Menu

The answer to the Head covering issue

R
rbanks

Well let’s see- one man esteems one day above another and another esteems everyday alike so let every man be fully persuaded in his own heart because whatever he does- it is unto the Lord. One woman is submissive unto the Lord honoring her husband as her covering with only her hair and another is submissive with an extra material on top of her head and so let everyone be fully persuaded in their own heart because whatever they do- they do unto the Lord.

That being said I believe God has revealed unto me by the Holy Spirit what Paul was talking about in the passage of scripture in 1 cor 11 because brethren I also have been baptized in the Holy Spirit and I believe that He is the interpreter of the Word. The reason I’m posting this is because in the other thread concerning legalism I sensed the Holy Spirit correcting me on my understanding of vs 16 and I was grieved because I didn’t truly believe what I wrote about it.

You see, I know I have been filled with the Holy Spirit and that the Holy Spirit is given to them that obey Him and I want to obey him in all things. So I begin to inquire of the Lord of the reason I was feeling as a spirit-filled man that this passage was being used legalistically and why did I not believe that we must teach women to put something extra on top of their heads because God was displeased with the teaching of the Pharisees in:
Matthew 23:4-5 (KJV)
4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers.
5 But all their works they do for to be seen of men: they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments,

This and many other rebukes from Jesus in the whole 23rd chapter in Matthew concerning their self righteous attitude and appearing to others as being holier than thou, was and is a concern of doing something outwardly to prove something inwardly as not truly being of God.

This led me to a discovery that brought me joy in the Holy Spirit that I truly believe was from Him. I will begin with 1 Corinthians 11:15 (KJV)
15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
It is clear from this scripture that Paul is saying that hair is given to her for a covering right after He said this in 1 Corinthians 11:13-14 (KJV)
13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?

Earlier he said in 1 Corinthians 11:4-6 (KJV)
4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.

It is evident that Paul is talking about a covering in this whole passage of scripture and then I began to realize that every passage of scripture is to be read in context understanding that there is background to that particular time and place of scripture being written. There were loose and ungodly women in the city of Corinth whose hair was cut short in an ungodly way as being disrespectable to God’s order of how he created us as men and women.

We all have seen women lose their hair from chemo treatments and they would cover their head with a wig or something because they felt shame to show their head without their hair covering it. Well God wants us to be godly and the men to be masculine and the women to be feminine. God does not want men to cover their heads with long hair like the women or veiled in any way because he is the image and glory of God but the woman is the glory of man so her head should be covered.

Also “sign of authority on her head” is not in the passage that is just other men’s opinion of what “power” means in 1 Corinthians 11:10 (KJV)
10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.

I must say that I’m no different than many other men who have come to different conclusions about this passage of scripture but one thing I do know is that Paul said “hair is given her for a covering”.

Well enough said for now but Paul said it plainly that the woman’s hair is given to her for a covering and he didn’t add that she needs to also wear something else for a covering also.

Well if I am to interpret this passage without the doctrines of men and all their quotations on it then it is clear that her long hair will do just fine for a covering. I believe Paul would even say “amen brother” that’s what I been trying to tell you all along- but sometimes we let other men influence us more than the Holy Spirit.

Blessings to all!

R
rainydaygirl

This led me to a discovery that brought me joy in the Holy Spirit that I truly believe was from Him. I will begin with 1 Corinthians 11:15 (KJV)
15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
It is clear from this scripture that Paul is saying that hair is given to her for a covering right after He said this in 1 Corinthians 11:13-14 (KJV)
13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?

Earlier he said in 1 Corinthians 11:4-6 (KJV)
4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.

It is evident that Paul is talking about a covering in this whole passage of scripture and then I began to realize that every passage of scripture is to be read in context understanding that there is background to that particular time and place of scripture being written. There were loose and ungodly women in the city of Corinth whose hair was cut short in an ungodly way as being disrespectable to God’s order of how he created us as men and women.

We all have seen women lose their hair from chemo treatments and they would cover their head with a wig or something because they felt shame to show their head without their hair covering it. Well God wants us to be godly and the men to be masculine and the women to be feminine. God does not want men to cover their heads with long hair like the women or veiled in any way because he is the image and glory of God but the woman is the glory of man so her head should be covered.

Also “sign of authority on her head” is not in the passage that is just other men’s opinion of what “power” means in 1 Corinthians 11:10 (KJV)
10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.

I must say that I’m no different than many other men who have come to different conclusions about this passage of scripture but one thing I do know is that Paul said “hair is given her for a covering”.

Well enough said for now but Paul said it plainly that the woman’s hair is given to her for a covering and he didn’t add that she needs to also wear something else for a covering also.
---
Hey
thanks for sharing this.
rdg

M
murrcolr

For he is great, he does wondrous things: he is God alone.

The Most High Great and Wonderful God he requires order and goverment.... He requires the woman to be covered, he gives her the desire to be covered and then he gives her a covering...

L
Lysa

rbanks wrote:
I must say that I’m no different than many other men who have come to different conclusions about this passage of scripture but one thing I do know is that Paul said “hair is given her for a covering”.

Well enough said for now but Paul said it plainly that the woman’s hair is given to her for a covering and he didn’t add that she needs to also wear something else for a covering also.


Thank you for this brother!

God bless you,
Lisa

S
sermonindex

Brother I am on the same the sane page with you. In reading 1 Cor.11:1-16 in the NIV and NASB it jumped out at me by the Holy Spirit the issue is hair covering.
and not a cloth. If I remember correctly Corinth was pretty pagan with temple prostitutes who would shave their heads. They did this to express their allegiance to their pagan diety. Buddhist priest and Hari Karishnas do this today, shave their heads. So it is concievable that temple prostitutes were shaving their heads in Paul's time.

A likely scenereo is some of these prostitutes heard the gospel and were converted. Paul does write that some of the Corithians were converted out of depraved backgrounds in 1 Cor.6:11. Just as a converted prostitute would need godly instruction in modest dress so Paul is probably instructing converted prostitutes and other women to grow their hair. Probably to distinguish them from the temple prostitutes.

I know this model does not answer all the questions. And it may be rejected by many in the forum. But given the background of Corithians if hair is the covering then these verses are seen in a new liberating light.

Blaine Scogin

S
sermonindex

My NIV renders the above verses this way.......Every man who prays of prophesies with long hair dishonors his head. And every woman who prays or prophesies with no covering of hair on her head dishonors her head---she is just like one of the "shorn women". If a woman has no covering, let her be for now with short hair, but since it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair shorn or shaved, she should grow it again. A man ought not to have long hair.......I think this rendering of the passage provides much clarity.

Blaine Scogin

R
rbanks

hi everyone,

Thanks for all the gracious replies!

Thanks brother Blaine for all your input which is very good.

I believe this thread is answering the head covering issue to help set a lot of people free to the question of does a woman have to put a piece of cloth on top of their head.

I have discovered something else that I believe will be enlightening to those who desire true freedom concerning this issue.

I will mention it later on.

Blessings to all!

M
murrcolr

I have worked in West Afirca for over 10 years.

One thing I have noticed is that if a woman has done something wrong they shave her head.

As it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair shorn or shaved.

P
pilgrim777

Fortunately we don't have this stigma or custom in America. Whenever I see a lady with a shaved head I usually think she is undergoing cancer treatment.

But whatever the reason for the shaved head I never think they did something wrong since we all have done something wrong and need the grace and love of God.

We are all sinners but Christians should not treat people like sinners. We should not treat them like untouchables. Even Jesus touched the lepers.

Pilgrim

S
sermonindex

zzzzzzzz....

Krispy

P
pilgrim777

The first "covering" that took place.

Gen 3:21 Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and CLOTHED them.

Notice that God clothed them both with skins which represent something that had to die to clothe/cover them. (The Life is in the blood). He clothed them both, not just the man.

And this is what God has done for male and female in Christ.

Isa 61:10 I will greatly rejoice in the LORD, my soul shall be joyful in my God; for he hath CLOTHED me with the garments of salvation, he hath COVERED me with the robe of righteousness, as a bridegroom decketh himself with ornaments, and as a bride adorneth herself with her jewels.

And the things that God is most intent on that we cover is the covering that Peter knew about quite personally. Peter never talked about an article of clothing and neither did the Jerusalem council. Jesus talked about clothing only once and it was symbolically as it relates to faith.

What did Peter say?

1Pe 4:8 And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves: for charity shall COVER the multitude of sins.

Jesus talked about clothing us, only once and no more and He interacted with many women and had many as His followers.

Luke 12:28 If then God so clothe the grass, which is to day in the field, and to morrow is cast into the oven; how much more will he clothe you, O ye of little faith?

Paul talked more about PUTTING ON other things much more important than any article of clothing.

Col 3:12 PUT ON therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering;

Rom 13:14 But PUT YE ON the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfil the lusts thereof.

Gal 3:27 For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have PUT ON Christ.

Eph 4:24 And that ye PUT ON the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.

Eph 6:11 PUT ON the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.

Col 3:10 And have PUT ON the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:

Col 3:14 And above all these things PUT ON charity, which is the bond of perfectness.

It seems that these are the most important things to put on and there is no dispute or misunderstanding or confusion about what is being communicated.

There are a plethora of teachings, understandings and interpretations of 1 Cor 11, but no consensus. However, we all have consensus on the aforementioned verses.

Shalom,
Pilgrim

L
Lysa

krispy wrote:
zzzzzzzz....

Krispy


Dude, I say this with all due respect but what is wrong with you? I feel compelled to ask this because I do not go into threads that I don’t like; I do not go in and harass the people by leaving snoring sounds or trying to make them feel less holy or saved (intimidation tactics) by talking about a certain topic. So you don’t like “any” headcovering thread; Greg already said something to you in another thread and here you are again acting like this. So hence the question, what is wrong with you?

I know I've offended you and I'm sorry, I just don't understand this immature behavior.

God bless,
Lisa

M
murrcolr

They weren't Christian’s they were unbelievers the last one I heard of she had her hair shorn because she was caught with cannabis and the Police shaved her head. She probably got a good beating as well.

The second last time was a woman who tried to poison another woman, and a group of woman shaved her hair off…………and I guess a good beating as well…

P
pilgrim777

It's amazing what you find in past threads.

I just posted a bunch of past threads on HeadCovering in this thread:
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=43257&forum=36

There are some very good discussions in these threads on this most polarizing of issues.

Here is another by post by Graftedbranch that witnessed to my spirit. I have the Magna Carta of Women and it is very good.

No Custom? Or No Argument?
https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&order=0&topic_id=9669&forum=36&post_id=&refresh=Go

Jessie Penn Lewis did a wonderful treatment of this passage in "The Magna Carta of Women".

In it she put's forth the interpretation that in these passages Paul is addressing a question put forth by the Corinthians in a letter they had written to Paul.

In those days and especially in Corinth, for a woman to unveil in public was a public shame to her husband. She was considered as a temple prostitute who would unveil.

But for a man to veil was a dishonor to his Head which is Christ because the Tallith, or veil was a symbol of Condemnation. So for a man to veil was to dishonor Christ and His redemption.

Yet the believing women, who were experiencing the liberty which is in Christ by the Spirit saw no need to veil. They said in effect, 'We are in Christ, we are all on the same level, we have no need to veil". And so in the public gatherings when women would prophecy or pray unveiled, in their culture they were dishonoring their head which is the husband in the eyes of outsiders.

Paul tells them that becuase the man is the head of the woman she should not dishoner her head, but rather she should veil (for his sake).

But the man should not veil because that was to dishonor Christ.

Yet at the close of this portion, he emphasises that it is not a matter of legality, and that there is no imposed custom in the churches. and that it should not be a matter of contention.

It is a matter not of doctrine but of custom. Not a custom of the church, but one of the culture and they should honor this for the sake of the reputation of the gospel.

It is also true in regard to woman "remaning silent and learning at home. It was not permitted for a woman to be "educated". So He told them the women who desired to learn, let them learn at home through their own husbands and not publically to bring the gospel in disrepute. Paul in saying this is not degradng women but elevating them saying, "let them learn at home", let them learn. But do so in a way that will not hinder the gospel or bring the church into disrepute.

If you were to push many's view to its conclusion, because the bible says that we should pray without ceasing, and that speaking Christ should be our normal living day to day, a woman should always be veiled. And men should never wear a hat.

Graftedbranch

R
rbanks

Hi everyone,

Thanks again for all the good replies.

I do hope this thread will be enlightening to many who feel pressured to do something without the leading of the Holy Spirit.

So I’m asking everyone to please not hijack this thread from its topic. I believe this subject is serious to many sincere people.

Here is something else I have discovered because government order of God is final concerning the covering of headship in 1 Corinthians 11:3 (KJV)
3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

So going back to what Paul was saying in 1 Corinthians 11:4-6 (KJV)
4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.

Notice verse 6 it says “let her be covered” if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven.

Then look again at 1 Corinthians 11:13-15 (KJV)
13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.

Again it implies to her long hair in “for hair is given her for a covering” and there is nothing else to add to this unless we want to add to scripture. Now if anyone wants to make the covering be a veil as in covering her head then it still says that her long hair can be that veil of covering for her.

Here is something to think about “that her hair is given her instead of a veil” saying that a woman’s long hair can meet the apostolic standards of propriety and that she would require no artificial covering.

Something to think about…

Blessings to all!

S
sermonindex

Again brother in agreement with you as I have meditated on those passages you mentioned. The thrust of 1 Cor.11:1-16 seems,to imply hair as a covering. Given what others have brought to the table there is a freeing truth here that goes beyond a cloth. Also Pilgrim has brought some wonderful truths of the more important things to put on.

Brother thank you for listening to the Holy Spirit and starting this thread. I can honestly say it has refreshed my soul. One of the better days to be on the forum.

With blessing in Jesus.

Blaine

S
sermonindex

1Co 11:6 For if a wife will not cover her head, then she should cut her hair short. But since it is disgraceful for a wife to cut off her hair or shave her head, let her cover her head.

So according to the understanding by those in this thread, If a woman won't have long hair (because she has short hair already), then cut her hair short. That doesn't make much sense.
-----------------------------------------------------------


"But isn’t a woman’s hair given to her to serve as a head covering (v. 15)? Does not a woman’s long hair qualify as a head covering?

No. Much of the argument here is superfluous and even irrelevant if all the apostle meant to teach was that women should have long hair.

The Bible is referring to a piece of cloth or fabric when it com-mands women to wear head coverings (and commands men not to do so). Beginning in the late nineteenth century, some argued (based on verse 15b) that Paul is instructing women to have long hair and that the so-called head covering is nothing more than long hair. If this “long hair equals head covering” interpretation is true, then we should be able to substitute the phrase long hair for the word covering in this passage (and short hair for no covering) and retain the passage’s meaning. However, this substitution of phrases (and thus this interpretation) does not make sense. For example, if covering means long hair, then verse 6 would be arguing that those women with short hair should cut their hair short— which is a logical absurdity. Likewise, verse 5 ould then mean that a woman with short hair is one and the same with women who have no hair— again, a logical absurdity.

This is why the Greek word used in verse 15 for the covering of a woman’s hair (peribolaion) is different from the Greek word used in verses 6 and 7 for the covering of cloth (katakalupto, which is derived from kalumma, a word that means “a covering, a hood, or veil”). The two Greek words are not interchangeable.

When Paul says in verse 15b that a woman’s long hair is given her as a covering, he is not defining the nature of the covering. By the time he reaches verse 15, the inspired apostle has already presented his argument at length. His readers know what he is talking about, viz. a piece of cloth called a head covering or veil. He is now bringing to bear additional considerations for his listeners to weigh. One such consideration is how our innate sensibilities tell us that women’s heads ought to appear different than men’s heads. Our own natural sensibilities, says Paul, tell us that women’s heads should be more covered than men’s. This is what Paul means by his reference to hair in verse 15b.

It is only in the past century that some commentators have attempted to make this “hair equals head covering” argument. Whether we look at Hebrew women in the Old Testament or Christian women through the ages (and in a variety of different cultures), God’s people have always understood that the head covering is a piece of cloth or clothing worn upon the head and not merely a woman’s long hair."

---------------------------------------------------------

Anyway, just thought this quote was relevant to that verse.

S
sermonindex

Hi Rbanks,

Here's another quote and explanation on 1 Cor 11:6:

"There are those who argue that a woman’s long hair serves as the only covering she requires. The Greek preposition anti more often conveys the idea of substitution, but not always. Here, Paul is saying that her hair serves as a covering,142 which is further evidence for the fact that a head covering is appropriate.143 Paul can hardly mean that a woman’s long hair serves as a substitute for a head covering. Paul’s words in verse 6 simply do not allow it: “For if a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head.” Far from saying that since the woman has her hair for a covering, she needs no other covering, Paul argues that if she will not cover her head, she might as well shave off the hair so that now she has no covering at all! Furthermore, since long hair serves as a natural covering for all women, the submission of a godly woman is hardly evidenced by being just like every other woman. The voluntarily worn head covering sets the submissive woman apart from all the rest.144 Finally, if a woman’s long hair is her glory, and the woman’s calling and intent is to bring glory to her husband, she veils her head so that her glory is veiled, thus calling attention to her husband’s glory and not her own.

This issue of head coverings seems to have been a matter of debate in the Corinthian church and could well have been the source of some of the divisions in the church. Knowing that his teaching on head coverings may still be resisted and debated, Paul ends with one final thrust in verse 16. For those who would be contentious over this issue, let them know that there is no other145 practice in any of the churches. For anyone to disregard and disobey Paul’s teaching is for them to set themselves outside the traditions of every New Testament church. It is not just Paul’s traditions but rather the consistent teaching and practice of every church. To disregard this instruction is to stand alone in disobedience and defiance." by Bob Deffinbaugh

R
rbanks

Hi Sean,

I appreciate your input brother and I do see somewhat of what you are talking about concerning vs 5&6 but I think we would have to agree that we cannot be positive on exactly what Paul was meaning in that particular time and particular place.

We also know he was not specific in describing for others 100’s of years down the road in a different place and custom than Corinth exactly what type of artificial covering that all women should wear. We do know their head should be covered in a godly manner.

I do know that vs 15 is precise and seems to mean exactly what it says and we both know that this would be a good time for the Holy Spirit to cause him to state more specifically about every woman of all time needing to wear an extra artificial covering and what type if God truly wanted all women of all ages to wear something extra on top of their head.

I just have now found out that the literal translation has “instead” along with the YLT version in vs 15
1 Corinthians 11:13-16 (YLT)
13 In your own selves judge ye; is it seemly for a woman uncovered to pray to God?
14 doth not even nature itself teach you, that if a man indeed have long hair, a dishonour it is to him?
15 and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her;
16 and if any one doth think to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the assemblies of God.

I also did a little more searching and found this which really makes sense also and I have quoted him precisely as he has written it.

Nature (vv. 13-16). In a general way, it is true that nature gives women longer hair and men shorter hair. The Romans, Greeks, and Jews (except for the Nazarites) pretty much followed this custom. Nowhere does the Bible tell us how long our hair should be. It simply states that there ought to be a noticeable difference between the length of the men's hair and the women's hair so that there be no confusion of the sexes. (This principle eliminates the so-called "unisex" styles.) It is shameful for the man to look like a woman or the woman to look like a man.
The woman's long hair is her glory, and it is given to her "instead of a covering" (literal translation). In other words, if local custom does not dictate a head-covering, her long hair can be that covering. I do not think that Paul meant for all women in every culture to wear a shawl for a head-covering; but he did expect them to use their long hair as a covering and as a symbol of their submission to God's order. This is something that every woman can do.
In my ministry in different parts of the world, I have noticed that the basic principle of headship applies in every culture; but the means of demonstrating it differs from place to place. The important thing is the submission of the heart to the Lord and the public manifestation of obedience to God's order.

Bible Exposition Commentary (BE Series) - New Testament - The Bible Exposition Commentary – New Testament, Volume 1.

S
sermonindex

"The Bible is referring to a piece of cloth or fabric when it com-mands women to wear head coverings"

The word covering was chosen in the KJV because it means a veil.

The rendering is "for her hair is given her for a veil.

He is not saying that she wear a veil, he is saying the hair is the veil.

Youngs Literal Translations renders it this way: "and a woman, if she have long hair, a glory it is to her, because the hair instead of a covering hath been given to her."

Clarke's commentary: "But if a woman have long hair - The Author of their being has given a larger proportion of hair to the head of women than to that of men; and to them it is an especial ornament, and may in various cases serve as a veil."

S
sermonindex

I haven’t commented on the head covering issue because until now I have seen it to be somewhat of a fruitless exercise. However at this point I would like to post my first and last post on the topic. Something from my past that really seems to apply here. A long time ago the Lord taught me a lesson specifically addressed to me (not everyone else, nor necessarily anyone else) regarding Lev 11 and the unclean animals. At the time it was made clear that I was not allowed to have any representation of these animals in our house. I didn’t fully understand it at the time, but went ahead with stripping off wallpaper that had hawks on it, and throwing out stuffed bunnies, blankets, pictures, art with unclean animals on it, etc. etc. Now some people may look at me like I am crazy for doing such a thing, and most did at the time, but I had to trust that the Lord had something to show me, not everyone else, just me. For that I had to stand alone in this, and MUCH trial and trouble came because of it (all from those who ought to have known better), but there I stood, ready to learn the lesson that the Lord wanted to teach. I didn’t learn it right away, but after a couple years the lesson cleared up immensely to such a point that I can’t imagine living with not having learned it! HOWEVER, others like Peter have gotten a different lesson and equally as important by going the OPPOSITE direction with the same passage of scripture.

My point is that perhaps, just maybe the Lord is teaching one group one lesson through covering their head with a cloth, and teaching another group another lesson in NOT covering their head with a cloth. The lessons have been customized for particular needs of each individual at particular times, and the current thought may pass or be adjusted with time once the lesson directed to them is learned. People are simply different with different needs, and since none can possess their own righteousness, but only the righteousness of Christ, neither group will be counted more righteous or less righteous for the particular needs they are learning a lesson for. Neither should living one way or the other be considered fulfilling a commandment of God, all it can amount to is following where you believe God is leading you for a lesson in the process of being learned. Thus it is with learning how to follow the leading of the Spirit of God.

Just my two cents, carry on….

OJ

G
ginnyrose

Lysa, maybe Krispy is under conviction that he is snoring...reminds of what young fellows used to do during preaching. If the preacher got to stepping on their toes they would slouch down in the bench and act like they are sleeping.

Now, maybe you better go wake up that guy and tell him his snoring is disruptive!

ginnyrose

S
sermonindex

Yea, I'm not sure about the Youngs translation. So why do you think head coverings was practiced until just recently? It was practiced in the Apostles day, in the early church following them, and practiced pretty uniformly until the last 100 years? Has our culture become more enlightened over time? It doesn't appear that way. There has been such a steady decline in truth. Of course, as history shows, this teaching is one of the first to go, and it's been follow by throwing out the gender roles in the churches as well. It's interesting just how much biblical truth can be rejected today just by stating it was cultural.

P
pilgrim777

Joe,

That is a great first and last post.

Thus it is with learning how to follow the leading of the Spirit of God.

We are all in an individual school of the Spirit, customized just for us to learn to follow and trust the Lord. He is teaching us to walk in love...as He walked.

Pilgrim

S
sermonindex

"My point is that perhaps, just maybe the Lord is teaching one group one lesson through covering their head with a cloth, and teaching another group another lesson in NOT covering their head with a cloth. The lessons have been customized for particular needs of each individual at particular times, and the current thought may pass or be adjusted with time once the lesson directed to them is learned. People are simply different with different needs, and since none can possess their own righteousness, but only the righteousness of Christ, neither group will be counted more righteous or less righteous for the particular needs they are learning a lesson for."


This just blows me away. I started to smile reading this because it's so right.


When I was reading your first part about doing what the LORD said to remove the different type of animal symbols out of your home. What became of that? I understand the Lord doing that for you and it's just for you I am sure, are you able to share what happened?

S
sermonindex

"So why do you think head coverings was practiced until just recently?"

I think that men have mistranlated it back in the day and thought that the covering was a cloth. But do you notice something in the last past century women have been chopping off their hair, some even look like men and act like them, especially lesbians. This has crept into the Churches.

This discussion is archived and closed to new replies. Start a new discussion to carry the subject on.
Archived
1 of 26 posts

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate