Menu

100 Sermon Illustrations on Crucifixion

100 illustrations Page 1 of 2

The crucifixion is central to Christian preaching as the ultimate demonstration of Christ's sacrificial love and atonement for sin, fulfilling Old Testament prophecy and divine justice (Isaiah 53, Romans 5:8). Illustrations often use vivid images of suffering, nails, and the cross to convey the harsh reality of Jesus' death and its profound spiritual significance.

Jesus Knew He Would Have To Die

Jesus' death is central to the church, to the apostles and to Jesus himself. Jesus knew he would have to die because of:

1. Hostility of Jewish national leaders.

2. Prophecies in Scripture (though they are not many).

3. Jesus' own deliberate choice (not martyr complex, but obedience to

Father).

from "The Cross Of Christ" · John R. W. Stott via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixion

The Swoon Theory of Jesus' Resurrection

John 19:41

Swoon theory of Jesus' resurrection.

1) (Modern theory) Jesus did not really die.

2) Requires greater miracle - survival of crucifixion.

Suppose he survived in tomb 3 days without food or water.

Suppose he freed himself from the grave clothes,

without in any way disturbing them,

and then went to the huge stone which sealed the tomb.

He would have had to move it with hands that had been pierced

by spikes.

He would then have to overcome the armed Roman guards and walk

14 miles to the town of Emmaus and back.

This was to loosen up his feet after the spikes had pierced

them, to get in shaped for his walk all the way to Galilee,

where he climbed a mountain.

Such a belief is more fantastic than the simple fact of the

Resurrection itself.

*1155

from Sermon (probably Originally From Paul Little) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Who Killed Jesus?

Luke 23:27

The current theological trend is to absolve Jews, collectively and individually, from the guilt of killing Jesus. Maier argues that this is simplistic. Jews are not collectively guilty but certain Jewish leaders, as well as Pilate, had a role to play in his death. This is the consistent testimony of early Jewish sources (Josephus, Babylonian Talmud) and the early Church fathers. It is also important to see that some contemporary Jews supported Jesus, even during the trial and crucifixion (note wailing of bystanders).

from Christianity Today magazine · Paul L. Maier via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database jewsguilt

So Dumb, It's Smart

Sermon on 1 Cor 1:18-25, God's wisdom.

1. The glory of human wisdom.

a. What we can learn. (space, etc.)

b. Is God needed? (fish in aquarium, illustration)

2. The foolishness of the Christian message.

a. The world wants signs and wisdom.

b. Christians present Christ crucified.

3. God's rationale: destroy human wisdom, show his great love.

a. The cross is still a scandal.

b. Also scandalous who gets saved.

1> God works through the weak to show his glory.

2> God seeks out the weak and outcast.

4. Do we have to be stupid to be a Christian?

a. God has wisdom, but it must be revealed by his spirit.

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Serm90v.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixion

Shame Crucified

John 8:1

Our culture is based on shame but is also ashamed of shame. Adam and Eve were first ones to sense shame, which is a preoccupation with appearance. It brings self-doubt. In John 8, the woman caught in adultery, Jesus' opponents tried to use the concept against him. Jesus used shame to affirm and rescue a degraded woman. He doesn't deny the shame of her sin, but he refuses to let shame have the last word or define her (John 8:11).

Crucifixion was shameful, and this used to be considered worse than shame. The Resurrection doesn't completely obliterate the shame. We need shame to show our dependence on others (no hiding). Our hope is not that shame has ended, but that Jesus bore shame to the cross and shamed it. Shame was crucified. The Cross creates a community of people who, no longer afraid of being defined and destroyed by shame, can admit their failures and allow their neediness. Churches exist for the healing of shame.

Look At the One You Pierced

John 19:37

Series on Minor Prophets. Zechariah and prophecies of Christ's Passion.

1. Background of Zechariah.

2. His prophecies of Christ's passion.

a. Messiah comes gently, on a donkey. (not a war-horse) 9:9

b. God's shepherd will be rejected. (30 pieces of silver) 11:8-9

c. Shepherd struck, sheep scattered. 13:7

d. Pierced Messiah. 12:10-11

3. Accuracy of prophetic fulfillment.

a. Jews expected two Messiahs.

b. Jesus - one Messiah comes twice.

4. The Second Coming in glory. 14:1ff

a. Jews in exile.

b. Battle in Mideast.

c. Messiah sets foot on Mount of Olives.

5. What will you do with Jesus?

a. The people of his day rejected him.

b. We must mourn over the one we pierced.

1> Our sins pierced Jesus, and continue to. [1456]

*

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Serm91l.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database prophecysecond coming

He Did the Time For Us

Near the city of San Jose dos Campos, Brazil, is a remarkable facility. In 1974 the Brazilian government turned a prison over to two Christians. The institution was renamed Humaita, and the plan was to run it on Christian principles. With the exception of the two full-time staff, all work is done by inmates. Families outside the prison adopt an inmate to work with during and after his term. Chuck Colson visited the prison and made this report:

“When I visited Humaita, I found the inmates smiling - particularly the murderer who held the keys, opened the gates and let me in. Wherever I walked I saw men at peace. I saw clean living areas, people working industriously. The walls were decorated with biblical sayings from Psalms and Proverbs ....

(later) My guide escorted me to the notorious prison cell once used for torture. Today, he told me, that block - houses only a single inmate. As we reached the end of a long concrete corridor and he put the key in the lock, he paused and asked, ‘Are you sure you want to go in?’

“‘Of course,’ I replied impatiently. ‘I’ve been in isolation cells all over the world.’ Slowly, he swung open the massive door, and I saw the prisoner in that punishment cell: a crucifix, beautifully carved by the Humaita inmates - the prisoner Jesus, hanging on a cross.

“‘He’s doing time for the rest of us,’ my guide said softly.”

from Kerux sermon #21604, "Better Than Angels" · Rev. Jeff Strite via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crossprisongood friday

Current Crucifixions [multiple Articles]

In 1997 the news services reported 15 people, including a woman, gave themselves up for crucifixion in the Philippines. One Filipino, Arnel Sanggalang, two years ago surprised many of his friends by vowing to undergo the crucifixion rite for the next 25 years. He said it was his way of thanking God after his mother recovered from an illness. Another man named Bob Velez has become famous for being crucified 11 times.

I knew someone in the military who said he actually witnessed a crucifixion over there. What shocked him was not the person getting nailed to a cross, but the fact people were selling hotdogs and T-shirts to the crowd. A few years ago, the Philippines Department of Tourism was an official sponsor of the re-enactments.

------------------------------

SAN FERNANDO, Pampanga- Five penitents who were nailed on crosses during the Good Friday crucifixion rites in Barangay San Pedro Cutud here were hospitalized when their wounds failed to stop bleeding. It was the first time in the decades-old reenactment of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ that penitents nailed on the cross here were actually injured.

The mishap was blamed on a neophyte nailer. Sun.Star: Clark gathered from San Pedro Cutud barangay councilor Jun David that he rushed Arnel to the Jose B. Lingad Memorial Hospital when bleeding from the wounds in his palms after the crucifixion at high noon on Good Friday did not stop. David said Arnel's examination showed that a bone in one of his hands has been damaged while a blood vessel was ruptured.

Despite his injury, the younger Sangalang, a penitent for the past six years, is reportedly still willing to undergo the gory Lenten ritual in this town which the Catholic Church frowns upon. He said it was an act of sacrifice to relieve his parents and his child of sickness. According to David, the rest of the injured penitents, all veterans of the ritual, also complained of continuous bleeding, unlike in past years' crucifixions when the bleeding on their wounds stopped almost instantly after the rites.

David said that a certain Dolfo Caireon was tasked with nailing the penitents. It was his first year in the job and inherited it from his dead brother. However, the penitents claimed that they expected Cardo Carreon, Dolfo's niece, to perform the ritual. Former Mayor PatGuevarra, a resident of Barangay San Pedro Cutud, provided medicines and food to Arnel and the rest of the severely injured penitents. Arner's elder brother Chito was surprised upon learning that Dolfo would crucify them, David revealed.

David, a 13-year veteran of the ritual, described the injuries suffered by his fellow penitents as simply accidental. He blamed the huge crowd at the crucifixion site as the reason why the nailer failed to properly drive the nails into their palms. He predicted that the large number of penitents who made their sacrifices is an offering to the Lord in order to save Barangay San Pedro Cutud from further lahar destruction.

Victor Caparas, another injured penitent, was reportedly resting in Arayat town. His left foot was also damaged. He reportedly fell ill hours after the crucifixion. ........"A neophyte nailer??"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why Ugandans shun Christ's lubengo

By Robert Mugagga

The Sunday Monitor (newspaper) March 30, 1997

Take an example of Good Friday, the day on which the son of man was "hanged" at the hill of Golgotha. Here in Uganda as usual the day was celebrated with the "way of the cross" marching throughout the land. Nothing more was witnessed in this land considered to have one of the biggest number of Christian martyrs and proclaimed saints in Africa and the whole world. Brave deeds experienced elsewhere like believers giving themselves up to be crucified in memory of Christ are however, still unheard of here. Some attribute this to our peoples' genuine and mature understanding of scriptures which says that God no longer requires human sacrifices and even that man has no control over his body because it belongs to God (Cor13:3).

Besides, by sacrificing themselves for crucification, in most cases such people aim at glorifying themselves yet when all glory, we are told should belong to God. A friend though gives a different explanation: To him Ugandans are not only lacking in faith but are cowards who can't be compared to the types that carry out suicide bombings and volunteer to be 'crucified'. In the Philippines, for instance, it is a common practice on Good Friday for a number of Christians to give themselves up for crucifixion while others undergo other bizarre rituals like walking on bent knees in churches.

This year Reuters reported 15 penitents including a woman who gave themselves up for crucifixion in the Philippines, a country where 85 percent of it 68 million people are Catholics. Other Filippinos like Bob Velez who has undergone the crucifixion ritual 11 times have become famous. Another Filippino, Arnel Sanggalang two years ago surprised many by declaring and vowing to undergo the crucifixion rite for the next 25 years as a sign of thanks to the Almighty for having recovered his mother.

Whereas such rites are permitted in the Philippines, elsewhere they are condemned and severely dealt with by both the church and the law. In the 1980s, just across the border in Kenya a crucifixion circus was observed around this period of the year. One David Mugo organised his own crucifixion near his home in Mombasa but his second attempt was thwarted by police who quickly moved in to uncrucify him. He reportedly protested as policemen struggled to remove him from a giant wooden cross and even refused to be interrogated by the arresting officers, vowing to talk only to bishops. He argued that even Jesus refused to talk to the police (The Romans). Mugo was later accused of trying to commit suicide though he insisted that he owed this to God - having been among the only two survivors in an accident which claimed over 20 lives ten years before.

WEIRDNUZ.481 (News of the Weird, April 25, 1997) by Chuck Shepherd *

Carrying on a 40-year tradition, Filipinos in the village of San Pedro Cutud recently conducted their Easter audience-participation crucifixion ceremonies, with 12 volunteers nailed to crosses with sterilized 4-inch spikes in a show of absolution. As News of the Weird reported in 1990, for several years the Philippines Department of Tourism was an official sponsor of the event.

================

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/29/filipino-devotees-reenact_0_n_2978190.html?utm_hp_ref=world&ir=World

Filipino Crucifixion Reenactment On Good Friday Draws Penitents And Onlookers, by Aaron Favila, 3/29/13, AP

Devotees in villages in the northern Philippines took part in a bloody annual ritual to mark Good Friday, a celebration that mixes Roman Catholic devotion and Filipino folk beliefs and sees some reenact the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.

The crucified devotees spent several minutes nailed to crosses in Pampanga province while thousands of tourists watched and took photos of the spectacle, which the church discourages. Earlier in the day, hooded male penitents trudged through the province’s villages under the blazing sun while flagellating their bleeding backs with makeshift whips. Others carried wooden crosses to dramatize Christ’s sacrifice.

Devotees undergo the hardships in the belief that such extreme sacrifices are a way to atone for their sins, attain miracle cures for illnesses or give thanks to God.

Alex Laranang, a 58-year-old vendor who was the first to be nailed to a cross Friday, said he was doing it “for good luck and for my family to be healthy.”

It was the 27th crucifixion for sign painter Ruben Enaje, 52, one of the most popular penitents from San Pedro Cutud village. He began his yearly rite after surviving a fall from a building.

Enaje screamed in pain as men dressed as Roman soldiers hammered stainless steel nails into his palms and feet. A wireless microphone carried his voice to loudspeakers for everyone watching to hear.

His cross was raised and he was hanged there for several minutes under the searing afternoon sun before the nails were pulled out and he was taken on a stretcher to a first aid station.

“It’s intriguing and fascinating what makes people do something like this, how you can believe so much that you make yourself suffer to that extent,” said Dita Tittesass, a tourist from Denmark.

Remigio de la Cruz, the chief of San Pedro Cutud village, explained that the practice began in his village in the 1950s.

Archbishop Jose Palma, president of the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines, told the church-run Radio Veritas that the practice is “not the desire of Jesus Christ.”

“We are aware that this has been practiced long before ... but we still hope that this will not be done any more,” he said. “We should all concentrate on prayers.”

from Internet and Personal Contact · (various) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crosssufferingatonement

A Violent Passing

At 7:05 p.m. Ambulance #2 sped from McDonough County Hospital with red lights flashing and roared down Highway 136 toward the town of Bushnell, Illinois. The dispatch on the dashboard was brief: “Car wreck.”

Sitting in the back beside the stretcher, Steven Mosley watched the trees and telephone poles whiz past and wondered how this call would turn out. You could never tell. Even the recent collision between a pickup and a locomotive, which he was sure would be hideous, had resulted in only a few scratches. Rounding a curve they came upon a crowd of people and two police cars beside the road. Another false alarm, Mosley thought.

But then he saw something out in the field. A Chevy that had once been white was crumpled up about thirty yards from the road. The car had turned end- over-end several times. The Chevy lay there all alone, speckled in the moonlight. Spectators lining the road maintained their distance. Even the police did not go near. Sure sign of a mess.

Clutching his attendant’s bad, Mosley and the other orderly walked across the field. They peered reluctantly through a smashed window. The body was sprawled across the seat. Then the beam of their flashlight illuminated the man’s face. His eyes stared up at them, wide open and full of terror.

Steven Mosley had seen deaths before. Usually their eyes seemed benumbed. This man still shouted. Terror, fully tasted, shone from his gray eyes. It was Steven’s first encounter with death in the raw. Deep in our hearts, we rarely go “gentle into that good night”; life is ripped from our hands.

Few of us in the suburbs are touched by violence. But there was one who took on all that which we rightfully shudder at. That incomprehensible violence that we pray never comes into our neighborhoods has been heaped on the One with an immaculate soul and has torn it apart. Sometimes we do get a glimpse, if only in an accident victim’s eyes, of the Cross as a spectacle designed to pierce our minds and hearts. For a moment it stands stark and unnerving as a silent scream in a mangled car. Christ crucified.

That is the ultimate measure of his courage: facing hell open-eyed, taking on what no man could bear. Christ looked straight into the specter of eternal separation from the Father and yet willed himself to stay on the cross.

from Discipleship Journal, #56 #56, P35,37 · Steven Mosley via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixioncross

Where Love and Justice Collide

Luke 22:42

Why did Jesus have to die? Was there no other way?

Why couldn't God just forgive everyone with one sweeping judicial pardon?

He was God , wasn't He?

1. A tale of two kings.

2. A King's request denied. Luke 22:42, Matt 7:9-11

3. The execution scene at Camelot.

4. Another Execution Scene. Phil 2:6-8

(excerpt from Windows of the Soul, 1996, Zondervan)

*

from Discipleship Journal · Ken Gire via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database cross

The Great Cover-up : Christ's Crucifixion and Resurrection

One of the most powerful evidences for the truth of the Gospels is found underneath an ancient church in Jerusalem. Ironically, in attempting to cover up the evidence, the ancient enemies of Christianity preserved it for later generations.

Our story begins in the year 135 A.D. The Roman emperor Hadrian had just subjugated Judea after the Second Jewish Revolt. Hadrian was determined to impose Roman religion upon the Judeans. After destroying the Jewish synagogues in Jerusalem, he then turned his attention to the Christians.

What better way to squelch this upstart religion than to obliterate its holy places? The site of Christ's crucifixion and resurrection was known and venerated by Christians at the time. So Hadrian concealed the site under a massive concrete platform and built a temple to the pagan god Zeus on top of it.

Nearly two centuries later the tables turned: The emperor Constantine converted to Christianity. He decided to build a magnificent church in Jerusalem to commemorate Christ's crucifixion and resurrection and he insisted that the church be built upon the actual site. When Constantine's architects arrived in Palestine, Christians pointed them to Hadrian's temple, which marked the very spot.

The builders set to work demolishing the pagan temple. Sure enough, underneath they found the ancient quarry called Golgotha and nearby, the remains of the tomb of Christ.

Today, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem's Old City still marks the actual site of the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ.

You see, the early Christians knew their faith was rooted in historical events. They built churches throughout the Holy Land for precisely that reason to mark the actual location.

And the Church of the Holy Sepulchre isn't the only example. The Gospels say that Jesus was tried before the high priest Caiaphas, and then was taken to the procurator of Judea, Pontius Pilate.

The tomb of the Caiaphas family was recently discovered in Jerusalem. Inside were the very bones of the infamous high priest mentioned in the Gospels. As for Pontius Pilate, a first-century inscription discovered at Caesarea confirms that he was indeed procurator of Judea from 26-36 A.D.

In addition, the second-century Roman historian Tacitus confirms that Christianity was founded by a man named Christus, whom he says was "put to death as a criminal by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea, in the reign of Tiberius."

Our faith is based squarely on history.

What does all this mean for us? It demonstrates that our faith is based squarely upon the acts of God in human history. The God of the Bible is a personal yet infinite God who became a man to walk among us and to redeem us. That's why Christian thinker Francis Schaeffer refers to "the God who is there" who "acts in history, answers prayers, and gives men reality in their lives."

Share the story of "the great cover-up" with those who question the historicity of the Gospels tell them of the botched attempt to hide the site of Christ's crucifixion.

Like the resurrected Christ Himself, the truth could not remain buried for long.

___________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrection

"Old Sparky"

Colossians 1:21

Shocking Reality

A business man selling full-scale replicas of Florida's

infamous electric chair is feeling the jolt of controversy.

John Pawley of North Carolina charges $995 for his models

of "Old Sparky", the 75-year-old death chair that's one of

just a few still used in the United States. For a few

dollars more, customers get a T-shirt that says, "Only

sissies do the injection."

Though Pawley won't give numbers, he says his Internet

and radio ads have yielded sales to bar owners, a sheriff

and even a judge. He admits he's a bit "warped" but insists

the venture's all in good fun.

Critics are genuinely shocked. A lawyer representing

Florida death row inmates says the replicas will desensitize

people even more to the fate of prisoners who've already

been written off by most of society.

But fascination with the electric chair is nothing new.

In the late 1890s, King Menelek of Ethiopia heard about the

introduction of electrocution in the U.S. Intrigued, he

ordered three electric chairs from the States, forgetting

they wouldn't work in a country that didn't yet have hydro.

To salvage his investment, Menelek used one of the chairs as

his throne.

In an infinitely more profound way, another instrument of

death now represents a King's position and authority. But

the cross is anything but a powerless symbol. It embodies

the stunning way in which God takes away our sins because of

what Jesus did there "This includes you, who were once so

far away from God... separated from Him by your evil

thoughts and actions, yet now He has brought you back as His

friends. He has done this through Christ's death on the

cross." (Col. 1:21,22).

That cross, with its message of hope and healing, is

still active today, giving life, not taking it away. But if

we're not careful, we can cheapen it horribly by offering

those around us what amounts to a facsimile of the real

thing: one that looks genuine and serves as a great

conversation piece, but has no power.

A morbid replica is all we have if we substitute our own

will and wisdom for God's and "empty the cross of its power"

(1 Cor. 1:7, 2:1-5). Like me, maybe you can find yourself

in the list of those who devalue the cross by "having a form

of godliness but denying its power": lovers of themselves

and money, the boastful, abusive, ungrateful and

unforgiving; those without love or self-control, the rash,

the conceited and lovers of pleasure not lovers of God (2

Tim. 3:1-5). Few of us can look down our noses at John

Pawley.

Even if we exhibit it daily, a cross without the

transforming power of Jesus and His Spirit demeans the

sacrifice of Calvary and makes it easy for people to care

little about a death that has no real connection with their

lives. That shouldn't come as a shock to any of us.

by Rick Gamble, published in Cross Current, Brantford,

Ontario, Canada. Publish at will.

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixion

Quotes On the Cross

"Study the cross for no other sake than God’s sake, and you will be holy without knowing it."

-- Oswald Chambers, Approved unto God

"Almighty God, whose most dear Son went not up to joy but first He suffered pain, and entered not into glory before He was crucified; mercifully grant that we, walking in the way of the cross, may find it none other than the way of life and peace; through the same Jesus Christ our Lord."

-- Book of Common Prayer

"The cross is a denial that self-assertiveness can ever be a satisfying way."

-- Leon Morris, The Atonement

"What significance will the cross have in connection with the crown? If anything is true, this is true: there will be nothing in heaven that does not have the mark of the cross upon it and has not passed through death and resurrection."

-- A. B. Simpson, The Cross of Christ

"Even a superficial study of church history reveals that the Spirit of God blows with hurricane force only through those prophets and lovers who have surrendered to the folly of the cross. If there is little power and shallow wisdom in our preaching, teaching, worship, and ministry, I believe it is because the Crucified Christ has been ignored in favor of a lot of ‘burning theological issues,’ most of which are neither burning nor theological."

-- Brennan Manning, The Signature of Jesus

"In the cross God is revealed not as one reigning in calm disdain above all the squalors of earth, but as one who suffers more keenly than the keenest sufferer -- 'a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief.'"

-- Oswald Chambers, The Place of Help

“If Christianity were made up, we would expect a rescue; instead, we have a conclusion that would have horrified any reader in the first century, Jewish, Roman, or Greek. They crucified Him, divided His clothes, and sat down to keep watch”

-- Mark Dever

The Cross Is A Radical Thing

Luke 9:23

The cross of Christ is the most revolutionary thing ever to appear among men.

The cross of the Roman times knew no compromise; it never made concessions. It won all its arguments by killing its opponent and silencing him for good. It spared not Christ, by slew Him the same as the rest. He was alive when they hung Him on that cross and completely dead when they took him down six hours later.

That was the cross the first time it appeared in Christian history.

After Christ was risen from the dead the apostles went out to preach His message, and what they preached was the cross. And wherever they went into the wide world they carried the cross, and the same revolutionary power went with them. The radical message of the cross transformed Saul of Tarsus and changed him from a persecutor of Christians to a tender believer and an apostle of the faith. Its power changed bad men into good ones. It shook off the long bondage of paganism and altered completely the whole moral and mental outlook of the Western world.

All this it did and continued to do as long as it was permitted to remain what it had been originally, a cross. Its power departed when it was changed from a thing of death to a thing of beauty. When men made of it a symbol, hung it around their necks as an ornament or made its outline before their faces as a magic sign to ward off evil, then it became at best a weak emblem, at worst a positive fetish. As such it is revered today by millions who know absolutely nothing about its power.

The cross effects its ends by destroying one established pattern, the victim’s, and creating another pattern, its own. Thus it always has its way. It wins by defeating its opponent and imposing its will upon him. It always dominates. It never compromises, never dickers nor confers, never surrenders a point for the sake of peace. It cares not for peace; it cares only to end its opposition as fast as possible.

With perfect knowledge of all this Christ said:

“If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his

cross daily and follow me.” -- Luke 9:23 (NIV)

So the cross not only brings Christ’s life to an end, it ends also the first life, the old life, of every one of His true followers. It destroys the old pattern, the Adam pattern, in the believer’s life, and brings it to an end. Then the God who raised Christ from the dead raises the believer and a new life begins.

This, and nothing less, is true Christianity, though we cannot but recognize the sharp divergence of this conception from that held by the rank and file of evangelicals today. But we dare not qualify our position. The cross stands high above the opinions of men and to that cross all opinions must come at last for judgment.

A shallow and worldly leadership would modify the cross to please the entertainment-mad saintlings who will have their fun even within the very sanctuary; but to do so is to court spiritual disaster and risk the anger of the Lamb turned Lion.

We must do something about the cross, and one of two things only we can do -- flee it or die upon it. And if we should be so foolhardy as to flee we shall by that act put away the faith of our fathers and make of Christianity something other than it is. Then we shall have left only the empty language of salvation; the power will depart with our departure from the true cross.

If we are wise we will do what Jesus did: endure the cross and despise its shame for the joy that is set before us. To do this is to submit the whole pattern of our lives to be destroyed and built again in the power of an endless life. And we shall find that it is more than poetry, more than sweet hymnody and elevated feeling. The cross will cut into where it hurts worst, sparing neither us nor our carefully cultivated reputations. It will defeat us and bring our selfish lives to an end. Only then can we rise in fullness of life to establish a pattern of living wholly new and free and full of good works.

The changed attitude toward the cross that we see in modern orthodoxy proves not that God has changed, nor that Christ has eased up on His demand that we carry the cross; it means rather that current Christianity has moved away from the standards of the New Testament. So far have we moved indeed that it may take nothing short of a new reformation to restore the cross to its right place in the theology and life of the Church.

*

[Original illustration at this number was moved to HolwickID #34143]

One Guy Didn't

One Guy Didn't

Three guys were tried for crimes against humanity.

Two guys committed crimes.

One guy didn't.

Three guys were given government trials.

Two guys had fair trials.

One guy didn't.

Three guys were whipped and beaten.

Two guys had it coming.

One guy didn't.

Three guys were given crosses to carry.

Two guys earned their crosses.

One guy didn't.

Three guys were mocked and spit at along the way.

Two guys cursed and spit back.

One guy didn't.

Three guys were nailed to crosses.

Two guys deserved it.

One guy didn't.

Three guys agonized over their abandonment.

Two guys had reason to be abandoned.

One guy didn't.

Three guys talked while hanging on their crosses.

Two guys argued.

One guy didn't.

Three guys knew death was coming.

Two guys resisted.

One guy didn't.

One.

Two.

Three guys died on three crosses.

Three days later.

Two guys remained in their graves.

One guy didn't.

He Showed Them His Scars [several Versions]

John 20:20

I once heard a story about a cottage in a little country village. In the cottage a family of four: father, mother, and two small children. One evening the cottage caught on fire. In a few seconds the thatched roof and the wooden timbers were ablaze. There was no fire engine in this remote spot and the villagers stood around helpless. Suddenly a young man, who had just arrived upon the scene cried out, “What, can nothing be done to save them?” When no one responded he jumped through the flames and darted into the house. A moment later he emerged bearing a little child under each arm. He had carefully protected them from the flames by hiding them under his coat but he himself was badly burned.

The parents of the two children died in the fire. There was much sympathy for the two children in the town and several people wanted to adopt them. When the judge arrived to decide who would adopt the children there were two who petitioned the court. The first was the squire of the village. He had money, position, and a fine house to offer the children. The second petitioner was the man who had rescued the children from the flames. When the judge asked him what right he had to ask the court for the children he did not answer with words. Instead he held up his hands that had been badly burned and scarred in their recuse and let them do his arguing for him.

Friends, when the devil accuses us before God and asks what right we poor sinners have to be adopted into God's family, I imagine the Lord Jesus Christ doesn't answer with words but rather holds up his nail scarred hands and points to his scarred side.

- Unknown

=========================

Another version:

Leslie B. Flynn told a story that illustrates a great truth. An orphaned boy was living with his grandmother when their house caught fire. The grandmother, trying to get upstairs to rescue the boy, perished in the flames. The boy’s cries for help were finally answered by a man who climbed an iron drain pipe and came back down with the boy hanging tightly to his neck. Several weeks later, a public hearing was held to determine who would receive custody of the child. A farmer, a teacher, and the town’s wealthiest citizen all gave the reasons they felt they should be chosen to give the boy a home. But as they talked, the lad’s eyes remained focused on the floor.

Then a stranger walked to the front and slowly took his hand from his pockets, revealing severe scars on them. As the crowd gasped, the boy cried out in recognition. This was the man who had saved his life. His hands had been burned when he climbed the hot pipe. With a leap the boy threw his arms around the man’s neck and held on for dear life. The other men silently walked away, leaving the boy and his rescuer alone. Those marred hands had settled the issue. And so it is with Jesus. His nail-pierced hands remind us that he has rescued us from sin and its deadly consequences.

=========================

Another version:

I read a story by Leslie Flynn who told of a small boy being raised in a frontier city by his grandmother. One night the house catches on fire. The grandmother, trying to rescue the boy who was asleep in the bedroom upstairs, is overcome by the smoke and dies in the fire. This frontier city doesn't have much of a fire department. A crowd gathers around the house and they hear a small boy crying out for help. The lower floor is a wall of flames and no one seems to know what to do. Suddenly, a man pushes through the crowd and begins climbing an iron drainage pipe which runs to the roof. The pipe is hot from the fire, but he makes it to a second floor window. The man crawls through the window and locates the boy. With the crowd cheering encouragement, the man climbs back down the hot iron pipe with the boy on his back and his arms around his neck.

A few weeks later, a public meeting was held to determine in whose custody the boy would be placed. Each person wanting the child would be allowed to make a brief statement. The first man said, "I have a farm and would give the boy a good home. He would grow up on the farm and learn a trade."

The second person to speak was the local school teacher. She said, "I am a school teacher and I would see to it that he received a good education." Finally, the banker said, "Mrs. Morton and I would be able to give the boy a fine home and a fine education. We would like him to come and live with us." The presiding officer looked around and asked, "Is there anyone else who would like to say anything?" From the back row, a man rose and said, "These other people may be able to offer some things I can't. All I can offer is my love." Then, he slowly removed his hands from his coat pockets. A gasp went up from the crowd because his hands were scarred terribly from climbing up and down the hot pipe. The boy recognized the man as the one who had saved his life and ran into his waiting arms.

The farmer, teacher and the banker simply sat down. Everyone knew what the decision would be. The scarred hands proved that this man had given more than all the others.

_____________________

Robert L. Allen, His Finest Days: Ten Sermons for Holy Week and the Easter Season, CSS Publishing Company, 1993.

*

[see also HolwickID #27239]

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixiongod s love

Teresa of Avila Considers A Crucifix

Teresa of Avila was an ordinary nun who went about her daily offices routinely. She recalls that it was with empty formality and in a coldly familiar way, that she passed the crucifix on hundreds of occasions to enter the chapel every few hours for scheduled prayers.

Then one day she saw with clear eyes the crucifix and through it the cross of Christ. She really saw her Lord’s passion. The selfless surrender, the awful loneliness, the agony, the bloody sweat, the uncalculating love that pays any price - the sacrifice of heaven’s very best.

Falling to her knees, she dedicated herself then and there, holding nothing back, to the service of this crucified King. She became a saint, going deeper and yet deeper in service to her brothers and sisters, in communion with God, in companionship with Christ. Behold your King!

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

Most of us are sufficiently wise and cautious to stay far enough

from crucifixions till they are over and then generously and

graciously vote the victims a place among the honored dead. -

{Billy Graham}

- Charles Wallis, {The Minister's Manual for 1974} (New York:

Harper & Row Publishers, 1973) 33

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Imagining Crucifixion

Try to imagine yourself at Golgotha Hill on Good Friday. The cross is placed on the ground and you are thrown backward with your shoulders against the wood. The legionnaire feels for the depression at the front of your wrist. He drives a heavy, square wrought-iron nail through your wrist and deep into the wood. Quickly he moves to the other side and repeats the action, being careful not to pull your arms too tightly, allowing you some flex and movement.

The cross is then lifted into place and fastened onto the upright set into the hill. Your left foot is pressed backward against the right foot, and with both feet extended, toes down, a nail is driven through the arch of each, leaving your knees flexed. You are now crucified. As you slowly sag down with more weight on the nails in the wrists, excruciating, fiery pain shoots along the fingers and up the arms to explode in your brain. You push yourself upward to avoid this stretching torment. But now you feel the searing agony of the nail tearing through the nerves of your feet.

As the arms fatigue, cramps sweep through your muscles, knotting them in deep, relentless, throbbing pain. With these cramps comes the inability to push yourself upward to breathe. Air can be drawn into the lungs but not exhaled. You fight to raise yourself in order to get even one small breath. What follows is hours of limitless pain: cycles of twisting, joint-rending cramps; intermittent partial asphyxiation; searing pain as tissue is torn from your lacerated back as you move up and down against the rough timber.

Then another agony begins: a deep, crushing pain within the chest as your heart cavity fills with serum and begins to compress the heart. It is now almost over: the loss of fluids has reached a critical level; the compressed heart is struggling to pump heavy, thick, sluggish blood into the tissues; the tortured lungs are making a frantic effort to gasp in small gulps of air.

Finally, you feel the chill of death creeping through your tissues. You welcome its approach.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixion

The Man Who Died For You

When Lincoln's body was being carried through the streets of Albany, New York, a Negro mother said to her little boy, “Take a long look, Honey; that is the man who died for you.” I would point you to the Cross and say, “Take a long look -- there is the Savior who died for you.”

(“Choice Illus.” W.W. Clay pg.29)

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixion

Quotes On Crucifixion

“Forgiving the unforgivable is hard. So was the cross: hard words, hard wood, hard nails.”

-- William S. Stoddard, quoted in Wisdom from a Pastor's Heart,

edited by Douglas Connelly

“Whoever heard of a suffering God? The idea is plain daft. God is up in heaven, and there he will stay. But wouldn't it be wonderful if it were true? If God came to visit us, like a great king visiting his subjects? Or, even better, if he came among us as one of us, sharing our way of life, with all its tragedy, sorrows and grief?”

-- Alister E. McGrath, What Was God Doing on the Cross?

“If we consider how utterly undeserved [the crucifixion] was, we call it grace; if we consider the cost, we call it atonement; if we consider the effect, we call it new life, redemption, sanctification.”

-- Austin Farrer, A Faith of Our Own

“The crucified is God's chosen: it is with the victim, the condemned, that God identifies, and it is in the company of the victim, so to speak, that God is to be found, and nowhere else….Jesus is judge because he is victim; and that very fact means that he is a judge who will not condemn.”

-- Rowan Williams, Resurrection

“Even from the cross, when our Lord in his agony found perfection of his saintly humanity—even then he did not own himself a victim of injustice: They know not what they do.”

-- Georges Bernanos, The Diary of a Country Priest

“We have become insensitive to the infinite tension which is implied in the words of the Apostles' Creed: "suffered…was crucified, dead, and buried…rose again from the dead." We already know, when we hear the first words, what the ending will be: "rose again," and for many people it is no more than the inevitable "happy ending."…But the answer of Easter had become possible precisely because the Christ has been buried. The new life would not really be new life if it did not come from the complete end of the old life.”

-- Paul Tillich, The Shaking of the Foundations

“The many strands of human experience run through the crossroads of the cross.”

-- Paul S. Fiddes, Past Event and Present Salvation

“Gracious God, the comfort of all who sorrow,

the strength of all who suffer,

hear the cry of those in misery and need.

In their afflictions show them your mercy,

and give us, we pray, the strength to serve them,

for the sake of him who suffered for us,

your Son, Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.”

-- Book of Common Worship

_____________

Copyright © 2002 Christianity Today. March 11, 2002, Vol. 46, No. 3, Page 69.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #14706]

from Christianitytoday.com · Compiled by Richard A. Kauffman In Reflections: Crucifixion via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database good fridaycross

(untitled)

The March 21, 1986, issue of the {Journal of the American

Medical Association} gave a clinical analysis of Jesus' death on the

cross. Replete with diagrams and technical language, it painted a

chilling picture of human cruelty. The report mentions seven-inch

spikes; the work of insects and birds on the victims's eyes, ears and

nose; continued blood loss and infection at the scourge wounds; and

painful mutilation of the "sensorimotor median nerve."

The doctors wrote that the cause of death by crucifixion had many

factors and varied with each case. The two most prominent causes

likely were hypovolemic shock and exhaustion asphyxia. Other factors

could have included dehydration, stress-induced arrhythmias, and

congestive heart failure with the accumulation of pericardial and

pleural efusion.

The article's language is professional, but the message is clear.

Crucifixion had a catastrophic effect on breathing, the heart, and the

body in general. It was a horrible death.

- Convention Uniform Sunday School Teacher

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

In late 1968, some tombs were uncovered mortheast of Jerusalem in

an area called Giv'at ha'Mivtar. It was determined that the tombs

were part of a huge Jewish cemetery dating from the second century

B.C. to 70 A.D. Of many skeletal remains, one, a young Jewish man

between the ages of 24 and 28, showed evidence of crucifixion. His

two heel bones, coated by a thick calcareous crust, had an iron nail

imbedded through them. The nail was about seven and one half inches

long, and its tip was bent due to having hit a strong knot in the wood

on the stake. Apparently, as surmised, when it came time to remove

the victim from the cross, the nail could not be pulled out.

Therefore, the executioners had to amputate the feet. When he was

placed in the tomb, his heel bones, the nail, and fragments from his

cross were buried togeter with the body. There he rested for nearly

2,000 years. Doctors of anatomy and ostelolgy performed extensive

studies on the bones and concurred that the young man had suffered

horribly. Later, with honor and respect, he was reburied in a modern

cemetery.

It cannot be determined why he was crucified. Perhaps it was for

some anti-Roman political activity. The only known fact about this

man, scratched on the side of the box that sheltered his bones, was

his name, "Yehohanan, the son of Hagakol."

- Peter Colón, {Pulput Helps, }April 1996 "Crucifixion: The

Exhumed Evidence" p. 7

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

A young man went to an old preacher and asked, "How can I get

victory over pride and criticism?"

The preacher said to him, "Go to the grave of Brother Jones who

recently passed away and as you stand by the grave say all the nice

things you can about him. Flatter him greatly."

He did as the old preacher advised, When he returned the old

preacher asked, "What did he say?"

The answer, "Nothing. He is dead."

The old preacher then told the young fellow to go out to the grave

and criticize Brother Jones. "Say many mean things to him."

When he came back the old preacher asked, "What did he say?"

The young preacher said, "Nothing, He's dead!"

Reckoning ourselves dead with Christ, we will be unmoved by

flattery or criticism.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

Dr. R. A. Torrey, founder of Montrose Bible Conference and first

dean for both Moody and Biola schools, walked into a service at which

Dr. A. B. Simpson, founder of the Christian and Missionary Alliance,

was preaching. Dr. Simpson, occupied with his sermon, noticed Dr.

Torrey but forgot to introduce him and have him pray, so later he

wired Dr. Torrey his apologies. Dr. Torrey wired back, "Dead - didn't

even notice it."

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Did Christ Die For Nothing?

Galatians 2:15

Galatians sermon series Galatians 2:15 - 3:9

DID CHRIST DIE FOR NOTHING?

===========================

I. Justification. 2:15

A. A universal human need.

II. Rationalization? 2:17

A. Paul's enemies said "faith alone" leads to sinful living.

B. Justification leads to a fundamental change.

III. Mortification.

A. Jesus had to die.

B. We have to die.

IV. Vivification.

A. Justification is not a legal fiction.

B. Elements of the new life in Christ...

V. Faith is the key.

A. Supported by personal experience. 3:2-5

B. Supported by examples in the Bible. 3:6-9

C. Do you have this faith?

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm00v.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixion

Shackled To A Dead Corpse

"The Romans sometimes compelled a captive to be joined face-to-face with a dead body, and to bear it about until the horrible effluvia destroyed the life of the living victim. Virgil describes this cruel punishment:

"The living and the dead at his command

Were coupled face to face, and hand to hand;

Till choked with stench, in loathed embraces tied,

The lingering wretches pined away and died."

Without Christ, we are shackled to a dead corpse -- our sinfulness. Only repentance frees us from certain death, for life and death cannot coexist indefinitely.

__________

Paul Lee Tan, Encyclopedia of 7700 Illustrations

from Source not recorded · Rev. David Lemmons; http://lemmonsaid.net/ via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixion

What Is Crucifixion?

Mark 15:24

JESUS (CRUCIFIXION OF)

C. Truman Davis, M.D., in The Expositor's Bible Commentary writes:

What is crucifixion? A medical doctor provides a physical description: The cross is placed on the ground and the exhausted man is quickly thrown backwards with his shoulders against the wood. The legionnaire feels for the depression at the front of the wrist. He drives a heavy, square wrought-iron nail through the wrist and deep into the wood. Quickly he moves to the other side and repeats the action, being careful not to pull the arms too tightly, but to allow some flex and movement. The cross is then lifted into place.

The left foot is pressed backward against the right foot, and with both feet extended, toes down, a nail is driven through the arch of each, leaving the knees flexed. The victim is now crucified. As he slowly sags down with more weight on the nails in the wrists, excruciating, fiery pain shoots along the fingers and up the arms to explode in the brain-the nails in the wrists are putting pressure on the median nerves. As he pushes himself upward to avoid stretching torment, he places the full weight on the nail through his feet. Again he feels the searing agony of the nail tearing through the nerves between the bones of the feet.

As the arms fatigue, cramps sweep through the muscles, knotting them in deep, relentless, throbbing pain. With these cramps comes the inability to push himself upward to breathe. Air can be drawn into the lungs but not exhaled. He fights to raise himself in order to get even one small breath. Finally carbon dioxide builds up in the lungs and in the blood stream, and the cramps partially subside. Spasmodically he is able to push himself upward to exhale and bring in life-giving oxygen.

Hours of this limitless pain, cycles of twisting, joint-rending cramps, intermittent partial asphyxiation, searing pain as tissue is torn from his lacerated back as he moves up and down against the rough timber. Then another agony begins: a deep, crushing pain deep in the chest as the pericardium slowly fills with serum and begins to compress the heart.

It is now almost over-the loss of tissue fluids reached a critical level-the compressed heart is struggling to pump heavy, thick, sluggish blood into the tissues-the tortured lungs are making a frantic effort to gasp in small gulps of air.

He can feel the chill of death creeping through his tissues.... Finally, he can allow his body to die.

All this the Bible records with the simple words, "And they crucified him" (Mark 15:24).

What wondrous love is this?

Illustrations For Preaching & Teaching

Editor Craig Brian Larson, Baker Books, p. 50-51.

from Source not recorded · C. Truman Davis via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database eastergood friday

On the Receiving End

Acts 5:30

We previously considered how Jesus' choice to die on the Cross, enduring separation from His Father, holds the key to making sense of God's nearness or farness. Many struggle with "feeling" God. Have you not wondered sometimes where God is in this hurting world?

I come now to my second conclusion. Although the Cross is so foreign to our way of thinking, somewhere even in the skeptics' own hearts they unwittingly affirm its underlying message: That even in the most evil expressions of life God must be somewhere within reach. May I illustrate?

Elie Wiesel, Nobel Prize winner and survivor of the Holocaust, tells of his time in a concentration camp, when he was forced, along with a few others, to witness the hanging of two Jewish men and one Jewish boy. The two men died right away, but the young lad struggled on the gallows. Somebody behind Wiesel muttered, "Where is God? Where is He?" Then the voice ground out the anguish again, "Where is He?" Wiesel felt the same question irrepressibly within him: "Where is God? Where is He?" Then he heard a voice softly within him saying, "He is hanging there on the gallows, where else?" [also see below]

I ask you, dear friend, can any faith other than Christianity answer that question in its fullest sense? As we see so many atrocities we wonder, "Where is God?" And the answer comes: He is right in the middle - at the receiving end of evil, hanging on the gallows. The Cross invades us as the only reasonable point of definition for a wounded world. God is on the gallows Himself so that we might come near.

From this truth follows a very significant personal challenge. When we come face-to-face with the Cross, we have a choice: We either recognize its implications and bring all that we are - yes, even our emotions - to Christ so that we might live near Him, or we walk away from the Cross and live feeling alienated from God. But this is where the lie comes in - believing that we can be close to God without dying to ourselves. We think that by walking away we are whole. The truth is that by understanding His brokenness we are truly mended.

This is a hard saying, I know. But God has promised that the one who loses His life will find it and know God's embrace. Bring your heart and mind to the Cross. Entrust them to His care, and He will guard them for you.

_________________________

Copyright © 2003 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

==================================

Elie Wiesel, in his holocaust novel NIGHT, poignantly tells how he lost his faith not by some long cultural process but from the direct sense of loss as he saw his mother and sisters metamorphosed into smoke in the skies over Buchenwald. “Never,” he writes, “shall I forget that night, the first night in camp which has turned my life into one long night, seven times cursed and seven times sealed. Never shall I forget that smoke. Never shall I forget the faces of the little children whose bodies I saw turned into wreathes of smoke beneath a silent blue sky. Never shall I forget those flames which consumed my faith forever. Never shall I forget that nocturnal silence which deprived me for all eternity of the desire to live. Never shall I forget these moments which murdered my God and my soul, and turned my dreams to dust. Never shall I forget these things if I am condemned to live as long as God himself. Never.”

Nothing could seem more final than that. Later his father was killed as well, but then he tells of an experience when he was one of a crowd drawn up as spectators to witness the inefficient hanging by the Nazis of a young child whom he notes as having the face of a sad angel. As he heard somebody in the crowd say, “Where is God? Where is he? Where can he be now?” And he writes, “I heard a voice within me saying, 'Where? Here he is. He has been hanged on these gallows.'“ The story continues through many grizzly and bitter experiences until Wiesel meets a Jewish rabbi in New York after the war, to whom he puts the question: “How can you believe in God after Buchenwald and Auschwitz?” To which the rabbi replies, “And how can you not - for without him and in the light of these things there is nothing left.”

A century more experienced in the agony than the ecstasy of life does not need to talk about the death of God in irreligious tones, rather it is the death of God, the Crucified One, that lends meaning and understanding to the ambiguity of human experience today. In such a context only a suffering God can help. And that indeed is the gospel message, that it is not by his omnipotence but by his suffering and weakness that Christ radically addresses all the problems of the human condition. [copied from #26111]

What's Good About It?

Matthew 27:41

What's Good About It?

Read: Matthew 27:41-54

We were reconciled to God through the death of His Son. --Romans 5:10

When faced with an ugly, unrelenting problem, we often cry, "I need a miracle!" A miracle may come, but if it doesn't, does that mean God's goodness isn't at work?

Let me ask another question: Why is Good Friday, the day Jesus hung on a cross, called "good"? If ever a miracle seemed appropriate, it was then. Even the mockers demanded, "If He is the King of Israel, let Him now come down from the cross, and we will believe Him" (Mt. 27:42). But Jesus didn't come down. Author Philip Yancey describes it as "a time of No Miracle."

Jesus certainly wasn't deserving of crucifixion. But God, in keeping with His loving purposes, used the evil that Jesus had to endure to accomplish the good that we so desperately needed--to be "reconciled to God through the death of His Son" (Rom. 5:10). That's why that awful day can be called "good."

Are you feeling that a miracle is your only hope of seeing God's goodness at work? Consider what Christ accomplished--not in spite of His sufferings but because of them. Also ponder Good Friday, Christ's day of "No Miracle." One day you'll be able to look back on the dark times in your life and honestly call them "good." --JEY

While Jesus hung on Calvary's cross,

The devil and his demons smiled;

Disciples grieved and mourned the loss,

But God and man were reconciled. --Sper

God uses life's reverses to move us forward.

from Our Daily Bread, March 30, 1999 via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database miraclecrucifixion

Giving Your Life

Galatians 6:14

"God forbid that I should boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world." --Galatians 6:14

A woman rushed up to violinist Fritz Kreisler after a concert and gushed, "Oh, I would give my life to play as you do!" He answered soberly, "That's exactly what I did."

Kreisler had made a great sacrifice of time, effort, and personal desires to attain the heights of such human accomplishments. So too, in the spiritual realm, if we would become mature followers of Christ, we must be willing to die to self.

Three crucifixions are in view in Galatians 6:14. First is the crucifixion of Christ. His sacrificial death on the cross provided our salvation. Second is the crucifixion of the world. Its pleasures, honors, treasures, and anything that hinders us from full blessing must be rejected. Third, we as believers are crucified, no longer responsive to the world's temptations. The first cross speaks of the basis of our salvation, the second deals with the result of our salvation, and the third points to the living out of that salvation from day to day.

Can you truthfully and enthusiastically say with Paul, "God forbid that I should boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world"? When you can say that, you're making a sacrifice that will reap eternal rewards.

--Henry G. Bosch (ODB Editor 1956-1981)

Take the world, but give me Jesus,

All its joys are but a name;

But His love abideth ever,

Through eternal years the same. --Crosby

Jesus paid the price for my salvation; how am I showing my gratitude?

from Our Daily Bread, 1999 · Henry G. Bosch via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database sacrificeeaster

Switching Heads: Goya and Human Power

Human power, from the least to the greatest, is transient. It waxes and it wanes, it foments and it fades, but ultimately it all passes. In the face of formidable human power this truth can be hard to recall. Present power, whether it be economic or political or even physical, often demands we forget its transience. It demands we be deceived and believe in its permanence. We must guard against this deception.

A fascinating illustration of the transience of human power comes through the story of Francisco de Goya's painting "Allegory of Madrid." As a court painter, Goya painted for whomever was in power. So in 1810, he began a portrait of King Joseph Bonaparte. Napoleon had conquered Spain and installed his brother Joseph as king. In 1812, Spain was liberated and Goya altered the portrait, putting the new Spanish Constitution where former King Joseph's head had been. Joseph's head reappeared, though, in 1813 when the French retook Madrid. The city fell again, and in 1814 Joseph's head was replaced with that of Ferdinand VII's, the new Spanish monarch.[1] Comically the head illustrates a profound truth: human power is anything but immutable.

My colleague Stuart McAllister tells a striking story with a similar conclusion. In 1982 he was detained for attempting to smuggle Christian literature into Soviet bloc Eastern Europe. East German soldiers fiercely interrogated him for twelve hours. They flaunted their power threatening Stuart with jail and even death. By God's grace Stuart was released unharmed. A decade later Stuart returned to that same spot where he had been detained and interrogated. The building was in disrepair. In the very room he had been interrogated the windows had been smashed. Where once he feared for his life he now walked freely. The power of his former captors had been decimated with the fall of the Iron Curtain. For his captors, the power, as it always does, had gone out.

As a Christian I believe there is only one power that will not go out. Amazingly this power has already demonstrated itself on this earthly plain. The great English journalist Malcolm Muggeridge spoke to this, “I see the Crucifixion in the first place as a sublime mockery of all earthly authority and power.”[2] The crucifixion mocks all human power, for it demonstrates ultimate power in ultimate weakness. And the resurrection demonstrates Christ's supremacy over all earthly powers, for by it Christ defeated death.

God is the ultimate power in this universe, and through Christ we see that He is a loving and just God. Through faith in Christ we access His power. A power that will not go out.

____________

1. Paul Johnson, The Birth of the Modern (New York, Harper Collins, 1991),

p. 69.

2. Malcom Muggeridge, Jesus Rediscovered (Wheaton, IL, Tyndale House

Publishers, 1971), p. 96.

____________

Copyright © 2002 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #18298]

Did Jesus Die Four Times?

Luke 6:22

A few weeks ago a Thai woman, Umpai, came to the home of missionaries Jan and Larry Martin and started asking questions about the Gospel. Umpai had studied English with the Martins more than a year ago, but they hadn't seen her in a long time. As the Martins shared with Umpai, they found out that she was having some trouble at work and a Christian co-worker suggested that God could help with her problem. Umpai remembered a Christian calendar that Jan had given her in English class and decided to come and ask about it. Umpai has returned several times to ask more questions about the Bible.

Both Jan and Noi, a Thai colleague, are teaching Umpai. One of her questions to them was, "Why did Jesus have to die four times?" This delighted them because it meant that she had already read the four Gospels. For someone from a Buddhist background, being born four times isn't abnormal but to die such a horrible death four times was worth a query.

Umpai's husband, Nian, has also started coming to the Bible teaching sessions, and Larry often instructs their two children while Jan and Noi spend time with their parents. They have asked many questions about the rejection they're experiencing from their families and neighbors. Umpai's mother has already indicated some displeasure with her daughter's new interest in the Bible. To encourage Umpai and Nian, Jan, Larry and Noi shared with the couple stories about the local church members' similar experiences, which included rejection and reconciliation. These stories exemplified to Umpai and Nian that the love of God would see them through any problems.

*

from American Baptist International Ministries: Update Newsletter via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database rejection

The Crucifixion Swoon Theory: the Case For Christ (1)

Mark 15:15

Forensic evidence: How many times has it helped solve a medical mystery -- determining how someone really died?

Well, Lee Strobel covered many trials during his journalism career where a jury's decision hung on the medical evidence. So, was it possible, he wondered, to examine 2,000-year-old medical evidence and determine if Jesus really died on the cross?

If so, science could deliver a knockout blow to one of the most persistent claims against Christianity: that the resurrection of Christ, which we celebrated yesterday, was really just a hoax.

For expert opinion, Strobel went to Dr. Alexander Metherell, a research scientist. Metherell had studied the medical data concerning Christ's death, and he's convinced there's no way anyone could have survived what the Romans put him through.

First, there was the flogging. Soldiers used whips of braided leather thongs. The metal balls woven into the lash caused deep bruises, which broke open during the torture. Often the victim's back, in such a beating, was so shredded that his spine was exposed.

Those who didn't die from the flogging went into hypovolemic shock, brought on by blood loss. There would be a loss of blood pressure, leading to faintness and collapse. And the loss of fluids would result in tremendous thirst.

The gospels indicate that Jesus was in shock as he carried his cross to Calvary: He collapsed in the road, and Simon of Cyrene had to carry the cross for him. Later, Jesus said, "I thirst."

And then there was the agony of the crucifixion itself. The Romans drove spikes through the wrists and feet of Jesus -- spikes that traveled through the median nerves. This caused such enormous pain that a new word was invented to describe it: "excruciating." The word literally means "out of the cross."

Metherell believes that Jesus, like other crucifixion victims, eventually died of asphyxiation. The stresses on the muscles and diaphragm put the chest in the inhaled position; in order to exhale, the victim had to push up on his feet to ease the tension in the muscles for just a moment. It would be enormously painful, and exhaustion would eventually set in.

As his breathing slowed, the victim would go into respiratory acidosis, leading to an irregular heartbeat and eventual cardiac arrest. Then, in the case of Jesus, to ensure that he was dead, a Roman soldier thrust a spear into his side.

The flogging, the massive blood loss, the shock, the crucifixion, the stabbing: Could Jesus have suffered all this and survived?

Not a chance, Metherell told Strobel. Besides, Roman soldiers had good reason to make certain Jesus was dead: Had he survived, they, themselves, would have been executed.

In the weeks before and after Easter, we often see the usual spate of articles by so-called experts claiming that Jesus didn't really die on the cross -- and, thus, is not the Son of God.

If your friends mention these articles, explain that forensic science goes a long way in disproving these ideas. And give them a copy of Strobel's book, The Case for Christ. The better the science the greater the support for what Christians have long believed in faith: that love drove Jesus to willingly endure an excruciating death -- so that you and I might live.

_____________________

For further reference:

Strobel, Lee. The Case for Christ. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1998.

_____________________

Copyright (c) 1999 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crosspain

What Is Truth (about Pilate)?

Mark 15:1

It's no surprise that, growing up, I did not hear much about the New Testament at my synagogue. I never heard much about Joseph of Arimathea, Judas, Paul, or, for that matter, Jesus. I did learn something about Pontius Pilate: that he was a very bad man - not because he killed an obscure carpenter from Nazareth, but because he was a coward. If he had handled Jesus' crucifixion with a little more courage, Pilate might have spared Jews centuries of grief, centuries of being labeled host-desecrating, blood-drinking Christ-killers.

Pilate's reputation may improve a tad, thanks to a biography and two novels of mixed quality.

British reporter Ann Wroe has garnered much acclaim on both sides of the pond for her elegantly written, engrossing study of Pilate. PONTIUS PILATE is not, as the dust jacket suggests, a biography of Pilate, about whom precious little is known: hard evidence amounts to an inscribed stone, a few coins, a few mentions by Josephus, a couple of pages on Philo of Alexandria, a sentence in Tacitus, and (of course) the Gospels.

Wroe's valiant attempts to reconstruct Pilate's life, therefore, are a little suspect. But her study of how Pilate has been remembered and imagined by writers, artists, and theologians for the last two millennia is striking.

IMAGINING PILATE'S WIFE

One of the most fascinating passages in PONTIUS PILATE is about not Pilate but his wife, Claudia Procula. The Bible tells us little about Mrs. Pilate. Unnamed by Scripture, à la Lot's wife, she makes a brief appearance in Matthew 27:19: "While he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent to him, saying, 'Have nothing to do with that just Man, for I have suffered many things today in a dream because of Him' " (NKJV). That brief message, Wroe reminds us, earned Claudia a place in Christian history: in Greek and Coptic churches, she is a saint.

Since antiquity, Wroe says, people have been especially fascinated with a detail Matthew leaves out: just what Claudia dreamed. Nineteenth-century Claudia-philes insisted she dreamed of Jesus, "his face appearing with all the sad-eyed solemnity of the lithographs that lined their halls." But medieval writers said Claudia dreamed of the devil, who whispered seductively in her ear, "Your husband holds sway over the life and death of a holy and saintly man. His name's Jesus, who calls himself Christ. You must be sure your husband doesn't pass sentence on him, for if he does you'll both be utterly destroyed."

The different ways Christians have imagined Claudia's dreams point to a greater tension about Jesus' death. We revile Judas and Pilate for their role in it (as, in past centuries, we have also reviled Jews). But would we really go back in time and prevent Judas and Pilate from crucifying Jesus? After all, the salvation of the world depends on the Crucifixion.

Two new novels about Pilate also share an interest in Claudia. Modernist poet H. D. wrote PILATE'S WIFE in 1929, but it was published for the first time this June. In this rendering, Pilate's wife - H. D. Calls her Veronica - is a spiritual seeker, casting about for a soothsayer or prophet who can help her answer the gnawing question of who she is. "I am Veronica," she repeats throughout the book, trying to convince herself. "She could say that and sense it, bite it and feel it."

But even the savviest star-chart-reading psychic in the empire fails to hold Veronica's attention the way an obscure Jew does. She sleeps restlessly, dreaming catch phrases from Scripture: "Unless ye become as a child," "Consider the lilies." Veronica, it seems, wants what all of us want-not fortune-telling and palm-reading but union with God. (It's noteworthy that H. D. was analyzed by none other than Freud, who pioneered the argument that dreams are all, at some level, wishes.)

Veronica seems enchanted with the Jesus who comes to us most clearly in the Gospel of Luke-the Jesus who hangs around with poor folks and lepers and women. She had heard that Jesus "loved women, yet was no lover. Yet who was a lover. What sense did that make? It belonged to some fabulous state of innocence; could one get back?"

Veronica never fully grasps that "getting back" requires following Jesus. Instead of allowing him to save her, she tries to save him, slipping an opiate into his water so that he merely passes out on the Cross. (It is, of course, one of the oldest heresies in the book: Jesus never rose from the dead because he never died.)

James Mills, a California state senator turned novelist, is also interested in Mrs. Pilate. Despite his not giving her a name, Mills offers readers a Mrs. Pilate who is remarkably modern and who shares in a remarkably modern marriage: her husband consults her on important state matters, shares all his secrets with her, and seems at a loss after she dies. But the Pilates' anachronistically companionate marriage is just one of many problems with MEMOIRS OF PONTIUS PILATE.

In this fictional rendering of the aged Roman prefect's recollections, Mills apparently tries to do what Marguerite Yourcenar accomplished with such panache in MEMOIRS OF HADRIAN:

Take a life that is known and completed, recorded and fixed by history (as much as lives ever can be fixed), so that its entire course may be seen at a single glance: more important still choose the moment when the man that lived that existence weighs and examines it, and is, for the briefest span, capable of judging it. Try to manage so that he stands before his own life in much the same position as we stand when we look at it.

But, on all counts, Mills fails. His prose is wooden, and Pilate sounds more like a man reading from an ancient history textbook than a man examining existence.

WHO IS CULPABLE?

Central to all these books are questions of guilt and blame: who was really responsible for Jesus' death? Pilate? The Jews?

H. D. presents the most novel hypothesis: Pilate, under orders from his superiors and beholden to give "the people ... their little sideshow," cannot simply stay the execution. But it is he who informs Veronica that there is still "one chance" to save Jesus; it is Pilate who instructs her to go to any of her mystical soothsayers and return with an opiate. Pilate is responsible for Jesus' death, but he is also responsible for trying to prevent it.

Mills's novel opens with musings about responsibility: who was guilty of starting the "great fire that destroyed Rome"? Maybe Christians. Or maybe it was the emperor himself, who then blamed the Christians. "Whether or not persons punished are responsible for the crimes of which they are accused is not the only factor to be taken into account sometimes," says Mills's Pilate. "That can be an uncomfortable truth, as it was for me in the case of the carpenter."

By the end of the book, Pilate doesn't quite kneel and pray the sinner's prayer, but his soul lurches toward Christianity. The last few paragraphs clinch the book's Christian message: "It is unlikely," Pilate muses, "that Christianity will survive, given the determination of Nero to obliterate it."

If Nero succeeds, than it will be clear that "Jesus of Nazareth was a poor mad fellow who misled himself and others into a tragic error." But if the church flourishes, if as many people come to believe in Jesus as in Hercules, if more people pray to Jesus than to Aesculapius, then we can conclude that Jesus was who he said he was: God. Pilate, it seems, would have become a Christian, if only he had had a crystal ball.

Although Mills's Pilate was coerced by Jewish leaders who would not take no for an answer, Pilate is still plagued with anxiety about his role in Jesus' death; so much so that he spends his last days recording everything he can remember about his brief encounter with Jesus. "[E]very memory of mine that has to do with Jesus of Nazareth is still clear," he writes. "Each of those vivid recollections seems like a punishment visited on me by some god."

DID PILATE SUFFER?

Wroe shows that this question-whether God visited a punishment upon Pilate-intrigued church Fathers for centuries. Did Pilate live out his days peaceful and prosperous, or the victim of suffering at the hands of an angry God?

Origen and Celsus debated the question in 248 - if Jesus was indeed God, Pilate should have suffered a miserable end. Celsus argued that since Pilate had not apparently suffered, Christ must not be God. But Origen said Celsus came to the wrong conclusion: Pilate was not the guilty party. The Jews were. And they had been suffering ever since. Pilate, said Origen, lived out his dotage peaceful and obscure. "Philo and Josephus," Wroe tells us, "endorsed the view," as did Anatole France, writing in 1892 of a Pilate happily exiled to Sicily, unable to even remember who Jesus was.

Some church Fathers, however, did not accept Origen's account. "It was not good enough to say, with Origen, that he was innocent," writes Wroe. "[E]very one knew it was the Romans, not the Jews, who had actually crucified Christ."

Juvenal and others pictured Pilate wracked by a guilty conscience, exiled to Tuscany, or, as a 14th-century Latin verse has it, imprisoned for 12 years in a well in Lausanne.

Of course we should be keen to affirm, contra Origen, that it was the Romans and not the Jews who sentenced Christ to hang. But in affirming just that, we should not lose sight of the deeper truth: it was our sin, finally, that sentenced him to die. Pilate was responsible, to be sure. But so are we.

Three books dig for insights into the shadowy ruler and his wife [referred to in article above]:

By Lauren Winner | posted 12/12/00

Pontius Pilate

ANN WROE

RANDOM HOUSE, 352 PAGES, $26.95

Pilate's Wife

H.D.

NEW DIRECTIONS, 160 PAGES, $12.95

Memoirs of Pontius Pilate: A Novel

JAMES R. MILLS

BAKER, 224 PAGES, $16.99

______________________

Christianity Today, December 4, 2000, Vol. 44, No. 14, Page 87

*

Medical Account of Crucifixion: A Physician Testifies About the Crucifixion

Mark 15:22

Medical Account of Crucifixion

by Dr. C. Truman Davis

Brought to you by:

The Youth Ministry Newsletter Exchange

http://www.cm-online.net/ym

A Physician Testifies About the Crucifixion

About a decade ago, reading Jim Bishop's “The Day Christ Died”, I realized that I had for years taken the Crucifixion more or less for granted -- that I had grown callous to its horror by a too easy familiarity with the grim details and a too distant friendship with our Lord. It finally occurred to me that, though a physician, I didn't even know the actual immediate cause of death. The Gospel writers don't help us much on this point, because crucifixion and scourging were so common during their lifetime that they apparently considered a detailed description unnecessary. So we have only the concise words of the Evangelists: “Pilate, having scourged Jesus, delivered Him to them to be crucified -- and they crucified Him.”

I have no competence to discuss the infinite psychic and spiritual suffering of the Incarnate God atoning for the sins of fallen man. But it seemed to me that as a physician I might pursue the physiological and anatomical aspects of our Lord's passionate some detail. What did the body of Jesus of Nazareth actually endure during those hours of torture?

This led me first to a study of the practice of crucifixion itself; that is, torture and execution by fixation to a cross. I am indebted to many who have studied this subject in the past, and especially to a contemporary colleague, Dr. Pierre Barbet, a French surgeon who has done exhaustive historical and experimental research and has written extensively on the subject.

Apparently, the first known practice of crucifixion was by the Persians. Alexander and his generals brought it back to the Mediterranean world -- to Egypt and to Carthage. The Romans apparently learned the practice from the Carthaginians and (as with almost everything the Romans did) rapidly developed a very high degree of efficiency and skill at it. A number of Roman authors (Livy, Cicer, Tacitus) comment on crucifixion, and several innovations, modifications, and variations are described in the ancient literature.

For instance, the upright portion of the cross (or stipes) could have the cross-arm (or patibulum) attached two or three feet below its topiin what we commonly think of as the Latin cross. The most common form used in our Lord's day, however, was the Tau cross, shaped like our T. In this cross the patibulum was placed in a notch at the top of the stipes. There is archeological evidence that it was on this type of cross that Jesus was crucified.

Without any historical or biblical proof, Medieval and Renaissance painters have given us our picture of Christ carrying the entire cross. But the upright post, or stipes, was generally fixed permanently in the ground at the site of execution and the condemned man was forced to carry the patibulum, weighing about 110 pounds, from the prison to the place of execution.

Many of the painters and most of the sculptors of crucifixion, also show the nails through the palms. Historical Roman accounts and experimental work have established that the nails were driven between the small bones of the wrists (radial and ulna) and not through the palms. Nails driven through the palms will strip out between the fingers when made to support the weight of the human body. The misconception may have come about through a misunderstanding of Jesus' words to Thomas, “Observe my hands.” Anatomists, both modern and ancient, have always considered the wrist as part of the hand.

A titulus, or small sign, stating the victim's crime was usually placed on a staff, carried at the front of the procession from the prison, and later nailed to the cross so that it extended above the head. This sign with its staff nailed to the top of the cross would have given it somewhat the characteristic form of the Latin cross.

But, of course, the physical passion of the Christ began in Gethsemane. Of the many aspects of this initial suffering, the one of greatest physiological interest is the bloody sweat. It is interesting that St. Luke, the physician, is the only one to mention this. He says, “And being in Agony, He prayed the longer. And His sweat became as drops of blood, trickling down upon the ground.” Every ruse (trick) imaginable has been used by modern scholars to explain away this description, apparently under the mistaken impression that this just doesn't happen. A great deal of effort could have been saved had the doubters consulted the medical literature. Though very rare, the phenomenon of Hematidrosis, or bloody sweat, is well documented. Under great emotional stress of the kind our Lord suffered, tiny capillaries in the sweat glands can break, thus mixing blood with sweat. This process might well have produced marked weakness and possible shock.

After the arrest in the middle of the night, Jesus was next brought before the Sanhedrin and Caiphus, the High Priest; it is here that the first physical trauma was inflicted. A soldier struck Jesus across the face for remaining silent when questioned by Caiphus. The palace guards then blind-folded Him and mockingly taunted Him to identify them as they each passed by, spat upon Him, and struck Him in the face.

In the early morning, battered and bruised, dehydrated, and exhausted from a sleepless night, Jesus is taken across the Praetorium of the Fortress Antonia, the seat of government of the Procurator of Judea, Pontius Pilate. You are, of course, familiar with Pilate's action in attempting to pass responsibility to Herod Antipas, the Tetrarch of Judea. Jesus apparently suffered no physical mistreatment at the hands of Herod and was returned to Pilate. It was then, in response to thecries of the mob, that Pilate ordered Bar-Abbas released and condemned Jesus to scourging and crucifixion.

There is much disagreement among authorities about the unusual scourging as a prelude to crucifixion. Most Roman writers from this period do not associate the two. Many scholars believe that Pilate originally ordered Jesus scourged as his full punishment and that the death sentence by crucifixion came only in response to the taunt by the mob that the Procurator was not properly defending Caesar against this pretender who allegedly claimed to be the King of the Jews.

Preparations for the scourging were carried out when the Prisoner was stripped of His clothing and His hands tied to a post above His head. It is doubtful the Romans would have made any attempt to follow the Jewish law in this matter, but the Jews had an ancient law prohibiting more than forty lashes.

The Roman legionnaire steps forward with the flagrum (or flagellum) in his hand. This is a short whip consisting of several heavy, leather thongs with two small balls of lead attached near the ends of each. The heavy whip is brought down with full force again and again across Jesus' shoulders, back, and legs. At first the thongs cut through the skin only. Then, as the blows continue, they cut deeper into the subcutaneous tissues, producing first an oozing of blood from the capillaries and veins of the skin, and finally spurting arterial bleeding from vessels in the underlying muscles.

The small balls of lead first produce large, deep bruises which are broken open by subsequent blows. Finally the skin of the back is hanging in long ribbons and the entire area is an unrecognizable mass of torn, bleeding tissue. When it is determined by the centurion in charge that the prisoner is near death, the beating is finally stopped.

The half-fainting Jesus is then untied and allowed to slump to the stone pavement, wet with His own blood. The Roman soldiers see a great joke in this provincial Jew claiming to be king. They throw a robe across His shoulders and place a stick in His hand for a scepter. They still need a crown to make their travesty complete. Flexible branch covered with long thorns (commonly used in bundles for firewood) are plaited into the shape of a crown and this is pressed into His scalp. Again there is copious bleeding, the scalp being one of the most vascular areas of the body.

After mocking Him and striking Him across the face, the soldiers take the stick from His hand and strike Him across the head, driving the thorns deeper into His scalp. Finally, they tire of their sadistic sport and the robe is torn from His back. Already having adhered to the clots of blood and serum in the wounds, its removal causes excruciating pain just as in the careless removal of a surgical bandage, and almost as though He were again being whipped the wounds once more begin to bleed.

In deference to Jewish custom, the Romans return His garments. The heavy patibulum of the cross is tied across His shoulders, and the procession of the condemned Christ, two thieves, and the execution detail of Roman soldiers headed by a centurion begins its slow journey along the Via Dolorosa. In spite of His efforts to walk erect, the weight of the heavy wooden beam, together with the shock produced by copious blood loss, is too much. He stumbles and falls. The rough wood of the beam gouges into the lacerated skin and muscles of the shoulders. He tries to rise, but human muscles have been pushed beyond their endurance.

The centurion, anxious to get on with the crucifixion, selects a stalwart North African onlooker, Simon of Cyrene, to carry the cross. Jesus follows, still bleeding and sweating the cold, clammy sweat of shock, until the 650 yard journey from the fortress Antonia to Golgotha is finally completed.

Jesus is offered wine mixed with myrrh, a mild analgesic mixture. He refuses to drink. Simon is ordered to place the patibulum on the ground and Jesus quickly thrown backward with His shoulders against the wood. The legionnaire feels for the depression at the front of the wrist. He drives a heavy, square, wrought-iron nail through the wrist and deep into the wood. Quickly, he moves to the other side and repeats the action being careful not to pull the arms to tightly, but to allow some flexion and movement.

The patibulum is then lifted in place at the top of the stipes and the titulus reading “Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews” is nailed in place. The left foot is now pressed backward against the right foot, and with both feet extended, toes down, a nail is driven through the arch of each, leaving the knees moderately flexed. The Victim is now crucified. As He slowly sags down with more weight on the nails in the wrists excruciating pain shoots along the fingers and up the arms to explode in the brain -- the nails in the wrists are putting pressure on the median nerves. As He pushes Himself upward to avoid this stretching torment, He places His full weight on the nail through His feet. Again there is the searing agony of the nail tearing through the nerves between the metatarsal bones of the feet.

At this point, as the arms fatigue, great waves of cramps sweep over the muscles, knotting them in deep, relentless, throbbing pain. With these cramps comes the inability to push Himself upward. Hanging by his arms, the pectoral muscles are paralyzed and the intercostal muscles are unable to act. Air can be drawn into the lungs, but cannot be exhaled. Jesus fights to raise Himself in order to get even one short breath. Finally, carbon dioxide builds up in the lungs and in the blood stream and the cramps partially subside. Spasmodically, he is able to push Himself upward to exhale and bring in the life-giving oxygen. It was undoubtedly during these periods that He uttered the seven short sentences recorded:

The first, looking down at the Roman soldiers throwing dice for His seamless garment, “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.” The second, to the penitent thief, “Today thou shalt be with me in Paradise.” The third, looking down at the terrified, grief-stricken adolescent John - the beloved Apostle - he said, “Behold thy mother.” Then, looking to His mother Mary, “Woman behold thy son.”

The fourth cry is from the beginning of the 22nd Psalm, “My God, my God, why has thou forsaken me?”

Hours of limitless pain, cycles of twisting, joint-rending cramps, intermittent partial asphyxiation, searing pain where tissue is torn from His lacerated back as He moves up and down against the rough timber. Then another agony begins. A terrible crushing pain deep in the chest as the pericardium slowly fills with serum and begins to compress the heart.

One remembers again the 22nd Psalm, the 14th verse: “I am poured out like water, and all my bones are out of joint; my heart is like wax; it is melted in the midst of my bowels.”

It is now almost over. The loss of tissue fluids has reached a critical level; the compressed heart is struggling to pump heavy, thick, sluggish blood into the tissue; the tortured lungs are making a frantic effort to gasp in small gulps of air. The markedly dehydrated tissues send their flood of stimuli to the brain.

Jesus gasps His fifth cry, “I thirst.”

One remembers another verse from the prophetic 22nd Psalm: “My strength is dried up like a potsherd; and my tongue cleaveth to my jaws; and thou has brought me into the dust of death.”

A sponge soaked in posca, the cheap, sour wine which is the staple drink of the Roman legionaries, is lifted to His lips. He apparently doesn't take any of the liquid. The body of Jesus is now in extremes, and He can feel the chill of death creeping through His tissues. This realization brings out His sixth words, possibly little more than a tortured whisper, “It is finished.”

His mission of atonement has completed. Finally He can allow his body to die. With one last surge of strength, he once again presses His torn feet against the nail, straightens His legs, takes a deeper breath, and utters His seventh and last cry, “Father! Into thy hands I commit my spirit.”

The rest you know. In order that the Sabbath not be profaned, the Jews asked that the condemned men be dispatched and removed from the crosses. The common method of ending a crucifixion was by crurifracture, the breaking of the bones of the legs. This prevented the victim from pushing himself upward; thus the tension could not be relieved from the muscles of the chest and rapid suffocation occurred. The legs of the two thieves were broken, but when the soldiers came to Jesus they saw that this was unnecessary.

Apparently to make doubly sure of death, the legionnaire drove his lance through the fifth interspace between the ribs, upward through the pericardium and into the heart. The 34th verse of the 19th chapter of the Gospel according to St. John reports: “And immediately there came out blood and water.” That is, there was an escape of water fluid from the sac surrounding the heart, giving postmortem evidence that Our Lord died not the usual crucifixion death by suffocation, but of heart failure (a broken heart) due to shock and constriction of the heart by fluid in the pericardium.

Thus we have had our glimpse - including the medical evidence - of that epitome of evil which man has exhibited toward Man and toward God. It has been a terrible sight, and more than enough to leave us despondent and depressed. How grateful we can be that we have the great sequel in the infinite mercy of God toward man - at once the miracle of the atonement and the expectation of the triumphant Easter morning.

________

Dr. C. Truman Davis is a nationally respected Ophthalmologist, vice president of the American Association of Ophthalmology, and an active figure in the Christian schools movement. He is founder and president of the excellent Trinity Christian School in Mesa Arizona, and a trustee of Grove City College.

================================================

Similar material from SermonCentral.com, 3/27/06:

The author Lee Strobel has written a book titled GOD’S OUTRAGEOUS CLAIMS. In it he writes these words:

Jesus was tied to a post and beaten at least thirty-nine times – and probably more – with a whip that had jagged bones and balls of lead woven into it. Again and again the whip was brought down with full force on his bare shoulders, back, and legs ...At first the heavy thongs cut through skin only. Then, as the blows continued, they cut deeper into the subcutaneous tissues, producing first and oozing of blood from the capillaries and veins of the skin, and finally spurting arterial bleeding from vessels in the underlying muscles. The small balls of lead first produce large, deep bruises which are broken open by subsequent blows. Finally, the skin of the back is hanging in long ribbons, and the entire area is an unrecognizable mass of torn, bleeding tissue. One witness to a Roman flogging gave this description: “The sufferer’s veins were laid bare, and the very muscles and tendons and bowels of the victim were open to exposure.”

________

Contributed by David Haun

The Strongest Nails In the World

John 20:25

My friend Alan was working with a carpenter friend of his on a building project. Out of the blue, Alan sprang this rather unusual question on the carpenter - "Do you know what the most powerful nails in the world are?" The craftsman paused on his ladder for a moment and then he replied, "I don't know - US Steel?" Alan said, "No. The strongest nails in the world are the three nails that held Jesus Christ on His cross." And then Alan just walked into the other room. A few minutes later, the carpenter called for Alan. He said, "Man, you gotta help me. Every time I drive a nail now, it's like I'm nailing Jesus to the cross." My friend responded, "In a way, we did."

I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A WORD WITH YOU today about "The Strongest Nails In The World."

For some people, Jesus' death on a cross is just history. For others, it's a religious event. But to some of us, the brutal death of Jesus on that Roman cross is a deeply personal event. I hope it is for you - or soon will be.

In Galatians 2:20, our word for today from the Word of God, there are two words that are literally life-changing ... even eternity-changing. They're the difference between someone who has Christianity and someone who has Christ. Between someone who has a Christian religion and someone who has a personal relationship with Jesus. Ultimately, these two words are actually the difference between heaven and hell.

Galatians 2:20 says, "I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me." There's those two words - "for me." One of my associates was on a plane recently with a man in his 30's who talked pretty openly about his years of spiritual searching. He said that as a young man he moved beyond his boyhood church and began experimenting with a buffet of spiritual beliefs and experiences. But nothing satisfied the restlessness in his heart. Then one day he came back to visit the church he grew up in. He said, "As soon as I walked in the door, I saw something I had seen hundreds of times as a boy - the cross at the front of the church. But suddenly I was overwhelmed with something I had never realized before. I said out loud, 'For me. What Jesus did on that cross was for me.'" He said his search ended that day, and the hole in his heart was finally filled.

My guess is that you know about Jesus dying on the cross ... you know He died there to pay for our sins. But you somehow may have missed that life-changing moment when, in your heart, you walk up to that cross and say those words - "For me, Jesus. What You did there is for me." When my friend said that in a way we all did help nail Jesus to the cross, he was right. Because it's our rebellion against God and His ways, all our "my way" choices that left us cut off from God and under His death penalty - until Jesus came and did the dying for the sinning we did. And, in reality, it wasn't the nails that kept Him on the cross. After all, He's the Son of God! No, it was His deep love for you that kept Him there 'til your bill was fully paid - with His life.

If you've never had your "for me" moment with Jesus, it could happen today. Right now. Right where you are. Tell Jesus you are taking for yourself what He died to give you ... that you're pinning all your hopes on what He did on that cross - for you. If you're ready to begin your relationship with Him, I want to send you the booklet, "Yours For Life," that I wrote about it if you'll just let me know you want it.

In your heart, you're standing there at the foot of the cross where God's Son died for you. This could be your moment to finally make the Savior your Savior.

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. 'Practical Answers to Real Life Issues'

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #3929 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixion

Nail Pierced Hands Fashioned the Atom

Religions are chocked full of incredible things. Possibly the strangest and maybe the most obscene is the Christian belief in the crucifixion of God. In my estimation, the only serious competitor with the Crucifixion for the title of world's most bizarre religious idea is the Christian belief that God came into the world as a little baby. Think about it: God is the one who wove the fabric of space and time from a loom of nothingness, flung the stars in place as one flings a hand full of sand, set the planets in their orbits with care, formed mankind from dirt and then gave us life with the breathe of His nostrils. This is His calling card, right? - not swaddling clothes or a dirty manger. If you find the stench of a stable unbearable (and believe me it must have smelled), try the stench of Golgatha. Tertullian asked, “What does Jerusalem have to do with Athens?” I ask, “What do nail pierced hands have to do with the fingers that fashioned the atom?”

As a Christian, let me answer that: everything. The hands that bore the nails had to create the atom, or what would it matter that they bore the nails? The Romans crucified countless thousands, but only one of those crucifixions shook the foundations of reality.

There's the Christian answer, but please don't believe it as if it were just a matter of course. If you do, you might have missed it entirely. This stuff is incredible, and belief in it is no regular affair. I believe that my car will start when I turn the key –that is a matter of course. I believe that Jesus is the incarnate Son of God, who was crucified and resurrected to pay my sin debt to God –this is no ordinary affair.

I don't say this to discourage belief. I say it to encourage true faith. True faith has the object of its belief clearly illumined, and as a Christian this object is incredible.

Yes, I can give you cogent and forceful arguments that the Christian faith is rational. But this should not for one second diminish the novelty, incredibleness, and wonder-filled-ness, of the belief that Jesus died and rose again, and that these two thousand year old events have essential import to your soul today.

Please seriously consider if you believe such things. They are of utmost importance for your life, your soul, and your destiny. Belief in them, heart-throbbing and sincere belief, is the key to your resurrection, today and in eternity.

____________

Copyright © 2002 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

God's Wooden Magnet

John 12:32

It was September of 1999. A Cambodian pastor had made his way to a remote corner of his country to bring the story of Jesus to an area he had wanted to go to for years. But that area had been under the control of the brutal Khmer Rouge radicals until then. As far as anyone knew, this pastor was the first person to speak of Jesus in that isolated area where most people were Buddhists or spiritists. Surprisingly, as told in the book THE GOD WHO HUNG ON THE CROSS, when the pastor arrived in one village, the people welcomed him warmly and seemed to hang on every words of his messages. Then this old woman bowed and grabbed his hands and said, “We've been waiting for you for twenty years.”

The story she then told explained what she meant. In their cruel march through Cambodia to destroy much of its infrastructure, the Khmer Rouge forces enslaved, killed, or otherwise caused the deaths of millions of Cambodians. When they reached this village, they forced everyone out of their huts and lined them up to dig a deep pit. The villagers realized they were digging their own mass grave. Anyone who tried to run or hide was shot on sight and dragged to the edge of the pit that was being dug. When the pit was finally finished, the soldiers ordered the people to turn and face the pit. As the people stood, helplessly awaiting their execution, they began to cry out in some desperate plea for help. Some screamed to Buddha, some to ancestors, to demon spirits, and some even for their mothers.

Then one woman, drawing on the distant memory of something her mother told her, began to cry out to one she called “the God who hung on the cross.” Surely this one who had suffered so Himself might have compassion on those about to die. Soon, the screams around her became just one desperate wail - crying out to the God who hung on the cross. And then there was silence. As the people slowly turned, they realized the soldiers were gone. And every since that day, they were, as the book says, “waiting for someone to come and tell them more. More about the God who hung on the cross.”

I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about “God's Wooden Magnet.”

Jesus said in John 12:32, our word for today from the Word of God, “'But I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to Myself.’ He said this to show the kind of death He was going to die.” Strip away all the Christianity, and all the rituals, and all the steeples, and all the creeds and you're down to what this is really the issue - the God who hung on the cross. Jesus, God's one and only Son, pouring out His life to absorb all the hell of all the sin of all the people who have ever lived. Including you.

God says that “whoever calls on the name of the Lord will be saved” (Romans 10:13). Maybe that's something that you've never done. You've done Christianity - or maybe rejected Christianity - but you've never been to that cross and given yourself to the One who is your only hope of being forgiven, your only hope of heaven because He came back from the dead on Easter morning.

If you belong to Jesus, don't spend time telling people all about your church or even your beliefs. Tell them about Jesus. Take them to that cross where they can see how much He loves them. And if you don't belong to Jesus, will you, in your heart, just stand there at His cross for a moment and say, “Jesus, that was for me. You died for the junk I've done.” Cry out to this God who hung on a cross for you and trust Him to save you, because only He can.

Jesus hung on a cross so your death sentence would be gone. God wants to know what you're going to do with His Son, after all His Son has done for you.

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

[see also HolwickID #25236]

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4319 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixiondeliverance

The God Who Hung On the Cross

Job 22:30

In September of 1999, a pastor named Tuy Seng traveled to Khampon Tom Province in northern Cambodia. Pastor Seng had wanted to bring the gospel to the remote villages there for years, but they had been under the control of an isolated pocket of Khmer Rouge radicals until early 1999.

Now, as far as anyone knew, he was the first person to speak of Jesus in that isolated area. Most villagers cast their lot with Buddhism or spiritism. Christianity was unheard of.

But when Seng arrived at one small, rural village, the people welcomed him eagerly. They could not hear enough about the Gospel. Most made decisions to commit their lives to Christ. Smiling, Pastor Seng asked the people why it seemed as if they had been waiting for him to come.

An old woman shuffled to the front of the group, bowed, and grasped Pastor Seng’s hands. “We have been waiting,” she said. “We have been waiting for you for twenty years.” And then she explained.

After the Khmer Rouge took over Cambodia, they made their way through the countryside, destroying just about anything created with purpose or design — bridges, highways, hospitals, human beings. It took a while, but after they had dealt with Phnom Penh and other city centers, they focused on the villages.

So it was that the soldiers came to this hamlet in 1979. Their technique [in that village] was the same as it had been for countless communities, but for the people who lived there the terror was new. The communists emerged from the jungle and strode from hut to hut, ordering the villagers out. Those who resisted were killed at once; many died in front of their homes.

The rest were marched to a clearing behind the village. Their own farm tools were thrust in their hands. “Now dig!” the soldiers shouted.

Hours passed as the people sweated and wept and dug — until finally the hole was deep enough [for them all]. The people laid down their spades and shovels. The soldiers shouted for them to turn and face the pit.

They braced themselves, waiting for the killing blows, knowing that the soldiers would bludgeon them to death rather than shoot them — why waste precious bullets on ordinary peasants?

The heavy, humid air lay still as the villagers [standing there] began to cry out — the wail before death, when the heart’s longing to live becomes a desperate plea for help. Some screamed to Buddha, to ancestors, or to demon spirits. A few cried for their mothers.

Then one woman began to cry, intuitively, to one of her earliest memories — the faint echo of a story told her by her mother about the God who hung on the cross. She called out to that God. Surely the One who had suffered Himself might have compassion on those about to die. Time stopped. The humid jungle air lay still.

Suddenly the screams around her became one great wail, as the entire village called out as one, crying for their lives to the God who hung on the cross.

There was only silence.

They sobbed into the darkness of the pit before them.

Silence. A flicker of hope.

And then, the people turned, one by one.

The jungle was empty. The soldiers were gone.

And ever since that astounding day in 1979, the people of that village had been waiting...waiting for someone to come and tell them more...more about the God who hung on the cross.

__________

Dois I. Rosser, Jr., and Ellen Vaughn, The God Who Hung on the Cross (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2003), 35-37.

======================

Another version from Http://advance.foursquare.org/rtf/3714.rtf

In various parts of the world the miraculous power of God is almost a common occurrence. This is especially true in the nation of Cambodia that has experienced the genocide of one-third of the population in the last 25 years. Forty years ago they were closed to the Gospel. Cambodians were proud and prosperous and according to FMI Missionary Ted Olbrich, “they did not need Christ but today are desperate for the Good News.” The following is a small glimpse of the signs and wonders happening through the Foursquare Church in Cambodia.

“Next time you come, if you don't bring rice we'll kill you!”

Ted understood that the man who stood before them wanted rice. However, still learning the Cambodian language, he did not fully discern the threat. Yet Ted noticed that the facial expression of the Foursquare pastor with him had changed for the worse. When he asked his friend what else the man said, the pastor simply and wisely said, “I'll tell you later.”

Van Saveth is a leader in his remote village located about 100 miles northeast of the capital city of Phnom Penh. Although a landowner, he struggled along with his fellow villagers to make a living and feed his family. He felt justified in making his death threat to Ted and the Foursquare pastor for rice. After all, what is more important than food? He would soon find out.

The greatest miracle of all soon happened to Van Saveth, a Foursquare evangelist told him about Jesus and he believed and was radically saved. The missionary he threatened, Ted Olbrich, sensing his leadership potential, sent one of his most trained leaders to live with Van Saveth for months of intense discipleship. The training paid off. Today Van Saveth is a Foursquare divisional superintendent with 15 churches under his care.

And according to Reverend Olbrich, “We never did take the rice.”

Though only in Cambodia two years, Ted Olbrich has seen a lot of pain, poverty and death. Scars of the past genocide inflicted by dictator Pol Pot are evident, as seen by the piles of victim's skulls or in the hollow eyes of the living. Despite circumstances, Ted knows something profound is happening in Cambodia. The Spirit of God is moving. According to Ted, “I believe Cambodia is much like Korea after the Korean War or Japan after WWII.” His optimism for the growth of the Gospel is based on increasing evidence.

Over one hundred Foursquare churches have been established in Cambodia with approximately 10,000 believers. Yet no church had been planted in the evil area of the Khampong Thom province, a Khmer Rouge stronghold until late 1998. To Ted, despite the threat, the Gospel must penetrate this difficult area. The strategy is simple in Foursquare Cambodia -- plant churches by sending out young, eager evangelists.

When Foursquare church planters invaded this province they found spiritually hungry people and that God had gone before them to prepare the way. One bold church planter, Daniel Em, entered a village that had never heard the Gospel. Like most villages the message was well received but this time even more than usual -- “almost like people were primed and expecting the truth.” They were. An older woman approached him after he spoke and shared how 20 years ago she and other town leaders were forced to dig their own mass grave by Khmer Rouge soldiers. As soldiers armed with guns prepared to fire, the villagers cried out for help to “any god that would help them.” Some cried out to Buddha, others to demon spirits but the older woman prayed to “the God who hung on the cross!” Each one saw a vision of a cross and heard a voice tell them to not be afraid; He would save them. When they opened their eyes their captors had vanished. From that time on this village had waited for someone like Pastor Em to tell them more about the “God who hung on the cross.”

More incredible miracles in the province followed, hundreds were getting saved. Churches needed to be built and pastors raised up. There are currently 30 churches planted in this province and another 20 home groups. Two new church orphanages are near completion with a third scheduled to begin construction.

Yet with amazing growth, the pain of growing up can occur. In the same province a new church was being built. Some of the pastors had been receiving kickbacks from the contractors and suppliers. Overseeing this project, Pastor Phalla called the pastors for an evening meeting. Some accusations were made and a loud argument ensued. Pastor Phalla called them to pray in the pitch-dark unfinished church building. With a group of more than 100 villagers gathered to witness the altercation, the Spirit of God came over Pastor Phalla and she cried out in a loud voice, “Repent!”

Olbrich tells the rest of the story. “As she said this, there was a loud explosive noise, some of the witnesses thought someone had thrown a hand grenade. All the pastors were knocked to their faces and a cone of light came down from heaven and illumined a circle of about 30 feet where the pastors lay. The witnesses said the light was not the regular yellow kind but multi-colored, like a rainbow and seemed to flow like water. It lasted about five minutes. All of the pastors heard the Lord speak to them. Some pastors prophesied while others laid there all night. Then they journeyed about 100 miles to Phnom Phen to ask forgiveness for their sins and publicly repent to my wife, Sou, and myself.”

It is a unique time in this part of the world. Cambodia continues to need the prayers of the Foursquare family to reach the multitudes still needing to hear the Gospel. Rev. Olbrich has said that timing is critical and reports, “I believe we have a five year window of opportunity to reach Cambodia for Christ. We must not waste this chance.”

[see also HolwickID #25235]

*

from Sermon "the Cross Of Christ" by Rev. David A. Staff, First Evangelical Free Church; Ames, Iowa; http · Dois I. Rosser, Jr., & Ellen Vaughn via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixiondeliverance

One Guy Didn't

• Three guys were tried for crimes against humanity. Two guys committed crimes. One didn’t.

• Three guys were given government trials. Two guys had fair trials. One didn’t.

• Three guys were whipped and beaten. Two guys had it coming. One didn’t.

• Three guys were given crosses to carry. Two guys earned their crosses. One didn’t.

• Three guys were mocked and spit at along the way. Two guys cursed and spit back. One didn’t.

• Three guys were nailed to crosses. Two guys deserved it. One didn’t.

• Three guys talked while they were hung on their crosses. Two guys argued. One didn’t.

• Three guys agonized over their abandonment. Two guys had reason to be abandoned. One didn’t.

• Three guys knew death was coming. Two guys resisted. One didn’t.

• One. Two. Three guys died on three crosses.

• Three days later. Two guys remained in their graves. One didn’t.

from Source not recorded · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrection

Crimson Flow - [poem]

The crimson flow traveled down the tree

Dripping upon the earth for all the world to see.

Nail pierced hands did not cause this crimson flow.

Though the pain to bare alone was an awesome blow.

A spear pierced side allowed the water to pour

Mixing with the blood, the flow became more.

Upon the ground, the crimson red did soak.

Taking on from men a painful eternal yoke.

As the crimson spread from the replanted tree

The thunder roared loudly and hell’s locks exploded free.

Down from the hill the stream did rush,

Sickness and death this crimson stream did crush.

The crimson flow was power and Holy Fire

Setting the captives free, creating a Holy desire

So much flowing blood to come from just one man

To cover every soul and sweeping every land.

From Heaven this crimson flow did come,

It watered the earth, sprinkling all not some.

Flowing to hell by way of a grave,

Resurrected in three days all men to save.

Then ascending back up to heaven again,

Taking with it death and repented sin.

Jesus was God and then Jesus was man.

Salvation was for all when the crimson blood ran.

from Source not recorded · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crucifixion

Who's Responsible? (for Killing Jesus)

John 19:6

“It is true that during certain historical periods, some factions of the Christian church hurt and killed Jews, but it is also true that in America, Christianity has not been a threat to Jews,” observes Rabbi Daniel Lapin in his book “America's Real War.”

He goes on to write, “While acknowledging the past, let us concede that obsession with a problem can indeed lead to paranoia.”

The problem to which Rabbi Lapin refers is anti-Semitism, a reality the Jewish people have endured for countless generations. Any rational person would agree that this antagonistic attitude is not only wrong, but it is an insidious evil.

However, as Rabbi Lapin points out, obsession with the problem of anti- Semitism can result in seeing hostility where it does not exist. Such is the case with Mel Gibson's new movie, “The Passion.”

The Oscar-winning film star's movie, set for release in early 2004, seeks to portray the last 12 hours of the life of Jesus Christ with as much biblical accuracy as possible. Gibson's script is based solely on the Gospel accounts of Christ's ordeal. In an effort to be historically accurate, he even had all the dialogue translated into Aramaic and/or Latin.

Some Jewish groups, like the Anti-Defamation League, are charging Gibson with promoting anti-Semitism. According to a variety of reports, Abraham Foxman, ADL national director has said, “The film unambiguously portrays Jewish authorities and the Jewish mob as the ones responsible for the decision to crucify Jesus.”

Foxman also added, “We are deeply concerned that the film, if released in its present form, will fuel hatred, bigotry and anti-Semitism that many responsible churches have worked hard to repudiate.”

Michael Medved, who like Foxman is Jewish, disagrees with the charges of anit-Semitism being hurled at Gibson. The movie critic and radio talk host recently wrote in USA Today, “Of course, even the most responsible, well-intentioned movie treatment of the last hours of Jesus will provoke concern in the Jewish community, because so many millions of Jews have suffered and died over the centuries due to Gospel-based charges that they are 'Christ killers.’ But the fact that persecutors and bigots have distorted teachings of the New Testament for their own cruel purposes doesn't mean that those Gospel texts, sacred to all Christians, must be scrapped, revised or ignored in a serious work of cinema.”

Medved is correct. The historical reality is that Jesus Christ was Jewish. His disciples were Jewish as were his detractors. The Gospel accounts reveal that Jesus was found guilty of blasphemy by Jewish religious counsels who then persuaded the Roman official, Pilate, to put him to death because they did not possess the authority to do so themselves.

I think it is accurate to say that Jesus Christ encountered Jews who loved him, Jews who hated him and Jews who were ambivalent toward him. However, it was first-century Jewish leaders, who at the very least felt threatened by him, in concert with Roman secular officials who were responsible for Jesus' crucifixion.

Are the Jews as a race responsible for the death of Jesus Christ? Are Germans as a race responsible for the Holocaust? Are Japanese people as a race responsible for Pearl Harbor? Are Caucasian people as a race responsible for American slavery? The answer to each previous question is a resounding no!

Do narrow-minded bigots seek to blame the aforementioned for atrocities committed by members of their race? Yes. Does that mean history should be revised, sanitized and ignored? No.

>From another perspective, the Jews as a race are responsible for the death of Jesus Christ. But so is every person of every race who has ever lived. Conservative Christians believe that Jesus was crucified because of the sins of the world. More specifically and personally, my sin brought about the death sentence of Jesus Christ. I am responsible for his crucifixion.

“I am not saying there is no such thing as anti-Semitism,” Rabbi Lapin writes. “I am only urging my fellow Jews to determine in a fair-minded manner exactly what we mean when we hurl that slur -- to be intellectually honest and carefully selective when we feel we must do so.”

Let's be fair-minded and intellectually honest. If Mel Gibson's movie, The Passion, is true to the Gospel accounts, then it won't convey anti- Semitism. What it will depict is God so loving the world that He sent His only begotten Son -- to die on the cross -- so whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life.

*

How Jesus Is Like Dracula

John 6:53

One of the most well-known aspects of a vampire is that it must feed upon the blood of the living; Dracula must drink to survive, (akin to people drinking the blood of Christ -the blood of divine life). However, I do not believe that this act of survival should be the basis by which the myth of Dracula is labelled as horrific and evil. The following are a few examples showing the parallels between Dracula myth and Christianity.

Christ dies for the sins of humanity and rises from his own death so that humanity may achieve life after death. Dracula dies for the sin of his bride’s (Elisabeta´s) suicide and rises from his own death so that their souls may again be linked in soul-love one day. In the Catholic mass, worshippers continually feast upon the blood and body of Christ in order to maintain their mortal link with the immortal life of the divine. Dracula feasts upon the blood and body of mortal life and incarnates immorality within himself; he becomes his own god.

__________

© a.r.e.a/Dr.Vicente Forés López © Carolina Romero Dolz Universitat de Valencia Press

*

Duct Tape Or Nails?

John 19:17

They say you can fix anything with duct tape.

Just strap it on.

Wrap it up.

And she's as good as new.

Yes, they say you can fix ANYTHING with duct tape.

But have they fixed.....

an addicted body.

an addicted brain.

the depressed soul.

the angry heart.

Brought back an absent father.

Consoled the stressed mother.

Calmed the frightened child.

Reassured the worrisome grandmother.

Brought the suicidal friend back from the living dead.

EVER SEEN YOUR ROLL OF DUCT TAPE DO THAT?? NEVER.

Only need

Two Hands.

Two Feet.

THREE NAILS.

Who Killed Jesus?

Philippians 2:8

The controversy over Mel Gibson's “The Passion of The Christ” has renewed a debate that has been raging off and on for the last two millennia: Who is responsible for the death of Jesus Christ? Several answers have been offered, each one with a unique twist on the event.

Many believe that the Jews (or at least the Jewish leadership) are responsible for the death of Jesus. Jewish groups claim that the movie (and the Gospels) paints the crucifixion in these anti-Semitic colors. Our Jewish friends look back over a long history of persecution by numerous groups, movements and nations. Shamefully, the historical list of Jewish persecutors is not devoid of Christian representation. Many Jews fear that The Passion will ignite a new wave of anti-Semitism as moviegoers become convinced that the Jews were the “bad guys.”

Some are quick to argue that the Jews did not put Jesus on the cross, but the Romans did. Because Palestine was under Roman rule, the Jews had no authority to kill Jesus. They did, after all, take him before the Roman authorities, putting the ultimate decision on the shoulders of the Roman procurator Pontius Pilate.

Still others, especially many evangelicals, do not want to pin the death of Jesus on either the Jews or the Romans. Instead, they want to emphasize that because all of humanity is sinful, ultimately everyone is responsible for the death of Jesus. The New Testament teaches that Jesus' death was voluntary, with the purpose of atoning for the sins of the world.

There is merit to each of these arguments. In fact, ultimately all of these are at least partially responsible for the death of Jesus. The Jewish leadership brought Jesus to the attention of the Roman authorities. Pilate (somewhat reluctantly) ordered the actual execution, spurred on by the demand of the Jewish mob that Jesus be crucified. Jesus submitted to this entire humiliating experience voluntarily, so that he could pay the penalty for the sins of humanity.

In all of these arguments it seems that one key party is constantly left out of the equation: God. The New Testament teaches that the Jews and Romans, though personally responsible for their sinful actions, were actually fulfilling the predetermined plan of God. In his death, Jesus was submissive to the will of God. The biblical evidence seems clear on this:

“He humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name” (Philippians 2:8-9, ESV). When He died, Jesus was being obedient to the will of God and, as a result, was “highly exalted” by God.

“This Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men” (Acts 2:23 ESV). Those who killed Jesus were playing a part in God's ultimate plan for His Son.

“He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things” (Romans 8:32 ESV). God Himself did not spare Jesus, but gave Him up for the sins of humanity.

There can be no doubt that God is ultimately responsible for the death of Jesus Christ. Many may ask why God would do such a thing. Fortunately, the New Testament answers this question as well:

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16 ESV). God was motivated by love for the world and a desire that all who repent receive eternal life.

“In this is love, not that we have loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins” (1 John 4:10 ESV). Because God loves us, he sent Jesus to be an atoning sacrifice for sins.

God sent Jesus into the world so that the world might be redeemed. All those who repent of their sins, believe in Jesus Christ and trust in His sacrificial death and miraculous resurrection are given eternal life. God killed Jesus because God loves sinful people.

The third stanza of the great hymn “How Great Thou Art” captures beautifully the reality of God's delivering up His only Son to be crucified for sinners:

And when I think that God, His Son not sparing

Sent Him to die, I scarce can take it in;

That on the cross, my burden gladly bearing

He bled and died, to take away my sin.

Then sings my soul, my savior God to Thee;

How great Thou art, how great Thou art!

How great indeed.

__________

Nathan Finn is a student at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky.

*

The Passion Gap: How Christians and Jews Misunderstand Each Other

Mark 14:65

Mel Gibson’s THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST is reminding me more each day of the O.J. Simpson trial. Back then, white and black friends I deeply respected talked past each other, utterly unable to understand each other's viewpoints. The lenses through which most blacks and whites saw the trial were so very different that interracial conversations, even among friends, became difficult.

I fear something similar is happening with The Passion. Most of my Jewish friends have had violently different reactions from many of my Christian friends. Many Jews profess no interest in seeing the film at all. And on the message boards of Beliefnet, I see a widespread sense that the other faith simply “doesn’t get it.”

Perhaps we can improve this dynamic if we take stock of the differing world views involved.

What Jews tend not to understand about the Christian response:

1) Christ's suffering is important

Many Jews (and some Christians) have criticized the movie on the grounds that the violence is gratuitous, unspiritual, and misses the point of Christianity. “He virtually ignores the entire life of Jesus, preferring instead to tell us that what made Jesus special was not that he lived righteously and meekly, but that he died bloodily,” Rabbi Shmuley Boteach writes.

What Jews fail to realize is that for many Christians the death -- and the suffering -- is as important as the life of Christ. Christians believe that Jesus died so that sin wouldn’t destine humanity to hell. Three postings from Beliefnet members capture just how powerful that message is:

“Every time he was hit and beaten and spit upon, I flinched because I knew it should have been me those things were happening to but he took my place.”

-- ToGodThruJesus [these are internet names]

“I walked out of the theater with a tear-streaked face, a broken heart and a renewed purpose: to make sure that I do not let the blood that was shed for me be in vain.”

-- anointed prophetess

“Life has me down. I won’t go into details. We all have our ‘crosses’ to bear’. But that is just it. I do not truly bear a cross. Christ did that. For me.”

-- Dharmadel

The movie's violence brings many Christians into Jesus' world and helps show just how much he had to give up in order to give us the gift. In that sense, the violence is extremely spiritual.

2) Most of this really is in the Bible

Gibson certainly inflamed the situation by adding all sorts of new material, but the core elements of the movie -- including the parts that have been used against Jews in the past -- are, indeed, in the Bible. According to the Gospels:

• Caiaphas and the other Jewish priests did plot to kill Jesus.

• Pilate was, in fact, reluctant to crucify Jesus.

• The priests did strike Jesus. (Mark 14:65)

• The crowd did cry “crucify him!”

It is quite possible that much of what’s in the Bible is not historically accurate but Jews need to understand that when they say that this basic plotline is anti-Semitic they are saying the New Testament itself is anti-Semitic and hateful.

3) Most Christians don’t even entertain the question of blame

Most Christians believe that Jesus went to his death willingly, so the identity of the killers is utterly irrelevant. Jews are sensitive to being blamed because they have been, but they also need to realize that most modern American Christians view that as a peculiar sideshow. By expressing so much anxiety about being blamed, Jews give the impression that they think anti-Semitism is pervasive and always ready to explode.

Most Christians view Hitler and others who twisted Christianity to justify hatred as diabolical. As one Beliefnet member put it, “I find it frustrating to be told that my perceptions (and that of all us Christians who read this story every year in church) are no different from a deranged dictator or someone from the Middle Ages.”

Christians need to be able to love the movie without feeling that Jews will therefore view them as anti-Semitic.

4) Christians feel persecuted

This may be the hardest one of all for Jews to understand. How can the majority religion in a religiously free country feel persecuted just because people are raising questions about this movie? But any given individual Christian may feel like his or her personal relationship with Jesus -- that which gives them hope and strength -- is being challenged. When Jews criticize the movie, they need to realize that, unless carefully worded, their complaints will feel like not merely theological disputes but personal insults and attacks.

============================================

What most Christians tend to not understand about the Jewish reaction:

1) Mel Gibson is terrifying

Christians need to understand just how scary a person Mel Gibson is to Jews. The comments from his father Hutton Gibson don’t represent ordinary country-club anti-Semitism but David Duke, neo-Nazi anti-Semitism. Of the Holocaust, Hutton Gibson said, “It’s all -- maybe not all fiction -- but most of it is.” The Jews, he said, “weren’t killed, they simply got up and left! They were all over the Bronx and Brooklyn and Sydney and Los Angeles. They have to ... go where's there's money.” While no one expects the son to repudiate the father, it’s terrifying to many Jews that one of Gibson’s defenses of his dad was that “My father has never told me a lie.”

Gibson’s own comments have not been terribly reassuring. “Yes, of course. Atrocities happened. War is horrible. The Second World War killed tens of millions of people.” This “s--t happens” view makes Jews feel like Gibson still doesn’t get it.

Worse, Gibson seems to be actively inflaming matters by casting his critics as opponents of Christianity. Before the movie opened, Gibson said, “There is vehement anti-Christian sentiment out there, and they don't want it. It's vicious.” On Jay Leno he said he would try to forgive even “those who persecute you,” and said he was being “picked on.” That he would choose to cast criticism of his movie as “anti-Christian” is terrifying to Jews, who view that as a first step toward demonizing them.

2) This is not ancient history

Bill Donohue, the respected head of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, has said, “Those who are sounding the alarms over anti-Semitic violence are historically ignorant: the last time Jews were assaulted after the production of a Passion Play was in the Middle Ages.” A number of posts on Beliefnet’s message boards encouraged Jews to stop “whining” since the horrible misuse of Passion plays happened in the distant past.

But there are enough directly relevant examples of far more recent anti-Semitism to make Jews worry. “One of our most important tasks will be to save future generations from a similar political fate and to remain forever watchful in the knowledge of the menace of Jewry,” said Adolph Hitler on July 5, 1942. “For this reason alone it is vital that the Passion Play be continued at Oberammergau; for never has the menace of Jewry been so convincingly portrayed as in this presentation of what happened in the times of the Romans.”

Beliefnet member Shira writes, “My father could not go near a Catholic school around Easter because he knew he was going to get beaten up.” It wasn’t until 1965 that the Catholic Church officially declared that the entire Jewish people were not guilty of deicide. Moreover, anti-Semitism is right now on the rise in Europe and the Mideast.

Though the Passion has so far not led to violence or even widespread negative commentary against Jews, there’s been enough to make Jews nervous. A church sign went up soon after the opening saying “The Jews killed Christ. Settled.” Relatively few posts on Beliefnet have been anti-Semitic but the exceptions are chilling:

“The past cannot be changed, so those crying foul should deal with it and keep their accusations to themselves. Could it simply be because Hollywood is primarily Jewish controlled that these anti-Semitic cries are being heard?” Or, “Let’s give up the anti-Jew kick. The whole world is done with that. It has been shoved down our throats long enough.”

3) Christian support of Israel is irrelevant

On July 24, after seeing a screening of the film, the Rev. Ted Haggard, president of the National Association of Evangelicals, commented: “There is a great deal of pressure on Israel right now, and Christians seem to be a major source of support for Israel. For the Jewish leaders to risk alienating 2 billion Christians over a movie seems shortsighted.” One Beliefnet member gently reassured Jews that Christians would not turn on Jews because “born again Christians are the best friend Israel and the Jew has.”

Obviously, supporting Israel does not give anyone a free pass to tolerate anti-Semitism in other realms. Besides, while most Jews delight in and appreciate Christian support for Israel they are also quite aware of their mixed motives. (Many evangelicals support Israel because they believe the nation is a necessary precondition for the apocalypse and the Second Coming of Jesus.)

The Passion has already exposed some deep, closeted misunderstandings between some Christians and Jews. Whether the movie will become a positive or negative force will depend largely on whether we keep talking past each other or attempt to actually see the film through the eyes of the other.

*

The Shocking Truth About History's Ultimate Crime

1 Peter 2:24

Actor Mel Gibson's movie, "The Passion," has broken new ground for Hollywood - and triggered a firestorm of controversy. "The Passion” tells the story of the day of Jesus' death with an attempt at Biblical accuracy that is seemingly unprecedented in movie-making history. The dialog is even spoken in the languages spoken at that time. And the portrayal of the crucifixion of Christ is said to be intensely realistic, following as closely as possible the Bible's description of what happened that day on a place called Skull Hill. The controversy revolves around the portrayal of the role of the Jewish leaders on that day in conspiring to have Jesus crucified by the Romans and their statement inviting His blood to be “upon us and our children.” So, for centuries, Jews have been wrongly persecuted as “Christ-killers,” allegedly guilty of “deicide.” What a tragic mistake! The truth of why Jesus died so brutally on that cross is far more shocking.

Well, I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about “The Shocking Truth About History's Ultimate Crime.”

If there's one thing you want to be straight on, it's understanding the death of Jesus Christ. Because God says what we do with what His Son did there will decide where we spend eternity.

Were the Jews responsible for His death? The Romans? No more than I am. No more than you are. Because the Bible says in 1 Peter 2:24, our word for today from the Word of God, “He Himself bore our sins in His body on the tree ... for you were like sheep going astray.” What made it necessary for Jesus to go that cross was the sins of every one of us. Every selfish thing you've ever done, every angry thing you've ever done, every dirty thing, every dishonest thing, every hurting thing, every time you've ever done it your way instead of God's way. That's what He was taking on Himself that unthinkable day on Skull Hill. Or in the words of God's bottom line summary: “Christ died for our sins” (1 Corinthians 15:3). So when Jesus cried out from that cross, “Father, forgive them,” He was forgiving me. He was forgiving you.

But no one had the power to take the life of the Son of God. Jesus said of His life, “No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of my own accord.” His reason? He said, “I lay down My life for the sheep” (John 10:18; 10:15). Jesus gave His life. He sacrificed His life for you to absorb the awful death penalty for you and me running our own lives. Our sins made His death necessary. His love made it happen - a love that does not want to lose you.

So the biggest mistake a person can possibly make is to miss, ignore or walk by Jesus and His cross. If you think there is any other hope of your sins being forgiven, of you going to heaven, look at the cross. If anything you can do could have paid the bill for your sin, God's Son would never be there, crying out, “My God, my God, why have You forsaken Me?” You know the answer? So He would never have to forsake you. Abandon all hope of your religion or your spirituality or your goodness ever removing the guilt of your sin and getting you into heaven. Only the horrific death of God's one and only Son can do that. And because He walked out of His grave three days later, He, and He alone, can give you life that lasts forever.

This can be your day to - in your heart - stand at the foot of Jesus' cross and say, “For me. What You're doing there, Jesus, is for me. And beginning right here and right now, I'm turning to You from a life of doing it my way. I am Yours.”

Don't walk away from that cross without taking for yourself what Jesus did there for you. He took your hell so you could have heaven. Don't miss Him.

__________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4399 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database cross

Passion Play

The Nicene Creed, recited by the world's more than two billion Christians every Sunday, declares that Jesus Christ “suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried.”

More than anything else, these ten words are the theme of “The Passion,” Mel Gibson's new movie. Although not scheduled to be released to theaters until Ash Wednesday, “The Passion” generated this spring more discussion than any film in recent memory: endless op-eds, press releases, debates, and denunciations -- all about a movie, in Aramaic and Latin, that none of the commentators had seen.

Perhaps in response to all this publicity, both negative and positive, Gibson released a trailer for “The Passion” on July 14, 2003. And then, on July 21, he brought a rough cut of the film (with English subtitles) to Washington for a few commentators and interested writers to see.

It is the most powerful movie I have ever seen. In the days since watching that rough cut, I have not been able to get the film out of my mind. Although I have read many books on the death of Jesus, and heard countless sermons dwelling on its details, I would never have believed a human being could suffer as much as Gibson's Christ does. Seen through the perspective of the mother of Jesus, as this film allows the viewer to do, the suffering is doubly painful -- for with her, we watch the unbearable scourging, gustily delivered by the Romans at Pilate's orders nearly to the point of death. The pillar to which Jesus is chained is less than waist-high, so that his back is bent while he must keep himself on his feet. When he is dragged away, blood lies pooled and splattered on the white marble floor. The soldiers' laughter echoes again at the moment of the awful downward push when he is crowned with thorns. And then there are the thundering falls of the scourged Christ upon his flailed and bleeding back, under the impossible weight of the cross.

There are, in a sense, only five historical accounts of the Passion: in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, and, in bare but vivid outline, in the letters of St. Paul. Paul's accounts are by some thirty years the earliest and represent in large strokes the settled beliefs of the first generation of Christians. Down the centuries, the narrative of Christ's death and its meaning have remained much the same.

The fuller accounts of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John supplement each other, often overlapping and sometimes contradicting one another on the sort of contingent details that eyewitnesses (or their note-takers) often report differently. But all the Christian accounts agree that Jesus Christ suffered and died for the sins of all human beings of all time, under the command of the Roman consul in Jerusalem, Pontius Pilate.

Jewish accounts concur that Jesus was a Jew who suffered and died under the Roman authorities. His claims for himself seemed to Jewish authorities then (and since) to be blasphemous -- for Christ clearly announced that he owned an authority higher than the high priests and the rabbis', said forthrightly that he was greater than Solomon, and put himself on a higher plane than Moses. He went even further, daring to call God his father.

The claims Christ made for himself seemed at the time divisive and dangerous. Many people, the Jewish authorities told Pilate, were following this man's lead. His history, they said, showed that he worked magic, performed miracles, and consorted with demons. He had been sent by God, he as much as said, to “fulfill the Scriptures.” His continued preaching might lead to riot and rebellion. But only the Romans had the power to do to Jesus what was actually done, and so it was under the authority of Pontius Pilate, and at the hands of the Roman Empire, that Jesus “was crucified, died, and was buried.”

At the time of Christ's death, Christianity was still internal to Judaism. The Christian Church itself began not at the Passion, but fifty-three days later on Pentecost, when the apostles left an “upper room” in Jerusalem speaking in tongues. With his preaching Jesus had clearly put a challenge to Judaism, expressly announcing a “new” covenant, whose mandate was to “complete” and “fulfill” the “old” covenant. And there is no doubt that Jesus' death meant a parting of the ways between Christians and Jews. Nonetheless, from a Christian point of view, the life and teachings of Jesus and his new covenant do not remove or destroy the old covenant. God cannot be unfaithful to his promises. Besides, if the Creator is not faithful to his first covenant with the Jews, how can Christians expect Him to be faithful to His new covenant with them?

Thus, Christians hold that Christianity fulfills the hopes launched into the world by Judaism. They also hold that those Jews who reject Christianity remain vessels of God's first love. In God's mysterious plan, the continuation of Judaism in time is a grace to be respected, on the same principle on which the faith of Christians rests -- the fidelity of God to his everlasting promises.

The Jewish leaders of the generation that knew him did in fact reject Jesus and his claims, and they did accuse him of blasphemy. “Nevertheless,” as the Second Vatican Council said in its statement on Judaism, “the Jews still remain very dear to God, for the sake of the patriarchs, since God does not take back the gifts he bestowed or the choice he made.” The Council strictly forbids Catholics to hold Jews to be “repudiated or cursed by God, as if such views followed from the Holy Scriptures.” And it deplores “all hatreds, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism leveled at any time and from any source against the Jews.” This condemnation includes the Church's own sins. The Council stressed the two covenants' common spiritual heritage and foresaw a future in which both communities would serve God “shoulder to shoulder.”

Gibson's film is wholly consistent with the Second Vatican Council's presentation of the relations of Judaism and the Christian Church. But “The Passion” will not be easy for Jews to watch. One reason is simply that its entire subject is the death of one who, for many Jews, is a figure of division, Jesus Christ. And a second reason is that it is never easy to relive a moment in which the leaders of one's community, however justified they might have been by their own lights and their own sense of responsibility, do not appear to viewers to be acting in a noble way. As a Catholic, I cringe every time I go to the theater when a pope, cardinal, archbishop, or even priest is portrayed in an unflattering light. Even when they deserve it, I do not enjoy the spectacle.

In the first part of the gospels' account of the Passion, the high priests of Jerusalem standing before Pilate are, painfully no doubt to contemporary Jews, the voice for the prosecution. During the early scenes of the movie, which I tried to watch as if I were Jewish or seated alongside a Jewish colleague, I thought: This is too painful. Having sat through many analogous moments as a Catholic, I did not like the experience.

Very soon, though, the action in the film belongs to the Romans. Roman soldiers inflict systematic pain on Jesus with gusto, lighthearted bantering, and the practiced sadism of those who know how to keep subdued populations subdued. The overwhelming drama consists in Christ's willing endurance of unbearable suffering, for the purpose of inaugurating an entirely new order in human life. The movie, like the gospels, is unmistakable in setting this meaning before our eyes. It is, somehow, our sins for which Jesus is dying.

The Passion of Jesus Christ is not a drama about ethnicity. It is about our humanity. The hero of this movie is Jewish, his mother is Jewish, his apostles and followers are Jewish. But one misses the whole point of the Passion of Jesus unless one sees that he submitted to his suffering for all of us. From the first, Christ's teaching in life had been, “Take up your cross and follow me.” The meaning of that teaching could not have been plainly understood before his death. This movie suggests to viewers that in witnessing Christ's suffering, our own suffering has a forerunner and teacher. Suffering like Christ's may be redemptive. That depends on how we shape our heart to it.

On the cross, the Christ of Gibson's movie is offering forgiveness, reconciliation, and unity. To blame his suffering on others' sins, instead of one's own, would be to join the boisterous soldiers who inflicted on him all the pain that viewers will hardly be able to watch. If Christians blamed others, they would again make a mockery of Christ. They would again pound the crown of thorns into his skull.

Are there historical inaccuracies in this film? Yes, some minor ones (beginning with the Roman characters' Italianate Latin: Echay 'Omo, Pilate pronounces Ecce Homo, when he exhibits Christ to the crowd). Is the film unfaithful to its historical sources? One who hears the gospels often will feel at home in it, but Gibson did not set out to make an academic documentary. His film is a stream of slowly moving, vivid images, against a starkly universal backdrop. The spoken words are mostly in Aramaic (Latin when the Romans speak), which exceedingly few people understand these days.

The sounds of the unfamiliar tongue put the viewer outside any one time or place, in a kind of timeless, universal space. The mood “The Passion” generates is meditative and contemplative. The tone is awe. One finds one's emotions hushed. For minutes after the film ended, the audience at the showing I attended did not speak or move. We felt part of an indescribably important human moment. We had been drawn into an axial point of silence and wonder.

Such is the power of a genuine work of art -- and in its artistic integrity, “The Passion” dwarfs any previous biblical film.

But the making of a film about the death of Jesus Christ is a public event, and it has public consequences that need to be considered. Before I saw “The Passion,” I was sympathetic to the worries about the film strongly expressed by the Anti-Defamation League and other Jewish organizations. History is not reassuring concerning dramatic treatments of Jesus' Passion, and there has been considerable negative talk about Mel Gibson ever since his project was announced, much of it related to the schismatic views attributed to his father, who is ninety-two.

More important, ours is a particularly nasty time for Jews around the world. Taboos that had seemed firmly in place since 1945 have suddenly dissolved. Jewish cemeteries are being desecrated in France, horrible slogans are shouted in public throughout Europe, acts of violence against Jewish passers-by are caught on film, and “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” which we thought discredited forever, is welcomed with a new credulity in the Arab world.

Gibson's film, however, is simply not part of this horrendous trend. On August 8, representatives of the Anti-Defamation League attended a private screening of the rough cut in Houston and, on August 11, released a new statement that still attacks the film “in its present form.” Their interpretation of the movie does not square with the film I saw. Gibson omits some of the New Testament texts most painful for Jewish readers, such as “His blood be upon us and our children!” He also adds such moderating scenes as some of the Pharisees walking out in dissent from the trial of Jesus before the Sanhedrin and, later, one member of the Sanhedrin, Joseph of Arimathea, helping to lift the lifeless body down from the cross.

Most important, Gibson's narrative shows that Pilate alone has the power to put Jesus to death, and the film's full narrative weight assigns responsibility to Rome and the Roman soldiers. The Anti-Defamation League is wrong to assert that the Jewish authorities are “forcing the decision” and that the Jewish high priest is “controlling” Pontius Pilate. The Jews had no such power, and they say so in the film. Pilate tries to shift the responsibility, first to Herod, then to the high priests. And he pretends that the decision is not his -- but he knows it is, and he gives the orders that only he can give. His soldiers enjoy their brutal sport, as obviously they have done before: Historians suggest they performed this gruesome work about 150 times in crucifixions under Pilate.

There is no doubt that the trial of Jesus was not, in the Christian telling, the best moment of the high priest and his council. But the first two generations of Christians were nearly all Jews. They still thought of themselves as Jews, and they were at first astonished to see how they were rejected and persecuted by Jewish officials. The accounts by the evangelists are plainly written to convince believing Jews that Jesus fulfills the biblical anticipations, and nearly every word they write in criticizing the Jewish leaders of their generation was an allusion to condemnations of earlier Jewish leaders by the Jewish prophets.

The early Christians thought their criticisms of the Jews were of the sort one makes within one's own community, and therefore had a different edge than they would have had if they had come from pure outsiders. Only gradually, and with something of a shock, did Christians come to see that, even if they thought of themselves as serious Jews, they belonged to a new community.

Though visually powerful in the way only movies can be, Gibson's film recognizes that Christian criticism of the Jewish leaders has different valences today than it did in the first years after Jesus' death, and on the whole the movie softens the Jewish elements of the gospels' story and with the New Testament places the onus on the Romans.

Still, Jews will not agree that Jesus as the Messiah took the sins of all upon himself in self-sacrifice. That makes a movie about the Passion not only a memory of a painful separation between communities, but also a story with dramatically different meanings for Christian and Jewish viewers -- and for that there is no immediate solution, short of banning all attempts to make films about the death of Jesus.

But Gibson's version is not divisive or dangerous for Jews. Without preachiness, without external commentary, this cinematic reenactment has the potential to be transformative in powerful, mysterious, and quiet ways. When “The Passion” is released on Ash Wednesday its effect around the world will almost certainly be conciliating, quieting, and calming, for it induces awe at the suffering we inflict upon one another.

Through the film, the viewer is forced to see a single human being's passion. A man who claims to be the Son of God knows in advance, as the film shows, the unbounded pain he is about to suffer, the mere thought of which makes him sweat blood. But he willingly accepts this burden, and he perseveres through every shock to his flesh in order to open up a new way of living for the entire race.

Gibson's achievement springs not solely, not even mainly, from a cinematographer's art. Whether he intended it this way or not, perhaps because he puts on film the unadorned directness of the gospels, “The Passion” is a meditation and a prayer.

__________

Michael Novak holds the George Frederick Jewett Chair of Religion, Philosophy, and Public Policy at the American Enterprise Institute

*

from Weekly Standard · Michael Novak via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Who Killed Jesus?: Setting the Record Straight

The cover of the latest NEWSWEEK magazine asks the right question: “Who killed Jesus?” This has been a raging debate for a year, since Mel Gibson started his remarkable film project THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST. He immediately ran into a buzz saw of opposition from the liberal media and Jewish groups who were afraid the film would rekindle anti-Semitism.

Now, Jews have a legitimate concern about this. During the Middle Ages, Christians treated Jews terribly. In Russia there were pogroms against the Jews. And of course some of the maniacs around Hitler professed that they were killing Jews to purify the Christian race.

But is this sensitivity today well-founded? If we would look at history alone, we would have to say that Pontius Pilate certainly was guilty. Legend has it that years after the crucifixion he was frantically washing his hands trying to cleanse himself from the blood of Christ. And, of course, Caiphus the High Priest certainly bears his share of responsibility. So do the crowds who yelled, “Crucify him.” So was it the Romans or the Jews, the venality of Pontius Pilate or the passion of the mob?

It was both and neither. The Jews didn't cause the death of Jesus, nor did the Romans. They were merely instruments carrying out what God had decreed. He sent His only begotten Son to die on the cross so that the sins of mankind might be forgiven. And those who take Scripture seriously have always known who killed Jesus: You and I and all other sinful human beings did so.

Mel Gibson understands this. In his movie, THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST, the hand holding the spike being nailed through Christ's wrist is Gibson's. Who killed Jesus? Mel Gibson knows. And he made the very point with his own hand that he was responsible, not the Jews.

Similarly the Dutch painter, Rembrandt painted THE RAISING OF THE CROSS as a self-portrait. As Christ hangs on the cross while it is being lifted into place, the soldier pulling it up is Rembrandt. Who killed Jesus? Rembrandt knew. He did. And I did. And you did. We're the ones who sent Jesus to the cross loaded down with our sins.

So enough of this foolish controversy. My advice to Christians is that you make it abundantly clear to your friends and neighbors that we are the ones responsible and then take them to see the film. Let them experience the passion and explain to them why it was necessary for Jesus to go to the cross. And be ready with a biblical answer for your Jewish friends who hear all of this propaganda, most of it stirred up by professional activists.

Albert Mohler, president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, says that it is not who is to blame that really has everybody up in arms. The media elite know that if people see this film, the right answer to the haunting question “Who Killed Jesus?” will be clear. What strikes terror into the hearts of the media elite is that people might once again be convicted of sin, repent, and come to faith in Christ.

So, three cheers for Mel Gibson. And thanks to NEWSWEEK for asking the right question, even if it does not have the right answer. But now it is up to us Christians to do our job to educate our neighbors and flood the movie theaters.

FOR FURTHER READING AND INFORMATION:

• Jon Meacham, “Who Killed Jesus?“ Newsweek, 16 February 2004. (Warning: Graphic photos.)

• Albert Mohler, “Newsweek Takes on the New Testament,” Crosswalk.com, 10 February 2004.

• Rabbi Daniel Lapin, “Protesting Passion,” National Review Online, 26 September 2003.

• Visit the Premier International Fan Website for Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ (this site is available in eighteen different languages).

• Antonio Gaspari, “The Cardinal & the Passion,” National Review Online, 18 September 2003.

• Kathryn Jean Lopez, “Mel Gibson, Feminist,” National Review Online, 2 December 2003.

• Michael Novak, “Passion Play,” Weekly Standard, 25 August 2003. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/014ziqma.asp

• BreakPoint Commentary No. 030715, “A Passion for Getting It Right.”

• BreakPoint Commentary No. 030908, “Believe It Or Not.”

• Kelley Reep, “The Last Temptation of Christ,” BreakPoint Online, 25 July 2003.

• Allan Dobras, “Mel Gibson: Passion and Prejudice,” BreakPoint Online, 23 October 2003.

• Mark Gauvreau Judge, “Christ in Majesty,” BreakPoint Online, 6 June 2003.

• Mark Gauvreau Judge, “Turning Around Battleship Hollywood,” BreakPoint Online, 15 January 2004.

• John Fischer, “The Last Temptation of Mel Gibson,” BreakPoint Online, 1 December 2003.

• View Rembrandt's The Raising of the Cross at http://www.abcgallery.com/R/rembrandt/rembrandt105.html.

__________

Copyright (c) 2004 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate