Menu

Biblical cosmology

S
sermonindex

Examine.

http://www.flatearthbible.com/flat-earth-in-the-scriptures-uncontested-revealed-truth/

"Flat Earth in The Scriptures Uncontested. Does the bible say the earth is flat
Revealed truth

Remember, what the apostle Paul said, "but test (or prove) everything; hold fast what is good!" (1 Thes 5:21 ESV)
Christians should not be afraid of investigating for the truth."

Edited to add quotation marks since those are not my words but the words accompanied by the video.

T
TrueWitness

I can imagine millions of people rolling their eyes over this video. It wouldn't surprise me if this is the work of unbelievers trying to make Christians look foolish. We even have photos of Earth from satellites, moon missions, etc. that clearly show the Earth is a SPHERE.


P.S. I don't mind being ridiculed for believing the "foolishness of the cross". I am not trying to look good in the eyes of the world. But believing in a flat Earth is just plain wrong and false. The Biblical verses used to show a flat Earth are very weak and tepid. Not only do these people believe in a flat Earth but they also believe that the Earth is completely stationary and the Sun, stars and all planetary bodies revolve around the Earth.

-Daniel

S
sermonindex

I wonder what would be our world view if we were living 200 years ago and only have the Bible and our own eyes as source of information...

P
proudpapa

double post

P
proudpapa

Isaiah 40:22 : "It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth,..."

John Gill 1697-1771 :

It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth,.... Or, "the globe (z)" of it; for the earth is spherical or globular: not a flat plain, but round, hung as a ball in the air; here Jehovah sits as the Lord and Sovereign; being the Maker of it, he is above it, orders and directs its motion, and governs all things in it:

S
sermonindex

This is addressed in the video

T
TMK

Tozsu-

Are you suggesting that you believe the earth is flat? I can't tell from your post.

I hope you don't believe such nonsense but again I can't tell from your posts.

S
sermonindex

I did not tell you to believe it, I told you to examine it. Can examining something hurt you? I will believe what is proven to me. Thanks for the input.

F
forrests

I have looked into this matter a bit - and I came across the interview I linked below. I haven't listened to it yet, but I plan to very soon. I believe the scientist in it is a Christian, and I think he is in the "God of Wonders" video.

I just thought it would be good to check out:

https://youtu.be/KbYbCB5Zj_E

C
Christinyou

I don't live or did not live 200 years ago. If you have ever been to 35000 or 40000 feet in an airplane, you can see the curvature of the earth. If the earth is flat I am being deceived along with 1000s of others astronauts, pilots, camera's from space. Personal testimony from space and pictures prove the earth is a globe, and for an object to be in space and travel over the same spot on earth, the object has to be in perfect sink at a certain speed to keep up with the earths rotation, (satellite tv) The satellites speed proves the earth is round and rotating. At a hundred and twenty miles above the earth, the object has to travel pretty fast, but some objects are hundreds or thousands of miles in orbit, to keep up with the earths rotation it has to move with the surface of the earth and go round and round.

I don't think anybody knew this 200 or 2000 years ago.

In Christ: Phillip

S
sermonindex

Thanks forrests for linking this video. I realize now that the scope of this topic way exceeds the possibilities of one thread, since outside of a biblical the FE has a cultural, a scientific, a psychological, a political. etc aspect, and we are not all experts so it would result in endless debate. Please allow me to narrow the topic to one question:
If we had the bible and our own simple observations and not have today's vast information from culture science etc. Would we come up with the idea that the earth is a sphere? The two Christians in the linked video state this and I strongly disagree, the way I see it the bible rather points to a flat earth than to a sphere.
Blessings,
Zsuzsanna

S
sermonindex

Christinyou,
In the last year lot of people published the results of their own personal experiments on the internet, including amateur rockets, balloons, physics experiments and theories etc. that makes an average thinker question the one sided information that can be gained from modern textbooks, magazines etc. When I flew to Hungary this Spring I made pictures from the airplane the horizon was flat and rose to eye level. The windows of the airplane did not have distortion...
I ask the posters please stick to the bible text from now on to see whether it describes a flat or globe earth.
Thank you,
Zsuzsanna

S
sermonindex

This is an old Athiests gotcha question. They usually ask it in context that the followers of Jesus are simple or uneducated and always were.

The thinking goes like this. If Jesus was God then why did he not tell mankind scientific truth concerning the cosmos? And why is it not recorded in the bible? I have never had a single one even try to rebut these versus when they see them and if it's good enough for athiest it should be enough here.

Jesus of course knew the earth was round and told us. He said in the "night" (a specific time at some point on the planet) and then mentions 3 different pairs of people doing things that happen at three different times on the earth, therefor the earth is round. I list them in their broadest terms.

In the field -8am til 4pm
At the mill - 4 pm til 12pm
In bed - 12pm til 8am

Luke- 17:34 I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left. 35 Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left. 36 Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

Marcmc

L
Lysa

by Zsuzsanna
Please allow me to narrow the topic to one question:
If we had the bible and our own simple observations and not have today's vast information from culture science etc. Would we come up with the idea that the earth is a sphere? The two Christians in the linked video state this and I strongly disagree, the way I see it the bible rather points to a flat earth than to a sphere.

What?? You want to go back to 350ish BC? Because Aristotle found out and argued that the Earth was round about that time. Why did he do that? Because during a lunar eclipse, the earth's circular shadow was cast on the Moon. This was "his" simple observation not based on our vast knowledge and he didn't even have a Bible. Just a man and his eyes.

(edit: after i wrote this, I downloaded and listened to "
THE LIFE OF BROKENNESS BY WILLIAM MACDONALD" and then deleted the bottom half of post.

I left only the facts, Aristotle around 350BC with no Bible saw with his own eyes, as we see during every eclipse - the circular shadow of the earth.

God bless,
Lisa

D
docs

It is with I hope a certain amount of fear and trembling and contriteness of my own self I offer this. But please good lady go to the website of those who made this film and spend some time there going over things they offer and advocate. That's all. You have made good posts and I have benefitted from them. So thank you for that.

S
sermonindex

why?....why?

(I write in love, PLEASE don't mistake the tenor of my response, I BEG YOU)

you quoted Paul, so will I, then I will let Ian Paisley
speak for me.

" Pay careful attention to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to care for the church of God, which he obtained with his own blood. I know that after my departure fierce wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock; and from among your own selves will arise men speaking twisted things, to draw away the disciples after them."
Acts 20:28-30 (ESV)


"Fundamentalism Versus Apostasy" Ian Paisley
http://www.sermonaudio.com/playpopup.asp?SID=6863

be not cross with me, please, in Jesus love, neil

S
sermonindex

I conclude that most of the readers find the idea of FE or geocentricity so absurd that they are not even willing to look at the scriptures.
Here is an article from ligonier ministries that dares to tackles this topic:
"Martin Luther and John Calvin believed geocentrism to be a true description of God’s creation."
http://www.ligonier.org/blog/luther-calvin-and-copernicus-reformed-approach-science-and-scripture/
docs, the Catholics believe that Jesus Christ the son of God died on the cross to bring us salvation. Should I not believe this idea because they are Catholics and worship Mary?
marc, According to current theories there are time zones in FE.
Lysa, I wanted to discuss the Bible not Aristotle.
Neil, Do you think that this idea is dangerous? It wasn't in the early church.

Thanks all the contributions they are good sources of information and have a humbling effect.

One more question:
How do you explain that God created the light and earth before He created the Sun and Moon while main stream science says that the earth came about from spinning dust in space? That would mean the Earth was always spinning and orbiting around the sun. Maybe when God created the Sun He also set the Earth in motion and on orbit?

God bless you.
Zsuzsanna


S
sermonindex

What would Aristotle do with this kind of Lunar eclipse? He did not know about the supposed refraction.
http://abc7ny.com/science/tonights-lunar-eclipse-is-so-unique-its-impossible/340212/

D
docs

From the film,

- There are no stars larger than earth

- The sun is not really ninety three million miles away

- The firmanent is really solid

- The heavenly bodies move and not the earth

/docs, the Catholics believe that Jesus Christ the son of God died on the cross to bring us salvation. Should I not believe this idea because they are Catholics and worship Mary?/

If the people who produced this film (worldslastchance) on a flat earth are the same people who maintain the website worldslastchance.com then there are issues. If they are not the same issues then I will be corrected. But if they are then they are anti-trinitarian and have a film denouncing the Trinity. Plus other unorthodox beliefs.

Plus under the articles section there is a article that is anti-semitic to its core and I say that with a great deal of trepidation because of the recent controversies and threads on SI relating to the Jewish people and Israel. I will not even go into the article. The air of unity on SI has been so exceedingly precious I dare not risk upsetting it. But perhaps you haven't perused their entire website or their beliefs and were just attracted to the article about the earth being flat. I'm done that before on websites. That is okay if you did but I would urge you to look around a bit on that website. I'm not trying to set myself up as better than you or anyone and I'm not comfortable saying what I have. No offense in any way is intended towards you. I believe the best of you and remember your many worthwhile contributions to SI.

"Doc"

S
sermonindex

Thanks docs, I hoped to have a discussion about the Bible verses, the creation and biblical cosmology. We do not have to agree with one video, but may discuss the scriptures regarding those questions. I do not agree with the end time views of that video. There are lots of issues with the Catholics also but they got that one thing right...

T
twayneb

Szuszanna: I spend some time researching both the video and the group that put it out. I cannot judge whether these people know and love God, probably so. But their Biblical interpretations and the things that they choose to focus on as important or essential show them to be very far off the path Biblically and very deceived where Biblical truth is concerned. In my opinion, I would not subject myself to their teachings.

As to the flat earth, I think that question has been put to rest. There is simply no question. All of the laws of physics and mathematics which God established when He fixed the workings of the earth and universe would literally fall apart if the earth were flat. The author is reading into verses a meaning that is strained rather than reading out of the verses their plain meaning.

D
docs

Well, I hear what you are saying and I'm not trying to be overbearing. But the fact is that if someone offers articles or videos from websites it almost goes without saying that somehow people feel you may agree with the website and its sponsors. Whether you do or not. And I'm not saying you do. It's just that I was somewhat taken back by the website and its anti-trinitarian stance and other unorthodox beliefs and the preposterous article about crypto-Jews. But thank you for listening. I just felt a disclaimer regarding some of the things presented by this group may have been wise. They say they have leaders but then don't name them but say their leadership is just a loose confederation of people spread over the world. But it may not even be my place to suggest that. If my comments are offensive or seen as meddling I apologize up front. I'm not trying to stir trouble at all

S
sermonindex

Thanks twayneb, I see that no one is puzzled by the scriptures presented in the video or Luther and Calvin or the creation question I presented. But I am puzzled.
I heard this quote before but forgot who it is from:
"We rather have questions that can not be answered than questions that can not be asked"
Again I brought up this video not to agree with it but to talk about the questions it brings up. The same way that we could discuss for example whether the bible teaches that Mary to be worshipped or not.
"I would not subject myself to it's teaching"
Please don't, this teaching is up for discussion, as in prove everything and hold fast to what is good.
God Bless you,
Zsuzsanna

Edit I apologise for misquoting the poster, here is the correct quote: "In my opinion, I would not subject myself to their teachings." Neither do I and never did. I hoped to discuss ideas not teachers. I am not Pauls ot apollos' we do not follow humans we follow Christ.

S
sermonindex

you asked me:
"Neil, Do you think that this idea is dangerous? It wasn't in the early church."

no, I do not think that this all is "dangerous", BUT I see the same old dysfunctional rubric settling in, said rubric, "pet" beliefs or "doctrines" slash agenda's....but precious one:

THE FAULT IS MINE...its on me, fore I NEVER should have responded, forgive me. and with that, I only wish the Grace and the Love and the Mercy of God on your dear heart and soul, in Jesus Love, neil

S
sermonindex

I am glad that it's not dangerous, since no one is interested in this discussion I do not insist. It was my pleasure to hear your opinions.
Thanks everyone,
and God bless you, I love you all,
Zsuzsanna

T
TMK

Toszu-

What is there to discuss?

What difference does it make what the scriptures "seem" to say on this topic?

It is absolutely proven 1000% that the earth is a sphere; that it moves around the sun, that the other planets are spheres (we can even see Saturn's rings which encircle that planet) and we can see other heavenly bodies rotating. And all the planets orbit the sun and the whole solar system is speeding through the Milky Way galaxy. We can see our own earth rotating from outer space. Are you suggesting that it is turning like a coin spinning on a table?

What difference does it make what people 500 years ago knew, or even people in Bible times? They did not have telescopes and space travel etc etc etc and finally the Bible is not a textbook on cosmology any more than it is a textbook on quantum physics.

Don't you have any concerns that such arguments like the earth being flat makes Christians look like fools? It is one thing to be a fool for the gospel but quite another to be a fool for being a fool's sake.

T
TMK

https://youtu.be/gIbfYsQfNWs

S
sermonindex

Luke 12:7King James Version (KJV)

7 But even the very hairs of your head are all numbered. Fear not therefore: ye are of more value than many sparrows.

S
sermonindex

Biblical cosmology.
All the bible verses related to how our universe is.

I do not believe in evolution in the eyes of the unbelievers I am fool enough. Do you?

T
TMK

I absolutely do not believe in macro evolution (species to new species). But the theory of evolution is still a theory. The spherical shape of the earth is proven and observable fact beyond all question.

S
sermonindex

I believe evolution as the variation of species, but do not believe that we came about by evolution.
"The spherical shape of the earth is proven and observable fact beyond all question."
Prove it to me with scientific experiments that an average person is capable to perform and/or understand.
No doctored pictures, news from magazines, opinions of people like Michio Kaku, Steven Hawking etc. No pictures by a telescope that I've never even seen, No theories of big bang etc. please.
Who has seen the curvature, which civil engineer calculated with the curve? How does a gyroscope which keeps its rotation plain in the same angle regardless of curve keep planes in line? Why doesn't a gyroscope apparently turn as it should if the earth rotates? Why do not big mass objects on earth attract each other by gravity? Who saw or repeated the experiment by Cavendish regarding gravity? Is it conclusive? Explain how Foucault's pendulum works so I can understand, Why can the Chicago skyline be seen from the other side of the lake? Why don't I feel acceleration while travelling from the North toward the Equator? Why does it take for planes the same time to travel a distance West to East and East to West? Why doesn't Polaris ever move? Etc.... What about classic experiments like Michaelson-Morey, and Airy's failure?

You can write me an e-mail but here I thought we could talk about the Bible. Ever since I first read the Bible this verse was strange to me:
Revelation 6:14King James Version (KJV)

14 And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places.

It could be symbolic or literal but why would God compare the huge universe with all the billions and billions lightyears and stars to a scroll? Same is with the tree: Why would God suggest that a tall tree can reach Heaven (anyway where is it? How many billions of light years away) and can be seen from all over the earth? At all why does the Bible suggest that up and down means anything? And there is the account of creation as I mentioned, how can it be harmonized with the official big bang and spinning dust?
And there is this verse:
Genesis 1:14
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

Why didn't God say that he creates the stars and planets moons so we can go there if the earth overpopulates? No he said they were to show time to us which they do. There are many more such verses. Why wouldn't God tell it to us if it's not so?

T
TMK

I honestly can't tell if you are pulling my leg or not. Is this a test?

The bible was written by ancient men who had no idea about much of anything beyond what their senses could tell them. I am not saying they were not inspired in what they wrote but the purpose of the inspiration was not astrophysics, geology, mathematics, chemistry, physics, biology, optics, etc etc etc.

It seems you are trying to put clearly poetic language in the Bible on a par with advanced scientific analysis and observation.

(By the way- I can see Saturn and its rings with my fairly cheap telescope).

S
sermonindex

No, not at all, dear TMK it might be a test but I am not testing you, it is just difficult to speak openly in a mocking and hostile atmosphere. But here it is, and this is personal:
There are two reasons I am questioning all that is so evident for you and used to be for me. 1. High school physics class, where I learned that in science everything is (should be) testable, and should be proven by measurements and observations 2. An uncovered lie by a science related agency regarding a major proof of globe earth, and the consequent distrust on my part.
I along with many others have this idea that FE can be proven or disproven by direct experiments and observations by common people i.e. not using high cost apparatus and highly trained scientists.


The bible was written by ancient men who had no idea about much of anything beyond what their senses could tell them. I am not saying they were not inspired in what they wrote but the purpose of the inspiration was not astrophysics, geology, mathematics, chemistry, physics, biology, optics, etc etc etc.

I think I am not the only Christian who believes that the Bible, especially the account of creation is significant, accurate and inspired for the purpose of telling us about our world. For example the order of creation can signify the central importance of the Earth which is I believe nowhere in the Bible is ever questioned, and the lesser importance of the heavenly bodies. True observation and true inspiration should give the same result.
"(By the way- I can see Saturn and its rings with my fairly cheap telescope)."
Funny, a stranger lady showed me a picture of Saturn on her cellphone last Saturday, she made it with her telescope. Too bad that I am not sure how far Saturn is...

C
Christinyou

Next time there is an eclipse of the moon look carefully and you will see the shadow of the earth on the moon surface and it will show the size of the earth to the moon, and can be calculated by mathematics. The shadow of the earth on the moon is curved not by optics but by the earth coming in front of the sun' light being blocked by the earth and seeing that shadow on the moon. If you look at the moon through a strong telescope you can see that it is a globe and not flat.

I still don't understand your motive with this excursion of something proven to be not true, FE as you describe the Flat Earth lie as being something to prove not to be a lie. It is inconceivable that with all the proof we have that the earth is round and not flat that you perceive the proof as not being proof to you because you have no way of testing it.

What proof do you have that Jesus Christ is the Son of God?

I have been a pilot for 40 years and have well over 10,000 hrs of fling and have had friends that flew the SR71, highest flying naturally aspirated Jet in the World. I have seen pictures they took from 80,000 feet and heard their testimony of how beautiful the earth is in all its glory, a beautiful round globe hanging perfectly in space just as God intended it to be. A spinning gyro top toy or gyro instruments create their own gravity from the speed of its rotation, that is exactly how the earth keeps from wobbling as a toy does when it slows down, The earths speed is prefect and keeps everything in place, if God slows or stops the rotation the mountains and everything else will certainly move.

This is not in any way putting you down or accusing you in any way of any dark intentions, I just don't understand your stand on FE.

In Christ: Phillip

H
Heydave

I thought about posting yesterday, but thought the subject had closed. Anyway I will add some thoughts to consider concerning bible revelation.

As has already been said, the bible is not, and never was a science text book or even a detailed history book. It may include some science and history, but it's sole purpose is to reveal who God is and our relationship to Him. Primarily it is the revelation of salvation in Jesus Christ from Genesis to Revelation.

The reason we get into problems and come up with erroneous teaching like the view that was posted in the OP is because we have a wrong view of the bible and what it is and how it should be read. Now I definitely believe the bible is the 100% word of God, 100% God given and complete in all we need to know Him and His will for mankind this side of eternity (there will be more to know in eternity).

However if we interpret every word or phrase in the bible in a 'technical' or overly extreme literal way we will completely miss the meaning and end up making false conclusions. Don't misunderstand me, I do take the bible literally in the message it is giving, but I am talking about not taking into account the context of words and phrases and the main point being taught. So if we ignore the poetic or expressive language often used and take each word in a technically literal way, we end up with something the author never intended. For example, when the bible talks about 'the four corners of the earth', almost everyone knows this means 'the whole earth' and not literally that there are 4 corners! We even still use that phrase today. When God says He is 'a sun and a shield' do we take that as meaning He is the Sun or a big shield? I Know these are obvious, but we do the same thing with many other scriptures to try and 'prove' something that the bible itself is not saying.

Someone I know often used to say that 'words have history', meaning we need to understand the use of words as they were understood at the time. I might write a letter and in it say that something 'is a pain in the neck'. Someone reading that hundreds of years later who does not understand the phrase could interpret that literally and think I had some medical neck condition!

I am a biblical creationist, but I think some of the arguments used to support it use scripture in this wrong way. We are quick to grab hold of scriptures like Isaiah 40:22 "It is he that sitteth upon the circle (or sphere) of the earth..." to show the bible teaches the earth is a sphere. However based on the context of the rest of the verse, it seems it could be saying God sits ABOVE the earth. It actually would not make sense that it was saying 'He sits on the earth and the people are as grasshoppers'. But we miss that meaning when we try and find 'proof texts' to back up a view, even when that view may be correct.


T
TMK

Well spoken Dave.

Toszu it is not my intention to mock and I do apologize for that tone.

I just don't think it is fair to us, and especially to God, to give credence to false theories. To say that the earth is flat and is the center of the universe subtracts from God's glory. It is His creation after all, and it is important to accurately portray what he has created. Did you watch the video I posted? It is pretty mind blowing how glorious the creation is.

S
sermonindex

I don't see anything wrong with the topic. I question everything that l have been taught and have looked intently at the Apollo program and the Holocaust, to understand for myself whether they really happened or not.

I am not convinced about a FE however.

T
TMK

Brenda- what was your conclusion regarding the Holocaust and th Apollo moon missions?

S
sermonindex

Aaaah new thread I think :)

S
savannah


Now & Then -

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eratosthenes

S
sermonindex

Thank you heydave and christinyou for the thoughtful and sober answers. Christinyou, the scientific questions were brought up by me as examples because TMK said there are no questions, but I did not want to discuss them on this thread. I would be happy to have a conversation with you about eclipses gyroscopes etc. but here I wanted to discuss bible verses related to our world view. Heydave I like your balanced approach and your respectful words. You say that in certain things such as creation we should go by the bible against the "obvious" and "evident" "proofs" of evolution provided by science, because it looks to you that evolution is difficult to believe. But in the case of view of the universe to go against the "obvious" and "evident" "proofs" of current scientific theories of the world is wrong because it looks to you that these latter are not difficult to believe. I know that when we read the Bible we should look to the Holy Spirit for explanation.
Does reading the bible lead you to a proof of globe earth and heliocentrism as it is said in the video linked by forrests, (the christian scientist said in the video that if you read the bible honestly you come up with the globe view) or to the ancient Hebrew worldview.
If you decide to go by the current scientific view where is your limit? Do you also believe the big bang theory and the spinning dust theory for the creation of the Earth or in this case would you go with the biblical creation, which is not compatible with today's heliocentrism as the earth was created before the sun?

S
sermonindex

What proof do you have that Jesus Christ is the Son of God?

I have two witnesses for proof: The revealed word of God (Bible) and the witness of the Holy Spirit.

S
sermonindex

"I question everything that l have been taught." Me too. But I purposely tried to avoid topics that may be deemed by others as "conspiracy theories" and are highly controversial therefore - for a very good reason - are recommended by the moderators not to be discussed on these forums. That's why I wanted to keep to the Bible verses.

S
sermonindex

I just don't think it is fair to us, and especially to God, to give credence to false theories. To say that the earth is flat and is the center of the universe subtracts from God's glory. It is His creation after all, and it is important to accurately portray what he has created. Did you watch the video I posted? It is pretty mind blowing how glorious the creation is.

What's wrong with wanting to search the Bible and question God for truth in the case when there is an uncertainty in us about anything including the world?

Edit: "question God" is an unfortunate expression thanks to my poor English. I meant:Ask God to answer my questions about what is the truth.

S
sermonindex

The threads I started were on the instigation of someone asking a question. Nothing more.

S
sermonindex

nothing.

T
TMK

Brenda-

I was wrong to ask those questions of you on this forum and I do apologize. Nothing good could come of them.

S
sermonindex

savannah:
Scientists are not always right. Sometimes they compare their findings and modify their theories. That's how it should always be with men, but not so with God. Here is an other view:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk_NzMejP-0

T
TMK

Quote:
"If you decide to go by the current scientific view where is your limit? Do you also believe the big bang theory and the spinning dust theory for the creation of the Earth or in this case would you go with the biblical creation, which is not compatible with today's heliocentrism as the earth was created before the sun?"

Again, in my opinion of course, the Bible is not a textbook about how God created all the matter, including dark matter (no where mentioned in the Bible). You are attempting to shoehorn into a few verses in Gen 1 all that happened when God created the universe.

Why do you think it is so necessary to do that?

My son is taking multi variable calculus and physical chemistry in school. He doesn't use the Bible for his textbook. Why do we insist on using a few verses in the Bible as the end-all in explaining everything about the universe?

S
sermonindex

Todd it is no problem to ask an innocent question and get an answer unless it steps on some truth deniers toes. Those with agendas make a big noise and cause the trouble and count on others being silenced.

S
sermonindex

In my opinion God can answer ANY question.
Science answers physical natural questions, but not spiritual ones. Plus science can be wrong, God can not be wrong. Which one is bigger?

S
sermonindex

TMK you took my answer to heydave out of context and misunderstood it. The context was that creationinsts rely on bible account concerning evolution but do not rely on bible verses when discuss the universe.

D
dolfan

I can prove the Earth is not flat with no fancy instruments, no agencies, no Ph.D.. Not one person, ship, plane, car, or vessel has ever sailed over the edge of it. Only a spherical object has the property that it can be continually travelled along its surface without reaching an edge. It is finite, and its surface may be traveled and the end of the surface may not be found. Has to be a sphere.

Now, does the Bible say so? Yes.

This also goes to the issue of why Toszu doesn't speed up when traveling from the north pole to the equator. The earth is hung on nothing, empty space. Job 26:7. The only way a surface of Earth's properties can be suspended in empty space is to be surrounded by empty space. That space hosts constellations, mazzaroth in Hebrew, Job 38:31, 32, which rotate in such fashion relative to our surface that no such movement visible to us is possible were we not on a spherical object.

There is no up or down in space. Approaching Earth from space, there is no up or down relative to its equatorial midline. Traveling along the surface of the earth does not produce a gravitational downward force because the equator is not "down" relative to the north. It is south, but it is not down.

S
sermonindex

Dolfan
According to the current model of FE it's a disc with the north pole in the center and an outer rim of ice wall on the South to keep the oceans in, and a land on the rim.
If a ship sails to the West while keeping its way constantly perpendicular to his compass showing North it will circumnavigate the FE without reaching an edge. Those who sail to the South will reach Antarctica and the huge ice walls which according to the model is on the edge.

Since the radius of the Earth is smaller in the north than at the Equator and both places travel around the Earth in one day the point at the Equator travels faster, so when I approach it from the North I should feel a speeding up.

According to current FE model the constellations and all the stars the sun and moon circle over FE. Up and down has a well defined meaning in scriptures, which is compatible with the FE model.

Edit I would like to correct: I said radius of the Earth smaller. Of course the radius of the earth is near the same everywhere, I meant the radius of the circular motion as the Earth spins.

T
TMK

quote: "TMK you took my answer to heydave out of context and misunderstood it. The context was that creationinsts rely on bible account concerning evolution but do not rely on bible verses when discuss the universe."

I did not misunderstand. You are using the exceedingly sparse info in the Bible to try to explain the universe.

If the Bible is the end-all for all knowledge, we should not need any other science or math textbook. Why did Newton have to write Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy? Doesn't the Bible lay out all the principles and rules of classical mechanics? Why did he have to come up with Calculus? Doesn't the Bible explain differential equations? Doesn't it explain the nature of chemical reactions and the microanatomy of the human body?(of course these are rhetorical questions- it doesn't).

So my question stands: Why is it okay to have texts on mathematics, chemistry, physics, etc but the Bible is the only legitimate source for cosmology?

The idea of the earth being in essence a pie pan with Antartica forming the ridge of the pan is patently absurd- sorry to use such words but that is the truth.

S
sermonindex

Brothers and Sisters,

Though the possibility of a flat earth seems interesting, I would not put it past God. But overall we should not speculate on these things or focus but rather seek First the Kingdom of God. We also ask that repeated threads on this topic not be opened as it is not leading to mutual edification but rather alot of speculation, conspiracies etc.

We have many "sure" things to share and discuss from the Scriptures that will edify and grow us in our Spiritual Walks with the Lord.

We are locked this thread as enough has been considered on this topic.

S
sermonindex

Thanks dolfan for bringing up scriptures to talk about.

The earth is hung on nothing, empty space. Job 26:7. The only way a surface of Earth's properties can be suspended in empty space is to be surrounded by empty space. That space hosts constellations, mazzaroth in Hebrew, Job 38:31, 32, which rotate in such fashion relative to our surface that no such movement visible to us is possible were we not on a spherical object.

Job 26:7King James Version (KJV)

7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.

Job 38:31-32King James Version (KJV)

31 Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades, or loose the bands of Orion?

32 Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons?

The surface of the Earth is surrounded by empty place. True. Over the surface of the earth there is air which in King James' time was called empty place. I think verse 7 is speaking about the firmament that is over the air, That's what is stretched out, why is it called North I am not sure. Perhaps because the stretching started in the middle (by FE model North is in the middle) "hangeth the earth upon nothing" The Bible says that the Earth hangs on nothing, but at other places it says that the earth has foundation and pillars. Could this mean that it is not supported from above (hang) but from below (fundation)?
Job 9:6-9King James Version (KJV)

6 Which shaketh the earth out of her place, and the pillars thereof tremble.

7 Which commandeth the sun, and it riseth not; and sealeth up the stars.

8 Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea.

9 Which maketh Arcturus, Orion, and Pleiades, and the chambers of the south.

God created the constellations and orders their precise movement to show us times and dates.

which rotate in such fashion relative to our surface that no such movement visible to us is possible were we not on a spherical object.

There is a way that they can circle over us: if they are in the firmament and it is possible to see them not only from a spherical object.

Genesis 1:14-15King James Version (KJV)

14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:

15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.

There is no indication here that there is a vast depth of space spotted with stars billions and billions of light years away, nor that the Earth is a sphere or that it moves.
How about the 6 days anyway if a star was created on the first week but we can not see it just billions and billions of light years later? This is not indicated in the text.

This discussion is archived and closed to new replies. Start a new discussion to carry the subject on.
Archived
1 of 57 posts

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate