Esther 1
EDTIntroduction to the Book of Esther
An unfolding of Divine Providence.
I. Unseen power behind human affairs.
II. Ultimate just awards both to evil and to good.
III. Prosperity of the wicked ending in adversity.
IV. Adversity of the righteous ending in prosperity.
V. Poetic exactness of retribution, e.g. Haman and the gallows.
VI. Minutest matters woven by God’s shuttle into the fabric of His design (chap. 6:1).
VII. Yet there is no fatalism taught here, but prayer, resolve, and independent action.
VIII. The name of God is not found in the book, perhaps to hint that the hand which regulates all these things is a hidden hand.
Arthur T. Pierson, * Seed Thoughts,* p. 10.
Esther God Amid the Shadows
The events recorded in the book of Esther occurred between the completion of the temple and the mission of Ezra. In all likelihood the narrative, as we have it, was taken directly from the Persian records. The principal value of the book is not its revelation of God’s care for individuals, it is rather that of His preservation of the people as a whole, in an hour when they were threatened with wholesale slaughter. The book is preeminently dramatic, and is best analysed around the scenes.
I. The King’s Court, Ahasuerus. The first scene is that of a great feast in the palace of the king. In the midst of it the king commanded his queen, Vashti, to his presence. The one redeeming feature in the revelation of the conditions at the court of Ahasuerus was that of Vashti’s refusal to obey the command of the king. Mordecai’s action in the case of Esther is open to question. His advice that she should not betray her nationality was questionable, as her position at the court of the king was one of peril for a daughter of the covenant. Haman is now introduced, His malice was stirred against Mordecai, and also, therefore, against all his people, and he made use of his influence with the king to obtain authority practically to exterminate the whole of them.
II. The Country, Mordecai, and the Mourning Jews. The intention of Haman became known to Mordecai, who at once took up his position outside the king’s gate, and there raised a loud and bitter cry. The royal proclamation filled the people through the provinces with sorrow, and they mourned with fasting and weeping and wailing.
III. The King’s Court, the Unnamed God. The news of this mourning reached Esther in the royal palace, and she sent to make inquiries. The custom and law of the court forbade her approach to her lord save at his command. The urgency of the case appealed to her, however, and with splendid heroism she ventured. Her request was at first of the simplest. She invited the king and Haman to a banquet Acting upon the advice of wife and friends, Haman committed the folly of making the time of the banquet merry by first erecting a gallows for Mordecai. To while away the hours of a sleepless night, the records were read to the king, and a deed of Mordecai therein recorded led to the hasty and strange happenings which filled the heart of Haman with anger and terror. Mordecai was lifted from obscurity to the most conspicuous position in the kingdom. By the way of the banquet Haman passed to the gallows.
IV. The Country, Purim, the Rejoicing Jews. The peril of the Hebrew people was not yet averted however. The royal proclamation had gone forth that on the thirteenth day of the twelfth month they should be exterminated. By the constitution no royal proclamation could be reversed. The king granted Mordecai to write and sign letters to his people permitting them to arm and defend themselves. The fateful day arrived, but it was one in which the changed conditions in the case of Haman and Mordecai were repeated throughout the whole of the provinces. In memory of the deliverance the feast of Purim was established.
G. Campbell Morgan, * The Analysed Bible,* p. 249.
References. I. 1-9. A. Raleigh, * Penny Pulpit,* No. 614. I. 1-10. * Ibid. The Book of Esther,* p. 1. I. 1-12. A. D. Davidson, * Lectures on Esther,* p. 9.
Esther 1:1-22
Empire Day Esther 1:6
Our text is from the first chapter of Esther, part of the sixth verse, ‘Red, and blue, and white,’ or, in more familiar order, red, white, and blue, those three great colours on the flag which has floated both in England and foreign parts over the whole of the British Empire.
What a strange power colours have in the nation’s history! We are familiar with the college colours, the dark blue of Oxford and the light blue of Cambridge; with school colours, the light blue of Eton and the dark blue of Harrow. We are familiar with the thought of the great power that the colours of uniforms have in the nation. We think of the red coats, the colour that Cromwell gave to the British Army, when he first of all clothed it in a special dress. We think of the blue jackets, the colour that you may see in Nelson’s coat in the Royal Institute in Whitehall, the first colour that a British sailor ever wore as an official uniform.
Let us take these colours separately.
I. Red. Red is the Bible colour for war. Red tells of battle; and we never can repeat too often the root-idea which is wrapped up in the present-day attitude of Christianity towards that red war. It is the attitude of a society which preaches that war is always a crime, is always wrong, but that there come days in the history of a nation when we have to choose between a greater crime and a lesser crime. We have to choose between that great crime, war and those of us who have seen anything of it know what it means but we know that great as that crime is, there is a greater crime, and that is, by a life of lazy indulgence to let our country be invaded and exposed to the horrors of a second siege of Jerusalem. It would be a greater crime to let the nation be exposed to the starvation, terribly increasing, that we are seeing about us today than to go to war and commit the lesser crime, crime though it be, of fighting. Let us look at the symbolical teaching of Trafalgar Square in London, an almost sacred spot for us English people. Go to that square. There, facing, fronting London, as it were, is the naval column of Nelson. What is behind? There is the representation first of the British Army; there are the monuments of Gordon, and Havelock, and Napier. Nelson stands in front of them. He keeps the British Navy that must defend the British Army. I look a little further behind and see the National Gallery that tells of Art and peace. What is it that makes the peaceful arts, the business life of the nation, possible? And I answer, If I see the symbolical teaching of Trafalgar Square, I see Nelson in front of all; I see the country in such a state of security as the British Navy alone makes it possible to be in.
II. White. There is another colour. It is white; and I learn that if the red, war, is indeed to float over England victoriously and successfully, then England’s cause must be a white cause. We must fight, not for greed, not for aggrandisement, not merely to increase our foreign possessions, but for a cause that has a clean slate behind it, for a cause that we can write down as the colour of the second colour in the great Union Jack a white cause.
III. Blue. Then there is that great colour, blue, our own naval colour. There is an expression which we English people are familiar with in connexion with the colour blue. It is this, ‘Be true blue’. Be true blue to your king. There have been times, there have been kings, when, and under whom, it has been difficult for the nation to stand loyally by, to be true blue to; but this is not the case now. On our great throne we have a King whose whole object is to keep the country at the high level at which his ancestors handed it down to him. Be true blue to your country. Be patriots.
IV. There is a Deeper Sense in which red, white, and blue will, I think, teach us all today.
( * a* ) * The red,* does it not tell of that great rebellion that is so visibly stalking our streets everywhere in the form of sin? What is sin but rebellion; and what have we to do but to enlist under the red banner of Him who was the soldiers’ God, and fight sin in whatever form it touches us, either personally or in our country?
( * b* ) * Lead, the white life.
( * c* ) * Be true to your Christ King.* There is an old toast of the English nation, ‘Church and King’. First Church, and all the Church stands for, and then King. First another King, one Jesus. Be loyal to the Christ; fight for Him. Fight the good fight with all thy might, as He fought for you. ‘Fight for the right, by day and by night; fight for the red, white, and blue.’
Spiritual Diversity Esther 1:7
The text is, ‘The vessels being diverse one from another’. There is a principle in this statement; let us find that principle, and fear not to apply it. No two men are alike. Yet we speak of men as if they were one. They are one, but not in likeness. The root lies deeper than the appearance; the root is unity, the evolution is variety; but the variety does not destroy the unity. The great thing to be done is to realize unity in diversity, and diversity in unity.
I. There are no two sins alike. No two men sin in just the same way. Wherein is the satisfaction or the subtle delight? It is in this, that I can thank God that I do not sin as my neighbour sins. There is some originality about my iniquity, there is no originality about the other man’s iniquity. He who is strong at one point seeks to magnify his strength by comparing it with the weaknesses of other men. We want the inner criticism. No two sins are just alike; they are various in measure if not always various in quality, and are to be judged by the temperament of the men. When all is known much may be forgiven.
II. Men believe in different ways. We are not all equally gifted in faith. ‘Him that is weak in the faith receive ye.’ You have been made strong that you may help the weakness of other men. Do not boast of your greatness and your orthodoxy, your Pharisaic pride and pomp; but wherein the Spirit of Christ has laid hold on you and made you very strong in faith and mighty in prayer, remember that you are trustees of these abilities and privileges, that you may use them for the sake of the poor, the outcast, and the weak.
III. It is easy to add, but most necessary, that men work in different ways. The vessels of gold are diverse one from the other even in this matter of work. But if you do not work in my way what becomes of you? When will people let other people alone? when will they recognize individuality of conscience? when will they give men credit for doing the very best according to their ability. When will we remember that the vessels of God are diverse the one from the other, that each man must be himself and work in his own way according to his own ability; remembering all the time not to make himself offensive to people who work along other lines and policies?
What a brotherhood there would be amongst us if we all recognized this principle! No two experiences are alike. We are at liberty to talk one to another, but we are not at liberty to judge one another in this matter of spiritual experience.
Joseph Parker, * City Temple Pulpit,* vol. III. p. 223.
References. I. 7. A. P. Stanley, * Sermons on Special Occasions,* p. 98. I. 13-22. A. D. Davidson, * Lectures on Esther,* p. 29. II. 1-4. * Ibid.* p. 49. II. 1-20. A. Raleigh, * The Book of Esther,* p. 48. II. 5-20. A. D. Davidson, * Lectures on Esther,* p. 67. II. 21-23; III. 1-5. * Ibid.* p. 89. III. 6-11. * Ibid.* p. 108.
