Menu

The Head Covering -nee

S
sermonindex


[b]The Head Covering[/b]
[i]by Watchman Nee[/i]

When the Lord Jesus was on earth, on the one hand He came to be Savior of the world, to deliver men from sin. This is according to the system of grace. On the other hand, God sent Him to the world that through the work of the cross He might establish His own authority and set up His kingdom so that the heavens might rule on the earth. This Is the system of government. Its work will continue until the power of the devil is destroyed and the kingdom and the new heaven and the new earth are brought in.

Many hold to a fundamental error: they foolishly maintain that grace can set government aside. The truth is that what God does in grace never alters God’s government.... Grace only complements government.... Grace is for the purpose of redeeming and restoring those who are insubordinate and rebellious so that they may be subject to God’s governmental system.... Grace can never nullify government; rather, grace enables people to obey government. May I say with all Seriousness that grace gives us strength to be subject to government.

Head Covering and God’s Government

The matter of head covering belongs to God’s government. For those who do not know God’s government, it is impossible to exhort them to have their heads covered. They will not be able to understand how much is involved in this matter. But those who have seen God’s government in God’s revealed Word are able to appreciate the tremendous connection between head covering and government.

The meaning of head covering is: I submit myself to God’s government: I accept God’s appointed position: I dare not nullify His government by the grace I have received; I do not even dare to think about it; on the contrary, I accept God’s government. As Christ accepts God as His head, so should every man accept Christ as his head. Likewise, woman should representatively accept man as her head. In covering the head, the woman signifies that she is not head, that she is as if she has no head—for it is covered.

God calls upon the sisters to show this arrangement. It is through the sisters that God’s governmental system is to be displayed. It is the sisters who are responsible to have the sign of obedience on their heads. God specifically requires women to have their head covered when praying or prophesying. Why? Because they ought to know God’s government when they come before Him. In going before God to pray for people or in going before people to prophesy for God, whether In praying or in prophesying, whether in that which goes to God or in that which comes from God, in whatever is related to God, head covering is demanded. The purpose Is to manifest the government of God.

Today woman has a sign of authority on her head because of the angels, that is, as a testimony to the angels. Only the sisters in the church can testify to this, for the women of the world know nothing of it. Today when the sisters have the sign of authority on their heads, they bear the testimony that, “I have covered my head so that I do not have my own head, for I do not seek to be head. My ‘head is veiled, and I have accepted man as head, and to accept man as head means that I have accepted Christ as head and God as head. But some of you angels have rebelled against God.” This is what it meant “because of the angels.”

I have on my head a sign of authority. I am a woman with my head covered. This is a most excellent testimony to the angels, to the fallen and to the unfallen ones. No wonder Satan persistently opposes the matter of the head covering. It really puts him to shame. We are doing what he has failed to do. What God did not receive from the angels, He now has from the church.

When many of the sisters in the church take the place given to women and learn to cover their heads, they send out an unspoken word of testimony to the angels in the air, to the effect that God has obtained in the church what He desires. Because of this, woman must have on her head a sign of authority, a testimony to the angels.

Let us remember that although in practice it is only the woman who has her head covered, yet, in reality, Christ has His head covered before God and every man has his head covered before Christ. Why is it that God only requires woman to have the practice of having her head covered? This indeed is marvelous, for it involves a very deep principle.

When a sister covers her head, she is standing before God on the basis of Christ’s position before God and man’s position before Christ. God wants the woman to cover her head in order to manifest His government on earth. This privilege falls only to the woman. She does not cover her head merely for her own self; she does it representatively. It is because she represents man before Christ and Christ before God. So when a woman covers her head before God, it is just the same as if Christ covered His head before God.... Man and woman should have no head since Christ is the head. If one’s head is not covered, there will be two heads. Between God and Christ, one head must be covered; so too must it be between man and woman and so between Christ and every man. If one head is not covered, the result will be that there are two heads, and God’s government does not allow two heads. If God is head, then Christ is not; if Christ is head, then man is not; if man is head, then woman is not.

Regarding the Contentious

So, for man to be uncovered and woman covered is a charge that only Christian apostles have given. It is a practice the churches of God alone hold, for it is different from both the Jewish and the Gentile custom. It is something few observe and understand, and it is from God.

All the apostles believed that woman should have her head covered. If anyone today professes to be an apostle and yet does not believe in the head covering of woman, he cannot be counted as one of the apostles. He must be taken as an outsider. There is no such practice among the apostles of not believing this. If any church does not believe, Paul’s answer is, “We have no such custom, neither the churches of God.” None of the local churches which the apostles had visited had any such custom as arguing about woman’s head covering. So the answer to any who argue is that there is no such practice as arguing about It. Paul is willing to reason in a few earlier verses, but after that he reasons no more. If any seems to be contentious, Paul says no apostle will approve of that one’s opinion. If anyone wants to argue, no church will agree with his view. You are outside the fellowship of the churches as well as of the apostles.

Therefore, let our sisters cover their heads in the church when praying or prophesying. Why? To manifest that in the church God has obtained that which He has failed to get in the world, in the universe, and among the angels.


E
enid

Good article.

Should get intresting feedback, since views vary somewhat concerning this matter.

God bless.

S
sermonindex

Most professed Christians dont agree with this outward appearance of holiness, but most do not practice inward holiness either. (Without which no man shall see the Lord).

Taking part in the beautiful priviledge of wearing a head covering has been a blessing to my wife.

In Christ - Jim

V
vico

hmmm...
something i find interesting is that when the head covering is discussed, not many scriptures are cited!!?? Why is that?

Another thing, I've read through the Bible quite a few times, but never have i ever seen anything about about women wearing a piece of cloth on their heads. Can someone please help me with this. Is this an extra-biblical doctrine?

M
myfirstLove

O.k. I just read 1 cor. 11 in search of understanding and just prayed to God lastnight about headcoverings.

My husband and I are clueless about this. we heard both sides. The part that really confused us was the part Nee spoke of towards the end

There is no such practice among the apostles of not believing this. If any church does not believe, Paul’s answer is, “We have no such custom, neither the churches of God.” None of the local churches which the apostles had visited had any such custom as arguing about woman’s head covering. So the answer to any who argue is that there is no such practice as arguing about It. Paul is willing to reason in a few earlier verses, but after that he reasons no more. If any seems to be contentious, Paul says no apostle will approve of that one’s opinion. If anyone wants to argue, no church will agree with his view. You are outside the fellowship of the churches as well as of the apostles.

When I prayed lastnight, I receive a dream. I woke up this morning and in my dream, I saw some ladies with head coverings and some not. Then I saw myself confused not knowing wich is true. Then I saw Greg in my dream!

I woke up seriously believing Greg is going to put an article about headcoverings and this will be a sign to end the confusion.

When I went to the forum and saw a title about headcoverings, a smile was on my face and I was saying to myself, I bet this is from Greg!

So what do you guys think it means ;-)

God is good and so very faithful!

S
sermonindex

hmmm...
something i find interesting is that when the head covering is discussed, not many scriptures are cited!!?? Why is that?

Because this instruction is only given in one place that I know of. 1 Corinthians 11

v16If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice—nor do the churches of God.

B
beenblake

What constitutes a head covering? Is it simply a piece of cloth? Is it the woman's hair? Or is it a husband? What does God mean by head covering?

1 Corinthians 11:15 (KJ)
But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.

If her hair is given for a covering, would not an additional piece of cloth be offensive to the Lord?

In addition, if a woman has a piece of cloth or long hair covering her head, does that mean she has her head covered?

The head covering is a symbol of her spiritual authority. It means she is both under authority and with authority. Her authority is established by the fact that she is under authority. The same is true for Christ. He has authority because He is under the Father's authority.

It is for her glory that her head is covered as it means she has spiritual authority as given by God. A woman whose head is covered has authority to prophecy, teach, and preach.

Obviously, the physical covering does nothing in this except publically display the spiritual truth. The same is true of circumcision and water immersion. When the flesh is circumcised, it does not mean the man has been circumcised in the heart. The man may have his flesh circumcised and be far from God. Likewise, if a woman is lacking the physical covering, it does not mean she is lacking the spiritual covering.

A woman's head is shown to be covered when she submits. What is essential is that she submits unto her husband, and if she is not married, that she submits unto her brothers.

1 Peter 3:3-5 (KJ)
Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel; But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price. For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:

We see here that Peter says, "let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair." A woman should not be concerned about the outward appearance. The true indication of head covering comes by "being in subjection unto their own husbands."

Of course, when this happens Christ is glorified. Women have indeed been blessed, as Watchman Nee has said, in displaying the submissiveness of Christ unto the Father through submission unto her husband. This is to be Christ directed and lead.

Husbands should not force authority on their wives, or demand it, but in love allow their wives to be used by Christ. Submission is a willing act, and if it is not allowed to be willing, then it is false. A husband who demands submission is hindering his wife and the Word of the Lord. When a husband loves his wife in the same way Christ loves the Church, her desire will be to submit. Therefore, husbands should first love their wives with sacrificial loves so that wifes will submit and Christ will be glorified.

In Christ,

Blake

V
vico

v16If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no other practice—nor do the churches of God.

Brother Jim, contention is the last thing i wanted. i just wanted to know, thats all. :-)

Blake, my thoughts precisely!

Blessings upon you brothers!

~vico

M
myfirstLove

I don't understand why paul ends it with long hair being her covering, but the verses before that seems to refer more than hair, but a material covering because Paul speaks of the men being uncovered. He couldn't have meant being bald, but some sort of material covering just like the woman. Does that make sense?

Well, if long hair is her real covering so all the woman with short hair is in rebellion or those who can't grow their hair out, what do they do? Or is it that those who have long hair do not need a material covering?

please know I am not wanting to argue, but understand the verses.

S
sermonindex

It seems the scriptures say that women should wear head coverings in the church - especially when prophesying or praying.

I think the confusions comes because the first part of the passage seems to say one thing and the last part of the passage seems to say just the opposite.

First part:

4Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head.

5But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for she is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved.

6For if a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head.

7For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.

8For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man;

9for indeed man was not created for the woman's sake, but woman for the man's sake.

10Therefore the woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels.

11However, in the Lord, neither is woman independent of man, nor is man independent of woman.

12For as the woman originates from the man, so also the man has his birth through the woman; and all things originate from God.

These verses say that the covering is NOT her hair. Notice verse 4 and 5:


5But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for she is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved. 6For if a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head.

Paul says that if a women prays without a covering let her shave her head. So obviously she has hair already. Therefore the covering is external.

Here's where I think it is confusing for some. Here it can seem like Paul is saying a womans hair is her covering but that's not what it is saying.

13Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?

14Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him,

15but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her for a covering.

Paul is making a comparison to show what should be obvious to his hearers. It seems as if Paul is saying "this should be obvious to you just like men having short hair and women having long hair should be obvious as what is right". Paul is using something his hearers would agree was obvious to say the same thing about women covering their heads.

Paul then concludes this passage by saying :

"16But if one is inclined to be contentious, we have no other practice, nor have the churches of God." NASB

Paul is saying..."you can disagree but this is the practice of the Churches of God".


I think this passage as a whole is even more confusing in the KJV. In the kjv verse 16 says: 16But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.

That really doesn't make much sense. It would seem odd that Paul would lay out a whole teaching on why women should have their hair covered then say "oh, by the way..we don't do that".

That would be like laying out a whole teaching on Jesus being the only way to heaven and then at the end say "by the way..you can actually get to heaven by many way". It wouldn't make sense.

P
PaulWest

That really doesn't make much sense. It would seem odd that Paul would lay out a whole teaching on why women should have their hair covered then say "oh, by the way..we don't do that".

Is this really what Paul was saying...as directed by the Holy Ghost? My brother, is our God the author of confusion?

Consider this bit of commentary on verse 16 by M. Henry:

"Custom is in a great measure the rule of decency. And the common practice of the churches is what would have them govern themselves by. He does not silence the contentious by mere authority, but lets them know that they would appear to the world as very odd and singular in their humour if they would quarrel for a custom to which all the churches of Christ were at that time utter strangers, or against a custom in which they all concurred, and that upon the ground of natural decency. It was the common usage of the churches for women to appear in public assemblies, and join in public worship, veiled; and it was manifestly decent that they should do so. Those must be very contentious indeed who would quarrel with this, or lay it aside."

Brother Paul

S
sermonindex

Is this really what Paul was saying...as directed by the Holy Ghost? My brother, is God the author of confusion?

No..I believe it's translated correctly in the NASB not the KJV. God is not the author of confusion. Paul's conclusion in the KJV is a contradiction to what he says just prior to his conclusion.

P
PaulWest

Paul's conclusion in the KJV is a contradiction to what he says just prior to his conclusion.

I see, brother. It would be wiser for you to say that Paul's statement in the KJV is a contradiction [i]according to your understanding[/i]. Mathew Henry didn't see it as a contradiction - nor do I.

S
sermonindex

this comment by Matthew Henry is nowhere in the text:

but lets them know that they would appear to the world as very odd and singular in their humour if they would quarrel for a custom to which all the churches of Christ were at that time utter strangers,

S
sermonindex

Mathew Henry didn't see it as a contradiction - nor do I.

Matthew Henry doesn't comment on verse 16.

P
PaulWest

this comment by Matthew Henry is nowhere in the text:

You would perhaps see it differently if you knew more about ancient eastern cultures and customs.

S
sermonindex

Brother Jim, contention is the last thing i wanted. i just wanted to know, thats all.

Brother, that wasnt aimed at you specifically.

Spiritual blessings in Christ - Jim

S
sermonindex

Paul,

In the KJV Paul goes into this long explanation of why women should wear head coverings and then sums it up by saying:

16But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.

It makes no sense to explain something women should do and then say "we don't do it".

P
PaulWest

Matthew Henry doesn't comment on verse 16.

Which commentary version are you looking to? The abridged or unabridged? It's in the unabridged.

V
vico

What constitutes a head covering? Is it simply a piece of cloth? Is it the woman's hair? Or is it a husband? What does God mean by head covering?

1 Corinthians 11:15 (KJ)
But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.

If her hair is given for a covering, would not an additional piece of cloth be offensive to the Lord?

In addition, if a woman has a piece of cloth or long hair covering her head, does that mean she has her head covered?

The head covering is a symbol of her spiritual authority. It means she is both under authority and with authority. Her authority is established by the fact that she is under authority. The same is true for Christ. He has authority because He is under the Father's authority.

It is for her glory that her head is covered as it means she has spiritual authority as given by God. A woman whose head is covered has authority to prophecy, teach, and preach.

Obviously, the physical covering does nothing in this except publically display the spiritual truth. The same is true of circumcision and water immersion. When the flesh is circumcised, it does not mean the man has been circumcised in the heart. The man may have his flesh circumcised and be far from God. Likewise, if a woman is lacking the physical covering, it does not mean she is lacking the spiritual covering.

A woman's head is shown to be covered when she submits. What is essential is that she submits unto her husband, and if she is not married, that she submits unto her brothers.

1 Peter 3:3-5 (KJ)
Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel; But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price. For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:

We see here that Peter says, "let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair." A woman should not be concerned about the outward appearance. The true indication of head covering comes by "being in subjection unto their own husbands."

Of course, when this happens Christ is glorified. Women have indeed been blessed, as Watchman Nee has said, in displaying the submissiveness of Christ unto the Father through submission unto her husband. This is to be Christ directed and lead.

Husbands should not force authority on their wives, or demand it, but in love allow their wives to be used by Christ. Submission is a willing act, and if it is not allowed to be willing, then it is false. A husband who demands submission is hindering his wife and the Word of the Lord. When a husband loves his wife in the same way Christ loves the Church, her desire will be to submit. Therefore, husbands should first love their wives with sacrificial loves so that wifes will submit and Christ will be glorified.

In Christ,

Blake

I still say amen to this!

Look at these verses:

1Co 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

1Co 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoreth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.

1Co 11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.

Blessings to all!


P
PaulWest

It makes no sense to explain something women should do and then say "we don't do it".

Paul is not saying this, again. He is saying there is no custom of [i]women praying uncovered[/i] in the churches.

S
sermonindex

Paul is not saying this, again. He is saying there is no custom of women praying uncovered.

Ok..that would make sense. It sure doesn't read that way though.

P
PaulWest

Yeah, I know, brother. This is why alot of people (especialy youths) disdain reading the KJV. We don't formulate sentences like this anymore!

Humbly yours,

Brother Paul

S
sermonindex

Yeah, I know, brother. This is why alot of people (especialy youths) disdain reading the KJV. We don't formulate sentences like this anymore!

Seems like a good reason to update the KJV. It would stop a lot of confusion.

Just like the word "replenish" in Genesis. It doesn't have the same meaning today as it once did. (I know that's a whole other topic but it's true).

P
PaulWest

Seems like a good reason to update the KJV. It would stop a lot of confusion.

Uh-oh, hey man, don't let Krispy see that! :-P

You just opened this thread up to an additional 70 or more posts!

Time for yours truly to bow out.

Brother Paul

M
myfirstLove

Thanks hubby (sscott). I understand the verses now . :-)

B
beenblake

*deleted*

B
becauseHEliv

In this day where so much emphasis is placed on “The Grace of Yahweh” we forget it is really all about “His Glory” being revealed to a lost world perishing for the Truth.

This I think is a much needed to be understood subject in light of the fact that every serious disciple of Yeshua sees the great need of the Church of Yeshua in our day. I pray as you read you let Yeshua speak to your hearts.

Head Covering
- The Glory of Man or The Glory of God
The significance of head covering is a truth long lost in this day of modern theology. Today I would like to show you from scripture why this is not a trivial topic and why it should be considered a fundamental rather than a non essential.
Last week we looked at Grace and how salvation is by grace through faith and not of works (Ephes 2:8-9). We often stop there rather than realising that though salvation is by grace through faith, faith has an outworking in obedience to the scriptures and is thus demonstrated by works. In no way is salvation attained by works but we are called to walk in the works which God hath before ordained for us and to be doers of the word (Ephes 2:10, Jas 1:22). So this is not about salvation, but conduct in the church of God.
1 Timothy 3:14-15
14 These things write I unto thee, hoping to come unto thee shortly:
15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.


1 Corinthians 1:1-2, 27-31
1 Paul called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother,
2 Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their's and our's:
27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:
29 That no flesh should glory in his presence.
30 But of him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption:
31 That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.
1 Corinthians 6:19-20
19 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
20 For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.
1 Corinthians 11:1-16
1 Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.
2 Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you.
3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.
9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.
11 Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.
12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God.
13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.
V3: Not hierarchy but order, eg alphabetical order does not mean a is more important than z.
V4: Man dishonoureth his literal head as well as his figurative head, Christ
V5: Woman dishonoureth her literal head as well as her figurative head, man which in turn dishonoureth Christ.
This covering can not mean hair, does not make sense to compare uncovered with shaven if uncovered means no hair. Why compare no hair with shaven? It is a literal covering, see v6. The If in v6 is not asking a question which we have the prerogative of answering but is really saying, "since it is a shame for a woman to be shaven, and since being shaven is as bad as having her head uncovered, if she is uncovered then she may as well be shaven".
2619 katakalupto {kat-ak-al-oop'-to}
from 2596 and 2572; TDNT - 3:561,405; v
AV - cover 3; 3
1) to cover up
2) to veil or cover one's self
Note: woman praying or prophesying - this cannot contradict scripture, 1 Cor 14:34. As the whole of Corinthians demonstrates, this church was extremely carnal but Paul graciously deals with each problem in turn. If women are to keep silent then how are they supposed to pray and prophesy? See 1 Cor 12:26.
V7: Man is the image and glory of God and woman is the glory of man, thus, a man covering his head covers the glory of God while a woman who represents the man's glory having her head uncovered reveals the glory of man, and, no flesh should glory in his presence. You can see why this is much more than a trivial case of to cover or not to cover. As Ephesians 3:10 states:
Ephesians 3:10
To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God, ...
V8-9: Creation order, all one in Christ as far as equality but different order in creation.
V10: word power should be translated authority. Again, the reason is given: because of the angels.
V11-12: woman of man but man by woman, not independent but complementary.
V13: Another rhetorical question, not one we have the prerogative of answering, except by scripture itself.
V14: unfortunately nature has been violated because it seems that long hair on a man is no longer a shame ... or is it?
V15: the woman's long hair is her glory given to her as a covering or vesture/veil. If this is given to the woman as a glory then why should a man have a woman's glory?
4018 peribolaion {per-ib-ol'-ah-yon}
from a presumed derivative of 4016;; n n
AV - covering 1, vesture 1; 2
1) a covering thrown around, a wrapper
1a) a mantle
1b) a veil
Ah but one might say, there it is, a woman's head covering is her own hair. Since we must not take one verse alone but compare scripture with scripture, we see that although it is a covering for her, it is not a covering of man's glory but is her glory. The word covering used in v15 is a different Greek word to that used in v6-7. In v6-7 the word means to cover up or veil oneself whereas the word for cover in v15 means a veil, vesture or mantle, something like Joseph's coat of many colours? If this is not enough, we must remember v4-7 which clearly shows that a woman's hair is not what is meant by a covering as again, why compare a shaven head to an uncovered head if they are the same thing? The fact is, it is God's glory which must be visible in the meeting, not man's because no flesh should glory in His presence. Since woman's head represents man's glory it must be covered, and so must her own glory, ie her hair.
This covering should not be a fashion statement, for this is another artificial glory. It should simply be a plain piece of material which covers the head and hair and does not draw attention.
V16: This is the most misunderstood verse, many claim that Paul is saying that the churches of God have no such custom. If this was the case, why write half a chapter about it and be so emphatic about the importance of this doctrine, especially when he said in v2-3 that he praised them for following his teaching except on this point? The answer is simple: Have you not heard some-one say, there is no such/like/sort of shopping centre like Westfield Marion? Perhaps straight after saying how big and impressive it is? The word such in v16 does not mean not existent but rather that this custom is unlike any other in the churches of God.
5108 toioutos {toy-oo'-tos} (including the other inflections)
from 5104 and 3778;; adj
AV - such 39, such thing 11, such an one 8, like 1, such a man 1,
such a fellow 1; 61
1) such as this, of this kind or sort
This is an important warning to us men who often come up here and speak arrogantly. As we look back and see the covered heads of the sisters, it is a solemn warning that our glory is covered and that no flesh should glory in God's presence. This is why the silent covered women are an essential part of the worship meeting and their obedience to this doctrine is as important as the men's participation in the open worship.
In today's modern meetings, instead of the world thinking they are foolishness and different to what they are used to, they see similarity. Instead of God's glory they see man's glory. Instead of the foolishness of the cross they see the wisdom of man. If we are to glorify God and not the flesh then our worship meetings should be such that man's glory is covered and God's is uncovered. The meeting should be such that if The Lord Jesus Christ stood among us as pictured in John's vision on the isle of Patmos, we would not be ashamed.
We meet together to exhort one-another in spiritual things yet our conversation before and after the meeting seldom reflects spiritual content, instead, the meeting is like an interruption to an otherwise worldly schedule instead of a continuance of a life filled with the richness of the Word of God obtained by time spent in the Word and prayer.
We are invited to the Lord's table to remember Him. Do we take this flippantly? If the queen or some other worldly idol such as our favourite band or actor/actress invited us to an intimate meeting would we be late? Would we come unprepared? Until we worship God more than all the idols in our lives, maybe we will continue on as we are.
Remember, this is not about salvation, that is by grace through faith. This is about Church conduct. This is about not robbing God of the glory due to his name. Head covering is a simple act of obedience, as simple as the remembrance feast. It is not the only thing we need to concentrate on in order to give God glory but it is a simple starting point.
James 4:17
17 Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.
May the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ compel us to conduct our lives and hence our worship meetings in a manner that glorifies our Heavenly Father and clearly manifests His manifold wisdom to all who look on.

________________________________________
Hackham South Christian Church
25/1/98
J Stephen


http://www.biblebeliever.co.za/Brethren%20Assemblys/Head%20Covering%20-%20The%20Glory%20of%20Man%20or%20The%20Glory%20of%20God.htm


I
iseek

I am new here and I want first greet you in the name of our Lord and Saviour Jesus the Messiah.

Greetings Saints :-)

I love this article - today our culture does not place an emphasis on woman having coverings on their head but this has not always been.

As recent as the 50's women made sure to have their heads covered in church.
That had to have come from somewhere.

Paul Washer used this statement:
'Fish Don't Know That They're Wet - meaning we are awashed in our culture.'

Our culture has no use for God's governmental arrangement in the Church.
And it seems it is so much easier for the saints see things through the eyes of this world.

But either way - it is a beautiful feeling to cover one's head when praying to our God.
It sort of like entering one's 'prayer closet'


B
becauseHEliv

Thinking about the phrase ”doth not nature teach you”…

Why do you suppose man by nature can grow a beard and woman can not?

I have what I believe is the answer but was wondering if anyone else has ever considered the application.

This discussion is archived and closed to new replies. Start a new discussion to carry the subject on.
Archived
1 of 30 posts

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate