Hi Brother iansmith...
After reading through this thread, I noticed that you already answered a question that I was going to ask. I wanted to ask WHY you wanted to go to a “Christian” college. You answered the question before I could even ask (thanks!) by stating your burden for missions.
In this case, I would recommend a study of some of the great missionaries in Church history. Hudson Taylor, David Livingstone, etc… -- they all attended college as a means to equip them in the field. Ironically, the most meaningful training that they received was in practical/natural studies (health, nutrition, language, survival, etc…). Most “missionary students” that I know do not care much for such study. They are concerned primarily with a study of doctrinal issues and evangelical methods. In fact, most Christian schools seem focused upon such things. It has always been my belief that a person who feels an imminent “call” to missionary work should already be well versed in spiritual matters. Yes, they can always learn more – but they should be firmly established in both personal and evangelical faith.
On the other hand, there is a great need for believers destined for foreign lands to learn a “trade.” During the short-term mission trips that I have taken, the most viable men were those who could both preach the gospel in word and action. They could build houses and church buildings, dig wells, practice basic medicine, and teach hygiene, etc… while preaching the Gospel at the same time. In other words, these men weren’t afraid to get their hands dirty. They lived amongst the locals and practiced their faith in their daily lives. It is rare to see Western preachers who live abroad live as the locals in the field. Many of today’s missionaries (particularly from many of the evangelical denominations) live “fat” lives in the field. I say this because I have friends who work abroad – even in “dangerous” Muslim countries. Yet they preach a non-offensive message while living in elaborate houses rented or purchased by the denominations. It makes me wonder as to whether they are truly bringing a good return of the investment for which so many others are giving?
At one time, I truly wanted to attend a Christian university. I had narrowed my own selection to Southwestern Assemblies of God University (in Waxahachie, Texas) and Dave Wilkerson’s Mt. Zion School of Ministry (in Central Pennsylvania). After a visit to Southwestern, I knew that particular school was not for me. I never visited the Mt. Zion School, because I became convinced about a need to learn a skill or trade (so as to not become an unnecessary burden upon any potential congregation). I eventually attended a secular University and enrolled in an Engineering program. I have never regretted attending a “secular” university – even in the face of criticism from brethren who sometimes almost boast in their ignorance (as if it were a virtue). Ironically, some of the loudest critics of formal education are the ones who take such great steps at self-education (…from learning about technology, a occupational trade, health, typing or even in “spiritual areas” such as Biblical linguistics and doctrine).
I applaud your desire to understand the people for whom you want to be sent. Is this Scriptural? Of course! Paul was well versed in both the language and the customs of the people for whom he was sent. Regardless of the school (“Christian” or “secular”) for which you choose, I suggest that you learn the language, the culture, a trade and survival techniques of the destination in question. Which “survival techniques?” The place to which you are sent may have some special conditions (lack of protein, inadequate water/hygiene, severe weather and climate, laws, etc…) for which you will need to be aware.
I will remember this question in my prayers. May God provide the proper direction in which He desires for you and the people for whom you will be sent.
:-)
