Hosea 4
EBHosea 4:1-19
I. THE LORD’S QUARREL WITH ISRAEL
“Hear the word of Jehovah, sons of Israel! Jehovah hath a quarrel with the inhabitants of the land, for there is no truth nor real love nor knowledge of God in the land. Perjury and murder and theft and adultery! They break out, and blood strikes upon blood.”
That stable and well-furnished life, across which, while it was still noon, Amos hurled his alarms-how quickly it has broken up! If there be still “ease in Zion,” there is no more “security in Samaria.” (Amos 6:1) The great Jeroboam is dead, and society, which in the East depends so much on the individual, is loose and falling to pieces. The sins which are exposed by Amos were those that lurked beneath a still strong government, but Hosea adds outbreaks which set all order at defiance. Later we shall find him describing housebreaking, highway robbery, and assassination. “Therefore doth the land wither, and every one of her denizens languisheth, even to the beast of the field and the fowl of the heaven; yea, even the fish of the sea are swept up” in the universal sickness of man and nature: for Hosea feels, like Amos, the liability of nature to the curse upon sin.
Yet the guilt is not that of the whole people, but of their religious guides. “Let none find fault and none upbraid, for My people are but as their priestlings. O Priest, thou hast stumbled today: and stumble tonight shall the prophet with thee.” One order of the nation’s ministers goes staggering after the other!"‘ And I will destroy thy Mother," presumably the nation herself. “Perished are My people for lack of knowledge.” But how? By the sin of their teachers. “Because thou,” O Priest, “hast rejected knowledge, I reject thee from being priest to Me; and as thou hast forgotten the Torah of thy God, I forget thy children- I on My side. As many as they be, so many have sinned against Me.” Every jack-priest of them is culpable. “They have turned their glory into shame. They feed on the sin of My people, and to the guilt of these lift up their appetite!” The more the people sin, the more merrily thrive the priests by fines and sin-offerings. They live upon the vice of the day, and have a vested interest in its crimes.
English Langland said the same thing of the friars of his time. The contention is obvious. The priests have given themselves wholly to the ritual; they have forgotten that their office is an intellectual and moral one. We shall return to this when treating of Hosea’s doctrine of knowledge and its responsibilities. Priesthood, let us only remember, priesthood is an intellectual trust.
“Thus it comes to be-like people like priest: “they also have fallen under the ritual, doing from lust what the priests do from greed. “But I will visit upon them their ways, and their deeds will I requite to them. For they” (those) “shall eat and not be satisfied,” (these) “shall play the harlot and have no increase, because they have left off heeding Jehovah.” This absorption in ritual at the expense of the moral and intellectual elements of religion has insensibly led them over into idolatry, with all its unchaste and drunken services. “Harlotry, wine, and new wine take away the brains!” The result is seen in the stupidity with which they consult their stocks for guidance. “My people! of its bit of wood it asketh counsel, and its staff telleth to it” the oracle! “For a spirit of harlotry hath led them astray, and they have played the harlot from their God. Upon the headlands of the hills they sacrifice, and on the heights offer incense, under oak or poplar or terebinth, for the shade of them is pleasant.” On “headlands,” not summits, for here no trees grow; and the altar was generally built under a tree and near water on some promontory, from which the flight of birds or of clouds might be watched. “Wherefore”-because of this your frequenting of the heathen shrines-“your daughters play the harlot and your daughters-in-law commit adultery. I will not come with punishment upon your daughters because they play the harlot, nor upon your daughters-in-law because they commit adultery.” Why? For “they themselves,” the fathers of Israel-or does he still mean the priests?-“go aside with the harlots and sacrifice with the common women of the shrines! “It is vain for the men of a nation to practice impurity and fancy that nevertheless they can keep their womankind chaste. “So the stupid people fall to ruin!”
(“Though thou play the harlot, Israel, let not Judah bring guilt on herself. And come not to Gilgal, and go not up to Beth-Aven, and take not your oath at the Well-of-the-Oath, BeerSheba, “By the life of Jehovah!” This obvious parenthesis may be either by Hosea or a later writer; the latter is more probable.”)
“Yea, like a wild heifer Israel has gone wild. How now can Jehovah feed them like a lamb in a broad meadow?” To treat this clause interrogatively is the only way to get sense out of it. “Wedded to idols is Ephraim: leave him alone.” The participle means “mated” or “leagued.” The corresponding noun is used of a wife as the “mate” of her husband (Malachi 2:4) and of an idolater as the “mate” of his idols. (Isaiah 44:11) The expression is doubly appropriate here, since Hosea used marriage as the figure of the relation of a deity to his worshippers. “Leave him alone”-he must go from bad to worse. “Their drunkenness over, they take to harlotry: her rulers have fallen in love with shame,” or “they love shame more than their pride.” But in spite of all their servile worship the Assyrian tempest shall sweep them away in its trail. “A wind hath wrapt them up in her skirts; and they shall be put to shame by their sacrifices.”
This brings the passage to such a climax as Amos loved to crown his periods. And the opening of the next chapter offers a new exordium.
Hosea 4:11-14
- “THE THAT IS THROUGH LUST”
Hosea 9:10-17 CF. Hosea 4:11-14
Those who at the present time are enforcing among us the revival of a paganism-without the pagan conscience-and exalting licentiousness to the level of an art, forget how frequently the human race has attempted their experiment, with far more sincerity than they themselves can put into it, and how invariably the result has been recorded by history to be weariness, decay, and death. On this occasion we have the story told to us by one who to the experience of the statesman adds the vision of the poet. The generation to which Hosea belonged practiced a periodical unchastity under the alleged sanctions of nature and religion. And, although their prophet told them that-like our own apostates from Christianity-they could never do so with the abandon of the pagans, for they carried within them the conscience and the memory of a higher faith, it appears that even the fathers of Israel resorted openly and without shame to the licentious rites of the sanctuaries. In an earlier passage of his book Hosea insists that all this must impair the people’s intellect. “Harlotry takes away the brains.” (Hosea 4:12) He has shown also how it confuses the family, and has exposed the old delusion that men may be impure and keep their womankind chaste. (Hosea 4:13-14) But now he diagnoses another of the inevitable results of this sin. After tracing the sin and the theory of life which permitted it, to their historical beginnings at the entry of the people into Canaan, he describes how the long practice of it, no matter how pretentious its sanctions, inevitably leads not only to exterminating strifes, but to the decay of the vigor of the nation, to barrenness and a diminishing population. “Like grapes in the wilderness I found Israel, like the first fruit on a fig-tree in her first season I saw your fathers.” So had the lusty nation appeared to God in its youth; in that dry wilderness all the sap and promise of spring were in its eyes, because it was still pure.
But “they-they came to Ba’al-Peor”-the first of the shrines of Canaan which they touched-“and dedicated themselves to the shame, and became as abominable as the object of their love. “Ephraim”-the “Fruitful” name is emphasized-“their glory is flown away like a bird. No more birth, no more motherhood, no more conception! Blasted is Ephraim, withered the root of them, fruit they produce not: yea, even when they beget children I slay the darlings of their womb. Yea, though they bring up their sons I bereave them,” till they are “poor in men. Yea, woe upon themselves” also, when I look away from them! Ephraim”-again the “Fruitful” name is dragged to the front-“for prey, as I have seen, are his sons destined.
Ephraim” - he “must lead his sons to the slaughter.”
And the prophet interrupts with his chorus: “Give them, O Lord-what wilt Thou give them? Give them a miscarrying womb and breasts that are dry!”
“All their mischief is in Gilgal”-again the Divine voice strikes the connection between the national worship and the national sin-“yea, there do I hate them: for the evil of their doings from My house I will drive them. I will love them no more: all their nobles are rebels.”
And again the prophet responds: “My God will cast them away, for they have not hearkened to Him, and they shall be vagabonds among the nations.”
Some of the warnings which Hosea enforces with regard to this sin have been instinctively felt by mankind since the beginnings of civilization, and are found expressed among the proverbs of nearly all the languages. But I am unaware of any earlier moralist in any literature who traced the effects of national licentiousness in a diminishing population, or who exposed the persistent delusion of libertine men that they themselves may resort to vice, yet keep their womankind chaste. Hosea, so far as we know, was the first to do this. History in many periods has confirmed the justice of his observations, and by one strong voice after another enforced his terrible warnings. The experience of ancient Persia and Egypt; the languor of the Greek cities; the “deep weariness and sated lust” which in Imperial Rome “made human life a hell”; the decay which overtook Italy after the renascence of Paganism without the Pagan virtues; the strife and anarchy that have rent every court where, as in the case of Henri Quatre, the king set the example of libertinage; the incompetence, the poltroonery, the treachery, that have corrupted every camp where, as in French Metz in 1870, soldiers and officers gave way so openly to vice; the checks suffered by modern civilization in face of barbarism because its pioneers mingled in vice with the savage races they were subduing; the number of great statesmen falling by their passions, and in their fall frustrating the hopes of nations; the great families worn out by indulgence; the homes broken up by infidelities; the tainting of the blood of a new generation by the poisonous practices of the old, -have not all these things been in every age, and do they not still happen near enough to ourselves to give us a great fear of the sin which causes them all? Alas! how stow men are to listen and to lay to heart!
Is it possible that we can gild by the names of frivolity and piquancy habits the wages of which are death? Is it possible that we can enjoy comedies which make such things their jest? We have among us many who find their business in the theatre, or in some of the periodical literature of our time, in writing and speaking and exhibiting as closely as they dare to limits of public decency. When will they learn that it is not upon the easy edge of mere conventions that they are capering, but upon the brink of those eternal laws whose further side is death and hell-that it is not the tolerance of their fellow men they are testing, but the patience of God Himself? As for those loud few who claim license in the name of art and literature, let us not shrink from them as if they were strong or their high words true. They are not strong, they are only reckless; their claims are lies.
All history, the poets and the prophets, whether Christian or Pagan, are against them. They are traitors alike to art, to love, and to every other high interest of mankind.
It may be said that a large part of the art of the day, which takes great license in dealing with these subjects, is exercised only by the ambition to expose that ruin and decay which Hosea himself affirms. This is true. Some of the ablest and most popular writers of our time have pictured the facts, which Hosea describes, with so vivid a realism that we cannot but judge them to be inspired to confirm his ancient warnings, and to excite a disgust of vice in a generation which otherwise treats vice so lightly. But if so, their ministry is exceeding narrow, and it is by their side that we best estimate the greatness of the ancient prophet. Their transcript of human life may be true to the facts it selects, but we find in it no trace of facts which are greater and more essential to humanity. They have nothing to tell us of forgiveness and repentance, and yet these are as real as the things they describe.
Their pessimism is unrelieved. They see the “corruption that is in the world through lust”; they forget that there is an escape from it. (2 Peter 1:1-21) It is Hosea’s greatness that, while he felt the vices of his day with all needed thoroughness and realism, he yet never allowed them to be inevitable or ultimate, but preached repentance and pardon, with the possibility of holiness even for his depraved generation. It is the littleness of the art of our day that these great facts are forgotten by her, though once she was their interpreter to men. When she remembers them the greatness of her past will return.