Menu

Revive Our Hearts

S
sermonindex

These messages are such a blessing and inspiration to me that I felt led to share them here on SI. I'm preaching to myself here too!:-)

Listen to it on audio [url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]HERE.[/url]


What Do Men Need?

Series: For Women Only: An Interview with Shaunti Feldhahn and Barbara Rainey

Thursday, April 10 2008


Leslie Basham: When husbands and wives don’t connect, who’s to blame? Here’s Shaunti Feldhahn.

Shaunti Feldhahn: For some reason, we’ve developed this inner, subtle feeling that we women are really the ones who are good at relationships, and we women are really the ones who have the interpersonal skills. So if there’s a problem, it’s probably his fault, and he’s just got to learn to relate better. And when we unpack that, what that’s actually saying is he’s got to learn to relate the same way we do.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss, for Thursday, April 10. Here’s Nancy.

Nancy: Do you ever find yourself wondering what in the world makes my husband tick? In fact, what makes men in general tick?

Our guest today has written a book called For Women Only: What You Need to Know about the Inner Lives of Men. Shaunti Feldhahn, welcome to Revive Our Hearts.

Shaunti: It’s great to be with you.

Nancy: Shaunti’s a best-selling author. She’s a newspaper columnist, a public-policy analyst, and most important, for this series, she’s the wife of her husband, Jeff Feldhahn, and a mother of two precious little children. I’m excited today to talk with you about this book.

Also joining us today is my long-time friend Barbara Rainey. Barbara, thank you for joining us at a last-minute notice. I asked you yesterday if would you be willing to come and join this conversation. Thanks for doing that.

Barbara Rainey: Yes, well, it was last-minute, but I’m honored to be here.

Nancy: Barbara and I have known each other for a number of years. Barbara is the wife of Dennis Rainey. Together they started FamilyLife Ministries. In fact, FamilyLife’s the ministry that partnered with us in starting Revive Our Hearts, so we owe a lot to that ministry. They still produce Revive Our Hearts today, and we’re so grateful for that team here in Little Rock.

Barbara, in your roles not only in FamilyLife Ministries, but as the wife of Dennis Rainey, the mother of your six children, and the grandmother of six—you don’t look old enough for that to be true—God’s given you a lot of wisdom. I’m thankful to be able to talk with two wives today about men.

Now, let me just say to Shaunti, when your book first came out and one of my staff picked it up, she showed me the book like this: “Shaunti Feldhahn, it says at the top, For Women Only, What You Need to Know about the Inner Lives of Men.” One of my staff women laughed, and she said, “Why in the world is a woman writing a book about the inner lives of men?” And one might ask that question.

We’re not claiming by any means, as a trio of women, to be experts on men. But you did some fascinating research that gave you some insights that I think are going to be very helpful to women about how men think. How did you stumble onto this project?

Shaunti: “Stumbling” is probably the right word, Nancy, in all honesty. I actually realized how little I understood about how men really think and feel when I had to write my last novel. I had to create a male character as one of my main characters. I suddenly was trying to write this guy’s thoughts and realizing that I have no idea what a guy would be thinking in this situation.

So I’d sit down and talk to my husband Jeff about it, and anytime we’d go out to dinner with another couple, I’d go to the guy and say, “Can I interview you?” And, “Here’s my scene. What would you be thinking in this situation?”

As the man would explain what he would be thinking, my mouth started dropping open, and his wife’s mouth would be dropping open. And we’d be saying, “That’s what you’re thinking?” It was this enormous surprise.

I started doing more and more and more of these discussions, and pretty soon I was going up to the guys behind the counter at Starbucks, going, “What would you be thinking in this situation?” I realized that there was so much that I didn’t realize about what’s going on in the minds and hearts of our men.

I ended up hiring a professional survey company to do a national survey of men, just to see if everything I was finding was borne out, and it was. And that’s why we created this book.

Nancy: So you ended up conducting spoken or written interviews with over a thousand men, some of them believers, some of them not believers.

Shaunti: Yes. All over the map.

Nancy: And you discovered that there were some things that they had in common—some of their feelings, fears, ways of thinking, concerns—and you summarized them into seven of what you call revelations about how men think. It sounds like it was kind of a light bulb going off in your head.

Shaunti: It really was. I tell people all the time that this book is really only about things we women just don’t get about men and things that, most of the time, our husbands really desperately wish we knew.

Nancy: And wish they could explain to us.

Shaunti: Yes, and wish they could explain.

Nancy: And it’s so true that, from the beginning, God created men and women very different—needing each other, interdependent on each other, but very different. And sometimes we gripe about how different men are from women, but would we really want them to be just like us?

Shaunti: I don’t think so.

Barbara: I don’t think so either! No.

Nancy: No, probably not. One of the things that encourages me about this book is that you challenge women to cherish the differences rather than resenting the differences.

Shaunti: Well, one thing I say right up front, and I tell people this when I give talks, is to recognize that there are an awful lot of resources out there for marriage—something that FamilyLife has been doing for years so wonderfully—and so many things that talk about the back-and-forth and the give-and-take that we really all need in marriage.

And yet, after I learned what I learned about men, I feel like there’s an awful lot that we women need to grow up about. We need to be willing to step out into maturity a little bit and recognize that there are these things that—well, you know what, let’s just be one-sided for a little bit. Let’s set aside our rights, our needs, and just be willing to recognize and have our eyes opened to the unique things that our husbands need.

Barbara: I couldn’t agree more. I think in our culture, we’ve had such a focus on women—from the last generation actually, because of the women’s lib movement and all of the focus on women’s rights—and I think it has done a disservice to marriages. The focus on women has caused us to be selfish, to be self-focused, to think about what we need, and to not think about what our husbands need.

Shaunti: For some reason we’ve developed this inner, subtle feeling that we women are really the ones who are good at relationships, and we women are really the ones who have the interpersonal skills. So if there’s a problem, it’s probably his fault, and he’s just got to learn to relate better. And when we unpack that, what that’s actually saying is he’s got to learn to relate the same way we do.

Instead, what I found is this is just the way these men are built. They have very unique needs, and just as we want them to love and support us the way we need, why on earth should we not learn to love and support them the way they need? It’s really a wonderful opportunity for us.

Barbara: It really is, and it leads to an arrogance that we are prey to. We’ve been taught that the way we relate is right and that men don’t know how to relate; therefore, I think we subtly begin to think that they’re wrong.

Nancy: And that they are the ones who need to change.

Barbara: Yes, and that there’s a problem with them, that they need to fix it, and that we don’t have any responsibility.

Nancy: We’re not saying that men don’t have problems, or that men don’t need to change.

Barbara: That’s right.

Nancy: But God didn’t call us to change the men.

Barbara: And to make them like us.

Nancy: Right—or to make them like us. And what I love, Shaunti, about this book, and about these revelations about men, is that they call us as women to be willing to make some adjustments.

Shaunti: Yes. I often talk to people who make the classic assumption that many of us have: “Well, if I can just get hold of these revelations and understand him better, I can change him.” And at the very beginning of the book, I say these are intended to change us. Period.

One of the wonderful things about that, as I have found in my own marriage, is that once we start realizing that we can reach out to our husbands and love them the way that they need, it builds them up to be the men that God created them to be. And suddenly they start becoming the men that God created them to be, which includes being a wonderful husband, even if they already were. They want to then love us more sacrificially. It’s a win-win for all concerned.

Nancy: I hope our listeners will stay tuned through this whole series. I think it’s going to bring a lot of hope to women.

We get a lot of desperate emails from women who are in desperate marriages. Learning some of the insights that you show in this book—and, Barbara, that you have learned through a lot of years of marriage—this brings hope.

This says that a wife can have an influence on her husband if she will become the godly woman God wants her to be. The impact on her husband will be significant—and not just on her husband, but on men in general.

So let’s jump in to the first of those revelations that I think is so foundational and is one of the key biblical teachings to women about relating to men. It starts with this revelation which we think we know, but we really don’t fully understand, and that is that men need respect.

Shaunti: Yes. I started actually learning this a little bit when I was right out of college. I was a brand-new believer, and I was on a retreat with a bunch of singles. The theme of the retreat was “Relationships,” which, as you can imagine, was of great interest to a bunch of singles.

The retreat speaker looked at this group of 70 people, and he divided us in half. He put the men on one side and the women on the other side of the room. Then he said, “I’m going to ask you a question, and I’m going to ask you to choose between these two bad feelings. If you had to choose, would you rather feel alone and unloved in the world, or would you rather feel inadequate and disrespected?”

Nancy: I really don’t want either!

Shaunti: No, I don’t want either, but if you had to choose, which would you rather? And he turned to the men, and he said, “Okay, men, who here would rather feel alone and unloved?” And every man raised his hand, and you heard a giant gasp from the women’s side of the room.

Nancy: They would rather feel alone and unloved than . . .?

Shaunti: . . . than to feel inadequate and disrespected.

Nancy: Wow.

Shaunti: As woman, we most want to feel loved and cherished, so this was like foreign land to us. We had no idea how they could choose this. He turned to the women’s side of the room, and he said, “Okay, women, who here would rather feel alone and unloved?” I think only three or four women raised their hands, and you heard the giant gasp from the men’s side of the room. And he said, “Women, who here would rather feel inadequate and disrespected?” Almost every woman raised her hand.

This retreat speaker said the same thing that I said in the book and asked the men on the survey—which is to recognize that, for women, the highest need in general is to feel loved and cherished. But the highest need for a man is to feel his wife’s respect and trust and admiration and honor.

So as women we can go overboard trying to show how much we love them, but if we don’t also show that we respect them—and maybe criticize them in public or question their decisions all the time—they’re going to feel disrespected, and then they won’t feel loved.

Nancy: And that’s a little different way of thinking in a culture that is so love-dominated.

Shaunti: Absolutely. It’s interesting. I was speaking with a gentleman who has a ministry called Love and Respect, a marriage ministry that deals with exactly this. He pointed out that we have come to believe in our culture that love is to be unconditional, but respect must be earned.

In fact, when you look at the Scripture, that’s actually a completely unbiblical idea in marriage. But I think, for many of us, that’s really the assumption we’ve made: that respect needs to be earned, and we’ll respect our husbands when they deserve it. Really, what God is saying is that that would be the same thing as your husband saying, “Well, I’ll love you when you’re loveable.” It’s absolutely imperative that we learn what the Scripture says about that.

Nancy: I think a lot of times women do respect the men in their lives—they feel that respect, and sometimes may not realize how their words or their actions can convey the opposite.

Barbara: Yes, I really agree, Nancy. I think, as a culture of women, we’ve become critical. I think our culture has invited that critical spirit in us by telling us we need to think about our own needs and our own wants.

So, without even maybe realizing it, we’ve become critical of our husbands and the men in our lives that we work with, or that we’re around on a regular basis. And we may not even say anything, but we may just have a critical attitude toward them and sort of a condescending spirit. That’s not healthy in relationships. It’s not biblical. It’s not what God called us to do.

Shaunti: The other thing that I discovered—and again, this was a revelation for me, too; I want to make sure I state that right up front—is that I’d been making this mistake far too many times with my husband Jeff. It’s not even just that we are critical to them, it’s that we are critical to them when what they most need is for us to be uncritical.

It would be the same thing as if our husbands spent their day never talking to us, or never showing any signs at all of love—and, in fact, showing us things that we felt were constantly unloving. That’s the way they often feel as they go through their day, because, again, their highest need is to feel that we respect and trust them.

And frankly, one of the things that I hear all the time from women is, “Well, what do you do? How do you show respect?” Or “Why should I show respect, or why should I respect him, if he’s really not respectable?” I say, it’s that paradox. It’s that same way that, when we weren’t worthy of it, Christ came and died for us, and that makes us want to be worthy of it. It makes us want to live a godly life.

When our husbands show us love, even if we haven’t been particularly loveable that day, it makes us want to be worthy of that. It’s the same thing with our men. If we will show them and choose—it’s a choice, really—to demonstrate that respect and to demonstrate that trust, even if we felt he hasn’t really earned it, he will want to be worthy of that.

Nancy: And that takes faith that God really will come through. You have to launch out into the deep and say, “Lord, I’m going to obey You and Your Word, regardless of how I feel, regardless of how my husband may have wounded my spirit. I’m going to trust You enough to obey You and let You deal with my husband.”

Shaunti: Right. The neat thing about that, though, is that—because this is the way that God created men and women—when we actually step out in faith and do that, sometimes the results are immediate. I mean, it’s wonderful.

It’s wonderful the way that God designed us to have these little encouragements along the way, even just, for example, stopping ourselves from teasing them in public, or talking bad about them behind their backs. You know what that does? It affirms deep in our hearts that they are disrespectable. When we talk about them behind their backs, we may think we’re not affecting them at all, but we are, because we’re creating that sensation within ourselves.

Barbara: Well, it’s a matter of focus, too, and if we’re focusing on what we don’t like, what we think is not worthy of respect, then that’s what consumes us.

One of the interesting things that I learned early in our marriage—I think it was within the first year of our marriage. I remember thinking the spiritual thing to do as a new wife was to pray about the things I saw in my husband’s life that I felt needed to be fixed or changed, or where he needed to grow up.

Nancy: You mean there were some things that you thought needed to be changed in Dennis Rainey?

Barbara: And they surprised me, because when I married him, we had a pretty short courtship and engagement. So I did discover some things in that first year that surprised me. I thought, “He’s not as mature as I thought he was.” So I began to think, “Well, now, how do I do this? How do I handle this as a Christian wife?” And I thought, “Well, the Christian thing to do would be to pray about these things.” So I began to make a list in my prayer notebook of things that I felt like God needed to work on in his life.

The thing that was so interesting about that is that after a few weeks I realized that, by praying on those things every day, I was focusing on them every day. I had that list memorized, and at the end of only three weeks, or maybe a month, I realized I was consumed with everything that I thought needed to be changed in his life.

I went to the Lord, and I said, “Lord, this isn’t working. I don’t like how I feel about him by focusing on what’s wrong—or what I think is wrong.” God may not even think it’s wrong, but I had come to the conclusion that it was wrong. And I said, “God, I’m going to give him to You. I’m going to tear this list up, and I’m not ever going to pray about things that need to be changed in his life again. If You want to change his life, it’s Your business, not mine. I’m going to instead focus on the things that are good.”

It’s a really practical way that we as wives can show respect to our husbands—by focusing on the things that are good, the things that he does do right. Thank him for those, praise him for those, encourage him for those things. And as Shaunti just said, watch him light up when we do give him respect for what is good and what is honorable and what is respectable in his life.

Nancy: I think it’s time for us to reissue a challenge that we have given several times before on Revive Our Hearts, and it’s always been received so positively. We’ve received so many emails telling how this was life-changing. So if you haven’t heard this before—or even if you have, but you’ve never done it; or maybe you’ve done it and you need to do it again—here’s the 30-day challenge: For 30 days, you can’t say anything negative about your husband—to him, or to anyone else about him.

Barbara: That’s an excellent challenge.

Nancy: Now, when I’ve given that challenge at conferences, I watch some people look like they’re going to fall off their chairs and say, “I don’t think I can do that.” Listen, if that’s a problem for you, then you’ve probably developed some bad habits, and you’re seeing your husband through negative eyes.

That’s the one side of the challenge. You can’t say anything negative about him for 30 days.

Here’s the positive side: Every day, for the next 30 days, find something that you appreciate or admire about your husband. Say it to him, and say it to someone else about him. And I’ve said to women, “If you can’t think of 30 things that you appreciate about your husband, then think of one thing and say it every day for the next 30 days.” And then I want you to write us and tell us, as many women have in the past, what happened in your marriage.

I’ve told women, I can’t guarantee that this will change your husband, though he may wake up one morning wondering if he’s married to a different woman, but I can tell you that it will change you. It will change your perspective, and you will begin to see your husband through new eyes.

So write and tell us about it, as one woman did. She said, “It’s only day one, and I can’t believe how my husband has already responded to me today in a situation, a relationship, that was strained and I thought was hopeless. He’s already warmed up and is communicating back as I’m showing respect to him, just after day one.”

Shaunti: It’s because our husbands are so starved for this. They’re like dry sponges, and it will just soak into their spirits, because, again, this is the most important thing to them. He needs the sense of, “I am appreciated.”

Nancy: We’re going to pick up again on this theme of respect tomorrow because I think it’s so important. We’re going to talk more about what communicates respect to men, and also what communicates disrespect, but let me just read from Ephesians chapter 5—a verse that most of us are familiar with, but I’m going to read it in the Amplified version, which says it in such a powerful way.

Ephesians chapter 5, verse 33, the second part of that verse: “Let the wife see that she respects and reverences her husband”—and then it expands on those terms, and here’s what it says: “that she notices him, regards him, honors him, prefers him, venerates, and esteems him; and that she defers to him, praises him, and loves and admires him exceedingly.”

Leslie: Nancy Leigh DeMoss has been offering her 30-day challenge to not say anything negative about your husband for 30 days, and to say at least one positive thing every day.

This challenge has transformed marriages. We know because so many women have taken the challenge and written to us about it—like a listener who wrote last time we offered this challenge. She said, “A friend of mine forwarded me the 30-day challenge. I’m very thankful to her for this. My husband, who was already wonderful to me, has just blossomed into an amazing creature. I think this has strengthened our communication toward one another.”

Like this listener, would you take the 30-day challenge? Refrain from saying anything negative about your husband, and choose to say one thing positive about him every day. We want to help you, and if you sign up at ReviveOurHearts.com, we’ll email you an encouraging reminder every day for 30 days.

Let me just mention that sometimes women ask why we don’t offer a similar challenge to men. Now, we definitely encourage men to obey God’s call to love their wives the way Christ loved the church, but our mission is to speak to wives. As Nancy often says, “God didn’t call me to speak to men; He called me to speak to women.” And I hope our guest, Shaunti Feldhahn, has helped you understand how meaningful it will be for your husband to receive your encouragement.

To learn more from her on how men think, you can visit our website, ReviveOurHearts.com. There you can order a copy of her book, For Women Only, along with a CD of the conversation between her, Nancy, and Barbara Rainey. It’s yours when you make a donation to the ministry of Revive Our Hearts. Or ask for the book, For Women Only, and the CD series when you donate by phone, 1-800-569-5959.

Does your husband show you enough love? If not, you may need to show him more respect. Find out why when Shaunti, Barbara, and Nancy return tomorrow. Now they’re back to wrap up our time today.

Nancy: So let me ask you women: If we were to ask your husband, would he say that you are his number-one cheerleader? Would he say that you’re in his corner with him, that you’re his number-one encourager? Or have you developed this ministry of deflation?

Let me just say, that’s not a ministry; that’s not an encouragement. You need to be a blessing and an encouragement, the one who lifts up your husband’s hands.

Listen, he’s living in a war zone out there, and there are plenty of people and plenty in our culture that will tear him down, that will make him feel emasculated, that will make him weary in the battle. He needs to be able to come into his home and find a woman who will strengthen him with her words, with her love, with her spirit, with her acceptance.

If you’ll let God make you into that kind of an encourager, you will find that God will do the job. God will do the work of turning that man’s heart. You’ll find that he’ll blossom under the encouragement—just as you would, but it’s even more important to him.

And so, Father, thank You for these principles from Your Word. Thank You that You have given husbands a wife to love them, to encourage them, to affirm them, to respect them. Thank You for that very special role that only a wife can have in a husband’s life.

And, Lord, I want to pray for each of our married listeners, the women who are listening who are married, and ask that You do a work of grace in their hearts. Plant in them the seed of a desire to be that cheerleader, to be that encourager for their husband.

Lord, we do pray for these men, that they might flourish and grow and be strengthened and nourished by the love and support and respect of their wives.

I pray in Jesus’ name, Amen.

Revive Our Heartswith Nancy Leigh DeMoss is an outreach of Life Action Ministries.

All Scripture is taken from the Amplified Bible.

M
MSeaman

I bought this book when it came out. It helped me to understand my husband's needs better. I recommend it for women who are married or getting married. There is now a companion book called "For Men Only" about a woman's needs. I believe it was written by Shaunti's husband, but can't remember for sure. Thanks for sharing this!

S
sermonindex


MSeaman wrote:
I bought this book when it came out. It helped me to understand my husband's needs better. I recommend it for women who are married or getting married. There is now a companion book called "For Men Only" about a woman's needs. I believe it was written by Shaunti's husband, but can't remember for sure. Thanks for sharing this!

I bought the book too. I've read it and reread it. I wanted to mention too that I posted the link to the audio of this in my first post.

M
MSeaman

Nancy Leigh Demoss always has something good to say. Have you heard her messages on Modesty and Biblical Womanhood?

S
sermonindex


MSeaman wrote:
Nancy Leigh Demoss always has something good to say. Have you heard her messages on Modesty and Biblical Womanhood?

I have read a few. If you or anyone else has any links or articles though you would like to share please post them here. I would like to read them if you do. It doesn't necessarily have to be from Nancy Leigh Demoss.

M
MSeaman

[url=http://www.proverbs31woman.com/]Proberbs 31 Woman[/url]

These ladies have some good tips and are very encouraging.

[url=http://titus2talk.blogspot.com/]Blog that offers a lot on Biblical Womanhood[/url]

Have you read His Needs, Her Needs? Also a good book.

S
sermonindex


MSeaman wrote:
[url=http://www.proverbs31woman.com/]Proberbs 31 Woman[/url]

These ladies have some good tips and are very encouraging.

[url=http://titus2talk.blogspot.com/]Blog that offers a lot on Biblical Womanhood[/url]

Have you read His Needs, Her Needs? Also a good book.

I haven't read that one yet. I will have to check out those links too.

Here's another good site you might want to check out:

[url=http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/]Ladies Against Feminism[/url]

S
sermonindex

Carolyn McCulley
http://solofemininity.blogs.com/

S
sermonindex

"For 30 days, you can’t say anything negative about your husband—to him, or to anyone else about him.

Barbara: That’s an excellent challenge.

Nancy: Now, when I’ve given that challenge at conferences, I watch some people look like they’re going to fall off their chairs and say, “I don’t think I can do that.”

[b]Listen, if that’s a problem for you, then you’ve probably developed some bad habits, and you’re seeing your husband through negative eyes."[/b]

M
MSeaman


Psalm18 wrote:

I haven't read that one yet. I will have to check out those links too.

Here's another good site you might want to check out:

[url=http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/]Ladies Against Feminism[/url]

Thanks, I'll check that one out. :-)

S
sermonindex

"Ephesians chapter 5, verse 33, the second part of that verse: “Let the wife see that she respects and reverences her husband”—and then it expands on those terms, and here’s what it says:
[b]“that she notices him, regards him, honors him, prefers him, venerates, and esteems him; and that she defers to him, praises him, and loves and admires him exceedingly.” [/b]

I think this 30 challenge is a great idea. We can form bad habits and this produces good habits.


S
sermonindex

"Words He Can Hear":

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here.[/url]


Series: For Women Only: An Interview with Shaunti Feldhahn and Barbara Rainey

Friday, April 11 2008


S
sermonindex

"Understanding His Needs"

Series: For Women Only: An Interview with Shaunti Feldhahn and Barbara Rainey

Monday, April 14 2008


[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here.Past programs on the left.[/url]

"Ephesians chapter 5, verse 33, the second part of that verse: “Let the wife see that she respects and reverences her husband”—and then it expands on those terms, and here’s what it says:

“that she notices him, regards him, honors him, prefers him, venerates, and esteems him; and that she defers to him, praises him, and loves and admires him exceedingly.”


S
sermonindex


Series: Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life

Wednesday, April 16 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: You don’t have to let a harsh, badly-behaved man turn you into a harsh, badly-behaved woman.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Wednesday, April 16.

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here. Past programs on the left.[/url]

Caught in the Middle
Series: Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life

Wednesday, April 16 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: You don’t have to let a harsh, badly-behaved man turn you into a harsh, badly-behaved woman.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Wednesday, April 16.

Yesterday we wrapped up a series on how wives can understand their husbands better, meet a husband’s needs, and serve him. Whenever we air a series like that, we hear from listeners who are in bleak situations.

Nancy provides biblical counsel for women who have husbands who seem impossible to love, and she gives advice to anybody who has to deal with a difficult person. Here she is in a series called How to Live with the Fools in Your Life.

Nancy: If you’ve been listening to Revive Our Hearts for any length of time, you may remember a year or so ago when we did a lengthy series on the Proverbs 31 woman. We called it The Counter-cultural Woman.

When you think about Proverbs 31 and that virtuous woman, it’s easy, perhaps, for some women to think, “That’s easy for that woman to be virtuous. Look at the guy she’s married to. I mean, he loves her. He’s an honorable man. He’s a virtuous man. Anybody could be a great woman if she was married to a man like that.”

I think of some of our listeners who call us, send letters, or emails. I’m so thankful for those letters and emails. I read as many of them as possible. So many of those women pour out their hearts about some difficult or impossible situation that they feel trapped in.

For some, it’s their marriage. They’re married to a man who just is impossible to love, humanly speaking. He may just be mean. Or maybe it’s a situation at work—a boss who’s impossible, somebody they can’t please.

It may be a situation in their church—someone they can’t get along with, someone who is cantankerous. I’m sure there’s nobody cantankerous in your church. But in some churches, there are some cantankerous people.

Maybe you have one of those impossible people in your life—maybe in the four walls of your own home, in your workplace, in your church, in your neighborhood, wherever. How do you live with those kinds of people? How do you respond as a virtuous woman when you’re living with someone who is an ungodly, foolish person?

Well, there’s an amazing story in the Old Testament, 1 Samuel chapter 25. I want to ask you to turn in your Bibles to 1 Samuel 25. We’re going to be introduced to a woman in the Old Testament. She’s not as well-known as some of the other women that we’ve studied in Revive Our Hearts, not as well-known as Mary of Nazareth or Deborah or Elizabeth, the mother of John the Baptist.

But Abigail has become one of my favorite Old Testament characters. She is an extraordinary woman. There’s a lot we can learn from her life, not only from her life but also from the two men who are the other main characters in this story.

At any given time in your life, you may relate to any one of these three characters. So we’re not just going to study Abigail. We want to look at the two men who were involved in her life. As we do this character study, we want to see what God has to teach us for our lives.

Let’s start with verse one, which is the setting for this story. In verse one of chapter 25 we read, “Now Samuel died. And all Israel assembled and mourned for him, and they buried him in his house at Ramah.”

You remember that Samuel was a man of God. He was a prophet. He lived a long, long time. He was the last of the judges. He was the one who anointed Saul to be the first king of Israel. He’s also the one who anointed David to be Saul’s replacement.

When I think of Samuel dying, the picture that comes to my mind is a little bit like what happened when President Ronald Reagan died. Do you remember? He had been a great leader. He had led this nation. He was esteemed. He was respected. He’d lived a lot of years. He had led the nation well.

When President Reagan died, do you remember how the flags were flown at half mast and how thousands and thousands of people lined up, first in California and then in the streets of Washington D.C., to just stand and watch as the procession carrying his body drove through those streets. Remember how over a hundred thousand people stood in line there at the rotunda in Washington, some of them for up to three hours, just to file by and pay their last respects.

The nation mourned when President Reagan died. I mean, Republicans, Democrats, people who didn’t know what party they were. They had a lot of respect for this man. And they mourned when he died. They grieved.

I think that’s a little bit what it was like when Samuel died. There was this national sense of grieving, mourning. But of all the people who were grieving when this great man of God, Samuel, died, I think that David was probably the one who mourned this loss as much as anyone else in the whole land of Israel.

You remember that David had been anointed to be the next king of Israel. But King Saul was still on the throne. King Saul was an egomaniac. He was full of himself. He was insecure. And he was trying to kill David. He was jealous of David and knew that David was coming to the throne. There was this war going on between Saul and David.

Samuel the prophet had been a buffer between David and Saul. And now Samuel is gone. I can imagine David feeling abandoned, vulnerable, alone, maybe depressed, discouraged, maybe wondering, “Are God’s promises for my life really ever going to come true?”

In the midst of that lonely, vulnerable, scared time in David’s life, we come to the next phrase in verse one that says, “Then David rose and went down to the wilderness of Paran.”

David, in the context of 1 Samuel 25 here, has been fleeing for his life from this madman, King Saul. He’s a fugitive. In the previous chapter he had been in the wilderness of Engedi and had had an encounter with King Saul. Now Samuel dies, and David moves further south down to the wilderness of Paran to get further away from King Saul.

As he’s headed south toward the wilderness of Paran, this story takes place. In this place David encounters a couple, a husband and a wife, and a couple like many I have heard of and met today, where one of the mates is a godly person who loves and fears the Lord and the other mate is a totally ungodly, selfish, wicked person. It happens. And David met a couple just like that.

As we’ve said, there are three main characters in this story. When you study the Bible, as you do character studies, it helps to ask yourself, whether the characters are good or bad.

Is there an example here for me?
Is there an example to be followed?
Is there an example to be avoided?
What does this passage and what do these people teach me about the heart and the ways and the character of God?
That’s what we’re going to be looking for in this story.

The first character we’re introduced to—and I want to just give you a quick overview today and then tomorrow we’ll jump into the story. But the first character is a man named Nabal. His name means “fool,” a Hebrew word for “fool.”

In verse 25, we read about Nabal. “As his name is, so is he.” His name means “fool” and that describes exactly what this man was like. He was a wicked, foolish man.

As we study the life of Nabal, we’re going to see a lot of the characteristics of a fool. As you see those characteristics, you may recognize someone you know, maybe more than one person.

But you know what else? You may also see yourself, at points. One of the things we want to do as we go through this series is say, “How can we avoid becoming like a Nabal? How can we avoid having those characteristics in our lives?”

Nabal’s foolish behavior evoked two very different kinds of responses from the other two main characters in the story. First there was David, the man who was going to be king. He had been appointed by God to be king, but he was still a fugitive from King Saul.

David’s response, when he came face to face with this foolish man Nabal, was to get provoked. He lost control. He was tempted to respond just the same way that Nabal had treated him. The danger is that when you get around a fool, you may respond like a fool.

In fact, as we get into this story, we’ll see that David’s response was even worse than what Nabal had done to provoke him. We’ll see in this story that even the most godly people sometimes act in ungodly, foolish ways.

That’s why we all need wise counsel. We need godly people around us who will help us see when we’re being foolish and, when necessary, will confront us, will love us enough to get into our face and speak the truth to us as Abigail did to David.

We need people who will give us godly counsel when we’re acting like fools. And we need to learn to listen to that counsel, to take it, to heed it.

That’s what humility really is. It’s the willingness to listen to wise counsel and to change direction when we realize we’ve been wrong. We’re going to see in David a man who, though he initially responded foolishly to this fool, was willing to listen to wise counsel and to change his course, to change his direction, when he realized he’d been wrong.

The third character, as we’ve already referenced, is this woman named Abigail. She models an incredible response to foolish people. There’s so much we can learn from her, whether the fool in your life is the husband or it’s a boss or it’s a son or daughter or it’s an in-law or it’s somebody in your church or your neighbor. Whoever the fool is in your life, Abigail teaches us how to live with and deal with the fools in your life.

She’s a woman of discretion. She’s a woman of wisdom. She’s a peacemaker. Her life changes the whole outcome of this story.

As in every story, including yours, there’s a fourth, mostly-silent character in this story and that is God Himself. God who is always behind the scenes ruling, overruling and intervening in the affairs of men. God who is always sovereign; He’s always on His throne. He’s always working to achieve His purposes and fulfill His promises.

We see in this story a God who is never absent, a God who is never asleep on the job. It’s the same God who is in your story, a God who is involved in your life, who cares about the fools that you live with or work with or go to school with. There’s a God who is involved.

Verses 2 and 3 tell us:

There was a man in Maon whose business was in Carmel. The man was very rich; he had three thousand sheep and a thousand goats. He was shearing his sheep in Carmel. Now the name of the man was Nabal, and the name of his wife Abigail. The woman was discerning and beautiful, but the man was harsh and badly behaved; he was a Calebite.

Most likely this marriage between Abigail and Nabal had been arranged by her parents, as most marriages were in that culture. She probably had no say in the matter. She was beautiful. He was rich. Her father may have thought he was really doing her a favor by marrying her into this rich man’s family, thought he was doing a good thing for her.

A beautiful woman and a rich man—you’d think that was a great combination. But the problem is that beauty and wealth are only external characteristics. What really matters when it comes down to real life is the heart, the character, not the outward appearance or the material wealth.

In the case of this couple, the difference between their hearts and their character could hardly have been more extreme. It was like night and day. This is a totally mismatched couple when it comes to matters of the heart.

He was a foolish, ungodly man; she was a wise, godly woman. We don’t know if he had always been that way, if he was that way when they got married. Maybe she thought he was a great man when they got married. As is true of many women that I’ve heard from, they say, “I had no clue till years into our marriage what kind of man he was going to turn into.”

Or maybe he’d always been ill-tempered and ill-mannered. We don’t know. All we know is she ended up in this very difficult marriage.

There are a couple points of application that are pretty obvious to me already in this chapter. First is the fact that if you are godly, that does not necessarily guarantee that your mate will be godly or that others in your life, others you live with, family members, friends, co-workers will be godly. The fact that you are a godly person does not guarantee that the people around you will be godly people. Neither does it guarantee that they will change.

Sometimes people who write us about our program say, “You give me the feeling that if I just live a godly life, my husband will become a godly man.”

I want to make it clear. We are not saying that, because the Scripture doesn’t say that. Scripture does teach that a godly mate can have a powerful influence on an ungodly mate. But there’s no guarantee that your choosing to live God’s way will change the people around you who are fools, who are Nabals. They may never change.

There’s a second application here, and that is that you don’t have to let a harsh, badly-behaved man turn you into a harsh, badly-behaved woman. That’s one of the powerful things about this story. The fact that your mate or someone else that you have to live with or work with on a regular basis, the fact that they are ungodly doesn’t mean that you can’t be godly yourself.

You see, we tend to feel that our level of godliness or spirituality is tied into the people around us. They make us react this way. No one can make you react in an ungodly way. The fact that you have to live with a person who is ungodly doesn’t mean that you can’t be godly yourself. Your character, your responses don’t have to be controlled by theirs.

One of the things that I love about this story is by the time we enter into it—we don’t know what all had preceded it but we know that Abigail has been living with this harsh, badly-behaved man. We know that had to affect her. She was living with the man.

But it’s obvious that she had not let Nabal destroy her. She was still a discerning, wise, godly, beautiful woman. She had not let his behavior control hers. She was still winsome, courageous, gracious.

And most important, she had not lost her faith in the promises of God just because she was living with this wicked man who, as far as she knew, never would change. In fact, he never did change.

We’re first introduced to Nabal in this story and then to David and then to Abigail. Verse 2 tells us that this man was very rich. He was a business man, a wealthy business man. He was influential.

As you read this story, and this will unfold over the next few sessions, one of the things that’s real obvious is some of the potential pitfalls of wealth. These things don’t have to be true of wealthy people, but they often are. By the world’s standards, we are wealthy. So these are qualities we need to watch out for in our own lives.

People who are wealthy can become independent-spirited. Others need them, others are dependent on them, but they don’t need anybody. They don’t need anything.

Sometimes with people who are very rich in the world’s standards in material goods, it’s hard for others to be honest with them. In verse 17 the servants said about Nabal their master, “One cannot speak to him.” He won’t listen to anybody.

Nobody can tell the truth to him. He’s powerful. He’s influential. He’s wealthy and people are scared to death of him. Nobody will really speak the truth to him.

We all need mirrors in our lives. We need people who will be honest with us, who will love us enough to speak the truth. But here’s a man who, partially because of his wealth, had gotten into a position where no one would be honest with him.

People were afraid of telling him the truth, afraid of losing their job. What if one of those employees had spoken up and said, “Nabal you’re wrong; you’re acting like a fool”?

“Off with your head.”

So, people were afraid of him. Sometimes when you have a lot of wealth by the world’s standards, it’s easy to assume the worst of others, to assume negatively of others, as we’ll see that Nabal did of David.

Proverbs 18:23 is a verse that has always been very convicting to me. It says, “The poor use entreaties.” They appeal. They plead. “But the rich answer roughly.” They can talk any way they want to talk. They own the world. It’s all theirs. There’s this pride, this arrogance that sometimes, not always but sometimes, goes with wealth.

Not only was he very rich, but verse 3 tells us he was harsh. If you’re using the King James Version you’ll have there the word churlish. It’s a word that in the Hebrew means “hard, unyielding, unbending, uncontrollable.” You get the picture of this man? He’s a harsh man.

He’s an abusive man. He’s abusive to his wife. He’s abusive to others. He’s verbally abusive. He’s a hard drinker; we’re going to see that. He’s just a mean man.

There are those men in this world and sometimes you have to live with a fool. It may be in your marriage, in your workplace, in your church, in some other sphere of your life. We’re going to see from this study that there is a way to deal with fools in your life and there’s a way not to deal with fools in your life.

The Scripture says that not only was he harsh, he was badly-behaved. The NIV says in that verse that he “was surly and mean in his dealings.” He was corrupt. Chances are he’d gotten some of his wealth by cheating others. He was a badly-behaved man.

And then that phrase, “He was a Calebite.” That may mean that he was a descendant of Caleb, who was a godly man from the tribe of Judah. But the word Caleb in Hebrew means “dog.” Some commentators suggest that, rather than being a descendant of Caleb, what it’s really saying is that it was an adjective to describe his behavior.

One translation renders it, “He was snappish as a dog.” His character is best described as we’ve seen by his name—Nabal, fool.

When we see the word fool in the Scripture, we need to remember that a fool is not somebody who is mentally deficient. It’s someone who is morally deficient. “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God’” (Psalm 14:1). It’s a person who wants to live his life as if there were no God.

He has no fear of God, no fear of man, no regard for what is moral, no regard for what is spiritual. As a result, he acts stupidly, foolishly, disgracefully.

Isaiah 32:6 says, “The fool speaks folly, and his heart is busy with iniquity, to practice ungodliness and to utter error concerning the LORD, to leave the craving of the hungry unsatisfied, and to deprive the thirsty of drink.”

We’re going to see that Nabal, the fool, lived up to that description of a fool. He kept back food and water from those who were hungry and thirsty. He was a foolish man.

I think you can see already that your heart determines your character and your behavior. If you have a foolish heart, you will act foolishly. Your character and your behavior reveals your heart. If you’re acting foolishly in foolish ungodly ways, that reveals that you have a foolish heart.

All through this series, it’s going to be easy as we read about Nabal to think of someone we know. But I want us as we examine this passage to let God shine the spotlight of His Spirit and His Word into our hearts and say, “Could any of this be true of me?”

Am I sometimes impossible to deal with?
Are people not honest with me because I’ll blow up?
Am I arrogant, proud, harsh?
Do I assume negatively of others, assume the worst of them?
Do I answer roughly rather than graciously?
If I act in those ways, if I speak in those ways, that tells you something about the condition of my heart.

The Scripture says we’re all born fools. Only the grace of God and the power of the Gospel, the power of Christ, can transform our hearts, give us a new heart and give us a wise heart.

That’s why we need a heart transplant. It’s only the grace of God if there’s anything in us that is gracious and kind or sweet-spirited, in our homes and in our other relationships. That’s why we desperately need God’s grace.

Apart from the grace of God, every one of us would be a Nabal. That’s why we desperately need the grace of God.

Leslie: That’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss reminding us of how needy we really are. All of us need to learn to not be a fool and how to love other people who are being foolish.


Roniya brought this up on another thread and I thought I would post it here to keep the unity:

[url=http://www.cbmw.org/Danvers]The Danvers Statement[/url]

Revive Our Hearts:

"The complementarian position regarding roles and functions of men and women in the home, and in the church in particular, is summarized in a document called The Danvers Statement, which was prepared by several evangelical leaders in Danvers, Massachusetts, in mid-1987."

S
sermonindex

"....Sometimes people who write us about our program say, “You give me the feeling that if I just live a godly life, my husband will become a godly man.”

I want to make it clear. We are not saying that, because the Scripture doesn’t say that. Scripture does teach that a godly mate can have a powerful influence on an ungodly mate. But there’s no guarantee that your choosing to live God’s way will change the people around you who are fools, who are Nabals. They may never change.

There’s a second application here, and that is that you don’t have to let a harsh, badly-behaved man turn you into a harsh, badly-behaved woman. That’s one of the powerful things about this story. The fact that your mate or someone else that you have to live with or work with on a regular basis, the fact that they are ungodly doesn’t mean that you can’t be godly yourself.

You see, we tend to feel that our level of godliness or spirituality is tied into the people around us. They make us react this way. No one can make you react in an ungodly way. The fact that you have to live with a person who is ungodly doesn’t mean that you can’t be godly yourself. Your character, your responses don’t have to be controlled by theirs.

One of the things that I love about this story is by the time we enter into it—we don’t know what all had preceded it but we know that Abigail has been living with this harsh, badly-behaved man. We know that had to affect her. She was living with the man.

But it’s obvious that she had not let Nabal destroy her. She was still a discerning, wise, godly, beautiful woman. She had not let his behavior control hers. She was still winsome, courageous, gracious.

And most important, she had not lost her faith in the promises of God just because she was living with this wicked man who, as far as she knew, never would change. In fact, he never did change...."

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

S
sermonindex

Nabal was a fool and he was rich:

Nabal- “As his name is, so is he.”


Isaiah 32:6 (English Standard Version)

6For(A) the fool speaks folly,
and his heart is busy with iniquity,
to practice ungodliness,
to utter error concerning the LORD,
(B) to leave the craving of the hungry unsatisfied,
and to deprive the thirsty of drink.


Proverbs 18:23 (English Standard Version)

23The poor use entreaties,
but(A) the rich answer roughly.


I used the English Standard version because that was the version "Revive Our Hearts" referred to in case your wondering. By the way this isn't a thread for women only. :-)

D
destinysweet

Always enjoyed the story of Abigail..bold woman of God!
Thanks for taking the time to put up these links.

Interesting thread..I'll have to join in as led.

S
sermonindex


destinysweet wrote:
Always enjoyed the story of Abigail..bold woman of God!
Thanks for taking the time to put up these links.

Interesting thread..I'll have to join in as led.

Their definately seems to be a need for this. The Lord put this on my heart.

C
crsschk

By the way this isn't a thread for women only.

:-)

Am very encouraged just reading through it all.

S
sermonindex

Are You Approachable?

Series: Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life

Thursday, April 17 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: In the crisis situations of life, you and I need to be women of discernment. How do you get discernment? You ask God for it. Ask God for it before you get in the crisis....

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here.[/url]

Are You Approachable?
Series: Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life

Thursday, April 17 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: In the crisis situations of life, you and I need to be women of discernment. How do you get discernment? You ask God for it. Ask God for it before you get in the crisis.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Thursday, April 17. The Bible says love is not provoked (1 Corinthians 13:5). That’s easy to understand until a two-year-old asks you the five hundredth question of the day, or someone cuts you off in traffic, or your husband forgets to pay the bills on time . . . again.

Well, today we’ll hear about a righteous man who let his guard down. He was so provoked he was ready to kill the person who offended him. Here’s Nancy in the series, How to Live with the Fools in Your Life.

Nancy: We’re looking at a story in the Old Testament in the book of 1 Samuel, chapter 25. If you have your Bible, let me ask you to open to that passage. It’s a story with three main characters. We see first a man named Nabal, who was a wealthy business man, but he was a harsh, mean, ill-behaved, ill-mannered man who acted like his name, Nabal, which means fool.

Now as we come to verse 4 today, we see that David heard in the wilderness—David and his 600 men, who are fugitives with him from King Saul, are fleeing from Saul. They’re out in the wilderness. David, verse 4, heard in the wilderness that Nabal was shearing his sheep. Nabal is a rancher. He’s a herdsman. He has a lot of sheep and a lot of goats.

Verses 5 and 6:

So David sent ten young men. And David said to the young men, "Go up to Carmel, and go to Nabal and greet him in my name. And thus shall you greet him: 'Peace be to you, and peace be to your house, and peace be to all that you have.'"

Here’s David wanting to be a peace-loving man and being gracious and kind in the way he approaches this man who has the heart of a fool and David’s going to reap some consequences from that.

Verses 7 and 8:

[Say to Nabal] "I hear that you have shearers. Now your shepherds have been with us, and we did them no harm, and they missed nothing all the time they were in Carmel. Ask your young men [Nabal] [your workers], and they will tell you. Therefore, let my young men [my servants, my workers] find favor in your eyes, for we come on a feast day. Please give whatever you have at hand to your servants and to your son David.”

Now let’s unpack that passage a little bit and see what’s happening here. David had treated Nabal and his herdsmen honorably. In this passage we see, and we’ll see even more later in the chapter, that David and his army of 600 men had provided protection out in the wilderness for Nabal’s men and Nabal’s herds. Protecting them from thieves, from bandits and marauders.

Now David was coming back and merely asking for what was his rightful due: compensation for services rendered. It was like a tip. This was the way things operated out in the wilderness. David and his men provided protection. They made sure that marauders stayed away from Nabal’s sheep and his herdsmen. Now they’re saying "there’s a feast day coming. Would you provide compensation for my men?" It was a reasonable thing to ask.

Verses 9 and 10:

When David’s young men came, they said all this to Nabal in the name of David, and then they waited. And Nabal answered David’s servants, "Who is David? Who is the son of Jesse? There are many servants these days who are breaking away from their masters.”

Now right off the bat, Nabal accuses David of having been disloyal to King Saul. “You’re just a servant who’s run away from his master. You’re a runaway slave. No way am I going to help you.” He goes on in verse 11,

Shall I take my bread and my water and my meat that I have killed for my shearers and give it to men who come from I do not know where?

Now it’s not surprising that a man who is harsh and badly behaved, as we saw in the previous session, should speak in a way that is harsh and badly behaved because as Jesus said, “Out of the depths of your heart you speak” (Matthew 12:34, paraphrased). What’s in your heart comes out in the way that your respond to people in life.

So Nabal is a foolish man. He’s a harsh man. He’s a badly behaved man. When David’s men come to him in peace just wanting what is their rightful due, he says, “No way.” Now in his response to this request, Nabal’s real heart motives come out. He’s selfish. Look at all the my's in verse 11. My bread. My water. My meat. My shearers.

Here’s a man who had a lot more than he needed and could well afford to share with these who had provided protection for him. But he refuses to share. He gives David’s men a slap in the face. I mean, this is a huge insult to David who is one of the most powerful men in the region and the man who was going to be the king.

Nabal is foolish. He’s a foolish man. He has much more than he needs, but he refuses to share. Sometimes wealthy people are extremely generous, and you can probably think of some that fall into that category. But wealthy people can also be the most stingy. Sometimes those who can afford to give the most end up giving the least.

Then you’ll notice in your church or you’re involved in a ministry in some way, sometimes it’s the little widows who can least afford to give who sometimes give the most. They’re generous. But sometimes those of us who have the most can hold most tightly onto what we have, and we see that in Nabal.

We see a man who’s controlling. “I don’t mind giving if it’s my idea, but not if it’s your suggestion. Not if it’s your request. No one is going to tell me what to do with my stuff.” That’s the attitude here. Here’s a man who’s suspicious. In verse 11, he says, “These are men who come from I do not know where.” Suspicious of their motives. Suspicious of what they’re up to.

He assumes negatively. He jumps to conclusions. He makes false accusations. Here’s a man, Nabal, who is insensitive to the needs of others. He couldn’t care less. “So what you guys are hungry. Go find food somewhere else.” He is utterly, absolutely unconcerned about their welfare.

You know why? Because he’s utterly, absolutely obsessed with his own welfare. “My stuff. How can I get more? How can I hold on to what I have?” I think this really is a man who just has this drive to have the upper hand. “THE BOSS” in big letters is what he wants on his mug. “I’m in charge. I’m in control.”

Now we’re going to learn even more about Nabal as the chapter unfolds, but first in the next verse we get a look at David’s initial response. Verses 12 and 13:

So David’s young men turned away and came back and told him all this. And David said to his men, "Every man strap on his sword!" [It’s war time!] And every man of them strapped on his sword. David also strapped on his sword. And about four hundred men went up after David, while two hundred remained with the baggage.

Now, in this account we’re going to see two very different ways to respond to provocation. Two very different ways to respond to the foolish people in your life. David’s way and Abigail’s way. How did David respond? His natural reaction was what? To get even. Vengeance. It was an impulsive reaction. I’m sure that David did not stop to think.

Isn’t that when we get in trouble. Somebody provokes us. Somebody irks us. Somebody’s rude to us. Somebody cuts you off in a lane of traffic. You don’t stop and think. You just react. You get right up on the backend of their car. In some bigger, more significant issues of life, what’s our natural reaction? Get even. Strap on your sword. We’re going to war. "You want to fight? We’ll fight."

But what you see here is that David’s initial response to Nabal was to act just like Nabal. Nabal is a harsh man. He’s badly behaved. He’s a warrior. He’s contentious. David says, “You want to be that way? Two can play that game. I’ll be that way.”

Isn’t that what our natural response is when we’re provoked? We may not strap on literal swords, but don’t we do it with our words? We pick up swords. Don’t we do it even sometimes without a word, just with our eyes? You can do it to your children. You can do it to your mate. You might do it to somebody who’s in the next office at work. Just our demeanor can communicate that we’ve picked up a sword. “You have hit my button and I’m going ballistic.”

Nabal had returned evil for good to David, and now David determines to return evil for evil. Now in all fairness to David, let me say that humanly speaking, I think this is a very understandable response. David is vulnerable. You’ve probably heard the acronym—I think I’ve shared it on Revive Our Hearts before—H-A-L-T.

If you’re:

hungry
angry
lonely
tired—you need to halt before you speak. Halt before you act.
David certainly had reason to be all of those things at this point. He was hungry. He was saying our men need food, and it’s not just David who is hungry. It’s 600 of his men that he’s responsible to feed. He was angry. His rights had been violated. He was perhaps lonely. Samuel had died. He may have felt abandoned. He could have been tired easily. He’s running through the wilderness from Saul.

He should have halted but instead he let himself respond in a Nabal-like way. His response was impulsive. It was impetuous. It was passionate. It did not demonstrate the quality of self-control.

Proverbs 25, verse 28, tell us, "A man without self-control is like a city broken into and left without walls.” If you lose self-control even in responding to the Nabals, the fools, in your life, then you become like a city that is defenseless. You become vulnerable to attack from the evil one if you lose control.

There’s another verse in Proverbs that it would have been good for David to heed in this situation. Proverbs 26, verse 4, says, “Do not answer a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like him” (NKJV). So Nabal responds in a foolish way to David’s request. Here comes David answering a fool according to his folly, strapping on his sword. What does Proverbs say? You will become like him.

The very person who drives you the most crazy—do you ever look in the mirror and say, “I am becoming that person”? That may be because you’ve been answering a fool according to his folly and you’re becoming harsh and ill-behaved and mean-spirited and mean-tempered in reacting to a person who acted foolishly.

Proverbs says, “A hot-tempered man stirs up strife, but he who is slow to anger quiets contention.” That’s Proverbs 15:18. So here David has a chance to avoid contention, and instead he stirs up strife.

Now we see the entrance of a woman who says, “That’s not the right way to deal with this situation.” She’s going to demonstrate a very different way to respond. We see in verse 14 that one of the young men, one of Nabal’s servants, comes to Abigail, Nabal’s wife, and tells her the situation.

Now, apparently this young man knew that Abigail would respond differently than her husband. I mean it was obviously common knowledge that this woman was not like her husband. She was beautiful and discerning the Scripture says. He was harsh and badly behaved. This young man apparently knew that Abigail was approachable. She was someone you could talk to. You could reason with her. She would listen.

By the way, in a tension or a conflict, do people know that you’re a woman who can be reasoned with? Or do they stay away from you and say, “No, she’s just going to fly off the handle. She’ll just get emotional.” Or do they know that you’re a woman that they can go, they can talk to, they can explain their story and you will know what to do in the situation?

That’s the kind of woman we need to be. That’s the kind of woman we want to be. You may have a great, godly husband, but you’re going to find yourself at times, whether with that man or with others in your life, in a bad situation, an intense situation where there’s conflict coming and you get drawn into the middle of it. Do people know that you are a wise woman that they can go to, and you will know what to do because you’re following the Spirit of God in that situation?

So verse 14: “One of the young men told Abigail, Nabal’s wife, ‘Behold, David sent messengers out of the wilderness to greet our master, and he railed at them.’” Now that word railed literally means "he flew at them." One translation says he hurled insults. He reviled them. “You want what?! No way!” Nabal was abusive—verbally abusive—to David and his men. We can only assume that if he was this way with strangers, he was not an easy man to live with at home. He railed at them.

So here again we see more about Nabal’s character. He’s an arrogant man. He humiliates these men. He attacks them—David’s men. He’s easily angered. He flies off the handle. Those are characteristics of a fool. If you find yourself responding that way in the midst of life’s circumstances, you need to stop and say, “I’m acting like a fool.”

Proverbs 14:17: “A man of quick temper acts foolishly, and a man of evil devices is hated.” Proverbs 29:22: “A man of wrath stirs up strife, and one given to anger causes much transgression.” Anger is a deadly thing in a marriage, in any relationship, in the body of Christ. It causes much transgression.

So here’s a man, Nabal. He’s out of control. He railed at them. He flew at them. His tongue is uncontrolled. His spirit is out of control. Now this is a totally unfair and unwarranted reaction on Nabal’s part. Nobody has done anything to deserve this kind of treatment. This was not a response that was provoked. There’s no good reason.

In fact, the servant telling Abigail what happened says in verse 15,

The men were very good to us [David’s men] [they treated us well], and we suffered no harm, and we did not miss anything when we were in the fields, as long as we went with them.

Nabal and his men had been protected by David and his men. David did not do anything to incite this response from Nabal.

[The servants said] They were a wall to us both by night and by day, all the while we were with them keeping the sheep.

So Nabal has returned evil for good. David has treated Nabal and his men well and Nabal has returned evil for good.

Now therefore know this and consider what you should do, for harm is determined against our master and against all his house.

Remember David had put on his sword and said, “We’re going to war.” He took 400 men with him. We’re going after Nabal and his men.

Harm is determined against our master. [That’s Abigail’s husband. Harm is determined against him.] And he is such a worthless man that one cannot speak to him (verses 16-17).

That phrase worthless man is a phrase that literally is the son of Belial. Does that ring a bell with you? Belial is one of the names in Scripture for Satan. It’s a name for the devil. It means "worthlessness" and what this servant is saying, “Our master, your husband, Abigail, is acting like the devil.”

It means "a hellion." It’s a scoundrel. It’s translated sometimes "corrupt man or perverted man or a rebel." It’s somebody who is absolutely, utterly wicked. He’s a son of Belial. He’s a worthless man. So again you see these characteristics of fools. They refuse to listen. No one can speak to him. They’re unapproachable. They won’t listen to reason. They’re stubborn. Their mind is made up.

Now as I describe Nabal, does it remind you of anyone you know? Maybe you’re thinking of someone that you go to school with or you work with. Maybe someone in your own household.

We’re going to see from Abigail some tips, some insights about responding to a person who is a hellion, somebody who is a worthless man, somebody who is a son of Belial, somebody who’s acting like the devil.

But there’s another question we need to ask and that is, does this ever remind you of you? This kind of behavior. Now your behavior may not be this extreme. You may not fly off the handle and throw things and scream at people and rail on them.

But what about when your child comes and asks you a question that they’ve already asked 17 times that morning, and you’ve been interrupted, and you’re irritated; you’re impatient. You go, “No way! Go to your room!” And you speak harshly. The child didn’t do anything to deserve that. You didn’t provoke the child. You speak without thinking. You’re easily provoked, irritated, angry.

You ever find yourself reacting that way? We need to learn from Abigail how to respond in a way that is unlike Nabal, to diffuse the anger, to protect the family in this situation.

Now if you’re thinking about someone that you know who is like this Nabal, you may be asking, “What can I do? How do I respond to this kind of person?” I think of the woman who wrote to us and said,

Can you help me know how to deal with an angry husband? I get so depressed and I want to know how God wants me to handle this. My husband would never abuse me physically, but he gets angry about so many things, and I’m growing weary of being the peacemaker.

I know that woman speaks for a lot of our listeners, not just in regard to husbands but in regard to other fools in our lives.

So here is Abigail caught between two proud, angry men—Nabal, her husband, and David, who is going to be the next king of Israel. Abigail is a contrast. Verse 3 already told us that she was discerning and beautiful. Beautiful speaks of her appearance, but discerning speaks of her heart. That word discerning means "intelligent." It’s a woman of good understanding, a woman who has common sense in a crisis.

Now you compare her with Nabal who was harsh and these are polar opposites. Abigail’s name, by the way, means "the joy of my father." She was a daddy’s girl. She was a girl whose father delighted in her but she ended up married to a Nabal, a fool. Now I think this must have been an incredibly difficult marriage. Though the Scripture doesn’t tell us what it was like inside the four walls of their home, you can just imagine.

Rather than getting a man like her father who delighted in her, probably through no fault of her own, in an arranged marriage, she had ended up married to a man who was impossible to live with. Proud, angry, unreasonable, stingy, controlling.

So what does Abigail do? Well, we’re going to see in the next session that she responds differently to Nabal than David did. She doesn’t become a Nabal in responding to the fool, the Nabal in her life. She acts in a way that is consistent with her wise and discerning character. Her behavior, the way she handles this crisis, reveals that this woman has a wise heart.

So I want to just say even before we see how Abigail responded, that in the crisis situations of life, you and I need to be women of discernment. How do you get discernment? You ask God for it. Ask God for it before you get in the crisis. Single women, before you get married, ask God for discernment to show you who you should marry.

Most of us today don't live in arranged marriages. You have some choice in the matter. Ask God for wisdom. Don’t just marry the next guy who comes along because he showed an interest in you, or he bought things for you. Ask God for discernment and godly counsel and wisdom. Once you’re in a situation, pray for discernment.

Then remember that you can respond differently than Nabal. You don’t have to become a Nabal. Remember that how you respond is what makes all the difference. You may never change your Nabal. We’ll see that Nabal never changed. But you can be a secure, confident, godly, courageous, winsome woman even in the midst of a crisis.

I’m reminded of what my dad often told us and that is, you’re not responsible for how others act or what they do to you. All you’re responsible for is how you respond to others. By God’s grace, we can respond in a way that is full of faith, that is appropriate, that is discerning and wise. That may make all the difference in the outcome of the situation.


S
sermonindex

Just wanted to pull something out of yesterday's broadcast that stuck out to me:


David’s response, when he came face to face with this foolish man Nabal, was to get provoked. He lost control. He was tempted to respond just the same way that Nabal had treated him. [b]The danger is that when you get around a fool, you may respond like a fool. [/b]

In fact, as we get into this story, we’ll see that David’s response was even worse than what Nabal had done to provoke him. We’ll see in this story that even the most godly people sometimes act in ungodly, foolish ways.

That’s why we all need wise counsel. We need godly people around us who will help us see when we’re being foolish and, when necessary, will confront us, will love us enough to get into our face and speak the truth to us as Abigail did to David.

We need people who will give us godly counsel when we’re acting like fools. And we need to learn to listen to that counsel, to take it, to heed it.

That’s what humility really is. It’s the willingness to listen to wise counsel and to change direction when we realize we’ve been wrong. We’re going to see in David a man who, though he initially responded foolishly to this fool, was willing to listen to wise counsel and to change his course, to change his direction, when he realized he’d been wrong.

S
sermonindex


Roniya wrote:
Just wanted to pull something out of yesterday's broadcast that stuck out to me:


David’s response, when he came face to face with this foolish man Nabal, was to get provoked. He lost control. He was tempted to respond just the same way that Nabal had treated him. [b]The danger is that when you get around a fool, you may respond like a fool. [/b]

In fact, as we get into this story, we’ll see that David’s response was even worse than what Nabal had done to provoke him. We’ll see in this story that even the most godly people sometimes act in ungodly, foolish ways.

That’s why we all need wise counsel. We need godly people around us who will help us see when we’re being foolish and, when necessary, will confront us, will love us enough to get into our face and speak the truth to us as Abigail did to David.

We need people who will give us godly counsel when we’re acting like fools. And we need to learn to listen to that counsel, to take it, to heed it.

That’s what humility really is. It’s the willingness to listen to wise counsel and to change direction when we realize we’ve been wrong. We’re going to see in David a man who, though he initially responded foolishly to this fool, was willing to listen to wise counsel and to change his course, to change his direction, when he realized he’d been wrong.

Related Scripture:

Proverbs 14:17 (King James Version)
17He that is soon angry dealeth foolishly: and a man of wicked devices is hated.

Proverbs 15:18 (King James Version)
18A wrathful man stirreth up strife: but he that is slow to anger appeaseth strife.

Proverbs 25:28
28He that hath no rule over his own spirit is like a city that is broken down, and without walls

Proverbs 29:22 (King James Version)
22An angry man stirreth up strife, and a furious man aboundeth in transgression.

Matthew 12:34 (King James Version)
34O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

D
destinysweet

Excellent reminder!Very encouraging word for today..and so we ask for discernment,believing and recieve it! Hallelujah! Blend in a cup of loving kindness,a generous portion of patience and forgiveness..voila! What a good meal!

S
sermonindex


destinysweet wrote:
Excellent reminder!Very encouraging word for today..and so we ask for discernment,believing and recieve it! Hallelujah! Blend in a cup of loving kindness,a generous portion of patience and forgiveness..voila! What a good meal!

1 Peter 3:4
But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of [u][i][b]great price.[/b][/i][/u]

With it comes also a great reward.

S
sermonindex

I have been doing a study on a meek and quiet spirit and I found this article by Zac Poonen:

Humility

Humility has tremendous value before God. It says in 1 Peter 3:4 that a meek and gentle spirit is extremely precious to God - whether found in a woman or in a man. Jesus Himself had a humble and gentle heart and told us to learn these virtues from Him (Matt.11:28). A gentle and a quiet spirit is one that is not agitated or in unrest. Some washing machines have what is called an "agitator". It turns one way and then the other way - perpetually. It is never at rest, it is always "agitating"! In the hearts of all who are born of Adam too, there is an "agitator". If anyone rubs them the wrong way, the agitator starts "agitating". But those who are humble and gentle in spirit have got rid of this agitator. They are not offended or hurt, when anyone says or does something to them , or when they don't say or do something that was expected of them. They have put their "agitator" on the cross. Peter says that the beauty of a gentle and a quiet spirit is "imperishable"! This is the secret of eternal beauty. The world is full of women nowadays who are wanting to look younger. But what is the beauty that is really imperishable? It is a gentle and a quiet spirit. And this is for men too! This is what will make you really precious to God - if you have a gentle, quiet spirit that is not agitated or offended, that doesn't get into bad moods, that is not grumpy or angry. You need never lose control of yourself at any time either, for the fruit of the Spirit is self-control. Let the world be full of people who have "agitators" but that's not for us any longer. Praise the Lord, we can get rid of our agitators permanently.

When Jesus told His disciples that their righteousness must exceed that of the scribes and the Pharisees, what did He mean? The righteousness of the Pharisees was a matter of "right" and "wrong". But Jesus wanted the righteousness of His disciples to comprise of more than that. It was to include humility, brokenness, gentleness and quietness of spirit as well. He told them that otherwise they would NEVER enter the kingdom of God. I don't know how many of us really believe what Jesus said. In Hebrews 4:1, we are asked to fear lest we do not enter into this "rest" that Jesus offers - this freedom from "agitating". And in verse 11, we are told to be diligent to ensure that we enter into that rest. Have you entered into that rest yourself? Have you forgiven all those who have cheated you, and those who have wronged you? Have you cleansed your heart of all bitterness, hatred, anxiety and greed? This is what will enable us to enter into that rest of God. There is no person or situation in the world, that can ever prevent Romans 8:28 ("All things work together for good for those who love God....") and 1 Corinthians 10:13 ("God will not allow you to be tempted beyond your ability....") from being fulfilled in your life, if you are a disciple of Jesus. We can never be tempted beyond our ability. That is impossible - because God is faithful to His promises. And everything - yes, everything - will work for our good. A humble person can never fall, because he is already at ground-level! How then can he fall down!! When God's Word says, "He is able to keep you from falling" (Jude 24), it is thus that the Lord keeps us - by keeping our faces in the dust before Him. Then it becomes impossible to fall.

The way of escape promised in 1 Corinthians 10:13 is the way of humbling ourselves. We humble ourselves, because we believe that God will give us grace and lift us up. Just as in water-baptism, we submit readily to someone who immerses us in the water, because we believe that he will lift us up again. In the same way, we also believe that the God who allows some situation to crush us will lift us up and bring a resurrection in our lives too. God is a consuming fire who is determined to consume every bit of pride from every corner of our hearts - if we will let Him. He will arrange people and circumstances in such a way that every particle of pride is totally consumed. Let us cooperate then with Him and allow the Spirit to do a perfect work within us.

S
sermonindex

Series: Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life

Friday, April 18 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: Just because there’s a fool in your life doesn’t mean you have to act like a fool. You can act differently.

Your husband may lose his cool at times or do foolish things. Your boss may lose his cool or be hard to work for. Your children may do foolish things . . . will do foolish things. But that doesn’t mean you have to act like a fool in the midst of the crisis.......

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here.[/url]

S
sermonindex


I decided to post this program here for future reference sense it deals with spousal abuse which is a difficult subject to deal with.


Diffusing the Situation

Series: Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life

Friday, April 18 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: Just because there’s a fool in your life doesn’t mean you have to act like a fool. You can act differently.

Your husband may lose his cool at times or do foolish things. Your boss may lose his cool or be hard to work for. Your children may do foolish things . . . will do foolish things. But that doesn’t mean you have to act like a fool in the midst of the crisis.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Friday, April 18.

When a husband makes a very poor decision—one that puts lives in jeopardy—what is a wife supposed to do? All week we’ve been looking at a woman in that situation, and today we’ll see what action she decided to take. Here’s Nancy in a series called How to Live with the Fools in Your Life.

Nancy: We’re talking about how to deal with the fools in your life. There may be somebody who comes to mind when you hear that term.

If you haven’t heard the first part of the series, you’ll want to go to 1 Samuel 25 and read the story we’ve been following for the last several days of Nabal, who was a foolish man. His name means fool, and he acted just like his name.

We’ve been talking about his wife, Abigail, who was a wise and discerning woman.

The third character is David, who is going to be the king of Israel; but he’s not the king yet. He’s a fugitive fleeing from King Saul out in the wilderness.

Nabal has antagonized David, and David is now on the warpath getting ready to go destroy Nabal and all his family. Abigail, the wife of Nabal, hears about this and helps to diffuse this tense situation between these two angry men.

So Abigail is married to an angry man, and she sees this brewing conflict between her husband and David. Now, at the moment, both these men are acting like fools. But Abigail responds in a different way.

Her life is such a powerful reminder to me that just because there’s a fool in your life doesn’t mean you have to act like a fool. You can act differently.

Your husband may lose his cool at times or do foolish things. Your boss may lose his cool or be hard to work for. Your children may do foolish things . . . will do foolish things. But that doesn’t mean you have to act like a fool in the midst of the crisis.

Abigail’s behavior, her response, reveals her wise, discerning heart. Let me point out two things that she does not do.

The servant of Nabal has just come to her and said, “Abigail, you’ve got to do something. David’s on the warpath. Nabal has acted foolishly, and this is a bad situation brewing here.”

One thing she does not do is cower in fear of Nabal or of David. She doesn’t just curl up into a fetal position and say, “I don’t know what to do. I’m so scared.” There’s no evidence that this woman has fear.

My guess is that there was fear in her heart, but she didn’t let that fear keep her from doing the wise and the right thing. She didn’t cower in fear.

Another thing she does not do is sit at home and do nothing. She is not passive in this situation. She takes action.

Now, I want to be very clear that if you are living in a situation with an abusive husband—if there is physical violence going on in your home—God does not expect you to sit there and do nothing.

We have some resources available, someone who would like to pray with you if you want to call. If you write or email us, we’ll share with you some resources that will help you know what to do to protect your family in that crisis situation.

But we see in this story that even though Abigail’s life is not threatened at this moment, she does not sit at home and do nothing. She’s not passive.

What does she do? She does listen to the warning from her servant, from her employees. Unlike her husband, who wouldn’t listen to anything or anybody, she listens. Then she takes action. She moves quickly, wisely, calmly, and decisively.

Look at verse 18.

Then Abigail made haste and took two hundred loaves and two skins of wine and five sheep already prepared and five seahs of parched grain and a hundred clusters of raisins and two hundred cakes of figs, and laid them on donkeys.

It says she did this quickly. She’s a woman who’s prepared for an emergency. She looks to me like a woman who’s organized. She knows where things are, knows how to get them when she needs them.

Verse 19,

She said to her young men, "Go on before me; behold, I come after you." But she did not tell her husband Nabal.

Here’s a woman who knew what to do and took action to diffuse this hostile situation. Let me remind you that a woman who walks with God will be prepared to act wisely in a crisis.

But don’t expect that once you get in the crisis you can take a crash course and become a wise woman overnight. If you’ve not been becoming a wise, discerning woman all along, when you get in the crisis you’ll get caught off guard and you won’t know what to do.

Here’s a woman who knew when to speak, and she knew when not to speak. In this case it says, “She did not tell her husband Nabal.” She knew that at the moment he was in no position or frame of mind to listen to her. So she wisely refrained from saying anything to him at the moment. She knew it would only further incite him.

She did go and speak to David. She knew when to speak and to whom. She knew that he had a heart for God, and she believed that he could be reasoned with, that he would listen to this appeal.

So, verse 20:

As she rode on the donkey and came down under the cover of the mountain, behold, David and his men came toward her, and she met them.

Now remember, what is David’s frame of mind right now? He has put on his sword, and his 400 men with him have put on their swords. They are on the warpath.

And here comes this little, beautiful, discerning (thankfully) wife to this army of 400 men with their swords going after her husband. I mean, she gets right in the middle of this situation between these two angry, foolish men.

She’s courageous. She goes to face David. She knows that he’s armed and that he’s angry.

Verses 21-22:

Now David had said, "Surely in vain have I guarded all that this fellow has in the wilderness, so that nothing was missed of all that belonged to him, and he has returned me evil for good. God do so to the enemies of David and more also, if by morning I leave so much as one male of all who belong to him.”

David is on the warpath. Watch out!

Let me point out that David’s response to Nabal, in my opinion (let’s see if you agree), is disproportionate to the offense. All Nabal had done—he’d been rude; he’d been ugly; he’d been mean—but all he’d really done was just refuse to feed David and his men.

This was not a capital offense. Not to speak of killing Nabal and all the men in his family and all his sheepherders. David is out of control.

I want to point out, too, that this is out of character for David. In just the previous chapter, chapter 24, David had been in a cave running from Saul. Then Saul came into the cave with his soldiers, and David was able stealthily, while Saul was not watching, to slip over and cut a piece off of Saul’s robe (see verse 4).

His men said, “Here’s your chance to take Saul’s life!” But David refused. The Scripture says his conscience smote him that he had even cut this piece off of Saul’s robe (verse 5).

He said, “I can’t do it. I can’t touch the Lord’s anointed.” David had exercised extraordinary control in that situation because he was essentially a man after God’s own heart.

But he got caught off guard in this situation—hungry, angry, lonely, tired—and he acts in a way that is not characteristic of him. He’s way out of control.

Proverbs 29:11 says, “A fool vents all his feelings, but a wise man holds them back.” NKJV

Proverbs 19:11 says, “Good sense makes one slow to anger.” You see, David lacked good sense in this situation. He was quick to retaliate. Then it says, “And it is his glory to overlook an offense.”

That’s probably what David should have done in this situation. This was not a capital offense. This was not deserving of a war. David made it into a battle. It didn’t have to be. It’s the glory of a man to overlook an offense.

Now, 1 Samuel 25:23 tells us,

When Abigail saw David, she hurried and got down from the donkey and fell before David on her face and bowed to the ground.

Here’s a woman who is humble. She approaches David humbly. She’s not acting like her foolish husband, Nabal, and she’s not acting like out-of-control David. She’s quiet, but she is direct and clear. She makes her appeal to David.

But as you read this speech, and we’ll look at it over the next couple days, it’s not a tirade. She’s calm. She’s composed. She’s controlled. I imagine her heart was probably about to beat out of her chest, but when she speaks, she’s controlled; she’s clear; she’s firm.

She goes to the one that she knows can be appealed to, and she appeals to David to listen to reason. In her appeal she’s respectful. She’s dignified. She’s earnest and sincere, but she’s humble.

Verses 24-25:

She fell at his feet and said, "On me alone, my lord, be the guilt. Please let your servant speak in your ears, and hear the words of your servant. Let not my lord regard this worthless fellow, Nabal, for as his name is, so is he. Nabal is his name [the word means fool] and folly is with him. [He’s acting foolishly, she says.] But I your servant did not see the young men of my lord whom you sent.

“I wasn’t there when this happened, and I’m sorry that it happened. Please forgive us.” She’s trying to diffuse the situation.

Notice that Abigail does not cover or make excuses for her husband. She’s honest about the offense, but she does it, I think, in a respectful way. Her goal is not to tear her husband down. Her goal is not to get somebody on her side. Her goal is to insert the voice of wisdom and reason into this tense situation.

Was she showing a lack of respect or reverence for her husband in the way she spoke about him?
How do you justify, some will ask, Abigail countermanding her husband? He said, “No, you can’t have food,” but she brings food.
Was she being unsubmissive?
Well, a couple things to keep in mind. Number one, Abigail did not have the advantage we have of the New Testament. She didn’t have all that expanded teaching. So she is not necessarily a perfect example of how women in a New Testament sense should act.

But I want to say, as I study this passage, I really believe that she was actually protecting her husband, sparing his life from David’s vengeance. She was doing what was in his best interests.

She was doing what she knew her husband would have wanted her to do if he had been thinking straight, if he hadn’t been so angry. If he had been thinking clearly, she knew this is what would be in the best interest of her husband and what he would have chosen.

Submission doesn’t mean that you automatically do everything that an authority tells you to do. It doesn’t mean that you enable him to sin. The obvious example of that in the New Testament is Ananias and Sapphira, where they agreed together to lie about what they were giving to the church.

So Ananias came in. “Did you give the whole amount?”

“Yes. It’s the whole amount.” He drops dead.

Sapphira comes in behind her husband, not knowing what’s just happened, and the apostles ask her, “Is this the whole amount?”

She now makes a choice to lie. She didn’t have to lie. She didn’t need to enable or empower her husband to sin in order to be a submissive wife.1

We’re picking up at verse 26 in 1 Samuel 25, where Abigail is speaking to David. She’s speaking humbly, but directly and clearly. She knows that David is a man who has a heart after God and who will listen to reasoning, even though David and his 400 men are on the warpath after her husband.

She’s acting in Nabal’s best interests. She wants to preserve his life and to diffuse this tense situation.

So she says in verse 26 to David,

Now then, my lord, as the Lord lives and as your soul lives, because the Lord has retrained you from bloodguilt and from saving with your own hand [some of your translations say, “from avenging yourself”], now then let your enemies and those who seek to do evil to my lord be as Nabal.

Abigail speaks respectfully to David. She calls him “my lord.” She calls herself “your servant.” And she brings the Lord (capital L) into the picture. She brings God into the situation. She knows that David, unlike her husband, has a heart for God, and she appeals to David to see this situation from God’s point of view.

In verse 27 she says,

And now let this present that your servant has brought to my lord be given to the young men who follow my lord.

Nabal, her husband, had refused food and provisions to David’s men. She comes loaded up with food and provisions. They have plenty to spare. She’s not hurting her husband in any way by doing this. She is doing the thing that she knows he would do if he were thinking straight. She brings this peace offering to pacify David’s anger.

Verse 28:

Please forgive the trespass of your servant. For the Lord [Jehovah God] will certainly make my lord [David] a sure house [a kingdom, a dynasty], because my lord [you, David] is fighting the battles of the Lord [Jehovah], and evil shall not be found in you so long as you live.

She challenges David to look at the big picture of God’s plan. “David, God has something in mind for you. God has promises He has given to you. God is going to fulfill those promises. God is going to do good to you. You can survive the evil that Nabal has done to you. You don’t need to avenge yourself. You don’t need to take matters into your own hands.”

She challenges him not to respond to evil with evil. She affirms him in fighting the Lord’s battle. “David, there are lots of big battles God has given you to fight. Stick to those battles.”

Then in verse 29 she reminds David of God’s protection and care for those who belong to the Lord. She reminds David of the fate and the judgment that await those who oppose God and His servants. You see both those themes not only in verse 29 but all throughout the Word of God.

It’s something that will give you perspective when you get in a dilemma or you get in the middle of a conflict. Keep in mind that in the long run, God rewards those who are faithful to Him, and God judges and ultimately destroys those who resist Him. Not always in the short term do we see that outcome, but always in the long term.

Look at verse 29. This is a rich verse. She says to David,

If men rise up to pursue you and to seek your life, the life of my lord [you, David] will be bound in the bundle of the living in the care of the Lord your God. And the lives of your enemies he shall sling out as from the hollow of a sling.

Now, let’s unpack that verse because there’s so much there. She encourages David and says to him, “David, even if men pursue you and try to kill you,” which you’ll remember was true for much of David’s life—I mean, if it wasn’t Saul it was Nabal. If it wasn’t Nabal it was Absalom. I mean, always somebody.

She says, “No matter who’s trying to kill you, no matter who’s after you, your life is safe, and you are in God’s care.”

She says to him, “The soul of my lord, the life of my lord (you, David) will be bound in the bundle of life with the Lord your God.”

That phrase “bound in the bundle of life” is a word picture that refers to the practice of taking your valuables or your prized possessions and wrapping them up in a bundle to keep them safe. “Your life,” she says, “shall be bound in the bundle of life with the Lord your God.”

Listen, if you are a child of God, that verse describes your position in Christ. Your life is bundled in the care of the Lord your God. He’s put you into a special place. He has wrapped you up. You are in Christ. You are safe if you are in Christ. Your life is under the protection of divine providence.

You see that theme in places like Psalm 91:1-4, that very familiar passage:

He who dwells in the secret place of the Most High
shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
I will say of the Lord, “He is my refuge and my fortress;
My God, in Him I will trust.” . . .
He shall cover you with His feathers,
and under His wings you shall take refuge (NKJV).

I think Abigail was a woman who knew what it was like, living in this difficult marriage, to have her life bundled up in the life of the Lord her God. She couldn’t escape her harsh, difficult circumstances, but she knew that her inner person was safe.

So she could say to David, “No matter what Nabals come into your life, your life is bundled up in the life of the Lord your God.”

Psalm 121 talks about the Lord being our keeper. According to one commentary that I read, the Hebrew title for Psalm 121 actually refers to this circumstance with Abigail and Nabal and David. What does that passage say?

The Lord is your keeper. [He has you bundled up.] The Lord shall preserve you from all evil; He shall preserve your soul. The Lord shall preserve your going out and your coming in from this time forth, and even forevermore (verses 5-8, NKJV).

Here’s the challenge, ladies: Let the Lord preserve you in His bundle, whether you’re in David’s shoes and someone has insulted you falsely, attacked you, done harm to you, or whether you’re in Abigail’s shoes trying to stand between these two angry men. Remember that your life is bundled in the place of refuge that you have in Christ.

There is not anything that can touch your life, if you’re a child of God, that does not first get filtered through the permission and the will of God for your life. You’re bundled.

Now, there may be steps you need to take in a situation where there’s a physical threat to your life. That doesn’t mean you just sit there and let that man beat up on you. There are steps you need to take when the law is being broken—the law of God or the civil law—to get pastors, elders, law enforcement officials involved.

But you can still in your heart have this security of knowing that you and your heart are safe with God. He is your refuge. He is your fortress.

Not only does this verse tell us that you will be safe. At the end of verse 29, Abigail says to David, “The lives of your enemies [God will] sling out as from the hollow of a sling.” What a reminder to him this was, that God’s enemies will be judged!

God will deal with the Nabals in this world, whether you’re married to one, whether you’re a mother of a Nabal, you’re the neighbor, you’re the employee of a Nabal, you’re in the same church as a Nabal. Remember, God will deal with the Nabals in this world.

Proverbs 11:21 says, “Be assured, an evil person will not go unpunished, but the offspring of the righteous will be delivered.” Safe in the bundle.

So here’s the challenge: Knowing that God will deal with the Nabals in the world, make sure you don’t become a Nabal, or you can be sure that God will have to deal with you. God will deal with the Nabals. You can count on it.

Now, you may have been married to one for 37 years, and your heart is crying out, “God, when?” Isn’t that what we hear in the book of Revelation as those in heaven cry out and say, “Lord, how long will it be until you avenge the blood of the martyrs?” [see Revelation 6:10].

We don’t know how long. But we know that in God’s way and in God’s time, He will sling out, He will discard, He will toss out, He will destroy all those who are evildoers. In the meantime you can know that your life is “bound in the bundle of the living in the care of the Lord your God.”

S
sermonindex

[b]Conflicts between men and women go back to the fall[/b]

[i](Excerpts from Revive our Hearts, A Vision of Biblical Womanhood[/i])

“But we know that ultimately all those conflicts go back to the Fall. The consequences of the man and the woman saying, "I’ll have it my way rather than God’s way.”

“Those consequences [color=003366][of sinful choices][/color] were not just for Adam and Eve, but they’re consequences that we experience as women and men and in our male/female relationships to this day. God said to Eve in verse 16 of Genesis chapter 3, “Your desire (this is the consequence of your choice) shall be for [against] your husband.”
Theologians have talked a lot about what that phrase means, but here’s what I think it comes down to. [b]God is saying you will have the urge or the impulse to oppose your husband, to control your husband, and to act against him. [/b]
Where you were intended to function in oneness, one flesh, in harmony, in peace, in oneness of relationship, there’s going to be a barrier between you. Your impulse, your fallen impulse is going to be to try and control your husband, to oppose him, to act against him. The one that you’re supposed to be on the same team with, you’re going to end up on opposite teams.”

~~~~~

[color=003366][i]From Wikipedia:
“Radical feminists believe that women can free themselves only when they have done away with what they consider an inherently oppressive and dominating system. Radical feminists feel that there is a male-based authority and power structure and that it is responsible for oppression and inequality,”[/i]

These woman just don’t realize what the root issue is. They see men as the problem, but the root goes all the way back to the garden of Eden with Eve’s choice to choose her own way and the consequences of her decision is what is being felt today. Daughters of Eve following the evil inclinations of their depraved flesh to lift up themselves above the position that God has placed them in, they do this by seeking to usurp and oppose the man’s position– that is feminism. It is sin. And freedom is not found any actions of our own but through the work of Christ on the cross. Freedom is found in Christ! And in embracing His role for us.[/color]

~~~~~

“The end of that verse says not only will your desire be against your husband, but “he shall rule over you.” Now again, there’s a lot of theological discussion as to exactly what that means. The explanation that has helped me the most is, when it says he shall rule over you, at least part of what that means is that he will respond to you with a rule, a headship, an oversight and authority that would at times be forceful and harsh. He will not always lead in godly ways. Sometimes he will be autocratic or dictatorial or harsh.

Here we have right in the third chapter of the Bible, after two incredibly beautiful chapters about God making everything and seeing that it’s good and God’s incredible design and blessing on His universe, this consequence of the woman saying no to God and yes to her own desires. God says this is going to affect everything in your life, starting with the only human relationship you have at the moment, which is with your husband.

So the man and the woman who were intended to live in oneness and harmony, God says now your impulse as women will be to control the men, to act against them. Battle of the sexes. He will rule over you sometimes in ways that are not appropriate."


[b]A Change in our culture[/b]

“This is an issue in which we have seen a massive change within the evangelical subculture within my lifetime. [b]If you are under 40 and did not grow up being taught in the ways of God today, you have been taught a whole different way of thinking about manhood and womanhood than what the Scripture teaches. [/b]

That shift within the evangelical culture has followed on the heels of a seismic shift in western culture as a whole. Points of view about womanhood and manhood that were once considered radical or fringe, extreme—those points of view have become mainstream. They are in the air that we breathe today. They’re everywhere, including in the church.

As a result, there is epidemic confusion. Women are confused, so are men. There’s disorientation among men and among women. ”

~~~~~~~

[color=003366]I tend to think that this has impacted us far more than we realize. It slips in everywhere! The media is a prime example of being a very successful venue of feministic philosophy. Though movies, tv shows, and even the news, this comes out in various forms. Even books from the late 1800’s into the early 1900’s this line of thinking came out through, for example the writings of authors like Louisa Alcott and Laura Wilder (that isn’t to say that their writings are bad, just that the philosophy of feminism is found here and there in their writings). It’s really at the point today of where a woman who chooses to stay home to be a wife and mother is looked upon as a failure. A girl who doesn’t choose to follow the path of a career and independence is viewed as a failure. Sadly even in Christian circles the girl who doesn’t leave home at eighteen to go to school or get a job is viewed as weird or unsuccessful. This is the result of this ‘seismic shift in western culture.’ This is where the culture is affecting our views, instead of God’s Word shaping our values and beliefs. And as believers we need to forsake this line of unbiblical thinking and return to the old paths of Biblical womanhood as is shown in the Scriptures.[/color]

~~~~~~

“The theme of manhood and womanhood is woven into the warp and woof of Scripture. It’s in the very fabric of Scripture. It’s not an afterthought on God’s part. It’s not something that’s inconsequential. It’s very significant that God made men and women. We’re going to see why and how. This is a crucial aspect of God’s plan in creation and in redemption.

[b]The potential for blessing is enormous if we recognize God’s plan and embrace it for our lives as women and if men would do the same. [/b] You see the enemy knows that and that’s why he made his first appearance in the Garden to start with.
That’s why he’s been making appearances in our lives ever since, deceiving us through pop-culture, through literature, through movies, through the way that we think, through our fallen nature. The enemy wants to steal the truth from the church, and he wants to steal the truth from you.”


[b]Nancy’s testimony: [/b]

"I want to give you a little glimpse of my own personal journey as a woman in ministry and try to communicate why I think it’s so important for us to grapple with and embrace the implications of a biblical perspective on our manhood and our womanhood. My own understanding of God’s calling in my life as a woman has been a many-year personal journey. It’s been a pilgrimage. It’s one that I’m still on.

As a young woman from the time I was actually a little girl and into my teenage years, I had a great passion for God. I was saved at the age of four. By the time I was six or seven, I knew that God had His hand on my life, that He had called me, that He had set me apart to serve Him in some way. I had no idea what that would look like, but I had this passionate desire to serve Christ.
All through high school and college I was teaching the Word, many times to children and young people. I was a visionary. I had a heart for ministry, but there were many times honestly when I felt somewhat frustrated and limited. I had this kind of gnawing, underlying sense.
I don’t think I could have put words to it or would have dared to say it at the time. But as I look back, there was this sense of feeling that if I had been a man, there was more I could do to serve God than there was that I could do as a woman.

When I was 21 years old, I was serving on the staff of a large local church, serving in the children’s ministries area. One day the pastor of that church came and asked if I would be willing to launch the women’s division for a new ministry that he was starting.

Part of my responsibility would involve doing women’s seminars called “The Battle for the Family: The Woman’s Role.” Well, I would not have said this to him, but the truth was at that point I wasn’t even sure I liked women. Honestly! I could not imagine giving my life to serving women. You say, “That seems kind of strange.” But the Lord led and directed that this was what I was to do. I agreed to serve as he had asked.

So as I got into my 20s and into my 30s, I sought to do what I had been asked to do and that is to serve women, to minister to the spiritual needs of women. In the course of doing those conferences and seminars and talking with women, I encountered many women who had been deeply wounded by men and were struggling with deep-seated resentments and fears and reservations when it came to their relationships with men.

Then I found other women who had little or no framework for what it means to be a Christian woman, from a biblical perspective. So as I ministered to women—hurting women, confused women, disoriented women—I found myself looking to the Scriptures for wisdom, which is the place to look for wisdom. That’s where you get wisdom. Wisdom comes from the Lord. I was asking God to help me help these women.

I began to look for answers to tough life issues related to our womanhood. As I did, God began to give me a deeper understanding of what it means to be a woman versus a man. Why God created us as women and what it means to relate to men in godly and healthy ways. I began to discover in God’s Word ways that we could glorify God as women.
I have to tell you that this has been an incredibly liberating journey for me. It didn’t happen overnight, but over a period of years [b]God began to set me free to love Him as a woman with my whole heart, soul, mind, strength and to serve and glorify Him as a woman. [/b]

I came to passages like this one that’s familiar to you in Genesis chapter 1, where God said in verse 26, “Let us make man [or mankind] in our image, after our likeness. . . . So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them” Genesis 1:26-27).

In the second chapter of Genesis, we get a little bit more detailed account of how God created the woman, the female part of that equation, and we see that God tailor-designed the woman for a specific purpose, to meet a specific need.

As I saw that, I began to realize that my gender,
my womanhood is not a biological accident. [b]The fact that you are a woman is not a matter of chance. God was intentional when He made you a woman. [/b] God was intentional when He made me a woman. He did it for a purpose.

Then Genesis 1:28 goes on to tell us, “And God
blessed them,” both male and female—blessed them. “And God said to them [both male and female together], ‘Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.’”

God said to the man and to the woman, the male and the female, "You’re blessed. Here’s your purpose. Here’s the design I have for you. Here’s what I want you to do. I want you to work together. I want you to complement each other. I want you to serve and glorify Me together."

Then we see in verse 31 of Genesis 1, “And God saw everything that he had made [the trees, the plants, the fruit, the animals, the birds, the fish, the man and the woman], and behold, it was very good.” It is good. Over these last years, God has given me a fresh vision for the wonder and the beauty of God’s plan—God’s plan for men and God’s plan for women—and the ways that they are distinct.

I began to see my womanhood not as a burden, but as a blessing, as a gift, as something to be received and embraced. I began to see that[b] my womanhood is a means by which I can glorify God. It’s a means by which I can reflect His image. It’s a means by which I can experience true freedom and fullness and fruitfulness as a child of God. [/b]

This is the first message from a series by Nancy Leigh DeMoss on ‘A Vision for Biblical Womanhood’
http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php?pid=9788 (You can read the transcript or listen to the program)

[size=xx-small][i][color=003366]Extra comments of mine are in color so as to differentiate from Nancy's words.[/color][/i][/size]

C
crsschk

A gentle and a quiet spirit is one that is not agitated or in unrest. Some washing machines have what is called an "agitator". It turns one way and then the other way - perpetually. It is never at rest, it is always "agitating"! In the hearts of all who are born of Adam too, there is an "agitator". If anyone rubs them the wrong way, the agitator starts "agitating". But those who are humble and gentle in spirit have got rid of this agitator. They are not offended or hurt, when anyone says or does something to them , or when they don't say or do something that was expected of them. They have put their "agitator" on the cross. Peter says that the beauty of a gentle and a quiet spirit is "imperishable"! This is the secret of eternal beauty. The world is full of women nowadays who are wanting to look younger. But what is the beauty that is really imperishable? It is a gentle and a quiet spirit. And this is for men too! This is what will make you really precious to God - if you have a gentle, quiet spirit that is not agitated or offended, that doesn't get into bad moods, that is not grumpy or angry. You need never lose control of yourself at any time either, for the fruit of the Spirit is self-control. Let the world be full of people who have "agitators" but that's not for us any longer. Praise the Lord, we can get rid of our agitators permanently.

This is a tremendous thread sisters ... Wanted to mention just this piece by Zac that it will be copied over to the thread on Pride and Humility as it is fitting. ( [url=https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&order=0&topic_id=10733&forum=34&post_id=182662&refresh=Go]Jonathan Edwards - Undiscerned Spiritual Pride[/url]) Just as well, the hope is that some day in the future that same thread will point back here and someone might be encouraged, challenged, blessed.


S
sermonindex


A Soft Answer

Series: Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life

Monday, April 21 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: When you have a heart full of love, you can say a lot and be a lot more effective than if you’re just being a contentious, domineering, controlling woman. You can say hard things to the most difficult men when you say them with a gentle and gracious spirit and with genuine concern and compassion.......

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss. It’s Monday, April 21.

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here.[/url]

S
sermonindex

T. Austin-Sparks

"The Lord is With Him" (1 Samuel 16:18)


"Then answered one of the young men and said, Behold I have seen a son of Jesse the Bethlehemite, that is skilful in playing, and a mighty man of valour, and a man of war, and prudent in speech, and a comely person; and the Lord is with him" (1 Samuel 16:18).

This verse gives us six features of the life of David, the man who came to be described as being after God's own heart. Perhaps it would be more correct to say that there are five virtues and that the last, "the Lord is with him", is really explanatory of the rest.

1. "...skilful in playing..."

This introduces us to a main feature of David's whole life, which was worship. We owe many of the Psalms to him. The title for what we call 'The Book of the Psalms' was originally 'The Book of Praises'. It became the book of worship, first for the nation and then for the whole world. There is an indication of what was to be an outstanding characteristic of David in this description of him as a skilful player. Where had he learned? How had he developed this talent? In solitude. When these words were spoken, David was unknown, living out his days in the fields of Bethlehem where he cared for his father's sheep. It was there in obscurity, and perhaps in loneliness, that he developed his spirit of praise. Afterwards it became public and the whole people profited from it, but it had its first beginnings in a simple humble life with God. How was the young man who recommended him to king Saul aware of this gift? It seems that he had somehow overheard David, for he appears to be the only one who was informed about him. We do not want to make too much of this point, and yet it is clear that what happened way back in those fields of Bethlehem did produce the foundations of David's later life. He himself referred to this when he offered to go out and fight Goliath. It was in the ordinary affairs of life that he proved the reality of the presence of the Lord and learned the secrets of an anointed life.

From this fact there immediately emerges the reminder that in the Lord's work we neither need to push ourselves forward nor to be pushed by others. Our first concern must consist of exercise Godward. If in your secret history you minister to His good pleasure, without the stimulus which comes from public applause, it will sooner or later, become apparent. God will see to that. Do not worry too much about your lifework; if you have a hidden life of worship, then that will show itself in the outward service to which He has called you. God has always described His service as worship and regarded worship as basic to His service. "Let my son go, that he may serve me," He demanded (Exodus 4:23). And how did Israel serve Him? By worship. The important point is that this does not begin in public. David's life of song was the result of a heart attitude of worship, in songs of praise which expressed his heart devotion to the Lord. Sometimes, perhaps, it was a case of songs without words, inner melody to the Lord for which there were no words.

We note that this first mention of music in David's life is associated with evil powers in king Saul. Saul had been given the highest opportunity, but he had been disobedient, taking into his own hands those things for which he should have waited for God. "Tarry till I come unto thee" - but Saul could not tarry. He was restless, impatient; and in taking hold of the things of God for himself he had allied himself with evil powers. As Samuel told him: "Rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft..." (1 Samuel 15:23), for it links a man with that other evil world. So by seeking to grasp at things for himself, Saul not only forfeited them but allowed Satan to gain a foothold in his life. This has been Satan's objective from the first, to draw things away from God and to himself. In his ultimate manifestation in the person of the Antichrist, he will sit in the temple of God, giving out that he is God and being worshipped as God. That is his ambition. David was just the opposite, for the motive in his music was that everything should be for God's glory. That explains the clash. There are the two kingdoms, one taking from God and the other bringing everything to God. No wonder, then, that Saul became David's greatest enemy.

From the first beginnings of his life David turned everything into music. All his experiences, all his history, he turned into song. It is a most helpful study to look for those Psalms of his which have an introductory explanation of the circumstances in which they were written. Even when Absalom drove him from his throne, David turned that bitter experience into a song (Psalm 3). The whole value of his Psalms is that they arose from a vital experience of God. The volume of Psalms then became the book of Israel's praises, until at last David organised the whole thing for temple worship. He drew together a choir of four thousand voices, and so organised their singing into twenty-four courses that praise was never silent in Israel, day or night. No sooner had one course finished than the next took over, and so round the whole twenty-four hours of each day, every week and every month, throughout the entire year. In this way there was an unbroken flow of continuous worship to God.

Even the deep and dark things of his life were turned by David into Psalms of praise to God. He had his failures, his tragedies, and even his desperate sin, but in all this he found forgiveness and restoration as he turned back in heart to God. This is why he was so beloved by God, because he never failed to find his way up and out through worship. And worship has always proved a most powerful weapon against the kingdom of darkness. "The lion of the tribe of Judah... hath overcome" is part of the heavenly song, and since Judah means 'praise', this suggests that there is a victoriously militant power in spiritual praise. Many a time Martin Luther found his escape by this means. He knew much of the onslaught of satanic powers; he seemed sometimes to be engaged in hand-to-hand conflict with the Devil. His only but very effective answer at such times was to say: 'Let us sing, brother'!

Psalm 22 is one of David's great Messianic Psalms and, although it opens with a dismayed cry at being forsaken by God, it soon breaks through in an appeal to the one who inhabits the praises of Israel (verse 3). It seems that God is provided with a throne for ruling when His people worship and praise Him. This is no small thing. Again in Psalm 114:2, speaking of the glorious procession out of Egypt and on towards the inheritance, the psalmist tells us that: "Judah became his sanctuary". This is only a figurative way of saying that the praises of the Lord provide a holy dwelling place for Him. Praise brings God into a situation as nothing else can, and it puts Him in His right place which is over all. It is a tremendous thing to be able to put the Lord over everything, over breakdown, over perplexity and suffering, over your enemies, over your failures and even over your sins. That was what David did, and that is surely the spiritual reality which lies behind the description: "skilful in playing".

Praise, real praise, means that we are on the victory side. Of course there is a kind of singing which is really a confession of defeat, singing to keep up your spirits, whistling in the dark to pretend that all is well. There was no need for David to do that, for the final statement about him was: "the Lord is with him". That was both the reason for David's singing and the result of it. Yet worshipper as he was, provider of praise as he might have been, David sometimes went down into the depths of despair and had to confess that, as he sang, his soul was cast down and disquieted within him. But he had an answer for this. It was to look on to the day of deliverance which must surely come: "Hope thou in God; for I shall YET praise him..." (Psalm 42:5). The end of the story is written for us in the book of Revelation which gives us glimpses of the glorious choir of the redeemed in heaven. In that day we shall all be skilful in playing and it will be true in the fullest sense that the Lord is with us. So let us praise Him that we shall YET praise Him, and this in itself will bring us a present experience of victory.

2. "...a mighty man of valour..."

This brings us straight on to the second feature of this anointed man's life, namely that he was a great man of courage. David may not have been as impressive in physique as those brothers of his, but because he had spiritual and moral courage he was rightly considered as a mighty man. Valour begins by getting on top of ourselves, by conquering our own moods and feelings; it begins within and not in outward things. At times it is not so difficult when you have an audience, and are inspired to courage by the fact that people are looking on, but it is much more difficult to be brave when you are quite alone. Once again we note that David first acquired his claim to valour when he was in the background, largely unobserved.

Of course there are also new challenges to the man who is exposed to public testing, but when that came, David confirmed that the original assessment of his valour was a correct one, for by God's grace he kept true through many temptations to doubt and fear. When the Philistines seized him in Gath he declared: "What time I am afraid, I will trust in thee" (Psalm 56:3). It is fear which robs a man of his courage. Fear entered the world when sin came in, and it has governed human behaviour ever since, just as it exercises a dreadful rule in the ranks of evil spirits (James 2:19). If sin brings in fear, then courage often depends on having a good conscience. The most fearless or courageous Man who ever walked this earth was the Lord Jesus, whose remarkable moral courage was based upon an absolutely clear way between Himself and His Father. A bad conscience makes us small and makes us cowards but a good conscience gives stature and boldness. David was far from being a sinless man, but he had learned the secret of getting right with God and a great theme of his Psalms is the blessing of forgiveness and justification by faith in our Saviour God.

Valour also depends upon a complete faith in the Lord. David believed God implicitly; he believed and he loved. The Psalms are full of this fact. Only perfect love can cast out fear. Every new experience of God which came to David made him the more ready to trust God's great love and to love Him in return, a fact which doubtless established him more and more as a mighty man of valour. The Lord built up his strength by taking him through difficult and adverse circumstances in which he proved the steadfast love of his God. Then as he grew in courage, he was able to undertake things altogether beyond his measure in the interests of the Lord. Tremendous odds mattered nothing to him provided he could be sure that the Lord was with him. He also proved his courage in waiting for God and enduring without complaining when things seemed to be against him. For a man of action to be powerless, just to endure and be patient while he waits for God, demands very great courage. There were times when David could have acted in desperation to rid himself of his great enemy Saul, but he refused to do so. He was prepared to wait for God. When we learn such a lesson then we are learning valour of a very high order.

3. "...a man of war..."

In the third place David was a warrior. This reference is the first intimation of the constant warfare which was to be a feature of his life. David had to be a fighter, not because he was personally aggressive, not because he needed to be relieved of superfluous energy, and not because he was trained or qualified in military matters, but because he was jealous for the rights of God. It is quite clear that what stirred his spirit was both indignation that God's name should be dishonoured and concern for the good of God's people. It was a sense of responsibility for the Lord's interests which made him a fighter, and as we speak of this we seem to hear the words of that other great spiritual warrior, Paul: "Knowing that I am set for the defence of the gospel" (Philippians 1:16).

As we have said, it all began in the simple and humble affairs of David's daily life. His first fight was over a lamb. Only a lamb! Why risk your life for just a lamb? Your father is a man of some substance - witness his gifts to the king and the older brothers - and he would never miss one little lamb. Surely the lion could have that one! But no, that lamb was David's responsibility, it was part of the father's possessions which had been committed to his care, and it was this sense of concern for Jesse's interests which led him later into concern for God's interests and made him the fighter that he was.

Warriorship, however, demands utter selflessness. Those who have personal problems and interests may be fighters in a wrong way but they will never be good soldiers of the Lord nor fight the good fight of faith. Those who spend their time complaining and criticising are doing the enemy's work. In the wilderness Israel was defeated not by outward enemies but by their internal complaining and murmuring. You may think that you have plenty to murmur about; David himself had times when he felt that he was being very badly treated, but he found - as we shall do - that whole-hearted devotion to the Lord's interests is the sure way of victory. God's man of war is also a worshipper; his mouth is filled with the high praises of the Lord. If worship is to come first, then this will mean a turning aside from selfish or personal problems and a total concentration of the whole heart on the honour of the name of the Lord. Only so can God's man be a true warrior. This brings us to a very practical point which is that the first phase of spiritual warfare and every subsequent skirmish and battle calls for a new letting go to the Lord. This is very often the secret of success, and especially so for the Christian whose enemies are spiritual and who is called not to personal conflicts or triumphs but to share in Christ's battle with evil and to share His victory.

4. "...prudent in speech..."

David was known to be prudent in speech or, as the Authorised Version has it, "prudent in matters". David was a man of discretion, a man of wise counsel, and a man who could speak for God because he had first learned to listen to God. Perhaps teachableness was one of his outstanding qualities. The person who is self sufficient, who thinks that he knows so much, will never be able to speak wisely for God.

Some of you may have felt at times that God can make no use of you, since you lack the qualifications or natural abilities which men regard as necessary for serving Him. The prudence of which we are now speaking is not a natural quality at all, but that which becomes a spiritual feature of the one who truly knows what it is to have the Lord with him. The Lord is not looking for cleverness. Indeed He often cannot use people because they are too clever in their own estimation. Teachableness, however, is a quality which He greatly values, and this is a matter of the spirit as well as of the mind. There is often a big difference between knowledge and wisdom, or prudence. Knowledge may consist of a mass of correct information, but wisdom means the application of that knowledge in ways which are good. It is possible for a Christian to have a vast amount of spiritual information, information as to what the Bible teaches and what the commentators suggest, holding all this in the mind or in the notebook yet with little evidence of it in the practical values of life. Wisdom is a matter of using the information correctly by turning it to account for the glory of God.

What is more, such wisdom will always be constructive. There are those who seem to think that they show their superior wisdom by their ability to criticise. If they can put their finger on a fault or discover some flaws, then they consider that they are being wise. But the effect of their activities is destructive, whereas the Scriptures make it plain that true wisdom is always constructive. Solomon, the wisest king of all, was a great builder, and it was he who wrote about wisdom building her house (Proverbs 9:1). So much is written in the New Testament about speech which is for building up or edification that the implication seems to be that if our tongues cannot contribute to positive helpfulness in this way then they had far better remain silent. Wisdom is always shown in its building values.

In fact wisdom is always actuated by the ability to discriminate as to what is for the glory of God. Nothing else matters. The Spirit's presence in a man is made evident by the ways in which he can avoid that which grieves God and devote himself to God's pleasure. If the Lord is with him then he will be prudent in matters.

5. "...a comely person..."

The final verdict on David was that he was a comely person, a man of good presence. It is clear that God intended that this should be true of every human being. From one standpoint this is the Bible's theme. "Let us make man in our image" God said. So far as man is concerned God always had perfection as His purpose. Through sin, however, man has become stunted, deformed and repulsive to God, and he would always remain so but for the fact that the Lord Jesus has brought a salvation which makes men perfectly whole. As the Saviour passed along the way He met the blind, the paralysed, the deformed, and He spoke the words of deliverance and transformation which left them whole again - they were saved. His eternal purpose in salvation is to have sons conformed to His eternal Son, who is indeed the Comely Person.

David is a foreshadowing of this mighty work of salvation. He who would by nature have been repulsive to a holy God (born in sin and shapen in iniquity) became a man after God's heart, a man of good presence who could be looked upon and admired. It may be helpful to consider some of his features, and the first one is undoubtedly meekness. David never claimed to be as good as the other man. He always thought himself to be the poorest of men. Emptiness of self is the very essence of meekness. See also how David suffered when things went wrong. Never for a moment did he blame someone else, but condemned himself outright. If ever a man was filled to overflowing with the consciousness of the marvellous mercy of God to a sinner, that man was David. See again how he suffered wrong without becoming vindictive. It is a mark of meekness to bear unjust wrong and not be embittered by it. For years David bore so much evil from Saul and yet he refused to take revenge, even when it could have been so easy. When Saul died in battle David did not gloat, he did not express relief but he made one of the most beautiful laments of grief over Saul as well as over his son, Jonathan.

Another thing which made David great was the way in which he accumulated wealth for the house of God. He took hold of every experience of suffering and wrung out of it something for God and God's people. Did he go into a deep and dark experience? Then he took hold of it and extracted from it that which would be for the enrichment of generations that were to follow. That is how we got our Psalter. That is not the little person's way of looking at things. He gets under his troubles, turns in on himself and gives way to self pity. The big man, however, does what David did, uses his own adversity to bring comfort and help to others.

One further feature of David's spiritual and moral stature was his single unifying passion. "...for thy sake I have borne reproach; shame hath covered my face... For the zeal of thy house hath eaten me up" (Psalm 69:9). David's supreme concern was for the Father's house, and in that he was a true type of the Lord Jesus to whom these very words are applied. He had a mighty concern for the Father's glory, and tremendous courage to carry that concern into action. David was like that. So much is written in the books of Samuel and Chronicles about his concern for the house of God. This was his one unifying passion. His life was a unity governed by a singleness of purpose, and that was what made him great. He had spiritual quality; he was a man of a good presence. God does not get glory out of our littlenesses, our petty jealousies and selfish pre-occupation. But when we grow up spiritually, leaving all those childish things behind, then the glory of God begins to be seen in us.

All this, then, because the Lord was with David. He himself was aware of that Presence, though at times he was tempted to question and doubt. What is more important, other people took note of it. This is what matters most. When people meet us, do they meet the Lord? When the Lord Jesus came to this earth He was called "Emmanuel" - God with us. The verdict upon His life after He had gone back to the glory was: "God was with him" (Acts 10:38). And the Holy Spirit has come to make this our experience. His anointing signifies that the Lord is with us, and this should make effective in our lives those five qualities which were observed in the young David. To have the Lord with him cost David dearly. It cost him his home; for a time it cost him his rightful place as king; it cost him comforts and popularity. But it gave him that which is more valuable than all earthy treasures. It gave him the supreme joy of bringing pleasure to the heart of God. The Lord was with him.

From "Toward the Mark" Nov-Dec 1975.

https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/articles/index.php?view=article&aid=1512

S
sermonindex

T. Austin Sparks:

David was a man of discretion, a man of wise counsel, and a man who could speak for God because he had first learned to listen to God. Perhaps teachableness was one of his outstanding qualities. The person who is self sufficient, who thinks that he knows so much, will never be able to speak wisely for God.

There is often a big difference between knowledge and wisdom, or prudence. Knowledge may consist of a mass of correct information, but [b]wisdom means the application of that knowledge in ways which are good.[/b] It is possible for a Christian to have a vast amount of spiritual information, information as to what the Bible teaches and what the commentators suggest, holding all this in the mind or in the notebook yet with little evidence of it in the practical values of life. [b]Wisdom is a matter of using the information correctly by turning it to account for the glory of God.[/b]

What is more, [b]such wisdom will always be constructive. There are those who seem to think that they show their superior wisdom by their ability to criticise. If they can put their finger on a fault or discover some flaws, then they consider that they are being wise. But the effect of their activities is destructive, whereas the Scriptures make it plain that true wisdom is always constructive.[/b] Solomon, the wisest king of all, was a great builder, and it was he who wrote about wisdom building her house (Proverbs 9:1). So much is written in the New Testament about speech which is for building up or edification that the implication seems to be that [b]if our tongues cannot contribute to positive helpfulness in this way then they had far better remain silent. Wisdom is always shown in its building values.[/b]

In fact [b]wisdom is always actuated by the ability to discriminate as to what is for the glory of God.[/b] Nothing else matters. The Spirit's presence in a man is made evident by the ways in which he can avoid that which grieves God and devote himself to God's pleasure. If the Lord is with him then he will be prudent in matters.

This ties in really well with Nancy's series on Abigail. Abigail exemplifies wisdom, and David though he may have been foolish in his response to Nabal, was wise in his response to Abigail.

Nancy DeMoss:

David demonstrates that he has a heart for God in the way he responds to this wise, discerning appeal from Abigail. It calms him down. It causes him to stop and think what he is doing, and to reverse his course.

He listens to her appeal, unlike Nabal, who refused to listen and couldn’t be appealed to. David said, “Blessed be the Lord.”

Abigail has succeeded in what she has said, in getting David’s eyes off himself, off his enemies, and on the Lord; and his response shows that he really did have a heart that wanted to please the Lord. He repented. He changed course.

Then he says in verse 33, “Blessed be your discretion,” your good judgment, your wise counsel. He praises her discretion and her discernment. Remember when we saw in verse 3 of this chapter that she was a beautiful woman? But what was it that David found attractive in the crisis? It was her discernment.

Remember what Proverbs says about the woman who has natural physical beauty but doesn’t have internal discretion and good judgment? Proverbs 11:22 is a graphic word picture: “As a jewel of gold in a swine’s snout, so is a fair [beautiful] woman which is without discretion” (KJV).

If you want to make an impact on people’s lives, ultimately the greatest impact is not to be had by your outward appearance. It’s to be had by your heart, your manner, your spirit, the way you speak.

S
sermonindex

This ties in really well with Nancy's series on Abigail. Abigail exemplifies wisdom, and David though he may have been foolish in his response to Nabal, was wise in his response to Abigail.

I was trying to find a good article on discretion and this one really stood out to me in so many ways.

C
crsschk

This is such an incredible post. Thank you sisters. T. Austin Sparks ...

[i]It is fear which robs a man of his courage. Fear entered the world when sin came in, and it has governed human behaviour ever since, just as it exercises a dreadful rule in the ranks of evil spirits (James 2:19). If sin brings in fear, then courage often depends on having a good conscience. The most fearless or courageous Man who ever walked this earth was the Lord Jesus, whose remarkable moral courage was based upon an absolutely clear way between Himself and His Father. A bad conscience makes us small and makes us cowards but a good conscience gives stature and boldness. David was far from being a sinless man, but he had learned the secret of getting right with God and a great theme of his Psalms is the blessing of forgiveness and justification by faith in our Saviour God.[/i]

Difficult to tear from this whole cloth. Much for contemplation in all this.

S
sermonindex


A Happy Ending?

Series: Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life

Tuesday, April 22 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: There is no trouble-free existence this side of heaven. You can have all your wish lists, and you’re fantasizing and thinking, “If I just weren’t married to this man; if I could just be married to this man who’s so much more godly. Oh, would I love to be married to a David!”

Really? A man given to moods? A man prone to depression? A man with women troubles? I mean, every situation and circumstance of life has its challenges. There’s no trouble-free existence this side of heaven. Life is hard, but God is good.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss. It’s Tuesday, April 22......

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here.[/url]


D
destinysweet

Psalm 18, After reading the post by Austin Sparks yesterday evening..I was inspired to pick up my newly restored 12 string guitar and play while praying..as I felt a great stirring in my spirit.I have been keeping up with the study on Abigail and David..and God has been speaking to me concerning the feminine..rightful use of God's authority and the abuse of authority..the difference between leaning upon our own understanding in viewing words written,sung,spoken..the weighing them,testing them..the asking for the highest,divine perspective and the openess to be taught and recieve the truth..which is perfected in Jesus Christ.The sword of the spirit is keenly sharp and rightly divides between soul and spirit,seperating between bone (structure,letter) and the marrow(pure heavenly wisdom,spirit)..that which brings life to the bone..and thus health to the whole body. We look to the Cornerstone,He is foundation of our faith..we follow Him,His word and His example, above and beyond all others.He alone is perfect,without corruption,the image of the invisible God,in whom all the fulness of the Godhead dwells bodily..all others will fail us should we chose their ways,words,sayings,example above His. He is the First and Last Word on any subject.

Called and seperated unto God as a psalmist throughout my life and bearing witness to the many great insights in the post on David's best qualities,I was inspired to play upon my 'Aaron's Rod'(that's what the Lord has called my instrument,seriously). I had thought I would sing praises to God..to worship Him only..but He quickly took over and coming upon me mightily,began to have me play with such powerful strokes and intensity,complicated fingerpickings more skillfuly playing at that force than I had ever done before to my memory,taking me back over the years of my calling as psalmist,opening up much of the path He took me upon.

In a stream of clear images He reminded me of: my joy of hearing and seeing many angels singing high praise to God, hailing Jesus as the King of Glory.The songs given during ordinary affairs of life,while going about the simple tasks before me.The enjoyment of putting certain Psalms,words spoken by prophets of old,New Testament truth even a full chapter of Revelation(5) to melodies for memorization and delight.Of teaching others to play more skillfully and to sing with confidence and the leading of worship,the special music times during the taking of communion.The outworking of God's spirit upon me in co-creating songs of high praise and worship,of warning,the provision for salvation and harvest,forgiveness and thanksgiving,the aspect of song in the royal priesthood capacity in mercy wrought in true intercession,and that of the prophetic.Songs that brought repentance and new beginnings,of miracles wrought,complete deliverances through spiritual song and skillful playing along withsongs for the healing of wounded souls,to bind up the broken hearted.And He reminded me of the many tests when approached with temptations common to the gifted songperson with any real talent and the many strict disciplines I willingly came under that He might cleanse me of unholy ambition..the wonderful hedge He had placed around me in being able to choose to serve God only in this wonderful gift,and not defile the anointing that comes with such a gift.I wa humbled that He allowed me to escape what I've seen so many be unable to resist..and I know it is Him who has kept this pure for His glory and for His higher purpose.

The above is included to show the diverse aspects of experience in a true calling.So that when I reveal the nature of a song of the unrighteous sin of the author of such song..by giving an example ,which I will do later,you can bear witness to my understanding of the truth,having given you evidence which can be checked by your prayers..Christ,His saints and heavenly host as my witness..I would have you look beyond me..this handmaiden reports in for your edification,out of obediance alone,to assist you in what for me has become easier to see with the divine help of this gifts true operation.

Glory filled the room as I played,all the while He was speaking to my spirit..asking me to share the important(He insists crucial) discoveries that He has revealed thus far during this still unfinished personal musical journey of His planning and implementation.If I were to hide this talent and His long investment under a tree..He would be not only be displeased but furious..for this is a gift that is for not only Him..but for all the body to benefit from.Many times we are called to surrender even our greatest gifts back unto God for His purification..as the days are evil and the temptations many..we must be alert to the ways the enemy would pervert the true callings of God lest we be decieved.

This morning we stayed communing for hours as the Spirit of Truth elaborated upon this subject giving me an express charge not to dodge the responsibility..but to step forward and present what has been given.

It is an encouragement to see that this morning's talk,the sisters gave,was for the most part in line with/parallel to what I am to share. God's way is to reveal Jesus..even if He must use His beloved David to expose the sin of soulful weakness.David was not allowed for his sin to be covered from our eyes.God has done this that we might learn from his error as well as be drawn closer towards God in our relationship with Him. This report is a call to align ourselves and our prayers to the highest law..the New Covenant which goes even further into the depths of God's's merciful love than the wickedly vengeful heart of man..adhering us to unite under His perfect Word..His living Word.His words are Spirit and they are Life.

I have been advised to keep my posts shorter so as not to discourage some from even beginning to read them..patience required here, as this is to be continued.

Psalm 18..bless the Lord for your diligence and responding to God's leading here..I am thankful for the warmth and vitality of your treasured fellowship.I am encouraged to share partly due to Christ's rich presence in you..Roniya too.May God protect and guide us all into His perfect truth as Christ Jesus is being formed in us all.

S
sermonindex

May God protect and guide us all into His perfect truth as Christ Jesus is being formed in us all.

I am very encouraged with this program and I am enjoying this fellowship. :-)

S
sermonindex

Excerpts from:
[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]A Happy Ending?
Series:
Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life[/url]


Nancy DeMoss:
David could pillow his head at night and sleep in peace (even if he was out in the wilderness laying his head on a rock). He could sleep in peace because he knew God is the one who brought this matter to a conclusion.

[b]Don’t take matters into your own hands. David had learned to let the Lord avenge the insults he received. [/b] When the insults come, don’t absorb them. Don’t retaliate. Don’t become like that Nabal.

David was going to need this lesson when he faced the next Nabal in his life, who he faces in the very next chapter, King Saul. Saul has been around and Saul has been antagonizing David. But in the very next chapter, David again is going to have a chance to take Saul’s life.

I think he has learned something from this experience. Don’t avenge yourself. Let God avenge evil. God will, in His time and in His way. With Nabal it happened fairly quickly. With Saul, it didn’t happen for years.

[b]With the Nabal in your life, God may not avenge the evil quickly. God may not avenge the evil done to you in your lifetime. But God will avenge evil. [/b]

This is very wise advice. It’s better to be still and let God do the avenging, then to take matters into our own hands and suffer from regret afterward because of our impatient foolishness and lack of trusting God to deal with that person or situation.



Nancy DeMoss:

I want to just say that [b]no matter what stage or season you are in, life is hard. [/b] Life is hard. There is no trouble-free existence this side of heaven.

You can have all your wish lists, and you’re fantasizing and thinking, “If I just weren’t married to this man, if I could just be married to this man who’s so much more godly. Oh, would I love to be married to a David!”

Really? A man given to moods? A man prone to depression? A man with women troubles? I mean, [b]every situation and circumstance of life has its challenges.[/b] There’s no trouble-free existence this side of heaven.

[b]Life is hard, but God is good. [/b] And God is sanctifying and redeeming this fallen creation, and that includes you. There is going to be a fairy tale ending to your life if you’re a child of God. [b]Those who are righteous will live happily ever after.

But it’s not here. It’s not now. [/b]That’s why you have to take the long view, which really isn’t so long when you see it in the light of eternity.

Nancy:

As we talk about a counter-revolution of godly, wise, biblical women in our day, we’re talking about women who respond and think and trust and act like Abigail. [b]Those are the women with their quiet and meek spirit and their quiet wisdom and their trust in God who ultimately will change this world.[/b]

So many women today are misillusioned in their quest for power and fulfillment. The greatest fulfillment as Christian women is obeying God's Word and stepping into the high position that He has for us. The influence of women on the lives of powerful men is found all through our history books. John and Abigail Adams, Jonathan and Sarah Edwards, Adoniram and Ann Judson, Hudson and Maria Taylor, and many others. And this story of Abigail is another one. The challenge is for us today to follow in the steps of these godly women in obeying Christ and living for His glory.


Psalm18 wrote:
May God protect and guide us all into His perfect truth as Christ Jesus is being formed in us all.

I am very encouraged with this program and I am enjoying this fellowship. :-)

As am I. Thank you, sisters.

[i]Romans 14:19
Let us therefore follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.[/i]

S
sermonindex

Death Brings Life

Series: Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life

Wednesday, April 23 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: You ought to be looking, when you study biblical characters, for evidences of Christ-likeness because anything good, anything wise is an expression of Christ living His life in and through us. I think that humility, that willingness to take the place of the offender, that’s what draws us to a woman like Abigail. We’re drawn to her because we’re drawn to those qualities we see that are like Christ.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Wednesday, April 23......

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here.[/url]

S
sermonindex

This is very wise advice. It’s better to be still and let God do the avenging, then to take matters into our own hands and suffer from regret afterward because of our impatient foolishness and lack of trusting God to deal with that person or situation.

Amen, prayer is essential in these situations.

Philippians 4:6-7

6Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God.

7And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus.

S
sermonindex

A Rich Tradition of Worship

Series: In Christ Alone: An Interview with Keith and Kristyn Getty

Thursday, April 24 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s hymn writer Keith Getty.

Keith Getty: What we sing deeply affects how we think, how we speak, how we pray, how we act. What we sing affects every part of our lives. We become like those whom we worship.

You’re the Word of God the Father
From before the world began.
Ev’ry star and every planet
Has been fashioned by Your hand.
All creation holds . . .

Leslie: What exactly is a hymn? An old-fashioned song? Is it more than that? Well, our guests will open your eyes—or rather, I should say, open your ears to the vibrancy of hymn writing.

You’re the Author of creation;
You’re the Lord of ev’ry man;
And Your cry of love rings out across the lands.1

Leslie: Here’s Nancy.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: As you know, on Revive Our Hearts this year we’re calling it the “Year of the True Woman,” and all of this is leading up to the [url=http://www.truewoman.com/]True Woman ’08[/url] Conference that will be held this October in Schaumberg, Illinois. That’s in the Chicago area.

We’re trying to introduce you throughout the course of these months to some of those who will be participating with us in the conference. I am so delighted to have with us in the studio today Keith and Kristyn Getty, who will be leading us in worship during the True Woman Conference.....

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here.[/url]

I wanted to quote something that was said on [url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php?pid=9856] yesterday's broadcast "Death Bring's Life" [/url] which I highly recommend you listen to if you haven't heard it because it was with an audience of women who gave some powerful testimonies:


"You say it’s just amazing she had survived however many years it was of marriage to this mean-spirited, ill-tempered man. What if she was beautiful and discerning not in spite of the man she had been married to all those years who was harsh and ill-behaved, but what if she was beautiful and discerning because of the years that she had been married to that man, seeking to know God and to become God’s woman in that situation?

Now, I don’t want to read more into the text than is there. We don’t know. But I do know this. I have seen some women, I have known some women who live with or near Nabals, that have a Nabal in their life. And as a result of seeking the Lord, becoming a prayerful woman, seeking to get God’s will injected into this situation, those women have become beautiful, godly women that you and I would want to emulate.

You wonder would that all have happened if there hadn’t been a Nabal in their life? I don’t know, but I do know this. I know we cannot become like Christ apart from suffering. God perfected Christ through the things that He suffered. We say we want to be like Christ. We want the glory and the end result without going through the process. The process is the cross. Your Nabal is your cross...."

S
sermonindex

Death Brings Life
Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life


Nancy DeMoss:

That’s what I love about Abigail. [b]She knew when not to speak, and she knew when to speak.[/b] The only way to know that is not to rely on your own understanding but to be continually crying out to the Lord to direct your life. Not going based on your emotions. That’s what David did. That’s what Nabal did. But going on inner confidence and light and witness within you that comes from the Word of God and the Spirit of God directing your steps and showing you what to do and how and when....

I think that’s important because as a wife you are not responsible for what your husband does wrong or your boss or your pastor or any authority in your life. [b]You’re only responsible for how you respond.[/b] But I think you can go, when you get involved in a situation like this, to the people involved and say, “Could you just extend mercy? Forgive us. Forgive me. This slight is not intended. The offense is not intended.”

In that sense, you’re trying to reach out and be a peacemaker and build a bridge. I think that’s the heart behind what she’s saying there. “I’m trying to build a bridge” rather than defending what her husband did or saying to David, “Boy, if you come after him, Nabal’s strong. He’s going to get you.” She just didn’t do anything to put fuel on the fire. [b]She’s trying to pour water on the fire to help it go out.[/b]

“Where no wood is, there the fire goeth out: so where there is no talebearer, the strife ceaseth. As coals are to burning coals, and wood to fire; so is a contentious man to kindle strife.” Proverbs 26:20-21


[b]The Tongue[/b]

[i]James 3:5 “...the tongue is a little member...but!”[/i]

There is a little member
which is not hard to find
It is a mighty weapon
That cannot be confined

It can bring joy and comfort
It soothes both hurt and woe
A balm to weary pilgrims
A help against the foe

A weaker brother stumbling
Is made to turn around
A wounded sister bleeding
Is lifted from the ground

But ah - that little member
Can cause a world of pain
If not to God surrendered,
His servant to ordain

It hurts, it cuts, it murders
the lives of fellow men
It dims the light of heaven
And makes the world condemn

Ah little tongue, I beg you
Bend to thy Lord above
That on the path you travel
YOUR MINISTRY IS LOVE.

~Jennifer Rene Daniel

S
sermonindex

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php?pid=9793][b]Equally Important
Series: A Vision for Biblical Womanhood (Part 2)[/b]
[/url]


Nancy DeMoss: You’re probably aware that there are those in our culture today who say that there are no real differences between men and women except for the obvious physiological differences.
Well, I read something the other day, and if nothing else convinces you that there are profound differences between men and women, this will. This had to do with the procedure for getting money out of an ATM machine. Somebody observed the difference between the way men get money out of an ATM machine and the way women get money out of an ATM machine.

For men it’s fairly simple. Here’s the male procedure:

1.\tDrive up to the cash machine.
2.\tPut down your car window.
3.\tInsert card into machine and enter your pin number.
4.\tEnter amount of cash required and withdraw.
5.\tRetrieve card, cash, and receipt.
6.\tPut window up.
7.\tDrive off.

That’s how this writer says that men get money out of an ATM machine. Now here’s the female procedure. And I’ll just tell you, for starters, it has 27 steps.

1.\tDrive up to the cash machine.
2.\tReverse and back up the required amount to align car window with the machine.
3.\tSet parking brake and put the window down.
4.\tFind handbag and remove all contents onto the passenger seat to locate card.
5.\tTell person on cell phone you will call them back and hang up.
6.\tAttempt to insert card into machine.
7.\tOpen car door to allow easier access to machine due to an excessive distance from the car.
8.\tInsert card.
9.\tReinsert card the right way.
10.\tDig through handbag to find diary with your pin written on the inside back page.
11.\tEnter pin.
12.\tPress cancel and re-enter correct pin.
13.\tEnter amount of cash required.
14.\tCheck makeup in rear view mirror. [I didn’t see that on the men’s list!]
15.\tRetrieve cash and receipt.
16.\tEmpty handbag again to locate wallet and place cash inside.
17.\tWrite debit amount in check register and place receipt in back of checkbook.
18.\tRecheck makeup.
19.\tDrive forward two feet.
20.\tReverse back to cash machine.
21.\tRetrieve card.
22.\tRe-empty handbag, locate cardholder and place card in the slot provided.
23.\tMouth "I’m sorry" to the irate male driver waiting behind you.
24.\tRestart stalled engine and pull off.
25.\tRedial person on cell phone.
26.\tDrive for two to three miles.
27.\tRelease parking brake.

Now, when it comes to this whole issue of manhood and womanhood, we want to look at it from a biblical perspective, not just what we think. Actually, our opinions on this don’t matter a whole lot, and what other people have said doesn’t matter a whole lot. [b]What matters is what God has to say.[/b]

We need to start with the assumption that God’s plan is good. God’s design for men and for women—and for marriage and for human relationships—is right; it’s necessary, and it’s important.

When you think about it,[b] who better knows how life should function than the Creator and Designer of life Himself?[/b] God is the One who designed us. He made us; He knows how we function. We need to look to His plan to find out how we’re supposed to work. Things work best when they function according to their design.

This is true of the chair I’m sitting on. It’s designed to be a chair, so it works best when you use it as a chair. Now, it would be foolish for me to try to use this chair as something it wasn’t designed to be—say, a fork or a piano. It wouldn’t work as a fork or a piano because it wasn’t designed to be a fork or a piano. It was designed to be a chair.

[b]When we function according to God’s plan, God’s purpose and God’s design in relation to our womanhood, and when men function according to God’s plan and purpose and design in relation to their manhood, God is glorified. Things function; they work. They’re blessed, and others are blessed as well. [/b]


~[b]Foundation – Both male and female created in the Image of God[/b]~

Just to lay a basic foundation here, I think we would all have to agree—that is, if we are committed to the authority of Scripture—that [b]Scripture affirms that men and women were both created in the image of God. Men and women were both created.[/b] That means we did not evolve. We did not just happen. We are not the result of chance. We were created by God and created in the image or the likeness of God.

As such, that means that [b]men and women have equal worth, equal value and equal dignity as persons before God. [/b]The Scripture teaches that type of equality—that we have equal value, equal worth before God as persons, men and women.

The equality of men and women is affirmed in the creation account in the very first chapter of the Bible. We looked at this verse in the last session, Genesis 1:27. “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.” [b]Equally in His image.[/b] It wasn’t, “God made male in his image, but the female is something inferior.” No, male and female—He created them both in his image.

So that suggests to us that [b]men and women are equally important to God, equally valuable to God.[/b] You’ll never find the Scripture belittling women. You’ll never find the Scripture demeaning women. And you won’t find the Scripture belittling or demeaning men either. You find the Scripture giving value and worth and significance to men and women, created in the image of God.

I think of the title of a book by a woman I know, Rebecca Jones is her name. And the book is called Does Christianity Squash Women? I love that title because it reflects on what our culture has come to believe is the truth about God’s Word. Many in our culture would say, “Christianity puts women down,” and they would pull out verses to say it proves their point.

You will not find that in the Scripture. You will not find the Scripture belittling or demeaning or putting down women.[b] You find God giving status and worth and value to both men and women. All are precious in His sight. [/b]


~[b]Equality found in the Scriptures[/b]~

It’s important, as we move on to talk about some of the differences between men and women, that we start with that foundational principle that both were created in the image of God, equal in His sight.

You see that [b]equality in the way Jesus treated women in the culture where He lived,[/b] which did not respect women and considered women, many times, as nothing more than a piece of property. In some cases, in those cultures, women were not allowed to be taught or were not considered in any sense equal heirs together of the grace of life.

[b]Jesus exalted the status of women. Jesus showed respect and kindness to women. You see Him treating women in a way that reflects His belief that they are created in the image of God. [/b]
In the New Testament you see when we come to Pentecost, that the Holy Spirit at the forming of the church is poured out in a new way on both men and women. Again, we’re talking about evidence in the Scripture, Old and New Testaments, that men and women are equal before God.

In Acts 2, in his Pentecost sermon, Peter quotes from the Old Testament book of Joel, chapter 2. And you read these verses: “In the last days it shall be, God declares, that I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh.” And Peter said, “This is what we’re seeing today at Pentecost.” God says, “I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh, and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams; even on my male servants and female servants in those days I will pour out my Spirit, and they shall prophesy” (Acts 2:17-18; see also Joel 2:28-29).

So without going into any further discussion about what all that means,[b] it’s clear that God poured out His Spirit equally on men and on women.[/b] God didn’t give men some special dispensation of the Holy Spirit. God poured out His Spirit on men and women equally.

We read, as we continue into the New Testament, that[b] men and women have been equally baptized into the body of Christ.[/b] That is, those who have repented of their sins and placed their faith in Jesus Christ have been equally made a part of the body of Christ. And they share equally in the privileges of salvation, the privileges of redemption.[b] Men and women have equal access to God.[/b]

For example, in Galatians chapter 3 the apostle Paul says, “For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.” He’s speaking to men and women. If you are in Christ, you’ve been baptized into His body. And then he says, “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (verses 27-28).

Now, as we’re going to see, Paul doesn’t mean by that verse that there are no differences between men and women. [b]But he does say that we have equal share in the privileges and the blessings of redemption, equal access to God through Jesus Christ. [/b]

And then we see in 1 Corinthians 12 that as members of the body of Christ we have all been given spiritual gifts—not just gifts given to men to serve the Lord. [b]God has given spiritual gifts to every woman who is a believer.[/b] First Corinthians 12:7: “To each”—who is each? It’s every member of the body of Christ, which we’ve already been told is men and women—“To each is given the manifestation of the Spirit for the common good.”

You see, you can’t just look at your pastor and say, “Well, he’s been given a spiritual gift to serve the Lord.” No. You have been given a spiritual gift to serve the Lord as well. And God gives us different gifts, different manifestations of the Spirit, to serve Him for the common good, for the building up of the whole body of Christ.

That means that, as a woman, as I exercise the gifts that God has given to me by His Spirit, the entire body, including men and women, is built up in Christ. [b]So Scripture affirms that men and women were both created in the image of God and have equal worth and value before God. [/b]


~[b]God-created Differences[/b]~

At the same time, [b]Scripture also affirms that there are God-created differences between men and women. Equality does not mean sameness. [/b]Now, no one disputes the obvious physiological differences between men and women. But I think it’s important that we realize that those external or physiological differences are merely a reflection of deeper, more profound, fundamental differences that God has created between men and women.

I will be the first to acknowledge that it is politically incorrect today to talk about differences between men and women. In fact, you can lose your job over it. Just ask Lawrence Summers, who is the former president of Harvard.
He dared to suggest at an academic conference that there could possibly be some innate factors—not just socialization, but some innate factors—to explain why there are more men than women in high-level science and engineering positions. And the department to which he was speaking got up in arms and ultimately ended up getting rid of him as the president of Harvard.

So I know that we are treading on some ground in this series where angels fear to tread. I know we are going to get some letters over this. And we love letters at Revive Our Hearts. We even love letters from people who don’t agree with everything we say.

I know that many of our lives have been greatly impacted by the writings and the ministry of Elisabeth Elliot. She’s been something of a mentor in my own life and ministry. She contributed a chapter to a book on biblical manhood and womanhood that was written more than 10 years ago.

In that chapter, here’s what she had to say about these differences.

[i]Throughout the millennia of human history, up until the past two decades or so (remember, this was written more than a decade ago) people took for granted that the differences between men and women were so obvious as to need no comment. They accepted the way things were.

But our easy assumptions have been assailed and confused. We have lost our bearings in a fog of rhetoric about something called "equality," so that I find myself in the uncomfortable position of having to belabor to educated people what was once perfectly obvious to the simplest peasant.1[/i]

She’s saying, “Everybody used to get it. And now the most educated people don’t seem to get it.”
Well, I go back to Genesis chapter 1, verse 27. God created man (mankind) in the image of God. Male and female He created them. [b]There is something different about male and female. They alike are created in the image of God. They alike were created to bear or reflect the image of God. But there are differences. There is something different between male and female. [/b]

And really, if you think about it, it’s an exercise in futility to deny that there are differences because nothing—no studies or rhetoric or discussion—can change the reality that God created men different from women. And those differences are far more profound than the obvious physiological ones.

As I was reviewing my notes this morning, I thought about that song in My Fair Lady where Professor Higgins says to Colonel Pickering, “Why can’t a woman be more like a man?” Some of you remember that song. Well, thank God for the differences! If we were exactly alike, one of us would be unnecessary.

[b]We need each other’s differences. Our differences are intended to complement each other, to strengthen each other.[/b] And again, those differences are not just the obvious physiological ones. They’re far more fundamental than that, and they are God-created differences. Those differences were intended to balance each other, to complement each other.

This is a silly illustration, but think of a knife and a fork. They’re both eating utensils, but they’re different. They’re intended to complement each other. Try eating with two knives, or try eating a steak with two forks. You need the knife and the fork. You need the things that are different about them. There are things that are the same about them, but you need the differences.

[b]And in the differences between men and women, God intended that we should not be independent from each other. God intended that we should not be competitors with each other, but that we should be interdependent with one another, that we should complete each other. [/b]


~[b]Complementary differences[/b]~

So the man and the woman were created to have complementary purposes—not identical, but complementary. We get a hint of this, a glimpse of it, in Genesis chapter 3, when we see the different consequences that God imposed on the man and on the woman after they sinned. Their consequences were not identical (verses 16-19).

In the different consequences you get a glimpse of how God created men and women different. To the woman, God said, “Here’s the consequence of your sin. I will multiply your pain in childbearing.” How many mothers here would say, “That’s true”? It is. God said, “I will multiply your pain in childbearing.” [b]The consequence that was meted out to the woman was given to her in her distinct, unique realm as a bearer and nurturer of life. [/b]

Now, that doesn’t mean that every woman will be blessed with physical children. I don’t have any physical children. That would be true of some of you as well. But it does mean that only women can have children. That’s something that a woman can do that a man can’t do.

I think that reality pictures something deeper—that[b] God designed the woman to have her primary realm of life as a bearer and a nurturer of life, a life-giver, giving birth to the next generation. That’s the woman’s primary field of calling and endeavor, which means that that’s where she experienced the consequences for her sin. [/b]

To the man, God said, “Cursed is the ground because of you . . . thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you . . . by the sweat of your face you shall eat bread.” [b]So where was the man affected as a consequence of his sin? He was affected in his primary sphere of responsibility, which was where? In the workplace, as a provider for his family. [/b]

Now, that doesn’t mean that men aren’t nurturing. It doesn’t mean that women don’t ever work outside the home. But it does speak to [b]the primary spheres of responsibility for the man and the woman being different. [/b]

We come to the conclusion of it all in verse 31 of Genesis 1: “God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good.” That included male and female. It included the fact that it was good that they were created in His image, that they were alike in many respects. But it also included their differences. Those differences are very good. [b]Those differences are a gift from God. They’re something to be received, to be cherished, to be protected rather than denied or rejected. [/b]


~[b]Receive and embrace the gift of womanhood[/b]~

I want to tell you as a woman—I know some of you are younger women, and you’re just starting into your journey toward womanhood. Let me say that [b]you have a choice as a woman. You can receive the gift that God has given you, or you can reject it. [/b]

You can say, “I don’t want to be a woman. I’d like to be more like a man. I envy, I covet the things that God has given distinctly to men.” You can fight it; you can resist it, but that will be a pathway to misery. It will be a pathway to what Adam and Eve experienced in their marriage and in their family, which is brokenness and hostility and conflict.

Or you can choose to embrace, to receive, to accept the gift of womanhood with its differences from manhood. And you will find that that will be a pathway to great blessing and a great means of your fulfilling the purpose for which God created you...

As we pray, let me just ask if you have ever come to the place where you have said, [b]“Lord, thank You for making me a woman. And thank You that You have made me different than men. Thank You that You have made men different than women. And, Lord, I accept and receive my womanhood as a gift from You”? [/b]

Pray with me and say, “Lord, would You glorify Yourself in and through my life? Use me as a woman, and help me by Your grace to fulfill, as a woman, Your created purpose for my life.” Lord, we pray it together in Jesus’ name, amen.

[Excerpted from [url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php?pid=9793]Revive Our Hearts Radio Program[/url]]

S
sermonindex


Roniya wrote:


That’s how this writer says that men get money out of an ATM machine. Now here’s the female procedure. And I’ll just tell you, for starters, it has 27 steps.

1.\tDrive up to the cash machine.
2.\tReverse and back up the required amount to align car window with the machine.
3.\tSet parking brake and put the window down.
4.\tFind handbag and remove all contents onto the passenger seat to locate card.
5.\tTell person on cell phone you will call them back and hang up.
6.\tAttempt to insert card into machine.
7.\tOpen car door to allow easier access to machine due to an excessive distance from the car.
8.\tInsert card.
9.\tReinsert card the right way.
10.\tDig through handbag to find diary with your pin written on the inside back page.
11.\tEnter pin.
12.\tPress cancel and re-enter correct pin.
13.\tEnter amount of cash required.
14.\tCheck makeup in rear view mirror. [I didn’t see that on the men’s list!]
15.\tRetrieve cash and receipt.
16.\tEmpty handbag again to locate wallet and place cash inside.
17.\tWrite debit amount in check register and place receipt in back of checkbook.
18.\tRecheck makeup.
19.\tDrive forward two feet.
20.\tReverse back to cash machine.
21.\tRetrieve card.
22.\tRe-empty handbag, locate cardholder and place card in the slot provided.
23.\tMouth "I’m sorry" to the irate male driver waiting behind you.
24.\tRestart stalled engine and pull off.
25.\tRedial person on cell phone.
26.\tDrive for two to three miles.
27.\tRelease parking brake.

:-D

D
destinysweet

OH! that is so funny! what a great laugh!


I mean the bit about the ATM machine,just in case you might've thought otherwise..so funny..I'm still laughing.We can be so funny..how is it that we take ourselves too seriously..I know I certainly can..it this mantle of repsonsibility I can sense sitting upon my shoulders..but if it gets too heavy...this is my first clue that I have momentarily forgotten on whose shoulders our heavenly government rests..and firmly..Jesus..whose name is Wonderful!

S
sermonindex


Psalm18 wrote:
Death Brings Life

Series: Abigail: How to Live with the Fools in Your Life

Wednesday, April 23 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: You ought to be looking, when you study biblical characters, for evidences of Christ-likeness because anything good, anything wise is an expression of Christ living His life in and through us. I think that humility, that willingness to take the place of the offender, that’s what draws us to a woman like Abigail. We’re drawn to her because we’re drawn to those qualities we see that are like Christ.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Wednesday, April 23......

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here.[/url]




How To Endure Suffering
By Nancy Leigh DeMoss

No one enjoys suffering, but suffering is a necessary, normal part of the Christian life. In fact, the Scripture says we can expect hardships and suffering to increase (2 Tim. 2:3; 3:1-4, 13), so we must be prepared.

We learn from the book of 2 Timothy that we may experience suffering as a result of our testimony, our godly living, or our stand for truth (2 Tim. 1:8; 2:8-9, 17-18; 3:6-8, 12). We may also experience suffering when we are rejected or left alone (2 Tim. 1:15; 4:9-11; 4:16), or as a natural consequence to our fleshly, worldly desires (2 Tim. 2:22).

Suffering will indeed come, but God can give us grace and power to overcome every trial and to fulfill our purpose and mission in His kingdom. In his second epistle to Timothy, the Apostle Paul shares some important truths about how we can endure suffering.

Ten Principles for Enduring Suffering

1. Don’t forget why you are suffering. Remember your purpose and Whom you serve! The Apostle Paul said he was willing to suffer for the proclamation of the Gospel, for the sake of the elect, and for the glory of God. Our suffering, big or little, can be used to bring about the same purposes.

“Remember Jesus Christ, risen from the dead . . . as preached in my gospel, for which I am suffering, bound with chains as a criminal.” (2 Tim. 2:8-9 )

“I endure everything for the sake of the elect, that they also may obtain the salvation that is in Christ Jesus with eternal glory.” (2 Tim. 2:10 )

“To him be the glory forever and ever. Amen.” (2 Tim. 4:18b)

2. Remember that you are a prisoner of Christ, not of your circumstances or other people.

“Do not be ashamed of the testimony about our Lord, nor of me his prisoner” (2 Tim. 1:8 ).


3. Keep going back to the things you know to be true from God’s Word. Don’t doubt in the dark what you have seen in the light. Remember what you received as a result of your salvation in Christ (2 Tim. 1:5). Remember your calling and the grace of God (2 Tim. 1:1, 9-12).

“Follow the pattern of the sound words that you have heard from me, in the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus.” (2 Tim. 1:13 )

4. Keep doing whatever God has called you to do. Persevere, stay the course, and be faithful, regardless of any opposition or hardship. (2 Tim. 4:1-5)

“The time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching . . . As for you, always be sober-minded, endure suffering, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry.” (2 Tim. 4:3a, 5)


5. Trust God to deal with those who oppose the truth. Don’t take matters into your own hands or become bitter and argumentative.

“Have nothing to do with foolish, ignorant controversies; you know that they breed quarrels. And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting his opponents with gentleness. God may perhaps grant them repentance leading to a knowledge of the truth and they may escape from the snare of the devil, after being captured by him to do his will.” (2 Tim. 2:23-26)


6. Remember times in the past when the Lord delivered or rescued you. Be quick to praise Him and testify to others (2 Tim. 3:11; 4:16-17).

“The Lord stood by me and strengthened me . . . So I was rescued from the lion’s mouth.” (2 Tim. 4:17)


7. Rely on the resources God has given you:

· The grace of God (2 Tim. 1:2, 9; 2:1; 4:22 ).


· The gift of God—your God-given ability to serve Him (2 Tim. 1:6-7).


· The power of God (rather than your own strength) (2 Tim. 1:8; Phil. 2:13; Eph. 6:10).


· The indwelling Holy Spirit (2 Tim. 1:14).


· The Word of God, which will keep you grounded and give you perspective (2 Tim. 2:7, 9; 3:12-17; 4:1-2).


8. Remember that you are not alone in your suffering.

You already have:

· The presence of Christ (Matt. 28:20)


· The prayers of other believers (2 Tim. 1:3)


· The “fellowship of suffering”—other believers who are facing hardships for the sake of Christ (2 Tim. 1:8; Heb. 13:3; Col. 1:24).


Cultivate these to help you endure :

· Godly helpers – Find and cultivate a group of like-minded believers whose faithfulness and prayers can inspire and strengthen you (2 Tim. 1:2, 4-5; 4:9-13, 19-21).

· Godly heroes – Read the biographies of missionaries and other faithful believers so God can cultivate faith and wisdom in your heart (Heb. 13:7).

“You, however, have followed my teaching, my conduct, my aim in life, my faith, my patience, my love, my steadfastness . . . continue in what you have learned and have firmly believed, knowing from whom you learned it.” (2 Tim. 3:10, 14)

· Godly heritage – As you learn about those who’ve gone before, you will be able to instill faith and courage in the next generation. Pass the baton to others.

“And what you have heard from me . . . entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also.” (2 Tim. 2:2)

9. No matter how difficult things are today, you can face the future with hope. Trust the truth of Scripture.

The Truth is:


· All wrongs will one day be righted (2 Tim. 3:8-9; 4:14).

· The Lord will deliver you from all evil—in His time and way (2 Tim. 4:17-18). In the meantime, counsel your heart according to the truth and promises of God (Psalm 27).

“The Lord will rescue me from every evil deed and bring me safely into his heavenly kingdom.” (2 Tim. 4:18a)

· All your suffering, efforts, labors, and faithfulness will be rewarded in “that Day” when believers stand before the Lord (2 Tim. 1:12, 18; 2:12; 4:8; Phil. 1:6, 10; 2:16; James 1:12).

“Henceforth there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will award to me on that Day, and not only to me but also to all who have loved his appearing.” (2 Tim. 4:8)

· You will give an account, so guard the “deposit” entrusted to you (2 Tim. 1:12, 14; 1 Tim. 6:20).

10. In all your suffering, remember Jesus Christ.

Remember:

His life and His suffering and sacrifice for you (2 Tim. 2:3)

His triumph over Satan, sin, and death (2 Tim. 2:8)

His power, promises, and presence (Matt. 28:18-20)

What He is doing for you in heaven (John 14:2-3; Rom. 8:34)
"Consider him who endured from sinners such hostility against himself, so that you may not grow weary or fainthearted. In your struggle against sin you have not yet resisted to the point of shedding your blood." Heb. 12:3-4

Expect suffering—it is inevitable—but don’t forget the powerful resource that you have in Christ. Entrust your life to His ever-present care and control. He loves you, and He will help you endure."

D
destinysweet

Thank you for the post..that was a very well balanced and satisfying meal!

S
sermonindex


A Biblical View of Friendships and Dating

Series: Lies Young Women Believe

"......Nancy: Bob, I have to come back to—and my burden is for the mothers and the parents—“What parents excuse in moderation,” someone has said, “their children will tend to tolerate in excess.”

I think we need to ask. We can’t just wring our hands in despair and say, “This younger generation is going to hell in a hand basket,” and “What’s wrong with them?”

We need to look in the mirror and say, “What’s wrong with us?”

I just see two things happening.

One, have we been painting a picture of Christ that makes Him the pearl of great price? We can’t create that hunger and thirst in them, but do they see in us a love for Christ that makes them realize it’s worth forsaking everything in order to have Christ?

Number two, have we been excusing in our environment, in our home, and in our world, entertainment choices, books, culture, influence, that promotes a view of sexuality that is not wholesome and holy?

I have to say I grieve....."

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]Listen to it on audio, top right of page or you can just read it here.[/url]

S
sermonindex

The Truth That Sets Us Free

By Nancy Leigh DeMoss


1. God is good (Ps. 119:68; 136:1).

2. God loves me and wants me to have His best (Rom. 8:32, 38-39).

3. I am complete and accepted in Christ (Eph. 1:6).

4. God is enough (Ps. 23:1).

5. God can be trusted (Isa. 28:16).

6. God doesn’t make any mistakes (Isa. 46:10)!

• Everything that comes into my life has been “filtered through His fingers of love.”

7. God’s grace is sufficient for me (2 Cor. 12:9).

8. The blood of Christ is sufficient to cover all my sin (1 John 1:7).

9. The cross of Christ is sufficient to conquer my sinful flesh (Rom. 6:6-7).

• I don’t have to sin (Rom. 6:14).

10. My past does not have to plague me (1 Cor. 6:9-11).

• My past failures can become stepping stones to greater victory and fruitfulness.
• If I will let Him, God will cause everything that has happened to me to work together for my good and for His glory.

11. God’s Word is sufficient to lead me, teach me, and heal me (Ps. 19:7; 107:20; 119:105).

12. Through the power of His Holy Spirit, God will enable me to do anything that He commands me to do (1 Thess. 5:24).

• There is no one that I cannot forgive (Mark 11:25).
• There is no one that I cannot love (Matt. 5:44).
• I can give thanks in all things (1 Thess. 5:18).
• I can be content (Heb. 13:5; Phil. 4:11).

13. I am responsible before God, for my behavior, responses, and choices (Ez. 18:19-22).

14. I will reap whatever I sow (Gal. 6:7-8).

15. The pathway to true joy is to relinquish control (Luke 1:38; 1 Peter 5:7; Matt.16:25):

• of my life
• of my husband
• of my children
• of my circumstances

16. The greatest freedom I can experience is found through submission to God-ordained authority (Eph. 5:23).

• The husband is the head of the wife (Eph. 5:23).
• The wife is to reverence and submit to her husband (Eph. 5:22, 33).
• “The heart of the king is in the Lord’s hand . . .” (Prov. 21:1).

17. In the will of God, there is no higher, holier calling than to be a wife and mother (Titus 2:4-5).

18. Personal holiness is more important than temporal happiness. (Eph. 5:26-27).

• Happiness is not a right.

19. God is more concerned about changing me and glorifying Himself, than about solving my problems (Rom. 8:29).

20. It is impossible to be godly, without suffering.

• Suffering is a tool in the hand of God to conform me to the image of Jesus (1 Peter 5:10).

21. My suffering will not last forever (2 Cor. 4:17-18; Ps. 30:5).

22. “It’s not about me; it’s all about Him!” (Col. 1:16-18).

“If you abide in My word, you are My disciples indeed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.” John 8:31-32

S
sermonindex

The End of the Story

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: Imagine being stranded in a foreign country after your husband and two sons have died. That’s exactly where Naomi found herself in the book of Ruth. She said, “The Almighty has afflicted me.”

Naomi realized that affliction is in some way connected to God, but she couldn't see the big picture like we can. As we read Naomi’s story, we see that her situation eventually made her even more blessed and fruitful. Ultimately, the Savior came from her family line.

Unfortunately, like Naomi, we can’t see the end of the story while we’re living in the middle. You may be living through an affliction right now at work or with a parent or with a son or daughter. Would you remember that God is right there with you in your affliction?


He allows us to go through affliction so we can be more blessed and fruitful—just like Naomi. He knows the end of the story.

S
sermonindex


Angels Encamp

“When I was little, I’d roam all over the neighborhood. But now, with my kids, they stay in the backyard. I mean, there are just too many crazy people out there today.”

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: We need to make wise choices and keep children safe, but we don’t have to live in constant fear.

Psalm 34:7 says, "The angel of the Lord encamps around those who fear Him." That word "encamp" reminds me of the story of Elisha. The Syrian army had been deployed to capture him, but he wasn’t afraid. You see, God enabled Elisha to see the spiritual reality—the hills surrounding him were filled with an angelic army.

The dangers children face today are real, just like that enemy army. But we can live in peace knowing that an invisible host of angels surrounds them. The only way evil can get to them is by God’s permission. And the best way we can protect them is to pray.

With Seeking Him, I’m Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

S
sermonindex

Poured Out

Nancy Leigh DeMoss

The people of Jeremiah’s day lived a pretty easy life. Jeremiah wrote, “They are like wine left on its dregs, not poured from one jar to another.”

In those days the process of making wine meant putting juice in a wineskin for several weeks while the bitter dregs, or sediment, settled to the bottom. Then the juice was poured into another wineskin to remove the dregs. The process was repeated again and again until all the bad-tasting impurities were gone.

Jeremiah compared the complacent people around him to wine that stayed in the skin too long.

Suffering is God’s means of pouring us from one jar to another so the dregs of self and sin can be removed and His sweet Spirit is all that remains. Would you accept the process that’s helping you become more like Christ?

S
sermonindex

No Greater Ministry

Series: Spoken Like a True Woman: A Conversation with Janet Parshall

Monday, May 5 2008


Leslie Basham: At a certain point in her life, radio host Janet Parshall had to decide whether to become a counter-cultural woman.

Janet Parshall: We would turn on the evening news, and I would hear a woman say, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle,” or, “Marriage is an illegitimate profession,” or, “Children will drain your brain.”

I have book after book, article after article, front-page magazine story after magazine story saying, “This is a wrong choice.”

I had to go to my husband and say, “I need your guidance; I need your input; I want to know what you think about this.” He looked at me and said, “Honey, I can think of no higher calling in your life than to look well to the ways of your household.”

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php


Lord, Come Down

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: Does it seem safer to ask God to look down on us or to come down to us?

In Isaiah 63 the prophet asks God to “look down from heaven.” He asks God to look at the people’s sin.

Then, in the next chapter, he changes his request: “Oh that you would rend the heavens and come down.” Isaiah is asking God to become more directly involved, to stir things up, to change the hearts of people.

It’s easy to ask God to look down: “Lord, please watch over us. Please keep us safe. Keep us in Your care.” It’s more challenging to ask God to come down: “Lord, please convict us of sin. Please interrupt our routine and show us Your plans. Help us to embrace suffering so we can be more like You.”

Lord, rend the heavens and come down.

S
sermonindex

Comfort or Character?

Series: Spoken Like a True Woman: A Conversation with Janet Parshall

Tuesday, May 6 2008


Leslie Basham: Are you weighed down by the things of this world? Here’s Janet Parshall.

Janet Parshall: In Acts we read about when the persecution breaks out in Jerusalem and all the saints scatter. I often read that and think, “Okay, if persecution came and we had to scatter”—the question I love to raise when I’m teaching is that passage is—“what would you take when you had to go?”

If you wouldn’t be ready and able and absolutely planning on traveling light, then you’ve got a problem.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss. It’s Tuesday, May 6.

It’s the “Year of the True Woman” here at Revive Our Hearts. We’ve been introducing some of the speakers who will be at the True Woman ‘08: National Women’s Conference . It’s coming October 9-11 in the Chicago area. Yesterday we met a radio talk-show host who will be speaking at that event. Now, let’s get back to that conversation between Nancy and Janet Parshall.

Janet: We do programs about motherhood, and I’ve lost count of the women who’ve said, “But I’m happier in the workplace than I am at home.” I want to linger on that point because it’s legitimate. A lot of people will say, “Well, I’m a better mother when I’m happier, and I’m happier when I’m out in the workplace than I am at home.”

We need to examine that. We need to unpack that a little bit and say:

How do you define happiness?
Why do you think that being affirmed with a paycheck and a co-worker that gives you an “atta boy” or an “atta girl” at the end of every two weeks somehow transcends what it means to be taking care of children?
Now again, you and I both understand the reality of the world. There are women right now listening and going, “Look, I don’t have that choice. I have to put my child in daycare. I have to work.”

You know what’s wonderful about that? We don’t have a religion, do we, Nancy? We have a relationship. We can go to our heavenly Father, who said in His Word, “My God shall supply all your need according to his riches in glory by Christ Jesus” (Philippians 4:19)....


Listen here: http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

S
sermonindex

The Divine Fingerprint

Series: Surrender: Facing Our Fears

Wednesday, May 7 2008


Leslie Basham: Janet Parshall says God always knows what He’s doing.

Janet Parshall: If He made us male and female, none of us are a biological mistake. If before He hung that first star He knew us by name and knows the number of hairs on our head, then our gender as we walk around in this costume known as flesh is not a mistake but a divine fingerprint. You have to start with understanding that principle because if you don’t, then what’s going to happen is Satan will absolutely fertilize that little seed of what I like to call victimology....

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php


S
sermonindex

The Pruning Shears

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: Whenever I see a gardener cut away extra growth, everything looks so barren. For a little while the plants are less attractive than they were before. But we trust that pruning will eventually make the plants fuller and more beautiful.

Jesus compares pruning with some of the problems that come into our lives. He says, “I am the vine, and my Father is the vinedresser. Every branch that bears fruit, He prunes.”

If we want to bear fruit, we need to accept God’s chastening hand in our lives. But if we try to run from our problems or resent them, we’ll end up like dry, shriveled branches.

Do you want God’s fullness and beauty to be seen in your life? Even if those plans involve some pruning shears?

----------------------------------

On Training Children:

4. I have one word more to say to parents; to mothers in particular. If, in spite of all the Apostle can say, you encourage your children by your example to "adorn" themselves "with gold, or pearls, or costly apparel," you and they must drop into the pit together. But if they do it, though you set them a better example, still it is yours, as well as their fault; for if you did not put any ornament on your little child that you would not wear yourself, (which would be utter distraction, and far more inexcusable than putting it on your own arms or head), yet you did not inure them to obey you from their infancy, and teach them the duty of it, from at least two years old. Otherwise, they would not have dared to do anything, great or small, contrary to your will. Whenever, therefore, I see the fine-dressed daughter of a plain-dressed mother, I see at once the mother is defective either in knowledge or religion. Either she is ig- norant of her own or her child's duty, or she has not practised what she knows.

~John Wesley

http://truthinheart.com/trainchild.html#N_15_

S
sermonindex

Resolved to Be Pure

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: Do you ever find yourself at the point of a decision?

“I’m not sure if this is right or not?!”

Nancy: There’s a question mark in your conscience, but you’re not exactly sure what the Bible says about it. Jonathan Edwards anticipated moments like these and wrote:

"Resolved, never to do anything of which I so much as question the lawfulness."

He’s saying, “If I have any question in my heart about whether what I'm about to do is acceptable to God and His Word, then I'll stop.”

So many of us today try and see how close we can get to sin without getting into serious trouble. Wouldn’t we be better off staying as close to purity as we can?

Paul tells us in Romans, "Whatever is not of faith is sin.” If there's doubt in your heart that God is giving you freedom to do something, then why do it?

----------------------------------------

On Training Children:

"5. I cannot dismiss this subject yet. I am pained continually at seeing religious parents suffer their children to run into the same folly of dress, as if they had no religion at all. In God's name, why do you suffer them to vary a hair's breadth from your example? "Why, they will do it?" They will! Whose fault is that? Why did not you break their will from their infancy? At least do it now; better late than never. It should have been done before they were two years old: It may be done at eight or ten, though with far more difficulty. However, do it now; and accept that difficulty as the just reward for your past neglect. Now, at least carry your point, whatever it costs. Be not mealy-mouthed; say not, like foolish Eli, "Nay, my children, it is no good report which I hear of you," instead of restraining them with a strong hand; but speak (though as calmly as possible, yet) firmly and peremptorily, "I will have it so;" and do as you say. Instill diligently into them the love of plain dress, and hatred of finery. Show them the reason of your own plainness of dress, and show it is equally reasonable for them. Bid defiance to indolence, to cowardice, to foolish fondness, and at all events carry your point; if you love their souls, make and keep them just as plain as yourselves. And I charge you, grandmothers before God, do not hinder your daughters herein. Do not dare to give the child anything which the mother denies. Never take the part of the children against their parent; never blame her before them. If you do not strengthen her authority, as you ought to do, at least do not weaken it; but if you have either sense or piety left, help her on in the work of real kindness."

~John Wesley

S
sermonindex

A Record of Faithfulness

“Through all my growing-up years, my mom kept a record for the family of things God did. Whenever He’d answer prayer, she’d write it down. And now my copy of that journal is really a treasure!”

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: That reminds me of what Moses did while the children of Israel spent forty years in the wilderness. Numbers 33 says, “At the Lord’s command Moses recorded the stages in their journey.”

I think God told Moses to keep that journal so that the Israelites would remember what they had learned. I think it was also so their children and we could learn those same lessons.

In Romans we read, “Everything that was written in the past was written to teach us so that through endurance and the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.”

How are your children and future generations going to know what God’s done in your life unless you tell them?

----------------------------------------

6. Permit me now to apply myself to you, children; particularly you that are the children of religious parents. Indeed if you have no fear of God before your eyes, I have no concern with you at present; but if you have, if you really fear God, and have a desire to please him, you desire to understand all his commandments, the fifth in particular. Did you ever understand it yet? Do you now understand what is your duty to your father and mother? Do you know, at least do you consider, that by the divine appointment their will is law to you? Have you ever considered the extent of that obedience to your parents which God requires? "Children, obey your parents in all things." No exception, but of things unlawful. Have you practised your duty in this extent? Did you ever so much as intend it?

7. Deal faithfully with your own souls. Is your conscience now clear in this matter? Do you do nothing which you know to be contrary to the will either of your father or mother? Do you never do anything (though ever so much inclined to it) which he or she forbids? Do you abstain from everything which they dislike, as far as you can in conscience? On the other hand, are you careful to do whatever a parent bids? Do you study and contrive how to please them, to make their lives as easy and pleasant as you can? Whoever you are that add this to your general care to please God in all things, blessed art thou of the Lord! "Thy days shall be long in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee."

8. But as for you who are little concerned about this matter, who do not make it a point of conscience to obey your parents in all things, but sometimes obey them, as it happens, and sometimes not; who frequently do what they forbid or disapprove, and neglect what they bid you do; suppose you awake out of sleep, that you begin to feel yourself a sinner, and begin to cry to God for mercy, is it any wonder that you find no answer, while you are under the guilt of unrepented sin? How can you expect mercy from God till you obey your parents? But suppose you have, by an uncommon miracle of mercy, tasted of the pardoning love of God, can it be expected, although you hunger and thirst after righteousness, after the perfect love of God, that you should ever attain it, ever be satisfied therewith, while you live in outward sin, in the willful transgression of a known law of God, in disobedience to your parents? Is it not rather a wonder, that he has not withdrawn his Holy Spirit from you? that he still continues to strive with you, though you continually grieve his Spirit? O grieve him no more! By the grace of God, obey them in all things from this moment! As soon as you come home, as soon as you set foot within the door, begin an entirely new course! Look upon your father and mother with new eyes; see them as representing your Father which is in heaven: Endeavour, study, rejoice to please, to help, to obey them in all things: Behave not barely as their child, but as their servant for Christ's sake. O how will you then love one another! In a manner unknown before. God will bless you to them, and them to you: All around will feel that God is with you of a truth. Many shall see it and praise God; and the fruit of it will remain when both you and they are lodged in Abraham's bosom.

~John Wesley

S
sermonindex

"I Do" Every Day

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: When a man and woman stand before a minister and join their lives together, they say some important words.

“I do.”

That marriage covenant reminds me of my relationship with Christ. There was a point where we said, “I do,” and entered into an eternal relationship with Him.

Now, a husband and wife learn to live out their vows “for better or worse” in the nitty-gritty of real life. Our commitment to Christ is no different. At the point of conversion, we surrendered our whole self, but now we have to live out that commitment in real life. It requires a new surrender of ourselves every day.

Romans 12:1 tells us: “Offer your bodies as living sacrifices, holy and pleasing to God.” You may have made an initial sacrifice to God. Are you living out that commitment through daily sacrifice of your time and your possessions to Him? What would it mean for you today to offer yourself as a “living sacrifice”?

-----------------------------------------


Part III.

ON FAMILY RELIGION

By John Wesley.


"As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." Josh. 24:15.

1. IN the foregoing verses we read that Joshua, now grown old, "gathered the tribes of Israel to Shechem, and called for the elders of Israel, for their heads, for their judges and officers; and they presented themselves before the Lord." (Josh. 15:1.) And Joshua rehearsed to them the great things which God had done for their fathers; (Josh. 15:2-13;) concluding with that strong exhortation: "Now therefore fear the Lord, and serve him in sincerity and truth; and put away the gods which your fathers served on the other side the flood, (Jordan,) and in Egypt." (Josh. 15:14.) Can anything be more astonishing than this? that even in Egypt, yea, and in the wilderness, where they were daily fed, and both day and night guided by miracle, the Israelites, in general, should worship idols, in flat defiance of the Lord their God! He proceeds: "If it seemeth evil to you to serve the Lord, choose ye this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods your fathers served on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land ye dwell: But as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord."

2. A resolution this worthy of a hoary-headed saint, who had had large experience, from his youth up, of the goodness of the Master to whom he had devoted himself, and the advantages of his service. How much is it to be wished that all who have tasted that the Lord is gracious, all whom he has brought out of the land of Egypt, out of the bondage of sin,—those especially who are united together in Christian fellowship,—would adopt this wise resolution! Then would the work of the Lord prosper in our land; then would his word run and be glorified. Then would multitudes of sinners in every place stretch out their hands unto God, until "the glory of the Lord covered the land, as the waters cover the sea."

3. On the contrary, what will the consequence be, if they do not adopt this resolution?—if family religion be neglected?—if care be not taken of the rising generation? Will not the present revival of religion in a short time die away? Will it not be as the historian speaks of the Roman state in its infancy,—res unius aetatis?—"an event that has its beginning and end within the space of one generation?" Will it not be a confirmation of that melancholy remark of Luther's, that "a revival of religion never lasts longer than one generation?" By a generation, (as he explains himself,) he means thirty years. But, blessed be God, this remark does not hold with regard to the present instance; seeing this revival, from its rise in the year 1729, has already lasted above fifty years.

4. Have we not already seen some of the unhappy consequences of good men not adopting this resolution? Is there not a generation arisen, even within this period, yea, and from pious parents, that know not the Lord? that have neither his love in their hearts, nor his fear before their eyes? How many of them already "despise their fathers, and mock at the counsel of their mothers!" How many are utter strangers to real religion, to the life and power of it! And not a few have shaken off all religion, and abandoned themselves to all manner of wickedness! Now, although this may sometimes be the case, even of children educated in a pious manner, yet this case is very rare: I have met with some, but not many, instances of it. The wickedness of the children is generally owing to the fault or neglect of their parents. For it is a general, though not universal rule, though it admits of some exceptions, "Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it."

S
sermonindex

5. But what is the purport of this resolution, "I and my house will serve the Lord?" In order to understand and practice this, let us, First, inquire, what it is to "serve the Lord." Secondly, Who are included in that expression, "my house." And, Thirdly, What can we do, that we and our house may serve the Lord.

I. We may inquire, First, what it is to "serve the Lord," not as a Jew, but as a Christian; not only with an outward service, (though some of the Jews undoubtedly went farther than this,) but with inward, with the service of the heart, "worshipping him in spirit in truth."

1. The First thing implied in this service is faith; believing in the name of the Son of God. We cannot perform an acceptable service to God, till we believe on Jesus Christ whom he hath sent. Here the spiritual worship of God begins. As soon as any had the witness in himself; as soon as he can say, "The life that I now live, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me;" he is able truly to "serve the Lord."

2. As soon as he believes, he loves God, which is another thing implied in "serving the Lord." "We love him because he first loved us;" of which faith is the evidence. The love of a pardoning God is "shed abroad in our hearts, by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us." Indeed this love may admit of a thousand degrees: But still every one, as long as he believes, may truly declare before God, "Lord, thou knowest that I love thee." Thou knowest that my desire is unto thee, and unto the remembrance of thy name."

3. And if any man truly love God, he cannot but love his brother also. Gratitude to our Creator will surely produce benevolence to our fellow-creatures. If we love Him, we cannot but love one another, as Christ loved us. We feel our souls enlarged in love toward every child of man. And toward all the children of God we put on "bowels of kindness, gentleness, longsuffering, forgiving one another," if we have a complaint against any, "even as God, for Christ's sake, hath forgiven us."

4. One thing more is implied in "serving the Lord," namely, the obeying him; the steadily walking in all his ways, the doing his will from the heart. Like those, "his servants" above, "who do his pleasure, who keep his command- ments, carefully avoid whatever he has forbidden, and zealously do whatever he has enjoined; studying always to have conscience void of offense toward God and toward man.

~John Wesley

S
sermonindex

Written into God's Script

Series: Rahab and the Thread of Redemption

Thursday, May 15 2008


Leslie Basham: When God led His people to destroy Jericho, why did He choose to save Rahab?

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: Now, God didn't somehow look down into Jericho and say, “Oh, there's a good woman. I think I'll rescue her before I judge the city.” Isn't it interesting that God chose to plant the seeds of faith and grace in the heart of a woman who was a failure, an outcast, someone low-down, someone who was not noble? She was at the low end of the social and moral scale, and God said, “That's the woman I want to save.”

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Thursday, May 15. If you've ever felt like a failure, get some hope today as we begin studying the life of an unconventional biblical hero. Here's Nancy in a series called, Rahab and the Thread of Redemption......

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

--------------------------------------

II. "I and my house will serve the Lord," will every real Christian say.

But who are included in that expression, "my house?"

This is the next point to be considered.

1. The person in your house that claims your first and nearest attention, is, undoubtedly, your wife; seeing you are to love her, even as Christ hath loved the Church, when he laid down his life for it, that he might "purify it unto himself, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing." The same end is every husband to pursue, in all his intercourse with his wife; to use every possible means that she may be freed from every spot, and may walk unblamable in love.

2. Next to your wife are your children; immortal spirits whom God hath, for a time, entrusted to your care, that you may train them up in all holiness, and fit them for the enjoyment of God in eternity. This is a glorious and important trust; seeing a soul is of more value than all the world beside. Every child, therefore, you are to watch over with the utmost care, that, when you are called to give an account of each to the Father of Spirits, you may give your accounts with joy and not with grief.

3. Your servants, of whatever kind, you are to look upon as a kind of secondary children: These, likewise, God has committed to your charge, as one that must give account. For every one under your roof that has a soul to be saved is under your care; not only intended servants, who are legally engaged to remain with you for a term of years; not only hired servants, whether they voluntarily contract for a longer of shorter time; but also those who serve you by the week of day: For these too are, in a measure, delivered into you hands. And it is not the will of your Master who is in heaven, that any of these should go out of your hands before they have received from you something more valuable than gold or silver. Yea, and you are in a degree accountable even for "the stranger that is within your gates." As you are particularly required to see that he does "no manner of work" on the Lord's day, while he is within your gates; so, by parity of reason, you are required to do all that is in your power to prevent his sinning against God in any other instance...

~John Wesley

S
sermonindex

God Is at Work
Series: Rahab and the Thread of Redemption

Friday, May 16 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: God is at work in the most corrupt settings, putting faith into the hearts of those that He has chosen. It’s a mystery how this happens. But the work of God in regeneration, in salvation, is always a mystery. It’s a mystery how it happened in my heart. It’s a mystery how it happened in your heart.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Friday, May 16.

God is everywhere. That means He’s in some places you and I might not usually visit. He’s there wooing the hearts of people in dire situations. Nancy will explain more in a series called Rahab and the Thread of Redemption....

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

-------------------------------------------

III. What can we do that all these may "serve the Lord?"

1. May we not endeavour, First, to restrain them from all outward sin; from profane swearing; from taking the name of God in vain; from doing any needless work, or taking any pastime, on the Lord's day? This labour of love you owe even to your visitants; much more to your wife, children, and servants. The former, over whom you have the least influence, you may restrain by argument or mild persuasion. If you find that, after repeated trials, they will not yield either to one or the other, it is your bounden duty to set ceremony aside, and to dismiss them from your house. Servants also, whether by the day, or for a longer space, if you cannot reclaim, either by reasoning added to your example, or by gentle or severe reproofs, though frequently repeated, you must, in anywise, dismiss from your family, though it should be ever so inconvenient.

2. I cannot find in the Bible that a husband has authority to strike his wife on any account, even suppose she struck him first, unless his life were in imminent danger. I never have known one instance yet of a wife that was mended thereby. I have heard, indeed, of some such instances; but as I did not see them, I do not believe them. It seems to me, all that can be done in this case is to be done partly by example, partly by argument of persuasion, each applied in such a manner as is dictated by Christian prudence. If evil can ever be overcome, it must be overcome by good. It cannot be overcome by evil: We cannot beat the devil with his own weapons. Therefore, if this evil cannot be overcome by good, we are called to suffer it. We are then called to say, "This is the cross which God hath chosen for me. He surely permits it for wise ends; `let him do what seemeth him good.' Whenever he sees it to be best, he will remove this cup from me." Meanwhile continue in earnest prayer, knowing that with God no word is impossible; and that he will either in due time take the temptation away, or make it a blessing to your soul....

~John Wesley

S
sermonindex

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/downloads/?id=9888:

Biblical Portrait of Womanhood

Introduction

Within my lifetime, there has been a sweeping revolution—a revolution of how women view themselves and their roles, how they view men, how they view their families, and how they function in our culture.

Whether they realize it or not, the vast majority of Christian women have bought into this “new” way of thinking. In the home, the church, and the marketplace, they have adopted the values and belief system of the world around them. The world promises freedom and fulfillment to those who embrace its philosophy. But sadly, millions of women who have done so have ended up disillusioned, wounded, and in terrible bondage.

For more than 20 years, I have listened to the heart cries of these women:

women who are exhausted from trying to juggle the demands of job and family
women who are desperately lonely
women who feel trapped in unhappy marriages
women who battle a pervasive sense of hopelessness and despair
women who live under a crushing load of guilt and failure
women who are struggling to find a sense of purpose in the midst of the “daily-ness” of life
women who have never known what it is to have whole relationships built on mutual love and commitment
women who live with crippling fears and chronic anxiety

I find that many women have given up hope that they can ever be released from their emotional and spiritual prisons. But over and over again, I have seen a light kindled in their eyes when they discover that the “abundant life” God promised truly can be a reality, regardless of their circumstances. The purpose of this booklet is to help us discover the path to that abundant life and to examine our lives in light of God’s design and plan.

Before you go any further, I feel I should warn you that what you are about to read is not politically correct. It flies in the face of what we have been taught as 21 st-century, “liberated” women. It is contrary to our natural instincts. It will never be the majority position and is likely to make some women uncomfortable.

But I can assure you that it is the only path to true joy, peace, and fulfillment as a woman. You see, God made us, He loves us, and we can only be whole when we function according to His design for our lives.

If your heart longs to be free to fulfill the purpose for which you were created, I invite you to join me in seeking to know the heart and ways of God.

I am praying that God will orchestrate a counter-revolution in our day—a quiet revolution of women who are willing to pattern their lives, not after the world, but after the Word of God. I am convinced that the influence of an army of godly women will be incalculable—in our homes, our churches, and our culture. Will you be one of those women?

Part One
Examining our walk in the light of Scripture

“It is time for women of biblical faith to reclaim our territory. We know the Designer. We have His instruction manual. If we don’t display the Divine design of His female creation, no one will. But if we do, it will be a profound testimony to a watching, needy world.” –Susan Hunt

The verses on the following pages express God’s heart for women. Together they provide a biblical portrait of a godly woman.

The questions that follow each verse are designed to help evaluate how well you are applying the Word in your daily walk. The point is not to answer a simple “yes” or “no” to each question, but rather to use the questions as a basis for personal meditation, application, and response to the Lord.

Some of these verses are directed specifically to married women. Others apply more broadly to all women. Regardless of your marital status, ask God to open your heart and to help you see areas where He wants to mold you and make you a woman after His own heart.

To get the most out of this exercise, you may want to focus on one verse each day, asking God to show you how your life measures up to that particular aspect of His design. As you work through this section, highlight three or four verses that reveal specific areas of need in your life, so you can memorize them and engraft them into your heart and life.

Why was I created as a woman?

1. “The Lord God said, ‘It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him’” (Genesis 2:18).

Have I embraced my God-created design to be a helper to the man?

Am I willing to sacrifice my own ambitions and aspirations in order to fulfill my primary role and calling as a helper to my husband?

Am I providing companionship for my husband?

Am I completing and complementing my husband , rather than competing with him?

How could I better help my husband fulfill God’s purpose for his life?

What kinds of words, actions, and attitudes on my part will help Christian men around me become all God wants them to be?

Am I promoting healthy, godly marriages in the ways I relate and respond to other women’s husbands?

Am I maintaining the kinds of boundaries in my relationships with men that promote biblical standards of purity?

2. “For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; neither was man created for woman, but woman for man” (1 Corinthians 11:8–9).

Do I recognize and accept that God created the woman to complete, complement, and
help the man?

Is my life helping and blessing the men around me in ways that promote holiness and godliness?

3. “The woman is the glory of man” (1 Corinthians 11:7).

In the way I talk to and about men, do I show their God-created worth and value?

Am I a responder (rather than an initiator) in my relationships with men?

Do I make it easy for men to fulfill their God-given calling to lead in the home, the church, and society?

Do I respond to men in ways that communicate appropriate respect and affirmation of their manhood?

Do I seek to protect and preserve God-created distinctions between men and women in the way that I conduct myself, in my dress, and in my various roles as a woman?

4. “And Adam called his wife’s name Eve; because she was the mother of all living” (Genesis 3:20, kjv ).

Do I recognize and accept my God-created calling to be a bearer and nurturer of life?

Do I consider it a high and holy calling to be a “mother,” whether of physical or spiritual children? Am I actively involved in bearing and nurturing life?

What makes a beautiful woman?

5. “Your beauty should not come from outward adornment . . . . Instead, it should be that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit” (1 Peter 3:3–4).

Do others see in me an inner radiance and beauty that are the result of a grateful, yielded, trusting spirit?

Do I focus more time and effort on cultivating inner spiritual beauty than I do on matters of external beauty?

6. “This is the way the holy women of the past who put their hope in God used to make themselves beautiful” (1 Peter 3:5).

Am I more concerned about being holy than about being happy?

Am I placing my hope and trust in God rather than in people?

7. “Charm is deceptive, and beauty is fleeting; but a woman who fears the Lord is to be praised” (Proverbs 31:30).

Am I more concerned about cultivating my relationship with the Lord than about being fashionable, stylish, or physically attractive?

Do I live in the constant, conscious recognition of the presence of God?

Do I desire to please God more than I desire the approval of others?

8. “I also want women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety” (1 Timothy 2:9).

Do I dress modestly?

Do my clothing styles encourage men to think pure thoughts, rather than stimulating them to have sensual thoughts or desires?

Do I dress in such a way as to draw attention to the heart and spirit of Jesus within me, rather than to my physical body?

9. “. . . not with braided hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes” (1 Timothy 2:9).

Do I avoid extreme or excessive fashions (hair, clothing, jewelry, make-up) that could call attention to myself or cause people to be distracted from focusing on the Lord?

Do I avoid extravagant jewelry or clothing that could flaunt my wealth or cause others to be envious?

Do my wardrobe and outward appearance portray a spirit of moderation, sobriety, purity, and reverence?

How does a woman of God conduct herself?

10. “All the city . . . doth know that thou art a virtuous woman” (Ruth 3:11, kjv ).

Do I have a reputation for being a woman of moral virtue and godly character?

Do I keep myself pure from all influences that could defile my heart, thoughts, or actions?

11. “She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness” (Proverbs 31:26, kjv ).

Do I bless my family, friends, and acquaintances by speaking words that are kind and wise?

Do I study and meditate on the Word of God so that I can know how to speak wise words?

Am I able to point people to specific Scriptures that apply to their lives and needs?

12. “Through patience a ruler can be persuaded, and a gentle tongue can break a bone” (Proverbs 25:15).

Am I willing to wait quietly for God to change the heart of an authority that I feel is wrong, rather than pushing, manipulating, or nagging?

Do I seek to influence others by means of gentle words, rather than controlling or intimidating them with harsh words?

13. “A woman should learn in quietness and full submission” (1 Timothy 2:11).

Do I have a teachable spirit?

Do I receive instruction with a meek, obedient spirit?

14. “It is better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and an angry woman” (Proverbs 21:19, kjv ).

Does my spirit make it easy for those I live or work with to be around me?

Do I frustrate others or make them want to stay away from me because of an argumentative or angry spirit?

What is God’s plan for me as a wife?

15. “The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her” (Proverbs 31:11, kjv ).

Can my husband trust me to walk with God on a consistent basis and to respond to life’s circumstances with praise, gratitude, and faith?

Can my husband trust me to be loyal and morally faithful to him?

Am I completely trustworthy in every area of my life—in my relationships with other men? in my spending habits? in the way I talk about my husband to others?

16. “She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life” (Proverbs 31:12, kjv ).

Am I committed to support my husband in every way possible and to always act in his best interests?

Does my husband know beyond the shadow of a doubt that I am committed to him for life, no matter what?

Am I committed unconditionally to bless and serve my husband?

17. “She took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it” (Genesis 3:6).

Is my life setting a godly example to my husband , children, and friends?

By my words or example, do I ever encourage others to act in a way that is contrary to the Word of God?

18. “As the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything” (Ephesians 5:24).

Do I respond to my husband’s leadership in the same way that the church is to respond to Christ as its head?

Am I submissive to my husband in my actions, as well as in my attitude?

Does my response to my husband demonstrate to the world the beauty and blessing of submission to Christ?

19. “For the husband is the head of the wife” (Ephesians 5:23).

Have I ever agreed with God that my husband is my spiritual head?

Do I allow my husband to lead me, or do I resist his leadership, making it difficult for him to fulfill his God-given responsibility?

20. “. . . and the wife see that she reverence her husband” (Ephesians 5:33, kjv ).

Does my husband feel that I reverence and respect him?

Do others know that I reverence my husband?

By my words, example, and counsel, do I encourage other women to reverence their husbands?

21. “The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to
her husband. The wife’s body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband” (1 Corinthians 7:3–4).

Do I reserve intimate communication, looks, words, and touch for my husband?

Am I giving of myself to meet my husband’s sexual needs?

22. “If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home (1 Corinthians 14:35).

Do I motivate my husband to grow spiritually by seeking his counsel, input, and direction, or am I quick to run to my pastor or another counselor for answers to my questions and problems?

Does my husband feel that I value and respect his input and counsel?

How does God want to use me in others’ lives?

23. “I exhort therefore, that . . . prayers . . . be made . . . for all that are in authority” (1 Timothy 2:1–2, kjv ).

Do I faithfully pray for the leaders that God has placed in my life (e.g., husband, parents, pastor, employer, elected officials), asking God to bless them, to meet their needs, to protect them, and to make them godly leaders?

When someone in a position of authority fails, do I pray for them, rather than criticizing or attacking them?

24. “She watches over the affairs of her household and does not eat the bread of idleness” (Proverbs 31:27).

Am I a hard worker?

Am I attentive to the needs of those around me?

Am I faithful in fulfilling practical responsibilities in my home?

25. “. . . well known for her good deeds, such as bringing up children, showing hospitality, washing the feet of the saints, helping those in trouble and devoting herself to all kinds of good deeds” (1 Timothy 5:10).

Is my life characterized by compassion, sacrifice, and acts of service?

Do I have a reputation for reaching out to minister to the needs of others?

26. “Share with God’s people who are in need. Practice hospitality” (Romans 12:13).

Am I sensitive to the needs of other believers?

Am I generous in sharing with others who are in need?

Do I open my home to minister to others?

27. “Teach the older women to be reverent in the way they live, not to be slanderers or addicted to much wine, but to teach what is good” (Titus 2:3).

Is my life a godly example to younger women?

Am I self-controlled and temperate in the way I speak and in my lifestyle?

Am I actively involved in teaching younger women how to live their lives according to the Word of God?

28. “Train the younger women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands, so that no one will malign the word of God” (Titus 2:4–5).

Are my priorities in order?

Am I adequately focused on loving and meeting the needs of my family?

Do I model a selfless, sacrificial, serving love for my husband and children?

Is my spirit self-controlled, pure, and kind?

Is my life an illustration of the “biblical portrait of womanhood”?

Part Two
Building Our Homes With Wisdom

“A community is not likely to be overthrown where woman fulfills her mission, for by the power of her noble heart over the hearts of others, she will raise it from its ruins, and restore it again to prosperity and joy.” –John Angell James, Female Piety

“The wise woman builds her house, but with her own hands the foolish one tears hers down.” Proverbs 14:1

Few women are aware of how much influence they have on their surroundings.

Regardless of our marital status or living arrangement, all of us as women have some type of “house.” That “house” may be our immediate family, our neighborhood, our workplace, our school, our church, or our nation.

Through our attitudes, our words, and our behavior, we have the power to bless and build the lives of those around us; we also have the power to tear them down and destroy them.

On the following pages, you will find a series of contrasting statements that suggest specific ways we can build up or tear down our homes. Check the statements that best describe your attitudes, words, and actions toward those that God has placed in your life.

Ask God to reveal whether you are wisely helping others by building them up, or foolishly hurting and hindering them by tearing them down.

Do not let the enemy discourage you by what you may see. Rather, as you become aware of attitudes, words, or actions that are tearing down your home, agree with God, confessing your foolishness. Then, in each of those areas, ask Him to make you a wise woman and to help you build a home that will bring great glory to Him.

Do my Attitudes “build up” or “tear down”?

I am committed to give to meet the needs of others, regardless of whether or not I get anything in return (Acts 20:35).

My willingness to meet the needs of others is determined by the love and appreciation they show to me.

I have a grateful spirit toward God and others for the blessings and benefits I have received (1 Thessalonians 5:18).

I chain people to my expectations and get hurt when those expectations are not fulfilled.

I “esteem all others better” than myself and demonstrate it by putting their needs and desires ahead of my own (Philippians 2:3, kjv ).

I often selfishly insist on having my way and seek to meet my own needs ahead of the needs of others.

I have yielded all my “rights” to God and there-fore can respond with meekness and forgiveness when others wrong me (Colossians 3:12–13).

I am easily angered when I feel my rights have been violated.

I realize that God is the “Blessed Controller of all things,” so I can respond to difficult circumstances with a spirit of meekness and trust (Romans 8:28).

I often resent and resist the circumstances that come into my life.

I trust God to work through the authorities He has placed in my life (Proverbs 21:1; 1 Peter 3:5).

I struggle with responding properly to authority because I don’t really believe that God is big enough to change the heart of “the king.”

I have a submissive spirit toward the authorities God has placed over my life. I am quick to yield and to follow direction that is given, even when it crosses my own will (Hebrews 13:17).

I have a resistant, stubborn spirit toward authority , and seek to manipulate or maintain control over my life, my circumstances, and those around me.

My life radiates joy, peace, and contentment, because I know God loves me and is in control of every detail of my life (Romans 8:37–39).

I often communicate a spirit of discontentment, bitterness, or fear regarding my circumstances.

I am quick to extend mercy and forgiveness toward those who fail (Matthew 5:7).

I keep a mental record of the offenses of others and seek for ways to get even.

I have an attitude of reverence and respect for my husband, as my spiritual head (Ephesians 5:22–23, 33).

I communicate an attitude of disrespect toward my husband.

I remain loyal to my husband, regardless of his failures or shortcomings (Proverbs 17:9; 1 Corinthians 13:7–8a).

I am openly or subtly critical of my husband when he fails.

I genuinely love other people and seek to meet their needs ahead of my own. I am more interested in the welfare of others than I am in my own (2 Corinthians 12:15; Philippians 2:4).

I really love myself more than I love others and seek to protect and defend my rights, my possessions, my time, and my reputation. I am more concerned about being happy than about making others happy.

I am easily content with whatever God provides for me (Hebrews 13:5).

I struggle with a spirit of discontent about my circumstances, my health, my physical surroundings, or my material possessions.

Do my Words “build up” or “tear down”?

I frequently express gratitude for the benefits that I have received from God and others (Colossians 3:15).

I frequently grumble about having what I don’t want or wanting what I don’t have.

I build others up with words of praise, appreciation, and admiration (Ephesians 4:29).

I often hurt others with critical, belittling words. I am quick to point out the failures of others.

I am quick to humble myself and seek forgiveness when I have wronged someone (Matthew 5:23–24).

I tend to defend or justify myself rather than admitting when I am wrong.

I am faithful in praying for God to work in others’ lives (i.e., my husband, children, friends, pastor, etc.) (Ephesians 6:18).

I spend more time talking to friends or counselors about the needs in the lives of those around me than I do in fervent, intercessory prayer on their behalf.

I seek to speak only wise words that point people to the Word and ways of God (Proverbs 31:26).

I am quick to share my own opinions about matters, rather than consciously pointing people to the Word and ways of God.

My words encourage others and minister health and life to their spirits (Proverbs 12:18).

My words tend to make others feel discouraged and defeated.

I am careful to speak words that are absolutely truthful (Ephesians 4:25).

I sometimes shade or exaggerate the truth for my personal benefit.

I am quick to hear and slow to speak (James 1:19).

I am not a good listener. I tend to dominate conversations and want others to listen to me.

When provoked, I generally respond with a gentle answer (Proverbs 15:1).

I am easily provoked and tend to respond with harsh words.

I restrain my words (Proverbs 10:19; 17:27).

I talk too much.

Do my Actions “build up” or “tear down”?

I set an example for my children and others by obeying my authorities with a right heart attitude (Titus 2:4–5).

I often disregard authority and do whatever I want to do.

I am diligent in serving and meeting the needs of others with a willing heart attitude (Galatians 5:13).

I am often lazy and reluctant or unwilling to serve others.

I am faithful in caring for the practical needs of my family and home (Proverbs 31:27).

I neglect many of the practical needs of my family and home due to lack of planning, discipline, or desire.

I take time to renew my mind with the Word of God so that I can be transformed into the likeness of Jesus (Romans 12:2).

I indulge my mind in suggestive books, magazines, television programs, or movies.

My behavior with men is discreet, chaste, and above reproach (1 Thessalonians 4:3–7).

My behavior with men is sometimes aggressive, bold, or flirtatious.

I look for opportunities to minister in practical ways to the poor and needy (Proverbs 31:20).

I am so consumed with my own needs that don’t have time to reach out to the poor.

My home is a place of ministry and encouragement to others outside my family (1 Peter 4:9).

I seldom invite others into my home.

My behavior in the presence of others is reverent, sober, and self-controlled (Titus 2:3–4).

I often seek to draw attention to myself or to gain acceptance through loud, boisterous behavior.

I am actively involved in teaching and discipling my children and/or other women in the ways of God (Titus 2:4–5).

I am not personally involved in ministering spiritually to others.

© Revive Our Hearts. Used with permission. www.ReviveOurHearts.com

S
sermonindex

When Mothers Intercede

Series: Rahab and the Thread of Redemption

Monday, May 19 2008


Leslie Basham: Nancy Leigh DeMoss says belief matters.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: What you believe about God determines whether you will make it in your battle against sin. It determines whether you will be willing to stand for God, not only when you are tempted, but when to stand for God means that you have to take risks in the culture.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss. It’s Monday, May 19. Last week Nancy began a series about the surprising way God chooses people to draw to Himself and call for His purposes. It’s called Rahab and the Thread of Redemption.

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

---------------------------------------

"3. Your children, while they are young, you may restrain from evil, not only by advice, persuasion, and reproof, but also by correction; only remembering, that this means is to be used last,—not till all other have been tried, and found to be ineffectual. And even then you should take the utmost care to avoid the very appearance of passion. Whatever is done should be done with mildness; nay, indeed, with kindness too. Otherwise your own spirit will suffer loss, and the child will reap little advantage.

4. But some will tell you, "All this is lost labour: A child need not be cor- rected at all. Instruction, persuasion, and advice, will be sufficient for any child without correction; especially if gentle reproof be added, as occasion may re- quire." I answer, There may be particular instances, wherein this method may be successful. But you must not, in anywise, lay this down as an universal rule; unless you suppose yourself wiser than Solomon, or, to speak more properly wiser than God. For it is God himself, who best knoweth his own creatures, that has told us expressly, "He that spareth the rod, hateth his son: But he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes." (Prov. 13:24.) And upon this is grounded that plain commandment, directed to all that fear God, "Chasten thy son while there is hope, and let not thy soul spare for his crying." (Prov. 19:18.)

~John Wesley

S
sermonindex

The Scarlet Thread

Series: Rahab and the Thread of Redemption

Tuesday, May 20 2008


Leslie Basham: Nancy Leigh DeMoss says the biblical character Rahab communicated something very important by taking one small action.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: Faith led her to obedience. Her faith produced the fruit of obedience, and her obedience was precise, even in something seemingly so insignificant and trivial as “hang this cord outside your window.”

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss. It’s Tuesday, May 20.

Do you ever feel like God couldn’t possibly love you? Well, stop what you’re doing then, and listen as Nancy Leigh DeMoss gives hope to everyone despite any past sins. She’s in a series called Rahab and the Thread of Redemption...

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

..............................................

5. May we not endeavour, Secondly, to instruct them? to take care that every person who is under our roof have all such knowledge as is necessary to salvation? to see that our wife, servants, and children be taught all those things which belong to their eternal peace? In order to this you should provide that not only your wife, but your servants also, may enjoy all the public means of instruction. On the Lord's day in particular, you should so forecast what is necessary to be done at home, that they may have an opportunity of attending all the ordinances of God. Yea, and you should take care that they have some time every day for reading, meditation, and prayer; and you should inquire whether they do actually employ that time in the exercises for which it is allowed. Neither should any day pass without family prayer, seriously and solemnly performed.

6. You should particularly endeavour to instruct your children, early, plainly, frequently, and patiently. Instruct them early, from the first hour that you perceive reason begins to dawn. Truth may then begin to shine upon the mind far earlier than we are apt to suppose. And whoever watches the first openings of the understanding, may, by little and little, supply fit matter for it to work upon, and may turn the eye of the son, toward good things, as well as toward bad or trifling ones. Whenever a child begins to speak, you may be assured reason begins to work. I know no cause why a parent should not just then begin to speak of the best things, the things of God. And from that time no opportunity should be lost, of instilling all truths as they are capable of receiving.

7. But the speaking to them early will not avail, unless you likewise speak to them plainly. Use such words as little children may understand, just such as they use themselves. Carefully observe the few ideas which they have already, and endeavour to graft what you say upon them. To take a little example: Bid the child look up; and ask. "What do you see there?" "The sun." "See, how bright it is! Feel how warm it shines upon you hand! Look, how it makes the grass green! But God, though you cannot see him, is above the sky, and is a great deal brighter than the sun! It is he, it is God that makes the grass and the flowers grow; that makes the trees green, and the fruit to come upon them! Think what he can do! He can do whatever he pleases. He can strike me or you dead in a moment! But he loves you; he loves to do you good. He loves to make you happy. Should not you then love him? And he will teach you how to love him."

8. While you are speaking in this, or some such manner, you should be continually lifting up your heart to God, beseeching him to open the eyes of their understanding, and to pour his light upon them. He, and he alone, can make them to differ herein from the beasts that perish. He alone can apply your words to their hearts; without which all your labour will be in vain. But whenever the Holy Ghost teaches, there is no delay in learning.

9. But if you would see the fruit of your labour, you must teach them not only early and plainly, but frequently too. It would be of little or no service to do it only once or twice a week. How often do you feed their bodies? Not less than three times a day. And is the soul of less value than the body? Will you not then feed this as often? If you find this a tiresome task, there is certainly something wrong in your own mind. You do not love them enough; or you do not love Him who is your Father and their Father. Humble yourself before him! Beg that he would give you more love; and love will make the labour light.

~John Wesley

S
sermonindex

Entirely Forgiven

Series: Rahab and the Thread of Redemption

Wednesday, May 21 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss with news about God that may seem too good to be true.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: How many sins has He freed us from? All of them. You say, “Even mine?” Yes. Even yours; even mine—the ones everyone knows about; the sins no one knows about; the things you’ve kept hidden, the things you couldn’t keep hidden. In Him we have been freed from our sins by His blood.

And He has “made us a kingdom, priests to His God and Father, to him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen” (Revelation 1:6).

Leslie Basham: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Wednesday, May 21.

Nancy’s most popular book, Lies Women Believe and the Truth That Sets Them Free, addresses this lie: God can’t forgive what I’ve done. It’s an important issue that affects a lot of women. Nancy will address it while continuing the series Rahab and the Thread of Redemption.

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php
---------------------------------------

10. But it will not avail to teach them both early, plainly, and frequently, unless you persevere therein. Never leave off, never intermit your labour of love, till you see the fruit of it. But in order to this, you will find the absolute need of being endued with power from on high; without which, I am persuaded, none ever had, or will have, patience sufficient for the work. Otherwise, the inconceivable dullness of some children, and the giddiness or perverseness of others, would induce them to give up the irksome task, and let them follow their own imagination.

11. And suppose, after you have done this, after you have taught your children from their early infancy, in the plainest manner you could, omitting no opportunity, and persevering therein, you did not presently see any fruit of your labour, you must not conclude that there will be none. Possibly the "bread" which you have "cast upon the waters" may be "found after many days." The seed which has long remained in the ground may, at length, spring up into a plentiful harvest. Especially if you do not restrain prayer before God, if you continue instant herein with all supplication. Meantime, whatever the effect of this be upon others, your reward is with the Most High.

12. Many parents, on the other hand, presently see the fruit of the seed they have sown, and have the comfort of observing that their children grow in grace in the same proportion as they grow in years. Yet they have not done all. They have still upon their hands another task, sometimes of no small difficulty. Their children are now old enough to go to school. But to what school is it advisable to send them?

13. Let it be remembered, that I do not speak to the wild, giddy, thoughtless world, but to those that fear God. I ask, then, for what end do you send your children to school? "Why, that they may be fit to live in the world." In which world do you mean,—this or the next? Perhaps you thought of this world only; and had forgot that there is a world to come; yea, and one that will last for ever! Pray take this into your account, and send them to such masters as will keep it always before their eyes. Otherwise, to send them to school (permit me to speak plainly) is little better than sending them to the devil. At all events, then, send your boys, if you have any concern for their souls, not to any of the large public schools, (for they are nurseries of all manner of wickedness,) but private school, kept by some pious man, who endeavours to instruct a small number of children in religion and learning together.

14. "But what shall I so with my girls?" By no means send them to a large boarding-school. In these seminaries too the children teach one another pride, vanity, affectation, intrigue, artifice, and, in short, everything which a Christian woman ought not to learn. Suppose a girl were well inclined, yet what would she do in a crowd of children, not one of whom has any thought of saving her soul in such company? especially as their whole conversation points another way, and turns upon things which one would wish she would never think of. I never yet knew a pious, sensible woman that had been bred at a large boarding-school, who did not aver. One might as well send a young maid to be bred in Drury-Lane.

15. "But where, then, shall I send my girls?" If you cannot breed them up yourself, (as my mother did, who bred up seven daughters to years of maturity,) send them to some mistress that truly fears God; one whose life is a pattern to her scholars, and who has only so many that she can watch over each as one that must give account to God. Forty years ago I did not know such a mistress in England; but you may now find several; you may find such a mistress, and such a school, at Highgate, at Deptford, near Bristol, in Chester, or near Leeds.

16. We may suppose your sons have now been long enough at school, and you are thinking of some business for them. Before you determine anything on this head, see that your eye be single. Is it so? Is it your view to please God herein? It is well if you take him into your account! But surely, if you live or fear God yourself, this will be your first consideration,—"In what business will your son be most likely to love and serve God? In what employment will he have the greatest advantage for laying up treasure in heaven?" I have been shocked above measure in observing how little this is attended to, even by pious parents! Even these consider only how he may get most money; not how he may get most holiness! Even these, upon this glorious motive, send him to a heathen master, and into family where there is not the very form, much less the power of religion! Upon this motive they fix him in a business which will necessarily expose him to such temptations as will leave him not a probability, if a possibility, of serving God. O savage parents! unnatural, diabolical cruelty.—if you believe there is another world.

"But what shall I do?" Set God before your eyes, and do all things with a view to please him. Then you will find a master, of whatever profession, that loves, or at least fears, God; and you will find a family wherein is the form of religion, if not the power also. Your son may nevertheless serve the devil if he will; but it is probable he will not. And do not regard, if he get less money, provided he get more holiness. It is enough, though he have less of earthly goods, if he secure the possession of heaven.

~John Wesley

S
sermonindex

An Unconventional Battle Plan
Series: Rahab and the Thread of Redemption

Thursday, May 22 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: We live in a world that has declared war on God. This fallen world is under His judgment, and one day it is going to be utterly destroyed. But 2,000 years ago, God sent Jesus to visit our sinful, fallen world, and He sought us out—even as those spies found that woman, Rahab the prostitute. He sought us out to let us know how we could escape the coming destruction.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Thursday, May 22.

Our current series, Rahab and the Thread of Redemption, has been so refreshing. If God chose the prostitute Rahab and was willing to offer her a chance for salvation, He can do the same for you.

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

-------------------------------------------

17. There is one circumstance more wherein you will have great need of the wisdom from above. Your son or you daughter is now of age to marry, and desires your advice relative to it. Now you know what the world calls a good match,—one whereby much money is gained. Undoubtedly it is so, if it be true that money always brings happiness: But I doubt it is not true; money seldom brings happiness, either in this world or the world to come. Then let no man deceive you with vain words; riches and happiness seldom dwell together. Therefore, if you are wise, you will not seek riches for your children by their marriage. See that your eye be single in this also: Aim simply at the glory of God and the real happiness of your children, both in time and eternity. It is a melancholy thing to see how Christian parents rejoice in selling their son or their daughter to a wealthy Heathen! And do you seriously call this a good match? Thou fool, by parity of reason, thou mayest call hell a good lodging, and the devil a good master. O learn a better lesson from a better Master! "Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness," both for thyself and thy children; "and all other things shall be added unto you."

18. It is undoubtedly true, that if you are steadily determined to walk in this path; to endeavour by every possible means, that you and your house may thus serve the Lord; that every member of your family may worship him, not only in form, but in spirit and in truth; you will have need to use all the grace, all the courage, all the wisdom which God has given you; for you will find such hinderances in the way, as only the mighty power of God can enable you to break through. You will have all the saints of the world to grapple with, who will think you carry things too far. You will have all the powers of darkness against you, employing both force and fraud; and, above all, the deceitfulness of your own heart; which, if you will hearken to it, will supply you with many reasons why you should be a little more conformable to the world. But as you have begun, go on in the name of the Lord, and in the power of his might! Set the smiling and the frowning world, with the prince thereof, at defiance. Follow reason and the oracles of God; not the fashions and customs of men. "Keep thyself pure." Whatever others do, let you and your house "adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour." Let you, your yoke-fellow, your children, and your servants, be all on the Lord's side; sweetly drawing together in one yoke, walking in all his commandments and ordinances, till every one of you "shall receive his own reward, according to his own labour!"

~John Wesley

S
sermonindex

Everybody Needs to Be Rescued
Series: Rahab and the Thread of Redemption

Friday, May 23 2008


Leslie Basham: Here’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: You don’t have to be a prostitute to go to hell. You can be sitting in the front row of church every Sunday and still be under the judgment and the wrath of God. What’s the qualification? If you don’t abide by everything that is written in the Book of the Law to do it. You say, “Well then, everybody’s hopeless!” You’re right. There is no hope for any human being apart from the grace of God.

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Friday, May 23. All week we’ve been looking at the amazing mercy poured out on a prostitute who came to know God. In looking at this story, we’ve addressed the lie: God couldn’t forgive my sin. But there’s a flip side to that lie just as damaging. It’s the lie: My sin isn’t so bad.

Today Nancy talks with those who think they’re a whole lot better than a prostitute. The series is called Rahab and the Thread of Redemption.

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php
----------------------------------------------

THE GREAT DUTY OF FAMILY RELIGION

By George Whitefield.


"As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." Joshua 24:15


THESE words contain the holy resolution of pious Joshua, who having in a most moving, affectionate discourse recounted to the Israelites what great things God had done for them, in the verse immediately preceding the text, comes to draw a proper inference from what he had been delivering; and acquaints them, in the most pressing terms, that since God had been so exceeding gracious unto them, they could do not less, than out of gratitude for such uncommon favors and mercies, dedicate both themselves and families to his service. "Now therefore, fear the Lord, and serve him in sincerity and truth, and put away the Gods which your fathers served on the other side of the flood." And by the same engaging motive does the prophet Samuel afterwards enforce their obedience to the commandments of God, 1 Sam. 12:24, "Only fear the Lord, and serve him in truth, with all your heart; for consider how great things he hath done for you." But then, that they might not excuse themselves (as too many might be apt to do) by his giving them a bad example, or think he was laying heavy burdens upon them, whilst he himself touched them not with one of his fingers, he tells them in the text, that whatever regard they might pay to the doctrine he had been preaching, yet he (as all ministers ought to do) was resolved to live up to and practice it himself: "Choose you therefore, whom you will serve, whether the Gods which your fathers served, or the Gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." A resolution this, worthy of Joshua, and no less becoming, no less necessary for every true son of Joshua, that is entrusted with the care and government of a family in our day: and, if it was ever seasonable for ministers to preach up, or people to put in practice family-religion, it was never more so than in the present age; since it is greatly to be feared, that out of those many households that call themselves Christians, there are but few that serve God in their respective families as they ought.

It is true indeed, visit our churches, and you may perhaps see something of the form of godliness still subsisting amongst us; but even that is scarcely to be met with in private houses. So that were the blessed angels to come, as in the patriarchal age, and observe our spiritual economy at home, would they not be tempted to say as Abraham to Abimilech, "Surely, the fear of God is not in this place?" Gen. 20:11.

How such a general neglect of family-religion first began to overspread the Christian world, is difficult to determine. As for the primitive Christians, I am positive it was not so with them: No, they had not so learned Christ, as falsely to imagine religion was to be confined solely to their assemblies for public worship; but, on the contrary, behaved with such piety and exemplary holiness in their private families, that St. Paul often styles their house a church: "Salute such a one, says he, and the church which is in his house." And, I believe, we must for ever despair of seeing a primitive spirit of piety revived in the world, till we are so happy as to see a revival of primitive family religion; and persons unanimously resolving with good old Joshua, in the words of the text, "As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." From which words, I shall beg leave to insist on these three things.


I. First, That it is the duty of every governor of a family to take care, that not only he himself, but also that those committed to his charge, "serve the Lord."
II. Secondly, I shall endeavor to show after what manner a governor and his household ought to serve the Lord. And,
III. Thirdly, I shall offer some motives, in order to excite all governors, with their respective households, to serve the Lord in the manner that shall be recommended.

S
sermonindex

Exegetical Defense of the Woman as Keeper At Home

by William Einwechter, February 9, 2004

In Titus 2:3-5 the apostle Paul charges the older women in the church to teach the younger women “to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.” The instruction for women to be “keepers at home” generally has been understood by the church as teaching that the sphere of a married woman’s work is her home. This understanding is reflected by the Puritan commentator Matthew Poole, who interpreted the phrase to mean: “housewives, not spending their time gadding abroad, but in looking to the affairs of their own families.” ([1]) The Christian woman as a housewife, looking diligently to the affairs of her family, was the standard in Puritan New England:

In seventeenth century New England no respectable person questioned that a woman’s place was in the home. By the laws of Massachusetts as by those of England a married woman could hold no property of her own. When she became a wife, she gave up everything to her husband and devoted herself exclusively to managing his household. Henceforth her duty was to “keep at home, educating her children, keeping and improving what is got by the industry of the man.”([2])

However, this view went beyond the Puritans and was the perspective of all branches of the church and a central aspect of Western Christian culture. For example, Lenski, the eminent Lutheran commentator, stated that the phrase “keepers at home” indicates domestic responsibility and that the home is the place of a married woman’s work; she is a “housekeeper” who dispenses “all good things in this domain.” ([3])

Nonetheless, in accord with the spirit of our age that looks in disdain upon the notion that the sphere of a married woman’s work is her home, many in the church have rejected the earlier consensus understanding of “keepers at home.” Instead, to be “keepers at home” is interpreted to mean that a wife and mother is “to be busy at home” (NIV), i.e., she “should not be idle or derelict in fulfilling home duties.” ([4]) In other words, “keepers at home” does not define the married woman’s calling or the sphere of her work, but is simply an admonition not to neglect her domestic duties. Therefore, a wife and mother may pursue a career outside of the home — as a lawyer, teacher, sales clerk, etc. — as long as she fulfills her responsibilities in the home.

The difference between the traditional interpretation of “keepers at home” and the modern version is considerable. While the traditional interpretation established the home as the sphere of a married woman’s work and calling, the modern understanding says that the term does nothing of the kind. While the traditional interpretation defined a married woman’s “career” as homemaking, the modern view teaches that a married woman may pursue a career outside of the home as long as she does not neglect homemaking. While the traditional interpretation calls the woman to focus her energy, time, and talents in the home in the service of her family, the modern view says that she is not so “restricted” and may go outside the home for her employment. Which is the correct understanding? It is our belief that the traditional interpretation is the correct one. We base this opinion on the meaning of the Greek word translated “keepers at home,” and on the wider Biblical teaching on the roles of the wife and mother.

The Meaning of “Keepers at Home”

The Greek word translated “keepers at home” is oikourous. This word is derived from two Greek words. The first, oikos, means a house, a dwelling, or, by metonymy, a household or family. The second, ouros, refers to a keeper, watcher or guardian, i.e., one who has the oversight and responsibility for something. Thus, the basic significance of oikourous is that of a “housekeeper,” that is, one who watches over a household and family, seeing to it that all members are cared for, and all things maintained in good order. Oikourous is used only in the New Testament in Titus 2:5; therefore, in seeking to accurately discern its meaning we must look to the Greek literature of the New Testament era. There, the word oikourous meant watching or keeping the house. It was employed in reference to a watchdog and to a rooster, but more germane to the context of Titus 2:5, oikourous also meant keeping at home, and was employed as a substantive, “housekeeper,” to indicate the mistress of the house. Furthermore, it was specifically used in praise of a good wife. Interestingly, oikourous is utilized contemptuously of a man who refused to go out to war, designating him a “stay-at-home” man. ([5]) The verbal form, oikoureo, meant to watch or keep the house. It was used of women to indicate those who were at home to watch over the affairs of a household, and of men to designate those who stayed at home to avoid military service. ([6]) Other closely related words such as 1) oikourema, meant keeping the house and staying at home, and was used to refer to women as the “stay-at-homes”; 2) oikouria, referred to women as those employed in the work of housekeeping; 3) oikourios, meant the wages or rewards for the work of keeping the house, but also designated, significantly, keeping children within the doors of the house, i.e., keeping them at home. ([7])

On the basis of this word study, it is concluded that oikourous was primarily used in the positive sense to indicate both the nature and sphere of a married woman’s work. The nature of her work is to manage the affairs of her household, and the sphere of her work is the home. It is important to note that oikourous and its cognates all included the idea of staying at home. Therefore, we believe that the “keepers at home” are those who stay at home for the purpose of managing their households. Paul’s admonition is definite: Let the older women teach the younger women to remain within the sphere of their own households so that they might properly attend to their duties of caring for their family and managing its everyday affairs.

The Biblical Roles of a Wife and Mother

The fact that “keepers at home” refers to the married woman’s responsibility to stay at home to care for her family is confirmed when the Biblical teaching on the roles of a wife and mother are considered. Her role is so vital to the well-being of her husband and children, her responsibilities in keeping the home so demanding, that it would not be possible to properly fulfill them unless she devotes herself entirely to them. She cannot do what God has called her to do unless she abides at home.

God assigns three specific roles to the wife and mother. First, she is to be the helper of her husband. “And the Lord God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him” (Gen. 2:18). Here is revealed the primary purpose of the woman in relation to her husband. The Hebrew word “help” (ezer) comes from two roots: the first meaning to rescue or save, and the second meaning to be strong. It indicates one who is able (has what it takes) to come to the aid of someone who is in need. Thus, God created the woman so that she would be able to come to the aid of the man and be his support and help. The word “meet” means corresponding to, suitable, or comparable to. The woman will be man’s counterpart equal to him mentally, spiritually, and physically. Note carefully that “meet” is a word of essence or nature, while “help” is a word of function. This means that in essence the woman is equal to man, but in function she is subordinate to the man — she is to assist and support him in his calling; or, her calling is to help enable him to be successful in his calling. As Calvin states: “Now, since God assigns the woman as a help to the man, he not only prescribes to wives the rule of their vocation, to instruct them in their duty, but he also pronounces that marriage will really prove to men the best support in life. We may therefore conclude, that the order of nature implies that the woman should be the helper of man.” [8]) Other important Scriptures indicate that the woman was made for the man to be his helper, and that his success in due measure is dependent on her love and support (1 Cor. 11:7-9; Tit. 2:4; Pr. 12:4; 18:22; 31:10-12, 23).

Second, the wife is to bear and nurture the children. The bearing and raising of children is one of the central purposes of marriage (Gen. 1:28). By God’s creative design, the woman is the primary caregiver for a child; she is called and equipped by him to nurture the life and soul of a child. She was created with the marvelous capacity of conceiving and carrying life within her. After birth, she is prepared by God to nurse the child and provide the tender love and affection the child so greatly needs. In conjunction with her duty to help her husband, the wife has the great privilege and high calling to nurture the children of the marriage. The English word “nurture” is a beautiful word to describe a mother’s role. It means to nourish both body and soul. It refers to the tasks of feeding and educating a child.

The Scripture is definite in regard to the motherly responsibilities of the woman. When Paul discusses the qualifications for those widows who will receive support from the church, he gives a list of “good works” that should be present in the report concerning her. The first good work on the list is “if she has brought up children” (1 Tim. 5:10). The Greek word translated “brought up” (tropheo) is extremely important. It means not only to raise, but also carries with it the idea of personal attendance, that of being with the child to care for and to train. Furthermore, the word “brought up” indicates that the rearing takes place in the home. The noun form of “brought up,” trophia, means “brought up in the house, reared at home.” In other words, the good work of the widow in view is that she stayed at home to raise her children! In Paul’s instructions to younger women, he admonishes them to marry and “bear children” (1 Tim. 5:14). To “bear children” means to bring them into the world, but also to nurture and train them. In another text, where Paul discusses the public ministry of the church, he says that women are not to teach but be in silence. However, he quickly points them to the place of ministry God has called them to — “childbearing” (1 Tim. 2:15). This word is a comprehensive term that comprehends all the duties of a mother — physical care, training, etc. — and could be translated as “motherhood.” Hiebert states:

“Childbearing” denotes the proper sphere in which woman finds the true fulfillment of her destiny. It speaks of the highest ideal of Christian womanhood. It brings out that which is noblest and best within her being. Paul’s thought naturally includes the training of children in a Christian home. It stands in opposition to the sphere of public teaching closed to her. ([9])

The motherly nurture of children in their physical and spiritual development is of utmost importance to the kingdom of God. The next generation of God’s servants is largely in her hands. If she is faithful in fulfilling her calling, God will highly honor her, and she shall be counted as one of the true heroes of the Faith.

Third, the wife is to manage the home. In Paul’s charge to the younger women, he exhorts them to “marry, bear children, guide the house . . .” (1 Tim. 5:14). The verb “guide” (oikodespotein) is an expressive term meaning to rule the household, to manage family affairs. It indicates that the sphere of a woman’s authority is the home (as opposed to the spheres of church and state). Furthermore, “guide” is a present infinitive indicating that managing the home is the wife’s constant occupation, her full-time job. In the Biblical description of the virtuous woman, we are told that “she looketh well to the ways of her household” (Pr. 31:27), meaning that she is a wise and diligent manager, supervising all aspects of family life. Additionally, the Scripture says that through her skill as a manager a wise woman secures the well-being of her household, while a foolish woman neglects her managerial responsibilities and her house comes to ruin (Pr. 14:1).

Thus the roles assigned to the married woman by God confirms that “keepers at home” refers to those who remain at home so that they might properly attend to their duties of caring for their family and managing its everyday affairs. When her duties are understood in all their scope and significance, it becomes clear that only by being “keepers at home” can a wife and mother fulfill her high calling from God to be a helper to her husband, a mother to her children, and a manager of her household.

What About the Virtuous Woman?

A common objection to the interpretation that to be “keepers at home” requires a married woman to confine her work, her “career,” to that of her home, is that the virtuous woman of Proverbs 31 did not so confine herself. We are told that she was a “business woman” engaged in pursuits beyond the sphere of her own household, thus justifying the claim that a wife and mother is free to pursue employment and a career outside of the home. But the picture of Proverbs 31 is that of a woman managing her own household, not of a woman leaving the home for employment elsewhere. Actually, the portrayal of the virtuous woman provides strong support for the traditional interpretation of “keepers at home.” She is a wise manager of the resources her husband commits to her care (vv. 14, 16, 24). She is a true helper to her husband enabling him to rise to prominence (v. 11, 12, 23). She cares for the needs of her children and husband, assuring that they are well fed and well clothed (v. 15, 21). She sees that all their property is put to good use (v. 16). ([10]) She even engages in “cottage industry” by using any available time and strength to make fine linen and sashes to be sold to the merchants. ([r:>11])

Conclusion

May God be pleased to restore to the church the proper understanding of “keepers at home” so that the Christian family and the Christian church might once again benefit from having the wife and mother in the home filling it with her presence, love, care, and wisdom. We often speak of the home as being the foundational unit of both church and state. We often say, “As goes the family, so goes all else.” So let us give it the priority it deserves, and return the wife to her indispensable role of helping her husband, nurturing her children, and managing her household. We know that a well-ordered home is one of life’s greatest treasures. So let us act accordingly, and return the jewel that truly makes the home a treasure. Let us obey God’s law when he commands the wife and mother to stay at home so that she can properly care for her family and manage her household. Let us give honor to “keepers at home” for to such much honor is due. Our hope for the future of the church and society rests, in large measure, with the virtuous women who are “keepers at home.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Matthew Poole, A Commentary on the Holy Bible, 3 vols. (Edinburgh, [1685] 1990), 3:803.

2. Edmund S. Morgan, The Puritan Family (New York, 1944), 42.

3. R. C. H. Lenski, The Interpretation of Paul’s Epistles to the Colossians, to the Thessalonians, to Timothy, to Titus and to Philemon (Minneapolis, 1937), 912.

4. Richard A. Taylor, “Who Are ‘Keepers at Home’?” Reflections (Spring 1982), 17.

5. Henry George Liddell and Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, 9th ed. (Oxford, 1940), 1205.

6. ibid.

7. ibid.

8. John Calvin, Commentaries on the First Book of Moses called Genesis, trans. John King (Grand Rapids, reprint ed. 1989), 129.

9. D. Edmond Hiebert, First Timothy (Chicago, 1957), 62.

10. The true sense of Proverbs 16:31 is not that she purchases real estate, but that she puts the family’s property to good use. The virtuous woman sees a field belonging to her husband that is either sitting idle or is not being used in the most profitable way. So she, literally, “takes” it (not “buys” it; see Hebrew text, and the center column reference of KJV), and sets it to good use by planting a vineyard there.

11. But she herself is not a merchant moving in the marketplace. She is a woman working out of her home under the authority of her husband (not some other man) to provide extra income for the family as she is able.

Used With Permission - Chalcedon Foundation

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/exegetical_defense_of_the_woma.aspx

S
sermonindex

The Rise and Fall and Rise of Motherhood in America

May 9, 2008

Only women can be mothers. Have we forgotten this fundamental?
Only a woman can carry in her body an eternal being which bears the very image of God. Only she is the recipient of the miracle of life. Only a woman can conceive and nurture this life using her own flesh and blood, and then deliver a living soul into the world. God has bestowed upon her alone a genuine miracle — the creation of life, and the fusing of an eternal soul with mortal flesh. This fact alone establishes the glory of motherhood.

Despite the most creative plans of humanist scientists and lawmakers to redefine the sexes, no man will ever conceive and give birth to a child. The fruitful womb is a holy gift given by God to women alone. This is one reason why the office of wife and mother is the highest calling to which a woman can aspire.

This is the reason why nations that fear the Lord esteem and protect mothers. They glory in the distinctions between men and women, and attempt to build cultures in which motherhood is honored and protected.

In his famous commentary on early American life, Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville explained:

Thus the Americans do not think that man and woman have either the duty or the right to perform the same offices, but they show an equal regard for both their respective parts; and though their lot is different, they consider both of them as beings of equal value. They do not give to the courage of woman the same form or the same direction as to that of man, but they never doubt her courage; and if they hold that man and his partner ought not always to exercise their intellect and understanding in the same manner, they at least believe the understanding of the one to be as sound as that of the other, and her intellect to be as clear. Thus, then, while they have allowed the social inferiority of woman to continue, they have done all they could to raise her morally and intellectually to the level of man; and in this respect they appear to me to have excellently understood the true principle of democratic improvement.
De Tocqueville contrasted the American understanding of women, with European sentiments:

There are people in Europe who, confounding together the different characteristics of the sexes, would make man and woman into beings not only equal but alike. They could give to both the same functions, impose on both the same duties, and grant to both the same rights; they would mix them in all things — their occupations, their pleasures, their business. It may readily be conceived that by thus attempting to make one sex equal to the other, both are degraded, and from so preposterous a medley of the works of nature nothing could ever result but weak men and disorderly women.
The War on Motherhood
America’s glory was her women. de Tocqueville believed this when he wrote:

As for myself, I do not hesitate to avow that although the women of the United States are confined within the narrow circle of domestic life, and their situation is in some respects one of extreme dependence, I have nowhere seen woman occupying a loftier position; and if I were asked, now that I am drawing to the close of this work, in which I have spoken of so many important things done by the Americans, to what the singular prosperity and growing strength of that people ought mainly to be attributed, I should reply: To the superiority of their women.
But this birthright would be exchanged during the last century for a mess of pottage. Perhaps the greatest legacy of the 20th century has been the war on motherhood and biblical patriarchy. Feminists, Marxists, and liberal theologians have made it their aim to target the institution of the family and divest it from its biblical structure and priorities. The results are androgyny, a radical decline in birthrate, abortion, fatherless families, and social confusion.

Incredibly, the biggest story of the 20th century never made headline news [i]. Somehow we missed it. It was the mass exodus of women from the home, and the consequent decline of motherhood. For the first time in recorded history of the West, more mothers left their homes than stayed in them. By leaving the home, the experience and reality of childhood, family life and femininity were fundamentally redefined, and the results have been so bad that if this one trend is not reversed, our grandchildren may live in a world where the both the true culture of Christian family life and the historic definition of marriage are the stuff of fairy tales.

Many “isms” have influenced these trends-evolutionism, feminism, statism, eugenicism, Marxism, and more. But in the end, the philosophical gap between the presuppositions of the Atheists, eugenicists, and Marxists of the early 20th century, and the presuppositions of the professing Church in the 21st century, have narrowed dramatically. The goals of the state and the goals of the mainstream church have so merged, that the biblical family with its emphasis on male headship, generational succession, and prolific motherhood are a threat to the social order of both institutions.

Less than one hundred years ago, the architects of the atheistic communist Soviet state anticipated the death of the Christian family. They explained the need for destroying the Christian family with its emphasis on motherhood, and replacing it with a vision for a “new family.” Lenin wrote:


Lenin
We must now say proudly and without any exaggeration that part from Soviet Russia, there is not a country in the world where women enjoy full equality and where women are not placed in the humiliating position felt particularly in day-to-day family life. This is one of our first and most important tasks...Housework is the most unproductive, the most barbarous and the most arduous work a woman can do. It is exceptionally petty and does not include anything that would in any way promote the development of the woman...The building of socialism will begin only when we have achieved the complete equality of women and when we undertake the new work together with women who have been emancipated from that petty stultifying, unproductive work...We are setting up model institutions, dining-rooms and nurseries, that will emancipate women from housework...These institutions that liberate women from their position as household slaves are springing up where it is in any way possible...Our task is to make politics available to every working woman.
In his 1920 International Working Women's Day Speech, Lenin emphasized:

The chief thing is to get women to take part in socially productive labor, to liberate them from 'domestic slavery,' to free them from their stupefying [idiotic] and humiliating subjugation to the eternal drudgery of the kitchen and the nursery. This struggle will be a long one, and it demands a radical reconstruction, both of social technique and of morale. But it will end in the complete triumph of Communism.
Lenin’s comrade Trotsky played a key role in communicating the Marxist vision of what he called the “new family.” Lenin and Trotsky believed in the overthrow of Christianity by destroying the biblical family. They sought to build a new state, free from historic Christian presuppositions concerning the family. This meant denigrating the biblical notion of male headship and hierarchy within the family. It meant eliminating any sense that there should be a division of labor between man and wife. This required delivering women from the burdens of childbirth and childcare. It meant adopting tools like birth control as guarantors that women could be free to remain in the workforce. Trotsky said this:


Lenin’s comrade Trotsky
Socialization of family housekeeping and public education of children are unthinkable without a marked improvement in our economics as a whole. We need more socialist economic forms. Only under such conditions can we free the family from the functions and cares that now oppress and disintegrate it. Washing must be done by a public laundry, catering by a public restaurant, sewing by a public workshop. Children must be educated by good public teachers who have a real vocation for the work. Then the bond between husband and wife would be freed from everything external and accidental, and the one would cease to absorb the life of the other. Genuine equality would at last be established...


The most disturbing part of quotes like those above is how similar they sound in sentiment and spirit to voices today from individuals who claim to be a part of the Church of Jesus Christ. Even more disturbing is how many of the anti-family social reforms are presuppositions of modern Christians in America. Presuppositions which have been fully accepted.

How America’s Conscience Was Seared Toward Motherhood
But motherhood is not easily defeated. It was here from the beginning and it has always carried the Church and civilization forward. Motherhood not only perpetuates civilization, it defines it.

At first Jamestown was a bachelor society struggling for survival. But she became a civilization when the women arrived. Plymouth, on the other hand, began as a civilization-families of faith committed to fruitfulness and multiplication for the glory of God, an impossibility without motherhood.

Motherhood is not easily defeated because God has placed reminders of its importance in the very bodies of the women He created. To defeat motherhood, the enemies of the biblical family must do more than make it a social inconvenience, they must teach women to despise themselves by viewing their own wombs as the enemy of self-fulfillment. This means minimizing the glorious gift of life which is only given to womankind. It means redefining what it means to be a woman.

But even this is not enough. To defeat motherhood the enemies of the biblical family must sear the conscience of an entire generation of women. This is done through the doctrines of social emancipation from the home, sexual liberation, birth control, and abortion — all four of which cause a woman to war against her created nature. Instead of being the blessed guardian of domesticity for society, she is taught that contentment can only be found by acting, dressing, and competing with men. Instead of being an object of respect, protection, and virtue, she sells herself cheaply, thus devaluing her womanhood. Instead of glorying in a fruitful womb she cuts off the very seed of life. Sometimes she even kills the life.

Years of playing the part of a man hardens a woman. It trains women to find identity in the corporation, not the home. It teaches them to be uncomfortable around children and large families---the mere presence of which is a reminder of the antithesis between God’s design for womankind and the norms of post-Christian societies.

But women are not the only ones with seared consciences. Men have them too. Consider that fifty years ago a man would have winced to think of female soldiers heading into combat while stay-at-home dads are left behind changing diapers. Today’s man has a seared conscience. He no longer thinks of himself as a protector of motherhood, and a defender of womankind. He comforts himself by repeating the mantras of modern feminism, and by assuring himself of how reasonable and enlightened he is — how different he is from his intolerant and oppressive fathers. But in his heart, modern man knows that he has lost something. He has lost his manhood.

To be a man, you must care about women. And you must care about them in the right way. You must care about them as creatures worthy of protection, honor, and love. This means genuinely appreciating them for their uniqueness as women. It means recognizing the preciousness of femininity over glamour, of homemaking over careerism, and of mature motherhood over perpetual youth. But when women are reduced to soldiers, sexual objects, and social competitors, it is not merely the women who lose the identity given to them by the Creator, but the men as well. This is why the attack on motherhood has produced a nation of eunuchs---socially and spiritually impotent men who have little capacity to lead, let alone love women as God intended man to love woman--as mothers, wives, sisters, and daughters.

Motherhood Will Triumph
There is an important reason why motherhood will not be defeated — The Church is her guardian. As long as she perseveres — and persevere she will — motherhood will prevail.

The Church is the ultimate vanguard of that which is most precious and most holy. She holds the oracles of God which dare to proclaim to a selfish, self-centered nation: “Children are a blessing and the fruit of the womb is His reward.” Psalm 127:3.

The Church stands at the very gates of the city, willing to receive the railing complaints of feminists, atheists, and the legions arrayed against the biblical family, and she reminds the people of God: “Let the older women teach the young to love their children, to guide the homes.” Titus 2:3-5.

It is this very love of the life of children, this passion for femininity and motherhood which may be God’s instrument of blessing on America in the days to come. As the birth rate continues to plummet, divorce rates rise, and family life in America dissipates to the point of extinction, life-loving families will not only have an important message to share, but thy will have an army of children to help them share it.

The Question:
Teacher: Susie what do you want to be when you grow up?

Susie: I want to be a doctor.

Teacher: How wonderful! And what about you Julie?

Julie: I want to be a soldier.

Teacher: How commendable! And what about you Hannah?

Hannah: When I grow up I want to be a wife and mother!

Teacher: [dead silence]...

After years of society belittling the calling of motherhood, something wonderful is happening — something wonderfully counter-cultural! In the midst of the anti-life, anti-motherhood philosophies which pervade the culture, there is a new generation of young ladies emerging whose priorities are not determined by the world’s expectations of them. They have grown up in homes where fathers shepherd them, where children are not merely welcome, but where they are deeply loved. Some of these women have been home educated, which means that many of them have grown up around babies and their mothers. They have learned to see motherhood as a joy and a high calling, because their parents see it that way.

And when asked about their future, these girls know their own minds. These are the future mothers of the Church. Young women who are not afraid to say that the goal of all of their education and training is to equip them to pursue the highest calling of womanhood, the office of wife and mother.

The Cost of Motherhood
Once a lady went to visit her friend. During the visit the children of the friend entered the room and began to play with each other. As the lady and her friend visited, the lady turned to her friend and said eagerly and yet with evidently no thought of the meaning of her words: “Oh, I’d give my life to have such children.” The mother replied with a subdued earnestness whose quiet told of the depth of experience out of which her words came: “That’s exactly what it costs.”

There is a cost of motherhood. And the price is no small sum. And if you are not willing to pay this price, no amount of encouragement about the joys of motherhood will satisfy.

But the price of motherhood is not fundamentally different from the price of being a disciple of Jesus Christ. In fact, Christian mothers see their duty as mothers flowing from their calling to Jesus Christ. And what is this cost?

Christian motherhood means dedicating your entire life in service of others. It means standing beside your husband, following him, and investing in the lives of children whom you hope will both survive you and surpass you. It means forgoing present satisfaction for eternal rewards. It means investing in the lives of others who may never fully appreciate your sacrifice or comprehend the depth of your love. And it means doing all these things, not because you will receive the praise of man — for you will not — but because God made you to be a woman and a mother, and there is great contentment in that biblical calling.

In other words, Motherhood requires vision. It requires living by faith and not by sight.

These are some of the reasons why Motherhood is both the most biblically noble and the most socially unappreciated role to which a young woman can aspire. There are many people who ask the question: Does my life matter? But a mother that fears the Lord need never ask such a question. Upon her faithful obedience hinges the future of the church and the hope of the nation.

In 1950, the great Scottish American preacher Peter Marshall stood before the United States Senate and he explained it this way:

The modern challenge to motherhood is the eternal challenge — that of being a godly woman. The very phrase sounds strange in our ears. We never hear it now. We hear about every other kind of women — beautiful women, smart women, sophisticated women, career woman, talented women, divorced women, but so seldom do we hear of a godly woman — or of a godly man either, for that matter.
I believe women come nearer fulfilling their God-given function in the home than anywhere else. It is a much nobler thing to be a good wife than to be Miss America. It is a greater achievement to establish a Christian home than it is to produce a second-rate novel filled with filth. It is a far, far better thing in the realm of morals to be old-fashioned than to be ultramodern. The world has enough women who know how to hold their cocktails, who have lost all their illusions and their faith. The world has enough women who know how to be smart.
It needs women who are willing to be simple. The world has enough women who know how to be brilliant. It needs some who will be brave. The world has enough women who are popular. It needs more who are pure. We need women, and men, too, who would rather be morally right that socially correct
As we approach America’s national Mother’s Day celebration, lets remember that we are fighting for the Lord, and it is He who prioritizes motherhood and home as the highest calling and domain of womanhood “that the word of God be not blasphemed.” Titus 2:5.

May the Lord fill our churches with faithful mothers.

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/the_rise_and_fall_and_rise_of.xml

-------------------------------------

"The Monstrous Regiment of Women" on DVD:

http://www.monstrousregiment.com/


S
sermonindex

"...And First, I am to show that it is the duty of every governor of a family to take care, that not only he himself, but also that those committed to his charge, should serve the Lord.

And this will appear, if we consider that every governor of a family ought to look upon himself as obliged to act in three capacities as a prophet, to instruct: as a priest, to pray for and with; as a king, to govern, direct, and provide for them. It is true indeed, the latter of these, their kingly office, they are not so frequently deficient in, (nay in this they are generally too solicitous) but as for the two former, their priestly and prophetic office, like Gallio, they care for no such things. But however indifferent some governors may be about it, they may be assured, that God will require a due discharge of these offices at their hands. For if, as the apostle argues, "He that does not provide for his own house," in temporal things, has denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel;" to what greater degree of apostasy must he have arrived, who takes no thought to provide for the spiritual welfare of his family!

But farther, persons are generally very liberal of their invectives against the clergy, and think they justly blame the conduct of that minister who does not take heed to and watch over the flock, of which the Holy Ghost has made him overseer: but may not every governor of a family, be in a lower degree liable to the same censure, who takes no thought for those souls that are committed too his charge? For every house is as it were a little parish, every governor (as was before observed) a priest, every family a flock; and if any of them perish through the governor's neglect, their blood will God require at their hands..."

~George Whitefield


S
sermonindex

A Letter to a Grieving Father

by Marcus Serven, November 14, 2007

John Calvin (1509-1564) is best known as a distinguished theologian and leading Protestant Reformer. However, it must be remembered that he functioned first and foremost as a pastor to the congregation of believers at Geneva for twenty-five years, and at Strasbourg for a brief interlude of three years. The learned Calvin scholar Jean-Daniel Benoit had the following to say about Calvin’s pastoral ministry:

The work of Calvin is immense and varied. Theologian, churchman, organizer of Protestantism in France, founder of the Academy of Geneva, public lecturer, Bible commentator, preacher at Saint Peter’s — Calvin was all of these. But to forget or to neglect the fact that Calvin was essentially and above all a pastor would be to misunderstand precisely that aspect of his personality which discloses the essential unity of his work, and to overlook the deep source of those waters which fecundate the entire field of his activity. In fact, theologian though he was, Calvin was even more a pastor of souls. More exactly, theology was for him the servant of piety and never a science sufficient unto itself. His thought is always directed towards life; always he descends from principles to the practical application; always his pastoral concern occurs.[1]

This consolatory letter, written by Calvin to Monsieur de Richebourg, shows the caring heart of the young minister of the gospel. Calvin was only thirty-one years old at the time he penned this letter, and he was away on an important mission to Ratisbon, Germany where he represented the city of Strasbourg at an ecclesiastical gathering. Two deceased men are mentioned in Calvin’s benevolent letter: (1) Louis, the young son of Monsieur de Richebourg; and (2) Claude Ferey, the distinguished Professor at the Academy of Strasbourg and Louis’ personal tutor. Sadly, both men were carried away by the Plague that swept through Strasbourg with deadly consequences in April, 1541. Calvin writes:

The son whom the Lord had lent you for a season, he has taken away. There is no ground, therefore, for those silly and wicked complaints of foolish men: O blind death! O horrid fate! O implacable daughters of destiny! O cruel fortune! The Lord who had lodged him here for a season, at this stage of his career has called him away. What the Lord has done, we must, at the same time, consider has not been done rashly, nor by chance, neither from having been impelled from without; but by that determinate counsel, whereby he not only foresees, decrees, and executes nothing but what is just and upright in itself, but also nothing but what is good and wholesome for us...

In what regards your son, if you bethink how difficult it is, in this most deplorable of ages, to maintain an upright course through life, you will judge him to be blessed, who, before encountering so many coming dangers which were already hovering over him, and to be encountered in his day and generation, was so early delivered from them all. He is like one who has set sail upon a stormy and tempestuous sea, and before he has been carried out into the deeps, gets in safety to the secure haven...

But what advantage, you will say, is it to me to have had a son of so much promise, since he has been torn away from me in the first flower of his youth? As if, forsooth, Christ had not merited, by his death, the supreme dominion over the living and the dead!...However brief, therefore, either in your opinion or in mine, the life of your son may have been, it ought to satisfy us that he has finished the course which the Lord had marked out for him. Moreover, we may not reckon him to have perished in the flower of his age, who had grown ripe in the sight of the Lord...Nor can you consider to have lost him, whom you will recover in the blessed resurrection in the kingdom of God...

Neither do I insist upon your laying aside all grief. Nor, in the school of Christ, do we learn any such philosophy as requires us to put off that common humanity with which God has endowed us...set bonds, temper even your most reasonable sadness; that having shed those tears which were due to nature and to fatherly affection, you by no means give way to senseless wailing...May Christ the Lord keep you and your family, and direct you all with his own Spirit, until you may arrive where Louis and Claude have gone before.[2]

Here we have an open window into the heart of John Calvin. And surprisingly, for some skeptical readers, it reveals a heart that is warm and tender towards those who suffer through the trials of life rather than one which is cold and hard. It is the heart of a true shepherd and pastor to his people. May we learn from Calvin’s compassionate example.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Jean-Daniel Benoit, “Pastoral Care of the Prophet,” from John Calvin Contemporary Prophet 450th Anniversary Volume celebrating the birth of John Calvin. Edited by Jacob T. Hoogstra (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1959), p. 51.

2. The full text of Calvin’s letter can be found in: Selected Works of John Calvin: Tracts and Letters (vol. 4). Edited by Jules Bonnet, translated by David Constable (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, reprint 1983), pp. 246-253.

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/a_letter_to_a_grieving_father.aspx

S
sermonindex

John Calvin on Women Rejoicing in Their Role as Homemakers


By John Calvin

All the chastity they [Nuns] pretend is nothing before God, in comparison of that that he hath appointed, that is to say, that albeit it seem but a vile thing, and a matter of none account, for a woman to take pains about housewifery, to make clean her children when they be arrayed, to kill fleas, and other such like, although this be a thing despised, yea and such, that many will not vouchsafe to look upon it, yet are they sacrifices which GOD accepteth & receiveth, as if they were things of great price and honourable.

Therefore let women study this lesson day and night that first of all they may play the housewives: and if women were the most negligent in the world, yet is there here matter enough to awaken them, and to correct this idleness. And how? If we take pains, we serve GOD, and not men. Again, when a man seeth his wife employ herself all the day long to do her duty, let him also consider whereunto God hath called him, that he also for his part may do his duty. For a man is not born to idleness, nor a woman.

Therefore...let women cast their eyes hither, for there is occasion enough to correct their slothfulness, when they shall see that the question is of serving God. And how? When they fall to kneading (as the proverb is) and apply themselves to good use, & flee not the subjection which God hath set them in: for this is to strive against GOD, when a man doth not follow his vocation, which is our true rule, that is to say, that that we have to do, & what God appointeth every one of us, according to the state, whereunto he is called. Therefore let women have this mark to shoot at, & say, well, although the world have no regard of me, yet must I find myself occupied here, for so God commandeth me. And thus much touching the first, how women have to take occasion to be diligent: and moreover also they have to consider, that when they do their duty and execute their office, God accepteth well of it, although men despise it.

And if men say, “What is this? A woman playeth the housewife, she spinneth on her distaff, and this is all that women can do.” As in deed there are a number of fools that when they speak of women’s distaffs, of seeing to their children, will make a scorn of it, and despise it. But what then? What saith the heavenly Judge? That he is well pleased with it, and accepteth of it, and putteth it in his reckoning. So then let women learn to rejoice when they do their duty, and though the world despise it, let this comfort sweeten all respect they might have that way, and say, “God seeth me here, and his Angels, who are sufficient witnesses of my doings, although the world do not allow of them.”


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As recorded in A Sermon of Master John Caluine, vpon the first Epistle of Paul, to Timothie, published for the benefite and edifying of the Churche of God (London: G. Bishop and T. Woodcoke, 1579), excerpted from Calvin’s sermon on 1 Timothy 2:13-15.

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/john_calvin_on_woman_rejoicing.aspx

S
sermonindex

Living in Sodom: A Case Study, Part I

The Protection of Daughters
by Scott Brown, April 29, 2005

As we survey the Scriptures, we find that the protection of daughters reached a low point in Lot’s household in Sodom. There are times in history that are better or worse for daughters, and this slice of history was one of the low watermarks.[1] The account of Lot and his daughters is found in Genesis 19:4-11:

Now before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both old and young, all the people from every quarter, surrounded the house. And they called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may know them carnally.” So Lot went out to them through the doorway, shut the door behind him, and said, “Please, my brethren, do not do so wickedly! See now, I have two daughters who have not known a man; please, let me bring them out to you, and you may do to them as you wish; only do nothing to these men, since this is the reason they have come under the shadow of my roof.” And they said, “Stand back!” Then they said, “This one came in to stay here, and he keeps acting as a judge; now we will deal worse with you than with them.” So they pressed hard against the man Lot, and came near to break down the door. But the men reached out their hands and pulled Lot into the house with them, and shut the door. And they struck the men who were at the doorway of the house with blindness, both small and great, so that they became weary trying to find the door.

This story illustrates Lot’s devastating syncretism in Sodom. On display is his failure to protect his daughters. While the protection of Lot’s daughters is only one of many themes in the narrative, what is described here gives us a vivid and startling example of what lack of protection by a father looks like and helps us to understand how a father, through poor choices, can abdicate his responsibility bit by bit, resulting in grave peril to his daughters.

Lot’s action in offering his daughters to the immoral men of Sodom is an outrage. Our natural gut response is, “How could he treat his daughters this way?”

Yet we often are so repulsed by what Lot did that we miss the point. The core of the problem was a sinful incursion in Lot’s life that expressed itself in a lack of protection toward his daughters.

We must not be so quick to distance ourselves from Lot and denounce him, as we ourselves are not exempt from the lessons his example offers. We must examine the text and attempt to carefully discern what was really happening to Lot and his family and seek to learn from it.

Interpreting the Story
Genesis 19 requires some careful investigation of the various places and personalities that are included in the story. If we breeze over the narrative, we might be tempted to be filled with righteous indignation toward Lot.

A cursory treatment of the passage might cause us to think that the focus of the text centers around the evils of homosexuality. If we are not homosexuals, our tendency is to distance ourselves from what took place with Lot in Sodom, thus missing clear lessons that we can learn from Lot’s errant example.

Because of the horrible things that happened to Lot and his family in Sodom, we are tempted to look at Lot and say, “That’s not me, I am in a different category.” Considering our own lives we would rather dismiss the story and think that it applies to someone else.

When we examine the broader record of Scripture regarding Lot’s life, however, it becomes apparent that there is something more that Moses wanted us to understand through the Genesis account.

II Peter 2:4-10 gives us one of the interpretive keys to the passage. In his letter, Peter is speaking of the judgment against unrighteousness and how that God through His indignation will deliver Satan and his hosts into chains of darkness. Looking to the past, he writes of how he did not spare the ancient world in Noah’s day, though Noah was a preacher of righteousness. Then, he writes about Lot in the same way:

For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment; turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes, condemned them to destruction, making them an example to those who afterward who live ungodly; and delivered righteous Lot, who was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked. For that righteous man, dwelling among them, tormented his righteous soul from day to day by seeing and hearing their lawless deeds-then the Lord knows how to deliver the godly out of temptations and to reserve the unjust under punishment for the day of judgment, and especially those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness and despise authority... (II Peter 2:4-10)

Peter Gives us a Spiritual Profile of Lot
Those who embrace a narrow view of Lot may be surprised at the positive terms that Peter uses to describe him: “Righteous”, “Oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked”, “Tormented his righteous soul day by day.”

Peter makes at least three things clear. First, Lot was not reveling in excesses of Sodom. Second, he was outraged by the evil conduct of his fellow citizens. Third, he was deeply conflicted by what he observed around him.

We are not so different than Lot. We see the trends of culture, and we are absolutely outraged. We cast judgment on the sins that are running amok in our land. We are alarmed by the cultural indicators. Like Lot, we see what is going on around us, and we are distressed by it, but there is no way we can completely disengage from the evil influences of our culture. They are inextricably a part of us.

Lot was a righteous man, and his righteousness was by faith alone. In this sense, he is a spiritual son of Abraham. He believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness. He was not saved by his own works, but from the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ. Knowing that Lot offered his daughters to the man of Sodom, it is shocking to say that Lot was a righteous man, but this is what God’s Word teaches.

Lot was standing in judgment of the culture in Sodom. In verse 9, we see the men of Sodom say to him, “This one keeps acting like a judge.” Lot’s righteous soul was vexed by what he observed in the city. And because he was not going along with everything in Sodom, he was chided for being judgmental.

So, why did Lot offer his daughters?

First, he was pressured by the surrounding situation. Lot was being threatened by the people of the city — and not just by a few people in the city, but by his entire constituency. People from all age groups and all locations of Sodom were demanding carnal relations with the visitors in his household.

We must understand (and sympathize) with Lot for the fierce external pressure upon him to fit in to the desires of the people around him. How often do we do the exact same thing? Have you ever felt pressured by your constituency to compromise? Have you ever made a wrong decision under the pressing fear of man?

John Calvin comments that “Lot was prepared to expose his own daughters to dishonour, in order to save his guests.”[2] Kent Hughes notes, “Lot placed the sanctity of hospitality above the sanctity of his family.”[3] Someone once said that he preferred some other social grace than the protection of his daughters. Lot did not want to rock the boat with the men of Sodom with whom he desired to coexist. He did not want to appear too odd.

Second, it must have seemed “normal” enough for to him to offer his daughters. Among the alternatives, it seemed reasonable to Lot to present an alternative to the men that they could accept. But how could this have seemed normal? Here, we find further evidence of his incremental moral slippage under the influence of Sodom. Looking back in the narrative, we find him first pitching his tent toward Sodom. Later, we find him living in Sodom. Finally, he is a civil magistrate possessing the favor that position implies. Now he has something to protect — his position.

People do not become base in a moment, but after many moments over many years — after many compromises. No one just “falls” into wrong thinking. It takes time and external pressures to dull our sensibilities.

What exactly did Lot do? He did at least three things. First, he opened the door to his daughter’s vulnerability. Second, by opening the door to their vulnerability, he was actually promoting it. Third, he withdrew his protection.

It is painfully obvious that Lot did not protect his daughters. He did what is unthinkable to our sensibilities, but his behavior reminds us that there are times in history when the social pressures cause fathers to disconnect with their daughters.

Lot lived in a culture where there was ferocious pressure to withdraw protection from his daughters. And, he lived in a culture where it was normal enough — it was “thinkable” to offer his daughters to the men of Sodom.

For we who are living in “Sodom,” this should cause us to ask ourselves several questions: “What pressures are there in our culture that would cause us to withdraw protection from our daughters and leave them vulnerable? Or, “What are the normal things we do in our culture that add up to withdrawing our protection?” Or, “Am I as vigilant as I should be in protecting my daughter?”

Rather than condemn Lot, we must examine our own hearts and learn from his example. Protecting our daughters from evil is too important for us to do otherwise.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Another low point of protection for daughters found in Scripture is that of Jacob and Dinah. In Genesis 34, we learn the Jacob permitted Dinah to go “out to see the daughters of the land” (Genesis 34:1), resulting in her rape.

2. John Calvin, Calvin’s Commentaries (Banner of Truth Trust), p. 498.

3. R. Kent Hughes, Genesis: Beginning and Blessing (Crossway Books), p. 272.

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/living_in_sodom_a_case_study_p.aspx

S
sermonindex

Return of the Daughters
Posted June 5, 2007, by Elizabeth


We are pleased to announce our latest project, a documentary about the growing number of young women resolving to stay at home until marriage. Released worldwide earlier this year, “Return of the Daughters” explores the vision of these young ladies and celebrates the glories of the biblical family.

Video Clip:
http://visionarydaughters.com/return-of-the-daughters/

S
sermonindex

I had devotions with my kids tonight on Danial and the Lions Den with 'school' being the lions den. Than we had our discussion and prayer time together. We had some really powerful prayer.

If you have any suggestions or ideas please feel free to post some of them here. :-)

S
sermonindex

Living in Sodom: A Case Study, Part II

Behavior Patterns of Fathers who Withdraw Protection from Daughters
by Scott Brown, May 6, 2005

Lot is an example of a father who did not protect his daughters. His lifestyle in Sodom worked to open the door to their vulnerability. He gives us some insight into behavior patterns that make their daughters vulnerable. The results of his syncretism were horrible. When Lot did what was socially acceptable in Sodom, it bought him a defiled family and a broken lineage.

Even though he was vexed by the lifestyles in Sodom and was criticized for his conservatism, Lot fit in enough to stay there. He maintained a level of social acceptability that insured he would be a player in the town. At the same time, he so disconnected with his daughters that he made them vulnerable to the ungodly influences of Sodom. Lot is an extreme example of a common trait in families—unprotected daughters.

Historical Perspective
Lot did what is unthinkable to our ears, but his behavior reminds us that there are times in history when fathers disconnect with their daughters. When we look at history, we see a spectrum of behavior regarding daughters. Some periods are worse than others. Lot’s was despicable, but there is a gradation of behavior that expresses the same root problem. While Lot may be on the far end of the scale in the daughter-protection department, we ought not think we are exempt from the root sin that resulted in his abdication. While his actions were extreme, there are many other ways that fathers tend to disconnect protection of their daughters.

Protection of Daughters in Nineteenth Century America
The idea of an unprotected woman was virtually unknown 150 years ago. In nineteenth century Occidental culture, women simply did not travel alone because there was a cultural assumption that women needed protection. If women were traveling over land or sea, they were sure to have a male escort to see them safely to their destination.

We have no consciousness of this concept in our current day. If you travel by sea or land or by air, you will often see hundreds or even thousands of what would be previously regarded as “unprotected” women on the move. One hundred and fifty years ago, it was unthinkable, but today is the norm. This change it is important to note because it demonstrates that there are forces at work in every culture that either work to provide or withdraw the protection of women. In our current culture, we have many socially acceptable norms that promote the withdrawal of protection from daughters.

How do you think that those from the culture of the nineteenth century would judge us if they came in a time capsule and saw unprotected daughters traveling to the ends of the earth—women in co-ed dorms, women living independently in colleges across the nation, and women brandishing automatic weapons in combat situations.

I believe they would be dumbfounded at what we regard as normal.

Protecting My Own Daughter
In 2003, I took my daughter with me on a mission trip to Romania. On the plane, there was a drunken man flirting with her in a very aggressive way. Unfortunately for him, there were 535 pounds of manhood in our party ready to protect her. Believe me, we were exercising much Christian patience with this man who persisted throughout the entire flight. He did not realize that he was facing deadly force, if he persisted. He actually touched her once and was making bold advances. He even continued the pursuit after the plane landed. I am convinced that, if we had not been with her to protect her, she would have been in serious danger

Where do we get the idea of protection from the Bible? We could make a long list, but here is a short one. Godly behavior is defined by shepherds who protect their flocks. The strong should support the weak. Women are the weaker vessels. And daughters should be protected by their fathers who are commanded to give 24/7 watch care over their children (Deuteronomy 6:1-9). This is enough for me to be convinced that women should be protected by men.

A Wake-up Call for Fathers
This example of Lot should be a wake-up call that prompts us to ask, “What are the socially acceptable ways that we disconnect our protection and expose our daughters to destructive influences of the world?”

Following are caricatured profiles of the kinds of things that fathers do that cause their daughters to be unprotected.

The Narcissistic Father. This is the father who is the quintessential couch potato. He only spends time on things that interest him. He has no energy for anyone else. His philosophy is “Live and Let Live.” He has no plan, no agenda. He is a relativist, except when it comes to his own comforts. His philosophy is, “You have your life and I have mine —do your own thing.”

His daughter is completely on her own.

She is an unprotected daughter.

The Nice-Guy Father. This father has a favorable disposition toward his daughter, and he is upstanding in every way. He takes her out to lunch regularly and attends her recitals and sports events. But he is so “nice” that he takes the path of least resistance. He does not engage in the difficulties involved in helping her to think about her life in a deep way.

This father accepts life as it is. For instance, he does not help his daughter have a deep understanding of the purpose of her life, beyond the things that are already swimming in her head. If you ask her what she is doing with her life, she gives answers that you hear from any other worldling. She speaks of her education or her hobbies or her career track, but you do not hear a biblical vision for womanhood. This should be a warning for all nice-guy fathers.

She is an unprotected daughter.

The Supportive Father. This father nearly idolizes his daughter’s feelings about life. He helps her to be all that she wants to be, even if it means an individualistic focus on her own inclinations. He interprets the popular song lyrics, “Fathers be good to your daughters,” to mean, “smooth the way for her own desires.” She is encouraged to focus on her individual passion instead of calibrating herself with the external call of God upon her life. She enjoys her own categories and is not energized by the biblical ones. She likes to elevate her own “take” on life over what she reads in her Bible. Instead of discipleship, she is focused on her own styled vision, calling and gifts.

Instead of carefully giving their daughters away in marriage, these fathers let them loose to find it on their own apart from their direction and counsel... because they are “supportive.”

She is an unprotected daughter.

The Feminist Father. This evangelical, church-attending father does not really understand the teaching of God’s Word regarding biblical manhood and womanhood. He gets his roadmap from the evening news, the men around him, and from the feminist ideology that propels the corporation he works for. Everyday he is so surrounded by unprotected women in the workplace that he is de sensitized to the subject. The result is that his daughter has not been protected from the bankrupt values that feminism has dished up to her by her loved ones. She has eaten at the table of feminist philosophy, right along with her father, and neither of them understand what the Bible says about a woman’s calling and role. Consequently, all her visions are disconnected from that role, and her father is not there with the voice of loving authority about how things really were meant to be.

She prefers something different, and something not so unpopular as the biblical vision. Why? Because she does not like the biblical vision. And why does she not like the biblical vision? Because she goes to church with her father who lives a shallow Christianity, attending a church governed by feminist ideology. They call themselves Bible-believing Christians, but in reality they live exactly like egalitarians, ignoring the specific commands and regulations found in Scripture.

She is an unprotected daughter.

The Harboring Father. He is extremely restrictive and does not accurately communicate the biblical vision. He may demand something like the biblical vision, but she never sees the joys and the freedoms that it holds. He is big on demands and small on life. He has rules, but not much love. He has structure and conviction, but not much joy. He only has a message of restriction, and life is no fun at all. Joyless Christianity reigns in his home. Affectionless Christianity rules the roost. Often you will find that this kind of father has laid out the game plan, but he has not explained why it is important. This father is over-protective, and his household looks more like a detention center than the green pastures and still waters that good shepherds provide.

A father can withdraw protection from his daughter, even when she is living in his own home. The harboring father actually exposes his daughter’s heart to harm, because of his lack of positive vision for her future.

She is an unprotected daughter.

The Core of the Problem
At the core of these caricatures is male passivity. It is perhaps the most dangerous quality of manhood.

Most daughters do not understand the biblical vision because fathers have not known what it is, because when they should be studying and preparing to deliver the messages, they are out playing golf or engaged in some kind of entertainment. They just do not know what to say to their daughters, because they have nothing to say. They have nothing to say, because they have not filled their minds with scriptural thoughts regarding their daughters.

And, whatever they do have to say, they do not communicate it in enough detail and over a long enough time for her to understand it. How long is enough? Communication of the biblical vision to a daughter needs to be from birth and continue every day of her life thereafter.

A father should be calling her to a rich life as a helpmeet (Genesis 2:18), a keeper at home (Titus 2:4), a trainer of the next generation (Ephesians 6:4), a demonstration of unfading beauty (I Peter 3:4), and a domestic entrepreneur (Proverbs 31). My view is that every daughter needs to have these passages of scripture memorized, so that she is equipped to detect influences which would divert her from her creation-order calling.

Without a careful delivery of “thus saith the Lord,” a daughter is unprotected and is denied the glorious hope of her calling as a woman in Christ.

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/living_in_sodom_a_case_study_p_1.aspx

S
sermonindex

Living in Sodom: A Case Study, Part III

When Daughters Lose Hope
by Scott Brown, May 13, 2005

Even though the feminist agenda cheerily shouts, “You can have it all,” and “You’ve come a long way, baby,” daughters have a natural bent toward hopelessness. Everywhere they turn, they are confronted with their inadequacy. Whether the role model is Barbie or Brittany or Hillary, daughters can easily fall prey to comparisons that would lead them astray—to desires that would undo them.

In Genesis 19, we find the story of what happened when Lot’s daughters lost hope. In her perceived hopeless estate, Lot’s eldest daughter explained to her younger sister the dilemma they find themselves in, as she saw it, “Now the firstborn said to the younger, ‘Our father is old, and there is no man on the earth to come in to us as is the custom of all the earth’” (Genesis 19:31).

Lot’s eldest daughter grew panicked by lack of hope. She saw no human means for the fulfillment of her longings as a woman.

Her perspective brings us face to face with two very important realities. First, the inclinations of the firstborn have a big impact on those siblings who follow them. In this case, the oldest daughter could have led in better directions. My firstborn daughter, Kelly, is one who has led the way for all siblings and cousins coming up behind her. Many times I have prayed thanks to God for this. What a blessing it is to have the firstborn with a heart toward God!

If you are firstborn, you have a unique place in your family as a pacesetter. Much hinges upon your behavior. Your younger siblings are watching your example. You eldest daughters: guard your hearts, for it is the wellspring of life—both for you and for many other lives as well.

Second, Lot’s daughter was filled with fear. She was afraid for the future of her heritage, and she acted upon those fears. This is the same fear that grips the hearts of every daughter in every age. She fears that somehow she will be left out of marriage and family. Every young woman I have ever known at some point comes to struggle with this boogeyman. It goes like this: “No one will ever love me”; “there are zero men around that I could want to marry”; “I am not attractive enough to attract a good man”; “the pool of men that I would be interested in is too small....”

This brings us to an important point that fathers need to monitor. A father needs to understand what is going on in the heart of his daughter regarding four of her great enemies: fear, loneliness, self-pity, and purposelessness. He should always have his antennae up for these destructive vices.

One area that a father should be tuned into is the music his daughter listens to. He should understand the tunes and lyrics of her favorite songs. Why? The vast majority of the popular songs of the day are filled with messages and chord progressions that will tend to plunge her deeper into a type of introspection that nourishes her fears. When a young woman begins to be led by these forces, nothing good will come of it. If a daughter’s virtue in bring compromised due to bad musical influences, a father must step in and take action.

Hopelessness in a young woman is a powder keg. Fathers, are your daughters lonely and insecure about the future? Then come to their aid and refresh them with the salvation of God. Help them to trust God and not to lean on their own understanding.

We don’t know exactly why Lot’s daughters had such a dim outlook. They were likely normal girls with normal temptations. What we do know is that when they looked out into the future, they could not see how God would bring them husbands, so they compromised.

If you are a daughter whose outlook toward the future looks dim, and you are tempted to jump ahead of God, then slow down; be patient. God will provide.

Another point to consider regarding the fear of Lot’s daughter’s is this: their uncle Abraham lived only a short distance away from them, and he was a godly man with a large extended household. Abraham would likely have had many young men under his oversight who could have made potential spouses for Lot’s daughters. Given their close proximity to Abraham, why then would Lot’s daughters say that “there is no man on the earth” who could be their husband? Why were they so afraid? The text does not reveal the answer.

What is revealed is this: Lot’s daughters panicked and sought a pragmatic alternative. Genesis 19:32-35 explains the perverted course they took to “solve” their problem:

Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve the lineage of our father.” So they made their father drink wine that night. And the firstborn went in and lay with her father, and he did not know when she lay down or when she arose. It happened on the next day that the firstborn said to the younger, “Indeed I lay with my father last night; let us make him drink wine tonight also, and you go in and lie with him, that we may preserve the lineage of our father.” Then they made their father drink wine that night also. And the younger arose and lay with him, and he did not know when she lay down or when she arose.

In the above narrative, we can observe at least two ways in which the protection of Lot’s daughters broke down.

First, you can see the breakdown of Lot’s protection in the character of his daughters. Lot’s daughters’ character qualities are revealed in striking fashion. They placed their trust in human means, and they did whatever they had to do to bring about the result they were after. In this case, they get their father drunk to suit their ends. These daughters were manipulative—children of Sodom and Gomorrah. Here is what Ray Stedman says about what they had become under their father’s roof:

These two girls were virgins in body, but they were already debauched in mind. They had long since grown accustomed to obscenity and unrestrained luridness, so, up in the cave on the mountainside, they seized the thinnest tissue of excuses and the story ends in a foul orgy of drunkenness and incest. Lot had nothing but heartbreak and grief to show for the years in Sodom. The Lord said, “For whoever would save his life will lose it,” (Matt 16:25a {RSV}). So Lot, trying to get the best out of both worlds, lost all and has become for all time the picture of the Christian who is saved, “but only as through fire,” (1 Cor 3:15b {RSV}). He has nothing but wasted years to look back on and eternity ahead.

Lot’s daughters possessed the same qualities of their father Lot. They were “their father’s daughters.” Not surprisingly, they did with their father the same thing that he proposed they do with the men of Sodom. They had become like their father. Their thinking process was just like his.

A father needs to be very discerning. He needs to be constantly asking, “Are my daughters becoming children of Sodom (Hollywood) or children of God? Are my daughters filled with hope? Do they have faith that God will see them through every difficulty and confusing trial that they encounter?

Our daughters need two things to hedge their vulnerability from these gripping fears of the heart. First, they need to have a father who will debunk the destructive ways of the world and show them how to avoid them. This is what Lot did not do. Instead of debunking the wrong notions about womanhood foisted on his daughters by the children of Sodom, Lot let them be.

Second, our daughters need to have a clear vision of Christ, and they need to be encouraged to become like Him. In Hebrews 1:9, we learn that Jesus Christ, when considered among his band of disciples, was the happiest of them all. And why was He so happy? The writer of Hebrews gives the answer: “Thou hast loved righteousness and hated lawlessness. Therefore, God, Thy God has anointed you with the oil of gladness above your companions.”

Fathers must extol the righteous life of the Lord Jesus Christ in their daily lives if their daughters are to have faith-filled hearts. Fathers need to love righteousness —the very best things—and to be dissatisfied with the world’s bankrupt solutions. This is the key to a daughter’s heart.

Pray that our daughters will have the character of the Lord Jesus Christ so that when they are in times of trouble, they will cry out to God for their answers instead of looking into their own hearts, into the lives of their peers, or into the popular songs of the day.

Second, you can see the breakdown of protection in the leadership of Lot as a father. It is easy to say that Lot is a terrible example as a father. Here is a father who has not lovingly or effectively trained his daughters. God has given Lot to us as an example of what NOT to do. Lot consented to the disobedient behavior of his daughters. He got drunk, and don’t believe for a minute that he was a victim.

Notice that what has happened in so many homes in our day happened in Lot’s home nearly four thousand years ago. Alcohol made the unthinkable actually plausible. This story should give us pause to carefully consider the presence of alcohol in our homes. I am not making a biblical case for total abstinence of alcohol (because Scripture does not do so), but I would like to note that we have two cases of alcohol in the home in the first nineteen chapters of Genesis, and neither one is positive. There are two incidences: Noah’s drunkenness and Lot’s drunkenness. These accounts should not escape our careful attention. The testimony of Noah and Lot should cause us to be cautious, should we choose to have alcohol in our homes.

In Conclusion
Fathers, you must take active steps to guard your daughters from harm. Here are some practical ways you can protect them:

Position them for a hope-filled life by filling their minds with the sufficiency found in God’s Word. In this way you will fortify them by your good deposit of clear teaching.
Instruct them on the destructive influences around them by exposing the harmful messages propounded by their peers and carried by many of the popular songs of our day.
Draw near to them by taking the time to listen to your daughters and responding to their concerns. Be available for them.
Give them clear and firm direction, even when it grates against their inclinations. Let them know that all of their feminine desires are not helpful, and that if they simply follow their hearts, they will lose the essence of what they are longing for.
Oh, fathers, take responsibility for protecting your daughters. Cry out to the Lord for them. How easy it is for them to lose heart. Everything the devil has for them is designed to kill, steal, and destroy their hope. Become a fountain of life for them. Create for them green pastures and pure waters. Expose the wolf. Silence the liar. Protect your precious lambs.

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/living_in_sodom_a_case_study_p_2.aspx

S
sermonindex

The Feminization of the Family
by William Einwechter, December 8, 2005

Feminism is a radical movement. As such, it goes to the very root of the relationship between men and women and seeks to alter the societal and institutional structures that are perceived to be in conflict with the ideas and goals of feminism. Janet Richards declares that “Feminism is in its nature radical . . . . It is the social institutions of which we complain primarily . . . . If you consider the past there is no doubt at all that the whole structure of society was designed to keep women entirely in the power of men.”[1] As a radical ideology, feminism’s goal is revolution. Gloria Steinem speaks for feminists when she says: “We’re talking about a revolution, not just reform. It’s the deepest possible change there is.”[2] Feminists want to create a “new society” where the restrictive social conditions of the past have been forever removed.[3] How successful have feminists been in promoting their agenda of social revolution? Davidson says: “Today, feminism is the gender ideology of our society. From the universities to the public schools to the media to the military, feminism decides the issues, sets the terms of debate, and intimidates potential opponents into abashed silence.”[4]

The social institution that feminists have targeted as one of the most repressive to women is the traditional family. By “traditional family” we mean the family structure that developed in Western society under the direct influence of Christianity and the Bible. In the traditional family, the man is the head of the home and the one responsible for providing those things necessary for the sustenance of life. The woman is a “keeper at home,” and the one primarily responsible for the care of the children. The traditional family thus defined is in line with the biblical plan for the home. Feminists hate the family that is patterned after the Word of God because it is contrary to all that they accept as true. Thus, their goal is the total destruction of the traditional family. Feminist Roxanne Dunbar said it plainly: “Ultimately, we want to destroy the three pillars of class and caste [i.e., sexist] society — the family, private property, and the state.”[5] Feminists seek the overthrow of the traditional family, and in its place they look for a radically different social institution that is shaped by feminist dogma.

When we consider the radical nature of feminism and it agenda to overthrow the family that is structured after the biblical model, we would be wise to pause and ponder how successful the feminists have been in remaking the family according to their own design. The fact is that, in Western society, feminism has been enormously successful in destroying the traditional family. The feminization of the family has already taken place! By the “feminization of the family” we mean the remaking of the family according to the beliefs and goals of feminism. This feminization has occurred in the last thirty years and with little opposition from men. Men have fallen away in fear at feminist charges of sexism, repression, tyranny, and exploitation, as a coward would wither before the charge of a determined enemy on the battlefield. Nothing seems to have terrified men more than the angry glare and words of feminist ideologues.

Now, when we say that the feminization of the family has already taken place, we do not intend to imply that the feminists have fully reached their goals in regard to the family. We mean, rather, that a revolution in family life that is due to feminist influence and in accord with feminist ideology has already come to pass in Western society. Today, the social institution of the family is far more in line with the vision of Betty Friedan than with the teaching of the Apostle Paul. This represents a triumph (at least a partial one) for the feminist’s radical vision of social revolution.

The feminization of the family is seen in at least six areas. First, marriage has been destabilized, and divorce is rampant. Feminism’s “diabolization of marriage” has made divorce “socially and psychologically more acceptable by the idea that it is a reasonable response to a defective and dying institution.”[6] The biblical teaching that marriage is a divine and covenantal institution that binds a man and woman together for life by a sacred vow (Gen. 2:18-24; Matt. 19:3-9) has been repudiated by modern society. The biblical concept has been replaced with the notion that marriage is a mere human institution, an imperfect one at that, and that divorce is a reasonable way to deal with any misery associated with it.

Second, male headship in the family has been replaced by an “egalitarian” arrangement where the husband and wife “share” in the leadership responsibilities of the family. The scriptural idea that the man is head of the family (1 Cor. 11:3-12; Eph. 5:22-23) and lord of his household (1 Pet. 3:5-6) is considered by feminists to be both tyrannical and barbaric, a vestige of primitive man and his ability to physically dominate his spouse. In our day, the overwhelming majority of both men and women scoff at the notion that the wife should submit to her husband’s authority.

Third, the man as provider has been rejected for a new model of joint economic responsibility. The view of our time is that the man is no more responsible than the woman to provide for the financial needs of the family. Feminists believe that the scriptural teaching the man is the family provider (1 Tim. 5:9) is part of a male conspiracy to hold women down by making them economically dependent on men.

Fourth, the women as a full-time homemaker is scorned, and the working woman who seeks fulfillment and independence in employment outside of her home is now a cultural norm. The biblical mandate that a woman be a “keeper at home” (Titus 2:4-5) is either unknown or unheeded. Feminist-minded folks consider it to be a demeaning thing for a woman to stay at home and confine her work to the sphere of her house and her family. A career is considered more suitable and meaningful for today’s wife and mother.

Fifth, the biblical norm of a woman as a nurturer of children has been replaced by the feminist ideal of a working mother who places her children in “daycare” so that she can pursue other important matters. The responsibility of motherhood is seen in far different terms than it was in the past. The biblical call to the mother to be with her children, to love, train, teach, and protect them (1 Tim. 2:15; 5:14) is rejected for the feminist vision of the woman who is freed from such constraints on her individuality and own fulfillment.

Sixth, the idea that a large family is a “blessing” is rejected for notion that a small family of one or two children (and for some, no children at all) is far better. The concept of “family planning” geared at reducing the number of children in the home is advocated by nearly all. The biblical teaching that a large family is due to God’s blessing and sovereignty (Ps. 127; 128) is despised by modern families, even those claiming to be Christian. The feminist’s view that we determine the number of children we will have, that we are sovereign over such matters is now accepted with hardly a question. Of course, this supposed sovereignty over life and birth leads to a justification of abortion, the ultimate birth control.

Yes, the feminization of the family has taken place in America and in the West! The Christian concept of the family has been replaced by the feminist idea of the family: easy divorce has replaced a covenantal view of marriage; egalitarianism has replaced male headship; man and woman as joint providers has replaced man as provider; the wife and mother working outside of the home has replaced the woman as a keeper at home; the mother as an employee has replaced the mother as the nurturer of her children; “family planning” and “birth control” has replaced the large family.

Two factors have greatly contributed to the success of feminists in overthrowing the family structure and practice that is based on the Bible. The first factor is the cowardice of men; yes, even Christian men. To a degree it is understandable (though still shameful) that non-Christian men have cowered before the feminists, and their attacks on them and the traditional family. But that Christian men who have the truth of the Word of God should have likewise capitulated is a sorry fact indeed. God has called men to defend His truth in the world and to live out its precepts. Yet, a look at the average evangelical Christian home will reveal that it too has been feminized to a large degree. Radical, Christ-hating feminist have transformed our homes, and Christian men have hardly objected to this or contested for the holy ground of a biblically patterned family. Furthermore, Christian husbands and fathers have also shown cowardice in their failure to lead and take up the responsibilities that God has given to them. They have been more than willing to shuck the full burden of leading and providing for their families; they have been more than to happy to share (or unload) these burdens with (or on) their wife. The family has been feminized because Christian men retreated from their duty.

The second factor is the silence and passivity of the church. The feminization of the family has taken place in large measure because the church has mostly been silent on the matter. The church has not met the assault of feminism head on with the sword of the Word of God. Rather, and shamefully, the church has retreated at the feminist onslaught, and has actually bought into many of the alien ideas of feminism. The church has been guilty of teaching such things as egalitarian marriage, “family planning,” and of supporting the idea of a career woman and working mother. Much of the blame must be laid at the feet of preachers and elders who are either deceived or too afraid to preach or stand for the truth concerning the family as God had revealed it in His Holy Word. The feminists have been successful in altering the family because the church has failed to live and teach the positive scriptural doctrine of the family and has not exposed, denounced, and answered the lies of the feminists.

What should our response be as Christians to the feminization of the family? Our response begins with the recognition that it has happened. Denial will not do us any good. Then, we must take up the task of the de-feminization of the family and the re-Christianization of the family. This task is the work of every individual Christian family; but it is primarily the work of Christian husbands and fathers who have been appointed by God as leaders in the home. Men must lead by precept and example in eradicating all aspects of feminist influence from the life and structure of their family and restore it to a biblical pattern. Men must prove themselves men and shoulder the full load of responsibility given to them by God. Men must stop being intimidated by feminist rhetoric and radicals and fearlessly promote God’s order for the family.

The task of reconstructing the family according to God’s Word will also require the church to faithfully teach what the Bible says concerning the family, and, in many cases, to alter the structure of their church and ministry (which has also been feminized) to support the family rather than to undermine it. It will require pastors and elders who respect the covenantal institution of the family, and who will stop lording it over the family and persecuting the man who seeks to de-feminize his own family. It will demand pastors and elders who are an example to the flock by de-feminizing their own homes. And it will take teachers and preachers with the courage and conviction of John Knox and John Calvin to expose the poisonous lies of feminist dogma and to declare and defend the biblical pattern for the family from the pulpit.

Note: This is a revised version of an article that originally appeared in the February 1998 edition of the Chalcedon Report. It is printed here by permission of the author.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. As cited by Michael Levin in Feminism and Freedom (New Brunswick, 1988), 19.

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Nicholas Davidson, “Preface,” in Gender Sanity, ed. Nicholas Davidson (New York, 1989), vi.

5. As cited by Rita Kramer in “The Establishment of Feminism,” Gender Sanity, 12 (emphasis added).

6. Levin, Feminism and Freedom, 277.

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/the_feminization_of_the_family.aspx

S
sermonindex

Called to the Home — Called to Rule
by Melissa Keen, June 16, 2004

The propriety of Christian, Bible-believing women having careers is a controversial subject in the modern church. However, I believe that God has something to say about everything, even if it is simply a subtly stated principle instead of a direct command or explicit explanation. When tackling any subject, it is vital to use Scripture as the basis for all points of discussion. Following are my personal thoughts and beliefs on the subject and the interpretation of this matter that God has laid on my heart.

In Proverbs 9 Wisdom is personified as a woman who is skillful, industrious, and resourceful. Amazingly enough, she accomplishes all her tasks from her home — “Wisdom hath builded her house... whoso is simple, let him turn in hither” (Proverbs 9:1, 4). She has built her house, decorated it, and furnished it. She has prepared food for her guests, using what she has at her home. Not only is her home fully functioning and productive, but she is also able to invite strangers in to enjoy and benefit from her well ordered, exemplary home.

As Christian women, we have the responsibility to look not only to our God-given realm of the home, but also to expand our ministry to those outside of our home. There are so many possibilities with the skills we are given! First, we are to use them to benefit our family and home. This is where our priorities and loyalties should always lie. Second, we are to extend the boundaries of our home to include others in ministry and hospitality. “Come, eat of my bread, and drink of the wine which I have mingled,” cries this wise woman (verse 5). I will share more on ministry opportunities in just a bit.

In contrast, the author gives a very different word picture of the foolish woman: “She is loud and stubborn; her feet abide not in her house: Now is she without, now in the streets...” (Proverbs 7:11-12). This description appears just two chapters before the chapter describing the wise woman. In Proverbs 9:13, the author continues to contrast these women by saying, “A foolish woman is clamorous: she is simple, and knoweth nothing.”

Further, in this same book of the Bible, the author introduces us to the famous Virtuous Woman of Proverbs 31. The list of her accomplishments, activities, and industriousness is quite daunting. Yet again, we see a picture of the well-balanced woman rolling up her sleeves and working — from home. “She maketh fine linen, and selleth it; and delivereth girdles unto the merchant” (Proverbs 31:24). Not only does she produce high quality goods, but these goods are of a standard of excellence that is acceptable to the merchants.

Whatever a merchant sells in his booth is a reflection of his own standard of quality. In order to maintain a good name and stay on the cutting edge of profitable business, a merchant is careful to ensure that all goods stocked in his booth are a good reflection upon his business. In her spare time, the virtuous keeper-at-home creates goods that meet demanding quality specifications and brings in a little profit as well.

Lest my views on this subject seem more than a little far-fetched or confined to only one book of the Bible, let us compare these passages with others in Scripture. Titus 2 gives a listing of the desired — nay, required — qualities that a woman of God should exemplify: “That they [the older women] may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed” (Titus 2:4, 5). The older women have the experience and capability in these qualities, and this qualifies them to teach others.

Looking again at the passage above, let me draw your attention to the phrase “that the word of God be not blasphemed.” This is the chief point and objective of the list of qualifications of a godly young woman. I believe Paul is saying that disregarding this exhortation blasphemes the name of God — strong medicine for many, I know. We do not like to think that anything we do could defame God’s Word, but I believe Paul wanted us to think soberly about the great power and privilege women have to live the Word before the world — and to see that we can also blaspheme the Word through disobedience to His commands for women.

Why do we have such a hard time accepting the timeless truth that we as women can indeed find fulfillment in being keepers-at-home? In I Peter 3, Paul decidedly states, “Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands... for after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands” (I Peter 3:1, 5). In my understanding, this leaves no room for a wife to be in subjection or submission to a man other than her husband, such as a boss at work. Jesus Himself taught “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other” (Matthew 6:24). I understand that the context here is money, but Christ’s teaching certainly fits with the rest of the Scriptural passages studied so far. Therefore, serving another master or submitting to some man other than your own husband is striving to serve two masters. Christ has said that this is impossible. “For either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.” “Hate” and “despise” are very strong words, are they not? A woman working outside the home under another “master” is in danger of growing in her heart discontentment, hate, and a feeling of despising who God has created her to be and those whom He has called her to serve.

Yes, young wives and mothers are the specified recipients of this training, but unmarried women can also benefit from the same training and application of these Scriptural truths. This powerfully enables them to be prepared for whatever God has for them, both now and in the future. A young woman who practices “serving two masters”—her father and employer—while she is single will have perfected this for her married life. This development of an independent spirit could result in a miserable marriage for herself, her husband, and her family. As with any art, the best way to master the art of contented submission is to practice it! Who could be a better recipient of this practice than a young lady’s father? Ideally, a daughter’s relationship with her father will be a vivid picture of what her future relationship will be with her husband.

Granted, there are certainly times for ministry or a moneymaking industry—from the home. We obviously see the ministry impact of Wisdom personified in Proverbs 7, and of the Proverbs 31 woman it is said, “She stretcheth out her hand to the poor; yea, she reacheth forth her hands to the needy” (Proverbs 31:20). Tabitha, also known as Dorcas, is a familiar example of the impact a godly woman can have while ministering to others: “Now there was at Joppa a certain disciple named Tabitha, which by interpretation is called Dorcas: this woman was full of good works and almsdeeds which she did... and all the widows stood by him [Peter] weeping, and shewing the coats and garments which Dorcas made, while she was with them” (Acts 9:36, 39). This woman was dearly beloved in her community. She gave of her self, her time, and her skills to minister to those around her. Where was she while she did this? I believe Paul tells us in the phrase “while she was with them.” This refers to the widows who are mourning Tabitha’s death. Judging from what I understand this passage to say, she stayed in the homes of widows and ministered to them with her skills as a capable, joyful, contented keeper-at-home.

My belief is that God did not intend for His women to pursue careers outside the home. The curse that he put upon Adam — the first curse issued in the world — was that he would have a sorrowful, difficult time laboring for his provision: “And unto Adam he said, ... cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field; in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground.” As for Eve, “Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee” (Genesis 3:16-19). The woman who labors to provide for her family while trying to maintain her role as wife and mother voluntarily takes upon herself both the curse of the man and the curse of the woman. The curse of laboring for provision was the curse that God saw fit to place upon the man—not upon the woman. Unfortunately, because of our disobedience in the Church, there are now many women who are forced to suffer under Adam’s curse — women for whom families and churches should be providing (widows, abandoned wives, etc.). This disobedience is expanded when the women laboring outside of the home are not widows or abandoned women, but wives and mothers in an average Christian home. How can either of these situations do anything but blaspheme the Word of God (which calls Christians to provide for widows and orphans and calls men to provide for and protect women and children)?

As a well-organized keeper-at-home, the godly wife is not only fulfilling the role God has created her to fulfill, but is now further available to assist her husband in his role. “The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil. She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life... Her husband is known in the gates, when he sitteth among the elders of the land... Her children arise up, and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praiseth her. Many daughters have done virtuously, but thou excellest them all. Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised. Give her of the fruit of her hands; and let her own works praise her in the gates.” (Proverbs 31: 11-12, 23, 28-31) Her husband trusts in her implicitly. He knows that her greatest goal in life is to joyfully and lovingly support him in his duties and care for his household. He is confident in her abilities and knows her heart attitude. This allows him to throw his energies into providing for his family. Then, after a tiring day “in the gates,” he cannot wait to return home and enter his haven of rest that his wife has prepared and maintained for him. Notice here where her praises are sung: “Let her own works praise her in the gates.” Could these be the same gates where her husband is known? Therefore, by singing the praises of his supportive wife, her husband is making her known through his influence. What better honor than to be known and praised to the elders of the land? The delight and contentedness of both the husband and the wife in their respective roles in accomplished simply through the tender submission of the keeper-at-home.

In summary, I do not see how a career outside the home in any way honors or obeys God’s design for who we are as women. If we truly believe that He is our Divine Creator, that He has known us since the beginning of time, and that He is the omniscient, watchful, tenderly caring God we know Him to be, then our actions will reflect this. If we trust Him and respect His leading and protection in our lives, we will desire to be exactly what He desires us to be. Let us bring glory to Him in the only way He has created us to do so—by being creative, industrious, joyful, contented keepers-at-home.

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/called_to_the_home_called_to_r.aspx

S
sermonindex

Becoming Radiant Women Conferences with Teresa Conlon:

http://www.tscnyc.org/radiant_ministry.php

[url=http://www.tscnyc.org/radiant_ministry_2008_london_conference_update.php]Listen to the messages here from Feb. 2008.[/url]

S
sermonindex

SOPs For Household Managementby Blaine

Pendleton, February 2, 2004

We live in a world in which most Christians have a radical disconnect between their orthodoxy (their sound theological foundation) and their orthopraxy (the practical application of their faith in the real world). From the beginning of our ministry Vision Forum Ministires has been committed to the wedding of orthodoxy and orthopraxy. Christianity is for real life.
Because we are in the “vision” business, so to speak, our passion and joy is casting vision and blessing to our friends and family through practical ideas for applying sound theology to the culture of Christian family life. That is why I was so excited recently to visit with Blaine Pendleton, former combat helicopter pilot in the United States Army, visionary patriarch and father of seven children, including our former collegue at Vision Forum Ministries, Joel (who has returned to Alabama to follow his dream flying planes with his father). Blaine runs a tight ship, but an extremely happy home, as anyone would testify who has met his wife and children. He has successfully applied some of his own military organization styles, to the management of his household, yet without a negative military edge to it. There are differences in the way that Blaine and I manage our households, as there should be with every father on the planet. These are glorious differences which reflect the fact that each man must personally study, pray and work out the wisest management approach for his own family. A well-run houshold should reflect the unique mission of the family, the personalities, histories, and priorities of the parents, as well as the number and age of the children, availablility of Christian community, extended family and a score of other important issues.

This means that no two housholds have to be managed the same way. The biblical principles of management don’t change, but the practical applications do from family to family based on changing facts and cirucmstances. Men need to remember that a biblical test of leadership is that they are faithful houshold managers. Household management is not an after thought for a man, it should be a priority.With this in mind I am including for your enjoyment and inspiration, Brother Blaine Pendleton’s Household SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) by which he manages his household. All the members of the family are expected to learn and know these SOPs and follow them. Because he rules his houshold with tender love and affection, the children have grown to thrive under these guidelines. On last comment: It is a sad thing today, but people are so quick to call people “legalist” the first time they make a practical application of a biblical principle, that it is sometimes necessary to remind our loved ones in Christ, that suggestions are not mandates, they are simply suggestions. Enjoy this one brother’s approach, and consider if you can glean from his wisdom, any wisdom for the management of your own household.

Pendletons want to live Simple, Separate and Deliberate lives for the glory of God and the building of His kingdom. The purpose of this SOP is to help us accomplish this goal by implementing some simple rules and guidelines that, when followed, will keep our priorities and focus right, and guard us against the tyranny of the urgent.

I. Daily Key Events

A. Rise on time, morning checklist/Papa(if home) and Mama

B. School lessons given/Papa and Mama

C. School lessons graded and recorded/Papa and Mama

D. Inspection” Chores and whiteboard/Papa and Mama

E. Dinner on time/Mama

F. Family Worship/ Papa

G. Bed on time/Papa II.

The Seven Family Rules
Personal offenses will be dealt with by following the brother offended checklist.

Papa and Mama will deal with violations of rules by following the if-then chart. The principle of “slow down to speed up” is important, i.e. train consistently when issues arise and you’ll have better trained children, therefore more will get accomplished in the long-run. Any male child 12 years or older that flagrantly violates a rule when Papa is gone will be sent outside to work. (yard care, property maint Etc,) until Papa returns home.

A. Be kind and loving in all you say and do. Rom 13:10

B Cheerfully obey without delay. Eph. 6:1

C. If you get it out, put it back, if you make a mess, clean it up. 1 Tim. 3:5

D. Be a good steward (don’t misuse or waste) Luke 12:42-44

E. Tell the whole truth the first time. Col 3:9

F. Be “where” directed doing “what” directed. Prov. 20:6-7

G. Accept discipline properly. Prov. 29:15 III. School.We must proactively follow the Hebrew model of education (Deut.6) rather than the Greek model.

Academics are important, however, heart level relationships are more important than academics.

A. Bible study and core academics, consisting of math and language arts, is primarily accomplished between breakfast and lunch. Life Training and other subjects primarily take place between lunch and dinner.

B. Mama must give and/or monitor assignments each day for E/A1/M/L/A2 Papa is responsible for J1’s and J2’s academics and Life Training.

C. Minimum passing score is 85% 1st time, 90% 2nd time, 95% 3rd time.

D. School Rules. The seven family rules apply at all times. During school the following rules also apply.All school is done in the school room Talking may only be school related. During school hours the house is kept quiet. (Even in the playroom) All work is to be done diligently, thoroughly and neatly. When help is needed quietly indicate it on the “Help Please” board then wait patiently until Papa or Mama arrive. While waiting work on or study other school subjects. Children inform Papa or Mama using the “help please” board when ready for a quiz/test and immediately upon completion, and also when assignments are complete and ready for grading. Micah and Lydia, when not doing school may play in playroom, outside or quietly in the schoolroom as specifically directed by Mama.

IV. Chores.Daily chore time and pick-ups are done according to the schedule. Children will start on time without prompting, all items done by the checklist, and a thorough “walk around” performed before requesting inspection by Papa/Mama. No one is complete until chores and pick-ups pass inspection. The “CHORE” block on the Daily White Board represents both morning chores and afternoon pick-ups.

V. Daily Free Time.Given by Papa/Mama when complete with school, chores, and any additional duties listed on the white board or assignment sheet.

VI. Time ManagementPriority Definition:

Importance placed on one thing as compared to another. A priority is determined by what it takes to displace it.

A. Godly prioritiesPersonal Spiritual growth and relationship with God Family (Husband/Wife and Children) Ministry (Grows from 1 and 2) Matt 22:37-40; Eph 5:25; Deut 6:6-7; 1 Tim 3:1/5:8; Matt 28:19-20; Gal 6:10; Titus 2:1, 4-5, 15)

B. Hospitality/Ministry. The basic principle to follow is for Papa and Mama to discuss each situation and decide how best to have hospitality/ministry.

Questions to ask:Is God leading us to do this? Is this a true ministry to the other people? Have we had a lot of commitments recently? Would this be edifying for the whole family? What is Papa’s work schedule? Can the situation be modified to make it more palatable such as dessert VS dinner or meeting at a restaurant?

C. Time Protection GuidelinesThe school day must be protected MON-FRI from outside commitments; during school hours we use the answering machine. Normally Papa will run any family errands or pick up any supplies on his way to or from work. Errands or supply runs can also be accomplished during piano lessons. Normally, no commitments for company until Friday evening. Only one reoccurring evening commitment during the week except for special circumstances. No email/internet until kids are in bed unless school or home management related.

D. Planned Weekly Time Commitments outside the HomeChurch meeting on Sunday Piano on Thursday

VII. Accountability.

The purpose of the accountability charts are to help Papa lead the family by keeping track of how everyone is doing daily and long term, as well as to see how planned and unplanned events are impacting our goals and priorities.

A. Papa will use two accountability charts which will be updated daily:Time - When applicable Daily Key events are all completed fill in the block on the chart. If an event is not completed the number of that event(s) is placed in the block. Excused days are: H = Holiday; C = Company; T = Travel; * = OtherMoney - Fill in the block at end of the day when exact checking and saving account balances are known. Excused days are same as above.

B. Mama. When Daily Key Events are all completed then the block on the accountability chart is filled in. Mama’s excused days are the same as Papa’s.

C. Children.Daily White Board. When each DWB item is completed and “X” is placed in the block. If the item is one requiring Papa/Mama inspection, then place a “/” in the block and the parent will complete the “X”Accountability Chart. Each child will have their own chart. When all required blocks on the DWB are completed the block is filled in for that day by Papa. Excused days are the same as Papa’s.Allowance. Each day (Mon — Fri) that the Accountability Chart block is filled in the person receives their daily allowance in the form of cash or a receipt. If all five blocks were filled in that week then two extra days of allowance are given on Friday! For weeks that only have four days, two days extra allowance will be given for all four days being filled in; for weeks with three or less one extra days allowance can be earned. If the person does not get at least three days completed then they lose all privileges during the upcoming weekend. Allowance amounts are as follows: J1=$4.50 day ($31.50 week); J2=$3.50 day ($24.50 week); E=$2.50 day ($17.50 week); A1=$1.50 ($10.50 week); M=$.75 day ($5.25 week); L=$.50 day ($3.50 week); A2=$.25 day ($1.75 week).

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/sops_for_household_management.aspx

S
sermonindex

.....Was a minister to disregard teaching his people publicly, and from house to house, and to excuse himself by saying, that he had enough to do to work out his own salvation with fear and trembling, without concerning himself with that of others; would you not be apt to think such a minister, to be like the unjust judge, "One that neither feared God, nor regarded man?" And yet, odious as such a character would be, it is no worse than that governor of a family deserves, who thinks himself obliged only to have his own soul, without paying any regard to the souls of his household. For (as was above hinted) every house is as it were a parish, and every master is concerned to secure, as much as in him lies, the spiritual prosperity of every one under his roof, as any minister whatever is obliged to look to the spiritual welfare of every individual person under his charge.

What precedents men who neglect their duty in this particular, can plead for such omission, I cannot tell. Doubtless not the example of holy Job, who was so far from imagining that he had no concern, as governor of a family, with any one's soul but his own, that the scripture acquaints us, "When the days of his children's feasting were gone about, that Job sent and sanctified them, and offered burnt-offerings, according to the number of them all; for Job said, It may be that my sons have sinned and cursed God in their hearts: thus did Job continually." Nor can they plead the practice of good old Joshua, whom, in the text, we find as much concerned for his household's welfare, as his own. Nor lastly, that of Cornelius, who feared God, not only himself, but with all his house: and were Christians but of the same spirit of Job, Joshua, and the Gentile centurion, they would act as Job, Joshua, and Cornelius did.

But alas! If this be the case, and all governors of families ought not only to serve the Lord themselves, but likewise to see that their respective households do so too; what will then become of those who not only neglect serving God themselves, but also make it their business to ridicule and scoff at any of their house that do? Who are not content with "not entering into the kingdom of heaven themselves; but who also that are willing to enter in, they hinder." Surely such men are factors for the devil indeed. Surely their damnation slumbereth not: for although God, is in his good providence, may suffer such stumbling-blocks to be put in his children's way, and suffer their greatest enemies to be those of their own households, for a trial of their sincerity, and improvement of their faith; yet we cannot but pronounce a woe against those masters by whom such offenses come. For if those that only take care of their own souls, can scarcely be saved, where will such monstrous profane and wicked governors appear?.....

~George Whitefield

S
sermonindex

Revive Our Hearts Radio Broadcast:

Honest and Respectful

Series: The Makings of a True Woman

Monday, June 2 2008


Leslie Basham: For a woman to respect her husband, does it mean she can’t bring up any issues?

Mary Kassian: Marriages need to be built on honesty. I need to reveal what’s on my heart, and my concerns, but to do it in a manner that is not critical and condescending and bossy and domineering, not in a way that tears him down but in a way that builds him up and gives him the opportunity to say, “Yes, I will move into that space. I will take leadership in this.”

I have found, actually, over the years that my husband now respects my opinion so highly, I need to be very cautious because when I say something he listens carefully.

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php?pid=9899

---------------------------------------

What Is a Woman?

Series: The Makings of a True Woman

Tuesday, June 3 2008


Leslie Basham: Mary Kassian remembers when a wife confided this about her husband.

Mary Kassian: “I have made him into what I wanted him to be, and now I don’t like him.” She found that her husband had gotten passive and was just spineless. She began to despise the very thing that she had wanted him to be because she was emasculating him. She was taking away all the things that defined him as a male. Instead of supporting that and encouraging his manhood, she was emasculating him, and when he was emasculated, she was not attracted to him anymore.

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

S
sermonindex

Women in the Church

Series: The Makings of a True Woman

Wednesday, June 4 2008


Leslie Basham: The New Testament says in Christ there is no male or female. Does that mean men and women are to fulfill the same roles in the church? Here’s Mary Kassian.

Mary Kassian: What Galatians is not talking about is our roles as men and women. It’s not directly addressing the structure of the church. It’s not directly addressing how we interact as men and women. It’s just addressing how we approach God. It’s a great passage. It’s a very important verse for us to understand because of the freedom that it gives everyone to approach God on a very personal, individual basis. But it does not address questions of church leadership, church structure or church authority.

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

--------------------------------------------

But hoping there are but few of this unhappy stamp, proceed we now to the Second thing proposed:


II. To show after what manner a governor and his household ought to serve the Lord.

1. And the first thing I shall mention, is READING THE WORD OF GOD.

This is a duty incumbent on every private person. "Search the scriptures, for in them ye think ye have eternal life," is a precept given by our blessed Lord indifferently to all: but much more so, ought every governor of a family to think it in a peculiar manner spoken to himself, because (as hath been already proved) he ought to look upon himself as a prophet, and therefore agreeably to such a character, bound to instruct those under his charge in the knowledge of the word of God. This we find was the order God gave to his peculiar people Israel: for thus speaks his representative Moses, Deut. 6:6-7, "These words," that is, the scripture words, "which I command thee this day, shall be in thy heart, and thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children," that is, as it is generally explained, servants, as well as children, "and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thy house." From whence we may infer, that the only reason, why so many neglect to read the words of scripture diligently to their children is, because the words of scripture are not in their hearts: for if they were, out of the abundance of the heart their mouth would speak.

Besides, servants as well as children, are, for the generality, very ignorant, and mere novices in the laws of God: and how shall they know, unless some one teach them? And what more proper to teach them by, than the lively oracles of God, "which are able to make them wise unto salvation?"

And who more proper to instruct them by these lively oracles, than parents and masters, who (as hath been more than once observed) are as much concerned to feed them with spiritual, as with bodily bread, day by day.

But if these things be so, what a miserable condition are those unhappy governors in, who are so far from feeding those committed to their care with the sincere milk of the word, to the intent they may grow thereby, that they neither search the scriptures themselves, nor are careful to explain them to others? Such families must be in a happy way indeed to do their Master's will, who take such prodigious pains to know it! Would not one imagine that they had turned converts to the Church of Rome, that they thought ignorance to be the mother of devotion; and that those were to be condemned as heretics who read their Bibles? And yet how few families are there amongst us, who do not act after this unseemly manner! But shall I praise them in this? I praise them not; Brethren, this thing ought not so to be....

~George Whitefield


S
sermonindex

Three Themes

Series: Esther: God's Woman at God's Time

Thursday, June 5 2008


Nancy Leigh DeMoss: In this crazy messed up world, even when you can’t see it, God is there.

Leslie Basham: That’s Nancy Leigh DeMoss explaining what theologians refer to as God’s providence.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: He’s always alive, always active behind the scenes hidden many times, but always, always, always at work on behalf of His people and His glory...

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

----------------------------------------

2. Pass we on now to the second means whereby every governor and his household ought to serve the Lord, FAMILY-PRAYER.

This is a duty, though as much neglected, yet as absolutely necessary as the former. Reading is a good preparative for prayer, as prayer is an excellent means to render reading effectual. And the reason why every governor of a family should join both these exercises together, is plain, because a governor of a family cannot perform his priestly office (which we before observed as is in some degree invested with) without performing this duty of family prayer.

We find it therefore remarked, when mention is made of Can and Abel's offering sacrifices, that they brought them. But to whom did they bring them? Why, in all probability, to their father Adam, who, as priest of the family, was to offer sacrifice in their names. And so ought every spiritual son of the second Adam, who is entrusted with the care of an household, to offer up the spiritual sacrifices of supplications and thanksgivings, acceptable to God through Jesus Christ, in the presence and name of all who wait upon, or eat meat at his table. Thus we read our blessed Lord behaved, when he tabernacled amongst us: for it is said often, that he prayed with his twelve disciples, which was then his little family. And he himself has promised a particular blessing to joint supplications: "Wheresoever two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them." And again, "If two or three are agreed touching any thing they shall ask, it shall be given them." Add to this, that we are commanded by the Apostle to "pray always, with all manner of supplication," which doubtless includes family prayer. And holy Joshua, when he set up the good resolution in the text, that he and his household would serve the Lord, certainly resolved to pray with his family, which is one of the best testimonies they could give of their serving him.

Besides, there are no families but what have some common blessings, of which they have been all partakers, to give thanks for; some common crosses and afflictions, which they are to pray against; some common sins, which they are all to lament and bewail: but how this can be done, without joining together in one common act of humiliation, supplication, and thanksgiving, is difficult to devise.

From all which considerations put together, it is evident, that family prayer is a great and necessary duty; and consequently, those governors that neglect it, are certainly without excuse. And it is much to be feared, if they live without family prayer, they live without God in the world.

And yet, such an hateful character as this is, it is to be feared, that was God to send out an angel to destroy us, as he did once to destroy the Egyptian first-born, and withal give him a commission, as then, to spare no houses but where they saw the blood of the lintel, sprinkled on the door-post, so now, to let no families escape, but those that called upon him in morning and evening prayer; few would remain unhurt by his avenging sword. Shall I term such families Christians or heathens? Doubtless they deserve not the name of Christians; and heathens will rise up in judgment against such profane families of this generation: for they had always their household gods, whom they worshipped and whose assistance they frequently invoked. And a pretty pass those families surely are arrived at, who must be sent to school to pagans. But will not the Lord be avenged on such profane households as these? Will he not pour out his fury upon those that call not upon his name?....

~George Whitefield


S
sermonindex

Thoughts on the Death of David

Part 1: Treason
by Douglas W. Phillips, Esq., July 18, 2004

After more than a year of studies in my local church on the life of David, we came this last weekend to the death of David. I preached for 90 minutes on I Kings 1,2 and 1 Chronicles 22, 23, 27 and 28, in a message titled: Farewell Beloved Patriarch: King David Goes Out in A Sullied, But Nonetheless in a Victorious Blaze of Glory. The following are some thoughts developed based on the study and the message:

In the twilight of his life, with just weeks before his death, a bedridden and decrepit King David faced one of the greatest trials of his life: Treason.

At stake was David’s life mission and his dream. After forty years of reigning as king, everything came down to two issues: First, would he fulfill his duty to prepare a covenant keeping heir to the promises of God. This heir was destined to be both king of Israel and a progenitor in the line of the Messiah. Second, would David make provision for, prepare, and install the man as king who was chosen by God to complete the Holy Temple of Jerusalem. David, the man after God’s own heart, had been denied this blessing because he was a man of blood and war.

Everything was in place. The heir had been declared. Vision had been cast. Preparations had been made. But the very signal that David was ready to pass the torch — his rapid physiological decline unto death — was a sign to those unscrupulous within his inner circle to take advantage of the king’s decline to make a move for power.


David’s son, Adonijah, saw his father’s weakness as an opportunity to seize the crown. He called for and rallied other malcontents within David’s kingdom, hired a public relations team, blasted his own trumpet, and found some official looking people to declare himself king.

Strategic Differences or Wicked Rebellion
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. — 2 Timothy 3:1

Traitors view their own treason as a mere strategic difference. “We are all reasonable men,” declares the traitor, “we just have strategic differences in how to advance the kingdom.” Thus, “strategic differences,” or even “philosophical differences” become the justification for dishonor, rebellion, and subterfuge. Christians should be able to demonstrate charity one towards another even with respect to genuine strategic and philosophical differences which are within the camp of orthodoxy, but no quarter should be give to dishonor, rebellion and subterfuge. These are sins of the heart that threaten to bring down Christian culture and community. They are not only perverse, they are strangely infectious, which is why they are so thoroughly excoriated in Scripture.

Patricide is the worst form of rebellion. Patricide is the opposite of patriarchy. Patriarchy is the biblical doctrine of multi-generational faithfulness. Patricide is the act of killing our fathers. Patricide takes many forms. It need not manifest itself in the actual physical execution of a father. If a son seeks to wipe out or usurp the legacy of his father, his actions are patricidal. Similarly, where men turn violently against their earthly fathers, spiritual fathers, or even those Founding Fathers who purchased the present generation’s freedom with the blood of the past, they are not only ungrateful, they are patricidal.

Adonijah was not only traitorous, he was patricidal. His actions would have the net effect of wiping out his father’s authority, legacy and dream. Oh, he would be ever so slick in his approach of course. Adonijah was a master at invoking his father’s name when it was convenient (“...look at me, the true heir to David’s throne.”), but distancing himself from his father’s authority when it was not.

Adonijah could offer numerous plausible justifications for treason against his own father: After all, he was the elder brother, not Solomon. By right the throne should go to the elder. David’s favoritism for Solomon should not be taken that seriously. David was old and not in a position to make the best judgment for the kingdom. Also typical of traitors, Adonijah had a form of godliness. He was handsome and winsome, and he knew it. People naturally gravitated to him. Perhaps he was a better communicator than Solomon. All of this combined meant he would have the heart of the people and could thus usher in a season of victorious peace. In sum, Adonijah had effectively persuaded himself and others that he was the rightful, natural, and appropriate successor to the crown.

Treason Hurts
Treason is always painful, especially when it comes from someone you loved, cherished, and nurtured. But rather than becoming bitter at traitors, the servant of God must recognize that God will not leave them unpunished. More importantly, the Christian must realize that he has no right to be spared what God did not spare to his only begotten Son — the presence of traitors.I am grateful that God spared David the horror of seeing a fourth son (after Amnon, Chileab and Absalom) go down to the grave. I am equally grateful for both the wisdom and restraint of Solomon (who was less than 20 years old) at this time. Solomon was merciful to Adonijah during the life of his father. After being anointed king, Solomon called for his half-brother Adonijah and granted him a conditional amnesty: If Adonijah would return to his house, and if no more rebellion be found in his heart, he would not die. This was more than generous. It was also wise. It demonstrated concern for the tender heart of his father David, and it gave Adonijah a second chance to prove himself honorable or traitorous.

Like all unrepentant traitors, Adonijah could not deny his true nature. After the death of King David, Adonijah again used subtlety to disgrace his father and possibly to launch yet another plot to seize power. Using Bathsheba as bait, Adonijah requested that King David’s latest concubine/wife be given to him to wed, an action specifically forbidden as incest under the laws of Leviticus, and sanctioned with the death penalty. Like his older brother Absalom, who disgraced himself with his father’s wives, Adonijah wanted to place himself on par with the former king. Solomon’s response was decisive and appropriate — Adonijah was executed.

Treason in 21st Century Christians
At the beginning of the 21st century several key national ministries experienced Adonijah-like treason. In each case, a man or woman who had been given opportunity and mentored by the organizations’ founder, turned on their spiritual fathers in an attempt to seize power. In each case, the results were spiritual bloodshed, broken hearts, and confusion.

I have thought of King David often as I have watched a spirit of dishonor and treason spread throughout our culture: Children seek to destroy their parents; Servants turning on masters for personal gain. Men no longer comprehend the concept of treason, because they have never been taught honor, loyalty, fidelity.

On incident in particular comes to mind: I was attending the funeral of a beloved Christian leader. Like King David, this leader would spent the last weeks of his life grieving in bed because a man he had mentored and treated as a son was taking advantage of his weakness by staging a coup d’etat, to wrest the leadership of the ministry from the appointed heir. The justification — you guessed it: “strategic differences.” As with Adonijah’s revolt, this coup d’etat failed and the rightful heir was installed. Like Adonijah, mercy was shown to the usurper, but also like Adonijah, the usurper would continue to reveal himself after the death of the leader. (In this case, he first did so by declaring the death of the Temple building work his spiritual mentor had created. Next, he was self-appointed heir to the new-improved temple building process.) As one might expect, the bankrupt morality which led to treason also lead to a bankrupt theology. A man’s morality often dictates his theology.

Do Traitors Prosper?
From man’s perspective treason unopposed is remarkably discouraging. There are times that we do see haughty and high-minded traitors prosper, redefine the issues and re-write the history books to cover their sins and switch the terms of debate. Sir John Harrington (1561-1612) explained the phenomenon this way: “Treason doth never prosper, what’s the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”

The lesson of Scripture is this: While there is pleasure in sin for a season, be sure your sins will find you out. Those who live by the sword will die by the sword, and those who ascend to power through treason, will meet their own end the same way. Few sins are as odious as a servant seizing his master’s kingdom, or a son violating his father, or a people who turn against the spiritual fathers whose blood bought them freedom. God will not be mocked.

How Not to Be a Traitor
In light of the above, I would like to take the liberty to offer some very practical thoughts on “how not to be a traitor.”

First, genuinely honor those who have invested in your life or who are in a position of authority over you. To honor them means that you reverence them deeply in your heart, and that your actions are a reflection of this reverence.

Second, let your heart be full of gratitude for those imperfect, but God appointed authorities whom the Lord God has given to you. It is impossible to be truly grateful and treasonable at the same time.

Third, always seek the best interests of those in positions of authority over you, especially fathers and mothers. Through your words, deeds, and actions, seek to make them successful.

Fourth, it is better to waive your rights and walk away from opportunity than to act against the lawful and jurisdictional interests of an authority. God knows your needs and desires. He will provide.

Fifth, work through chain of command. This shows respect and honor. Never, ever adopt an “ends justifies the means” mentality. Equate pragmatic thinking with infidelity, because the two are one and the same.

Sixth, when you are troubled by an authority, be upfront, honest and make appeals. Approach fathers and other leaders with a spirit of humility and charity.

Seventh, study the lives and consequences of famous traitors in the Bible and history. This will serve as an ever present warning against the temptation in your own heart.

Eight, don’t hang around or associate with other traitors. They will corrupt your thinking, your resolve, and in the end, you will be half the man you are now.

Nine, in matters of succession, opportunity, and finances, keep in mind that the issue is never how much you know, what a better job you would do for the business/family/local church/kingdom than the individual appointed by those in authority — the issue is submitting to the will of God and His choice.

Tenth, never justify a rebellious and self-serving attitude as a “strategic difference.”

Finally, if you have committed treason, repent.

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/thoughts_on_the_death_of_david.aspx

S
sermonindex

3. But it is time for me to hasten to the third and last means I shall recommend, whereby every governor ought with his household to serve the Lord, CATECHIZING AND INSTRUCTING their children and servants, and bringing them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

That this, as well as the two former, is a duty incumbent on every governor of an house, appears from that famous encomium or commendation God gives of Abraham: "I know that he will command his children and his household after him, to keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and judgment." And indeed scarce any thing is more frequently pressed upon us in holy writ, than this duty of catechizing. Thus, says God in a passage before cited, "Thou shalt teach these words diligently unto thy children."

And parents are commanded in the New Testament, to "bring up their children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord." The holy Psalmist acquaints us, that one great end why God did such great wonders for his people, was, "to the intent that when they grew up, they should show their children, or servants, the same." And in Deut. 6 at the 20th and following verses, God strictly commands his people to instruct their children in the true nature of the ceremonial worship, when they should inquire about it, as he supposed they would do, in time to come. And if servants and children were to be instructed in the nature of Jewish rites, much more ought they now to be initiated and grounded in the doctrines and first principles of the gospel of Christ: not only, because it is a revelation, which has brought life and immortality to a fuller and clearer light, but also, because many seducers are gone abroad into the world, who do their utmost endeavor to destroy not only the superstructure, but likewise to sap the very foundation of our most holy religion.

Would then the present generation have their posterity be true lovers and honorers of God; masters and parents must take Solomon's good advice, and train up and catechize their respective households in the way wherein they should go.

I am aware but of one objection, that can, with any show of reason, be urged against what has been advanced; which is, that such a procedure as this will take up too much time, and hinder families too long from their worldly business. But it is much to be questioned, whether persons that start such an objection, are not of the same hypocritical spirit as the traitor Judas, who had indignation against devout Mary, for being so profuse of her ointment, in anointing our blessed Lord, and asked why it might not be sold for two hundred pence, and given to the poor. For has God given us so much time to work for ourselves, and shall we not allow some small pittance of it, morning and evening, to be devoted to his more immediate worship and service? Have not people read, that it is God who gives men power to get wealth, and therefore that the best way to prosper in the world, is to secure his favor? And has not our blessed Lord himself promised, that if we seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, all outward necessaries shall be added unto us?

Abraham, no doubt, was a man of as great business as such objectors may be; but yet he would find time to command his household to serve the Lord. Nay, David was a king, and consequently had a great deal of business upon his hands; yet notwithstanding, he professes that he would walk in his house with a perfect heart. And, to instance but one more, holy Joshua was a person certainly engaged very much in temporal affairs; and yet he solemnly declares before all Israel, that as for him and his household, they would serve the Lord. And did persons but redeem their time, as Abraham, David, or Joshua did, they would no longer complain, that family duties kept them too long from the business of the world.

~George Whitefield

------------------------------------------

The Plot Thickens
Series: Esther: God's Woman at God's Time

http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php

S
sermonindex


Would then the present generation have their posterity be true lovers and honorers of God; masters and parents must take Solomon's good advice, and train up and catechize their respective households in the way wherein they should go.

I am aware but of one objection, that can, with any show of reason, be urged against what has been advanced; which is, that such a procedure as this will take up too much time, and hinder families too long from their worldly business. But it is much to be questioned, whether persons that start such an objection, are not of the same hypocritical spirit as the traitor Judas, who had indignation against devout Mary, for being so profuse of her ointment, in anointing our blessed Lord, and asked why it might not be sold for two hundred pence, and given to the poor. For has God given us so much time to work for ourselves, and shall we not allow some small pittance of it, morning and evening, to be devoted to his more immediate worship and service? Have not people read, that it is God who gives men power to get wealth, and therefore that the best way to prosper in the world, is to secure his favor? And has not our blessed Lord himself promised, that if we seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, all outward necessaries shall be added unto us?

~George Whitefield


This actually ties in with my last post I noticed on what it means to be a traitor.


Thoughts on the Death of David

Part 1: Treason

by Douglas W. Phillips, Esq., July 18, 2004

After more than a year of studies in my local church on the life of David, we came this last weekend to the death of David. I preached for 90 minutes on I Kings 1,2 and 1 Chronicles 22, 23, 27 and 28, in a message titled: Farewell Beloved Patriarch: King David Goes Out in A Sullied, But Nonetheless in a Victorious Blaze of Glory. The following are some thoughts developed based on the study and the message:

In the twilight of his life, with just weeks before his death, a bedridden and decrepit King David faced one of the greatest trials of his life: Treason.

At stake was David’s life mission and his dream. After forty years of reigning as king, everything came down to two issues: First, would he fulfill his duty to prepare a covenant keeping heir to the promises of God. This heir was destined to be both king of Israel and a progenitor in the line of the Messiah. Second, would David make provision for, prepare, and install the man as king who was chosen by God to complete the Holy Temple of Jerusalem. David, the man after God’s own heart, had been denied this blessing because he was a man of blood and war.

Everything was in place. The heir had been declared. Vision had been cast. Preparations had been made. But the very signal that David was ready to pass the torch — his rapid physiological decline unto death — was a sign to those unscrupulous within his inner circle to take advantage of the king’s decline to make a move for power.


David’s son, Adonijah, saw his father’s weakness as an opportunity to seize the crown. He called for and rallied other malcontents within David’s kingdom, hired a public relations team, blasted his own trumpet, and found some official looking people to declare himself king.

Strategic Differences or Wicked Rebellion
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. — 2 Timothy 3:1

Traitors view their own treason as a mere strategic difference. “We are all reasonable men,” declares the traitor, “we just have strategic differences in how to advance the kingdom.” Thus, “strategic differences,” or even “philosophical differences” become the justification for dishonor, rebellion, and subterfuge. Christians should be able to demonstrate charity one towards another even with respect to genuine strategic and philosophical differences which are within the camp of orthodoxy, but no quarter should be give to dishonor, rebellion and subterfuge. These are sins of the heart that threaten to bring down Christian culture and community. They are not only perverse, they are strangely infectious, which is why they are so thoroughly excoriated in Scripture.

Patricide is the worst form of rebellion. Patricide is the opposite of patriarchy. Patriarchy is the biblical doctrine of multi-generational faithfulness. Patricide is the act of killing our fathers. Patricide takes many forms. It need not manifest itself in the actual physical execution of a father. If a son seeks to wipe out or usurp the legacy of his father, his actions are patricidal. Similarly, where men turn violently against their earthly fathers, spiritual fathers, or even those Founding Fathers who purchased the present generation’s freedom with the blood of the past, they are not only ungrateful, they are patricidal.

Adonijah was not only traitorous, he was patricidal. His actions would have the net effect of wiping out his father’s authority, legacy and dream. Oh, he would be ever so slick in his approach of course. Adonijah was a master at invoking his father’s name when it was convenient (“...look at me, the true heir to David’s throne.”), but distancing himself from his father’s authority when it was not.

Adonijah could offer numerous plausible justifications for treason against his own father: After all, he was the elder brother, not Solomon. By right the throne should go to the elder. David’s favoritism for Solomon should not be taken that seriously. David was old and not in a position to make the best judgment for the kingdom. Also typical of traitors, Adonijah had a form of godliness. He was handsome and winsome, and he knew it. People naturally gravitated to him. Perhaps he was a better communicator than Solomon. All of this combined meant he would have the heart of the people and could thus usher in a season of victorious peace. In sum, Adonijah had effectively persuaded himself and others that he was the rightful, natural, and appropriate successor to the crown.

Treason Hurts
Treason is always painful, especially when it comes from someone you loved, cherished, and nurtured. But rather than becoming bitter at traitors, the servant of God must recognize that God will not leave them unpunished. More importantly, the Christian must realize that he has no right to be spared what God did not spare to his only begotten Son — the presence of traitors.I am grateful that God spared David the horror of seeing a fourth son (after Amnon, Chileab and Absalom) go down to the grave. I am equally grateful for both the wisdom and restraint of Solomon (who was less than 20 years old) at this time. Solomon was merciful to Adonijah during the life of his father. After being anointed king, Solomon called for his half-brother Adonijah and granted him a conditional amnesty: If Adonijah would return to his house, and if no more rebellion be found in his heart, he would not die. This was more than generous. It was also wise. It demonstrated concern for the tender heart of his father David, and it gave Adonijah a second chance to prove himself honorable or traitorous.

Like all unrepentant traitors, Adonijah could not deny his true nature. After the death of King David, Adonijah again used subtlety to disgrace his father and possibly to launch yet another plot to seize power. Using Bathsheba as bait, Adonijah requested that King David’s latest concubine/wife be given to him to wed, an action specifically forbidden as incest under the laws of Leviticus, and sanctioned with the death penalty. Like his older brother Absalom, who disgraced himself with his father’s wives, Adonijah wanted to place himself on par with the former king. Solomon’s response was decisive and appropriate — Adonijah was executed.

[b]Treason in 21st Century Christians[/b]

At the beginning of the 21st century several key national ministries experienced Adonijah-like treason. In each case, a man or woman who had been given opportunity and mentored by the organizations’ founder, turned on their spiritual fathers in an attempt to seize power. In each case, the results were spiritual bloodshed, broken hearts, and confusion.

I have thought of King David often as I have watched a spirit of dishonor and treason spread throughout our culture: Children seek to destroy their parents; Servants turning on masters for personal gain. Men no longer comprehend the concept of treason, because they have never been taught honor, loyalty, fidelity.

On incident in particular comes to mind: I was attending the funeral of a beloved Christian leader. Like King David, this leader would spent the last weeks of his life grieving in bed because a man he had mentored and treated as a son was taking advantage of his weakness by staging a coup d’etat, to wrest the leadership of the ministry from the appointed heir. The justification — you guessed it: “strategic differences.” As with Adonijah’s revolt, this coup d’etat failed and the rightful heir was installed. Like Adonijah, mercy was shown to the usurper, but also like Adonijah, the usurper would continue to reveal himself after the death of the leader. (In this case, he first did so by declaring the death of the Temple building work his spiritual mentor had created. Next, he was self-appointed heir to the new-improved temple building process.) As one might expect, the bankrupt morality which led to treason also lead to a bankrupt theology. A man’s morality often dictates his theology.

Do Traitors Prosper?

From man’s perspective treason unopposed is remarkably discouraging. There are times that we do see haughty and high-minded traitors prosper, redefine the issues and re-write the history books to cover their sins and switch the terms of debate. Sir John Harrington (1561-1612) explained the phenomenon this way: “Treason doth never prosper, what’s the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”

The lesson of Scripture is this: While there is pleasure in sin for a season, be sure your sins will find you out. Those who live by the sword will die by the sword, and those who ascend to power through treason, will meet their own end the same way. Few sins are as odious as a servant seizing his master’s kingdom, or a son violating his father, or a people who turn against the spiritual fathers whose blood bought them freedom. God will not be mocked.

How Not to Be a Traitor

In light of the above, I would like to take the liberty to offer some very practical thoughts on “how not to be a traitor.”

First, genuinely honor those who have invested in your life or who are in a position of authority over you. To honor them means that you reverence them deeply in your heart, and that your actions are a reflection of this reverence.

Second, let your heart be full of gratitude for those imperfect, but God appointed authorities whom the Lord God has given to you. It is impossible to be truly grateful and treasonable at the same time.

Third, always seek the best interests of those in positions of authority over you, especially fathers and mothers. Through your words, deeds, and actions, seek to make them successful.

Fourth, it is better to waive your rights and walk away from opportunity than to act against the lawful and jurisdictional interests of an authority. God knows your needs and desires. He will provide.

Fifth, work through chain of command. This shows respect and honor. Never, ever adopt an “ends justifies the means” mentality. Equate pragmatic thinking with infidelity, because the two are one and the same.

Sixth, when you are troubled by an authority, be upfront, honest and make appeals. Approach fathers and other leaders with a spirit of humility and charity.

Seventh, study the lives and consequences of famous traitors in the Bible and history. This will serve as an ever present warning against the temptation in your own heart.

Eight, don’t hang around or associate with other traitors. They will corrupt your thinking, your resolve, and in the end, you will be half the man you are now.

Nine, in matters of succession, opportunity, and finances, keep in mind that the issue is never how much you know, what a better job you would do for the business/family/local church/kingdom than the individual appointed by those in authority — the issue is submitting to the will of God and His choice.

Tenth, never justify a rebellious and self-serving attitude as a “strategic difference.”

Finally, if you have committed treason, repent.

http://www.visionforumministries.org/issues/family/thoughts_on_the_death_of_david.aspx

S
sermonindex


Continuing on the Subject of Treason:

Some articles I found:

………..There are two arguments running through the whole of this scene, by means of which Jesus tried to melt the betrayer. First, His perfect knowledge of him. As if He had said: I know thee, Judas; I know your whole life and history; I know that you have always been a thief and a traitor; I know that you have sold me for thirty pieces of silver; I know all your plans and all your crimes. In this way He tried to awaken the traitor-to make him feel himself a lost sinner. Second, His anxious love for him. As if He had said: I love you, Judas; I have left the bosom of the Father just for lost sinners like you; I pitied you before the world was; I am quite willing still to be a Savior to you. In this way He tried to win the traitor-to draw him to Himself

Christ Knows Judas' Whole Heart
All the Savior's dealings with Judas were intended to convince him that He knew his whole heart: "I know you, Judas, and all your crimes."

This was plainly His intention when washing the disciples' feet and telling them, that if they be bathed in His blood, they need nothing more than to have their feet washed-their daily sins wiped off daily: "Ye are clean every whit." He then adds, but "Ye are not all clean." This was evidently intended as a hint to Judas, to awaken his guilty conscience.

And then, when He had sat down again, to partake of the Passover with them, and had sent around the cup of the Passover, saying, as we are told in Luke: "Take this and divide it among yourselves," He would not let Judas slumber, as if He were unknown to him; but declares more plainly than before: "I know whom I have chosen; but that the Scripture may be fulfilled, He that eateth bread with me hath lifted up his heel against me." This was evidently intended as a plainer intimation to Judas that, however concealed he might be to others, he was naked and laid open to the eyes of the Savior, with whom he had to do…………

-Robert Murray MCheyne :


https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/articles/index.php?view=article&aid=459

…….Judas never had a true love for Christ. The incident of the alabaster box of spikenard makes that perfectly evident. To Mary there was nothing too good for Jesus, so she took her woman's treasure, the box of precious ointment, and broke it and poured it upon His head, as He said in deep appreciation of her devotion, for His burial, of which she had probably learned while sitting at His feet. But to Judas, and to others who were more or less influenced by him, this was utter waste. With cool calculation he figured that the ointment if sold would have yielded three hundred denarii, a full year's wages for a Roman soldier or an ordinary laboring man. Cunningly he insinuated that it was wasted on Jesus when it might have relieved much human misery if given to the poor. But it was only to cover up the covetousness of his heart that he mentioned the poor. He was really calculating the use he could have made of so large a sum for his own ends…..

-Harry Ironside

https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/articles/index.php?view=article&aid=10306

…………After making mention of those fearful examples of falling, it is highly probable that the thoughts of the penman of this Epistle turned to another one much more recent, and which had come beneath his own immediate notice. It is quite possible that, when our Lord sent forth the twelve, "Judas [Jude] the brother of James, and Judas Iscariot" were paired together (Luke 6:16, brackets mine; 9:1-6)—the great apostate "son of perdition" (John 17:12) and the one who was to write at length upon the great apostasy! It scarcely admits of doubt that as Jude’s mind reverted to the traitor it made him exclaim with added emphasis, "Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling… be glory… both now and ever." He had probably respected Judas Iscariot as his fellow apostles had, and perhaps had heard him ask along with the others, "Lord, is it I?" in response to Christ’s statement that one of their number was about to betray Him. And no doubt he was shocked when Judas Iscariot began to openly reveal his true character. For immediately after receiving the sop that Jesus had dipped in the dish for him and hearing a woe pronounced upon himself, Judas hypocritically repeated the question, "Master, is it I?" then went forth to do that most despicable deed for which he had been appointed (John 6:70; Matthew 26:20-25; John 13:21-30; Ps. 41:9; John 17:12). He could not but be aware that in remorse the traitor had hanged himself: and I believe that the shadow of his awful doom fell upon Jude as he penned this Epistle.

But Jude did not suffer these sad contemplations to sink him into a state of dejection. He knew that his omniscient Master had foretold that a rising tide of evil would spread through the visible Church, and that however mysterious such a phenomenon might be there was a wise reason for it in the Divine economy. He knew that however fiercely the storm might rage there was no occasion to fear, for Christ Himself was in the ship who had declared, "and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world [or "age"]" (Matthew 28:20, brackets mine). He knew that the gates of hell could not and would not prevail against the Church (Matthew 16:18). Therefore he lifted up his eyes above this present evil age and gazed by faith upon the enthroned Head and Preserver of the Church, rendering worship to Him. That is the all-important lesson to be drawn from the background of this prayer, and why I have dwelt so long upon it. Fellow Christians, let us duly heed it. Instead of being so much occupied with conditions in the world, with the menace of the atomic bomb, with the deepening apostasy, let our hearts be increasingly engaged with our beloved Lord; let us find our peace and joy in Him……….

~A.W. Pink

https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/articles/index.php?view=article&aid=679


EDIT: Yikes! fixed it... :-)

S
sermonindex


Rebecca_LF wrote:

Continuing on the Subject of Treason:

Some articles I found:

EDIT: Yikes! fixed it... :-)


I can’t help but quote
Paris Reidhead. This is indeed the age we live:

“…It has penetrated so much of our religion. And it is in utter and total contrast with Christianity! Unfortunately, it’s seldom seen. And here we find Micah, wants to have a little chapel, and he wants to have a priest, and he wants to have prayer, and he wants to have devotion, because, "I know the Lord will do me good!" AND THIS IS SELFISHNESS! AND THIS IS SIN! And the Levite comes along and falls right in with it! Because he wants a place! He wants ten shekels and a shirt and his food! And so in order that he can have what he wants, and Micah can have what they want, They sell out God! For ten shekels and a shirt! AND THIS IS THE BETRAYAL OF THE AGES! And it is the betrayal in which we live. And I don’t see how God can revive it! Until we come back to Christianity. As in direct and total contrast with the stenchful humanism that’s perpetrated in our generation in the name of Christ.

I’m afraid that it’s become so subtle that it goes everywhere. What is it? In essence it’s this! That this philosophical postulate that the end of all being is the happiness of man, has been sort of covered over with evangelical terms and Biblical doctrine until God reigns in heaven for the happiness of man, Jesus Christ was incarnate for the happiness of man, all the angels exist in the…..Everything is for the happiness of man! And I submit to you that this is Unchristian! Isn’t man happy? Didn’t God intend to make man happy? Yes. But as a by-product, and not a prime-product….”

https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/articles/index.php?view=article&aid=2067


“….He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me,
except I drink it, thy will be done. (Matt 26:39-42)
What was the cup?
Well, I’ll tell you one ingredient it had: It had betrayal in it.
The men who had sworn allegiance to Him, when it came to a crisis, quit.
Can He drink of the cup? What’s in the cup?
I believe in that cup there was
Internal suffering,
Mental suffering, and
Spiritual suffering.
Do you want to drink the cup?
I am straightened, He says. I cannot do anything now. There is a baptism through which I have to go.
The Holy Ghost cannot come down until I go up.
I cannot go up until I have done the will of the Father….:”

~Leonard Ravenhill

https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/articles/article_pdf.php?aid=6914


S
sermonindex

[b]TRAITORS[/b]

…….never justify a rebellious and self-serving attitude as a “strategic difference.”

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, [b]Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;[/b] Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. — 2 Timothy 3:1…..”

“…Finally, if you have committed treason, repent.”

S
sermonindex

"III. But my Third and Last general head, under which I was to offer some motives, in order to excite all governors, with their respective households, to serve the Lord in the manner before recommended, I hope, will serve instead of a thousand arguments, to prove the weakness and folly of any such objection.

1. And the first motive I shall mention is the duty of GRATITUDE, which you that are governors of families owe to God. Your lot, every one must confess, is cast in a fair ground: providence hath given you a goodly heritage, above many of your fellow-creatures, and therefore, out of a principle of gratitude, you ought to endeavor, as much as in you lies, to make every person of your respective households to call upon him as long as they live: not to mention, that the authority, with which God has invested you as parents and governors of families, is a talent committed to your trust, and which you are bound to improve to your Master's honor. In other things we find governors and parents can exercise lordship over their children and servants readily, and frequently enough can say to one, Go, and he goeth; and to another, Come, and he cometh; to a third, Do this, and he doeth it. And shall this power be so often employed in your own affairs, and never exerted in the things of God? Be astonished, O heavens, at this! Thus did not faithful Abraham; no, God says, that he knew Abraham would command his servants and children after him. Thus did not Joshua: no, he was resolved not only to walk with God himself, but to improve his authority in making all about him do so too: "As for me and my household, we will serve the Lord." Let us go and do likewise...."

~George Whitefield

S
sermonindex

2. But Secondly, If gratitude to God will not, methinks LOVE AND PITY TO YOUR CHILDREN should move you, with your respective families, to serve the Lord.

Most people express a great fondness for their children: nay so great, that very often their own lives are wrapped up in those of their offspring. "Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb?" says God by his Prophet Isaiah. He speaks of it as a monstrous thing, and scarce credible; but the words immediately following, affirm it to be possible, "Yes, they may forget" and experience also assures us they may. Father and mother may both forsake their children: for what greater degree of forgetfulness can they express towards them, than to neglect the improvement of their better part, and not bring them up in the knowledge and fear of God?

It is true indeed, parents seldom forget to provide for their children's bodies, (though, it is to be feared, some men are so far sunk beneath the beasts that perish, as to neglect even that) but then how often do they forget, or rather, when do they remember, to secure the salvation of their immortal souls? But is this their way of expressing their fondness for the fruit of their bodies? Is this the best testimony they can give of their affection to the darling of their hearts? Then was Delilah fond of Samson, when she delivered him up into the hands of the Philistines? Then were those ruffians well affected to Daniel, when they threw him into a den of lions?

3. But Thirdly, If neither gratitude to God, nor love and pity to your children, will prevail on you; yet let a principle of COMMON HONESTY AND JUSTICE move you to set up the holy resolution in the text.

This is a principle which all men would be thought to act upon. But certainly, if any may be truly censured for their injustice, none can be more liable to such censure, than those who think themselves injured if their servants withdraw themselves from their bodily work, and yet they in return take no care of their inestimable souls. For is it just that servants should spend their time and strength in their master's service, and masters not at the same time give them what is just and equal for their service?

It is true, some men may think they have done enough when they give unto their servants food and raiment, and say, "Did not I bargain with thee for so much a year?" But if they give them no other reward than this, what do they less for their very beasts? But are not servants better than they?

Doubtless they are: and however masters may put off their convictions for the present, they will find a time will come, when they shall know they ought to have given them some spiritual as well as temporal wages; and the cry of those that have mowed down their fields, will enter into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth...

~George Whitefield


S
sermonindex


Feel free to jump in anytime...the waters great...

S
sermonindex

My son will be turning nine soon. I have 5 kids, 4 of them girls. I have been finding alot of great articles on what it means to be a real man. I thought this one was really good.:)

[url=http://www.therebelution.com/A%20Real%20Man.pdf]A Real Man[/url]

S
sermonindex

I appreicaite all of the women that have pm'd me to tell me what a blessing this thread was to them. That has been such an encouragement to me! :-)

S
sermonindex


Rebecca_LF wrote:
My son will be turning nine soon. I have 5 kids, 4 of them girls. I have been finding alot of great articles on what it means to be a real man. I thought this one was really good.:)

[url=http://www.therebelution.com/A%20Real%20Man.pdf]A Real Man[/url]

[url=http://www.therebelution.com/A%20Real%20Woman.pdf]A Real Woman[/url]

:-o This is good stuff. :-)

S
sermonindex


O.K. here's my final post on this thread. :-) I'm ending it with a final quote from George Whitefield:


"....4. But Fourthly, If neither gratitude to God, pity to children, nor a principle for common justice to servants, are sufficient to balance all ob- jections; yet let that darling, that prevailing motive of SELF-INTEREST turn the scale, and engage you with your respective households to serve the Lord.

This weighs greatly with you in other matters: be then persuaded to let it have a due and full influence on you in this: and if it has, if you have but faith as a grain of mustard-seed, how can you avoid believing, that promoting family-religion, will be the best means to promote your own temporal, as well as eternal welfare? For "Godliness has the promise of the life that now is, as well as that which is to come."

Besides, you all, doubtless wish for honest servants, and pious children: and to have them prove otherwise, would be as great a grief to you, as it was to Elisha to have a treacherous Gehazi, or David to be troubled with a rebellious Absolom. But how can it be expected they should learn their duty, except those set over them, take care to teach it to them? Is it not as reasonable to expect you should reap where had not sewn, or gather where you had not strawed?

Did Christianity, indeed, give any countenance to children and servants to disregard their parents and masters according to the flesh, or represent their duty to them, as inconsistent with their entire obedience to their father and master who is in heaven, there might then be some pretense to neglect instructing them in the principles of such a religion.

But since the precepts of this pure and undefiled religion, are all of them holy, just, and good; and the more they are taught their duty to God, the better they will perform their duties to you; methinks, to neglect the improvement of their souls, out of a dread of spending too much time in religious duties, is acting quite contrary to your own interest as well as duty.

5. Fifthly and Lastly, If neither gratitude to God, love to your children, common justice to your servants, nor even that most prevailing motive self-interest, will excite; yet let a consideration of the terrors of the Lord persuade you to put in practice the pious resolution in the text. Remember, the time will come, and that perhaps very shortly, when we must all appear before the judgment-seat of Christ; where we must give a solemn and strict account how we have had our conversation, in our respective families in this world. How will you endure to see your children and servants (who ought to be your joy and crown of rejoicing in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ) coming out as so many swift witnesses against you; cursing the father that begot them, the womb that bare them, the paps which they have sucked, and the day they ever entered into your houses? Think you not, the damnation which men must endure for their own sins, will be sufficient, that they need load themselves with the additional guilt of being accessory to the damnation of others also? O consider this, all ye that forget to serve the Lord with your respective households, "lest he pluck you away, and there be none to deliver you!"

But God forbid, brethren, that any such evil should befall you: no, rather will I hope, that you have been in some measure convinced by what has been said of the great importance of FAMILY-RELIGION; and therefore are ready to cry out in the words immediately following the text, "God forbid that we should forsake the Lord;" and again, ver. 21, "Nay, but we will (with our several households) serve the Lord."

And that there may be always such a heart in you, let me exhort all governors of families, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, often to reflect on the inestimable worth of their own souls, and the infinite ransom, even the precious blood of Jesus Christ, which has been paid down for them. Remember, I beseech you to remember, that you are fallen creatures; that you are by nature lost and estranged from God; and that you can never be restored to your primitive happiness, till by being born again of the Holy Ghost, you arrive at your primitive state of purity, have the image of God restamped upon your souls, and are thereby made meet to be partakers of the inheritance with the saints in light. Do, I say, but seriously and frequently reflect on, and act as persons that believe such important truths, and you will no more neglect your family's spiritual welfare than your own. No, the love of God, which will then be shed abroad in your hearts, will constrain you to do your utmost to preserve them: and the deep sense of God's free grace in Christ Jesus, (which you will then have) in calling you, will excite you to do your utmost to save others, especially those of your own household. And though, after all your pious endeavors, some may continue unreformed; yet you will have this comfortable reflection to make, that you did what you could to make your families religious: and therefore may rest assured of sitting down in the kingdom of heaven, with Abraham, Joshua, and Cornelius, and all the godly householders, who in their several generations shone forth as so many lights in their respective households upon earth. Amen....."

:-)

S
sermonindex

Thank you, sister Rebecca, for this thread. I haven't read all of it, but I know it is full of edifying encouragement for the body of Christ, especially in the area of the home and being Biblical women. Thank you for all the time you have poured into this thread in sharing these things. You never know who might come along and be greatly encourage. :)

~Joy

S
sermonindex


Roniya wrote:
Thank you, sister Rebecca, for this thread. I haven't read all of it, but I know it is full of edifying encouragement for the body of Christ, especially in the area of the home and being Biblical women. Thank you for all the time you have poured into this thread in sharing these things. ~Joy

Well thanks sister Joy, and hopefully it was an encouragement to you also.;-)

You never know who might come along and be greatly encourage. :)

Yes, you never do know do you?....

S
sermonindex

I most certainly have been blessed, sister! :-)

And here is another thread that is along the same lines as this one.

[url=https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=24139&forum=34]Sermons on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood[/url]

S
sermonindex


Roniya wrote:
I most certainly have been blessed, sister! :-)

And here is another thread that is along the same lines as this one.

[url=https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=24139&forum=34]Sermons on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood[/url]

https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&order=1&topic_id=24139&forum=34&post_id=&refresh=Go

Sister, this is really going too far. Can there be enough "Revive Our Hearts Threads" if we want to call it that? Enjoy your thread....God bless! ;-)

S
sermonindex


Rebecca_LF wrote:
The Feminization of the Family
by William Einwechter, December 8, 2005

The social institution that feminists have targeted as one of the most repressive to women is the traditional family. By “traditional family” we mean the family structure that developed in Western society under the direct influence of Christianity and the Bible. In the traditional family, the man is the head of the home and the one responsible for providing those things necessary for the sustenance of life. The woman is a “keeper at home,” and the one primarily responsible for the care of the children. The traditional family thus defined is in line with the biblical plan for the home. Feminists hate the family that is patterned after the Word of God because it is contrary to all that they accept as true. Thus, their goal is the total destruction of the traditional family. Feminist Roxanne Dunbar said it plainly: “Ultimately, we want to destroy the three pillars of class and caste [i.e., sexist] society — the family, private property, and the state.”[5] Feminists seek the overthrow of the traditional family, and in its place they look for a radically different social institution that is shaped by feminist dogma.

That is radical...the destruction of the traditional family. It really is shocking to read the agenda of the feminists, and they are really serious about it. It would be interesting to see a list of different philosophies or concepts our culture has accepted that is comes from the agenda of the feminists...

I've just started reading this article by Mr. Einwechter. The first couple paragraphs were really good...I'll have to print it out and read the rest. :)

Thanks for posting it, Rebecca!

~Joy

S
sermonindex

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php?pid=10121]The Danger of Deception[/url]


"..The enemy has a goal that is no less than to conquer and control our lives. That’s your life, and your life, and your life, and your life, and my life. He never stops in that effort in trying to deceive and trying to control, and he constantly lays siege. He doesn’t give up and go away.

Many times he doesn’t have to use force to conquer us. He often uses subtle, deceptive means. Because if he came in very obvious ways, we would recognize his attempts and we would resist his efforts.

So he worms his way into our lives, our thoughts, our culture, by deceptive means that are subtle, that sometimes come disguised as gifts—things we think will be good for us, things we think will be helpful, things we think will be blessings—and they turn out to be very, very dangerous, something that is harmful.

Deception is one of the primary means, primary weapons of our enemy. He uses deception as the Greeks did with the Trojans to lure us in, to ensnare us, and to gain entrance into the fortress of our hearts, and sometimes he does that without ever firing a shot..."

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php?pid=10122]Part Two[/url]

[b]"... I’m not talking about things that seem deceptive. That’s the very nature of deception—it seems to make sense and to be right...."[/b]


S
sermonindex

[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]"Decieving God's People-Series: Discerning Truth in a World of Deception" Listen here.[/url]

[b]2 Timothy 3:1-5

2 Timothy 3
1This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.

2For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,

3Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,

4Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;

5Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.[/b]


One of the reasons I believe these times are so perilous is because it is so decieving.


Leslie Basham: Nancy Leigh DeMoss says we let many popular books and movies promote false ideas.

Nancy Leigh DeMoss: So if it has glaring biblical and theological errors, why do we accept it? Why do we rave about it? Why do we give it five stars? Why do we buy it and read it? Why do they sell it in Christian bookstores?

Leslie: This is Revive Our Hearts with Nancy Leigh DeMoss for Thursday, January 29. You need discernment when interacting with books and movies in the world. But when you walk into a Christian bookstore, you don’t have to worry quite so much, right? Not necessarily, according to Nancy.

Nancy: If you’ve not been with us earlier in this series, we’re talking about the issue of deception, which is so widespread. The Scripture said it would be many deceivers in the last days and those who deceive us theologically and doctrinally. Then once you’re deceived theologically in terms of what you believe, you can be deceived in terms of how you should live, because how we should live flows out of what we believe.

So I’m doing something in this series that I really don’t like to do, and that is to spend time concentrating on the false. I much prefer spending my time on the true. We’re told that in the FBI—I’m sure you’ve heard this—when they want to train agents to spot counterfeit money, they don’t spend a lot of time handling the counterfeit. They spend all their time handling the genuine—the authentic—so that when a counterfeit is slipped in, they can recognize it quickly and easily.

I have made a commitment in my life since the time I was a little girl to spend my life handling the genuine. So we’re taking a couple of days here at the beginning of this series to delve into some of the deception—just enough on the surface so that you can see the kinds of things that we’re talking about. Then we’re going to turn the corner and talk about discernment. What does it mean to have discernment and how can we know the difference between truth and error?

In the last session, I spelled out and gave you some illustrations of how New Age teaching and thinking is infiltrating our world and even being adopted by some in our churches today. Now I want to talk about another kind of deception in terms of teaching and writing that is more prevalent in the church than the New Age teachings.

The people I quoted in the last session—and you can go back to ReviveOurHearts.com and get that transcript if you missed it—these are not Christians. These are false teachers. They are not believers in Christ, and what they are teaching is heresy. It is totally opposite of the gospel of faith in Jesus Christ.

Today I want to talk about something that’s a little more subtle, and that is we have many widely-respected, best-selling authors, pastors, and teachers in the Christian world who are deceiving God’s people. Again, I don’t know their hearts so I can’t say whether they have an intent to deceive. I think some do. But I think more often they are themselves deceived and are just being used by the enemy—by Satan, the deceiver—in ways they don’t even realize. I think many of them are just blind.

We talked about different levels of theological and doctrinal issues. Some of the errors we’re going to talk about today are not first level errors. Some of them are. Some of them are more second level errors, but they are serious errors that can affect the way we live and think about God and about the Word. So I want to bring some of them to your attention.

Some of these teachers and teachings are very, very popular today and particularly popular with young people or with new believers. These are teachings and books that are being promoted in church youth groups, in Christian high schools, and in Christian colleges. They are rampant. They are widespread and they are not as completely erroneous as the teachings we talked about in the last session. These are more truth mixed with error. Some truth and some error, which makes it even more subtle, I think, in some ways.

Now in this session, I’m not going to name specific books or teachers if I can help it for a couple of reasons. First, there’s so many examples of doctrinal error out there that I couldn’t possibly identify all of them for you. And by the time this program airs, some months from when it’s being recorded, some of today’s bestsellers will be passé and there will be new ones. So I’m not picking on particular books or authors. I just want you to get the concept of how error works itself in.

Then, ultimately, you can’t depend on me or anyone else to tell you what is truth and error, what is right and wrong. You need to develop a spiritual centeredness on the Word of God, a groundedness in God’s Word, and spiritual antennae that go up so that you know what is truth and error. You can discern yourself. That’s what we’ll talk about in the upcoming sessions.

Let me put these in a few different categories. First of all, there’s this whole area of what I call shallow, feel-good Christianity. A lot of this involves self-help or self-esteem teaching that is packaged in biblical terminology but in many cases it is really devoid of the gospel.

It’s the concept that theology doesn’t really matter. We just want to help people feel better. So tied in with these kinds of teaching you’ll find a lot of psychotherapeutic theology—if you could call it that. It’s barely theology. Just a little bit of theology mixed in with a whole lot of psychotherapeutic teaching and in some cases psychobabble.

There’s a lot of teaching on how to be happy, how to be fulfilled, and replacing negative thoughts with positive thoughts. What you have is a teaching that tends to be what theologians call anthrocentric, which is man-centered, rather than theocentric, which is God-centered. It’s self-centered rather than Christ-centered.

I’m thinking, for example, of the pastor of what may be the largest church in the country, certainly one them. The essence of his teaching is seven principles for success and those principles are:

1. Enlarge your vision
2. Develop a healthy self-image
3. Discover the power of your thoughts and words
4. Let go of the past
5. Stand strong against opposition and adversity
6. Live to give
7. Choose to be happy1

This particular teacher urges you to get up every morning and say, “I’m going to do something great. This is going to be a great day.” When you do this, you agree with God who “is trying to promote us, to increase us, to give us more.”2 These are direct quotes from one of his best-selling books. When I say best-selling, I’m talking huge bestsellers, being read and imbibed by Christians who at best are getting cotton candy.

This is a psychological message with a thin covering of theology. It starts with ourselves rather than God. God is a positive God. So you have little or no concept of His holiness, His wrath, His justice, and again virtually no mention of the cross, the blood of Christ, atonement for sin, the resurrection of Christ.

These don’t just define who we are, they are who we are. You take these out and you have nothing left. You have no substance. You have no life. You have no hope. But in this kind of teaching, none of that is considered really necessary. They miss the gospel entirely. So the problem as they see it is not that we are fallen sinners or rebels, but that we have a negative self-image and that’s all up to us to change.

We’re not dependent on the transforming work of God’s grace to change us. It’s moralism. It’s changing your outward behavior without really changing your heart or taking you to the gospel that gives you a personal relationship with Christ.

One blogger I read summarized a message he watched by this pastor of the megachurch. The blogger’s comment was there was no Christ, no cross, no mention of man’s moral bankruptcy. Just the feel-good, positive message of assurance that God always rewards human effort and virtue.

Now is there something wrong with buying one of those books and reading it? Well, I’ll just tell you this for me, and we’ll get to this when I talk about discernment. Those are books I don’t buy. Those are books I don’t read. Will it destroy your soul if you read it? The problem is if you fill your mind and your heart—it’s like telling your kids you can’t eat all this junk before dinner because then you don’t have an appetite for the real stuff.

That’s where we have anemic Christians who don’t know how to deal with suffering, don’t know how to deal with pain, don’t know how to deal with sinful habits and issues in their lives. It will just leave you weak, anemic, and impotent spiritually at its best. At its worst it could be very, very deceptive.

Now let me move to another area that I’ve been asked to comment on more than once. I’m going to say so little about this that I hate to bring it up, but just enough for you to know that there are a lot of red flags here and that is the whole issue of what has been called today the “emerging church.”

The emerging church today is by and large an attempt to reach post-moderns who are unchurched. What you find of many in the emerging church movement is that they are reactionary. Now anything I say is not going to be true of all of them, but these are some of the characteristics that seem to me to be pretty common.

A lot of them are reactionary.
They are disillusioned with traditional, organized church.
They feel it’s become irrelevant in our culture, and there is some truth to that.
There is some truth to all of this. But therefore their inclination is to throw off Christian dogma, Christian terminology, systematic theology.

You find those in this movement often reacting to propositional truth or direct proclamation of the gospel. When I say propositional truth, I mean a gospel that is rooted in objective propositions and truth about the sinfulness of man, the holiness of God, the substitutionary atonement and death of Christ. They would say that’s not really how you reach people. You reach them more with one-on-one dialogue, with conversation. That word conversation is a big word in the emerging church movement.

They react to what they would call confrontational evangelism. “[God] commands all [men] everywhere,” the New Testament says, “to repent” (Acts 17:30). That’s not the kind of language that you would often hear used in the emerging church. They want to give people freedom to discover truth through dialogue, interpersonal relationships. Within the emerging church movement, you will find unorthodox views on such doctrines as blood atonement, salvation by faith, the existence of hell, etc.

Let me quote from a very popular, huge best-selling book—somebody who’s influencing a lot of Bible college students. A lot of seminary students are reading this stuff and are being very influenced by it. This author said, “For me, the beginning of sharing my faith with people began by throwing out Christianity and embracing Christian spirituality, a nonpolitical mysterious system that can be experienced but not explained.”3

Now I won’t take the time to dissect all of that, but let me just say that is very, very dangerous kind of teaching. It’s deceptive. It’s not that there’s no kernel of truth maybe in parts of it and I’m not saying this person isn’t a nice person. I don’t know the man who wrote this.

I’m just saying I could name a half-dozen names that many of you . . . some of you young people are reading these books. They’re reading them in the church youth groups. They’re being very influenced in some of our conservative Christian schools. Some of the teachers are using some of these books as textbooks.

I hate to just say it and leave it at that but that’s what I’m going to do. We have some resources available at ReviveOurHearts.com that can help you explore more on these kinds of teachings if you’re interested in that.

Let me mention another teaching that is making the rounds today—something called redemptive-movement hermeneutics. You may say, “I can’t even spell that.” That’s okay. Go to the transcript. We’ll have it for you there. Actually, some of this is tied into some of the emerging church theology.

Hermeneutics has to do with how you interpret Scripture, and redemptive-movement hermeneutics—redemptive, that’s a good word, and hermeneutics, that’s a good word—but the meaning here is that you have to interpret Scripture progressively, that it doesn’t necessarily mean today what it meant when it was written and that the Bible has to be interpreted in light of where culture is, where culture has evolved.

For example, homosexuality may have been a sin in Bible days but those passages now have to be interpreted differently based on cultural changes and advances in our understanding of psychology and sociology. One of the areas where this hermeneutic—this approach to interpreting Scripture—has been the most damaging and the most deceptive is on the whole issue of women’s role in the church.

The egalitarian position that says there should be no differences between men’s and women’s roles in the church, that women can be pastors, women can be elders in the church. That theology has been very influenced by this redemptive-movement hermeneutic.

Is this a first level teaching or doctrinal issue? It may be in some cases. In some cases it touches on second level issues, secondary issues, but in some cases it can take you to really do damage to the gospel.

Let me mention another movement. This is moving into a different field here. I’m not trying to bash anybody. I hope you know my heart. I want your eyes to be opened to the truth that is in Christ and to the deception that can pull us away from that truth. But we’ve had now for at least a couple of generations this whole movement called word-faith or word of faith.

This is where preachers promise complete physical healing for people who believe God’s Word. They say that in the atonement of Jesus Christ comes not only spiritual healing but also physical healing. The second tenet of this word of faith theology system is that God wants His people to be financially prosperous. So many of these teachers guarantee that God will reward followers with new homes, with cars, with better jobs, of course, in exchange for your donation to our ministry.

God wants you to be wealthy and God wants you to be healthy. We have what’s been called under this branch of theology the “name it and claim it” teaching, which in essence says you can speak anything into existence by positive confessions.

Now again we could do a long whole series on this word of faith theology. I’m not saying that everything in all of these teachings is heretical. I’m saying there is plenty of heresy and false teaching embedded and infiltrated into these systems. I’m just saying you must be cautious. You must be discerning, because there’s a lot of deception here.

Now let me give you one more illustration. This is a book that at the time of when we’re recording right now is very, very hot in the Christian world. I walked into my local Christian bookstore the other day. It was front and center. As of today, I think it’s the number eight bestseller on Amazon.com on their ratings, which is huge, huge, huge. This is a Christian book. This is not a New Age book. This is not a book written by some New Age guru. This is a book that purports to be a Christian book.

I’m not going to name it because by the time we air this it will be something different, but let me just tell you a little bit about it. I went to an online resource—I’m trying to say this without naming what it is—that sells Christian books and saw the description on this website for this book. Here’s the product description:

In a world where religion seems to grow increasingly irrelevant, this book wrestles with the timeless question, "Where is God in a world so filled with unspeakable pain?" [So far, so good.] The answers that the main character gives will astound you and perhaps transform you as much as it did him. You’ll want everyone you know to read this book.

Now that’s not the description on Amazon.com. That’s the description on a site that sells Christian books. And it’s our Christian bookstores promoting this book. This book is endorsed by a list of who’s who in the Christian world. A well-known Christian leader and author endorses it on the front with a line that says something like: “This book will be to its generation what Pilgrim’s Progress was to Bunyan’s generation.”

So it likens it to something of the stature of Pilgrim’s Progress, which in my view could not be further from the truth. The man writing that statement is a godly, pious man who has written some wonderful things and loves the Lord. So this is where the confusion can enter in.

I skimmed through—there were 118 reviews on this Christian website—reviews of this book. The vast majority are rave reviews. Almost all of them were fives. A handful of them were zeros, which meant in terms of five stars—five is the most you can get. So the average was about four. But it wasn’t because there were people in between. People either thought this book was the most fantastic thing since the Bible, or they thought it was heresy, which I don’t think you have to guess which camp I’m in on that subject.

Let me read to you what some of these reviews said. This one said, “This book has transformed my life and the lives of the nine individuals I have given it to.” Another said, “I have read hundreds of books in my life. This book is the most compelling, impactful book I have ever read, after the Bible, of course.”

Now when you go to a Christian website and you see those kinds of reviews—and there are many, many of them on that site—would that not make you think maybe this is something that would be good for me to read? I can understand if you would think that.

But the problem is that mixed in with a smattering of helpful insights in this book is a perspective on the nature of God, on the trinity, on salvation, and on other core doctrinal issues that is incompatible with Scripture.

The problem as I read through these reviews on this Christian website is that most people seem more than willing to overlook those doctrinal differences and deficiencies. That’s what bothers me.

Let me give you some examples. One reviewer said, “An incredible book. I bought copies for my friends. Some who have a problem with the doctrine are missing the true message.” Hello?! The doctrine is the message.

Another reviewer said, “The book has glaring theological and biblical errors but the book is not about theology. It’s about forgiveness, reconciliation, and getting past the dead structure of churchianity in order to live the relationship of Christianity with God and man.” Again, I say, hello?! It’s not about theology? Forgiveness is theology. Reconciliation is theology. A relationship between God and man—that is theology!

So if it has glaring biblical and theological errors, why do we accept it? Why do we rave about it? Why do we give it five stars? Why do we buy it and read it? Why do they sell it in Christian bookstores? Can you tell I’m exercised?

One more. “I think we can all learn from this book,” one reviewer says, “is that the important thing is that we have a personal relationship with God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. This is just one man’s unique take on it and if it works for him and keeps him close to God, then who are we to judge?”

The test of validity of a book or a teaching or a radio program is not: Does it work? Does it help somebody? Does it make somebody feel closer to God? The test is: Does it accord with the Scripture? That’s where I go back to the Scripture.

Again we hear the words of Paul in 2 Corinthians chapter 11, verse 3, “I am afraid that as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, your thoughts will be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ”—Christ who is the truth.

Proverbs chapter 30, verses 5 and 6: “Every word of God proves true; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, lest he rebuke you and you be found a liar.”

Ladies, you may find it in the Christian bookstore. It may be the number one bestseller. It may sell a gazillion copies, and you may hear the authors on Christian radio, on interviews, on television. You may read about them. You may say they look like really nice people. They are really nice people. They’re really articulate. Don’t be deceived. If it’s not according to this Book, it’s not truth. And don’t spend your time on it.

I hesitated in a sense to do this part of this series because I’ve been told that if you point out the errors in something, people are more inclined to want to go read it. I’m hoping that my talking about some of these things does not at all incline any of our listeners to go pick up a copy. Don’t go pick up a copy. You don’t need to.

If you need to know more about it, go on the Internet. You can find some outstanding reviews that will tell you what the doctrinal errors are, but then don’t take it into your system. You don’t need it. Get your life rooted and grounded in this Book—the Word of God. It’s the truth. Measure everything you read according to how it stands up to the light of God’s holy, holy Word.

Leslie: Nancy Leigh DeMoss has been pointing you to the one solid place you can stand. You need to know God’s Word and use it to discern the messages you hear from the mainstream media and within the church.

I hope you’re evaluating everything you hear on Revive Our Hearts according to the Bible. This topic is so important to Nancy. When she recommends a resource to you, she evaluates it in the way she’s been describing.

So we’re happy to recommend a book by Tim Challies called The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment. It will help you gain tools of discernment that you can apply to messages at the Cineplex or the megachurch.

When you donate any amount to Revive Our Hearts we’ll say thanks by sending you The Discipline of Spiritual Discernment. Call with your donation at 1-800-569-5959 and ask for the book by Tim Challies. Or visit ReviveOurHeartsRadio.com.

Is there any type of deception we as women specifically need to watch for? Nancy will address that tomorrow. Now she’s back to lead us in prayer.

Nancy: O Lord, I love Your Word. I love Your truth. I love Jesus. I love the gospel. And Lord, my heart is so broken when I see the deception in the Christian world—people who are buying into ways of thinking that are reactionary and that redefine your Word and reorder it and dissuade us from thinking in ways that are in accordance with the simplicity and the purity of the doctrine of Christ.

O Lord, I pray that my heart has come across, that I will not seem to be just making a loud noise or being contrary or cantankerous. I want people to love the truth because it’s the truth that sets them free and it’s the truth that lifts You up for who You are and lifts up the gospel for what it is. This is precious truth. Help us to love Your truth more than we love life itself and to stake our lives on it. For Jesus’ sake I pray it, amen.

S
sermonindex


[url=http://www.reviveourhearts.com/radio/roh/today.php]A Popular Deception 29Series: Discerning Truth in a World of Deception[/url]

"...If you think about what characterizes our generation, there’s a lot of hurt, a lot of pain. We have the divorce culture—young people and older alike who are starved for healthy relationships, who are starved for intimacy. We have a whole wounded generation that is desperate for healing and wholeness, so they’re easily drawn into something that promises what they long for.

I see also in this generation a heart-longing for beauty, for goodness. They don’t want to just know objective truth intellectually. They want to experience it. That’s part of the promise that comes with many of these popular writings today.

We have a generation that is struggling to know experientially the reality of the love of God and the gospel story. They know it in their heads, but they have not really experienced it in their hearts; it’s not made the connection to their hearts. They’re looking for writers, for speakers, for leaders who can connect to their hearts and who can enflame their passions, not just stir their minds. The ones who enflame their hearts and passions are the ones who are capturing their minds...."


This discussion is archived and closed to new replies. Start a new discussion to carry the subject on.
Archived
1 of 107 posts

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate