Romans 9

CHAPTER 9THEME: Israel defined; Israel identified; the choice of Israel is in the sovereign purpose of God; the choice of Gentiles in the scriptural propheciesWe now have come to the second major division of this epistle. Romans chapters 1-8 is doctrinal. Romans chapters 9-11 is dispensational. Romans chapters 12-16 is duty. The first eight chapters of Romans emphasize faith. Chapters 9-11 emphasize hope. Chapters 12-16 emphasize love. There is another way to view Romans: The first section deals with salvation; the second section with segregation; and the last section with service. Paul has concluded the first eight chapters of Romans, and he has put salvation on a broad basis, because the entire human race is lost. “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Rom_3:23). God has made salvation available to everyone on one basis alonefaith in the Lord Jesus Christ. Paul is now ready to discuss the second major division. Some have attempted to dismiss this section by labeling it an appendix. Others minimize its importance by terming it a parenthesis and not actually pertinent. However, it is not only pertinent, it is vital to the logic and doctrine of the epistle. There is a sense in which chapters 8 and 12 can be joined together as two boxcars. But Paul was not making up a freight train when he wrote Romans. Romans is not a freight train but a flowing stream. Chapters 9-11 can no more be removed than you can take out the middle section of the Mississippi River without causing havoc. Griffith Thomas writes, “The chapters 9-10-11 are an integral part of the epistle and are essential to its true interpretation.” There are certain grand particulars which reveal the significance of this section. They are: The psychological factor; the historical factor; the doctrinal factor. The psychological factor has to do with the personal experience of the apostle Paul. It is not entirely accurate to state that Romans comes from the head of the apostle and Galatians comes from his heart. The heart of Paul is laid bare in the opening of chapter 9and in fact, throughout this section. There is a great gap between chapter 8 and chapter 9. Chapter 8 closes on the high plane of triumph and joy in the prospect of no separation from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord. Chapter 9 opens on the low plane of despair and sorrow. Obviously a change of subject matter brought about this heartbreak in the apostle. This we shall observe when we consider the text. The historical factor takes into account the unique position and problem in Paul’s day. Modern interpretation has largely failed to take into consideration this factor. The present-day church is for the most part Gentile, and the Jewish background has been all but forgotten. Men assume that the Old Testament promises are merged and dissolved into the church. The arbitrary assumption is that the church is heir to the prophecies of the Old Testament and that God is through with the nation Israel. Some time ago a Christian organization held a prophetic congress in Jerusalem. It was rather amusing because a meeting that was to be so important ended up as a “tempest in a teapot.” Many writers who covered the congress said that the city of Jerusalem did not even know that it was taking place. It is interesting to compare this congress with the Council at Jerusalem in Acts 15 when the whole city was shaken. Half of those present in the congress had no place for the nation Israel in God’s plan for the future. They felt that God was through with Israel. If that were true, why did they go to Jerusalem to hold a prophetic congress?

They could have gone just as well to Scappoose, Oregon, or Muleshoe, Texas. God is not by any means through with Israel, as we shall see. Stifler states this view: It has been tacitly assumed in Christian interpretation that Judaism’s day is over; that an elect, leveling church built on faith in Christ was the intent of the law and the prophets; and that it was the duty of all Jews to drop their peculiarities and come into the church. Such an assumption the Jews ascribed to Paul. It is strangely forgotten that the mother church in Jerusalem and Judaea never had a Gentile within its fold, that none could have been admitted, and that every member of that primitive body of tens of thousands was zealous of the law (Act_21:20). They accepted Jesus as the Messiah, but abandoned none of their Old Testament customs and hopes. Christianity has suffered not a little in the continuous attempt to interpret it not from the Jewish, but from the Gentile point of view. The church in Jerusalem, and not the church in Antioch or Ephesus or Rome, furnishes the only sufficient historic outlook (James M. Stifler, The Epistle to the Romans, p. 162). My friend, it is a very narrow view to assume that God is through with the nation Israel. Paul’s answer to, “Hath God cast away his people?” is a sharp negative: “God forbid” (Rom_11:1). He is going to show that the promises that God made to the nation Israel are going to be fulfilled to that nation. Also he will show that God has made certain promises to the church, and today He is calling out an elect people, both Jew and Gentile, to form the church. This is exactly the conclusion to which the Council at Jerusalem came (Acts 15). This is actually the crux of the interpretation of prophecy: “And after they had held their peace, James answered, saying, Men and brethren, hearken unto me: Simeon hath declared how God at the first did visit the Gentiles, to take out of them a people for his name.

And to this agree the words of the prophets; as it is written, After this I will return, and will build again the tabernacle of David, which is fallen down; and I will build again the ruins thereof, and I will set it up: That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things. Known unto God are his works from the beginning of the world” (Act_15:13-18). James is making it very plain that God is calling out a people to His name. When He concludes this, He will remove the church from the earth and will turn again to Israel. But even at that time, God is not through with Gentiles. We are told that all the saved Gentiles at that time will enter the Kingdom with Israel, and God’s Kingdom will be set up on this earth. This historical factor cannot be ignored. The doctrinal factor concerns the right dispensational interpretation and the sovereign purposes of God. Paul has traced in the first eight chapters the great subjects of sin, salvation, and sanctificationall the way from grace to glory. In this age, nationality, ritual, and ceremonies have no weight before God. Faith is the only item which God accepts from man. Any person, regardless of race or condition, can find mercy. This does seem to level out the very distinctions made in the Old Testament.

But Paul is going to answer that, and he begins by the rhetorical question: “Hath God cast away his people?” (Rom_11:1). The answer, of course, is that He has not. Paul began this epistle, you remember, by saying that the gospel is “to the Jew first” (Rom_1:16), which I think means that chronologically it was given to the Jew first. Chapters 9-11 is a very important section. It may not deal with Christian doctrine, but it deals with the eschatological, that is, the prophetic, section of the Bible that reveals God is not through with Israel. Now as we begin chapter 9, notice that this has to do with God’s past dealings with Israel. In chapter 10 we will see God’s present dealings with Israel and, in chapter 11, God’s future dealings with Israel as a nation. God’s reason for dealing with the nation in the past did not derive from their exceptional qualities or superior efforts. On the contrary, all of God’s actions are found in His own sovereign will. He functions through mercy in His dealings with Israel and all otherswith you and me. Luther’s statement affords a fitting introduction to this chapter. “Who hath not known passion, cross, and travail of death cannot treat of foreknowledge (election of grace) without injury and inward enmity toward God. Wherefore take heed that thou drink not wine while thou art yet a sucking babe.” This is strong medicine we are going to look at here.

Romans 9:1

ISRAEL DEFINEDLet me give you my translation of this verse: I speak the truth in Christ, I do not lie, my conscience in the Holy Spirit bearing witness with me. This seems to be a very formal introduction coming from the apostle Paul, but you must remember that at the time he wrote this he was accused of being an enemy of his own people. We are told in Act_23:12, “And when it was day, certain of the Jews banded together, and bound themselves under a curse, saying that they would neither eat nor drink till they had killed Paul.” Now Paul uses an expression that is a favorite with him: “I tell the truth, I do not lie.”

Romans 9:2

It is impossible for us to appreciate adequately the anguish of this great apostle for his own nation. His patience in the presence of their persistent persecution is an indication of it. He knew how they felt toward Christ and toward Christianity, for he once felt that way himself. He had been a Pharisee, a leader; he longed for them to come to Christ as he had.

Romans 9:3

I’d like to give you a different translation of this: For I was wishing (but it is not possible) that I myself were accursed (devoted to destruction) from the Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh. The verse presents a real problem in translation. If you want a free translation, here it is: For I was once myself accursed from Christ as my brethren, my kinsman according to the flesh. Frankly, I do not understand Paul at all, if our Authorized Version has translated it accurately. Paul has just said in chapter 8 that nothing can separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus. Now Paul says, “I wish I were accursed.” That is idle wishing, Paul. You can’t be accursedyou just told us that. This, then, is just an oratorical gesture; you are not sincere when you say a thing like this. However, the apostle Paul is always sincere. He didn’t use oratorical gestures. So I believe he is saying, “For I was once myself accursed from Christ just like my brethren. I know I cannot be accursed, and I want them to come to know Christ and be in my present position.” Professor J. A. Bengel said, “It is not easy to estimate the measure of love in a Moses and a Paul.” Moses expressed the same sentiment in Exo_32:31-32, “And Moses returned unto the LORD, and said, Oh, this people have sinned a great sin, and have made them gods of gold. Yet now, if thou wilt forgive their sin; and if not, blot me, I pray thee, out of thy book which thou hast written.”

Romans 9:4

Paul raises the question: Who are Israelites? There are eight things that identify Israelites:

1. The Adoption. The adoption was national and pertained to the national entity, not to separate individuals. The only nation that God ever called His “son” is the nation Israel: “And thou shalt say unto Pharaoh, Thus saith the LORD, Israel is my son, even my firstborn” (Exo_4:22). Again in Deu_7:6. “For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.” Either God meant this or He did not mean it. And if He didn’t mean it, then I don’t know why you believe in Joh_3:16both promises are in the same Book.

I believe Joh_3:16, and I believe Deu_7:6. He said “When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt” (Hos_11:1). God speaks of the nationnot just an individualthe nation of Israel as being His son. He never said that of any other people. The adoption belongs to Israel. 2. The Glory. This was the physical presence of God with them as manifested in the tabernacle and later in the temple. Exo_40:35 reveals, “And Moses was not able to enter into the tent of the congregation, because the cloud abode thereon, and the glory of the LORD filled the tabernacle.” The children of Israel are the only people who have ever had the visible presence of God. There is no visible presence of God today. We need to remember that fact. Many years ago there was an evangelist who put up a tent in Southern California. He bragged that you could see angels walking on top of the tent and that you could see angels inside the tent. The minute he made a statement like that I knew there was something radically wrong. I also knew there was an explanation, and there wasthe man died an alcoholic. I imagine that, after two or three drinks, you could see angels walking on tents, and he probably did. But only Israel truly had the visible presence of God. The church does not have it. Why? Because the Spirit of God indwells every believer, making real the living Christ who is at God’s right hand. 3. The Covenants. God has made certain covenants with the nation Israel that He intends to carry out. Many of them He has already carried out. He said He would make them a blessing to all people. He said to David that this One would come in his line. All of this has been fulfilled in the Lord Jesus Christ. God made many covenants with Israelwith Abraham, with David, with the nationwhich He has not made with any other people. To Israel belong the covenants. 4. The Law. The Mosaic Law was given to the nation Israel. “Now therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my covenant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine” (Exo_19:5). Then God says in Exo_31:13, “Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying, Verily my sabbaths ye shall keep: for it is a sign between me and you throughout your generations; that ye may know that I am the LORD that doth sanctify you.” This is for the nation Israel, you see. I have been asked, “Why don’t you keep the Sabbath Day?” I do not keep it because I am not a member of the nation Israel. Others have asked me, “Did God ever change the Sabbath Day?” God has not changed the Sabbath, but He has sure changed us. We are in Christ, and that is a new relationship. He gave the Mosaic Law to Israel. 5. The Service of God. This had to do with the worship of the tabernacle and temple. They were to be a kingdom of priests. “And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel” (Exo_19:6). The nation failed God, but God did not give up His purpose that they should be priests. God took the tribe of Levi and gave them the responsibility of serving and caring for the tabernacle and, later on, the temple. In the future, in the millennial Kingdom the nation Israel will once again be God’s priests upon the earth. 6. The Promises. The Old Testament abounds with promises made to these people. God told Joshua, “Moses my servant is dead; now therefore arise, go over this Jordan, thou, and all this people, unto the land which I do give to them, even to the children of Israel” (Jos_1:2). The children of Israel were to possess the land. I was over there some time ago, but I didn’t cross the Jordan because it wasn’t safeprobably someone would have shot at me.

Several years ago I did cross the Jordan River, but not because God gave a command to Joshua and the people of Israel. I have never felt that any of the land of Palestine belonged to me. The land is beginning to bloom like a rose, but much of that land is still barren. It will be a beautiful land again when the Lord Jesus comes to rule. It has never been my land, and it never will be. The land of Palestine was given strictly to the Jews. 7. The Fathers. This refers primarily to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. 8. Christ the Messiah. He came according to the flesh. When He came to this earth, He was a Jew. The woman at the well called Him a Jew (see Joh_4:9). Paul is careful to say that we know Him no longer after the flesh: “Wherefore henceforth know we no man after the flesh: yea, though we have known Christ after the flesh, yet now henceforth know we him no more” (2Co_5:16).

Paul identifies Jesus as God, and to Paul He is the God-Man. Joh_1:14 tells us, “And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.” Christ came as a human babe to the nation Israel. The woman at the well identified Him as a Jew, and I think she was in a better position to say who He was than some scholar in New York City sitting in a swivel chair in a musty library. Perhaps “Christ the Messiah” should be separated from the other seven features because it is greater than all the others. “For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham” (Heb_2:16).

Romans 9:6

ISRAEL IDENTIFIEDThe Israel of another time period has already been defined. Now let us identify them in Paul’s day and in our day also. This is a strange expression. In other words, not all the offspring, the natural offspring of Israel, are the real Israel. The Jew in Paul’s day raised the question as to why the Jew had not wholeheartedly accepted Christ since theirs was an elect nation. Is not this failure on God’s part? Paul partially dealt with this problem at the beginning of Romans 3. Now Paul is going to make a distinction between the natural offspring of Jacob and the spiritual offspring. Always there has been a remnant, and that remnant, whether natural or not natural, has been a spiritual offspring. This is a distinction within the nation Israel, and he is not including Gentiles here at all. The failure was not God’s; but the people had failed. God’s promises were unconditional.

Romans 9:7

This verse is a devastating blow to the argument of those who were attempting to stand against Paul. If the “seed” were reckoned on natural birth alone, then the Ishmaelites, Midianites, and Edomites would be included. A fine Arab man in Jericho said to me several years ago, “I want you to know that I am a son of Abraham.” I could not argue against that. He was a son of Abraham. These others were all the physical offspring of Abraham. To be the natural offspring of Abraham was no assurance that a person was a child of promise. You will recall what the Jews said to the Lord Jesus on one occasion, “…Abraham is our father. Jesus said unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.” Then the Lord continued saying, “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it” (Joh_8:39, Joh_8:44).

Romans 9:8

The apostle Paul makes a clear distinction between the elect and the nonelect in the nation Israel. “The children of the flesh” are not the children of God. “The children of the promise” are the ones counted for the seed. In Act_21:20 Dr. Luke tells us, “And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law.” There were in Israel thousands of Jews who turned to Christ after His death and resurrection. They were the elect, and Paul always called them “Israel.” When we come to the Book of the Revelation where our Lord was speaking to the churches (the turn of the first century), He says to them in effect, “They do not even belong to a synagogue that worships Me any longer; it is a synagogue that worships Satan” (see Rev_2:9; Rev_3:9).

Romans 9:9

The children of the promise are not those who believed somethingIsaac did not believe before he was born! Isaac was the promised seed. God promised, and God made good. Now we are coming to some strong statements.

Romans 9:10

Isaac and Rebecca are likewise given as an illustration of this principle of the divine election.

Romans 9:11

Although this verse is in parentheses, its truth is of supreme importance. Some explanation may be offered for God’s rejection of Ishmael, but that is not possible in the case of Isaac and Rebecca’s childrenthose boys were twins! God rejected the line of primogeniture, that is, of the first born, and chose the younger son. At that time Jacob had done no good, and Esau had done no evil. It does not rest upon birththat was identicaland it does not rest upon their character or their works. Paul makes the entire choice rest upon “the purpose of God according to election.” He further qualifies his statement that it is not of works, but rests upon God who calls. However, the calling in this verse is not to salvation.

Romans 9:12

This is a quotation from Gen_25:23, which was given before the two boys were born. “And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.”

Romans 9:13

This is a quotation from the last book in the Old Testament (see Mal_1:2-3). This statement was not made until the two boys had lived their lives and two nations had come from them, which was about two thousand years later, and much history had been made. A student once said to Dr. Griffith Thomas that he was having trouble with this passage because he could not understand why God hated Esau. Dr. Thomas answered, “I am having a problem with that passage too, but mine is different.

I do not understand why God loved Jacob.” That is the big problem. It is easy to see why God rejected Esau, friend. He was a rascal; he was a godless fellow, filled with pride, and from him came a nation that wanted to live without God and turned their backs upon Him. I can understand why God rejected Esau, but not why He chose Jacob. The Bible tells us that He made His choice according to His sovereign will.

Romans 9:14

THE CHOICE OF ISRAEL IS IN THE SOVEREIGN PURPOSE OF GODWhat will we say to this? Is there injustice with God? Perish the thought! Let is not be. The answer is a resounding no! The natural man rebels against the sovereignty of God. If anything is left to God to make the choice, man immediately concludes that there is injustice. Why is that? There are people today who have applauded some of the presidents we have had during the 1960s and 1970s. ApparentlyI don’t know if we will ever get the truththere have been bad judgments made during their terms in office, and as a result thousands of our boys have died. Yet one of those men received more votes than any man who has run for president. The remarkable thing is that we often do not question the judgments of men, but we do question the judgments of God. My friend, although we cannot intrude into the mysterious dealings of God, we can trust Him to act in justice. We cannot avoid the doctrine of election, nor can we reconcile God’s sovereign election with man’s free will. Both are true. Let’s keep in mind that this is His universe. He is sovereign. I am but a little creature on earth, and He could take away the breath from me in the next moment.

Do I have the audacity to stand on my two feet, look Him in the face, and question what He does? That would be rebellion of the worst sort. I bow to my Creator and my Redeemer, knowing that whatever choice He makes is right. By the way, if you do not like what He does, perhaps you should move out of His universe and start one of your own so you can make your own rules. But as long as you live in God’s universe, you will have to play according to His rules. Little man needs to bow his stiff neck and stubborn knees before Almighty God and say, “There is no unrighteousness with Thee” (see Joh_7:18).

Romans 9:15

Moses, you recall, wanted to see the glory of God. God said in effect, “I’ll show it to you, Moses, but I’ll not show it to you because you are Moses.” Now, Moses was a very important person. He was leading the children of Israel through the wilderness. God says, “I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. I will do this for you, not because you are Moses, but because I am God!” Do you know why God saved me? It was not because I am Vernon McGee, but because He is God. He made the choice, and I bow before Him.

Romans 9:16

God’s mercy is not extended as a recognition of human will, nor is it a reward of human work. Human-willing and human-working are not motivating causes of God’s actions. Man thinks that his decision and his effort cause God to look with favor upon him. Stifler states it succinctly when he says, “Willing and running may indicate the possession of grace, but they are not the originating cause” (The Epistle to the Romans, p. 172). God extends mercy, and He does it because he is God, my friend. Who are we to question Him? I bow before Him today.

Romans 9:17

God says that He used Pharaoh. “But,” you may say, “he was not elected.” No, he sure wasn’t. Just think of the opportunities God gave him. Pharaoh would have said, “I am Pharaoh. I make the decisions around here. I reject the request to let the people of Israel go.” God says, “You may think you won’t, but you are going to let them go.” God’s will prevails. When the Scriptures say that God hardened Pharaoh’s heart, it means that God forced Pharaoh to make the decision that was in his heart. God forced him to do the thing he wanted to do. There never will be a person in hell who did not choose to be there, my friend. You are the one who makes your own decision.

Romans 9:19

This is the reasoning of the natural man: If God hardened the heart of Pharaoh, why should he find fault with Pharaoh? Wasn’t he accomplishing God’s purpose?

Romans 9:20

Human reasoning is not the answer to the problem. The answer is found only in the mystery and majesty of God’s sovereignty. Faith leaves it there and accepts it in humble obedience. Unbelief rebels against it and continues on under the very wrath and judgment of the God it questions. John Peter Lange has well stated it: “When man goes the length of making himself a god whom he affects to bind by his own rights, God then puts on His majesty, and appears in all His reality as a free God, before whom man is nothing, like the clay in the hand of the potter. Such was Paul’s attitude when acting as God’s advocate in his suit with Jewish Pharisaism. This is the reason why he expresses only one side of the truth.” You cannot put one little star in motion; You cannot shape one single forest leaf, Nor fling a mountain up, nor sink an ocean Presumptuous pigmy, large with unbelief! You cannot bring one down of regal splendor, Nor bid the day to shadowy twilight fall, Nor send the pale moon forth with radiance tender; And dare you doubt the One who has done it all? Sherman A. Nagel, Sr. The important thing is that God is God, and little man won’t change that. In the next few verses Paul uses the illustration of the potter and the clay. God is the Potter and we are clay. God took man out of the dust of the earth and formed him. He didn’t start with a monkeyman made a monkey of himself, but God didn’t make him like that. God took man from the dust of the ground. The psalmist says, “…he remembereth that we are dust” (Psa_103:14). We forget this sometimes. As some wag has said, when dust gets stuck on itself, it is mud. Abraham took his correct position before God when he said, “…Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes” (Gen_18:27).

Romans 9:21

God reaches into the same lump of humanity and takes out some clay to form Moses. Again, He reaches in and takes out of the same lump the clay to make Pharaoh. It was all ugly, unlovely, sightless, and sinful clay at the beginning. His mercy makes a vessel “unto honour”; that is, a vessel for honorable use. It is the Potter’s right to make another vessel for “dishonour” or common use.

Romans 9:22

Paul has already established the fact that God is free to act in the mystery and majesty of His sovereignty. Now Paul shows that God deals in patience and mercy even with the vessels of wrath. God did not fit them for destruction; the rebellion and sin of the clay made them ripe for judgment. God would have been right in exercising immediate judgment, but He dealt with these vessels, not as lifeless clay, but as creatures with a free will. He gave them ample opportunity to reveal any inclination they might have of obeying God. Although God hates sin and must judge it in a most final manner, His mercy is constantly going out to the creatures involved. God suggests that the “vessels of wrath” are the Jewish nation, which was destroyed in A.D. 70. Jesus, you recall, announced this destruction, but He wept over the city, and he prayed, “…Father, forgive them …” (Luk_23:34). When the final judgment came in A.D. 70, God saved a remnant. These were “vessels of mercy.”

Romans 9:25

THE CHOICE OF GENTILES IN THE SCRIPTURAL PROPHECIESThis is the final division of the chapter. Paul has made it very clear that the nation Israel was chosen by the sovereign will of God, not because of their merit. God not only chose a nation and not only saved those in that nation who turned to Himand it’s a remnant alwaysbut among the Gentiles He is calling out a people today to His name. “Osee” is the Greek name of the prophet Hosea. This is a quotation from Hos_2:23, and it refers to the nation Israel. Peter refers this prophecy to the believing remnant in his day which perpetuated the nation. To his people who had turned to Christ, he says, “But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light: which in time past were not a people, but are now the people of God: which had not obtained mercy, but now have obtained mercy” (1Pe_2:9-10). The second prophecy (v. Rom_9:26) is from Hos_1:10 and refers to Gentiles anyplace on the earth who turn to Christ now and in the future. As James put it: “That the residue of men might seek after the Lord, and all the Gentiles, upon whom my name is called, saith the Lord, who doeth all these things” (Act_15:17). And so God reached into Europe. He did not send the gospel into Europe because the people there were superior. Some members of the white race seem to think that they are superior people. They are not. The Chinese were way ahead of my ancestors in Paul’s day. My ancestorsand perhaps yourswere there in the forests of Europe. A branch of my family was over in Scotland. I am told they were the dirtiest, filthiest savages who have ever been on this earth. Do you think God carried the gospel to them because they were superior? They were anything but that. “It is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy” (v. Rom_9:16). I thank Him for thathow wonderful it is!

Romans 9:27

A literal translation would be: Isaiah also cried in anguish over Israel, if the number of the sons of Israel be as the sand of the sea, the remnant only shall be saved; for He [the Lord] will execute His word upon the earth, finishing and cutting it short in righteousness. The quotation Paul uses is from Isa_10:22-23. Only a remnant of Israel will be saved in the Great Tribulation period. If you want to see the percentage, there are approximately fifteen million Jews today. In the Great Tribulation period we know that only 144,000 Jews will be sealedthat is a small ratio. While I do believe others will be saved during that period, 144,000 will be His witnesses, and a small remnant will be saved. It has always been only a remnant with them, and it is only a remnant with Gentiles. Now don’t ask me whyit is God that shows mercy. If He saved only one, it would reveal the mercy of God, because none of us deserve His mercy.

Romans 9:29

In this verse Paul is quoting from Isa_1:9. This is a startling statement, but it is a fitting climax to the sovereignty of God. Even the elect nation would have been like Sodom and Gomorrah in depravity and rebellion to God if He had not intervened in sovereign mercy and recovered a remnant. What an indictment of proud Pharisaism and proud church membership today! Only God’s mercy keeps any of us from going to hell, my beloved.

Romans 9:30

This is a thrilling statement. Gentiles, without willing or working, found righteousness in Christ because God worked and God willed it. The Old Testament Scriptures had prophesied it. As we have seen, Isaiah had said that Gentiles were to be saved.

Romans 9:31

In other words, Israel, pursuing after a law which should give righteousness, did not arrive at such a law. This is a terrifying statement. The Jews tried to produce a righteousness of their own through the Mosaic system. They didn’t produce itlook at the nation today. Religious people are the most difficult people to reach with the gospelchurch members, who think they are good enough to be saved. You will never be able to reconcile the sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man. But Paul is making it very clear here that if you are going to be saved it is your responsibility. It is “whosoever will may come” (see Mar_8:34) and “…him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out” (Joh_6:37). You can come; don’t stand on the sidelines and say, “I’m not elected.” But I have never heard of anybody being elected who didn’t run for office. If you want to be saved, you are the elect. If you don’t, you’re not.

And that is all I know about it. I cannot reconcile election and free will. I have come to the place in the sunset of my life that I can say that God is sovereign, and He is going to do this according to His will. And His will is rightthere is no unrighteousness with Him. He won’t make a mistake. Men make mistakes; men in government make mistakes, yet people believe in them.

My friend, why don’t you believe in God? He is righteous, He is good, and whatever He does is right.

Romans 9:32

The quotation here is from both Isa_8:14 and Isa_28:16. The Jews stumbled. To the Gentile the Cross is foolishness. The one who believes, either Jew or Gentile, will be saved. The humble mind will come in simple faith. The natural man will still try to produce salvation by some natural process. He will try to reconcile the sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man as if the puny mind of man is capable and infallible.