roaringlamb wrote:
#1 Why do YOU call their deeds evil when you don't know them? Thats presumption.
No, I have not said this God has.
Genesis 6:5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Jeremiah 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
Matthew 15:19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies:
All of these are to show that until a persons' heart has been changed by the working of the Holy Spirit, they are in God's estimation "wicked", and in no state to receive Heaven.
Then you must, by your conclusions, include every righteous man in the OT. You are totally out of context here.
#2. The righteous are justied by faith...theirs. This happened long before the cross. It kept the righteous out of hells torment upon their death to await freedom to enter the presence of God through the peace made with God in their behalf. See Roman 5.1
Now if it happened long before the cross, then why the cross at all?
Why? I believe I covered this already. Isn't that what the cross was about, making peace with God by the Blood of Jesus Christ and setting the captives free? You sure you read Romans 5.1?
True the just shall live by faith but as we see in Romans 8 the flesh could not fulfill the requirements of the Law whic was against all men upon its inception.
NO! The righteous were/are justified by faith, theirs. Who then could the blameless be who were spoken of?
It's a given that the Just shall live by truth, isn't it? However, before the cross and though justified, their walking in truth was insufficient for them to enter the actual presence of God. Nothing of the old Law could qualify them for that. This is where The blood of Christ is more than just a heaven/hell issue. Upon death they entered paradise, that can be looked upon as a holding tank for the justified righteous. Enter Jesus Christ who made peace in their behalf.
Of course there were those who by faith understood somehow the promise of the Messiah that was promised in Genesis 3:16, and those would be the ones in Abraham's Bosom that Christ descended to take to Heaven with Him.
"Of course" or perhaps, "maybe"? There is no "of course" or "maybe" about this. Either you know from the scriptuire or you are supposing because the scripture is quite clear in the matter.
I'm still curious how you can run with the "maybe's", "of course's" and "somehow's" and then call it the absolute certainty of the truth.
How about those who never heard of the promise of messiah but nevertheless had faith in God through the revelation given by creation itself? Is creation not a sure way for one to recognize God in life, all life? No "maybe's" about that.
Question: Do you think God just abritrarily chose Abraham? If He didn't, then why assume Abraham was a wicked person, evil and contemptable or any selfish way that God, by His, supposed by you, independent Sovereignty, could ignore? He never did conduct Himself that way anywhere in the Bible. There was nothing special other than he believed a God was there who saw all men and he order up his life believing that. God recognized that and met him. Abraham's believing in God and then believing God's word to him, was accounted to him as righteousness. It all started off with God foreknowing Abraham and "in the fullness of time God, revealed Himself to him.
Let's back up a couple of verses from Romans 5:1 to get an idea of Paul's thoughts
Rom 4:21 And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform.
Rom 4:22 And therefore it was imputed to him(Abraham) for righteousness.
Rom 4:23 [b]Now it was not written for his sake alone,[/b] that it was imputed to him;
Rom 4:24 [b]But for us(the Church) also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;
Rom 4:25 Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.[/b]
Hindsight is great isn't it? Even Paul had some.... for our benefit, mind you.
Do you see that Christ died for, or because of our offences?
Yes, I see that in scripture, Jesus died for not only ours but the offenses [sin] of the whole world.
Notice also the righteousness is imputed if we believe on Him who raised Jesus Christ.
Indeed, again Rom 5.1. Many people in the world believe in God unto righteousness and as yet haven't heard about Jesus Christ. Won't they be in heaven?
But to beleive that He was raised also means we have to believe He died, and why did He die? because of our offences, or breaking of the Law which was the surety of our damnation.
Damnation or separation,.... without damnation?
There are none righteous outside of Christ as He alone is the ONLY righteousness God the Father will accept.
For the healing of Adam's scarring us, you are correct. It took perfect human blood as a substitute for our own imperfect blood to do that. But lets not mix the issue too much it will be quite confusing to sort it all out. Righteousness unto justification but not entrance into the actual presence of God was manifested in many men of old. God said so if you don't twist the scriptures.
So to be in Christ is how we are accepted, and have righteousness imputed for our faith.
I believe it would be more accurate if you said Christ in us...the hope of Glory. Him being IN us the only way we can live by His Faith which the only faith pleasing to the Father because it is of Himself. Our faith took us to Him and now His Faith is what we must learn to live by. Christ being in us is what the new birth experience is all about, but that's another issue that makes all of this do-able.