CJaKfOrEsT wrote:
UniqueWebRev wrote:
A Christian Psychologist who had much to do with my re-commitment to Jesus, and who is now my dear friend, and I agree that when psychology enters the realm of putting self above God, it becomes evil. This is the ultimate aim of psychology, to focus entirely on the self, and this is a valid fear of the church, that man might actually do something that God can do, then wean the child of God from the church.
...
And may God bless you for staying with your spouse through all the hard times. Your love may be helping her more than you know, but ultimately, she must learn to love herself. Your pain will also be used for your good, as you know.
One of the things that I like about posting in this thread, is that it can be clearly seen how my observations have formed, and how God has proved Himself true to His word. There is much that is, has and continues to happening, as part of His loving tempering process.
Forrest, I have highlighted these two statements, in order to highlight an issue that I hope that our experience will address. This issue is that of redefining Psychology down to its grass roots. The word Psychology simply means the "study of the psyche (or mind)". It is an amoral term and must be, simply because God created the mind, and therefore it cannot be called evil, in itself.
[color=0033FF]Very true. I should have used the words the use of Psychological assessment, analysis, diagnosis, and treatment, rather than the word psychology. I can see that amongst my brothers and sisters on this site that I dare not make a generalization, for what you focused on was not the heart of what I was trying to say.[/color]
To say that "the ultimate aim of psychology, to focus entirely on the self", is not an accurate statement, and has as much validity as "religion is the cause of all wars". While it is true that many wars have been fought between people of different religions, the basis of the war hasn't so much been the religion itself, but the political agendas of the leaders of the groups that may or not be religious. Therefore the root of war is selfishness, based in politics.
[color=0033FF]I agree in part, although I would say that the root of war, regardless of the excuse used, is the perpetual drive to forcibly redistribute wealth and territory according to population driven needs. In regards the statement ""To say that "the ultimate aim of psychology, is to focus entirely on the self", is not an accurate statement,"" I will state that the study of the psyche is not focused on anything but the study of the psyche, and it's potential use, presumably for good.
However, in my experience, the use and application of psychology does tend toward the development of the self, within the confines of the world system in which it exists, and the object of the application. A person who suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder, for instance, has been allowed to develop no seperate self from the mother, say, perhaps, a Narcissist with Control Oriented Fear motivations, will find the use of appropriate psychological environment to allow the patient to build a 'self'.
Unfortunately, the tendency of Psychologists is to see the case, not in the context of a total environment, but in the narrow focus of the self that needs to be re-built. In that case, and context, my original statement was true, though I did not explain it well.
In addition, most operative conditions, wherein the patient is lucid, are also subject to the validation of the self above all. Once the self is fully established from the psychological point of view, integration, or more successful re-integration within society, is a secondary aim. The value and use of the community is relegated to whether or not it is likely to be harmed by the subject.[/color]
Granted, much of what the world calls Psychology focuses on absolving of guilt by shifting blame, this, in itself is not what Psychology is. True Psychology is concerned with how the mind works, particularly attempting to understand defects in function, and working towards correction of these defects. Worldly Psychology may tend to be content with having it's patient to have the [b]appearance[/b] of normal function, but in the end, this is merely denial.
[color=0033FF]Oddly, despite the many psychologists I have seen, the varying diagnoses and treatments of me, and the furtherance of scientific discovery since 1973, when I began my trek through the perils of counseling and the research I did along the way, I have found that most psychologists do attempt a positive result for the patient. Whether they are allowed sufficient time to actually help the patient re-structure the underlying parameters of their psychosis, or limited by time and monetary constraints to a simulation of a complete restructuring, is not a matter of denial, but a recognition of what they, as Psychologists, will be allowed to do. Tell a psychologist they have six weeks, and they will do what they must to keep the patient in a home environment, at the least. Give a Psychologist unlimited time and resources, and you can end up with a totally viable, if damaged, person.
However, because the non-believing Psychologist must replace God in the patient's mind as the ultimate source of authority, God, in the patient's mind, is reduced to a pleasant myth to be used to comfort the patient. This is a necessity to ensure that the patient will listen to, and transfer to the Psychologist all of the emotional distress and lack of control they feel. Unfortunately, with some Psychologists I have known, this permits them too much authority in the patient's mind. This is why the church in general is suspicious of Psychological treatment, and reasonably so.[/color]
One of the major errors the Church has embraced, regarding Psychology, has been that the connection between the physical and mental is often either ignored or denied. It is easy to see that when one is tired, they are often more irritable than when well rested, but that is about the extent of understanding such a connection. The church is largely ignorant of how the brain functions as a data storage and retrieval system for a person. This is left for the Psychologist to understand, and even then, some if lack adequate knowledge, or worse, ignore the practicalities once someone begins to be able to "go about their business"...
[color=0033FF]This is not solely a church matter, but a societal one. The more parochial the society, the more parochial the local Churches, and the more limited their thinking of what is considered appropriate medical treatment. In those denominations that refuse or limit medical treatment, this has become particularly evident, but is not absent from the older members of even the most liberal and cosmopolitan congregations.[/color]
...There is no doubt that God uses traumatic events in His tempering process, but the point in this is that He would be glorified. How is He glorified? Ultimately when we obey the command to "love the Lord God with all your heart, mind, soul and strength" and "love your neighbour as yourself." The point ultimately is that he come into intimate fellowship with God, with the associated evidence of like fellowship with our fellow man.
[color=0033FF]We have no disagreement here. However, during the process of tribulation, unless it is actual, Christian oriented abuse, no patient is likely to see it this way until well after maximum recovery, whatever that may be, and then, only if they are Christian themselves. Fortunately, God frequently uses such world, flesh, or devil promoted travail to make a devoted Christian out of the most blatant pagan. At any rate, He certainly used the travail of my entire life to make this so. [/color]
Consider that when a person has endured abuse as a child, be it sexual or other, often that child grows into an adult who is unable to trust others, and for good reason. Their is no point splitting hairs over the moral value of trust, with such a person, simply because most of these ones would rather the relief of trusting, that to be enslaved to a kind of paranoia when considering everyone's motives, but are unable to find a way to change. They pray, they fast, they strive, but nothing changes. And in spite of all this, the fact is that distrust is not conducive to intimacy, thereby rendering fellowship all but impossible.
Now, understanding how a person processes memories and emotions, particularly fear and anger, and you are a step closer to being able to at least not exasperate their problem, and perhaps even assist in their recovery. This is where Psychology comes in. I have heard it said that there is no such thing as a "Christian Psychologist".
[color=0033FF]Aaron, you may have heard it said that there is no such thing as a 'Christian Psychologist. That doesn't mean they don't exist. Perhaps their title differs, perhaps they merely advertise in Church directories as well as the Yellow Pages, but they do exist. And for someone who does not want their family member to deal with an assault on thir belief system as a means to a cure, these Psychologists are invaluable.
For myself, I did not know that my "Christian Psychologist" was a Christian of any kind until the 4th year of a 5 year span of treatment. Except where the referral comes from a Christian source, my friend would not dare to mention it, but she would find it extremely valuable to know the basis of the subject's world view, including whether there is a belief in God, what denominational lines the subject has been raised under, and what prejudices against treatment are within the subject's family and congregation.
Since any Psychologist must discover all this information, and do it gradually, a bit here, and a bit there, asking inoffensive questions allowing the patient to speak, and gathering the information so critical to helping the patient, it doesn't hurt for a Christian patient to work with a Psychologist who happens to be a Christian. At that point, the Psychologist can work with the patient from the background of the patient's belief structure, instead of replacing God as the authority figure. A Christian-based Psychologist can use God and the Bible as the authority, disturbing the belief system as little as possible.
Once trust has been established; and treatment proceeds apace, beliefs do come into the matter of the final resolution of selfhood, and the amelioration of the initial complaint. Prayer, speaking about God, speaking about lifestyle difficulties within the family and congregation are quite influential to a working diagnosis and order of treatment.[/color]
While this is true, there is also no such thing as a Christian Surgeon.
[color=0033FF]Really? And the surgeon who prays for assistance before operating on your child has no value? This is a strange conclusion.[/color]
The thing is, there is little moral impact to the way that one recovers from a appendectomy, while there is when someone gets involved in emotional restoration, therefore it is wise to make a distinction.
[color=0033FF]You'd be surprised how much impact occurs during surgery when the Doctor is relying on God's favor and grace, how much it helps to have a Christian staff to pray over the healing of the surgery, and so forth. My personal physician is a Christian, and so is her staff, and the majority of the specialists she works with.
It is even more apparent in psychological treatment. And as not all psychological treatment relates to emotional restoration, but a rebuilding of the entire growth process or restoration of mind/body/psyche connectivity, I ask you to be careful in using the word emotional in regards to Psychological Treatment. It is as likely to be a matter of hardware and software, in computer terms.[/color]
As I mentioned, earlier, the issue of trust is a major key to intimacy, and the Bible word for trust is "faith". Without faith, it is impossible to please God. Faith is an imminent thing, where I trust that something God has promised, is on the way, in spite of every appearance to the contrary.
[color=0033FF]
I am reluctant to dispute with you over words, but in this one case, where trust, as in leaning upon God, is very different from trust, as in intimacy. You use trust as intimacy as the same thing as faith in God. I know from experience how much one leans upon their psychologist, once a Godlike trust is engendered in them, which is why I am concerned that you have a very different idea of what a Psychologist becomes to the patient. Trust, as in leaning upon God, is the relationship necessary for a psychologist to do their best work. And although faith, as in faith in God is similar to the kind of intimacy of trust, they are not equivalent, and it is dangerous to assume they are.
Strong's Ref. # 982 Trust
Romanized batach
Pronounced baw-takh'
a primitive root; properly, to hie for refuge [but not so precipitately as HSN2620]; figuratively, to trust, be confident or sure:
KJV--be bold (confident, secure, sure), careless (one, woman), put confidence, (make to) hope, (put, make to) trust.
Strong's Ref. # 4102 Faith,
Romanized pistis
Pronounced pis'-tis
from GSN3982; persuasion, i.e. credence; moral conviction (of religious truth, or the truthfulness of God or a religious teacher), especially reliance upon Christ for salvation; abstractly, constancy in such profession; by extension, the system of religious (Gospel) truth itself:
KJV--assurance, belief, believe, faith, fidelity.
[/color]
Forrest,(and many others) have mentioned that our pain will be also be used for (our) good. I personally would rather speak in the present and past tense, because in spite of the appearance of evil, God's hand can be seen clearly at work, because without the opportunity to doubt, there can be no true faith. In Psalm 73, Asaph wrote, "My strength and my heart faileth, but thou, oh Lord are the strength of my heart, and my portion forever." This has been my testimony throughout all of this. It is peculiar to be enduring such torment, and yet be able to console those you find out about your circumstances, because they cannot handle the thought that such a thing could happen to someone that they know. But this is a part of the faith that is required for true fellowship, coupled with being able to allow another to bear your burdens, so that they may obey the Word of God. It is a strength that is mixed with humility.
[color=0033FF]Aaron, I am grateful that you are enabled to find usefulness, even glory, in your suffering. I am grateful on Rachael's behalf, that you value your marriage vows enough to stay despite the pain. Generally, when I am in distress, I am not capable of such distinctions. I know that I am growing. I cannot take comfort from it. God must indeed be blessing you in the midst of your difficulties.[/color]
When I consider all of this, it is hard to see a tragedy. Of course, it is not always seen with such clarity. :cry:
[color=0033FF]Naturally not. God's grace is involved to make it so, and the suffering that brings about such clarity must be painful indeed.
However, in my original post, I was not speaking to Psychology, or the use of it, or to your pain, although I naturally acknowledged it.
I must have spoken badly indeed, for my intent was to focus on the words being used in other posts, such as guilt and shame. I used the words anger at self, and self hatred, because, in a case of sexual abuse, guilt only promotes a deep and abiding anger at one's self, and shame results in self hatred.
Mere guilt and shame do not lead one, as a rule, to attempted suicide, and the continuing attempt to hurt one's self unto death. Only hate and anger promote self murder. Consequently, Rachael must learn to love herself, and she cannot do that unless she knows how to love. If she had no experience of genuine love, a growing love of God will eventually result in the ability to love herself. How much she is valued, and shown to be valued, now, and when she recovers is crucial.
I do not believe, by the words used, that anyone but you has much idea of what Rachael is going through, and even you, can only see the pain of these feelings, and their result.
The rest of us can only pray for you both.
Blessings,
[/color]