Menu

The Pope Calls for an End to Popular Music in Church

S
sermonindex

[image][img]https://www.sermonindex.net/images/forum/2004/may/featured_news.gif[/img]

In what may be the most visible — or audible — instance of the present-day Catholic hierarchy's retreat from the reforms of the 1960s and '70s, Pope Benedict XVI has called for an end to popular music in churches, suggesting that traditional chant and sacred polyphony are the suitable accompaniment to worship.

Numerous media outlets — from The Daily Telegraph of London ("Silence modern music in church, says Pope") to the Catholic News Service ("Pope says new liturgical music need not ignore older church music") to LoneStarTimes.com of Texas ("Pope demands end to crappy church music") — reported the pontiff's statement this past week.

The Second Vatican Council of 1962-65 severely curtailed the use of Latin in Catholic services in favor of the vernacular, believing that many potential worshippers were put off attending church by a liturgy in a language they didn't understand. In the same spirit, beginning shortly after Vatican II and continuing in subsequent decades, countless parishes and dioceses have experimented with popular and vernacular music in church — from guitars and panpipes in the Andes to drumming in Africa to flamenco singing in Spain. Rock 'n' roll-style amplified instruments have been tried in many places; in the U.S., the guitar-strumming "folk Mass" has been an object of derision among traditionalists (and music snobs) for a generation.

The Telegraph quoted Pope Benedict as saying, "It is possible to modernise holy music, but it should not happen outside the traditional path of Gregorian chants or sacred polyphonic choral music." He made the comment at a concert on June 24 which placed liturgical music by Palestrina alongside sacred works by Msgr. Domenico Bartolucci, from 1956 to 1997 the director of the Sistine Chapel Choir. The concert would seem intended to serve a purpose analogous to that of the mythical first performance of Palestrina's "Pope Marcellus" Mass, which, legend (and Hans Pfitzner's opera Palestrina) would have it, convinced the prelates at the Council of Trent not to ban sacred polyphony altogether by demonstrating that it could be as spiritually pure and uplifting as plainchant.

An accomplished pianist and devoted Mozart-lover, Pope Benedict — né Joseph Ratzinger — comes from a musical family; his brother Georg was for 30 years the director of the renowned choir of Regensburg Cathedral in Germany, the "Regensburger Domspatzen."

Reaction to the papal pronouncement was predictably mixed. Cardinal Ersilio Tonini, the Archbishop of Ravenna, agreed with his superior, saying that "Mass is the presence of Christ and the music adds so much more when the harmony allows the mind to transcend the concrete to the divine."

But Cardinal Carlo Furno, grand master of the Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem, was quoted in the Telegraph as saying it was "better to have guitars on the altar and rock and roll Masses than empty churches," adding that the use of modern music was a "sign of the vitality of the faith." The Italian newspaper La Stampa compared Benedict to his predecessor Pius X, who in 1903 deplored the newfangled sacred music of the Baroque and Classical eras and enforced the use of standardized Gregorian chants.

Nicholas Kenyon, controller of the BBC Promenade Concerts, remarked in the Telegraph of June 29 that "This is like David Lammy, just because he happens to be culture minister, criticising anything he does not personally like on the radio and insisting on a diet of his own favourites. [...] Who is to say that different generations cannot worship to the music of Palestrina or pop, Josquin or flamenco? We should encourage all who want to worship to do so in the style closest to their hearts."

Kenyon did go on to observe that, in the '60s and '70s, "the Catholic Church, in a desperate moment of realising that it was several centuries out of date, embarked on liturgical and musical reform with all the enthusiasm of a French revolutionary, censuring choirmasters, organists, and singers with a will, revoking all sense of value in the musical heritage of previous generations." He pointed out the critical and popular success of such contemporary composers as Arvo Pärt, Henryk Górecki and John Tavener, whose music seeks to express traditional Christian spirituality in a modern classical idiom. And, of course, he suggested that His Holiness might want to pay a visit to a Prom.

C
crsschk

("Pope demands end to crappy church music")

:-P

I'm sorry, but that is just to hilarious not to comment on.

S
sermonindex

I'm sorry, but that is just to hilarious not to comment on.

My thoughts were that how sad it is that the church has allowed all the worlds music in and is even not shamed of it, Nothing is sacred anymore, from trash christian metal to rap music worship, the idea of having sacred hymns or other songs with its own unique style just for the saints of God to sing seems weird in our times that we are living. How sad it is that the roman church with all its idolatorious behaviours can't tolerate the maligning of its "religious" music.

W
WorldView

"Equestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem"

Never heard of that.

C
crsschk

Nothing is sacred anymore

True. The earlier comment stuck me funny ... too true to life perhaps...

For all it's problems and not as a condensation, the Protestant Church could learn at least the sense of reverence that they hold.

J
JoeA

the Protestant Church could learn at least the sense of reverence that they hold.

As hard as it is to say, yeah we could learn from the pope on this one.

W
WorldView

I think that worship services have lost their sacredness not because of the tempo of the music, but by the attitude in which it is approached.

S
sermonindex

I think that worship services have lost their sacredness not because of the tempo of the music, but by the attitude in which it is approached.

Agreed and that is a very important principle to take in mind but it does break down, because there are definetly some styles of music in the church that are not worshipful at all. And it may be fair to say also that alot of the music does not cater at all to get people's heart into a form of worship to start thinking on things above and setting affections on things above not things of the earth.

S
sermonindex

Pardon my ignorance, although I am slightly confused.

Sermonindex, when you talk about some styles of music that have popped up inside churches and branded as 'worship music,' what kind of music are you talking about?

For example, at my church we have a piano, drums, guitar, bass, trombone, trumpet and an organ. Would you find this acceptable?

Or are you more talking about things like rap or hardcore music being used in church?

H
hmmhmm

i see it this way...when someone sings in a church..if you notice the singer and says ..wow how beutiful that song was!! thats wrong..it should be wow what great god she/he sings about.... if you notice the person singing the song and not the god they are singing about somethings wrong... and in older hymns the songs are about god..often now days its what god done for us...im so happy now... me is that me feel this me is that..and so on.... in older hymn its more he is great he is lord he is good...not me me me... thats the big difference i see in todays worship music...it isent for god..its for us and for us to feel cosy in church and get a feeling that feels good..... instead of just singing to his glory.... only for him...

O
OverSeer

In his book, [i]Return to Worship[/i], Ron Owens, has several chapters dealing with music in the church. In chapter or "letter" 27, entitled The Language and Power of Music, he says,

The fundamental question in determining whether something is right or wrong is not, "What are the consequences?" or, "Does it fit into the way people think?" or even, "Will the result be favorable or unfavorable?" The fundamental question must be, "Does it adhere to the standards of God as set forth in His Word?"

Our worship is not for the purpose of pleasing people - it is for pleasing God. Worship that is man-centered is untrue to the very nature of the God we say we've come to worship.

But this reversal of true worship has not only infiltrated worship music - it has also infiltrated much of today's modern preaching.

Psalm 80:3 - "Turn us again, O God, and cause they face to shine; and we shall be saved."

Grace and peace
Olan

S
sermonindex

Not trying to be inflammatory here... but... who cares what the Pope has to say about anything?

Krispy

S
sermonindex

Krispy said:

Not trying to be inflammatory here... but... who cares what the Pope has to say about anything?
Well, here's why I care. The Pope is a very influential world figure, and the Vatican, being a sovreign state has a seat at the UN.

Those two facts would matter less, if it were not that this particular Pope, with his conservatism, sounds just like an evangalical on many issues.

To those who don't know the difference, they perceive a unification of thinking between Catholic and Protestant, and then they make the incorrect deduction that it doesn't make any difference to their eternal welfare, if they remain Catholic - or, if they [i]become[/i] Catholic.

This supreme deception is the main reason I am concerned every time I hear the Pope echoing truth, whether it is clearly biblical, or merely popular (and not wrong for either of those categories).

Over here (UK), the old Labour Party was turned into 'New Labour' by Tony Blair who leapt at the opportunity to stand for leadership when the previous leader died suddenly, not as an old man, either, leaving the perceived natural successor to recover from the shock of both events.

One of the strongest accusations which has been levelled at New Labour, is that it won the Conservative vote by stealing their policies. I see the same 'picture' in the Pope having an opinion about popular music in church, just at the same time as the American church is waking up to the emptiness of some of what its leaders have been teaching it to sing. I'd be surprised if this is a co-incidence, but hey! Surprise me.... ;-)

R
Rahman


Whoa! ... Looks like many of us really missed the point as to why Holy Spirit moved brother SermonIndex to post this thread (as with many of the other threads He moves bro Greg to post) ...

Come on saints any of us who know the words of the old hymns know that the majority of this newer so called Christian music don't hold a candle to the devotion contained to God, His will, and way like the old standards ...

There once was a time when Christians could say of some secular/worldly music that it sounded like Christian or Gospel music - Now we find ourselves saying that Christian/Gospel music sounds like secular/worldly music ... My being American/African, modern Am/Af gospel music is a subject that i believe our Lord used me to address for much of our new Gospel music is just downright (designed for worldly commercial crossover) deplorable;

A Message to Black America and the Black Church
Gangsta Rap – God’s Final Straw
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=2826&forum=35&9

To be blatantly honest i've come to really believe that our advesary has pretty much blinded us to any point(s) of His pleading us our need to repent of, to turn around and move away from ... It seems that
instead of taking His point(s) seriously that we'd much rather make fun of an alternate point, or find some other escape rather than just bear the brunt of His point(s) and stop our foolishness ... My prayer life has much increased in alarm to the degree of spiritual deafness and blindness that so many of us display whenever He touches on how much wordliness we carry ... He's trying to get His point(s) across to us, and we're blind and deaf to them ... Jesus help us!

Lord Jesus please stop our adversary's blinding uf us ... It seems anything other than just plain taking Your point(s) and repenting of them ... For Your sake, for the sake of we Your Body, and especially for the sake of a lost and dying world who view us as a joke rather than Your shining city on a hill ... To Your glory: MAKE US ALL GET YOUR POINT(S)! ... Amen

J
JoeA

Not trying to be inflammatory here... but... who cares what the Pope has to say about anything?

If the pope is concerned about worldly music in the Catholic church, then shouldn't Protestants definately be concerned? On any given day i'll state why i think the Catholic church is not Christian, but if the pope is worried about worldliness, that means we should be waking up too. I just wish some Protestant leaders would rise up and say the same.

And hmmhmm, i totally agree with what you said.

S
sermonindex

I didnt say one way or the other about music, or worldiness in the church. Those have been serious issues facing Bible believing churches for a long time... I'm just wondering why when the Pope addresses it we're all of a sudden going to pay attention. Nothing in this world could cause me to care any less what the Pope has to say about any topic.

I'm concerned about worldiness in the church as anyone who has been on this forum for any length of time knows.

So the Pope is concerned about worldliness... big deal. So are the nutty Islamic extremeists about their religion. So are the Mormons. So are the JW's.

I'm really not trying to cause any contention here. Just surprised that many of us here have been sounding the trumpet for a long time about compromise and worldliness among God's people. It's a bit disconcerting when [b]we[/b] get dismissed and sometimes chastised by other Christians on this forum for speaking out against it... but when the leader of the world's largest false religion brings it up people have more respect for him than they do their fellow believers.

Krispy

Krispy

R
roadsign

Is anybody not concerned that a mere man on the other side of the pond should have such a degree of control over the local church?!!!

For several years my sister, a musician had been using the Catholic Church in her community to host classical chamber concerts. It is an ideal sanctuary for such events. But then the church received orders from above that this would not be allowed anymore – as the building was to be used only for “worship”. Of course the church board did not like that order, as they had enjoyed a good community relationship with my sister and others. However, they felt obligated to obey the mandate.

This is preposterous! - not only that the Pope takes that degree of control over the local churches, but also that the local churches keeps on submitting – even against their will.

This makes me angry, as it grieves our Lord so much. It’s like the heirarchy refusing to let their children ever grow up, and the lowerarchy refusing to grow up. (and risk persecution and excommunication)
Diane

R
Rahman


Hmmmm ... maybe i'm not getting the point here ... The beginning of bro Greg's post says;

"In what may be the most visible — or audible — instance of the present-day Catholic hierarchy's retreat from the reforms of the 1960s and '70s, Pope Benedict XVI has called for an end to popular music in churches, suggesting that traditional chant and sacred polyphony are the suitable accompaniment to worship."

See i'm thinking the point of the thread is about the Catholic Church's "repentance", "turn around", from attempting to be relevant to our modern world by allowing this popular influenced music in the first place, and not whether the RCC or the pope is right in anything else, or that it was posted as a personal affront, or in superceedance to anything that any of us have already been trumpeting against in the Body ... i'm thinking that the main point of the thread being posted is that if the pope/RC can see where it was a mistake to "compromise" in music, then why can't we as the Body of Christ see where we've made similar compromise ...

i know bro Greg to be one of few words, unlike many of us who will beat our point(s) to exhaustion (yep i'm guilty), but to me bro Greg's point(s) often seem to be toward pointing to the Body's errors, the need for the Body's serious repentance from our errors, and much needed REVIVAL toward the Body getting on with the King's business in replacement of our own ...

Ya know as of late i've gotten real butterflies in my gut for we the Body of Christ especially here in America ... Not that the gates of hell will prevail against us, but a real sense of dread of just what it's gonna take for our Lord to shake us out of our stupor to our acknowledging His point(s) ... :-(

S
sermonindex

you're speaking wisdom here:

Those two facts would matter less, if it were not that this particular Pope, with his conservatism, sounds just like an evangalical on many issues.

and

To those who don't know the difference, they perceive a unification of thinking between Catholic and Protestant


that's good stuff....you know, when I see posters on this forum "speaking out against" the "world's greatest false religion", it just makes me grieve, because God gave us this ministry of reconciliation. That said, am I going to engage in popery or the idolatrous practices of the roman church?

no.

But one of my employees, is a God fearing born again follower of Jesus, and we were sitting around talking about the Word, this and that, and I ask him where he goes to church, and he tells me, "Saint so and so catholic church".

Now what happens if I "speak out" and tell him he's in a "false religion"? I could stumble a brother, lose a brother.

He must of sensed my heart, because he told me, he's a Christian catholic, he loves Jesus, maybe the Lord has him in this particular parish to be a witness. Only God knows.

Good words sister, your brother bartle

S
sermonindex

Now what happens if I "speak out" and tell him he's in a "false religion"? I could stumble a brother, lose a brother.

He must of sensed my heart, because he told me, he's a Christian catholic, he loves Jesus, maybe the Lord has him in this particular parish to be a witness. Only God knows

Yes, bartle, I have a number of similar experiences. I know a number of Catholics who worship God with an amazing amount of love and devotion.

The balance for me is difficult. I will not compromise God's truth, but standing up against such a great deception with the same boldness as bro Ravenhill and others is much more difficult when these people are your friends whom who know love God.

So, how does it make sense? Do these Christian Catholics not completely understand the implications of their doctrine? Do they unknowingly in their hearts ascribe solely to God's grace for their salvation?

Sorry if I am getting off topic. I am the new guy on the block, so that is my excuse ;-).

-K DAY

S
sermonindex

Sorry if I am getting off topic. I am the new guy on the block, so that is my excuse

no problems, and these "catholic" Christians love Jesus, so what does one do?

One thing is to know when to keep quiet, like James said the tongue can set fires. A lot of times, most times, its the Holy Ghost that does the Talking. We mess things up. Sometimes when we open our mouths and give our "opinions" or "the truth"....I didnt say The Truth. God the Holy Ghost will be doing a Work on a person, and some well-intentioned, yet imprudent follower will open their mouths and mess things up.

Notice the way Paul handled himself on Mars Hill. No one can ever say Paul was soft and compromised, yet you don't read of him stomping into Mars Hill with an amp system shrieking "REPENT YOU FILTHY PERVERTS!!"

Those Greek philosphers would have just tuned him out, regarded Paul as an irelevant abberation, not worthy of a sober low key discussion on divine matters. Did you ever notice thats how God the Holy Spirit speaks to one, sober and low key.

would to God that believers would emulate Paul's ministry, including me, especially me!!

bartle

R
roadsign

nothing is sacred anymore
I'd feel more comfortable with the word “godly” or “decent” rather than “sacred”. There is a reason for that: For centuries the church has tried to nail down a description of what would pass as “sacred” by enforcing all kinds of rules and restrictions. And maybe really, what became sacred really became an idolatrous icon in the church. It's no different today.

The bible has no rules about musical style. It is people who make rules. I say, when one is humble, respects the people, and has a humble appreciation for musical quality, you will likely get decent music in church.

I think that worship services have lost their sacredness
I certainly know what you are saying, yet I might add that a desire for “sacredness” may really be a craving for a respectable form of godliness that is without the power of God. That’s essentially what the Pope is striving for, though I do appreciate his love for quality music in the church. I think Krispy makes the point perfectly:
so the Pope is concerned about worldliness... big deal. So are the nutty Islamic extremeists about their religion. So are the Mormons. So are the JW's.

Krispy, I believe you are right: Most religions want to maintain their distinction – and be set apart from the world. Really that’s how they maintain their identity and not get washed away. This hits close to home, doesn't it?

See i'm thinking the point of the thread is about the Catholic Church's "repentance", "turn around", from attempting to be relevant to our modern world
But Rahman, is this really the kind of repentance that leads to Life?

one of my employees, is a God fearing born again follower of Jesus,..(in the RCC)

... a light in the darkness ... in the world but not of the world - in the RCC, but not of the RCC. Of course that should go for any of us in our religious affiliation. We are in the church; but hopefully, we are OF the Church. (Capitol C)

Diane


R
Rahman

Sis D you (partially) quoted me where i said;
"See i'm thinking the point of the thread is about the Catholic Church's "repentance", "turn around", from attempting to be relevant to our modern world"

Then you said;
"But Rahman, is this really the kind of repentance that leads to Life?"


YIKES! ... Back to my point about anything but seeing "the point" ... Not angry here, but i just really need to know, Sis D, anyone, am i not writing clearly? ... Please tell me what i could have said to make it any plainer than the rest of my post which says ...

Quote;
"by allowing this popular influenced music in the first place, and not whether the RCC or the pope is right in anything else"

Help us Jesus! ... But once again isn't the point of the posting of this thread about "pop music" and not the pope or the RCC? ...

Again i restate ...

"i'm thinking that the main point of the thread being posted is that if the pope/RC can see where it was a mistake to "compromise" in music, then why can't we as the Body of Christ see where we've made similar compromise"

... AND NOT ABOUT THE POPE OR THE RCC BEING RIGHT OR WRONG OR IF THIS KIND OF REPENTANCE LEADS TO LIFE WITHIN IT'S STRUCTURE!!!

Yes i've shouted, forgive me, but man i feel like i'm posting to a wall here ... ISN'T THE POINT ABOUT MUSIC - IF NOT THEN PLEASE WILL SOMEONE LET ME KNOW!

Seems to me that much of this thread has turned into a diatribe of what we don't like, which is the main reason why much of His Body is in the deplorable state we're in because the focus is supposed to be on what He doesn't like ...

i can't speak as well about what has happened to Christian Music amongst my brothers and sisters who happen to be white, but i can tell you about black new so called Gospel music ... IT PRETTY MUCH REEKS OF COMMERCIALISM AND THE WORLD!!! ... And i wish God would raise up some preacher(s), any preacher(s) whom He could use to turn back the hands of time on much of the modern crapola that's passing for Gospel music in much of the American African church ...

First off as i said before a bunch of it comes from it's penning to crossover into the R&B/Rap/Pop market ... To me if it's designed with the intent to sell secularly that's a compromise to praising God in the first place ... Back in the day Mahalia Jackson didn't sell out like that, she woudn't even concider singing secular music ... When she was asked why, she said that God gave her her voice to sing praises to Him and that's what she intended to do ... He supplied her needs (very well i might add) in doing it, but so many of todays so called Gospel singers are going after their wants - They want Holy Ghost bling-bling, which is an oxymoron in itself, thereby reducing anyone whose trying to play both ends from the middle just a plain spiritual moron - period!

i've sat in church services, grieved to the core, and watched young folk be allowed to do so called Christian rap while they bust their demonically inspired worldly movements supposedly to the glory of God ... i also know the difference between a rousing Gospel praise song, and one inspired by the likes of George Clinton and the Parlament Funkedelic or MC Hammer ... That's what we got a lot of in so called black Gospel music today, and if anyone is afraid to stand flat footed and say this in your church, our feels that a church leader don't have the right to set precedent over the music, then i'll shout it to the rafters here: IT'S WRONG, AND SO ARE YOU! ...

God Himself is the one who put preachers over their assignments and if such a man has sought our Lord and feels led of Holy Ghost to set music codes then God bless him, and if we don't like it we can always go and find a more liberal church ... When i got saved 27 years ago we just didn't sing any ole thing, and we certainly weren't allowed (by the preacher and church rules) to come to church dressed any ole kind of way ... And please before anyone goes off point about some not having the whatever to come to church presentable, #1 i'm not talking about the poorest of the poor (at my church clothing is provided to the poorest of the poor), i'm talking about most folk and particularly the youth ... Within 25 years i now sit and see many young black men come to church "thugged out" and many young black women in stuff so tight, low and/or short that it's just mind blowing to me ... When i first got saved the pastors and churches i first started out in would not ALLOW such disrespect in the house of God, but now we've become so relevant, so relaxed, so purpose driven for quantity in numbers for quantity of dollars, until as far as i'm concerned, and as far as i believe our Lord has me to shout, WE'RE JUST PLAIN SOLD OUT!

One thing for sure is i believe that the reason we miss "the point" is because as soon as something comes across as a "can't" or "don't" to we modern day, free thinking, way over stepping Pauls meaning of liberty type saints, we instantly start to espousing on what we think, when the main "point" should become "well what does God think" and if we kept our faces in His Word we wouldn't have to guess ... He said, "Be ye Holy as i am Holy" and we have a whole Book to tell us what He thinks/likes and what He don't ... Bottom line is if we'd keep our faces in His Word we wouldn't even need a leader to tell us ... But the problem is that most of us do need a leader like Israel of old because we don't have what it takes to serve the invisible, let alone discern by ourselves, without one, and now even so many of the leaders have fallen down on their responsibility TO DISCERN & LEAD! ...

i for one travail for the (please Jesus) soon coming day when our Lord will do whatever it's gonna take for Him to shake us out of "ourselves" back into our first love devotion and first work service to Himself ...

COME QUICKLY CORRECTION & REVIVAL!!! ... Amen

R
roadsign

Hi, Rahman, my friend, It appears that mental meanderings have caused you a wee bit of distress. (I easily get quite divergent.)

I reread the initial post –this time more from the perspective of the music itself:

("Pope demands end to crappy church music")

Ohhh, If only I could be pope-for-a-day in our Protestant churches and do that, but I can’t see how that would that make good musicians out of mediocre ones. It’s not just a case of changing style but changing people.

The Vatican has retreated from the 60’s liturgical reforms when modern musical expression was stipulated in order to be relevant and keep members. But they went overboard and censured anything “old”. Obviously the reforms backfired. People ended up copying the world. Now, I would call that voluntary slavery to the world. So, many parishioners shifted from one kind of ruler to another. And now the pendulum gets pulled back again.

The Pope’s edict:

"It is possible to modernise holy music, but it should not happen outside the traditional path of Gregorian chants or sacred polyphonic choral music."

This restriction seems like an over-reaction! There are a lot of fabulous sacred styles available between chant and contemporary that is far from “crappy” – as someone pointed out:

He pointed out the critical and popular success of such contemporary composers …whose music seeks to express traditional Christian spirituality in a modern classical idiom.

My main objection to the edict is the fact that it does not allow for a freedom of musical expression. It would be intensely frustrating for any trained musician, including the rest of the folk. Composers have struggled with religious restrictions like this for years (from protestants too), and thankfully many just ignored orders and wrote what was in their heart. And so now we have a great deal of fabulous music that has stood the test of time.

You know – when it comes to music, “pop” and “crappy” are not automatically the same thing. Wouldn’t you agree?

Diane


C
crsschk

This just came across the front page via the Random Article, seemed timely ...

[b]Adoring Worship[/b]

[i]Neither the word adoration nor any of its forms is found in our familiar King James Bible, but the idea is there in full bloom. The great Bible saints were, above all, enraptured lovers of God. The psalms celebrate the love which David (and a few others) felt for the person of God. As suggested above, Paul admitted that the love of God was in his breast a kind of madness: For whether we be beside ourselves, it is of God: or whether we be sober, it is for your cause. For the love of Christ constraineth us (2 Cor. 5:13-14). In Weymouth's translation the passage reads, For the love of Christ overmasters us. The idea appears to be that Paul's love for Christ carried him beyond himself and made him do extravagant things which to a mind untouched with the delights of such love might seem quite irrational. Perhaps the most serious charge that can be brought against modern Christians is that we are not sufficiently in love with Christ. The Christ of Fundamentalism is strong but hardly beautiful. It is rarely that we find anyone aglow with personal love for Christ. I trust it is not uncharitable to say that in my opinion a great deal of praise in conservative circles is perfunctory and forced, where it is not downright insincere.[/i]

~A.W. Tozer

S
sermonindex

It's interesting... previous to becoming the new Pope (I believe the official title is Holy Head Honcho) of the Roman Catholic Church, Benedict was basically in charge of the doctrinal side of things. Believe it or not, he was in charge of what used to be called the Inquisition... but they have softened up the name now because of the bad memories it drudges up for folks.

So why should we be surprised that he is flexing a little muscle over the local churches?

Remember, the local churches see him as God in the flesh on this earth. Of course they are not going to disobey.

Ah, sweet liberty in Christ. It's nice not to belong to any religion. Isnt the book of Galations one of the best books in the Bible? Sweet freedom.

Krispy

R
Rahman


Sis D you wrote;
"Hi, Rahman, my friend, It appears that mental meanderings have caused you a wee bit of distress. (I easily get quite divergent.) .. I reread the initial post –this time more from the perspective of the music itself:"


Ahhhhhhh ... sweet breakthrough :-P ...

You know sis when i was in the world and couldn't quite get my point across i'd throw a rod (usually with a whole lot of foul language) and voila - i'd get instant attention ... i used to always wonder why that had to be so ... Anyhow i'm glad to be restrained by Holy Spirit enuf now to still be able throw a slight rod, but with no anger and cussin ...

i think you hit on something in your statement about easily getting quite divergent, i think that's one of the bad things that has happened to us saints in the body ... God's pointed, pretty precise in His ways and thoughts, and we've become divergent in ours - scattered i'd say, like lost sheep gone astray ... Praise Him that we have His promise that He'll come look for us ...


You continued;
"Ohhh, If only I could be pope-for-a-day in our Protestant churches and do that, but I can’t see how that would that make good musicians out of mediocre ones. It’s not just a case of changing style but changing people."


Praise God that at least in Protestantism we don't have to be subjected to that degree of Nicolaitinism, but what you said hit upon one of my points ... Where are the preacher/pastors of God who have the power bestowed on them as His annointed to change things within the confines of the segment of Christ flock that He's given them ...

You said "it's not just a case of changing style but changing people" ... i somewhat disagree in that i believe if pastors would submit themselves, their ministerial staffs, and then their congregations back as prescribed in Joel chapter 2 that return to a seeking of a more holy style of living and worshipping would change the people ... Some to repentance and a closer walk with Him, and others to revulsion and a walk right out the door ... Especially in Christ it's quality that He's interested in (as in the lesson of Gideon) and not quantity as so many preachers have come to seek ...

OK i'm done, i believe the point about the music has been gotten across ... :-D ...

Blessings in Christ Jesus one and all!

W
wyattearp

Krispy
The actual official title of the pope is

The Holy Head Honcho in the post hole digger hat.

Thought you aught to know

Wyatt

R
roadsign

God's pointed, pretty precise in His ways and thoughts, and we've become divergent in ours - scattered i'd say, like lost sheep gone astray .

Hi, Rahman, Really I was using the word “divergent” to explain how I can make one thought go in many different directions which go in yet different directions. I didn’t mean straying off the straight and narrow. See there, you took a word I used, and diverged into a yet different direction. Oh the fun we have with words.

And now.. back to the topic of music….. boy, that can sure get divergent!

it's quality that He's interested in … and not quantity …

If the Pope had appealed for quality than I could have accepted his edict more readily, but he also commanded a return to music that would be very difficult to resurrect in this day and age. I sure couldn’t expect it from my church. I doubt that very few even know what choral polyphonic music is – let alone be able to perform it on a Sunday morning.

We live in a different world, where music has become something that you get when you click a button, not when you practise and perform an instrument or voice. So I think skills are being lost. And our worship leaders are not trained to teach these more refined styles. Also, our modern churches are not built with the acoustics that made those ancient styles so magnificent. The RC churches have a lot of similar cultural issues as the protestants. Perhaps the Pope is not aware of these nitty-gritty’s.... or maybe I'm not understanding his expectations....
... modernized chant?..... mmmmm I like the idea, though..... well, sometimes.

Diane

R
Rahman


Sis D ...

It dawned on me last night that you'd posted this final question ...,

Quote:
"You know – when it comes to music, “pop” and “crappy” are not automatically the same thing. Wouldn’t you agree?

... and i didn't address it ...

No i don't think that "pop" music from a technical standpoint has to be "crappy" ... There's some pop music that's finely crafted, orchestrated, with lyrics clean enough even a Christian could listen to without getting convicted ... There was a time when i used to think that saints who just shut down on any other type music than old hymns, old Gospel, and the few newer songs that uplift ones spirit, were just way over the top, seeing the devil in everything ... You know, as some say, "just to heaven bound to be of any earthly good" ... Now i've become the same way, tho i don't see the devil in everything, just anything that doesn't point ones attention to Christ ... So while say Celine Dion's style of "pop" music might fit comfortably with some Christians as entertainment, and i'm certainly not condemning anyone to hell if they listen for i myself like smooth jazz, what i am saying is that even smooth jazz because it doesn't point me to thoughts of Christ has even become suspect to me of being a more subtle tool of the devil ... As you know i'm a very black and white type thinker, not much room for gray areas: it's either inspired of/from God or of/from the devil ...

i'm a 50's guy who grew up during the Motown era, and once i used to compare the "pop" music i listened to to the "pop" music my kids liked in the 80's and thought how much more cleaner, and innocent, my era of music was compared to theirs ... By the time pop music got to the 2K's i was horrified then Holy Spirit hit me, moving me closer to the Light, and ripped the blinders from my spiritual eyes, so that when i went back and tried to listen to my 60's R&B i heard it in a whole different Light ... Know what i found? ... It wasn't innocent at all, but just another (then masked in sexual innuendo) stepping stone in satan's musical plan to bring American African "pop/R&B" music to the "crap of rap" it is today - a "pop" music that may be finely crafted, orchestrated, but now with such blatant filthy "lyrics" that'll melt most sensitive saints ears ...

So no, to me, from a technical stand point "pop" music doesn't have to be "crappy" - But also to me any music that comes into the Church alledging to uplift Christ and it sets my "discernment" alarm off to the contrary, i don't care how cleverly it's put together, it becomes crap to me ... Highly toxic and dangerous crap!

S
sermonindex

Hi bartle and thank you for your positive feedback on my post. I was encouraged.

he told me, he's a Christian catholic, he loves Jesus,
I too have a very close friend whose testimony is identical, who has a formidable spiritual ministry of exorcism, which he does not take lightly. I cannot dismiss his awesome testimony, and have prayed and watched as the Lord has drawn him closer to Himself.

I think it is the written word of God which really turns Catholics away from Catholicism, without in any way denting their love of the God the Father and Jesus Christ His Son. However, there is a huge emotional battle to support them through, as they work out how to handle the truth that Catholicism is not in the Bible.

Personally, I don't think this can be rushed, and one must simply trust the Lord to do His own work, as you said in your next post, meanwhile continuing to fellowship in the Spirit.

Praise the Lord for this brother's witness.

R
Rahman


Sis D you wrote;
"Hi, Rahman, Really I was using the word “divergent” to explain how I can make one thought go in many different directions which go in yet different directions. I didn’t mean straying off the straight and narrow. See there, you took a word I used, and diverged into a yet different direction. Oh the fun we have with words."


- i know, as i WAS using the word to point out how we can get off the straight and narrow -


Sis D you wrote;
"If the Pope had appealed for quality than I could have accepted his edict more readily, but he also commanded a return to music that would be very difficult to resurrect in this day and age. I sure couldn’t expect it from my church. I doubt that very few even know what choral polyphonic music is – let alone be able to perform it on a Sunday morning."


- Ha! ... ha! ... i don't know what "choral polyphonic music" is either ... But in terms of what type of music the pope want the RCC to go back to is neither here nor there to me ... But do you as a musical director in a protestant church think that it would be difficult to go back to singing more meaningful hymns? ... Perhaps you don't have such a problem with this new wave type Christian music in your church, but i can tell you that in many a black church this emergent hip-hop style, via many preachers cowtowing to the belief that it must be allowed to appease young folk, is giving satan a wide opening in paralyzing our spiritual core ...

Then there's also a similar problem amongst older members who seem to think that Holy Spirit can't operate or manifest Himself thru them without the aid of a raucous uptempo cacophony that causes one to shout, holy dance and bounce off pews ... I'm not saying that Holy Spirit can't fill up a saint to a point that one might shout, cry, wail, moan or do a Holy dance, but i've been in one service, just one in the entire 27 years i've been saved, where there wasn't even a lick of music, only many voices praising God aloud, and i truly saw Holy Spirit move on members, as He also moved on me ... That one service changed the course of my life for it was in that service that i heard (and i ain't even gonna soften it up here by saying i believe i heard) God speak to me ... It was also that service that convinced me the role of music occupies much to high a place in our worship services ... In many a black church we may say that our music is to our Lord, but i suspect it to be more for ourselves because it makes US feel good ... Plus music in song can easily be empty lip service, as i think it was Ravenhill who said, "We don't outright lie to God, we sing them" ... Scripture says our Lord inhabits our praise and i've come to believe that means He's more interested in hearing our voices just lifted up in praise to Him, doesn't have to be a orchestrated song accompanied by music ...

i'm American African and i know how easily emotional we can become in Church ... The part that bothers me is that i see where that tendency to emotionalism is played upon but emotionalism is not strength in the Spirit ... Emotionalism like happiness is transitory, but true joy in our Lord for the sake of being in our Lord because He is in us is eternal ...

You know sis D i was talking to bro Ironman last night and our Lord used Him to tell me that His reasons for bringing me to many a thread here on SI is primarily not for Him to use me to teach someone something, as much as it is for His use of someone else to teach me (praise Him He continually checks my ego and motives) ... Whenever we go back and forth He always teaches me something, and this is what He just dawned on me about this thread ... The "point" ain't about getting back to old music as a way of getting back to what's lost in His Church ... [b] The "point" is our getting back to Him (period) in REVIVAL/REUNION[/b] of our first love and first works [b]for such a crying out would truly be music to our Lord's ears[/b] ...

Blessings in our wonderful Lord Jesus Christ! -

R
roadsign

You know sis D i was talking to bro Ironman last night and our Lord used Him to tell me that His reasons for bringing me to many a thread here on SI is primarily not for Him to use me to teach someone something, as much as it is for His use of someone else to teach me

Now, there’s a prophetic word, for sure! – for me too. I think we benefit more here if we approach the forum as God’s teaching tool for us, rather than our teaching tool for everyone else.
i'm American African

So you are black. Funny, I just assumed that you were white - fair-haired and blue-eyed to boot. (Ha!) So there - I just learned something about myself – I make assumptions. There are a lot of good lessons in that point alone.

Here’s a lesson about black culture:

… i know how easily emotional we can become in Church ... The part that bothers me is that i see where that tendency to emotionalism is played upon

Funny, we whites assume that blacks are so passionate about their faith, and show it by the way they worship. We say, Why can’t we be more like them in our worship? Many a choir director has told his reserved choristers, “Hey, folks, you need to be more black!”

I recently chatted with a black cousin (by marriage). He shared with me that he left the black church – because he got tired of the emotionalism. It was pushed on him – like it was the only right way. So he defected to the CRC - a BIG contrast, as Dutch reformed people are not exactly emotive – again, an EXPECTED behavior. Nevertheless, the CRC was a breath of fresh air for my cousin. He said he could finally understand the preacher and he appreciated hearing content.

Incidently, his Dutch wife is now in a black church because she felt called to minister to black children. The word "scatter" comes to mind: God scatters his people so they learn to depend on him, not their religous/cultural/racial origions. Maybe bad music isn't all bad in the long run - it nudges you futher down the road.

As I implied earlier, you don’t need to have a Pope to squeeze religious expression into a small box. It seems to happen automatically in any religious culture.

The "point" ain't about getting back to old music as a way of getting back to what's lost in His Church ... The "point" is our getting back to Him

And the music will take care of itself.

Diane

R
Rahman

Sis D you wrote;

"The "point" is our getting back to Him
And the music will take care of itself."


Precisely ... as well as everything else ... :-D

R
Rahman

--- Sis D,

Our Lord is really using you in my behalf to bringing some things to calarity ... He popped what you'd said back up into my mind this weekend and these are some subsequent thoughts ---

Sis D you wrote;
"So you are black. Funny, I just assumed that you were white - fair-haired and blue-eyed to boot. (Ha!) So there - I just learned something about myself – I make assumptions. There are a lot of good lessons in that point alone."


--- MAJORITY THINKING;

Sis your assumption about my being white is actually normal, it's "majority thinking" ... Meaning that if you're part of a majority group (as Caucasian is in N. America), unless given any hint or clue to think otherwise it's just a normal assumption to think so of others (especially on a forum) ... If i wrote how i generally speak to others in my ethnic group you would probably pick it up right away, but i don't ... Minorities (blacks are 12% of US population) also "majority think", in that on SI i take for granted that the majority of my brothers and sisters here are (in the natural) white ...

i'll let you in on something you may not know about American Africans, but there used to be a time (especially amongst we that came out of the Civil Rights Movement) where we had "a black voice" and a "white voice" ... The former we used amongst ourselves, with a more lazy and truncated use of English, interspersed with slang ... But our "white voice" we'd use on the telephone/in person doing business, setting up job interviews, and on interviews, any area where we'd have to speak to white people ... The stories i could tell you about my setting up job interviews with white architects, and the shock i saw on there faces when i showed up being black :-P ...This is just one example of the many unfortunate by-products birthed from US history of slavery and discrimination :-( ...

Another horrible by-product is something that many Am/Af's subscribe to called "keepin-it-real" ... i really hate this one because the conotation is that being Am/Af i can't be real to a large portion of my ethnic group if i have an affinity towards anything that can be ascribed as my "trying to be like the white man" ... The former is usually aimed at any blacks who put a strong emphasis on education and are prone toward Eurocentric intellectualism and culture ... This pretty much describes me, besides the fact that my parents raised me from a standard of expectation far above the poor neighborhoods we lived in ... So i wound up pretty much getting this attitude from both white and black, "Who do you think you are"? ... Which equated to my being what was once called "an uppity Negro" (and that's putting it nicely) ...

Now the really weird part of this is that i also got this in "church" ... i believe that our Lord groomed me to be exactly as i am, for His use amongst the assignment and people group He's put me in, tho often i feel like Jeremiah amongst folk who just refuse to "get it" ...

i believe our Lord has shown me (to warn) that the great majority of the black church, at present is still stuck in a now archaic emotionally driven, still feeling oppresses for being black in America, music to make me feel good, type of worship culture that may have served a purpose then but is straight up crippling us now ... This along side the fact that even still we're trying to balance being relevant to Christ and what He requires, with ethnically and culturally trying to be relevant to being black and what it requires have in my opinion turned much of the black church into a schizophrenic mess ... We want to be of Christ in the super-natural, but we want to embrace our ethnic/cultural icons/achievments in the natural ... i can see where that may not be so bad in some arenas, but lets face it a lot of who and what's achieved under black enterprise today (music and sports paramount) ain't holy spiritual no way-no how! ... So a choice has to be made, will a black saint and the black church here in America continue to be double-minded? ... Will we continue to try to embrace Christ and His principles to the furtherence of His agenda, while yet at the same time attempt to hold on to our "keeping it real" with others just because they happen to be black, to the furtherance of agendas often times in direct conflict to Christ's?" ... Holy Ghost has shown me that once we come to Christ we ALL become one color in the eyesight of God the Father: RED (as in the color of the blood of His Lamb in which we've been washed clean), and i think the sooner in the Spirit we begin to view one another in this same color the less satan will be able to use our old ethnic strifes to divide us ...

i've given example here of some things i see that's hobbling the black church, but those of you who may be white (or another ethnic group) and attend a congregation predominantly white (or your own ethnic group) you see similar conflicts of agendas going on where you are too! ... So again what to do about it? ... i pray your answer be to earnestly seek God about it in prayer, and if (tho in my experience it's always when) He answers you, submit to His will, and in love do what He tells you ... The bottom line is this, no man can serve two agendas, he'll either love one or hate the other ... All saints, i don't care what color we are, when we come to Christ we become a new creation, all former things are brought to nill and non effect in light of our new agenda, His agenda---

Sis D you wrote:
"Funny, we whites assume that blacks are so passionate about their faith, and show it by the way they worship. We say, Why can’t we be more like them in our worship? Many a choir director has told his reserved choristers, “Hey, folks, you need to be more black!”

--- Ha ... ha ... Yes this is an irony ... i was raised JW, in an all black congregation, whose modus opperendi was strong on teaching and training, little emotionalism but a whole lot of evangelism ... Tho in this invironment also my intellectualism was frowned upon because "free thinking" (that being to question the accepted norm) was dangerous to what man had put together ... See in Christ i've learned that one can ask all the questions one wants to of God, and He'll answer us thru His Word (Bible), because God ain't afraid of none of our questions ... But when man comes along and creates his way of how things are supposed to be, folk who ask to many questions are quickly labeled trouble makers ---

Sis D you wrore;
"I recently chatted with a black cousin (by marriage). He shared with me that he left the black church – because he got tired of the emotionalism. It was pushed on him – like it was the only right way. So he defected to the CRC - a BIG contrast, as Dutch reformed people are not exactly emotive – again, an EXPECTED behavior. Nevertheless, the CRC was a breath of fresh air for my cousin. He said he could finally understand the preacher and he appreciated hearing content.

Incidently, his Dutch wife is now in a black church because she felt called to minister to black children. The word "scatter" comes to mind: God scatters his people so they learn to depend on him, not their religous/cultural/racial origions. Maybe bad music isn't all bad in the long run - it nudges you futher down the road."


--- CULTURAL RELEVANCY:

This is most interesting isn't it? ... i came to learn that in a great many white congregations (other than Pentecostal) it was said in black congregations that they were "to intellectual" in worship ... It was said that they had a tendency to experience God/Christ and His message with to much logic, as blacks from their view tend to experience Him with to much emotion ... Two extremes it seems here ... i often tell folk that i'm a "emotional intellectual", meaning that i believe He's groomed me to a good balance between the two ... But here's the rub, whether "emotional" or "intellectual" they're both arenas where we experience God in our souls/minds, when the Word says that we are to worship Him "in Spirit and in truth" ... Bro Mike struck a cord with me about this over on the "Sick Rap" thread where he calls it worshipping via "cultural relevance" ...

It seems that it would all work out OK if emotionally prone black saints and intellectually prone white saints could all get together in a perfect mix to even out one another, but that would't do it either ... This walk with/in Christ has to do with the Spirit bearing witness with our spirit, and our soulish extremes (with it's subsequent way of defining how we worship) often prove to be a huge hinderance to the movement of the Spirit ... We seem to eventually get stuck on/in ourselves ... This is another reason why our need for REVIVAL, for it seems to me crucial such a fresh movement of Holy Spirit amongst us to come along and bust up thru an elevation of our spirits, all the soulishness we tend to cover up the essence of His primal will and way for us, to make it easier on ourselves ... i believe the cross of Christ a tough pill to swallow, and so over time we sugar coat that pill in soulish ways that makes it more palatable to us ...

REVIVAL is the only thing that will/can throw the learned methods of the opposite extremes of intellectual and emotional worship right out the window, and bring them both into right mixture and stature below the predominance of Holy Spirit's lifting our spirits to worshipping Him in Spirit and in truth ... i believe that REVIVAL elevating our spirits to where we're supposed to be is what will/can turn any saint back to our first love and first work status where Holy Spirit will dictate our correct worship before Him ...

It's as you said sis D "As I implied earlier, you don’t need to have a Pope to squeeze religious expression into a small box. It seems to happen automatically in any religious culture." ... Amen, it's seems to be what the soul does, to elevate itself above the Spirit ... But just as true it takes Holy Spirit to release us ALL out of our small boxes of religious expression, into that of how it's supposed to be ... Many may see folk like myself as critical, legalistic, or some other negative, but i believe it's Holy Spirit who raises up the initial few who say His Church hasn't on any clothes (which is but a repeat of what He says about Laodicea), and that we ALL need to prayerfully seek Him towards that "white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear" ...

Both worship extremes of intellectallism surrounding many white saints, and emotionalism surrounding many black saints, or even in combination certainly ain't the answer when we look at the spiritual, moral and ethical condition of both groups ... It's obvious that somethings missing when it appears we got it all together on the outside, but our stats show that on the inside we're struggling spiritually - and if so many in the Church are still struggling within there can't even begin to be an effective witness to those who don't know Christ! ... The more i go on the more i can see why "correction" must first begin in His Church ... Whatever it takes is my prayer to our Lord ... whatever it takes! ---

This discussion is archived and closed to new replies. Start a new discussion to carry the subject on.
Archived
1 of 35 posts

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate