Menu
Daniel Steele

Retrocession a Prerequisite of Sanctification

The sermon argues that the theory of successive partial sanctifications is flawed and that entire sanctification requires a live, growing, and intensely earnest Christian.
Daniel Steele discusses the theory of successive partial sanctifications, highlighting the misconception of implying backslidings after every cleansing and the confusion between entire sanctification and being reclaimed from spiritual decline. He emphasizes that true inward purity is grasped by live, growing, and intensely earnest Christians, discouraging the preaching of Christian perfection to those who have retrograded or are indifferent to spiritual advancement.

Text

THE theory of successive partial sanctifications it up to light," but never reaching the extinction of depravity, seems to imply successive backslidings after every cleansing:

When justified, every person is, in the relative or comparative sense, entirely justified. And whenever, at any subsequent point, after a season of retrocession, he comes fully up to his light and once more walks in unclouded communion he becomes again entirely sanctified, in this lower sense.

Thus our author confounds entire sanctification with what has been called being reclaimed from spiritual decline. Any acquaintance with the law of spiritual progress shows that only live, growing, and intensely earnest Christians grasp the prize of inward purity.

In fact, Wesley discourages preaching Christian perfection to those who have retrograded and are indifferent to spiritual advancement. This is his answer to the question, "In what manner should we preach sanctification?" "Scarce at all to those who are not pressing forward," or "to those who are always drawing rather than driving." The good sense of Wesley in this matter is in striking contrast with the crudity of our author, who would make "a season of retrocession" a preparation for entire sanctification "in the relative sense."

Sermon Outline

  1. The Theory of Successive Partial Sanctifications
  2. Entire Sanctification vs. Reclamation from Spiritual Decline
  3. The Importance of Pressing Forward in Spirituality
  4. The Role of Intense Earnestness in Spiritual Growth
  5. The Dangers of Indifference to Spiritual Advancement

Key Quotes

“When justified, every person is, in the relative or comparative sense, entirely justified.” — Daniel Steele
“Any acquaintance with the law of spiritual progress shows that only live, growing, and intensely earnest Christians grasp the prize of inward purity.” — Daniel Steele
“Scarce at all to those who are not pressing forward,” — Daniel Steele

Application Points

  • We should strive to be intensely earnest in our spirituality to grasp the prize of inward purity.
  • Preaching sanctification to those who are not pressing forward in their spirituality can be counterproductive.
  • A season of retrocession is not a preparation for entire sanctification, but rather a sign of spiritual decline.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the theory of successive partial sanctifications?
This theory implies that a person is only partially sanctified, with depravity still present, and that this state can lead to successive backslidings.
How does our author confuse entire sanctification with reclamation from spiritual decline?
Our author confuses entire sanctification with reclamation from spiritual decline by suggesting that a season of retrocession can prepare a person for entire sanctification.
What is the law of spiritual progress?
The law of spiritual progress shows that only live, growing, and intensely earnest Christians can grasp the prize of inward purity.
How should we preach sanctification?
According to Wesley, we should scarce preach sanctification to those who are not pressing forward in their spirituality.

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate