Is The Higher Criticism Scholarly
A scholarly refutation of the higher criticism's 'assured results' by Professor Robert Dick Wilson of Princeton Theological Seminary. Wilson, a specialist in Semitic philology, presents clearly attested facts showing that destructive critical conclusions are indefensible.
41 Chapters
Table of Contents
1
00.1. Is the Higher Criticism Scholarly?
2
00.2. FOREWORD
3
01. IS THE HIGHER CRITICISM SCHOLARLY?
4
02. Countering With Proof, Defensive and Offensive
5
03. The Old Testament Derived From Written Sources Based on Contemporary Documents
6
04. Age-long Correspondence in the Chronology of the Bible and Profane History
7
05. A Foundation for Reliance
8
06. Correct Order and Character of the Kings
9
07. A Biblical Phenomenon Unequaled in the History of Literature
10
08. The Correctness of Hebrew Authors a Basis for Faith
11
09. Intruding Foreign Words as Date-Setters
12
10. The Ever-Changing Influx of New Words in Hebrew Scriptures
13
11. No Whit Different From Our Own Language To-day
14
12. Critics Undervalue the Totality of the Evidence
15
13. Why Are Persian Words Missing in Critic-Belated Bible Books?
16
14. How Greek Words May Have Crept Into Daniel
17
15. Why Daniel May Have Used Persian Words
18
16. Hebraisms in Aramaic, Not Aramaisms in Hebrew
19
17. A Theory That Would Make All Documents Late
20
18. Hebrew Literary Forms Duplicated in Babylon and Egypt
21
19. The Same True of Legal Forms
22
20. An Argument From Silence Which Proves Nothing
23
21. Ample Time for Revision of Laws
24
22. Were the “Redactors” Slipshod Editors?
25
23. Will Objectors Please Answer a Few Questions?
26
24. Why the Emphasis on the Shedding of Blood?
27
25. Ezra’s Careful Camouflage!
28
26. ‘‘To the Text and to the Testimony!”
29
27. Why Do the Critics Reject Chronicles?
30
28. An Inconsistent Theory Made to Fit
31
29. Psalm Writers Would Not Have Absurdly Attributed Their Work to Pre-Captivity Authors
32
30. The “Jaddua” of Chronicles and of Josephus Not Necessarily the Same
33
31. Ewald Utterly Refuted in the Argument Regarding the Title “King of Persia”
34
32. Inexcusable Ignorance of Evidence on the Part of Notable Critics Exposed
35
33. Variations in Numbers Will be Better Understood When Israel’s Numerical Signs Are Discovered
36
34. The Chronicler Need Not Have Copied From Kings
37
35. Prophecies That Contain No Persian or Greek Word
38
36. Nothing in 1800 Years of History to Invalidate the Old Testament
39
37. The Plan, Purpose, and People of the History of Redemption Offer a Reasonable Basis for Belief
40
38. A Parallel Monstrosity to the Denial of Old Testament History Imagined
41
39. Grovel for Beetles,—or Pluck Violets?
