What follows is an e-mail I sent to a number of professing christians. Many of those professing christians were "pastors" of "churches".
I thought it would be an appropriate place to post it as this thread is addressing these very same issues. I post this in hopes that it may serve some here in their pursuit of His Holy will in sanctifying those children given them by God in the area of education.
I believe I have plainly stated previously on this thread what I understand the mind of God to be on the matter.
I do hope that this serves to further clarify those claims from God's Holy infallible Word.
Here is the question I put forth:
I was wondering if you might furnish me with a Biblical defense of either the neutrality,indifference,command,permission/allowance or otherwise respecting God's will for the christian to send their children to be educated by state/government-run institutions where the teachers and fellow students are for the most part unbelievers,God-haters,anti-Christ and immoral, where hypocrisy abounds and the religion of secular humanism promoted.
Please reply ASAP if able,
______________
PS APOLOGIA - The Greek word meaning "a spoken or written defense." It appears eight times in the New Testament, in the context of people defending their faith or actions by reason and logic.
From Webster's Dictionary: apologia \\ap-uh-LOH-jee-uh;-juh\\, noun:
A formal defense or justification, especially of one's opinions, position, or actions.
From Websters Dictionary (1828 edition) Apologetic
Defending by words or arguments; excusing; said or written in defense, or by way of apology; as an apologetic essay.
"But sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you..." 1 Peter 3:15
I received but two responses. All others chose not to reply.
Here is one response from a "pastor" I received. Note: I knew him quite well as we attended where he "pastored" for awhile. We had him in our home and he had us in his. He was a young married man of 26 years of age. A fine aspiring,intelligent,friendly young man indeed. Yet,in my opinion he was not qualified to be an elder/pastor.
Hey _______: Thanks for your email. You ask a good question, although the innuendos (overtones) in your question indicate you aren't really asking a question. Kinda like me (A Presbyterian) asking a Baptist, "You don't REALLY believe that every single person in the NT was Immersed DO YOU?" Not a question to learn, but a question to make a statement, and possibly provoke an argument. I would caution you with the exhortation of Hebrews, "make every effort to live in peace with all men and to be holy; without holiness no one will see the Lord. See to it that no one misses THE GRACE OF GOD, and that no bitter root grows up to cause trouble and defile many." It is my observation that many Christian parents today are primarily motivated by bitterness (some bordering on hatred) of public schools, and can only define their beliefs re. education in OPPOSITION to public education. The "education question" has torn apart churches. (Rom. 14:10) James says, "the wisdom that comes from heaven is first of all pure, then peace loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial, and sincere. Peacemakers who sow in peace raise a harvest of righteousness." (3:17-18) Whatever educational process we pursue, it should equip us to love God and to love our neighbor. The RP Testimony brings some wisdom on the question of education, "In the providence of God public schools have provided great social benefits. Yet in serving a highly pluralistic society they have attempted to be religiously and morally "neutral" which is sinful. To a large extent instruction is based on a secular, humanistic philosophy which ignores God and sees man's welfare as the highest good. Local schools vary widely, however, according to the standards of the community and quality of the teachers." (Mt. 12:30; 2 Sa. 23:3-4) "Where necessary and POSSIBLE, Christian parents should cooperate in supporting or establishing schools whose curriculum present a biblical world and life view, and place their children in them. This requires maintenance of the highest academic quality along with Christian orientation in every subject and activity." "We reject any attempt by the state to force a secular, humanistic philosophy on Christian schools. Parents should take care to counteract any unbiblical teaching given to their children, whether in public or Christian schools. As youth increase in their knowledge and discernment, the home and the Church should help them to examine what is presented in school, to distinguish between God-given truths and human theories, and to integrate the facts learned with a Christian view of man and the universe." (Reformed Presbyterian Testimony 24.31-34) Both my wife and I are products of both Christian schooling and homeschooling. I had a very positive, Christ-centered, church-centered home education experience. Sue observed friends who had a very backward, charismatic, anti-intellectual, legalistic home education experience. Today they are completely unable to excel in the REAL world, with little ability to out-think the opposition or present a robust argument for truth. Both of us have friends who today hate their parents, the church, and God BECAUSE of their home education experience - an experience which focused on outward rules rather than hearts (1 Sa. 16:7). We both heartily agree that it is a HUGE mistake to equate a particular FORM (outward) of education with God's Biblical standards for education -- which are largely RESULT-oriented (inward, eg. 2 Sa. 23:3-4). This world is too "messy," and education is too grand an endeavor to reduce it to FORM. It is interesting to me that the Bible actually has very little to say about the day-to-day form of education, but rather places responsibility on the shoulders of parents (Deut. 6:1-6; Eph. 6:4), who will be accountable to God for how they acquitted themselves in the education of their children. Clearly the writer of Psalm 119 had others than his mother and father teaching him. (Ps. 119:99). Daniel and his friends were trained in the language and literature of the Babylonians, (Dan. 1:4) and though Daniel had to take stands against those teaching him, he was able to use his knowledge and influence for the glory of God, even in Babylon. Paul called on his extensive "secular" education when rubbing shoulders with the Ph.D.s of his day (Acts 17). He said he became "all things to all people, that by all means I might save some." (1 Co. 9:22) Paul forbade the Corinthians from associating with sexually immoral and unrepentant brothers, "not at all meaning the sexually immoral of this world, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world." (1 Cor. 5:10) As I grow in Christ, I'm endeavoring to define education by what it IS, not by what it's NOT. I want to help conscientious parents do what God has called them to do raise up their children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. When it comes to educating children, how grateful I am for God's tremendous outpouring of grace. I'm thankful we don't need to "get it all right" to be pleasing to our Father, who loves us not because of our performance, but because we are "in Christ." ________________
My reply to the "pastor":
__________,
That God our Father,by,through,and for our
LORD Jesus the Christ's sake,cares for us(1
Pet.5:7),succors us(Heb.2:18),comforts us(2
Cor.1:4),knows us(Num.16:5;2Tim.2:19),prays for
us(John 17:9;Heb.7:25),and keeps us(1Pet.1:5)I am
eternally grateful,humbled and awed. That He calls me a son(1John 3:1)of God,and is become a Father to me(2Cor.6:18;2Sam.7:14)rejoices my heart and satisfies my soul. If we take His words in our mouth to others,may we tremble as we do(Isa.66:2),lest we become men-pleasers and not prophets of God as Ezekiel (Ezek.33:32,33).
Recommended article:
http://christianunplugged.com/tozercross.htm
That God would have you acknowledge my electronic mail I am thankful as well as hopeful. As far as the content of the electronic mail in the way it was stated,it served its purpose.
You did not furnish me with "a Biblical defense of either the neutrality,indifference,command,permission/allowance or otherwise respecting God's will for the christian to send their children to be educated by state/government-run institutions where the teachers and fellow students are for the most part unbelievers,God-haters,anti-Christ and immoral, where hypocrisy abounds and the religion of secular humanism promoted". Nor did you attempt to dispute wether or no I portrayed an accurate picture of the environment of those places in question. I ended by asking you to
"Please reply ASAP if able". If you were not able,you should have just said so.
You then judged my motives by saying " Not a question to learn, but a question to make a statement, and possibly provoke an argument." You then proceeded to caution and exhort me
by using God's Holy Word quoting from Hebrews. A poor application indeed seeing you did not even refute any gainsaying (to deny or declare not to be true what another says; to controvert; to dispute; applied to persons, or to propositions, declarations or facts)of mine and in consideration that while "following peace with all men," we are not so to seek to please them, as to make God's will and our sanctification a
secondary object,the latter must be our first aim
having our conscience clear before both God and
man(Gal.1:10).
You then proceeded to give me your observation rather than God's Law-Word on the matter. This is similar to one of the errors contributing to the breakdown of the judicial system of the U.S. where what is called "case law" is practiced in the place of constitutional law. I also see a relation to what is called "situational ethics" albeit in a somewhat different sphere.
You then proceed to make a statement as though it is fact "The "education question" has torn
apart churches". And quote Rom. 14:10 and James
3:17-18 as if these support your conclusions. And
again you follow these verses with your own words
"Whatever educational process we pursue, it
should equip us to love God and to love our neighbor" as if God's Word in the preceeding verses prove such to be so. Thus far you have taken texts out of their context to use as prooftexts.
You then proceed to appeal to man again. A Testimony of a "denomination",which I need not remind you that Scripture repudiates denominationalism. But again,this is not to your credit, as these men you appeal to do not appeal to the Scriptures but rather one another.You say that "The RP Testimony brings some wisdom on the question of education." I'd contest that and apply 1 Cor. 1:20 and 1 Cor. 2:14:15 realizing
that the object in view in these verses is Christ and the Gospel. Yet "all things" regarding our duty and responsibility toward God are to be diligently inquired into and that by "sola scriptura". I conclude from their words that they're guilty on this point of being "blind guides leading the blind".
You then proceed to your experience and the experience of others. I will not argue with an experience because experience is no
argument. Yet you do make some assumptions and
apparent allegations. Are we to buy into the lies and excuses men and women give that they "hate their parents, the church, and God BECAUSE of..." as you claim "their home education experience". You may believe and swallow such lies but I am not convinced
that God will(Heb.4:13). The only thing you could say from God's Word on this subject followed next, "It is interesting to me that the Bible actually has very little to say about the day-to-day form of education,but rather places responsibility on the shoulders of parents (Deut. 6:1-6; Eph. 6:4)". You then resort to
your poor prooftexts once again. In Psalm 119:99
David's teachers were the prophets, priests and
Levites, who sat in Moses's chair, and whose lips
ought to have kept knowledge, but who neglected the study of the law, and minded their honours and formalities only of their religion; and so David, who conversed much with the scriptures, by that means became more intelligent than they.
One commentator commented thus on this verse "In short, he means to affirm, that whoever yields himself with docility to God, keeps his thoughts in subjection to his word, and exercises himself
diligently in meditating upon the Law, will thence derive wisdom sufficient for enabling him to consult his own safety in opposition to the stratagems of his enemies, to exercise circumspection requisite for escaping their deceits; and, finally, to match with the most eminent masters through the whole course of
his life. David, however, does not adduce his wisdom,that he may boast of it before the world; but, by his own example, he warns us, that nothing is better for us than to learn at God’s mouth, since those only are perfectly wise who are taught in his school. At the same time, sobriety is here enjoined upon the faithful, that they may not seek for wisdom elsewhere
than from God’s word, and that ambition or curiosity may not incite them to vain boasting. In short, all are here recommended to behave themselves with modesty and humility, that no man may claim to himself such knowledge as elevates him above the Divine Law; but that all men, however intelligent, may willingly yield
themselves to the lessons of heavenly wisdom revealed in the Divine Word. When he says, that he kept God’s statutes, he teaches us what kind of meditation it is of which we have spoken, to let us know that he did not coldly philosophies upon God’s precepts, but devoted himself to them with earnest affection".
You then appeal to exceptional men in the Scriptures as Daniel the prophet and Paul the apostle. As if the "historical narrative" concerning these men is an equalizer to attest to God's condoning of children being sent to the ravenous wolves and educational bureaucrats fueled by powerful teachers’ unions.
You continue with 1 Cor. 5:10. I will only comment upon this by noting the distinction between "associating" and "koinonia" and "instruction or counsel". Also bearing in mind the differences and treatment of both adult and child as the Scripture addresses and delineates upon each.
"Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership does righteousness have with lawlessness? And what fellowship does light have with darkness? And what agreement does Christ have with Belial? Or what part does a believer have with an unbeliever? And what agreement does a temple of God have with idols? For you are a temple of the living God, even as God said, "I will" dwell in them and "walk among them,and I will be their God, and they shall be My people."
(Ref.Lev. 26:12; Ezek. 37:27)
Because of this, "come out from among them" "and be separated," says the Lord, "and do not touch the unclean thing," and I will receive you.(Ref.Isa.52:11)
"And I will be a Father to you, and you will be sons"and daughters to Me, says the Lord Almighty." (2 Cor.6:14-18) (Ref. 2 Sam. 7:8, 14; Isa.43:6)
I am thankful as well that "we don't need to
"get it all right" to be pleasing to our Father, who loves us not because of our performance, but because we are "in Christ.""
I despise arguing for arguments sake as I do the
display of knowledge for knowledge sake,yet for truth I am commited to die for as souls lie in the balance.Our children are entrusted to us,may we do them right by God. Recommended article:
http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/mather/dut-par.htm
Would to God that you and I humble ourselves before God, putting our hand over our mouth if His Spirit has not enlightened us or sanctified us in any area of our lives or understanding, that we be not guilty of taking our LORD'S Name in vain.
Please read with discernment the following brief and humble reply I received from a seasoned saint and reformed pastor in his 60's who has been(for many years)and is serving the LORD. He received the exact same(excluding your name of course)electronic mail I sent you asking
that he furnish me with a Biblical defense of this issue. He wrote:
From: "______"
To: "__________"
Subject: Re: APOLOGIA
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 20:54:41 -0600
________,
Sorry it took me a couple of days to answer you. As far as I can tell I could not do what you asked, God did say of Abraham that he knew he would teach his children Gen 18:19.
Ultimately we are responsible for our children in
every aspect of their lives as long as they are under our care.
_________
________,I do earnestly yearn for, and hope I have kept up, an irenic spirit here, as I do earnestly contend for the faith once for all delivered unto the saints.
FYI-
"Educational leaders like John Dewey saw the public schools, often called the “common” schools, as the mechanism for indoctrinating children into a new democratic faith. The worldviews and eccentricities of the various ethical and national backgrounds would be
erased and a new melting pot of Americans would
emerge. Dewey, the most influential shaper of the
public schools in America, understood that the success of his effort would require children to be liberated from the prejudices and values of their parents.
In his book, A Common Faith, Dewey advocated
a radically secular vision for the public schools and the larger public culture. His concept of a humanistic faith, stripped of all supernatural claims, doctrines,and theological authorities, would replace Christianity as the dominant culture-shaping worldview. “Here are all the elements for a religious faith that shall not be confined to sect, class, or race,” he claimed. “Such a faith has always been the
common faith of mankind. It remains for us to make it explicit and militant.” (Dr. Albert Mohler)
It has taken longer than Dewey expected, but this
secularist faith is certainly explicit and militant now.
_________
His brief reply to me:
__________: Thanks for your email. I think that after your second email I better understand your intention in emailing. And it is appreciated. As I recall saying quite a few times, I agree with your intellectual position, and with your thorough documentation from Scripture. Christian parents raise Christians. Pagans raise pagans. The church needs to be bound together in TRUTH and LOVE. I appreciate the careful logic of your emails. ____________
I do hope this was profitable to some on S.I.