Menu

80 Sermon Illustrations on Lying

80 illustrations Page 2 of 2

Lying in Christian preaching is often portrayed as a destructive practice that undermines trust and damages one's reputation, contrasting sharply with the virtue of truthfulness (Ephesians 4:25). Illustrations typically use images of fragile or unstable structures to symbolize the precariousness and eventual collapse of falsehoods.

Science/medical Reports Language

The following list of phrases and their definitions might help you understand the mysterious language of science and medicine. These special phrases are also applicable to anyone reading a Ph.D. dissertation or academic paper.

• “IT HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN”… I didn’t look up the original reference.

• “A DEFINITE TREND IS EVIDENT”… These data are practically meaningless.

• “WHILE IT HAS NOT BEEN POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE DEFINITE ANSWERS TO THESE QUESTIONS”… An unsuccessful experiment, but I still hope to get it published.

• “THREE OF THE SAMPLES WERE CHOSEN FOR DETAILED STUDY”… The other results didn’t make any sense.

• “TYPICAL RESULTS ARE SHOWN”… This is the prettiest graph.

• “THESE RESULTS WILL BE IN A SUBSEQUENT REPORT”… I might get around to this sometime, if pushed/funded.

• “IN MY EXPERIENCE”… Once.

• “IN CASE AFTER CASE”… Twice.

• “IN A SERIES OF CASES”… Thrice.

• “IT IS BELIEVED THAT”… I think.

• “IT IS GENERALLY BELIEVED THAT”… A couple of others think so, too.

• “CORRECT WITHIN AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE”… Wrong.

• “ACCORDING TO STATISTICAL ANALYSIS”… Rumor has it.

• “A statistically oriented PROJECTION OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE FINDINGS”… A wild guess.

• “A CAREFUL ANALYSIS OF OBTAINABLE DATA”… Three pages of notes were obliterated when I knocked over a glass of beer.

• “IT IS CLEAR THAT MUCH ADDITIONAL WORK WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE A COMPLETE UNDERSTANDING OF THIS PHENOMENON OCCURS”… I don’t understand it.

• “AFTER ADDITIONAL STUDY BY MY COLLEAGUES”… They don’t understand it either.

• “THANKS ARE DUE TO JOE BLOTZ FOR ASSISTANCE WITH THE EXPERIMENT AND TO CINDY ADAMS FOR VALUABLE DISCUSSIONS”… Mr. Blotz did the work and Ms. Adams explained to me what it meant.

• “A HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT AREA FOR EXPLORATORY STUDY”… A totally useless topic selected by my committee.

• “IT IS HOPED THAT THIS STUDY WILL STIMULATE FURTHER INVESTIGATION IN THIS FIELD”… I quit.

from Source not recorded · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

I Cannot Tell A Lie

Zechariah 8:16

Rev. David Holwick ZI Questions People Ask

Zechariah 8:16-17

I CANNOT TELL A LIE

===================

I. Truth or consequences.

II. Deception is on a roll.

A. For my generation, especially evident in politics.

B. This generation is no better.

III. Acceptable to lie sometimes?

A. Categorizing lies.

B. Implication: lies for a good purpose are morally acceptable.

IV. The truth is always a better idea.

A. The Bible unequivocally denounces lies and liars.

1) Sixth commandment: "Don't bear false witness." Deut 5:20

2) The Apostle Paul: Speak truthfully to neighbor. Eph 4:25

3) Book of Revelation: No liars in heaven. Rev 22:15

B. The testimony of theologians Augustine, Wesley, Theilicke.

V. Lying assumes we must manipulate the situation.

VI. Always tell the truth.

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm03zi.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

I Can No Longer Lie For You

John 13:15

John Fafinski works in a sales office in the Midwest with a lady named Laura Cooper. One day, Laura received a phone call which she didn’t want to take. She asked John to tell the caller that she wasn’t there. John did that. Later, John went to Laura with these words: “I feel bad for having lied. I confessed my sin to God and I can no longer lie for you.”

At that point, Laura realized that there was something unusual about the character of John’s life. He had a level of integrity that was different. Later, Laura came to appreciate how devoted John was to his wife. These are not dramatic or even unusual qualities. But Laura instinctively knew that in John was the presence of something which was different. John never talked about religion. Yet his example was a factor in Laura’s decision to begin attending a church.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #155]

from Kerux Sermon #13132 · Rev. Mark Murphy; Ypsilanti Free Methodist Church; Ypsilanti, Michigan via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database honestydeception

The Father of Lies

John 8:44

Alyce was one of the most pathetic-looking young women I have ever met. She was so skinny that she literally had no more body fat to lose. She had lost her job three days earlier, and her vacant eyes conveyed that she had lost all hope for her life. She was a very talented girl and a committed Christian in many ways, but she was also a Darvon junkie who had even been arrested once for illegal possession of prescription drugs.

“I want you to tell me who you think you are,” I said to Alyce.

“I’m just a no-good failure,” she whimpered.

“You’re not a failure,” I responded. “You’re a child of God.” She continued to pour out the negative self-talk and evidences of demonic deception she had been living under, and I continued to counter her negativism with the good news of her identity in Christ. The more we talked, the more aware I became of Christ’s presence ministering to Alyce. We tested the spirit that was harassing her, and she knew firsthand that she had been deceived. Astonished, she said, “Do you mean to tell me that my whole problem has been deception, that I have been listening to a pack of lies?” Today she’s free.

The prevailing theme of the New Testament is the position we enjoy in Christ through our faith in Him. That’s the good news: Christ in you and you in Christ. If there is a prevailing negative theme in the New Testament which capsulizes the opposition we face in Satan, I believe it is deception. There are at least three avenues through which Satan will attempt to dissuade you from God’s truth and deceive you into believing his lies: self-deception, false prophets/teachers, and deceiving spirits. We are vulnerable to Satan’s deception in these areas if we fail to clothe ourselves daily with the spiritual armor of the belt of truth.

Lord, I put on the belt of the truth of Your Word today and stand against the deception of Satan.

from (unknown) · Neil Anderson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

What A Whopper!

A clergyman was walking down the street when he came upon a group of about a dozen boys, all of them between 10 and 12 years of age.

The group surrounded a dog. Concerned lest the boys were hurting the dog, he went over and asked “What are you doing with that dog?”

One of the boys replied, “This dog is just an old neighborhood stray. We all want him, but only one of us can take him home. So we’ve decided that whichever one of us can tell the biggest lie will get to keep the dog.”

Of course, the reverend was taken aback. “You boys shouldn’t be having a contest telling lies!” he exclaimed. He then launched into a ten minute sermon against lying, beginning, “Don’t you boys know it’s a sin to lie,” and ending with, “Why, when I was your age, I never told a lie.”

There was dead silence for about a minute.

Just as the reverend was beginning to think he’d gotten through to them, the smallest boy gave a deep sigh and said, “All right, give him the dog.”

from (unknown) · Anonymous via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Two Important Facts

John 8:44

"There are six things the Lord hates … a false witness who pours out lies" — (Proverbs 6:16, Proverbs 6:19)

What if someone came to your house to murder a member of your family and asked if that person was in? Would it not be right to lie in such circumstances? The “situational ethics” people would say “Yes.” The Bible, in my opinion, says, “No.”

Situational ethics is notorious for coming up with hypothetical situations in which a person must sin because that is what ought to be done. But once we view sin as a “must” and an “ought,” we are finished. A Christian view of ethics rejects every constructed situation which the situational ethics people advance because it fails to take into account two important biblical facts.

First – God’s sovereignty. God will always make a way for His people to avoid sinning. Second – the Holy Spirit’s power. The believer is encouraged not to worry about what to say in difficult situations.

“At that time you will be given what to say” (Matthew 10:19). Also, “Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding” (Proverbs 3:5). God is not ignorant or stupid. He did not fail to see that sometimes His laws would seem to contradict one another. He knew full well that there would be occasions when it might seem prudent from a human point of view to violate one of His principles, hence His promise to us in 1 Corinthians 10:13. Those who try to excuse the breaking of any of God’s moral laws on the pretext that it feels “right” or seems “good” sow the seeds of disruption in their own inner being. It is not the way of wisdom.

PRAYER:

Father, Forgive us that so often we prefer human wisdom to divine wisdom simply because it “feels” right. Help us to trust Your Word even when it runs counter to our own feelings. In Jesus’ Name we pray. Amen.

FURTHER STUDY: — Psalm 116:1-19; Micah 6:12; Romans 3:13

1. What conclusion had the psalmist come to?

2. How does Paul communicate God’s abhorrence of lies?

[Yet, consider also 1 Kings 22:20-23, 2 Chronicles 18:18-22 among other similar examples, but always in the context of John 8:44. What is the context of ‘false witness’ in the Bible? RGH. Holwick: and also consider Rahab's lie in Joshua 2:3-5...]

from (unknown) · Anonymous via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Things Are Not Always What They Seem

On the campus of Harvard University is a statue with the following inscription: “John Harvard, Founder 1638.” Guides tell visitors that this statue is known as “the statue of the three lies.”

First, the artist commissioned to sculpt the statue could not find a clear picture of John Harvard, so he just chose a picture of a respectable-looking gentleman from the proper era.

Second, John Harvard was not the founder of Harvard University – he just donated a lot of money in its early days.

Third, the date on the base of the statue does not represent John Harvard’s death, as one might suppose, but the year he donated his library and most of his fortune to the college.

To top it off, on the side of the statue is the Harvard emblem, emblazoned with the school’s motto: “Veritas.”

from (unknown) · Anonymous via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database truthdeception

The Lie Trap

Hosea 10:13

You have plowed wickedness; You have reaped iniquity. You have eaten the fruit of lies, Because you trusted in your own way, In the multitude of your mighty men. Therefore tumult shall arise among your people, And all your fortresses shall be plundered As Shalman plundered Beth Arbel in the day of battle—A mother dashed in pieces upon her children” Hosea 10:13-14

Lies are like potato chips. You can’t eat just one potato chip and you can’t tell just one lie. Ever tried it? I have. When I would tell a lie to my Mom, she would ask me something that would challenge it. I’m sure that she knew it was a lie from the start. When she asked, I had a choice. I could tell the truth, or I could try to cover-up my sin by telling another lie. I wasn’t really smart enough to know that the former option was the best. I always tried the second lie. Then a third. Maybe even a fourth. Eventually my lies would catch up with me and I would make a near fatal (at least I thought I would die when my Mom spanked me) error. I was caught in a trap every bit as secure as a fly on flypaper!

Even if my Mom didn’t catch the lie, I would lay awake at night with guilt overwhelming me. To this day I believe that some of my childhood nightmares are the result of worrying about my lies coming out in the open. Thank God I sleep soundly now. I’ve learned that painful honestly is better than convenient little lies.

Israel was about ready to learn the consequences of lying ––– again. They had gone their own way. They had believed the lies of false prophets. They had abandoned the truth. For a while they had found dishonesty with God to be a lucrative way of life. But, as we all discover eventually, their lies, their sins, were about to “find them out.” Payday was close at hand. Judgment was just around the corner — and God was giving them ample warning.

Of course Israel didn’t listen, didn’t learn their lesson the easy way. They continued on in their sinful mode and soon reaped the rewards of their lifestyle. It wasn’t a pretty sight.

God is calling for a new honesty in the Church today. New in the sense that the average Church member is little different from the average non- church member. God wants us to be pure, honest, undefiled. He is calling us to be a step above the rest of the world. He desires that we be examples of what a godly person looks like.

Sure, all of us are sinners — no one doubts that. But what God is looking for is a people who are trying to do right, trying to live for Him. To these people He will apply the blood of cleaning that flowed from Jesus’ side. Only in this way will we be made pure and holy. Only in this way will we be able to stand tall before God and man. Only in this way will we be able to say “follow me and you will see Jesus.”

from (unknown) · Unknown via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Radical Honesty

Job 6:25

Brad Blanton, founder of a movement called Radical Honesty, is swirling a drink as he sits by a fire in his rural Virginia home, telling me why it’s important to live without lies. “You’ll have really bad times, you’ll have really great times,” he says, “but you’ll contribute to other people because you haven’t been dancing on eggshells your whole life.”

Radical Honesty is based on a simple premise. Blanton, a 69-year-old psychotherapist, claims that everyone would be happier if we just stopped lying, if we just told the truth, all the time. That would be radical in itself, of course — a world without fibs. But Blanton goes further. He says we should toss out all the filters between our brains and our mouths. If you think it, say it. Confess to your boss your secret plans to start your own company. If you’re having fantasies about your wife’s sister, Blanton says to tell your wife and tell her sister. To him, it’s the only path to authentic relationships, the only way to smash through modernity’s soul-deadening alienation. Oversharing? No such thing.

Yes. I know. One of the most idiotic ideas ever: Deceit makes our world go round. Without lies, marriages would crumble, workers would be fired, egos would be shattered, governments would collapse.

And yet ... maybe there’s something to it. Maybe a couple of weeks of truth-telling would do me good.

Blanton, in person, isn’t the bully I expect. He’s a former Texan with a big laugh and a big voice. He calls himself “white trash with a Ph.D.” Twice he’s run for Congress, on the novel platform that he’d be an honest politician. In 2004, he ran as an independent and won a surprising 25 percent of the vote in his Virginia district.

Blanton’s movement is at least sizable, if not huge. He has sold 175,000 books in 11 languages and has 25 trainers assisting workshops and running practice groups around the country.

“Do you think it’s ever okay to lie?” I ask.

“I advocate never lying in personal relationships. But if you have Anne Frank in your attic and a Nazi knocks on the door, lie. I lie to any government official. I lie to the IRS. I always take more deductions than are justified.”

Upon my return to New York, I immediately set about delaying my experiment. When you’re with Blanton, you think, Yes, I can do this! The truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. But when I get back to bosses and fragile friendships, I continue my lying ways.

“How’s Radical Honesty going?” my boss asks. “It’s okay,” I lie. In fact, not until my boss says he needs the story ASAP do I get serious about the project.

The next day, my wife, Julie, and I get a visit from Julie’s dad and stepmom. “Did you get the birthday gift I sent you? Did you like it?” asks her stepmom. “Not really. I don’t like gift certificates,” I say. “It’s like you’re giving me an errand to run.”

Once again, I feel the thrill of inappropriate candor. And I feel something else, too. The paradoxical joy of being free from choice. I had no choice but to tell the truth. I didn’t have to rack my brain figuring out how to hedge it, spin it, massage it. “Just being honest.” I shrug. Nice touch, I decide; helps take the edge off. She’s got thick skin. She’ll be okay. And I’ll tell you this: I’ll never get a stupid gift certificate from her again.

By the end of the week, I’ve slashed my routine lying by at least 40 percent.

One thing becomes quickly apparent, though: There’s a fine line between Radical Honesty and creepiness. It’s simple logic: Men think about sex every three minutes, as the scientists at Redbook remind us. If you speak whatever’s on your mind, you’ll be talking about sex every three minutes.

I have a business breakfast with an editor from Rachael Ray’s magazine. As we’re sitting together, I tell her that I remember what she wore the first time we met and that I’d try to sleep with her if I were single.

The thing is, the separate cubbyholes of my personality are merging. Usually, there’s a professional self, a home self, a friend self, a with-the-guys self. Now it’s one big improper mess. Either this woman and I have taken a step forward in our relationship, or she’ll never return my calls again.

While getting my hair cut, I stop my barber short when he starts telling me how he doesn’t want his wife to get pregnant. “You know, I’m tired. I have a cold. I don’t want to talk anymore. I want to read.” “Okay,” he says, wielding his scissors, “go ahead and read.” Later, I do the same thing with my in-laws when they’re yapping on about preschools. “I’m bored,” I announce. “I’ll be back later.” And with that, I leave the living room.

Radical Honesty can save a whole lot of time.

My break with Blanton’s philosophy comes soon enough. A friend of a friend wrote some poems and sent them to me. This was an older man. His wife had just died, and he’d taken up poetry. He just wanted someone “in publishing” to read his work, and though I didn’t like the poems much, I wrote to him that I thought they were very good.

I confess my lie in an e-mail to Blanton, then ask if I made a mistake. Blanton responds curtly, advising me to “send the man the e-mail you sent me and ask him to call you when he gets it.”

Show him the e-mail? Is he kidding? In his book RADICAL HONESTY, Blanton advises us to start sentences with the words “I resent you for” or “I appreciate you for.” So I write back to him: “I resent you for giving me the advice to break that old man’s heart.”

Blanton responds quickly. First, he doesn’t like that I expressed my resentment by e-mail. He expects resentment to be expressed in person so that “you can stay with” the person you resent “until the sensations arise and recede and then get back to neutral — which is what forgiveness is.” Second, he tells me that telling the old man the truth would be compassionate. “Your lie is not useful to him. In fact, it is simply avoiding your responsibility as one human being to another.”

I try to understand Blanton’s point about compassion, and I will concede that my e-mail to the old man was wrong. I shouldn’t have been so rah-rah effusive. But I’ve hit the outer limit of Radical Honesty, a hard wall. I can’t trash the old man.

I call Blanton several days later to tell him I intend to end my experiment. “You’re going to start lying again?” he asks. “Yeah,” I say, then concede, “But I’m going to lie less than I did before.”

I can say this for Radical Honesty. Whenever I am radically honest, people become radically honest themselves. In fact, all my relationships could take a whole lot more truth than I expected.

But the giddiness I experienced at first wore off pretty quickly. A life of Radical Honesty is filled with a hundred confrontations every day. They’re small, but relentless. “Yes, I’ll come to your office, but I resent you for making me travel.” “My boss said I should invite you to this meeting, although it wouldn’t have occurred to me to do so.” At one point, my wife told me a story about switching operating systems on her computer. In the middle, I had to go help our son with something, then forgot to come back. “Do you want to hear the end of the story or not?” Julie asked. “Well ... is there a payoff?” I asked. She cursed at me.

________

Adapted from the book THE GUINEA PIG DIARIES by A.J. Jacobs. ©2009 by A.J. Jacobs. Used with permission of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

from The Week Magazine · A. J. Jacobs; edited by David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database lyingtruth

Falsehoods Are Much Better Than Lies

Luke 22:31

“My campaign is not based on a foundation of lies,” said Antwon Womack, 21, a candidate for the Board of Education in Birmingham, Alabama. “My values are not lies. It’s just the information I provided to the people is false.”

Many key facts on his campaign web site were li -- ...uh... false: his age (he said he was 23), his bachelor’s degree in education and his title of “Dr.” (he actually dropped out of high school -- as a freshman), even his address (he didn’t actually live in the district where he was running) and phone number.

Womack said he was running for the Board “because I seen a lack of leadership,” but the revelation of his lies -- er, falsehoods -- “is really going to hurt my political career,” he said.

Womack announced he would drop out of the race “because when people read this, there’s no way I can win.” But he reneged on that promise, saying that two local politicians were supportive of him staying in the race. Both denied supporting him and demanded he stop using their names. Womack came in third with just 117 votes.

________

Birmingham News

from This Is True · Randy Cassingham via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database truth

The Devious Art of Lying By Telling The Truth

Luke 22:31

It is no secret that politicians often lie, but consider this ­– they can do so simply by telling the truth. Confused?

That statement becomes clearer when you realise that we’ve probably all done it. A classic example might be if your mum asks if you’ve finished your homework and you respond: “I’ve written an essay on Tennessee Williams for my English class.” This may be true, but it doesn’t actually answer the question about whether your homework was done. That essay could have been written long ago and you have misled your poor mother with a truthful statement. You might not have even started your homework yet.

Misleading by “telling the truth” is so pervasive in daily life that a new term has recently been coined to describe it: paltering. That it is so widespread in society now gives us more insight into the grey area between truth and lies, and perhaps even why we lie at all.

We lie all the time, despite the fact that it costs us considerably more mental effort to lie than to tell the truth. U.S. president Abraham Lincoln once said that “no man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar”.

In 1996 one researcher, Bella DePaulo even put a figure on it. She found that each of us lies about once or twice a day. She discovered this by asking participants for one week to note down each time they lied, even if they did so with a good intention. Out of the 147 participants in her original study, only seven said they didn’t lie at all - and we can only guess if they were telling the truth.

Many of the lies were fairly innocent, or even kind, such as: “I told her that she looked good when I thought that she looked like a blimp.” Some were to hide embarrassment, such as pretending a spouse had not been fired. DePaulo, a psychologist at the University of California Santa Barbara, says that the participants in her study were not aware of how many lies they told, partly because most were so “ordinary and so expected that we just don’t notice them”.

It is when individuals use lies to manipulate others or to purposely mislead that it is more worrying. And this happens more often than you might think.

When Todd Rogers and his colleagues were looking at how often politicians dodge questions during debates they realised something else was going on. By stating another truthful fact, they could get out of answering a question. They could even imply something was truthful when it was not. Politicians do this all the time, says Rogers, a behavioural scientist at Harvard Kennedy School. He and colleagues therefore set out to understand more about it.

He found that paltering was an extremely common tactic of negotiation. Over half the 184 business executives in his study admitted to using the tactic. The research also found that the person doing the paltering believed it was more ethical than lying outright.

The individuals who had been deceived, however, did not distinguish between lying and paltering. “It probably leads to too much paltering as communicators think that when disclosed, it will be somewhat ethical, whereas listeners see it as a lie,” says Rogers.

It is also difficult to spot a misleading “fact” when we hear something that on the face of it, sounds true. For instance, the United Kingdom’s Labour Party campaign video to lower the voting age said: “You’re 16. Now you can get married, join the Army, work full-time.” The BBC’s reality check team discovered that these facts do not tell the whole truth.

“You can only join the Army aged 16 or 17 with your parents’ permission,” the Reality Check team wrote. “At that age you also need your parents’ permission to get married unless you do so in Scotland. Since 2013, 16 and 17-year-olds cannot work full-time in England, but can in the other three home nations with some restrictions.”

In another example, the then-presidential-nominee Donald Trump paltered during the presidential debates. He was questioned about a housing discrimination lawsuit early on in his career and stated that his company had given “no admission of guilt”. While they may not have admitted it, an investigation by the New York Times found that his company did discriminate based on race.

And even if we do spot misleading truths, social norms can prevent us from challenging whether or not they are deceptive. Take a now infamous interview in the United Kingdom, where journalist Jeremy Paxman interviewed the politician Michael Howard (pictured below). He repeatedly asks Howard whether he “threatened to overrule” the then prisons governor. Howard in turn, continues to evade the question with other facts in a bizarre exchange that becomes increasingly awkward to watch. Not many of us are comfortable challenging someone in that way.

While it’s common in politics, so too is it in everyday life. Consider the estate agent who tells a potential buyer that an unpopular property has had “lots of enquiries” when asked how many actual bids there have been. Or the used car salesman who says a car started up extremely well on a frosty morning, without disclosing that it broke down the week before. Both statements are true but mask the reality of the unpopular property and the dodgy car.

Paltering is perhaps so commonplace because it is seen as a useful tool. It happens because we constantly have so many competing goals, suggests Rogers. “We want to achieve our narrow objective – [selling a house or car] – but we also want people to see us as ethical and honest.” He says these two goals are in tension and by paltering, people believe they are being more ethical than outright lying. “We show evidence they are making a mistake,” says Rogers.

We can see the problems this sort of thinking can cause reflected in society today. The public are clearly sick of being lied to and trust in politicians is plummeting. One 2016 poll found that the British public trust politicians less than estate agents, bankers and journalists.

And despite the fact that we now frequently expect lies from those in power, it remains challenging to spot them in real time, especially so if they lie by paltering. Psychologist Robert Feldman, author of The Liar in Your Life, sees this as worrying both on a personal and on a macro level. “When we’re lied to by people in power, it ruins our confidence in political institutions – it makes the population very cynical about [their] real motivations.”

Lying can and does clearly serve a devious social purpose. It can help someone paint a better picture than the truth, or help a politician dodge an uncomfortable question. “It’s unethical and it makes our democracy worse. But it’s how human cognition works,” says Rogers.

Unfortunately, the prevalence of lies might stem from the way we are brought up. Lies play a role in our social interactions from a very young age. We tell young children about tooth fairies and Santa, or encourage a child to be grateful for an unwanted present. “We give our kids very mixed messages,” says Feldman. “What they ultimately learn is that even though honesty is the best policy, it’s also at times fine and preferable to lie about things.”

So next time you hear a fact that sounds odd, or someone to be deflecting a question, be aware that what you think is the truth may very well be deceptive.

True Lies: Rielle Hunter Tells Her Story

Job 6:25

I can’t say I spend my time watching Oprah, but I recently came across a New York Times article about her show that made me do a double take. It seems that recently, the Queen of Therapy interviewed Rielle Hunter, mistress of John Edwards and mother of his youngest child. Times writer Alessandra Stanley reported the interview in a column titled “One Woman’s ‘Truth’: Rielle Hunter Talks to Oprah.”

The word “truth” is in quotation marks, and for good reason.

I have spoken and written many times about the issue of truth and reality. Well, this story may illustrate most of the things I’ve ever said.

For one thing, Rielle Hunter stated that she did not regret the affair with John Edwards, but rather, painted the scandal as a necessary stage in Mr. Edwards’ “process of self-actualization.” And then she said, “I followed my heart, and I believe it was the right thing to do, which is weird...because I didn’t make a commitment to Elizabeth. I wasn’t the one lying to her.”

My heavens! Where do I begin? First of all, “following your heart” may lead you to do the right thing. But more often it will lead you to do the wrong thing. And it depends, of course, on the moral condition of your heart — or, if you prefer, your conscience. Remember, the word “conscience” comes from two Latin words, con scienta, meaning “with knowledge.” The healthy conscience is informed by objective moral laws and truth.

Second, Ms. Hunter talks about being supportive of Mr. Edwards’ desire to live “a life of truth.” Rielle admits that lying like a rug is a “really unique way of getting there.” No kidding. Leaving out everything else that’s wrong with that idea, calling something “true” doesn’t make it true. Your opinion and my opinion have no effect on truth. Truth is truth because it is objectively so. It is unchanging; it is not something we can make up.

But what I find particularly striking — appalling really — is the gentle treatment that Ms. Hunter received from Oprah Winfrey. Wouldn’t you think Oprah might say, “But didn’t your conscience bother you? Don’t you care about the consequences? How can you say hurting someone else is self-actualization?” Instead, the Times reports, “Ms. Winfrey...wasn’t confrontational or even very probing.”

Not that the Times’ own tone is very probing either. But at least Ms. Stanley did call Ms. Hunter’s story a “solipsistic and New Age-ish account, in which Ms. Hunter’s ‘truth,’ as she put it, trumped all other concerns, including all the lying.”

Well, the whole incident has me aghast. Why was this tawdry interview on network television? Is sensationalism the only thing the media thinks will sell to the public? Does anyone care about genuine standards of morality and truth and decency? What about the influence this kind of drivel has on the millions of adoring Oprah groupies?

Well, in one way, maybe it’s a good thing the interview aired. It showed the world what has become of the so-called “self-esteem” generation. It stripped bare the old clichés of moral relativism, like “follow your heart” and “truth is what you believe it to be,” and showed just how ugly and hollow they really are.

There it is for all to see. When we base our idea of truth on what makes us feel good, we end up lying not just to others, but to ourselves.

________

Copyright (c) 2010 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

Lies and Truth

Luke 22:31

There is an old Hindu law which says lying is justified in only two cases: in saving a person’s life and in paying a compliment to a lady. It gives us cause to chuckle, but most often lying takes on a more ominous nature.

Lying is one of the most fascinating of sins. It is denounced and often despised by those on the receiving end, whereas it is commonly brushed off as no big deal by those on the giving end. Lies are easy to justify in the human mind. There is always someone to protect, someone to avoid disappointing or some reason to try to achieve what one believes is “the greater good” in a given situation.

Christians historically have believed it sinful to lie and that it somehow simultaneously displeases God while actually pleasing Satan, who is identified in Scripture as the “father of lies.” Longtime Southern Baptist pastor Adrian Rogers said, “A man is never more like the devil than when he lies.”

Throughout Scripture the concepts of “truth” and “lies” are contrasted. It begins as early as Genesis 3 when sin first entered the world. It was God’s “truth” which was “lied” about by Satan who then helped lead Adam and Eve astray. Sadly, mankind has been lying ever since.

In order for there to be a lie, there must first be truth. A lie is nothing more than a distortion or denial of the truth. Truth is the objective standard and the lie always falls short, conceals or attempts to change/pervert truth.

Most often, lies are about self-preservation or self-promotion. Perhaps the worst lies of all are those we tell ourselves and actually believe. People will not be honest with God unless or until they become honest with themselves. Many lies have been contrived to protect one’s self from the harm of consequences, whether it be shame or anything else. Quite often it seems another purpose, another agenda is in view.

The Lord Jesus stated He is the Way, Truth and Life in John 14:6. We are actually most like Jesus when we stretch ourselves to be as truthful as possible and hold “truth” in high regard. Lies demand tolerance, understanding and creative interpretation of facts, whereas truth calls for as close and as thorough examination as can be given. Truth never has fear of having the brightest of lights turned on it. It is always able to stand the test.

The problem is that the “looked to” standard has changed. God’s Word was once the standard in American and European culture, but no more. Now, it seems, serving other interests is the primary objective. That makes it easy for the standards of truth to change. Truth essentially now is seen as whatever someone says is the truth. No longer are people “servants” of the truth, they have instead found ways by which to make the truth subservient to them.

But it simply never works. It always blows up somehow if given enough time.

When a person makes the declarative statement “this is true,” what does it mean? One must determine what standard is being used. Is it the biblical standard or another standard? The Bible was given as a foundation to mankind. Scripture asks us quite pointedly, “If the foundations be destroyed, what will the righteous do?” (Psalm 11:3).

The good news for Christians is that we do not have to live enslaved to lies. God has promised, “You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free” (John 8:32). The truth is incredibly liberating and unencumbering, whereas lies constrain, entangle and ultimately control. Believers need not wander around in the darkness and constraints of lies. There is the light of God’s truth to illumine our path. In John 17:17, the Lord Jesus appealed to the heavenly Father on behalf of His disciples, “Sanctify them by your truth. Your Word is truth.” Jesus desires for all people to identify themselves with Him by identifying with all that is true.

________

Allen Raynor is senior pastor of First Baptist Church in Rogers, Texas.

from Baptist Press · Allen Raynor via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database truth

Seven Lies Christians Tell In Evangelism

John 8:44

Tony Kriz has given an evangelism presentation he titles, “How to talk about your faith without being a total jerk.” Once everyone is settled in, they realize that this is not going to be a typical evangelism seminar. He asks the room a question, “How do we Christians lie ... How do we lie when evangelizing?”

At first the room is still and silent. It always starts silent when he asks this question. And then, once the question sinks in, hands dart up all over the room ... the thoughts and ideas jump from the seats more quickly than they can even collect them. It feels like most people have never considered the question before, and then, as they ponder it for the first time, the epiphanies naturally flow. It is like pure discovery in action.

Here is a short list, in no particular order, of seven of the ways that Tony is aware that he and others have lied (and still do) when they practice cross-spiritual communication. In Tony’s words:

1. We lie when we claim we are more confident than we really are. The culture of pretending within Christianity seems almost at an epidemic level. Many of us feel the need to hide our doubts and questions. We feel compelled to act like our faith life is totally satisfying, when in fact it often feels limited, dry, cold or numb. I think we also believe that our “witness” will be less powerful if we reveal a less than “perfect” religious experience. The funny thing is that the opposite is often true. Non-Christians are often drawn to stories of an authentic and even struggling faith.

2. We lie when we claim that unexplainable things are in fact explainable. God is transcendent and beyond even the shadowy wisps of imagination in our finite minds. The Trinity, for instance, is not as simple as a metaphor of water (ice, water, steam) or an egg (shell, white, yoke). Sometimes I think we would be better off if we just said, “These ideas are so beyond me that if God did reveal them to me, I am pretty sure my brain would explode.”

3. We lie when we don’t acknowledge our doubts within the drama of faith. This is similar to number one above but just on a more detailed level. When another person challenges us with a difficult theological/philosophical issue, sometimes it is best to just admit that those questions are very challenging and even emotionally taxing on the soul (I think people like to know that our faith is so important to us that it does impact our soul-state in both encouraging and difficult ways.) Difficult questions for me include: What is the destiny of people with no access to the true and loving message of Christ’s gospel? Where did evil come from? Why did God put this whole human story into motion when it has caused so much pain?

4. We lie when we pretend like the Bible doesn’t say some really nasty things when in fact it does. For instance, God commands genocide. He just does ... at least from a clear and honest reading of the Bible. There is also a verse that says, “Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks (Psalm 137:9).” If we want the Bible to be our document, we need to own the whole thing. (The same thing can be said for the atrocities in the story of the church, past and present.)

5. We lie when we claim we understand other beliefs, faiths and world-views. We need to stop saying things like, “I understand Islam,” or, “I know what a Muslim thinks/believes.” Do you want someone saying that they understand your faith experience because they once lived in a Greek Orthodox neighborhood? Do you think a Muslim would accurately understand your beliefs because they read a book about Christianity (particularly one written by Muslim scholars)? Belief systems are extremely diverse (heck, in Christianity there are hundreds of Protestant denominations alone, before we even talk about Orthodox, Coptic, Armenian, Syrian, Palestinian, just to scratch the surface). Other religions are just as diverse. Further more, faith experience can be as specific as a neighborhood, family or individual.

6. We lie when we claim that all of our beliefs are a “10”. This one is probably going to frustrate some people, but we are disingenuous when we claim all of our dogmas with equal veracity. To put it another way, on a scale of one to ten, not all Christian beliefs are a “10.” Do I believe in the historicity of a floating zoo? Yes I do. Do I hold to the specific details of that historic event with the same “lay my life on the line” conviction as I do the historical death on a cross and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth? No, I do not. The details of the zoo are not a 10 for me. Jesus is a 10.

7. Finally, and most importantly, we lie (insidious and barbaric lying) when we pretend like we really, really, really love the other person when in fact we don’t. We do not love people when we dismiss their story (including their hopes, values, beliefs and convictions). We do not love people when we do not empathetically listen to them, as opposed to spending that time formulating a counter-argument. We do not love others when we reduce them to labels, caricatures, or opponents. If we love, then we will find them shockingly beautiful and fascinating creations. We will find their stories riveting. We will radiate affection. Humans know deep down when they are or are not truly loved.

I would like to close with a different sort of lie. This is not a way that I lie, but instead a way that I was lied to. I was lied to by religious people. They told me that cross-spiritual communication is dangerous. It is dangerous because when I do it, there is a strong possibility that it will divide and the other person will become my enemy.

Well, in my experience sharing my faith around the world and in my post-Christian city, if we can share honestly, authentically and with humility, division does not happen. Instead, friendship happens.

Is Lying That Bad? (also with Muslim Perspective)

Mark 14:66

Reports of apparent lies by NBC News anchor Brian Williams and President Obama have highlighted the prevalence of dishonesty among Americans as well as the dismissive attitude many have toward it. But the Bible portrays lying as a violation of God’s intended order for the universe -- with consequences as real as those that come from failed attempts to violate the laws of physics or medical science.

Williams is a prime example. He was suspended by NBC for six months after an internal investigation uncovered multiple “instances of exaggeration” in the veteran journalist’s reporting, including the false statement that he was riding on a military helicopter hit by a rocket-propelled grenade during the Iraq war, the Washington Post reported.

Obama made headlines when his former adviser David Axelrod claimed in a book released Feb. 10, 2015, that the president lied about his support for same-sex marriage during the 2008 election cycle. As an Illinois state senate candidate in 1996, Obama stated on a questionnaire, “I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages,” TIME reported. But Obama said during his first presidential campaign that he only supported civil unions and believed marriage “is the union between a man and a woman.”

Axelrod claimed the lie was an attempt not to offend voters in black churches. Obama countered in an interview published Feb. 10 that he did not lie but was “struggling” to balance between “people’s rights” and “religious sensitivities,” Politico reported. Obama officially endorsed gay marriage in 2012.

A 60 Minutes/Vanity Fair poll released last year suggests Obama and Williams are not alone in their struggle to tell the truth. Only 56 percent of Americans surveyed said a person “should always tell the truth under every circumstance.” The top three areas about which Americans are tempted to lie are their past, their salary and their age, according to the poll.

So if most everyone is doing it, is lying really that big of a deal? In short, yes.

Of course, Christian ethicists disagree about whether it is morally acceptable to lie in extreme circumstances. For example, were people in Nazi Germany justified in lying to the Gestapo about hiding Jews in their homes? Was Rahab sinning when she lied about the Israelite spies to the king of Jericho’s messengers (Joshua 2:4-5)? And no one is suggesting a moral obligation to reveal everything we know in every circumstance. But Scripture is clear that the relaying of false information under normal circumstances is a sin with real consequences -- even when it is a “white lie” or one intended to protect the fibber.

Honesty is of primary importance in Scripture, first of all, because truthfulness is an attribute of God. The Old Testament teaches that God is incapable of lying (Numbers 23:19), and Jesus said He is “the truth” (John 14:6). God codified the importance of truth-telling for humans in the ninth commandment (Exodus 20:16) as a way of ordering human interactions to reflect His holy character.

When the Lord disciplines those who lie, it is not an arbitrary hand slap doled out by a capricious deity. It is the attempt of a loving Lord to align His creatures with what is best for them and purge the world of what is objectively evil. Lies have consequences.

In Genesis 3, the serpent’s lie led to the ruin of God’s good creation. Abraham’s lie about Sarah being his sister once led to plagues on the Egyptians (Genesis 12:17) and on another occasion to the near death of Abimelech and his subjects (Genesis 20:7). A similar lie by Isaac about his wife Rebekah threatened to undo Abimelech’s kingdom again a generation later (Genesis 26:6-11).

Jacob’s notorious deception stole his father’s blessing from Esau and led to years of strife between the two brothers as well as their descendants (Genesis 27:1-29). The deception of Joseph’s brothers concerning his death led to prolonged grief in their family (Genesis 37:29-35).

When Israel was established as a nation, God included numerous provisions about honesty in its laws. The nation’s eventual exile from the Promised Land was partly due to its dishonesty (Isaiah 59:4).

In the New Testament, Peter’s dishonesty led to shame (Mark 14:66-72) and that of Ananias and Sapphira to death (Acts 5:1-11). At the end of time, the “father of lies” will be cast into a lake of fire along with the “false prophet” and “all liars” who have refused to repent (Revelation 20:10; 21:8; John 8:44).

While all of us have been liars at some point (Romans 3:13), we don’t have to continue such behavior. There is grace and forgiveness in Christ -- as well as increasing relief from the consequences of lying the longer we practice honesty. Yet persisting in dishonesty yields a painful harvest. Just ask Brian Williams.

==================

Quran: lying allowed to protect Muslims

Contrary to the Bible’s persistent emphasis on honesty, adherents of Islam believe the Quran permits lying in order to prevent death or injury to Muslims.

Known as “taqiyya,” the practice of lying in the name of Islam is based in part on chapter 16, verse 106 of the Quran: “Anyone who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters unbelief under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith shall be absolved -- but such as open their breast to unbelief -- on them is wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful penalty.”

Though most often associated with Shiite Muslims, Sunnis have practiced taqiyya as well. Sunnis and Shiites differ over who should be Muhammad’s successor as the caliph, or ruler, of the Islamic community.

“Over time, pro-Shi’i movements used taqiyah [an alternate spelling] to hide revolutionary activities,” according to the Oxford Islamic Studies website. “Taqiyah became a widely accepted practice, and in the 900s, Ibn Babawayh, a prominent Shi’i authority, declared it to be a religious obligation. Some scholars, however, voiced concerns about the danger of following a policy of deceit. They argued that taqiyah permits Shi’is to say anything and make any claim, and therefore, their words are not trustworthy. As a result, Shi’i scholars created rules for the use of taqiyah.”

Taqiyya has been advocated by both medieval and modern Muslims. In the seventh century, Muhammad’s son-in-law Ali temporarily accepted the rule of his rivals following Muhammad’s death even though he believed himself the legitimate heir to Muhammad’s authority. Ali’s pledge of loyalty to his opponents was actually a strategic maneuver to preserve his movement until he saw an opportune moment to seize power. Sunnis view Ali’s action as one basis for taqiyya.

In the 1980s, Islamic writer Afif Tabbarah stated in his book “The Spirit of Islam,” “Lying is not always bad, to be sure; there are times when telling a lie is more profitable and better for the general welfare, and for the settlement of conciliation among people, than telling the truth.”

Former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and former Palestinian leader Yasser Afafat all practiced taqiyya in their dealings with the international community, some Islam experts say.

Hussein was known to break promises to U.N. weapons inspectors, and Ahmadinejad said Iran’s uranium enrichment projects were for peaceful purposes although western leaders suspected that was a lie.

In 1994, Afafat said in a Johannesburg mosque, “The jihad will continue, and Jerusalem is not for the Palestinian people. It is for all the Muslim nation.” When questioned by journalists, Arafat said he was merely using the term “jihad” to call Muslims to be more devout in their faith.

Although Muslim scholars have identified situations in which they believe it is acceptable to practice taqiyya, “in general, they advise against its use, whenever possible,” the Oxford Islamic Studies website said.

________

David Roach is chief national correspondent for Baptist Press, the Southern Baptist Convention’s news service.

The Liar of Long Island

George Santos was the Republican congressman for the wealthiest district in New York. He got very little attention from the media until the election was over, but then the floodgates opened. You might say he “fudged” on his resume to win his election:

He claimed his grandparents survived the Holocaust.

- he is not Jewish, but Catholic.

He claimed his mother had died as a result of 9-11.

- she was in Brazil on the day of the attack.

He claimed to have made a fortune on Wall Street.

- he never worked there.

Santos lied about his high school, where he went to college, about almost every job he ever had, and on and on. He has also been accused of defrauding charities, disabled veterans, and stealing $3,000 meant for a sick dog.

Several articles have tried to rank his lies in order of severity, usually listing 13 or more.

The biggest issue in my mind is that he has refused to take the blame for any of this, or to resign from his seat. He is utterly shameless.

And he is not the first, of course. The lack of shame among our leaders has been noted since the 1990s. One commentator has even suggested that shamelessness is a new Superpower.

________

Among the internet sources used for this illustration:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/01/george-santos-worst-lies

https://www.npr.org/2023/01/22/1150136390/george-santos-dog-gofundme-anthony-devolder

https://www.npr.org/2023/02/15/1157049312/george-santos-politics-of-shame

from (see below) · Rev. David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database deception

Seven Lies Christians Tell In Evangelism

John 8:44

Tony Kriz has given an evangelism presentation he titles, “How to talk about your faith without being a total jerk.” Once everyone is settled in, they realize that this is not going to be a typical evangelism seminar. He asks the room a question, “How do we Christians lie ... How do we lie when evangelizing?”

At first the room is still and silent. It always starts silent when he asks this question. And then, once the question sinks in, hands dart up all over the room ... the thoughts and ideas jump from the seats more quickly than they can even collect them. It feels like most people have never considered the question before, and then, as they ponder it for the first time, the epiphanies naturally flow. It is like pure discovery in action.

Here is a short list, in no particular order, of seven of the ways that Tony is aware that he and others have lied (and still do) when they practice cross-spiritual communication. In Tony’s words:

1. We lie when we claim we are more confident than we really are. The culture of pretending within Christianity seems almost at an epidemic level. Many of us feel the need to hide our doubts and questions. We feel compelled to act like our faith life is totally satisfying, when in fact it often feels limited, dry, cold or numb. I think we also believe that our “witness” will be less powerful if we reveal a less than “perfect” religious experience. The funny thing is that the opposite is often true. Non-Christians are often drawn to stories of an authentic and even struggling faith.

2. We lie when we claim that unexplainable things are in fact explainable. God is transcendent and beyond even the shadowy wisps of imagination in our finite minds. The Trinity, for instance, is not as simple as a metaphor of water (ice, water, steam) or an egg (shell, white, yoke). Sometimes I think we would be better off if we just said, “These ideas are so beyond me that if God did reveal them to me, I am pretty sure my brain would explode.”

3. We lie when we don’t acknowledge our doubts within the drama of faith. This is similar to number one above but just on a more detailed level. When another person challenges us with a difficult theological/philosophical issue, sometimes it is best to just admit that those questions are very challenging and even emotionally taxing on the soul (I think people like to know that our faith is so important to us that it does impact our soul-state in both encouraging and difficult ways.) Difficult questions for me include: What is the destiny of people with no access to the true and loving message of Christ’s gospel? Where did evil come from? Why did God put this whole human story into motion when it has caused so much pain?

4. We lie when we pretend like the Bible doesn’t say some really nasty things when in fact it does. For instance, God commands genocide. He just does ... at least from a clear and honest reading of the Bible. There is also a verse that says, “Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks (Psalm 137:9).” If we want the Bible to be our document, we need to own the whole thing. (The same thing can be said for the atrocities in the story of the church, past and present.)

5. We lie when we claim we understand other beliefs, faiths and world-views. We need to stop saying things like, “I understand Islam,” or, “I know what a Muslim thinks/believes.” Do you want someone saying that they understand your faith experience because they once lived in a Greek Orthodox neighborhood? Do you think a Muslim would accurately understand your beliefs because they read a book about Christianity (particularly one written by Muslim scholars)? Belief systems are extremely diverse (heck, in Christianity there are hundreds of Protestant denominations alone, before we even talk about Orthodox, Coptic, Armenian, Syrian, Palestinian, just to scratch the surface). Other religions are just as diverse. Further more, faith experience can be as specific as a neighborhood, family or individual.

6. We lie when we claim that all of our beliefs are a “10”. This one is probably going to frustrate some people, but we are disingenuous when we claim all of our dogmas with equal veracity. To put it another way, on a scale of one to ten, not all Christian beliefs are a “10.” Do I believe in the historicity of a floating zoo? Yes I do. Do I hold to the specific details of that historic event with the same “lay my life on the line” conviction as I do the historical death on a cross and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth? No, I do not. The details of the zoo are not a 10 for me. Jesus is a 10.

7. Finally, and most importantly, we lie (insidious and barbaric lying) when we pretend like we really, really, really love the other person when in fact we don’t. We do not love people when we dismiss their story (including their hopes, values, beliefs and convictions). We do not love people when we do not empathetically listen to them, as opposed to spending that time formulating a counter-argument. We do not love others when we reduce them to labels, caricatures, or opponents. If we love, then we will find them shockingly beautiful and fascinating creations. We will find their stories riveting. We will radiate affection. Humans know deep down when they are or are not truly loved.

I would like to close with a different sort of lie. This is not a way that I lie, but instead a way that I was lied to. I was lied to by religious people. They told me that cross-spiritual communication is dangerous. It is dangerous because when I do it, there is a strong possibility that it will divide and the other person will become my enemy.

Well, in my experience sharing my faith around the world and in my post-Christian city, if we can share honestly, authentically and with humility, division does not happen. Instead, friendship happens.

Seven Lies Christians Tell In Evangelism

John 8:44

Tony Kriz has given an evangelism presentation he titles, “How to talk about your faith without being a total jerk.” Once everyone is settled in, they realize that this is not going to be a typical evangelism seminar. He asks the room a question, “How do we Christians lie ... How do we lie when evangelizing?”

At first the room is still and silent. It always starts silent when he asks this question. And then, once the question sinks in, hands dart up all over the room ... the thoughts and ideas jump from the seats more quickly than they can even collect them. It feels like most people have never considered the question before, and then, as they ponder it for the first time, the epiphanies naturally flow. It is like pure discovery in action.

Here is a short list, in no particular order, of seven of the ways that Tony is aware that he and others have lied (and still do) when they practice cross-spiritual communication. In Tony’s words:

1. We lie when we claim we are more confident than we really are. The culture of pretending within Christianity seems almost at an epidemic level. Many of us feel the need to hide our doubts and questions. We feel compelled to act like our faith life is totally satisfying, when in fact it often feels limited, dry, cold or numb. I think we also believe that our “witness” will be less powerful if we reveal a less than “perfect” religious experience. The funny thing is that the opposite is often true. Non-Christians are often drawn to stories of an authentic and even struggling faith.

2. We lie when we claim that unexplainable things are in fact explainable. God is transcendent and beyond even the shadowy wisps of imagination in our finite minds. The Trinity, for instance, is not as simple as a metaphor of water (ice, water, steam) or an egg (shell, white, yoke). Sometimes I think we would be better off if we just said, “These ideas are so beyond me that if God did reveal them to me, I am pretty sure my brain would explode.”

3. We lie when we don’t acknowledge our doubts within the drama of faith. This is similar to number one above but just on a more detailed level. When another person challenges us with a difficult theological/philosophical issue, sometimes it is best to just admit that those questions are very challenging and even emotionally taxing on the soul (I think people like to know that our faith is so important to us that it does impact our soul-state in both encouraging and difficult ways.) Difficult questions for me include: What is the destiny of people with no access to the true and loving message of Christ’s gospel? Where did evil come from? Why did God put this whole human story into motion when it has caused so much pain?

4. We lie when we pretend like the Bible doesn’t say some really nasty things when in fact it does. For instance, God commands genocide. He just does ... at least from a clear and honest reading of the Bible. There is also a verse that says, “Happy is the one who seizes your infants and dashes them against the rocks (Psalm 137:9).” If we want the Bible to be our document, we need to own the whole thing. (The same thing can be said for the atrocities in the story of the church, past and present.)

5. We lie when we claim we understand other beliefs, faiths and world-views. We need to stop saying things like, “I understand Islam,” or, “I know what a Muslim thinks/believes.” Do you want someone saying that they understand your faith experience because they once lived in a Greek Orthodox neighborhood? Do you think a Muslim would accurately understand your beliefs because they read a book about Christianity (particularly one written by Muslim scholars)? Belief systems are extremely diverse (heck, in Christianity there are hundreds of Protestant denominations alone, before we even talk about Orthodox, Coptic, Armenian, Syrian, Palestinian, just to scratch the surface). Other religions are just as diverse. Further more, faith experience can be as specific as a neighborhood, family or individual.

6. We lie when we claim that all of our beliefs are a “10”. This one is probably going to frustrate some people, but we are disingenuous when we claim all of our dogmas with equal veracity. To put it another way, on a scale of one to ten, not all Christian beliefs are a “10.” Do I believe in the historicity of a floating zoo? Yes I do. Do I hold to the specific details of that historic event with the same “lay my life on the line” conviction as I do the historical death on a cross and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth? No, I do not. The details of the zoo are not a 10 for me. Jesus is a 10.

7. Finally, and most importantly, we lie (insidious and barbaric lying) when we pretend like we really, really, really love the other person when in fact we don’t. We do not love people when we dismiss their story (including their hopes, values, beliefs and convictions). We do not love people when we do not empathetically listen to them, as opposed to spending that time formulating a counter-argument. We do not love others when we reduce them to labels, caricatures, or opponents. If we love, then we will find them shockingly beautiful and fascinating creations. We will find their stories riveting. We will radiate affection. Humans know deep down when they are or are not truly loved.

I would like to close with a different sort of lie. This is not a way that I lie, but instead a way that I was lied to. I was lied to by religious people. They told me that cross-spiritual communication is dangerous. It is dangerous because when I do it, there is a strong possibility that it will divide and the other person will become my enemy.

Well, in my experience sharing my faith around the world and in my post-Christian city, if we can share honestly, authentically and with humility, division does not happen. Instead, friendship happens.

Carter's "no Lie" Pledge

Mark 12:13

Claiming to be truthful sets you up to get shot at.

(Illustration of President Carter and "no lie" pledge.)

Claim to be honest, claim to have integrity, and you set yourself up to be shot at. Remember when Jimmy Carter said, "I won't lie to you"? A correspondent on the White House staff said that as soon as the president said that, a whole group of correspondents determined to prove that he lied. They weren't interested in anything else.

from The Ten Commandments: Playing by The Rules · Rev. Stuart Briscoe via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database lying

You Learn What Sells

Job 27:5

In the classroom setting of one Peanuts comic strip, on the first day of the new school year, the students were told to write an essay about returning to class. In her essay Lucy wrote, "Vacations are nice, but it's good to get back to school. There is nothing more satisfying or challenging than education, and I look forward to a year of expanding knowledge."

Needless to say, the teacher was pleased with Lucy and complimented her fine essay. In the final frame, Lucy leans over and whispers to Charlie Brown, "After a while, you learn what sells."

The temptation to say "what sells," that is, what others want to hear whether it is true or not, is always with us. When we give in to that temptation, what we really sell is the integrity of our soul. When we resist, Christ can say of us as he did of Nathaniel, "Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!" (John 1:47)

from Leadership · William M. Nieporte via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database integritylying

That Lightning Must Have Been Mighty Close

Job 36:32

A while back the Reader’s Digest had a story about the fear that a violent storm can create. The writer said he and some friends were golfing when suddenly the sky turned ominous. They were approaching the 4th hole when it began to rain hard.

Claps of thunder motivated them to seek shelter in a gazebo. As they reached it, a bolt of lightning hit a chain-link fence close by and it lit up like a neon sign.

The men were so shaken by it they didn’t say anything for a long time. Then one of them said, “You know that five I had on the first hole -- it really was a seven.”

Sometimes God’s judgment seems extra close.

________

Contributed by Robert L. Hodge

Readers Digest, May 1996, p. 135

from Rev. Jeff Strite's sermon "Surely This Was The Son of God," Kerux Sermon #20833 · Contributed by Robert L. Hodge via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database fearhonestylyingconfession

The Truth Alarm

John 8:44

You see them in motel rooms, most public buildings, and you should see them on the ceilings in your house - smoke detectors. Those little plastic monitoring devices that sound an obnoxious alarm when there's smoke in the room. Just ask me - I proved it the day I left my English muffin in the toaster oven too long. That smoke detector did its job - a job that can actually save lives. You want an alarm to go off when there's smoke in your house, especially if it's warning you about something that could do major damage.

Well, I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about "The Truth Alarm."

Years ago, I asked God to install a spiritual smoke detector in my heart - one that would go off inside me whenever I was saying something that was less than the truth. I think we all need an inner alarm like that. Because lies do so much damage if you don't put them out right away.

We tend to think of lying as, you know, a "lesser" sin. God doesn't. Listen to what He says in Proverbs 6, beginning with verse 16, our word for today from the Word of God. "There are six things the Lord hates, seven that are detestable to Him." What follows is God's hate list. Only one sin is mentioned twice in this list - "a lying tongue" and "a false witness that pours out lies." See, that lie you tell is very serious business. You're messing with something God detests.

When you lie, you violate the Ninth Commandment of God's sacred law. When you lie, you become an ally of the devil - because Jesus told us the devil is "the father of lies." (John 8:44) When you lie, you start a series of events that usually means more lies to cover up the lie and it means damage to relationships, reputations, respect - and, most certainly, your relationship with the God who hates lying.

We even tend to lie to ourselves about the fact that we are lying! We're just "exaggerating" or it's only a "white lie," whatever that is. But in God's book, you're lying whenever you're intending to deceive or mislead someone. That's why we need to ask God for that inner alarm that reminds us that we're saying something - or are about to say something - that is less than what God knows to be true.

Lying is so common that we can do it with little guilt or remorse. We lie to get ahead ... to get our way ... to get even ... to get out of a jam. The reason doesn't matter. God hates it. And He clearly commands: "Each of you must put off falsehood and speak truthfully to his neighbor." (Ephesians 4:25)

Deceiving ... lying ... distorting the truth - it starts a spiritual fire that can do so much damage and actually end up consuming you. But inside you lives the Holy Spirit of God who Jesus called "the Spirit of truth" (John 15:26) - and He is your inner alarm system to let you know when you've crossed from what's real into what's false. Ask Him to ring it loud whenever you're about to let something less than the truth cross your lips. We've become desensitized to lying. We need God Himself to awaken our calloused conscience and not let us get away with anything less than the truth.

Telling the truth may hurt. But it can never do as much damage as not telling the truth. Because our God hates lying.

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4040 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database lyingtruthhonesty

Radical Honesty

Job 6:25

Brad Blanton, founder of a movement called Radical Honesty, is swirling a drink as he sits by a fire in his rural Virginia home, telling me why it’s important to live without lies. “You’ll have really bad times, you’ll have really great times,” he says, “but you’ll contribute to other people because you haven’t been dancing on eggshells your whole life.”

Radical Honesty is based on a simple premise. Blanton, a 69-year-old psychotherapist, claims that everyone would be happier if we just stopped lying, if we just told the truth, all the time. That would be radical in itself, of course — a world without fibs. But Blanton goes further. He says we should toss out all the filters between our brains and our mouths. If you think it, say it. Confess to your boss your secret plans to start your own company. If you’re having fantasies about your wife’s sister, Blanton says to tell your wife and tell her sister. To him, it’s the only path to authentic relationships, the only way to smash through modernity’s soul-deadening alienation. Oversharing? No such thing.

Yes. I know. One of the most idiotic ideas ever: Deceit makes our world go round. Without lies, marriages would crumble, workers would be fired, egos would be shattered, governments would collapse.

And yet ... maybe there’s something to it. Maybe a couple of weeks of truth-telling would do me good.

Blanton, in person, isn’t the bully I expect. He’s a former Texan with a big laugh and a big voice. He calls himself “white trash with a Ph.D.” Twice he’s run for Congress, on the novel platform that he’d be an honest politician. In 2004, he ran as an independent and won a surprising 25 percent of the vote in his Virginia district.

Blanton’s movement is at least sizable, if not huge. He has sold 175,000 books in 11 languages and has 25 trainers assisting workshops and running practice groups around the country.

“Do you think it’s ever okay to lie?” I ask.

“I advocate never lying in personal relationships. But if you have Anne Frank in your attic and a Nazi knocks on the door, lie. I lie to any government official. I lie to the IRS. I always take more deductions than are justified.”

Upon my return to New York, I immediately set about delaying my experiment. When you’re with Blanton, you think, Yes, I can do this! The truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. But when I get back to bosses and fragile friendships, I continue my lying ways.

“How’s Radical Honesty going?” my boss asks. “It’s okay,” I lie. In fact, not until my boss says he needs the story ASAP do I get serious about the project.

The next day, my wife, Julie, and I get a visit from Julie’s dad and stepmom. “Did you get the birthday gift I sent you? Did you like it?” asks her stepmom. “Not really. I don’t like gift certificates,” I say. “It’s like you’re giving me an errand to run.”

Once again, I feel the thrill of inappropriate candor. And I feel something else, too. The paradoxical joy of being free from choice. I had no choice but to tell the truth. I didn’t have to rack my brain figuring out how to hedge it, spin it, massage it. “Just being honest.” I shrug. Nice touch, I decide; helps take the edge off. She’s got thick skin. She’ll be okay. And I’ll tell you this: I’ll never get a stupid gift certificate from her again.

By the end of the week, I’ve slashed my routine lying by at least 40 percent.

One thing becomes quickly apparent, though: There’s a fine line between Radical Honesty and creepiness. It’s simple logic: Men think about sex every three minutes, as the scientists at Redbook remind us. If you speak whatever’s on your mind, you’ll be talking about sex every three minutes.

I have a business breakfast with an editor from Rachael Ray’s magazine. As we’re sitting together, I tell her that I remember what she wore the first time we met and that I’d try to sleep with her if I were single.

The thing is, the separate cubbyholes of my personality are merging. Usually, there’s a professional self, a home self, a friend self, a with-the-guys self. Now it’s one big improper mess. Either this woman and I have taken a step forward in our relationship, or she’ll never return my calls again.

While getting my hair cut, I stop my barber short when he starts telling me how he doesn’t want his wife to get pregnant. “You know, I’m tired. I have a cold. I don’t want to talk anymore. I want to read.” “Okay,” he says, wielding his scissors, “go ahead and read.” Later, I do the same thing with my in-laws when they’re yapping on about preschools. “I’m bored,” I announce. “I’ll be back later.” And with that, I leave the living room.

Radical Honesty can save a whole lot of time.

My break with Blanton’s philosophy comes soon enough. A friend of a friend wrote some poems and sent them to me. This was an older man. His wife had just died, and he’d taken up poetry. He just wanted someone “in publishing” to read his work, and though I didn’t like the poems much, I wrote to him that I thought they were very good.

I confess my lie in an e-mail to Blanton, then ask if I made a mistake. Blanton responds curtly, advising me to “send the man the e-mail you sent me and ask him to call you when he gets it.”

Show him the e-mail? Is he kidding? In his book RADICAL HONESTY, Blanton advises us to start sentences with the words “I resent you for” or “I appreciate you for.” So I write back to him: “I resent you for giving me the advice to break that old man’s heart.”

Blanton responds quickly. First, he doesn’t like that I expressed my resentment by e-mail. He expects resentment to be expressed in person so that “you can stay with” the person you resent “until the sensations arise and recede and then get back to neutral — which is what forgiveness is.” Second, he tells me that telling the old man the truth would be compassionate. “Your lie is not useful to him. In fact, it is simply avoiding your responsibility as one human being to another.”

I try to understand Blanton’s point about compassion, and I will concede that my e-mail to the old man was wrong. I shouldn’t have been so rah-rah effusive. But I’ve hit the outer limit of Radical Honesty, a hard wall. I can’t trash the old man.

I call Blanton several days later to tell him I intend to end my experiment. “You’re going to start lying again?” he asks. “Yeah,” I say, then concede, “But I’m going to lie less than I did before.”

I can say this for Radical Honesty. Whenever I am radically honest, people become radically honest themselves. In fact, all my relationships could take a whole lot more truth than I expected.

But the giddiness I experienced at first wore off pretty quickly. A life of Radical Honesty is filled with a hundred confrontations every day. They’re small, but relentless. “Yes, I’ll come to your office, but I resent you for making me travel.” “My boss said I should invite you to this meeting, although it wouldn’t have occurred to me to do so.” At one point, my wife told me a story about switching operating systems on her computer. In the middle, I had to go help our son with something, then forgot to come back. “Do you want to hear the end of the story or not?” Julie asked. “Well ... is there a payoff?” I asked. She cursed at me.

________

Adapted from the book THE GUINEA PIG DIARIES by A.J. Jacobs. ©2009 by A.J. Jacobs. Used with permission of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

from The Week Magazine · A. J. Jacobs; edited by David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database lyingtruth

The Devious Art of Lying By Telling The Truth

Luke 22:31

It is no secret that politicians often lie, but consider this ­– they can do so simply by telling the truth. Confused?

That statement becomes clearer when you realise that we’ve probably all done it. A classic example might be if your mum asks if you’ve finished your homework and you respond: “I’ve written an essay on Tennessee Williams for my English class.” This may be true, but it doesn’t actually answer the question about whether your homework was done. That essay could have been written long ago and you have misled your poor mother with a truthful statement. You might not have even started your homework yet.

Misleading by “telling the truth” is so pervasive in daily life that a new term has recently been coined to describe it: paltering. That it is so widespread in society now gives us more insight into the grey area between truth and lies, and perhaps even why we lie at all.

We lie all the time, despite the fact that it costs us considerably more mental effort to lie than to tell the truth. U.S. president Abraham Lincoln once said that “no man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar”.

In 1996 one researcher, Bella DePaulo even put a figure on it. She found that each of us lies about once or twice a day. She discovered this by asking participants for one week to note down each time they lied, even if they did so with a good intention. Out of the 147 participants in her original study, only seven said they didn’t lie at all - and we can only guess if they were telling the truth.

Many of the lies were fairly innocent, or even kind, such as: “I told her that she looked good when I thought that she looked like a blimp.” Some were to hide embarrassment, such as pretending a spouse had not been fired. DePaulo, a psychologist at the University of California Santa Barbara, says that the participants in her study were not aware of how many lies they told, partly because most were so “ordinary and so expected that we just don’t notice them”.

It is when individuals use lies to manipulate others or to purposely mislead that it is more worrying. And this happens more often than you might think.

When Todd Rogers and his colleagues were looking at how often politicians dodge questions during debates they realised something else was going on. By stating another truthful fact, they could get out of answering a question. They could even imply something was truthful when it was not. Politicians do this all the time, says Rogers, a behavioural scientist at Harvard Kennedy School. He and colleagues therefore set out to understand more about it.

He found that paltering was an extremely common tactic of negotiation. Over half the 184 business executives in his study admitted to using the tactic. The research also found that the person doing the paltering believed it was more ethical than lying outright.

The individuals who had been deceived, however, did not distinguish between lying and paltering. “It probably leads to too much paltering as communicators think that when disclosed, it will be somewhat ethical, whereas listeners see it as a lie,” says Rogers.

It is also difficult to spot a misleading “fact” when we hear something that on the face of it, sounds true. For instance, the United Kingdom’s Labour Party campaign video to lower the voting age said: “You’re 16. Now you can get married, join the Army, work full-time.” The BBC’s reality check team discovered that these facts do not tell the whole truth.

“You can only join the Army aged 16 or 17 with your parents’ permission,” the Reality Check team wrote. “At that age you also need your parents’ permission to get married unless you do so in Scotland. Since 2013, 16 and 17-year-olds cannot work full-time in England, but can in the other three home nations with some restrictions.”

In another example, the then-presidential-nominee Donald Trump paltered during the presidential debates. He was questioned about a housing discrimination lawsuit early on in his career and stated that his company had given “no admission of guilt”. While they may not have admitted it, an investigation by the New York Times found that his company did discriminate based on race.

And even if we do spot misleading truths, social norms can prevent us from challenging whether or not they are deceptive. Take a now infamous interview in the United Kingdom, where journalist Jeremy Paxman interviewed the politician Michael Howard (pictured below). He repeatedly asks Howard whether he “threatened to overrule” the then prisons governor. Howard in turn, continues to evade the question with other facts in a bizarre exchange that becomes increasingly awkward to watch. Not many of us are comfortable challenging someone in that way.

While it’s common in politics, so too is it in everyday life. Consider the estate agent who tells a potential buyer that an unpopular property has had “lots of enquiries” when asked how many actual bids there have been. Or the used car salesman who says a car started up extremely well on a frosty morning, without disclosing that it broke down the week before. Both statements are true but mask the reality of the unpopular property and the dodgy car.

Paltering is perhaps so commonplace because it is seen as a useful tool. It happens because we constantly have so many competing goals, suggests Rogers. “We want to achieve our narrow objective – [selling a house or car] – but we also want people to see us as ethical and honest.” He says these two goals are in tension and by paltering, people believe they are being more ethical than outright lying. “We show evidence they are making a mistake,” says Rogers.

We can see the problems this sort of thinking can cause reflected in society today. The public are clearly sick of being lied to and trust in politicians is plummeting. One 2016 poll found that the British public trust politicians less than estate agents, bankers and journalists.

And despite the fact that we now frequently expect lies from those in power, it remains challenging to spot them in real time, especially so if they lie by paltering. Psychologist Robert Feldman, author of The Liar in Your Life, sees this as worrying both on a personal and on a macro level. “When we’re lied to by people in power, it ruins our confidence in political institutions – it makes the population very cynical about [their] real motivations.”

Lying can and does clearly serve a devious social purpose. It can help someone paint a better picture than the truth, or help a politician dodge an uncomfortable question. “It’s unethical and it makes our democracy worse. But it’s how human cognition works,” says Rogers.

Unfortunately, the prevalence of lies might stem from the way we are brought up. Lies play a role in our social interactions from a very young age. We tell young children about tooth fairies and Santa, or encourage a child to be grateful for an unwanted present. “We give our kids very mixed messages,” says Feldman. “What they ultimately learn is that even though honesty is the best policy, it’s also at times fine and preferable to lie about things.”

So next time you hear a fact that sounds odd, or someone to be deflecting a question, be aware that what you think is the truth may very well be deceptive.

Doing Evil That Good May Come

Romans 3:7

“For if the truth of God has increased through my lie to His glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner? And [why] not [say], ‘Let us do evil that good may come’? — as we are slanderously reported and as some affirm that we say. Their condemnation is just.” (Romans 3:7-8 NKJV)

Doing evil that good may come

• Truth — veracity

• Abounded [increased] — was enhanced

• Lie — unfaithfulness, sin

• Judged — condemned, punished

• Sinner — case supposed is this, that because good has been brought out of evil, the evil-doer should not be punished

• And…say — since out of evil, good has been extracted

• Do…come ? — Rom 6:1, 15 — if we do good, good will come of it: if we do evil, good is brought out of it: therefore it matters not what we do, since all will come right in the end

• Whose [Their]…just — just must be the condemnation of all who act on such a principle, and talk in such a way

Whose damnation is just — Rev. T. Robinson

I. What is meant by damnation

1. Judgment

2. Condemnation

3. Punishment

II. The damnation of all the impenitent is just, especially where there is

1. A wicked will to choose evil

2. A wicked wit to justify it

Justification.— In a conversation which the Rev. Mr. Innes had with an infidel on his sick bed he told him that when he was taken ill, he thought he would rely on the general mercy of God; that as he never had done anything very bad, he hoped all would be well. “But as my weakness increased,” he added, “I began to think, is not God a just Being as well as merciful? Now, what reason have I to think He will treat me with mercy, and not with justice; and if I am treated with justice,” he said, with much emotion, “where am I?” “I showed him,” says Mr. Innes, “that this was the very difficulty the Gospel was sent to remove, as it showed how mercy could be exercised in perfect consistency with the strictest demands of justice, while it was bestowed through the atonement made by Jesus Christ. After explaining this doctrine, and pressing it on his attention and acceptance, one of the last things he said to me, before leaving him, was, ‘Well I believe it must come to this. I confess I here see a solid footing to rest on, which, on my former principles, I could never find.’”

“I know not which is worse; the bearer of tales, or the receiver; for the one makes the other. We should no less hate to tell, than to hear slanders. If we cannot stop others' mouths, let us stop our own ears. The receiver is as bad as the thief.” — Bishop Henshaw

“God is as true in His threatenings as He is in His promises. Let us fear the threatening, that we may not feel it.”

from The Biblical Museum (1883) - A Compendium of Quotations and Illustrations · James Cowper Gray, Editor via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database lyingslander

Everyday Miracles: the Innerchange Program

John 3:3

Thirteen years ago, James Corder was convicted of murdering his stepmother and was sent to prison in Iowa. From the beginning, Corder insisted they had the wrong man -- a claim his family fervently believed.

Then James signed up for the InnerChange Freedom Initiative, one of the prisons Prison Fellowship actually runs as a Christian institution -- the story of which was featured in prime time at the Republican National Convention 2000 in Philadelphia.

Prison Fellowship opened the first InnerChange prison three years ago outside of Houston. The 18-month regimen is far from easy. Inmates, all of whom volunteer for the program, get up at 5 in the morning for devotions. Then they spend their day working at their jobs, or studying for their high school equivalency exams. They also attend classes to develop life skills and to gain spiritual maturity. Evenings are filled with more classes and discipleship seminars that run until 10 p.m. -- no TV, no wasted time.

During Phase 2 of the program, inmates perform community service, and they're encouraged to repent and to make restitution to their victims. Prisoners are then matched with volunteers from area churches who mentor them during their remaining time in prison. Each mentor spends at least six months after the inmate's release, helping him adjust back into the community.

Three months after James Corder signed up for the second program we started, in Newton, Iowa, he found he could no longer live with himself. As Jack Cowley, IFI's national director put it, "James felt the Lord was telling him that if he was going to stay in the program, he would have to stop living a lie. He had to tell his parents he DID stab his stepmother to death."

That was not easy, for after 13 years of lying, James was concerned about how his parents would react. He asked his fellow inmates to pray with him. When he told his parents the truth, they were indeed shocked, as he expected. But they told James they would continue to love and support him.

Well, that confession had a tremendous impact on his fellow inmates. Jack Cowley says, "These were men who wanted to change their lives through Christ, but had no idea what a life in Christ looked like. And here's a lifer who showed a dramatic proof of the reality of Christ. He's a role model."

One of many, I might add. I've been in Iowa and Houston several times. I've met lifers who praised the Lord that they're in prison so that they can witness for Christ. I've met hardened criminals, including some six-time losers, who have been transformed totally. I've met men who turned down parole -- imagine that -- so that they could stay in the prison and complete the program.

Do faith-based solutions work? Well, take a look at Houston for an answer. Recidivism in America's prisons is over 70 percent. But in the three years we've run the prison in Houston, 47 men have completed the full 18 months and are now out, in church, at work, and matched with mentors. And NOT ONE is back in custody.

This is a wonderful testimony to share with those who wonder if faith-based solutions really work. The answer is, "Yes, they do!" And the time has come to replace inefficient government programs with faith-based answers.

Not only do these programs work, they afford Christians a great opportunity to show the world the power of our risen Lord.

___________________

Copyright (c) 2000 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database honestylyingconfession

Read Mark 17

Luke 22:31

A minister told his congregation, "Next week I plan to preach about the sin of lying. To help you understand my sermon, I want you all to read Mark 17."

The following Sunday, as he prepared to deliver his sermon, the minister asked for a show of hands. He wanted to know how many had read Mark 17. Almost every hand went up. The minister smiled and said, "Mark has only sixteen chapters. I will now proceed with my sermon on the sin of lying."

from Email · Submitted by Rev. Dick Lewis via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database lying

Radical Honesty

Job 6:25

Brad Blanton, founder of a movement called Radical Honesty, is swirling a drink as he sits by a fire in his rural Virginia home, telling me why it’s important to live without lies. “You’ll have really bad times, you’ll have really great times,” he says, “but you’ll contribute to other people because you haven’t been dancing on eggshells your whole life.”

Radical Honesty is based on a simple premise. Blanton, a 69-year-old psychotherapist, claims that everyone would be happier if we just stopped lying, if we just told the truth, all the time. That would be radical in itself, of course — a world without fibs. But Blanton goes further. He says we should toss out all the filters between our brains and our mouths. If you think it, say it. Confess to your boss your secret plans to start your own company. If you’re having fantasies about your wife’s sister, Blanton says to tell your wife and tell her sister. To him, it’s the only path to authentic relationships, the only way to smash through modernity’s soul-deadening alienation. Oversharing? No such thing.

Yes. I know. One of the most idiotic ideas ever: Deceit makes our world go round. Without lies, marriages would crumble, workers would be fired, egos would be shattered, governments would collapse.

And yet ... maybe there’s something to it. Maybe a couple of weeks of truth-telling would do me good.

Blanton, in person, isn’t the bully I expect. He’s a former Texan with a big laugh and a big voice. He calls himself “white trash with a Ph.D.” Twice he’s run for Congress, on the novel platform that he’d be an honest politician. In 2004, he ran as an independent and won a surprising 25 percent of the vote in his Virginia district.

Blanton’s movement is at least sizable, if not huge. He has sold 175,000 books in 11 languages and has 25 trainers assisting workshops and running practice groups around the country.

“Do you think it’s ever okay to lie?” I ask.

“I advocate never lying in personal relationships. But if you have Anne Frank in your attic and a Nazi knocks on the door, lie. I lie to any government official. I lie to the IRS. I always take more deductions than are justified.”

Upon my return to New York, I immediately set about delaying my experiment. When you’re with Blanton, you think, Yes, I can do this! The truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth. But when I get back to bosses and fragile friendships, I continue my lying ways.

“How’s Radical Honesty going?” my boss asks. “It’s okay,” I lie. In fact, not until my boss says he needs the story ASAP do I get serious about the project.

The next day, my wife, Julie, and I get a visit from Julie’s dad and stepmom. “Did you get the birthday gift I sent you? Did you like it?” asks her stepmom. “Not really. I don’t like gift certificates,” I say. “It’s like you’re giving me an errand to run.”

Once again, I feel the thrill of inappropriate candor. And I feel something else, too. The paradoxical joy of being free from choice. I had no choice but to tell the truth. I didn’t have to rack my brain figuring out how to hedge it, spin it, massage it. “Just being honest.” I shrug. Nice touch, I decide; helps take the edge off. She’s got thick skin. She’ll be okay. And I’ll tell you this: I’ll never get a stupid gift certificate from her again.

By the end of the week, I’ve slashed my routine lying by at least 40 percent.

One thing becomes quickly apparent, though: There’s a fine line between Radical Honesty and creepiness. It’s simple logic: Men think about sex every three minutes, as the scientists at Redbook remind us. If you speak whatever’s on your mind, you’ll be talking about sex every three minutes.

I have a business breakfast with an editor from Rachael Ray’s magazine. As we’re sitting together, I tell her that I remember what she wore the first time we met and that I’d try to sleep with her if I were single.

The thing is, the separate cubbyholes of my personality are merging. Usually, there’s a professional self, a home self, a friend self, a with-the-guys self. Now it’s one big improper mess. Either this woman and I have taken a step forward in our relationship, or she’ll never return my calls again.

While getting my hair cut, I stop my barber short when he starts telling me how he doesn’t want his wife to get pregnant. “You know, I’m tired. I have a cold. I don’t want to talk anymore. I want to read.” “Okay,” he says, wielding his scissors, “go ahead and read.” Later, I do the same thing with my in-laws when they’re yapping on about preschools. “I’m bored,” I announce. “I’ll be back later.” And with that, I leave the living room.

Radical Honesty can save a whole lot of time.

My break with Blanton’s philosophy comes soon enough. A friend of a friend wrote some poems and sent them to me. This was an older man. His wife had just died, and he’d taken up poetry. He just wanted someone “in publishing” to read his work, and though I didn’t like the poems much, I wrote to him that I thought they were very good.

I confess my lie in an e-mail to Blanton, then ask if I made a mistake. Blanton responds curtly, advising me to “send the man the e-mail you sent me and ask him to call you when he gets it.”

Show him the e-mail? Is he kidding? In his book RADICAL HONESTY, Blanton advises us to start sentences with the words “I resent you for” or “I appreciate you for.” So I write back to him: “I resent you for giving me the advice to break that old man’s heart.”

Blanton responds quickly. First, he doesn’t like that I expressed my resentment by e-mail. He expects resentment to be expressed in person so that “you can stay with” the person you resent “until the sensations arise and recede and then get back to neutral — which is what forgiveness is.” Second, he tells me that telling the old man the truth would be compassionate. “Your lie is not useful to him. In fact, it is simply avoiding your responsibility as one human being to another.”

I try to understand Blanton’s point about compassion, and I will concede that my e-mail to the old man was wrong. I shouldn’t have been so rah-rah effusive. But I’ve hit the outer limit of Radical Honesty, a hard wall. I can’t trash the old man.

I call Blanton several days later to tell him I intend to end my experiment. “You’re going to start lying again?” he asks. “Yeah,” I say, then concede, “But I’m going to lie less than I did before.”

I can say this for Radical Honesty. Whenever I am radically honest, people become radically honest themselves. In fact, all my relationships could take a whole lot more truth than I expected.

But the giddiness I experienced at first wore off pretty quickly. A life of Radical Honesty is filled with a hundred confrontations every day. They’re small, but relentless. “Yes, I’ll come to your office, but I resent you for making me travel.” “My boss said I should invite you to this meeting, although it wouldn’t have occurred to me to do so.” At one point, my wife told me a story about switching operating systems on her computer. In the middle, I had to go help our son with something, then forgot to come back. “Do you want to hear the end of the story or not?” Julie asked. “Well ... is there a payoff?” I asked. She cursed at me.

________

Adapted from the book THE GUINEA PIG DIARIES by A.J. Jacobs. ©2009 by A.J. Jacobs. Used with permission of Simon & Schuster, Inc.

from The Week Magazine · A. J. Jacobs; edited by David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database lyingtruth

That Lightning Must Have Been Mighty Close

Job 36:32

A while back the Reader’s Digest had a story about the fear that a violent storm can create. The writer said he and some friends were golfing when suddenly the sky turned ominous. They were approaching the 4th hole when it began to rain hard.

Claps of thunder motivated them to seek shelter in a gazebo. As they reached it, a bolt of lightning hit a chain-link fence close by and it lit up like a neon sign.

The men were so shaken by it they didn’t say anything for a long time. Then one of them said, “You know that five I had on the first hole -- it really was a seven.”

Sometimes God’s judgment seems extra close.

________

Contributed by Robert L. Hodge

Readers Digest, May 1996, p. 135

from Rev. Jeff Strite's sermon "Surely This Was The Son of God," Kerux Sermon #20833 · Contributed by Robert L. Hodge via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database fearhonestylyingconfession

Professor who lied to give up course

Pulitzer Prize-winning historian Joseph J. Ellis, who made false claims in classes and interviews that he served in Vietnam, will give up the American culture course he teaches at Mount Holyoke College.

College spokesman Kevin McCaffrey said Tuesday that Ellis, 57, chose to give up the class.

In a brief statement, Mount Holyoke President Joanne V. Creighton expressed regret about Ellis' misrepresentation, but stopped short of criticizing him. She did not say whether Ellis would be disciplined for the deceptions.

"I too deeply regret the effect of his misrepresentation on students, colleagues, and the public," the statement said.

Ellis apologized for the Vietnam misrepresentations after The Boston Globe disclosed Monday that he had falsely claimed to have served in Vietnam with the 101st Airborne Division. He also had claimed in interviews that his experience in Vietnam motivated him to join the anti-war movement.

Creighton and Ellis both refused to be interviewed.

Ellis also taught a course on the literature of the Vietnam War at nearby Amherst College. Three students there told the Globe that Ellis talked about his Vietnam experiences in that class.

The Amherst class is not scheduled for the next academic year. Amherst officials have not commented on Ellis' misrepresentations in that school's classrooms.

Ellis won the Pulitzer Prize in April for his book "Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation.

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate