I mentioned something earlier for just a second, but I think it's something that we all need to be quite aware of.
That is adding the Name of the Lord to anything we say, as some sort of stamp of approval. I.E. God told me to do this, God spoke to me about this, etc. etc. ESPECIALLY if what we're saying cannot be 100% undeniably backed up by Scripture. I'm not sure where we think we get this sort of liberty. People will use His Name so flippantly and so commonly that it can be tacked on to about anything.
"The Lord told me to shop at Rite-Aid today instead of Walmart."
"God spoke to me and told me to drive home a different way from work on Thursdays"
I even had a lady once tell me, "God spoke to me, letting me know exactly how to cut down the tree stump in the back of my yard." She then proceeded to demonstrate that it was to make a sweeping motion in the shape of a cross, thus further validating that it must have been from God.
In the Old Testament, men weren't just allowed to say anything in the Lord's Name. You were LITERALLY putting your life on the line. If you were wrong, and spoke presumptuously, your life was forfeit. You think God didn't mind if you blundered a few things that you decided to stamp His Name on? But we all make bad judgement calls, yeah? In the OT, you didn't get the bailout option of a bad judgement call. And we think a holy God is not incredibly serious about the casual use of His Name?
We need to learn the difference of being led somewhere by the Spirit, or the Spirit revealing something to us VS actually hearing God speak directly to us. Have we seen many real prophets? I can tell you this, the very few REAL ones I've ever ran across have had such a heavy reverence for the Name, they wouldn't dare speak it 1/10000th of the frequency that I see it being tossed around by a group of people who think God's giving them all this fantastic revelation. Art Katz mentioned something to this effect when referencing a pastors meeting or something he attended one time. A man stood up and declared that he had received something from God to share with them. Mr. Katz said at first he was ecstatic, but it soon gave way to disappointment, as he realized the man had received nothing of the sort.
Most of what I see today is either self delusion of a rehash of Kings 22. Now if you have to look up Kings 22, to figure out what I'm talking about, I would instantly distrust anything that came out of your mouth as being a Word from God. The terror of the possibility of what happens in that chapter should be on the forefront of anyone's mind the moment they even begin to dream of speaking in God's name. And the funny thing is this, if they are a victim of the same, they really ARE giving a word that IS from the Lord (In a manner of speaking). It's just not what they think it is.
There's power in the Name of the Lord. Serious power. Yet we wonder why the name of the Lord lacks the punch it should. Could it be that we've made it so common, He no longer trusts it to us? We're quite willing to put it on any revelation or idea that "seems quite Biblical and/or good" or may even sound "profound" in the way we think God should sound. But is any of that what the requirement is for speaking on behalf of Him?
But maybe this shouldn't be so surprising. After all, most people still believe that the third commandment only means that we shouldn't use the Lord's Name as an expletive.