when a sinner realises the seriousness of His crimes against God, that God was not constrained by the sinners worth to save Him, because God was already infinetly happy with His Son, and could have thrown rebellious man into hell and still be complete. And yet because of the overflow of God's goodness and love and grace, He took it upon Himself to be mans Saviour and in the Person of Christ, God died for His rebellious creatures as a creature by hanging upon a cross of shame bearing our sin and being crushed under the weight of His own wrath and righteous judgment.
You are right and, at the same time, this quotation nearly pinpoints the approach which makes me cringe. I think it is vital that we expound upon worth.
Saying that God was not constrained by the sinner;s worth to save him is too vague. Certainly, we do not have the "worth" gained by good behavior, cleverness or any of our own inventions. We can't earn grace.
However, many preachers stop here and fail to point out the "worth" God gives us by virtue of his behavior towards us. We do have worth because God made us, loves us, wishes that we wouldn't perish and desires that we all come to repentance. Furthermore, He was willing to bear His own wrath in our stead.
Saying, "because of the overflow of God's goodness and love and grace, He took it upon Himself to be mans Saviour" doesn't seem to do justice (in my mind) to the worth God gives us. We often preach His love and sacrifice like an afterthought or grudging concession. Of course this is not intentional, but often we are so concerned about trying to play the Holy Spirit and convict people into true conversion that we clobber them with their worthlessness and ignore the value God gives all of us.
God is love.
"The reason the mass of men fear God, and at bottom dislike Him, is because they rather distrust His heart, and fancy Him all brain like a watch." - Herman Melville
Melville's observation is telling, some of us are so theological that we miss the emotion of God and fit Him into systematic boxes of holiness, love, justice, etc. Yet, all throughout the Bible, God is very emotional. His behavior in the OT certainly portrays a jealous God, a jilted lover. Song of Songs doesn't make too much sense to the crusty theologian we views God like a machine.
Primarily painting overpowering, terrifying, systematic images of God in the minds of people may actually cause them to despise Him because such a god doesn't seem good.
Who wants to serve a god who gleefully anticipates tearing away the slippery bridge out from under the feet of sinners and plunging them into Hell?
Yes, we need to explain the consequence and trespass of rebelling against a holy God - especially to the stiff-necked. But there seems to be a much larger dynamic going on.
When God created Adam, Eve and creation, He was well pleased. He fellowshipped with them and walked with them in the garden. In the beginning, there is little evidence of a nonchalant, self-sufficiency in God - nothing to emphasis man as inconsequential. On the contrary, man was the crown of creation.
Saying that God is self-satisfied and needs nothing isn't really saying much. Yes, God existed without man and was perfectly fine. But, for some reason, He created mankind and seemed thoroughly pleased with the initial setup - fellowship. Man was given dominion/stewardship over the earth and allowed to enjoy God and creation.
When Adam and Eve fell, we've misinterpreted God's act of banning them from the Garden as anger when it was really love. Nothing could be worse than if they ate from the Tree of Life and were able to live forever in such a fallen condition.
We have this notion that a holy God and sin are so contrary (which they are), but fail to recognize that God still met with Adam and Eve in person after they fell. Furthermore, when Cain killed Able, God met with Cain in person asking where Able was and He eventually put a mark on Cain promising to avenge Him if anyone hurt him. So Cain committed murder in the OT and God didn't strike Him down, but the first person to screw up under the Law was put to death for collecting sticks on the Sabbath. He was merciful from the very beginning and has made a type of “restoration” possible in which men can be born again and will one day inhabit a new heaven and new earth.
There is a much larger dynamic than a holy God who hates sin. Bible history confirms God’s love for man, not as an afterthought but as a primary thought. His just punishment of sin and wickedness was not the initial goal, but a heartbreaking consequences to man’s rebellion.
We need to be careful to portray God's love as well as His holiness and justice. He pictures Himself as a loving father, not just a king.
Sorry for the rambler, but I wanted to shed a little light on considering a larger picture of God.
Curious to know your thoughts…