Many here come to find comfort by finding people who also have their belief. I definitely do not share the same belief with you or William. You both can comfort each other taking Bible out of context. I am not here to tell words that please men, I gave all my view from Bible. None of these are my own idea. As far as I see no one here has given any thing from Bible to justify how it is perfectly normal to sit alone without being part of a Church.
It all depends on what is priority. To most believers the priority might be to be saved and go to heaven. If that is the priority then go ahead, why should someone be concerned about what the Bible teaches about Church or letters that Jesus writes to Church. They can be happily believing in a imaginary Gobal church. But according to a definition that a true believer in God's word, if they miss God's plan for their life, they lost something precious. They may still end up in Heaven. But lost is lost. That is why there were people weeping in heaven.
I am as much prone to pride as any believer. But saying the truth is pride then God save people. I never said once that being in a local Body of CHrist will automatically solve all Spiritual pride or problems. Please read at least what I have said. Do not come to such conclusion. It is clearly painful that people here do not care to even understand what others have to say. The moment you hear a word that does not comfort your belief then immediately start blaming others.
I have asked a simple question with an attitude to learn. Did God made the mistake by not showing a local Church to them? Or did they miss God's plan by not praying for a Church? God will always do 2 things either take them to a local body of believers or use them to Build a Local Body if there is no local body in their locality. But to say that God did neither is Arrogance.
If believers do not take the blame and keep seeking comfort in one another then I can plainly see they are ARROGANT in blaming God for not showing a Church to them.
Yes Sheep will hear his voice. But Jesus also said in John 12 that 'Where I am my disciples will also be'. He will not let the sheep to keep wandering without a Sheppard. There should be local Sheppard who submit to the chief Sheppard Jesus. It is believers who are proud to submit to any local Sheppard will keep believing in imaginary Global Church. Humility is the key.
1 Peter 5:1 :- Therefore, I exhort the elders among you, as your fellow elder and witness of the sufferings of Christ, and a partaker also of the glory that is to be revealed, 2 shepherd the flock of God among you, exercising oversight not under compulsion, but voluntarily, according to the will of God; and not for sordid gain, but with eagerness; 3 nor yet as lording it over [a]those allotted to your charge, but [b]proving to be examples to the flock. 4 And when the Chief Shepherd appears, you will receive the unfading [c]crown of glory. 5 You younger men, likewise, be subject to your elders; and all of you, clothe yourselves with humility toward one another, for God is opposed to the proud, but gives grace to the humble.
If each believer does not need a local shepherd to oversee them then why did Jesus appoint them? All can be under the chief shepherd directly and imagine a Global body of believers right? It takes humility to be subject to local elders whom Jesus has appointed. That is why Peter calls them proud who does not want to submit to the authority of a local Church. God himself will be opposed to such a person. What more spiritual danger we need?
Blame Peter for being hash.
It really amazes me how believers here are so poor in self examination and keep seeking comfort from fellow posters. Truth alone can set one free not comforting words. Truth is often bitter.