Hello,
I have a couple of cents to add to this discussion, (which I've glanced through, rather than read in depth).
The first cent is about the concept of 'office', as if it is a title of a position, rather than a function of the spiritual body. I would like to recommend caution in thinking in terms of 'the office of a prophet', because that really is not what Tyndale had in mind.
This is from Romans 12. Sorry about the old spellings!
[i]7 Let him that hath an office wayte on his office. Let him that teacheth take hede to his doctrine.
8 Let him that exhorteth geve attendaunce to his exhortacion.[/i]
I believe the above gives us all plenty to think about, as this meaning is not as clear in the KJV as it is from Tyndale himself.
This leads on to the other cent, which is in disagreement with 'a pastor'. (Nothing personal, bro. :-) ) clintstone said
I believe apostles establish churches , and once established and set up with a pastor ,
If the ministries listed in Eph 4:11 are to work with a kind of natural (in the spiritual sense) instinctivity, then pastoring has to be seen as something that anyone with that call on their life should engage with towards the believers around them, just as evangelists should be going outside the church with their ministry, and teachers and apostles should be travelling from time to time, establishing and strengthening saints in other assemblies.
EDIT (The not-so-old thread 'Just who IS responsible for this state of affairs...' raised the thought that Christ is all in all - the Elect, the Prophet, the Apostle, the Teacher (and so on) and if HE is in the believer - which He is - then there is a legitimate overlap of spiritual attributes in every single saint who is filled with the Holy Spirit, necessarily reflecting the fulness and variety of Christ's ministries. Likewise, the natural body's capacity for recovery and duplication of roles within itself is clear to physiologists, and we are modeled on Him, even naturally.) end edit.
The prophet, though - the [b]person[/b] given to the church - for the equipping of the saints, does not travel purely because he is a prophet (unless he is an apostle or teacher as well). He has plenty to do to bring the fresh word of God to the local assembly.
From 1 Cor 14 we see that he should not be a lone voice. However, he could be, and this also might therefore, be an unpopular voice if the local saints do not receive the word. Even more, then, he or she should not be roaming around from assembly to assembly like some demi-god, but staying in place for the sake of the flock of God, and taking the flack and the misunderstanding, and interceding for the saints and the elder[b]s[/b].
1 Timothy 5:17, Acts 20:28 overseers (plural), 1 Peter 5:2, 3, which is among you,
Eph 5:21 Submitting yourselves [u]one to another[/u] in the fear of God.
I do believe there is a difference between the prophet in Eph 4:11, and the gift of prophecy in the sense that anyone can bring a word from God anytime. (The presupposes all that has been said by others here, about holiness and prayer.)
We are far too apt to think of members of the body as people we can do without, rather than as essential to our spiritual growth and well-being.
Just look down at your body as you sit there. Which part would you like to do without? Really! I'm sure even if there is a quirky part, you're more attached to it then you thought, if someone else were to suggest you should cut it off... Likewise, we have to appreciate everyone in the body of Christ, and be discerning with regard to those who are not. That's one reason evangelism should be done [i]outside[/i] the Church. Christ is the Door. Those who enter by Him, are welcome [i]inside[/i].
(Forgive me for sounding brusque. I'm using library facilities and must be speedy.)