scripture says, views the thanksgiving, and the blessing, and the rejoicing, and the gladness, and furthermore the endurance which works together with them and their embrace: views His Church, showing only His face, which was wanting to the Church, which is made perfect by her royal Head.
Isaac also laughed, released from death, playing and rejoicing with his bride, the helper for our salvation, the Church. The firm name “endurance” is given to her, either because she alone remains forever, always rejoicing, or because she is made up of the endurance of believers, who are the members of Christ. The witness of those who endured to the end, and the thanksgiving for them, is the mystical play, and the salvation that helps us along with solemn gladness. So Christ the King looks down on our laughter from above. As the Scripture says, he “looks through the window.” He watches over his own Church: the thanksgiving, the blessing, the joy and gladness, and also the endurance that works with them, and the Church that binds them together. He shows only his face, which was lacking to the Church, now made perfect by her royal Head.
And where, then, was the door by which the Lord showed Himself? The flesh by which He was manifested. He is Isaac (for the narrative may be interpreted otherwise), who is a type of the Lord, a child as a son; for he was the son of Abraham, as Christ the Son of God, and a sacrifice as the Lord, but he was not immolated as the Lord. Isaac only bore the wood of the sacrifice, as the Lord the wood of the cross. And he laughed mystically, prophesying that the Lord should fill us with joy, who have been redeemed from corruption by the blood of the Lord. Isaac did everything but suffer, as was right, yielding the precedence in suffering to the Word. Furthermore, there is an intimation of the divinity of the Lord in His not being slain. For Jesus rose again after His burial, having suffered no harm, like Isaac released from sacrifice.
And where was the window through which the Lord showed himself? It was the flesh, through which he has been made visible. Isaac can also be taken another way, as a type of the Lord. He is a child, as a son (for he was Abraham’s son, as Christ is God’s Son), and he is an offering, as the Lord is. But unlike the Lord, he was not actually offered up. Isaac carried the wood for the sacrifice, as the Lord carried the wood. And he laughed in a mystical way, prophesying that the Lord would fill us with joy, us who have been redeemed from corruption by the blood of the Lord. Isaac did not suffer. This was fitting, since he yielded the first place in suffering to the Word. But in not being slain he also hints at the Lord’s divinity. For Jesus rose again after his burial, as though he had not suffered, just as Isaac was released from the sacrifice.
And in defence of the point to be established, I shall adduce another consideration of the greatest weight. The Spirit calls the Lord Himself a child, thus prophesying by Esaias: "Lo, to us a child has been born, to us a son has been given, on whose own shoulder the government shall be; and His name has been called the Angel of great Counsel. Who, then, is this infant child? He according to whose image we are made little children. By the same prophet is declared His greatness: "Wonderful, Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace; that He might fulfil His discipline: and of His peace there shall be no end. O the great God! O the perfect child! The Son in the Father, and the Father in the Son. And how shall not the discipline of this child be perfect, which extends to all, leading as a schoolmaster us as children who are His little ones?
I will offer one more very strong argument in support of the point before us. The Spirit himself calls the Lord a child, prophesying this through Isaiah: “Behold, a child has been born to us, a son has also been given to us, whose rule is upon his shoulder, and his name has been called Angel of Great Counsel.” Who, then, is this little child, in whose likeness we are little children? The same prophet describes his greatness: “Wonderful Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace, by increasing instruction; and of his peace there is no end.” O the great God! O the perfect child! The Son in the Father, and the Father in the Son. How could the instruction of that child not be perfect, reaching to all of us as children, guiding us, his little ones, as an instructor?
He has stretched forth to us those hands of His that are conspicuously worthy of trust. To this child additional testimony is borne by John, "the greatest prophet among those born of women: " Behold the Lamb of God! For since Scripture calls the infant children lambs, it has also called Him-God the Word-who became man for our sakes, and who wished in all points to be made like to u"-"the Lamb of God"-Him, namely, that is the Son of God, the child of the Father.
He has stretched out to us his hands, which we plainly believe. John, “the greatest prophet among those born of women,” also bears witness to this child: “Behold, the Lamb of God.” Scripture calls young children lambs. So God the Word, who became man for our sake and wished to be made like us in every way, has been called the Lamb of God: the Son of God, the infant child of the Father.
The Name Children Does Not Imply Instruction in Elementary Principles.We have ample means of encountering those who are given to carping. For we are not termed children and infants with reference to the childish and contemptible character of our education, as those who are inflated on account of knowledge have calumniously alleged. Straightway, on our regeneration, we attained that perfection after which we aspired. For we were illuminated, which is to know God. He is not then imperfect who knows what is perfect. And do not reprehend me when I profess to know God; for so it was deemed right to speak to the Word, and He is free. For at the moment of the Lord's baptism there sounded a voice from heaven, as a testimony to the Beloved, "Thou art My beloved Son, to-day have I begotten Thee. Let us then ask the wise, Is Christ, begotten to-day, already perfect, or-what were most monstrous-imperfect?
The title “Children”: against those who think it means teaching in elementary lessons. We can answer those who love to find fault, and do so more than fully. We are not called children and infants because our learning is childish and worth despising, as those puffed up with “knowledge” have slandered us. On the contrary, the moment we were born again we received the perfection we were hurrying toward. For we were enlightened, and this means coming to know God. So the one who knows the perfect is not imperfect. Do not take me to be claiming that I have fully known God. It seemed right to the Word to say it in this way, and he is free. At the Lord’s baptism, a voice sounded from heaven, witnessing to the beloved one: “You are my beloved Son; today I have begotten you.” Let us ask the wise, then: was Christ, born again today, already perfect, or (which would be most absurd) lacking?
If the latter, there is some addition He requires yet to make. But for Him to make any addition to His knowledge is absurd, since He is God. For none can be superior to the Word, or the teacher of the only Teacher. Will they not then own, though reluctant, that the perfect Word born of the perfect Father was begotten in perfection, according to oeconomic fore-ordination? And if He was perfect, why was He, the perfect one, baptized? It was necessary, they say, to fulfil the profession that pertained to humanity. Most excellent. Well, I assert, simultaneously with His baptism by John, He becomes perfect? Manifestly. He did not then learn anything more from him? Certainly not. But He is perfected by the washing-of baptism-alone, and is sanctified by the descent of the Spirit? Such is the case. The same also takes place in our case, whose exemplar Christ became. Being baptized, we are illuminated; illuminated, we become sons; being made sons, we are made perfect; being made perfect, we are made immortal. "I," says He, "have said that ye are gods, and all sons of the Highest. This work is variously called grace, and illumination, and perfection, and washing: washing, by which we cleanse away our sins; grace, by which the penalties accruing to transgressions are remitted; and illumination, by which that holy light of salvation is beheld, that is, by which we see God clearly. Now we call that perfect which wants nothing.
If he was lacking, he still has something to learn. But it is unthinkable that he should learn anything more, since he is God. No one could be greater than the Word, or be a teacher of the one and only Teacher. Will they not then admit, though unwillingly, that the Word, perfect and born of the perfect Father, was perfectly born again, according to the plan of the economy that was prefigured? And if he was perfect, why was the perfect one baptized? “It was necessary,” they say, “to fulfil what belongs to human beings.” Quite so. Then I ask: at the very moment he was baptized by John, did he become perfect? Clearly. Then he learned nothing more from John? Nothing. Is he perfected by the washing alone, and sanctified by the descent of the Spirit? That is how it is. The same thing happens to us, for whom the Lord became a pattern. When we are baptized we are enlightened; enlightened, we are made sons; made sons, we are made perfect; made perfect, we are made immortal. “I said,” it says, “you are gods, and all of you sons of the Most High.” This work is called by many names: gift of grace, enlightenment, perfection, and washing. It is a washing, by which we are cleansed of our sins. It is a gift of grace, by which the penalties for our sins are cancelled. It is an enlightenment, by which we see that holy, saving light, that is, by which we see God clearly. And we call “perfect” the one who lacks nothing.
For what is yet wanting to him who knows God? For it were truly monstrous that that which is not complete should be called a gift (or act) of God's grace. Being perfect, He consequently bestows perfect gifts. As at His command all things were made, so on His bare wishing to bestow grace, ensues the perfecting of His grace. For the future of time is anticipated by the power of His volition. Further release from evils is the beginning of salvation. We then alone, who first have touched the confines of life, are already perfect; and we already live who are separated from death. Salvation, accordingly, is the following of Christ: "For that which is in Him is life. "Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth My words, and believeth on Him that sent Me, hath eternal life, and cometh not into condemnation, but hath passed from death to life. Thus believing alone, and regeneration, is perfection in life; for God is never weak.
For what is still lacking to the one who has come to know God? It would be truly absurd for something incomplete to be called a gift of God’s grace. Since he is perfect, he will surely give perfect gifts. Just as everything comes into being the moment he commands it, so the completion of his grace follows as soon as he merely wills to give it. For the power of his will anticipates the time still to come. Besides, deliverance from evils is the beginning of salvation. So we who have first laid hold of the boundaries of life are already perfect, and we who have been separated from death already live. Salvation, then, is following Christ. “For what has come into being in him is life.” “Truly, truly, I say to you,” he says, “the one who hears my word and believes the one who sent me has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed over from death to life.” So to believe and be born again is, by itself, perfection in life, for God is never weak.
For as His will is work, and this is named the world; so also His counsel is the salvation of men, and this has been called the church. He knows, therefore, whom He has called, and whom He has saved; and at one and the same time He called and saved them. "For ye are," says the apostle, "taught of God. It is not then allowable to think of what is taught by Him as imperfect; and what is learned from Him is the eternal salvation of the eternal Saviour, to whom be thanks for ever and ever. Amen. And he who is only regenerated-as the name necessarily indicates-and is enlightened, is delivered forthwith from darkness, and on the instant receives the light. As, then, those who have shaken off sleep forthwith become all awake within; or rather, as those who try to remove a film that is over the eyes, do not supply to them from without the light which they do not possess, but removing the obstacle from the eyes, leave the pupil free; thus also we who are baptized, having wiped off the sins which obscure the light of the Divine Spirit, have the eye of the spirit free, unimpeded, and full of light, by which alone we contemplate the Divine, the Holy Spirit flowing down to us from above. This is the eternal adjustment of the vision, which is able to see the eternal light, since like loves like; and that which is holy, loves that from which holiness proceeds, which has appropriately been termed light. "Once ye were darkness, now are ye light in the Lord. Hence I am of opinion man was called by the ancientsfw/j.
For just as his will is a work, and this work is called the world, so his purpose is the salvation of people, and this is called the church. He knows, then, those whom he has called, and those whom he has called he has saved. He called and saved them at the same moment. “For you yourselves,” says the apostle, “are taught by God.” So it is not right for us to think that what he teaches is incomplete. What is learned from him is the eternal salvation given by the eternal Savior, to whom be grace forever, amen. And the one who has simply been born again, as the very name implies, is enlightened. He is set free from the darkness at once and receives the light on the spot. Think of people who shake off sleep: they are immediately awake within. Or better, think of people who try to remove a cataract from the eyes. They do not supply from outside a light they lack, but remove the obstacle from the eyes and leave the pupil free. In the same way we who are baptized wipe away, by the divine Spirit, the sins that overshadow us like a mist. We then have the eye of the spirit free, unobstructed and full of light. By this eye alone we look upon the divine, since the Holy Spirit flows into us from heaven. This is a blending with an eternal radiance that is able to see the eternal light, for like is dear to like, and what is holy is dear to the source of holiness, which is properly called light: “For you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord.” This is why I think the ancients called man “light.”
But he has not yet received, say they, the perfect gift. I also assent to this; but he is in the light, and the darkness comprehendeth him not. There is nothing intermediate between light and darkness. But the end is reserved till the resurrection of those who believe; and it is not the reception of some other thing, but the obtaining of the promise previously made. For we do not say that both take place together at the same time-both the arrival at the end, and the anticipation of that arrival. For eternity and time are not the same, neither is the attempt and the final result; but both have reference to the same thing, and one and the same person is concerned in both. Faith, so to speak, is the attempt generated in time; the final result is the attainment of the promise, secured for eternity.
“But he has not yet received the perfect gift,” they say. I agree with that. Still, he is in the light, and the darkness does not overtake him. Between light and darkness there is nothing in the middle. The fulfillment is stored up for the resurrection of those who believe. This does not mean receiving something different, but obtaining the promise already declared. For we do not say that both things take place at the same time: the arrival at the goal, and the taking hold of it in advance. Eternity and time are not the same, and neither are the starting out and the end. Yet one and the same person is occupied with both, and with each of them. Faith, so to speak, is the starting out, born in time; the end is the obtaining of the promise, made secure forever.
Now the Lord Himself has most clearly revealed the equality of salvation, when He said: "For this is the will of my Father, that every one that seeth the Son, and believeth on Him, should have everlasting life; and I will raise him up in the last day. As far as possible in this world, which is what he means by the last day, and which is preserved till the time that it shall end, we believe that we are made perfect. Wherefore He says, "He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life. If, then, those who have believed have life, what remains beyond the possession of eternal life? Nothing is wanting to faith, as it is perfect and complete in itself. If aught is wanting to it, it is not wholly perfect. But faith is not lame in any respect; nor after our departure from this world does it make us who have believed, and received without distinction the earnest of future good, wait; but having in anticipation grasped by faith that which is future, after the resurrection we receive it as present, in order that that may be fulfilled which was spoken, "Be it according to thy faith. And where faith is, there is the promise; and the consummation of the promise is rest.
The Lord himself has revealed most clearly that salvation is the same for all, when he said: “For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him may have eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.” As far as is possible in this world, which he hints at by “the last day,” we believe that we are made perfect. We are kept for that time, until this world comes to an end. For faith is the perfection of learning. This is why he says, “The one who believes in the Son has eternal life.” So if we who have believed have life, what more remains beyond possessing eternal life? Nothing is lacking to faith, since it is perfect and complete in itself. If anything were lacking to it, it would not be whole, and it would not be faith at all, but something limping in some respect. Nor, after we leave this life, does something else await those who have believed. Here we have been given the pledge without distinction, and because we have already grasped by faith what is to come, we receive it as present after the resurrection. In this way what was said is fulfilled: “Let it be done for you according to your faith.” Where faith is, there is the promise, and the completion of the promise is rest.
So that in illumination what we receive is knowledge, and the end of knowledge is rest-the last thing conceived as the object of aspiration. As, then, inexperience comes to an end by experience, and perplexity by finding a clear outlet, so by illumination must darkness disappear. The darkness is ignorance, through which we fall into sins, purblind as to the truth. Knowledge, then, is the illumination we receive, which makes ignorance disappear, and endows us with clear vision. Further, the abandonment of what is bad is the adopting of what is better. For what ignorance has bound ill, is by knowledge loosed well; those bonds are with all speed slackened by human faith and divine grace, our transgressions being taken away by one Poeonian medicine, the baptism of the Word. We are washed from all our sins, and are no longer entangled in evil.
So knowledge lies in the illumination, and the end of knowledge is rest, which is understood to be the last thing we long for. Inexperience is ended by experience, and perplexity by finding a way through. In the same way darkness must vanish when we are illuminated. The darkness is ignorance, which makes us fall into sins because our sight of the truth is dim. Knowledge, then, is illumination. It makes ignorance vanish and gives us the power to see clearly. Throwing away what is worse also reveals what is better. What ignorance bound badly, full knowledge looses well. These bonds are quickly loosed by human faith and divine grace. Our offences are forgiven by one healing remedy, the baptism of the Word. We are washed from all our sins, and from that moment we are no longer evil.
This is the one grace of illumination, that our characters are not the same as before our washing. And since knowledge springs up with illumination, shedding its beams around the mind, the moment we hear, we who were untaught become disciples. Does this, I ask, take place on the advent of this instruction? You cannot tell the time. For instruction leads to faith, and faith with baptism is trained by the Holy Spirit. For that faith is the one universal salvation of humanity, and that there is the same equality before the righteous and loving God, and the same fellowship between Him and all, the apostle most clearly showed, speaking to the following effect: "Before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed, so that the law became our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith; but after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. Do you not hear that we are no longer under that law which was accompanied with fear, but under the Word, the master of free choice?
This is the one grace of illumination: that our way of life is no longer what it was before we were washed. Knowledge dawns together with the illumination and flashes around the mind. At once we who were untaught hear and become disciples. Was it that this learning had come to us at some earlier time? You could not name the time. Instruction leads us around to faith, and faith is trained together with holy baptism by the Holy Spirit. Faith is the one salvation common to all humanity, and the same equality and fellowship with the righteous and loving God extends to everyone. The apostle explained this most clearly when he said: “Before faith came, we were guarded under the law, shut up for the faith that was about to be revealed. So the law has become our instructor to bring us to Christ, so that we might be justified by faith. But now that faith has come, we are no longer under an instructor.” Do you not hear that we are no longer under that law, which went with fear, but under the Word, the instructor of free choice?
Then he subjoined the utterance, clear of all partiality: "For ye are all the children of God through faith in Christ Jesus. For as many as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. There are not, then, in the same Word some "illuminated (gnostics); and some animal (or natural) men; "but all who have abandoned the desires of the flesh are equal and spiritual before the Lord. And again he writes in another place: "For by one spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether bond or free, and we have all drunk of one cup. Nor were it absurd to employ the expressions of those who call the reminiscence of better things the filtration of the spirit, understanding by filtration the separation of what is baser, that results from the reminiscence of what is better.
Then Paul added a statement free of all partiality: “For you are all sons, through faith in God, in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, neither slave nor free, neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” So in the Word himself there are not some who are “knowers” and others who are merely “soulish.” All who have put away the desires of the flesh are equal, and spiritual before the Lord. Elsewhere he writes again: “For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free, and we were all given one drink.” It is not out of place to use the very words of those who say that the remembrance of better things is a filtering of the spirit.
There follows of necessity, in him who has come to the recollection of what is better, repentance for what is worse. Accordingly, they confess that the spirit in repentance retraces its steps. In the same way, therefore, we also, repenting of our sins, renouncing our iniquities, purified by baptism, speed back to the eternal light, children to the Father. Jesus therefore, rejoicing in the spirit, said: "I thank Thee, O Father, God of heaven and earth, that Thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them to babes; " the Master and Teacher applying the name babes to us, who are readier to embrace salvation than the wise in the world, who, thinking themselves wise, are inflated with pride. And He exclaims in exultation and exceeding joy, as if lisping with the children, "Even so, Father; for so it seemed good in Thy sight. Wherefore those things which have been concealed from the wise and prudent of this present world have been revealed to babes.
By “filtering” they mean the separating of the worse from the better, which comes from remembering the better things. Whoever is reminded of better things must then repent of the lesser. They agree, at any rate, that the spirit itself, once it has repented, runs back up. In the same way we too have repented of our sins and said farewell to their faults. We are filtered by baptism, and we run back to the eternal light, as children to the Father. So Jesus, rejoicing in the Spirit, says: “I give thanks to you, Father, God of heaven and earth, because you hid these things from the wise and understanding, and revealed them to infants.” Here the Instructor and Teacher calls us infants. He means that we are better suited to salvation than the wise of this world, who think themselves wise and are puffed up. Exulting and overjoyed, he cries out, as if lisping along with the infants: “Yes, Father, for so it was well pleasing before you.” That is why the things hidden from the wise and understanding of the present age were revealed to infants.
Truly, then, are we the children of God, who have put aside the old man, and stripped off the garment of wickedness, and put on the immortality of Christ; that we may become a new, holy people by regeneration, and may keep the man undefiled. And a babe, as God's little one, is cleansed from fornication and wickedness. With the greatest clearness the blessed Paul has solved for us this question in his First Epistle to the Corinthians, writing thus: "Brethren, be not children in understanding; howbeit in malice be children, but in understanding be men. And the expression, "When I was a child, I thought as a child, I spoke as a child," points out his mode of life according to the law, according to which, thinking childish things, he persecuted, and speaking childish things he blasphemed the Word, not as having yet attained to the simplicity of childhood, but as being in its folly;
It is fitting, then, that the children of God are infants. They have put away the old man and stripped off the tunic of wickedness. They have put on over it the incorruption of Christ. So we become new, a holy people, born again, so that we may keep the man undefiled. We are infants, like God’s baby, cleansed from fornication and wickedness. The blessed Paul has settled this question for us most clearly in his first letter to the Corinthians, where he writes: “Brothers, do not become children in your thinking, but in evil be infants, and in your thinking become mature.” The words “When I was an infant, I thought as an infant, I spoke as an infant” hint at his life under the law. Then he was not yet simple but still senseless. With childish thoughts he persecuted, and with childish words he blasphemed the Word.
for the wordnh/pion has two meanings. "When I became a man," again Paul says, "I put away childish things. It is not incomplete size of stature, nor a definite measure of time, nor additional secret teachings in things that are manly and more perfect, that the apostle, who himself professes to be a preacher of childishness, alludes to when he sends it, as it were, into banishment; but he applies the name "children" to those who are under the law, who are terrified by fear as children are by bugbears; and "men" to us who are obedient to the Word and masters of ourselves, who have believed, and are saved by voluntary choice, and are rationally, not irrationally, frightened by terror. Of this the apostle himself shall testify, calling as he does the Jews heirs according to the first covenant, and us heirs according to promise: Now I say, as long as the heir is a child, he differeth nothing from a servant, though he be lord of all; but is under tutors and governors, till the time appointed by the father.
For the word “child” has two meanings. “Since I have become a man,” Paul says again, “I have put away the things of the child.” The apostle is not hinting at an immature stage of physical growth, nor at a fixed length of time, nor at some other secret teachings belonging to more manly and advanced instruction. He is the one who declares that he is putting childhood away, sending it off into exile. Rather, he calls “children” those who live under the law, who are thrown into panic by fear, as children are by bogeys. And he calls “men” those who obey the Word and are masters of themselves. We have believed and are saved by free and willing choice, and any fear that frightens us frightens us sensibly, not senselessly. The apostle himself will testify to this, when he calls the Jews heirs under the first covenant, and us heirs by promise. “I mean,” he says, “that as long as the heir is a child, he is no different from a slave, though he is lord of everything. But he is under guardians and stewards until the date set by the father.”
So also we, when we were children, were in bondage under the rudiments of the world: but when the fulness of the time was came, God sent forth His Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons " by Him. See how He has admitted those to be children who are under fear and sins; but has conferred manhood on those who are under faith, by calling them sons, in contradistinction from the children that are under the law: "For thou art no more a servant," he says, "but a son; and if a son, then an heir through God. What, then, is lacking to the son after inheritance? Wherefore the expression, "When I was a child," may be elegantly expounded thus: that is, when I was a Jew (for he was a Hebrew by extraction) I thought as a child, when I followed the law; but after becoming a man, I no longer entertain the sentiments of a child, that is, of the law, but of a man, that is, of Christ, whom alone the Scripture calls man, as we have said before. "I put away childish things. But the childhood which is in Christ is maturity, as compared with the law.
“So also we, when we were children, were enslaved under the elemental things of the world. But when the fullness of time came, God sent out his Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to buy back those under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons through him.” See how he admits that those under fear and sins are children. Those under faith he calls sons, and so makes them men, in contrast with the children who were under the law. “For you are no longer a slave,” he says, “but a son. And if a son, then also an heir through God.” What, then, is still lacking to the son after the inheritance? So it is a fine way to explain “When I was a child” like this: “When I was a Jew” (for he was a Hebrew from the beginning), “I thought like a child,” because I followed the law. “But since I have become a man,” I no longer think the things of the child, that is, of the law, but the things of the man, that is, of Christ, whom alone Scripture, as we said before, calls a man. “I have put away the things of the child.” But childhood in Christ is maturity, in comparison with the law.
Having reached this point, we must defend our childhood. And we have still to explain what is said by the apostle: "I have fed you with milk (as children in Christ), not with meat; for ye were not able, neither yet are ye now able. For it does not appear to me that the expression is to be taken in a Jewish sense; for I shall oppose to it also that Scripture, "I will bring you into that good land which flows with milk and honey. A very great difficulty arises in reference to the comparison of these Scriptures, when we consider. For if the infancy which is characterized by the milk is the beginning of faith in Christ, then it is disparaged as childish and imperfect. How is the rest that comes after the meat, the rest of the man who is perfect and endowed with knowledge, again distinguished by infant milk? Does not this, as explaining a parable, mean something like this, and is not the expression to be read somewhat to the following effect: "I have fed you with milk in Christ; "and after a slight stop, let us add, "as children," that by separating the words in reading we may make out some such sense as this: I have instructed you in Christ with simple, true, and natural nourishment,-namely, that which is spiritual: for such is the nourishing substance of milk swelling out from breasts of love. So that the whole matter may be conceived thus: As nurses nourish new-born children on milk, so do I also by the Word, the milk of Christ, instilling into you spiritual nutriment.
Having come to this point, we must speak in defense of our childhood. We must also explain further what the apostle said: “I gave you milk to drink, as to infants in Christ, not solid food. For you were not yet able, and even now you are not able.” It does not seem to me that this saying should be taken in a Jewish way. For I will set against it that other Scripture: “I will bring you into the good land, flowing with milk and honey.” So a very great difficulty arises when we put these passages side by side: what do they mean? If childhood on milk is the beginning of faith in Christ, yet it is belittled as childish and imperfect, how is it that the rest of the perfect man, the man of knowledge, which comes after the solid food, is again honored with the infant’s milk? Perhaps the word “as,” which signals a comparison, points to something like this, and the saying should be read in some such way as this: “I gave you milk to drink in Christ.” Then, pausing briefly, let us add, “as to infants.” By this pause in the reading we may take the sense to be: I instructed you in Christ with simple, true, naturally grown, spiritual nourishment. For such is the life-giving substance of milk, which flows from loving breasts. The whole meaning can then be understood like this: as nurses feed newborn children with milk, so I too, by the Word, which is Christ’s milk, drip spiritual nourishment into you.
Thus, then, the milk which is perfect is perfect nourishment, and brings to that consummation which cannot cease. Wherefore also the same milk and honey were promised in the rest. Rightly, therefore, the Lord again promises milk to the righteous, that the Word may be clearly shown to be both, "the Alpha and Omega, beginning and end; " the Word being figuratively represented as milk. Something like this Homer oracularly declares against his will, when he calls righteous men milk-fed (galaktofa/goi). So also may we take the Scripture: "And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ; " so that the carnal may be understood as those recently instructed, and still babes in Christ. For he called those who had already believed on the Holy Spirit spiritual, and those newly instructed and not yet purified carnal; whom with justice he calls still carnal, as minding equally with the heathen the things of the flesh:
In this way, then, milk is perfect nourishment. It is perfect and leads to the end that never ceases. That is why this same milk, along with honey, is promised in the rest. It is fitting that the Lord promises milk again to the righteous, so that the Word may be clearly shown to be both: “Alpha and Omega, beginning and end.” Homer, too, unwittingly prophesies something like this when he calls the righteous among men “milk-eaters.” The Scripture can also be taken this way: “And I, brothers, could not speak to you as to spiritual people, but as to fleshly people, as to infants in Christ.” So the “fleshly” can be understood as those newly instructed, still infants in Christ. For he called “spiritual” those who had already believed in the Holy Spirit. He called “fleshly” those newly taught and not yet cleansed, whom he rightly calls “still fleshly,” since like the pagans they still think the things of the flesh.
"For whereas there is among you envy and strife, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? " "Wherefore also I have given you milk to drink," he says; meaning, I have instilled into you the knowledge which, from instruction, nourishes up to life eternal. But the expression, "I have given you to drink" (e0po/tisa), is the symbol of perfect appropriation. For those who are full-grown are said to drink, babes to suck. "For my blood," says the Lord, "is true drink. In saying, therefore, "I have given you milk to drink," has he not indicated the knowledge of the truth, the perfect gladness in the Word, who is the milk? And what follows next, "not meat, for ye were not able," may indicate the clear revelation in the future world, like food, face to face. "For now we see as through a glass," the same apostle says, "but then face to face. Wherefore also he has added, "neither yet are ye now able, for ye are still carnal," minding the things of the flesh,-desiring, loving, feeling jealousy, wrath, envy. "For we are no more in the flesh," as some suppose. For with it [they say], having the face which is like an angel's, we shall see the promise face to face.
“For where there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not fleshly, and do you not walk in a merely human way?” This is why he says, “I gave you milk to drink.” He means, “I poured knowledge into you,” the knowledge that comes from instruction and nourishes us up to eternal life. The word “gave to drink” is also a symbol of full sharing in the truth. For the mature are said to drink, while infants are said to nurse. “My blood,” says the Lord, “is true drink.” So when he said “I gave you milk to drink,” was he not hinting at the perfect joy found in the Word as milk, the knowledge of the truth? And what follows, “not solid food, for you were not yet able,” can hint at the clear revelation in the age to come, face to face, like solid food. For the same apostle says, “Now we see as through a mirror, but then face to face.” That is why he added, “But even now you are not able, for you are still fleshly.” They set their minds on the things of the flesh: they lust, they crave, they are jealous, angry and envious. He does not mean that we are still in the flesh, as some have supposed. For we shall have the flesh with us, and with a face like the angels’ face we shall see the promise face to face.
How then, if that is truly the promise after our departure hence, say they that they know "what eye hath not known, nor hath entered into the mind of man," who have not perceived by the Spirit, but received from instruction "what ear hath not heard," or that ear alone which "was rapt up into the third heaven? " But it even then was commanded to preserve it unspoken. But if human wisdom, as it remains to understand, is the glorying in knowledge, hear the law of Scripture: "Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom, and let not the mighty man glory in his might; but let him that glorieth glory in the Lord. But we are God-taught, and glory in the name of Christ. How then are we not to regard the apostle as attaching this sense to the milk of the babes? And if we who preside over the Churches are shepherds after the image of the good Shepherd, and you the sheep, are we not to regard the Lord as preserving consistency in the use of figurative speech, when He speaks also of the milk of the flock?
But suppose that promise really comes after we leave this life, the promise that “no eye has seen, and it has not entered into the mind of man.” How then do they say they know it? They have not conceived it by the Spirit but have received it by learning. They claim to know “what ear never heard,” when only that one who was caught up into the third heaven could say so. Yet even he was told at that time to keep silent. And if what is left to suppose is that this boasting about knowledge is human wisdom, hear the law of Scripture: “Let not the wise man boast in his wisdom, and let not the strong man boast in his strength, but let him who boasts boast in the Lord.” We are “taught by God,” and we boast in the name of Christ. So why should we not suppose that this is what the apostle means by the milk of infants? After all, those who lead the churches are shepherds after the image of the good Shepherd, and we are the sheep.
And to this meaning we may secondly accommodate the expression, "I have given you milk to drink, and not given you food, for ye are not yet able," regarding the meat not as something different from the milk, but the same in substance. For the very same Word is fluid and mild as milk, or solid and compact as meat. And entertaining this view, we may regard the proclamation of the Gospel, which is universally diffused, as milk; and as meat, faith, which from instruction is compacted into a foundation, which, being more substantial than hearing, is likened to meat, and assimilates to the soul itself nourishment of this kind. Elsewhere the Lord, in the Gospel according to John, brought this out by symbols, when He said: "Eat ye my flesh, and drink my blood; " describing distinctly by metaphor the drinkable properties of faith and the promise, by means of which the Church, like a human being consisting of many members, is refreshed and grows, is welded together and compacted of both,-of faith, which is the body, and of hope, which is the soul; as also the Lord of flesh and blood.
Does not the Lord keep the same consistency of figure when he also speaks of the milk of the flock? And so the saying must be fitted again to this sense: “I gave you milk to drink, not solid food, for you were not yet able.” The apostle does not take the solid food to be something other than the milk, but the same thing in substance. For the same Word is either gentle and fluid, like milk, or firm and compact, like solid food. There is another way to take it. We can understand milk as the preaching of the gospel, poured out as widely as possible. Solid food is then faith, built up from instruction into a foundation. Faith is firmer than mere hearing, so it is compared to solid food, as it is made into body within the soul itself. Elsewhere, in the Gospel according to John, the Lord expressed this same nourishment in a different way through symbols. He said, “You shall eat my flesh and drink my blood.” By this figure he spoke of the clear evidence of faith, and of the promise as food and drink. Through these the Church, like a person made of many members, is watered and grows, and is knit and fitted together from both: faith as the body and hope as the soul, just as the Lord himself is made of flesh and blood.
For in reality the blood of faith is hope, in which faith is held as by a vital principle. And when hope expires, it is as if blood flowed forth; and the vitality of faith is destroyed. If, then, some would oppose, saying that by milk is meant the first lesson"-as it were, the first food-and that by meat is meant those spiritual cognitions to which they attain by raising themselves to knowledge, let them understand that, in saying that meat is solid food, and the flesh and blood of Jesus, they are brought by their own vainglorious wisdom to the true simplicity. For the blood is found to be an original product in man, and some have consequently ventured to call it the substance of the soul. And this blood, transmuted by a natural process of assimilation in the pregnancy of the mother, through the sympathy of parental affection, effloresces and grows old, in order that there may be no fear for the child. Blood, too, is the moister part of flesh, being a kind of liquid flesh; and milk is the sweeter and finer part of blood.
For in truth hope is the blood of faith. By hope faith is held together, as by a soul. And when hope breathes its last, like blood flowing out, the life of faith drains away. Now some may want to argue further. They may say that milk means the first lessons, the first foods so to speak, and that solid food means the spiritual understanding to which they lift themselves up in “knowledge.” Let them know that when they call the solid food “solid nourishment” and also “the flesh and blood of Jesus,” their own boastful wisdom carries them back to the true simplicity. For blood is found to be the first-formed thing in a human being, and some have dared to call it the substance of the soul. When the mother conceives, this blood is changed by natural digestion. Through the sympathy of her tender love, it blossoms and ripens, so that the child has nothing to fear. Blood is moister than flesh, being a kind of liquid flesh. And milk is sweeter than blood and finer in texture.
For whether it be the blood supplied to the foetus, and sent through the navel of the mother, or whether it be the menses themselves shut out from their proper passage, and by a natural diffusion, bidden by the all-nourishing and creating God, proceed to the already swelling breasts, and by the heat of the spirits transmuted, [whether it be the one or the other] that is formed, into food desirable for the babe, that which is changed is the blood. For of all the members, the breasts have the most sympathy with the womb. When there is parturition, the vessel by which blood was conveyed to the foetus is cut off: there is an obstruction Of the flow, and the blood receives an impulse towards the breasts; and on a considerable rush taking place, they are distended, and change the blood to milk in a manner analogous to the change of blood into pus in ulceration. Or if, on the other hand, the blood from the veins in the vicinity of the breasts, which have been opened in pregnancy, is poured into the natural hollows of the breasts; and the spirit discharged from the neighbouring arteries being mixed with it, the substance of the blood, still remaining pure, it becomes white by being agitated like a wave; and by an interruption such as this is changed by frothing it, like what takes place with the sea, which at the assaults of the winds, the poets say, "spits forth briny foam. Yet still the essence is supplied by the blood.
Whether it is the blood supplied to the unborn child, sent first through the mother’s navel, or whether it is the menstrual blood itself, shut out from its usual course, God, who feeds all things and brings them to birth, commands it to flow back by a natural overflow to the breasts, which are by then swollen. There it is changed by warm breath and prepared as the food the infant longs for. Either way, what is being changed is blood. For of all the members, the breasts have the closest fellow-feeling with the womb. At birth the vessel that carried blood to the child is cut off. The passage closes, and the blood rushes toward the breasts. When a great flow arrives, the breasts are stretched, and the blood turns into milk, in a way comparable to blood turning into pus in a festering wound. Or else, the veins lying near the breasts are opened out during the stretching of pregnancy, and the blood is poured into the natural hollows of the breasts. The breath sent down from the neighboring arteries mingles with it, while the underlying substance of the blood stays unchanged. Stirred up like a wave, it turns white, and by this beating it is changed into froth. It is much like the sea, which, when the winds strike it, the poets say “spits out the foam of the salt.” Yet the substance is still blood.
In this way also the rivers, borne on with rushing motion, and fretted by contact with the surrounding air, murmur forth foam. The moisture in our mouth, too, is whitened by the breath. What an absurdity is it, then, not to acknowledge that the blood is converted into that very bright and white substance by the breath! The change it suffers is in quality, not in essence. You will certainly find nothing else more nourishing, or sweeter, or whiter than milk. In every respect, accordingly, it is like spiritual nourishment, which is sweet through grace, nourishing as life, bright as the day of Christ. The blood of the Word has been also exhibited as milk. Milk being thus provided in parturition, is supplied to the infant; and the breasts, which till then looked straight towards the husband, now bend down towards the child, being taught to furnish the substance elaborated by nature in a way easily received for salutary nourishment. For the breasts are not like fountains full of milk, flowing in ready prepared; but, by effecting a change in the nutriment, form the milk in themselves, and discharge it.
In the same way, rivers rushing along are whipped by the surrounding air and murmur with foam. The moisture in our mouth also turns white with the breath. Why then should we not admit that blood, too, is turned by breath into this most shining and white substance? It undergoes a change of quality, not of substance. You will certainly find nothing more nourishing than milk, nor sweeter, nor whiter. Spiritual food is like it in every way: sweet because of grace, nourishing like life, white like the day of Christ. And the blood of the Word has been shown to us as milk. So, when the child is born, the milk is arranged and supplied to the baby. The breasts, which until then stood upright and looked toward the husband, now bend down toward the child. They are taught to offer, in an easily received form, the food that nature has worked on, for the nourishing of salvation. For the breasts are not full like springs, with ready-made milk flowing into them. They change the food within themselves, make it into milk, and give it out.
And the nutriment suitable and wholesome for the new-formed and new-born babe is elaborated by God, the nourisher and the Father of all that are generated and regenerated,-as manna, the celestial food of angels, flowed down from heaven on the ancient Hebrews. Even now, in fact, nurses call the first-poured drink of milk by the same name as that food-manna. Further, pregnant women, on becoming mothers, discharge milk. But the Lord Christ, the fruit of the Virgin, did not pronounce the breasts of women blessed, nor selected them to give nourishment; but when the kind and loving Father had rained down the Word, Himself became spiritual nourishment to the good. O mystic marvel! The universal Father is one, and one the universal Word; and the Holy Spirit is one and the same everywhere, and one is the only virgin mother. I love to call her the Church.
This food is fitted and suited to the newly formed, newly grown child, and it is prepared by God, the nourisher and Father of those who are born and born again. It is like the manna that flowed down from heaven for the ancient Hebrews, the heavenly food of angels. Even now, in fact, nurses call the first draught of milk by the same name as that food: manna. But women who have conceived become mothers and then their milk flows. The Lord Christ, the fruit of the Virgin, did not pronounce women’s breasts blessed, nor did he judge them to be his nurses. Instead, when the loving Father, who loves humankind, had rained down the Word, Christ himself became spiritual food for the self-controlled. O mystical wonder! There is one Father of all, and one Word of all, and the Holy Spirit is one and the same everywhere, and there is only one virgin who becomes a mother. I like to call her the Church.
This mother, when alone, had not milk, because alone she was not a woman. But she is once virgin and mother-pure as a virgin, loving as a mother. And calling her children to her, she nurses them with holy milk, viz., with the Word for childhood. Therefore she had not milk; for the milk was this child fair and comely, the body of Christ, which nourishes by the Word the young brood, which the Lord Himself brought forth in throes of the flesh, which the Lord Himself swathed in His precious blood. O amazing birth! O holy swaddling bands! The Word is all to the child, both father and mother and tutor and nurse. "Eat ye my flesh," He says, "and drink my blood. Such is the suitable food which the Lord ministers, and He offers His flesh and pours forth His blood, and nothing is wanting for the children's growth.
This mother alone had no milk, because she alone did not become a woman. She is both virgin and mother: undefiled as a virgin, loving as a mother. She calls her children to her and nurses them with holy milk, the Word suited to infants. Therefore she had no milk, because the milk was this child, fair and her own, the body of Christ. It feeds the young people of the Word, whom the Lord himself bore in the pains of the flesh and whom the Lord himself wrapped in swaddling clothes with his precious blood. O the holy births! O the holy swaddling clothes! The Word is everything to the infant: father and mother, instructor and nurse. “Eat my flesh,” he says, “and drink my blood.” The Lord gives us this fitting food. He holds out his flesh and pours out his blood, and nothing is lacking for the children’s growth.
O amazing mystery l We are enjoined to cast off the old and carnal corruption, as also the old nutriment, receiving in exchange another new regimen, that of Christ, receiving Him if we can, to hide Him within; and that, enshrining the Saviour in our souls, we may correct the affections of our flesh. But you are not inclined to understand it thus, but perchance more generally. Hear it also in the following way. The flesh figuratively represents to us the Holy Spirit; for the flesh was created by Him. The blood points out to us the Word, for as rich blood the Word has been infused into life; and the union of both is the Lord, the food of the babes-the Lord who is Spirit and Word. The food-that is, the Lord Jesus-that is, the Word of God, the Spirit made flesh, the heavenly flesh sanctified.
What a strange and wonderful mystery! He commands us to strip off our old, fleshly corruption, just as we strip off our old food. We are to share in a new and different way of life, the way of Christ. We are to take him into ourselves, if we can, and store him up there, and to hold the Saviour close to our hearts, so that we may put an end to the passions of our flesh. But you do not want to understand it this way. Perhaps you prefer the more common reading. Then hear it this way too. He speaks of the Holy Spirit allegorically as “flesh,” for the flesh was made by the Spirit. He hints at the Word as “blood,” for the Word has been poured out on our life like rich blood. The mixture of the two is the Lord, the food of infants. The Lord is Spirit and Word. The food, that is, the Lord Jesus, that is, the Word of God, is Spirit made flesh, heavenly flesh made holy.
The nutriment is the milk of the Father, by which alone we infants are nourished. The Word Himself, then, the beloved One, and our nourisher, hath shed His own blood for us, to save humanity; and by Him, we, believing on God, flee to the Word, "the care-soothing breast" of the Father. And He alone, as is befitting, supplies us children with the milk of love, and those only are truly Messed who suck this breast. Wherefore also Peter says: "Laying therefore aside all malice, and all guile, and hypocrisy, and envy, and evil speaking, as new-born babes, desire the milk of the word, that ye may grow by it to salvation; if ye have tasted that the Lord is Christ. And were one to concede to them that the meat was something different from the milk, then how shall they avoid being transfixed on their own spit, through want of consideration of nature?
The food is the Father’s milk, and on it alone we infants are nursed. The Word himself, the “beloved” one and our nourisher, poured out his own blood for us to save humanity. Through him we have believed in God, and we run for refuge to the Father’s “care-forgetting breast,” the Word. As it appears, he alone supplies us infants with the milk of love, and those who suckle at this breast are the only ones truly blessed. For this reason Peter also says: “So put away all malice and all deceit, hypocrisy, envy and slander. Like newborn babies, long for the milk of the word, so that by it you may grow into salvation, if you have tasted that the Lord is good.” But suppose someone granted these people that solid food is something other than milk. How then would they not run themselves through, since they have not understood nature?
For in winter, when the air is condensed, and prevents the escape of the heat enclosed within, the food, transmuted and digested and changed into blood, passes into the veins, and these, in the absence of exhalation, are greatly distended, and exhibit strong pulsations; consequently also nurses are then fullest of milk. And we have shown a little above, that on pregnancy blood passes into milk by a change which does not affect its substance, just as in old people yellow hair changes to grey. But again in summer, the body, having its pores more open, affords greater facility for diaphoretic action in the case of the food, and the milk is least abundant, since neither is the blood full, nor is the whole nutriment retained. If, then, the digestion of the food results in the production of blood, and the blood becomes milk, then blood is a preparation for milk, as blood is for a human being, and the grape for the vine.
In winter the surrounding air thickens and gives no way out, so the heat is shut up inside. The food is then cooked and digested, turned into blood, and passes into the veins. The veins get no ventilation, so they fill up, become very tense, and pulse. This is why nurses are fullest of milk at that time. A little earlier we showed that in pregnant women the blood turns into milk by a change in form, not a change in substance. In the same way, the fair hair of old people changes to grey. In summer it is the other way around. The body is more porous, so the food is dispersed more easily and there is very little milk, since there is not much blood either; not all the food is retained. So if the working-up of food produces blood, and the blood is turned into milk, then blood is the raw material for milk. It is like the seed of a human being, or the pip of a vine.
With milk, then, the Lord's nutriment, we are nursed directly we are born; and as soon as we are regenerated, we are honoured by receiving the good news of the hope of rest, even the Jerusalem above, in which it is written that milk and honey fall in showers, receiving through what is material the pledge of the sacred food. "For meats are done away with," as the apostle himself says; but this nourishment on milk leads to the heavens, rearing up citizens of heaven, and members of the angelic choirs. And since the Word is the gushing fountain of life, and has been called a river of olive oil, Paul, using appropriate figurative language, and calling Him milk, adds: "I have given you to drink; " for we drink in the word, the nutriment of the truth. In truth, also liquid food is called drink; and the same thing may somehow be both meat and drink, according to the different aspects in which it is considered, just as cheese is the solidification of milk or milk solidified; for I am not concerned here to make a nice selection of an expression, only to say that one substance supplies both articles of food.
So from the moment we are born, we are nursed with milk, the Lord’s food. And from the moment we are born again, we are honoured with the good news of the hope of rest, the Jerusalem above, where, it is written, milk and honey rain down. Through this material food we are already being betrothed to the holy food as well. For “foods will be done away with,” as the apostle himself says. But the nourishment of milk leads the way to the heavens, because it raises citizens of heaven and fellow dancers with the angels. The Word is a gushing spring of life and has been called a river of oil. So Paul speaks allegorically and names him milk, and then adds, “I gave you to drink.” For the Word is drunk; he is the food of truth. Indeed, a drink is called liquid food. The same thing can be both food and drink, depending on how we think of it. Cheese, for example, is curdled milk, or milk that has set.
Besides, for children at the breast, milk alone suffices; it serves both for meat and drink. "I," says the Lord, "have meat to eat that ye know not of. My meat is to do the will of Him that sent Me. You see another kind of food which, similarly with milk, represents figuratively the will of God. Besides, also, the completion of His own passion He called catachrestically "a cup," when He alone had to drink and drain it. Thus to Christ the fulfilling of His Father's will was food; and to us infants,who drink the milk of the word of the heavens, Christ Himself is food. Hence seeking is called sucking; for to those babes that seek the Word, the Father's breasts of love supply milk.
I am not concerned just now with hunting for exact words. My point is only that one substance serves as both kinds of nourishment. For babies at the breast, milk alone is enough to be both drink and food. The Lord says, “I have food to eat that you do not know about. My food is to do the will of the one who sent me.” You see here another food, which like milk is allegorical: the will of God. He also called the completion of his own suffering a “cup,” using the word loosely, because he alone had to drink it to the end and finish it. So for Christ the food was the fulfilment of the Father’s purpose. For us infants, who milk out the word of the heavens, Christ himself is the food. This is why seeking is called “mastevsai.” To infants who seek the Word, the Father’s breasts of loving kindness give milk.
Further, the Word declares Himself to be the bread of heaven. "For Moses," He says, "gave you not that bread from heaven, but My Father giveth you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is He that cometh down from heaven, and giveth life to the world. And the bread which I will give is My flesh, which I will give for the life of the world. Here is to be noted the mystery of the bread, in as much as He speaks of it as flesh, and as flesh, consequently, that has risen through fire, as the wheat springs up from decay and germination; and, in truth, it has risen through fire for the joy of the Church, as bread baked. But this will be shown by and by more clearly in the chapter on the resurrection. But since He said, "And the bread which I will give is My flesh," and since flesh is moistened with blood, and blood is figuratively termed wine, we are bidden to know that, as bread, crumbled into a mixture of wine and water, seizes on the wine and leaves the watery portion, so also the flesh of Christ, the bread of heaven absorbs the blood; that is, those among men who are heavenly, nourishing them up to immortality, and leaving only to destruction the lusts of the flesh.
The Word also declares himself to be the bread of heaven. “For Moses did not give you the bread from heaven,” he says, “but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. For the bread of God is the one who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world. And the bread that I will give is my flesh, for the life of the world.” Here we should note the mystery of the bread. He calls it flesh, and flesh that rises, as wheat rises from decay and sowing. It is also put together through fire, like bread being baked, for the joy of the Church. But this will be made clearer to us later, in the work On the Resurrection. He said, “The bread that I will give is my flesh.” Flesh is watered by blood, and blood is figuratively called wine. So we must understand this. Bread crumbled into a mixture of wine and water takes up the wine and leaves the watery part behind. In the same way the flesh of the Lord, the bread of heaven, drinks up the blood. It feeds the heavenly among men to incorruption, and leaves behind to corruption only the desires of the flesh.
Thus in many ways the Word is figuratively described, as meat, and flesh, and food, and bread, and blood, and milk. The Lord is all these, to give enjoyment to us who have believed on Him. Let no one then think it strange, when we say that the Lord's blood is figuratively represented as milk. For is it not figuratively represented as wine? "Who washes," it is said, "His garment in wine, His robe in the blood of the grape. In His Own Spirit He says He will deck the body of the Word; as certainly by His own Spirit He will nourish those who hunger for the Word. And that the blood is the Word, is testified by the blood of Abel, the righteous interceding with God. For the blood would never have uttered a voice, had it not been regarded as the Word: for the righteous man of old is the type of the new righteous one; and the blood of old that interceded, intercedes in the place of the new blood. And the blood that is the Word cries to God, since it intimated that the Word was to suffer.
So the Word is described figuratively in many ways: as food, flesh, nourishment, bread, blood and milk. The Lord is all of these for the enjoyment of us who have believed in him. Let no one be surprised, then, when we say that the Lord’s blood is figuratively called milk. Is it not also figuratively called wine? “He who washes his robe in wine,” it says, “and his garment in the blood of the grape.” He means that he will adorn the body of the Word with his own blood. In the same way he will feed with his Spirit those who hunger for the Word. That the blood is the Word is shown by the blood of righteous Abel, which pleaded with God. Blood could never have uttered a voice unless “blood” is understood to mean the Word. The righteous man of old is a type of the new Righteous One. The blood of old that pleaded also pleads on behalf of the new blood.
Further, this flesh, and the blood in it, are by a mutual sympathy moistened and increased by the milk. And the process of formation of the seed in conception ensues when it has mingled with the pure residue of the menses, which remains. For the force that is in the seed coagulating the substances of the blood, as the rennet curdles milk, effects the essential part of the formative process. For a suitable blending conduces to fruitfulness; but extremes are adverse, and tend to sterility. For when the earth itself is flooded by excessive rain, the seed is swept away, while in consequence of scarcity it is dried up; but when the sap is viscous, it retains the seed, and makes it germinate. Some also hold the hypothesis, that the seed of an animal is in substance the foam of the blood, which being by the natural heat of the male agitated and shaken out is turned into foam, and deposited in the seminal veins. For Diogenes Apollionates will have it, that hence is derived the word aphrodisia.
The blood, which is the Word, speaks to God, because it pointed to the Word who was to suffer. Flesh itself, and the blood in it, is watered and made to grow by milk, as though milk repaid it with a kind of returned care. Even the shaping of what is conceived happens when the seed is mixed with the pure residue left over from the monthly cleansing. The power in the seed curdles the nature of the blood, as rennet sets milk, and so produces the substance for forming the child. A balanced mixture flourishes, but extremes risk childlessness. The earth itself works the same way. When it is flooded by heavy rain, the seed is washed away. When it is dry for lack of moisture, the seed withers. But when the moisture is sticky, it holds the seed and makes it grow. Some suppose that the seed of a living creature is, in its substance, the foam of the blood. In intercourse, they say, the male’s inborn heat stirs the blood up and whips it into foam, and the foam is deposited in the seed-bearing veins. Diogenes of Apollonia wants the word “aphrodisia” (the acts of love) to come from this.
From all this it is therefore evident, that the essential principle of the human body is blood. The contents of the stomach, too, at first are milky, a coagulation of fluid; then the same coagulated substance is changed into blood; but when it is formed into a compact consistency in the womb, by the natural and warm spirit by which the embryo is fashioned, it becomes a living creature. Further also, the child after birth is nourished by the same blood. For the flow of milk is the product of the blood; and the source of nourishment is the milk; by which a woman is shown to have brought forth a child, and to be truly a mother, by which also she receives a potent charm of affection. Wherefore the Holy Spirit in the apostle, using the voice of the Lord, says mystically, "I have given you milk to drink. For if we have been regenerated unto Christ, He who has regenerated us nourishes us with His own milk, the Word; for it is proper that what has procreated should forthwith supply nourishment to that which has been procreated.
It is plain from all this that the substance of the human body is blood. In the womb, what is formed is at first a milky composition of fluid. Then it is turned to blood, and this composition becomes flesh. It sets in the womb by the natural, warm breath by which the embryo is shaped, and so it is brought to life. After birth the child is again fed by the same blood, for the flow of milk is blood in another form, and milk is the source of nourishment. By milk a woman is clearly shown to have truly given birth and to be a mother, and through it she also gains a charm that wins affection. For this reason the Holy Spirit in the apostle, using the Lord’s voice, says in a mystery, “I gave you milk to drink.” For if we have been born again into Christ, the one who has begotten us again feeds us with his own milk, the Word. Everything that begets seems to provide nourishment at once for what it has begotten.
And as the regeneration was conformably spiritual, so also was the nutriment of man spiritual. In all respects, therefore, and in all things, we are brought into union with Christ, into relationship through His blood, by which we are redeemed; and into sympathy, in consequence of the nourishment which flows from the Word; and into immortality, through His guidance:- "Among men the bringing up of children Often produces stronger impulses to love than the procreating of them. The same blood and milk of the Lord is therefore the symbol of the Lord's passion and teaching. Wherefore each of us babes is permitted to make our boast in the Lord, while we proclaim:- "Yet of a noble sire and noble blood I boast me sprung. And that milk is produced from blood by a change, is already clear; yet we may learn it from the flocks and herds.
Just as our new birth is spiritual, so in the same way our nourishment has become spiritual. In every respect, then, and in everything, we have been made Christ’s own. We are bound to him by kinship, through his blood, by which we are redeemed. We are bound to him by sympathy, through the upbringing that comes from the Word. And we are bound to him for immortality, through his training of us. “Among mortals, bringing up children often wins more love than begetting them.” So the blood and the milk of the Lord are one and the same: a symbol of his suffering and of his teaching. Each of us who are infants may therefore boast in the Lord, and say, “I claim to be sprung from a good father and from his blood.” That milk comes from blood by a process of change is already clear, but we can also learn it from flocks and herds.
For these animals, in the time of the year which we call spring, when the air has more humidity, and the grass and meadows are juicy. and moist, are first filled with blood, as is shown by the distension of the veins of the swollen vessels; and from the blood the milk flows more copiously. But in summer again, the blood being burnt and dried up by the heat, prevents the change, and so they have less milk. Further, milk has a most natural affinity for water, as assuredly the spiritual washing has for the spiritual nutriment. Those, therefore, that swallow a little cold water, in addition to the above-mentioned milk, straightway feel benefit; for the milk is prevented from souring by its combination with water, not in consequence of any antipathy between them, but in consequence of the water taking kindly to the milk while it is undergoing digestion.
In the season of the year we call spring, the air is moister, and the grass and pastures are juicy and damp. At that time these animals are first filled with blood, as the swelling of the veins and the bulging of the vessels shows. From the blood the milk then flows more abundantly. In summer, by contrast, the blood is scorched and dried up by the heat, and the change is checked, so less milk is drawn. Milk also has a very natural kinship with water, just as the spiritual washing has with spiritual food. People who sip a little cold water after drinking milk are helped at once. Its association with water keeps the milk from turning sour, not through any opposition between them, but because the water agrees with the milk and suits it.
And such as is the union of the Word with baptism, is the agreement of milk with water; for it receives it alone of all liquids, and admits of mixture with water, for the purpose of cleansing, as baptism for the remission of sins. And it is mixed naturally with honey also, and this for cleansing along with sweet nutriment. For the Word blended with love at once cures our passions and cleanses our sins; and the saying, "Sweeter than honey flowed the stream of speech," seems to me to have been spoken of the Word, who is honey. And prophecy oft extols Him "above honey and the honeycomb. Furthermore, milk is mixed with sweet wine; and the mixture is beneficial, as when suffering is mixed in the cup in order to immortality. For the milk is curdled by the wine, and separated, and whatever adulteration is in it is drained off.
The partnership the Word has with baptism is the same as the bond between milk and water. Milk alone of liquids admits a mixture with water for the sake of cleansing, as baptism is taken for the forgiveness of sins. It also mixes naturally with honey, again for cleansing, along with sweet nourishment. For the Word, mixed with love for mankind, heals our passions and at the same time cleanses away our sins. The line “sweeter than honey flowed his speech” seems to me to have been said of the Word, who is honey. And prophecy in many places lifts him up as “above honey and the honeycomb.” Milk is also mixed with sweet wine. The mixture is beneficial, as when suffering is mixed in for the sake of incorruption. The wine draws off the whey and curdles the milk, and whatever in it is impure is drained away.
And in the same way, the spiritual communion of faith with suffering man, drawing off as serous matter the lusts of the flesh, commits man to eternity, along with those who are divine, immortalizing him. Further, many also use the fat of milk, called butter, for the lamp, plainly indicating by this enigma the abundant unction of the Word, since He alone it is who nourishes the infants, makes them grow, and enlightens them. Wherefore also the Scripture says respecting the Lord," He fed them with the produce of the fields; they sucked honey from the rock, and oil from the solid rock, butter of kine, and milk of sheep, with fat of lambs; " and what follows He gave them. But he that prophesies the birth of the child says: "Butter and honey shall He eat.
In the same way, the spiritual fellowship of faith with suffering man draws off the fleshly desires. It gathers man together for eternity and makes him immortal through divine things. Many people also use the fatty part of milk, which they call butter, as lamp oil. By this clear riddle they show the rich oil of the Word, who alone rightly feeds, nourishes and enlightens the little ones. For this reason Scripture says of the Lord: “He fed them with the produce of the fields; they sucked honey from the rock and oil from the solid rock, butter of cattle and milk of sheep, with the fat of lambs.” And he gave them what follows after that. The prophet who foretells the birth of the child also says, “He will eat butter and honey.”
And it occurs to me to wonder how some dare call themselves perfect and gnostics, with ideas of themselves above the apostle, inflated and boastful, when Paul even owned respecting himself, "Not that I have already attained, or am already perfect; but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which I am apprehended of Christ. Brethren, I count not myself to have apprehended: but this one thing I do, forgetting the things which are behind, and stretching forth to those that are before, I press toward the mark, for the prize of the high calling in Christ Jesus. And yet he reckons himself perfect, because he has been emancipated from his former life, and strives after the better life, not as perfect in knowledge, but as aspiring after perfection. Wherefore also he adds, "As many of us as are perfect, are thus minded," manifestly describing perfection as the renunciation of sin, and regeneration into the faith of the only perfect One, and forgetting our former sins.
I am even amazed that some dare to call themselves “perfect” and “gnostics,” thinking themselves above the apostle, puffed up and arrogant, when Paul himself admits about himself: “Not that I have already obtained it or have already been made perfect, but I press on to see if I may lay hold of that for which I was also laid hold of by Christ. Brothers, I do not yet count myself to have laid hold of it. But one thing: forgetting what lies behind and stretching out toward what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal, to the prize of the upward call in Christ Jesus.” Paul does count himself perfect, in that he has been set free from his former life and holds fast to the better one. He is not perfect in knowledge, but is reaching for what is perfect. So he adds, “Let us then, as many as are perfect, think this way.” By perfection he clearly means renouncing sins and being born again into faith in the One who alone is perfect, having forgotten the sins left behind.
Who the Instructor Is, and Respecting His Instruction.Since, then, we have shown that all of us are by Scripture called children; and not only so, but that we who have followed Christ are figuratively called babes; and that the Father of all alone is perfect, for the Son is in Him, and the Father is in the Son; it is time for us in due course to say who our Instructor is. He is called Jesus: Sometimes He calls Himself a shepherd, and says, "I am the good Shepherd. According to a metaphor drawn from shepherds, who lead the sheep, is hereby understood the Instructor, who leads the children-the Shepherd who tends the babes. For the babes are simple, being figuratively described as sheep. "And they shall all," it is said, "be one flock, and one shepherd. The Word, then, who leads the children to salvation, is appropriately called the Instructor (Paedagogue).
Who the Instructor Is, and His Instruction. We have shown that Scripture calls all of us children. More than that, we who have followed Christ are called babes in a figure of speech. And the Father of all is the only one who is perfect, for the Son is in him and the Father is in the Son. So now, keeping to our order, it is time to say who our Instructor is. He is called Jesus. Sometimes he calls himself a shepherd and says, “I am the good shepherd.” The image is drawn from shepherds who lead their sheep. By it we are to understand the Instructor, who leads the children, the shepherd who cares for the babes. For babes are simple, and so they are pictured as sheep. “And they shall all become one flock and one shepherd,” he says. So the Word, who leads us children to salvation, is rightly called the Instructor.
With the greatest clearness, accordingly, the Word has spoken respecting Himself by Hosea: "I am your Instructor. Now piety is instruction, being the learning of the service of God, and training in the knowledge of the truth, and right guidance which leads to heaven. And the word "instruction" is employed variously. For there is the instruction of him who is led and learns, and that of him who leads and teaches; and there is, thirdly, the guidance itself; and fourthly, what is taught, as the commandments enjoined. Now the instruction which is of God is the right direction of truth to the contemplation of God, and the exhibition of holy deeds in everlasting perseverance. As therefore the general directs the phalanx, consulting the safety of his soldiers, and the pilot steers the vessel, desiring to save the passengers; so also the Instructor guides the children to a saving course of conduct, through solicitude for us; and, in general, whatever we ask in accordance with reason from God to be done for us, will happen to those who believe in the Instructor.
The Word has spoken very plainly about himself through Hosea: “I am your instructor.” Now godliness is instruction. It is learning how to serve God, training toward the knowledge of the truth, and right guidance that leads up to heaven. The word “instruction” is used in several ways. There is the instruction of the one who is led and learns. There is that of the one who leads and teaches. Third, there is the guidance itself. Fourth, there are the things taught, such as the commandments. The instruction that comes from God is a straightening of the way by truth, toward the vision of God. It is also a pattern of holy deeds, set in lasting perseverance. A general directs his battle line out of concern for the safety of his hired soldiers, and a helmsman steers his ship because he wants to save those sailing with him. In the same way the Instructor leads the children toward a saving way of life, out of care for us. In general, whatever we reasonably ask God to do for us will be ours if we obey the Instructor.
And just as the helmsman does not always yield to the winds, but sometimes, turning the prow towards them, opposes the whole force of the hurricanes; so the Instructor never yields to the blasts that blow in this world, nor commits the child to them like a vessel to make shipwreck on a wild and licentious course of life; but, wafted on by the favouring breeze of the Spirit of truth, stoutly holds on to the child's helm,-his ears, I mean,-until He bring him safe to anchor in the haven of heaven. What is called by men an ancestral custom passes away in a moment, but the divine guidance is a possession which abides for ever. They say that Phoenix was the instructor of Achilles, and Adrastus of the children of Croesus; and Leonides of Alexander, and Nausithous of Philip.
A helmsman does not always give way to the winds. Sometimes he turns his bow into them and stands against the full force of the gales. In the same way the Instructor never gives way to the winds that blow in this world. He does not let the child, like a ship, be driven onto a bestial and licentious way of life. Instead he is carried along by the favoring wind of the Spirit of truth alone, and he holds the child’s rudder very firmly. By the rudder I mean the ears. He holds on until he brings the child safely into harbor in the heavens. What men call ancestral custom passes away almost at once, but divine guidance is a possession that stays forever. They say that Phoenix was the instructor of Achilles, Adrastus of the sons of Croesus, Leonidas of Alexander, and Nausithous of Philip.
But Phoenix was women-mad Adrastus was a fugitive. Leonides did not curtail the pride of Alexander, nor Nausithous reform the drunken Pellaean. No more was the Thracian Zopyrus able to check the fornication of Alcibiades; but Zopyrus was a bought slave, and Sicinnus, the tutor of the children of Themistocles, was a lazy domestic. They say also that he invented the Sicinnian dance. Those have not escaped our attention who are called royal instructors among the Persians; whom, in number four, the kings of the Persians select with the greatest care from all the Persians and set over their sons. But the children only learn the use of the bow, and on reaching maturity have sexual intercourse with sisters, and mothers, and women, wives and courtesans innumerable, practised in intercourse like the wild boars.
But Phoenix was mad after women, and Adrastus was an exile. Leonidas did not remove the conceit of the Macedonian, and Nausithous did not cure the drunkenness of the man from Pella. The Thracian Zopyrus could not restrain the fornication of Alcibiades, but Zopyrus was a slave bought for money. And Sicinnus, the instructor of the sons of Themistocles, was a careless household slave. They say he invented the dance, and the dancing called “sicinnizing,” after his name. We are not unaware of the so-called royal instructors among the Persians. The kings of the Persians choose four of them for their excellence out of all the Persians and set them over their own sons. But the boys learn only to shoot the bow. When they come of age they sleep with sisters, mothers, wives and countless concubines, like boars trained for mating.
But our Instructor is the holy God Jesus, the Word, who is the guide of all humanity. The loving God Himself is our Instructor. Somewhere in song the Holy Spirit says with regard to Him, "He provided sufficiently for the people in the wilderness. He led him about in the thirst of summer heat in a dry land, and instructed him, and kept him as the apple of His eye, as an eagle protects her nest, and shows her fond solicitude for her young, spreads abroad her wings, takes them, and bears them on her back. The Lord alone led them, and there was no strange god with them. Clearly, I trow, has the Scripture exhibited the Instructor in the account it gives of His guidance. Again, when He speaks in His own person, He confesses Himself to be the Instructor: "I am the Lord thy God, who brought thee out of the land of Egypt. Who, then, has the power of leading in and out?
But our Instructor is the holy God Jesus, the Word who is the guide of all humanity. The God who loves humanity is himself our Instructor. Somewhere in the Song the Holy Spirit says of him: “He provided for the people in the wilderness, in thirst and burning heat, in a waterless land. He surrounded him, instructed him, and guarded him like the apple of his eye. Like an eagle he covered his nest and yearned over his young. He spread out his wings, received them, and took them up on his back. The Lord alone led them, and there was no foreign god with them.” I think Scripture clearly shows us the Instructor here, as it tells of his guidance. Again, when he speaks in his own person, he confesses himself to be the Instructor: “I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt.” Who, then, has the authority to lead in and out?
Is it not the Instructor? This was He who appeared to Abraham, and said to him, "I am thy God, be accepted before Me; " and in a way most befitting an instructor, forms him into a faithful child, saying, "And be blameless; and I will make My covenant between Me and thee, and try seed. There is the communication of the Instructor's friendship. And He most manifestly appears as Jacob's instructor. He says accordingly to him, "Lo, I am with thee, to keep thee in all the way in which thou shalt go; and I will bring thee back into this land: for I will not leave thee till I do what I have told thee. He is said, too, to have wrestled with Him. "And Jacob was left alone, and there wrestled with him a man (the Instructor) till the morning. This was the man who led, and brought, and wrestled with, and anointed the athlete Jacob against evil.
Is it not the Instructor? This is the one who “appeared to Abraham and said to him: I am your God; be pleasing before me.” In the manner of a true instructor he shapes Abraham into a faithful child, saying, “And be blameless, and I will set my covenant between me and you and your seed.” Here is a fellowship of friendship, with the Instructor presiding over it. He shows himself most plainly as Jacob’s Instructor. He says to him, “Behold, I am with you, guarding you in every way you go, and I will bring you back to this land, for I will not leave you until I have done all that I spoke to you.” He is also said to have wrestled with Jacob. “And Jacob was left alone,” it says, “and a man wrestled with him”—the Instructor—“until morning.” This was the man who led him and carried him, who trained with him and anointed the athlete Jacob for the contest against the evil one.
Now that the Word was at once Jacob's trainer and the Instructor of humanity [appears from this]-"He asked," it is said, "His name, and said to him, Tell me what is Try name. And he said, "Why is it that thou askest My name? "For He reserved the new name for the new people-the babe; and was as yet unnamed, the Lord God not having yet become man. Yet Jacob called the name of the place, "Face of God. "For I have seen," he says, "God face to face; and my life is preserved. The face of God is the Word by whom God is manifested and made known. Then also was he named Israel, because he saw God the Lord. It was God, the Word, the Instructor, who said to him again afterwards, "Fear not to go down into Egypt.
That the Word was both Jacob’s trainer and the Instructor of humanity is shown here: “He asked him,” it says, “and said to him, Tell me your name. And he said, Why do you ask my name?” For he was keeping the new name for the new people, the infant people. God the Lord was still unnamed, since he had not yet become man. Even so, “Jacob called the name of that place the Face of God. For I have seen God face to face,” he says, “and my soul was saved.” The face of God is the Word, by whom God is lit up and made known. Then too he was given the name Israel, when he saw God the Lord. This is God, the Word, the Instructor, who later said to him again, “Do not be afraid to go down into Egypt.”
See how the Instructor follows the righteous man, and how He anoints the athlete, teaching him to trip up his antagonist. It is He also who teaches Moses to act as instructor. For the Lord says, "If any one sin before Me, him will I blot out of My book; but now, go and lead this people into the place which I told thee. Here He is the teacher of the art of instruction. For it was really the Lord that was the instructor of the ancient people by Moses; but He is the instructor of the new people by Himself, face to face. "For behold," He says to Moses, "My angel shall go before thee," representing the evangelical and commanding power of the Word, but guarding the Lord's prerogative. "In the day on which I will visit them," He says, "I will bring their sins on them; that is, on the day on which I will sit as judge I will render the recompense of their sins. For the same who is Instructor is judge, and judges those who disobey Him; and the loving Word will not pass over their transgression in silence. He reproves, that they may repent. For "the Lord willeth the repentance of the sinner rather than his death. And let us as babes, hearing of the sins of others, keep from similar transgressions, through dread of the threatening, that we may not have to undergo like sufferings.
See how the Instructor follows the righteous man, and how he anoints the athlete, teaching him to trip up his opponent. This same Instructor also teaches Moses to be an instructor. For the Lord says, “If anyone has sinned before me, I will blot him out of my book. But now go and lead this people to the place I told you of.” Here he is the teacher of instruction. For in truth the Lord was the Instructor of the old people through Moses, but of the new people through himself, face to face. For he says to Moses, “Behold, my angel goes before you.” By this he sets over them the Word’s power as messenger and leader, while still guarding the Lord’s own dignity: “But on the day when I visit them,” he says, “I will bring their sin upon them.” That is, on the day when I sit as judge, I will pay them back what their sins deserve. For the same one is Instructor and judge, and he judges those who disobey him. Yet the Word, who loves humanity, does not stay silent about their sin. He reproves them so that they may repent, for “the Lord wants the repentance of the sinner rather than his death.” And let us, like infants who have only heard about the sins of others, hold back from the same offenses out of fear of the threat, so that we will not suffer the same things.
What, then, was the sin which they committed? "For in their wrath they slew men, and in their impetuosity they hamstrung bulls. Cursed be their anger. Who, then, would train us more lovingly than He? Formerly the older people had an old covenant, and the law disciplined the people with fear, and the Word was an angel; but to the fresh and new people has also been given a new covenant, and the Word has appeared, and fear is turned to love, and that mystic angel is born-Jesus. For this same Instructor said then, "Thou shalt fear the Lord God; " but to us He has addressed the exhortation, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God. Wherefore also this is enjoined on us: "Cease from your own works, from your old sins; ""Learn to do well; ""Depart from evil, and do good; ""Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity. This is my new covenant written in the old letter.
What, then, was the sin they committed? “For in their anger they killed men, and in their desire they hamstrung a bull. Cursed be their anger.” Who, then, could train us more lovingly than he does? Before this, the older people had an older covenant. The law trained the people with fear, and the Word was an angel. But to the new and young people a new covenant has been given. The Word has become flesh, fear has been turned into love, and that mystical angel, Jesus, is born. For this same Instructor said to them then, “You shall fear the Lord your God,” but to us he has urged, “You shall love the Lord your God.” This is why he also commands us, “Stop your works,” that is, your old sins; “learn to do good; turn away from evil and do good; you have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness.” This is my new covenant, engraved in the old letter.
The newness of the word must not, then, be made ground of reproach. But the Lord hath also said in Jeremiah: "Say not that I am a youth: before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee, and before I brought thee out of the womb I sanctified thee. Such allusions prophecy can make to us, destined in the eye of God to faith before the foundation of the world; but now babes, through the recent fulfilment of the will of God, according to which we are born now to calling and salvation. Wherefore also He adds, "I have set thee for a prophet to the nations," saying that he must prophesy, so that the appellation of "youth" should not become a reproach to those who are called babes. Now the law is ancient grace given through Moses by the Word. Wherefore also the Scripture says, "The law was given through Moses," not by Moses, but by the Word, and through Moses His servant. Wherefore it was only temporary; but eternal grace and truth were by Jesus Christ. Mark the expressions of Scripture: of the law only is it said "was given;
So the newness of the Word is nothing to be ashamed of. The Lord also says in Jeremiah: “Do not say, ‘I am too young.’ Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you came out of the womb I set you apart.” This prophecy can hint at us. God knew us for faith before the foundation of the world, yet we are babes now, because his will has only recently been fulfilled, and in that sense we have only just been born to our calling and salvation. That is why he goes on: “I have appointed you a prophet to the nations.” He is saying that Jeremiah must prophesy, and that the name “younger” should not seem a reproach to those who are called babes. The law is an older grace, given by the Word through Moses. That is why Scripture says, “The law was given through Moses.” It does not say by Moses, but by the Word, through Moses his servant. For this reason the law was only for a time. “But eternal grace and truth came through Jesus Christ.” Notice the wording of Scripture. Of the law it says only “was given.”
"but truth being the grace of the Father, is the eternal work of the Word; and it is not said to be given, but to be by Jesus, without whom nothing was. Presently, therefore, Moses prophetically, giving place to the perfect Instructor the Word, predicts both the name and the office of Instructor, and committing to the people the commands of obedience, sets before them the Instructor. "A prophet," says he, "like Me shall God raise up to you of your brethren," pointing out Jesus the Son of God, by an allusion to Jesus the son of Nun; for the name of Jesus predicted in the law was a shadow of Christ. He adds, therefore, consulting the advantage of the people, "Him shall ye hear; " and, "The man who will not hear that Prophet," him He threatens.
But “truth” is the grace of the Father and the eternal work of the Word. It is no longer said to be given, but to “come to be through Jesus,” “without whom not one thing came to be.” So Moses, prophetically yielding to the Word as the perfect Instructor, foretells both his name and his work as Instructor, and puts the Instructor before the people, entrusting to them commands of obedience. “God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your brothers,” he says. He means Jesus the son of Nun, but hints at Jesus the Son of God. For the name Jesus, announced in advance in the law, was a sketch in shadow of the Lord. He then adds, counseling what is good for the people: “You shall listen to him,” and, “The man who will not listen to this prophet,” he threatens.
Such a name, then, he predicts as that of the Instructor, who is the author of salvation. Wherefore prophecy invests Him with a rod, a rod of discipline, of rule, of authority; that those whom the persuasive word heals not, the threatening may heal; and whom the threatening heals not, the rod may heal; and whom the rod heals not, the fire may devour. "There shall come forth," it is said, "a rod out of the root of Jesse. See the care, and wisdom, and power of the Instructor: "He shall not judge according to opinion, nor according to report; but He shall dispense judgment to the humble, and reprove the sinners of the earth. And by David: "The Lord instructing, hath instructed me, and not given me over to death. For to be chastised of the Lord, and instructed, is deliverance from death. And by the same prophet He says: "Thou shalt rule them with a rod of iron. Thus also the apostle, in the Epistle to the Corinthians, being moved, says, "What will ye? Shall I come unto you with a rod, or in love, in the spirit of meekness? " Also, "The Lord shall send the rod of strength out of Sion," He says by another prophet. And this same rod of instruction, "Thy rod and staff have comforted me," said some one else. Such is the power of the Instructor-sacred, soothing, saving.
Such is the name that the prophecy foretells for our saving Instructor. That is why prophecy gives him a rod: a rod that trains, rules and holds authority. Those whom the obedient word does not heal, threatening will heal. Those whom threatening does not heal, the rod will heal. Those whom the rod does not heal, the fire will consume. “A rod will come out of the root of Jesse,” it says. See the care, the wisdom and the power of the Instructor: “He will not judge by reputation, nor reprove by talk, but he will judge the humble with justice and reprove the sinners of the earth.” And through David: “The Lord has trained me by discipline, and has not handed me over to death.” To be disciplined and instructed by the Lord is deliverance from death. The same prophet says: “You will shepherd them with an iron rod.” The apostle was moved by this when he wrote to the Corinthians: “What do you want? Shall I come to you with a rod, or in love and a spirit of gentleness?” Through another prophet he says, “The Lord will send out the rod of power from Zion.” And of this instructor’s rod, someone else said, “Your rod and your staff comforted me.” This is the power of the Instructor: dignified, comforting and saving.
Against Those Who Think that What is Just is Not Good.At this stage some rise up, saying that the Lord, by reason of the rod, and threatening, and fear, is not good; misapprehending, as appears, the Scripture which says, "And he that feareth the Lord will turn to his heart; " and most of all, oblivious of His love, in that for us He became man. For more suitably to Him, the prophet prays in these words: "Remember us, for we are dust; " that: is, Sympathize with us; for Thou knowest from personal experience of suffering the weakness of the flesh. In this respect, therefore, the Lord the Instructor is most good and unimpeachable, sympathizing as He does from the exceeding greatness of His love with the nature of each man. "For there is nothing which the Lord hates. For assuredly He does not hate anything, and yet wish that which He hates to exist Nor does He wish anything not to exist, and yet become the cause of existence to that which He wishes not to exist. Nor does He wish anything not to exist which yet exists.
Against Those Who Think that What Is Just Is Not Good. At this point some people spring up and say that the Lord is not good, because of the rod, the threatening and the fear. They have evidently misheard Scripture, which says somewhere, “He who fears the Lord turns back to his heart.” They have also forgotten the greatest proof of his love for humanity: that he became man for our sake. The prophet prays in words that fit him all the more: “Remember us, for we are dust.” That is, “Have sympathy with us, because you have felt the weakness of the flesh from your own experience.” In this way the Lord our Instructor is altogether excellent and beyond reproach, for in the abundance of his love he has sympathy with the nature of every human being. “For there was nothing that the Lord hates.” Surely he does not hate something and yet want what he hates to exist. Nor does he want something not to exist and yet cause the existence of what he wants not to exist. Nor, again, does he not want something to exist, and yet it exists.
If, then, the Word hates anything, He does not wish it to exist. But nothing exists, the cause of whose existence is not supplied by God. Nothing, then, is hated by God, nor yet by the Word. For both are one-that is, God. For He has said, "In the beginning the Word was in God, and the Word was God. If then He hates none of the things which He has made, it follows that He loves them. Much more than the rest, and with reason, will He love man, the noblest of all objects created by Him, and a God-loving being. Therefore God is loving; consequently the Word is loving. But he who loves anything wishes to do it good. And that which does good must be every way better than that which does not good. But nothing is better than the Good. The Good, then, does good. And God is admitted to be good. God therefore does good.
If, then, the Word hates anything, he wishes it not to exist. But there is nothing for whose existence God does not supply the cause. So nothing is hated by God, and nothing is hated by the Word either, for the two are one, God. John says, “In the beginning the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” If he hates nothing that he has made, it remains that he loves it. Much more than the rest, and with good reason, he will love man, the most beautiful of all the things he has made, a living creature who loves God. So God loves mankind, and therefore the Word loves mankind. Now whoever loves something wants to benefit it. What benefits is certainly better than what does not benefit, and nothing at all is better than the good. So the good benefits. God is acknowledged to be good, so God benefits.
And the Good, in virtue of its being good, does nothing else than do good. Consequently God does all good. And He does no good to man without caring for him, and He does not care for him without taking care of him. For that which does good purposely, is better than what does not good purposely. But nothing is better than God. And to do good purposely, is nothing else than to take care of man. God therefore cares for man, and takes care of him. And He shows this practically, in instructing him by the Word, who is the true coadjutor of God's love to man. But the good is not said to be good, on account of its being possessed of virtue; as also righteousness is not said to be good on account of its possessing virtue-for it is itself virtue.-but on account of its being in itself and by itself good.
The good, insofar as it is good, does nothing other than benefit. So God benefits all things. Surely he does not benefit man without also caring for him, nor care for him without also looking after him. For what benefits by deliberate choice is better than what does not benefit by deliberate choice, and nothing is better than God. To benefit by deliberate choice is nothing other than to look after. So God cares for man and looks after him. He shows this in action by instructing him through the Word, who is the genuine fellow-worker with God in his love for mankind. Now “good” is not said of righteousness because it possesses virtue. Righteousness is itself virtue. It is called good because it is good in itself and for its own sake.
In another way the useful is called good, not on account of its pleasing, but of its doing good. All which, therefore, is righteousness, being a good thing, both as virtue and as desirable for its own sake, and not as giving pleasure; for it does not judge in order to win favour, but dispenses to each according to his merits. And the beneficial follows the useful. Righteousness, therefore, has characteristics corresponding to all the aspects in which goodness is examined, both possessing equal properties equally. And things which are characterized by equal properties are equal and similar to each other. Righteousness is therefore a good thing. "How then," say they, "if the Lord loves man, and is good, is He angry and punishes? "We must therefore treat of this point with all possible brevity; for this mode of treatment is advantageous to the right training of the children, occupying the place of a necessary help.
The expedient is also called good in another sense, not because it gives pleasure but because it benefits. Righteousness is all of these. It is good as a virtue, as something to be chosen for its own sake, and as something that does not aim to please. It does not judge in order to win favor, but gives to each what he deserves. And what is beneficial goes with what is expedient. So righteousness is marked out by every aspect in which the good is examined, since the two share equally in the same qualities. Things marked by equal qualities are equal and alike. So righteousness is good. “How then,” they say, “if the Lord loves mankind and is good, does he get angry and punish?” We must deal with this too, as briefly as we can. This way of handling the question is useful for the right upbringing of children and serves as a needed aid.
For many of the passions are cured by punishment, and by the inculcation of the sterner precepts, as also by instruction in certain principles. For reproof is, as it were, the surgery of the passions of the soul; and the passions are, as it were, an abscess of the truth, which must be cut open by an incision of the lancet of reproof. Reproach is like the application of medicines, dissolving the callosities of the passions, and purging the impurities of the lewdness of the life; and in addition, reducing the excrescences of pride, restoring the patient to the healthy and true state of humanity. Admonition. is, as it were, the regimen of the diseased soul, prescribing what it must take, and forbidding what it must not. And all these tend to salvation and eternal health. Furthermore, the general of an army, by inflicting fines and corporeal punishments with chains and the extremest disgrace on offenders, and sometimes even by punishing individuals with death, aims at good, doing so for the admonition of the officers under him.
Many of the passions are healed by punishment, by the imposing of stricter commands, and also by teaching certain doctrines. Rebuke is like surgery on the passions of the soul. The passions are a kind of festering growth that breaks away from the truth, and they must be exposed by cutting them open. Reproach is like medicine. It dissolves the hardened callouses of the passions, cleanses the filth of the life, meaning its lusts, and smooths down the swellings of pride, restoring a person to health and truth. Admonition is like the diet of a sick soul. It advises what to take and forbids what not to take. All of this aims at salvation and everlasting health. A general also does this. He lays fines on wrongdoers and inflicts beatings that reach the body itself, with chains and the worst disgrace, and sometimes even punishes some with death. Yet his aim is good, for he is training the soldiers under his command.
Thus also He who is our great General, the Word, the Commander-in-chief of the universe by admonishing those who throw off the restraints of His law, that He may effect their release from the slavery, error, and captivity of the adversary, brings them peacefully to the sacred concord of citizenship. As, therefore in addition to persuasive discourse, there is the hortatory and the consolatory form; so also, in addition to the laudatory, there is the inculpatory and reproachful. And this latter constitutes the art of censure. Now censure is a mark of good-will, not of ill-will. For both he who is a friend and he who is not, reproach; but the enemy does so in scorn, the friend in kindness. It is not, then, from hatred that the Lord chides men; for He Himself suffered for us, whom He might have destroyed for our faults. For the Instructor also, in virtue of His being good, with consummate art glides into censure by rebuke; rousing the sluggishness of the mind by His sharp words as by a scourge. Again in turn He endeavours to exhort the same persons.
In the same way our great General, the Word, the Commander of all things, warns those who rebel against his law. He aims to free them from slavery, error, and captivity to the Adversary, and to restrain the passions of the soul. In this way he leads them peaceably into the holy harmony of the common life of his city. Alongside the counseling kind of speech there is the exhorting and encouraging form. In the same way, alongside the praising kind there is the abusive and reproachful form. This form is an art of blame, and blame is a sign of goodwill, not of hatred. Both a friend and a non-friend reproach, but the enemy does it to mock, while the friend does it out of goodwill. So the Lord does not revile people out of hatred. He could have destroyed them for their own faults, yet he even suffered for us. For like a good instructor, he skillfully slips into blame by way of rebuke. He uses abuse like a whip to rouse the dullness of the mind, and then in turn he tries to exhort the same people.
For those who are not induced by praise are spurred on by censure; and those whom censure calls not forth to salvation being as dead, are by denunciation roused to the truth. "For the stripes and correction of wisdom are in all time. "For teaching a fool is gluing a potsherd; and sharpening to sense a hopeless blockhead is bringing earth to sensation. Wherefore He adds plainly, "rousing the sleeper from deep sleep," which of all things else is likest death. Further, the Lord shows very clearly of HimSelf, when, describing figuratively His manifold and in many ways serviceable culture,-He says, "I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. Then He adds, "Every branch in me that beareth not fruit He taketh away; and every branch that beareth fruit He pruneth, that it may bring forth more fruit. For the vine that is not pruned grows to wood. So also man. The Word-the knife-clears away the wanton shoots; compelling the impulses of the soul to fructify, not to indulge in lust.
Those whom praise did not move to action, blame stirs up. Those whom blame did not call out to salvation, because they were like dead men, harsh words raise up to the truth. For “whips and discipline are wisdom at every time. He who glues a potsherd together is teaching a fool.” That is, he says, it is like bringing the earth to feeling, and sharpening a hopeless person to understanding. That is why he plainly added, “rousing a sleeper from deep sleep,” since sleep, more than anything else, resembles death. The Lord himself shows this very clearly about himself. He speaks in an allegory of his many-sided and richly beneficial care. He said, “I am the true vine, and my Father is the farmer.” Then he added, “Every branch in me that does not bear fruit he takes away, and every branch that bears fruit he cleans, so that it may bear more fruit.” A vine that is not pruned runs wild into wood, and so does a human being. The Word, like a knife, cuts away its unruly offshoots. He forces our appetites to bear fruit instead of lusting.
Now, reproof addressed to sinners has their salvation for its aim, the word being harmoniously adjusted to each one's conduct; now with tightened, now. with relaxed cords. Accordingly it was very plainly said by Moses," Be of good courage: God has drawn near to try you, that His fear may be among you, that ye sin not. And Plato, who had learned from this source, says beautifully: "For all who suffer punishment are in reality treated well, for they are benefited; since the spirit of those who are justly punished is improved. And if those who are corrected receive good at the hands of justice, and, according to Plato, what is just is acknowledged to be good, fear itself does good, and has been found to be for men's good. "For the soul that feareth the Lord shall live, for their hope is in Him who saveth them. And this same Word who inflicts punishment is judge; regarding whom Esaias also says, "The Lord has assigned Him to our sins," plainly as a corrector and reformer of sins.
The rebuke given to sinners aims at their salvation. The Word adjusts himself, as a musician would, to each person’s own character, sometimes tightening and sometimes loosening. Moses says this very plainly: “Take courage. God has come to test you, so that the fear of him may be in you, so that you do not sin.” Plato learned from this source and says well: “All who pay the penalty truly suffer good things. They are benefited, because their souls become better when they are justly punished.” If those who are set right by the just one suffer good, even according to Plato, then it is agreed that the just one is good. Fear itself is beneficial and was devised for people’s good, because “a spirit that fears the Lord will live, for its hope is in the one who saves it.” This same Word, who imposes the penalty, is the judge. Isaiah also speaks of him: “The Lord handed him over to our sins.” He means, plainly, as one who corrects and directs us away from our sins.
Wherefore He alone is able to forgive our iniquities, who has been appointed by the Father, Instructor of us all; He alone it is who is able to distinguish between disobedience and obedience. And while He threatens, He manifestly is unwilling to inflict evil to execute His threatenings; but by inspiring men with fear, He cuts off the approach to sin, and shows His love to man, still delaying, and declaring what they shall suffer if they continue sinners, and is not as a serpent, which the moment it fastens on its prey devours it. God, then, is good. And the Lord speaks many a time and oft before He proceeds to act. "For my arrows," He says, "will make an end of them; they shall be consumed with hunger, and be eaten by birds; and there shall be incurable tetanic incurvature. I will send the teeth of wild beasts upon them, with the rage of serpents creeping on the earth.
For this reason he alone is able to forgive our offenses. The Father of all appointed him as our Instructor, and he alone can tell disobedience from obedience. When someone threatens, it is clear that he does not want to do any harm or carry out what he threatens. By setting fear in place, he stopped the rush toward sin, and he shows his love for people. He still holds back and makes clear what they will suffer if they remain sinners. He does not, like a snake, fasten on and bite immediately. So God is good. The Lord often uses words before the deed. He says, “For my arrows will finish them off. They will waste away with hunger and be devoured by birds, and with an incurable spasm of the back. I will send the teeth of wild beasts against them, together with the fury of things that crawl on the ground.”
Without, the sword shall make them childless; and out of their chambers shall be fear. For the Divine Being is not angry in the way that some think; but often restrains, and always exhorts humanity, and shows what ought to be done. And this is a good device, to terrify lest we sin. "For the fear of the Lord drives away sins, and he that is without fear cannot be justified," says the Scripture. And God does not inflict punishment from wrath, but for the ends of justice; since it is not expedient that justice should be neglected on our account. Each one of us, who sins, with his own free-will chooses punishment, and the blame lies with him who chooses. God is without blame. "But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous, who taketh vengeance? God forbid. He says, therefore, threatening," I will sharpen my sword, and my hand shall lay hold on judgment; and I will render justice to mine enemies, and requite those who hate me. I will make mine arrows drunk with blood, and my sword shall devour flesh from the blood of the wounded. It is clear, then, that those who are not at enmity with the truth, and do not hate the Word, will not hate their own salvation, but will escape the punishment of enmity.
“Outside, the sword will leave them childless, and inside the storerooms, there will be fear.” So the divine nature is not angry, as some have supposed. Most of what God says is threat, but in everything he has been advising humanity and showing what must be done. This is a good art: to frighten us so that we do not sin. “For the fear of the Lord drives away sins, but the one who has no fear will not be able to be justified,” says the Scripture. God does not bring punishment out of anger. He looks to what is just, since it is not good for us that justice be set aside. Each of us chooses his own penalties by sinning willingly: “The blame belongs to the one who chooses; God is blameless.” “But if our unrighteousness establishes the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous to bring his wrath upon us? By no means.” So he says in his threat: “I will sharpen my sword, and my hand will take hold of judgment. I myself will repay vengeance to my enemies, and I will repay those who hate me. I will make my arrows drunk with blood, and my sword will eat flesh from the blood of the wounded.” It is plain here that those who are not enemies of the truth and do not hate the Word would never hate their own salvation, and so they would escape the penalties of that enmity.
"The crown of wisdom," then as the book of Wisdom says, "is the fear of the Lord. Very clearly, therefore, by the prophet Amos has the Lord unfolded His method of dealing, saying, "I have overthrown you, as God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah; and ye shall be as a brand plucked from the fire: and yet ye have not returned unto me, saith the Lord. See how God, through His love of goodness, seeks repentance; and by means of the plan He pursues of threatening silently, shows His own love for man. "I will avert," He says, "My face from them, and show what shall happen to them. For where the face of the Lord looks, there is peace and rejoicing; but where it is averted, there is the introduction of evil. The Lord, accordingly, does not wish to look on evil things; for He is good. But on His looking away, evil arises spontaneously through human unbelief.
“The crown of wisdom,” as Wisdom says, “is the fear of the Lord.” Very plainly, then, the Word has made known his own way of managing things through the prophet Amos, saying, “I overthrew you, as God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah, and you became like a brand snatched out of the fire, and even so you did not turn back to me, says the Lord.” See how God, out of his love of what is good, seeks repentance. By the very method of his threat he quietly shows his love for humanity. “I will turn my face away from them,” he says, “and I will show what will happen to them.” Where the face of the Lord looks, there is peace and rejoicing; where it is turned away, evil creeps in. So he does not wish to look upon evil things, for he is good. But when he willingly looks away, because of human unbelief, evil comes into being.
"Behold, therefore," says Paul, "the goodness and severity of God: on them that fell severity; but upon thee, goodness, if thou continue in His goodness," that is, in faith in Christ. Now hatred of evil attends the good man, in virtue of His being in nature good. Wherefore I will grant that He punishes the disobedient (for punishment is for the good and advantage of him who is punished, for it is the correction of a refractory subject); but I will not grant that He wishes to take vengeance. Revenge is retribution for evil, imposed for the advantage of him who takes the revenge. He will not desire us to take revenge, who teaches us "to pray for those that despitefully use us. But that God is good, all willingly admit; and that the same God is just, I require not many more words to prove, after adducing the evangelical utterance of the Lord; He speaks of Him as one, "That they all may be one; as Thou, Father, art in Me, and I in Thee, that they also may be one in Us: that the world also may believe that Thou hast sent Me. And the glory which Thou hast given Me I have given them; that they may be one, as We are one: I in them, and Thou in Me, that they may be made perfect in one.
“See then,” says Paul, “the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who fell, but kindness toward you, if you remain in that kindness,” that is, in faith in Christ. Hatred of evil follows upon the good, since he is good by nature. So I would agree that he punishes the unbelieving, for punishment is for the good and benefit of the one punished: it is the correction of one who resists. But I would not agree that he wants to take vengeance. Vengeance is the repayment of evil given for the benefit of the one who takes revenge. And he who teaches us to pray for those who abuse us would not desire to take vengeance. Everyone, even against their will, admits that God is good. That the same God is also just, I need no more words to show, once I set beside it the voice of the Lord in the Gospel. He speaks of God as one: “that they may all be one, just as you, Father, are in me and I in you, that they also may be one in us, so that the world may believe that you sent me.”
God is one, and beyond the one and above the Monad itself. Wherefore also the particle "Thou," having a demonstrative emphasis, points out God, who alone truly is, "who was, and is, and is to come," in which three divisions of time the one name (o0 w !n); "who is," has its place. And that He who alone is God is also alone and truly righteous, our Lord in the Gospel itself shall testify, saying "Father, I will that they also whom Thou hast given Me be with Me where I am; that they may behold My glory, which Thou hast given Me: For Thou lovedst Me before the foundation of the world.
“And the glory which you gave me I have given them, that they may be one as we are one: I in them and you in me, that they may be perfected into one.” God is one, and beyond the one, and above the very Monad. This is why the word “you,” which points directly at someone, shows the one who truly alone is, who was and is and will be, and for these three times there is one name: “the One who is.” That this same God, who alone is, is also just, the Lord will testify in the same Gospel, saying, “Father, I want those whom you have given me to be with me where I am, so that they may see my glory, which you gave me, because you loved me before the foundation of the world.”
O righteous Father, the world hath not known Thee: but I have known Thee, and these have known that Thou hast sent Me. And I have declared to them Thy name, and will declare it. This is He "that visits the iniquities of the fathers upon the children, to them that hate Him, and shows mercy to those that love Him. For He who placed some "on the right hand, and others on the left," conceived as Father, being good, is called that which alone He i"-"good; " but as He is the Son in the Father, being his Word, from their mutual relation, the name of power being measured by equality of love, He is called righteous. "He will judge," He says, "a man according to his works," -a good balance, even God having made known to us the face of righteousness in the person of Jesus, by whom also, as by even scales, we know God.
“Righteous Father, the world did not know you, but I knew you, and these knew that you sent me. I made your name known to them, and I will make it known.” This is the one “who repays the sins of fathers upon children for those who hate him, and shows mercy to those who love him.” He is the one who sets some on the right and others on the left. Insofar as he is thought of as Father, he is good, and he is called only what he is: good. Insofar as he is Son, his Word who is in the Father, he is called righteous. This comes from the loving relation of the two to each other, a name of power measured out by equality. Scripture says, “He will judge a man according to his works.” God has shown us Jesus as the face of a good balance, and through him we have come to know God, as from a scale whose two pans are equally weighted.
Of this also the book of Wisdom plainly says, "For mercy and wrath are with Him, for He alone is Lord of both," Lord of propitiations, and pouring forth wrath according to the abundance of His mercy. "So also is His reproof. For the aim of mercy and of reproof is the salvation of those who are reproved. Now, that the God and Father of our Lord Jesus is good, the Word Himself will again avouch: "For He is kind to the unthankful and the evil; "and further, when He says," Be merciful, as your Father is merciful. Still further also He plainly says, "None is good, but My Father, who is in heaven. In addition to these, again He says, "My Father makes His sun to shine on all. Here it is to be noted that He proclaims His Father to be good, and to be the Creator. And that the Creator is just, is not disputed:
Of this same God Wisdom also speaks plainly: “For mercy and wrath are with him.” He alone is Lord of both: “mighty in propitiations, pouring out wrath. As great as his mercy, so great is his reproof.” The aim of both mercy and reproof is the salvation of those who are reproved. Now the Word himself will again declare that the God and Father of our Lord Jesus is good: “for he is kind to the ungrateful and the wicked.” He also says, “Be compassionate, just as your Father is compassionate.” And he says plainly, “No one is good except my Father in the heavens.” On top of this he says again, “My Father makes his sun shine on all.” Notice here that he acknowledges his own Father to be both good and Creator. No one disputes that the Creator is just.
And again he says," My Father sends rain on the just, and on the unjust. In respect of His sending rain, He is the Creator of the waters, and of the clouds. And in respect of His doing so on all, He holds an even balance justly and rightly. And as being good, He does so on just and unjust alike. Very clearly, then, we conclude Him to be one and the same God, thus. For the Holy Spirit has sung, "I will look to the heavens, the works of Thy hands; " and, "He who created the heavens dwells in the heavens; "and, "Heaven is Thy throne. And the Lord says in His prayer, "Our Father, who art in heaven. And the heavens belong to Him, who created the world. It is indisputable, then, that the Lord is the Son of the Creator. And if, the Creator above all is confessed to be just, and the Lord to be the Son of the Creator; then the Lord is the Son of Him who is just.
And again he says, “My Father sends rain on the just and the unjust.” Insofar as he sends rain, he is the Creator of water and clouds. Insofar as he sends it on all, he holds the balance evenly and justly. Insofar as he is good, he does it for the just and the unjust alike. So we reason very plainly that God is one and the same, in this way. The Holy Spirit sang, “I will see the heavens, the works of your fingers,” and “The one who made the heavens dwells in the heavens,” and “Heaven is your throne.” The Lord says in his prayer, “Our Father in the heavens.” The heavens belong to the one who made the world. So it cannot be denied that the Lord is also the Son of the Creator. Everyone agrees that the Creator is just, and the Lord is the Son of the Creator. Therefore the Lord is the Son of the Just One.
Wherefore also Paul says, "But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested; " and again, that you may better conceive of God, "even the righteousness of God by the faith of Jesus Christ upon all that believe; for there is no difference. And, witnessing further to the truth, he adds after a little, "through the forbearance of God, in order to show that He is just, and that Jesus is the justifier of him who is of faith. And that he knows that what is just is good, appears by his saying, "So that the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good," using both names to denote the same power. But "no one is good," except His Father. It is this same Father of His, then who being one is manifested by many powers And this was the import of the utterance, "No man knew the Father," who was Himself everything before the coming of the Son. So that it is veritably clear that the God of all is only one good, just Creator, and the Son in the Father, to whom be glory for ever and ever, Amen.
This is why Paul says, “But now the righteousness of God has been revealed apart from law.” Again he says (so that you may understand it all the more as said of God), “the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe, for there is no distinction.” Then, bearing witness to the truth, he adds a little later, “in the forbearance of God, to show that he is righteous and that he justifies the one who is of faith in Jesus.” He also knows that what is righteous is good, for he says somewhere, “So the law is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.” He places both names under the same power. And Scripture also says, “No one is good except his Father.” So it is the same Father of his, who is one, who is made known by many powers. This is what was meant by “No one knew the Father”: he was everything before the Son came. So it is truly plain that the God of all is one alone: good, righteous, Creator, and Son in the Father. To him be glory for ever. Amen.
But it is not inconsistent with the saving Word, to administer rebuke dictated by solicitude. For this is the medicine of the divine love to man, by which the blush of modesty breaks forth, and shame at sin supervenes. For if one must censure, it is necessary also to rebuke; when it is the time to wound the apathetic soul not mortally, but salutarily, securing exemption from everlasting death by a little pain. Great is the wisdom displayed in His instruction, and manifold the modes of His dealing in order to salvation. For the Instructor testifies to the good, and summons forth to better things those that are called; dissuades those that are hastening to do wrong from the attempt, and exhorts them to turn to a better life. For the one is not without testimony, when the other has been testified to; and the grace which proceeds from the testimony is very great. Besides, the feeling of anger (if it is proper to call His admonition anger) is full of love to man, God condescending to emotion on man's account; for whose sake also the Word of God became man.
It is not foreign to the saving Word to rebuke out of loving care. This too is a medicine of God’s love for humanity. It brings out the blush of modesty and slips in a shame at sinning. If censure is needed, then rebuke is needed too, when the time has come to wound a soul that has grown numb. The wound is not deadly but saving, for by a little pain the soul gains escape from eternal death. There is great wisdom in his training, and the manner of his dealing is varied, all aimed at our salvation. The Instructor bears witness to the good. He calls those who are called to better things. He turns back from their course those who are hurrying to do wrong, and he urges them to change to a better life. Neither side is left without witness, since the one is witnessed to alongside the other, and the grace that comes from such witness is very great. Even the passion of anger, if his admonition should be called anger, shows love for humanity. For God comes down to feelings for the sake of man, and for man’s sake the Word of God became man.
That It is the Prerogative of the Same Power to Be Beneficent and to Punish Justly. Also the Manner of the Instruction of the Logos.With all His power, therefore, the Instructor of humanity, the Divine Word, using all the resources of wisdom, devotes Himself to the saving of the children, admonishing, upbraiding, blaming, chiding, reproving, threatening, healing, promising, favouring; and as it were, by many reins, curbing the irrational impulses of humanity. To speak briefly, therefore, the Lord acts towards us as we do towards our children. "Hast thou children? correct them," is the exhortation of the book of Wisdom, "and bend them from their youth. Hast thou daughters? attend to their body, and let not thy face brighten towards them," -although we love our children exceedingly, both sons and daughters, above aught else whatever.
That it belongs to the same power both to do good and to punish justly, and what the manner of the Word’s training is. With all his strength, then, the Instructor of humanity, our divine Word, makes use of every device of wisdom and sets himself to save the little children. He admonishes, scolds, rebukes, reproves, threatens, heals, promises, and gives gifts. As with “many reins,” so to speak, he “binds” the irrational impulses of humanity. To put it briefly, the Lord is toward us as we are toward our own children. “Do you have children? Train them,” Wisdom advises, “and bend them from their youth. Do you have daughters? Take care for their bodies, and do not show them a cheerful face.” Yet we love our children, sons and daughters, very much, above anything whatever.
For those who speak with a man merely to please him, have little love for him, seeing they do not pain him; while those that speak for his good, though they inflict pain for the time, do him good for ever after. It is not immediate pleasure, but future enjoyment, that the Lord has in view. Let us now proceed to consider the mode of His loving discipline, with the aid of the prophetic testimony. Admonition, then, is the censure of loving care, and produces understanding. Such is the Instructor in His admonitions, as when He says in the Gospel, "How often would I have gathered thy children, as a bird gathers her young ones under her wings, and ye would not! And again, the Scripture admonishes, saying, "And they committed adultery with stock and stone, and burnt incense to Baal. For it is a very great proof of His love, that, though knowing well the shamelessness of the people that had kicked and bounded away, He notwithstanding exhorts them to repentance, and says by Ezekiel, "Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of scorpions; nevertheless, speak to them, if peradventure they will hear. Further, to Moses He says, "Go and tell Pharaoh to send My people forth; but I know that he will not send them forth.
People who speak to us only to please us have little love for us, since they do not grieve us. But those who speak sharply for our benefit may cause pain at the moment, yet they do us good for the age to come. So the Lord looked not to pleasure of the moment but to the delight that is coming. Let us now go through the manner of his loving training, with the witness of the prophets. Admonition, then, is loving censure that produces understanding. Such is the Instructor when he admonishes, as when he says in the Gospel, “How often I wanted to gather your children, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were not willing!” Scripture likewise admonishes when it says, “And they committed adultery with wood and stone, and burned incense to Baal.” It is the greatest proof of his love for humanity that, though he knew clearly the shamelessness of the people who had kicked against him and bolted away, he still calls them to repentance. He says through Ezekiel, “Son of man, you live in the midst of scorpions; nevertheless, speak to them, in case they will listen.” And to Moses he says, “Go and tell Pharaoh to send the people away, but I know that he will not send them away.”
For He shows both things: both His divinity in His foreknowledge of what would take place, and His love in affording an opportunity for repentance to the self-determination of the soul. He admonishes also by Esaias, in His care for the people, when He says, "This people honour Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me. What follows is reproving censure: "In vain do they worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. Here His loving care, having shown their sin, shows salvation side by side. Upbraiding is censure on account of what is base, conciliating to what is noble. This is shown by Jeremiah: "They were female-mad horses; each one neighed after his neighbour's wife. Shall I not visit for these things? saith the Lord: shall not my soul be avenged on such a nation as this? " He everywhere interweaves fear, because "the fear of the Lord is the beginning of sense.
For in this he shows both things: his divine foreknowledge of what would happen, and his love for humanity, in giving the soul’s free will occasions for repentance. He also admonishes through Isaiah, out of care for the people, when he says, “This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.” This is reproving censure. Then: “They worship me in vain, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.” Here his loving care, having made the sin plain, shows salvation alongside it. Rebuke is censure for shameful things that draws people close to what is good. He shows this through Jeremiah: “They became horses mad for females; each one neighed after his neighbor’s wife. Shall I not visit them for these things? says the Lord. Or on such a people shall my soul not take vengeance?” Everywhere he weaves fear in, because “the fear of the Lord is the beginning of perception.”
And again, by Hosea, He says, "Shall I not visit them? for they themselves were mingled with harlots, and sacrificed with the initiated; and the people that understood embraced a harlot. He shows their offence to be clearer, by declaring that they understood, and thus sinned wilfully. Understanding is the eye of the soul; wherefore also Israel means, "he that sees God"-that is, he that understands God. Complaint is censure of those who are regarded as despising or neglecting. He employs this form when He says by Esaias: "Hear, O heaven; and give ear, O earth: for the Lord hath spoken, I have begotten and brought up children, but they have disregarded Me. The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master's crib: but Israel hath not known Me. For how shall we not regard it fearful, if he that knows God, shall not recognise the Lord; but while the ox and the ass, stupid and foolish animals, will know him who feeds them, Israel is found to be more irrational than these?
And again, through Hosea, he says, “I will not visit them, because they themselves were mixed up with prostitutes and sacrificed with those who were initiated into the mysteries, and the people who understood were entangled with a prostitute.” He makes their sin plainer by declaring that they understood, so that they sinned willingly. Understanding is the eye of the soul. This is why Israel, “the one who sees God,” means the one who understands God. Complaint is blame directed at people who are thought to be despising or neglecting someone. The Instructor uses this method of training through Isaiah, saying: “Hear, O heaven, and give ear, O earth, for the Lord has spoken: I have begotten sons and raised them high, but they have rejected me. The ox knows its owner, and the donkey the manger of its lord, but Israel has not known me.” How terrible it is if the one who knows God will not know the Lord! The ox and the donkey, dull and foolish animals, will know the one who feeds them, but Israel will be found even less reasonable than these.
And having, by Jeremiah, complained against the people on many grounds, He adds: "And they have forsaken Me, saith the Lord. Invective is a reproachful upbraiding, or chiding censure. This mode of treatment the Instructor employs in Isaiah, when He says, "Woe to you, children revolters. Thus saith the Lord, Ye have taken counsel, but not by Me; and made compacts, but not by My Spirit. He uses the very bitter mordant of fear in each case repressing the people, and at the same time turning them to salvation; as also wool that is undergoing the process of dyeing is wont to be previously treated with mordants, in order to prepare it for taking on a fast colour. Reproof is the bringing forward of sin, laying it before one. This form of instruction He employs as in the highest degree necessary, by reason of the feebleness of the faith of many. For He says by Esaias, "Ye have forsaken the Lord, and have provoked the Holy One of Israel to anger. And He says also by Jeremiah: "Heaven was astonished at this, and the earth shuddered exceedingly. For My people have committed two evils; they have forsaken Me, the fountain of living waters, and have hewn out to themselves broken cisterns, which will not be able to hold water. And again, by the same: "Jerusalem hath sinned a sin; therefore it became commotion. All that glorified her dishonoured her, when they saw her baseness. And He uses the bitter and biting language of reproof in His consolations by Solomon, tacitly alluding to the love for children that characterizes His instruction: "My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord; nor faint when thou art rebuked of Him: for whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth; " "For a man who is a sinner escapes reproof.
Through Jeremiah, after complaining against the people on many counts, he adds: “And they have forsaken me, says the Lord.” Rebuke is a stinging reproof, or blame that strikes hard. The Instructor uses this remedy too, through Isaiah, saying: “Woe to you, rebellious children. Thus says the Lord: you made a plan, but not through me, and agreements, but not through my Spirit.” In each case he applies fear like a very sharp astringent. It opens their mouths and, at the same moment, turns the people through it toward salvation. In the same way, wool that is to be dyed is usually treated first with a mordant, to prepare it to take the dye firmly. Reproof is bringing a sin out into the open. He uses this method most of all, as necessary because the faith of many is slack. For he says through Isaiah, “You have forsaken the Lord and provoked the Holy One of Israel to anger.” And he says through Jeremiah: “The heaven was astonished at this, and the earth shuddered all the more. For this people has done two evil things: they have forsaken me, the spring of living water, and they have dug broken cisterns for themselves that cannot hold water.” And again through the same prophet: “Jerusalem has sinned a sin; therefore she has become an object of tossing and shaking. All who glorified her have dishonored her, because they have seen her shame.” He softens the severity of the reproof and the rebuke through Solomon, hinting by what he leaves unsaid at the fatherly love in his training: “My son, do not despise the discipline of the Lord, and do not lose heart when you are reproved by him. For the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and scourges every son whom he receives.” For “a sinful man turns away from reproof.”
Consequently, therefore, the Scripture says, "Let the righteous reprove and correct me; but let not the oil of the sinner anoint my head. Bringing one to his senses (fre/nwsij) is censure, which makes a man think. Neither from this form of instruction does he abstain, but says by Jeremiah, "How long shall I cry, and you not hear? So your ears are uncircumcised. O blessed forbearance! And again, by the same: "All the heathen are uncircumcised, but this people is uncircumcised in heart: " "for the people are disobedient; children," says He, "in whom is not faith. Visitation is severe rebuke. He uses this species in the Gospel: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, that killest the prophets, and stonest them that are sent unto thee! The reduplication of the name gives strength to the rebuke. For he that knows God, how does he persecute God's servants?
Accordingly, Scripture says, “Let the righteous man reprove me and discipline me, but let the oil of the sinner not anoint my head.” Calling to one’s senses is blame that puts sense into a person. He does not hold back from this method of training either, but says through Jeremiah: “How long shall I cry out and they will not listen? Look, their ears are uncircumcised.” What blessed patience! And again through the same prophet: “All the nations are uncircumcised, but this people is uncircumcised in heart.” And, “The people are disobedient, sons,” he says, “who have no faith.” Visitation is a sharp rebuke. He uses this kind in the Gospel: “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those who are sent to you.” The doubling of the name makes the rebuke strong. For how can one who knows God persecute God’s servants?
Wherefore He says, "Your house is left desolate; for I say unto you, Henceforth ye shall not see Me, till ye shall say, Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord. For if you do not receive His love, ye shall know His power. Denunciation is vehement speech. And He employs denunciation as medicine, by Isaiah, saying, "Ah, sinful nation, lawless sons, people full of sins, wicked seed! And in the Gospel by John He says, "Serpents, brood of vipers. Accusation is censure of wrong-doers. This mode of instruction He employs by David, when He says: "The people whom I knew not served me, and at the hearing of the ear obeyed me. Sons of strangers lied to me, and halted from their ways. And by Jeremiah: "And I gave her a writing of divorcement, and covenant-breaking Judah feared not. And again: "And the house of Israel disregarded Me; and the house of Judah lied to the Lord. Bewailing one's fate is latent censure, and by artful aid ministers salvation as under a veil.
This is why he says: “Your house is left to you desolate. For I tell you, from now on you will not see me until you say, ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.’” For if you do not accept his kindness, you will come to know his power. Abuse is intensified blame. He uses abuse as a kind of medicine, through Isaiah, saying, “Woe to a sinful nation, lawless sons, a people full of sins, an evil seed.” In the Gospel, through John, he says, “Serpents, brood of vipers.” Accusation is blame of those who do wrong. He uses this training method through David, saying: “A people whom I did not know served me, and at the hearing of the ear obeyed me. Foreign sons lied to me and limped away from their paths.” And through Jeremiah: “And I gave her a certificate of divorce, and treacherous Judah was not afraid.” And again: “The house of Israel acted faithlessly against me, and the house of Judah lied to the Lord.” Complaining of one’s lot is hidden blame. It too arranges salvation by skillful help, under a covering.
He made use of this by Jeremiah: "How did the city sit solitary that was full of people! She that ruled over territories became as a widow; she came under tribute; weeping, she wept in the night. Objurgation is objurgatory censure. Of this help the Divine Instructor made use by Jeremiah, saying, "Thou hadst a whore's forehead; thou wast shameless towards all; and didst not call me to the house, who am thy father, and lord of thy virginity. "And a fair and graceful harlot skilled in enchanted potions. With consummate art, after applying to the virgin the opprobrious name of whoredom, He thereupon calls her back to an honourable life by filling her with shame. Indignation is a rightful upbraiding; or upbraiding on account of ways exalted above what is right. In this way He instructed by Moses, when He said, "Faulty children, a generation crooked and perverse, do ye thus requite the Lord?
He uses this kind of speech through Jeremiah: “How does the city sit alone, she who was full of people? She has become like a widow. She who ruled over the regions has become subject to tribute. Weeping, she has wept in the night.” Mockery is censure that holds a person up to ridicule. The divine Instructor used this remedy too, through Jeremiah, saying: “You have the face of a prostitute; you have become shameless toward everyone. Did you not call me your house, your father, and the guide of your virginity?” And again: “a beautiful and charming prostitute, mistress of drugs.” With great skill he insults the virgin with the name of prostitution, and then, by shaming her, calls her back to modesty. Indignation is lawful rebuke, or rebuke of those who are exalted in their ways beyond what is fitting. In this way he trained them through Moses, speaking of “blameworthy children, a crooked and perverse generation: is this how you repay the Lord?
This people is foolish, and not wise. Is not this thy father who acquired thee? " He says also by Isaiah, "Thy princes are disobedient, companions of thieves, loving gifts, following after rewards, not judging the orphans. In fine, the system He pursues to inspire fear is the source of salvation. And it is the prerogative of goodness to save: "The mercy of the Lord is on all flesh, while He reproves, corrects, and teaches as a shepherd His flock. He pities those who receive His instruction, and those who eagerly seek union with Him. And with such guidance He guarded the six hundred thousand footmen that were brought together in the hardness of heart in which they were found; scourging, pitying, striking, healing, in compassion and discipline: "For according to the greatness of His mercy, so is His rebuke. For it is indeed noble not to sin; but it is good also for the sinner to repent; just as it is best to be always in good health, but well to recover from disease.
“This is a foolish people, not a wise one. Is not he himself your father, who acquired you?” He says also through Isaiah: “Your rulers are disobedient, partners of thieves, lovers of bribes, chasers after payment; they do not give justice to orphans.” In general, then, his skilful handling of people through fear is a fountain of salvation, and saving is the work of a good being: “The mercy of the Lord is upon all flesh, as he reproves, disciplines and teaches, like a shepherd with his flock. He has mercy on those who accept discipline and on those who earnestly seek to cling to him.” By this same training, “he kept safe the six hundred thousand foot soldiers who had been gathered together in their hardness of heart, by scourging and pitying, striking and healing, in compassion and discipline.” “For as great as his mercy is, so great is his reproof.” It is good not to sin, but it is also good for the sinner to repent. In the same way, the best thing is to be always healthy, but it is also good to recover from illness.
So He commands by Solomon: "Strike thou thy son with the rod, that thou mayest deliver his soul from death. And again: "Abstain not from chastising thy son, but correct him with the rod; for he will not die. For reproof and rebuke, as also the original term implies, are the stripes of the soul, chastizing sins, preventing death, and leading to self-control those carried away to licentiousness. Thus also Plato, knowing reproof to be the greatest power for reformation, and the most sovereign purification, in accordance with what has been said, observes, "that he who is in the highest degree impure is uninstructed and base, by reason of his being unreproved in those respects in which he who is destined to be truly happy ought to be purest and best. For if rulers are not a terror to a good work, how shall God, who is by nature good, be a terror to him who sins not?
For this reason Solomon too gives the command: “Strike your son with the rod, and rescue his soul from death.” And again: “Do not hold back from disciplining a child. Correct him with the rod, for he will not die.” Reproof and rebuke, as the very word hints, are blows to the soul. They bring sins to their senses, keep death away, and lead to self-control those who are being swept along into licentiousness. In the same way Plato knew that reproof is the greatest power for setting people right and the most authoritative purification. Following this line of argument, he holds that the man who is most deeply impure is uneducated and ugly because he has never been reproved, whereas the man who is truly to be happy ought to be as pure and as beautiful as possible. For if “rulers are no terror to good work,” how could God, who is good by nature, be a terror to the one who does not sin?
"If thou doest evil, be afraid," says the apostle. Wherefore the apostle himself also in every case uses stringent language to the Churches, after the Lord's example; and conscious of his own boldness, and of the weakness of his hearers, he says to the Galatians: "Am I your enemy, because I tell you the truth? " Thus also people in health do not require a physician, do not require him as long as they are strong; but those who are ill need his skill. Thus also we who in our lives are ill of shameful lusts and reprehensible excesses, and other inflammatory effects of the passions, need the Saviour. And He administers not only mild, but also stringent medicines. The bitter roots of fear then arrest the eating sores of our sins. Wherefore also fear is salutary, if bitter.
“But if you do evil, be afraid,” as the apostle says. That is why the apostle himself, after the Lord’s likeness, tightened the reins on the churches on every occasion. Aware of his own boldness and of the weakness of his hearers, he says to the Galatians: “Have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?” Those who are healthy do not need a doctor, because they are strong, but the sick need his skill. In the same way we, who are sick in our way of life, with shameful desires, blameworthy lack of self-control and the other inflammations of the passions, need the Saviour. He applies not only soothing medicines but also astringent ones. The bitter roots of fear halt the spread of sins, which feed like a creeping sore. So fear is saving, even if it is bitter.
Sick, we truly stand in need of the Saviour; having wandered, of one to guide us; blind, of one to lead us to the light; thirsty, "of the fountain of life, of which whosoever partakes, shall no longer thirst; " dead, we need life; sheep, we need a shepherd; we who are children need a tutor, while universal humanity stands in need of Jesus; so that we may not continue intractable and sinners to the end, and thus fall into condemnation, but may be separated from the chaff, and stored up in the paternal garner. "For the fan is in the Lord's hand, by which the chaff due to the fire is separated from the wheat. You may learn, if you will, the crowning wisdom of the all-holy Shepherd and Instructor, of the omnipotent and paternal Word, when He figuratively represents Himself as the Shepherd of the sheep. And He is the Tutor of the children.
It is right, then, that we who are sick need a saviour; that we who have gone astray need someone to guide us; that the blind need someone to lead them to the light; and that the thirsty need the fountain of life, from which those who drink will never thirst again. The dead need life, the sheep need the shepherd, and children need the instructor. Indeed all humanity needs Jesus, so that we do not fall into final condemnation as undisciplined sinners, but are sifted out from the chaff and heaped up in the Father’s storehouse. For the winnowing fork is in the Lord’s hand, and with it the chaff, which is due to the fire, is separated from the wheat. And if you wish, we may learn the highest wisdom of the all-holy Shepherd and Instructor, the almighty Word of the Father, in the place where he speaks in figure and calls himself the shepherd of the sheep. He is also the instructor of little children.
He says therefore by Ezekiel, directing His discourse to the elders, and setting before them a salutary description of His wise solicitude: "And that which is lame I will bind up, and that which is sick I will heal, and that which has wandered I will turn back; and I will feed them on my holy mountain. Such are the promises of the good Shepherd. Feed us, the children, as sheep. Yea, Master, fill us with righteousness, Thine own pasture; yea, O Instructor, feed us on Thy holy mountain the Church, which towers aloft, which is above the clouds, which touches heaven. "And I will be," He says, "their Shepherd," and will be near them, as the garment to their skin. He wishes to save my flesh by enveloping it in the robe of immortality, and He hath anointed my body. "They shall call Me," He says, "and I will say, Here am I. Thou didst hear sooner than I expected, Master. "And if they pass over, they shall not slip," saith the Lord. For we who are passing over to immortality shall not fall into corruption, for He shall sustain us. For so He has said, and so He has willed.
He says, then, through Ezekiel, addressing the elders and setting before them a saving pattern of wise care: “I will bind up the lame, and heal the one who is troubled, and bring back the one who has wandered, and I myself will feed them on my holy mountain.” These are the promises of a good shepherd. Feed us, who are children, like sheep. Yes, Master, fill us with your pasture, which is righteousness. Yes, Instructor, shepherd us to your holy mountain, to the Church, which is lifted high, which is above the clouds, which touches the heavens. “And I will be their shepherd,” he says, “and I will be near them,” as close as a tunic to their skin. He wants to save my flesh, clothing it in the tunic of incorruption, and he has anointed my skin. “They will call me,” he says, “and I will say, ‘Here I am.’” You answered sooner than I expected, Master. “And if they pass over, they will not slip, says the Lord.” For we who are passing over into incorruption will not fall into corruption, because he himself will hold on to us. For he himself has spoken, and he himself has willed it.
Such is our Instructor, righteously good. "I came not," He says, "to be ministered unto, but to minister. Wherefore He is introduced in the Gospel "wearied," because toiling for us, and promising "to give His life a ransom for many. For him alone who does so He owns to be the good shepherd. Generous, therefore, is He who gives for us the greatest of all gifts, His own life; and beneficent exceedingly, and loving to men, in that, when He might have been Lord, He wished to be a brother man; and so good was He that He died for us. Further, His righteousness cried, "If ye come straight to me, I also will come straight to you but if ye walk crooked, I also will walk crooked saith the Lord of hosts; " meaning by the crooked ways the chastisements of sinners. For the straight and natural way which is indicated by the <i>iota of the name of Jesus is His goodness, which is firm and sure towards those who have believed at hearing:
Such is our Instructor, and he is rightly called good. “I did not come,” he says, “to be served, but to serve.” For this reason he is shown in the Gospel as weary, because he toils for us, and he promises “to give his life as a ransom in place of many.” For this is the only one he acknowledges to be a good shepherd. He is generous, then, who gives the greatest gift for us, his own life. He is greatly beneficial and loving toward humanity, because, though he could have been Lord, he chose to be a brother of human beings. He is so good that he even died on our behalf. His righteousness also cries out: “If you come to me straight, I also will be straight toward you; if you walk crookedly, I also will be crooked, says the Lord of hosts.” By the crooked ways he hints at the rebukes given to sinners. For the straight way, the natural one, which the iota of “Jesus” hints at, is his goodness, which is unmoved and unwavering toward those who have believed through obedience.
"When I called, ye obeyed not, saith the Lord; but set at nought my counsels, and heeded not my reproofs. Thus the Lord's reproof is most beneficial. David also says of them, "A perverse and provoking race; a race which set not their heart aright, and whose spirit was not faithful with God: they kept not the covenant of God, and would not walk in His law. Such are the causes of provocation for which the Judge comes to inflict punishment on those that would not choose a life of goodness. Wherefore also afterwards He assailed them more roughly; in order, if possible, to drag them back from their impetuous rush towards death. He therefore tells by David the most manifest cause of the threatening: "They believed not in His wonderful works. When He slew them, they sought after Him, and turned and inquired early after God; and remembered that God was their Helper, and God the Most High their Redeemer. Thus He knew that they turned for fear, while they despised His love:
“Since I called and you did not obey, says the Lord, but made my counsels void and paid no attention to my reproofs.” In this way the Lord’s reproof is most beneficial. Concerning these people he also says through David: “A crooked and embittering generation, a generation that did not set its heart straight, and whose spirit was not faithful toward God. They did not keep God’s covenant, and they were unwilling to walk in his law.” These are the causes of the embitterment, and for them the Judge comes to bring judgment on those who were unwilling to choose a good life. For this reason he dealt with them more harshly from that point on, to see whether he could hold them back from their rush toward death. Through David he gives the very clear reason for his threat: “They did not believe in his wonders. When he killed them, they sought him, and turned back, and rose early to seek God, and remembered that God is their helper and God the Most High is their redeemer.” In this way he knows that they turn back through fear, but have despised his kindness.
for, for the most part, that goodness which is always mild is despised; but He who admonishes by the loving fear of righteousness is reverenced. There is a twofold species of fear, the one of which is accompanied with reverence, such as citizens show towards good rulers, and we towards God, as also right-minded children towards their fathers. "For an unbroken horse turns out unmanageable, and a son who is let take his own way turns out reckless. The other species of fear is accompanied with hatred, which slaves feel towards hard masters, and the Hebrews felt, who made God a master, not a father. And as far as piety is concerned, that which is voluntary and spontaneous differs much, nay entirely, from what is forced. "For He," it iS said, "is merciful; He will heal their sins, and not destroy them, and fully turn away His anger, and not kindle all His wrath. See how the justice of the Instructor, which deals in rebukes, is shown; and the goodness of God, which deals in compassions.
For goodness that is always gentle is generally neglected, but it is respected when it reminds us through the humane fear that comes from righteousness. The kind of fear is twofold. One kind comes with reverence, which citizens show toward good rulers, and we toward God, as well-behaved children do toward their fathers: “For an untamed horse,” it says, “turns out stubborn, and a son left unrestrained turns out reckless.” The other kind of fear comes with hatred, which slaves feel toward harsh masters, and which the Hebrews felt when they made God their master instead of their father. In matters of godliness, I think, what is willing and chosen differs greatly, indeed completely, from what is forced. “For he himself is compassionate,” it says, “he will heal their sins and not destroy them; and he will multiply his turning away of his anger, and will not kindle all his wrath.” See how the Instructor’s justice is shown in his corrections, and God’s goodness in his acts of compassion.
Wherefore David-that is, the Spirit by him-embracing them both, sings of God Himself, "Justice and judgment are the preparation of His throne: mercy and truth shall go before Thy face. He declares that it belongs to the same power both to judge and to do good. For there is power over both together, and judgment separates that which is just from its opposite. And He who is truly God is just and good; who is Himself all, and all is He; for He is God, the only God. For as the mirror is not evil to an ugly man because it shows him what like he is; and as the physician is not evil to the sick man because he tells him of his fever,-for the physician is not the cause of the fever, but only points out the fever;-so neither is He, that reproves, ill-disposed towards him who is diseased in soul. For He does not put the transgressions on him, but only shows the sins which are there; in order to turn him away from similar practices.
For this reason David, that is, the Spirit speaking through him, takes in both together and sings of the one God: “Righteousness and judgment are the preparation of your throne; mercy and truth will go before your face.” He acknowledges that it belongs to the same power both to judge and to do good. For authority over both belongs together, and the judgment of the just one distinguishes between opposites. The same God is just and good. He is truly God, who is himself all things, and all things are the same to him, because he is God, the only God. A mirror is not bad to an ugly person because it shows him what he looks like. A physician is not bad to a sick person because he reports the fever. The physician is not the cause of the fever; he only exposes it. In the same way, the one who reproves is not ill-disposed toward the person who is sick in soul. He does not put the faults into him. He shows the sins that are already there, so that the person may turn away from similar practices.
So God is good on His own account, and just also on ours, and He is just because He is good. And His justice is shown to us by His own Word from there from above, whence the Father was. For before He became Creator He was God; He was good. And therefore He wished to be Creator and Father. And the nature of all that love was the source of righteousness-the cause, too, of His lighting up His sun, and sending down His own Son. And He first announced the good righteousness that is from heaven, when He said, "No man knoweth the Son, but the Father; nor the Father, but the Son. This mutual and reciprocal knowledge is the symbol of primeval justice. Then justice came down to men both in the letter and in the body, in the Word and in the law, constraining humanity to saving repentance; for it was good. But do you not obey God? Then blame yourself, who drag to yourself the judge.
So God is good for his own sake, and just for our sake, and he is just because he is good. His justice is shown to us through his own Word, from above, from the place where he became Father. For before he became Creator he was God, and he was good. For that reason he also wished to be Creator and Father. The disposition of that love became the beginning of justice. It is the reason he makes his own sun shine and sends down his own Son. And this Son was the first to announce the good righteousness that comes from heaven, when he said, “No one knew the Son except the Father,” and “no one knew the Father except the Son.” This knowledge, balanced equally on both sides, is the sign of an ancient, impartial justice. Then justice came down to human beings, in letter and in body, that is, in the Word and in the law. It pressed humanity toward saving repentance, for it was good. But you do not obey God? Then blame yourself, for you are drawing the judge down on you.
That the Same God, by the Same Word, Restrains from Sin by Threatening, and Saves Humanity by Exhorting.If, then, we have shown that the plan of dealing stringently with humanity is good and salutary, and necessarily adopted by the Word, and conducive to repentance and the prevention of sins; we shall have now to look in order at the mildness of the Word. For He has been demonstrated to be just. He sets before us His own inclinations which invite to salvation; by which, in accordance with the Father's will, He wishes to make known to us the good and the useful. Consider these. The good (to\ kalo/n) belongs to the panegyrical form of speech, the useful to the persuasive. For the hortatory and the dehortatory are a form of the persuasive, and the laudatory and inculpatory of the panegyrical.
That the same God, by the same Word, both restrains from sins by threatening and saves humanity by exhorting. We have shown that the plan of dealing sharply with humanity is good and saving. We have shown that the Word necessarily adopts it, and that it is well suited to bring repentance and to prevent sins. Next we should look at the gentleness of the Word. For he has been shown to be just, and he sets before us his own counsels, which call us to salvation. Through them, by his Father’s will, he wants to make known to us what is noble and what is beneficial. Consider this: the noble belongs to the style of praise, and the beneficial to the style of advice. Exhortation and dissuasion belong to the style of advice. Commendation and censure belong to the style of praise.
For the persuasive style of sentence in one form becomes hortatory, and in another dehortatory. So also the panegyrical in one form becomes inculpatory, and in another laudatory. And in these exercises the Instructor, the Just One, who has proposed our advantage as His aim, is chiefly occupied. But the inculpatory and dehortatory forms of speech have been already shown us; and we must now handle the persuasive and the laudatory, and, as on a beam, balance the equal scales of justice. The exhortation to what is useful, the Instructor employs by Solomon, to the following effect: "I exhort you, O men; and I utter my voice to the sons of men. Hear me; for I will speak of excellent things; " and so on. And He counsels what is salutary: for counsel has for its end, choosing or refusing a certain course; as He does by David, when He says, "Blessed is the man who walketh not in the counsels of the ungodly, and standeth not in the way of sinners, and sitteth not in the chair of pestilences; but his will is in the law of the Lord. And there are three departments of counsel: That which takes examples from past times; as what the Hebrews suffered when they worshipped the golden calf, and what they suffered when they committed fornication, and the like. The second, whose meaning is understood from the present times, as being apprehended by perception; as it was said to those who asked the Lord, "If He was the Christ, or shall we wait for another? Go and tell John, the blind receive their sight, the deaf hear, the lepers are cleansed, the dead are raised up;
For advice becomes exhortation in one state of mind and dissuasion in another. In the same way the style of praise becomes censure in one state and commendation in another. The just Instructor, who aims at what is good for us, is chiefly occupied with these. We have already been shown the censuring and dissuading kind. Now we must deal with the exhorting and commending kind, and, as on a balance, set the equal pans of the just one against each other. The Instructor uses exhortation toward what is beneficial through Solomon, somewhat as follows: “I call on you, people, and I send out my voice to the sons of men. Listen to me, for I will speak solemn things,” and so on. He advises what saves, because advice is suited to choosing and avoiding. He does this through David when he says, “Blessed is the man who did not walk in the counsel of the ungodly, and did not stand in the way of sinners, and did not sit in the seat of the pestilent, but his desire is in the law of the Lord.” There are three parts to advice. One takes its examples from past times: for instance, what the Hebrews suffered when they worshipped an idol in the golden calf, and what they suffered when they committed fornication, and the like. The second is observed in the present time, grasped by the senses, as in what was said to those who asked the Lord, “Are you the Christ, or are we to wait for another?” He said, “Go away.
and blessed is he who shall not be offended in Me. Such was that which David aid when he prophesied, "As we have heard, so have we seen. And the third department of counsel consists of what is future, by which we are bidden guard against what is to happen; as also that was said, "They that fall into sins shall be cast into outer darkness, where there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth," and the like. So that from these things it is clear that the Lord, going the round of all the methods of curative treatment, calls humanity to salvation. By encouragement He assuages sins, reducing lust, and at the same time inspiring hope for salvation. For He says by Ezekiel, "If ye return with your whole heart, and say, Father, I will hear you, as a holy people. And again He says, "Come all to Me, who labour, and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest; " and that which is added the Lord speaks in His own person.
“...and tell John: the blind see again, the deaf hear, the lepers are cleansed, the dead are raised, and blessed is the one who is not offended in me.” This is what David meant when he prophesied, “As we have heard, so also we have seen.” The third part of counsel is made up of things to come. By it the Instructor commands us to guard against what will result. So it was said: “Those who fall into sins will be thrown into the outer darkness; there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth,” and similar words. From these it is plain that the Lord goes through every kind of treatment to call humanity to salvation. By consolation he comforts us in our sins, lessening desire and at the same time giving hope of salvation. For he says through Ezekiel, “If you turn back with your whole heart and say, ‘Father,’ I will listen to you as to a holy people.” And again he says, “Come to me, all who labor and are weighed down, and I will give you rest,” and the words that follow, which the Lord speaks in his own person.
And very clearly He calls to goodness by Solomon, when He says, "Blessed is the man who hath found wisdom, and the mortal who hath found understanding. "For the good is found by him who seeks it, and is wont to be seen by him who has found it. By Jeremiah, too, He sets forth prudence, when he says, "Blessed are we, Israel; for what is pleasing to God is known by us; -and it is known by the Word, by whom we are blessed and wise. For wisdom and knowledge are mentioned by the same prophet, when he says, "Hear, O Israel, the commandments of life, and give ear to know understanding. By Moses, too, by reason of the love He has to man, He promises a gift to those who hasten to salvation. For He says, "And I will bring you into the good land, which the Lord sware to your fathers. " And further, "And I will bring you into the holy mountain, and make you glad," He says by Isaiah.
Most plainly he calls us to goodness through Solomon, saying, “Blessed is the man who has found wisdom, and the mortal who has found understanding.” For the good is found by the one who seeks it, and it likes to be seen by the one who has found it. Through Jeremiah also he explains understanding. He says, “We are blessed, Israel, because what pleases God is known to us.” It is known through the Word, through whom we are blessed and wise. For through the same prophet knowledge is shown to be understanding, when he says, “Hear, Israel, the commandments of life; listen closely, so as to know understanding.” Through Moses, too, because of his love for humanity, he promises in advance a gift to those who hurry toward salvation. For he says, “I will bring you into the good land which the Lord swore to your fathers.” And in addition, through Isaiah he says, “I will bring you into the holy mountain and make you glad.”
And still another form of instruction is benediction. "And blessed is he," He saith by David, "who has not sinned; and he shall be as the tree planted near the channels of the waters, which will yield its fruit in its season, and his leaf shall not wither " (by this He made an allusion to the resurrection); "and whatsoever he shall do shall prosper with him. Such He wishes us to be, that we may be blessed. Again, showing the opposite scale of the balance of justice, He says, "But not so the ungodly-not so; but as the dust which the wind sweeps away from the face of the earth. By showing the punishment of sinners, and their easy dispersion, and carrying off by the wind, the Instructor dissuades from crime by means of punishment; and by holding up the merited penalty, shows the benignity of His beneficence in the most skilful way, in order that we may possess and enjoy its blessings.
There is another form of his instruction as well: pronouncing blessing. Through David he says, “Blessed is the one who has not sinned, and he will be like the tree planted beside the streams of water, which will give its fruit in its season, and its leaf will not fall off” (by this he also hinted at the resurrection), “and everything he does will prosper.” He wants us to become such people, so that we may be blessed. Then, to show the opposite pan of the scale of justice, he says, “Not so the ungodly, not so; they are like the chaff which the wind blows off the face of the earth.” The Instructor shows the penalty of sinners, how easily they are scattered and how they are at the mercy of the wind. In this way he turns us away from the cause of sin by the threat of penalty. By holding up the punishment they deserve, he shows the goodness of his kindness. With great skill he leads us by this means to the use and possession of good things.
He invites us to knowledge also, when He says by Jeremiah, "Hadst thou walked in the way of God, thou wouldst have dwelt for ever in peace; " for, exhibiting there the reward of knowledge, He calls the wise to the love of it. And, granting pardon to him who has erred, He says, "Turn, turn, as a grape-gatherer to his basket. Do you see the goodness of justice, in that it counsels to repentance? And still further, by Jeremiah, He enlightens in the truth those who have erred. "Thus saith the Lord, Stand in the ways, and look, and ask for the eternal paths of the Lord, what is the good path, and walk in it, and ye shall find purification for your souls. And in order to promote our salvation, He leads us to repentance. Wherefore He says, "If thou repent, the Lord will purify thy heart, and the heart of thy seed. We might have adduced, as supporters on this question, the philosophers who say that only the perfect man is worthy of praise, and the bad man of blame.
He also urges us toward knowledge. Through Jeremiah he says, “If you had walked in the way of God, you would have lived in peace forever.” By pointing here to the reward of knowledge, he calls the thoughtful to love it. And to the one who has strayed he grants forgiveness: “Turn back, turn back,” he says, “like a grape-gatherer to his basket.” Do you see the goodness of justice, which counsels repentance? Further, through Jeremiah he lights up the truth for those who wander: “Thus says the Lord: Stand at the roads and look, and ask for the eternal paths of the Lord, which is the good path, and walk in it, and you will find purification for your souls.” He leads us to repentance for the sake of our salvation. This is why he says, “If you repent, the Lord will cleanse your heart and the heart of your offspring.” We could have called in the philosophers as advocates for this inquiry, who say that only the perfect person deserves praise, and the worthless person deserves blame.
But since some slander beatitude, as neither itself taking any trouble, nor giving any to any one else, thus not understanding its love to man; on their account, and on account of those who do not associate justice with goodness, the following remarks are added. For it were a legitimate inference to say, that rebuke and censure are suitable to men, since they say that all men are bad; but God alone is wise, from whom cometh wisdom, and alone perfect, and therefore alone worthy of praise. But I do not employ such language. I say, then, that praise or blame, or whatever resembles praise or blame, are medicines most essential of all to men. Some are ill to cure, and, like iron, are wrought into shape with fire, and hammer, and anvil, that is, with threatening, and reproof, and chastisement; while others, cleaving to faith itself, as self-taught, and as acting of their own free-will, grow by praise:- "For virtue that is praised Grows like a tree.
But some people misrepresent the blessed life. They say it takes no trouble over anything itself and brings none to anyone else, and so they fail to understand its love for humanity. For their sake, and for the sake of those who still do not join justice to goodness, I set this argument aside. For it would follow that we should say the rebuking and censuring side of instruction suits human beings, since the philosophers say that all men are bad. God alone is wise, since wisdom comes from him, and he alone is perfect, and therefore he alone is worthy of praise. But I do not use this argument. I say instead that praise, blame, or anything like praise or blame is, above all else, the most necessary medicine for people. Some are hard to cure. Like iron, they are driven into shape by fire, hammer and anvil, that is, by threat, exposure and rebuke. Others give their attention to faith itself. They are, as it were, self-taught and willing, and they grow by praise: “For virtue that is praised grows like a tree.”
And comprehending this, as it seems to me, the Samian Pythagoras gives the injunction :- "When you have done base things, rebuke yourself; But when you have done good things, be glad. Chiding is also called admonishing; and the etymology of admonishing (nouqe/thsij) is (nou= e0nqematismo/j) putting of understanding into one; so that rebuking is bringing one to one's senses. But there are myriads of injunctions to be found, whose aim is the attainment of what is good, and the avoidance of what is evil. "For there is no peace to the wicked, saith the Lord. Wherefore by Solomon He commands the children to beware: "My son, let not sinners deceive thee, and go not after their ways; and go not, if they entice thee, saying, Come with us, share with us in innocent blood, and let us hide unjustly the righteous man in the earth; let us put him out of sight, all alive as he is into Hades. This is accordingly likewise a prediction concerning the Lord's passion. And by Ezekiel, the life supplies commandments: "The soul that sinneth shall die;
It seems to me that Pythagoras of Samos understood this when he gave the command: “When you have done shameful things, rebuke yourself; but delight in what is good.” Rebuking is also called admonishing. The word for admonition (nouthetesis) is explained as “putting sense into the mind” (nou enthematismos), so that the rebuking kind of instruction is what produces understanding. But countless other commands have been found for gaining good and avoiding evil: “There is no peace for the ungodly, says the Lord.” For this reason he commands the little children, through Solomon, to be on guard: “My son, do not let sinners lead you astray. Do not walk their roads with them. Do not go if they urge you, saying, ‘Come with us, share in the shedding of innocent blood, let us bury a righteous man in the earth for no reason, let us wipe him out like Hades, alive.’” This is also a prophecy about the Lord’s suffering. And through Ezekiel Life lays down commands: “The soul that sins shall die.
but he that doeth righteousness shall be righteous. He eateth not upon the mountains, and hath not set his eyes on the devices of the house of Israel, and will not defile his neighbour's wife, and will not approach to a woman in her separation, and will not oppress a man, and will restore the debtor's pledge, and will not take plunder: he will give his bread to the hungry, and clothe the naked. His money he will not give on usury, and will not take interest; and he will turn away his hand from wrong, and will execute righteous judgment between a man and his neighbour. He has walked in my statutes, and kept my judgments to do them. This is a righteous man. He shall surely live, saith the Lord. These words contain a description of the conduct of Christians, a notable exhortation to the blessed life, which is the reward of a life of goodness-everlasting life.
But the man who is righteous, who does righteousness, will not eat on the mountains. He has not set his eyes on the idle fancies of the house of Israel. He will not defile his neighbor’s wife. He will not come near a woman while she is set apart for her uncleanness. He will not oppress anyone. He will return the pledge of a debtor. He will not seize plunder. He will give his bread to the hungry and clothe the naked. He will not lend his money at interest or take extra profit. He will keep his hand from injustice, and will make a just judgment between a man and his neighbor. He has walked in my commands and kept my ordinances to do them. This man is righteous. He will surely live, says the Lord.” These words contain an outline of the Christian way of life and a notable encouragement toward the blessed life, the prize of a good life: eternal life.
That the Word Instructed by the Law and the Prophets.The mode of His love and His instruction we have shown as we could. Wherefore He Himself, declaring Himself very beautifully, likened Himself to a grain of mustard-seed; and pointed out the spirituality of the word that is sown, and the productiveness of its nature, and the magnificence and conspicuousness of the power of the word; and besides, intimated that the pungency and the purifying virtue of punishment are profitable on account of its sharpness. By the little grain, as it is figuratively called, He bestows salvation on all humanity abundantly. Honey, being very sweet, generates bile, as goodness begets contempt, which is the cause of sinning. But mustard lessens bile, that is, anger, and stops inflammation, that is, pride. From which Word springs the true health of the soul, and its eternal happy temperament (eu0krasi/a).
That the Word instructed through the Law and the Prophets. We have shown, as well as we could, the manner of his love for humanity and of his instruction. So, explaining himself very beautifully, he compared himself to a “grain of mustard seed.” By this he hinted at several things: the spiritual nature of the word that is sown, its fruitful and many-sided character, and the greatness and easy growth of the power of the Word. He also hinted that the biting and cleansing effect of rebuke does good because of its sharpness. So through the little seed, which is an allegory, he freely gives to all humanity a very great thing, salvation. Honey, though very sweet, produces bile, just as kindness produces contempt, which is the cause of sinning. Mustard, on the other hand, reduces bile (that is, anger) and cuts through phlegm (that is, pride). From this Word comes true health of the soul and its lasting, well-balanced condition.
Accordingly, of old He instructed by Moses, and then by the prophets. Moses, too, was a prophet. For the law is the training of refractory children. "Having feasted to the full," accordingly, it is said, "they rose up to play; " senseless repletion with victuals being calledxo/rtasma (fodder), not brw=ma (food). And when, having senselessly filled themselves, they senselessly played; on that account the law was given them, and terror ensued for the prevention of transgressions and for the promotion of right actions, securing attention, and so winning to obedience to the true Instructor, being one and the same Word, and reducing to conformity with the urgent demands of the law. For Paul says that it was given to be a "schoolmaster to bring us to Christ. So that from this it is clear, that one alone, true, good, just, in the image and likeness of the Father, His Son Jesus, the Word of God, is our Instructor; to whom God hath entrusted us, as an affectionate father commits his children to a worthy tutor, expressly charging us, "This is my beloved Son: hear Him. The divine Instructor is trustworthy, adorned as He is with three of the fairest ornament"-knowledge, benevolence, and authority of utterance;-with knowledge, for He is the paternal wisdom: "All Wisdom is from the Lord, and with Him for evermore; "-with authority of utterance, for He is God and Creator: "For all things were made by Him, and without Him was not anything made; " -and with benevolence, for He alone gave Himself a sacrifice for us: "For the good Shepherd giveth His life for the sheep; " and He has so given it. Now, benevolence is nothing but wishing to do good to one's neighbour for his sake.
Long ago, then, the Word trained us through Moses, and afterward through the prophets. Moses was himself a prophet. For the law is the training of unruly children. Scripture says, “Having been filled, they rose up to play.” The word it uses is “fodder,” not “food,” meaning a mindless stuffing of the belly. They had been filled without thought, and they played without thought. So the law followed them, and fear with it, to check their sins and urge them toward right conduct. It prepared them to listen to the true Instructor and to obey him. He is one and the same Word, fitting himself to what each moment requires. Paul says that the law was given as “a tutor to bring us to Christ.” From this it is plain that there is only one Instructor of ours who is true, good and just: the Son, Jesus, the Word of God, in the image and likeness of the Father. God has handed us over to him, as a loving father entrusts his children to a faithful tutor. God gave an explicit command: “This is my beloved Son; listen to him.” The divine Instructor deserves our trust, because he is adorned with three of the finest qualities: knowledge, goodwill and boldness of speech. He has knowledge, because he is the Father’s wisdom: “All wisdom is from the Lord and is with him forever.” He has boldness, because he is God and Creator: “All things were made through him, and without him not one thing was made.” He has goodwill, because he alone gave himself as a sacrifice for us: “The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep,” and he did lay it down. Goodwill is nothing other than wishing good for one’s neighbor for that neighbor’s own sake.
The Instructor Characterized by the Severity and Benignity of Paternal Affection.Having now accomplished those things, it were a fitting sequel that our instructor Jesus should draw for us the model of the true life, and train humanity in Christ. Nor is the cast and character of the life He enjoins very formidable ; nor is it made altogether easy by reason of His benignity. He enjoins His commands, and at the same time gives them such a character that they may be accomplished. The view I take is, that He Himself formed man of the dust, and regenerated him by water ; and made him grow by his Spirit; and trained him by His word to adoption and salvation, directing him by sacred precepts ; in order that, transforming earth-born man into a holy and heavenly being by His advent, He might fulfil to the utmost that divine utterance, "Let Us make man in Our own image and likeness. And, in truth, Christ became the perfect realization of what God spake; and the rest of humanity is conceived as being created merely in His image.
The Instructor shows both sternness and kindness, in keeping with a father’s affection. With these points already covered, the next step is for our Instructor Jesus to sketch for us the true life and to train the person who is in Christ. His character is not excessively fearsome, nor is it wholly slack through kindness. He gives commands and at the same time shapes them so that we are able to carry them out. It seems to me that this same one formed man from the dust, gave him new birth by water, made him grow by the Spirit, and trained him by the Word. He guides us by holy commands toward adoption as sons and toward salvation. His purpose is to remake the earth-born man into a holy and heavenly man, raised up by ascent, and so to fulfil most completely that divine saying, “Let us make man in our image and likeness.” Christ has become the full realization of what God said, while the rest of humanity is understood to be made only “in the image.”
But let us, O children of the good Father-nurslings of the good Instructor-fulfil the Father's will, listen to the Word, and take on the impress of the truly saving life of our Saviour; and meditating on the heavenly mode of life according to which we have been deified, let us anoint ourselves with the perennial immortal bloom of gladness-that ointment of sweet fragrance-having a clear example of immortality in the walk and conversation of the Lord; and following the footsteps of God, to whom alone it belongs to consider, and whose care it is to see to, the way and manner in which the life of men may be made more healthy. Besides, He makes preparation for a self-sufficing mode of life, for simplicity, and for girding up our loins, and for free and unimpeded readiness of our journey; in order to the attainment of an eternity of beatitude, teaching each one of us to be his own storehouse. For He says, "Take no anxious thought for to-morrow," meaning that the man who has devoted himself to Christ ought to be sufficient to himself, and servant to himself, and moreover lead a life which provides for each day by itself.
But let us, children of a good Father and nurslings of a good Instructor, fulfil the Father’s will. Let us listen to the Word and take the impress of the truly saving life of our Savior. From now on let us practice the heavenly way of life, by which we are made divine. Let us anoint ourselves with the ever-fresh ointment of joy and the unspoiled ointment of sweet fragrance. We have the Lord’s way of life as a clear example of incorruption, and we follow in the footsteps of God. He alone is fit to consider, and does care, how and in what manner the life of human beings may become healthier. He also prepares us for a life of self-sufficiency and simplicity, and for being ready to travel lightly and unencumbered toward the endless blessedness of the good life. He teaches each of us to be our own storehouse. For he says, “Do not worry about tomorrow.” He means that the person enrolled in Christ’s service should be self-sufficient, his own servant, and should live a life that takes up each day as it comes.
For it is not in war, but in peace, that we are trained. War needs great preparation, and luxury craves profusion; but peace and love, simple and quiet sisters, require no arms nor excessive preparation. The Word is their sustenance. Our superintendence in instruction and discipline is the office of the Word, from whom we learn frugality and humility, and all that pertains to love of truth, love of man, and love of excellence. And so, in a word, being assimilated to God by a participation in moral excellence, we must not retrograde into carelessness and sloth. But labour, and faint not. Thou shalt be what thou dost not hope, and canst not conjecture. And as there is one mode of training for philosophers, another for orators, and another for athletes; so is there a generous disposition, suitable to the choice that is set upon moral loveliness, resulting from the training of Christ. And in the case of those who have been trained according to this influence, their gait in walking, their sitting at table, their food, their sleep, their going to bed, their regimen, and the rest of their mode of life, acquire a superior dignity. For such a training as is pursued by the Word is not over strained, but is of the right tension.
For we are trained in peace, not in war. War requires heavy preparation, and luxury demands lavish supply. But peace and love are plain, quiet sisters. They need no weapons and no wasteful provision. The Word is their food. He has been given the leadership that shows us the way and trains us. From him we learn simplicity, freedom from pride, and in sum everything that belongs to a love of freedom, a love of humanity and a love of what is good. In a word, through a kinship of virtue we become like God. So work hard and do not grow weary, for you will become what you do not hope for and could not even imagine. Philosophers have one kind of training, orators another, wrestlers another. In the same way there is a noble character, matching a choice to love what is good, that comes from the training of Christ. In those trained by it, the activities of life show a worthy dignity: how they walk, how they recline at table, their food, sleep, bed, daily regimen, and the rest of their training. For this training by the Word is not overstrained but properly tuned.
Thus, therefore, the Word has been called also the Saviour, seeing He has found out for men those rational medicines which produce vigour of the senses and salvation; and devotes Himself to watching for the favourable moment, reproving evil, exposing the causes of evil affections, and striking at the roots of irrational lusts, pointing out what we ought to abstain from, and supplying all the antidotes of salvation to those who are diseased. For the greatest and most regal work of God is the salvation of humanity. The sick are vexed at a physician, who gives no advice bearing on their restoration to health. But how shall we not acknowledge the highest gratitude to the divine Instructor, who is not silent, who omits not those threatenings that point towards destruction, but discloses them, and cuts off the impulses that tend to them; and who indoctrinates in those counsels which result in the true way of living?
For this reason the Word is also called Saviour. He has discovered for people these rational remedies, which bring sharp perception and salvation. He watches for the right moment, exposes the harm, explains the causes of the passions, and cuts out the roots of irrational desires. He commands what we must keep away from, and he brings every antidote of salvation to the sick. For this is God’s greatest and most kingly work: to save humanity. Sick people resent a doctor who gives them no advice for their health. How then could we fail to give the greatest thanks to the divine Instructor? He does not keep silent, and he does not overlook the acts of disobedience that lead to destruction. He exposes them, checks the impulses that stretch toward them, and teaches the fitting counsels for a right way of life.
We must confess, therefore, the deepest obligations to Him. For what else do we say is incumbent on the rational creature-I mean man-than the contemplation of the Divine? I say, too, that it is requisite to contemplate human nature, and to live as the truth directs, and to admire the Instructor and His injunctions, as suitable and harmonious to each other. According to which image also we ought, conforming ourselves to the Instructor, and making the word and our deeds agree, to live a real life.
We must therefore confess the very greatest thanks to him. What else do we say the rational creature, I mean man, must do, if not contemplate the divine? I say he must also contemplate human nature, and live as the truth leads. He must greatly admire both the Instructor himself and his commands, because they are fitting and in harmony with each other. After this pattern we too must fit ourselves to the Instructor, make our words agree with our deeds, and truly live.
Virtue Rational, Sin Irrational.Everything that is contrary to right reason is sin. Accordingly, therefore, the philosophers think fit to define the most generic passions thus: lust, as desire disobedient to reason ; fear, as weakness disobedient to reason; pleasure, as an elation of the spirit disobedient to reason. If, then, disobedience in reference to reason is the generating cause of sin, how shall we escape the conclusion, that obedience to reason-the Word-which we call faith, will of necessity be the efficacious cause of duty? For virtue itself is a state of the soul rendered harmonious by reason in respect to the whole life. Nay, to crown all, philosophy itself is pronounced to be the cultivation of right reason; so that, necessarily, whatever is done through error of reason is transgression, and is rightly called, (a9ma/rthma) sin.
Virtue Rational, Sin Irrational. Just as right conduct comes about according to right reason, so, in the opposite way, sin comes about against reason. Everything that goes against right reason is sin. For example, the philosophers see fit to define the most general passions in this way. Desire is an appetite that disobeys reason. Fear is an avoidance that disobeys reason. Pleasure is an elation of the soul that disobeys reason. Grief is a contraction of the soul that disobeys reason. Now if disobedience to reason produces sin, then obedience to reason, which we call faith, must surely bring about what is called duty. For virtue itself is a condition of the soul that is in harmony with reason throughout the whole of life. Above all, they define philosophy itself as the pursuit of right reason. So everything done wrongly must come about through a failure of reason, and it is rightly called a “sin.”
Since, then, the first man sinned and disobeyed God, it is said, "And man became like to the beasts: " being rightly regarded as irrational, he is likened to the beasts. Whence Wisdom says: "The horse for covering; the libidinous and the adulturer is become like to an irrational beast. Wherefore also it is added: "He neighs, whoever may be sitting on him. The man, it is meant, no longer speaks; for he who transgresses against reason is no longer rational, but an irrational animal, given up to lusts by which he is ridden (as a horse by his rider). But that which is done right, in obedience to reason, the followers of the Stoics callprosh=kon and kaqh=kon, that is, incumbent and fitting. What is fitting is incumbent. And obedience is founded on commands. And these being, as they are, the same as counsel-having truth for their aim, train up to the ultimate goal of aspiration, which is conceived of as the end (te/loj). And the end of piety is eternal rest in God. And the beginning of eternity is our end.
So when the first man sinned and disobeyed God, Scripture says, “man was likened to the beasts.” He had sinned against reason, and so he was counted irrational and compared to beasts. This is why Wisdom also says, “The pleasure-lover and the adulterer is a horse for mating.” He is compared to a senseless animal, and so it adds, “He neighs under everyone who sits on him.” Man, it says, no longer speaks. Whoever sins against reason is no longer rational. He is an irrational beast, handed over to his desires, with every pleasure sitting on his back. But what is done rightly through obedience to reason, the heirs of the Stoics call “fitting” and “duty.” Now duty is what is fitting, and obedience is built on commands. These commands are the same as the counsels, and they have truth as their aim. They train us toward the final object of desire, which is understood as the end. The end of godliness is eternal rest in God, and our end is the beginning of the age to come.
The right operation of piety perfects duty by works; whence, according to just reasoning, duties consist in actions, not in sayings. And Christian conduct is the Operation of the rational soul in accordance with a correct judgment and aspiration after the truth, which attains its destined end through the body, the soul's consort and ally. Virtue is a will in conformity to God and Christ in life, rightly adjusted to life everlasting. For the life of Christians, in which we are now trained, is a system of reasonable actions-that is, of those things taught by the Word-an unfailing energy which we have called faith. The system is the commandments of the Lord, which, being divine statues and spiritual counsels, have been written for ourselves, being adapted for ourselves and our neighbours. Moreover, they turn back on us, as the ball rebounds on him that throws it by the repercussion. Whence also duties are essential for divine discipline, as being enjoined by God, and furnished for our salvation.
Now the right accomplishment of godliness fulfils duty through works. So duties rightly consist in actions, not in words. An action is the activity of the rational Christian soul. It follows a refined judgment and a desire for truth, and it is carried out through the body, the soul’s natural partner and fellow-combatant. A duty is a single purpose in life that follows God and Christ, and it is rightly completed in eternal life. For the Christian life, in which we are now being trained, is a system of rational actions. That means the unfailing activity of what the Word teaches, which we have called faith. The system is the Lord’s commandments. They are divine decisions and spiritual counsels, written down for us, and they are suited both to ourselves and to our neighbours. They also come back to us again, as a ball bounces back to the one who threw it when it strikes something solid. For this reason duties are necessary for divine training, since God commanded them and provided them for our salvation.
And since, of those things which are necessary, some relate only to life here, and others, which relate to the blessed life yonder, wing us for flight hence; so, in an analogous manner, of duties, some are ordained with reference to life, others for the blessed life. The commandments issued with respect to natural life are published to the multitude; but those that are suited for living well, and from which eternal life springs, we have to consider, as in a sketch, as we read them out of the Scriptures.
And some necessary things serve only for life here, while others lift us on wings from here toward the good life there. In the same way, some duties are laid down for living, and others for living well. The commands given for ordinary, worldly living are common knowledge among the many. But what is fitting for living well, which is how that eternal life is gained, we may consider in outline by gathering it from the Scriptures themselves.
⚑ Possible scanning error in the digital Greek (A., B., E., F., Z., H.). Check it against the printed edition.
(the older translation has no table of contents here)
Chapter headings of the second book. 1. How we should behave about food. 2. How we should approach drink. 3. That we should not be eager for costly household vessels. 4. How we should relax at feasts. 5. On laughter. 6. On obscene talk. 7. What those who live decently together must guard against. 8. Whether perfumes and garlands may be used. 9. How we should approach sleep. 10. What we must understand about having children. 11. On footwear. 12. That we should not be excited over jewels and golden ornaments.
On Eating.Keeping, then, to our aim, and selecting the Scriptures which bear on the usefulness of training for life, we must now compendiously describe what the man who is called a Christian ought to be during the whole of his life. We must accordingly begin with ourselves, and how we ought to regulate ourselves. We have therefore, preserving a due regard to the symmetry of this work, to say how each of us ought to conduct himself in respect to his body, or rather how to regulate the body itself. For whenever any one, who has been brought away by the Word from external things, and from attention to the body itself to the mind, acquires a clear view of what happens according to nature in man, he will know that he is not to be earnestly occupied about external things, but about what is proper and peculiar to man-to purge the eye of the soul, and to sanctify also his flesh.
How we should behave about food. So let us hold to our aim and choose from the Scriptures what serves the practical purpose of our training. We must outline briefly what a person called a Christian ought to be throughout his whole life. We must begin with ourselves and with how we ought to conduct ourselves. So, keeping in view the proportion of the whole work, we must say how each of us should treat his own body, or rather how he should direct it. When someone is led by the Word away from outward things, and even from the mere management of the body, to the mind, and learns exactly how things happen in man according to nature, he will know not to be eager about outward things. He will know instead to cleanse what is truly man’s own, the eye of the soul, and to purify the flesh itself as well.
For he that is clean rid of those things which constitute him still dust, what else has he more serviceable than himself for walking in the way which leads to the comprehension of God. Some men, in truth, live that they may eat, as the irrational creatures, "whose life is their belly, and nothing else. But the Instructor enjoins us to eat that we may live. For neither is food our business, nor is pleasure our aim; but both are on account of our life here, which the Word is training up to immortality. Wherefore also there is discrimination to be employed in reference to food. And it is to be simple, truly plain, suiting precisely simple and artless children-as ministering to life, not to luxury. And the life to which it conduces consists of two things-health and strength; to which plainness of fare is most suitable, being conducive both to digestion and lightness of body, from which come growth, and health, and right strength, not strength that is wrong or dangerous and wretched, as is that of athletes produced by compulsory feeding.
For if someone is cleanly freed from those things by which he is still dust, what could he have that is more useful than himself for going on the road to grasp God? Other people live in order to eat, just like the irrational animals, whose whole life is nothing but the belly. But the Instructor commands us to eat in order to live. Food is not our work, and pleasure is not our aim. Food is approved for the sake of our staying here, which the Word is training toward immortality. This food is simple and unfussy, fitting the truth and suiting simple, unfussy children. It is suited to living, not to luxury. And this living is made of two things, health and strength. For these the easiest food is most fitting. It helps digestion and keeps the body light, and from it come growth, health, and a right strength. It is not an unjust, risky and miserable strength like that of athletes produced by forced feeding.
We must therefore reject different varieties, which engender various mischiefs, such as a depraved habit of body and disorders of the stomach, the taste being vitiated by an unhappy art-that of cookery, and the useless art of making pastry. For people dare to call by the name of food their dabbling in luxuries, which glides into mischievous pleasures. Antiphanes, the Delian physician, said that this variety of viands was the one cause of disease; there being people who dislike the truth, and through various absurd notions abjure moderation of diet, and put themselves to a world of trouble to procure dainties from beyond seas. For my part, I am sorry for this disease, while they are not ashamed to sing the praises of their delicacies, giving themselves great trouble to get lampreys in the Straits of Sicily, the eels of the Maeander, and the kids found in Melos, and the mullets in Sciathus, and the mussels of Pelorus, the oysters of Abydos, not omitting the sprats found in Lipara, and the Mantinican turnip; and furthermore, the beetroot that grows among the Ascraeans: they seek out the cockles of Methymna, the turbots of Attica, and the thrushes of Daphnis, and the reddish-brown dried figs, on account of which the ill-starred Persian marched into Greece with five hundred thousand men.
So the many kinds of flavors must be spat out. They breed all sorts of harm: bad condition of the body and upset stomachs. The sense of taste is made to play the harlot by an evil-spirited art, the art of cookery, and by the empty craft of pastry-making. People dare to call food that cultivated pursuit of luxuries which slides into harmful pleasures. Antiphanes of Delos, a physician, said that this variety of dishes is one of the causes of disease. Such people are displeased with the truth. In their varied vanity they swear off a sober diet and go to great trouble over foods from overseas. I feel pity for their sickness, but they are not ashamed to sing the praises of their pleasures. They hunt out lampreys from the Strait of Sicily, eels from the Maeander, kids from Melos, mullets from Sciathos, mussels from Pelorus, and oysters from Abydos. They do not leave out the sardines of Lipara or the Mantinean turnip, nor even the beets of the Ascraeans. They search for scallops from Methymna, flatfish from Attica, thrushes of the laurel groves, and swallow figs. For the sake of such things the ill-starred Persian sent five hundred myriads of men into Greece at once.
Besides these, they purchase birds from Phasis, the Egyptian snipes, and the Median peafowl. Altering these by means of condiments, the gluttons gape for the sauces. "Whatever earth and the depths of the sea, and the unmeasured space of the air produce," they cater for their gluttony. In their greed and solicitude, the gluttons seem absolutely to sweep the world with a drag-net to gratify their luxurious tastes. These gluttons, surrounded with the sound of hissing frying-pans, and wearing their whole life away at the pestle and mortar, cling to matter like fire. More than that, they emasculate plain food, namely bread, by straining off the nourishing part of the grain, so that the necessary part of food becomes matter of reproach to luxury. There is no limit to epicurism among men. For it has driven them to sweetmeats, and honey-cakes, and sugar-plums; inventing a multitude of desserts, hunting after all manner of dishes.
On top of these they buy up birds from the river Phasis, Egyptian francolins, and the Median peacock. The gluttons vary all this with seasonings and stand gaping at the delicacies. They provide for their greed with whatever the earth, the depths of the sea and the measureless breadth of the air produce. These grasping, meddlesome people seem to be simply dragging the whole world with a net to feed their love of pleasure. The sound of “sizzling frying pans” rings around them. They wear out their whole lives at the mortar and the grinding stone, these eaters of everything, who cling to their fuel like fire. They even make bread, the plain and easy food, soft and effeminate by sifting out the nourishing part of the wheat. So the necessary part of food becomes a reproach to pleasure. Among men, daintiness knows no limit. It has run aground on cakes and honey-cakes, and on sweets as well, inventing a multitude of desserts and hunting out every kind of flavor.
A man like this seems to me to be all jaw, and nothing else. "Desire not," says the Scripture, "rich men's dainties; " for they belong to a false and base life. They partake of luxurious dishes, which a little after go to the dunghill. But we who seek the heavenly bread must role the belly, which is beneath heaven, and much more the things which are agreeable to it, which "God shall destroy," says the apostle, justly execrating gluttonous desires. For "meats are for the belly," for on them depends this truly carnal and destructive life; whence some, speaking with unbridled tongue, dare to apply the name agape, to pitiful suppers, redolent of savour and sauces. Dishonouring the good and saving work of the Word, the consecrated agape, with pots and pouring of sauce; and by drink and delicacies and smoke desecrating that name, they are deceived in their idea, having expected that the promise of God might be bought with suppers.
Such a man seems to me to be nothing but a jaw. “Do not desire the rich man’s dainties,” says the Scripture, “for they belong to a life that is false and shameful.” Such people cling to rich dishes, which a little later end up in the latrine. But we are hunting for the heavenly food, so we must rule the belly, which belongs under heaven, and still more the things attached to it. “God will destroy” these, says the apostle, rightly pronouncing a curse on greedy appetites. “Foods are for the belly,” and on these hangs this truly fleshly, corrupting way of life. Some even dare to call by the name of “love” (agape) little suppers that reek of fat and gravy, and they use a tongue with no door on it. They insult the good and saving work of the Word, the sanctified love, with small pots and a flow of sauce. By drinking, luxury and smoke they slander the name. They are mistaken in their notion, for they expected to buy the promise of God with suppers.
Gatherings for the sake of mirth, and such entertainments as are called by ourselves, we name rightly suppers, dinners, and banquets, after the example of the Lord. But such entertainments the Lord has not called agapae. He says accordingly somewhere, "When thou art called to a wedding, recline not on the highest couch; but when thou art called, fall into the lowest place; " and elsewhere, "When thou makest a dinner or a supper; "and again, "But when thou makest an entertainment, call the poor," for whose sake chiefly a supper ought to be made. And further, "A certain man made a great supper, and called many. But I perceive whence the specious appellation of suppers flowed: "from the gullets and furious love for suppers"-according to the comic poet. For, in truth, "to many, many things are on account of the supper. For they have not yet learned that God has provided for His creature (man I mean) food and drink, for sustenance, not for pleasure; since the body derives no advantage from extravagance in viands. For, quite the contrary, those who use the most frugal fare are the strongest and the healthiest, and the noblest; as domestics are healthier and stronger than their masters, and husbandmen than the proprietors; and not only more robust, but wiser, as philosophers are wiser than rich men. For they have not buried the mind beneath food, nor deceived it with pleasures.
For gatherings held for good cheer, we ourselves would count suppers, lunches and receptions among them. Following the Word, we may fittingly call such a gathering a “reception.” But the Lord has not called such feasts “love-feasts.” He says in one place, “When you are invited to a wedding, do not recline in the chief place, but when you are invited, lie down in the last place.” In another place he says, “When you give a lunch or a dinner.” And again, “But when you give a reception, invite the poor,” which is the very occasion for which a dinner should chiefly be given. And again, “A certain man gave a great dinner and invited many.” But I see where the respectable name for these dinners came from. It came from gullets and from a madness that haunts the dinner table, as the comic poet puts it: “For truly, most things for most people are for the sake of dinner.” They have not learned that God provided food and drink for his creature, man, for the sake of his being kept alive, not for pleasure. The body does not naturally benefit from costly foods. Quite the opposite: those who live on the cheapest food are stronger, healthier and nobler, as servants are than their masters and farmers than their landlords. They are not only more robust but also wiser, as philosophers are than rich men. For they have not buried the mind under food, nor deceived it with pleasures.
But love (agape) is in truth celestial food, the banquet of reason. "It beareth all things, endureth all things, hopeth all things. Love never faileth. "Blessed is he who shall eat bread in the kingdom of God. But the hardest of all cases is for charity, which faileth not, to be cast from heaven above to the ground into the midst of sauces. And do you imagine that I am thinking of a supper that is to be done away with? "For if," it is said, "I bestow all my goods, and have not love, I am nothing. On this love alone depend the law and the Word; and if "thou shalt love the Lord thy God and thy neighbour," this is the celestial festival in the heavens. But the earthly is called a supper, as has been shown from Scripture. For the supper is made for love, but the supper is not love (agape); only a proof of mutual and reciprocal kindly feeling.
Love (agape) is truly heavenly food, a banquet of the mind and reason. “It bears all things, endures all things, hopes all things. Love never falls.” “Blessed is he who will eat bread in the kingdom of God.” It is the worst of all falls for love, which never falls, to be flung from heaven above down to the ground among the gravies. Do you suppose I count as a supper that which is to be done away with? “For if I give away all that I have,” he says, “and have not love, I am nothing.” The whole Law and the Word depend on this love. And if you love the Lord your God and your neighbor, this is the heavenly feast in the heavens. The earthly one is called a dinner, as has been shown from Scripture. A dinner is given out of love, but the dinner is not love. It is a token of a kindly, sharing and generous goodwill.
"Let not, then, your good be evil spoken of; for the kingdom of God is not meat and drink," says the apostle, in order that the meal spoken of may not be conceived as ephemeral, "but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost. He who eats of this meal, the best of all, shall possess the kingdom of God, fixing his regards here on the holy assembly of love, the heavenly Church. Love, then, is something pure and worthy of God, and its work is communication. "And the care of discipline is love," as Wisdom says; "and love is the keeping of the law. And these joys have an inspiration of love from the public nutriment, which accustoms to everlasting dainties. Love (agape), then, is not a supper. But let the entertainment depend on love. For it is said, "Let the children whom Thou hast loved, O Lord, learn that it is not the products of fruits that nourish man; but it is Thy word which preserves those who believe on Thee. "For the righteous shall not live by bread.
“So do not let our good be spoken of as evil. For the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking,” says the apostle. He says this so that the meal he means will not be understood as one that lasts only a day. He goes on: “but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.” Whoever eats this best of meals will gain the best of all things that exist, the kingdom of God. He will have practiced here below for that holy gathering of love, the heavenly church. Love, then, is something pure and worthy of God, and its work is sharing. “The care of instruction is love,” says Wisdom, “and love is the keeping of her laws.” These feasts of joy have a spark of love in them, taken from the food common to all, and they train us in the habit of eternal food. So love is not a dinner, but let the feast depend on love. For it says, “Let your sons, whom you have loved, Lord, learn that it is not the produce of the crops that feeds a man, but your word that keeps safe those who believe in you.” For the righteous man will not live on bread alone.
But let our diet be light and digestible, and suitable for keeping awake, unmixed with diverse varieties. Nor is this a point which is beyond the sphere of discipline. For love is a good nurse for communication; having as its rich provision sufficiency, which, presiding over diet measured in due quantity, and treating the body in a healthful way, distributes something from its resources to those near us, But the diet which exceeds sufficiency injures a man, deteriorates his spirit, and renders his body prone to disease. Besides, those dainty tastes, which trouble themselves about rich dishes drive to practices of ill-repute, daintiness, gluttony, greed, voracity, insatiability. Appropriate designations of such people as so indulge are flies, weasels, flatterers, gladiators, and the monstrous tribes of parasites-the one class surrendering reason, the other friendship, and the other life, for the gratification of the belly; crawling on their bellies, beasts in human shape after the image of their father, the voracious beast.
But let our dinner be simple and light, suited to keeping us alert, not mixed with a variety of flavors. Even this is not left without instruction. For love is a good nurse for fellowship, and her rich provision is self-sufficiency. When self-sufficiency oversees the food, measured out in the right amount, it manages the body for its health, and it also gives some share out of its own store to our neighbors. But a diet that overflows what is sufficient harms a person. It makes the soul sluggish and the body liable to sickness. Moreover, pleasure in rich dishes brings on itself names of blame that are hard to bear: daintiness, greediness, gluttony, fondness for delicacies, insatiability, ravenous eating. Flies, weasels, flatterers, gladiators, and “the wild tribes of parasites” fit these names well. Some sell their reason, some their friendship, some their very life for the pleasure of the belly. They creep along on their bellies, beasts in the shape of men, made in the image of their father, the greedy beast.
People first called the abandoneda0sw/touj, and so appear to me to indicate their end, understanding them as those who are (a0sw/souj) unsaved, excluding the j. For those that are absorbed in pots, and exquisitely prepared niceties of condiments, are they not plainly abject, earth-born, leading an ephemeral kind of life, as if they were not to live [hereafter]? Those the Holy Spirit, by Isaiah, denounces as wretched, depriving them tacitly of the name of love (agape), since their feasting was not in accordance with the word. "But they made mirth, killing calves, and sacrificing sheep, saying, Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die. And that He reckons such luxury to be sin, is shown by what He adds, "And your sin shall not be forgiven you till you die," -not conveying the idea that death, which deprives of sensation, is the forgiveness of sin, but meaning that death of salvation which is the recompense of sin.
Those who first called such people “asotoi” (dissolute) seem to me to have hinted well at their end. They understood the word as “asostoi” (unsaved), with the letter sigma squeezed out. Are these not the very people who busy themselves over casserole dishes and the silly fussiness of seasonings, low-minded and earth-born, chasing a life that lasts a day as if they were never going to live again? The Holy Spirit pronounces them wretched through Isaiah, quietly taking away from them the name of love, since their feasting was not according to reason: “But they made merry, slaughtering calves and sacrificing sheep, and saying, ‘Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.’” And to show that he counts such luxury as sin, he adds: “And this sin of yours will not be forgiven until you die.” He does not mean that a death without feeling is forgiveness of sin. He means that death, the loss of salvation, is the repayment for sin.
"Take no pleasure in abominable delicacies, says Wisdom. At this point, too, we have to advert to what are called things sacrificed to idols, in order to show how we are enjoined to abstain from them. Polluted and abominable those things seem to me, to the blood of which, fly "Souls from Erebus of inanimate corpses. "For I would not that ye should have fellowship with demons," says the apostle; since the food of those who are saved and those who perish is separate. We must therefore abstain from these viands not for fear (because there is no power in them); but on account of our conscience, which is holy, and out of detestation of the demons to which they are dedicated, are we to loathe them; and further, on account of the instability of those who regard many things in a way that makes them prone to fall, "whose conscience, being weak, is defiled: for meat commendeth us not to God. "For it is not that which entereth in that defileth a man, but that which goeth out of his mouth. The natural use of food is then indifferent. "For neither if we eat are we the better," it is said, "nor if we eat not are we the worse. But it is inconsistent with reason, for those that have been made worthy to share divine and spiritual food, to partake of the tables of demons.
“Do not rejoice in a little luxury,” says Wisdom. Here we should also recall the so-called idol sacrifices, and why we are told to abstain from them. Those things seem to me foul and loathsome, and over their blood hover “souls from Erebus of the dead who have died.” “For I do not want you to become partners with demons,” says the apostle, since the food of those who are being saved and of those who are perishing is separate. So we must abstain from them. We do not do so out of fear, for there is no power in these foods. We do so for the sake of our conscience, which is holy. We do so because we loathe the demons, whose names the foods carry, for their foulness. And we do so also because of those who are watery-minded and take many things in a slippery way, “whose conscience, being weak, is defiled. For food will not bring us before God.” And he says, “It is not what goes in that defiles a man, but what comes out of his mouth.” So the natural use of food makes no difference. “For if we eat, we gain nothing extra,” he says, “and if we do not eat, we lack nothing.” But it is not reasonable for people who have been counted worthy to share in divine and spiritual food to take part in “the table of demons.”
"Have we not power to eat and to drink," says the apostle, "and to lead about wives"? But by keeping pleasures under command we prevent lusts. See, then, that this power of yours never "become a stumbling-block to the weak. For it were not seemly that we, after the fashion of the rich man's son in the Gospel, should, as prodigals, abuse the Father's gifts; but we should use them, without undue attachment to them, as having command over ourselves. For we are enjoined to reign and rule over meats, not to be slaves to them. It is an admirable thing, therefore, to raise our eyes aloft to what is true, to depend on that divine food above, and to satiate ourselves with the exhaustless contemplation of that which truly exists, and so taste of the only sure and pure delight. For such is the agape, which, the food that comes from Christ shows that we ought to partake of. But totally irrational, futile, and not human is it for those that are of the earth, fattening themselves like cattle, to feed themselves up for death; looking downwards on the earth, and bending ever over tables; leading a life of gluttony; burying all the good of existence here in a life that by and by will end; courting voracity alone, in respect to which cooks are held in higher esteem than husbandmen.
The apostle says, “Do we not have the right to eat and drink, and to take a wife about with us?” But we hold our pleasures in check and so restrain our desires. “Take care, then, that this right of yours never becomes a stumbling block to the weak.” We must not squander the Father’s gifts like the rich man’s son in the Gospel story, living wastefully. We should use them as rulers do, with no leaning toward them. For we were appointed to reign and to rule, not to be slaves to our food. It is admirable, then, to look up to the truth and cling to the divine food from above. We should be filled with the insatiable vision of him who truly is, and taste a pleasure that is steady, lasting and pure. For the food of Christ shows that we must receive this love. But it is utterly senseless, useless and inhuman to be fed for death, fattened like livestock. Such people look down at the ground, always creatures of earth, bent over their tables. They chase a greedy life and bury the good here, in a life that will not last. They flatter only the act of swallowing, and because of it cooks have become more highly valued than farmers.
For we do not abolish social intercourse, but look with suspicion on the snares of custom, and regard them as a calamity. Wherefore daintiness is to be shunned, and we are to partake of few and necessary things. "And if one of the unbelievers call us to a feast, and we determine to go" (for it is a good thing not to mix with the dissolute), the apostle bids us "eat what is set before us, asking no questions for conscience sake. Similarly he has enjoined to purchase "what is sold in the shambles," without curious questioning. We are not, then, to abstain wholly from various kinds of food, but only are not to be taken up about them. We are to partake of what is set before us, as becomes a Christian, out of respect to him who has invited us, by a harmless and moderate participation in the social meeting; regarding the sumptuousness of what is put on the table as a matter of indifference, despising the dainties, as after a little destined to perish. "Let him who eateth, not despise him who eateth not; and let him who eateth not, not judge him who eateth. And a little way on he explains the reason of the command, when he says, "He that eateth, eateth to the Lord, and giveth God thanks; and he that eateth not, to the Lord he eateth not, and giveth God thanks. So that the right food is thanksgiving. And he who gives thanks does not occupy his time in pleasures.
We are not doing away with companionship. We only regard the slippery slope of habit as a disaster. So we must refuse greediness and take only a few necessary things. If one of the unbelievers invites us and we decide to go (for it is good not to mix with the disorderly), Paul tells us to eat whatever is set before us, “asking no questions for conscience’ sake.” In the same way he told us to buy from the meat market without fussy inquiry. So we are not to abstain completely from varied dishes; we are only not to make them our concern. We should take what is set before us as befits a Christian. We honor the one who invited us by sharing in the company in a way that does no harm and does not wear anyone out. We treat the costliness of what is brought in as a matter of indifference, and we despise the delicacies, since in a little while they will be gone. “Let the one who eats not despise the one who does not eat, and let the one who does not eat not judge the one who eats.” A little further on he explains the reason for this instruction, saying, “The one who eats, eats to the Lord and gives thanks to God; and the one who does not eat, does not eat to the Lord and gives thanks to God.” So the right food is thanksgiving, and the one who always gives thanks is not preoccupied with pleasures.
And if we would persuade any of our fellow-guests to virtue, we are all the more on this account to abstain from those dainty dishes; and so exhibit ourselves as a bright pattern of virtue, such as we ourselves have in Christ. "For if any of such meats make a brother to stumble, I shall not eat it as long as the world lasts," says he, "that I may not make my brother stumble. I gain the man by a little self-restraint. "Have we not power to eat and to drink? " And "we know"-he says the truth-"that an idol is nothing in the world; but we have only one true God, of whom are all things, and one Lord Jesus. But," he says, "through thy knowledge thy weak brother perishes, for whom Christ died; and they that wound the conscience of the weak brethren sin against Christ. Thus the apostle, in his solicitude for us, discriminates in the case of entertainments, saying, that "if any one called a brother be found a fornicator, or an adulterer, or an idolater, with such an one not to eat; " neither in discourse or food are we to join, looking with suspicion on the pollution thence proceeding, as on the tables of the demons.
And if we are urging any of our fellow guests toward virtue, that is all the more reason to keep away from these greedy dishes. We show ourselves as a clear example of virtue, just as we ourselves have Christ. Paul says, “If any such food makes my brother stumble, I will never eat it, so that I do not make my brother stumble.” By a little self-restraint he wins the man. “Do we not have the right to eat and drink?” And he says, “We have come to know the truth, that there is no idol in the world, but there is truly one God for us, from whom are all things, and one Lord, Jesus.” But, he says, “the weak brother is destroyed by your knowledge, the brother for whom Christ died. And those who wound the conscience of weak brothers sin against Christ.” This is why the apostle, taking care for us, distinguishes between dinners. He says we are “not to associate with anyone called a brother who is found to be sexually immoral, or an adulterer, or an idolater, and not even to eat with such a person.” We are to avoid it whether it be the conversation or the dish, suspecting the defilement that comes from it, just as from the tables of demons.
"It is good, then, neither to eat flesh nor to drink wine," as both he and the Pythagoreans acknowledge. For this is rather characteristic of a beast; and the fumes arising from them being dense, darken the soul. If one partakes of them, he does not sin. Only let him partake temperately, not dependent on them, nor gaping after fine fare. For a voice will whisper to him, saying, "Destroy not the work of God for the sake of food. For it is the mark of a silly mind to be amazed and stupefied at what is presented at vulgar banquets, after the rich fare which is in the Word; and much sillier to make one's eyes the slaves of the delicacies, so that one's greed is, so to speak, carried round by the servants. And how foolish for people to raise themselves on the couches, all but pitching their faces into the dishes, stretching out from the couch as from a nest, according to the common saying, "that they may catch the wandering steam by breathing it in! And how senseless, to besmear their hands with the condiments, and to be constantly reaching to the sauce, cramming themselves immoderately and shamelessly, not like people tasting, but ravenously seizing! For you may see such people, liker swine or dogs for gluttony than men, in such a hurry to feed themselves full, that both jaws are stuffed out at once, the veins about the face raised, and besides, the perspiration running all over, as they are tightened with their insatiable greed, and panting with their excess; the food pushed with unsocial eagerness into their stomach, as if they were stowing away their victuals for provision for a journey, not for digestion. Excess, which in all things is an evil, is very highly reprehensible in the matter of food. Gluttony, called o0yofagi/a, is nothing but excess in the use of relishes (o !yon); and laimargi/a is insanity with respect to the gullet; and gastrimargi/a is excess with respect to food-insanity in reference to the belly, as the name implies; for ma/rgoj is a madman.
“It is good, then, not to eat meat or to drink wine.” Paul himself says this, and so do the followers of Pythagoras. For eating flesh is more the way of wild animals, and the vapor that rises from it is thick and clouds the soul. Yet if someone does take these things, he does not sin, provided he takes them with self-control, without clinging to them, being dependent on them, or gorging on the delicacies. A voice will speak within him, saying, “Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food.” It is very foolish to marvel and gape at what is served at ordinary banquets, after the luxury we have in the Word. It is far more foolish to have made one’s eyes slaves to the side dishes, as though the servants carried one’s lack of self-control around along with them. How useless it is to raise oneself up on the couches, almost throwing one’s face into the dishes, and to peer out from the couch as from a nest, as the common saying goes, just to catch the wandering vapor with one’s breath!
And is it not senseless to smear the hands with sauces, or to keep reaching out to the dishes? These people do not taste; they snatch. They stuff themselves without measure and without decency. You can see such people, in their greed to be filled, looking more like pigs or dogs than human beings. Both jaws bulge at once, and the veins in the face swell. Sweat pours over them, gripped as they are by insatiable appetite, and they pant from lack of self-control. The food is shoved in with frantic haste, with no thought for anyone else, down into the belly. They stow away the dishes as if packing provisions for a journey, not as food to be digested. Excess is an evil everywhere, but it is most plainly exposed in the matter of food. Thus “dainty-gluttony” (opsophagia) is nothing other than excess in the use of delicacies. “Throat-gluttony” (laimargia) is madness about the throat. “Belly-gluttony” (gastrimargia) is lack of self-control about food, and, as the very name implies, madness about the belly, since a margos is a madman.
The apostle, checking those that transgress in their conduct at entertainments, says: "For every one taketh beforehand in eating his own supper; and one is hungry, and another drunken. Have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? Or despise ye the church of God, and shame those who have not? " And among those who have, they, who eat shamelessly and are insatiable, shame themselves. And both act badly; the one by paining those who have not, the other by exposing their own greed in the presence of those who have. Necessarily, therefore, against those who have cast off shame and unsparingly abuse meals, the insatiable to whom nothing is sufficient, the apostle, in continuation, again breaks forth in a voice of displeasure: "So that, my brethren, when ye come together to eat, wait for one another.
The apostle rebukes those who practice such habits at feasts, and says: “For each one takes his own supper ahead of others as he eats, and one is hungry while another is drunk. Do you not have houses to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and shame those who have nothing?” Among those who do have, the people who eat without restraint, the insatiable, bring shame on themselves. Both groups do wrong. The one burdens those who have nothing, and the other exposes its own lack of self-control in front of those who have. So the apostle, of necessity, turns to those who have lost all shame and who abuse their meals without restraint, the insatiable, for whom nothing is enough. A second time he raises his voice in indignation: “So then, my brothers, when you come together to eat, wait for one another.
And if any one is hungry, let him eat at home, that ye come not together to condemnation. From all slavish habits and excess we must abstain, and touch what is set before us in a decorous way; keeping the hand and couch and chin free of stains; preserving the grace of the countenance undisturbed, and committing no indecorum in the act of swallowing; but stretching out the hand at intervals in an orderly manner. We must guard against speaking anything while eating: for the voice becomes disagreeable and inarticulate when it is confined by full jaws; and the tongue, pressed by the food and impeded in its natural energy; gives forth a compressed utterance. Nor is it suitable to eat and to drink simultaneously. For it is the very extreme of intemperance to confound the times whose uses are discordant. And "whether ye eat or drink, do all to the glory of God," aiming after true frugality, which the Lord also seems to me to have hinted at when He blessed the loaves and the cooked fishes with which He feasted the disciples, introducing a beautiful example of simple food.
If anyone is hungry, let him eat at home, so that you do not come together for judgment.” So we must keep away from all servile behavior and lack of self-control. We should take what is set before us in an orderly way, keeping the hand, the couch and the chin unsoiled, keeping the face’s good appearance undistorted, and behaving decently even in swallowing. The hand should be stretched out in order, at intervals. * * We must also take care not to say anything while eating. The voice becomes unseemly and indistinct when it is cramped by full jaws. The tongue, pressed by the food and hindered in its natural working, gives out a squeezed sound. Nor is it fitting to eat and drink at the same time. It is the greatest intemperance to confuse times whose uses do not go together. And “whether you eat or drink,” he says, “do everything for the glory of God.” We should aim at true simplicity of living. I think the Lord hinted at it when he blessed the loaves and the broiled fish with which he feasted his disciples, giving us a fine example of plain, unfussy food.
That fish then which, at the command of the Lord, Peter caught, points to digestible and God-given and moderate food. And by those who rise from the water to the bait of righteousness, He admonishes us to take away luxury and avarice, as the coin from the fish; in order that He might displace vainglory; and by giving the stater to the tax-gatherers, and "rendering to Caesar the things which are Caesar's," might preserve "to God the things which are God's. The staler is capable of other explanations not unknown to us, but the present is not a suitable occasion for their treatment. Let the mention we make for our present purpose suffice, as it is not unsuitable to the flowers of the Word; and we have often done this, drawing to the urgent point of the question the most beneficial fountain, in order to water those who have been planted by the Word.
The fish that Peter caught at the Lord’s command also hints at food that is easy to come by, given by God, and moderate. For he suggests that, among those who come up out of the water to the bait of righteousness, we should remove extravagance and love of money, like the coin from the fish’s mouth. In this way he would drive out vainglory, and by giving the stater to the tax collectors, rendering to Caesar what is Caesar’s, he would keep for God what is God’s. The stater could have other explanations, which are not unknown to us, but the present moment is not suitable for working them out. It is enough to mention it, since we are using it for our subject and it does not clash with the flowers of the Word. We have often done this, drawing the many-benefiting spring to the pressing point of the question, to water what the Word has planted.
"For if it is lawful for me to partake of all things, yet all things are not expedient. For those that do all that is lawful, quickly fall into doing what is unlawful. And just as righteousness is not attained by avarice, nor temperance by excess; so neither is the regimen of a Christian formed by indulgence; for the table of truth is far from lascivious dainties. For though it was chiefly for men's sake that all things were made, yet it is not good to use all things, nor at all times. For the occasion, and the time, and the mode, and the intention, materially turn the balance with reference to what is useful, in the view of one who is rightly instructed; and this is suitable, and has influence in putting a stop to a life of gluttony, which wealth is prone to choose, not that wealth which sees clearly, but that abundance which makes a man blind with reference to gluttony.
For even if “it is lawful for me to partake of everything, not everything is beneficial.” Those who do everything that is lawful quickly fall into doing what is not lawful. Righteousness is not gained through greed, nor self-control through licentiousness. In the same way, the Christian’s way of life is not acquired through pleasure-seeking. The table of truth is far from “dishes that crave indulgence.” Even if everything was made chiefly for the sake of human beings, it is not good to use everything, nor to use it at all times. For the occasion, the time, the manner, and the purpose all make no small difference, for the person being trained, in leading to what is profitable. Fitness for the occasion has the strength to put an end to the life lived for the belly. Riches invite such a life, though not riches that see sharply, but an abundance that is blind to gluttony.
No one is poor as regards necessaries, and a man is never overlooked. For there is one God who feeds the fowls and the fishes, and, in a word, the irrational creatures; and not one thing whatever is wanting to them, though "they take no thought for their food. And we are better than they, being their lords, and more closely allied to God, as being wiser; and we were made, not that we might eat and drink, but that we might devote ourselves to the knowledge of God. "For the just man who eats is satisfied in his soul, but the belly of the wicked shall want," filled with the appetites of insatiable gluttony. Now lavish expense is adapted not for enjoyment alone, but also for social communication. Wherefore we must guard against those articles of food which persuade us to eat when we are not hungry, bewitching the appetite. For is there not within a temperate simplicity a wholesome variety of eatables?
No one is poor when it comes to the necessities of life, and no human being is ever overlooked. There is one God who feeds the birds, the fish, and, in a word, all the creatures without reason. They lack nothing at all, though they take no anxious thought for food. We are better than they, since we are their masters, and closer to God, since we are wiser. We were made, not to eat and drink, but to come to the knowledge of God. “For the righteous man,” it says, “eats and is satisfied in his soul, but the bellies of the ungodly are in want,” because they crave a gluttony that never rests. Lavish expense is suited not to solitary enjoyment but to sharing with others. So we must be on guard against foods that bewitch our appetites and persuade us to eat when we are not hungry. For surely a wholesome variety of dishes is possible even within a temperate simplicity?
Bulbs, olives, certain herbs, milk, cheese, fruits, all kinds of cooked food without sauces; and if flesh is wanted, let roast rather than boiled be set down. Have you anything to eat here? said the Lord to the disciples after the resurrection; and they, as taught by Him to practise frugality, "gave Him a piece of broiled fish; "and having eaten before them, says Luke, He spoke to them what He spoke. And in addition to these, it is not to be overlooked that those who feed according to the Word are not debarred from dainties in the shape of honey-combs. For of articles of food, those are the most suitable which are fit for immediate use without fire, since they are readiest; and second to these are those which are simplest, as we said before. But those who bend around inflammatory tables, nourishing their own diseases, are ruled by a most lickerish demon, whom I shall not blush to call the Belly-demon, and the worst and most abandoned of demons.
Bulbs, olives, certain vegetables, milk, cheese, fruits in season, and all kinds of cooked dishes without rich sauces. If roast or boiled meat is needed, it should be served. After the resurrection the Lord said to the disciples, “Do you have anything to eat here?” And they, as men taught by him to practise simple living, “gave him a piece of roasted fish. And when he had eaten in front of them, he said to them” what he said, as Luke records. Besides these, we must not overlook that those who dine according to the Word are not to be left without nuts and honeycombs. Of all foods, the most suitable are those we can use straight away without fire, since they are the most readily available. Next come the plainest, as we said before. But those who hunch over inflamed tables, nursing their own passions, are led by a most gluttonous demon. I would not be ashamed to call him the “belly-demon,” the worst and most ruinous of demons.
He is therefore exactly like the one who is called the Ventriloquist-demon. It is far better to be happy than to have a demon dwelling with us. And happiness is found in the practice of virtue. Accordingly, the apostle Matthew partook of seeds, and nuts, and vegetables, without flesh. And John, who carded temperance to the extreme, "ate locusts and wild honey. Peter abstained from swine; "but a trance fell on him," as is written in the Acts of the Apostles, "and he saw heaven opened, and a vessel let down on the earth by the four corners, and all the four-looted beasts and creeping things of the earth and the fowls of heaven in it; and there came a voice to him, Rise, and slay, and eat. And Peter said, Not so, Lord, for I have never eaten what is common or unclean.
This demon is just like the so-called ventriloquist spirit. But it is far better to become blessed (“well-spirited”) than to have a demon living with you. Happiness is tested by the practice of virtue. The apostle Matthew, then, ate seeds, nuts and vegetables, without meat. John carried self-control to the extreme: “he ate locusts and wild honey.” Peter also abstained from pork. But “a trance fell upon him,” as it is written in the Acts of the Apostles, “and he saw heaven opened and a vessel tied at four corners resting on the earth. In it were all the four-footed animals and reptiles of the earth and the birds of heaven. And a voice came to him: ‘Get up, kill and eat.’ But Peter said, ‘Certainly not, Lord, for I have never eaten anything common and unclean.’”
And the voice came again to him the second time, What God hath cleansed, call not thou common. The use of them is accordingly indifferent to us. "For not what entereth into the mouth defileth the man," but the vain opinion respecting uncleanness. For God, when He created man, said, "All things shall be to you for meat. "And herbs, with love, are better than a calf with fraud. This well reminds us of what was said above, that herbs are not love, but that our meals are to be taken with love; and in these the medium state is good. In all things, indeed, this is the case, and not least in the preparation made for feasting, since the extremes are dangerous, and middle courses good. And to be in no want of necessaries is the medium. For the desires which are in accordance with nature are bounded by sufficiency.
“And the voice came to him again a second time: ‘What God has cleansed, do not you call common.’” So for us, too, the use of foods is a matter of indifference. “For it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person.” What is empty is the notion about self-indulgence. For God, when he formed man, said, “All things shall be yours for food.” But “a dish of vegetables with love” (or “a calf with deceit”) is a good reminder of what was said before: it is not that vegetables are love, but that meals are to be taken with love. The middle state is good in everything, and not least in the preparation for a feast, since extremes are slippery and the middle is good. The middle is whatever lacks none of the necessities. For natural appetites are bounded by what is sufficient.
The Jews had frugality enjoined on them by the law in the most systematic manner. For the Instructor, by Moses, deprived them of the use of innumerable things, adding reasons-the spiritual ones hidden; the carnal ones apparent, to which indeed they have trusted; in the case of some animals, because they did not part the hoof, and others because they did not ruminate their food, and others because alone of aquatic animals they were devoid of scales ; so that altogether but a few were left appropriate for their food. And of those that he permitted them to touch, he prohibited such as had died, or were offered to idols, or had been strangled; for to touch these was unlawful. For since it is impossible for those who use dainties to abstain from partaking of them, he appointed the opposite mode of life, till he should break down the propensity to indulgence arising from habit.
To the Jews, frugality was proclaimed through the law in a very well-ordered way. For through Moses the Instructor took away from them the use of countless things, attaching reasons: the spiritual ones hidden, the fleshly ones plain, and these latter they believed. Some animals were forbidden because they do not have a divided hoof, some because they do not chew the cud, and some fish because they alone of water creatures lack scales. So very few were left that were suitable for their food. Even among the things he allowed them to touch, he forbade animals that died of themselves, food offered to idols, and animals that had been strangled, for it was not right to touch these either. Since it is impossible for someone who enjoys pleasant things to give up approving of them, he set against them the opposite discipline, until he could break the habit’s rush toward self-indulgence.
Pleasure has often produced in men harm and pain; and full feeding begets in the soul uneasiness, and forgetfulness, and foolishness. And they say that the bodies of children, when shooting up to their height, are made to grow right by deficiency in nourishment. For then the spirit, which pervades the body in order to its growth, is not checked by abundance of food obstructing the freedom of its course. Whence that truth-seeking philosopher Plato, fanning the spark of the Hebrew philosophy when condemning a life of luxury, says: "On my coming hither, the life which is here called happy, full of Italian and Syracusan tables, pleased me not by any means, [consisting as it did] in being filled twice a day, and never sleeping by night alone, and whatever other accessories attend the mode of life. For not one man under heaven, if brought up from his youth in such practices, will ever turn out a wise man, with however admirable a natural genius he may be endowed. For Plato was not unacquainted with David, who "placed the sacred ark in his city in the midst of the tabernacle ; "and bidding all his subjects rejoice "before the Lord, divided to the whole host of Israel, man and woman, to each a loaf of bread, and baked bread, and a cake from the frying-pan.
For human beings, pleasure has mostly brought harm and grief. Overeating breeds in the soul dullness, forgetfulness and folly. They also say that children’s bodies grow well in height when they are given somewhat less food. The breath that runs up through the body to make it grow is then not hindered, because plenty of food does not block the free flow of its course. So Plato, the philosopher who most zealously sought the truth, condemned the life of luxury and fanned the spark of Hebrew philosophy back into flame. He says: “When I came there, the life they call happy, full of Italian and Syracusan tables, did not please me at all. It means living stuffed twice a day, never sleeping alone at night, and all the habits that go with that kind of life. No human being under heaven could ever become wise if he practiced such things from his youth, nor would he ever be so wonderfully balanced in character.” For Plato was not unaware of David. David set up the holy ark in his own city, in the middle of the tent, and made all the people under his rule glad. “Before the Lord he distributed to the whole host of Israel, from man to woman, a loaf of bread to each, a baked cake, and a cake from the frying pan.”
This was the sufficient sustenance of the Israelites. But that of the Gentiles was over-abundant. No one who uses it will ever study to become temperate, burying as he does his mind in his belly, very like the fish called ass, which, Aristotle says, alone of all creatures has its heart in its stomach. This fish Epicharmus the comic poet calls "monster-paunch. Such are the men who believe in their belly, "whose God is their belly, whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things. To them the apostle predicted no good when he said, "whose end is destruction."
This food was enough for the Israelites, but the food of the Gentiles is excessive. A man who lives on it “would never even intend to become temperate.” He has buried his mind in his belly. He is very like the fish called the “ass,” which Aristotle says is the only creature with its heart in its stomach. The comic poet Epicharmus calls this fish “monster-belly.” Such are those who put their trust in the belly: “whose god is the belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who set their minds on earthly things.” The apostle foretold nothing good for them, for he said, “Their end is destruction.”
On Drinking."Use a little wine," says the apostle to Timothy, who drank water, "for thy stomach's sake; " most properly applying its aid as a strengthening tonic suitable to a sickly body enfeebled with watery humours; and specifying "a little," lest the remedy should, on account of its quantity, unobserved, create the necessity of other treatment. The natural, temperate, and necessary beverage, therefore, for the thirsty is water. This was the simple drink of sobriety, which, flowing from the smitten rock, was supplied by the Lord to the ancient Hebrews. It was most requisite that in their wanderings they should be temperate. Afterwards the sacred vine produced the prophetic cluster. This was a sign to them, when trained from wandering to their rest; representing the great cluster the Word, bruised for us. For the blood of the grape-that is, the Word-desired to be mixed with water, as His blood is mingled with salvation. And the blood of the Lord is twofold. For there is the blood of His flesh, by which we are redeemed from corruption; and the spiritual, that by which we are anointed.
On Drinking. How we should approach drink. The apostle tells Timothy, who drank only water, “Use a little wine, for your stomach’s sake.” This was an excellent way to treat an ailing, flabby body, for he gave it a fitting, strengthening remedy. He approved only a little, so that the remedy would not, through its quantity, quietly become something that itself needed another treatment. The natural and sober drink that the thirsty need is water. The Lord supplied this to the ancient Hebrews as the one drink of self-control, pouring it from the sheer rock. Those who were still wandering most needed to be sober. Afterward the holy vine put forth the prophetic cluster of grapes. This was a sign for those who had been trained out of wandering into rest. The great cluster is the Word, crushed for our sake. The Word wished the blood of the grape to be mixed with water, just as his own blood is mixed with salvation. The Lord’s blood is twofold. One is fleshly, by which we have been redeemed from corruption. The other is spiritual, and by it we have been anointed.
And to drink the blood of Jesus, is to become partaker of the Lord's immortality; the Spirit being the energetic principle of the Word, as blood is of flesh. Accordingly, as wine is blended with water, so is the Spirit with man. And the one, the mixture of wine and water, nourishes to faith; while the other, the Spirit, conducts to immortality. And the mixture of both-of the water and of the Word-is called Eucharist, renowned and glorious grace; and they who by faith partake of it are sanctified both in body and soul. For the divine mixture, man, the Father's will has mystically compounded by the Spirit and the Word. For, in truth, the spirit is joined to the soul, which is inspired by it; and the flesh, by reason of which the Word became flesh, to the Word.
To drink the blood of Jesus is to share in the Lord’s incorruption. The Spirit is the power of the Word, as blood is of flesh. In the same proportion, then, wine is mixed with water, and the Spirit with the human being. The mixture of wine and water feeds us toward faith, and the Spirit leads us on to incorruption. The mixture of both, the drink and the Word, is called the Eucharist, a grace that is praised and beautiful. Those who share in it by faith are made holy in body and soul. The Father’s will mystically mixes the human being, this divine mixture, with the Spirit and the Word. For the Spirit is truly joined to the soul that it carries, and the flesh is joined to the Word, the flesh for whose sake “the Word became flesh.”
I therefore admire those who have adopted an austere life, and who are fond of water, the medicine of temperance, and flee as far as possible from wine, shunning it as they would the danger of fire. It is proper, therefore, that boys and girls should keep as much as possible away from this medicine. For it is not right to pour into the burning season of life the hottest of all liquids-wine-adding, as it were, fire to fire. For hence wild impulses and burning lusts and fiery habits are kindled; and young men inflamed from within become prone to the indulgence of vicious propensities; so that signs of injury appear in their body, the members of lust coming to maturity sooner than they ought. The breasts and organs of generation, inflamed with wine, expand and swell in a shameful way, already exhibiting beforehand the image of fornication; and the body compels the wound of the soul to inflame, and shameless pulsations follow abundance, inciting the man of correct behaviour to transgression; and hence the voluptuousness of youth overpasses the bounds of modesty.
I admire, then, those who have chosen a strict way of life. They long for water, the medicine of self-control, and flee as far as they can from wine, as from the threat of fire. So it seems good to me that boys and girls, for the most part, should keep away from this drug. It is not suitable to pour the hottest of liquids, wine, onto an age that is already boiling. That is like channeling fire onto fire. From it wild impulses, inflamed desires and a fiery temper are kindled. Young people, heated from within, become hasty toward their appetites. The harm is then plain to see in their bodies, since the organs of desire ripen sooner than they should. They are aroused more shamelessly, as if from boiling wine. Their breasts and private parts swell, and already announce a picture of fornication. The wound of the soul forces the body to inflame, and shameless throbbings drive them on to excess, calling the well-ordered character out into lawlessness.
And we must, as far as possible, try to quench the impulses of youth by removing the Bacchic fuel of the threatened danger; and by pouring the antidote to the inflammation, so keep down the burning soul, and keep in the swelling members, and allay the agitation of lust when it is already in commotion. And in the case of grown-up people, let those with whom it agrees sometimes partake of dinner, tasting bread only, and let them abstain wholly from drink; in order that their superfluous moisture may be absorbed and drunk up by the eating of dry food. For constant spitting and wiping off perspiration, and hastening to evacuations, is the sign of excess, from the immoderate use of liquids supplied in excessive quantity to the body. And if thirst come on, let the appetite be satisfied with a little water. For it is not proper that water should be supplied in too great profusion; in order that the food may not be drowned, but ground down in order to digestion; and this takes place when the victuals are collected into a mass, and only a small portion is evacuated.
From this point the “new wine” of youth passes beyond the limits of modesty. So as far as possible we must try to quench the urges of the young. We should take away the fuel, the Bacchic frenzy that threatens them, and pour on the remedy for the boiling over. This will hold back the soul that is already smoldering, check the swelling members, and put to sleep the agitation of desire that is already stirring. As for those in the prime of life, let them take a midday meal, since a midday meal suits them. Let them taste bread only and abstain entirely from drink, so that their excess moisture may be soaked up and drunk in by the dry food. For constant spitting and blowing the nose and hurrying to relieve oneself are signs of intemperance, caused by immoderate intake that floods the body with fluids. If thirst does come, let them cure the discomfort with a little water. It is not right to drink water freely either, lest the food be washed out. The food should be broken down for digestion, with the solid food settling into a mass and only a very little passing off in the excretions.
And, besides, it suits divine studies not to be heavy with wine. "For unmixed wine is far from compelling a man to be wise, much less temperate," according to the comic poet. But towards evening, about supper-time, wine may be used, when we are no longer engaged in more serious readings. Then also the air becomes colder than it is during the day; so that the failing natural warmth requires to be nourished by the introduction of heat. But even then it must only be a little wine that is to be used; for we must not go on to intemperate potations. Those who are already advanced in life may partake more cheerfully of the draught, to warm by the harmless medicine of the vine the chill of age, which the decay of time has produced. For old men's passions are not, for the most part, stirred to such agitation as to drive them to the shipwreck of drunkenness. For being moored by reason and time, as by anchors, they stand with greater ease the storm of passions which rushes down from intemperance. They also may be permitted to indulge in pleasantry at feasts.
Besides, it is not fitting to be heavy with wine when we are occupied with thoughts of God. For, as the comic poet says, “unmixed wine compels a man to think few thoughts,” let alone to be self-controlled. Wine should be used toward evening, around supper time, when we are no longer busy with the more sober readings. At that hour the surrounding air is cooler than in the daytime, so the natural warmth that is failing needs to be fed with warmth brought in from outside. Even then the wine should be little, for we must not go on to the bowls of insolence. Those who are already past their prime may be allowed to take the drink more freely. With the vine’s remedy they can safely rekindle the chill of age, which seems to wither under time. For the appetites of older men, for the most part, no longer swell toward the shipwrecks of drunkenness. Moored, as it were, by reason and by time as by anchors, they bear more easily the gale of desires that blows up from drink. They may perhaps even allow themselves a little pleasantry at feasts.
But to them also let the limit of their potations be the point up to which they keep their reason unwavering, their memory active, and their body unmoved and unshaken by wine. People in such a state are called by those who are skilful in these matters, acrothorakes. It is well, therefore, to leave off betimes, for fear of tripping. One Artorius, in his book On Long Life (for so I remember), thinks that drink should be taken only till the food be moistened, that we may attain to a longer life. It is fitting, then, that some apply wine by way of physic, for the sake of health alone, and others for purposes of relaxation and enjoyment. For first wine makes the man who has drunk it more benignant than before, more agreeable to his boon companions, kinder to his domestics, and more pleasant to his friends. But when intoxicated, he becomes violent instead. For wine being warm, and having sweet juices when duly mixed, dissolves the foul excrementitious matters by its warmth, and mixes the acrid and base humours with the agreeable scents.
But even for these let the limit of drinking be the point at which they keep their reasoning steady, their memory active, and their body unmoved and unshaken by wine. Those who are skilled in these matters call this state “top of the breastplate.” It is good, then, to stop beforehand because of the risk of slipping. A certain Artorius, in his book On Long Life (so I remember), thinks we should go only as far as is needed to moisten the food, so that we may gain a longer life. It is fitting, then, that some take wine as part of a treatment, for health alone, and others for rest and relaxation. For wine first makes the drinker kinder to himself than before, gentler to his fellow drinkers, milder to his servants, and more pleasant to his friends. But if he is made drunk, it repays him with insolence. For wine is warm and has sweet juices. When mixed in due measure, it dissolves the sticky waste matter by its warmth, and blends the sharp and bad humors with its pleasant aromas.
It has therefore been well said, "A joy of the soul and heart was wine created from the beginning, when drunk in moderate sufficiency. And it is best to mix the wine with as much water as possible, and not to have recourse to it as to water, and so get enervated to drunkenness, and not pour it in as water from love of wine. For both are works of God; and so the mixture of both, of water and of wine, conduces together to health, because life consists of what is necessary and of what is useful. With water, then, which is the necessary of life, and to be used in abundance, there is also to be mixed the useful. By an immoderate quantity of wine the tongue is impeded; the lips are relaxed; the eyes roll wildly, the sight, as it were, swimming through the quantity of moisture; and compelled to deceive, they think that everything is revolving round them, and cannot count distant objects as single. "And, in truth, methinks I see two suns," said the Theban old man in his cups. For the sight, being disturbed by the heat of the wine, frequently fancies the substance of one object to be manifold. And there is no difference between moving the eye or the object seen. For both have the same effect on the sight, which, on account of the fluctuation, cannot accurately obtain a perception of the object.
Rightly, then, it has been said: “Wine was created from the beginning as a gladness of soul and heart, when drunk in sufficient measure.” It is best to mix the wine with as much water as possible and to dull its force against drunkenness. It should not be poured in like water out of a love of wine. Both are works of God, and so the mixture of both, water and wine, contributes to health, because life consists of what is necessary and what is useful. So the necessary, water, should be mixed in as abundantly as possible with the useful. But when wine is taken without measure, the tongue stumbles, the lips go slack, and the eyes turn aside, as if the sight were swimming in the quantity of liquid. Forced to deceive, the eyes think everything is spinning around, and they cannot count distant objects as single. “Indeed, I seem to see two suns,” said the old Theban man in his drunkenness. The sight, stirred by the heat of the wine, often pictures one thing as many. It makes no difference whether the eye is moved or the thing seen, for the sight suffers the same either way: because of the tossing, it cannot accurately grasp the object before it.
And the feet are carried from beneath the man as by a flood, and hiccuping and vomiting and maudlin nonsense follow; "for every intoxicated man," according to the tragedy, - "Is conquered by anger, and empty of sense, And likes to pour forth much silly speech; And is wont to hear unwillingly, What evil words he with his will hath said. And before tragedy, Wisdom cried, "Much wine drunk abounds in irritation and all manner of mistakes. Wherefore most people say that you ought to relax over your cups, and postpone serious business till morning. I however think that then especially ought reason to be introduced to mix in the feast, to act the part of director (paedagogue) to wine-drinking, lest conviviality imperceptibly degenerate to drunkenness. For as no sensible man ever thinks it requisite to shut his eyes before going to sleep, so neither can any one rightly wish reason to be absent from the festive board, or can well study to lull it asleep till business is begun.
Their steps are swept away from under them as by a current. Hiccups, vomiting and madness crash in on the revel. For, as the tragedy says, every man drunk with wine is overcome by anger and empty of sense. He loves to pour out a flood of idle talk, and then unwillingly hears the evil things he said willingly. Even before the tragedy, Wisdom cried out: “Wine drunk in quantity increases irritation and every kind of fall.” Therefore most people say that we should unbend at drinking parties and put serious matters off until dawn. I hold the opposite. That is exactly the time to bring in the Word to share the feast and to act as instructor over the drinking, so that the feast does not slip unnoticed into drunkenness. No sensible person would think of closing his eyes before he goes to sleep. In the same way no one could rightly want the Word absent from the banquet, or do well to put him to sleep before the day’s business is done.
But the Word can never quit those who belong to Him, not even if we are asleep; for He ought to be invited even to our sleep. For perfect wisdom, which is knowledge of things divine and human, which comprehends all that relates to the oversight of the flock of men, becomes, in reference to life, art; and so, while we live, is constantly, with us, always accomplishing its own proper work, the product of which is a good life. But the miserable wretches who expel temperance from conviviality, think excess in drinking to be the happiest life; and their life is nothing but revel, debauchery, baths, excess, urinals, idleness, drink. You may see some of them, half-drunk, staggering, with crowns round their necks like wine jars, vomiting drink on one another in the name of good fellowship; and others, full of the effects of their debauch, dirty, pale in the face, livid, and still above yesterday's bout pouring another bout to last till next morning.
Indeed the Word can never withdraw from what is his own, not even when we sleep, for we must call on him even for our sleep. Wisdom is perfect: it is knowledge of divine and human affairs and embraces the whole. In so far as it oversees the flock of men, it becomes an art of living. So it is present with us everywhere, as long as we live, always completing its own work, which is the good life. But the wretched men who drive self-control out of the feast think that the disorder of their drinking parties is the happy life. Their living is nothing but revelling, hangovers, baths, unmixed wine, chamber pots, idleness and drink. You can see some of them half-drunk and staggering, with garlands around their necks like wine jars, forcing the unmixed wine down one another’s throats in the name of a toast to friendship. Others are sodden from their hangover, unwashed and pale, with livid faces. Yet on top of yesterday’s drunkenness they pump up another drunkenness at dawn.
It is well, my friends, it is well to make our acquaintance with this picture at the greatest possible distance from it, and to frame ourselves to what is better, dreading lest we also become a like spectacle and laughing-stock to others. It has been appropriately said, "As the furnace proverb the steel blade in the process of dipping, so wine proveth the heart of the haughty. A debauch is the immoderate use of wine, intoxication the disorder that results from such use; crapulousness (kraipa/lh) is the discomfort and nausea that follow a debauch; so called from the head shaking (ka/ra pa/llein). Such a life as this (if life it must be called, which is spent in idleness, in agitation about voluptuous indulgences, and in the hallucinations of debauchery) the divine Wisdom looks on with contempt, and commands her children, "Be not a wine-bibber, nor spend your money in the purchase of flesh; for every drunkard and fornicator shall come to beggary, and every sluggard shall be clothed in tatters and rags. For every one that is not awake to wisdom, but is steeped in wine, is a sluggard.
It is good, my friends, very good, to study this picture, at once ridiculous and pitiable, from as far away as possible. Then we may shape ourselves toward something better, fearing that we too might become a similar sight and a laughingstock to others. It was well said: “As the furnace tests the temper of steel in the dipping, so wine tests the heart of the proud in drunkenness.” Now drunkenness is the more violent use of unmixed wine. Drunken misbehavior is the disorder that comes from that use. A hangover (kraipalē) is the discomfort and distaste that follow drunkenness. It is named from the head throbbing (kara pallein). This kind of life, if it should be called life, is lazy, restless after pleasures, and frantic over wine. Divine Wisdom looks on it with suspicion and commands her children: “Do not be a wine-drinker, and do not stretch yourself out in contracts and purchases of meat. For every drunkard and every frequenter of prostitutes will become poor, and every drowsy person will wear torn clothes.” For the drowsy person is anyone who is not awake to wisdom but is plunged into sleep by drunkenness.
"And the drunkard," he says, "shall be clothed in rags, and be ashamed of his drunkenness in the presence of onlookers. For the wounds of the sinner are the rents of the garment of the flesh, the holes made by lusts, through which the shame of the soul within is seen-namely sin, by reason of which it will not be easy to save the garment, that has been torn away all round, that has rotted away in many lusts, and has been rent asunder from salvation. So he adds these most monitory words. "Who has woes, who has clamour, who has contentions, who has disgusting babblings, who has unavailing remorse? " You see, in all his raggedness, the lover of wine, who despises the Word Himself, and has abandoned and given himself to drunkenness. You see what threatening Scripture has pronounced against him. And to its threatening it adds again: "Whose are red eyes? Those, is it not, who tarry long at their wine, and hunt out the places where drinking goes on? "Here he shows the lover of drink to be already dead to the Word, by the mention of the bloodshot eyes,-a mark which appears on corpses, announcing to him death in the Lord. For forgetfulness of the things which tend to true life turns the scale towards destruction.
“And the drunkard,” it says, “will wear torn clothes.” He will be ashamed of his drunkenness because of those who look on. The tears in the garment are the holes that the sinner’s love of pleasure has made in the fabric of the flesh. Through them the shame of the soul within is seen, which is sin. Because of sin the fabric will not easily be saved. It has been torn away on every side and is rotting in many desires, cut off from salvation. So Scripture adds this very instructive warning: “Who has woe? Who has uproar? Who has judgment? Who has unpleasant chatter? Who has bruises for nothing?” See the wine-lover, torn to pieces. He pays no heed to the Word himself, and he has handed himself over to drunkenness. See everything Scripture has threatened against him. Again it adds to the threat: “Whose eyes are livid? Is it not those who linger over wine? Those who track down where the drinking parties are?” Here the Word already shows the lover of drink to be dead. It points to the livid eyes, which is a mark that appears on corpses, and so announces to him a death “in the Lord.” For forgetfulness of the things that lead to true life tilts toward destruction.
With reason therefore, the Instructor, in His solicitude for our salvation, forbids us, "Drink not wine to drunkenness. Wherefore? you will ask. Because, says He, "thy mouth will then speak perverse things, and thou liest down as in the heart of the sea, and as the steersman of a ship in the midst of huge billows. Hence, too, poetry comes to our help, and says:- "Let wine which has strength equal to fire come to men. Then will it agitate them, as the north or south wind agitates the Libyan waves. And further:- "Wine wandering in speech shows all secrets. Soul-deceiving wine is the ruin of those who drink it. And so on. You see the danger of shipwreck. The heart is drowned in much drink. The excess of drunkenness is compared to the danger of the sea, in which when the body has once been sunken like a ship, it descends to the depths of turpitude, overwhelmed in the mighty billows of wine; and the helmsman, the human mind, is tossed about on the surge of drunkenness, which swells aloft; and buried in the trough of the sea, is blinded by the darkness of the tempest, having drifted away from the haven of truth, till, dashing on the rocks beneath the sea, it perishes, driven by itself into voluptuous indulgences.
It is only natural, then, that the Instructor, who cares for our salvation, forbids this most firmly: “Do not drink wine to drunkenness.” Why, you ask? “Because,” he says, “your mouth will then speak twisted things, and you will lie down as in the heart of the sea, like a ship’s pilot in a heavy swell.” Poetry has learned from this too, and says: “Wine, whose force is like fire when it comes among men, and which heaves like the Libyan sea under the north wind or the south; it reveals everything that is hidden, and makes men speak wrongly. Wine is a slippery slope to the drunk; wine deceives the soul,” and so on. Do you see the danger of shipwreck? The heart is swamped by heavy drinking. The Scripture compares the flood of drunkenness to the threat of the sea. In that sea the body is sunk like a ship; it goes down into the depths of disorder, buried under the triple waves of wine. The pilot, the human mind, is swept about in the surge while drunkenness towers over it. Out at sea it reels in the murk of the storm, having missed the harbor of truth. In the end it strikes hidden rocks, runs itself aground on pleasures, and destroys itself.
With reason, therefore, the apostle enjoins, "Be not drunk with wine, in which there is much excess; "by the term excess (a0swti/a) intimating the inconsistence of drunkenness with salvation (to\ a !swston). For if He made water wine at the marriage, He did not give permission to get drunk. He gave life to the watery element of the meaning of the law, filling with His blood the doer of it who is of Adam, that is, the whole world; supplying piety with drink from the vine of truth, the mixture of the old law and of the new word, in order to the fulfilment of the predestined time. The Scripture, accordingly, has named wine the symbol of the sacred blood; but reproving the base tippling with the dregs of wine, it says: "Intemperate is wine, and insolent is drunkenness. It is agreeable, therefore, to right reason, to drink on account of the cold of winter, till the numbness is dispelled from those who are subject to feel it; and on other occasions as a medicine for the intestines.
It is only natural, then, that the apostle also commands: “Do not get drunk with wine, in which there is much dissipation.” By the word “dissipation” (asotia) he hints that drunkenness cannot be saved (asoston). For although the Lord made water into wine at the wedding, he did not give permission to get drunk. Rather he brought to life the watery quality of our thinking. [The Greek text is damaged here.] He filled the whole world with the blood of the vine, which is the drink of truth. He gave to godliness the mixture of the old law and the new Word, for the fulfilment of the time already set in reconciliation. So Scripture has called wine a mystical symbol of holy blood. But when it exposes the hangover that comes from wine, it says: “Wine is undisciplined, and drunkenness is insolent.” Right reason therefore approves drinking in winter, because of the cold, up to the point of not shivering, for those who are easily chilled. At other times it approves it as a remedy for the inner organs.
For, as we are to use food to satisfy hunger, so also are we to use drink to satisfy thirst, taking the most careful precautions against a slip: "for the introduction of wine is perilous. And thus shall our soul be pure, and dry, and luminous; and the soul itself is wisest and best when dry. And thus, too, is it fit for contemplation, and is not humid with the exhalations, that rise from wine, forming a mass like a cloud. We must not therefore trouble ourselves to procure Chian wine if it is absent, or Ariousian when it is not at hand. For thirst is a sensation of want, and craves means suitable for supplying the want, and not sumptuous liquor. Importations of wines from beyond seas are for an appetite enfeebled by excess, where the soul even before drunkenness is insane in its desires. For there are the fragrant Thasian wine, and the pleasant-breathing Lesbian, and a sweet Cretan wine, and sweet Syracusan wine, and Mendusian, an Egyptian wine, and the insular Naxian, the "highly perfumed and flavoured," another wine of the land of Italy. These are many names. For the temperate drinker, one wine suffices, the product of the cultivation of the one God.
We should use drink to stop thirst just as we use food to stop hunger, carefully guarding against slipping, for wine’s creeping in is treacherous. In this way our soul will be pure, dry and full of light, “for a dry soul is a radiance, the wisest and best.” So it can also look on divine things, and is not waterlogged and turned into a cloud-like body by the vapors that rise from wine. We should not fuss about Dian wine if it is not to be had, or Ariusian wine when it is not at hand. Thirst is the feeling of some lack, and it looks for the fitting remedy to fill it, not a swollen, showy drink. Importing wines from overseas is for an appetite that has gone soft through lack of self-control, a soul that is already out of its mind with desires before it gets drunk. There is fragrant Thasian, sweet-breathing Lesbian, a sweet Cretan, a pleasant Syracusan, an Egyptian Mendesian, island Naxian, and another flowery-scented wine from the land of Italy. Those are many names. For the self-controlled drinking companion there is one wine, the farm-produce of the one God.
For why should not the wine of their own country satisfy men's desires, unless they were to import water also, like the foolish Persian kings? The Choaspes, a river of India so called, was that from which the best water for drinking-the Choaspian-was got. As wine, when taken, makes people lovers of it, so does water too. The Holy Spirit, uttering His voice by Amos, pronounces the rich to be wretched on account of their luxury: "Those that drink strained wine, and recline on an ivory couch," he says; and what else similar he adds by way of reproach. Especial regard is to be paid to decency (as the myth represents Athene, whoever she was, out of regard to it, giving up the pleasure of the flute because of the unseemliness of the sight): so that we are to drink without contortions of the face, not greedily grasping the cup, nor before drinking making the eyes roll with unseemly motion; nor from intemperance are we to drain the cup at a draught; nor besprinkle the chin, nor splash the garments while gulping down all the liquor at once,-our face all but filling the bowl, and drowned in it.
Why should the local wine not be enough to satisfy the desire? Unless, of course, they will also bring in water, like the foolish kings who brought along Choaspes water as they brought their friends. The Holy Spirit pronounces the rich wretched for their luxury here too, speaking through Amos: “Those who drink strained wine,” he says, “and lie on ivory couches,” and he adds the rest that follows in the way of reproach. We should take special care for decency. (The story says that Athena, whoever she was, looked after her own appearance and threw away the pleasure of the flutes because of the ugliness it gave her face.) So we should drink without distorting the face. We should not gulp until we are full, or force our eyes into unseemly looks over the cup, or pull at it in one breath through lack of self-control. We should not pour the drink over the chin or soak our clothes when the drink rushes in all at once. That would be almost washing and rinsing our own faces in the cups.
For the gurgling occasioned by the drink rushing with violence, and by its being drawn in with a great deal of breath, as if it were being poured into an earthenware vessel, while the throat makes a noise through the rapidity of ingurgitation, is a shameful and unseemly spectacle of intemperance. In addition to this, eagerness in drinking is a practice injurious to the partaker. Do not haste to mischief, my friend. Your drink is not being taken from you. It is given you, and waits you. Be not eager to burst, by draining it down with gaping throat. Your thirst is satiated, even if you drink slower, observing decorum, by taking the beverage in small portions, in an orderly way. For that which intemperance greedily seizes, is not taken away by taking time. "Be not mighty," he says, "at wine; for wine has overcome many. The Scythians, the Celts, the Iberians, and the Thracians, all of them warlike races, are greatly addicted to intoxication, and think that it is an honourable, happy pursuit to engage in. But we, the people of peace, feasting for lawful enjoyment, not to wantonness, drink sober cups of friendship, that our friendships may be shown in a way truly appropriate to the name.
Think of the gurgling noise as the drink comes pouring down, drawn in with a great gasp of breath as if it were being poured into a clay jar, while the throat echoes with the rushing gulps. That is ugly, and the sight of such self-indulgence is unseemly. A love of drinking is also a harmful habit for the one who gives in to it. Don’t rush into harm, my friend. Your drink is not being snatched away. It has been given to you and is waiting for you. Don’t be so eager to gulp it down with open mouth that you burst. Your thirst will be filled even if you drink more slowly, and you will have gained good order, if the drink is taken in measured portions. What self-indulgence grabs in haste is not taken from you by waiting. Scripture says, “Do not play the strong man with wine, for wine has ruined many.” “Drunkenness is practiced above all by the Scythians, Celts, Iberians and Thracians. These are all warlike peoples, and they consider it a fine and happy custom.” But we are a peaceful people. We feast for enjoyment, not for insolence, so let us drink our friendship cups sober, so that they may truly be shown to be friendly pledges, as the name says.
In what manner do you think the Lord drank when He became man for our sakes? As shamelessly as we? Was it not with decorum and propriety? Was it not deliberately? For rest assured, He Himself also partook of wine; for He, too, was man. And He blessed the wine, saying, "Take, drink: this is my blood"-the blood of the vine. He figuratively calls the Word "shed for many, for the remission of sins"-the holy stream of gladness. And that he who drinks ought to observe moderation, He clearly showed by what He taught at feasts. For He did not teach affected by wine. And that it was wine which was the thing blessed, He showed again, when He said to His disciples, "I will not drink of the fruit of this vine, till I drink it with you in the kingdom of my Father. But that it was wine which was drunk by the Lord, He tells us again, when He spake concerning Himself, reproaching the Jews for their hardness of heart: "For the Son of man," He says, "came, and they say, Behold a glutton and a wine-bibber, a friend of publicans. Let this be held fast by us against those that are called Encratites.
How do you think the Lord drank when he became man for our sake? As shamelessly as we do? Was it not with refinement? With decorum? With careful thought? You may be sure that he too took wine, for he too was man. And he blessed the wine, saying, “Take, drink; this is my blood.” The blood of the vine is his figure for the Word, “poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins,” the holy stream of gladness. He showed clearly, by what he taught at feasts, that the one who drinks must be self-controlled, for he did not teach while drunk. And that what he blessed was wine, he showed again when he said to his disciples, “I will not drink of this fruit of the vine until I drink it with you in the kingdom of my Father.” That it was wine the Lord drank, he also says of himself, when he rebukes the hard-heartedness of the Jews: “For the Son of Man came, and they say, ‘Look, a glutton and a wine-drinker, a friend of tax collectors.’” Let this be thrown in, as a playful aside, against those who call themselves Encratites.
But women, making a profession, forsooth, of aiming at the graceful, that their lips may not be rent apart by stretching them on broad drinking cups, and so widening the mouth, drinking in an unseemly way out of alabastra quite too narrow: in the mouth, throw back their heads and bare their necks indecently, as I think; and distending the throat in swallowing, gulp down the liquor as if to make bare all they can to their boon companions; and drawing hiccups like men, or rather like slaves, revel in luxurious riot. For nothing disgraceful is proper for man, who is endowed with reason; much less for woman to whom it brings modesty even to reflect of what nature she is. "An intoxicated woman is great wrath," it is said, as if a drunken woman were the wrath of God. Why? "Because she will not conceal her shame. For a woman is quickly drawn down to licentiousness, if she only set her choice on pleasures.
Women, supposedly to keep up a graceful appearance, avoid wide cups so that their lips will not be stretched and split by opening the mouth wide. Instead they drink indecently from narrow-necked alabaster flasks. They tilt their heads back and bare their necks, which is not decent, in my opinion. They stretch the throat and gulp as they swallow, as though they were exposing to their fellow drinkers all they could. They draw up belches like a man’s, or rather like a slave’s, and carry on in wanton luxury. For no such noise is fitting for a reasoning man, and still less for a woman, for whom the mere awareness of what she is brings nothing but shame. Scripture says, “A drunken woman is great wrath.” It is as if a wine-soaked woman were the anger of God. Why? Because “she does not cover up her disgrace.” A woman is quickly dragged into disorder if she only gives her will over to pleasures.
And we have not prohibited drinking from alabastra; but we forbid studying to drink from them alone, as arrogant; counselling women to use with indifference what comes in the way, and cutting up by the roots the dangerous appetites that are in them. Let the rush of air, then, which regurgitates so as to produce hiccup, be emitted silently. But by no manner of means are women to be allotted to uncover and exhibit any part of their person, lest both fall,-the men by being excited to look, they by drawing on themselves the eyes of the men. But always must we conduct ourselves as in the Lord's presence, lest He say to us, as the apostle in indignation said to the Corinthians, "When ye come together, this is not to eat the Lord's supper. To me, the star called by the mathematicians Acephalus (headless), which is numbered before the wandering star, his head resting on his breast, seems to be a type of the gluttonous, the voluptuous, and those that are prone to drunkenness.
We have not forbidden drinking from alabaster flasks. What we cut off is the habit of drinking only from them, as a piece of showiness. We advise women to use whatever happens to be at hand without fuss, and so to check their appetites while they are still far from slipping. The swelling of air that rises toward a belch should be let out quietly. In no way should women be allowed to let any part of the body be seen uncovered, so that both do not fall: the men, provoked to look, and the women, drawing the men’s eyes to themselves. We must always behave decently, as though the Lord were present. Otherwise the apostle may say to us in anger, as he did to the Corinthians, “When you come together, it is not possible to eat the Lord’s supper.” It seems to me that the star the astronomers call “the Headless,” which is counted before the “wandering” star, with its head sunk into its chest, hints at gluttons, lovers of pleasure and those ready for drunkenness.
For in such the faculty of reasoning is not situated in the head, but among the intestinal appetites, enslaved to lust and anger. For just as Elpenor broke his neck through intoxication, so the brain, dizzied by drunkenness, falls down from above, with a great fall to the liver and the heart, that is, to voluptuousness and anger: as the sons of the poets say Hephaestus was hurled by Zeus from heaven to earth. "The trouble of sleeplessness, and bile, and cholic, are with an insatiable man," it is said. Wherefore also Noah's intoxication was recorded in writing, that, with the clear and written description of his transgression before us, we might guard with all our might against drunkenness. For which cause they who covered the shame of his drunkenness are blessed by the Lord. The Scripture accordingly, giving a most comprehensive compend, has expressed all in one word: "To an instructed man sufficiency is wine, and he will rest in his bed."
For in such people the reasoning faculty is seated not in the head but in the bowels, enslaved to the passions of desire and anger. Elpenor broke his neck when he fell down drunk. In the same way the brain of these people, made dizzy from above by drunkenness, falls down to the liver and the heart, that is, to the love of pleasure and to anger. It is a greater fall than the one the poets’ children say Hephaestus took when Zeus threw him from heaven to the ground. Scripture says, “Sleeplessness brings pain, and bile and colic, with an insatiable man.” This is also why Noah’s drunkenness was written down. We are to guard against drunkenness as much as we can, having the failure set plainly before us in writing. For this reason those who covered the shame of his drunkenness are blessed by the Lord. So Scripture gathers it all up very briefly and says it in one sentence: “Wine is enough for an instructed man, and he will rest on his bed.”
On Costly Vessels.And so the use of cups made of silver and gold, and of to hers inlaid with precious stones, is out of place, being only a deception of the vision. For if you pour any warm liquid into them, the vessels becoming hot, to touch them is painful. On the other hand, if you pour in what is cold, the material changes its quality, injuring the mixture, and the rich potion is hurtful. Away, then, with Thericleian cups and Antigonides, and Canthari, and goblets, and Lepastae, and the endless shapes of drinking vessels, and wine-coolers, and wine-pourers also. For, on the whole, gold and silver, both publicly and privately, are an invidious possession when they exceed what is necessary, seldom to be acquired, difficult to keep, and not adapted for use. The elaborate vanity, too, of vessels in glass chased, more apt to break on account of the art, teaching us to fear while we drink, is to be banished from our well-ordered constitution. And silver couches, and pans and vinegar-saucers, and trenchers and bowls; and besides these, vessels of saver and gold, some for serving food, and others for other uses which I am ashamed to name, of easily cleft cedar and thyine wood, and ebony, and tripods fashioned of ivory, and couches with silver feet and inlaid with ivory, and folding-doors of beds studded with gold and variegated with tortoise-shell, and bed-clothes of purple and other colours difficult to produce, proofs of tasteless luxury, cunning devices of envy and effeminacy,-are all to be relinquished, as having nothing whatever worth our pains.
That we should not be eager for costly furnishings. The use of drinking cups made of silver and gold, or others set with jewels, is to be rejected. They are only a deception of the eye. If you pour a hot drink into them, the vessels become scorching, and taking hold of them hurts. If you pour in something cold, the material passes on its quality and spoils the mixture, so the rich man’s drink is harmful. Away, then, with Thericlean cups, Antigonid cups, cantharoi, labronioi, lepastai, the endless kinds of drinking vessels, and the wine-coolers and wine-pourers besides. For gold and silver, in private and in public alike, are a possession that provokes envy when they go beyond what we need. They are rare to get, hard to keep, and not suitable for use. The over-elaborate vanity of engraved glass is also to be kept out of our well-ordered life. Because of its craftsmanship it breaks all the more easily, and it teaches us to be afraid and to drink at the same time. Then there are silver couches, basins, vinegar-dishes, small plates and bowls. There are further vessels of silver and gold, some for serving food and some for other uses that I am ashamed even to mention. There are tripods finely worked in easily split cedar, in thyine wood, in ebony and in ivory. There are couches with silver feet, inlaid with ivory and dotted with gold, and bed-screens decorated with tortoise-shell. There are purple bedcovers and others in colours hard to come by. All these are proofs of tasteless luxury, advantages that scheme to bring envy and laziness. All of them are to be set aside, for none of them deserves any serious effort.
"For the time is short," as says the apostle. This then remains that we do not make a ridiculous figure, as some are seen in the public spectacles outwardly anointed strikingly for imposing effect, but wretched within. Explaining this more clearly, he adds," It remains that they that have wives be as though they had none, and they that buy as though they possessed not. And ff he speaks thus of marriage, in reference to which God says, "Multiply," how do you not think that senseless display is by the Lord's authority to be banished? Wherefore also the Lord says, "Sell what thou hast, and give to the poor; and come, follow me. Follow God, stripped of arrogance, stripped of fading display, possessed of that which is thine, which is good, what alone cannot be taken away-faith towards god, confession towards Him who suffered, beneficence towards men, which is the most precious of possessions.
“For the time is short,” as the apostle says. [The Greek text has a gap here.] What remains is that we not make ourselves look ridiculous. Some people are seen in processions smeared on the outside to impressive effect and made to look dignified, but they are wretched within. To make this clearer, the apostle added, “What remains is that those who have wives be as though they had none, and those who buy as though they did not possess.” If this applies to marriage, about which God says, “Multiply,” how, do you think, must tasteless display be driven out by the Lord’s authority? This is also why the Lord says, “Sell your possessions and give to the poor, and come, follow me.” Follow God stripped of arrogance, stripped of perishable show. Keep only what is truly yours, the good that cannot be taken away. That is faith in God, confession of the One who suffered, and kindness to people, the most precious possession of all.
For my part, I approve of Plato, who plainly lays it down as a law, that a man is not to labour for wealth of gold or silver, nor to possess a useless vessel which is not for some necessary purpose, and moderate; so that the same thing may serve for many purposes, and the possession of a variety of things may be done away with. Excellently, therefore, the Divine Scripture, addressing boasters and lovers of their own selves, says, "Where are the rulers of the nations, and the lords of the wild beasts of the earth, who sport among the birds of heaven, who treasured up silver and gold, in whom men trusted, and there was no end of their substance, who fashioned silver and gold, and were full of care? There is no finding of their works. They have vanished, and gone down to Hades. Such is the reward of display.
I also approve of Plato, who lays it down outright that one should have no wealth of silver or gold. He says one should not even have a useless vessel, one that is not moderate as well as serving a necessary use. The same thing should be suitable for many purposes, and owning many things should be done away with. The divine Scripture speaks admirably somewhere to the self-loving and the boastful: “Where are the rulers of the nations, and those who lord it over the wild beasts on the earth, who make sport of the birds of the sky, who store up silver and gold, in which people trusted, and there is no end to their possessions, who work silver and gold and worry over it? There is no tracing their works. They have vanished and gone down to Hades.” This is the reward of tasteless extravagance.
For though such of us as cultivate the soil need a mattock and plough, none of us will make a pickaxe of silver or a sickle of gold, but we employ the material which is serviceable for agriculture, not what is costly. What prevents those who are capable of considering what is similar from entertaining the same sentiments with respect to household utensils, of which let use, not expense, be the measure? For tell me, does the table-knife not cut unlest it be studded with silver, and have its handle made of ivory? Or must we forge Indian steel in order to divide meat, as when we call for a weapon for the fight? What if the basin be of earthenware? will it not receive the dirt of the hands? or the footpan the dirt of the foot? Will the table that is fashioned with ivory feet be indignant at bearing a three-halfpenny loaf? Will the lamp not dispense light because it is the work of the potter, not of the goldsmith?
We farm the land, and for that we need a hoe and a plough. Yet no one would forge a hoe of silver or a sickle of gold. For farming we use the material that works well, not the one that is rich. So what is to stop those who can see the same principle from thinking the same way about household utensils? Let use be their measure, not expense. Tell me, then: does the table knife not cut unless it is studded with silver or has an ivory handle? Or must we forge Indian steel to carve a portion of meat, as if we were calling in an ally for battle? And what if the washbasin is earthenware? Will it not take the water from washing hands? Will the footbath not take the water from washing feet? Will a table with ivory legs feel insulted at carrying a loaf worth a penny? Will the lamp refuse to give light because it is the potter’s work and not the goldsmith’s?
I affirm that truckle-beds afford no worse repose than the ivory couch; and the goatskin coverlet being amply sufficient to spread on the bed, there is no need, of purple or scarlet coverings. Yet to condemn, notwithstanding, frugality, through the stupidity of luxury, the author of mischief, what a prodigious error, what senseless conceit! See. The Lord ate from a common bowl, and made the disciples recline on the grass on the ground, and washed their feet, girded with a linen towel-He, the lowly-minded God, and Lord of the universe. He did not bring down a silver foot-bath from heaven. He asked to drink of the Samaritan woman, who drew the water from the well in an earthenware vessel, not seeking regal gold, but teaching us how to quench thirst easily. For He made use, not extravagance His aim. And He ate and drank at feasts, not digging metals from the earth, nor using vessels of gold and silver, that is, vessels exhaling the odour of rust-such fumes as the rust of smoking metal gives off.
I say further that a plain cot gives a rest no worse than an ivory couch. A coat of goatskin is quite enough to spread over the bed, so there is no need for purple or scarlet covers. Yet people condemn such simplicity because of the foolishness of luxury, the origin of all evil. See how great the error is, how great the love of empty show! The Lord ate from a cheap dish. He had his disciples recline on the grass on the ground. He washed their feet with a linen towel tied around him. He is the God without pride, the Lord of all, and he did not bring a silver footbath down from heaven. He asked the Samaritan woman for a drink, as she drew water from the well in an earthenware jar. He did not look for royal gold, but taught us to quench thirst without trouble. He made need his aim, not unlimited abundance. At feasts he ate and drank, but he did not dig metals out of the earth. He did not use little vessels of silver and gold, which is to say, of rust, giving off the smell of that puffed-up material.
For in fine, in food, and clothes, and vessels, and everything else belonging to the house, I say comprehensively, that one must follow the institutions of the Christian man, as is serviceable and suitable to one's person, age, pursuits, time of life. For it becomes those that are servants of one God, that their possessions and furniture should exhibit the tokens of one beautiful life; and that each individually should be seen in faith, which shows no difference, practising all other things which are conformable to this uniform mode of life, and harmonious with this one scheme. What we acquire without difficulty, and use with ease, we praise, keep easily, and communicate freely. The things which are useful are preferable, and consequently cheap things are better than dear.
In general, then, I say that food, clothing, utensils and everything else in the household must fit the settled purpose of a Christian. Each should suit the person, age, occupation and time. We are servants of one God, so our possessions and the furniture that goes with them should show the marks of one good life. Each individual, with a faith that makes no distinctions, with this single settled purpose, should be seen doing whatever follows from it, in agreement with that one disposition. Whatever we acquire without hardship, use without difficulty, and so can praise, keep easily and share readily, is better. Useful things are better, and certainly the cheaper things are better than those of the rich.
In fine, wealth, when not properly governed, is a stronghold of evil, about which many casting their eyes, they will never reach the kingdom of heaven, sick for the things of the world, and living proudly through luxury. But those who are in earnest about salvation must settle this beforehand in their mind, "that all that we possess is given to us for use, and use for sufficiency, which one may attain to by a few things. For silly are they who, from greed, take delight in what they have hoarded up. "He that gathereth wages," it is said, "gathereth into a bag with holes. Such is he who gathers corn and shuts it up; and he who giveth to no one, becomes poorer. It is a farce, and a thing to make one laugh outright, for men to bring in silver urinals and crystal vases de nuit, as they usher in their counsellors, and for silly rich women to get gold receptacles for excrements made; so that being rich, they cannot even ease themselves except in superb way. I would that in their whole life they deemed gold fit for dung.
In sum, wealth that is not rightly managed is a fortress of evil. Many people have their eyes fixed on it, and they will never enter the kingdom of heaven. They are sick with worldly things and live arrogantly because of their luxuries. But those who hurry toward salvation must grasp this first: all creation exists for us to use, and possessions exist for the sake of self-sufficiency, which one can attain with few things. People are foolish who, out of insatiable greed, take delight in their stored-up treasures. Scripture says, “He who gathers wages has gathered them into a bag with holes.” This is the man who gathers and locks up his seed and ends up with less, the man who shares with no one. It is a joke and a big laugh that men carry silver chamber pots and glass urinals around with them, as they take their advisers along with them. Rich women, without any sense, have gold made as containers for their excretions. So even to relieve themselves, the rich cannot do it unless they do so with pomp. I would pray that for their whole lives they would judge gold to be fit for dung.
But now love of money is found to be the stronghold of evil, which the apostle says "is the root of all evils, which, while some coveted, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. But the best riches is poverty of desires; and the true magnanimity is not to be proud of wealth, but to despise it. Boasting about one's plate is utterly base. For it is plainly wrong to care much about what any one who likes may buy from the market. But wisdom is not bought with coin of earth, nor is it sold in the market-place, but in heaven. And it is sold for true coin, the immortal Word, the regal gold.
But as things are, the fortress of evil has been found: the love of money. The apostle says it is the root of all evils: “Some, reaching for it, have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pains.” The best wealth is to be poor in desires, and true greatness of mind does not mean being proud of wealth but despising it. To boast about one’s household utensils is utterly shameful. It is hardly right to take pains over things that anyone who wishes can buy in the market. Wisdom, however, cannot be bought with earthly coin or in a market. It is sold in heaven, and it is sold for honest coin: the incorruptible Word, the royal gold.
How to Conduct Ourselves at Feasts.Let revelry keep away from our rational entertainments, and foolish vigils, too, that revel in intemperance. For revelry is an inebriating pipe, the chain of an amatory bridge, that is, of sorrow. And let love, and intoxication, and senseless passions, be removed from our choir. Burlesque singing is the boon companion of drunkenness. A night spent over drink invites drunkenness, rouses lust, and is audacious in deeds of shame. For if people occupy their time with pipes, and psalteries, and choirs, and dances, and Egyptian clapping of hands, and such disorderly frivolities, they become quite immodest and intractable, beat on cymbals and drums, and make a noise on instruments of delusion; for plainly such a banquet, as seems to me, is a theatre of drunkenness. For the apostle decrees that, "putting off the works of darkness, we should put on the armour of light, walking honestly as in the day, not spending our time in rioting and drunkenness, in chambering and wantonness.
Heading: How we should relax at feasts. Let revelry be kept far from our rational feasting. So too the empty all-night parties that run wild in drunken excess. Revelry is a drunken restlessness, an improvised outburst of lovesick distress. Love and drunkenness, those irrational passions, are banished far from our company. An all-night party over drink is a kind of drunken carousing: it calls out for drunkenness and stirs up lust, a daring that does shameful things. People who give themselves to flutes, harps, choruses, dances, Egyptian castanets and such idle amusements become unruly, indecent and wholly uninstructed, deafened by cymbals and drums and surrounded by the noise of instruments of deceit. To my mind, a drinking party like that is simply a theatre of drunkenness. The apostle calls on us to put off the works of darkness and put on the armor of light, “walking decently as in the day,” not devoting ourselves to “revelries and drunkenness, to beds and licentiousness.”
Let the pipe be resigned to the shepherds, and the flute to the superstitious who are engrossed in idolatry. For, in truth, such instruments are to be banished from the temperate banquet, being more suitable to beasts than men, and the more irrational portion of mankind. For we have heard of stags being charmed by the pipe, and seduced by music into the toils, when hunted by the huntsmen. And when mares are being covered, a tune is played on the flute-a nuptial song, as it were. And every improper sight and sound, to speak in a word, and every shameful sensation of licentiousnes"-which, in truth, is privation of sensation-must by all means be excluded; and we must be on our guard against whatever pleasure titillates eye and ear, and effeminates. For the various spells of the broken strains and plaintive numbers of the Carian muse corrupt men's morals, drawing to perturbation of mind, by the licentious and mischievous art of music.
Let the shepherd’s pipe be left to shepherds, and the flute to superstitious people hurrying off to idol worship. In truth these instruments should be sent away from a sober banquet, for they suit wild animals better than human beings, and the more irrational kind of human beings at that. We are told that deer are charmed by pipes and led by the tune into the snares when hunters are chasing them. And when mares are being mated, a flute-tune is played over them like a wedding song; the musicians call it the “horse-mounting song.” In short, every sight and sound that is unworthy of a free person, and every shameful sensation that comes from lack of self-control (which is truly a lack of feeling), must be cut out completely. We must guard against the pleasure that tickles the eyes and ears and makes us soft and unmanly. For the varied spells of limp, broken melodies and mournful rhythms of the Carian muse corrupt character, and with their undisciplined and wicked art drag people down into passion.
The Spirit, distinguishing from such revelry the divine service, sings, "Praise Him with the sound of trumpet; "for with sound of trumpet He shall raise the dead. "Praise Him on the psaltery; "for the tongue is the psaltery of the Lord. "And praise Him on the lyre. By the lyre is meant the mouth struck by the Spirit, as it were by a plectrum. "Praise with the timbrel and the dance," refers to the Church meditating on the resurrection of the dead in the resounding skin. "Praise Him on the chords and organ. Our body He calls an organ, and its nerves are the strings, by which it has received harmonious tension, and when struck by the Spirit, it gives forth human voices. "Praise Him on the clashing cymbals. He calls the tongue the cymbal of the mouth, which resounds with the pulsation of the lips.
In contrast to such revelry, the Spirit sings of the divine service: “Praise him with the sound of the trumpet.” For at the sound of a trumpet he will raise the dead. “Praise him with the psaltery,” because the tongue is the Lord’s psaltery. “And praise him with the harp”: let the harp be understood as the mouth, struck by the Spirit as though with a plectrum. “Praise him with drum and dance”: he means the Church, rehearsing the resurrection of the flesh in the sounding of the skin. “Praise him with strings and organ”: he calls our body the organ and its sinews the strings, through which it has received its harmonious tension, and when it is struck by the Spirit it gives out human voices. “Praise him with cymbals of shouting”: he calls the tongue the cymbal of the mouth, which sounds along with the lips as they are struck.
Therefore He cried to humanity, "Let every breath praise the Loan," because He cares for every breathing thing which He hath made. For man is truly a pacific instrument; while other instruments, if you investigate, you will find to be warlike, inflaming to lusts, or kindling up amours, or rousing wrath. In their wars, therefore, the Etruscans use the trumpet, the Arcadians the pipe, the Sicilians the pectides, the Cretans the lyre, the Lacedaemonians the flute, the Thracians the horn, the Egyptians the drum, and the Arabians the cymbal. The one instrument of peace, the Word alone by which we honour God, is what we employ. We no longer employ the ancient psaltery, and trumpet, and timbrel, and flute, which those expert in war and contemners of the fear of God were wont to make use of also in the choruses at their festive assemblies; that by such strains they might raise their dejected minds.
For this reason he called out to humanity, “Let every breath praise the Lord,” because he has watched over every breath he has made. For man is truly an instrument of peace. If you investigate the other instruments, you will find them to be instruments of war, which either inflame desires, or kindle passions, or work up rage. In their wars, for example, the Etruscans use the trumpet, the Arcadians the pipe, the Sicilians the pektis, the Cretans the lyre, the Spartans the flute, the Thracians the horn, the Egyptians the drum, and the Arabs the cymbal. But we use only one instrument, the peaceful Word alone, with which we honor God. We no longer use the old psaltery, trumpet, drum and flute. Men trained for war, who despised the fear of God, were accustomed to use these at their festivals, so that through such rhythms their slackened spirit might be roused up again.
But let our genial feeling in drinking be twofold, in accordance with the law. For "if thou shalt love the Lord try God," and then "thy neighbour," let its first manifestation be towards God in thanksgiving and psalmody, and the second toward our neighbour in decorous fellowship. For says the apostle, "Let the Word of the Lord dwell in you richly. And this Word suits and conforms Himself to seasons, to persons, to places. In the present instance He is a guest with us. For the apostle adds again, "Teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, in psalms, and hymns, and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your heart to God. And again, "Whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and His Father. This is our thankful revelry. And even if you wish to sing and play to the harp or lyre, there is no blame. Thou shalt imitate the righteous Hebrew king in his thanksgiving to God.
Let our friendly cheer at the drink be twofold, as the law teaches. For if the command is “You shall love the Lord your God,” and then “your neighbor,” then the first kind of goodwill should be toward God, in thanksgiving and the singing of psalms. The second should be toward our neighbor, in dignified conversation. For the apostle says, “Let the word of the Lord dwell in you richly.” This Word fits itself to times, persons and places, and here it is a Word for the banquet. For the apostle adds again: “teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, with psalms, hymns and spiritual songs, singing to God in your hearts with grace; and whatever you do in word or deed, do everything in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God his Father.” This is our revel of thanksgiving. And if you want to sing and play to the harp or the lyre, there is no fault in it. You will be imitating the righteous Hebrew king who gave thanks to God.
"Rejoice in the Lord, ye righteous; praise is comely to the upright," says the prophecy. "Confess to the Lord on the harp; play to Him on the psaltery of ten strings. Sing to Him a new song. And does not the ten-stringed psaltery indicate the Word Jesus, who is manifested by the element of the decad? And as it is befitting, before partaking of food, that we should bless the Creator of all; so also in drinking it is suitable to praise Him on partaking of His creatures. For the psalm is a melodious and sober blessing. The apostle calls the psalm "a spiritual song. Finally, before partaking of sleep, it is a sacred duty to give thanks to God, having enjoyed His grace and love, and so go straight to sleep. "And confess to Him in songs of the lips," he says, "because in His command all His good pleasure is done, and there is no deficiency in His salvation. Further, among the ancient Greeks, in their banquets over the brimming cups, a song was sung called a skolion, after the manner of the HeBrew psalms, all together raising the paean with the voice, and sometimes also taking turns in the song while they drank healths round; while those that were more musical than the rest sang to the lyre.
“Rejoice in the Lord, you righteous; praise is fitting for the upright,” says the prophecy. “Give thanks to the Lord on the harp; sing to him on the ten-stringed psaltery; sing him a new song.” Does not the ten-stringed psaltery point to the Word, Jesus, who is shown forth by the letter standing for ten? Just as it is fitting to bless the Maker of all things before we share in food, so at the drinking it is right to sing to him as we share in his creatures. For a psalm is a tuneful and sober blessing; the apostle calls the psalm “a spiritual song.” Above all, before we fall asleep, it is holy to give thanks to God, having enjoyed his grace and kindness, so that we go to sleep in godly fashion. “And give thanks to him in songs of the lips,” it says, “for all good pleasure comes by his command, and there is no lack in his salvation.” Even among the ancient Greeks, at drinking feasts and over the cups being poured, a song called the skolion was sung, after the pattern of the Hebrew psalms. Sometimes all sang the paean together with one voice, and sometimes they took turns passing the toasts of the song around. The more musical among them sang to the lyre.
But let amatory songs be banished far away, and let our songs be hymns to God. "Let them praise," it is said, "His name in the dance, and let them play to Him on the timbrel and psaltery. And what is the choir which plays? The Spirit will show thee: "Let His praise be in the congregation (church) of the saints; let them be joyful in their King. And again he adds, "The Lord will take pleasure in His people. For temperate harmonies are to be admitted; but we are to banish as far as possible from our robust mind those liquid harmonies, which, through pernicious arts in the modulations of tones, train to effeminacy and scurrility. But grave and modest strains say farewell to the turbulence of drunkenness. Chromatic harmonies are therefore to be abandoned to immodest revels, and to florid and meretricious music.
But let love songs be gone far away, and let our songs be hymns to God. “Let them praise his name in the dance,” it says; “let them sing to him with timbrel and psaltery.” And who is the choir that sings? The Spirit himself will tell you: “His praise is in the assembly of the holy ones; let them rejoice in their King.” And again he adds: “For the Lord takes pleasure in his people.” We should accept only sober harmonies. We must drive as far as possible from our vigorous minds those truly soft and slack harmonies, which use corrupt skill in the bending of the notes and slide into softness and vulgar buffoonery. But stern and sober melodies reject the arrogance of drunkenness. So we should leave the chromatic harmonies to drunken, unrestrained revels and to flowery, harlot-like music.
On Laughter.People who are imitators of ludicrous sensations, or rather of such as deserve derision, are to be driven from our polity. For since all forms of speech flow from mind and manners, ludicrous expressions could not be uttered, did they not proceed from ludicrous practices. For the saying, "It is not a good tree which produces corrupt fruit, nor a corrupt tree which produces good fruit," is to be applied in this case. For speech is the fruit of the mind. If, then, wags are to be ejected from our society, we ourselves must by no manner of means be allowed to stir up laughter. For it were absurd to be found imitators of things of which we are prohibited to be listeners; and still more absurd for a man to set about making himself a laughing-stock, that is, the but of insult and derision. For if we could not endure to make a ridiculous figure, such as we see some do in processions, how could we with any propriety bear to have the inner man made a ridiculous figure of, and that to one's face?
On Laughter. People who imitate ridiculous, or rather laughable, passions must be driven out of our way of life. All speech flows from the mind and character, so ridiculous words cannot be uttered unless they come from a ridiculous character. The saying “There is no good tree that bears rotten fruit, nor again a rotten tree that bears good fruit” fits here too, for speech is the fruit of the mind. So if buffoons are to be banished from our community, we must be far from allowing ourselves to play the buffoon. It is out of place to be found imitating what we are forbidden to listen to. It is much more out of place to work at becoming ridiculous oneself, that is, abusive and laughable. If we would not put up with being dressed in a ridiculous way, as some are seen in processions, how could we reasonably tolerate the inner man being shaped into something still more ridiculous?
Wherefore we ought never of our own accord to assume a ludicrous character. And how, then, can we devote ourselves to being and appearing ridiculous in our conversation, thereby travestying speech, which is the most precious of all human endowments? It is therefore disgraceful to set one's self to do this; since the conversation of wags of this description is not fit for our ears, in as much as by the very expressions used it familiarizes us with shameful actions. Pleasantry is allowable, not waggery. Besides, even laughter must be kept in check; for when given vent to in the right manner it indicates orderliness, but when it issues differently it shows a want of restraint. For, in a word, whatever things are natural to men we must not eradicate from them, but rather impose on them limits and suitable times. For man is not to laugh on all occasions because he is a laughing animal, any more than the horse neighs on all occasions because he is a neighing animal. But as rational beings, we are to regulate ourselves suitably, harmoniously relaxing the austerity and over-tension of our serious pursuits, not inharmoniously breaking them up altogether.
And if we would not willingly twist our faces into something more ridiculous, how could we deliberately try to be, and to look, ridiculous in our speech, mocking the most precious of all human possessions, the word? To practice this is mere buffoonery, since talk that is merely comic is not worth hearing. By its very words it trains us toward shameful deeds. We should be witty and charming, but not clowns. Even laughter itself must be kept under control. When it comes out in the right way, it shows good order; when it goes the wrong way, it reveals a lack of self-control. In short, we must not remove from people whatever is natural to them, but set a fitting measure and a proper time for it. Man is a creature that can laugh, but that does not mean we should laugh at everything, just as a horse, which can neigh, does not neigh at everything. As reasoning creatures, we should keep ourselves in good balance. We should ease the strictness and over-tension of our earnestness in tune, not let it go slack out of tune.
For the seemly relaxation of the countenance in a harmonious manner-as of a musical instrument-is called a smile. So also is laughter on the face of well-regulated men termed. But the discordant relaxation of countenance in the case of women is called a giggle, and is meretricious laughter; in the case of men, a guffaw, and is savage arid insulting laughter. "A fool raises his voice in laughter," says the Scripture; but a clever man smiles almost imperceptibly. The clever man in this case he calls wise, in as much as he is differently affected from the fool. But, on the other hand, one needs not be gloomy, only grave. For I certainly prefer a man to smile who has a stern countenance than the reverse; for so his laughter will be less apt to become the object of ridicule. Smiling even requires to be made the subject of discipline. If it is at what is disgraceful, we ought to blush rather than smile, lest we seem to take pleasure in it by sympathy; if at what is painful, it is fitting to look sad rather than to seem pleased. For to do the former is a sign of rational human thought; the other infers suspicion of cruelty.
The proper relaxing of the face in harmony, as of an instrument, is called a smile. This is the laughter of self-controlled people (the cheerfulness is, so to speak, reflected in the face). But when the face goes slack out of tune, it is called, in women, a giggle, which is the laughter of a prostitute. In men it is called a guffaw, which is the laughter of a suitor and of an insolent man. “A fool raises his voice when he laughs,” says the Scripture, “but a shrewd man will hardly smile quietly.” Here he uses “shrewd” to mean sensible, the opposite of the fool. But we must not on the other hand be sullen; we should be thoughtful. I quite approve of the man who was seen “smiling with a grim face,” for then his laughter “would be less open to ridicule.” Even the smile needs to be trained. If something is shameful, we should be seen to blush rather than smile, so that we do not seem to share in the pleasure out of fellow-feeling. If something is sad, it is fitting to look downcast rather than seem to enjoy it. The one is a sign of human reasoning; the other suggests a reputation for cruelty.
We are not to laugh perpetually, for that is going beyond bounds; nor in the presence of elderly persons, or others worthy of respect, unless they indulge in pleasantry for our amusement. Nor are we to laugh before all and sundry, nor in every place, nor to every one, nor about everything. For to children and women especially laughter is the cause of slipping into scandal. And even to appear stem serves to keep those about us at their distance. For gravity can ward off the approaches of licentiousness by a mere look. All senseless people, to speak in a word, wine "Commands both to laugh luxuriously and to dance," changing effeminate manners to softness. We must consider, too, how consequently freedom of speech leads impropriety on to filthy speaking. "And he uttered a word which had been better unsaid. Especially, therefore, in liquor crafty men's characters are wont to be seen through, stripped as they are of their mask through the caitiff licence of intoxication, through which reason, weighed down in the soul itself by drunkenness, is lulled to sleep, and unruly passions are roused, which overmaster the feebleness of the mind.
We should not laugh all the time, for that is without measure. We should not laugh in the presence of older people or others who deserve respect, unless they themselves make a pleasant joke to cheer us. We should not laugh at just anyone, or in every place, or with everyone, or about everything. Laughter is especially a slippery slope into slander for young people and women. Looking dignified, even from a distance, drives off those who would tempt us. Dignity alone, just by its appearance, can beat back the assaults of licentiousness. As for the senseless, one might say all of them, wine “bids them laugh softly and dance,” turning their effeminate character toward softness. And we should notice how, from this, loose freedom of speech increases disorder into foul talk: “and he let slip a word that had better been left unsaid.” Indeed, it happens that in wine the characters of the deceitful are most clearly seen, stripped of their pretense by the shameless frankness of drunkenness. Because of it reason, heavy-headed with drink, is put to sleep within the soul itself, and the unruly passions are roused and overpower the weakness of reasoning.
On Filthy Speaking.From filthy speaking we ourselves must entirely abstain, and stop the mouths of those who practise it by stern looks and averting the face, and by what we call making a mock of one: often also by a harsher mode of speech. "For what proceedeth out of the mouth," He says, "defileth a man," -shows him to be unclean, and heathenish, and untrained, and licentious, and not select, and proper, and honourable, and temperate. And as a similar rule holds with regard to hearing and seeing in the case of what is obscene, the divine Instructor, following the same course with both, arrays those children who are engaged in the struggle in words of modesty, as ear-guards, so that the pulsation of fornication may not penetrate to the bruising of the soul; and He directs the eyes to the sight of what is honourable, saying that it is better to make a slip with the feet than with the eyes.
On Filthy Speaking. We must keep entirely away from filthy talk ourselves, and we must shut the mouths of those who use it. We can do this with a sharper look, by turning the face away, by what is called a sneer, and often also with a rather harsh word. “For what comes out of the mouth,” he says, “defiles a man.” It shows him to be common, pagan, uneducated and licentious, not a person of his own mind, well-ordered and self-controlled. As for hearing and seeing shameful things, the divine Instructor acts like the trainers of boys who wrestle. To keep their ears from being injured, he puts self-controlled words around us like ear-guards, so that the blow of fornication cannot reach far enough to break the soul. And he directs our eyes to the sight of what is good, saying that it is better to slip with the feet than with the eyes.
This filthy speaking the apostle beats off, saying, "Let no corrupt communication proceed out of your mouth, but what is good. And again, "As becometh saints, let not filthiness be named among you, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which things are not seemly, but rather giving of thanks. And if "he that calls his brother a fool be in danger of the judgment," what shall we pronounce regarding him who speaks what is foolish? Is it not written respecting such: "Whosoever shall speak an idle word, shall give an account to the Lord in the day of judgment? " And again, "By thy speech thou shalt be justified," He says, "and by thy speech thou shalt be condemned. What, then, are the salutary ear-guards, and what the regulations for slippery eyes? Conversations with the righteous, preoccupying and forearming the ears against those that would lead away from the truth.
The apostle drives off this filthy speaking when he says, “Let no rotten word come out of your mouth, but only what is good.” And again: “As is fitting for saints, let shamefulness not be named among you, nor foolish talk, nor coarse joking, which are not fitting, but rather thanksgiving.” If the person who calls his brother a fool is liable to judgment, what shall we say of the one who talks foolishly? About this too it is written: “Whoever speaks an idle word will give account of it to the Lord on the day of judgment.” And again He says, “By your word you will be justified, and by your word you will be condemned.” What, then, are the ear-guards that save us? And what is the training for eyes that slip? They are time spent with the righteous. Such company takes hold of the ears beforehand and blocks them against those who want to draw us away from the truth.
"Evil communications corrupt good manners," says Poetry. More nobly the apostle says, "Be haters of the evil; cleave to the good. For he who associates with the saints shall be sanctified. From shameful things addressed to the ears, and words and sights, we must entirely abstain. And much more must we keep pure from shameful deeds: on the one hand, from exhibiting and exposing parts of the body which we ought not; and on the other, from beholding what is forbidden. For the modest son could not bear to look on the shameful exposure of the righteous man; and modesty covered what intoxication exposed-the spectacle of the transgression of ignorance. No less ought we to keep pure from calumnious reports, to which the ears of those who have believed in Christ ought to be inaccessible. It is on this account, as appears to me, that the Instructor does not permit us to give utterance to aught unseemly, fortifying us at an early stage against licentiousness.
“Bad company corrupts good character,” says the poet. The apostle puts it more nobly: “Be those who hate what is evil and cling to what is good.” For the one who lives among the holy will be made holy. We must therefore keep away completely from shameful things heard, said or seen. Much more must we keep clear of shameful deeds. These include displaying or uncovering parts of the body that should not be shown, and gazing at the more private parts. The modest son could not bear to look at the righteous man’s nakedness, which was shameful. Self-control covered what drunkenness had uncovered, the glaring fault of ignorance. We must be no less pure in the words we utter, and the ears of those who believe in Christ must be closed to such words. For this reason, it seems to me, the Instructor does not allow us even to say anything indecent. He attacks licentiousness from far off.
For He is admirable always at cutting out the roots of sins, such as, "Thou shalt not commit adultery," by "Thou shalt not lust. For adultery is the fruit of lust, which is the evil root. And so likewise also in this instance the Instructor censures licence in names, and thus cuts off the licentious intercourse of excess. For licence in names produces the desire of being indecorous in conduct; and the observance of modesty in names is a training in resistance to lasciviousness. We have shown in a more exhaustive treatise, that neither in the names nor in the members to which appellations not in common use are applied, is there the designation of what is really obscene. For neither are knee and leg, and such other members, nor are the names applied to them, and the activity put forth by them, obscene. And even the pudenda are to be regarded as objects suggestive of modesty, not shame. It is their unlawful activity that is shameful, and deserving ignominy, and reproach, and punishment. For the only thing that is in reality shameful is wickedness, and what is done through it.
For He is always skilled at cutting out the roots of sins. He turns “You shall not commit adultery” into “You shall not desire,” since adultery is the fruit of desire, the evil root. In the same way here, the Instructor condemns the careless use of words, cutting off the careless mixing with licentiousness. Disorder in words builds the habit of disorder in deeds, and practising self-control in speech is training to resist lust. We have explained in a deeper discussion that the label “truly shameful” does not belong to the names (the unusual names, not used in everyday speech) for the organs of intercourse, nor to those organs, nor to the union of marriage. Knee and shin are not shameful members, nor are their names, nor what they do. The private parts are also members of the human body, and they are counted worthy of reverence, not shame. What is shameful is their unlawful use, and that is why it deserves disgrace, reproach and punishment. For the only thing that is truly shameful is vice and what is done through it.
In accordance with these remarks, conversation about deeds of wickedness is appropriately, termed filthy [shameful] speaking, as talk about adultery and paederasty and the like. Frivolous prating, too, is to be put to silence. "For," it is said, "in much speaking thou shalt not escape sin. "Sins of the tongue, therefore, shall be punished. "There is he who is silent, and is found wise; and there is that is hated for much speech. But still more, the prater makes himself the object of disgust. "For he that multiplieth speech abominates his own soul."
By the same reasoning, “shameful speaking” is properly the name for talk about the deeds of vice, such as discussing adultery or the love of boys and the like. Idle, foolish chatter must also be silenced. “For in much talking,” it says, “you will not escape sin.” So the lazy tongue will pay a penalty. “There is one who is found wise by keeping silent, and one who is hated for his many words.” The chatterer is already sick of himself: “For the one who multiplies words makes his own soul loathe him.”
Directions for Those Who Live Together.Let us keep away from us jibing, the originator of insult, from which strifes and contentions and enmities burst forth. Insult, we have said, is the servant of drunkenness. A man is judged, not from his deeds alone, but from his words. "In a banquet," it is said, "reprove not thy neighbour, nor say to him a word of reproach. For if we are enjoined especially to associate with saints, it is a sin to jibe at a saint: "For from the mouth of the foolish," says the Scripture, "is a staff of insult," -meaning by staff the prop of insult, on which insult leans and rests. Whence I admire the apostle, who, in reference to this, exhorts us not to utter "scurrilous nor unsuitable words. For if the assemblies at festivals take place on account of affection, and the end of a banquet is friendliness towards those who meet, and meat and drink accompany affection, how should not conversation be conducted in a rational manner, and puzzling people with questions be avoided from affection?
What those who live together in a refined way must guard against. Let mockery stay far from us, for it starts insult, and from insult come quarrels, fights and hatreds, which swell up. We said that insult is the servant of drunkenness. A person is judged not only by his deeds but also by his words. “At a banquet,” it says, “do not rebuke your neighbour, and do not speak a word of reproach to him.” For even if we are told above all to keep company with the saints, mocking a holy person is a sin. “From the mouth of fools,” Scripture says, “comes a rod of insult.” By “rod” it means the support of insult, the thing on which insult leans and rests. So I admire the apostle, who here too urges us not to let slip coarse jokes or unfitting words. For if gatherings at feasts are held out of love, and the aim of a banquet is friendly kindness toward those who are together, and eating and drinking only go along with love, how should we not behave reasonably?
For if we meet together for the purpose of increasing our good-will to each other, why should we stir up enmity by jibing? It is better to be silent than to contradict, and thereby add sin to ignorance. "Blessed," in truth, "is the man who has not made a slip with his mouth, and has not been pierced by the pain of sin; " or has repented of what he has said amiss, or has spoken so as to wound no one. On the whole, let young men and young women altogether keep away from such festivals, that they may not make a slip in respect to what is unsuitable. For things to which their ears are unaccustomed, and unseemly sights, inflame the mind, while faith within them is still wavering; and the instability of their age conspires to make them easily carried away by lust. Sometimes also they are the cause of others stumbling, by displaying the dangerous charms of their time of life.
We must not be puzzling one another with riddles, either, for the sake of love. If we gather to deepen our goodwill toward one another, how can we stir up hatred by mocking? It is better to keep silent than to argue back, adding sin to ignorance. “Blessed,” truly, “is the man who has not slipped with his mouth and has not been pierced with grief for sin.” That is, he has either repented of the sin he committed by speaking, or he has spoken in such a way as to grieve no one. In general, then, young men and young women should for the most part keep away from such feasts, so that they do not stumble where they should not. Unaccustomed things heard and indecent things seen stir up the mind while their faith is still tossed by waves. The instability of their age also helps push them toward desire, to which they are already inclined. Sometimes, too, they cause others to stumble, by showing off the dangers of their youthful beauty.
For Wisdom appears to enjoin well: "Sit not at all with a married woman, and recline not on the elbow with her; " that is, do not sup nor eat with her frequently. Wherefore he adds, "And do not join company with her in wine, lest thy heart incline to her, and by thy blood slide to ruin. For the licence of intoxication is dangerous, and prone to deflower; And he names "a married woman," because the danger is greater to him who attempts to break the connubial bond. But if any necessity arises, commanding the presence of married women, let them be well clothed-without by raiment, within by modesty. But as for such as are unmarried, it is the extremest scandal for them to be present at a banquet of men, especially men under the influence of wine. And let the men, fixing their eyes on the couch, and leaning without moving on their elbows, be present with their ears alone; and if they sit, let them not have their feet crossed, nor place one thigh on another, nor apply the hand to the chin. For it is vulgar not to bear one's self without support, and consequently a fault in a young man.
Wisdom, it seems, gives good instruction: “Do not sit at all with a married woman, and do not recline with her on your elbow.” That is, do not dine with her often or eat with her. So the text goes on: “And do not argue with her over wine, lest your heart turn aside toward her, and in your blood you slide into destruction.” For the freedom that comes with wine is treacherous, and it can lead to a fall. He says “married” because the danger is greater for the man who tries to break the bond of a marriage. But if some necessity arises that requires women to be present, let them be well covered, outwardly with clothing and inwardly with modesty. As for women who are not married, it is the worst scandal for them to be present at a banquet of men, especially men who have been drinking. The men, for their part, should keep their eyes fixed on the couch, lean steadily on their elbows without moving, and be present with their ears alone. If they sit, they must not cross their legs, or lay one thigh over the other, or prop the chin on the hand. It is ill-bred not to hold oneself up, and in a young man it is a fault to be blamed.
And perpetually moving and changing one's position is a sign of frivolousness. It is the part of a temperate man also, in eating and drinking, to take a small portion, and deliberately, not eagerly, both at the beginning and during the courses and to leave off betimes, and so show his indifference. "Eat," it is said, "like a man what is set before you. Be the first to stop for the sake of regimen; and, if seated in the midst of several people, do not stretch out your hand before them. You must never rush forward under the influence of gluttony; nor must you, though desirous, reach out your hand till some time, in as much as by greed one shows an uncontrolled appetite. Nor are you, in the midst of the repast, to exhibit yourselves hugging your food like wild beasts; nor helping yourselves to too much sauce, for man is not by nature a sauce-consumer, but a bread-eater. A temperate man, too, must rise before the general company, and retire quietly from the banquet. "For at the time for rising," it is said, "be not the last; haste home. The twelve, having called together the multitude of the disciples, said, "It is not meet for us to leave the word of God and serve tables. If they avoided this, much more did they shun gluttony.
Constantly shifting about and changing position is also a sign of lightness. It belongs to the self-controlled man, right from the start, to choose the smaller portion and the slower pace in eating and drinking, not the more hasty, both at the beginning and in the pauses between courses. He also stops early and is not attached to the food. “Eat,” it says, “what is set before you, as a man should. Be the first to stop, for the sake of good manners. If you are seated among many, do not reach out your hand before them.” So we must never leap ahead because greed persuades us. Nor should we strain to stretch the meal out for a long time, since by lagging behind we confess our lack of self-control. Nor should we be seen in the middle of the meal clinging to the food like wild animals, or taking a large helping of savory dishes. For man is by nature not a relish-eater but a grain-eater. It is also fitting for a self-controlled man to rise before the crowd and quietly slip away from the banquet. “For at the time for getting up,” it says, “do not be last; hurry off home.” The Twelve called together the multitude of the disciples and said, “It is not right for us to leave the word of God and serve tables.” If they guarded against this, much more did they flee gluttony.
And the apostles themselves, writing to the brethren at Antioch, and in Syria and Cilicia, said: "It seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no other burden than these necessary things, to abstain from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication, from which, if you keep yourselves, ye shall do well. But we must guard against drunkenness as against hemlock; for both drag down to death. We must also check excessive laughter and immoderate tears. For often people under the influence of wine, after laughing immoderately, then are, I know not how, by some impulse of intoxication moved to tears; for both effiminacy and violence are discordant with the word. And elderly people, looking on the young as children, may, though but very rarely, be playful with them, joking with them to train them in good behaviour.
These same apostles, writing “to the brothers in Antioch and Syria and Cilicia,” said: “It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay no greater burden on you than these necessary things: to abstain from things sacrificed to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from sexual immorality. If you keep yourselves from these, you will do well.” We must guard against drunken excess just as we guard against hemlock, for both drag us down to death. “We must also keep away from extreme laughter and from excessive tears.” Often drunken men laugh loudly for a long time, and then, I do not know how, are led by some drunken impulse into tears. Both effeminate behavior and insolence are out of harmony with the Word. Older men, looking on the young as their children, will very seldom, but perhaps sometimes, play with them, joking in a way that will train them in good behavior.
For example, before a bashful and silent youth, one might by way of pleasantry speak thus: "This son of mine (I mean one who is silent) is perpetually talking. For a joke such as this enhances the youth's modesty, by showing the good qualities that belong to him playfully, by censure of the bad quantities, which do not. For this device is instructive, confirming as it does what is present by what is not present. Such, certainly, is the intention of him who says that a water-drinker and a sober man gets intoxicated and drunk. But if there are those who like to jest at people, we must be silent, and dispense with superfluous words like full cups. For such sport is dangerous. "The mouth of the impetuous approaches to contrition. "Thou shalt not receive a foolish report, nor shall thou agree with an unjust person to be an unjust witness," neither in calumnies nor in injurious speeches, much less evil practices.
For example, to a shy and silent young man one may say playfully something like this: “This son of mine—I mean the one who says nothing—never stops talking.” A joke like this deepens the young man’s modesty. In a playful way it brings out the good qualities he has by accusing him of the bad ones he does not have. It is a teacher’s device, confirming what is present by what is not. The same kind of judgment lies behind the saying that a water-drinker, a sober man, is behaving drunkenly and is drunk. But if there are people who love to mock, we must keep silent and pass their idle words along, as we pass on the full cups. Such sport is risky. “The mouth of the reckless is near to ruin.” “You shall not accept an empty report, nor agree to join an unjust man as an unjust witness,” whether in slanders, in abusive speech, or even in malicious talk.
I also should think it right to impose a limit on the speech of rightly regulated persons, who are impelled to speak to one who maintains a conversation with them. "For silence is the excellence of women, and the safe prize of the young; but good speech is characteristic of experienced, mature age. Speak, old man, at a banquet, for it is becoming to you. But speak without embarrassment, and with accuracy of knowledge. Youth, Wisdom also commands thee. Speak, if you must, with hesitation, on being twice asked; sum up your discourse in a few words. But let both speakers regulate their discourse according to just proportion. For loudness of utterance is most insane; while an inaudible utterance is characteristic of a senseless man, for people will not hear: the one is the mark of pusillanimity, the other of arrogance. Let contentiousness in words, for the sake of a useless triumph, be banished; for our aim is to be free from perturbation. Such is the meaning of the phrase, "Peace to thee. Answer not a word before you hear. An enervated voice is the sign of effeminacy. But modulation in the voice is characteristic of a wise man, who keeps his utterance from loudness, from drawling, from rapidity, from prolixity.
I think I should also set a limit on the voice of self-controlled people, at least those who are permitted to speak, namely the one who is answering in conversation. Silence is the virtue of women and the safe honor of the young, but good speech belongs to a tested age. “Speak, elder, at a banquet, for it becomes you. But speak without hindrance and with exact knowledge.” “Young man,” wisdom allows you also: “Speak, if you must. When you have barely been asked twice, sum up your words briefly.” Both speakers should keep their voices in due proportion. A loud delivery is utterly mad, and speaking so that those nearby cannot hear is the mark of a senseless person, since they will not hear him. The first is a sign of low breeding, the second of arrogance. Let there also be no quarrelsomeness, no striving for an empty victory in words, since our goal is freedom from disturbance, and this is what “Peace to you” means. “Before you have heard, do not answer a word.” A soft, broken voice belongs to an effeminate man, but a measured voice belongs to the self-controlled man, who keeps his speech in check in loudness, length, speed and amount.
For we ought not to speak long or much, nor ought we to speak frivolously. Nor must we converse rapidly and rashly. For the voice itself, so to speak, ought to receive its just dues; and those who are vociferous and clamorous ought to be silenced. For this reason, the wise Ulysses chastised Thersites with stripes:- "Only Thersites, with unmeasured words, Of which he had good store, to rate the chiefs, Not over-seemly, but wherewith he thought To move the crowd to laughter, brawled aloud. "For dreadful in his destruction is a loquacious man. And it is with triflers as with old shoes: all the rest is worn away by evil; the tongue only is left for destruction. Wherefore Wisdom gives these most useful exhortations: "Do not talk trifles in the multitude of the elders. Further, eradicating frivolousness, beginning with God, it lays down the law for our regulation somewhat thus: "Do not repeat your words in your prayer. Chirruping and whistling, and sounds made through the fingers, by which domestics are called, being irrational signs, are to be given up by rational men. Frequent spitting, too, and violent clearing of the throat, and wiping one's nose at an entertainment, are to be shunned.
We must never talk at great length, or too much, or idly, nor must we speak in a hurried, tumbling rush. The voice itself, so to speak, must be given its due of justice, and those who shout at the wrong moments and bawl must be silenced. This is why the self-controlled Odysseus beat Thersites with blows. He was the only one who was punished, because he was a man of measureless words, who knew in his mind many words that were disorderly, uttered idly and not in good order. “A talkative man is dreadful in his own destruction.” With babblers it is like old shoes: everything else is worn out by wickedness, and only the tongue is left over, to do harm. So Wisdom gives the most practical advice for life: “Do not chatter in the company of elders.” She cuts off foolish talk at the top and begins from God, laying down the rule of moderation like this: “Do not repeat your words in your prayer.” Clicking noises, whistles, and snapping of the fingers, which people use to call their servants, are signals without words, and rational people should avoid them. We should also give up constant spitting and violent throat-clearing.
For respect is assuredly to be had to the guests, lest they turn in disgust from such filthiness, which argues want of restraint. For we are not to copy oxen and asses, whose manger and dunghill are together. For many wipe their noses and spit even whilst supping. If any one is attacked with sneezing, just as in the case of hiccup, he must not startle those near him with the explosion, and so give proof of his bad breeding; but the hiccup is to be quietly transmitted with the expiration of the breath, the mouth being composed becomingly, and not gaping and yawning like the tragic masks. So the disturbance of hiccup may be avoided by making the respirations gently; for thus the threatening symptoms of the ball of wind will be dissipated in the most seemly way, by managing its egress so as also to conceal anything which the air forcibly expelled may bring up with it.
Do not blow your nose at the drinking either. We must have some regard for our fellow guests, so that they do not turn away in nausea from this kind of disorderly conduct, which accuses a person of lack of self-control. The manger and the dung-heap are not in the same place for oxen and donkeys. Yet many people blow their nose and spit while they are dining in the same place. If someone happens to sneeze, or likewise belch, he must not make a noise that rings in the ears of those nearby and testifies to his own lack of training. The belch must be let pass quietly with the breath as it goes out, the mouth shaped decently, not stretched and gaping like a tragic mask. The disturbance of a sneeze should be removed by checking the breathing gently. In this way, by managing the passage of the breath, we can quietly put out the sudden threat of the wind in the most seemly manner, and even try to conceal anything superfluous that the air may force out with it.
To wish to add to the noises, instead of diminishing them, is the sign of arrogance and disorderliness. Those, too, who scrape their teeth, bleeding the wounds, are disagreeable to themselves and detestable to their neighbours. Scratching the ears and the irritation of sneezing are swinish itchings, and attend unbridled fornication. Both shameful sights and shameful conversation about them are to be shunned. Let the look be steady, and the turning and movement of the neck, and the motions of the hands in conversation, be decorous. In a word, the Christian is characterized by composure, tranquillity, calmness, and peace.
To want to add to such noises instead of reducing them is a sign of arrogance and disorder. People who pick at their teeth until their gums bleed are unpleasant to themselves and offensive to their neighbors. Tickling the ears and provoking sneezes are also pig-like itches, which practice unrestrained fornication. We must also avoid shameful sights and shameful talk about them. Let the gaze be steady, the turning of the neck and the movement of the body composed, and the gestures of the hands in conversation restrained. In short, the Christian belongs to stillness, quietness, calm and peace.
On the Use of Ointments and Crowns.The use of crowns and ointments is not necessary for us; for it impels to pleasures and indulgences, especially on the approach of night. I know that the woman brought to the sacred supper "an alabaster box of ointment," and anointed the feet of the Lord, and refreshed Him; and I know that the ancient kings of the Hebrews were crowned with gold and precious stones. But the woman not having yet received the Word (for she was still a sinner), honoured the Lord with what she thought the most precious thing in her possession-the ointment; and with the ornament of her person, with her hair, she wiped off the superfluous ointment, while she expended on the Lord tears of repentance: "wherefore her sins are forgiven. This may be a symbol of the Lord's teaching, and of His suffering. For the feet anointed with fragrant ointment mean divine instruction travelling with renown to the ends of the earth. "For their sound hath gone forth to the ends of the earth. And if I seem not to insist too much, the feet of the Lord which were anointed are the apostles, having, according to prophecy, received the fragrant unction of the Holy Ghost.
Question: should we use perfumed oils and wreaths? We have no need to use wreaths and perfumed oils. They run aground on pleasures and laziness, especially when night is near. I know that the woman brought an “alabaster jar of ointment” to the holy supper, anointed the Lord’s feet, and sang his praise. I also know that the ancient kings of the Hebrews were crowned with gold and precious stones. But the woman had not yet shared in the Word (for she was still a sinner). She honored the Master with the thing she thought finest among her possessions, the ointment. With the adornment of her body, her own hair, she wiped away the excess ointment, and she poured out on the Lord tears of repentance. For this reason “her sins have been forgiven.” This can also be a symbol of the Lord’s teaching and his suffering. Feet anointed with fragrant ointment hint at divine teaching traveling with good repute to the ends of the earth: “Their voice has gone out to the ends of the earth.” And if I do not seem tiresome, the Lord’s perfumed feet are the apostles. In keeping with prophecy, they received a share of the Holy Spirit, the fragrance of the anointing.
Those, therefore, who travelled over the world and preached the Gospel, are figuratively called the feet of the Lord, of whom also the Holy Spirit foretells in the psalm, "Let us adore at the place where His feet stood," that is, where the apostles, His feet, arrived; since, preached by them, He came to the ends of the earth. And tears are repentance; and the loosened hair proclaimed deliverance from the love of finery, and the affliction in patience which, on account of the Lord, attends preaching, the old vainglory being done away with by reason of the new faith. Besides, it shows the Lord's passion, if you understand it mystically thus: the oil (e !laion) is the Lord Himself, from whom comes the mercy (e !leoj) which reaches us. But the ointment, which is adulterated oil, is the traitor Judas, by whom the Lord was anointed on the feet, being released from His sojourn in the world. For the dead are anointed. And the tears are we repentant sinners, who have believed in Him, and to whom He has forgiven our sins. And the dishevelled hair is mourning Jerusalem, the deserted, for whom the prophetic lamentations were uttered.
So the apostles, who went around the whole world and proclaimed the gospel, are allegorically called the Lord’s feet. The Spirit foretells this about them through the psalmist: “Let us worship at the place where his feet stood.” That is, let us worship where his feet, the apostles, arrived, since by their preaching he came to the ends of the earth. The tears are repentance. The loosened hair announced release from love of adornment. It also announced the affliction, borne with endurance, that goes with preaching for the Lord’s sake, since the old vainglory has been loosed for the sake of the new faith. But it also reveals the Lord’s passion, for those who understand it mystically in this way. The oil is the Lord himself, from whom comes the mercy shown to us. The ointment, which is oil that has been tampered with, is Judas the betrayer. Through him the Lord was anointed on the feet as he was departing from his life in the world, for the dead are anointed with perfume. We are the tears: sinners who have repented, who have believed in him, and whose sins he has forgiven. The loosened hair is Jerusalem, deserted and in mourning, for whose sake the prophets’ laments were made.
The Lord Himself shall teach us that Judas the deceitful is meant: "He that dippeth with Me in the dish, the same shall betray Me. You see the treacherous guest, and this same Judas betrayed the Master with a kiss. For he was a hypocrite, giving a treacherous kiss, in imitation of another hypocrite of old. And He reproves that people respecting whom it was said, "This people honour Me with their lips; but their heart is far from Me. It is not improbable, therefore, that by the oil He means that disciple to whom was shown mercy, and by the tainted and poisoned oil the traitor. This was, then, what the anointed feet prophesied-the treason of Judas, when the Lord went to His passion. And the Saviour Himself washing the feet of the disciples, and despatching them to do good deeds, pointed out their pilgrimage for the benefit of the nations, making them beforehand fair and pure by His power.
The Lord himself teaches us that Judas is the one who is tampered with, when he says, “Whoever dips with me in the dish, this one will betray me.” Do you see the deceitful table companion? This same Judas betrayed the Teacher with a kiss. He became a hypocrite with a deceitful kiss, imitating another hypocrite of old, and exposing that people of whom it was said: “This people love me with their lips, but their heart is far from me.” So it is not unlikely that Judas himself stands for both kinds of oil. As a disciple who had been shown mercy, he is oil. As a betrayer, he is deceitful, drugged oil. This, then, is what the perfumed feet were prophesying: the betrayal by Judas, as the Lord went on toward his passion. And the Savior himself, when he washed the disciples’ feet and sent them out to good works, hinted at their journey for the benefit of the nations. By his own power he had made that journey ready beforehand, fair and clean.
Then the ointment breathed on them its fragrance, and the work of sweet savour reaching to all was proclaimed; for the passion of the Lord has filled us with sweet fragrance, and the Hebrews with guilt. This the apostle most clearly showed, when he said, "thanks be to God, who always makes us to triumph in Christ, and maketh manifest the savour of His knowledge by us in every place. For we are to God a sweet savour of the Lord, in them that are saved, and them that are lost; to one a savour of death unto death, to the other a savour of life unto life. And the kings of the Jews using gold and precious stones and a variegated crown, the anointed ones wearing Christ symbolically on the head, were unconsciously adorned with the head of the Lord.
In these events the ointment gave off its fragrance, and the work of that fragrance, which reaches everyone, has been made known. For the Lord’s passion has filled us with fragrance, but the Hebrews with sin. The apostle showed this most clearly when he said: “Thanks be to God, who always leads us in triumph in Christ and makes known through us the fragrance of the knowledge of him in every place. For we are the Lord’s fragrance to God, among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing. To some it is a fragrance from death to death, and to others a fragrance from life to life.” As for the kings of the Jews, they wore a composite, varied crown of gold and precious stones. They were the “anointed ones” (the christs), and they carried Christ symbolically on their heads without knowing it. They were adorned with the head of the Lord.
The precious stone, or pearl, or emerald, points out the Word Himself. The gold, again, is the incorruptible Word, who admits not the poison of corruption. The Magi, accordingly, brought to Him on His birth, gold, the symbol of royalty. And this crown, after the image of the Lord, fades not as a flower. I know, too, the words of Aristippus the Cyrenian. Aristippus was a luxurious man. He asked an answer to a sophistical proposition in the following terms: "A horse anointed with ointment is not injured in his excellence as a horse, nor is a dog which has been anointed, in his excellence as a dog; no more is a man," he added, and so finished. But the dog and horse take no account of the ointment, whilst in the case of those whose perceptions are more rational, applying girlish scents to their persons, its use is more censurable. Of these ointments there are endless varieties, such as the Brenthian, the Metallian, and the royal; the Plangonian and the Psagdian of Egypt.
A precious stone, a pearl or an emerald, is a hidden picture of the Word himself. Gold, in turn, is the incorruptible Word, who does not admit the rust (or poison) of decay. When he was born, the Magi brought him gold as a symbol of kingship. This crown, made in the likeness of the Lord, stays immortal, for it does not wither like a flower. I also know what Aristippus the Cyrenian said. Aristippus lived a soft and luxurious life. He put a sophistical argument like this: “A horse anointed with perfume is not harmed in its excellence as a horse, nor is a dog perfumed in its excellence as a dog. So neither is a man.” That was how he drew his conclusion. But the horse and the dog take no notice of the perfume. Those whose sense of smell is more rational are more to be blamed for enjoying it when they put on girlish scents. These perfumes come in endless varieties: the Brenthian, the Metallian, the Royal, the Plangonian, and the Egyptian Psagdas.
Simonides is not ashamed in Iambic lines to say,- "I was anointed with ointments and perfumes, And with nard. For a merchant was present. They use, too, the unguent made from lilies, and that from the cypress. Nard is in high estimation with them, and the ointment prepared from roses and the others which women use besides, both moist and dry, scents for rubbing and for fumigating; for day by day their thoughts are directed to the gratification of insatiable desire, to the exhaustless variety of fragrance. Wherefore also they are redolent of an excessive luxuriousness. And they fumigate and sprinkle their clothes, their bed-clothes, and their houses. Luxury all but compels vessels for the meanest uses to smell of perfume. There are some who, annoyed at the attention bestowed on this, appear to me to be rightly so averse to perfumes on account of their rendering manhood effeminate, as to banish their compounders and vendors from well-regulated states, and banish, too, the dyers of flower-coloured wools. For it is not right that ensnaring garments and unguents should be admitted into the city of truth;
Simonides is not ashamed to say in his iambic verses: “I was anointed with perfumes and incense and bacchar, for a merchant happened to be there.” People also make perfume from lilies and from henna. Nard is highly valued among them, as are ointment of roses and the others that women still use: liquid and dry perfumes, scented powders, and perfumes burned as incense. Every day they invent some new way to match their insatiable desire with an insatiable supply of fragrance. So they reek of a great lack of taste. These women also perfume their clothes, bedding and houses with incense and sprinkle them with scent. Luxury all but forces even their chamber pots to smell of perfume. Some people are indignant at this enthusiasm. They think perfumes make the men’s quarters effeminate, and they seem to me right to be so hostile to them. They even drive the makers of perfume, the perfumers, out of well-governed cities, and the dyers of flower-colored wools as well. For deceitful garments and ointments have no right to enter the city of truth.
but it is highly requisite for the men who belong to us to give forth the odour not of ointments, but of nobleness and goodness. And let woman breathe the odour of the true royal ointment, that of Christ, not of unguents and scented powders; and let her always be anointed with the ambrosial chrism of modesty, and find delight in the holy unguent, the Spirit. This ointment of pleasant fragrance Christ prepares for His disciples, compounding the ointment of celestial aromatic ingredients. Wherefore also the Lord Himself is anointed with an ointment, as is mentioned by David: "Wherefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows; myrrh, and stacte, and cassia from thy garments. But let us not unconsciously abominate unguents, like vultures or like beetles (for these, they say, when smeared with ointment, die); and let a few unguents be selected by women, such as will not be overpowering to a husband. For excessive anointings with unguents savour of a funeral and not of connubial life.
It is especially fitting that the men among us should smell not of perfumes but of nobility and goodness. Let the woman breathe out Christ, the royal ointment, and not scented powders and perfumes. Let her always be anointed with the heavenly oil of self-control, taking delight in the holy ointment, the Spirit. Christ prepares this for people who know him: an ointment of fragrance, made up from heavenly spices. The Lord himself is anointed with this ointment, as David shows: “Therefore God, your God, has anointed you with the oil of gladness beyond your companions. Myrrh, stacte and cassia come from your garments.” But let us not, without noticing it, come to loathe perfumes the way vultures do, or beetles (they say beetles die when anointed with rose perfume). Women should be permitted a few of these perfumes, those that do not overwhelm their husbands. For excessive anointing with perfume smells of a funeral, not of life together.
Yet oil itself is inimical to bees and insects; and some men it benefits, and some it summons to the fight; and those who were formerly friends, when anointed with it, it turns out to deadly combat. Ointment being smooth oil, do you not think that it is calculated to render noble manners effeminate? Certainly. And as we have abandoned luxury in taste, so certainly do we renounce voluptuousness in sights and odours; lest through the senses, as through unwatched doors, we unconsciously give access into the soul to that excess which we have driven away. If, then, we say that the Lord the great High Priest offers to God the incense of sweet fragrance, let us not imagine that this is a sacrifice and sweet fragrance of incense; but let us understand it to mean, that the Lord lays the acceptable offering of love, the spiritual fragrance, on the altar.
Yet oil itself is hostile to bees and to insects. Among people, it has helped some and stirred others to fight. Those who were cowardly before, once anointed with it, it turns in the stadiums into thorough fighters in the contest. But perfume is a soft oil. Do you not think it can make noble character effeminate? Certainly. Just as we have shut out luxury from taste, so we also banish the pursuit of pleasure in what we see and smell. Otherwise we may unknowingly give a way back into the soul, through the senses (like unguarded doors), to the self-indulgence we drove out. Suppose they say that the Lord, the great High Priest, offers the incense of fragrance to God. Let them not take this to mean a sacrifice and the fragrance of burning incense. Let them accept instead that the Lord offers on the altar what love has made acceptable, the spiritual fragrance.
To resume: oil itself suffices to lubricate the skin, and relax the nerves, and remove any heavy smell from the body, if we require oil for this purpose. But attention to sweet scents is a bait which draws us in to sensual lust. For the licentious man is led on every hand, both by his food, his bed, his conversation, by his eyes, his ears, his jaws, and by his nostrils too. As oxen are pulled by rings and ropes, so is the voluptuary by fumigations and unguents, and the sweet scents of crowns. But since we assign no place to pleasure which is linked to no use serviceable to life, come let us also distinguish here too, selecting what is useful.
Oil by itself is enough to make the skin glossy, to relax the sinews, and to check any heavy smell of the body. For that purpose we may well need oil. But the cultivation of fragrance is a bait of idle self-indulgence, drawing a person from far off into greedy desire. The undisciplined man is led on from every side: by food, by bedding, by company, by his eyes, his ears and his jaws, and by his nostrils too. As oxen are pulled by rings and ropes, so the undisciplined man is dragged about by incense, perfumes and the scents of garlands. We give no place to any pleasure that is tied to no useful service in life. So let us make a distinction here too, and choose what is useful.
For there are sweet scents which neither make the head heavy nor provoke love, and are not redolent of embraces and licentious companionship, but, along with moderation, are salutary, nourishing the brain when labouring under indisposition, and strengthening the stomach. One must not therefore refrigerate himself with flowers when he wishes to supple his nerves. For their use is not wholly to be laid aside, but ointment is to be employed as a medicine and help in order to bring up the strength when enfeebled, and against catarrhs, and colds, and ennui, as the comic poet says:- "The nostrils are anointed; it being A most essential thing for health to fill the brain with good odours. The rubbing of the feet also with the fatness of warming or cooling unguents is practised on account of its beneficial effects; so consequently, in the case of those who are thus saturated, an attraction and flow take place from the head to the inferior members.
There are some fragrances that do not dull the head or stir up desire. They do not smell of sexual embrace or loose company. Used with moderation they are healthy, feeding the brain when it is in poor condition and strengthening the stomach. We should not throw out their use altogether. Ointment should be used like a medicine or a remedy: to revive failing strength, and against catarrh, chills and low spirits. The comic poet says somewhere: “He anoints his nostrils with perfumes; it is a very great part of health to give the brain good smells.” The rubbing of the feet with the oil of warming or cooling ointments is also practised for the sake of benefit. In those who are congested, it draws the fluid from the head and lets it drain down to the less important parts of the body.
But pleasure to which no utility attaches, induces the suspicion of meretricious habits, and is a rug provocative of the passions. Rubbing one's self with ointment is entirely different from anointing one's self with ointment. The former is effeminate, while anointing with ointment is in some cases beneficial. Aristippus the philosopher, accordingly, when anointed with ointment, said "that the wretched Cinoedi deserved to perish miserably for bringing the utility of ointment into bad repute. "Honour the physician for his usefulness," says the Scripture, "for the Most High made him; and the art of healing is of the Lord. Then he adds, "And the compounder of unguents will make the mixture," since unguents have been given manifestly for use, not for voluptuousness. For we are by no means to care for the exciting properties of unguents, but to choose what is useful in them, since God hath permitted the production of oil for the mitigation of men's pains.
But pleasure that has no usefulness joined to it is a mark of a courtesan’s character and a drug that provokes desire. There is a real difference between bathing oneself in perfume and being anointed with ointment. The first is womanish; the second is sometimes even profitable. The philosopher Aristippus, for example, once anointed himself with ointment and said that the wretched effeminate men deserved to perish miserably for bringing the benefit of ointment into disrepute. “Honour the physician for the use you have of him,” says the Scripture, “for the Most High created him, and healing comes from the Lord.” Then it goes on: “And the perfumer will make a mixture.” Clearly, ointments are given for benefit and not for self-indulgence. We must never take pains over the provocative side of ointments, but choose what is helpful. After all, God granted people the making of oil to help them in their labours.
And silly women, who dye their grey hair and anoint their locks, grow speedily greyer by the perfumes they use, which are of a drying nature. Wherefore also those that anoint themselves become drier, and the dryness makes them greyer. For if greyness is an exsiccation of the hair, or defect of heat, the dryness drinking up the moisture which is the natural nutriment of the hair, and making it grey, how can we any longer retain a liking for unguents, through which ladies, in trying to escape grey hair, become grey? And as dogs with fine sense of smell track the wild beasts by the scent, so also the temperate scent the licentious by the superfluous perfume of unguents. Such a use of crowns, also, has degenerated to scenes of revelry and intoxication. Do not encircle my head with a crown, for in the springtime it is delightful to while away the time on the dewy meads, while soft and many-coloured flowers are in bloom, and, like the bees, enjoy a natural and pure fragrance. But to adorn one's self with "a crown woven from the fresh mead," and wear it at home, were unfit for a man of temperance. For it is not suitable to fill the wanton hair with rose-leaves, or violets, or lilies, or other such flowers, stripping the sward of its flowers.
Foolish women dye their grey hairs and perfume their locks, yet they go grey sooner, because spices are drying. This is why those who use perfume look more unkempt, and dryness makes the hair greyer. (Whether grey hair is a withering of the hair or a lack of heat, the dryness drinks up the moist nourishment proper to the hair and turns it grey.) How can people who run from grey hair reasonably go on loving perfumes, when perfumes cause it? Just as dogs track wild animals by the scent, so the self-controlled hunt down the licentious by their overdone perfume. The use of garlands is much the same, fit for revelry and drunkenness: “Away! Do not put a garland around my head.” In spring it is good to spend time in dewy, soft meadows, green with flowers of every colour, and to feed, like the bees, on their natural, pure fragrance. But to weave a garland from an untouched meadow and wear it about at home is not for people of self-control. It is not fitting for revelling hair to be covered with rosebuds, violets, lilies or other such flowers, as though dressing oneself in the greenery.
For a crown encircling the head cools the hair, both on account of its moisture and its coolness. Accordingly, physicians, determining by physiology that the brain is cold, approve of anointing the breast and the points of the nostrils, so that the warm exhalation passing gently through, may salutarily warm the chill. A man ought not therefore to cool himself with flowers. Besides, those who crown themselves destroy the pleasure there is in flowers: for they enjoy neither the sight of them, since they wear the crown above their eyes; nor their fragrance, since they put the flowers away above the organs of respiration. For the fragrance ascending and exhaling naturally, the organ of respiration is left destitute of enjoyment, the fragrance being carried away. As beauty, so also the flower delights when looked at; and it is meet to glorify the Creator by the enjoyment of the sight of beautiful objects.
A garland set around the head chills the hair in any case, both by its moisture and by its coldness. For this reason physicians, explaining by natural science that the brain is cold, think it right to anoint the chest and the tips of the nostrils with ointment. Then the warm vapour, passing gently upward, can strongly warm the chill. So a man is far from right to cool the head with flowers when the sinewy part wants to be warmed. Besides, those who wear garlands lose the delight of the blossoms. People who bind a garland above their eyes do not enjoy the sight, and those who drive the flowers up above their breathing do not enjoy the fragrance. Fragrance naturally rises and evaporates upward above the head, so the breath is left without enjoyment, since the fragrance is snatched away. A flower, like any beauty, gives pleasure when it is looked at, and in enjoying beautiful things through the eye we should glorify the Creator.
The use of them is injurious, and passes swiftly away, avenged by remorse. Very soon their evanescence is proved; for both fade, both the flower and beauty. Further, whoever touches them is cooled by the former, inflamed by the latter. In one word, the enjoyment of them except by sight is a crime, and not luxury. It becomes us who truly follow the Scripture to enjoy ourselves temperately, as in Paradise. We must regard the woman's crown to be her husband, and the husband's crown to be marriage; and the flowers of marriage the children of both, which the divine husbandman plucks from meadows of flesh. "Children's children are the crown of old men. And the glory of children is their fathers, it is said; and our glory is the Father of all; and the crown of the whole church is Christ.
Wearing them is harmful, and the pleasure soon passes, punished by regret. Their short life is quickly exposed, for both of them fade, the flower and the beauty. And of those who touch them, the one cools them and the other sets them on fire. In a word, enjoying them by any means other than the eye is an outrage, not a delight. We should take our delight as in a paradise, with self-control, since we truly follow the Scripture. We should think of a woman’s crown as her husband, and of a husband’s crown as his marriage. The flowers of the marriage are the children of both, which the divine farmer gathers from the meadows of the flesh. “The crown of old men is their children’s children, and the glory of children is their fathers,” it says. For us the glory is the Father of all, and the crown of the whole church is Christ.
As roots and plants, so also have flowers their individual properties, some beneficial, some injurious, some also dangerous. The ivy is cooling; nux emits a stupefying effluvium, as the etymology shows. The narcissus is a flower with a heavy odour; the name evinces this, and it induces a torpor (na/rkhn) in the nerves. And the effluvia of roses and violets being mildly cool, relieve and prevent headaches. But we who are not only not permitted to drink with others to intoxication, but not even to indulge in much wine, do not need the crocus or the flower of the cypress to lead us to an easy sleep. Many of them also, by their odours, warm the brain, which is naturally cold, volatilizing the effusions of the head.
Flowers, like roots and herbs, have their own properties. Some are beneficial, some harmful, and some risky. Ivy, for example, is cooling. The walnut tree gives off a drugging vapor, as its name, when traced to its origin, shows. The narcissus is a flower with a heavy scent, and its name exposes it, since it produces numbness in the nerves. The scents of roses and violets, which are mildly cool, relieve and check heaviness of the head. But we are not permitted to join others in drinking at all, and not even to get drunk on wine. Saffron and the cyprus flower lead to painless sleep. Many flowers, though, warm the brain, which is naturally cold, by their scents, thinning out the excess matter in the head.
The rose is hence said to have received its name (r9o/don) because it emits a copious stream (r9eu=ma) of odour (o0dwdh/). Wherefore also it quickly fades. But the use of crowns did not exist at all among the ancient Greeks; for neither the suitors nor the luxurious Phaeacians used them. But at the games there was at first the gift to the athletes; second, the rising up to applaud; third, the strewing with leaves; lastly, the crown, Greece after the Median war having given herself up to luxury. Those, then, who are trained by the Word are restrained from the use of crowns; and do not think that this Word, which has its seat in the brain, ought to be bound about, not because the crown is the symbol of the recklessness of revelry, but because it has been dedicated to idols. Sophocles accordingly called the narcissus "the ancient coronet of the great gods," speaking of the earth-born divinities; and Sappho crowns the Muses with the rose:- "For thou dost not share in roses from Pieria. They say, too, that Here delights in the lily, and Artemis in the myrtle.
They say the rose also gets its name from this, because it sends out a great stream of fragrance, and so it fades quickly. But the ancient Greeks did not yet use crowns at all. Neither the suitors nor the luxury-loving Phaeacians wore them. At the games, first came the giving of the prizes, second the circling round to be acclaimed, third the showering of leaves, and last the crown, after Greece, once the Persian wars were over, had grown in luxury. Those trained by the Word, then, are kept from crowns. It is not that they think this would bind the Word, who has his seat in the brain, and not that the crown might be a symbol of revelry and arrogance. It is because crowns are named after the idols. Sophocles, for example, called the narcissus “the ancient garland of the great gods,” meaning the gods of the underworld. Sappho crowns the Muses with the rose, for “you have no share in the roses of Pieria.” They say that Hera delights in the lily and Artemis in the myrtle.
For if the flowers were made especially for man, and senseless people have taken them not for their own proper and grateful use, but have abused them to the thankless service of demons, we must keep from them for conscience sake. The crown is the symbol of untroubled tranquillity. For this reason they crown the dead, and idols, too, on the same account, by this fact giving testimony to their being dead. For revellers do not without crowns celebrate their orgies; and when once they are encircled with flowers, at last they are inflamed excessively. We must have no communion with demons. Nor must we crown the living image of God after the manner of dead idols. For the fair crown of amaranth is laid up for those who have lived well. This flower the earth is not able to bear; heaven alone is competent to produce it.
Even if flowers were made above all for the sake of man, foolish people have taken them and used them wrongly. They have not used them in thankful use of their own, but in the ungrateful service of demons. So we must abstain from them “for conscience’ sake.” The crown is a symbol of carefree ease, free from trouble. For this reason people crown the dead, and for the same reason the idols, bearing witness by the act itself that the idols are dead. Revelers do not celebrate their rites without crowns, and once they have put on the flowers, they are inflamed for the ceremony. We must have no fellowship at all with demons. Nor should we crown the living image of God, as dead idols are crowned. The fair crown of what does not fade is laid up for the one who has lived well. The earth has no room to bear this flower. Heaven alone knows how to bring it to fruit.
Further, it were irrational in us, who have heard that the Lord was crowned with thorns, to crown ourselves with flowers, insulting thus the sacred passion of the Lord. For the Lord's crown prophetically pointed to us, who once were barren, but are placed around Him through the Church of which He is the Head. But it is also a type of faith, of life in respect of the substance of the wood, of joy in respect of the appellation of crown, of danger in respect of the thorn, for there is no approaching to the Word without blood. But this platted crown fades, and the plait of perversity is untied, and the flower withers. For the glory of those who have not believed on the Lord fades. And they crowned Jesus raised aloft, testifying to their own ignorance. For being hard of heart, they understood not that this very thing, which they called the disgrace of the Lord, was a prophecy wisely uttered:
Besides, it is senseless for us who have heard that the Lord was crowned with thorns to put on flowers, making light of the Lord’s solemn suffering. The Lord’s crown spoke prophetically in riddle of us, who were once fruitless, and who are placed around him through the church, of which he is the head. It is also a figure of faith: of life, because of the substance of the wood; of joy, because of the name of a crown; and of danger, because of the thorn. For it is not possible to approach the Word without blood. But this woven crown of flowers fades. The braid of crookedness comes undone, and the flower withers. For the glory of those who have not believed in the Lord fades. They crowned Jesus when he was lifted up, bearing witness to their own ignorance. The hard-hearted do not understand that this very thing, which they call an insult to the Lord, was a prophecy, wisely framed.
"The Lord was not known by the people " which erred, which was not circumcised in understanding, whose darkness was not enlightened, which knew not God, denied the Lord, forfeited the place of the true Israel, persecuted God, hoped to reduce the Word to disgrace; and Him whom they crucified as a malefactor they crowned as a king. Wherefore the Man on whom they believed not, they shall know to be the loving God the Lord, the Just. Whom they provoked to show Himself to be the Lord, to Him when lifted up they bore witness, by encircling Him, who is exalted above every name, with the diadem of righteousness by the ever-blooming thorn. This diadem, being hostile to those who plot against Him, coerces them; and friendly to those who form the Church, defends them. This crown is the flower of those who have believed on the glorified One but covers with blood and chastises those who have not believed.
“The people who went astray did not know the Lord. They are not circumcised in their reasoning, and their darkness has not been enlightened. They did not see God. They denied the Lord, and they have lost the name of Israel. They persecuted God and hoped to insult the Word. The one they crucified as a criminal, they crowned as a king. For this reason they will come to know, as Lord and righteous, the loving God in the man they did not believe in. They provoked him to show himself as Lord, and by that very act they bore witness to him when he was lifted up. They fastened the diadem of righteousness on the one exalted above every name, by means of the ever-flowering thorn. To those who plot against him, this diadem is an enemy and holds them back. To those who gather together in the church, it is a friend and fences them round. This crown is the flower of those who have believed in the glorified One, but it draws blood from the unbelieving and punishes them.”
It is a symbol, too, of the Lord's successful work, He having borne on His head, the princely part of His body, all our iniquities by which we were pierced. For He by His. own passion rescued us from offences, and sins, and such like thorns; and having destroyed the devil, deservedly said in triumph, "O Death, where is thy sting? " And we eat grapes from thorns, and figs from thistles; while those to whom He stretched forth His hands-the disobedient and unfruitful people-He lacerates into wounds. I can also show you another mystic meaning in it. For when the Almighty Lord of the universe began to legislate by the Word, and wished His power to be manifested to Moses, a godlike vision of light that had assumed a shape was shown him in the burning bush (the bush is a thorny plant); but when the Word ended the giving of the law and His stay with men, the Lord was again mystically crowned with thorn. On His departure from this world to the place whence He came, He repeated the beginning of His old descent, in order that the Word beheld at first in the bush, and afterwards taken up crowned by the thorn, might show the whole to be the work of one power, He Himself being one, the Son of the Father, who is truly one, the beginning and the end of time.
Yes, and the crown is also a symbol of the Lord’s triumph. On his head, the ruling part of his body, he bore all our evils, by which we were being pricked. By his own suffering he rescued us from stumbling-blocks, sins and thorns of that kind. He brought the devil to nothing, and so he rightly said in triumph, “Death, where is your sting?” And we gather grapes from thorns and figs from brambles, while those toward whom he stretched out his hands, a disobedient and fruitless people, are torn into wounds. I can tell you another hidden meaning here as well. When the almighty Lord of all began to give the law through the Word, he wanted his power to be made plain to Moses. A vision of God’s form appeared to him, light shaped upon a burning bush. (The bush is a thorny plant.) When the Word had finished giving the law and his visit among men, the Lord was again crowned with thorn, in a hidden sense. He was going from here to the place from which he had come down, and he recapitulated the beginning of his old descent. The Word first seen in the bush, and afterward taken up through the thorn, would show that everything is the work of one power. He is one, from the one Father, who is the beginning and end of the age.
But I have made a digression from the paedagogic style of speech, and introduced the didactic. I return accordingly to my subject. To resume, then: we have showed that in the department of medicine, for healing, and sometimes also for moderate recreation, the delight derived from flowers, and the benefit derived from unguents and perfumes, are not to be overlooked. And if some say, What pleasure, then, is there in flowers to those that do not use them? let them know, then, that unguents are prepared from them, and are most useful. The Susinian ointment is made from various kinds of lilies; and it is warming, aperient, drawing, moistening, abstergent, subtle, antibilious, emollient. The Narcissinian is made from the narcissus, and is equally beneficial with the Susinian. The Myrsinian, made of myrtle and myrtle berries, is a styptic, stopping effusions from the body; and that from roses is refrigerating.
But I have strayed from the instructor’s manner by bringing in the style of a teacher, so I now return to the subject before us. We have shown that the delight of flowers, and the benefit of perfumes and incense, are not to be rejected. They serve as a medicine for healing, and sometimes also for moderate relaxation. Some may ask, “What then is the use of flowers to those who do not wear them?” Let them know that perfumed oils are made from flowers, and that these have many uses. Susinon oil is made from lilies and is warming, opening, drawing, moistening, cleansing, fine in texture, stimulating to the bile and softening. Narcissus oil, made from the narcissus, helps just as much as the Susinon. Myrtle oil, made from myrtle and myrtle berries, is astringent and holds back discharges from the body. The oil from roses is cooling.
For, in a word, these also were created for our use. "Hear me," it is said, "and grow as a rose planted by the streams of waters, and give forth a sweet fragrance like frankincense, and bless the Lord for His works. We should have much to say respecting them, were we to speak of flowers and odours as made for necessary purposes, and not for the excesses of luxury. And if a concession must be made, it is enough for people to enjoy the fragrance of flowers; but let them not crown themselves with them. For the Father takes great care of man, and gives to him alone His own art. The Scripture therefore says, "Water, and fire, and iron, and milk, and fine flour of wheat, and honey, the blood of the grape, and oil, and clothing,-all these things are for the good of the godly."
In general, these things too were made for our good use. Scripture says, “Listen to me, and blossom like a rose planted by streams of water. Give off a sweet smell like frankincense, and bless the Lord for his works.” There would be much to say on this subject, since we hold that flowers and spices were made for necessary benefits, not for the excesses of luxury. If some allowance must be made, it is enough for people to enjoy the scent of flowers. Let them not wear them as crowns. For the Father cares greatly for man, and gives his own craftsmanship to him alone. So Scripture says, “Water and fire and iron and milk, fine wheat flour and honey, the blood of the grape and oil and clothing: all these are for good to the godly.”
On Sleep.How, in due course, we are to go to sleep, in remembrance of the precepts of temperance, we must now say. For after the repast, having given thanks to God for our participation in our enjoyments, and for the [happy] passing of the day, our talk must be turned to sleep. Magnificence of bed-clothes, gold-embroidered carpets, and smooth carpets worked with gold, and long fine robes of purple, and costly fleecy cloaks, and manufactured rugs of purple, and mantles of thick pile, and couches softer than sleep, are to be banished. For, besides the reproach of voluptuousness, sleeping on downy feathers is injurious, when our bodies fall down as into a yawning hollow, on account of the softness of the bedding. For they are not convenient for sleepers turning in them, on account of the bed rising into a hill on either side of the body. Nor are they suitable for the digestion of the food, but rather for burning it up, and so destroying the nutriment.
How We Should Approach Sleep Next we must say how to go to sleep, keeping in mind the rules of self-control. After the meal we bless God for sharing these enjoyments with us and for the day that has run its course. Then our talk should turn to sleep, and we should dismiss costly bedding: rugs sprinkled with gold, smooth coverlets embroidered in gold, purple robes, expensive shaggy cloaks, fancy purple blankets, thick woolen covers laid on top, and beds “softer than sleep.” Besides the shame of such self-indulgence, sleeping in downy feathers is harmful. The bodies of those who lie in them sink as into a chasm because the bedding is so soft. † It is not suitable for those who turn over in it, because the bed rises like a hill on either side of the body. It allows food to be digested, but it overheats it all the more, and that ruins the nourishment.
But stretching one's self on even couches, affording a kind of natural gymnasium for sleep, contributes to the digestion of the food. And those that can roll on other beds, having this, as it were, for a natural gymnasium for sleep, digest food more easily, and render themselves fitter for emergencies. Moreover, silver-footed couches argue great ostentation; and the ivory on beds, the body having left the soul, is not permissible for holy men, being a lazy contrivance for rest. We must not occupy our thoughts about these things, for the use of them is not forbidden to those who possess them; but solicitude about them is prohibited, for happiness is not to be found in them. On the other hand, it savours of cynic vanity for a man to act as Diomede,- "And he stretched himself under a wild bull's hide," - unless circumstances compel. Ulysses rectified the unevenness of the nuptial couch with a stone. Such frugality and self-help was practised not by private individuals alone, but by the chiefs of the ancient Greeks.
Those who can roll over on level beds have, in this, a kind of natural exercise for sleep. They digest their food more easily and make themselves readier for emergencies. Furthermore, silver-footed couches condemn their owners as very showy. And ivory on little beds, “from a body that has left its soul, is not pure.” For holy people it is a lazy contrivance for rest. So we should not be eager about such things. Those who own them are not forbidden to use them, but fussing over them is forbidden, for happiness does not lie in them. On the other hand, it is Cynic vainglory to make a practice of sleeping like Diomedes, “and under him was spread the hide of an ox of the fields,” unless circumstances force it. Odysseus set right the lame leg of his wedding bed with a stone. Such plain living and doing for oneself was practiced not only by ordinary people but also by the leaders of the ancient Greeks.
But why speak of these? Jacob slept on the ground, and a stone served him for a pillow; and then was he counted worthy to behold the vision-that was above man. And in conformity with reason, the bed which we use must be simple and frugal, and so constructed that, by avoiding the extremes [of too much indulgence and too much endurance], it may be comfortable: if it is warm, to protect us; if cold, to warm us. But let not the couch be elaborate, and let it have smooth feet; for elaborate turnings form occasionally paths for creeping things which twine themselves about the incisions of the work, and do not slip off. Especially is a moderate softness in the bed suitable for manhood; for sleep ought not to be for the total enervation of the body, but for its relaxation. Wherefore I say that it ought not to be allowed to come on us for the sake of indulgence, but in order to rest from action.
But why do I speak of these? Jacob slept on the ground with a stone for his pillow, and then he was counted worthy to see the sight that is beyond man. For us, following reason, the bed should be plain and simple, with a moderate comfort: in summer something to cover us, in cold weather something to keep us warm. The bedstead should not be fussy, and its legs should be smooth. Elaborate carvings sometimes become highways for crawling creatures, which wind around the cuts of the craftsman’s work and do not slip off. Above all, the softness of the bedding should be moderate and manly. Sleep should not be a total loosening of the body, but a relaxing of it. So I say we should take sleep not for laziness, but as a rest from our work.
We must therefore sleep so as to be easily awaked. For it is said, "Let your loins be girt about, and your lamps burning; and ye yourselves like to men that watch for their lord, that when he returns from the marriage, and comes and knocks, they may straightway open to him. Blessed are those servants whom the Lord, when He cometh, shall find watching. For there is no use of a sleeping man, as there is not of a dead man. Wherefore we ought often to rise by night and bless God. For blessed are they who watch for Him, and so make themselves like the angels, whom we call "watchers. But a man asleep is worth nothing, any more than if he were not alive. But he who has the light watches, "and darkness seizes not on him," nor sleep, since darkness does not. He that is illuminated is therefore awake towards God; and such an one lives. "For what was made in Him was life. "Blessed is the man," says Wisdom, "who shall hear me, and the man who shall keep my ways, watching at my doors, daily observing the posts of my entrances. "Let us not then sleep, as do others, but let us watch," says the Scripture, "and be sober.
So we should doze off in such a way that we wake easily. For he says, “Let your loins be girded and your lamps burning. Be like people waiting for their master to return from the wedding, so that when he comes and knocks they may open to him at once. Blessed are those servants whom the master finds awake when he comes.” A sleeping man is of no more use than a dead one. So we should often rise from bed in the night and bless God. Blessed are those who stay awake for him, making themselves like the angels, whom we call “watchers.” “A man asleep is worth nothing, no more than one who is not alive.” But the one who has the light is awake, and the darkness does not overtake him, nor does sleep, since there is no darkness. So the enlightened person is awake toward God, and such a person lives: “What came to be in him was life.” “Blessed is the man,” says Wisdom, “who will listen to me, and the man who keeps my ways, watching daily at my doors, guarding the posts of my entrances.” “So let us not sleep like the rest,” says the Scripture, “but let us stay awake and be sober.
For they that sleep, sleep in the night; and they that be drunken, are drunken in the night," that is, in the darkness of ignorance. "But let us who are of the day be sober. For ye are all children of the light, and children of the day; we are not of the night, nor of the darkness. But whoever of us is most solicitous for living the true life, and for entertaining noble sentiments, will keep awake for as long time as possible, reserving to himself only what in this respect is conducive to his own health; and that is not very usual. But devotion to activity begets an everlasting vigil after toils. Let not food weigh us down, but lighten us; that we may be injured as little as possible by sleep, as those that swim with weights hanging to them are weighed down. But, on the other hand, let temperance raise us as from the abyss beneath to the enterprises of wakefulness.
For those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk, get drunk at night.” That is, in the darkness of ignorance. “But let us, who belong to the day, be sober. For you are all sons of light and sons of the day. We do not belong to night or to darkness.” “But whoever among us is most of all a guardian of true life and of genuine understanding stays awake as long as possible. He keeps only as much sleep as is useful for his health, and that is not much, once it has become a good habit.” Training in self-discipline, born of hard work, produces a lasting wakefulness. So let our food not weigh us down but lighten us, so that sleep harms us as little as possible. Weighed-down food is like the weights hung on swimmers. Instead, let sobriety lift us up, as if from the deep below, to the surface of wakefulness.
For the oppression of sleep is like death, which forces us into insensibility, cutting off the light by the closing of the eyelids. Let not us, then, who are sons of the true light, close the door against this light; but turning in on ourselves, illumining the eyes of the hidden man, and gazing on the truth itself, and receiving its streams, let us clearly and intelligibly reveal such dreams as are true. But the hiccuping of those who are loaded with wine, and the snortings of those who are stuffed with food, and the snoring rolled in the bed-clothes, and the rumblings of pained stomachs, cover over the clear-seeing eye of the soul, by filling the mind with ten thousand phantasies. And the cause is too much food, which drags the rational part of man down to a condition of stupidity. For much sleep brings advantage neither to our bodies nor our souls; nor is it suitable at all to those processes which have truth for their object, although agreeable to nature. Now, just Lot (for I pass over at present the account of the economy of regeneration ) would not have been drawn into that unhallowed intercourse, had he not been intoxicated by his daughters, and overpowered by sleep.
The pull of sleep is like death. Through lack of awareness it carries us down into insensibility, and it cuts off the light by the closing of the eyelids. So let us, who are sons of the true light, not shut this light outside. Let us turn it inward on ourselves and light up the eyes of the hidden man. Let us look upon the truth itself and share in its streams, so that true dreams may be clearly and wisely revealed to us. But the belching of those heavy with wine, the rattling breath of those stuffed with food, the snoring wrapped up in bedclothes, and the rumbling of cramped stomachs bury the seeing eye of the soul, because the mind is filled with countless fantasies. The cause is excess food, which drags the reasoning part down into insensibility. “For much sleep brings no benefit to our bodies or our souls, and even though it is natural, it is not altogether suited to the pursuit of truth.” The righteous Lot (I leave aside for now the interpretation of the economy of regeneration) would not have been led into that unlawful union if he had not been made drunk by his daughters and stupefied by sleep.
If, therefore, we cut off the causes of great tendency to sleep, we shall sleep the more soberly. For those who have the sleepless Word dwelling in them, ought not to sleep the livelong night; but they ought to rise by night, especially when the days are coming to an end, and one devote himself to literature, another begin his art, the women handle the distaff, and all of us should, so to speak, fight against sleep, accustoming ourselves to this gently and gradually, so that through wakefulness we may partake of life for a longer period. We, then, who assign the best part of the night to wakefulness, must by no manner of means sleep by day; and fits of uselessness, and napping and stretching one's self, and yawning, are manifestations of frivolous uneasiness of soul. And in addition to all, we must know this, that the need of sleep is not in the soul. For it is ceaselessly active. But the body is relieved by being resigned to rest, the soul whilst not acting through the body, but exercising intelligence within itself. Thus also, such dreams as are true, in the view of him who reflects rightly, are the thoughts of a sober soul, undistracted for the time by the affections of the body, and counselling with itself in the best manner. For the soul to cease from activity within itself, were destruction to it. Wherefore always contemplating God, and by perpetual converse with Him inoculating the body with wakefulness, it raises man to equality with angelic grace, and from the practice of wakefulness it grasps the eternity of life.
If, then, we cut away the causes of heavy drowsiness, we shall sleep more soberly. For those who have the wakeful Word living in them “ought not to sleep the whole night through.” We should rise in the night, especially when the days are growing short. One should pursue learning, another begin his own craft, and the women take up their wool-working. All of us, so to speak, should fight against sleep, accustoming ourselves to it gently and by degrees, so that through wakefulness we may gain more time for living. (For sleep, like a tax collector, takes half of our lifetime.) Much less should we allow sleep in the daytime to those who cut off most of the night for staying awake. Restlessness, drowsy nodding, stretching and yawning are signs of discontent in an unsteady soul. Above all we must know this: it is not the soul that needs sleep, for the soul is always in motion. It is the body that is eased and let go by rest, while the soul no longer works through the body but thinks by itself. So true dreams, for anyone who reasons rightly, are the thoughts of a sober soul. At that time it is undistracted by the body’s sympathies and gives itself the best counsel. For the soul, to be still is destruction. Therefore, by thinking always of God and keeping constant company with him, the soul enrolls wakefulness in the body, makes the person equal to the angels in grace, and takes hold of the eternity of life from the practice of staying awake.
-Quaenam de Procreatione Liberorum Tractanda Sint.Tempus autem opportunum conjunctionis solis iis relinquitur considerandum, qui juncti sunt matrimonio; qui autem matrimonio juncti sunt, iis scopus est et institutum, liberorum susceptio finis autem, ut boni sint liberi: quemadmodum agricolaeseminis quidem dejectionis causa est, quod nutrimenti habendi curam gerat; agriculturaeautem finis est, fructuum perceptio. Multo autem melior est agricola, qui terrain colit animatam: ille enim ed tempus alimentum expetens, hic veto ut universum permanent, curam gerens, agricolaeofficio fungitur: et ille quidem propter se, hic veto propter Deum plantat ac seminat. Dixit enim: "Multiplicemini; " ubi hoc subaudiendum est: "Et ea ratione fit homo Dei imago, quatenus homo co-operatur ad generationem hominis. Non est quaelibet terra apta ad suscipienda semina: quod si etiam sit quaelibet, non tamen eidem agricolae. Neque veto seminandum est supra petram, neque semen est contumlia afficiendum, quod quidem dux est et princeps generationis, estque substantia, quaesimul habet insitas nature rationes. Quaesunt autem secundum naturam rationes, absque ratione praeternaturalibus mandando meatibus, ignominia afficere, valde est impium.
What should be said about the begetting of children. The time for intercourse is left for married people alone to consider. For the married, the purpose is the begetting of children, and the end is good children. It is like the farmer: the reason he scatters seed is to provide food, and the end of his farming is gathering in the crops. But far better is the farmer who sows a living field. The one farms because he wants food for the season. The other farms because he cares for the continuance of the whole race. The one plants for himself, the other for God. For God said, “Multiply,” and we must obey. In this respect man becomes an image of God, that a man works together with God in the birth of a man. Not every soil is fit to receive seed. Even if every soil were, it would not be so for the same farmer. Nor should anyone sow on rocks, or outrage the seed. The seed is the substance that begins generation, and it has the principles of nature sown together within it. To shame those natural principles senselessly, by sending them into unnatural channels, is utterly godless.
Videte itaque quomodo sapientissimus Moyses infrugiferam aliquando sationem symbolice repulerit: "Non comedes, inquiens, leporem, nec hyaenam. Non vult homines esse qualitatis eorum participes, neque eis aequalem gustare libidinem: haec enim animalia ad explendum coitum venereum feruntur insano quodam furore. Ac leporem quidem dicunt quotannis multiplicare anum, pro numero annorum, quos vixit, habentem foramina: et ea ratione dum leporis esum prohibet, significat se dehortari puerorum amorem. Hyaenam autem vicissim singulis annis masculinum sexum mutare in femininum: significare autem non esse illi ad adulteria prorumpendum, qui ab hyaena abstinet. Well, I also agree that the consummately wise Moses confessedly indicates by the prohibition before us, that we must not resemble these animals; but I do not assent to the explanation of what has been symbolically spoken.
See, then, how the all-wise Moses figuratively rejects fruitless sowing when he says, “You shall not eat the hare or the hyena.” He does not want a man to share their nature or to taste the same licentiousness, for these animals are driven to excess in mating. They say the hare gains an extra opening each year, having as many openings as the years he has lived. So the ban on eating hare shows, they say, a turning away from the love of boys. The hyena, they say, changes in turn from male to female every year, and abstaining from the hyena hints that one must not rush into adultery. I too agree that the all-wise Moses, by this prohibition, hints that we must not be made like these animals. But I do not agree with this way of explaining what he said symbolically.
For nature never can be forced to change. What once has been impressed on it, may not be transformed into the opposite by passion. For passion is not nature, and passion is wont to deface the form, not to cast it into a new shape. Though many birds are said to change with the seasons, both in colour and voice, as the blackbird (ko/ssufoj), which becomes yellow from black, and a chatterer from a singing-bird. Similarly also the nightingale changes by turns both its colour and note. But they do not alter their nature itself, so as in the transformation to become female from male. But the new crop of feathers, like new clothes, produces a kind of colouring of the feathers, and a little after it evaporates in the rigour of winter, as a flower when its colour fades. And in like manner the voice itself, injured by the cold, is enfeebled. For, in consequence of the outer skin being thickened by the surrounding air, the arteries about the neck being compressed and filled, press hard on the breath; which being very much confined, emits a stifled sound.
Nature can never be forced into change. What has once been formed in it may not be remade into its opposite by passion. For passion is not nature. Passion tends to debase the stamp of creation, not to rearrange it. Many birds are said to change both color and voice with the seasons. The blackbird, for example, turns yellow from black and becomes a chatterer instead of a singer. The nightingale likewise changes both its color and its song as the seasons turn. But they do not change their nature itself, so as to become female from male by a change of form. Instead, the new growth of feathers blossoms like fresh clothing, a kind of dye on the plumage. A little later, at winter’s threat, it fades like a flower whose color withers. The voice, worn down by the cold, withers in the same way. The surface of the body is thickened by the surrounding air, and the passages in the neck are squeezed and thickened and press upon the breath. The breath is badly confined and chokes, and so it gives out its sound.
When, again, the breath is assimilated to the surrounding air and relaxed in spring, it is freed from its confined condition, and is carried through the dilated, though till then obstructed arteries, it warbles no longer a dying melody, but now gives forth a shrill note; and the yoice flows wide, and spring now becomes the song of the voice of birds. Nequaquam ergo credendum est, hyaenam unquam mutare naturam: idem enim animal non habet simul ambo pudenda maris et feminae, sicut nonnulli existimarunt, qui prodigiose hermaphroditos finxerunt, et inter marem et feminam, hanc masculo-feminam naturam innovarunt. Valde autem falluntur, ut qui non animadverterint, quam sit filiorum amans omnium mater et genetrix Natura: quoniam enim hoc animal, hyaena inquam, est salacissimum, sub cauda ante excrementi meatum, adnatum est ei quoddam carneum tuberculum, feminino pudendo figura persimile. Nullum autem meatum habet haec figura carnis, qui in utilem aliquam desinat partem, vel in matricem inquam, vel in rectum intestinum: tantum habet magnam concavitatem, quaeinanem excipiat libidinem, quando aversi fuerint meatus, qui in concipiendo fetu occupati sunt.
Then, once the breath is again made like the surrounding air and relaxes with the spring, it is freed from its confinement. It travels through wide passages that until then had been shut. The withered song no longer twitters faintly. It blossoms now, clear and shrill, and the sound of the birds pours out more broadly. The song becomes the spring of the birds’ voice. So we must never believe that the hyena changes its nature. The same animal does not have both organs at once, male and female, as some have supposed. They tell marvelous tales of hermaphrodites and invent a new third nature between female and male, the androgyne. They are badly deceived, because they have not understood the artistry of nature, the mother of all and maker of generation. The hyena is an extremely lustful animal. Under its tail, before the passage for waste, there grows a fleshy protrusion, similar in shape to the female organ. But this fleshy formation has no passage leading to any useful end, that is, neither to a womb nor to the rectum. It has only a large cavity, which receives empty lust when the passages occupied with bearing young are turned away.
Hoc ipsum autem et masculo et feminae hyae nae adnatum est, quod sit insigniter pathica: masculus enim vicissim et agit, et patitur: unde etiam rarissime inveniri potest hyaena femina: non enim frequenter concipit hoc animal, cum in eis largiter redundet ea, quae praeter naturam est, satio. Hac etiam ratione mihi videtur Plato in Phoedro, amorem puerorum repellens, eum appellate bestiam, quod frenum mordentes, qui se voluptatibus dedunt, libidinosi, quadrupedum coeunt more, et filios seminare conantur. Impios "autem tradidit Deus," ut air Apostolus, "in perturbationes ignominiae: nam et feminaeeorum mutaverunt naturalem usum in eum, qui est procter naturam: similiter autem et masculi eorum, relicto usu naturali, exarserunt in desiderio sui inter se invicem, masculi in masculos turpitudinem operantes, et mercedem, quam oportuit, erroris sui in se recipientes. At vero ne libidinosissimis quidem animantibus concessit natura in excrementi meatum semen immittere: urina enim in vesicam excernitur, humefactum alimentum in ventrum, lacryma vero in oculum, sanguis in venas, sordes in aures, mucus in hares defertur: fini autem recti intestini, sedes cohaeret, per quam excrementa exponuntur.
This same feature grows on both the male and the female hyena, because of their excessive passive lust. The male also takes the passive part with other males. This is why it is very rare to find a female hyena. Pregnancies are not frequent in this animal, since unnatural sowing is so common among them, unchecked. For this reason, it seems to me, Plato in the Phaedrus rejects pederasty and calls it a beastly thing. He says that lustful men, handed over to pleasures, “take the bit between their teeth, mount in the manner of four-footed animals, and try to beget children.” The godless, as the apostle says, “God handed over to passions of dishonor. For their females exchanged natural use for what is against nature. In the same way their males also left natural use and burned in their desire for one another, males working shameful things with males and receiving in themselves the repayment that was due for their error.” Yet nature has not allowed even the most lustful animals to leap upon the passage of waste. Urine is separated off into the bladder, and moistened food into the stomach. Tears go to the eye, blood to the veins, wax to the ears, and mucus to the nostrils. The seat lies next to the end of the rectum, and through it the waste is expelled.
Sola ergo varia in hyaenis natura, superfluo coitui superfluam hanc partem excogitavit, et ideo est etiam aliquantisper concavum, ut prurientibus partibus inserviat, exinde autem excaecatur concavitas: non fuit emm res fabricata ad generationem. Hinc nobis manifestum atque adeo in confesso est, vitandos esse cum masculis concubitus, et infrugiferas sationes, et Venerem praeposteram, et quae natura coalescere non possunt, androgynorum conjunctiones, ipsam naturam sequentibus, quae id per partium prohibet constitutionem, ut quae masculum non ad semen suscipiendum, sed ad id effundendum fecerit. Jeremias autem, hoc est, per ipsum loquens Spiritus, quando dicit: "Spelunca hyaenae facta est domus mea," id quod ex mortuis constabat corporibus detestans alimentum, sapienti allegoria reprehendit cultum simulacrorum: vere enim oportet ab idolis esse puram domum Dei viventis.
Only in hyenas, then, has nature in her variety devised this extra organ for their excessive mating. So it is hollow to a certain depth, to serve the itching parts, but beyond that the cavity is blind, because it was not made for generation. From this it is plain, and generally agreed, that we must refuse sex between males, barren sowing, intercourse from behind, and unnatural unions of the androgynous kind. We are to follow nature herself, who forbids them by the construction of the bodily parts. She made the male virile not to receive seed but to send it forth. When Jeremiah says, that is, when the Spirit says through him, “My house has become a hyena’s den,” he shows his loathing for food taken from dead bodies. By this wise allegory he condemns idolatry. For the house of the living God must truly be pure of idols.
Rursus Moyses lepore quoque vesci prohibet. Omni enim tempore coit lepus, et salit, assidente femina, earn a tergo aggrediens: est enim ex iis, quaeretro insiliunt. Concipit autem singulis mensibus, et superfetat; init autem, et parit; postquam autem peperit, statim a quovis initur lepore (neque enim uno contenta est matrimonio) et rursus concipit, adhuc lactans: habet enim matricem, cui sunt duo sinus, et non unus solus matricis vacuus sinus, est ei sufficiens sedes ad receptaculure coitus (quidquid enim est vacuum, desiderat repleri); verum accidit, ut cure uterum gerunt, altera pars matricis desiderio teneatur et libidine furiat; quocirca fiunt eis superfetationes. A vehementibus ergo appetitionibus, mutuisque congressionibus, et cure praegnantibus feminis conjunctionibus, alternisque initibus, puerorumque stupris, adulteriis et libidine abstinere, hujus nos aenigmatis adhortata est prohibitio.
Again, Moses forbids eating the hare. The hare mates in every season. The male mounts the female while she sits, coming at her from behind, for the hare is a rear-mounting animal. She conceives every month and conceives again while already pregnant. She mates and gives birth, and right after giving birth she is mated by whatever hare happens to come along, since she is not content with one partner. She conceives again while still nursing, because her womb is divided in two. The empty space of the womb is not the only thing that drives her to intercourse, for everything empty longs to be filled. When hares are pregnant, the other half of the womb is gripped by desire and is in heat. That is why they conceive again on top of a pregnancy. So the prohibition in this riddle urged us to keep away from violent appetites and from repeated acts of intercourse. It urged us to avoid relations with pregnant women, males mounting one another, the corruption of boys, adultery and lust.
Idcirco aperte, et non per renigmata Moyses prohibuit, "Non fornicaberis; non moechaberis; pueris stuprum non inferes," inquiens. Logi itaque praescriptum totis viribus observandum, neque quidquam contra leges ullo modo faciendum est, neque mandata sunt infirmanda. Malaeenim. cupiditati nomen est u\ #brij, "petulantia; "et equum cupiditatis, "petulantem" vocavit Plato, cure legissit, "Facti estis mihi equi furentes in feminas. Libidines autem supplicium notum nobis facient illi, qui Sodomam accesserunt, angeli. Li eos, qui probro illos afficere voluerunt, una cum ipsa civitate combusserunt, evidenti hoc indicio ignem, qui est fructus libidinis, describentes. Quaeenim veteribus acciderunt, sicut ante diximus, ad nos admonendos scripta sunt, ne eisdem teneamur vitiis, et caveamus, ne in poenas similes incidamus.
So the same Moses forbade these things openly, no longer in riddles, with uncovered head, saying: “You shall not commit fornication, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not corrupt boys.” We must keep the Word’s command with all our strength. We must never break it in any way or make the commandments void. For the name of evil desire is “hubris” (outrage). Plato called the horse of desire “outrageous,” having read the words “You have become to me horses mad for women.” The punishment for such outrage will be shown to you by the angels who came to Sodom. They burned up, together with the city itself, those who wanted to violate them. By this clear example they sketched out fire as the fruit of lust. For the misfortunes of the ancients, as we said before, were written down to warn us. They were written so that we would not be caught in the same sins, but would guard against falling into the same penalties.
Oportet autem filios existimare, pueros; uxores autem alienas intueri tanquam proprias filias: voluptates quippe continere, ventrique et iis quaesunt infra ventrem, dominari, est maximi imperii. Si enim ne digitum quidem temere movere permittit sapienti ratio, ut confitentur Stoici, quomodo non multo magis iis, qui sapientiam persequuntur, in eam, qua coitur, particulam dominatus est obtinendus? Atque hac quidem de causa videtur esse nominatum pudendum, quod hac corporis parte magis, quam qualibet alia, cum pudore utendum sit; natura enim sicut alimentis, ita etiam legitimis nuptiis, quantum convenit, utile est, et decet, nobis uti permisit: permisit autem appetere liberorum procreationem. Quicumque autem, quod modum excedit, persequuntur, labuntur in eo quod est secundum naturam, per congressus, qui sunt praeter leges, seipsos laedentes.
We should regard boys as our sons, and look on other men’s wives as our own daughters. It is a most masterful thing to rule over pleasures, to hold the belly in check, and to be lord over what lies below the belly. The Stoics agree that reason does not allow even the wise man to move his finger carelessly. How much more, then, must those who pursue wisdom master the organ of intercourse! For this reason, I think, it is called the “aidoion” (part of shame), because we must use this part of the body, above all others, with modesty. Nature has allowed us what is fitting, useful and decent, both in food and in lawful marriage. She has also allowed us to desire to have children. Those who chase after excess go wrong against what is natural, and harm themselves through unlawful intercourse.
Ante omnia enim recte habet, ut nunquam cure adolescentibus perinde ac cum feminis, Veneris utamur consuetudine. Et ideo "non esse in petris et lapidibus seminandum" dicit, qui a Moyse factus est philosophus, "quoniam nunquam actis radicibus genitalem sit semen naturam suscepturum. Logos itaque per Moysen appertissime praecepit: "Et cure masculo non dormies feminino concubitu: est enim abominatio. Accedit his, quod "ab omni quoque arvo feminino esse abstinendum" praeterquam a proprio, ex divinis Scripturis colligens praeclarus Plato consuluit lege illinc accepta: "Et uxori proximi tui non dabis concubitum seminis, ut polluaris apud ipsam. Irrita autem sunt et adulterina concubinarum semina. Ne semina, ubi non vis tibi nasci quod seminatum est. Neque ullam omnino tange mulierem, praeterquam tuam ipsius uxorem," ex qua sola tibi licet carnis voluptates percipere ad suscipiendam legitimam successionem.
For it is right above all never to have sexual relations with young men as one does with women. So the philosopher who learned from Moses says we must not “sow on rocks and stones,” because what is sown there will never take root and receive its fertile nature. And the Word, through Moses, commanded very plainly: “And you shall not lie with a male as with a woman, for it is an abomination.” Besides this, the noble Plato took his advice from the divine Scriptures and gave it as a law received from there. He said to keep away from “every female field” except one’s own. The Scripture says: “And you shall not give your bed of seed to your neighbor’s wife, to be defiled with her.” And Plato says: “The seeds of concubines are unconsecrated and illegitimate.” Do not sow where you would not want what is sown to grow. Do not touch anyone at all except your own wedded wife. It is right to enjoy the pleasures of the flesh with her alone, for the sake of legitimate offspring.
Haec enim Logo sola sunt legitima. Eis quidem certe, qui divini muneris in producendo opificio sunt participes, semen non est abjiciendum, neque injuria afficiendum, neque tanquam si cornibus semen mandes seminandum est. Hic ipse ergo Moyses cum ipsis quoque prohibet uxoribus congredi, si forte eas detineant purgationes menstruae. Non enim purgamento corporis genitale semen, et quod mox homo futurum est, polluere est aequum, nec sordido materiae profluvio, et, quae expurgantur, inquinamentis inundare ac obruere; semen autem generationis degenerat, ineptumque redditur, simatricis sulcis privetur. Neque vero ullum unquam induxit veterum Hebraeorum coeuntem cum sua uxore praegnante. Sola enim voluptas, si quis ea etiam utatur in conjugio, est praeter leges, et injusta, eta ratione aliena. Rursus autem Moyses abducit viros a praegnantibus, quousque pepererint. Revera enim matrix sub vesica quidem collocata, super intestinum autem, quod rectum appellatur, posita, extendit collum inter humeros in vesica; et os colli, in quod venit semen, impletum occluditur, illa autem rursus inanis redditur, cum partu purgata fuerit: fructu autem deposito, deinde semen suscipit.
For these are the only things the Word counts as lawful. Since we share in the divine creative power, we must not throw seed away, or abuse it, or sow it in ground that cannot receive it. This same Moses forbids approaching even our wives when they are in their monthly cleansing. It is not reasonable to defile the most fertile part of the seed, which will soon be a human being, with the body’s waste. Nor is it reasonable to wash away the seed of a well-formed offspring in the filthy flow and discharge of that matter, cut off from the furrows of the womb. Nor has Moses presented any of the ancient Hebrews as having intercourse with his pregnant wife. For mere pleasure, even when taken within marriage, is unlawful, unjust and irrational. Moses, on the contrary, keeps husbands away from pregnant women until they have given birth. In fact, the womb lies beneath the bladder and above the intestine called the rectum. It extends its neck “between the shoulders” in the bladder. The opening of the neck, which receives the seed, closes when the womb is full. It is emptied again when it is cleansed by childbirth. Once it has laid down its fruit, it then receives seed again.
Neque vero nobis turpe est ad auditorum utilitatem nominare partes, in quibus fit fetus conceptio, quae quidem Deum fabricari non puduit. Matrix itaque sitiens filiorum procreationem, semen suscipit, probrosumque et vituperandum negat coitum, post sationem ore clauso omnino jam libidinem excludens. Ejus autem appetitiones, quae prius in amicis versabantur complexibus, intro conversae, in procreatione sobolis occupatae, operantur una cum Opifice. Nefas est ergo operantem jam naturam adhuc molestia afficere, superflue ad petulantem prorumpendo libidinem. Petulantia autem, quae multa quidem habet nomina, et multas species, cure ad hanc veneream intemperantiam deflexerit, lagnei/a, id est "lascivia," dicitur; quo nomine significatur libidinosa, publica, et incesta in coitum propensio: quae cum aucta fuerit, magna simul morborum convenit multitudo, obsoniorum desiderium, vinolentia et amor in mulieres; luxus quoque, et simul universarum voluptatum studium; in quae omnia tyrannidem obtinet cupidity.
It is not shameful for us to name the organs of conception, for the benefit of those who hear. God was not ashamed to create them. So the womb, thirsting for children, receives the seed. It refuses the blameworthy side of intercourse, and once the seed is sown it shuts its mouth and bars wantonness completely. Its desires had until then been stirred toward loving embraces. Now they turn inward and are busy with bearing a child, and so they work together with the Creator. It is not right, then, to trouble nature while it is already at work, by going on to excess and outrage. Outrage has many names and many forms. When it turns aside into that part of disorder which concerns sexual pleasure, it is called lust (lagneia). The name itself shows what it is: the common, vulgar, unclean urge toward mating. When these appetites grow, a great crowd of diseases follows: love of fine food, love of wine, love of women, and also profligacy and every kind of love of pleasure. Desire is the tyrant over all of them.
His autem cognatae innumerabiles augentur affectiones, ex quibus mores intemperantes ad summum provehuntur. Dicit autem Scriptura: "Parantur intemperantibus flagella, et supplicia humeris insipientium: " vires intemperantiae, ejusque constantem tolerantiam, vocans "humeros insipientium. Quocirca, "Amove a servis tuis spes inanes, et indecoras," inquit, "cupiditates averte a me. Ventris appetitio et coitus ne me apprehendant. Longe ergo sunt arcenda multifaria insidiatorum maleficia; non ad solam enim Cratetis Peram, sed etiam ad nostram civitatem non navigat stultus parasitus, nec scortator libidinosus, qui posteriori delectatur parte: non dolosa meretrix, nec ulla ejusmodi alia voluptatis bellua. Multa ergo nobis per totam vitam seminetur, quae bona sit et honesta, occupatio. In summa ergo, vel jungi matrimonio, vel omnino a matrimonio purum esse oportet; in quae stione enim id versatur, et hoc nobis declaratum est in libro De continentia.
Countless sister passions grow alongside these, and from them the undisciplined character reaches its peak. Scripture says, “Whips and punishments are prepared for the undisciplined, on the shoulders of fools.” It calls the strength of undiscipline, and its stubborn endurance, “the shoulders of fools.” For this reason it says, “Remove from your servants empty hopes, and turn away from me unseemly desires. Let the appetite of the belly and sexual intercourse not overtake me.” So we must keep the great mischief of those who plot against us far away. For not only into the knapsack of Crates, but into our city too, “there sails no foolish parasite, no greedy fornicator exulting in his backside, no deceitful harlot,” and no other such beast of pleasure. Let us then sow much dignity of conduct in ourselves throughout our whole life. Whether one should marry at all, or keep entirely clear of marriage (for this too is open to inquiry), I have explained in my work On Continence.
Quod si hoc ipsum, an ducenda sit uxor. veniat in considerationem: quomodo libere permittetur, quemadmodum nutrimento, ita etiam coitu semper uti, tanquam re necessaria? Ex eo ergo videri possunt nervi tanquam stamina distrahi, et in vehementi congressus intensione disrumpi. Jam vero offundit etiam caliginem sensibus, et vires enervat. Patet hoc et in animantibus rationis expertibus, et in iis, quae in exercitatione versantur, corporibus; quorum hi quidem, qui abstinent, in certaminibus superant adversarios; illa vero a coitu abducta circumaguntur, et tantum non trahuntur, omnibus viribus et omni impetu tandem quasi enervata. "Parvam epilepsiam" dicebat "coitum" sophista Abderites morbum immedicabilem existimans. Annon enim consequuntur resolutiones, quae exinanitionis ejusque, quod abscedit, magnitudini ascribuntur? "homo enim ex homine nascitur et evellitur. Vide damni magnitudinem:
But if the very question whether one should marry needed examination, how could anyone be allowed to use intercourse without restraint, as if it were necessary every time, like food? One can see that the nerves, like threads on a loom, are pulled apart and torn by the strain of the union. It also spreads a mist over the senses and cuts down the body’s strength. This is plain among animals without reason and among trained bodies. Athletes who abstain overcome their opponents in contests. Animals are led away from mating, dragged around, almost hauled along, completely drained of all strength and spring. The sophist from Abdera called intercourse “a small epilepsy,” and thought it an incurable disease. Do not faint spells and weakness follow, and are they not put down to the greatness of what is lost? “For a human being grows out of a human being and is torn away from him.” See how great the harm is.
totus homo per exinanitionem coitus abstrahitur. Dicit enim: Hoc nunc os ex ossibus meis, et caro ex came mea. Homo ergo tantum exinanitur semine, quantus videtur corpore; est enim generationis initium id, quod recedit: quin etiam conturbat ebullitio materiae et compagem corporis labefactat et commovet. Lepide ergo ille, qui interroganti, "Quomodo adhuc se haberet ad res venereas," respondit: "Bona verba, quae so: ego vero lubentissime isthinc, tanquam ab agresti et insano domino, profugi. Verum concedatur quidem et admittatur matrimonium: vult enim Dominus humanum genus repleri; seal non dicit, Estote libidinosi: nec vos, tanquam ad coitum natos, voluit esse deditos voluptati. Pudore autem nos afficiat Paedagogus, clamans per Ezechielem: "Circumcidamini fornicationem vestram.
A whole man is torn away through the loss that comes with intercourse. For Scripture says, “This now is bone from my bones and flesh from my flesh.” A man is emptied by the seed to the full extent of what is seen in his body, because what leaves him is the beginning of generation. The seething of the matter also stirs up the body and shakes its harmony. How witty, then, was the man who was asked how he stood toward sexual pleasures. He said, “Hush, man! I was most glad to escape them, as from a raging and savage master.” But let marriage be approved and given its place. The Lord wants humanity to “multiply.” He does not say, “Be licentious,” and he did not want people to give themselves up to pleasures as if they had been made for mating. Let the Instructor put us to shame, crying through Ezekiel, “Circumcise your fornication.”
Aliquod tempus ad seminandum opportunum habent quoque rationis expertia animantia. Aliter autem coire, quam ad liberorum procreationem, est facere injuriam naturae ; qua quidem oportetmagistra, quas prudenter introducit temporis commoditates, diligenter observare, senectutem, inquam, et puerilem aetatem. His enim nondum concessit, illos autem non vult amplius uxores ducere. Seal non vult homines semper dare operam matrimonio. Matrimonium autem est filiorum procreationis appetitio, non inordinata seminis excretio, quae est et praeter leges eta ratione aliena. Secundum naturam autem nobis vita universa processerit, si et ab initio cupiditates contineamus, et hominum genus, quod ex divina providentia nascitur, improbis et malitiosis non tollamus artibus: eaeenim, ut fornicatiohem celent, exitialia medicamenta adhibentes, quae prorsus in perniciem ducunt, simul cum fetu omnem humanitatem perdunt.
Even the animals without reason have a fitting season for sowing. To come together for any purpose other than the begetting of children is to outrage nature. We should take nature as our teacher and observe the wise lessons of the proper time. I mean old age and childhood, which nature brings in: for the one she has not yet permitted marriage, and the other she no longer wishes to marry. But even otherwise, she does not mean us to be married at all times. Marriage is the desire for children, not the disorderly discharge of seed, which is lawless and against reason. Our whole life would run according to nature if we mastered our desires from the start. We must not destroy, by wicked contrivances, the human race that grows by God’s providence. People use these devices to cover up fornication. They take drugs that bring complete destruction, and so they abort human kindness along with the unborn child.
Caeterum, quibus uxores ducere concessum est, iis Paedagogo opus fuerit, ut non interdiu mystica naturae celebrentur orgia, nec ut aliquis ex ecclesia, verbi gratia, aut ex foro mane rediens, galli more coeat, quando orationis, et lectionis, et eorum quae interdiu facere convenit, operum tempus est. Vespere autem oportet post convivium quiescere, et post gratiarum actionem, quae fit Deo pro bonis quae percepimus. Non semper autem concedit tempus natura, ut peragatur congressus matrimonii; est enim eo desiderabilior conjunctio, quo diuturnior. Neque vero noctu, tanquam in tenebris, immodeste sese ac imtemperanter gerere oportet, sed verecundia, ut quae sit lux rationis, in animo est includenda. Nihil enim a Penelope telam texente differemus, si interdiu quidem texamus dogmata temperantiae; noctu autem ea resolvamus, cum in cubile venerimus. Si enim honestatem exercere oportet, multo magis tuae uxori honestas est ostendenda, inhonestas vitando conjunctiones: et quod caste cum proximis verseris, fide dignum e domo adsit testimonium.
For those who are allowed to marry, though, an instructor was needed. The secret rites of nature must not be carried out by day. A man must not come home from church or the marketplace in the early morning and mount his wife like a rooster, when it is the time for prayer, for reading, and for the good works of the day. The evening is the right time to rest, after the meal and after giving thanks for the good things enjoyed. Nature does not always allow the time for marital union to be fulfilled, and a union that is delayed longer is more longed for. Nor should anyone give way to wantonness at night, as if in the dark. Instead, modesty should be kept shut up in the soul like the light of reason. Otherwise we will be no different from Penelope at her loom: by day we weave the teachings of self-control, and at night, when we go to bed, we unravel them. If we must practice dignity, as indeed we must, then much more must a man show dignity to his own wife by refusing shameful embraces. And let reliable proof of his dignity toward his neighbors come from his own home.
Non enim potest aliquid honestum ab ea existimari, apud quam honestas in acribus illis non probatur certo quasi testimonio voluptatibus. Benevolentia autem quae praeceps fertur ad congressionem, exiguo tempore floret, et cum corpore consenescit; nonnunquam autem etiam prae senescit, flaccescente jam libidine, quando matrimonialem temperantiam meretriciae vitiaverint libidines. Amantium enim corda sunt volucria, amorisque irritamenta exstinguuntur saepe poenitentia; amorque saepe vertitur in odium, quando reprehensionera senserit satietas. Impudicorum vero verborum, et turpium figurarum, meretriciorumque osculomm, et hujusmodi lasciviarum nomina ne sunt quidem memoranda, beatum sequentibus Apostolum, qui aperte dicit: "Fornicatio autem et omnis immunditia, vel plura habendi cupiditas, ne nominetur quidem in vobis, sicut decet saneros. Recte ergo videtur dixisse quispiam: "Nulli quidem profuit coitus, recte autem cum eo agitur, quem non laeserit. Nam et qui legitimus, est periculosus, nisi quatenus in liberorum procreatione versatur. De eo autem, qui est praeter leges, dicit Scriptura: "Mulier meretrix apro similis reputabitur. Quaeautem viro subjecta est, turris est mortis iis, qui ea utuntur. Capro, vel apro, meretricis comparavit affectionem. "Mortem" autem dixit "quae sitam," adulterium, quod committitur in meretrice, quae custoditur.
For it cannot be, it cannot be, that a man is thought dignified by a wife in whose experience his dignity is not borne out in those very keen pleasures. Goodwill that admits it slips easily into intercourse blooms only briefly and grows old along with the body. Sometimes it grows old before the body, when desire has withered, as happens whenever the pleasures of a prostitute have insulted the self-control of marriage. For the hearts of lovers are fickle, and love charms are quenched by regret. Love often turns to hatred, when satiety senses it has been condemned. As for unrestrained words, indecent postures, kisses like a prostitute’s, and lewd acts of that kind, we should not even mention them. We are obeying the blessed apostle, who says plainly: “Fornication and every kind of uncleanness or greed must not even be named among you, as is proper for saints.” Someone seems to have put it well: “Intercourse has never done anyone good; we should be glad if it has not done harm.” For even lawful intercourse is hazardous, except as far as it serves the begetting of children. About unlawful intercourse Scripture says: “A woman for hire will be reckoned a fattened pig, but a married woman is a tower of death to those who use her.” It compared the passion for a prostitute to a boar or a sow. And it called adultery “death that is sought,” when it is committed with a prostitute who is kept under guard.
"Domum" autem, et "urbem," in qua suam exercent intemperantiam. Quin etiam quae est apud vos poetica, quodammodo ea exprobrans, scribit:- Tecum et adulterium est, tecum coitusque nefandus, Foedus, femineusque, urbs pessima, plane impura. Econtra autem pudicos admiratur:- Quos desiderium tenuit nec turpe cubilis Alterius, nec tetra invisaque stupra rulerunt Ulla unquam maribus.
As for a house and a city where people live in wantonness, your own poetry somewhere reproaches them, writing: “Adulteries are found with you, and unlawful mingling of men, womanish and unjust, wicked city, wholly unclean.” On the other hand, it admires the self-controlled: those who do not feel shameful desire for another man’s bed, and do not rush to the hateful and loathsome outrage against a male, because it is against nature. Most people think of these things as luxuries, though they are their own sins. Those who are a little more decent know that they are sins, but they are overcome by pleasures. And darkness is their cover for their passions. For a man who treats his own marriage like a relationship with a prostitute commits adultery against it, and he does not hear the Instructor crying out: “The man who goes up onto his bed, who says in his soul: Who sees me?
For many think such things to be pleasures only which are against nature, such as these sins of theirs. And those who are better than they, know them to be sins, but are overcome by pleasures, and darkness is the veil of their vicious practices. For he violates his marriage adulterously who uses it in a meretricious way, and hears not the voice of the Instructor, crying, "The man who ascends his bed, who says in his soul, Who seeth me? darkness is around me, and the walls are my covering, and no one sees my sins. Why do I fear lest the Highest will remember? " Most wretched is such a man, dreading men's eyes alone, and thinking that he will escape the observation of God. "For he knoweth not," says the Scripture, "that brighter ten thousand times than the sun are the eyes of the Most High, which look on all the ways of men, and cast their glance into hidden parts. Thus again the Instructor threatens them, speaking by Isaiah: "Woe be to those who take counsel in secret, and say, Who seeth us? " For one may escape the light of sense, but that of the mind it is impossible to escape. For how, says Heraclitus, can one escape the notice of that which never sets?
Darkness is all around me, and the walls cover me, and no one sees my sins. Why should I be afraid? The Most High will not remember.” This man is utterly wretched. He fears only human eyes, and he supposes that he will escape God’s notice. “For he does not know,” says Scripture, “that the eyes of the Lord Most High are ten thousand times brighter than the sun. They look upon all the ways of men and see into hidden places.” Again the Instructor threatens such people through Isaiah, saying: “Woe to those who make their plans in secret, and will say: Who sees us?” One might perhaps escape the light that we perceive with the senses, but the light of the mind cannot be escaped. As Heraclitus says: “How could anyone hide from what never sets?” So let us never cover ourselves with darkness, for the light lives in us. “And the darkness,” it says, “did not overcome it.” The night is lit up by self-controlled reasoning, and Scripture calls the thoughts of good men lamps that never sleep.
Let us by no means, then, veil our selves with the darkness; for the light dwells in us. "For the darkness," it is said, "comprehendeth it not. And the very night itself is illuminated by temperate reason. The thoughts of good men Scripture has named "sleepless lamps; " although for one to attempt even to practise concealment, with reference to what he does, is confessedly to sin. And every one who sins, directly wrongs not so much his neighbour if he commits adultery, as himself, because he has committed adultery, besides making himself worse and less thought of. For he who sins, in the degree in which he sins, becomes worse and is of less estimation than before; and he who has been overcome by base pleasures, has now licentiousness wholly attached to him. Wherefore he who commits fornication is wholly dead to God, and is abandoned by the Word as a dead body by the spirit. For what is holy, as is right, abhors to be polluted. But it is always lawful for the pure to touch the pure. Do not, I pray, put off modesty at the same time that you put off your clothes; because it is never right for the just man to divest himself of continence. For, lo, this mortal shall put on immortality; when the insatiableness of desire, which rushes into licentiousness, being trained to self-restraint, and made free from the love of corruption, shall consign the man to everlasting chastity. "For in this world they marry and and are given in marriage.
Yet to try to hide what one is doing is itself an admission of sinning. Everyone who sins does wrong at once. If he commits adultery, he wrongs his neighbor less than he wrongs himself, because he is the one who has committed adultery. In every case he shows himself to be worse and less honorable. For the sinner, to the extent that he sins, is worse and less honorable than he was himself before. And surely a man who is mastered by a shameful pleasure already has licentiousness added to him. For this reason the fornicator has altogether died to God. The Word has left him, as the spirit leaves a corpse. For what is holy shrinks from being defiled, as one would expect. It is always right for the pure to touch what is pure. So let us never strip off modesty at the same moment that we take off a garment, since it is never right for the righteous man to strip off self-control. “For behold, this corruptible will put on incorruption.” That happens when the insatiable appetite, which flows toward licentiousness, has been trained by self-control and has ceased to love corruption. It then yields the man to an everlasting self-control. “For in this age they marry and are given in marriage.” But when we have put away the works of the flesh, and have put on incorruption in the flesh itself, now pure, we pursue the measure of the angels.
But having done with the works of the flesh, and having been clothed with immortality, the flesh itself being pure, we pursue after that which is according to the measure of the angels. Thus in the Philebus, Plato, who had been the disciple of the barbarian philosophy, mystically called those Atheists who destroy and pollute, as far as in them lies, the Deity dwelling in them-that is, the "Logo"-by association with their vices. Those, therefore, who are consecrated to God must never live mortally (qnhtw=j). "Nor," as Paul says, "is it meet to make the members of Christ the members of an harlot; nor must the temple of God be made the temple of base affections. Remember the four and twenty thousand that were rejected for fornication. But the experiences of those who have committed fornication, as I have already said, are types which correct our lusts. Moreover, the Paedagogue warns us most distinctly: "Go not after thy lusts, and abstain from thine appetites; for wine and women will remove the wise; and he that cleaves to harlots will become more daring. Corruption and the worm shall inherit him, and he shall be held up as public example to greater shame. And again-for he wearies not of doing good "He who averts his eyes from pleasure crowns his life. Non est ergo justum vinci a rebus venereis, nec libidinibus stolide inhiare, nec a ratione alienis appetitionibus moveri, nec desiderare pollui.
For this reason Plato in the Philebus, a disciple of the barbarian philosophy, mystically called “godless” those who ruin and defile, as far as they can, the God who dwells in them, the Word, by making themselves at home with the passions. So those who are made holy to God must never live in a merely mortal way. Nor, as Paul says, may we make the members of Christ members of a prostitute. Nor may we make the temple of God a temple of shameful passions. Remember the twenty-four thousand who were cast off because of fornication. The sufferings of those who committed fornication, as I have already said, are “types” that train our desires. And the Instructor advises us most plainly: “Do not go after your desires, and keep yourself back from your appetites.” “For wine and women will lead the wise astray, and he who joins himself to prostitutes will become more reckless. Rot and the worm will inherit him, and he will be taken away as a greater public example.” And again, for he never tires of doing us good: “He who stands face to face against pleasure crowns his life.” So it is not right to be mastered by sexual pleasures, nor to gape after desires, nor to be driven wild by irrational appetites, nor to wish to be defiled.
Ei autem soli, qui uxorem duxit, ut qui tune sit agricola, serere permissum est; quando tempus sementem admittit. Adversus aliam autem intemperantiam, optimum quidem est medicamentum, ratio. Fert etiam auxilium penuria satietatis, per quam accensae libidines prosiliunt ad voluptates. Wherefore neither are we to provide for ourselves costly clothing any more than variety of food. The Lord Himself, therefore, dividing His precepts into what relates to the body, the soul, and thirdly, external things, counsels us to provide external things on account of the body; and manages the body by the soul (yukh=), and disciplines the soul, saying, "Take no thought for your life (yukh=|) what ye shall eat; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on; for the life is more than meat, and the body more than raiment. And He adds a plain example of instruction: "Consider the ravens: for they neither sow nor reap, which have neither storehouse nor barn; and God feedeth them.
The married man, like a farmer, is permitted only to sow, and only at the time when the season receives the seed. Against other kinds of intemperance the Word is the best medicine. It also helps to go without being stuffed, since fullness inflames the desires and makes them leap about after pleasures. So we should not strive after expensive clothing, any more than after elaborate food. The Lord himself divides his counsel into three parts: soul, body, and, third, external things. He advises us to get external things for the sake of the body, to govern the body by the soul, and he trains the soul, saying, “Do not worry for your soul about what you will eat, or for your body about what you will wear. For the soul is more than food, and the body more than clothing.” And he adds a clear example for his teaching: “Consider the ravens. They do not sow or reap. They have no storeroom or barn, and God feeds them.
"Are ye not better than the fowls? " Thus far as to food. Similarly He enjoins with respect to clothing, which belongs to the third division, that of things external, saying, "Consider the lilies, how they spin not, nor weave. But I say unto you, that not even Solomon was arrayed as one of these."" And Solomon the king plumed himself exceedingly on his riches. What, I ask, more graceful, more gay-coloured, than flowers? What, I say, more delightful than lilies or roses? "And if God so clothe the grass, which is to-day in the field, and to morrow is cast into the oven, how much more will He clothe you, O ye of little faith! Here the particle what (ti/) banishes variety in food. For this is shown from the Scripture, "Take no thought what things ye shall eat, or what things ye shall drink. For to take thought of these things argues greed and luxury. Now eating, considered merely by itself, is the sign of necessity; repletion, as we have said, of want. Whatever is beyond that, is the sign of superfluity. And what is superfluous, Scripture declares to be of the devil.
Are you not worth more than the birds?” That is what he says about food. He gives the same instruction about clothing, which belongs to the third division, external things, saying, “Consider the lilies, how they neither spin nor weave. But I tell you, not even Solomon was dressed like one of these.” King Solomon prided himself greatly on his wealth. What, then, is more beautiful or more colorful than flowers? What is more delightful than lilies or roses? “And if God clothes in this way the grass that is in the field today and thrown into the oven tomorrow, how much more will he clothe you, you of little faith! You also, do not seek what you will eat or what you will drink.” Here the word “what” rules out variety in food. The Scripture means this: do not worry about what sorts of things you will eat or drink. To worry about such things is greed and luxury. Eating, understood simply by itself, is a sign of need, since it is, as we said, the filling of a want. But the “what” goes beyond that, and Scripture has shown that whatever goes beyond what is needed comes from the devil.
The subjoined expression makes the meaning plain. For having said, "Seek not what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink," He added, "Neither be ye of doubtful (or lofty) mind. Now pride and luxury make men waverers (or raise them aloft) from the truth; and the voluptuousness, which indulges in superfluities, leads away from the truth. Wherefore He says very beautifully, "And all these things do the nations of the world seek after. The nations are the dissolute and the foolish. And what are these things which He specifies? Luxury, voluptuousness, rich cooking, dainty feeding, gluttony. These are the "What? "And of bare sustenance, dry and moist, as being necessaries He says, "Your Father knoweth that ye need these. And if, in a word, we are naturally given to seeking, let us not destroy the faculty of seeking by directing it to luxury, but let us excite it to the discovery of truth.
The words that follow make his meaning clear. After saying, “Do not seek what you will eat or what you will drink,” he added, “and do not be lifted up.” Pride and luxury lift people up and away from the truth. The pleasure-seeking that busies itself with superfluous things also leads away from the truth. That is why he says, very rightly, “All these things the nations of the world seek.” The “nations” are the disorderly and senseless. And what does he mean by “these things”? Luxury, self-indulgence, rich seasoning, dainty eating, gluttony. These are the “what.” But about plain food, dry and liquid, which is necessary, he says, “Your Father knows that you need it.” If we have become seekers at all, let us not waste our seeking on luxury. Let us fan it into flame to find the truth.
For He says, "Seek ye the kingdom of God, and the materials of sustenance shall be added to you. If, then, He takes away anxious care for clothes and food, and superfluities in general, as unnecessary; what are we to imagine ought to be said of love of ornament, and dyeing of wool, and variety of colours, and fastidiousness about gems, and exquisite working of gold, and still more, of artificial hair and wreathed curls; and furthermore, of staining the eyes, and plucking out hairs, and painting with rouge and white lead, and dyeing of the hair, and the wicked arts that are employed in such deceptions? May we not very well suspect, that what was quoted a little above respecting the grass, has been said of those unornamental lovers of ornaments? For the field is the world, and we who are bedewed by the grace of God are the grass; and though cut down, we spring up again, as will be shown at greater length in the book On the Resurrection. But hay figuratively designates the vulgar rabble, attached to ephemeral pleasure, flourishing for a little, loving ornament, loving praise, and being everything but truth-loving, good for nothing but to be burned with fire.
“Seek the kingdom of God,” he says, “and what you need for food will be added to you.” If he removes anxiety about clothing, food and all superfluous things, as unnecessary, what must we think he would say about love of finery? What about the dyeing of wool, the variety of colours, the fussiness over gems, the elaborate working of gold, artificial hairpieces and twisted curls? What about painting the eyes, plucking hairs, rouge, white lead, hair dye, and all the evil tricks used in these deceptions? Should we not strongly suspect that what was said a little earlier about the grass was said also about these “unadorned” lovers of adornment? For the field is the world, and we are the plants of the field, refreshed with dew by the grace of God. When we are cut down, we spring up again, as will be shown at greater length in the book On the Resurrection. But the common crowd is pictured by the “hay.” It belongs to a passing merriment and blooms only briefly. It loves the world and loves glory, and loves anything more than truth. It is good for nothing except to feed a fire.
"There was a certain man," said the Lord, narrating, "very rich, who was clothed in purple and scarlet, enjoying himself splendidly every day. This was the hay. "And a certain poor man named Lazarus was laid at the rich man's gate, full of sores, desiring to be filled with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table. This is the grass. Well, the rich man was punished in Hades, being made par-taker of the fire; while the other flourished again in the Father's bosom. I admire that ancient city of the Lacedaemonians which permitted harlots alone to wear flowered clothes, and ornaments of gold, interdicting respectable women from love of ornament, and allowing courtesans alone to deck themselves. On the other hand, the archons of the Athenians, who affected a polished mode of life, forgetting their manhood, wore tunics reaching to the feet, and had on the crobulus-a kind of knot of the hair-adorned with a fastening of gold grasshoppers, to show their origin from the soil, forsooth, in the ostentation of licentiousness.
“There was a man,” says the Lord in his account, “very rich, who dressed in purple and fine linen and made merry splendidly every day.” This man was the hay. “And a poor man named Lazarus had been thrown at the rich man’s gate, covered with sores, longing to be filled with what fell from the rich man’s table.” This man is the grass. But the rich man was being punished in Hades, sharing in the fire, while the other flourished again in the bosom of the Father. I admire the old city of the Spartans. It allowed only courtesans to wear flowered clothing and gold ornaments. By permitting only women of that kind to adorn themselves, it took the love of finery away from respectable women. The Athenian magistrates were the opposite. They were keen on the refined life of the city, and they forgot what befits men. They wore gold and put on tunics down to their feet. They tied up the *krobylos*, a kind of braided knot of hair, adorned with golden cicadas fastened into it. So they displayed their “earth-born” origin, in the tasteless vulgarity of their effeminate decadence.
Now rivalry of these archons extended also to the other Ionians, whom Homer, to show their effeminancy, calls "Long-robed. Those, therefore, who are devoted to the image of the beautiful, that is, love of finery, not the beautiful itself, and who under a fair name again practise idolatry, are to be banished far from the truth, as those who by opinion, not knowledge, dream of the nature of the beautiful; and so life here is to them only a deep sleep of ignorance; from which it becomes us to rouse ourselves and haste to that which is truly beautiful and comely, and desire to grasp this alone, leaving the ornaments of earth to the world, and bidding them farewell before we fall quite asleep. I say, then, that man requires clothes for nothing else than the covering of the body, for defence against excess of cold and intensity of heat, lest the inclemency of the air injure us.
The zeal of these magistrates spread to the other Ionians as well. Homer mocks them as effeminate and calls them “trailing their robes.” So there are people who turn to love of finery, which is only an image of the beautiful, and not to the beautiful itself. Under a fair-sounding name they practise idolatry again. They must be sent far away from the truth, because they dream of the nature of the beautiful by opinion, not by knowledge. Life here is for them a deep sleep of ignorance. We must wake from it and hurry toward what is truly beautiful and orderly. We must long to lay hold of that alone, and leave the ornaments of this life to delight in the world itself, before we fall fast asleep for good. I say, then, that people needed woven cloth for one reason only: to cover the body, to protect against extreme cold and fierce heat, so that the excesses of the air around us do not harm us.
And if this is the object of clothing, see that one kind be not assigned to men and another to women. For it is common to both to be covered, as it is to eat and drink. The necessity, then, being common, we judge that the provision ought to be similar. For as it is common to both to require things to cover them, so also their coverings ought to be similar; although such a covering ought to be assumed as is requisite for covering the eyes of women. For if the female sex, on account of their weakness, desire more, we ought to blame the habit of that evil training, by which often men reared up in bad habits become more effeminate than women. But this must not be yielded to. And if some accommodation is to be made, they may be permitted to use softer clothes, provided they put out of the way fabrics foolishly thin, and of curious texture in weaving; bidding farewell to embroidery of gold and Indian silks and elaborate Bombyces (silks), which is at first a worm, then from it is produced a hairy caterpillar;
If this is the purpose of clothing, consider whether one kind of clothing should be assigned to men and another to women. Being covered is common to both, just as eating and drinking are. Since the need is common, we approve a similar provision. As both need coverings, so the coverings should be alike. [The Greek text is damaged at this point.] If so, we must also adopt that covering by which women are to hide their eyes. Even if the female sex claims more for itself because of its weakness, we should blame the habit of a bad upbringing. Through it, men raised on poor ways of living have often become more effeminate than women. We must not slacken our firmness. But if some allowance must be made, we should give women a little room to use softer fabrics. We should remove only the foolish fineness and the elaborate patterns in the weaving. We should bid farewell to gold thread, Indian silks and the fussy products of silkworms.
after which the creature suffers a new transformation into a third form which they call lava, from which a long filament is produced, as the spider's thread from the spider. For these superfluous and diaphanous materials are the proof of a weak mind, covering as they do the shame of the body with a slender veil. For luxurious clothing, which cannot conceal the shape of the body, is no more a covering. For such clothing, falling close to the body, takes its form more easily, and adhering as it were to the flesh, receives its shape, and marks out the woman's figure, so that the whole make of the body is visible to spectators, though not seeing the body itself. Dyeing of clothes is also to be rejected. For it is remote both from necessity and truth, in addition to the fact that reproach in manners spring from it. For the use of colours is not beneficial, for they are of no service against cold; nor has it anything for covering more than other clothing, except the opprobrium alone. And the agreeableness of the colour afflicts greedy eyes, inflaming them to senseless blindness. But for those who are white and unstained within, it is most suitable to use white and simple garments.
Then the creature changes again into a third form, which some call the “chrysalis” (others call it “nekydallos”). From this a long thread is produced, as the spider’s thread comes from the spider. These excessive, see-through fabrics are the proof of a weak mind. They cover the shame of the body with a slight veil, and so serve as a go-between for it. For luxurious clothing is no longer a covering at all, since it cannot hide the shape of the nakedness. Such clothing falls against the body and takes its impression more easily. It clings to the figure like flesh and moulds itself to it. It stamps the outline of the woman, so that anyone looking sees the whole form of the body, even though he is not actually looking at the body itself. Dyes in clothing must also be refused. They are far from what is needed and far from the truth, and they also break out into a slander on one’s character. Their use is not helpful, for they are not good against cold. They provide nothing for covering beyond what other clothing gives, except the blame. The pleasing effect of the colour troubles the greedy and provokes them to foolish ogling. But for those who are white inside and not counterfeit, it is most fitting to wear white and simple clothes.
Clearly and plainly, therefore, Daniel the prophet says, "Thrones were set, and upon them sat one like the Ancient of days, and His vesture was white as snow. The Apocalypse says also that the Lord Himself appeared wearing such a robe. It says also, "I saw the souls of those that had witnessed, beneath the altar, and there was given to each a white robe. And if it were necessary to seek for any other colour, the natural colour of truth should suffice. But garments which are like flowers are to be abandoned to Bacchic fooleries, and to those of the rites of initiation, along with purple and silver plate, as the comic poet says:- "Useful for tragedians, not far life. And our life ought to be anything rather than a pageant. Therefore the dye of Sardis, and another of olive, and another green, a rose-coloured, and scarlet, and ten thousand other dyes, have been invented with much trouble for mischievous voluptuousness.
Daniel the prophet says clearly and plainly: “Thrones were set, and one like an Ancient of days sat on them, and his garment was white as snow.” He sees the Lord in a vision wearing such a robe. The Revelation also says: “I saw the souls of those who had borne witness, under the altar, and a white robe was given to each.” But if some other colour must be sought, the natural dye of truth is enough. Garments that look like flowers should be left to Bacchic nonsense and the mystery rites. So should “the purple and the silver plate,” as the comic poet says, “which are useful for tragic actors and not for life.” Our life ought to be anything but a parade. Yet Sardian dye, another the colour of unripe grapes, another green, another rose-mixed, another scarlet, and countless other dyes have been devised, with great effort, for ruinous self-indulgence.
Such clothing is for looking at, not for covering. Garments, too, variegated with gold, and those that are purple, and that piece of luxury which has its name from beasts (figured on it), and that saffron-coloured ointment-dipped robe, and those costly and many-coloured garments of flaring membranes, we are to bid farewell to, with the art itself. "For what prudent thing can these women have done," says the comedy, "who sit covered with flowers, wearing a saffron-coloured dress, painted? " The Instructor expressly admonishes, "Boast not of the clothing of your garment, and be not elated on account of any glory, as it is unlawful. Accordingly, deriding those who are clothed in luxurious garments, He says in the Gospel: "Lo, they who live in gorgeous apparel and luxury are in earthly palaces. He says in perishable palaces, where are love of display, love of popularity, and flattery and deceit. But those that wait at the court of heaven around the King of all, are sanctified in the immortal vesture of the Spirit, that is, the flesh, and so put on incorruptibility.
This kind of clothing is for the eye, not for covering. We must also bid farewell, along with the art itself, to garments embroidered with gold, to the purple-dyed and those woven with figures (a luxury that is merely a show in the wind), to that saffron robe dyed with perfume, and to the costly, many-coloured cloaks of fine membrane that people stare at, with little figures in the purple. “What sensible or splendid thing could we women do,” says the comedy, “when we sit about decked in flowers, wearing saffron robes and made up with cosmetics?” The Instructor, however, gives plain advice: “Do not boast about the clothing you wear, and do not be lifted up by any glory, since it does not last.” So in the Gospel he mocks those dressed in soft clothing: “Look, those who live in splendid clothing and luxury are in kings’ palaces.” He means the earthly palaces, the perishable ones, where there is love of reputation, hunting for fame, flattery and deceit. But those who serve in the heavenly court around the King of all are made holy in the unstained garment of the soul, the flesh, and over it they put on incorruption.
As therefore she who is unmarried devotes herself to God alone, and her care is not divided, but the chaste married woman divides her life between God and her husband, while she who is otherwise disposed is devoted entirely to marriage, that is, to passion: in the same way I think the chaste wife, when she devotes herself to her husband, sincerely serves God; but when she becomes fond of finery, she falls away from God and from chaste wedlock, exchanging her husband for the world, after the fashion of that Argive courtesan, I mean Eriphyle,- "Who received gold prized above her dear husband. Wherefore I admire the Ceian sophist, who delineated like and suitable images of Virtue and Vice, representing the former of these, viz. Virtue, standing simply, white-robed and pure, adorned with modesty alone (for such ought to be the true wife, dowered with modesty). But the other, viz. Vice, on the contrary, he introduces dressed in superfluous attire, brightened up with colour not her own; and her gait and mien are depicted as studiously framed to give pleasure, forming a sketch of wanton women.
So the unmarried woman gives her time to God alone, and her concern is not divided. The self-controlled married woman divides her life between God and her husband. But the woman who is carried off in another direction gives herself wholly to marriage, which means to passion. In the same way, I think, the self-controlled wife who devotes herself to her husband worships God without hypocrisy. But if she loves finery, she falls away both from God and from chaste marriage. She trades her husband for adornment, just like the Argive courtesan, I mean Eriphyle, who “accepted precious gold in place of a dear husband.” For this reason I also approve of the sophist of Ceos, who drew matching and corresponding pictures of virtue and vice. He made one of them, Virtue, stand simply, in white, clean, adorned with modesty alone. (Faith ought to be like that: virtuous, with modesty.) The other, Vice, he presented in the opposite way: dressed in excessive clothing and made radiant with borrowed colour. Her movement and her bearing are practised for pleasing effect, and she is displayed as a sketch for loose women.
But he who follows the Word will not addict himself to any base pleasure; wherefore also what is useful in the article of dress is to be preferred. And if the Word, speaking of the Lord by David, sings, "The daughters of kings made Thee glad by honour; the queen stood at Thy right hand, clad in cloth of gold, girt with golden fringes," it is not luxurious raiment that he indicates; but he shows the immortal adornment, woven of faith, of those that have found mercy, that is, the Church; in which the guileless Jesus shines conspicuous as gold, and the elect are the golden tassels. And if such must be woven for the women, let us weave apparel pleasant and soft to the touch, not flowered, like pictures, to delight the eye. For the picture fades in course of time, and the washing and steeping in the medicated juices of the dye wear away the wool, and render the fabrics of the garments weak; and this is not favourable to economy.
The one who follows the Word will not attach himself to any shameful pleasure. So in clothing, too, what is useful should be chosen first. The Word sings through David about the Lord: “The daughters of kings made you glad in your honor; the queen stood at your right hand, in a robe woven with gold, clothed in golden fringes.” Here he does not mean luxurious clothing. He means the unspoiled adornment of the Church, woven together out of faith, made up of those who have received mercy. In her the guileless Jesus “shines like gold,” and the fringes are the elect, the golden ones. If we must relax our strictness a little for the sake of the women, let the cloth be woven smooth and soft to the touch. It should not be decked with flowers like paintings, to please the eye. A painting fades with time. The washing and soaking in the drug-like juices of the dye eat away the wool and leave the fabric of the garments weak. That is not good household management either.
It is the height of foolish ostentation to be in a flutter about peploi, and xystides, and ephaptides, and "cloaks," and tunics, and "what covers shame," says Homer. For, in truth, I am ashamed when I see so much wealth lavished on the covering of the nakedness. For primeval man in Paradise provided a covering for his shame of branches and leaves; and now, since sheep have been created for us, let us not be as silly as sheep, but trained by the Word, let us condemn sumptuousness of clothing, saying, "Ye are sheep's wool. Though Miletus boast, and Italy be praised, and the wool, about which many rave, be protected beneath skins, yet are we not to set our hearts on it. The blessed John, despising the locks of sheep as savouring of luxury, chose "camel's hair," and was clad in it, making himself an example of frugality and simplicity of life.
It is the greatest tastelessness to be so excited about robes, long gowns, wraps, cloaks and tunics, “which cover the private parts,” as Homer says. I am truly ashamed to see so much wealth poured out on covering the parts we are ashamed of. The first man in paradise measured out his covering for shame with branches and leaves. Now that sheep have been made for us, let us not be as foolish as sheep. Trained by the Word, let us expose the costliness of clothing by saying: “You are sheep’s hair. Though Miletus boasts of you and Italy praises you, and though the hair that so many go mad over is kept safe under skin covers, we ought not to take it seriously.” The blessed John looked down even on sheep’s hair, since it smells of luxury. He chose camel’s hair and wore it, setting before us an example of a plain and honest life.
For he also "ate locusts and wild honey," sweet and spiritual fare; preparing, as he was, the lowly and chaste ways of the Lord. For how possibly could he have worn a purple robe, who turned away from the pomp of cities, and retired to the solitude of the desert, to live in calmness with God, far from all frivolous pursuits-from all false show of good-from all meanness? Elias used a sheepskin mantle, and fastened the sheepskin with a girdle made of hair. And Esaias, another prophet, was naked and barefooted, and often was clad in sackcloth, the garb of humility. And if you call Jeremiah, he had only "a linen girdle. For as well-nurtured bodies, when stripped, show their vigour more manifestly, so also beauty of character shows its magnanimity, when not involved in ostentatious fooleries.
John also ate honey and locusts, a sweet and spiritual food, preparing the Lord’s ways to be free of pride and self-controlled. Would a man who had turned away from the showiness of city life wear a purple cloak? He went into the desert, living for God in the stillness of the wilderness, far from all empty busyness, from clumsy display and from pettiness. Elijah wore a sheepskin cloak and fastened it with a belt made of hair. Isaiah, another prophet, was “naked and barefoot,” and often wore sackcloth as a garment of humility. If you mention Jeremiah, he had only a linen loincloth. Well-fed bodies show their vigor more plainly when stripped. In the same way the beauty of character shows its greatness when it is not wrapped up in tasteless nonsense.
But to drag one's clothes, letting them down to the soles of his feet, is a piece of consummate foppery, impeding activity in walking, the garment sweeping the surface dirt of the ground like a broom; since even those emasculated creatures the dancers, who transfer their dumb shameless profligacy to the stage, do not despise the dress which flows away to such indignity; whose curious vestments, and appendages of fringes, and elaborate motions of figures, show the trailing of sordid effeminacy. If one should adduce the garment of the Lord reaching down to the foot, that many-flowered coat shows the flowers of wisdom, the varied and unfading Scriptures, the oracles of the Lord, resplendent with the rays of truth. In such another robe the Spirit arrayed the Lord through David, when he sang thus: "Thou wert clothed with confession and comeliness, putting on light as a garment. As, then, in the fashioning of our clothes, we must keep clear of all strangeness, so in the use of them we must beware of extravagance.
It is also thoroughly showy to let clothes hang down to the tips of the toes and drag along. It gets in the way of walking. The garment sweeps the loose rubbish on the ground like a broom. Not even those degenerate dancers on the stage, who act out a silent shamelessness, overlook a robe that falls to such a disgrace. Their careful draping, their dangling hems and the elaborate rhythms of their poses show the dragging of petty-minded softness. Someone may point to the Lord’s robe that reached to the feet. But that tunic, with its many flowers, shows the flowers of wisdom: the varied Scriptures that never fade, the oracles of the Lord flashing with the rays of truth. The Spirit clothed the Lord in another such robe through David, singing something like this: “You have put on praise and splendor, wrapping yourself in light like a garment.” So, just as we must keep clear of everything improper in making our clothes, we must also guard against excess in using them.
For neither is it seemly for the clothes to be above the knee, as they say was the case with the Lacedaemonian virgins; nor is it becoming for any part of a woman to be exposed. Though you may with great propriety use the language addressed to him who said, "Your arm is beautiful; yes, but it is not for the public gaze. Your thighs are beautiful; but, was the reply, for my husband alone. And your face is comely. Yes; but only for him who has married me. But I do not wish chaste women to afford cause for such praises to those who, by praises, hunt after grounds of censure; and not only because it is prohibited to expose the ankle, but because it has also been enjoined that the head should be veiled and the face covered; for it is a wicked thing for beauty to be a snare to men. Nor is it seemly for a woman to wish to make herself conspicuous, by using a purple veil.
It is not fitting either for a woman’s dress to be above the knee, as they say the Spartan girls dressed. No part of a woman should be bared. A modest woman can answer very properly, with that witty remark, someone who says, “Your arm is beautiful.” She can reply, “But not for the public.” When he says, “Your legs are beautiful,” she can say, “But only for my husband.” And “Your face is lovely”: “But only for the man who married me.” Still, I do not want chaste women even to give occasion for such praises to men who use praise to hunt for something to blame. And it is not only forbidden to show the ankle. The head is also commanded to be covered and the face shaded. It is not holy for the beauty of the body to become a trap for men. Nor is it reasonable for a woman to use a purple veil to make herself the center of attention.
Would it were possible to abolish purple in dress, so as not to turn the eyes of spectators on the face of those that wear it! But the women, in the manufacture of all the rest of their dress, have made everything of purple, thus inflaming the lusts. And, in truth, those women who are crazy about these stupid and luxurious purples, "purple (dark) death has seized," according to the poetic saying. On account of this purple, then, Tyre and Sidon, and the vicinity of the Lacedaemonian Sea, are very much desired; and their dyers and purple-fishers, and the purple fishes themselves, because their blood produces purple, are held in high esteem. But crafty women and effeminate men, who blend these deceptive dyes with dainty fabrics, carry their insane desires beyond all bounds, and export their fine linens no longer from Egypt, but some other kinds from the land of the Hebrews and the Cilicians.
If only it were possible to remove purple from clothing altogether, so that spectators would not be drawn to look at the faces of those who wear it! But these women weave only a very small part of their garment in other colors and make the whole thing purple, and so they inflame their own careless indulgence. Those who are besotted with these foolish, dainty purples fall under the poet’s saying, “purple death took hold of them.” Because of this purple, Tyre and Sidon, and the seacoast neighboring Laconia, are most longed for. Their dyers and purple-fishers are held in high esteem, and so are the shellfish themselves, because the purple blooms from their blood. Deceitful women, and effeminate men too, mix these deceitful dyes into their greedy fabrics and rave on without any limit. They no longer get their linens from Egypt, but obtain other kinds from the land of the Hebrews and the land of the Cilicians.
I say nothing of the linens made of Amorgos and Byssus. Luxury has outstripped nomenclature. The covering ought, in my judgment, to show that which is covered to be better than itself, as the image is superior to the temple, the soul to the body, and the body to the clothes. But now, quite the contrary, the body of these ladies, if sold, would never fetch a thousand Attic drachms. Buying, as they do, a single dress at the price of ten thousand talents, they prove themselves to be of less use and less value than cloth. Why in the world do you seek after what is rare and costly, in preference to what is at hand and cheap? It is because you know not what is really beautiful, what is really good, and seek with eagerness shows instead of realities from fools who, like people out of their wits, imagine black to be white.
I say nothing of the Amorgian and fine linen garments; luxury has gone beyond even the names for things. A covering, I think, should show that what it covers is better than itself: as the statue is better than the temple, the soul than the body, and the body than its clothing. But now it is the complete opposite. If the body of these women were put up for sale, it would never fetch a thousand Attic drachmas, yet they will pay ten thousand talents for a single garment, and so they prove themselves more worthless and less valuable than the fabrics. Why then do you chase after what is rare and costly rather than what is common and cheap? Because you do not know what is truly beautiful and truly good. Foolish people pursue what only seems so in place of what really is, and like madmen they imagine white things to be black.
-On Clothes.Women fond of display act in the same manner with regard to shoes, showing also in this matter great luxuriousness. Base, in truth, are those sandals on which golden ornaments are fastened; but they are thought worth having nails driven into the soles in winding rows. Many, too, carve on them amorous embraces, as if they would by their walk communicate to the earth harmonious movement, and impress on it the wantonness of their spirit. Farewell, therefore, must be bidden to gold-plated and jewelled mischievous devices of sandals, and Attic and Sicyonian half-boots, and Persian and Tyrrhenian buskins; and setting before us the right aim, as is the habit with our truth, we are bound to select what is in accordance with nature. For the use of shoes is partly for covering, partly for defence in case of stumbling against objects, and for saving the sole of the foot from the roughness of hilly paths.
On Shoes. Showy women behave much the same way with their footwear, and here too they display great softness of living. Those sandals with gold ornaments on them are truly shameful. They even insist on having the nails driven into the soles in spiral patterns. Many of them engrave love-greetings on the soles, so that as they walk they set the ground to a rhythm, and stamp the harlot’s attitude of mind into it by their stride. So we must say goodbye to the pointless craftsmanship of gold-covered and jeweled sandals, to Attic and Sicyonian half-boots, and to Persian and Tyrrhenian buskins. Setting before ourselves, as our truth is accustomed to do, the right aim, we should choose what is natural. For shoes are used partly to cover the feet, and partly to guard the sole of the foot against stumbling and against the roughness of mountain paths.
Women, are to be allowed a white shoe, except when on a journey, and then a greased shoe must be used. When on a journey, they require nailed shoes. Further, they ought for the most part to wear shoes; for it is not suitable for the foot to be shown naked: besides, woman is a tender thing, easily hurt. But for a man bare feet are quite in keeping, except when he is on military service. "For being shod is near neighbour to being bound. To go with bare feet is most suitable for exercise, and best adapted for health and ease, unless where necessity prevents. But if we are not on a journey, and cannot endure bare feet, we may use slippers or white shoes; dusty-foots the Attics called them, on account of their bringing the feet near the dust, as I think. As a witness for simplicity in shoes let John suffice, who avowed that "he was not worthy to unloose the latchet of the Lord's shoes. For he who exhibited to the Hebrews the type of the true philosophy wore no elaborate shoes. What else this may imply, will be shown elsewhere.
Women may be allowed white shoes, except when they are traveling; then they should use greased leather. Women who travel need shoes with nailed soles. Still, they should wear shoes most of the time, for it is not fitting to show a bare foot; besides, a woman is easily led into harm. For a man, going barefoot is entirely suitable, unless he is serving as a soldier, for being shod is somehow close to being bound. Going barefoot is best for training, and it suits health and ease, wherever no necessity prevents it. But if we are not traveling and cannot bear to go barefoot, we should use slippers or white shoes. The Athenians called these “dust-feet,” I think because they keep the feet close to the dust. John is sufficient witness for simple footwear, since he declared that he was not worthy to untie the strap of the Lord’s sandals. The man who was showing the Hebrews the pattern of true philosophy wore nothing elaborate on his feet. If this also hints at something further, it will be explained elsewhere.
On Shoes.It is childish to admire excessively dark or green stones, and things cast out by the sea on foreign shores, particles of the earth. For to rush after stones that are pellucid and of peculiar colours, and stained glass, is only characteristic of silly people, who are attracted by things that have a striking show. Thus children, on seeing the fire, rush to it, attracted by its brightness; not understanding through senselessness the danger of touching it. Such is the case with the stones which silly women wear fastened to chains and set in necklaces, amethysts, ceraunites, jaspers, topaz, and the Milesian "Emerald, most precious ware. And the highly prized pearl has invaded the woman's apartments to an extravagant extent. This is produced in a kind of oyster like mussels, and is about the bigness of a fish's eye of large size.
That we should not be wild about jewels and gold ornaments. It is childish to gape at dark blue or green stones, at what a distant sea throws up, and at the nuggets of the earth. To rush after little transparent stones, stones of unusual color, and varicolored glass is nothing but the mark of foolish people who are drawn by whatever has a striking appearance. In the same way, children who see a fire run to it, led on by its brightness, and in their foolishness do not understand how dangerous it is to touch. Such are the stones that silly women hang on their chains and fasten into their necklaces: amethysts, thunderstones, jaspers, topaz, and the Milesian emerald, a most costly piece of merchandise. The very expensive pearl has also burst into the women’s quarters in an extravagant way. It is formed in a kind of oyster like the pinna-shell, and is about the size of a large fish’s eye.
And the wretched creatures are not ashamed at having bestowed the greatest pains about this little oyster, when they might adorn themselves with the sacred jewel, the Word of God, whom the Scripture has somewhere called a pearl, the pure and pellucid Jesus, the eye that watches in the flesh,-the transparent Word, by whom the flesh, regenerated by water, becomes precious. For that oyster that is in the water covers the flesh all round, and out of it is produced the pearl. We have heard, too, that the Jerusalem above is walled with sacred stones; and we allow that the twelve gates of the celestial city, by being made like precious stones, indicate the transcendent grace of the apostolic voice. For the colours are laid on in precious stones, and these colours are precious; while the other parts remain of earthy material. With these symbolically, as is meet, the city of the saints, which is spiritually built, is walled.
These wretched women are not ashamed to have put all their effort into this little oyster. They could be adorned with a holy stone, the Word of God, whom Scripture somewhere calls a pearl: the clear and pure Jesus, the eye that watches over us in the flesh, the transparent Word, through whom the flesh is made precious when it is born again by water. For that oyster, which comes to be in water, covers the flesh around it, and the pearl is conceived from that flesh. We have received the teaching that the Jerusalem above is walled with holy stones. We understand that the twelve gates of the heavenly city are likened to precious stones, and that this hints at the conspicuous grace of the apostles. For in costly stones the colors are what is prized, and these are the valuable part, while the rest is left over as earthy matter. It is fitting, then, that the city of the saints, built spiritually, is walled with these stones as symbols.
By that brilliancy of stones, therefore, is meant the inimitable brilliancy of the spirit, the immortality and sanctity of being. But these women, who comprehend not the symbolism of Scripture, gape all they can for jewels, adducing the astounding apology, "Why may I not use what God hath exhibited? "and, "I have it by me, why may I not enjoy it? "and., "For whom were these things made, then, if not for us? "Such are the utterances of those who are totally ignorant of the will of God. For first necessaries, such as water and air, He supplies free to all; and what is not necessary He has hid in the earth and water. Wherefore ants dig, and griffins guard gold, and the sea hides the pearl-stone. But ye busy yourselves about what you need not.
In contrast to the inimitable bloom of the stones, they have understood the bloom of the Spirit, the pure and holy bloom of its being. But these women do not grasp the symbolic language of the Scriptures. They stand gaping at the stones, offering that marvelous excuse: “Why should we not use what God has shown us?” “I have it at hand; why should I not enjoy it?” “For whom, then, did these things come to be, if not for us?” Such talk comes from people who are completely ignorant of God’s will. First, God supplies the necessities, such as water and air, openly to all. But everything that is not necessary he hid in earth and water. This is why ants mine gold, griffins guard it, and the sea hides the pearl, that stone. But you are meddlesome about what you should leave alone.
Behold, the whole heaven is lighted up, and ye seek not God; but gold which is hidden, and jewels, are dug up by those among us who are condemned to death. But you also oppose Scripture, seeing it expressly cries "Seek first the kingdom of heaven, and all these things shall be added unto you. But if all things have been conferred on you, and all things allowed you, and "if all things are lawful, yet all things are not expedient," says the apostle. God brought our race into communion by first imparting what was His own, when He gave His own Word, common to all, and made all things for all. All things therefore are common, and not for the rich to appropriate an undue share. That expression, therefore, "I possess, and possess in abundance: why then should I not enjoy?
Look, the whole heaven is spread open, and you do not seek God. But the gold and stones that lie hidden are dug out of the earth, among us, by those condemned to death. You even sing against Scripture, which cries out plainly: “Seek first the kingdom of heaven, and all these things will be added to you.” But suppose all things have been given to you and all things allowed to you. The apostle says, “All things are lawful for us, but not all things are beneficial.” God himself brought our race into being for fellowship. He was first to share what was his own, and he offered his own Word as a help common to all people, making all things for the sake of all. So all things are common, and the rich should not grab more than their share. Therefore the saying “I have it, and I have more than enough; why should I not enjoy it?”
"is suitable neither to the man, nor to society. But more worthy of love is that: "I have: why should I not give to those who need? "For such an one-one who fulfils the command, "Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself"-is perfect. For this is the true luxury-the treasured wealth. But that which is squandered on foolish lusts is to be reckoned waste, not expenditure. For God has given to us, I know well, the liberty of use, but only so far as necessary; and He has determined that the use should be common. And it is monstrous for one to live in luxury, while many are in want. How much more glorious is it to do good to many, than to live sumptuously! How much wiser to spend money on human being, than on jewels and gold! How much more useful to acquire decorous friends, than lifeless ornaments! Whom have lands ever benefited so much as conferring favours has?
is neither human nor sociable. This one is much more loving: “I have it; why should I not share it with those in need?” The person who says this is perfect, having fulfilled “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” For this is true luxury, wealth that is stored up as treasure. But spending on empty desires should be counted as destruction, not as expense. I know that God has given us the freedom to use things, but only up to what is necessary, and he has willed that the use be shared. It is out of place for one person to live in luxury while many are poor. How much more glorious it is to do good to many than to live in costly splendor! How much wiser to spend on people than on stones and gold! How much more useful to gain well-ordered friends than lifeless ornaments! What have fields ever profited anyone as much as giving generously does?
It remains for us, therefore, to do away with this allegation: Who, then, will have the more sumptuous things, if all select the simpler? Men, I would say, if they make use of them impartially and indifferently. But if it be impossible for all to exercise self-restraint, yet, with a view to the use of what is necessary, we must seek after what can be most readily procured, bidding a long farewell to these superfluities. In fine, they must accordingly utterly cast off ornaments as girls' gewgaws, rejecting adornment itself entirely. For they ought to be adorned within, and show the inner woman beautiful. For in the soul alone are beauty and deformity shown. Wherefore also only the virtuous man is really beautiful and good. And it is laid down as a dogma, that only the beautiful is good. And excellence alone appears through the beautiful body, and blossoms out in the flesh, exhibiting the amiable comeliness of self-control, whenever the character like a beam of light gleams in the form.
So we still have to answer this objection that follows: “For whom, then, are the more costly things, if everyone chooses the cheaper?” I would say: for people, if we use them without attachment and without favoritism. But if it is impossible for everyone to be self-controlled, we should still pursue what is easy to obtain, for the sake of what we need, and bid a long farewell to these superfluities. In general, then, women must drive away their “ornaments” like girls’ trinkets, and refuse adornment itself altogether. For they ought to be well-ordered within and show the woman inside to be beautiful. Beauty and ugliness show themselves only in the soul. So only the earnest person is truly beautiful and good, and the teaching holds that only the beautiful is good. Virtue alone shines through a beautiful body and blooms in the flesh. It shows the lovely bloom of self-control as worthy of love, when character shines on the appearance like a ray of light.
For the beauty of each plant and animal consists in its individual excellence. And the excellence of man is righteousness, and temperance, and manliness, and godliness. The beautiful man is, then, he who is just, temperate, and in a word, good, not he who is rich. But now even the soldiers wish to be decked with gold, not having read that poetical saying:- "With childish folly to the war he came, Laden with store of gold. But the love of ornament, which is far from caring for virtue, but claims the body for itself, when the love of the beautiful has changed to empty show, is to be utterly expelled. For applying things unsuitable to the body, as if they were suitable, begets a practice of lying and a habit of falsehood; and shows not what is decorous, simple, and truly childlike, but what is pompous, luxurious, and effeminate.
The beauty of every plant and every animal lies in the particular excellence of each. The excellence of a human being is justice, self-control, courage and godliness. So the beautiful person is the just and self-controlled person, in short the good person, not the rich one. Yet even soldiers now want to be decked out with gold. They have not read the poet’s line about the man who “went to war wearing gold, like a silly young girl.” The love of finery cares nothing for virtue and lays claim only to the body. Here the love of what is beautiful has turned aside into vainglory, and it must be thrown out completely. It attaches to the body things that do not belong to it, as though they did. In this way it trains people in lying and breeds a habit of deceit. It shows not what is dignified, unaffected and truly childlike, but what is haughty, soft and pampered.
But these women obscure true beauty, shading it with gold. And they know not how great is their transgression, in fastening around themselves ten thousand rich chains; as they say that among the barbarians malefactors are bound with gold. The women seem to me to emulate these rich prisoners. For is not the golden necklace a collar, and do not the necklets which they call catheters occupy the place of chains? and indeed among the Attics they are called by this very name. The ungraceful things round the feet of women, Philemon in the Synephebus called ankle-fetters:- "Conspicuous garments, and a kind of a golden fetter. What else, then, is this coveted adorning of yourselves, O ladies, but the exhibiting of yourselves fettered? For if the material does away with the reproach, the endurance [of your fetters] is a thing indifferent.
Some women dim true beauty by overshadowing it with gold. They do not realize how great their fault is, since they have put countless rich bonds around themselves. They say that among the barbarians criminals are bound with gold, and these women seem to me to be imitating those rich prisoners. Is the golden necklace not a collar, and the twisted neck-rings too? The so-called “catheters” work like chains, and Attic writers call them by that very name, “chains.” Philemon, in his play *The Fellow-Cadet*, called the women’s unseemly adornment of the feet “ankle-fetters”: “transparent garments and a golden fetter.” What else, then, is this envied beautifying, women, but a wish to be seen in fetters? If the material takes the edge off the shame, the condition is still the same.
To me, then, those who voluntarily put themselves into bonds seem to glory in rich calamities. Perchance also it is such chains that the poetic fable says were thrown around Aphrodité when committing adultery, referring to ornaments as nothing but the badge of adultery. For Homer called those, too, golden chains. But new women are not ashamed to wear the most manifest badges of the evil one. For as the serpent deceived Eve, so also has ornament of gold maddened other women to vicious practices, using as a bait the form of the serpent, and by fashioning lampreys and serpents for decoration. Accordingly the comic poet Nicostratus says, "Chains, collars; rings, bracelets, serpents, anklets, earrings. In terms of strongest censure, therefore, Aristophanes in the Thesmophoriazousae exhibits the whole array of female ornament in a catalogue:- "Snoods, fillets, natron, and steel;
To me, then, women who fall into bonds of their own free will seem to be boasting about rich misfortunes. Perhaps the poet’s myth also says that such bonds were thrown around Aphrodite when she was caught in adultery. If so, it hints that these ornaments are nothing but a sign of adultery, for Homer called those bonds golden too. Yet women are not ashamed to wear the plainest emblems of the evil one. The serpent deceived Eve, and in the same way golden ornament has driven other women wild into licentiousness. It uses the serpent’s shape as bait, and they have moray eels and snakes molded into jewelry to look attractive. The comic poet Nicostratus says: “chains, catheters, rings, bracelets, snakes, anklets, hellebore.” Aristophanes, in the *Thesmophoriazusae*, lists the whole array of women’s finery in a very reproachful way. I will set down the comic poet’s own words, which expose exactly how vulgar your ignorance of what is good really is. Speaker A:
⚑ Possible scanning error in the digital Greek (A.). Check it against the printed edition.
Pumice-stone, band, back-band, Back-veil, paint, necklaces, Paints for the eyes, soft garment, hair-net, Girdle, shawl, fine purple border, Long robe, tunic, Barathrum, round tunic. But I have not yet mentioned the principal of them. Then what? "Ear-pendants, jewelry, ear-rings; Mallow-coloured cluster-shaped anklets; Buckles, clasps, necklets, Fetters, seals, chains, rings, powders, Bosses, bands, olisbi, Sardian stones, Fans, helicters. I am weary and vexed at enumerating the multitude of ornaments; and I am compelled to wonder how those who bear such a burden are not worried to death. O foolish trouble!O silly craze for display! They squander meretriciously wealth on what is disgraceful; and in their love for ostentation disfigure God's gifts, emulating the art of the evil one. The rich man hoarding up in his barns, and saying to himself, "Thou hast much goods laid up for many years; eat, drink, be merry," the Lord in the Gospel plainly called "fool. "For this night they shall take of thee thy soul; whose then shah those things which thou hast prepared be? " Apelles, the painter, seeing one of his pupils painting a figure loaded with gold colour to represent Helen, said to him, "Boy, being incapable of painting her beautiful, you have made her rich.
“Headbands, hair-bands, soda, pumice, breast-band, back-sling, veil, rouge, necklaces, eye-liner, soft shawl, hellebore, hair-net, girdle, wrap, luxury gown, border, long robe, tunic, *barathron*, round cloak, little tunic. And I have not mentioned the biggest items.” B: “What else, then?” A: “Ear-pendants, gem-set pieces, plasters, mallow-colored dye, cluster earrings, bracelets, brooches, armlets, necklaces, anklets, seal rings, chains, finger rings, poultices, bubbles, ties, *olisboi*, carnelians, *hypoderides*, spiral ornaments.” I am tired and annoyed at listing so many ornaments. I am amazed that these women are not worn out carrying such a load. What empty fussing! What vain craze for glory! Like prostitutes they pour out their wealth to their own shame. In their lack of taste they counterfeit God’s gifts and imitate the craft of the evil one. The Lord in the Gospel plainly called the rich man a fool. He stored up his goods in barns and said to himself, “You have many good things laid up for many years; eat, drink, be merry.” But the Lord said, “This very night they are taking your soul from you; and the things you have prepared, whose will they be?” The painter Apelles once saw one of his pupils who had painted Helen loaded with gold. “Young man,” he said, “since you could not paint her beautiful, you have made her rich.”
Such Helens are the ladies of the present day, not truly beautiful, but richly got up. To these the Spirit prophesies by Zephaniah: "And their silver and their gold shall not be able to deliver them in the day of the Lord's anger. But for those women who have been trained under Christ, it is suitable to adorn themselves not with gold, but with the Word, through whom alone the gold comes to light. Happy, then, would have been the ancient Hebrews, had they cast away their women's ornaments, or only melted them; but having cast their gold into the form of an ox, and paid it idolatrous worship, they consequently reap no advantage either from their art or their attempt. But they taught our women most expressively to keep clear of ornaments. The lust which commits fornication with gold becomes an idol, and is tested by fire; for which alone luxury is reserved, as being an idol, not a reality.
Such Helens are the women of today: not genuinely beautiful, but richly made up. To them the Spirit prophesies through Zephaniah: “Neither their silver nor their gold will be able to rescue them in the day of the Lord’s wrath.” Women who are being trained by Christ should be adorned not with gold but with the Word, through whom alone gold shows itself for what it is. The ancient Hebrews would have been blessed if they had simply taken off their women’s ornaments and thrown them away or melted them down. Instead they cast the gold into a calf and worshiped it as an idol. They gained nothing from their craft or their scheme. Yet they taught our women, in a most striking pattern, to keep away from ornaments. That part of desire which prostitutes itself to gold becomes an idol, and it is put to the test by fire. Luxury is kept for fire alone, as an idol is, and not truth.
Hence the Word, upbraiding the Hebrews by the prophet, says, "They made to Baal things of silver and gold," that is, ornaments. And most distinctly threatening, He says, "I will punish her for the days of Baalim, in which they offered sacrifice for her, and she put on her earrings and her necklaces. And He subjoined the cause of the adornment, when He said, "And she went after her lovers, but forgot Me, saith the Lord. Resigning, therefore, these baubles to the wicked master of cunning himself, let us not take part in this meretricious adornment, nor commit idolatry through a specious pretext. Most admirably, therefore, the blessed Peter says, "In like manner also, that women adorn themselves not with braids, or gold, or costly array, but (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works. For it is with reason that he bids decking of themselves to be kept far from them. For, granting that they are beautiful, nature suffices. Let not art contend against nature; that is, let not falsehood strive with truth. And if they are by nature ugly, they are convicted, by the things they apply to themselves, of what they do not possess [i.e., of the want of beauty].
Here the Word, rebuking the Hebrews through the prophet, says, “They made silver and gold things for Baal.” He means ornaments. And in a most vivid threat he says, “I will take vengeance on her for the days of the Baalim, on which she offered sacrifice to it, and put on her earrings and her necklaces.” Then he adds the reason for her adornment: “And she went after her lovers, but me she forgot, says the Lord.” So let women lay aside these trifles to the evil sophist himself. Let them take no part in this harlot-like beautifying, and let them not practice idolatry behind a respectable screen. The blessed Peter speaks very admirably here: “Women likewise, not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly clothing, but with what is fitting for women who profess reverence for God, adorning themselves through good works.” He is right to command that their beautifying be absent. If they are beautiful, nature is enough. Let art not compete with nature. That is, let deceit not quarrel with truth. But if they are ugly by nature, what they put on to cover what they lack exposes them.
It is suitable, therefore, for women who serve Christ to adopt simplicity. For in reality simplicity provides for sanctity, by reducing redundancies to equality, and by furnishing from whatever is at hand the enjoyment sought from superfluities. For simplicity, as the name shows, is not conspicuous, is not inflated or puffed up in aught, but is altogether even, and gentle, and equal, and free of excess, and so is sufficient. And sufficiency is a condition which reaches its proper end without excess. or defect. The mother of these is Justice, and their nurse "Independence; "and this is a condition which is satisfied with what is necessary, and by itself furnishes what contributes to the blessed life. Let there, then, be in the fruits of thy hands, sacred order, liberal communication, and acts of economy. "For he that giveth to the poor, lendeth to God. "And the hands of the manly shall be enriched. Manly He calls those who despise wealth, and are free in bestowing it.
It is fitting, then, for women who serve Christ to embrace simplicity. For simplicity really does provide for holiness. It evens out excess and obtains the use we seek from superfluities by means of ordinary things. For what is simple, as the very name suggests, does not stick out or swell or puff itself up at any point. It is wholly level, smooth, even and free of excess, and for that reason it is sufficient. Sufficiency is a settled state that reaches its proper end without lack and without excess. The mother of these is righteousness, and their nurse is self-sufficiency. This is a settled state that is content with what is needed and by itself provides what contributes to the blessed life. Then let your adornment be in the fruits of your hands: holy, generous sharing and works of homemaking. “For he who gives to the poor lends to God,” and “the hands of the courageous enrich.” By “courageous” he means those who despise money and are ready to share it.
And on your feet let active readiness to well-doing appear, and a journeying to righteousness. Modesty and chastity are collars and necklaces; such are the chains which God forges. "Happy is the man who hath found wisdom, and the mortal who knows understanding," says the Spirit by Solomon: "for it is better to buy her than treasures of gold and silver; and she is more valuable than precious stones. For she is the true decoration. And let not their ears be pierced, contrary to nature, in order to attach to them ear-rings and ear-drops. For it is not right to force nature against her wishes. Nor could there be any better ornament for the ears than true instruction, which finds its way naturally into the passages of hearing. And eyes anointed by the Word, and ears pierced for perception, make a man a hearer and contemplator of divine and sacred things, the Word truly exhibiting the true beauty "which eye hath not seen nor ear heard before."
On your feet, let there appear a tireless readiness to do good and a walking in the way of righteousness. Modesty and self-control are your chains and necklaces. These are the kind of necklaces God makes of gold. “Blessed is the man who has found wisdom, and the mortal who has seen understanding,” says the Spirit through Solomon, “for it is better to trade for her than for treasures of gold and silver, and she is more precious than costly stones.” This is true adornment. Their ears should not be pierced, against nature, to hang pendants and earrings from them. It is not right to force nature against what it intends. Nor could there be a better ornament for the ears than true instruction, which goes down by the natural passages of hearing. Eyes anointed with the Word, and ears pierced for perception, make a person a hearer of divine things and a beholder of holy things. The Word truly shows the true beauty, “which eye has not seen, nor ear heard” before.
⚑ Possible scanning error in the digital Greek (B., E., F., Z., H., I.). Check it against the printed edition.
(the older translation has no table of contents here)
Chapter headings of the third book. 1. On true beauty. 2. That one should not beautify oneself. 3. Against men who beautify themselves. 4. With whom one should spend time. 5. How one should behave at the baths. 6. That only the Christian is rich. 7. That frugality is a good provision for a Christian. 8. That images and examples are a very large part of right teaching. 9. For what purpose the bath is to be used. 10. That exercises too are to be approved for those who live according to reason. 11. A summary survey of the best life. 12. A similar summary survey of the best life, drawn from the holy Scriptures that mark out the Christian life.
On the True Beauty.It is then, as appears, the greatest of all lessons to know one's self. For if one knows himself, he will know God; and knowing God, he will be made like God, not by wearing gold or long robes, but by well-doing, and by requiring as few things as possible. Now, God alone is in need of nothing, and rejoices most when He sees us bright with the ornament of intelligence; and then, too, rejoices in him who is arrayed in chastity, the sacred stole of the body. Since then the soul consists of three divisions; the intellect, which is called the reasoning faculty, is the inner man, which is the ruler of this man that is seen. And that one, in another respect, God guides. But the irascible part, being brutal, dwells near to insanity. And appetite, which is the third department, is many-shaped above Proteus, the varying sea-god, who changed himself now into one shape, now into another; and it allures to adulteries, to licentiousness, to seductions. "At first he was a lion with ample beard. While he yet retained the ornament, the hair of the chin showed him to be a man. "But after that a serpent, a pard, or a big sow. Love of ornament has degenerated to wantonness.
On the True Beauty. It appears, then, that the greatest of all lessons is to know oneself. For if someone knows himself, he will know God. And knowing God, he will be made like God. This happens not by wearing gold or trailing robes, but by doing good and by needing as few things as possible. God alone needs nothing. He is most pleased when he sees us clean in the adornment of the mind, and then also in that of the body, clothed in self-control, which is a pure robe. The soul has three parts. The first is the rational part, also called the reasoning faculty. This is the inner man, who rules this visible man, while that inner man is himself led by another, God. The second is the spirited part, which is bestial and lives close to madness. The third is the desiring part, which has many forms. It is more changeable than Proteus, the sea-god, taking one shape after another and working itself up into adultery, lust and seduction. “First he became a bearded lion,” still keeping his finery, for the hair of the beard shows he is a man. “But then a serpent, or a leopard, or a great boar.” Love of finery has slid down into wantonness.
A man no longer appears like a strong wild beast, "But he became moist water, and a tree of lofty branches. Passions break out, pleasures overflow; beauty fades, and falls quicker than the leaf on the ground, when the amorous storms of lust blow on it before the coming of autumn, and is withered by destruction. For lust becomes and fabricates all things, and wishes to cheat, so as to conceal the man. But that man with whom the Word dwells does not alter himself, does not get himself up: he has the form which is of the Word; he is made like to God; he is beautiful; he does not ornament himself: his is beauty, the true beauty, for it is God; and that man becomes God, since God so wills. Heraclitus, then, rightly said, "Men are gods, and gods are men.
No longer does the man appear in a mighty beast, “but he became flowing water, and a tree with high leaves.” The passions pour out and the pleasures gush forth. Beauty withers. It falls to the ground faster than a leaf when the lustful storms of insolence blow on it, and it is shriveled by corruption before autumn even comes. For desire becomes everything, fashions itself, and wants to deceive, so as to hide the man. But the man in whom the Word lives is not painted up and not fashioned. He has the form of the Word and is made like God. He is beautiful and does not beautify himself, for the true beauty is God. That man becomes God, because God wills it. Heraclitus therefore spoke rightly when he said, “Men are gods, and gods are men,
For the Word Himself is the manifest mystery: God in man, and man God. And the Mediator executes the Father's will; for the Mediator is the Word, who is common to both-the Son of God, the Saviour of men; His Servant, our Teacher. And the flesh being a slave, as Paul testifies, how can one with any reason adorn the handmaid like a pimp? For that which is of flesh has the form of a servant. Paul says, speaking of the Lord, "Because He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant," calling the outward man servant, previous to the Lord becoming a servant and wearing flesh. But the compassionate God Himself set the flesh free, and releasing it from destruction, and from bitter and deadly bondage, endowed it with incorruptibility, arraying the flesh in this, the holy embellishment of eternity-immortality.
for the Word is the same.” This is a plain mystery: God in man, and man God. The Mediator carries out the Father’s will. For the Word is Mediator, shared by both: Son of God and Savior of men, servant of the one and our Instructor. Now the flesh is a slave, as Paul testifies. So how could anyone reasonably deck out the maid-servant like a procurer? That the fleshly is the form of a slave, the apostle says of the Lord: “He emptied himself, taking the form of a slave.” He calls the outward man a slave even before the Lord became a slave and bore flesh. But the compassionate God himself set the flesh free. He rescued it from corruption and from the bitter, death-bringing slavery, and clothed it with incorruption. He put on the flesh this holy adornment of eternity: immortality.
There is, too, another beauty of men-love. "And love," according to the apostle, "suffers long, and is kind; envieth not; vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up. For the decking of one's self out-carrying, as it does, the look of superfluity and uselessness-is vaunting one's self. Wherefore he adds, "doth not behave itself unseemly: "for a figure which is not one's own, and is against nature, is unseemly; but what is artificial is not one's own, as is clearly explained: "seeketh not," it is said, "what is not her own. For truth calls that its own which belongs to it; but the love of finery seeks what is not its own, being apart from God, and the Word, from love. And that the Lord Himself was uncomely in aspect, the Spirit testifies by Esaias: "And we saw Him, and He had no form nor comeliness but His form was mean, inferior to men. Yet who was more admirable than the Lord? But it was not the beauty of the flesh visible to the eye, but the true beauty of both soul and body, which He exhibited, which in the former is beneficence; in the latter-that is, the flesh-immortality.
There is another beauty of men: love. As the apostle says, “Love is patient, is kind, is not jealous, does not brag, is not puffed up.” For beautifying oneself is bragging, since it gives the impression of excess and uselessness. This is why he adds, “It does not behave indecently.” For a form that is foreign and not according to nature is indecent, and what is artificially made up is foreign. He makes this clear by saying that love “does not seek what is not its own.” Truth calls its own what truly belongs to it, but love of finery seeks what is foreign, since it stands outside God, the Word and love. The Spirit testifies through Isaiah that the Lord himself was ugly in appearance: “And we saw him, and he had no form or beauty, but his form was without honor, lacking beside men.” And who is better than the Lord? But what he showed was not the outward, illusory beauty of the flesh. It was the true beauty of both soul and body: in the soul, doing good; in the flesh, immortality.
Against Embellishing the Body.It is not, then, the aspect of the outward man, but the soul that is to be decorated with the ornament of goodness; we may say also the flesh with the adornment of temperance. But those women who beautify the outside, are unawares all waste in the inner depths, as is the case with the ornaments of the Egyptians; among whom temples with their porticos and vestibules are carefully constructed, and groves and sacred fields adjoining; the halls are surrounded with many pillars; and the walls gleam with foreign stones, and there is no want of artistic painting; and the temples gleam with gold, and silver, and amber, and glitter with parti-coloured gems from India and Ethiopia; and the shrines are veiled with gold-embroidered hangings. But if you enter the penetralia of the enclosure, and, in haste to behold something better, seek the image that is the inhabitant of the temple, and if any priest of those that offer sacrifice there, looking gave, and singing a paean in the Egyptian tongue, remove a little of the veil to show the god, he will give you a hearty laugh at the object of worship.
That is why it is not the outward appearance of a person that must be adorned. It is the soul that must be adorned with the ornament of true nobility of character. We could say the same of the flesh, which is to be adorned with the ornament of self-control. But women who beautify the surface while leaving the depths a wasteland do not realize that they are decorating themselves like the temples of the Egyptians. Those people take great care over gateways and outer courts, with groves and sacred meadows. Their courtyards are ringed with many columns. Their walls shine with imported stones, and no skill in painting is lacking. The temples gleam with gold, silver and amber, and sparkle with many-colored gems from India and Ethiopia. The inner sanctuaries are shaded with curtains woven with gold. But suppose you go on into the depths of the enclosure, eager to see something greater, and look for the statue that lives in the temple. Then a priest, or some other temple official, comes forward with a solemn look on his face, singing a hymn in the Egyptian language. He lifts the curtain a little, as if to show you the god, and gives us a good laugh at the thing they worship.
For the deity that is sought, to whom you have rushed, will not be found within, but a cat, or a crocodile, or a serpent of the country, or some such beast unworthy of the temple, but quite worthy of a den, a hole, or the dirt. The god of the Egyptians appears a beast rolling on a purple couch. So those women who wear gold, occupying themselves in curling at their locks, and engaged in anointing their cheeks, painting their eyes, and dyeing their hair, and practising the other pernicious arts of luxury, decking the covering of flesh,-in truth, imitate the Egyptians, in order to attract their infatuated lovers. But if one withdraw the veil of the temple, I mean the head-dress, the dye, the clothes, the gold, the paint, the cosmetics,-that is, the web consisting of them, the veil, with the view of finding Within the true beauty, he will be disgusted, I know well.
The god we hurried to find will not be found inside. We will find a cat, a crocodile, a native snake, or some such animal. It is unworthy of the temple and fit only for a hole, a den or the mud. The god of the Egyptians appears as a beast rolling on a purple couch. In the same way, I think, women who wear gold are like this. They work at curling their hair, rub ointment on their cheeks, paint under their eyes, dye their hair, and devise other kinds of mischievous self-indulgence. They decorate the fleshly enclosure, truly acting like Egyptians, to draw in lovers who are superstitious. But suppose someone pulled back the curtain of the temple. I mean the hairnet, the dye, the clothing, the gold, the rouge, the cosmetics, that is, the whole fabric woven from these. He expects to find true beauty inside, but he will be disgusted, I know well.
For he will not find the image of God dwelling within, as is meet; but instead of it a fornicator and adulteress has occupied the shrine of the soul. And the true beast will thus be detected-an ape smeared with white paint. And that deceitful serpent, devouring the understanding part of man through vanity, has the soul as its hole, filling all with deadly poisons; and injecting his own venom of deception, this pander of a dragon has changed women into harlots. For love of display is not for a lady, but a courtesan. Such women care little for keeping at home with their husbands; but loosing their husbands' purse-strings, they spend its supplies on their lusts, that they may have many witnesses of their seemingly fair appearance; and, devoting the whole day to their toilet, they spend their time with their bought slaves.
He will not find the image of God, so worthy of respect, living inside. Instead a prostitute and adulteress has taken over the inner shrine of the soul. The real beast will be exposed: an ape smeared with white lead. That shifty serpent eats away the mind of the person through the love of glory and makes the soul his den. He fills everything with deadly drugs and spits out into them his own venom of deceit. This dragon, this pimp, has turned women into prostitutes. For love of finery belongs not to a wife but to a courtesan. Such women give little thought to keeping house for their husbands. They undo their husbands’ purses and divert the money to their desires, so that they may have many witnesses to their seeming beauty. They sit all day at the hairdresser’s and spend their time with slaves they have bought.
Accordingly they season the flesh like a pernicious sauce; and the day they bestow on the toilet shut up in their rooms, so as not to be caught decking themselves. But in the evening this spurious beauty creeps out to candle-light as out of a hole; for drunkenness and the dimness of the light aid what they have put on. The woman who dyes her hair yellow, Menander the comic poet expels from the house:- "Now get out of this house, for no chaste Woman ought to make her hair yellow," nor, I would add, stain her cheeks, nor paint her eyes. Unawares the poor wretches destroy their own beauty, by the introduction of what is spurious. At the dawn of day, mangling, racking, and plastering themselves over with certain compositions, they chill the skin, furrow the flesh with poisons, and with curiously prepared washes, thus blighting their own beauty.
Like a bad relish, they season the flesh. They spend the day shut up in their rooms, wasting away over their cosmetics, so that no one will catch them dyeing their hair blond. In the evening this counterfeit beauty creeps up to the lamp as if out of a den. Drunkenness and the dim light help the make-up they have put on. The comic poet Menander banishes from the house the woman who dyes her hair blond: “Now get out of this house.” For a self-controlled woman must not make her hair blond, and she must not rouge her cheeks or paint her eyes either. These unlucky women do not realize that by bringing in a foreign beauty they destroy their own. At daybreak they are torn at, scrubbed and plastered with various pastes. They scrape the skin, wear down the flesh with drugs, and by their fussy washes they wither their own natural bloom.
Wherefore they are seen to be yellow from the use of cosmetics, and susceptible to disease, their flesh, which has been shaded with poisons, being now in a melting state. So they dishonour the Creator of men, as if the beauty given by Him were nothing worth. As you might expect, they become lazy in housekeeping, sitting like painted things to be looked at, not as if made for domestic economy. Wherefore in the comic poet the sensible woman says, "What can we women do wise or brilliant, who sit with hair dyed yellow, outraging the character of gentlewomen; causing the overthrow of houses, the ruin of nuptials, and accusations on the part of children? " In the same way, Antiphanes the comic poet, in Malthaca, ridicules the meretriciousness of women in words that apply to them all, and are framed against the rubbing of themselves with cosmetics, saying:- "She comes, She goes back, she approaches, she goes back. She has come, she is here, she washes herself, she advances, She is soaped, she is combed, she goes out, is rubbed, She washes herself, looks in the glass, robes herself, Anoints herself, decks herself, besmears herself; And if aught is wrong, chokes [with vexation].
That is why they look pale from the plasters, and they easily fall sick, since their flesh, shaded with paints, is already softened by the drugs. They dishonor the Creator of human beings, as though he had given them a beauty that was not good enough. No wonder they become idle about keeping house. They sit like painted pictures, made to be looked at and not to run a household. This is why the thoughtful woman in the comic poet says: “What wise or brilliant thing could we women do, who sit with our hair dyed blond, spoiling the character of free women? We bring about the ruin of households, the turning aside of marriages, and the passing off of substitute children.” Antiphanes the comic poet, in his play *Malthake*, mocks this courtesan-like behavior of women in words that apply to all of them and describe the endless wearing-out of themselves: “She comes, she goes again, she approaches, she goes again, she has come, she is here, she is washing, she approaches, she is soaping, she is combing, she has stepped in, she is rubbing, she is bathing, she is looking in the mirror, she is dressing, she is perfuming, she is adorning, she is anointing herself. And if she has anything wrong, she hangs herself.”
Thrice, I say, not once, do they deserve to perish, who use crocodiles' excrement, and anoint themselves with the froth of putrid humours, and stain their eyebrows with soot, and rub their cheeks with white lead. These, then, who are disgusting even to the heathen poets for their fashions, how shall they not be rejected by the truth? Accordingly another comic poet, Alexis, reproves them. For I shall adduce his words, which with extravagance of statement shame the obstinacy of their impudence. For he was not very far beyond the mark. And I cannot for shame come to the assistance of women held up to such ridicule in comedy. Then she ruins her husband. "For first, in comparison with gain and the spoiling of neighbours, All else is in their eyes superfluous. "Is one of them little? She stitches cork into her shoesole.
They deserve to be destroyed three times, not just once, for using crocodile dung, smearing themselves with the foam of rotting matter, rubbing soot onto their eyebrows and white lead into their cheeks. If even the pagan poets are sick of these women because of their manner of life, how could the truth not cast them out? Another comic poet, Alexis, exposes them. I will quote his words as well, so that his elaborate wording may shame their stubborn shamelessness; he was not overdoing it that much. I myself am ashamed that the women’s quarters should be mocked in comedy so far, when woman was made to be a “helper” and yet ends up destroying her husband as well. “First of all, everything else is a side issue to them compared with making a profit and robbing their neighbors. If one of them happens to be short, she stitches cork into her shoes.
Is one tall? She wears a thin sole, And goes out keeping her head down on her shoulder: This takes away from her height. Has one no flanks? She has something sewed on to her, so that the spectators May exclaim on her fine shape behind. Has she a prominent stomach? By making additions, to render it straight, such as the nurses we see in the comic poets, She draws back, as it were, by these poles, the protuberance of the stomach in front. Has one yellow eyebrows? She stains them with soot. Do they happen to be black? She smears them with ceruse. Is one very white-skinned? She rouges. Has one any part of the body beautiful? She shows it bare. Has she beautiful teeth? She must needs laugh, That those present may see what a pretty mouth she has; But if not in the humour for laughing, she passes the day within, With a slender sprig of myrtle between her lips, Like what cooks have always at hand when they have goats' heads to sell, So that she must keep them apart the whilst, whether she will or not.
“If one is tall, she wears a thin sole and goes out with her head drooped onto her shoulder; this takes away from her height. If one has no hips, she puts on padding sewn in underneath, so that those who see her cry out about her fine figure. If one has a big belly, she gets the sort of false breasts the comic poets give their nurses, and by adding these upright pieces she pushes the front of her belly forward like poles. If one has reddish eyebrows, she paints them with soot. If she happens to be dark, she plasters herself with white lead. If one is too pale, she rubs on rouge. If she has some fine part of her body, she displays it bare. If she has good teeth, she has to laugh, so that those present can see what a pretty mouth she has. But if she has no wish to laugh, she spends the whole day with a thin, straight sliver of myrtle wood held between her lips, so that in time her mouth is fixed in a grin, whether she wants it or not.”
I set these quotations from the comic poets before you, since the Word most strenuously wishes to save us. And by and by I will fortify them with the divine Scriptures. For he who does not escape notice is wont to abstain from sins, on account of the shame of reproof. Just as the plastered hand and the anointed eye exhibit from their very look the suspicion of a person in illness, so also cosmetics and dyes indicate that the soul is deeply diseased. The divine Instructor enjoins us not to approach to another's river, meaning by the figurative expression "another's river," "another's wife; "the wanton that flows to all, and out of licentiousness gives herself up to meretricious enjoyment with all. "Abstain from water that is another's," He says, "and drink not of another's well," admonishing us to shun the stream of "voluptuousness," that we may live long,and that years of life may be added to us; both by not hunting after pleasure that belongs to another, and by diverting our inclinations.
I set these passages from worldly wisdom before you to turn you away from the scheming of those who love finery, since the Word wants to save us by every means. Soon I will reinforce them with the divine Scriptures. People who are exposed tend to give up their sins out of shame at being rebuked. A bandaged hand or a salved eye makes people suspect, from the look of it, that the person is ill. In the same way, face-creams and dyes hint that the soul is deeply sick. But the divine Instructor urges us to pass by “a foreign river.” By this figure he means a foreign woman, the lustful one, who flows toward everyone and pours herself out to all in prostitute-like indulgence. “Keep away from foreign water,” he says, “and do not drink from a foreign spring.” He is urging us to guard against the stream of pleasure, “so that we may live a long time, and years of life may be added to us.” This applies whether we avoid hunting after pleasures that belong to someone else, or turn away from the sects.
Love of dainties and love of wine, though great vices, are not of such magnitude as fondness for finery. "A full table and repeated cups" are enough to satisfy greed. But to those who are fond of gold, and purple, and jewels, neither the gold that is above the earth and below it is sufficient, nor the Tyrian Sea, nor the freight that comes from India and Ethiopia, nor yet Pactolus flowing with gold; not even were a man to become a Midas would he be satisfied, but would be still poor, craving other wealth. Such people are ready to die with their gold. And if Plutus is blind, are not those women that are crazy about him, and have a fellow-feeling with him, blind too? Having, then, no limit to their lust, they push on to shamelessness. For the theatre, and pageants, and many spectators, and strolling in the temples, and loitering in the streets, that they may be seen conspicuously by all, are necessary to them.
Love of delicacies and love of wine are great passions, but they are not as great as love of finery. A full table and cup after cup are enough to satisfy gluttony. But for those who love gold, purple and jewels, neither the gold above and below the earth is enough, nor the Tyrian sea, nor the cargo from India and Ethiopia, nor even the Pactolus river flowing with riches. Not even if one of them became a Midas would she be satisfied; she would still be poor, longing for more wealth. These people are ready to die along with their gold. And if Wealth is blind, as he is, how can the women who are crazy about him and share his feelings not be blind too? Having no limit to their desire, they run aground on shamelessness. For they need the theater, the processions, crowds of spectators, wandering about in the temples and loitering in the streets, so that they are seen by everyone.
For those that glory in their looks, not in heart dress to please others. For as the brand shows the slave, so do gaudy colours the adulteress. "For though thou clothe thyself in scarlet, and deck thyself with ornaments of gold, and anoint thine eyes with stibium, in vain is thy beauty," says the Word by Jeremiah. Is it not monstrous, that while horses, birds, and the rest of the animals, spring and bound from the grass and meadows, rejoicing in ornament that is their own, in mane, and natural colour, and varied plumage; woman, as if inferior to the brute creation, should think herself so unlovely as to need foreign, and bought, and painted beauty? Head-dresses and varieties of head-dresses, and elaborate braidings, and infinite modes of dressing the hair, and costly specimens of mirrots, in which they arrange their costume,-hunting after those that, like silly children, are crazy about their figures,-are characteristic of women who have lost all sense of shame. If any one were to call these courtesans, he would make no mistake, for they turn their faces into masks.
They adorn themselves to please others, boasting in the face and not in the heart. As brand marks show a runaway slave, so these fancy colors show the adulteress. “Even if you put on scarlet and adorn yourself with golden ornaments, and even if you paint your eyes with eye-shadow, your beautification is in vain,” says the Word through Jeremiah. Is it not absurd that horses, birds and other animals rise up from the grass and the meadows, and fly up, delighting in their own natural adornment, the horse’s mane, the natural color, the varied plumage, while woman, as though worse off than the animals, thinks she is so unlovely that she needs someone else’s beauty, bought and painted on? Hairnets, different kinds of hairnets, elaborate braids, countless arrangements of the hair, and costly mirrors in which they pose themselves to catch those who are as crazy about looks as foolish children: all this belongs to women who have lost every blush of shame. Anyone who called them prostitutes would not be wrong, since they turn their faces into masks.
But us the Word enjoins "to look not on the things that are seen, but the things that are not seen; for the things that are seen are temporal, but the things that are not seen are eternal. But what passes beyond the bounds of absurdity, is that they have invented mirrors for this artificial shape of theirs, as if it were some excellent work or masterpiece. The deception rather requires a veil thrown over it. For as the Greek fable has it, it was not a fortunate thing for the beautiful Narcissus to have been the beholder of his own image. And if Moses commanded men to make not an image to represent God by art, how can these women be right, who by their own reflection produce an imitation of their own likeness, in order to the falsifying of their faces? Likewise also, when Samuel the prophet was sent to anoint one of the sons of Jesse for king, and on seeing the eldest of his sons to be fair and tall, produced the anointing oil, being delighted with him, the Lord said to him, "Look not to his appearance, nor the height of his stature: for I have rejected him For man looketh on the eyes, but the Logo into the heart.
But the Word urges us “not to look at the things that are seen, but at the things that are not seen; for the things that are seen are temporary, but the things that are not seen are eternal.” What goes beyond even absurdity is this: for their artificial appearance, as if it were some feat of courage or a work of improvement, they have thought up mirrors. Yet this deceit above all ought to be covered with a veil. For even by the Greek myth it did not turn out well for the handsome Narcissus to be a spectator of his own image. Moses commands that people make no image in rivalry with God’s craft. How then could these women reasonably copy their own likenesses by reflection, to produce a falsified face? Consider also the prophet Samuel. When he was sent to anoint one of Jesse’s sons as king, he saw the eldest of the boys, handsome and tall, and brought out the oil, pleased with him. Scripture says, “The Lord said to him: Do not look at his appearance or the height of his stature, for I have rejected him.
And he anointed not him that was comely in person, but him that was comely in soul. If, then, the Lord counts the natural beauty of the body inferior to that of the soul, what thinks He of spurious beauty, rejecting utterly as He does all falsehood? "For we walk by faith, not by sight. Very clearly the Lord accordingly teaches by Abraham, that he who follows God must despise country, and relations, and possessions, and all wealth, by making him a stranger. And therefore also He called him His friend who had despised the substance which he had possessed at home. For he was of good parentage, and very opulent; and so with three hundred and eighteen servants of his own he subdued the four kings who had taken Lot captive. Esther alone we find justly adorned.
“For man looks at the eyes, but the Lord looks at the heart.” And he anointed not the one beautiful in body, but the one beautiful in soul. If then the Lord counts the natural beauty of the body as less than that of the soul, what does he think of counterfeit beauty, when he throws out every falsehood root and branch? “For we walk by faith, not by appearance.” The Lord teaches very clearly through Abraham that the one who follows God must despise homeland, relatives, property and all wealth. He made him a foreigner, and for this reason he called him “friend,” because he despised the abundance he had at home. For Abraham was of noble birth and very wealthy. With three hundred and eighteen servants of his own he defeated the four kings who had taken Lot captive. Esther alone, we find, was rightly adorned.
The spouse adorned herself mystically for her royal husband; but her beauty turns out the redemption price of a people that were about to be massacred. And that decoration makes women courtesans, and men effeminate and adulterers, the tragic poet is a witness; thus discoursing:- "He that judged the goddesses, As the myth of the Argives has it, having come from Phrygia To Lacedaemon, arrayed in flowery vestments, Glittering with gold and barbaric luxury, Loving, departed, carrying away her he loved, Helen, to the folds of Ida, having found that Menelaus was away from home. O adulterous beauty! Barbarian finery and effeminate luxury overthrew Greece; Lacedaemonian chastity was corrupted by clothes, and luxury, and graceful beauty; barbaric display proved Jove's daughter a courtesan. They had no instructor to restrain their lusts, nor one to say, "Do not commit adultery; "nor, "Lust not; "or, "Travel not by lust into adultery; "or further, "Influence not thy passions by desire of adornment.
That woman made herself beautiful in a hidden, mystical way for her own king, and that beauty of hers turns out to be the ransom of a people marked for slaughter. That adornment turns women into courtesans, and men into effeminate adulterers. The tragic poet bears witness to this, telling the story something like this: “This man who judged the goddesses came from Phrygia to Lacedaemon, as the Argive myth has it. He was bright in a robe of flowered garments and gleaming with gold, in barbarian luxury. A lover, he went off with a loving Helen, snatching her away to the cattle-folds of Ida, having caught Menelaus away from home.” What adulterous beauty! Barbarian love of finery and effeminate luxury overthrew Greece. Clothing, luxury and youthful beauty destroyed Spartan self-control. Barbarian love of display exposed the daughter of Zeus as a courtesan. They had no instructor to cut off their desires. They had none to say “You shall not commit adultery,” or “You shall not desire.” They had none to say: do not travel the road to adultery through desire, and do not inflame your appetites through love of finery.
What an end was it that ensued to them, and what woes they endured, who would not restrain their self-will! Two continents were convulsed by unrestrained pleasures, and all was thrown into confusion by a barbarian boy. The whole of Hellas puts to sea; the ocean is burdened with the weight of continents; a protracted war breaks out, and fierce battles are waged, and the plains are crowded with dead: the barbarian assails the fleet with outrage; wickedness prevails, and the eye of that poetic Jove looks on the Thracians:- "The barbarian plains drink noble blood, And the streams of the rivers are choked with dead bodies. Breasts are beaten in lamentations, and grief desolates the land; and all the feet, and the summits of many-fountained Ida, and the cities of the Trojans, and the ships of the Achaeans, shake. Where, O Homer, shall we flee and stand? Show us a spot of ground that is not shaken!- "Touch not the reins, inexperienced boy, Nor mount the seat, not having learned to drive. Heaven delights in two charioteers, by whom alone the chariot of fire is guided.
Think what an end followed for them, and how many evils those suffered who were unwilling to restrain self-love. Two continents were shaken by undisciplined pleasures, and everything was thrown into turmoil by a barbarian youth. All Greece set sail, and the sea was crowded, carrying continents. A long war blazed up, and fierce battles broke out, and the plains were filled with corpses. The barbarian insults the naval camp. Injustice prevails, and the eye of that Zeus of the poets looks toward the Thracians. Barbarian plains drink noble blood, and the streams of the rivers stand clogged with dead bodies. Breasts are beaten in lamentation, and grief spreads over the land. All the foothills and peaks of many-springed Ida shake, and the city of the Trojans and the ships of the Achaeans. Where shall we flee, Homer, and make a stand? Show us a land that is not shaken. * * * “Do not touch the reins, child, since you have no experience, and do not mount the chariot to drive without having learned. Heaven delights in two charioteers, and only by them is the fire driven and led.”
For the mind is carried away by pleasure; and the unsullied principle of reason, when not instructed by the Word, slides down into licentiousness, and gets a fall as the due reward of its transgression. An example of this are the angels, who renounced the beauty of God for a beauty which fades, and so fell from heaven to earth. The Shechemites, too, were punished by an overthrow for dishonouring the holy virgin. The grave was their punishment, and the monument of their ignominy leads to salvation.
For the mind is carried away by pleasure. The untouched purity of reason, when it is not instructed by the Word, slides down into licentiousness and receives a fall as the wage of its transgression. The angels of God are an example of this. They abandoned beauty for the sake of a fading beauty, and so fell from heaven to the ground. The Shechemites too were punished and brought low for outraging the holy virgin. Their punishment was a grave, and the memorial of their penalty instructs us toward salvation.
Against Men Who Embellish Themselves.To such an extent, then, has luxury advanced, that not only are the female sex deranged about this frivolous pursuit, but men also are infected with the disease. For not being free of the love of finery, they are not in health; but inclining to voluptuousness, they become effeminate, cutting their hair in an ungentlemanlike and meretricious way, clothed in fine and transparent garments, chewing mastich, smelling of perfume. What can one say on seeing them? Like one who judges people by their foreheads, he will divine them to be adulterers and effeminate, addicted to both kinds of venery, haters of hair, destitute of hair, detesting the bloom of manliness, and adorning their locks like women. "Living for unholy acts of audacity, these fickle wretches do reckless and nefarious deeds," says the Sibyl. For their service the towns are full of those who take out hair by pitch-plasters, shave, and pluck out hairs from these womanish creatures. And shops are erected and opened everywhere; and adepts at this meretricious fornication make a deal of money openly by those who plaster themselves, and give their hair to be pulled out in all ways by those who make it their trade, feeling no shame before the onlookers or those who approach, nor before themselves, being men. Such are those addicted to base passions, whose whole body is made smooth by the violent tuggings of pitch-plasters.
Against men who adorn themselves. Luxury has advanced so far that it is no longer only women who are sick with this empty concern for appearances. Men are now eager to catch the disease too. Men who are not free of the love of finery are not healthy. They lean toward softness and become womanish. They have their hair cut in a base and harlot-like style, wrap themselves in fine, transparent cloaks, chew mastic gum, and reek of perfume. What can one say on seeing them? Like a man who reads character from the forehead, one can tell from their appearance that they are adulterers and half-women, hunting after both kinds of sexual pleasure. They hate body hair and are hairless. They loathe the bloom of manhood, yet they adorn their head hair as women do. “Living in unholy acts of daring,” says the Sibyl, these fickle creatures “do reckless and evil deeds.” Because of them the cities are full of people who apply pitch plasters, shave and pluck these effeminate men. Workshops have been set up and opened everywhere. The craftsmen of this prostitute-like vice openly make a great deal of money. Men let themselves be covered with pitch and have their hairs pulled out, offering themselves in every way. They feel no shame before those who watch or pass by, or even before themselves as men. Such are the zealots of the baser passions, whose whole body has been made smooth by the violent tugging of the pitch.
It is utterly impossible to get beyond such effrontery. If nothing is left undone by them, neither shall anything be left unspoken by me. Diogenes, when he was being sold, chiding like a teacher one of these degenerate creatures, said very manfully, "Come, youngster, buy for yourself a man," chastising his meretriciousness by an ambiguous speech. But for those who are men to shave and smooth themselves, how ignoble! As for dyeing of hair, and anointing of grey locks, and dyeing them yellow, these are practices of abandoned effeminates; and their feminine combing of themselves is a thing to be let alone. For they think, that like serpents they divest themselves of the old age of their head by painting and renovating themselves. But though they do doctor the hair cleverly, they will not escape wrinkles, nor will they elude death by tricking time. For it is notre dreadful, it is not dreadful to appear old, when you are not able to shut your eyes to the fact that you are so.
They care nothing about going further in such shamelessness. If nothing is left undone by them, nothing will be left unsaid by me. When Diogenes was being sold as a slave, he rebuked one of these degenerates like a teacher, and said very boldly, “Come here, young man, and buy yourself a man.” With a double-edged saying he was correcting the fellow’s harlot-like ways. For men to shave themselves and make themselves smooth: is that not degrading? The dyes for the hair, the ointments for grey hair, the yellow tints, and the womanish combing of hair are the habits of ruined half-women, and must be given up. They think that, like a snake, they can slip off the old age of their head, repainting themselves and making themselves young again. Though they may cleverly trick the hair, they will not escape wrinkles. They will not escape death either by tricking time. For it is not terrible, it is not terrible, to look old when you cannot hide the fact that you are.
The more, then, a man hastes to the end, the more truly venerable is he, having God alone as his senior, since He is the eternal aged One, He who is older than all things. Prophecy has called him the "Ancient of days; and the hair of His head was as pure wool," says the prophet. "And none other," says the Lord, "can make the hair white or black. How, then, do these godless ones work in rivalry with God, or rather violently oppose Him, when they transmute the hair made white by Him? "The crown of old men is great experience," says Scripture; and the hoary hair of their countenance is the blossom of large experience. But these dishonour the reverence of age, the head covered with grey hairs. It is not, it is not possible for him to show the head true who hasa fraudulent head. "But ye have not so learned Christ; if so be that ye have heard Him,and have been taught by Him, as the truth is in Jesus: that ye put off, concerning the former conversation, the old man (not the hoary man, but him that is) corrupt according to deceitful lusts; and be renewed (not by dyeings and ornaments), but in the spirit of your mind; and put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness. But for one who is a man to comb himself and shave himself with a razor, for the sake of fine effect, to arrange his hair at the looking-glass, to shave his cheeks, pluck hairs out of them, and smooth them, how womanly!
The nearer a man hurries to his end, the more truly honorable he is. Only God is older than he is, since God is the eternal Elder, older than all that exists. Prophecy has called him “the Ancient of days,” and the prophet says, “the hair of his head was like pure wool.” And no one else, says the Lord, “can make a hair white or black.” How then do these godless men set themselves up as rival makers against God, or rather, struggle to oppose him, when they counterfeit the hair he has turned grey? Scripture says, “The crown of old men is great experience,” and the grey hair on their face is the flower of great experience. But these men disgrace the privilege of old age, the grey head. It is not possible, it is not possible, for a man with a counterfeit head to show a true soul. The apostle says: “But you did not learn Christ in this way, if indeed you heard him and were taught in him, as the truth is in Jesus: that you put off, in keeping with your former way of life, the old man.” He does not mean the grey-haired man, but the one “who is being corrupted by the desires of deceit.” And he says to be renewed, not by dyes and cosmetics, but “in the spirit of your mind,” and to “put on the new man, created according to God in righteousness and holiness of the truth.” For a man to comb his hair, to have it cut with a razor for good looks, to arrange it at the mirror, to shave, pluck and smooth his cheeks: how is that not womanish?
And, in truth, unless you saw them naked, you would suppose them to be women. For although not allowed to wear gold, yet out of effeminate desire they enwreath their latches and fringes with leaves of gold; or, getting certain spherical figures of the same metal made, they fasten them to their ankles, and hang them from their necks. This is a device of enervated men, who are dragged to the women's apartments, amphibious and lecherous beasts. For this is a meretricious and impious form of snare. For God wished women to be smooth, and rejoice in their locks alone growing spontaneously, as a horse in his mane; but has adorned man, like the lions, with a beard, and endowed him, as an attribute of manhood, with shaggy breasts,-a sign this of strength and rule. So also cocks, which fight in defence of the hens, he has decked with combs, as it were helmets;
If you did not see them naked, you would take them for women. Even if they are not allowed to wear gold, out of their womanish desire they wrap straps and the fringes of their garments in thin sheets of gold. Or they have balls shaped from the same metal made, and tie them to their ankles and hang them from their necks. This is a trick of broken-down men who are dragged off into the women’s quarters: amphibious, lustful beasts. This way of lying in ambush is that of a harlot, and it is godless. God wanted woman to be smooth-skinned, glorying only in her naturally growing hair, as a horse does in its mane. But he adorned man with a beard, like lions, and made him manly with a shaggy chest, a sign of strength and authority. In the same way he decked out the cocks, which fight on behalf of the hens, with combs like helmets.
and so high a value does God set on these locks, that He orders them to make their appearance on men simultaneously with discretion, and delighted with a venerable look, has honoured gravity of countenance with grey hairs. But wisdom, and discriminating judgments that are hoary with wisdom, attain maturity with time, and by the vigour of long experience give strength to old age, producing grey hairs, the admirable flower of venerable wisdom, conciliating confidence. This, then, the mark of the man, the beard, by which he is seen to be a man, is older than Eve, and is the token of the superior nature. In this God deemed it right that he should excel, and dispersed hair over man's whole body. Whatever smoothness and softness was in him He abstracted from his side when He formed the woman Eve, physically receptive, his partner in parentage, his help in household management, while he (for he had parted with all smoothness) remained a man, and shows himself man.
God values these hairs so highly that he commands them to appear on men together with good sense. Delighting in dignity, he has honored the rugged look of a man’s face with venerable grey hair. Good sense and careful reasoning, grown grey with understanding, come to their prime along with time. They strengthen old age with the vigor of long experience, and they hold out the grey head, the lovely flower of serious good sense, as a reasonable ground for trust. The beard, then, is the man’s badge, the thing by which he is plainly seen to be a man. It is older than Eve and is a symbol of the stronger nature. God judged that shagginess suited the man, and he scattered hair over his whole body. But whatever in him was smooth and soft, God took from his side. From it he made Eve, pleasant to the touch for receiving seed, a woman who is a helper in bringing forth children and in keeping the house.
And to him has been assigned action, as to her suffering; for what is shaggy is drier and warmer than what is smooth. Wherefore males have both more hair and more heat than females, animals that are entire than the emasculated, perfect than imperfect. It is therefore impious to desecrate the symbol of manhood, hairiness. But the embellishment of smoothing (for I am warned by the Word), if it is to attract men, is the act of an effeminate person,-if to attract women, is the act of an adulterer; and both must be driven as far as possible from our society. "But the very hairs of your head are all numbered," says the Lord; those on the chin, too, are numbered, and those on the whole body.
But the man (for he gave up the smoothness) remained a man and shows himself a man. To him it is granted to act, as it is to her to be acted upon. For hairy things are by nature drier and hotter than smooth ones. So males are hairier and hotter than females, animals with their organs than castrated ones, and the complete than the incomplete. It is therefore impious to violate the symbol of manly nature, hairiness. As for the adornment of smoothing (for the Word makes me hot with anger), if it is aimed at men, it belongs to an effeminate person. If it is aimed at women, it belongs to an adulterer. Both must be driven as far as possible from our way of life. “But even the hairs of your head are all numbered,” says the Lord. The hairs on the chin are numbered too, and indeed those on the whole body.
There must be therefore no plucking out, contrary to God's appointment, which has counted them in according to His will. "Know ye not yourselves," says the apostle, "that Christ Jesus is in you? " Whom, had we known as dwelling in us, I know not how we could have dared to dishonour. But the using of pitch to pluck out hair (I shrink from even mentioning the shamelessness connected with this process), and in the act of bending back and bending down, the violence done to nature's modesty by stepping out and bending backwards in shameful postures, yet the doers not ashamed of themselves, but conducting themselves without shame in the midst of the youth, and in the gymnasium, where the prowess of man is tried; the following of this unnatural practice, is it not the extreme of licentiousness? For those who engage in such practices in public will scarcely behave with modesty to any at home. Their want of shame in public attests their unbridled licentiousness in private. For he who in the light of day denies his manhood, will prove himself manifestly a woman by night.
Nothing at all is to be plucked out against God’s choice, which he has counted in by his own will. The apostle says, “Unless you somehow fail to recognize yourselves, that Christ Jesus is in you.” If we knew that he lives in us, I do not know how we could dare to abuse him. Then there is the use of pitch plasters. I hesitate even to speak of the indecency of the act. These men turn away and bend over, exposing nature’s private parts to view. They sway and arch their backs in shameful postures, and they feel no shame at themselves. They behave indecently among the young men and in the middle of the gymnasium, where the manly virtue of men is tested. They pursue this practice that is against nature. Is that not the height of licentiousness? Those who do such things in public would hardly feel shame before anyone at home. Their shamelessness in public bears witness to their unrestrained wantonness in private. The man who denies his manhood in the light of day is clearly shown up as a woman at night.
"There shall not be," said the Word by Moses, "a harlot of the daughters of Israel; there shall not be a fornicator of the sons of Israel. But the pitch does good, it is said. Nay, it defames, say I. No one who entertains right sentiments would wish to appear a fornicator, were he not the victim of that vice, and study to defame the beauty of his form. No one would, I say, voluntarily choose to do this. "For if God foreknew those who are called, according to His purpose, to be conformed to the image of His Son," for whose sake, according to the blessed apostle, He has appointed "Him to be the first-born among many brethren," are they not godless who treat with indignity the body which is of like form with the Lord? The man, who would be beautiful, must adorn that which is the most beautiful thing in man, his mind, which every day he ought to exhibit in greater comeliness; and should pluck out not hairs, but lusts.
The Word said through Moses, “There shall not be a prostitute among the daughters of Israel, and there shall not be a fornicator among the sons of Israel.” “But the pitch is useful,” someone says. I say it slanders. No one in his right mind would want to seem a fornicator unless he were sick. No one would willingly choose to make a practice of slandering the beautiful image. For the blessed apostle says that God predestined “those called according to his purpose, whom he foreknew, to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.” So how are they not godless who mutilate the body that is conformed to the Lord? The man who wants to be beautiful must adorn the most beautiful thing in a human being, his mind. Each day he should show it more attractive. What must be plucked out is not hairs but desires.
I pity the boys possessed by the slave-dealers, that are decked for dishonour. But they are not treated with ignominy by themselves, but by command the wretches are adorned for base gain. But how disgusting are those who willingly practise the things to which, if compelled, they would, if they were men, die rather than do? But life has reached this pitch of licentiousness through the wantonness of wickedness, and lasciviousness is diffused over the cities, having become law. Beside them women stand in the stews, offering their own flesh for hire for lewd pleasure, and boys, taught to deny their sex, act the part of women. Luxury has deranged all things; it has disgraced man. A luxurious niceness seeks everything, attempts everything, forces everything, coerces nature. Men play the part of women, and women that of men, contrary to nature; women are at once wives and husbands:
I even pity the boys who belong to slave-dealers and are dressed up for abuse. They have not mutilated themselves. The poor things are made up on orders, for someone’s shameful profit. But those who choose of their own will to do what they would rather have died than do on orders, if they were men, how are they not contemptible? Life has now reached such a pitch of licentiousness, with injustice running riot, that all lewdness has flooded the cities and become law. Among them women stand on the brothel roofs, selling their own flesh for the outrage of pleasure. Boys who have been taught to deny their nature pass themselves off as women. Luxury has upset everything. A soft-living, meddling curiosity has disgraced humanity. It searches out everything, tries everything, forces everything, and confuses nature. Men have taken on what belongs to women, and women are made manly against nature, women being both wives and husbands.
no passage is closed against libidinousness; and their promiscuous lechery is a public institution, and luxury is domesticated. O miserable spectacle! horrible conduct! Such are the trophies of your social licentiousness which are exhibited: the evidence of these deeds are the prostitutes. Alas for such wickedness! Besides, the wretches know not how many tragedies the uncertainty of intercourse produces. For fathers, unmindful of children of theirs that have been exposed, often without their knowledge, have intercourse with a son that has debauched himself, and daughters that are prostitutes; and licence in lust shows them to be the men that have begotten them. These things your wise laws allow: people may sin legally; and the execrable indulgence in pleasure they call a thing indifferent. They who commit adultery against nature think themselves free from adultery. Avenging justice follows their audacious deeds, and, dragging on themselves inevitable calamity, they purchase death for a small sum of money.
No road is closed to licentiousness. Their shared lust is made public property, and luxury sits at the same table with them. What a pitiable sight! What an unspeakable way of life! These are the trophies of your city’s lack of self-control that are put on show, and the women who walk the streets are the proof of what is done. Alas for such lawlessness! The wretches do not even understand how many tragedies are caused by the secrecy of these encounters. A son has used prostitutes, and there are daughters who sell themselves, and fathers often sleep with them without knowing it. They forget the children they exposed, and this freedom to indulge without restraint shows the fathers to be the very men who begot them. These are the things your wise laws permit. People may sin by the law, and they call the unmentionable side of pleasure a convenience. Those who commit adultery against nature think they are free of adultery. But justice follows their daring acts as an avenger. They draw down an unavoidable disaster on themselves, and for a little coin they buy their own death.
The miserable dealers in these wares sail, bringing a cargo of fornication, like wine or oil; and others, far more wretched, traffic in pleasures as they do in bread and sauce, not heeding the words of Moses, "Do not prostitute thy daughter, to cause her to be a whore, lest the land fall to whoredom, and the land become full of wickedness. Such was predicted of old, and the result is notorious: the whole earth has now become fullof fornication and wickedness. I admire the ancient legislators of the Romans: these detested effeminacy of conduct; and the giving of the body to feminine purposes, contrary to the law of nature, they judged worthy of the extremest penalty, according to the righteousness of the law. For it is not lawful to pluck out the beard, man's natural and noble ornament. "A youth with his first beard: for with this, youth is most graceful.
The unhappy traders in these goods sail the seas carrying prostitution as cargo, as if it were grain or wine. Others, far more wretched, buy pleasures as they would bread or relish. They have not even given a thought to the saying of Moses: “You shall not defile your daughter by making her a prostitute, and the land will not prostitute itself, and the land will be filled with lawlessness.” This was prophesied long ago, and the outcome is plain: the whole earth is now filled with prostitution and lawlessness. I admire the ancient Roman lawgivers. They hated unmanly conduct. They judged that a man who gives his body to a woman’s role, against the law of nature, deserved the pit, according to the law of justice. For it is never right to pluck out the beard, the natural beauty, the noble beauty that first belongs to a young man with his first growth of beard, whose youth is most charming.
By and by he is anointed, delighting in the beard "on which descended" the prophetic, "ointment" with which Aaron was honoured. And it becomes him who is rightly trained, on whom peace has pitched its tent, to preserve peace also with his hair. What, then, will not women with strong propensities to lust practise, when they look on men perpetrating such enormities? Rather we ought not to call such as these men, but lewd wretches (bata/loi), and effeminate (gu/nidej), whose voices are feeble, and whose clothes are womanish both in feel and dye. And such creatures are manifestly shown to be what they are from their external appearance, their clothes, shoes, form, walk, cut of their hair, look. "For from his look shall a man be known," says the Scripture, "from meeting a man the man is known: the dress of a man, the step of his foot, the laugh of his teeth, tell tales of him. For these, for the most part, plucking out therest of their hair, only dress that on the head, all but binding their locks with fillets like women.
As he grows older, he is anointed and rejoices in his beard, on which the prophetic ointment ran down when Aaron was honored. The man who is rightly trained, on whom peace has settled, ought to keep peace with his own hair as well. What, then, will women not do, women who rush into lewdness, when they see men daring such things in front of their mirrors? Better to call these people not men but degenerates and effeminate creatures. Their voices are soft and broken, and their clothing is made womanish by its feel and its dye. Such people are exposed for what they are by outward things: their cloak, their shoes, their bearing, their walk, their haircut, their look. For Scripture says, “A man will be known by his look, and a person will be known by meeting him. A man’s clothing, the step of his foot, and the laughter of his teeth will tell about him.” These men, even though they fight hard against every other kind of hair, tend only the hair on their heads, and almost bind up their locks in hairnets like women.
Lions glory in their shaggy hair, but are armed by their hair in the fight; and boars even are made imposing by their mane; the hunters are afraid of them when they see them bristling their hair. "The fleecy sheep are loaded with their wool. And their wool the loving Father has made abundant for thy use, O man, having taught thee to sheer their fleeces. Of the nations, the Celts and Scythians wear their hair long, but do not deck themselves. The bushy hair of the barbarian has something fearful in it; and its auburn (canqo/n) colour threatens war, the hue being somewhat akin to blood. Both these barbarian races hate luxury. As clear witnesses will be produced by the German, the Rhine; and by the Scythian, the waggon. Sometimes the Scythian despises even the waggon: its size seems sumptuousness to the barbarian; and leaving its luxurious ease, the Scythian man leads a frugal life. For a house sufficient, and less encumbered than the waggon, he takes his horse, and mounting it, is borne where he wishes. And when faint with hunger, he asks his horse for sustenance; and he offers his veins, and supplies his master with all he possesses-his blood. To the nomad the horse is at once conveyance and sustenance;
Lions are proud of their shaggy manes, but their hair arms them for battle. Boars too are proud of their bristly crest, but hunters fear them when they bristle their hair. Woolly sheep are weighed down with their fleeces, but even their hair the Father, who loves humanity, made abundant for your service, O man, having taught you to shear the fleece. Among the nations, the Celts and the Scythians wear their hair long, but they do not dress it up. The thick hair of the barbarian has something fearful about it, and its yellow color threatens war, since the color is akin to blood. Both these barbarian peoples have hated luxury. The German will offer the Rhine as a clear witness, and the Scythian his wagon. The Scythian sometimes even despises the wagon (the barbarian thinks a large one a sign of wealth), and leaving luxury behind, he lives simply. A Scythian takes a horse, a self-sufficient home, lighter to carry than the wagon, and mounts it and is carried wherever he likes. When he is faint with hunger, he asks the horse for food. The horse offers its veins, and gives its master the only thing it has, its blood. So for the nomad the horse becomes both transport and food.
and the warlike youth of the Arabians (these are other nomads) are mounted on camels. They sit on breeding camels; and these feed and run at the same time, carrying their masters the whilst, and bear the house with them. And if drink fail the barbarians, they milk them; and after that their food is spent, they do not spare even their blood, as is reported of furious wolves. And these, gentler than the barbarians, when injured, bear no remembrance of the wrong, but sweep bravely over the desert, carrying and nourishing their masters at the same time. Perish, then, the savage beasts whose food is blood! For it is unlawful for men, whose body is nothing but flesh elaborated of blood, to touch blood. For human blood has become a partaker of the Word: it is a participant of grace by the Spirit; and if any one injure him, he will not escape unnoticed.
Among the Arabs (another nomadic people), the fighting men ride camels. They mount camels that are pregnant. These graze and run at the same time, carrying their masters and bearing their household along with them. If the barbarians run out of drink, they milk the camels. When that food is used up, they do not spare even the blood, like wolves in a frenzy, as people say. Yet the camels, which are gentler than the barbarians, bear no grudge when wronged. They run boldly across the desert, carrying and feeding their masters at once. So let those guardian beasts perish, whose food is blood! For it is not right for human beings to touch blood, since their body is nothing but flesh nourished by blood. Human blood shares in the Word, and takes part in grace through the Spirit. If anyone wrongs it, it will not go unnoticed.
Man may, though naked in body, address the Lord. But I approve the simplicity of the barbarians: loving an unencumbered life, the barbarians have abandoned luxury. Such the Lord calls us to be-naked of finery, naked of vanity, wrenched from our sins, bearing only the wood of life, aiming only at salvation.
Even naked, stripped of outward show, a person may speak to the Lord. I approve of the plain living of the barbarians. They have loved a life free of baggage and have given up luxury. This is what the Lord calls us to be: bare of bad taste, bare of vain glory, torn away from our sins, carrying with us only the wood of life, holding on only to salvation.
With Whom We are to Associate.But really I have unwittingly deviated in spirit from the order, to which I must now revert, and must find fault with having large numbers of domestics. For, avoiding working with their own hands and serving themselves, men have recourse to servants, purchasing a great crowd of fine cooks, and of people to lay out the table, and of others to divide the meat skilfully into pieces. And the staff of servants is separated into many divisions; some labour for their gluttony, Carvers and seasoners, and the compounders and makers of sweetmeats, and honey-cakes, and custards others are occupied with their too numerous clothes; others guard the gold, like griffins; others keep the silver, and wipe the cups, and make ready what is needed to furnish the festive table; others rub down the horses; and a crowd of cup-bearers exert themselves in their service, and herds of beautiful boys, like cattle, from whom they milk away their beauty.
With Whom We Are to Associate. But I had unawares sailed past the order of my subject in my thoughts. I must run back to it and rebuke the great number of household slaves that people keep. They avoid working for themselves and serving themselves, so they take refuge in servants. They buy up a great crowd of cooks, of table-setters, and of men who skillfully cut up the meat into portions. Their service is divided into many branches. Some labor over their gluttony: the carvers, the seasoners, and those who prepare and make the pastries, the honey-cakes and the soups. Others busy themselves with their excessive wardrobes. Others guard their gold like griffins. Others look after the silver, polish the cups, and get ready the equipment for banquets. Others groom the pack animals. A crowd of cupbearers is trained in their houses, along with herds of handsome young boys, like livestock, from whom they milk out their beauty.
And male and female assistants at the toilet are employed about the ladies-some for the mirrors, some for the head-dresses, others for the combs. Many are eunuchs; and these panders serve without suspicion those that wish to be free to enjoy their pleasures, because of the belief that they are unable to indulge in lust. But a true eunuch is not one who is unable, but one who is unwilling, to indulge in pleasure. The Word, testifying by the prophet Samuel to the Jews, who had transgressed when the people asked for a king, promised not a loving lord, but threatened to give them a self-willed and voluptuous tyrant, "who shall," He says, "take your daughters to be perfumers, and cooks, and bakers," ruling by the law of war, not desiring a peaceful administration. And there are many Celts, who bear aloft on their shoulders women's litters. But workers in wool, and spinners, and weavers, and female work and housekeeping, are nowhere. But those who impose on the women, spend the day with them, telling them silly amatory stories, and wearing out body and soul with their false acts and words.
Male and female hairdressers attend the women, some with the mirrors, some with the hairnets, others with the combs. There are many eunuchs too, and they act as go-betweens. Because they are believed to be unable to enjoy pleasure, they serve those who wish to indulge themselves without raising suspicion. But a true eunuch is not the man who is unable, but the man who is unwilling, to enjoy pleasure. Now the Word, through the prophet Samuel, bore witness against those Jews who had transgressed when the people asked for a king. He did not promise them a kindly lord. He threatened them with a headstrong, self-indulgent tyrant, who “will take your daughters,” he says, “to be perfumers, cooks and bakers.” Such a king rules by the law of war and has no zeal for peaceful government. Many Celts lift the women’s litters high and carry them on their shoulders. But there is nowhere any wool-working, spinning, weaving, women’s work in the women’s quarters, or housekeeping. Instead those who falsify the women spend all day with them, chattering about love stories, and wear down their bodies and souls with false work and false talk.
"Thou shalt not be with many," it is said, "for evil, nor give thyself to a multitude; " for wisdom shows itself among few, but disorder in a multitude. But it is not for grounds of propriety, on account of not wishing to be seen, that they purchase bearers, for it were commendable if out of such feelings they put themselves under a covering; but it is out of luxuriousness that they are carried on their domestics' shoulders, and desire to make a show. So, opening the curtain, and looking keenly round on all that direct their eyes towards them, they show their manners; and often bending forth from within, disgrace this superficial propriety by their dangerous restlessness. "Look not round," it is said, "in the streets of the city, and wander not in its lonely places. For that is, in truth, a lonely place, though there be a crowd of the licentious in it, where no wise man is present. And these women are carried about over the temples, sacrificing and practising divination day by day, spending their time with fortune-tellers, and begging priests, and disreputable old women; and they keep up old wives' whisperings over their cups, learning charms and incantations from soothsayers, to the ruin of the nuptial bonds.
“You shall not be with many for evil,” it says, “nor add yourself to a crowd.” For wisdom shows itself among the few, but disorder among the many. These women do not buy bearers out of modesty, from not wanting to be looked at. That would be commendable, if they sought the covering with that attitude. They are carried by their servants out of pampered luxury, eager to put on a show. So they pull back the curtain and look sharply around at those who gaze at them, and they prove what their character is. Often they even lean out from inside, and by their unsteady curiosity they disgrace their surface show of modesty. “Do not look around in the streets of the city,” it says, “and do not wander in its deserted places.” For a place is truly deserted, even if there is a crowd of dissolute people, where no self-controlled person is present. These women are carried around the temples, offering sacrifices and consulting oracles. Every day they parade along with beggar-priests, beggar-priests of the Mother goddess, and scurrilous old women who ruin households. They put up with the old women’s whispering over the cups, and they learn love potions and spells from sorcerers, to the destruction of marriages.
And some men they keep; by others they are kept; and others are promised them by the diviners. They know not that they are cheating themselves, and giving up themselves as a vessel of pleasure to those that wish to indulge in wantonness; and exchanging their purity for the foulest outrage, they think what is the most shameful ruin a great stroke of business. And there are many ministers to this meretricious licentiousness, insinuating themselves, one from one quarter, another from another. For the licentious rush readily into uncleanness, like swine rushing to that part of the hold of the ship which is depressed. Whence the Scripture most strenuously exhorts, "Introduce not every one into thy house, for the snares of the crafty are many. And in another place, "Let just men be thy guests, and in the fear of the Lord let thy boast remain. Away with fornication. "For know this well," says the apostle, "that no fornicator, or unclean person, or covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God. But these women delight in intercourse with the effeminate. And crowds of abominable creatures (kinai/dej) flow in, of unbridled tongue, filthy in body, filthy in language; men enough for lewd offices, ministers of adultery, giggling and whispering, and shamelessly making through their noses sounds of lewdness and fornication to provoke lust, endeavouring to please by lewd words and attitudes, inciting to laughter, the precursor of fornication. And sometimes, when inflamed by any provocation, either these fornicators, or those that follow the rabble of abominable creatures to destruction, make a sound in their nose like a frog, as if they had got anger dwelling in their nostrils.
Some of the men they already have, others they pray for, and others the diviners promise them. They do not realize they are being deceived. They hand themselves over as an instrument of pleasure to anyone who wants to indulge his lust. They trade their purity for the most shameful abuse, and they count their disgraceful ruin as a business deal. Many serve this prostitute-like lewdness, slipping in from one place or another. The licentious are quick to rush toward debauchery, like pigs on a boat rushing to the end that is sinking. So Scripture warns with great force: “Do not bring every man into your house, for the traps of the deceitful are many.” Elsewhere it says: “Let righteous men be your dinner companions, and in the fear of the Lord your boast will stand.” To the crows with fornication! “For you may be sure of this,” says the apostle, “that every fornicator or covetous person, who is an idolater, has no inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God.” But these women take pleasure in the company of effeminate men. Crowds of loose-tongued perverts slip into the house, foul in body and foul in speech, grown men fit for shameless services, servants of adultery. They giggle and whisper. Through their noses they make lewd, unrestrained snorts that signal lust. They try to please with indecent words and gestures, and they draw out laughter, which comes before fornication. Sometimes, when some passing anger inflames them, they are fornicators themselves, or devoted followers of the crowd of perverts to their own destruction. Then they snort through the nose like frogs, as if bile lived in their nostrils.
But those who are more refined than these keep Indian birds and Median pea-fowls, and recline with peak-headed creatures; playing with satyrs, delighting in monsters. They laugh when they hear Thersites; and these women, purchasing Thersiteses highly valued, pride themselves not in their husbands, but in those wretches which are a burden on the earth, and overlook the chaste widow, who is of far higher value than a Melitaean pup, and look askance at a just old man, who is lovelier in my estimation than a monster purchased for money. And though maintaining parrots and curlews, they do not receive the orphan child; but they expose children that are born at home, and take up the young of birds, and prefer irrational to rational creatures; although they ought to undertake the maintenance of old people with a character for sobriety, who are fairer in my mind than apes, and capable of uttering something better than nightingales; and to set before them that saying, "He that pitieth the poor lendeth to the Lord; " and this, "In as much as ye have done it unto the least of these My brethren, ye have done it to Me. But these, on the other hand, prefer ignorance to wisdom, turning their wealth into stone, that is, into pearls and Indian emeralds. And they squander and throw away their wealth on fading dyes, and bought slaves; like crammed fowls scraping the dung of life. "Poverty," it is said, "humbles a man. By poverty is meant that niggardliness by which the rich are poor, having nothing to give away.
But the more refined women raise Indian birds and Median peacocks. They recline at table with deformed, pointy-headed people and play with them, delighted with these satyr-dance freaks. They laugh when they hear about Thersites, yet they buy Thersiteses at high prices. They take pride not in their husbands but in these creatures, who are a burden on the earth. They overlook a chaste widow, who is worth far more than a Maltese lapdog. They look past a righteous old man, who is better looking, I think, than a freak bought with silver. They who raise parrots and plovers will not even take in an orphan child. They expose the babies born in their own homes, but take up the chicks of birds. They prefer creatures without reason to those with reason. They ought instead to support old men who profess self-control, who are better looking than monkeys, I think, and can say something better than nightingales. “As much as you did it to one of these least,” he says, “you did it to me.” But these women, on the contrary, have put lack of training ahead of self-control. They turn their fortunes into stone, into pearls and Indian emeralds. Yes, and they waste and scatter their money on fading dyes and on slaves bought with silver. They are like well-fed hens scratching through the dung heaps of life. “Poverty,” it says, “humbles a man.” By poverty he means stinginess, which makes the rich poor in giving, as though they had nothing.
Behaviour in the Baths.And of what sort are their baths? Houses skilfully constructed, compact, portable, transparent, covered with fine linen. And gold-plated chairs, and silver ones, too, and ten thousand vessels of gold and silver, some for drinking, some for eating, some for bathing, are carried about with them. Besides these, there are even braziers of coals; for they have arrived at such a pitch of self-indulgence, that they sup and get drunk while bathing. And articles of silver with which they make a show, they ostentatiously set out in the baths, and thus display perchance their wealth out of excessive pride, but chiefly the capricious ignorance, through which they brand effeminate men, who have been vanquished by women; proving at least that they themselves cannot meet and cannot sweat without a multitude of vessels, although poor women who have no display equally enjoy their baths.
How to behave at the baths. And what are their baths like? They are built-up rooms, solid yet portable, covered with sheer linen. They have gilded chairs, silver ones too [text missing], and countless vessels of gold and silver. Some are carried along for toasts, some for food, some for bathing. They even have braziers of coals. They have reached such a level of self-indulgence that they dine and get drunk while still bathing. The silver plate that they parade about they set out, in poor taste, in the bathhouses. Perhaps this is to show off their wealth out of excessive vanity. But above all it shows their headstrong lack of training, which lets them denounce unmanly men who are ruled by women. In doing so they show, and in a way prove, that they themselves cannot even sweat without a great collection of equipment. For even poor women, who have no share in the procession, use the same baths.
The dirt of wealth, then, has an abundant covering of censure. With this, as with a bait, they hook the miserable creatures that gape at the glitter of gold. For dazzling thus those fond of display, they artfully try to win the admiration of their lovers, who after a little insult them naked. They will scarce strip before their own husbands affecting a plausible pretence of modesty; but any others who wish, may see them at home shut up naked in their baths. For there they are not ashamed to strip before spectators, as if exposing their persons for sale. But Hesiod advises "Not to wash the skin in the women's bath. The baths are opened promiscuously to men and women; and there they strip for licentious indulgence (for from looking, men get to loving), as if their modesty had been washed away in the bath.
So the grime of excess comes wrapped in plenty of reproach. With this, as with bait, they hook the poor fools who gape at the glitter of gold. By dazzling the tasteless with it, they contrive to be admired by their lovers, who a little later treat them with contempt when they are naked. They would not undress before their own husbands, since they are after a pretended reputation for modesty. Yet anyone else who wishes may see these women, who are kept shut up at home, naked in the baths. There they are not ashamed to strip before spectators, as though before dealers in bodies. Hesiod advises that one should not even wash the skin in a woman’s bath. But the baths are open to men and women together, and there they strip for self-indulgence. “For from seeing, people come to desire,” as though their modesty were washed away in the baths.
Those who have not become utterly destitute of modesty shut out strangers; but bathe with their own servants, and strip naked before their slaves, and are rubbed by them; giving to the crouching menial liberty to lust, by permitting fearless handling. For those who are introduced before their naked mistresses while in the bath, study to strip themselves in order to audacity in lust, casting off fear in consequence of the wicked custom. The ancient athletes ashamed to exhibit a man naked, preserved their modesty by going through the contest in drawers; but these women, divesting themselves of their modesty along with their tunic, wish to appear beautiful, but contrary to their wish are simply proved to be wicked. For through the body itself the wantonness of lust shines clearly; as in the case of dropsical people, the water covered by the skin. Disease in both is known from the look.
Some women are not quite so shameless. They shut out strangers, but they bathe together with their own household servants. They strip naked before their slaves and are rubbed down by them. In this way they give the servant, who has been cowering with his desire, freedom to touch without fear. For the men brought in to attend their naked mistresses at the bath get practice in stripping themselves. By this evil custom they set fear aside and grow bold in their desire. The athletes of old were ashamed to show a man’s naked body, so they competed in loincloths and kept their modesty. But these women take off their shame along with their tunics. They want to look beautiful, but they are shown, against their will, to be wicked all the same. For the body itself most clearly shows the wanton hunger of desire, just as in people with dropsy the water shows beneath the surface of the skin. In both cases the sickness is recognized by the look.
Men, therefore, affording to women a noble example of truth, ought to be ashamed at their stripping before them, and guard against these dangerous sights; "for he who has looked. curiously," it is said, "hath sinned already. At home, therefore, they ought to regard with modesty parents and domestics; in the ways, those they meet; in the baths, women; in solitude, themselves; and everywhere the Word, who is everywhere, "and without Him was not anything. For so only shall one remain without failing, if he regard God as ever present with him.
So men ought to give women a noble example of truth. They should be ashamed to strip in front of women, and they should guard against slippery glances. For Scripture says, “He who has looked too curiously has already sinned.” At home, then, we should show respect to parents and servants. On the streets we should respect those we meet. In the baths we should respect the women. In lonely places we should respect ourselves. And everywhere we should respect the Word, who is everywhere, and “without him not one thing came into being.” For a person will stay free from falling only if he always believes that God is present with him.
The Christian Alone Rich.Riches are then to be partaken of rationally, bestowed lovingly, not sordidly, or pompously; nor is the love of the beautiful to be turned into self-love and ostentation; lest perchance some one say to us, "His horse, or land, or domestic, or gold, is worth fifteen talents; but the man himself is dear at three coppers. Take away, then, directly the ornaments from women, and domestics from masters, and you will find masters in no respect different from bought slaves in step, or look, or voice, so like are they to their slaves. But they differ in that they are feebler than their slaves, and have a more sickly upbringing. This best of maxims, then, ought to be perpetually repeated, "That the good man, being temperate and just," treasures up his wealth in heaven. He who has sold his worldly goods, and given them to the poor, finds the imperishable treasure, "where is neither moth nor robber. Blessed truly is he, "though he be insignificant, and feeble, and obscure; "and he is truly rich with the greatest of all riches. "Though a man, then, be richer than Cinyras and Midas and is wicked," and haughty as he who was luxuriously clothed in purple and fine linen, and despised Lazarus, "he is miserable, and lives in trouble," and shall not live.
Only the Christian is rich. We must take our share of wealth in a worthy way and give from it generously, not in a mean or showy way. We must not let the love of beauty turn into self-love and bad taste. Otherwise someone may say of us, “His horse is worth fifteen talents, or his land, or his servant, or his gold, but the man himself is worth only three coppers.” Take away the women’s finery and the masters’ servants, and you will find the masters no different from slaves who were bought with money: not in the way they walk, or look, or speak. They look just like their slaves. They differ only by being weaker than their servants and having been brought up in a more sickly way. So we should sing this best of teachings on every occasion: the good man, being self-controlled and just, stores up his wealth in heaven. He sells his earthly goods and gives to the poor, and so finds the treasure that cannot perish, where no moth and no thief comes. He is truly blessed, even if he is small, weak and unknown, and he is truly rich with the greatest wealth. But suppose a man is richer than Cinyras and Midas, yet is unjust and proud. He is like the man who lived in luxury in purple and fine linen and looked down on Lazarus. That man is wretched. He lives a painful life, and he will not live.
Wealth seems to me to be like a serpent, which will twist round the hand and bite; unless one knows how to lay hold of it without danger by the point of the tail. And riches, wriggling either in an experienced or inexperienced grasp, are dexterous at adhering and biting; unless one, despising them, use them skilfully, so as to crush the creature by the charm of the Word, and himself escape unscathed. But, as is reasonable, he alone, who possesses what is worth most, turns out truly rich, though not recognised as such. And it is not jewels, or gold, or clothing, or beauty of person, that are of high value, but virtue; which is the Word given by the Instructor to be put in practice. This is the Word, who abjures luxury, but calls self-help as a servant, and praises frugality, the progeny of temperance. "Receive," he says, "instruction, and not silver, and knowledge rather than tested gold; for Wisdom is better than precious stones, nor is anything that is valuable equal in worth to her. And again: "Acquire me rather than gold, and precious stones, and silver; for my produce is better than choice silver. But if we must distinguish, let it be granted that he is rich who has many possessions, loaded with gold like a dirty purse; but the righteous alone is graceful, because grace is order, observing a due and decorous measure in managing and distributing. "For there are those who sow and reap more," of whom it is written, "He hath dispersed, he hath given to the poor; his righteousness endureth for ever. So that it is not he who has and keeps, but he who gives away, that is rich; and it is giving away, not possession, which renders a man happy; and the fruit of the Spirit is generosity. It is in the soul, then, that riches are.
Wealth seems to me to be like a snake. If someone does not know how to pick it up safely, by holding the creature up at a distance by the tip of its tail, it will wind around his hand and bite. Wealth is just as dangerous as it wriggles. Whether the hand that grips it is skilled or unskilled, it is quick to cling and bite. The only safe way is to look down on it with a great mind and to use it with knowledge. Then, by the charm of the Word, a person can subdue the creature and remain unharmed himself. But it seems that the man who owns the things of greater worth is rich without anyone noticing. And the things of great value are not stone, or silver, or clothing, or bodily beauty. They are virtue, which is the Word handed on through the Instructor to be put into practice. This is the Word who swears off luxury. He calls self-reliant work to serve us, and he sings the praises of simple living, the child of self-control. “Take instruction,” he says, “and not silver, and knowledge rather than tested gold. For wisdom is better than costly stones, and nothing precious is worth as much as she is.” And again: “Gain me as your fruit rather than gold and precious stone and silver. For my produce is better than choice silver.” But if we must make a distinction, let the man with many possessions be called “rich,” stuffed with gold like a filthy bag. The just man, though, is the one who is “well-formed.” For good form is a right order, measured in how one manages and gives. “For there are those who sow and gather more,” and of such a man it is written, “He scattered, he gave to the poor; his righteousness remains for ever.” So the rich man is not the one who has and keeps, but the one who shares. It is the giving, not the owning, that shows a man to be blessed. Generosity is the fruit of the soul. So real wealth lies in the soul.
Let it, then, be granted that good things are the property only of good men; and Christians are good. Now, a fool or a libertine can neither have any perception of what is good, nor obtain possession of it. Accordingly, good things are possessed by Christians alone. And nothing is richer than these good things; therefore these alone are rich. For righteousness is true riches; and the Word is more valuable than all treasure, not accruing from cattle and fields, but given by God-riches which cannot be taken away. The soul alone is its treasure. It is the best possession to its possessor, rendering man truly blessed. For he whose it is to desire nothing that is not in our power, and to obtain by asking from God what he piously desires, does he not possess much, nay all, having God as his everlasting treasure? "To him that asks," it is said, "shall be given, and to him that knocketh it shall be opened. If God denies nothing, all things belong to the godly.
Let it be granted, then, that good things can be possessed only by good people, and Christians are good. A foolish or self-indulgent person could neither perceive what is good nor obtain it. So good things can be possessed by Christians alone. Nothing is richer than these good things, so Christians alone are rich. For true wealth is righteousness, and the Word, more precious than any treasure. This wealth does not grow from flocks and fields but is given by God. It cannot be taken away, and the soul alone is its treasure house. It is the best possession for its owner, and it makes a person truly blessed. Think of the man who desires nothing that is not in our power, who gets what he desires, and who receives from God, by asking, whatever he rightly longs for. Is he not rich in possessions, indeed in everything, when he has God as his everlasting treasure? “To the one who asks,” it says, “it will be given, and to the one who knocks it will be opened.” If God refuses nothing, then everything belongs to the godly person.
Frugality a Good Provision for the Christian.Delicacies spent on pleasures become a dangerous shipwreck to men; for this voluptuous and ignoble life of the many is alien to true love for the beautiful and to refined pleasures. For man is by nature an erect and majestic being, aspiring after the good as becomes the creature of the One. But the life which crawls on its belly is destitute of dignity, is scandalous, hateful, ridiculous. And to the divine nature voluptuousness is a thing most alien; for this is for a man to be like sparrows in feeding, and swine and goats in lechery. For to regard pleasure as a good thing, is the sign of utter ignorance of what is excellent. Love of wealth displaces a man from the right mode of life, and induces him to cease from feeling shame at what is shameful; if only, like a beast, he has power to eat all sorts of things, and to drink in like manner, and to satiate in every way his lewd desires.
Luxury that wanders off into pleasures becomes a terrible shipwreck for people. For this pleasant but inglorious life of the many is foreign to true love of what is beautiful and to refined pleasures. By nature a human being is a lofty and proud creature who seeks what is noble, since he is the work of the One who alone is noble. But a life lived for the belly is undignified, disgraceful, ugly and laughable. Love of pleasure is most foreign to the divine nature: to eat like sparrows, and to mate like pigs and goats. To think pleasure a good is the mark of complete lack of taste for what is truly excellent. Love of money, too, drives a person from the right way of living. It persuades him to feel no shame at shameful things, “so long as he has the power, like a beast, to eat all kinds of food, to drink in the same way, and to take his fill of sexual pleasure in every way.”
And so very rarely does he inherit the kingdom of God. For what end, then, are such dainty dishes prepared, but to fill one belly? The filthiness of gluttony is proved by the sewers into which our bellies discharge the refuse of our food. For what end do they collect so many cupbearers, when they might satisfy themselves with one cup? For what the chests of clothes? and the gold ornaments for what? Those things are prepared for clothes-stealers, and scoundrels, and for greedy eyes. "But let alms and faith not fail thee," says the Scripture. Look, for instance, to Elias the Thesbite, in whom we have a beautiful example of frugality, when he sat down beneath the thorn, and the angel brought him food. "It was a cake of barley and a jar of water. Such the Lord sent as best for him.
For this reason such a person very rarely inherits the kingdom of God. Why, then, are so many dishes prepared, except to fill a single belly? The sewers prove the filthiness of gluttony, for our bellies spit out into them the leftovers of the feast. Why do they gather so many cupbearers, when one cup would be enough to fill them? Why the chests of clothing? Why the gold? Why the ornaments? These things are made ready for clothes-thieves and criminals, and for greedy eyes. “Let acts of mercy and faithfulness not forsake you,” says the Scripture. Look, we have in Elijah the Tishbite a fine example of frugality, when he “sat down under the broom tree” and the angel brought him food: “there was a barley loaf baked in the ashes and a flask of water.” That was the meal the Lord sent him.
We, then, on our journey to the truth, must be unencumbered. "Carry not," said the Lord, "purse, nor scalp, nor shoes; " that is, possess not wealth, which is only treasured up in a purse; fill not your own stores, as if laying up produce in a bag, but communicate to those who have need. Do not trouble yourselves about horses and servants, who, as bearing burdens when the rich are travelling, are allegorically called shoes. We must, then, cast away the multitude of vessels, silver and gold drinking cups, and the crowd of domestics, receiving as we have done from the Instructor the fair and grave attendants, Self-help and Simplicity. And we must walk suitably to the Word; and if there be a wife and children, the house is not a burden, having learned to change its place along with the sound-minded traveller. The wife who loves her husband must be furnished for travel similarly to her husband. A fair provision for the journey to heaven is theirs who bear frugality with chaste gravity. And as the foot is the measure of the shoe, so also is the body of what each individual possesses. But that which is superfluous, what they call ornaments and the furniture Of the rich, is a burden, not an ornament to the body.
As we travel toward the truth, then, we must travel light. “Do not carry,” said the Lord, “a purse, a bag, or sandals.” That is: do not acquire wealth that is merely stored up in a purse. Do not fill your own storehouses, as if you were packing grain into a bag, but share with those in need. Do not busy yourselves with pack animals and servants, who carry the burdens of the rich on their journey and are called “sandals” in a figurative sense. So we must throw away the great mass of household goods, the silver and gold drinking cups, and the crowd of servants. In their place we take from the Instructor two fine and dignified companions, self-help and simplicity. We must walk in step with the Word, even if a man has a wife and children. A household is no burden when it has learned to follow a self-controlled traveler. The wife who loves her husband must be equipped like him for the road. Both of them carry simplicity along with one chaste dignity, a good provision for the journey to heaven. As the foot is the measure of the sandal, so each person’s body is the measure of what he should own. What goes beyond that, what people call “ornaments,” and the furnishings of the rich, is a burden and no adornment to the body.
He who climbs to the heavens by force, must carry with him the fair staff of beneficence, and attain to the true rest by communicating to those who are in distress. For the Scripture avouches, "that the true riches of the soul are a man's ransom," that is, if he is rich, he will be saved by distributing it. For as gushing wells, when pumped out, rise again to their former measure, so giving away, being the benignant spring of love, by communicating of its drink to the thirsty, again increases and is replenished, just as the milk is wont to flow into the breasts that are sucked or milked. For he who has the almighty God, the Word, is in want of nothing, and never is in straits for what he needs. For the Word is a possession that wants nothing, and is the cause of all abundance. If one say that he has often seen the righteous man in need of food, this is rare, and happens only where there is not another righteous man. Notwithstanding let him read what follows: "For the righteous man shall not live by bread alone, but by the word of the Lord," who is the true bread, the bread of the heavens.
Whoever is pressing hard to climb up into the heavens must carry about the good staff of doing good, and by sharing with those in distress, take his share of true rest. For Scripture agrees that “a man’s own wealth is the ransom of his soul.” That is, if he is rich, he will be saved by giving to others. Think of wells that naturally flow freely: when they are drawn down, they rise again to their former level. In the same way giving is a good spring of kindness to people. When it shares drink with the thirsty, it grows and fills again, just as milk usually flows into breasts that are nursed or milked. For the one who has the Word, the almighty God, lacks nothing and is never at a loss for anything he needs. The Word is a possession that lacks nothing, and the cause of all plenty. Someone may say he has often seen a righteous man short of bread. That is rare, and happens only where there is no other righteous man around. Even so, let him read this as well: “For the righteous man will not live on bread alone, but by the word of the Lord.” That Word is the true bread, the bread of the heavens.
The good man, then, can never be in difficulties so long as he keeps intact his confession towards God. For it appertains to him to ask and to receive whatever he requires from the Father of all; and to enjoy what is his own, if he keep the Son. And this also appertains to him, to feel no want. This Word, who trains us, confers on us the true riches. Nor is the growing rich an object of envy to those who possess through Him the privilege of wanting nothing. He that has this wealth shall inherit the kingdom of God.
The good man, then, is never in need, as long as he keeps his confession of God sound. For he may ask and receive from the Father of all whatever he needs, and enjoy what is his own, if he keeps the Son. He may also feel no want at all. This Word, who is our instructor, gives us riches, and there is no envy in being rich for those who gain, through him, freedom from want. Whoever has this wealth will inherit the kingdom of God.
Similitudes and Examples a Most Important Part of Right Instruction.And if any one of you shall entirely avoid luxury, he will, by a frugal upbringing, train himself to the endurance of involuntary labours, by employing constantly voluntary afflictions as training exercises for persecutions; so that when he comes to compulsory labours, and fears, and griefs, he will not be unpractised in endurance. Wherefore we have no country on earth, that we may despise earthly possessions. And frugality is in the highest degree rich, being equal to unfailing expenditure, bestowed on what is requisite, and to the degree requisite. For has the meaning of expenses. How a husband is to live with his wife, and respecting self-help, and housekeeping, and the employment of domestics; and further, with respect to the time of marriage, and what is suitable for wives, we have treated in the discourse concerning marriage. What pertains to disciplane alone is reserved now for description, as we delineate the life of Christians.
Similitudes and examples are a very important part of right instruction. If any of you avoids luxury to the end, nursing yourself on simple living, you will find it easier to bear hardships you do not choose. By constantly making voluntary troubles your exercises for persecutions, you will not be untrained in endurance when you come to unavoidable hardships, fears and griefs. This is why we have no homeland on earth: so that we may look down on earthly possessions. Simplicity is the richest condition, since it never runs short in spending, when money is spent on what it should be, and as much as it should be. For expenses are “charges” (tele). How a wife should live with her husband, and about doing one’s own work, housekeeping and the use of servants, and also about the proper time for marriage and what suits women, we will go through in our discourse on marriage. Here we must set down only what belongs to instruction, sketching in outline the life of Christians.
The most indeed has been already said, and laid down in the form of disciplinary rules. What still remains we shall subjoine; for examples are of no small moment in determining to salvation. See, says the tragedy, "The consort of Ulysses was not killed By Telemachus; for she did not take a husband in addition to a husband, But in the house the marriage-bed remains unpolluted. Reproaching foul adultery, he showed the fair image of chastity in affection to her husband. The Lacedaemonians compelling the Helots, their servants (Helots is the name of their servants), to get drunk, exhibited their drunken pranks before themselves, who were temperate, for cure and correction. Observing, accordingly, their unseemly behaviour, in order that they themselves might not fall into like censurable conduct, they trained themselves, turning the reproach of the drunkards to the advantage of keeping themselves free from fault. For some men being instructed are saved; and others, self-taught, either aspire after or seek virtue.
Most things have now been said and taught. What remains I will add, since examples are no small weight toward salvation. See what the tragedy says: “Telemachus did not kill the wife of Odysseus; for she did not marry husband upon husband, but the bed stayed sound in the house.” In rebuking shameless adultery, the poet held up a fine picture of chastity, love for one’s husband. And the Spartans made the Helots (Helots is the name of their slaves) drink to excess. They showed their own sober men the deeds of drunkenness, as a kind of cure and correction. Watching the Helots’ disgraceful behavior, so as not to fall into the same condemnation, the Spartans were trained, and benefited by the shame of the drunkards to keep themselves free from fault. For some people were saved by being taught, and others by teaching themselves; they either pursued virtue eagerly or searched for it.
"He truly is the best of all who himself perceives all things. Such is Abraham, who sought God. "And good, again, is he who obeys him who advises well. Such are those disciples who obeyed the Word. Wherefore the former was called "friend," the latter "apostles; "the one diligently seeking, and the other preaching one and the same God.And both are peoples, and both these have hearers, the one who is profited through seeking, the other who is saved through finding. "But whoever neither himself perceives, nor, hearing another, Lays to heart-he is a worthless man. The other people is the Gentile-useless; this is the people that followeth not Christ. Nevertheless the Instructor, lover of man, helping in many ways, partly exhorts, partly upbraids. Others having sinned, He shows us their baseness, and exhibits the punishment consequent upon it, alluring while admonishing, planning to dissuade us in love from evil, by the exhibition of those who have suffered from it before. By which examples He very manifestly checked those who had been evil-disposed, and hindered those who were daring like deeds; and others He brought to a foundation of patience; others He stopped from wickedness; and others He cured by the contemplation of what is like, bringing them over to what is better.
“Best of all is the man who works out everything for himself.” That is Abraham, who sought God. “Good also is the man who obeys one who speaks well.” These are the disciples who were persuaded by the Word. So the one was called a friend, and the others apostles. The one busied himself in search, the others preached, one and the same God. Both are good. Their hearers are of two kinds: one is helped through searching, the other saved through finding. “But whoever neither understands for himself nor takes to heart what he hears from another, he is a useless man.” This is the people who do not follow Christ. Yet the loving Instructor helps in many ways. Some things he urged, some he rebuked. When others sinned, he showed us their shame, and made plain the punishment that followed. In this he both led our souls and warned us, devising a kindly way to turn us from evil by showing what others had suffered before. By these pictures he plainly stopped some who were in a bad state, and held back those who dared the same things. He built others up in endurance, and made others stop their wickedness. Others he healed, when they changed for the better by looking at their like.
For who, when following one in the way, and then on the former falling into a pit, would not guard against incurring equal danger, by taking care not to follow him in his slip? What athlete, again, who has learned the way to glory, and has seen the combatant who had preceded him receiving the prize, does not exert himself for the crown, imitating the eider one? Such images of divine wisdom are many; but I shall mention one instance, and expound it in a few words. The fate of the Sodomites was judgment to those who had done wrong, instruction to those who hear. The Sodomites having, through much luxury, fallen into uncleanness, practising adultery shamelessly, and burning with insane love for boys; the All-seeing Word, whose notice those who commit impieties cannot escape, cast His eye on them. Nor did the sleepless guard of humanity observe their licentiousness in silence; but dissuading us from the imitation of them, and training us up to His own temperance, and falling on some sinners, lest lust being unavenged, should break loose from all the restraints of fear, ordered Sodom to be burned, pouting forth a little of the sagacious fire on licentiousness; lest lust, through want of punishment, should throw wide the gates to those that were rushing into voluptuousness.
Who, when following someone along a road, would not take care, if the man ahead fell into a pit, to turn aside from the same danger, guarding against following him into his sin? Again, what athlete in training has learned the way to glory and seen the competitor before him win the prize, and does not himself race for the crown, imitating the older man? There are many such pictures in divine wisdom. But I will mention one example and set it out briefly. The suffering of the Sodomites was a judgment on those who did wrong, and instruction for those who heard of it. The Sodomites, through great luxury, ran aground on licentiousness. They committed adultery without fear and were wildly inflamed with passion for boys. The all-seeing Word looked on them. Those who do unholy things cannot hide from him, and the sleepless guardian of humanity did not keep silent about their licentiousness. He wanted to turn us away from imitating them and to train us toward his own self-control. So he brought punishment on the sinners, so that lust going unpunished should not gain a flood of impunity. He ordered Sodom to be burned, pouring out a little of that wise fire on their lack of restraint. Otherwise their lust, grown unchecked, would have thrown wide the gates for those rushing toward pleasure.
Accordingly, the just punishment of the Sodomites became to men an image of the salvation which is well calculated for men. For those who have not committed like sins with those who are punished, will never receive a like punishment. By guarding against sinning, we guard against suffering. "For I would have you know," says Jude, "that God, having once saved His people from the land of Egypt, afterwards destroyed them that believed not; and the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, He hath reserved to the judgment of the great day, in everlasting chains under darkness of the savage angels. And a little after he sets forth, in a most instructive manner, representations of those that are judged: "Woe unto them, for they have gone in the way of Cain, and run greedily after the error of Balaam, and perished in the gainsaying of Core. For those, who cannot attain the privilege of adoption, fear keeps from growing insolent.
So the just punishment of the Sodomites became, for people, a picture of salvation that is reasonable. Those who have not sinned as the punished did would never suffer the same penalty as those sinners, since by not sinning they are kept from suffering. “For I want you to know,” says Jude, “that God, having once saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterwards destroyed those who did not believe. And the angels who did not keep their own rank but left their proper dwelling, he has kept in eternal chains under darkness for the judgment of the great day.” Then, a little further on, he sets out in a very instructive way the pictures of those who are judged: “Woe to them, for they have gone the way of Cain, have poured themselves out in the error of Balaam, and have perished in the rebellion of Korah.” For fear keeps from insolence those who cannot bear the freedom of adoption as sons.
For punishments and threats are for this end, that fearing the penalty we may abstain from sinning. I might relate to you punishments for ostentation, and punishments for vainglory, not only for licentiousness; and adduce the censures pronounced on those whose hearts are bad through wealth, in which censures the Word through fear restrains from evil acts. But sparing prolixity in my treatise, I shall bring forward the following precepts of the Instructor, that you may guard against His threatenings.
This is why there are punishments and threats: so that, fearing the penalties, we may hold back from sinning. I could tell you of the punishments for love of the world and for love of glory, and not only for lack of self-control. I could also set beside them the condemnations of the foolish talk that comes from wealth, in which the Word holds us back from wrongdoing by making us afraid. But to spare the length of this work, I now bring you the next commands of the Instructor, so that you may heed his warnings.
Why We are to Use the Bath.There are, then, four reasons for the bath (for from that point I digressed in my oration), for which we frequent it: for cleanliness, or heat, or health, or lastly, for pleasure. Bathing for pleasure is to be omitted. For unblushing pleasure must be cut out by the roots; and the bath is to be taken by women for cleanliness and health, by men for health alone. To bathe for the sake of heat is a superfluity, since one may restore what is frozen by the cold in other ways. Constant use of the bath, too, impairs strength and relaxes the physical energies, and often induces debility and fainting. For in a way the body drinks, like trees, not only by the mouth, but also over the whole body in bathing, by what they call the pores.
Why the bath is to be used. Now, to return to the point where I turned aside: there are four reasons why we go to the bath. These are cleanliness, warmth, health, and lastly pleasure. Bathing for pleasure must be set aside, for shameless pleasure must be cut out by the roots. Women should take the bath for cleanliness and health; men for health alone. Bathing for warmth is unnecessary, since a body stiff with cold can be comforted in other ways. Constant use of the bath wears down strength and loosens the body’s natural tone, and it often brings on weakness and fainting. For in a certain way bodies drink, like trees, not only through the mouth but also through the opening of the pores over the whole body in the bath, as they say.
In proof of this often people, when thirsty, by going afterwards into the water, have assuaged their thirst. Unless, then, the bath is for some use, we ought not to indulge in it. The ancients called them places for fulling men, since they wrinkle men's bodies sooner than they ought, and by cooking them, as it were, compel them to become prematurely old. The flesh, like iron, being softened by the heat, hence we require cold, as it were, to temper and give an edge. Nor must we bathe always; but if one is a little exhausted, or, on the other hand, filled to repletion, the bath is to be forbidden, regard being had to the age of the body and the season of the year. For the bath is not beneficial to all, or always, as those who are skilled in these things own. But due proportion, which on all occasions we call as our helper in life, suffices for us. For we must not so use the bath as to require an assistant, nor are we to bathe constantly and often in the day as we frequent the market-place.
Here is the proof: people who are thirsty have often gone into the water and so cured their thirst. So even if the bath is useful for some purpose, we should not give ourselves up to it. The ancients called baths “places for fulling people,” since they wear out the body into rags and force it to grow old sooner than it should. They boil the body, as it were, and the flesh is softened by the heat like iron. So we then need cold water, like the dipping and tempering of the metal. Nor should we bathe every time we can. If someone is very empty, or on the other hand overfull, he should avoid the bath, and he should also consider the age of his body and the season of the year. For the bath does not benefit everyone, or at all times, as the experts in these matters agree. For us moderation is enough, which we call on everywhere as a help in life. We should not spend so long at the bath that we need someone to lead us by the hand, nor bathe constantly and many times a day, as if going to the marketplace.
But to have the water poured over us by several people is an outrage on our neighbours, through fondness for luxuriousness, and is done by those who will not understand that the bath is common to all the bathers equally. But most of all is it necessary to wash the soul in the cleansing Word (sometimes the body too, on account of the dirt which gathers and grows to it, sometimes also to relieve fatigue). "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! saith the Lord, "for ye are like to whited sepulchres. Without, the sepulchre appears beautiful, but within it is full of dead men's bones and all uncleanness. And again He says to the same people, "Woe unto you! for ye cleanse the outside of the cup and platter, but within are full of uncleanness. Cleanse first the inside of the cup, that the outside may be clean also. The best bath, then, is what rubs off the pollution of the soul, and is spiritual. Of which prophecy speaks expressly: "The Lord will wash away the filth of the sons and daughters of Israel, and will purge the blood from the midst of them" -the blood of crime and the murders of the prophets. And the mode of cleansing, the Word subjoined, saying, "by the spirit of judgment and the spirit of burning. The bathing which is carnal, that is to say, of the body, is accomplished by water alone, as often in the country where there is not a bath.
It is also an outrage against our neighbors to have several servants pour water over us. Such people grab more than their share out of love of luxury, and refuse to understand that the bath is equally common to all who bathe. Above all we should wash the soul with the cleansing Word. The body we wash sometimes because of the dirt that grows on it, and sometimes also to ease weariness. “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites,” says the Lord, “for you are like whitewashed tombs. Outwardly the tomb looks beautiful, but inside it is full of dead men’s bones and all uncleanness.” And again he says to the same people: “Woe to you, because you clean the outside of the cup and the dish, but inside they are full of uncleanness. First clean the inside of the cup, so that the outside may be clean too.” The best bath, then, scrubs the filth from the soul, and it is spiritual. Of this the prophecy says plainly: “The Lord will wash away the filth of the sons and daughters of Israel, and will cleanse the blood from their midst.” This means the blood of lawlessness and the murders of the prophets. And the Word went on to name the manner of the cleansing: “by a spirit of judgment and a spirit of burning.” The bodily, fleshly washing, by contrast, is done with water alone, as often happens in the country, where there is no bath.
The Exercises Suited to a Good Life.The gymnasium is sufficient for boys, even if a bath is within reach. And even for men to prefer gymnastic exercises by far to the baths, is perchance not bad, since they are in some respects conducive to the health of young men, and produce exertion-emulation to aim at not only a healthy habit of body, but courageousness of soul. When this is done without dragging a man away from better employments, it is pleasant, and not unprofitable. Nor are women to be deprived of bodily exercise. But they are not to be encouraged to engage in wrestling or running, but are to exercise themselves in spinning, and weaving, and superintending the cooking if necessary. And they are, with their own hand, to fetch from the store what we require. And it is no disgrace for them to apply themselves to the mill. Nor is it a reproach to a wife-housekeeper and helpmeet-to occupy herself in cooking, so that it may be palatable to her husband.
Those who live by reason should also approve of exercise. For young men the gymnasium is enough, even if a bath is at hand. Indeed, it is perhaps no bad thing for men to choose exercises before baths above all else. They have something useful for the health of the young, and they stir up zeal and ambition to care not only for good physical condition but also for courage of soul. When this is done without being pulled away from better work, it is pleasant and not unprofitable. Women are not to be excluded from bodily exertion either. But they should not be urged toward wrestling and running. Let them exercise by spinning wool, by weaving, and by standing beside the woman who bakes, if need be. Wives should also fetch with their own hands from the storeroom what we need, and there is no shame in their going to the mill. Nor is it a disgrace for a wife who keeps the house and helps her husband to busy herself with the cooking, so that it is pleasing to him.
And if she shake up the couch, reach drink to her husband when thirsty, set food on the table as neatly as possible, and so give herself exercise tending to sound health, the Instructor will approve of a woman like this, who "stretches forth her arms to useful tasks, rests her hands on the distaff, opens her hand to the pool, and extends her wrist to the beggar. She who emulates Sarah is not ashamed of that highest of ministries, helping wayfarers. For Abraham said to her, "Haste, and knead three measures of meal, and make cakes. "And Rachel, the daughter of Laban, came," it is said, "with her father's sheep. Nor was this enough; but to teach humility it is added, "for she fed her father's sheep. And innumerable such examples of frugality and self-help, and also of exercises, are furnished by the Scriptures, In the case of men, let some strip and engage in wrestling;
If she also shakes out the bedding herself, hands a drink to her thirsty husband, and sets food before him, she will be exercising herself most becomingly and for sound health. The Instructor approves of such a wife, who “stretches out her arms to useful tasks, and her hands hold the spindle. She opened her hands to the poor and reached out her fruit to the needy.” She was not ashamed of the finest service, imitating Sarah in waiting on travelers. For Abraham said to her, “Hurry, and knead three measures of fine flour, and make hearth cakes.” “Rachel, the daughter of Laban,” it says, “came with her father’s sheep.” And that was not enough: to teach freedom from pride, the text adds, “for she was feeding her father’s sheep.” The Scriptures offer countless examples of simple living and self-reliance, and also of exercise.
let some play at the small ball, especially the game they call Pheninda, in the sun. To others who walk into the country, or go down into the town, the walk is sufficient exercise. And were they to handle the hoe, this stroke of economy in agricultural labour would not be ungentleman like. I had almost forgot to say that the well-known Pittacus, king of Miletus, practised the laborious exercise of turning the mill. It is respectable for a man to draw water for himself, and to cut billets of wood which he is to use himself. Jacob fed the sheep of Laban that were left in his charge, having as a royal badge "a rod of storax," which aimed by its wood to change and improve nature. And reading aloud is often an exercise to many. But let not such athletic contests, as we have allowed, be undertaken for the sake of vainglory, but for the exuding of manly sweat. Nor are we to straggle with cunning and showiness, but in a stand-up wrestling bout, by disentangling of neck, hands, and sides. For such a struggle with graceful strength is more becoming and manly, being undertaken for the sake of serviceable and profitable health. But let those others, who profess the practice of illiberal postures in gymnastics, be dismissed.
Among men, let some strip and take part in wrestling. Let others play the small-ball game called phaininda, especially in the sun. For others a walk is enough, whether they go out to the country or down into town. If they also take up a hoe, this is no ignoble side-activity: it is economical, and it is farm exercise. I had almost overlooked the famous Pittacus, the king of the Mytileneans, who is said to have used active exercise (the older English says he turned the mill). It is also good to draw water for oneself and to chop the wood one will use. “Jacob was shepherding the rest of Laban’s sheep,” carrying a royal sign, “a rod of storax wood,” and practicing by means of the wood to change nature for the better. For many people, reading aloud is also at times an exercise. As for the wrestling we have approved, let it not be taken up out of useless rivalry, but to bring out a man’s sweat. We should not work at the skilful tricks, the show-off side of it, but at straight wrestling, freeing the neck, hands and sides. Such exercise is more orderly and manly, done with seemly strength for the sake of useful, beneficial health. The other kinds of athletic labor announce training in postures unworthy of free men.
We must always aim at moderation. For as it is best that labour should precede food, So to labour above measure is both very bad, very exhausting, and apt to make us ill. Neither, then, should we be idle altogether, nor completely fatigued. For similarly to what we have laid down with respect to food, are we to do everywhere and with everything. Our mode of life is not to accustom us to voluptuousness and licentiousness, nor to the opposite extreme, but to the medium between these, that which is harmonious and temperate, and free of either evil, luxury and parsimony. And now, as we have also previously remarked, attending to one's own wants is an exercise free of pride,-as, for example, putting on one's own shoes, washing one's own feet, and also rubbing one's self when anointed with oil. To render one who has rubbed you the same service in return, is an exercise of reciprocal justice; and to sleep beside a sick friend, help the infirm, and supply him who is in want, are proper exercises.
We must always aim at the right measure. Just as it is best for work to come before meals, so working beyond the measure is very bad, tiring, and productive of sickness. So we should not be altogether idle, nor completely worn out with toil. As we have explained about food, so in everything and everywhere our way of life should not be turned toward soft living and self-indulgence, nor to the opposite extreme of harshness. It should take the middle course between them, one that is well-tuned, self-controlled, and free of both vices, luxury and stinginess. As we have also said before, doing things for oneself is an exercise that keeps pride away. Examples are putting on one’s own shoes, washing one’s own feet, and rubbing oneself down after being oiled. To give the same service in return, turn and turn about, to the one who has rubbed you is likewise an exercise in shared justice. So too is staying up through the night beside a sick friend, helping one who cannot help himself, and setting food before one in need.
"And Abraham," it is said, "served up for three, dinner under a tree, and waited on them as they ate. The same with fishing, as in the case of Peter, if we have leisure from necessary instructions in the Word. But that is the better enjoyment which the Lord assigned to the disciple, when He taught him to "catch men" as fishes in the water.
“And Abraham,” it says, “set a meal before the three of them under the tree, and stood by them while they ate.” Fishing is also fitting, as with Peter, if we have time to spare from the necessary lessons of the Word. But better is the catch the Lord gave to his disciple, when he taught him to fish for people through water, as one fishes for fish.
A Compendious View of the Christian Life.Wherefore the wearing of gold and the use of softer clothing is not to be entirely prohibited. But irrational impulses must be curbed, lest, carrying us away through excessive relaxation, they impel us to voluptuousness. For luxury, that has dashed on to surfeit, is prone to kick up its heels and toss its mane, and shake off the charioteer, the Instructor; who, pulling back the reins from far, leads and drives to salvation the human horse-that is, the irrational part of the soul-which is wildly bent on pleasures, and vicious appetites, and precious stones, and gold, and variety of dress, and other luxuries. Above all, we are to keep in mind what was spoken sacredly: "Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles; that, whereas they speak against you as evil-doers, they may, by the good works which they behold, glorify God. Clothes. The Instructor permits us, then, to use simple clothing, and of a white colour, as we said before. So that, accommodating ourselves not to variegated art, but to nature as it is produced, and pushing away whatever is deceptive and belies the truth, we may embrace the uniformity and simplicity of the truth.
A Summary Survey of the Best Life. For this reason we need not cut off entirely the wearing of gold or the use of softer clothing. But we must put a bridle on the irrational impulses, so that they do not throw us into soft living by carrying us off in a flood of too much ease. Luxury that has run on into excess is terrible: it leaps about, rears up, and throws off its driver, the Instructor. He, from a distance, pulls back on the reins and leads and drives toward salvation the human horse. That is the irrational part of the soul, which turns wild over pleasures, blameworthy desires, jewels, gold, embroidered clothing and other finery. Above all we should keep in mind what was said in a holy way: “Keep your conduct among the Gentiles good, so that when they slander you as evildoers, they may see your good works and glorify God.” So the Instructor allows us simple clothing, and white in colour, as we said before. We are then not to be at home with what is patterned by artifice, but with what is produced by nature. We should push aside everything deceitful that tells lies against the truth, and embrace the single manner and single face of the truth.
Sophocles, reproaching a youth, says:- "Decked in women's clothes."For, as in the case of the soldier, the sailor, and the ruler, so also the proper dress of the temperate man is what is plain, becoming, and clean. Whence also in the law, the law enacted by Moses about leprousy rejects what has many colours and spots, like the various scales of the snake. He therefore wishes man, no longer decking himself gaudily in a variety of colours, but white all over from the crown of the head to the sole of the foot, to be clean; so that, by a transition from the body, we may lay aside the varied and versatile passions of the man, land love the unvaried, and unambiguous, and simple colour of truth. And he who also in this emulates Moses-Plato best of all-approves of that texture on which not more than a chaste woman's work has been employed. And white colours well become gravity. And elsewhere he says, "Nor apply dyes or weaving, except for warlike decorations. To men of peace and of light, therefore, white is appropriate.
Sophocles, rebuking a soft-living young man, says: “You make a show in clothes that imitate a woman’s.” For as there is a proper dress for a soldier, a sailor and a ruler, so the proper dress for a self-controlled person is one that is unfussy, becoming and clean. For this reason the law about leprosy given through Moses in the Law rejects what is multicoloured and heavily spotted as unholy, since it resembles the mottled scales of the serpent. It wants the person who is no longer decked out in a variety of colours, but has turned wholly white from the top of the head to the soles of the feet, to be clean. Thus, by a change from the body to the mind, we are to let go of the variegated and cunning passion of the mind, and love the plain, unhesitating, simple colour of the truth. In this also Plato, best in everything, shows himself an admirer of Moses. He approves of that kind of weaving which needs no more work than a modest woman can give. He says: “White colours are fitting for dignity, in weaving as elsewhere; but dyes are not to be used, except for the ornaments of war.” So white suits peaceable people, people of light.
As, then, signs, which are very closely allied to causes, by their presence indicate, or rather demonstrate, the existence of the result; as smoke is the sign of fire, and a good complexion and a regular pulse of health; so also clothing of this description shows the character of our habits. Temperance is pure and simple; since purity is a habit which ensures pure conduct unmixed with what is base. Simplicity is a habit which does away with super-fluities. Substantial clothing also, and chiefly what is unfulled, protects the heat which is in the body; not that the clothing has heat in itself, but that it turns back the heat issuing from the body, and refuses it a passage. And whatever heat falls upon it, it absorbs and retains, and being warmed by it, warms in turn the body. And for this reason it is chiefly to be worn in winter. It also (temperance) is contented. And contentment is a habit which dispenses with super-fluities, and, that there may be no failure, is receptive of what suffices for the healthful and blessed life according to the Word.
Signs that stand closest to their causes show the presence of the cause, or rather prove the existence of what produced them. Smoke shows fire, and good colour and a strong pulse show health. In the same way, among us, this kind of clothing displays the settled state of our character. Self-control is clean and plain. Cleanness is a condition that provides for a pure way of life, unmixed with anything shameful. Plainness is a condition that removes what is excessive. Sturdy clothing, especially unbleached cloth, keeps in the heat of the body. It is not that the clothing has heat in itself, but that it turns back the heat leaving the body and gives it no way out. If any heat from outside falls on it, the cloth catches and keeps it, and being warmed by it, warms the body in return. That is why it should be used especially in winter. Such clothing is also easy to live with. Ease of living is an unexcessive condition that accepts what is enough to keep life from lacking anything, so that one lives a life according to reason, healthy and blessed.
Let the women wear a plain and becoming dress, but softer than what is suitable for a man, yet not quite immodest or entirely gone in luxury. And let the garments be suited to age, person, figure, nature, pursuits. For the divine apostle most beautifully counsels us "to put on Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the lusts of the flesh. Ear-rings. The Word prohibits us from doing violence to nature by boring the lobes of the ears. For why not the nose too?-so that, what was spoken, may be fulfilled: "As an ear-ring in a swine's nose, so is beauty to a woman without discretion. For, in a word, if one thinks himself made beautiful by gold, he is inferior to gold; and he that is inferior to gold is not lord of it. But to confess one's self less ornamental than the Lydian ore, how monstrous!
A woman too should wear plain and modest clothing. It may be softer than is fitting for a man, but it should not be altogether shameless, nor so soft that it is all luxury and slackness. Clothes should suit a person’s age, appearance, place, build and way of life. The divine apostle counsels us very well “to put on Christ Jesus, and to make no provision for the flesh for its desires.” The Word forbids us to do violence to nature by piercing the lobes of the ears. For why not the nose as well? Then the saying would be fulfilled: “Like an earring in a pig’s snout, so is beauty on a woman without sense.” In short, if anyone thinks gold makes her beautiful, she is lower than gold, and one who is lower than gold is not its master. And to admit that you are less adorned than a speck of Lydian gold dust, is that not utterly absurd?
As, then, the gold is polluted by the dirtiness of the sow, which stirs up the mire with her snout, so those women, that are luxurious to excess in their wantonness, elated by wealth, dishonour by the stains of amatory indulgences what is the true beauty. Finger- rings. The Word, then, permits them a finger-ring of gold. Nor is this for ornament, but for sealing things which are worth keeping safe in the house in the exercise of their charge of housekeeping. For if all were well trained, there would be no need of seals, if servants and masters were equally honest. But since want of training produces an inclination to dishonesty, we require seals. But there are circumstances in which this strictness may relaxed. For allowance must sometimes be made in favour of those women who have not been fortunate in falling in with chaste husbands, and adorn themselves in order to please their husbands. But let desire for the admiration of their husbands alone be proposed as their aim.
Gold is fouled by the filthiness of a sow when she stirs up the muck with her snout. In the same way, the more pampered women, puffed up by their wealth, run wild in wantonness and insult true beauty with the defilement of sexual indulgence. The Word, then, allows them a gold ring, though not as an ornament. It is for sealing whatever in the house is worth guarding, because of their care in keeping house. If everyone were well trained, there would be no need of seals, since righteous people, servants and masters alike, would be on equal terms. But since lack of training gives a strong push toward wrongdoing, we have needed seals. Yet there are times to ease the strictness. Sometimes we must forgive women who have not been fortunate in finding a self-controlled marriage, and who adorn themselves to please their husbands. Let their limit be this: that their eagerness to be admired is directed only at their own husbands.
I would not have them to devote themselves to personal display, but to attract their husbands by chaste love for them-a powerful and legitimate charm. But since they wish their wives to be unhappy in mind, let the latter, if they would be chaste, make it their aim to allay by degrees the irrational impulses and passions of their husbands. And they are to be gently drawn to simplicity, by gradually accustoming them to sobriety. For decency is not produced by the imposition of what is burdensome, but by the abstraction of excess. For women's articles of luxury are to be prohibited, as things of swift wing producing unstable follies and empty delights; by which, elated and furnished with wings, they often fly away from the marriage bonds. Wherefore also women ought to dress neatly, and bind themselves around with the band of chaste modesty, lest through giddiness they slip away from the truth.
I myself would not want them to cultivate bodily attractiveness at all. I would rather they won their husbands by self-controlled love for them, which is a compelling and righteous charm. Even so, since they choose to be unhappy in soul, let them, if they really want to be self-controlled, set themselves to calm their husbands’ irrational impulses and desires gently. They should lead their husbands quietly toward simplicity, by accustoming them little by little to greater self-restraint. For a dignified bearing comes not from adding something burdensome but from taking away what is excessive. In the same way, women’s luxury goods must be clipped like swift wings. They produce unstable puffed-up vanity and empty pleasures, and lifted up and winged by these, women often fly away from their marriages. So women must be kept in an orderly way and bound with the restraint of modest reserve, so that they do not slip away from the truth through vanity.
It is right, then, for men to repose confidence in their wives, and commit the charge of the household to them, as they are given to be their helpers in this. And if it is necessary for us, while engaged in public business, or discharging other avocations in the country, and often away from our wives, to seal anything for the sake of safety, He (the Word) allows us a signet for this purpose only. Other finger-rings are to be cast off, since, according to the Scripture, "instruction is a golden ornament for a wise man. But women who wear gold seem to me to be afraid, lest, if one strip them of their jewellery, they should be taken for servants, without their ornaments. But the nobility of truth, discovered in the native beauty which has its seat in the soul, judges the slave not by buying and selling, but by a servile disposition. And it is incumbent on us not to seem, but to be free, trained by God, adopted by God.
It is good, then, for husbands who trust their wives to entrust the care of the house to them, since they were given as helpers for this. But we men may need to take part in city life or manage other tasks in the country, often away from our wives, and may need to seal something for safety. For this alone the Word gives us a signet. All other rings must be thrown away, since, as Scripture says, “a golden ornament is instruction for a prudent man.” Women who wear gold seem to me to be afraid that, if someone takes their gold away, they will be taken for slaves rather than adorned women. But the true nobility, which is judged by what is naturally beautiful in the soul, does not tell a slave by sale and purchase. It tells him by a servile mind. It is fitting for us not to appear free but to be free, since we are trained by God and adopted by God.
Wherefore we must adopt a mode of standing and motion, and a step, and dress, and in a word, a mode of life, in all respects as worthy as possible of freemen. But men are not to wear the ring on the joint; for this is feminine; but to place it on the little finger at its root. For so the hand will be freest for work, in whatever we need it; and the signet will not very easily fall off, being guarded by the large knot of the joint. And let our seals be either a dove, or a fish, or a ship scudding before the wind, or a musical lyre, which Polycrates used, or a ship's anchor, which Seleucus got engraved as a device;and if there be one fishing, he will remember the apostle, and the children drawn out of the water. For we are not to delineate the faces of idols, we who are prohibited to cleave to them; nor a sword, nor a bow, following as we do, peace; nor drinking-cups, being temperate.
So we must discard every trace of the slavish in our standing, moving, walking, dress and, in a word, our whole way of life, and make them as truly free as possible. Men should not wear the ring on the joint, for that is feminine. They should wear it on the little finger, pushed down to its base. That way the hand will be most useful for whatever work we need it for, and the signet will not easily fall off, since it is held by the thicker joint. Let our seals be a dove, or a fish, or a ship running before the wind, or a musical lyre, as Polycrates used, or a ship’s anchor, which Seleucus had engraved as his device. If someone is a fisherman, he will remember the apostle and the children drawn up out of the water. We must not engrave the faces of idols, since we are forbidden even to pay attention to them. Nor should we engrave a sword or a bow, since we pursue peace, or drinking cups, since we practice self-control.
Many of the licentious have their lovers engraved, or their mistresses, as if they wished to make it impossible ever to forget their amatory indulgences, by being perpetually put in mind of their licentiousness. The Hair. About the hair, the following seems right. Let the head of men be shaven, unless it has curly hair. But let the chin have the hair. But let not twisted locks hang far down from the head, gliding into womanish ringlets. For an ample beard suffices for men. And if one, too, shave a part of his beard, it must not be made entirely bare, for this is a disgraceful sight. The shaving of the chin to the skin is reprehensible, approaching to plucking out the hair and smoothing. For instance, thus the Psalmist, delighted with the hair of the beard, says, "As the ointment that descends on the beard, the beard of Aaron. Having celebrated the beauty of the beard by a repetition, he made the face to shine with the ointment of the Lord.
Many licentious people have their lovers or their mistresses engraved on their rings. They seem unwilling ever to forget their love affairs, even if they wanted to, because their licentiousness is constantly brought back to mind. On the matter of hair, this is my judgment. A man’s head should be close-cropped, unless his hair is naturally curly, but his chin should be bearded. The twisted locks on the head should not hang down too far and slide into womanish ringlets, for a “fine beard” is enough for men. If someone does trim some of his beard, he must not make it completely bare, for that is an ugly sight. Cutting the beard right down to the skin is condemned, since it comes close to plucking and smoothing it. The psalmist, for example, delighting in the hair of the beard, says, “Like the ointment that runs down on the beard, the beard of Aaron.” By repeating the word “beard” he praised its seemliness, and he made the face shine with the ointment of the Lord.
Since cropping is to be adopted not for the sake of elegance, but on account of the necessity of the case; the hair of the head, that it may not grow so long as to come down and interfere with the eyes, and that of the moustache similarly, which is dirtied in eating, is to be cut round, not by the razor, for that were not well-bred, but by a pair of cropping scissors. But the hair on the chin is not to be disturbed, as it gives no trouble, and lends to the face dignity and paternal terror. Moreover, the shape instructs many not to sin, because it renders detection easy. To those who do [not] wish to sin openly, a habit that will escape observation and is not conspicuous is most agreeable, which, when assumed, will allow them to transgress without detection; so that, being undistinguishable from others, they may fearlessly go their length in sinning. A cropped head not only shows a man to be gave, but renders the cranium less liable to injury, by accustoming it to the presence of both cold and heat; and it averts the mischiefs arising from these, which the hair absorbs into itself like a sponge, and so inflicts on the brain constant mischief from the moisture.
Cutting the hair is not to be taken up for the sake of beauty but out of necessity. The hair on the head should be cut so that, as it grows, it does not come down and get in the way of the eyes. The hair on the moustache, which gets dirty when we eat, should perhaps be cut too. This should be done not with a razor, which is unbecoming for a free man, but with a pair of cropping scissors. The hair on the chin, however, should not be disturbed when it causes no trouble, since it gives the face dignity and a fatherly, awe-inspiring look. Appearance also trains many not to sin, because they would be easily found out. But for those who do not want to sin openly, an appearance that goes unnoticed and does not stand out is most welcome. Hidden behind it, they can go astray without being recognized, and because they look like the crowd they enjoy sinning without fear. A shaved head, then, not only shows a man to be austere. It also makes the skull hardier, by accustoming it to cold and heat, and it keeps off the harm that hair soaks up like a sponge from these and then lodges in the brain, so that the damage from the moisture lasts.
It is enough for women to protect their locks, and bind up their hair simply along the neck with a plain hair-pin, nourishing chaste locks with simple care to true beauty. For meretricious plaiting of the hair, and putting it up in tresses, contribute to make them look ugly, cutting the hair and plucking off it those treacherous braidings; on account of which they do not touch their head, being afraid of disordering their hair. Sleep, too, comes on, not without fear lest they pull down without knowing the shape of the braid. But additions of other people's hair are entirely to be rejected, and it is a most sacrilegious thing for spurious hair to shade the head, covering the skull with dead locks. For on whom does the presbyter lay his hand? Whom does he bless? Not the woman decked out, but another's hair, and through them another head.
For women it is enough to keep their hair soft and to tie it up simply at the neck with a plain pin. With this unaffected care they let their modest hair grow into true beauty. The elaborate twisting of hair that prostitutes go in for, and the binding of it into coils, make women look unsightly. They also damage the hair, pulling it out with those cunning braids. Because of the braids, women dare not even touch their own heads for fear of disturbing their hair. Even sleep comes with anxiety, in case they unknowingly spoil the shape of the arrangement. But adding other people’s hair is to be rejected entirely. It is utterly godless to fit foreign hair onto the head, dressing the skull in dead locks. For on whom will the elder lay his hand? Whom will he bless? Not the woman who has been adorned, but the strange hair, and through it another head.
And if "the man is head of the woman, and God of the man," how is it not impious that they should fall into double sins? For they deceive the men by the excessive quantity of their hair; and shame the Lord as far as in them lies, by adorning themselves meretriciously, in order to dissemble the truth. And they defame the head, which is truly beautiful. Consequently neither is the hair to be dyed, nor grey hair to have its colour changed. For neither are we allowed to diversify our dress. And above all, old age, which conciliates trust, is not to be concealed. But God's mark of honour is to be shown in the light of day, to win the reverence of the young. For sometimes, when they have been behaving shamefully, the appearance of hoary hairs, arriving like an instructor, has changed them to sobriety, and paralyzed juvenile lust with the splendour of the sight.
“The head of a woman is the man, and the head of the man is Christ.” So how is it not godless for these women to fall into a double sin? They deceive the men by substituting hair that is not their own. And as far as it lies in them, they shame the Lord by adorning themselves like prostitutes, to the deception of the truth, and they slander the head that is truly beautiful. So hair must not be dyed, nor must grey hair be changed in colour, for we are not even permitted to vary the colours of our clothing. Above all, the venerable and trustworthy look of old age should not be covered up. The mark of honour should be shown in the light of God, to win the respect of the young. For sometimes, when young people have been shameless, the sight of grey hair, standing over them like a tutor, has turned them to self-control, and the brightness of its appearance has stunned the youthful rage of desire.
Painting the Face. Nor are the women to smear their faces with the ensnaring devices of wily cunning. But let us show to them the decoration of sobriety. For, in the first place, the best beauty is that which is spiritual, as we have often pointed out. For when the soul is adorned by the Holy Spirit, and inspired with the radiant charms which proceed from Him,-righteousness, wisdom, fortitude, temperance, love of the good, modesty, than which no more blooming colour was ever seen,-then let coporeal beauty be cultivated too, symmetry of limbs and members, with a fair complexion. The adornment of health is here in place, through which the transition of the artificial image to the truth, in accordance with the form which has been given by God, is effected. But temperance in drinks, and moderation in articles of food, are effectual in producing beauty according to nature; for not only does the body maintain its health from these, but they also make beauty to appear.
Women also must not rub their faces with the tricks of crafty cleverness. Instead, let us show them a modest kind of beautifying. The best beauty is first of all that of the soul, as I have often pointed out. This is when the soul is adorned by the Holy Spirit and breathed upon by the bright graces that come from him: righteousness, prudence, courage, self-control, love of the good, and modesty. No colour more blooming than modesty has ever been seen. Next, let bodily beauty also be cultivated: “the symmetry of limbs and parts, with a good colour.” The beautifying that belongs to health is suitable here. By it the artificial image gives way to what is real, according to the form given by God. A well-tempered mixture in drinks and moderation in food are wonderfully able to beautify in accord with nature. For through these the body not only keeps its health but also lets its beauty show through.
For from what is fiery arises a gleam and sparkle; and from moisture, brightness and grace; and from dryness, strength and firmness; and from what is aerial, free-breathing and equipoise; from which this well-proportioned and beautiful image of the Word is adorned. Beauty is the free flower of health for the latter is produced within the body; while the former, blossoming out from the body, exhibits manifest beauty of complexion. Accordingly, these most decorous and healthful practices, by exercising the body, produce true and lasting beauty, the heat attracting to itself all the moisture and cold spirit. Heat, when agitated by moving causes, is a thing which attracts to itself; and when it does attract, it gently exhales through the flesh itself, when warmed, the abundance of food, with some moisture, but with excess of heat.
From what is fiery come gleam and sparkle. From what is moist come brightness and grace. From what is dry come manliness and firmness. From what is airy come easy breathing and balance. With these the Word’s well-proportioned and beautiful statue is adorned. Beauty is the free-born flower of health. Health works inside the body, while beauty blossoms out to the surface and shows a healthy complexion. So the finest and healthiest ways of training, by working the body hard, produce a beauty that is genuine and lasting. Heat draws to itself all the moisture and the cold breath, and heat is fanned into drawing power by movement. Once it has drawn them in, it gently warms the flesh and steams off through the flesh itself the surplus left from food, with a measure of moisture but an excess of heat.
Wherefore also the first food is carried off. But when the body is not moved, the food consumed does not adhere, but falls away, as the loaf from a cold oven, either entire, or leaving only the lower part. Accordingly, the foeces are in excess in the case of those who do not throw off the excrementitious matters by the rubbings necessitated by exercise. And other superfluous matters abound in their case too, and also perspiration, as the food is not assimilated by the body, but is flowing out to waste. Thence also lusts are excited, the redundance flowing to the pudenda by commensurate motions. Wherefore this redundance ought to be liquefied and dispersed for digestion, by which beauty acquires its ruddy hue. But it is monstrous for those who are made in "the image and likeness of God," to dishonour the archetype by assuming a foreign ornament, preferring the mischievous contrivance of man to the divine creation.
For this reason the earlier food is also cleared away. But if the body does not move, the food it has eaten does not take hold. It drops out, like bread from a cold oven, which comes out either whole or with only the bottom left behind. So it is natural that those who live in excess, and do not rub it off by exercise, produce too much urine and excrement. They also have too much of the other waste, and sweat as well, because the food is not distributed through the body but spills out into waste. Lusts also arise from this, since the surplus flows to the organs of procreation. So this surplus should be melted away by moderate exercise and dissolved into digestion, and it is digestion that gives beauty its rosy color. It is absurd for people made “in the image and likeness of God” to dishonor the original, as it were, by bringing in a foreign cosmetic art. They prefer human trickery to the creation of God.
The Instructor orders them to go forth "in becoming apparel, and adorn themselves with shamefacedness and sobriety," "subject to their own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives; while they behold," he says, "your chaste conversation. Whose adorning, let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel; but let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price. For the labour of their own hands, above all, adds genuine beauty to women, exercising their bodies and adorning themselves by their own exertions; not bringing unornamental ornament wrought by others, which is vulgar and meretricious, but that of every good woman, supplied and woven by her own hands whenever she most requires. For it is never suitable for women whose lives are framed according to God, to appear arrayed in things bought from the market, but in their own home-made work.
The Instructor commands women to come forward “in modest dress, adorning themselves with modesty and self-control,” “submitting to their own husbands, so that even if some are disobedient to the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives, as they watch,” he says, “your pure conduct in the word. Let your adornment not be the outward braiding of hair and putting on of gold or wearing of clothes. Let it be the hidden person of the heart, in the imperishable quality of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is very precious in God’s sight.” Working with their own hands, above all, brings women genuine beauty. It exercises their bodies and adorns them by their own efforts. They do not bring out an adornment made by others, which is unadorned, servile and fit for a prostitute. Instead each self-controlled woman brings what she herself has made and woven with her own hands, whenever she needs it most. For it is never fitting for women who live as citizens according to God to appear adorned with things bought in the market. They should be adorned by the work of the household.
For a most beautiful thing is it thrifty wife, who clothes both herself and her husband with fair array of her own working; in which all are glad-the children on account of their mother, the husband on account of his wife, she on their account, and all in God. In brief, "A store of excellence is a woman of worth, who eateth not the bread of idleness; and the laws of mercy are on her tongue; who openeth her mouth wisely and rightly; whose children rise up and call her blessed," as the sacred Word says by Solomon: "Her husband also, and he praiseth her. For a pious woman is blessed; and let her praise the fear of the Lord. And again, "A virtuous woman is a crown to her husband. They must, as far as possible, correct their gestures, looks, steps, and speech.
For a woman who keeps house is a most beautiful piece of work. She clothes herself and her husband in ornaments of her own making. In these all rejoice: the children in their mother, the husband in his wife, she in them, and all of them in God. In short, a woman of courage is a storehouse of virtue. She “did not eat the bread of idleness, and the rules of almsgiving are on her tongue.” She “opened her mouth wisely and lawfully, and her children rose up and called her blessed,” as the holy Word says through Solomon, “and her husband praised her. For a godly woman is blessed, and let her praise the fear of the Lord.” And again: “A woman of courage is a crown to her husband.” Above all, their bearing, their looks, their walk and their voices must be set right.
For they must not do as some, who, imitating the acting of comedy, and practising the mincing motions of dancers, conduct themselves in society as if on the stage, with voluptuous movements, and gliding steps, and affected voices, casting languishing glances round, tricked out with the bait of pleasure. "For honey drops from the lips of a woman who is an harlot; who, speaking to please, lubricates thy throat. But at last thou wilt find it bitterer than bile, and sharper than a two-edged sword. For the feet of folly lead those who practise it to hell after death. The noble Samson was overcome by the harlot, and by another woman was shorn of his man hood. But Joseph was not thus beguiled by another woman. The Egyptian harlot was conquered. And chastity, assuming to itself bonds, appears superior to dissolute licence.
They must not behave like some women who envy the playacting of comedy and copy the loose movements of dancers, and so strut about on a stage in company. They glance around in a languid way, with soft movements, gliding steps and put-on voices, trained as bait for pleasure. “For honey drips from the lips of a prostitute, who speaks to please and makes your throat smooth. But afterward you will find it more bitter than gall and sharper than a two-edged sword. For the feet of folly lead those who use her down to Hades, with death.” Samson, noble man that he was, was beaten by a prostitute, and another woman cut off his hair. But no other woman deceived Joseph like that. The Egyptian prostitute was beaten, and self-control, though it took bonds, showed itself stronger than the one who was free.
Most excellent is what has been said:- "In fine, I know not how To whisper, nor effeminately, To walk about with my neck awry, As I see others-lechers there In numbers in the city, with hair plucked out. But feminine motions, dissoluteness, and luxury, are to be entirely prohibited. For voluptuousness of motion in walking, "and a mincing gait," as Anacreon says, are altogether meretricious. "As seems to me," says the comedy, "it is time to abandon meretricious steps and luxury. And the steps of harlotry lean not to the truth; for they approach not the paths of life. Her tracks are dangerous, and not easily known. The eyes especially are to be sparingly used, since it is better to slip with the feet than with the eyes. Accordingly, the Lord very summarily cures this malady: "If thine eye offend thee, cut it out," He says, dragging lust up from the foundation. But languishing looks, and ogling, which is to wink with the eyes, is nothing else than to commit adultery with the eyes, lust skirmishing through them.
That saying also fits very well: “In short, I do not know how to whisper, or to walk about with my neck bent sideways in a limp way, as I see other men doing here in the city, many of them effeminate, with their hair plucked out with pitch.” Womanish movements, softness and luxury must be cut out completely. For a delicate, pampered way of walking, and “walking with a mincing gait,” as Anacreon puts it, is altogether the manner of courtesans, or so it seems to me. Comedy says that the tracks of courtesans leave behind youthful beauty and luxury. And Scripture says: “A prostitute’s footprints do not rest firmly on the truth; for she does not travel the paths of life, and her tracks are slippery and hard to recognize.” Above all the eyes must be spared, since it is better to slip with the feet than with the eyes. So the Lord cures this passion in the shortest way, when he says, “If your eye causes you to stumble, cut it out,” pulling desire up from its foundations. Languishing looks and ogling, that is, winking with the eyes, are nothing other than committing adultery with the eyes, as desire shoots its darts through them.
For of the whole body, the eyes are first destroyed. "The eye contemplating beautiful objects (kala/), gladdens the heart; "that is, the eye which has learned rightly (kalw=j) to see, gladdens. "Winking with the eye, with guile, heaps woes on men. Such they introduce the effeminate Sardanapalus, king of the Assyrians, sitting on a couch with his legs up, fumbling at his purple robe, and casting up the whites of his eyes. Women that follow such practices, by their looks offer themselves for prostitution. "For the light of the body is the eye," says the Scripture, by which the interior illuminated by the shining light appears. Fornication in a woman is in the raising of the eyes. "Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, and concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry: for which things' sake cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience," cries the apostle. But we enkindle the passions, and are not ashamed.
For the eyes are ruined before the rest of the body. “An eye that looks on fine things gladdens the heart.” That is, the eye that has learned to look well gladdens it. “But one who winks his eye with deceit gathers griefs for men.” They portray the effeminate Sardanapalus, king of the Assyrians, in much this way: sitting on a couch with his feet up, carding purple wool and rolling up the whites of his eyes. Women who practice these things act as their own procurers by their looks. For Scripture says, “The eye is the lamp of the body,” by which the things inside are shown, lit up by the light that shines out. “A woman’s fornication is in the lifting of her eyes.” “Put to death, then, the members that are on the earth: fornication, uncleanness, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry, on account of which the wrath of God comes,” the apostle cries out. Yet we fan the passions into flame and are not ashamed.
Some of these women eating mastich, going about, show their teeth to those that come near. And others, as if they had not fingers, give themselves airs, scratching their heads with pins; and these made either of tortoise or ivory, or some other dead creature they procure at much pains. And others, as if they had certain efflorescences, in order to appear comely in the eyes of spectators, stain their faces by adorning them with gay-coloured unguents. Such a one is called by Solomon "a foolish and bold woman," who "knob not shame. She sits at the door of her house, conspicuously in a seat, calling to all that pass by the way, who go right on their ways; "by her style and whole life manifestly saying, "Who among you is very silly? let him turn to me. And those devoid of wisdom she exhorts, saying, "Touch sweetly secret bread, and sweet stolen water;
Some of these women go about “chewing mastic” and grin at those who pass by. Others behave as though they had no fingers, and put on delicate airs while scratching their heads with the pins they carry. They go to great trouble over these pins, which are made of tortoiseshell, or ivory, or the body of some other dead animal. Others act as if they had some sort of blemishes, and to look attractive to onlookers they decorate themselves with brightly colored cosmetics and so stain their own faces. Through Solomon he calls such a woman “foolish and brazen, a woman who knows no shame. She sat on a chair at the doors of her own house, openly calling to those passing by, those who were keeping their paths straight.” By her posture and her whole way of life she is plainly saying, “Which of you is the most foolish? Let him turn aside to me.” And to those who lack sense she urges, saying, “Gladly touch secret bread and sweet stolen water.” By this he means this stealthy Aphrodite.
"meaning by this, clandestine love (from this point the Boeotian Pindar, coming to our help, says, "The clandestine pursuit of love is something sweet"). But the miserable man "knoweth not that the sons of earth perish beside her, and that she tends to the level of hell. But says the Instructor: "Hie away, and tarry not in the place; nor fix thine eye on her: for thus shalt thou pass over a strange water, and cross to Acheron. Wherefore thus saith the Lord by Isaiah, "Because the daughters of Sion walk with lofty neck, and with winkings of the eyes, and sweeping their garments as they walk, and playing with their feet; the Lord shall humble the daughters of Sion, and will uncover their form" -their deformed form. I, deem it wrong that servant girls, who follow women of high rank, should either speak or act unbecomingly to them. But I think it right that they should be corrected by their mistresses. With very sharp censure, accordingly, the comic poet Philemon says: "You may follow at the back of a pretty servant girl, seen behind a gentlewoman; and any one from the Plataeicum may follow close, and ogle her.
Helped by this, Pindar of Boeotia says, “Something sweet is the stolen delight of Cypris.” “But the wretched man does not know that earthborn men perish with her, and he comes to the very ledge of Hades. So leap away,” says the Instructor, “and do not linger in that place, or fix your eye on her. For in this way you will cross foreign water and pass over the Acheron.” This is why the Lord says these things through Isaiah: “Because the daughters of Zion walked with raised neck and winking eyes, dragging their tunics as they walked and playing with their feet, God will humble the daughters of Zion and will uncover their shape.” That is, their shameful shape. For my part, I do not think the maidservants who walk at the women’s left, or who follow them, should speak shamefully or act shamefully. They should be corrected by their mistresses. The comic poet Philemon speaks very sharply: “As I went out, I saw behind a free woman only one maidservant following, a pretty one, and some man from Plataea tagging along and ogling her.”
For the wantonness of the servant recoils on the mistress; allowing those who attempt to take lesser liberties not to be afraid to advance to greater; since the mistress, by allowing improprieties, shows that she does not disapprove of them. And not to be angry at those who act wantonly, is a clear proof of a disposition inclining to the like. "For like mistress like wench," as they say in the proverb. Walking. Also we must abandon a furious mode of walking, and choose a grave and leisurely, but not a lingering step. Nor is one to swagger in the ways, nor throw back his head to look at those he meets, if they look at him, as if he were strutting on the stage, and pointed at with the finger. Nor, when pushing up hill, are they to be shoved up by their domestics, as we see those that are more luxurious, who appear strong, but are enfeebled by effeminacy of soul.
The wantonness of a maidservant rebounds on her mistress. It gives a foothold to men who try small liberties first, so that they need not fear to go on to greater ones. For the mistress, by tolerating shameful conduct, shows that she does not condemn it. And not to be angry with those who behave licentiously is a plain proof of a mind inclined the same way. “Like mistress, like dog,” as the proverb-makers say. We must also drive out of our walking any wild, frantic manner. We should choose a dignified and unhurried pace, though not a dawdling step. A man must not swagger in the streets, or throw his head back and glance sideways at those he meets to see whether they are looking at him, as if he were parading on a stage and being pointed out with fingers. Nor should men be pushed up a slope by their servants, as we see the more pampered do. They think themselves strong, but they are worn down by softness of soul.
A true gentleman must have no mark of effeminacy visible on his face, or any other part of his body. Let no blot on his manliness, then, be ever found either in his movements or habits. Nor is a man in health to use his servants as horses to bear him. For as it is enjoined on them, "to be subject to their masters with all fear, not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward," as Peter says; so fairness, and forbearance, and kindness, are what well becomes the masters. For he says: "Finally, be ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another; love as brethren, be pitiful, be humble," and so forth, "that ye may inherit a blessing," excellent and desirable. The Model Maiden. Zeno the Cittiaean thought fit to represent the image of a young maid, and executed the statue thus: "Let her face be clean, her eyebrows not let down, nor her eyelids open nor turned back. Let her neck not be stretched back, nor the members of her body be loose. But let the parts that hang from the body look as if they were well strung; let there be the keenness of a well-regulated mind for discourse, and retention of what has been rightly spoken; and let her attitudes and movements give no ground of hope to the licentious;
A noble man must show no visible sign of softness in his face, or indeed in any other part of his body. So let the ugly mark of unmanliness never be found in his movements or his postures. Nor should a healthy man use his servants as pack animals. Servants are commanded “to be subject to their masters with all fear, not only to the good and gentle but also to the crooked,” as Peter says. In the same way fairness, patience and kindness suit masters. For he says, “Finally, all be of one mind, sympathetic, loving as brothers, tenderhearted, humble,” and what follows, “that you may inherit a blessing.” Zeno of Citium seems to sketch a fine and lovable portrait for a young person, and he sculpts him like this: “Let the face be clear, the brow not drooping, the eye neither wide open nor melting. Let the neck not be thrown back, nor the limbs of the body slack, but held up as if they were taut. Let there be quickness to hear a word and make it one’s own, and a firm hold on what has been rightly said. Let the postures and movements give the licentious no hope at all.
but let there be the bloom of modesty, and an expression of firmness. But far from her be the wearisome trouble that comes from the shops of perfumers, and goldsmiths, and dealers in wool, and that which comes from the other shops where women, meretriciously dressed, pass whole days as if sitting in the stews. Amusements and Associates. And let not men, therefore, spend their time in barbers' shops and taverns, babbling nonsense; and let them give up hunting for the women who sit near, and ceaselessly talking slander against many to raise a laugh. The game of dice is to be prohibited, and the pursuit of gain, especially by dicing, which many keenly follow. Such things the prodigality of luxury invents for the idle. For the cause is idleness, and a love for frivolities apart from the truth. For it is not possible otherwise to obtain enjoyment without injury; and each man's preference of a mode of life is a counterpart of his disposition.
Let modesty and manliness bloom in him. Let him stay away from loitering in the perfume shops, goldsmiths’ shops, wool shops and other workshops, where people dressed like prostitutes spend whole days, like women sitting on a brothel’s roof.” So men too must stop spending their time in barbers’ shops and taverns, chattering idly and hunting the women who pass by. Many of them never stop slandering others for a laugh. The game of dice should also be forbidden, and the practice of greed through knucklebones, which such men love to handle. Self-indulgence with no restraint invents things like this for those who spend their leisure badly. The cause is idleness. A man falls in love with empty things that lie outside the truth. There is no other way to get pleasure without harm. And the choice a person makes about how to live reflects the mind of each one.
But, as appears, only intercourse with good men benefits; on the other hand, the all-wise Instructor, by the mouth of Moses, recognising companionship with bad men as swinish, forbade the ancient people to partake of swine; to point out that those who call on God ought not to mingle with unclean men, who, like swine, delight in corporeal pleasures, in impure food, and in itching with filthy pruriency after the mischievous delights of lewdness. Further, He says: "Thou art not to eat a kite or swift-winged ravenous bird, or an eagle," meaning: Thou shalt not come near men who gain their living by rapine. And other things also are exhibited figuratively. With whom, then, are we to associate? With the righteous, He says again, speaking figuratively; for everything "which parts the hoof and chews the cud is clean. For the parting of the hoof indicates the equilibrium of righteousness, and ruminating points to the proper food of righteousness, the word, which enters from without, like food, by instruction, but is recalled from the mind, as from the stomach, to rational recollection.
But, it seems, only company with good men does us good. On the other hand, the all-wise Instructor, through Moses, knew that living with worthless people is swinish, so he forbade the older people to eat pork. He was showing that those who call on God must not mix with unclean people. Such people, like pigs, are itching for bodily pleasures, for foul food, and for lewd titillations, and they delight in the ill-joyed pleasure of sex. He also says not to eat “kite, or swift-winged bird that tears at the breast, or eagle.” He means, “You shall not go near those who earn their living by plunder.” The other animals are explained allegorically in the same way. With whom, then, should we keep company? Again speaking allegorically, he says: with the righteous. For everything that “parts the hoof and chews the cud” is clean. The parted hoof shows a balanced righteousness. The chewing of the cud shows righteousness feeding on its own proper food, the Word. The Word enters from outside, like food, through instruction, and is sent back up from within, as if from the stomach of the mind, for rational remembrance.
And the spiritual man, having the word in his mouth, ruminates the spiritual food; and righteousness parts the hoof rightly, because it sanctifies us in this life, and sends us on our way to the world to come. Public Spectacles. The Instructor will not then bring us to public spectacles; nor inappropriately might one call the racecourse and the theatre "the seat of plagues; " for there is evil counsel as against the Just One, and therefore the assembly against Him is execrated. These assemblies, indeed, are full of confusion and iniquity; and these pretexts for assembling are the cause of disorder-men and women assembling promiscuously if or the sight of one another. In this respect the assembly has already shown itself bad: for when the eye is lascivious, the desires grow warm; and the eyes that are accustomed to look impudently at one's neighbours during the leisure granted to them, inflame the amatory desires.
The righteous man chews the cud of spiritual food, keeping the Word in his mouth. And righteousness fittingly parts the hoof, because it sanctifies us here and sends us on to the age to come. So the Instructor will not take us to the shows either. It would not be unfitting to call the stadiums and theatres “the seat of plagues.” There is a wicked “counsel” here, just as there was against the Righteous One, and so the gathering against him is cursed. These assemblies are full of great disorder and lawlessness. The very reasons for coming together cause indecency, since men and women come mixed together to look at one another. At this point the whole gathering becomes vain and showy. With the eyes feasting greedily, desires grow warm. Eyes grow used to looking more boldly at those nearby, because they have leisure to do so, and they set erotic desires ablaze.
Let spectacles, therefore, and plays that are full of scurrility and of abundant gossip, be forbidden. For what base action is it that is not exhibited in the theatres? And what shameless saying is it that is not brought forward by the buffoons? And those who enjoy the evil that is in them, stamp the clear images of it at home. And, on the other hand, those that are proof against these things, and unimpressible, will never make a stumble in regard to luxurious pleasures. For if people shall say that they betake themselves to the spectacles as a pastime for recreation, I should say that the cities which make a serious business of pastime are not wise; for cruel contests for glory which have been so fatal are not sport. No more is senseless expenditure of money, nor are the riots that are occasioned by them sport.
So let us also give up the shows and the public recitals, which are full of coarse jokes and idle chatter. What shameful deed is not put on display in the theatres? What shameless word do the clowns not bring out? Those who have enjoyed the wickedness shown there carry its vivid images home with them. By contrast, those who are not charmed by such things and are unmoved by them will never stumble into easy-going pleasures. People will say they take up the shows as a kind of play, for the heart’s delight. But I would say that cities which take even their play so seriously are not sound-minded. For these ruthless rivalries for glory, which end in so many deaths, are no longer play. Nor are the empty enthusiasms and thoughtless ambitions, or the pointless waste of money, and nor are the riots that follow from them still play.
And ease of mind is not to be purchased by zealous pursuit of frivolities, for no one who has his senses will ever prefer what is pleasant to what is good. Religion in Ordinary Life. But it is said we do not all philosophize. Do we not all, then, follow after life? What sayest thou? How hast thou believed? How, pray, dost thou love God and thy neighbour, if thou dost not philosophize? And how dost thou love thyself, if thou dost not love life? It is said, I have not learned letters; but if thou hast not learned to read, thou canst not excuse thyself in the case of hearing, for it is not taught. And faith is the possession not of the wise according to the world, but of those according to God; and it is taught without letters; and its handbook, at once rude and divine, is called love-a spiritual book. It is in your power to listen to divine wisdom, ay, and to frame your life in accordance with it. Nay, you are not prohibited from conducting affairs in the world decorously according to God.
Relaxation must never be bought at the price of empty zeal. No one with any sense would choose what is more pleasant over what is better. “But,” someone says, “we are not all philosophers.” Then do we not all pursue life? What are you saying? How, then, have you come to believe? How do you still love God and your neighbor, if you do not pursue wisdom? How do you love yourself, if you do not love life? “I never learned letters,” he says. But even if you have not learned to read, you have no excuse for not hearing, since hearing does not have to be taught. Faith is the possession not of those who are wise by the world’s standard, but of those who are wise by God’s. It is trained even without letters. Its book, plain and yet divine, is called love, a spiritual composition. It is possible to listen to divine wisdom, and also to live as a citizen of it. Nothing forbids you to conduct the affairs of this world decently, in a way that honors God.
Let not him who sells or buys aught name two prices for what he buys or sells; but stating the net price, and studying to speak the truth, if he get not his price, he gets the truth, and is rich in the possession of rectitude. But, above all, let an oath on account of what is sold be far from you; and let swearing, too, on account of other things be banished. And in this way those who frequent the market-place and the shop philosophize. "For thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain. But those who act contrary to these things-the avaricious, the liars, the hypocrites, those who make merchandise of the truth-the Lord cast out of His Father's court, not willing that the holy house of God should be the house of unrighteous traffic either in words or in material things.
Let the one who sells or buys never name two prices for what he buys or sells. Let him name a single price and practice telling the truth. If he does not get that price, he still gets the truth, and he is rich in right disposition. Let praising of the goods and oaths over anything sold be far away, and let oaths be far away in everything else. In this way too let the market people and shopkeepers practice philosophy. “You shall not take the name of the Lord in vain, for the Lord will not cleanse the one who takes his name in vain.” Those who act against these things, the lovers of money, the liars, the hypocrites, those who peddle the truth, the Lord drove out of his Father’s courtyard. He did not want the holy house of God to be a house of dishonest trade, whether in words or in goods made of material things.
Going to Church. Woman and man are to go to church decently attired, with natural step, embracing silence, possessing unfeigned love, pure in body, pure in heart, fit to pray to God. Let the woman observe this, further. Let her be entirely covered, unless she happen to be at home. For that style of dress is grave, and protects from being gazed at. And she will never fall, who puts before her eyes modesty, and her shawl; nor will she invite another to fall into sin by uncovering her face. For this is the wish of the Word, since it is becoming for her to pray veiled. They say that the wife of Aenuas, through excess of propriety, did not, even in her terror at the capture of Troy, uncover herself; but, though fleeing from the conflagration, remained veiled. Out of Church. Such ought those who are consecrated to Christ appear, and frame themselves in their whole life, as they fashion themselves in the church for the sake of gravity; and to be, not to seem such-so meek, so pious, so loving. But now I know not how people change their fashions and manners with the place. As they say that polypi, assimilated to the rocks to which they adhere, are in colour such as they; so, laying aside the inspiration of the assembly, after their departure from it, they become like others with whom they associate.
Woman and man are to be led to the church decently dressed, walking without affectation, loving silence, possessing “love without hypocrisy,” pure in body and pure in heart, fit to pray to God. Let the woman take this further: let her be covered entirely, unless she happens to be at home. For that dress is dignified, and it keeps her from being gazed at. She will never fall if she puts modesty and her covering before her eyes, and she will not tempt another into the slip of sin by uncovering her face. This is what the Word wills, since it is fitting for her to pray veiled. They say that Aeneas’ wife, out of extreme modesty, did not uncover herself even when Troy was being captured and she was in terror. Though fleeing from the burning city, she stayed veiled. Those who are being initiated into Christ ought to appear like this, and to shape themselves like this, throughout their whole life, just as they make themselves look more solemn in the churches. They ought to be such people, not merely seem to be, so gentle, so reverent, so loving. But now, somehow, they change their appearance and manners along with the place, just as they say octopuses become like the rocks they cling to and take on their color.
Nay, in laying aside the artificial mask of solemnity, they are proved to be what they secretly were. After having paid reverence to the discourse about God, they leave within [the church] what they have heard. And outside they foolishly amuse themselves with impious playing, and amatory quavering, occupied with flute-playing, and dancing, and intoxication, and all kinds of trash. They who sing thus, and sing in response, are those who before hymned immortality,-found at last wicked and wickedly singing this most pernicious palinode, "Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die. But not to-morrow in truth, but already, are these dead to God; burying their dead, that is, sinking themselves down to death. The apostle very firmly assails them. "Be not deceived; neither adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers," and whatever else he adds to these, "shall inherit the kingdom of God. Love and the Kiss of Charity. And if we are called to the kingdom of God, let us walk worthy of the kingdom, loving God and our neighbour.
When they leave this place, they lay aside the God-inspired spirit of the assembly and become like the many people they live among. Or rather, by dropping the false show of solemnity, they are exposed as what they secretly were. They showed reverence for the word about God, but they have left it inside, where they heard it. Outside they carry on foolishly with the godless, filled with strumming and love-song trills, flute-singing, clapping, drunkenness and every kind of rubbish. These are the same people who earlier sang hymns to immortality. They sing along, and sing back and forth, and in the end, wicked as they are, they wickedly sing the most ruinous of reversals: “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.” But they are dead to God not tomorrow but already. They are burying their own dead, that is, burying themselves in death. The apostle stands firmly against them: “Do not be deceived: neither adulterers, nor the soft, nor men who lie with men, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor slanderers,” and all the others that go with these, “will inherit the kingdom of God.” And if we have been called to the kingdom of God, let us live as citizens worthy of the kingdom, loving God and our neighbor.
But love is not proved by a kiss, but by kindly feeling. But there are those, that do nothing but make the churches resound with a kiss, not having love itself within. For this very thing, the shameless use of a kiss, which ought to be mystic, occasions foul suspicions and evil reports. The apostle calls the kiss holy. When the kingdom is worthily tested, we dispense the affection of the soul by a chaste and closed mouth, by which chiefly gentle manners are expressed. But there is another unholy kiss, full of poison, counterfeiting sanctity. Do you not know that spiders, merely by touching the mouth, afflict men with pain? And often kisses inject the poison of licentiousness. It is then very manifest to us, that a kiss is not love. For the love meant is the love of God. "And this is the love of God," says John, "that we keep His commandments; " not that we stroke each other on the mouth. "And His commandments are not grievous. But salutations of beloved ones in the ways, full as they are of foolish boldness, are characteristic of those who wish to be conspicuous to those without, and have not the least particle of grace.
Love is judged not by a kiss but by goodwill. Yet some people do nothing but make the churches ring with kissing, though they do not have the loving heart itself within them. This careless use of the kiss has filled the matter with shameful suspicion and slander. The kiss ought to be a mystery (the apostle called it “holy”). The soul should taste goodwill through a modest mouth that is kept closed, and through such a mouth above all a gentle character does its service. But there is also another kiss, an unchaste one, full of poison, which pretends to be holy. Do you not know that poisonous spiders, merely by touching a person’s mouth, cause them agony? Kisses often inject the venom of licentiousness. So it is plain to us that a kiss is not love, for “love is of God.” “This is the love of God,” says John, “that we keep the commandments” (not that we fawn on one another with the mouth), “and his commandments are not burdensome.” Likewise the greetings of the brothers and sisters in the streets are full of foolish boldness. They come from people who want to be noticed by outsiders, and they have not the least grace in them.
For if it is proper mystically "in the closet" to pray to God, it will follow that we are also to greet mystically our neighbour, whom we are commanded to love second similarly to God, within doors, "redeeming the time. "For we are the salt of the earth. "Whosoever shall bless his friend early in the, morning with a loud voice, shall be regarded not to differ from cursing. The Government of the Eyes. But, above all, it seems right that we turn away from the sight of women. For it is sin not only to touch, but to look; and he who is rightly trained must especially avoid them. "Let thine eyes look straight, and thine eyelids wink right. For while it is possible for one who looks to remain stedfast; yet care must be taken against falling. For it is possible for one who looks to slip; but it is impossible for one, who looks not, to lust. For it is not enough for the chaste to be pure; but they must give all diligence, to be beyond the range of censure, shutting out all ground of suspicion, in order to the consummation of chastity; so that we may not only be faithful, but appear worthy of trust.
If it is right to pray to God secretly “in the inner room,” it follows that we should also show kindness to “our neighbor,” whom we are commanded to love second, secretly in the same way, from within, “redeeming the time.” For we are “the salt of the earth.” Scripture says: “Whoever blesses his friend early in the morning with a loud voice will seem no different from one who curses.” Above all, it seems best to turn away from looking at women. For it is possible to sin not only by touching but also by looking, and the person who is truly trained must avoid this most of all. “Let your eyes look straight ahead, and let your eyelids look toward what is right.” Surely it is not impossible to stand firm even after seeing? But we must guard against falling. A person who has seen may slip, but a person who has not seen cannot possibly desire. For self-controlled people it is not enough just to be pure. They must also take care to be free from blame, shutting out every ground for suspicion, to complete their purity, so that we are not only believers but also appear trustworthy.
For this is also consequently to be guarded against, as the apostle says, "that no man should blame us; providing things honourable, not only in the sight of the Lord, but also in the sight of men. "But turn away thine eyes from a graceful woman, and contemplate not another's beauty," says the Scripture. And if you require the reason, it will further tell you," For by the beauty of woman many have gone astray, and at it affection blazes up like fire; " the affection which arises from the fire which we call love, leading to the fire which will never cease in consequence of sin.
This too must be guarded against, as the apostle says: “that no one find fault with us; for we take thought for what is honorable, not only before the Lord but also before men.” And Scripture says: “Turn your eye away from a graceful woman, and do not study another’s beauty.” If you ask the reason, it explains further: “For many have been led astray by a woman’s beauty, and from it love is kindled like fire.” So the love that starts from fire, which people call passion, leads on, because of sin, to a fire that never stops.
Continuation: with Texts from Scripture.I would counsel the married never to kiss their wives in the presence of their domestics. For Aristotle does not allow people to laugh to their slaves. And by no means must a wife be seen saluted in their presence. It is moreover better that, beginning at home with marriage, we should exhibit propriety in it. For it is the greatest bond of chastity, breathing forth pure pleasure. Very admirably the tragedy says:- "Well! well! ladies, how is it, then, that among men, Not gold, not empire, or luxury of wealth, Conferred to such an extent signal delights, As the right and virtuous disposition Of a man of worth and a dutiful wife? " Such injunctions of righteousness uttered by those who are conversant with worldly wisdom are not to be refused.
A summary overview of the best life: all the passages of the holy Scriptures that mark out the Christian life. I would also advise married men never to kiss their wives at home in front of the servants. Aristotle would not even allow people to smile at slaves, so a husband should be far from showing affection to his wife in their sight. It is better to begin at home, in marriage itself, to show dignity. For the partnership of self-control is the greatest, and it breathes out pure pleasure. The tragedy puts it wonderfully: “Ah, women, among human beings neither gold, nor royal power, nor the luxury of wealth has pleasures so far above the rest as the mind of a good man and a devout wife, a mind that is just and thinks what is right.” We should not reject these precepts of righteousness even when they are spoken by those who pursue the wisdom of the world.
Knowing, then, the duty of each, "pass the time of your sojourning here in fear: for as much as ye know that ye were not deemed with corruptible things, such as silver or gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot. "For," says Peter, "the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and abominable idolatries. We have as a limit the cross of the Lord, by which we are fenced and hedged about from our former sins. Therefore, being regenerated, let us fix ourselves to it in truth, and return to sobriety, and sanctify ourselves; "for the eyes of the Lord are on the righteous, and His ears are open to their prayer; but the face of the Lord is against them that do evil. And who is he that will harm us, if we be followers of that which is good? " "us" for "you. But the best training is good order, which is perfect decorum, and stable and orderly power, which in action maintains consistence in what it does.
So then, since we know “the work of each one,” let us “live out the time of your stay here as foreigners in fear, knowing that you were ransomed from your empty way of life handed down from your fathers, not with perishable things, silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot.” “The time that has passed is enough,” says Peter, “to have done the will of the Gentiles, living in debauchery, lusts, drunkenness, revelries, drinking parties, and lawless idolatries.” Let us take the cross of the Lord as our boundary. By it we are fenced around and walled off from our former sins. Having been born again, then, let us nail ourselves to the truth, return to sobriety, and be made holy, “because the eyes of the Lord are on the righteous, and his ears are open to their prayer, but the face of the Lord is against those who do evil. And who is there to harm us, if we become zealous for what is good?” The best way of life is good order. It is complete propriety and a settled, well-ordered strength. It gives each thing in turn its proper place in practice, and in virtue it cannot be surpassed.
If these things have been adduced by me with too great asperity, in order to effect the salvation which follows from your correction; they have been spoken also, says the Instructor, by me: "Since he who reproves with boldness is a peacemaker. And if ye hear me, ye shall be saved. And if ye attend not to what is spoken, it is not my concern. And yet it is my concern thus: "For he desires the repentance rather than the death of a sinner. "If ye shall hear me, ye shall eat the good of the land," the Instructor again says, calling by the appellation "the good of the land," beauty, wealth, health, strength, sustenance. For those things which are really good, are what "neither ear hath heard, not hath ever entered into the heart" respecting Him who is really King, and the realities truly good which await us. For He is the giver and the guard of good things. And with respect to their participation, He applies the same names of things in this world, the Word thus training in God the feebleness of men from sensible things to understanding.
The Instructor says: “If I have spoken rather harshly in arranging for your salvation through correction, let it be put down to me, since ‘the one who rebukes with frankness makes peace.’ If you listen to me, you will be saved. If you pay no attention to what I have said, it is no concern of mine.” Yet it is still a concern to me even so, for “he chooses the repentance of the sinner rather than his death.” The Instructor says again, “If you listen to me, you will eat the good things of the land.” By “the good things of the land” he means what people count as good: beauty, wealth, health, strength, food. The things that are truly good are “what no ear has heard, and what has never entered the heart.” These are the truly good things that belong to the truly existing King and are waiting for us, for he is both the giver and the guardian of good things. The things here share the same names because they take part in those realities. In this way the Word, in a manner worthy of God, trains the weakness of human beings, leading them from what the senses perceive to what the mind understands.
What has to be observed at home, and how our life is to be regulated, the Instructor has abundantly declared. And the things which He is wont to say to children by the way, while He conducts them to the Master, these He suggests, and adduces the Scriptures themselves in a compendious form, setting forth bare injunctions, accommodating them to the period of guidance, and assigning the interpretation of them to the Master. For the intention of His law is to dissipate fear, emancipating free-will in order to faith. "Hear," He says, "O child," who art rightly instructed, the principal points of salvation. For I will disclose my ways, and lay before thee good commandments; by which thou wilt reach salvation. And I lead thee by the way of salvation.
The Instructor has now said plenty about what must be guarded against at home and how life is to be set right. But there are also things he likes to say to his children along the road, until he brings them to the Teacher. These he now lays before us in summary form, using the Scriptures themselves. He sets out the commands plainly, fitting them to the time of guidance, and leaves their explanation to the Teacher. For his law intends to loosen the hold of fear by setting the willing will free for faith. “Listen, child,” he says, “you who are being rightly trained, to the main points of salvation. I will lay bare my own character and set before you these good commands, through which you will come to salvation. And I am leading you along the way of salvation.”
Depart from the paths of deceit. "For the Lord knoweth the way of the righteous, and the way of the ungodly shall perish. "Follow, therefore, O son, the good way which I shall describe, lending to me attentive ears. "And I will give to thee the treasures of darkness, hidden and unseen" by the nations, but seen by us. And the treasures of wisdom are unfailing, in admiration of which the apostle says, "O the depth of the riches and the wisdom! And by one God are many treasures dispensed; some disclosed by the law, others by the prophets; some to the divine mouth, and others to the heptad of the spirit singing accordant. And the Lord being one, is the same Instructor by all these. Here is then a comprehensive precept, and an exhortation of life, all-embracing: "As ye would that men should do unto you, do ye likewise to, them. We may comprehend the commandments in two, as the Lord says, "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, and with all thy strength; and thy neighbour as thyself. Then from these He infers, "on this hang the law and the prophets. Further, to him that asked, "What good thing shall I do, that I may inherit eternal life? "He answered, "Thou knowest the commandments? "And on him replying Yea, He said, "This do, and thou shalt be saved.
“Keep away from the ways of error, for the Lord knows the way of the righteous, and the way of the ungodly will perish.” Follow, then, child, the good way that I shall explain to you, and lend me your listening ears. “And I will give you treasures that are dark, hidden, and unseen” by the nations, but visible to us. “The treasures of wisdom are inexhaustible,” and the apostle, marveling at them, says, “Oh, the depth of riches and of wisdom!” These many treasures are supplied by one God. Some are revealed through the law, some through the prophets, some by the divine mouth, and another by the sevenfold Spirit singing in harmony. The Lord is one, and through all of these he is the same Instructor. Here, then, is a short rule that sums up the whole of life and includes everything: “As you want people to do to you, do the same to them.” It is also possible to include the commandments in two, as the Lord says: “You shall love your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength, and your neighbor as yourself.” Then he adds, “On these hang the whole law and the prophets.” Indeed, to the man who asked, “What must I do to inherit eternal life?” he answered, “You know the commandments.” When the man said yes, he said, “Do this, and you will be saved.”
Especially conspicuous is the love of the Instructor set forth in various salutary commandments, in order that the discovery may be readier, from the abundance and arrangement of the Scriptures. We have the Decalogue given by Moses, which, indicating by an elementary principle, simple and of one kind, defines the designation of sins in a way conducive to salvation: "Thou shall not commit adultery. Thou shall not worship idols. Thou shalt not corrupt boys. Thou shalt not steal. Thou shall not bear false witness. Honour thy father and thy mother. And so forth. These things are to be observed, and whatever else is commanded in reading the Bible. And He enjoins on us by Isaiah: "Wash you, and make you clean. Put away iniquities from your souls before mine eyes. Learn to do well. Seek judgment. Deliver the wronged. Judge for the orphan, and justify the widow. And come, and let us reason together, saith the Lord. And we shall find many examples also in other places,-as, for instance, respecting prayer: "Good works are an acceptable prayer to the Lord," says the Scripture.
Still, the Instructor’s love for humanity should be set out more distinctly, through his many different commandments that lead to salvation. Then, with the Scriptures so generously arranged, we can find the way of salvation more readily. We have the Decalogue given through Moses. It hints at its meaning through a single, simple element, and it marks out a saving name for sins: “You shall not commit adultery, you shall not worship idols,” you shall not corrupt boys, “you shall not steal, you shall not bear false witness; honor your father and your mother,” and what follows these. We must keep these commands, and whatever else is commanded in the readings of the books. He also commands through Isaiah: “Wash yourselves, become clean. Remove the evils from your souls from before my eyes. Learn to do good, seek justice, rescue the wronged, give judgment for the orphan, vindicate the widow. And come, let us reason together, says the Lord.” We would find many instructions in other writers too. Take prayer, for example: “Good works,” says the Scripture, “are a prayer acceptable to the Lord.”
And the manner of prayer is described. "If thou seest," it is said, "the naked, cover him; and thou shalt not overlook those who belong to thy seed. Then shall thy light spring forth early, and thy healing shall spring up quickly; and thy righteousness shall go before thee, and the glory of God shall encompass thee. What, then, is the fruit of such prayer? "Then shall thou call, and God will hear thee; whilst thou art yet speaking, He will say, I am here. In regard to fasting it is said, "Wherefore do ye fast to me? saith the Lord. Is it such a fast that I have chosen, even a day for a man to humble his soul? Thou shall not bend thy neck like a circle, and spread sackcloth and shes under thee.Not thus shall ye call it an acceptable fast. What means a fast, then?
The manner of prayer is also laid down: “If you see a naked person,” it says, “clothe him, and you will not look down on those of your own family. Then your light will appear early, and your garments will quickly shine out, and your righteousness will go on before you, and the glory of God will wrap you round.” What, then, is the fruit of this prayer? “Then you will cry out, and God will answer you; while you are still speaking, he will say, ‘Look, I am here.’” About fasting he says: “Why do you fast for me? says the Lord. This is not the fast I chose, a day for a man to humble his soul. Even if you bend your neck like a hoop and spread sackcloth and ashes beneath you, you will still not call that an acceptable fast.” What, then, does fasting point to?
"Lo, this is the fast which I have chosen, saith the Lord. Loose every band of wickedness. Dissolve the knots of oppressive contracts. Let the oppressed go free, and tear every unjust bond. Break thy bread to the hungry; and lead the houseless poor into thy house. If thou see the naked cover him. About sacrifices too: "To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices to me? saith the Lord. I am full of burnt-offerings and of rams; and the fat of lambs, and the blood of bulls and kids I do not wish; nor that ye should come to appear before me. Who hath required this at your hands? You shall no more tread my court. If ye bring fine flour, the vain oblation is an abomination to me. Your new moons and your sabbaths I cannot away with. How, then, shall I sacrifice to the Lord?
“Look,” he says, “this is the fast that I have chosen, says the Lord. Loose every bond of injustice. Undo the strangling knots of violent contracts. Set free the broken-down by release, and tear up every unjust written agreement. Break your bread for the hungry, and bring homeless poor people into your house. If you see a naked person, clothe him.” And about sacrifices he says: “What is the multitude of your sacrifices to me? says the Lord. I am full of whole burnt offerings of rams. I do not want the fat of lambs, or the blood of bulls and goats, even if you come to appear before me. For who asked this from your hands? You shall no more trample my court. If you bring fine flour, it is worthless; incense is an abomination to me. I cannot stand your new moons and your sabbaths.” How, then, shall I sacrifice to the Lord?
"The sacrifice of the Lord is," He says, "a broken heart. How, then, shall I crown myself, or anoint with ointment, or offer incense to the Lord? "An odour of a sweet fragrance," it is said, "is the heart that glorifies Him who made it. These are the crowns and sacrifices, aromatic odours, and flowers of God. Further, in respect to forbearance. "If thy brother," it is said, "sin against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him. If he sin against thee seven times in a day, and turn to thee the seventh time, and say, I repent, forgive him. Also to the soldiers, by John, He commands, "to be content with their wages only; "and to the publicans, "to exact no more than is appointed. To the judges He says, "Thou shalt not show partiality in judgment. For girls blind the eyes of those who see, and corrupt just words. Rescue the wronged. And to householders: "A possession which is acquired with iniquity becomes less. Also of "love. "Love," He says, "covers a multitude of sins. And of civil government: "Render to Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things which are God's. Of swearing and the remembrance of injuries: "Did I command your fathers, when they went out of Egypt, to offer burnt-offerings and sacrifices? But I commanded them, Let none of you bear malice in his heart against his neighbour, or love a false oath. The liars and the proud, too, He threatens; the former thus: "Woe to them that call bitter sweet, and sweet bitter; "and the latter: "Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight. "For he that humbleth himself shall be exalted, and he that exalteth himself shall be humbled. And "the merciful" He blesses, "for they shall obtain mercy. Wisdom pronounces anger a wretched thing, because "it will destroy the wise. And now He bids us "love our enemies, bless them that curse us, and pray for them that despitefully use us.
“A sacrifice to the Lord,” he says, “is a broken spirit.” How then shall I crown myself with a wreath, or anoint myself with perfume? Or what incense shall I burn to the Lord? “A fragrant aroma to God,” he says, “is a heart that glorifies the one who formed it.” These are God’s wreaths and sacrifices, his perfumes and flowers. Now, about patience under wrong: “If your brother sins,” he says, “rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him. If he sins against you seven times in a day, and seven times turns back to you saying, ‘I repent,’ forgive him.” Through John he commands soldiers to be content with their pay alone, and tax collectors to demand nothing beyond what is set. To a judge he says, “You shall not show partiality in judgment, for gifts blind the eyes of those who see and ruin just words”; and, “Rescue those who are wronged.” To those who manage households: “A possession hastily gained with lawlessness becomes less.” About love: “Love,” he says, “covers a multitude of sins.” About citizenship: “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s.” About oaths and holding grudges: “Did I command your fathers when they came out of the land of Egypt to bring me whole burnt offerings and sacrifices? This is what I commanded them: let none of you hold a grudge in his heart against his neighbor, and let him not love a false oath.” He also threatens liars and the arrogant. To the first he says something like this: “Woe to those who call sweet bitter and bitter sweet.” To the others: “Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes and learned in their own sight.” “He who humbles himself will be exalted, and he who exalts himself will be humbled.” He blesses the merciful, “for they themselves will receive mercy,” while wisdom pities the angry person, “because anger will destroy even the wise.” Finally he commands us to love our enemies, to bless those who curse us, and to pray for those who mistreat us.
And He says: "If any one strike thee on the one cheek, turn to him the other also; and if any one take away thy coat, hinder him not from taking thy cloak also. Of faith He says: "Whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive. "To the unbelieving nothing is trustworthy," according to Pindar. Domestics, too, are to be treated like ourselves; for they are human beings, as we are. For God is the same to free and bond, if you consider. Such of our brethren as transgress, we must not punish, but rebuke. "For he that spareth the rod hateth his son. Further, He banishes utterly love of glory, saying, "Woe to you, Pharisees! for ye love the chief seat in the synagogues, and greetings in the markets. But He welcomes the repentance of the sinner-loving repentance-which follows sins. For this Word of whom we speak alone is sinless. For to sin is natural and common to all. But to return [to God] after sinning is characteristic not of any man, but only of a man of worth.
“To the one who strikes you on the cheek,” he says, “offer the other also; and if someone takes your tunic, do not stop him from taking your cloak as well.” About faith he says: “Whatever you ask in prayer, believing, you will receive.” And, as Pindar says, “nothing is trustworthy to the unbelieving.” We should also treat our household servants as we treat ourselves, for they are human beings like us. “For God is equal to all, if you consider it, to free men and to slaves alike.” When servants do wrong, we must not punish them but rebuke them. “For the one who spares his rod,” it says, “hates his own son.” Again, he drives out the love of glory, saying, “Woe to you, Pharisees, because you love the best seat in the synagogues and the greetings in the marketplaces.” But he welcomes the repentance of the sinner, loving the repentance that follows sins. For the Word alone is without sin. To sin is inborn in all and common to all, but to recover from sin is not the mark of any ordinary man, but of a man of real worth.
Respecting liberality He said: "Come to me, ye blessed, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: for I was an hungry, and ye gave Me meat; I was thirsty, and ye gave Me drink; I was a stranger, and ye took Me in; naked, and ye clothed Me; sick, and ye visited Me; in prison, and ye came unto Me. And when have we done any of these things to the Lord? The Instructor Himself will say again, loving to refer to Himself the kindness of the brethren, "In as much as ye have done it to these least, ye have done it to Me. And these shall go away into everlasting life. Such are the laws of the Word, the consolatory words not on tables of stone which were written by the finger of the Lord, but inscribed on men's hearts, on which alone they can remain imperishable.
About sharing, he said: “Come to me, all you who are blessed, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was hungry and you gave me food; I was thirsty and you gave me drink; I was a stranger and you took me in; naked and you clothed me; sick and you visited me; in prison and you came to me.” And when did we do any of these things for the Lord? The Instructor himself will answer again, lovingly counting the kindness shown to the brothers as done to himself, saying: “Inasmuch as you did it to these little ones, you did it to me. And such people will go away into eternal life.” Such are the laws of the Word, words of encouragement. They are written not on tablets of stone by the finger of the Lord, but inscribed on the hearts of men, the only place where they cannot be destroyed.
Wherefore the tablets of those who had hears of stone are broken, that the faith of the children may be impressed on softened hearts. However, both the laws served the Word for the instruction of humanity, both that given by Moses and that by the apostles. What, therefore, is the nature of the training by the apostles, appears to me to require to be treated of. Under this head, I, or rather the Instructor by me, will recount; and I shall again set before you the precepts themselves, as it were in the germ. "Putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another. Let not the sun go down upon your wrath; neither give place to the devil. Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth. Let all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and clamour, and evil-speaking, be put away from you, with all malice:
For this reason the tablets of the hard-hearted were broken, so that the faith of the little children might be impressed on soft minds. Both laws served the Word for the training of humanity, one through Moses and the other through the apostles. What kind of training came through the apostles? I think I must speak about this kind of teaching too. Or rather, the Instructor himself, remembering me, speaks, and I will again set out his counsels in seed form: “Put away falsehood, and let each of you speak truth with his neighbor, for we are members of one another. Do not let the sun go down on your anger, and do not give a place to the devil. Let the thief steal no longer, but rather let him labor, doing good work, so that he may have something to share with anyone in need. Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and shouting and slander be taken away from you, along with all malice.
and be ye kind one to another, tender-hearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ hath forgiven you. Be therefore wise, followers of God, as dear children; and walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us. Let wives be subject to their own husbands, as to the Lord. And let husbands love their wives as Christ also hath loved the Church? Let those who are yoked together love one another "as their own bodies. "Children, be obedient to your parents. Parents, provoke not your children to wrath; but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. Servants, be obedient to those that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in the singleness of your hearts, as unto Christ; with good-will from the soul doing service.
Be kind to one another, compassionate, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you. Be wise, then, and imitators of God, as beloved children, and walk in love, as Christ also loved us.” “Let wives submit to their own husbands, as to the Lord, and let husbands love their own wives, as Christ also loved the church.” So let those joined together love one another “as their own bodies.” “Children, obey your parents. Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord. Slaves, obey your masters according to the flesh with fear and trembling, in singleness of heart, as to Christ, serving from the soul with goodwill.
ye masters, treat your servants well, forbearing threatening: knowing that both their and your Lord is in heaven; and there is no respect of persons with Him. "If we live in the Spirit, let us walk in the Spirit. Let us not be desirous of vainglory, provoking one another, envying one another. Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ. Be not deceived; God is not mocked. Let us not be weary in well-doing: for in due time we shall reap, if we faint not. "Be at peace among yourselves. Now we admonish you, brethren, warn them who are unruly, comfort the feeble-minded, support the weak, be patient toward all men. See that none render evil for evil to any man. Quench not the Spirit. Despise not prophesyings. Prove all things: hold fast that which is good. Abstain from every form of evil. "Continue in prayer, watching thereunto with thanksgiving.
And masters, treat your servants well, giving up threats, knowing that both their Lord and yours is in heaven, and there is no favoritism with him.” “If we live by the Spirit, let us also walk by the Spirit. Let us not become conceited, challenging one another, envying one another. Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ. Do not be deceived: God is not mocked. Let us not grow weary in doing good, for in due season we will reap if we do not give up.” “Be at peace among yourselves. And we urge you, brothers, admonish the disorderly, encourage the fainthearted, hold on to the weak, be patient with everyone. See that no one repays anyone evil for evil. Do not quench the Spirit; do not despise prophecies; but test everything, hold fast to what is good; keep away from every kind of evil.” “Devote yourselves to prayer, staying alert in it with thanksgiving.
Walk in wisdom towards them that are without, redeeming the time. Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man. "Nourish yourselves up in the words of faith. Exercise yourselves unto godliness: for bodily exercise profiteth little; but godliness is profitable for all things, having the promise of the life which now is, and that which is to come. "Let those who have faithful masters not despise them, because they ate brethren; but rather do them service, because they are faithful. "He that giveth, let him do it with simplicity; he that ruleth, with diligence; he that showeth mercy, with cheerfulness. Let love be without dissimulation. Abhor that which is evil; cleave to that which is good. Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love, in honour preferring one another. Not slothful in business; fervent in spirit, serving the Lord. Rejoicing in hope; patient in tribulation; continuing instant in prayer. Given to hospitality; communicating to the necessities of the saints. Such are a few injunctions out of many, for the sake of example, which the Instructor, running over the divine Scriptures, sets before His children; by which, so to speak, vice is cut up by the roots, and iniquity is circumscribed.
“Walk in wisdom toward those outside, making the most of the time. Let your speech always be with grace, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer each person.” “Feed on the words of faith. Train yourselves for godliness. For bodily training is of benefit for a little, but godliness is beneficial for everything, since it holds a promise for the life now and for the life to come.” “Those who have believing masters must not look down on them because they are brothers, but must serve them all the more, because they are believers.” “Let the one who gives do so with simplicity, the one who leads with diligence, the one who shows mercy with cheerfulness. Let love be without hypocrisy. Hate what is evil and hold fast to what is good. Be tenderly affectionate toward one another in brotherly love, taking the lead in showing honor to one another. Do not be slow in diligence. Be fervent in spirit, serving the Lord, rejoicing in hope, enduring in affliction, devoted to prayer, pursuing hospitality, sharing in the needs of the saints.” These are a few out of many sayings, offered as samples. The Instructor has gone through the divine Scriptures themselves and sets them before his children. By them, one might say, wickedness is torn up by the roots and injustice is shut out.
Innumerable commands such as these are written in the holy Bible appertaining to chosen persons, some to presbyters, some to bishops, some to deacons, others to widows, of whom we shall have another opportunity of speaking. Many things spoken in enigmas, many in parables, may benefit such as fall in with them. But it is not my province, says the Instructor, to teach these any longer. But we need a Teacher of the exposition of those sacred words, to whom we must direct our steps. And now, in truth, it is time for me to cease from my instruction, and for you to listen to the Teacher. And He, receiving you who have been trained up in excellent discipline, will teach you the oracles. To noble purpose has the Church sung, and the Bridegroom also, the only Teacher, the good Counsel, of the good Father, the true Wisdom, the Sanctuary of knowledge. "And He is the propitiation for our sins," as John says; Jesus, who heals both our body and soul-which are the proper man. "And not for our sins only, but also for the whole world.
There are countless other instructions written in the holy books, addressed to particular chosen persons: some to elders, some to bishops and deacons, others to widows. We may speak of these at another time. Many things are also said in riddles and many in parables, and readers can benefit from them. But, says the Instructor, it is no longer my task to teach these things. We need a teacher to explain those holy words, and we must go to him. And now it is time for me to stop my instruction and for you to listen to the Teacher. When he takes you over, trained as you have been in good discipline, he will teach you the oracles. This Church is his school, and the Bridegroom is the only Teacher. He is the good purpose of the good Father, the genuine Wisdom, the sanctuary of knowledge. “And he is the propitiation for our sins,” as John says. He is Jesus, who heals both our body and our soul, the eternal person. “And not only for our sins, but also for the whole world.
And by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. He that saith, I know Him, and keepeth not His commandments, is a liar; and the truth is not in Him. But whoso keepeth His word, in him verily is the love of God perfected. Hereby know we that we are in Him. He that saith he abideth in Him, ought himself to walk even as He also walked. O nurslings of His blessed training! let us complete the fair face of the church; and let us run as children to our good mother. And if we become listeners to the Word, let us glorify the blessed dispensation by which man is trained and sanctified as a child of God, and has his conversation in heaven, being trained from earth, and there receives the Father, whom he learns to know on earth.
“And by this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments. The one who says, ‘I know him,’ and does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoever keeps his word, in him the love of God has truly been brought to completion. By this we know that we are in him. The one who says he remains in him ought himself also to walk just as he walked.” O you who are nurtured by this blessed training! Let us fill out the fair face of the Church, and let us who are infants run to our good mother. Even if we only become hearers of the Word, let us glorify the blessed plan of salvation. By it a person is trained, and made holy as a child of God. He lives as a citizen in heaven while still being trained on earth, and he receives there as Father the one he learns about on earth.
The Word both does and teaches all things, and trains in all things. A horse is guided by a bit, and a bull is guided by a yoke, and a wild beast is caught in a noose. But man is transformed by the Word, by whom wild beasts are tamed, and fishes caught, and birds drawn down. He it is, in truth, who fashions the bit for the horse, the yoke for the bull, the noose for the wild beast, the rod for the fish, the snare for the bird. He both manages the state and tills the ground; commands, and helps, and creates the universe. "There were figured earth, and sky, and sea, The ever-circling sun, and full-orbed moon, And all the signs that crown the vault of heaven. O divine works! O divine commands! "Let this water undulate within itself; let this fire restrain its wrath; let this air wander into ether; and this earth be consolidated, and acquire motion! When I want to form man, I want matter, and have matter in the elements. I dwell with what I have formed.
The Word does everything, teaches everything and trains in everything. A horse is led by a bridle, a bull is led by a yoke, and a wild animal is caught in a snare. But a human being is reshaped by the Word. By the Word wild animals are tamed, fish are lured and birds are brought down. He is the one who truly devises the bridle for the horse, the yoke for the bull, the snare for the wild animal, the rod for the fish and the trap for the bird. He governs the city and farms the land; he rules, he serves, and he creates the whole universe. “In it he made the earth, in it the sky, in it the sea, in it all the constellations with which the heaven is crowned.” O the divine works of creation! O the divine commands! “Let this water surge within itself. Let this fire hold back its anger. Let this air drift into the upper sky. Let the earth be fixed firm, and let it move whenever I wish. I still want to form a human being. The elements are the matter I have to work with. I dwell with what I have formed.”
If you know me, the fire will be your slave. Such is the Word, such is the Instructor, the Creator of the world and of man: and of Himself, now the world's Instructor, by whose command we and the universe subsist, and await judgment. "For it is not he who brings a stealthy vocal word to men," as Bacchylidis says, "who shall be the Word of Wisdom; "but "the blameless, the pure, and faultless sons of God," according to Paul, "in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation, to shine as lights in the world. All that remains therefore now, in such a celebration of the Word as this, is that we address to the Word our prayer.
“If you come to know me, fire will serve you.” Such is this Word, the Instructor, the Creator of the world and of man, and for man’s sake now also the Instructor of the world. By his command we both stand firm, man and world together, as we wait for judgment. “For he does not bring to mortals a stealthy, spoken word; the word will be wisdom,” as Bacchylides says. But the “blameless, pure and unblemished” children “of God,” as Paul says, “in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation, shine in the world like lights.” Now that we are at such a festival of the Word, what remains is to pray to the Word. Be merciful to your children, Instructor, Father, Charioteer of Israel, Son and Father, both one, Lord. Grant to us who follow your commands that we may fill out the likeness of the image. Grant that we may sense, as strongly as we can, that God is good and a judge who is not harsh. And may you yourself provide everything for us. May we live as citizens in your peace and be moved to your city. May we sail across the surge of sin without being tossed. May we be carried along in calm by the Holy Spirit, by your inexpressible wisdom. Night and day, until the perfect day, may we offer a thankful praise to the only Father and Son, Son and Father, the Son who is Instructor and Teacher, together with the Holy Spirit.
All things to the One, in whom are all things, through whom all things are one, through whom there is forever, of whom all are members, whose glory is the ages. All things to the good, all things to the beautiful, all things to the wise, all things to the just. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen. Since the Instructor has set us in the church and has handed us over to himself as the teaching Word who oversees all things, it is fitting that we, having come to this point, send up a song of praise to the Lord. It is a fair wage of thanks, matching his excellent training. Bridle of untamed colts, wing of birds that do not stray, sure rudder of ships, shepherd of royal lambs: gather your simple children to praise you in holiness, to sing to you without guile, with the innocent mouths of children, to Christ, the leader of children. King of the saints, all-conquering Word of the Most High Father, ruler of wisdom, support of those who toil, joy of the ages, Jesus, Savior of the human race: shepherd, plowman, rudder, bridle, heavenly wing of the all-holy flock, fisher of the people who are being saved. You draw pure fish out of the sea of wickedness, out of the hostile wave, and bait them with sweet life.
Lead us, holy shepherd of rational sheep. Lead us, king of untouched children. The footsteps of Christ are the heavenly way. Ever-flowing Word, boundless age, eternal light, spring of mercy, worker of virtue for those who hymn God with a reverent life, Christ Jesus: you are the heavenly milk pressed out from the sweet breasts of the bride, from the graces of your wisdom. We are infants, nourished with tender mouths and filled from the breast of the Word with the refreshing Spirit. Simple praises and true hymns to Christ the King, holy wages for the teaching of life, let us sing together, let us send up in simplicity to the mighty Child. We are a chorus of peace, the Christ-born; we are a self-controlled people. Let us sing together to the God of peace.
Sources. Greek text: Otto Stählin’s edition (Leipzig, Hinrichs, 1905), digitized by the First Thousand Years of Greek project (CC BY-SA 4.0). English (older translation): Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 2 (1885), public domain, from the Writings-Database collection (HistoricalChristianFaith); we matched its sentences to the Greek rows, and the translator’s chapter titles are kept. English (older translation): Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. 2 (1885), public domain, from the Writings-Database collection (HistoricalChristianFaith); we matched its sentences to the Greek rows by reading both in order. Modern English: prepared for SermonIndex with AI, based on that older English translation and checked clause by clause against the Greek, then checked again in a second AI pass, and released under CC BY-SA 4.0. Where the older translation departs from the Greek, our wording follows the Greek and a translator’s note says so. Translator’s notes also explain hard words and mark places where the author departs from Scripture. Long sections are divided into parts (2a, 2b …) for easier reading; those divisions are ours, not the author’s. The short hymn at the end of Book 3 has no older English column.
⚑ Greek flags mark places where the digital Greek looks like a typing or scanning error. Please report any error.
Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.