Menu

Undersea cable fault disrupts internet access

S
sermonindex


Internet services have been disrupted in parts of the Middle East following damage to an undersea cable in the Mediterranean, according to reports.

[url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7218008.stm]Web disrupted 'across Mid-East' [/url]

S
sermonindex

The Internet Traffic Report still reports that the main 'Iranian' router is unreachable. Traffic is apparently getting in and out over alternate routes, and there appears to be a great deal of confusion over to what extent Iran's internet traffic has been cut off.
What is know for a fact is that there have been numerous cuts in the undersea cables, with the UAE reporting a total of 5 known cuts as of this morning, 2/5/08. The cuts have indeed impacted millions of internet users around the Mideast.

http://www.internettrafficreport.com/asia.htm

http://www.internettrafficreport.com/history/267.htm

S
sermonindex

Still hearing on the usual Christian radio, talk from the big name Christian speakers, about Iran and the same war drums beating. Dr. James Dobson's program has given more time to this subject of a war with Iran than any other on the radio. Gave a whole week to it last year and repeated some of those shows since. Brought in 'scholars' on Ezek 38 and how Russia would be involved, against us and Israel and all the typical reasonings from others as well.
I leave the radio on, either on the Christian station or the NPR/BBC station, interchangably. All the talk made me feel to check their site again also for more Iran news.
Saw these two from there and others -

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7201708.stm iran sanctions increased

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7185985.stm Jan 13th Iran had "a month"

And -

Iran's oil bourse could topple the dollar
Mike Whitney
Online Journal
Wednesday February 6, 2008

Two weeks ago George Bush was sent on a mission to the Middle East to deliver a horse's head. We all remember the disturbing scene in Francis Ford Coppola's “The Godfather” where Lucca Brassi goes to Hollywood to convince a recalcitrant movie producer to use Don Corleone's nephew in his next film. The “Big shot” producer is finally persuaded to hire the young actor after he wakes up in bed next to the severed head of his prize thoroughbred. I expect that Bush made a similar “offer they could not refuse” to the various leaders of the Gulf States when he met with them earlier this month.

The media has tried to portray Bush's trip to the Middle East as a "peace mission," but nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, three days after Bush left Jerusalem, Israel stepped-up its military operations in the occupied territories and resumed its merciless blockade of food, water and medicine to the 1.5 million people of the Gaza Strip. Bush must have green-lighted Israel's aggression or it would have been seen as an insult to the president of the United States.

So, what was the real purpose of Bush's trip? Why would he waste time visiting the Middle East if he had no real interest in promoting peace or resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Sometimes personal visits are important, especially when the nature of the information is so sensitive that it has to be delivered face to face. In this case, Bush went to the trouble of traveling halfway around the world so he could tell the Saudis and their friends in the Gulf States that they were going to continue linking their oil to the dollar or they were going to “sleep with the fishes." For the last two months, a number of sheiks and finance ministers have been publicly groaning about the falling dollar -- threatening to break from the so-called “dollar-peg” and covert to a basket of currencies. Bush's trip appears to have rekindled the spirit of brotherly cooperation. The grumbling has stopped and everyone is back "on board." The regional leaders now seem less bothered by the fact that inflation is trashing their economies and driving food, labor, energy and housing through the roof.

Reuters summed it up like this: "After a flurry of public disagreements over currency reform last year, Gulf central bankers are trying to close ranks, talking up the pegs as a source of stability and playing down the dollar's weakness as a temporary phenomenon."

In the last few weeks, the Saudis and Co. have watched nervously while the Federal Reserve has slashed rates by a whopping 125 basis points. The cuts are steadily eroding the $1 trillion of capital the sheiks have invested in US Treasuries and securities.

"Inflation is at 16-year highs in Saudi Arabia and Oman, a 19-year peak in the United Arab Emirates. Gulf policymakers are intervening directly in loans, property and commodity markets to offset rate cut." (Reuters)

Property values have skyrocketed. Commercial property in the UAE has doubled since the beginning of 2007. The inflation-bomb has forced other Gulf states to provide food subsidies for their people and a “70 percent wage rise for some Emirati federal government employees.”

Disgruntled migrant workers rioted in Dubai recently, demanding to be fairly compensated for the sharp increase in prices. The Saudi riyal has climbed to a 21-year peak.

Currency traders expect another 8 percent rise in the dirham and riyal by April and they are predicting that interest rates will compel central bankers throughout the Gulf states to convert to either the euro or a basket of regional currencies. So far, however, the loyal Saudi princes have continued their support for the dollar.

Defending dollar hegemony

So, how important is it that oil continues to be denominated in dollars? Would the United States really wage war to defend the dollar's status as the world's “reserve currency”?

The answer to this question could come as early as this week, since the long-awaited Iranian Oil Bourse is scheduled to open between now and February 11. According to Iranian Finance Minister Davoud Danesh-Jafari “All preparations have been made to launch the bourse; it will open during the 10-day Dawn (the ceremonies marking the victory of the 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran) The bourse is considered a direct threat to the continued global dominance of the dollar because it will require that Iranian “oil, petrochemicals and gas” be traded in “non-dollar currencies." [Press TV, Iran]

The petrodollar system is no different than the gold standard. Today's currency is simply underwritten by the one vital source of energy upon which every industrialized society depends -- oil. If the dollar is de-linked from oil; it will no longer serve as the de facto international currency and the US will be forced to reduce its massive trade deficits, rebuild its manufacturing capacity, and become an export nation again. The only alternative is to create a network of client regimes that repress the collective aspirations of their people so they can faithfully follow directives from Washington.

As to whether the Bush administration would start a war to defend dollar hegemony, that's a question that should be asked of Saddam Hussein. Iraq was invaded just six months after Saddam converted to the euro.

Iran switched from the dollar in 2007 and has insisted that Japan pay its enormous energy bills in yen. The “conversion” infuriated the Bush administration and has moved Iran to the top of the White House's target list. In fact, even though 16 US Intelligence agencies issued a report (NIE) saying that Iran was not developing nuclear weapons; and even though the UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, found that Iran was in compliance with its obligations under the Nuclear Nonproliferation (NPT) Treaty, a preemptive US-led attack on Iran still appears likely.

And, although the Western media now minimizes the prospects of another war in the region; Israel is taking the precautions that suggest that the idea is not so far-fetched. “Israel calls for shelter rooms to be set up in a bid to prepare the public for yet another war, this time, one of raining missiles.” [Press TV, Iran]

"The next war will see a massive use of ballistic weapons against the whole of Israeli territory," claimed retired general Udi Shani. [Global Research]

Russia also sees a growing probability of hostilities breaking out in the Gulf and has responded by sending a naval task force into the Mediterranean Sea and the North Atlantic.

According to an article on the Global Research site: “The flagship of Russia's Black Sea Fleet, the Moskva guided missile cruiser, joined up with Russian naval warships in the Mediterranean on January 18 to participate in the current maneuvers. . . . The current operation is the first large-scale Russian Navy exercise in the Atlantic in 15 years. All combat ships and aircraft involved carry full combat ammunition loads.

France is also planning military maneuvers in the Straits of Hormuz. Operation "Gulf Shield 01" will take place off the coast of Iran and will employ thousands of personnel in combined arms operations that will include simulated attacks on oil platforms.”

Exercises are scheduled to take place from Feb. 23 to March 5, and will involve 1,500 French, 2,500 Emirate, and 1,300 Qatari personnel operating on land, at sea and in the air, the ministry said . . ."'Around a half-dozen warships, 40 aircraft and dozens of armored vehicles will be in the war games,' Fusalba said." [DefenseNews.com]

The Jerusalem Post reports: "An American missile ship set to dock at Haifa port on Monday is equipped with anti-missile defense system that could be deployed in the region in the event of an Iranian missile attack against Israel. . . . The US San Jacinto is an Aegis Cruiser in the Ticonderoga Class . . . It carries the most advanced underwater surveillance system available today and is equipped with the Aegis Missile System to protect against aircraft and missiles. The ship will remain in Haifa for three days."

Also, within the last week, four of the main underwater cables which carry Internet and telephone traffic to the region have been cut. As a result, three-quarters of the international communications between Europe and the Middle East have been lost. Large parts of the Middle East have been plunged into darkness.

Is this merely a coincidence or is it part of a broader military operation?

Ian Brockwell, of the American Chronicle said, "On the assumption that the cables cut were no accident, we must ask ourselves who would do such a thing and why. Clearly Iran, who were most affected, would gain nothing from such an action and are perhaps the target of those responsible? . . . Maybe this is a prelude to an attack, or perhaps a test run for a future one?

"Communication has always been an important factor in military action, and cutting these cables might affect Iran's ability to defend itself." (American Chronicle]

Despite the lack of media coverage, the build-up for a war in the Gulf has continued and the probability of a US-led attack on Iran is quite high. Bush is convinced that if he doesn't confront Iran, then no one will. He also believes that if he doesn't militarily defend the dollar, then America's days as “the world's only superpower” will soon be over. The question is whether Bush will realize that America is already bogged down in two “unwinnable” conflicts or if he will “go with his gut” once again and lead us into a ruinous region-wide conflagration.

An American missile ship that was set to dock at Haifa Port on Monday is equipped with an anti-missile defense system that could be deployed in the region in the event of an Iranian missile attack against Israel.

The USS San Jacinto is an AEGIS cruiser in the Ticonderoga Class and was commissioned in 1988. It carries the most advanced underwater surveillance system available today and is equipped with the AEGIS missile defense system, which was developed by Lockheed Martin to protect against aircraft and missiles. The ship will remain in Haifa for three days. [Jerusalem Post] - End.


Interesting times and some interesting posts at RS also. And yes, it is good to be quieter and with Him.

His Love & Peace.

C
Compton

Hi Annie

Bush must have green-lighted Israel's aggression or it would have been seen as an insult to the president of the United States.

So, what was the real purpose of Bush's trip? Why would he waste time visiting the Middle East if he had no real interest in promoting peace or resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

Sometimes personal visits are important, especially when the nature of the information is so sensitive that it has to be delivered face to face. In this case, Bush went to the trouble of traveling halfway around the world so he could tell the Saudis and their friends in the Gulf States that they were going to continue linking their oil to the dollar or they were going to “sleep with the fishes."

Jesus might very well have been prophesying the internet itself when he coined the phrase "rumors of wars." Take SI for example. Now we routinely take the contents of one blog and pour it into another blog...and call it news. Mike Whitney appears to be an amazing individual. He's a fly on the wall, a mind reader, and Tom Clancy all rolled into one.

Sister in all honesty, I just don't see how you can post this article and in the name of

His Love & Peace.

I'm not saying it has no factual bits at all, but perhaps we might rinse our cottage cheese a bit more before feeding it to everyone here. Truth must be more then discernible---it must be demonstrable. This article fails that test in several places.

Yet even we Christians, once bewitched by blogs, seem little bothered with such standards. These days practicing 'discernment' means never having to say your sorry. God forbid someone write an article as presumptive about our own motives, but most 'reporters' have learned to pose themselves as objective and outside of the scene they describe. The sniper is most effective appearing to be simply part of the landscape...when in fact he has altered the landscape purposefully and deliberately.

These types of writings might appear to be "against the war", but in fact they are doing as much to fuel it's machinations and passions as the CIA itself. What they lack in bringing patriotism for the cause of war, they more then make up for in carrying powder kegs to it. But if we are Christians who equate true faith with complete abstinence from the world's contests of war and money, then we should abstain and not entertain them.

We may protest the evils of war and the banking system, but if [url=http://www.amazon.com/World-Was-Going-Our-Way/dp/0465003117]we enter into the fight politically and ideologically[/url], however righteous out intentions are, we have entered the war none the less.

I'm not railing against you dear sister, for I know full well the deep love towards the Lord you hold in your heart. I am only cautioning that we can unwittingly be dragged into modern warfare and never fire a gun or drop a bomb. By spreading these politically and ideologically charged conjectures, you are participating in the war.

Thoughtfully,

MC

S
sermonindex

Sorry it didn't occur to me earlier when posting, to mention that the post I intended to follow Mike Compton's is out of order, being last now. end EDIT.


My point is: that these conflicts which appear to be between nations, are really between God and His enemies, and men who do not deliberately step out of the enemy camp into God's camp, find themselves caught up in local manifestations (of world events) over which they have no control. We are constantly challenged by the gospel, to see God's over-arching intention to save [u]to Himself[/u] a people called by His name. Let us not forget the Roman soldiers who for love of Christ, rather died than kill. They were not able to control world events, either, but, saved themselves from their untoward generation.


I have not, actually, taken part in the threads about non-violence or peace, perhaps because I still had to pass through my own pain barrier on this, and there may be more (pain barriers) - to the intent that I am [i]not[/i] disturbed by what I hear (but am sure of that to which I am called, and am fully persuaded that He is able to keep that which I've committed to Him against 'that day').

However, I do 'hear' not only what is being covered by the media (when I listen), but also what the Spirit is pressing into me, (especially as it is clear over here in the EU, that much is not being covered by the media. They have ceased to [i]serve[/i] my nation's interests as a [i]sovereign[/i] entity.) So that, what I [i]hear[/i] is two-fold: namely, that the Spirit of Truth witnesses (as Jeff pointed out in his comment about the need to 'discern evil'), to both the truth [u]and the lie[/u], and, the wooings of God to keep trusting Him - to walk as Jesus walked, while He knew that His hour had not yet come, and, just the same when it did (come).

The observation of such historic events as are detailed in the article, can be neither anti-American, nor anti-God, simply by their observing. They remind me of the time when John told Peter 'it is the Lord', and Peter acted on John's observation. Was Peter physically short-sighted, or was John making a spiritually discerned observation? Either way, his observation was [i]trusted[/i] by Peter to the extent that had John been [i]wrong[/i], both Peter's faith and his action might have be considered rather rash (John 21), (today). There is one body (Eph 4:4).

I do understand God works in His own way with each of us, for I wasn't always ready to believe what I now see as making sense of this multi-layered picture.


1 Peter 1
13 Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ;
14 As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance:
15 But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation;
16 Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy.

17 And if ye call on the Father, who without respect of persons judgeth according to every man's work, pass the time of your sojourning [i]here[/i] in fear:
18 Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, [i]as[/i] silver and gold, from your vain conversation [received] by tradition from your fathers;
19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:
20 Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times [b]for you[/b],
21 [u]Who [b]by him do believe in God[/b], that raised him up from the dead, and gave him glory; [b]that your faith and hope might be in God[/b][/u].

S
sermonindex

My heart has been strangely [i]quieted[/i], by understanding these things.


Matthew 21
43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.
45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.
46 But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a prophet.


Luke 13
30 And, [b]behold, there are last which shall be first, and there are first which shall be last[/b].
31 The same day there came certain of the Pharisees, saying unto him, Get thee out, and depart hence: for Herod will kill thee.
32 And he said unto them, Go ye, and tell that fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do cures to day and to morrow, and the third [i]day[/i] I shall be perfected.
33 Nevertheless I must walk to day, and to morrow, and the [i]day[/i] following: for [u]it cannot be that a prophet perish out of Jerusalem[/u].


Luke 9 [i]just after the Mount of Transfiguration[/i]
44 Let these sayings sink down into your ears: for the Son of man shall be delivered into the hands of men.
45 But they understood not this saying, and it was hid from them, that they perceived it not: and they feared to ask him of that saying.
46 Then there arose a reasoning among them, which of them should be greatest.
47 And Jesus, perceiving the thought of their heart, took a child, and set him by him,
48 And said unto them, Whosoever shall receive this child in my name receiveth me: and whosoever shall receive me receiveth him that sent me: for he that is least among you all, the same shall be great.
49 And John answered and said, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name; and we forbad him, because he followeth not with us.
50 And Jesus said unto him, Forbid [i]him[/i] not: for he that is not against us is for us.
51 And it came to pass, when the time was come that he should be received up, [u]he stedfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem[/u],
52 And sent messengers before his face: and they went, and entered into a village of the Samaritans, to make ready for him.
53 And they did not receive him, because his face was as though he would go to Jerusalem.


Hebrews 12
22 But [u]ye are come[/u] unto mount Sion, and [u]unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem[/u], and to an innumerable company of angels,
23 To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,
24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than [i]that of[/i] Abel.
25 See that ye refuse not him that speaketh. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more [i]shall not[/i] we [i]escape[/i], if we turn away from him that [speaketh] from heaven:
26 Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he hath promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven.
27 And this [i]word[/i], Yet once more, signifieth the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain.
28 Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear:
29 For our God [i]is[/i] a consuming fire.


Right in the middle of Jesus saying these extreme things about God's judgement, and the things to come - upon Himself, Jerusalem and those who tried to make capital out of their natural entitlement to blessing - the disciples are bickering about who should be, effectively, first and second after Himself, while they seem oblivious to the global perspective He is putting upon the composition of those who [i]will definitely be[/i] in the kingdom, and commenting upon how to measure firstness and lastness. I bless God for the help He gives us in His word, to (begin to) see things from [i]His[/i] point of view.

2 Corinthians 3:18
[b]But we all, with open face beholding[/b] as in a glass [b]the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord[/b].


Mike,

We have a saying about 'not teaching' one's 'grannie how to suck eggs', which seems relevant here, in that I have learned more in fellowship with you than anyone, about God's love - its expression and its dynamics. In the context of the discussion in [i]these[/i] threads, perhaps I am remiss not to have said much much sooner, that the [i][b]effect[/i][/b] of these deliberations within my soul, is continually to drive me back down on the simplicity of the clues in Matthew 25, and to desire more fervently, to be a recipient and a minister of the blessings He describes in the Beatitudes.

This may seem paradoxical to what I have written, or, is the Holy Spirit at work? I think I'm understanding that the effect of God's agenda on the individual, uniquely expressed by their lives and lips, is identified nevertheless, by [u]His glory[/u] alone.

I hope so.

I pray so.

S
sermonindex

Well, well, well.... The first of these has become the last... :-?

Too many clicks of the 'preview' button has been my undoing...

Apologies to all!


This next post, should have lain above the previous two.

S
sermonindex

Mike Whitney wrote

The media has tried to portray Bush's trip to the Middle East as a "peace mission," [b]but nothing could be further from the truth[/b].
Hi Mike,

I have been wondering how to answer your comments to me in another thread, which make the same point (which you make here, to Annie). Honestly, I hope to exhort us all, to trust the Lord, who has given us His word, with [i]everything[/i].

[i]Of course[/i], Jesus' prophecies are vital to our understanding of what we as Christians are to be about. His disciple, John, helpfully observes three times, that there was an ongoing intention by His enemies, to kill Jesus, to which he also refers four other times with the phrase [His hour had] 'not yet come', [i]twice in the mouth of Jesus Himself[/i].

For us to gird up the loins of our minds, our lives, our faith, and 'hope [in God] unto the end' (1 Pet 1), I completely agree with your perspective of looking to the Lord. This has been all the more provoked by listening to the promptings of the Holy Spirit within the context of world current events, not neglecting to learn from history. I have a clutch of testimonies marching round in my head, which only push me closer to the Lord.

If you think about His parables, there is a level of violence in many of them, our humanistic culture finds hard to accept - the taking of 'that which he hath' and giving it to the person who already has more than the others, for instance (the way a game of Scrabble ends); the killing of the vineyard-keepers who kept killing the prophets and eventually the Son of the owner (the Heir); the refusal to let Lazarus get a tiny drop of water to cool the rich man's tongue; the casting into prison of the unrighteous servant who would not show the kind of mercy he himself had received; all those to whom 'weeping and gnashing of teeth' is promised.


Surely these promises, are strong encouragements to believers, to take heed that God is not messing around when He gives us our parentage, our nationality, our natural circumstances, and finally that call to follow Him out from amidst all that would tag us back to earthliness.


Matthew 13
37 He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;
38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked [i]one[/i];
39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.
40 As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and [u]they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend[/u], and them which do iniquity;
42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there [u]shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth[/u].
43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.


Luke 13
23 Then said one unto him, Lord, are there few that be saved? And he said unto them,
24 Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able.
25 When once the master of the house is risen up, and hath shut to the door, and ye begin to stand without, and to knock at the door, saying, Lord, Lord, open unto us; and he shall answer and say unto you, I know you not whence ye are:
26 Then shall ye begin to say, We have eaten and drunk in thy presence, and thou hast taught in our streets.
27 But he shall say, I tell you, I know you not whence ye are; depart from me, all [i]ye[/i] workers of iniquity.
28 There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth, when ye shall see Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, and all the prophets, in the kingdom of God, and you [i]yourselves[/i] thrust out.
29 And they shall come from the east, and [i]from[/i] the west, and from the north, and [i]from[/i] the south, and shall sit down in the kingdom of God.

S
sermonindex

Dear Brother Mike, I do understand, in part, what you are saying. I hope you can give me a chance to explain my frustrations with this talk of "war on Iran" that I can't seem to escape. Tempts me to watch something dumb on television, but I don't watch the thing ---- but maybe I should, just so I could shut down my care-response with Sit-Coms or something.

To hear about Iran on Billy Graham's radio station from James Dobson continuously and others and then turning to the News station and hearing it there, and for going on years now -- 'That' is why I titled my post "and Rumors of war".
Last Fall, Dobson came on his program on a Monday saying - 'Eighteen of us were in the Oval Office, but I can't tell you what we talked about - but for this Whole Week - we will have guests speaking about our war with Iran and how that will bring Russia to attack the U.S. and Israel'. That "Focus on the Family" giving a whole week, non-stop, to this Iran war they're planning. That frustrates the life out of me. Then they've repeated these type programs since. And that's just one program on that Station.

I hate war. I'm tired of hearing about it. I tired of hearing all the different accounts of it. From Gitmo - on. I hear ALL sides. I listen to ALL sides, with good reason, I believe.

The one article from the BBC that I posted above said - "US 'pleased'
A US official said the resolution would "increase the severity" of existing sanctions, such as travel bans and asset freezes, "[u]and will also introduce new elements[/u]". "

Then these which I posted first - http://www.internettrafficreport.com/asia.htm

http://www.internettrafficreport.com/history/267.htm

From what all that I've heard, they, in Iran are in desperate need of "electricity" - they must ration it out quite a bit, and for years now, they have begged that they do not want war and only want the same nuclear power plants that we enjoy.

If I can still have and ask for "Love & Peace" in the midst of this crazy world, with 40 "rumors" about one country or another over-seas - it's because I feel we are all hearing conflicting stories and that is why I posted more than one. We NEED "Love & Peace" because these wars have now caused Christians to yell out - "Nuke 'em" and "Torture is Good".

I NEED "Love & Peace" - because I listen to ALL sides and not just FOX news and believe that with our Sources for News, we need to hear it from ALL sides - so we don't masacre another bunch of people in "the name of peace".

WE are the ones who should be careful and open minded to hear ALL sides before we back KILLING and being killed.

If we could say and bank other's lives on it - that there are only pure motives from those who run this earth - this thread wouldn't exist at all.

With the continuing "rumors" of wars - we Have to have His Love and maintain our Peace and pray for it for Iran [u]and whomever else[/u] and hear them ALL out. Every side. Israel may not be Right in their treatment of those in Gaza. Iran may just truly desire Electricity, as that article has proved through those sources who report on Iran's capabilities and non-capabilities. The LORD will show us who was/is telling the truth or not - but I fear it won't be until HE comes in most cases and after we've backed systems that are not "working for Him", but for a Global Greedy System and worse. Rick Warren and all included.

Love and the true desire for Peace should be in our hearts at this time more than ever - when innocents may be killed and we as a nation (as Dobson and all say) may bring Russia Plus, down on our own heads, over reasons that we don't hear from FOX news or whatever we've limited ourselves to listen to. We of all the people's on this earth should care enough to truly get to the bottom of this rumor of a war with Iran (or any others) - we are the ones that are spoke of in Daniel, etc. as "having understanding" of the times. The events SINCE Mr. Bush left the mid-east was all they reported on. I find no fault in that one article compared to the FOX etc cry to "Nuke 'em and Torture 'em".

If nothing else - the various sources on this Iran topic gives me more to pray over - because we 'are' to Care - despite what ethnicity we may wipe off of the map and then get excited over Ezek 38 on our Christian Ministies that we'll thus bring Russia upon ourselves and Israel. That week with Dobson and Co. made me sick.

And I do love you also.

Just wish I could communicate my heart better. Expressive aphasia is a real drag brother.

Love & Peace.

Annie

Edit: What else bothers me - Hussein was hung for killing 141 people - but it is China on this security counsel who is making decisions on world security and judgments on Iran and How Many Have They Killed - especially to this day, Christians? Russia and China are the main 6 on the UN Security Council.

Yes, this stuff breaks my heart.

C
Compton

Hi Annie and Dorcas,

Thank you for your thoughtful responses. I am happy to count you as friends.

The observation of such historic events as are detailed in the article, can be neither anti-American, nor anti-God, simply by their observing

The reason I responded earlier to the article, as well as my rejection of that much earlier thread with brother Ironwood, is that conclusions were being mistaken for observations. It is worth stating for the record here, that I personally do not consider 'discernment' or 'prophecy' as actual observations. How you feel about this may prove to be a disjoint or not in future conversations.

That there is a crisis of evil in the world is beyond refutation. Indeed, we may be seeing the tipping point where the great tree passes from merely tottering to falling.

However the brink is nothing new to this world. True it seems there are fragile strings holding the ship, but this fragility is precisely why I urge discipline and caution in how we communicate. If a Hitler can inflame a continent with anti-jewish rhetoric, we can at least start a smoldering in someone's heart with anti-american or anti-muslim rhetoric. Man's heart is violent enough without adding unnecessary fear and hatred.

I'll spare you my love of my country, except to say that you can be rest assured it would be easier on my heart in these sorrowful days if I had no love for her. She has enough problems without adding disinformation or speculation to the mix.

If we were ever forced to come together in some persecuted situation I would be even more resistant to speculation and publishing of speculation regarding the machinations of the enemies of God. I have several clear reasons for this resistance.

1) I am already aware that the spirit of anti-christ is afoot. There is no productive purpose in thrusting this at me constantly.
2) I am aware that satan hates the Church.
3) My cannot eat a steady diet of evil things and grow strong in the Lord. I know some people claim they can, but I find that what I meditate on tends to own my soul.
4) The news, the blogs, and everything in between is completely unreliable because their precepts are far from God, and because their business models demand the manufactured production of hourly content to fill their distribution channels.
5) Furthermore, the news distorts the heart of God for the believer. The news packages sorrow from every corner of the globe, while I, through crushed with pity, can only respond in very limited and finite measures. Therefore I do not believe the Lord holds my brethren responsible for everything I hear on the news, anymore then he holds me responsible for keeping the moon in it's orbit or causing the rain to fall. To judge my brethren for their indifference or incapacity to the news I care about is to put a distraction and destructive burden upon them that is not of the Lord.
6) The Church (you and I) is too politically, socially, and culturally diverse to establish communion with one another on any other basis then the worship of Jesus Christ and faith in his Gospel. All other ties and connections are too weak and even divisive.
7) Prophetic insight into the world is not a platform for unity. Most New testament prophecy is as much a portrait of the prophet's temper and beliefs as it is God's perspective. If we demand submission, or attempt to form unity on any Word but the Bible, we are already defeated. (SI, which has more good will then most communities, proves this weekly.)

Lastly, I should offer that I believe that only the Bible is truthful to us. Not only are it's suppositions truthful, but it's presuppositions are truthful. But more then that it's pretexts and contexts are God's and not man's. The news contains none of these virtues. Ignoring the news altogether leaves a bible reading Christian more informed about the state of the world then a Christian who is well educated in current headlines.

If a person must read about political or economic events let them read history. Though history books suffers from a similar corrupt bias as news, at least the events in their pages have the opportunity to benefit from research, distance and time. As such history is more informative then the daily news, and more accurate then most current prophecy.

But even history books are not a point of fellowship. So consider this...if history books, (which are going to be as factual as corrupt man can be factual) can divide the church, then prophesying to one another after being influenced from the nightly news might very well rip the Church into shreds. We needs to serve one another healthier food!

Bless you two!

(BTW, you express yourself fine Annie!)

MC

S
SimpleLiving

I just came by to say that I saw an article today stating that the undersea cables were damaged by an "abandoned anchor." (If anyone is interested. I see the conversation has taken another direction! Not a complaint, I just didn't expect it!)

S
sermonindex

The "anchor" story was debunked.

Two cables were cut at the same time - 250 miles apart and there are up to 5 cut at last count.

The anchor story was their first understanding.

S
sermonindex

Brother MC, I see things completely different than what you've shared in your post.

My head is wrapped around the globe. I can know what is going on in Pakistan, Kenya, and so forth and pray for them all.

To shut down on Current Events makes no sense to me whatsoever and maintain the "mind of Christ" - Who's Mind is wrapped around the Globe and is our example. He Cares.

Evil will always be with us - until He comes, that is why He said that we should be wise as serpents but as harmless as Doves.

The sons of Issachar were praised for knowing the times and that same mind is alluded to in Daniel and Revelation.

The News section may just be a place that you should avoid, if the News bothers you.
I understand that some don't want to hear anything negative.
I had a Pastor once say to me, "I don't want to hear anything negative from the Holy Spirit."

As I read Daniel 7-12, I see that those things were written for us to know and to "compute" as that word is used in Revelation.

All that is written in Revelation was not written to be ignored but to seek the Holy Spirit to 'reveal' as the events are happening or about to happen.

Though this thread had nothing to do with prophecy in the beginning - it may be leading that way - if Iran is the next target.

According to Daniel 8 - it is indeed.

I do not spend my whole day on this topic - but as much time as the Scriptures do.

Is it that folks only notice my posts on these type topics? I'm not asking anyone to do a Search on my posts, but I think if one did, they'd see where my head is Also - besides - the Signs of His Coming.

I love you Brother Mike. I hope you know that. It means much that that unity be preserved despite our differences of opinion on these current events or what some see as signs of the times written for our sake into His Word.

His Best to you.

Annie

C
ChrisJD

Hi everyone,


Brother Mike, how are you?

Brother, you wrote


"Man's heart is violent enough without adding unnecessary fear and hatred."


Recently I noticed how many times the word [i]stirred[/i] is used in connection with the religous Jews in the book of Acts.

In Acts chapter 6 it is "...certain of the synagogue, which is called the [i]synagogue[/i] of the Libertines," and others, who [i]stirred up[/i] the people and others against Stephen.

Strong's says the word here translated stirred up is

G4787
συγκινέω
sugkineō
soong-kin-eh'-o
From G4682 and G2795; to move together, that is, (specifically) to excite as a mass (to sedition): - stir up.

In Acts 13:50 we read of those who "stirred up the devout and honorable women, and the chief men of the city, and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas"


Stirred up here is


G3951
παροτρύνω
parotrunō
par-ot-roo'-no
From G3844 and ὀτρύνω otrunō (to spur); to urge along, that is, stimulate (to hostility): - stir up.

Next in Acts 14:2 "...the unbelieving Jews stirred up the Gentiles, and made their minds evil affected against the brethren."


Stirred up is here, again according to Strong's


G1892
ἐπεγείρω
epegeirō
ep-eg-i'-ro
From G1909 and G1453; to rouse upon, that is, (figuratively) to excite against: - raise, stir up.

In Acts 17:13 "...the Jews of Thessalonica...stirred up the people."

G4531
σαλεύω
saleuō
sal-yoo'-o
From G4535; to waver, that is, agitate, rock, topple or (by implication) destroy; figuratively to disturb, incite: - move, shake (together), which can [-not] be shaken, stir up.

And then in Acts 21:27 "...the Jews which were of Asia...stirred up all the people"

G4797
συγχέω
sugcheō
soong-kheh'-o
Or συγχύνω sugchunō soong-khoo'-no
From G4862 and χέω “cheō” (to pour) or its alternate; to commingle promiscuously, that is, (figuratively) to throw (an assembly) into disorder, to perplex (the mind): - confound, confuse, stir up, be in an uproar.

I noticed also in this passage that they 'supposed' that Paul had brought "Trophimus an Ephesian" into the Temple.


Also brother Mike,


"The news, the blogs, and everything in between is completely unreliable because their precepts are far from God..."

In Exodus it says


"Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked."


- chapter 23 verse 7(KJV)

Strong's says that one of the words which is translated "false matter" is


H8267
שׁקר
sheqer
sheh'-ker
From H8266; an untruth; by implication a sham (often adverbially): - without a cause, deceit (-ful), false (-hood, -ly), feignedly, liar, + lie, lying, vain (thing), wrongfully.


And before this, in verse 1 of chapter 23 it says


"Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness."


Here, Strong's says the word 'report' is


H8088
שׁמע
shêma‛
shay'-mah
From H8085; something heard, that is, a sound, rumor, announcement; abstractly audience: - bruit, fame, hear (-ing), loud, report, speech, tidings.


And right after this the scripture says

"Thou shalt not follow a multitude to [i]do[/i] evil..."

Chris

S
SimpleLiving

by HE_Reigns on 2008/2/8 20:58:32

The "anchor" story was debunked.

Two cables were cut at the same time - 250 miles apart and there are up to 5 cut at last count.

The anchor story was their first understanding.

Go figure. I read the article on either CNN or FoxNews. Go figure that someone tried to blame it on someone else who supposedly abandoned an anchor. I wonder how long it took someone to think that one up? "Hey, guys! I got it! Listen to this....!"

S
sermonindex

Chris, when I did that post on understanding the gifts of the spirit - you came on and "stirred things up" and no one could understand why, because the gist of that whole thread was For Love and Unity and not looking at our gifts but the Giver.

How do you post such scriptures pointed at me?

How dare you judge my heart with such evil intents or compare what Mike wrote to me with Those Scriptures - "judging hearts with Evil intents".

Is this what Mike meant? Is this what he is charging me with? Is this your way to bring unity and understanding between us all?

C
ChrisJD

Hi everyone,


Annie, about the other thread you started, I think you are right, in that I should have left my concerns unspoken or found another way to express them. Please forgive me if I wronged you in any way.

Here, I'm not sure what you are reading in this? I thought these things are appropriate in regards to what Mike wrote.


Annie, I do not know what your intents are here and I do not think I had any suspicions of what they may be in mind when I shared these things.


Thank you,


Chris

C
ChrisJD

Again for clarification,


Brother Mike wrote


[b][color=000000]"Man's heart is violent enough without adding unnecessary fear and hatred."[/color][/b]

S
sermonindex

Dear Brother Mike, I do understand, in part, what you are saying. I hope you can give me a chance to explain my frustrations with this talk of "war on Iran" that I can't seem to escape. Tempts me to watch something dumb on television, but I don't watch the thing ---- but maybe I should, just so I could shut down my care-response with Sit-Coms or something.

To hear about Iran on Billy Graham's radio station from James Dobson continuously and others and then turning to the News station and hearing it there, and for going on years now -- 'That' is why I titled my post "and Rumors of war".
Last Fall, Dobson came on his program on a Monday saying - 'Eighteen of us were in the Oval Office, but I can't tell you what we talked about - but for this Whole Week - we will have guests speaking about our war with Iran and how that will bring Russia to attack the U.S. and Israel'. That "Focus on the Family" giving a whole week, non-stop, to this Iran war they're planning. That frustrates the life out of me. Then they've repeated these type programs since. And that's just one program on that Station.

I hate war. I'm tired of hearing about it. I tired of hearing all the different accounts of it. From Gitmo - on. I hear ALL sides. I listen to ALL sides, with good reason, I believe.

The one article from the BBC that I posted above said - "US 'pleased'
A US official said the resolution would "increase the severity" of existing sanctions, such as travel bans and asset freezes, "[u]and will also introduce new elements[/u]". "

Then these which I posted first - http://www.internettrafficreport.com/asia.htm

http://www.internettrafficreport.com/history/267.htm

From what all that I've heard, they, in Iran are in desperate need of "electricity" - they must ration it out quite a bit, and for years now, they have begged that they do not want war and only want the same nuclear power plants that we enjoy.

If I can still have and ask for "Love & Peace" in the midst of this crazy world, with 40 "rumors" about one country or another over-seas - it's because I feel we are all hearing conflicting stories and that is why I posted more than one. We NEED "Love & Peace" because these wars have now caused Christians to yell out - "Nuke 'em" and "Torture is Good".

I NEED "Love & Peace" - because I listen to ALL sides and not just FOX news and believe that with our Sources for News, we need to hear it from ALL sides - so we don't masacre another bunch of people in "the name of peace".

WE are the ones who should be careful and open minded to hear ALL sides before we back KILLING and being killed.

If we could say and bank other's lives on it - that there are only pure motives from those who run this earth - this thread wouldn't exist at all.

With the continuing "rumors" of wars - we Have to have His Love and maintain our Peace and pray for it for Iran [u]and whomever else[/u] and hear them ALL out. Every side. Israel may not be Right in their treatment of those in Gaza. Iran may just truly desire Electricity, as that article has proved through those sources who report on Iran's capabilities and non-capabilities. The LORD will show us who was/is telling the truth or not - but I fear it won't be until HE comes in most cases and after we've backed systems that are not "working for Him", but for a Global Greedy System and worse. Rick Warren and all included.

Love and the true desire for Peace should be in our hearts at this time more than ever - when innocents may be killed and we as a nation (as Dobson and all say) may bring Russia Plus, down on our own heads, over reasons that we don't hear from FOX news or whatever we've limited ourselves to listen to. We of all the people's on this earth should care enough to truly get to the bottom of this rumor of a war with Iran (or any others) - we are the ones that are spoke of in Daniel, etc. as "having understanding" of the times. The events SINCE Mr. Bush left the mid-east was all they reported on. I find no fault in that one article compared to the FOX etc cry to "Nuke 'em and Torture 'em".

If nothing else - the various sources on this Iran topic gives me more to pray over - because we 'are' to Care - despite what ethnicity we may wipe off of the map and then get excited over Ezek 38 on our Christian Ministies that we'll thus bring Russia upon ourselves and Israel. That week with Dobson and Co. made me sick.

And I do love you also.

Just wish I could communicate my heart better. Expressive aphasia is a real drag brother.

Love & Peace.

Annie

Edit: What else bothers me - Hussein was hung for killing 141 people - but it is China on this security counsel who is making decisions on world security and judgments on Iran and How Many Have They Killed - especially to this day, Christians? Russia and China are the main 6 on the UN Security Council.

Yes, this stuff breaks my heart.

S
SimpleLiving

Apparently, it really was an anchor. Here's the story, with pictures, on CNN.


[url=http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/02/08/internet.outage/index.html]Firm: Ship's anchor cut Mideast Internet cable[/url]

(CNN) -- A telecommunications company on Friday blamed a ship anchor for cutting one of three severed undersea cables that snarled Internet traffic throughout the Middle East last week.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS
- Three undersea Internet cables off Dubai, Egypt to be online in days, officials say
- Cut cables hurt Mideast Web traffic last week, prompting conspiracy theories
- Severed undersea cables quite common and sabotage unlikely, analyst says
- Analyst: "Tin-foil hat crowd" suspects U.S. military or terrorists behind snafu

S
sermonindex

Hi Brother Keith, I just need to clear why I looked up this story late Monday.
I heard on the radio about a fifth cable being cut. So I got up and typed it into google.

The radio program also said, that how the cables are laid, that it would be impossible to cut it with an anchor in that many spots.

This was what I typed into google after hearing that ....

http://www.google.com/search?q=5+internet+cables+cut&rls=com.microsoft:en-us&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&startIndex=&startPage=1


Edit: Couldn't find the map I saw but -

"A total of five cables being operated by two submarine cable operators have been damaged with a fault in each. These are SeaMeWe-4 (South East Asia-Middle East-Western Europe-4) near Penang, Malaysia, the FLAG Europe-Asia near Alexandria, FLAG near the Dubai coast, FALCON near Bandar Abbas in Iran and SeaMeWe-4, also near Alexandria. " Source Link

S
sermonindex

Internet cable cuts: More than accidents?
February 6, 2008

By MIKE WENDLAND

Free Press Technology Columnist

There's a growing uneasiness in the global Internet community over a series of crippling Internet blackouts overseas that has resulted from four cuts and disruptions to underwater cables over the past week. While no evidence of sabotage has been forthcoming, the four breaks seem to many observers to stretch the bounds of coincidence.

The cable breaks have been causing a growing buzz on tech blogs and drawing attention from conspiracy theorists, who suspect everything from information warfare to terrorism to sabotage by the United States to take out Internet connections to Iran, whose connectivity indeed has been pretty much blacked out for most of the past week.

The breaks have been in the Middle East and Asia and have caused widespread disruptions, especially in India. They've had little to no effect in the United States, except for users trying to communicate with people in the affected areas. Most of the huge tech firms in India that do outsourced programming and data entry for U.S. and European insurance, banking and medical companies have not been seriously disrupted because they have used alternate land- or satellite-based private connections.

Dragging ship anchors caused by rough waters in the eastern Mediterranean were the initial suspicion, but [b]Egyptian authorities repairing some of the breaks today said they have reviewed onshore cameras of the cable locations and could see no maritime traffic in the area when the breaks occurred[/b].

Two of the severed lines are owned by the India-based FLAG company that has assembled a team of 30, including telecommunication engineers and Egyptian government and Navy officials. They're working on a repair ship at the FLAG Europe-Asia site off the coastal city of Alexandria.

Those breaks have affected more than 85 million Internet users in India, Pakistan, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Sudan, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates. Egyptian officials say those breaks may not be fixed until the weekend. Meanwhile, a crew of 50 off the coast of Dubai says it will take them about a week to repair a damaged fiber optic.

The fourth cable linked Qatar and the United Arab Emirates and went out Monday. Officials are unsure what happened, although some reports say there was damage to the power supply system that "lights up" the cable and sends the data streams through the hair-thin strands of glass-like optical fibers. That's expected to take several days to repair.

Despite all the conspiracy speculation, such breaks are not without precedence. [b]In December 2006, [u]seven of the eight[/u] Internet cables connected to Taiwan were damaged by an earthquake. Internet communications in much of Asia were disrupted for weeks.[/b]

Still, with so much of the globe dependent on Internet connectivity, the breaks are focusing attention on the vulnerability of the oceanic network that handles 95% of the world's Internet and telephone traffic. Colonel R.S. Parihar, the secretary of the Internet Service Providers Association of India told the International Herald Tribune that the incidents have been a wake-up call to the global telecommunications industry.

"These are owned by private operators, and there are no governments or armies protecting these cables," he said.


Full article above, found in Detroit Free Press,
[url=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080206/BLOG01/80206022/0/NEWS15]MIKE WENDLAND'S TECH BLOG[/url]


[image][img align=left]http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2008/TECH/02/08/internet.outage/art.cable.jpg[/img]

Picture from CNN webpage.

Just wondering if a six ton anchor can be this small-looking - and shiny! - or, is it all a matter of perspective in the end?

S
sermonindex

Here's the map with the dates I mentioned with the two cuts on the 5th at that distance.

And that's it for me on this topic. :-(


http://www.ilovebonnie.net/cablecuts.jpg

M
Miccah

Its possible that it was the same anchor :-)

C
Compton

Hi all,

Thanks again Annie. I appreciate your response. For me current events are the people that God actually places in our lives, not on television. I know you understand this of course.

I also feel it fair to point out that Mike Whitney's article wasn't 'current events'. It was more an exhibition of his own political imagination, even to the point where he was speculating what was must have taken place between President Bush and the Israelis...which he obviously wasn't reporting on but merely imagining. Today, because we no longer connect to the world locally in the flesh but globally in cyberspace, we cannot tell a good story with pictures from the truth anymore.

Indeed, the Whitney article is an X-Ray not into the workings of the world, but of a particular individual's mind. I recently read a curious statement by George Wahsington, during the Shay's Rebellion crisis that threatened to topple the American government in 1786. He was marvleing at how 'accurate' the British were in predicting the troubles in store for the young nation. "Good God! Who but a tory could have forseen, or a Briton predicted them! Were these people wiser then others, or did they judge us from the corruption and depravity of their own hearts?. I am pursuaded that the latter was the case..."

Likewise Mike Whitney, and thousands just like him, simply project their own depravity and corruption onto those they 'report' on. This is how Whitney was able to talk so expertly about complex political intigue without having even a tenth of the facts that a true understanding of these events begs. Writing unauthorized autobiographies is the risk we take when we are anxious to offer our 'insight' and 'discernment'...the prophets included. We must be careful that when we appear upon stage in public that our slip is not showing.

Thanks Chris for pointing out the word 'stirred.' I think you have picked up on something that is key.

Man is unique among God's creatures because he is always stirring up. The only question that remains is just what is it that we are intending to stir up?

MC


C
ccchhhrrriiisss

[i]Here is another article about the recent Internet disruption in Asia. This time, the article is from the Associate Press (AP).

As an Electrical Engineer, I am fully aware of problems that can be caused by the simplest of matters (including a single, broken line). Did you know the origin of the term "computer bug" came from a literal [u]bug[/u] that was trapped within the architecture of a computer and short circuited it?

I'm not certain, but it seems that the folks in the areas affected might be slightly more given to conspiracy theories than those of us in the West. Perhaps that is the reason that this simple accident turned into a conspiracy theory and spread so quickly around the globe?

Anyway, here is the article:[/i]

[b]Abandoned anchor cut Gulf Internet cable [/b]
By KATARINA KRATOVAC
Associated Press Writer
Fri Feb 8, 2:24 PM ET

CAIRO, Egypt - An abandoned anchor was responsible for cutting one of the undersea Internet cables severed last week, causing disruptions across the Middle East and parts of Asia, the cable's owner said Friday.

A FLAG Telecom repair crew discovered the anchor near where the fiber-optic cable was severed Feb. 1 in the Persian Gulf, 35 miles north of Dubai, between the Emirates and Oman.

Weighing more than 5.5 tons, the anchor has been pulled to the surface. The company did not immediately explain whether the anchor moved and snapped the cable or whether the cable itself was drifting when it was sliced.

It remains unclear exactly how any of the cuts occurred.

It also was unclear whether FLAG knew what vessel the anchor belonged to. Rough weather was reported nearby at the time of the cut, but conditions have improved since.

Meanwhile, a second FLAG repair ship continued work on two undersea cables that were cut Jan. 30. They are about 5 miles off the north coast of Egypt, near the port city of Alexandria, and run between Egypt and Palermo, on the Italian island of Sicily.

Repairs at both locations are expected to be done by Sunday.

One of the two Mediterranean cables was owned by FLAG. The other, identified as SEA-ME-WE 4, or South East Asia-Middle East-West Europe 4 cable, was owned by a consortium of 16 international telecommunication companies.

Egypt's telecommunication ministry said no ships were registered near the location at the time.

The cuts slowed businesses, hampered personal Internet usage and caused a flurry of Internet blogger speculation, including mentions of sabotage. Government authorities and FLAG, which stands for Fiber-Optic Link Around the Globe, have refused to comment on the speculation.

Reports of additional cuts in Middle East Internet cables could not be confirmed.

FLAG, in a statement posted on the company Web site, said it has surveyed the cable cut off Egypt with remotely operated robots.

The FLAG spokesman said this week that it was laying a new cable underwater between Egypt and France that would be "fully resilient" against cuts such as last week's and "provide a diversity in routes."

He did not say what that resilience entailed, but said it would take months to set up the new cable.

"It is difficult to comment right now on this," said a FLAG spokesman, reached over the telephone. "We are doing our own investigation."

He spoke on condition of anonymity, in line with company policy.

Ovum analyst Matt Walker said undersea cable networks are highly vulnerable to deliberate attack and need enhanced security.

"If ports, railways, gas pipelines and other types of networks are being secured against possible sabotage, we must similarly increase the security of undersea optical highways," Walker said.

The cuts also underlined the threats that Internet disruptions could pose to organizations and businesses worldwide. Large-scale Internet disruptions are rare, but East Asia suffered nearly two months of outages and slow service after an earthquake damaged undersea cables near Taiwan in December 2006.

"The economic cost of losing, or even just slowing down, international communications is extremely high," said Walker. "This risk has to be factored into the calculations behind the investment level and design of undersea optical networks."

FLAG said it has fully restored circuits to some customers and switched others to alternative routes.

State Telecom Egypt said it sealed a $125 million contract Jan. 31 with French-American telecommunications equipment maker Alcatel-Lucent, for a new 1,900-mile-long undersea cable between Egypt and France.

Named TE North, it will link Sidi Kerir on Egypt's northern coast to the French port of Marseilles.

It will have multiple times the bandwidth capacity of existing cables and enable Telecom Egypt to "expand international connectivity, providing diversity from existing cable routes." Egyptian media have said the new Telecom cable would take more than 18 months to complete.

___

AP Business Writer Matt Moore contributed to this report from Frankfurt, Germany.

[url=http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080208/ap_on_hi_te/mideast_internet_outage]CLICK HERE[/url] to read the full article.

:-)

S
sermonindex


Compton wrote:
Hi all,

Thanks again Annie. I appreciate your response. For me current events are the people that God actually places in our lives, not on television. I know you understand this of course.

MC


No Brother Mike, I don't understand that - but I do understand that is what the mind-set of MOST Americans is.

My point was not so much that one article, as I stated twice - but that we 'should CARE' about the rest of the world and about going to war with whomever without hearing all sides.'

Kenya is in deep trouble and many other nations presently.

If WE don't care who will? THAT was my point.

To hear all sides lest we find ourselves siding with the wrong and "Nuke 'em - Kill 'em - Torture 'em" in the name of some "Righteous Cause" again - that later - when HE returns - we'll find out that we believed "the television" more than HIM on "who to kill".

I don't watch television because I am not convinced in the least that we are not hearing 'controlled media'.

You can use that word "treasonous" again if you like - but I do not believe the major network news sources.

And I am greatly grieved by how "the church" puts their "Sources" above their love for each other.

How one day they love you - but if you say or post something that goes agaisnt their political grain - you are shunned and labeled from thence forth.

You are thrown Scriptures that talk about Evil Intents of the heart - and then Normally - articles will be posted or other threads about how "evil" these people are who post against what most see on their own TV news.

Gal 6:10 As we have therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith.

You said - "For me current events are the people that God actually places in our lives, not on television."

Yup - that's the American way. Most are making their decision for candidates based on the Economy. To Hades with those over seas.

Oh yes, "Torture is good".

Let those Africans starve to death.

Who cares who's right in the middle east - as long as the AP - or CNN - or FOX says we're right - I can relax and agree to kill them all.

That has become the American way - and GOD forbid anyone think outside that box - they are labeled "stirrer uppers" - "treasonous" - "busybodies" - "not to be listened to" - and no matter what else they may post from that point on - they are not to be listened to - they no longer exist basically and no longer receive the same treatment they had not months ago.

THAT is why I take up to a year at a time off-line.
Twice taking a year off. Other times 3 and 6 months and this month took 8 days off-line to pray about the grieving I feel in my spirit.

Love ya today - labeled tomorrow and we can put our political views above our love for each other.

I'm tired of seeing people not care about each other (except for inner circles) and not caring about the rest of the world.

They sacrifice "Care" at Bohemian Grove - and maybe that is having an affect in the general atmosphere of the American Church.
I don't think that is anywhere near the full extent that has caused our callous reactions to differences in "media news sources" and desire for more war - but it is not the same Church Jesus intended. It just doesn't CARE - just as long as we have peace in the homeland and the economy improves - the heck with the rest.
And we may love you today - but tomorrow, turn on or away from you if you don't agree with "us".


Cold - cold Church of America.

C
ccchhhrrriiisss

Sister Annie...

"Who cares who's right in the middle east - as long as the AP - or CNN - or FOX says we're right - I can relax and agree to kill them all."
...
I don't watch television because I am not convinced in the least that we are not hearing 'controlled media'.

You can use that word "treasonous" again if you like - but I do not believe the major network news sources.

And I am greatly grieved by how "the church" puts their "Sources" above their love for each other.
...
How one day they love you - but if you say or post something that goes agaisnt their political grain - you are shunned and labeled from thence forth.
...
Yup - that's the American way. Most are making their decision for candidates based on the Economy. To Hades with those over seas.
...
"Nuke 'em - Kill 'em - Torture 'em" in the name of some "Righteous Cause"
...
"To Hades with those over seas."
...
"Oh yes, "Torture is good".
...
"Love ya today - labeled tomorrow and we can put our political views above our love for each other."

"I'm tired of seeing people not care about each other (except for inner circles) and not caring about the rest of the world."


Do you [i]really[/i] believe that people here at SermonIndex are like that? If so, you really need to rethink your assumptions. Perhaps there is just a little too much [i]reading between the lines[/i] going on?

Annie, I think that just about everyone here at SermonIndex cares about the people of this world. We should, like Christ, see them as [i]sheep having no shepherd[/i]. It is extremely presumptuous to allege that we don't care. We just want to use caution when loudly proclaiming rumor as fact in a website that is meant to spread an understanding of historic revival – and not what seems to be End-Time paranoia. I know that this is probably not what you have in mind, but this is how it sometimes comes across.

:-(

C
crsschk

Perhaps there is just a little too much reading between the lines going on?

Far too much.

Two words;

News fast.

2Ti 2:4 No man that warreth entangleth himself with the affairs of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be a soldier.

C
Compton

but I do understand that is what the mind-set of MOST Americans is.

My earlier points were not concerned with the mind set of Americans, but of the Church. My point about being concerned for the people that God put into our lives, I think is simple enough. It needs not to be confused with indifference for the world.

Instead, I was attempting to call attention to that unique modern development in the history of man; namely that each of us now must learn how to digest sorrow and woe from the whole globe. I feel that all this 'information', while pretending to 'connect us' globally has actually disconnected and fragmented society. The Christian is not immune to this dynamic. For the Christian, who is astonishingly inclined to love the whole world, might well develop a physche that is overwhelmed with global issues it has no power over, while ignoring local spiritual and physical needs that could be adressed.

This crushing burden for the whole world at once, when combined with our inability to help all the world at once, too often leads to unhealthy resentment of the impotence of fellow Christians. I believe much of the seperation we see happening from churches today, is not of the Puritan variety, where a committed people formed a holier society together, but of the post-modern variety, where everyone lives in their own reality that has no room for dissapointing people. Today, we find we can do a better job feeding our own souls technologically with a smorgasboard of information, but tragically the spiritual and emotional interactions we have with streaming words and images is edited and produced, and is therefore not even reality...at least as compared to the few people that we could have served had we thought they were as 'important' as the 'global crisis' that demanded our attention.

This point is not a rebuke, but an observation. Really Annie, I wasn't trying to set myself up against you... I do not see this as a character issue that needs addressed, but a very real problem unique to modern humanity. I simply do not think the human physche can successfully process the rivers of information we gulp down from around the world.

Still, I do believe I understand your intent. There is a story I read about a visitor at the home of GW North. One morning this visitor said he arose before the sun and saw a light coming from North's study. As he quietly approached he saw the preacher upon his knees in front of a globe. Every few minutes North would gently rotate the globe and point to a new spot, and then bow his head in prayer. For a long time the visitor watched, transfixed at the unseen love he was priviledged to see. Then without warning, North sighed in sorrow, leaned forward to embrace the whole globe, and wept.

Now sister, I would never want to talk anyone out of such a holy burden for the world as that!

I hope the account of North relates to the point you were trying to make. I must say it relates to my original point as well: praying earnestly for the nations in the presence of God is a far cry from Mike Whitney's article.

MC

S
sermonindex

My only response - does anyone who has posted to this thread remember who, when and where it was posted here on the News section, words to the affect - 'that if it were up to me, I'd just go over there and Nuke them.' ?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

MikeB, I respect the News Fast. Amen.

S
sermonindex

Hi Annie,

I don't remember that comment... but I do remember hearing a Christian saying something similar about the trouble in Ireland (I won't repeat what I heard), and it made me gird up my loins and go over there to experience the atmosphere for myself. It was very salutory coming off the ferry to see real soldiers with real guns in a group near the quay; armoured cars in the streets; my bag being searched completely - just to queue up to buy stamps; to be on a bus within sight of a bomb explosion which happened during my journey; to visit the main hospital and see war-wounds with my own eyes; then, to meet one after another earnest Christians living in that situation who were still talking about the goodness of God, showing hospitality and sharing the word with me.

Definitely, I came back with a very quiet heart, and much to think about.

;-(

This discussion is archived and closed to new replies. Start a new discussion to carry the subject on.
Archived
1 of 32 posts

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate