Interesting thoughts so far. I wonder if the overall site views are a much higher female population or if they are just the ones responding in larger numbers on this thread.
It seems there are also several misconceptions that keep being perpetuated. In the interest of clarity please allow me to highlight a few of the more obvious ones-
1. The idea has been put forth that to own firearms that can be used to provide lethal force in a life/death self protection situation somehow mean one is trusting in the firearm and not on God. It has been said that to own them with the knowledge they might be used indicates lack of trust in God.
I RESPOND: If a person actually believes that then let me ask a few other questions of them. Do you have locks on your doors? Do you at times lock them? If so that would seem to be hypocrisy as you are by your own definition "trusting something other than the Lord" for a degree of safety.
Further, do you use seat belts... why, don't you trust the Lord to keep you safe and not the item? Do you at times take medication or go to a doctor.. why.. don't you trust the Lord? Do you teach your kids to read and obey traffic signs, not play in the street, or walk with strangers?..Why? Don't you trust the Lord. I can go on and on.. however, the point is clear. I would no more be trusting in a firearm for my safety, if I own one, than I am trusting the seat belt for my safety. In both cases they are simply tools that are hopefully never used. However, I trust in God and am willing to use the tools he puts at my disposal if needed.
2. The scripture of Jesus telling the disciples that, "Those who live by the sword die by the sword".
I RESPOND: True. Ask any dictator that has gone that route. However, "living by" the sword has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with saving the life of an innocent from attack. They have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with each other.
3. Using scriptures that apply only to persecution for righteousness sake as a proof text for non firearm ownership.
I RESPOND: That is unfaithfully handling the Word of God. I think it is agreed here that the scripture clearly teaches 2 things concerning PERSECUTION FOR THE FAITH. One is that it tells us to at times flee from it. The second is that at times we may be called to stand and be a witness in it. In either case it is to be met with non violence. That has been true historically and should be in our lives if it happens. I, and probably all here, agree with that. However, the discussion has NOTHING to do with persecution. The scriptures dealing with persecution for the faith also have nothing to do with heinous crimes randomly committed on innocent people. It is heinous crimes committed by criminals on random people....not persecution for faith in Christ. These random people, regardless of faith, are your family members.
4. Several guys have stated they would allow their wives/daughters to be raped, mutilated, and murdered. They would not use lethal force to stop it. One said he would allow them to do this to his family... and only after they killed his family THEN would he take lethal action.
I RESPOND: I don't know what exact vows you used in your wedding ceremony. However, in addition to our own we used one of the sets from the wedding ceremony manual I use for services. Fairly basic and historic. It states- "I promise before God and these witnesses to LOVE, HONOR, CHERISH AND PROTECT this woman from this day forward...."
Guys...you made a vow before God and those witnesses to PROTECT her! To fail in this responsibility is to abandon the vow you made before God, those witnesses, and her!
If you asked her father for her hand in marriage were you honest enough to say that you would not protect her and would allow her rape, mutilation, or murder if it meant that to protect her you might have to use lethal force?!?!?!
Honestly..will you go tell that to her dad? Did you have the guts to when you asked to marry her?
God forbid any guy ever ask for my daughters hand that doesn't have the dedication to her that he would protect her!
If I were a married female I think I would be absolutely shocked, sickened, and ashamed to know that the one God gave to protect me was willing to possibly abdicate that responsibility and allow the worst of terrors to happen to me... not for my faith... but because they didn't think the innocent should be protected from the guilty!
If it came to it I would rather explain to the police why there are 2 dead intruders in my house with holes in their chests than explain to my inlaws, and my other children, why I simply watched as their daughter, mother, and sisters were raped, mutilated, and murdered.
Is this nothing more than the "feminization" of the men in the church? Most churches make the guys check their masculinity and testosterone at the door to feel welcome. That's why attendance in mainline denominations is often some 65-75 percent female.
5. It has been said that Jesus told His disciples to get a sword only to show it isn't to be used at Gethsemane.
I RESPOND: That would seem to be an absolute butchery of the Word. The entire story is told of how on their first missionary journey they were not to take a sword(for protection), a purse (to hold money), or a bag ( to hold provisions).. but that he would supply them. After they learned the lesson that He was the true source Jesus told the that from now on THEY WERE TO TAKE a sword (for protection), a bag (to hold money), and a purse(to hold provisions).
If the sword were to longer be taken then neither were bag or purse. They are obviously listed together as a "package" if you will. However, they clearly were supposed to be taken. There is not one single scripture that indicates they were to negate these words from Christ.
If you actually believe He no longer wanted them to take a sword then you must delete the other items as well. Do you have something so you CAN TAKE MONEY/CASH WITH YOU?.. say a billfold or purse...then that would seem to be hypocritical! Do you ever travel with ANY CLOTHES AT ALL except the ones on you back...that would seem to be be practicing hypocrisy! So..if you want to abandon the sword statement of Jesus then also never carry cash/credit cards/debit cards/ or ways to pay for things.... or ever have more than the clothing on your back or it looks pretty clear that would constitute hypocrisy. That is right there in the Word for all to see.
SO... with no commands to negate his words to them to take these things THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN IN DISOBEDIENCE TO NOT TAKE ALL THREE ITEMS....SWORD INCLUDED!
Unless they disobeyed Christ the Apostles were normally armed. I know that won't sit well with some.... but it is in the scripture. There is little else to do with it. He told them to take sword, purse, and bag. No record exists of that changing. Hard to believe that they disobeyed Him and didn't take those things.
There is no scripture anywhere to prove that the disciples disobeyed Jesus on this statement. Some may not like that.... but there is no scripture found that says these words of Jesus went into non effect.
I am not saying that a person should or should not own firearms. I am however making the point that to own them, and under certain difficult circumstances use them in a lethal fashion, is in no way inconsistent with scripture. God forbid any here ever face this dilemma. However, if one does they are well within the boundaries of scripture to save their wife and daughters from rape, mutilation, and murder with the use of lethal force.
Well.. hopefully that helps move the discussion along. I have enjoyed reading everyones input!
Blessings!
CAPS used to emphasize words and phrases only. No yelling was intended.
edited to make an example first person as opposed to "general" application