I've been reading through this thread tonight which gave me pause to consider what I've been reading.
There were several topics on SermonIndex between November and now regarding the various people who gave public "prophetic" utterances regarding the election. Many of those "prophetic" words predicted an outcome that never came to pass.
Before and after the election, many people sent me video links to those "words." Yet, I never watched a single one of them. I was certainly interested in watching them. I was certainly interested in knowing what other people thought of them too. However, I couldn't bring myself to watch even one of them.
Oddly enough, I voted for President Trump. I wanted him to win the election. This was primarily for reasons of policy. After all, my faith was not in President Trump.
Despite the fact that I voted for him and wanted him to serve another four years (and wanting the party of abortion, LGBTQ, pro-China, anti-faith, anti-Israel, etc. to lose), I realize the futility of trusting in men or even institutions. In fact, it would be futile to trust in the words of any men -- including "men of God." Our faith should ONLY be in Christ alone.
Still, I wanted for President Trump to be reelected. In fact, I have performed post-election statistical analysis and I'm quite convinced that there was widespread fraud that happened in the election. The math just doesn't make any sense and defies every election norm.
Yet, even in all the confusion and likely fraud, it is interesting to note that God allowed all of this to happen. This happened despite the "prophetic" words uttered prior to (and even after) the election. Does this make those individuals "false prophets," "charlatans" or just people who "got it wrong?"
Recently, my wife and I read through the first five books of the Bible during our morning devotions. In fact, we just finished the Book of Joshua today.
One name popped out several times throughout our reading: Balaam the son of Beor.
From the time that "Balaam" is first mentioned in Numbers chapter 22, his name is referenced fairly often in the Bible. In fact, his name appears 66 times. He is referenced in ten different passages after his story was told in Numbers 22-24.
When you read his story in those initial chapters, it is difficult to make out just what his sin was. He was solicited by Balak, the king of Moab. Balak knew that Moses and the Israelites were rapidly approaching the land that was promised to Abraham. He knew that God was with them.
It was Balak's desire that Balaam -- known for his "gift" -- would curse Israel. Yet, each time that Balaam spoke, the words that he spoke blessed Israel. Balak was frustrated by this turn of events. Eventually, he returned to his homeland.
It isn't until later in the Bible that we understand what this great "error of Balaam" actually was.
We discover through other references to Balaam that he was something of a "prophet for hire." He was recognized as a "soothsayer" with a gift of "divination." He was solicited by Balak to utter a curse.
In Numbers 24, it states that God spoke to Balaam (and vice versa). God warned Balaam not to go with the men sent by Balak. The men from Balak pressed him to go with them and curse Israel. Yet, Balak replied, "If Balak would give me his house full of silver and gold, I cannot go beyond the word of the LORD my God, to do less or more" (Numbers 22:18).
So far, this almost seems commendable.
Eventually, Balaam consulted the Lord yet again and the Lord permitted him to go with those men -- but told Balaam to only utter what He (the Lord) told him. Yet, the Lord was angry that Balaam was going (Numbers 22:22). Later, we read that Balaam uttered the blessings over Israel (to Balak's dismay).
It isn't until later that we discover that all of these "words" that were blessings were inconsequential to the evil of Balaam's error.
We learn in Numbers 31 that Balaam was actually responsible for the sexual promiscuity that came after Israel was tempted by foreign women (and the subsequent plague). Apparently, Balak realized that God wasn't going to curse Israel through Balaam's mouth, but that he could entice Israel to curse themselves through immorality.
Consider the following verses about Balaam:
"Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against the LORD in the matter of Peor, and there was a plague among the congregation of the LORD."
- Numbers 31:16"Because they met you not with bread and with water in the way, when ye came forth out of Egypt; and because they hired against thee Balaam the son of Beor of Pethor of Mesopotamia, to curse thee. Nevertheless the LORD thy God would not hearken unto Balaam; but the LORD thy God turned the curse into a blessing unto thee, because the LORD thy God loved thee."
- Deuteronomy 23:4-5
"Then Balak the son of Zippor, king of Moab, arose and warred against Israel, and sent and called Balaam the son of Beor to curse you: But I would not hearken unto Balaam; therefore he blessed you still: so I delivered you out of his hand."
- Joshua 24:9-10
"Because they met not the children of Israel with bread and with water, but hired Balaam against them, that he should curse them: howbeit our God turned the curse into a blessing."
- Nehemiah 13:2
"Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness...."
- II Peter 2:15
"Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core."
- Jude 1:11
"But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication."
- Revelation 2:14
While Balaam only BLESSED the people of Israel, he was still a "prophet" for hire. He did speak with God. God did speak to him. God put words -- blessings -- in his mouth. Yet, this great error was that he was never supposed to go to King Balak in the first place.
The "prophets" who uttered words about the election that didn't come to pass didn't get paid to do so. However, they did receive something for their "words." They received fame and reputation.
This is the greatest wrong that I see in those individuals who "prophesized" things. In addition to being wrong and bearing false witness against God (who they claim sanctioned their words), they gained a famous reputation from their attempts to tell people the future.
We don't know if these would-be prophets "taught" the ungodly people of this world anything, but the words themselves did become a stumbling block for many. They believed the words of men when the Word of God was available at all times.
We should NEVER trust in men.
We should ONLY trust -- with real faith -- in the Word of God.
Paul wrote in Galatians, "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed" (Galatians 1:8). I'm not saying that we should consider those "prophets" as being "accursed." However, I do think that this passage is explicit in how we should not buy stock in the words of men (or of angels). The Word of God is the ultimate authority.
As such, the Bible isn't particularly clear about current events (at least in terms of specifics). The names "Trump" and "Biden" never appear in Scripture. The Word of God does, however, teach us to place our faith and hope in God.
God is in control -- no matter what. The Word of God makes this abundantly clear. Sadly, the "words" spoken by others might create a distraction from this.