Hi Jesse,
I've written you an essay. There are no direct quotes of you from this thread, but I have alluded to your words, I hope accurately enough.
It's nearly light here now and I toyed with not posting till after I've had some sleep. But I'll risk it. If you think I haven't been gentle enough, please tell me, and be gentle at the same time please. I have tried to share the thoughts which have come to me as an explanation for the apparent disconnects which this thread has generated, which seem to me to be unnecessary, seeing we are all on the same side.
Also I've been trying to understand what it is you don't see, without intending to fall on you from a great height for not being able to see it. I hope you can give me credit for that, because I haven't watched your videos and I don't intend to criticise you for doing what God has called you to do.
This leads me to comment that you seem to feel free also to criticise others, though, in a general way, for not doing what [i]you've[/i] been called to do. But this deduction is erroneous as how can we give account of our obedience to the Father's will, if we are not doing what He has told us?
I realised, this evening, that the thread's title also is misleading, in that the whole Church cannot be street preachers, even if every member should be able to give a reason for the hope that is in him or her. This is not to be lukewarm but to acknowledge the other parts of the body.
Further, not everyone should be let loose in a pulpit. If you've never heard someone 'preaching' who has not been called to preach, and felt the death settle on those who find themselves condemned to listen, you haven't missed a thing. :-?
I would like to put it to you that you could take much more interest in what God has said to [i]others[/i], and nurture them\\us in their\\our obedience to Him. This would be the outworking of the general exhortation in Hebrews to 'provoke one another to love, while it is today'.
Earlier, when I quoted Tyndale, the very point he is making (in case it was not clear to you) is that whatever a person's ministry, gift or calling, they should make themselves available to that, faithfully, and they should make sure they are admonished and edified by the word brought through the exercise of their gift, as much as the others in the body for which it or they were given. Amen. I think it is one of the clearest marks of spiritual integrity under God, when a man realises he must blaze the way in his own following of Christ, before he can lead anyone else to that point.
Following on from that thought, assuming Peter wasn't one of those (and that neither are you), there is a phrase which I believe you could borrow from his book, namely: save yourselves (Acts 2). Your aggression against fellow-saints, as if they are 'letting' an unbeliever go to hell, [i]after[/i] the person has heard the word but not received it, is not scripturally accurate. This exhortation was given by Jesus to His hearers: And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. But rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell (Matt 10:28). Not the brethren, but the unsaved are being urged to fear Him. He is going to save us from the wrath to come.
You see, while there are a few people who can claim a formal ministry, which is recognised by others with degrees and church affiliations, who are accountable within denominational systems and codes of conduct, many of us (especially at SI), are working to at least as high a standard or higher, because we feel accountable directly to the Lord, and we feel something like what happened to Peter and John, as John records here:
[i][Jesus] saith unto him the third time, Simon, [/i]son[i] of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep. Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry [/i]thee[i] whither thou wouldest not.
This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him, Follow me. Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee? Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, [b]Lord, and what [/b][/i]shall[i] [b]this man [/b][/i]do[i]? Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, [b]what[/b] [/i]is that[i] [b]to thee? follow thou me[/b].
Then went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die; but, If I will that he tarry till I come, what [/i]is that[i] to thee? [/i] (John 21)
You state that those who do not have a heart for the lost, maybe don't have the Holy Spirit, or are grieving the Holy Spirit. But there are a great many lost people [u]in churches[/u], who present recurring opportunities for spiritual nurture, and there are many more opportunities to apply the gospel to situations in daily life which those of us who do not work on the streets (any more, or, all the time), are presented with continuously - perhaps for more hours in the day than a street preacher faces. For those who don't know better, such implications cause confusion and condemnation. When I say 'know better', I mean, know how God is leading them [i]not[/i] to be 'preachers' [i]because[/i] He's equipping them for a completely different kind of service.
One of the things I've wondered, knowing that you believe a person who becomes a Christian will follow Christ (not without any nurturing or discipling, but will have been dynamically changed enough to do the following), is whether you have ever given any thought to the kind of commitment some Christians give to their ministry, which makes a place available to meet, week by week, month by month, year by year, bearing the cost of bills, hospitality, staying up late to prepare, getting up early to pray, raising children, holding down full time employment (often) as well, and somehow holding together marriage and other responsibilities? This kind of pressure is what produces the fruit of the Spirit in a person, because if they are not abiding in Christ, they cannot cope.
These are the ones who are going to be there for those you bring into 'the Church' as raw converts, who are going to find food for them from the word of God, that they may grow. Who have to find food for themselves from the word, that they may have something to sustain them while they pour out to others. I don't mean that they pull out some verses which sound as if they must be relevant, (but aren't), but that they allow themselves to be led by the Holy Spirit in conversation and counselling, so that they give the young saint the right balance of attention, example and spiritual food as God brings it to their heart.
Here are a few things I think about 'the lost'. One is, that it's pretty hard to believe that in the English speaking countries there are many people who are completely unaware of Christmas. They have heard of Jesus, even if they don't understand what He was about.
Also, God is always speaking. People have a conscience and feel their guilt, often quite supernaturally and not because of the value system they are adopting, or, were raised with (whether those are the same or different). They cannot get away from their sense of being out of fellowship with God. He makes them know it.
Therefore, when people find themselves in a very deep hole, sinking in the miry clay, drowning in sin, sorrow, depression and heartache, it is a surprise to find that God is also there with them, giving hope and causing them to cry out for help - not necessarily mercy, for they may not understand anything about sin - because God is desirous of being their reconciled Father, (Acts 17) and they have been unbelieving children (Eph 2).
Really, they don't need any more antagonism from the preaching fraternity. They need answers. They need the gospel to be comprehensively presented, so they can fit their woe-set into what they are hearing, and God will use a methodical presentation perhaps even more effectively, than one which is emotionally charged with overstatements. One does not have to shout 'wrath' for wrath to be 'wrath', as long as what 'wrath' means, is clearly communicated.
Frances Schaeffer pondered over how he would present the gospel if he had only one hour with a man, and concluded he would spend 45 minutes on the wrath of God, and 15 minutes on God's answer to His wrath. However, I would add that people are not necessarily being difficult when they don't see what the problem is about sin; when they don't get why God even cares. They genuinely don't see. They are blind. They genuinely don't hear. They are deaf. They geniunely aren't sorry. They are dead. It is only the word of [i][b]life[/i][/b] which is going to reach their brand of opacity, and cut through it like a knife in butter, and that might be just one word or phrase. Then you need to let God continue His own work in them.
Also, I hope you preach healing to them, and not only sin. Because Jesus preached healing and repentance together, but there is no record of Him calling a person directly, a 'sinner'. He may have told them what they did wrong 'you gave me no kiss', or forgiven them without being asked for forgiveness, or by His presence brought them conviction of sin (as Zaccheus), but He [i]loved[/i] the people for whom He was about to die, [u]and they could tell that He did[/u].
I have one last thought to share. It's tough to keep going through with God. Not everyone (eg me) has any idea what is involved in [i]being[/i] a Christian, but God has a way of letting us fall into all kinds of trouble, so that we need Him to get us out, and also find how much we need Him in the process, proving again and again that if it's left to us, we fail. However, [i]if[/i] someone like me, who has a reasonably disastrous past can be pulled through by God, so can many others. But I came through because people in churches honoured my needs with their time and prayers, as much as by my own determination to know God for myself, and I suppose I feel a bit of sympathy for the concern that maybe you don't honour the members of your audiences [u]enough[/u], bearing in mind that they bear the image of God, albeit marred.
I work with a charming group of Asians, some obviously of gentile descent, one of Ishmeal, another Jewish, another of Seth. It's fascinating to consider this. But I have no idea how to present Jesus to them except by caring for the things which matter to them, at the same time as being completely independent in my thinking, and value system. In passing, these men all have wives and are faithful to them. It's the Europeans who are living out of wedlock. :-o :-o :-o Also, I believe in situations where the believer is with the same people day after day, and everyone knows they are a believer, [u]the heat is on the believer to show forth Christ[/u] in such a way as people have to ask questions, for the good of their own souls.
You know, people are listening for the voice of the Shepherd. Something inside them tells them they'll know when they hear it. When you preach, can they hear Jesus calling them into life? Does His word create faith in them? Can they tell that He's alive in you, because you love them? Or might they wonder about that?
I do ask myself aaaall the same questions and know they are not rhetorical.