Menu

241 Sermon Illustrations on Resurrection

241 illustrations Page 5 of 5

Resurrection in Christian preaching signifies the victory over death and the promise of eternal life through Christ's rising (1 Corinthians 15:20-22). Illustrations often use images of life restored after long death, personal encounters affirming Christ's living presence, and the unstoppable divine power that secures resurrection despite opposition (John 11:25). This theme encourages faith that death is but a sleep before awakening to new life.

Confessions

1 Thessalonians 4:14

The earliest creeds of the Christian church confess that Jesus “suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried.” “On the third day,” it is then confessed, “he rose again.”(1) While modern presuppositions may lead us to interpret the language surrounding the death and resurrection of Jesus as symbolic or merely spiritual in nature, there is nothing abstract about the details confessed by those who first beheld them. Jesus's suffering was a datable event in history, his crucifixion a sentence inflicted on an actual body. Likewise, “the third day” was a tangible, historical occasion -- albeit an occasion of unfathomable proportions.

Yet the resurrection of Jesus was clearly not viewed as a static fact, a fixed event for history alone. “We believe that Jesus died and rose again” said the apostle Paul, “AND SO WE BELIEVE that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him” (1 Thessalonians 4:14, emphasis mine). For those who first beheld it, the resurrection was an event with inherent consequences. The earliest confessions of this death, burial, and third day are immediately followed by certain understood implications.

In the eyes of Jesus's contemporaries, the resurrection verified his ties with the Father and his claims to divine authority. This rabbi who was accused of blasphemy for calling himself equal to God was now shown by God to be speaking the truth. Far from the rebel Jesus was accused of being, the risen one and his claims to the Father were in one instant visibly and unmistakably confirmed by the God of Israel. “For God raised him from the dead” writes Paul in 1 Thessalonians 1:10.

Thus, the resurrection was recognized as being far more than a one time event. For if “God raised Jesus from the dead,” as this unlikely Jewish believer testified, then history offers a glimpse of God's movement among us. Beyond vindicating and verifying Christ's ministry, the resurrection also provides the ground for interpreting Christ's life in light of every prior act and Word of God. The prophet's words, like the whole of Scripture, take on new dimensions: “On the third day he will restore us, that we may live in his presence” (Hosea 6:2). The resurrection directs us back to the life of Christ, to the movement of God in history, and offers a glimpse of the uniting purpose of a redemptive God.

For those who first confessed it, the identity of the risen Jesus was a pronouncement of divine authority, wisdom, and messiahship. As one New Testament scholar observes, “[F]or Paul and probably for most early Christians, it was precisely the resurrection of Jesus which declared that he was lord, saviour, and judge, and that Caesar was not.”(2) But the risen Jesus was also a pronouncement that it was God's very Son who had come among us. “In that day you will know that I am in my Father, and you in me, and I in you” (John 14:20). The Living God of Israel who acted in confirmation of Jesus's life and ministry was also acting THROUGH Jesus in accordance with his ancient promise. In the death and resurrection, human history became the setting in which God's final assurance of victory over sin and death was once for all established. The resurrection poured instant light on all that preceded it, and in turn illumined all that is coming.

As Paul writes, “If only for this life only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are to be pitied more than all men. But Christ has INDEED been raised from the dead, the first-fruits of those who have fallen asleep” (1 Corinthians 15:19-20). In the eyes of Jesus's beholders, the resurrection had clear implications for the future -- for our own bodies, lives, and deaths.

Knowing Christ and the power of his resurrection we know the rest of the story, even as we wait eagerly for the day we shall see face to face. From this expectant perspective, we continue to discover what it means to confess: I BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST, GOD'S ONLY SON, OUR LORD. HE WAS CRUCIFIED, DIED, AND WAS BURIED. AND ON THE THIRD DAY HE ROSE AGAIN.

________

1. Excerpts from the Apostles' Creed. Similar wording is found in both the Nicene Creed and the Creed of Athanasius.

2. N.T. Wright, THE RESURRECTION OF THE SON OF GOD, (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003), 371.

________

Copyright © 2006 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

The Last Enemy

John 11

The Chambers English Dictionary defines death as “the final cessation of all the vital functions.” No matter who we are, what we have accomplished, how much money we have, or what our position in life, death comes to us all. The truth seems a harsh reality: in the midst of life we are in death. By the time you have finished reading this, about a billion cells in your body will have died, and approximately sixty people in the United Kingdom will have made the final journey to the undiscovered country.

Despite the fact that death fills many of us with uncertainty, fear, and even dread, deep down most of us cannot believe in our own mortality. In some way we are convinced that we shall live on. Remarkably, atheists too can have a vague conviction in this matter. “While my personality may not live on,” some say, “my spirit or essence might. I may be reincarnated or reconstituted, or even join other spirits!” For most of us, the idea that the person we know as “I” will no longer be goes against all our instincts.

Whatever we believe, one thing is certain: Death comes to us all. Finally the clock will stop ticking, and the enemy we have sought to outrun with medicine, exercise, diets, and cosmetic surgery will overtake us. The question is, what happens next?

There has been only one person in human history who not only claimed to be able to defy death and win, but was seen by hundreds to be raised from the dead, never to die again. The only exception to our ultimate statistic is Jesus Christ, the conqueror of death. One of his most famous sayings concerns death itself: “I am the resurrection and the life. Those who believe in me, even though they die, will live” (John 11:25-26).

I find no sight more distressing than a funeral where there is no hope, only despair and sorrow. Jesus had arrived at just such a place of mourning when he said these words, and shortly afterwards he raised a man named Lazarus from the dead, demonstrating divine authority over death itself (John 11:1ff.). Later in life Lazarus died again, but Jesus was raised and ascended into heaven in a body that had defied death; he was not just a spirit, thus making resurrection claims falsifiable.

If the resurrection of Jesus took place, it is not only the supreme fact of history, but the ultimate proof that he is God and Christianity is true. The resurrection is the great authenticator! If Christ is raised, then the curse is broken. God had pronounced over rebellious people back in the Garden, “you are dust, and to dust you shall return” (Genesis 3:19). We have seen this ever since, as we scatter the ashes of dead loved ones, to be picked up by the wind or absorbed into the soil. It can all seem so hopeless. But if Christ is the great exception, if his words are true, if he can give life eternal to those who come to him, then sorrow is at an end, the fear of death and the grave is broken, death’s harvest has been ruined, and we are free!

Perhaps this very issue led one atheist Professor to say, “The most important question in the world is did Christ rise from the dead?” No question is more important, because, if the resurrection is true, we dare not fail to acknowledge its implications. If it is not true, and Christ is still in his grave, then the last enemy, death, remains undefeated, the darkness of the tomb is all there is, and Christ is proven a liar.

But considering all he said and did, from his promise of life to healing the sick and raising others who had died, is Christ’s resurrection really as incredible as it may sound? If the events in the Gospels took place, then is it unbelievable that Jesus defeated death itself? Perhaps the greater mystery is how divinity could die. Jesus sits uniquely in a class of his own. The resurrection was inevitable; death and the grave could not hold him.

________

From SEARCHING FOR TRUTH by Joe Boot, © 2002. Used by permission of Crossway Books, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers, Wheaton, IL 60187, www.crossway.com.

Copyright © 2006 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Garnering Proof

Mark 9:24

In his book A CASE AGAINST CHRISTIANITY, atheist philosopher Michael Martin observes, “A person full of religious zeal may see what he or she wants to see, not what is really there.”(1) Ironically, this argument is equally true for the atheist. But what if we were to look at that statement in light of the first believers of Christianity -- the men that devotedly proclaimed the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ? Is it possible that they were seeing only what they wanted to see? Is it possible that they simply created a story they wanted to believe?

Many who attack the documents of Scripture explain that these men, having seen their leader brutally crucified and longing to believe that he was still with them, merely experienced hallucinations of the resurrected Christ. Others argue that the disciples purposely created the resurrection story so that they could continue propagating the myth that Jesus was the Messiah. There are many theories. But as Martin alludes, one must sort thoroughly through the evidence before pronouncing the verdict.

And in fact, the claim for hallucination logically breaks itself down. For by their very nature, hallucinations are individual, subjective experiences of one person at one time. And this simply cannot explain the multiple sightings of Christ, by multiple individuals at the same time. It stands to reason, the disciples either knowingly fabricated the claim of Christ’s resurrection or they truly saw the resurrected Christ.

One thing is historically incontestable: the disciples went to their deaths proclaiming the resurrected Christ. And it is here that it seems we are left with common sense questions. For if the disciples agreed to propagate a story, having even the slightest bit of intelligence, wouldn’t they have thought to conceive something less remarkable -- perhaps a story that would accommodate the arguments they would undoubtedly face? Why wouldn’t they have come up with something unfalsifiable? If they would have only claimed that Jesus had SPIRITUALLY risen again, how would the antagonists have proven them false? And in so doing, they would not have to worry about hiding the body or about what would happen to them if the body was ever discovered. Furthermore, if the disciples agreed to propagate a story, when standing up for these falsified claims became a matter of life and death wouldn’t at least a few of them have buckled?

But the disciples did not say that Jesus spiritually rose from the dead, and nor did they back down when the time came to stake their lives on it. They took the dangerous road -- indeed, the inconceivable road -- and they not only went to great lengths to proclaim that Jesus bodily rose from the dead, but they went to their deaths proclaiming it was true. Now why would they risk everything proclaiming the actual, physical resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead if they knew it was a lie?

Resurrection is difficult to imagine, but it is hard to deny the circumstantial evidence is anything short of staggering. What do you do with this? Perhaps we respond as one man facing the astounding reality of Jesus Christ once responded, “Lord I believe, help my unbelief” (Mark 9:24). For it is logical to conclude the disciples did not take the easier road because they were NOT trying to fabricate something.

The implications of the resurrection of Christ are both incredibly far-reaching and immensely personal. If Jesus is alive, his words are more than good ideas, his life more than moral teaching, his kingdom greater than I realize, and his forgiveness a gift I cannot fathom. In fact, he is a person I would wary of living without.

________

1. Michael Martin, A CASE AGAINST CHRISTIANITY (Philadelphia: Temple Press, 1991), 75.

________

Copyright © 2006 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Life and Resurrection

John 11:25

I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: and whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. — John 11:25, 26.

At the coming of the Lord which is at hand many believers will be alive. To all such Christ shall come as “The Life,” changing their bodies into His own very likeness. “We shall be changed” (I Cor. 15:52). On the other hand, many will be asleep, that is dead (cf. John 11:11). To such Christ comes as “The ,Resurrection,” raising up the body in glory. Then all in one great company shall be caught up in the clouds into the air, where we shall meet the Lord (I Thess. 4:17). Here now; perhaps a moment hence, there.

Lord Jesus, come!

And take Thy people Home;

That all Thy flock so scattered here,

With Thee in glory may appear;

Lord Jesus, come!

from Old Devotional Calendar (ca 1960's) · Anonymous via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database transformation

A Wonderful Prospect

2 Corinthians 5:1

For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. — 2 Corinthians 5:1.

The knowledge of the Christian embraces not only the things of time and sense, but reaches out into that which lies beyond. Paul was looking onward to the glorious body he would receive at the resurrection of the just when the Lord Jesus returns for His own. May we be looking for and loving His appearing; but should death claim us before He comes, we have a wonderful prospect. — G. M. Landis

“Should we die, then resurrection,

Then the glorious mystery,

Raised to know a long perfection,

In Thy likeness we shall be;

In a moment raised to immortality.”

from Old Devotional Calendar, 1963 · G. M. Landis via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database hope

Saviour Was Or Saviour Is!

Revelation 1:18

I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore. Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death. — Revelation 1:18.

On January 21, 1924, this public declaration was issued at the death of a well-known leader [Vladimir Ilyich Lenin]: “His vision was colossal; his intelligence in organizing the masses was beyond belief … He was lord of the new humanity, the saviour of the world.” Yet the little word “WAS” wrote an end to his life. The lifeless body could no longer claim the titles, “supreme leader,” “lord,” “saviour.”

Some 1900 years before this, another declaration was issued. An angel in an open tomb proclaimed: “He is risen!” No need for flowery speeches -the present tense says enough. This eternal “is” means joy for the present and hope for the future. — Alvin C. Shackleford.

He lives–the great Redeemer lives;

What joy this blest assurance gives!

And now before His Father God,

Pleads the full merits of His blood. — Anne Steele

from Old Devotional Calendar, 1963 · Alvin C. Shackleford; Anne Steele via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrectioneaster

Messianic Hope

Luke 24:26

When considering the Christian message, it is important to remember that the disciples of Jesus were totally surprised by the events that took place in Jerusalem. After the crucifixion of Jesus, the apostles believed that all was lost.

Though some have argued that the disciples merely refused to accept failure after Jesus’ death and made up the story of the resurrection, a crucified and risen Messiah simply did not fit into Jewish expectations for the one who was to come. Though there was no single understanding of what the Messiah would be like, there were common elements that every Jew would have assumed within their messianic expectations.

The Messiah was closely linked to Jewish beliefs regarding the place of worship; he was to institute a renewal of the temple. It was also commonly understood that the Messiah would be a royal military leader who would overthrow Israel’s enemies and prove his lordship through conquest. Jesus clearly did neither of these, coming in peace and dying in his youth like a criminal. Why, then, would his followers maintain that he was the Messiah? Why did they not just cut their losses after his death and move on?

New Testament scholar N.T. Wright explains:

There were, to be sure, ways of coping with the death of a

teacher, or even a leader. The picture of Socrates was

available, in the wider world, as a model of unjust death nobly

borne. The category of ‘martyr’ was available, within Judaism,

for someone who stood up to pagans.... The category of failed

but still revered Messiah, however, did not exist. A Messiah who

died at the hands of the pagans, instead of winning [God’s]

battle against them, was a deceiver... Why then did people go on

talking about Jesus of Nazareth, except as a remarkable but

tragic memory? The obvious answer is that... Jesus WAS raised

from the dead.

In this light of resurrection, the disciples had to go through a massive renewal of their thinking. Seeing the once-dead Jesus standing before their eyes brought them to what was a radical new way of understanding the Messiah.

It remains radical today. On the day that Jesus rose from the dead he spoke of himself saying, “Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and enter into his glory?” (Luke 24:26). It is indelibly hard for us to see how there could be glory in suffering. But it is not hard to see that the death of Christ carries with it the force of something much more. The glory of the suffering Messiah lies in the magnitude of the love he showed on the Cross.

It was this very point that Jesus’ disciples missed until his resurrection, and it is a point that many are still missing today. The Messiah’s glory was not shown through his power, though it easily could have been, nor was it shown in status or position. But it was shown in his suffering and his love, and this remains a far-reaching hope.

________

Copyright © 2007 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

No Easter In Jefferson's Bible

Thoughts on Easter by a Unitarian:

Three nights in 1803, when Thomas Jefferson was in the White House, he cut up the gospels, excising the miracles and arranging Jesus’ life and teachings into a single narrative.

Jefferson performed this pruning operation for his own spiritual purposes — he had no intention of sharing his bible with a world that surely would have scorned his act as arrogant and impious. But according to the few surviving letters that allude to it, Jefferson was simply trying to rescue Jesus from the captivity of his biographers (whom he considered unlettered and superstitious) and from what he called the “sophistications” of Christian theology. By separating what he believed to be the teachings OF Jesus from the teachings ABOUT Jesus, Jefferson sought reverently to construct for his evening devotions the ultimate in Christian commonplace books. What Jefferson omits is any hint of Jesus’ higher status among mortals. Jefferson opens his Bible not with the Annunciation, but with Jesus’s birth. Its final words are these: “There laid they Jesus, and rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulchre, and departed.”

The resurrection was missing. The tale of God’s son — preaching salvation and proclaiming the advent of the Realm of God — ended in the ordinary, all-too-human way. Having for a brief time lived, even having loved and served so memorably and well, the hero died.

This realization is the first of many that have shaped my understanding of religion. If religion is our response to the dual reality of being alive and having to die, THE PURPOSE OF LIFE IS TO LIVE IN SUCH A WAY THAT OUR LIVES WILL PROVE WORTH DYING FOR. As much as anyone in history, Jesus lived in such a way that his life proved worth dying for.

The Son of Righteousness Shall Rise

Luke 24:1

The year 1515 brought new responsibilities to a young German monk named Martin Luther. He became the overseer of 11 monasteries, and began lecturing on the book of Romans. Luther knew God demanded righteousness, and he tried with all his might to be a good monk. However, in studying Romans he awoke to see the righteousness demanded by God is a righteousness provided by God, the imputed righteousness of Christ. Luther said, “What does avail is God’s imputation of righteousness for Christ’s sake, through faith.” Luther found the Gospel and the Gospel found him. Less than two years later, Luther sparked the Protestant Reformation by nailing his 95 Theses to the church doors at Wittenburg.

Meanwhile, around the same time in another German monastery, Matthias Grünewald began to paint what is considered his greatest work, the “Isenheim Altarpiece” -- a series of paintings of Christ that make up one masterpiece. One element of that altarpiece is “Resurrection” [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isenheim_Altarpiece].

Throughout Western civilization, there have been hundreds of masterworks depicting the resurrection of Jesus. What makes Grünewald’s “Resurrection” so special? What stands out?

The most significant feature is the enormous sun behind the risen Christ. The sun seems to blend right into the top of his head. Stars remain visible in the dark background, for this is the sun of early dawn (Luke 24:1).

Symbolizing Christ as light and sun is directly from the Bible. Jesus said, “I am the light of the world” (John 8:12). In a messianic prophecy, Malachi 4:2 says, “But for you who fear my name, the sun of righteousness shall rise with healing in its wings.”

The luminous light of Christ’s dawn overcomes the nighttime bleakness. “The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it” (John 1:5). The light of Christ also brings life through the Savior, “In him was life, and the life was the light of men” (John 1:4).

And it is God Himself who brings the light to our darkened hearts. “For God, who said, ‘Let light shine out of darkness,’ has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ” (2 Corinthians 4:6).

Jesus of Nazareth claimed to be God. The religious leaders cried, “Blasphemy!”, and sought to kill him. If what Jesus claimed about himself was false, then his dead body would forever remain in the tomb. The dusty bones of another false messiah would exonerate the religious leaders for their hatred of Jesus.

But Jesus was no false messiah. God the Father directed the earth to spin through space, and once again the sun rose on the horizon. And in an even greater display of God’s power, the Son also rose on the horizon. God would not allow Jesus to remain and rot in the tomb (Psalm 16:10).

Look again at the painting, and note the color of Christ’s clothing. Observe the difference in color as your eye moves from grave to sky. Coming out of the ground the cloth is grayish-white with a tinge of blue. These colors are symbolic of mourning and humility. From borrowed manger to borrowed tomb, Jesus lived as a “man of sorrows” among those who “esteemed him not”.

However, from the moment of the resurrection, Jesus was and is forever in a position of exaltation (Philippians 2:9-11). Hence, the color of the mantle surrounding him at the top is bright yellowish-red. Yellow is the color of divinity and sovereign power. Because of the resurrection, Jesus was transformed from the humble and suffering servant into the honored and sovereign savior.

But there is more. Look at the nail prints in the hands and feet of Jesus. Remember how Thomas had doubted that Jesus was alive, saying he would only believe when he saw the nail prints in the hands (John 20:25-27). Christians will one day see Christ face to face, and on that day we too will see the nail prints in his hands and feet (Revelation 5:12). Do you believe this? Does your mind think of Jesus in literal, historical flesh-and-blood terms -– a real man who had real iron nails pushed through skin and sinew? Do you believe? “If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved” (Romans 10:9).

While it is humorous to see 16th century European soldier’s clothes and a German-style gravesite, don’t miss the point. Look at the utter impotence of the powers at work against Christ. The heavy stone plate on the sepulcher is thrown open. The soldiers are sleeping, falling over and knocked out. Matthew 28:4 says of the guards, “And for fear of him the guards trembled and became like dead men.”

But it is not just the Romans and the Jews who were impotent in the face of resurrection power, for even gravity does not hold down Christ! Perhaps this is a foreshadowing of the ascension, or a symbolic display of his “being over all” (Ephesians 1:22). Most importantly, death itself held no power over Jesus. “Death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting? The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 15:54-57).

Which brings us back full circle to Martin Luther. In 1515, even as Grünewald was painting his Resurrection, Luther penned the following words: “The content of the Gospel is Jesus Christ, the Son of God, born of the seed of David, according to the flesh, and now appointed to be King and Lord of all things with power, and this according to the Holy Ghost who raised Him from the dead.”

But whatever happened to Grünewald? He was not even correctly identified by historians -- his name actually was Mathis Gothart. Historians, though, sometimes make mistakes. Some people thought Grünewald’s paintings were created by the great German artist Albrecht Dürer. What we do know is that Grünewald eventually chose to live in German cities that supported the Protestant Reformation. And when he died, his possessions included some of Luther’s printed sermons. Grünewald painted a crucified and risen Christ, but did he find salvation for his own soul through the living Christ? More importantly, have you?

________

Scott Lamb is pastor of Providence Baptist Church in St. Louis, Missouri.

God's Mornin' Is Come!

John 11:11

Pastor Cameron S. Smith tells a wonderful story. It is about the only white person in the state of Georgia buried in a cemetery reserved exclusively for African-Americans. This man had lost his mother when he was just a baby. His father, who never married again, hired a black woman named Mandy to help raise his son.

She was a Christian woman who took her task seriously. Seldom has a motherless boy received such warmhearted attention. One of his earliest memories was of Mandy bending tenderly over him in his upstairs bedroom at the beginning of each day and softly saying, “Wake up -- God’s mornin’ is come.”

As the years passed this devoted woman continued to serve as his surrogate mother. The young man went away to college, but when he would come home on holidays and in the summer, she would still climb the stairs and call him in the same loving way. “Wake up — God’s mornin’ is come.”

One day, after he had become a successful statesman, the sad message came: “Mandy is dead. Can you attend her funeral?” As he stood by her grave in the cemetery, he turned to his friends and said, “If I die before Jesus comes, I want to be buried right here beside Mandy. I like to think that on Resurrection Day she’ll speak to me again and say, ‘Wake up, my boy, God’s mornin’ is come!’”

________

Rev. Guss Shelly, First United Methodist Church, Gulfport, Mississippi, http://www.fumc-gulfport.org/

Unreasonable Omission

Acts 2:32

This Jesus God has raised up, of which we are all witnesses. — Acts 2:32

The feature article in the December 1999 issue of Life magazine presented a generally accurate picture of the first 2,000 years of Christianity. It portrayed Jesus and His ministry favorably, acknowledged the phenomenal growth of the apostolic church, and dated the Gospels as written between ad 60 and 85. But the article never mentioned the resurrection of Jesus, without which there would have been no Christianity.

If the apostles had not been convinced that Jesus rose from the dead, they would not have been transformed from a band of cowards into bold witnesses willing to suffer and die for the message they proclaimed.

An unbeliever once admitted to me that something must have happened to convince the apostles that Jesus had conquered death. But the man was so committed to the idea that a resurrection from the dead is impossible that he refused to accept it.

That response, though, is illogical. The apostle Paul asked people who had a similar attitude, “Why should it be thought incredible by you that God raises the dead?” (Acts 26:8). Why indeed! Believing the gospel is a reasonable step of faith. It is a hearty “Amen!” to Peter’s triumphant declaration, “This Jesus God raised up, of which we are all witnesses!” — HVL

Christ’s resurrection is rejected by some,

That He rose from the dead is denied;

Yet Jesus still pleads and asks sinners to come

And believe that for them He has died. — Fitzhugh

The empty tomb is the foundation on which our faith is built.

Two Men At the Fork In the Road

Dr. Seamands tells of a Muslim who became a Christian in Africa. “Some of his friends asked him, ‘Why have you become a Christian?’ He answered, ‘Well, it's like this. Suppose you were going down the road and suddenly the road forked in two directions, and you didn’t know which way to go, and there at the fork in the road were two men, one dead and one alive -- which one would you ask which way to go?’”

from H I S Magazine · Warren Webster via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrectionconversion

They Aren't Even Dead Yet

John 11:26

I read a great story about a six-year-old boy named David who was taking a walk one day with his grandmother. They decided to detour through the local graveyard. They stopped to read some of the tombstones and Grandma explained that the first date on the tombstones was the day the person was born and the second date was the day the person died.

“Why do some tombstones only have one date?” little David asked.

“Because those people haven’t died yet,” his grandmother explained.

David was obviously stunned by his grandmother’s explanation because, that night, he couldn’t stop talking about the excursion. “Mom,” he said with wide eyes, “did you know some of the people buried there in the cemetery aren’t even dead yet!”

________

DON'T STOP LAUGHING NOW! Compiled by Ann Spangler and Shari MacDonald (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2002), p. 54.

from Source not recorded · Rev. Billy D. Strayhorn via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrectioneaster

Must One Believe In the Resurrection To Be A Christian?

Romans 10:9

This was the question asked for the end of the past week by the editors of The Washington Post and Newsweek for the “ON FAITH” conversation. Here was the question as stated by the editors: Do you have to believe the resurrection is literally true -- that Jesus came back to life in his body -- to be a Christian?

A similarly framed question is often asked about various Christian doctrines and such questions are unavoidable. If the word “Christian,” used as a noun, is to mean anything, it must be defined -- and the definition must include some essential doctrinal elements. The New Testament leaves no choice here, for essential beliefs are explicitly mentioned within the Bible’s presentation of the Gospel.

On this essential question -- Do you have to believe the resurrection is literally true -- that Jesus came back to life in his body -- to be a Christian? -- the Bible is actually very clear.

As I said in my ON FAITH column:

The literal, historical, bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ from

the dead is the vindication of Christ’s saving work on the cross.

The issue is simple -- no resurrection, no Christianity. For

this reason, belief in the resurrection of Christ is essential in

order to be a Christian.

The resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead is the central

miracle of the Christian faith. As the New Testament reveals,

the resurrection represents the Father’s complete satisfaction in

the obedience of the Son -- even unto death. Sin and death do

not have the final word. Indeed, they are defeated through the

saving work of Christ....

As Paul well understood, Christianity stands or falls with the

empty grave. If Christ is not raised, we are to be pitied, for

our faith is in vain. Those who would preach a resurrectionless

Christianity have substituted the truth of the gospel for a lie.

But, asserted Paul, Christ is risen from the dead. Our faith is

not in vain, but is in the risen Lord. He willingly faced death

on a cross and defeated death from the grave. The Resurrection

is the ultimate sign of God’s vindication of His Son.

The great good news of the resurrection is this -- those who come

to Christ by faith will share in His victory over sin and death.

Belief in the resurrection of Christ is clearly essential in

order for one to be a Christian. The Christian church has

understood this from the beginning, and the Apostle Paul left no

room for doubt when he declared that those who are saved are

those who confess with their lips that Jesus Christ is Lord and

believe in their hearts that God raised Him from the dead [Romans

10:9].

There were other significant responses. Bishop N. T. Wright argued for the resurrection as a “concrete” event in history and as the central affirmation of Christ’s victory, but did not actually answer the question as asked. Oddly, Michael Otterson, Media Relations Director of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, said: “To take the resurrection out of Christianity is to gut the Christian faith of much of its hope and promise.” Much? The Apostle Paul said it would remove all hope and promise from the Christian faith. What do Mormons believe would be left?

Interestingly, Deepak Chopra, the New Age president of the Alliance for a New Humanity, made this claim:

I think there are three ways to interpret the Resurrection and

remain Christian in every sense of the word:

1. Jesus of Nazareth literally arose from the dead.

2. The divine Resurrection as the core of Christian theology.

3. The resurrection of the spirit whenever a person attains

higher consciousness.

Now, Chopra writes as one who knows he is “someone outside the Christian faith,” but what makes his point so interesting is that it is almost precisely the argument made by liberal Protestant theology -- that it is enough to believe that the Apostles experienced a special consciousness of the risen Christ.

In a set of parallel articles at “ON FAITH,” various figures spoke of what the claim of the resurrection means to them. Unsurprisingly, retired Bishop John Shelby Spong said more about what he does not believe -- another testimony to liberal theology:

I do not believe that the deceased body of Jesus was resuscitated

physically on the third day and was restored to the life of this

world as, at least, the later gospels assert, but I do believe

that in him and through him people found a way into that which is

eternal and so they portrayed him as breaking through and

transcending the limits of death.

Spong said he was speaking “for those people who are committed to the Jesus experience, but because they are citizens of the 21st Century cannot twist their minds into First Century pretzels in order to say “I believe” to the traditional explanations offered by the biblical writers.”

Well, at least he is strangely if boldly honest. The choice is between John Shelby Spong and the Apostle Paul. A choice this clear is truly a gift.

Sermon: Awakening To What?

John 5:28

Final sermon in Daniel series, #11. Daniel 12:1-4

AWAKENING TO WHAT?

==================

I. Some of us have no one to call today.

A. My last sermon on Daniel coincides with Mother's Day.

B. Not every mother is with us.

II. Everyone loves the idea of heaven.

A. Heaven and resurrection are melded together in our minds.

B. The joy of heaven has been diluted.

C. The requirements for heaven have been erased.

III. Warning -- there is more than one resurrection.

A. Daniel presents two alternatives.

B. Jesus completely agrees with Daniel. John 5:28-29 (5:24)

C. Revelation gives more details on both resurrections. 20:6,14; 21:8

IV. Wouldn't a single option be nicer?

A. Many reject the harshness of heaven vs. hell.

B. The only thing that matters is whether it is true or not.

V. You can have the good resurrection.

A. You must belong to God.

B. We have hope when there is no hope.

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm08q.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database heavenhell

Resurrection Hope: Jesus and Scripture

Luke 24:13

Christian hope is not wide-eyed optimism or emotions. Christian hope is based on the certainty of God’s promises and His character. And it is evidenced by the fruits of joy, sacrificial love, boldness, and endurance. We see no better example of this kind of hope than in the life of our Savior, especially in the days and hours before His death.

In the garden of Gethsemane, Jesus certainly had cause to abandon hope. His closest friends fell asleep in the time when, as he said, His soul was “overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death.” He pled with His Father to take the cup away from Him if it was possible. But there was no other way.

Yet even in that hour of agony, Jesus pressed on. The writer of Hebrews tells us why: “For the joy set before Him, [He] endured the cross, despising its shame.”

When the authorities came for Him, and Judas betrayed the Son of Man with a kiss, Jesus showed us the example of hope’s boldness. His disciples reached for their swords to protect Him, but Jesus rebuked them. He said, “Do you think I cannot call on my Father, and He will at once put at my disposal more than twelve legions of angels?”

No one could press on like this without hope. But where did it come from? Jesus told the disciples its source in those very moments. He said, “But how then would the Scriptures be fulfilled that say it must happen this way?”

From childhood, Jesus had studied the Word of God. He read from Isaiah’s scrolls at the beginning of his public ministry. He had declared Himself to be the Suffering Servant whom Isaiah had foretold.

We see this again later, after the resurrection on the road to Emmaus. Jesus opened up the minds of the disciples to see all the things that had been foretold about Him in the Scriptures. Jesus — He who enjoyed the deepest level of intimacy with the Father — showed us how to put our hope in God by trusting in the Word of God.

The hope this gave Him enabled Him to endure what followed: the mockery, the scourging, the hammer, the lance, and the abandonment. Christ showed us hope transformed into sacrificial love. And as He was crushed under the weight of the sins of the world, the fragrance of His gift goes up to God as the perfect — the most pleasing — of any sacrifice.

And just as had been foretold, on the third day Christ did rise from the grave. He broke the chains of the captive. He set the prisoners free by conquering death and sin.

As Christians, we have no reason to lack hope. Christ has shown the trustworthiness of God and of His Word.

Having seen that God loved us enough that He did not spare even His own Son, how can we lack for hope today, even in these bleak times? Christ became for us both the basis of our hope, and our ultimate example of hope.

As we celebrate Easter this coming Sunday, I want to challenge you to, in these tough times, make a point to live in light of that tremendous resurrection hope.

Be joyful. Love beyond what is reasonable. Be bold. And endure. You are not like those who have no hope. You live on the other side of the Resurrection.

________

Copyright (c) 2009 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database hopeeaster

Sermon: Becoming Transhuman

John 11:17

Easter sermon on resurrection life. John 11:17-27

BECOMING TRANSHUMAN

===================

I. A mausoleum in Newton.

A. I like old cemeteries.

B. Some people are not satisfied with this situation.

II. Is it really in our power?

A. Different approaches are being tried.

B. Many experts have doubts.

C. Perhaps the key to success is reducing our humanness.

III. Two resurrections in the Bible.

A. The experience of Lazarus.

B. The experience of Jesus.

IV. What will your experience be?

A. Transhumanism isn't doing too well.

B. Why not choose the Jesus experience?

V. We begin the journey the moment we believe.

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm09l.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database eternal liferesurrection

The Empty Tomb and the Emptied Urn

Job 30:19

What the wounds of Jesus can — and can’t — tell us about our resurrection bodies.

________

I inhaled as I stepped behind the pulpit, ready for a fight. It was a sermon series on the end times, and I knew there’d be controversy. I looked out at the elderly man in the fourth pew with his Scofield Reference Bible in tow, the woman in the back with her John Hagee book on the Middle East crisis, the teenager in the front with the Left Behind video game on his computer at home.

I expected an onrush of feedback after the service. “I can’t believe you don’t believe in a pre-tribulation Rapture!” “You mean you don’t think the land belongs to the Jewish state?!” “What do you mean you don’t think 666 is a microchip in the arm?”

I was wrong.

There was controversy, but it wasn’t one of comparing prophecy charts. My hearers were most provoked by what I said, in passing, about an issue we rarely think of as eschatological: cremation.

While speaking of the Christian belief in the resurrection of the flesh, I called my hearers to reconsider what their funeral plans testified about their hope for the future. I reiterated a position — long-held in the history of the church — that burial, not cremation, best pictures the imagery of death as a sleep from which one is awakened at the last trumpet. You would have thought I had tried to lead the service through an invitation hymn to the Blessed Virgin (with every head bowed and every eye closed).

As I talked to my congregants, though, I realized what was controversial was not my position. Many, if not most of them, already knew intuitively that our culture’s rush toward cremation should take more careful thought than Christians have given it. What alarmed my people was the thought of people they knew, now sitting in urns on their mantles or scattered across the Pacific Ocean or fertilizing a grove of banana trees in someone’s backyard.

Was I suggesting, they wondered, that their friends and family members couldn’t be resurrected from the dead — or that they would be resurrected permanently disfigured by the fires of the cremation oven?

Of course that’s not at all what I was suggesting. After all, most people who hear the voice of Jesus on resurrection morning will have long before disintegrated into dust, through the natural process of decay. And anyway, it doesn’t take any more Spirit dynamic to recompose ashes than to reactivate dead tissue.

There are many of our brothers and sisters in Christ, I noted to my disturbed flock, who have been torn apart by lions in the Roman arenas or devoured by sharks after being cast overboard slave ships or evaporated in wartime bombings. They’ll be with us in the resurrection.

I do believe, with the ancient church, that the resurrection body reconstitutes our earthly bodies. It is the same body of Jesus that the women went to anoint with spices that greets them in the garden.

This doesn’t necessitate, however, that every fleck or skin or cell is simply carried along into resurrection. You, after all, have the same body you had as a toddler, though your cellular composition and bone mass have changed somewhat since then.

My reassurance that I didn’t think a body’s state would stop resurrection seemed to settle some minds for a while. Then someone brought out the hymn book. They referred to the lyrics of the great hymn “All Hail the Power of Jesus’ Name,” in which we call one another to “behold” the hands and side of the resurrected Jesus. We sing, “Those wounds yet visible above, in beauty glorified.” That’s coupled with the revivalist gospel hymn countless Christians have sung together at altar-call time: “Place your hand in the nail-scarred hand.”

These hymns resonate with the biblical story. Jesus, after all, demonstrates his identity — and the very meaning of the resurrection of the body — by the familiarity of eating and talking with his disciples, just as he did before, right along with the eerie mystery of such things as appearing dramatically in a locked room.

But he proves himself resurrected most memorably by calling his wavering disciple, Thomas, to feel the spike-marks in his hands, the spear-hole in his ribcage. This is after God has reversed the curse of death Jesus bore on our behalf.

We shouldn’t see these crucifixion marks as meaning that God will resurrect us in whatever shape he finds us. Jesus, after all, would have been taken off the crucifixion stake in a far more disfigured condition than simply these wounds. He was beaten, pummeled, bled to death.

He was, the prophet Isaiah tells us beforehand, “as one from whom men hide their faces” (Isa. 53:3). It is telling that Jesus has to indicate to his disciples that there are wounds. His friends have trouble believing he’s not a ghost, but they don’t see him as some sort of zombie — a living version of the corpse they had left behind.

Our resurrection bodies will be whole and at peace, Scripture tells us. However we die, however we are laid to rest, this is all just the planting of a seed that flourishes into new life in the age to come (1 Cor. 15:35-44). Of course there’s continuity. It is your body being raised; everything it means to be you. But what is “sown in weakness” is “raised in power” and what is “sown in dishonor” is “raised in glory” (1 Cor. 15:43).

Jesus’ remaining wounds are unique, and the gospel itself shows us how. The Cross and the Empty Tomb aren’t blips on the screen of God’s redemptive purposes. They represent the gospel itself, the one story that makes sense of all our stories. They are, as the apostle Paul puts it, “of first importance” (1 Cor. 15:3).

This is why, even in the heavenly courts themselves, the redeemed sing of the worthiness of Christ “for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God” (Rev. 5:9). The Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, “has conquered,” we’ll sing together. His piercings show us how he did so. The marks of Jesus’ crucifixion are ever-present reminders that the redeemed of all the ages are just that: redeemed. When we’ve been there 10,000 years, bright shining as the sun, we will still be ex-sinners, those who were rescued by the love and mercy of God in Christ.

The wounds of Jesus — in beauty glorified — are eternal reminders that the gospel is never past tense.

I still oppose cremation. There’s a reason Christians throughout the centuries have committed the bodies of the faithful to the ground, dramatically picturing our trust in the reclamation of these very same bodies when the roll is called up yonder. But I’m careful now to explain that, whatever is the case, cremation isn’t forever. Neither is amputation or mastectomies or the horrifying tattoo marks of totalitarian regimes sending prisoners to their executions.

Our God is able to empty urns, to enliven graves, to restore limbs. He is able — and willing — to wipe away tears, and to make all things new. We ought to care for our bodies, and to care about how we honor them before and after death.

But, more importantly, we ought to remind ourselves of our hope, the day when we’ll be gathered on the other side of this age of cemeteries. His blessings will be known, far as the curse is found — and that includes the marks of death we bore in our bodies. We’ll be home, and we’ll be whole.

Only One of us will bear any reminder of the sufferings behind us, and it’ll be clear that he is not suffering anymore.

________

Russell D. Moore is dean of the School of Theology and senior vice-president for academic administration at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. He also serves as a preaching pastor at Highview Baptist Church in Louisville, Kentucky.

All Scripture references are from the Holy Bible, English Standard Version (ESV).

Copyright © 2009 Christianity Today.

from Christianitytoday.com · Russell D. Moore via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

That Curious Idea of Resurrection

Job 19:26

How early Christians grappled to accept the idea that Jesus returned from the dead.

________

Sunday represents the foundational claim of Christian faith, the highest day of the Christian year as celebration of Jesus’ resurrection. But many Christians are unsure what the claim that Jesus had been raised to new life after being crucified actually means — while non-Christians often find the whole idea of resurrection bemusing and even ridiculous.

These differences over what Jesus’ resurrection represents and discomfort with the whole idea are nothing new, however: Christians in the first few centuries also had difficulty embracing the idea of a real, bodily resurrection. Then, as now, resurrection was not the favored post-death existence — people much preferred to think that after dying, souls headed to some ethereal realm of light and tranquillity. During the Roman period, many regarded the body as a pitiful thing at best and at worst a real drag upon the soul, even a kind of prison from which the soul was liberated at death. So, it’s not surprising that there were Christians who simply found bodily resurrection stupid and repugnant. To make the idea palatable, they instead interpreted all references to Jesus’ resurrection in strictly spiritual terms. Some thought of Jesus as having shed his earthly body in his death, assuming a purely spiritual state, and returning to his original status in the divine realm. In other cases, Jesus’ earthly body and his death were even seen as illusory, the divine Christ merely appearing to have a normal body (rather like Clark Kent!).

The idea of a real, personal resurrection — meaning a new bodily existence of individuals after death, in one way or another — did not originate with Christianity or with claims about Jesus. Instead, it seems to be first clearly reflected in Jewish texts dated to sometime in the second century B.C., such as the biblical book of Daniel 12:2. At the time, it was a genuinely innovative idea. (Alan Segal’s book LIFE AFTER DEATH gives an expansive discussion of the origins of the idea of resurrection.) Many peoples of the ancient world hoped for one or another sort of eternal life, but it was usually thought of as a kind of bodiless existence of soul or spirit set in realms of the dead that might or might not be happy, pleasant places. In still other expectations, death might bring a merging of individuals with some ocean of being, like a drop of water falling into the sea.

The ancient Jewish and early Christian idea of personal resurrection represented a new emphasis on individuals and the importance of embodied existence beyond the mere survival or enhancement of the soul, although there was debate about the precise nature of the post-resurrection body. Some seem to have supposed it would be a new body of flesh and bones, closely linked to the corpse in the grave but not liable to decay or death. Others imagined a body more like that of an angel. But whatever its precise nature, the hope of resurrection reflected a strongly holistic view of the person as requiring some sort of body to be complete. With ancient Jews, early Christians saw resurrection as an act of God, a divine gift of radically new life, not an expression of some inherent immortality of the soul. That is, the dead don’t rise by themselves; they are raised by God and will experience resurrection collectively as one of the events that comprise God’s future redemption of the world and vindication of the righteous.

In the ancient Judaism of Jesus’ time, however, resurrection was not universally affirmed. Some devout Jews (particularly the religious party called Sadducees) apparently considered the whole idea ridiculous, as evidenced by the New Testament, which gives us some of the most direct references to disputes among ancient Jews about the matter. In Mark 12:18-27, Sadducees taunt Jesus with a question about a woman married several times, asking him whose wife she will be following the resurrection. Jesus strongly affirms resurrection, but he insists that those resurrected will not marry and portrays the Sadducees’ question as reflecting a foolish ignorance of God’s power.

In the earliest expressions of their faith that we have, Christians claimed that Jesus’ resurrection showed that God singled out Jesus ahead of the future resurrection of the dead to show him uniquely worthy to be lord of all the elect. However, the paradigmatic significance of Jesus’ resurrection was also very important for early Christians.

In Christianity’s first few centuries, when believers often suffered severe persecution and even the threat of death, those who believed in Jesus’ bodily resurrection found it particularly meaningful for their own circumstances. Jesus had been put to death in grisly fashion, but God had overturned Jesus’ execution and, indeed, had given him a new and glorious body. So, they believed that they could face their own deaths as well as those of their loved ones in the firm hope that God would be faithful to them as well. They thought that they would share the same sort of immortal reaffirmation of their personal and bodily selves that Jesus had experienced. Elaine Pagels, a scholar of early Christianity, has argued that those Christians who regarded the body as unimportant, perhaps including “Gnostics,” were less willing to face martyrdom for their faith and more willing to make gestures of acquiescence to the Romans — for example, by offering sacrifices to Roman gods — because they regarded actions done with their bodies as insignificant so long as in their hearts they held to their beliefs.

By contrast, Christians who believed in bodily resurrection seem to have regarded their own mortal coils as the crucial venues in which they were to live out their devotion to Christ. When these Christians were arraigned for their faith, they considered it genuine apostasy to give in to the gestures demanded by the Roman authorities. For them, inner devotion to Jesus had to be expressed in an outward faithfulness in their bodies — and they were ready to face martyrdom for their faith, encouraged by the prospect of bodily resurrection. Indeed, Christian martyrs are pictured as engaged in a battle with the Roman authorities (and the Devil, whom Christians saw as behind Roman malevolence toward them), with the martyrs’ bodies as battlegrounds in which the integrity of their person and their personal salvation could be lost or retained.

Historically, then, how Christians have understood Jesus’ “resurrection” says a lot about how they have understood themselves, whether they have a holistic view of the human person, whether they see bodily existence as trivial or crucial, and how they imagine full salvation to be manifested. Does salvation comprise a deliverance from the body into some sort of immediate and permanent postmortem bliss (which is actually much closer to popular Christian piety down the centuries), or does salvation require a new embodiment of some sort, a more robust reaffirmation of persons? This sort of question originally was integral to early Jewish and Christian belief in the resurrection. In all the varieties of early Christianity, and in all the various understandings of what his “resurrection” meant, Jesus was typically the model, the crucial paradigm for believers, what had happened to him seen as prototypical of what believers were to hope for themselves.

________

Larry W. Hurtado is head of the School of Divinity, University of Edinburgh. His recent books are THE EARLIEST CHRISTIAN ARTIFACTS: MANUSCRIPTS AND CHRISTIAN ORIGINS, HOW ON EARTH DID JESUS BECOME A GOD? and LORD JESUS CHRIST: DEVOTION TO JESUS IN EARLIEST CHRISTIANITY.

from Source not recorded · Larry Hurtado via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database easter

Life After Death ... Or Just Love After Death?

Job 19:26

Rev. Forrest Church had died on Thursday, September 24, after a battle against esophageal cancer. Pastor of the Unitarian Church of All Souls on the Upper East Side for many years, Forrest Church was almost certainly the best-known and most influential Unitarian figure of the late twentieth century.

Forrest Church was in the public eye for most of his life. His father was the late Senator Frank Church [D-Idaho], who chaired committees that investigated the Central Intelligence Agency during the 1970s. Sen. Church also ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1976. After serving four terms in the Senate, Church was defeated for re-election in 1980. Then, in 1984, he was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. He died just three months later.

Forrest Church was 61 when he died. He lived only two years longer than his father. But Forrest Church did something that few people are able to do -- he wrote extensively about his own (impending) death. When told that his cancer was terminal, Forrest Church preached a sermon that was intended to help his congregation understand the process of death and dying. In the month that followed, he wrote a book about death and the experience of approaching his own death.

In LOVE & DEATH: MY JOURNEY THROUGH THE VALLEY OF THE SHADOW, Church wrote of his understanding of death and its meaning. At the end of it all, the Unitarian pastor and philosopher wrote of “my abiding belief in love after death.”

Significantly, Church wrote of his fascination with death. As a younger person, he had romanticized death and contemplated various scenarios of a famous demise. Later, though no longer believing himself to romanticize death, Church still seemed to see death in similar terms. Writing as a pastor, he told of a terminally ill church member who had committed suicide with the assistance of the Hemlock Society. Church wrote of his sympathy for her wish to remain in control of her life, even through her death. “I could only admire her,” he wrote.

Forrest Church was a man of intelligence and culture -- assets no doubt valued by his socially elite congregation at All Souls. He was also a gifted writer. In helpful sections of the book, Church took on the “conspiracy of silence concerning death” and helpfully reminded his readers that all of us will surely die. Church saw our modern obsession with health as a barely-disguised effort to postpone death, but to no avail. Vegetarians and joggers die, the pastor reminds.

Church compared life to the voyage of the Titanic. In the end, every life hits an iceberg and sinks. His exhortation was for all people to “dare to live before you die.”

He also tied his understanding of religion to the knowledge that we shall surely die. “I draw from a strong faith tradition which, if not orthodox, invites me to explore everything from the scriptures to ancient philosophy to current events,” Church wrote. “But the object is always the same. For me, religion is our human response to the dual reality of being alive and having to die.”

Therefore, “if religion is our human response to being alive and having to die, the purpose of life is to live in such as way that our lives will prove worth dying for.”

Missing from the picture is any notion of life on the other side of death. The minister declared his belief in “love after death,” but not in LIFE after death. The reason for this becomes more clear as Church writes of Jesus Christ. “I have no idea whether Jesus was physically resurrected or not, but I suspect he wasn’t,” he wrote. “If I am right, for many people that would be it for Jesus, period, end of story. Christianity would be a delusion, a miscommunication of events faithfully transmitted from generation to generation.”

Indeed, Church insisted that his faith was not grounded in the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, but rather in the “spiritual rebirth of Jesus’s followers.”

The disciples experienced a “saving transformation” in which the love of Jesus was reborn in them, Church suggested.

It was the LOVE of Jesus that survived his death, Church insisted -- not the LIFE of Jesus. And that is a power available to all of us today, he promised. Forrest Church often repeated his “mantra” with words his church came to know: “Want what you have, do what you can, and be who you are.”

Forrest Church was a classical religious and theological liberal. He rejected a supernatural Christ and did not believe in the virgin birth or the resurrection. He also denied that Christianity could be reduced to some mere admiration for the teachings of Jesus. While Jesus’ teachings were “in many ways wonderful,” those same teachings were “also flawed, limited by cultural and personal experience.”

The Unitarian minister came to his theological liberalism quite early. At the age of ten, Forrest was given a Bible by his father. That Bible was the so-called “Jefferson Bible,” produced by Thomas Jefferson as an experiment in removing all references to the supernatural Jesus from the New Testament. Known formally as THE LIFE AND MORALS OF JESUS OF NAZARETH, the Jefferson Bible ends with these words: “There they laid Jesus, and rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulcher, and departed.” End of story. No resurrection. Jesus is simply sealed into the tomb.

If that is all there is to the life of Jesus, Christianity does indeed fall apart. Christianity would be a delusion and a misrepresentation of the truth. The New Testament clearly claims that Jesus Christ was physically raised from the dead -- and that his resurrection is the promise of our own. The New Testament clearly promises life after death, not merely love after death. This is where Christianity stands or falls.

The death of Forrest Church at age 61 is a sobering reminder of our mortality. More tellingly, it is a lamentable but important reminder of the centrality of the resurrection of Christ to our Christian understanding of death and eternal life. Without the resurrection of Christ, there is no hope for us after death. We are, as Paul warned, of all people most to be pitied, for we believed in a false hope.

The Christian hope is essentially grounded in the physical resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. Without life after death, love after death will not matter. No resurrection -- no hope.

=================

Version used in sermon on April 20, 2014 [Easter]:

Rev. Forrest Church was a Unitarian minister in Manhattan and the son of a United States Senator. A few years ago he was diagnosed with throat cancer; he was only 61 years old. The doctors said it was terminal and he would not survive. So he decided to write a book about his final days.

In it he compared life to the voyage of the Titanic. Every life hits an iceberg and sinks, so you better live before you die. Missing from the picture is any notion of life on the other side of death. He declared his belief in “love after death,” but not in LIFE after death.

The reason for this becomes more clear as Church writes of Jesus Christ: “I have no idea whether Jesus was physically resurrected or not, but I suspect he wasn’t. If I am right, for many people that would be it for Jesus, period, end of story.” In his view, Jesus’ love for us lives on, but that is it.

Unitarians do not believe Jesus is divine. Nowadays they don’t focus much on Christianity at all, but sample from every religion and philosophy. They are the ultimate expression of theological liberalism.

For Rev. Church it happened at a very early age. He was only ten when his father gave him a Bible. It wasn’t a real Bible, but the so-called “Jefferson Bible.” Thomas Jefferson produced it by removing all references to the supernatural Jesus from the New Testament. The Jefferson Bible ends with these words: “There they laid Jesus, and rolled a great stone to the door of the sepulcher, and departed.” End of story. No resurrection. Jesus is simply sealed into the tomb.

What Makes Christmas So Special?

John 1:14

In Dr. Seuss’s classic tale “How The Grinch Stole Christmas,” the malevolent main character discovers that Christmas cannot be thwarted. Try as he might, the Grinch is unable to steal, stifle or subdue the Christmas celebration of the Whos who inhabit Whoville.

Even the Whos understand that the reason for Christmas is not to be found in gifts, feasts or decorations. Christmas is a celebration that takes place in the heart.

While the good doctor’s holiday tale is not inherently Christian, it does illustrate that Christmas is essentially a spiritual matter -- a contemplation of the soul.

Those familiar with Seuss’s story know that the reason the Grinch could not comprehend the Whos’ zeal for Christmas is because his heart was “two sizes too small.”

Dr. Seuss demonstrated simply and profoundly that the reality of Christmas does not exist in external symbols. Much of what is associated with Christmas these days has little or nothing to do with why the holiday is so special.

Decorated trees, blinking lights, singing-dancing snowmen, Santa and his flying reindeer have no connection whatsoever with the essence and reality that is Christmas.

Many who celebrate Christmas believe the significance centers on the birth of Jesus Christ. However, the season’s significance transcends the mere fact that Jesus was born.

The only people who celebrate a birth, for the sake of the birth, are family and friends. In order for someone’s birth to be honored by a nation, much less the world, the person must achieve a great deal during his or her lifetime.

In America we remember the birth of certain presidents because of a unique or significant contribution to our country.

Columbus has long been honored because his voyage across the Atlantic opened the door for colonization of the new world. Martin Luther King Jr. is remembered for his courageous leadership in the cause of civil rights.

What did Jesus do that was so significant that the world should pause to remember His birth? In his relatively short life, he wrote no books, made no earth-shaking discovery and he led no political movement. So, why do people the world over celebrate the birth of Jesus?

Perhaps it is Jesus’ death that makes his birth worth commemorating?

The Bible details the nature of Jesus’ earthly demise. Each of the Gospel writers relates the horrific reality of Christ’s crucifixion. However, the fact that Jesus suffered a tortuous death is not, by itself, justification for the world to remember his death.

What is it that makes Christmas so special? It is not because Jesus lived a virtuous life or died a tragic death. What makes Christ’s birth so significant is the awesome reality that Jesus conquered death.

The Bible boldly proclaims that three days after Jesus was crucified He rose from the dead. The resurrection is the exclamation point on the life of Christ. The resurrection is why Christians celebrate the birth of Jesus.

The significance of the resurrection as it relates to Christmas cannot be stressed enough. When Jesus walked on earth He claimed to be God in the flesh. Had He died and remained in the grave, His claims would have been dismissed. However, an empty tomb and subsequent appearances to His followers validated his “outrageous” pronouncements.

What makes Christmas so very significant, so special, is Easter.

The Grinch learned that Christmas cannot be thwarted. It is not a celebration dependent on symbols or external motivation. It is a celebration of the heart.

While the masses may bury the Gospel truth under gifts, trees, tinsel and lights, the fact remains that the reason for the season is a crucified and risen Savior.

May our hearts be enlarged this Noel in order to accommodate the whole Christmas story -- which includes the cross and the empty tomb.

Sermon: Easter's Question

John 11:17

Easter sermon on resurrection. John 11:17-26

EASTER'S QUESTION

=================

I. What happens when we die?

A. It is a question that everyone asks at some point.

B. Near-death experiences give light to some.

C. Easter offers hope.

II. Easter raises lots of questions.

A. Is it even plausible?

B. Americans are solving the dilemma on their own.

C. Or you can dispense with the physical altogether.

III. Long before Easter, Jesus confronted death.

A. Jesus delayed coming to Lazarus. John 11:6

B. "If you had been here..." John 11:21

C. Jesus' dramatic statement.

IV. The ultimate question of Easter.

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm10m.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database easter

The Resurrection Can Be A Myth

The Rev. Rodney Romney, who is the Senior Pastor of First Baptist Church of Seattle, recently wrote in a church newsletter his thoughts on the Resurrection:

“In the face of what modern scholarship claims, the average Christian may feel stranded. If the Resurrection stories are myths, what does this do to our faith? We must always base our faith on experience, not tradition or dogma. Who Jesus is to us personally should not depend on any particular doctrine. No idea or story about Jesus, including the Resurrection, should ever be a litmus test for faith.”

He went on:

“Even if the Resurrection stories prove to be legends developed by the Christian community forty to sixty years after the death of Jesus, it does not change the core of Jesus’ message of forgiveness and grace, of God’s liberating presence among all women and men.”

Overlords Or Overhyped?: Watson and Jeopardy!

At the end of a recent Jeopardy! competition, former champion Ken Jennings said, “I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.” Jennings’ quote from The Simpsons was intended as humor, but there are many who are taking what happened on Jeopardy! as a sign of things to come.

As you’ve doubtless heard, Jennings and fellow Jeopardy! champion Brad Rutters were defeated decisively by an IBM supercomputer named Watson. Watson -- more than a decade in the making -- has nearly 3,000 state-of-the-art microprocessors and, among other things, nearly instant access to the entire content of Wikipedia.

For all this power, the principal reason Watson won was that it was better at buzzing in after Jeopardy! host Alex Trebek read the clues. As Jeopardy! fans know, it’s not enough to know things; you have to have great reflexes to buzz. Watson’s advantage in this area allowed it to control the game and defeat Jennings and Rutter.

This is not to denigrate IBM’s and its partners’ achievement. Watson is a formidable piece of technology. But to read and hear the hype that preceded and followed Watson’s win, you would think that humanity had reached some kind of transformative point in its history. I mean that literally.

The week before the Jeopardy! competition, Time magazine ran a story about scientist Ray Kurzweil and what he calls “the Singularity.” That’s when truly intelligent computers are supposed to transform what it means to be human. By 2045, Kurzweil envisions a world of machines whose “intelligence” far exceeds our own. At some point afterwards, we will “merge” with these machines; that is, we will transfer our consciousness into machines and transcend the limitations of our bodies. We will become, as Time puts it, “immortal.” But this robotic millennialism reduces human intelligence to the ability to process information. In this reductionism, human language becomes just another albeit subtle way of inputting that information, just like keystrokes or a touchscreen.

The idea that we will able to “upload” our consciousness proceeds from a series of flawed assumptions. For one, mind and brain are not the same. In fact, the latter is an organ and the former is a state of being. The mind, which is just another way of saying “consciousness,” employs the brain, but it isn’t identical to it any more than a driver is identical to a car. The brain can be x-rayed, handled. Our mind and all the things that make us distinctly human and separate us from the animal world -- reason, love, emotions, appreciation for beauty -- are not mechanical or even biological. They cannot be digitized -- broken down into a line of zeroes and ones. We can only observe them working out in practice as the mind determines behavior.

Then there’s the inherent Gnosticism of thinking you can separate us from our bodies. Christians, the people of the incarnate Word, know that our humanity is inseparable from our bodies. Christians believe, after all, in the bodily resurrection of the dead. We believe in the unity of mind, body, and spirit.

So human nature is not the sum of the information we carry, and it can’t be transferred to any thing or any machine -- even a machine that can win at Jeopardy!

________

Copyright (c) 2011 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Chuck Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Why the Afterlife Bores Us

John 1:4

I have long suspected that many Christians dread not just death but heaven. We won’t admit that, of course. Our hymnody, of whatever era, is filled with songs about the joy of the afterlife, and “what a day of rejoicing that will be.” We’re glad we’re not going to hell or to oblivion. But most of our songs and sermon mentions are about that first few moments in heaven: when we see Jesus, when we’re reunited with our loved ones, and so on. It’s like the happy ending of the story. And that’s the problem.

The Gospel tells us that Satan keeps unbelievers bound by fear of death (Hebrews 2:14-15). Believers, too often, dread death also, though not as much from fear as from boredom. We see the story of our lives as encompassing this span of 70 or 80 or 100 years. The life to come is our “great reward” in “the afterlife.”

But just think about that word “afterlife.” It assumes eternity is an endless postlude to where the action really happens. It’s “after.” Our “reward” happens after we’ve lived our lives. Here’s why this language matters.

Imagine a couple referring to their marriage as their “after-love.” They explain to you that years ago they met, fell in love, and married. The years since are their “after-love” years, since they follow their falling in love with each other. You would, no doubt, ask whether they still loved each other and, if so, why they would relegate their lives together now as “after” anything, and why they seem to put their “love” in the past tense. You would think they were downgrading marriage and missing out on joy by talking like that.

And you’d be right.

Too many Christians see the hope of resurrection life as a capstone on their lives now. We implicitly assume that our focus in the new creation is a backward focus on our lives as they are now.

We talk about all the questions we’ll ask about why this or that happened. We never think about whether we’ll be too busy to care about that, just like we’re too busy in the prime of our careers to ask our kindergarten teacher why she had snack time after recess rather than before. We talk about our reunion with loved ones, but even they often implicitly have a past focus.

A high school reunion can be fun. You catch up with old friends, and remember good and bad times. But the focus is usually on “remember when” and “whatever happened to” conversations. That’s great for an hour or four, but 4 trillion years of that would be awful. That’s not what Jesus promised us. He promised us life.

If we miss this, then we become just like those with no hope. We talk about our “bucket lists” of what we have to do before we’re gone since “you only live once.” We worry about our future and we nurse grudges because we fear our lives can be ruined by circumstances instead of by sin. We essentially move into the same old “eat, drink, and be merry for tomorrow you shall die” except that we cap it with “and then you’ll stand around with your loved ones singing songs and staring at a light for a quadrillion years and then some.”

God forbid.

Your eternity is no more about looking back to this span of time than your life now is about reflecting on kindergarten. The moment you burst through the mud above your grave, you will begin an exciting new mission -- one you couldn’t comprehend if someone told you. And those things that seem so important now -- whether you’re attractive or wealthy or famous or cancer-free -- will be utterly irrelevant in the face of an exhilarating new purpose, one that you were prepared for in this era but one that is far more than a mere sequel to your best life now.

Let’s talk about eternity. But it’s no mere “afterlife.” Instead let’s start thinking of this little puff of time, the next 80 or so years, as what it is: the pre-life.

The Empty Tomb and the Risen Christ — the Centrality of the Resurrection To the Christian Faith

Acts 2:32

The pattern of the Christian year is an exercise of the Church’s annual remembrance and proclamation of the Gospel. The annual celebrations of Christmas and Resurrection Day help the Church to ponder again the truths of Christ’s incarnation and resurrection from the dead.

Christians understand that every Lord’s Day is Resurrection Day, but this Sunday is the festival which draws all Christians face to face with the empty tomb and the truth of the resurrected Lord.

Resurrection Sunday is the central event in the church year – the climax of worship, expectation, and celebration. This celebration is also an acid test of the Church’s faithfulness and conviction.

The secular world has done its best to make a mess of Christmas, but it has largely ignored our celebration of the Resurrection. Where commercialism intrudes, it comes in the forms of eggs and chicks and rabbits – none of which claim any connection with the Resurrection. The fact is, the secular world will attempt to domesticate, commercialize, and tame the babe in the manger – but it will run at breakneck speed from the cross and the empty tomb.

That cross stands as condemnation on all human attempts at self-righteousness, and the fallen world will do all within its power to hide the cross from sight. The empty tomb is the seal and confirmation of the cross, and the world will shield its eyes.

The resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead separates Christianity from all mere religion – whatever its form. Christianity without the literal, physical resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead is merely one religion among many. “And if Christ is not risen,” said the Apostle Paul, “then our preaching is empty and your faith is in vain” [1 Corinthians 15:14]. Furthermore, “You are still in your sins!” [v. 17b]. Paul could not have chosen stronger language. “If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men the most pitiable” [v. 19].

Yet, the resurrection of Jesus Christ has been under persistent attacks since the Apostolic age. Why? Because it is the central confirmation of Jesus’ identity as the incarnate Son of God, and the ultimate sign of Christ’s completed work of atonement, redemption, reconciliation, and salvation. Those who oppose Christ, whether first century religious leaders or twentieth century secularists, recognize the Resurrection as the vindication of Christ against His enemies.

Those who would attack the Church and reject its gospel must direct their arrows at the most crucial truth claim of the New Testament and the disciples: That Jesus Christ, having suffered death on a cross, though sinless, having borne the sins of those He came to save, having been buried in a sealed and guarded grave, was raised by the power of God on the third day.

As Paul well understood, Christianity stands or falls with the empty grave. If Christ is not raised, we are to be pitied, for our faith is in vain. Those who would preach a resurrectionless Christianity have substituted the truth of the gospel for a lie. But, asserted Paul, Christ is risen from the dead. Our faith is not in vain, but is in the risen Lord. He willingly faced death on a cross and defeated death from the grave. The Resurrection is the ultimate sign of God’s vindication of His Son.

As John A. Broadus preached over a century ago: “It was the signed manual of the Deity, it was the seal of the Sovereign of the Universe affixed to His claim, it declared Him to be all that He had ever professed to be, and so it establishes the truth of all His teachings and the truth of the whole Christian society. The great fact that Jesus Christ rose from the dead is the central fact of the evidence of Christianity.”

Believers have no reason to be defensive concerning the Resurrection. To the contrary, any denial of the Resurrection is a denial of the Savior. The biblical evidence is overwhelming.

As the disciples preached in the earliest Christian sermons, “This Jesus God has raised up, of whom we are all witnesses .... Therefore, let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ” [Acts 2:32,36].

The Resurrection was not a dawning awareness of Christ’s continuing presence among the disciples, it was the literal, physical raising of Jesus’ body from the dead. The Church is founded upon the resurrected Lord, who appeared among His disciples and was seen by hundreds of others.

The Church does not have mere permission to celebrate the Resurrection, it has a mandate to proclaim the truth that God raised Jesus Christ from the dead. The resurrected Lord gave the Church a sacred commission to take the gospel throughout the world. As Paul made clear, the resurrection of Christ also comes as a comfort to the believer, for His defeat of death is a foretaste and promise of our own resurrection by His power. “For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality” [1 Corinthians 15:53].

So, as the Church gathers to celebrate the resurrection of Jesus Christ, we should look backward in thankfulness to that empty tomb and forward to the fulfillment of Christ’s promises in us. For Resurrection Day is not merely a celebration – it is truly preparation as well. The resurrection of Jesus Christ is the promise of our resurrection from the dead, and of Christ’s total victory over sin and death. The resurrection of Jesus Christ is at the very center of the Christian gospel. The empty tomb is full of power.

She Thought He Was Dead

On February 27, 1991, at the height of Desert Storm, Ruth Dillow received a very sad message from the Pentagon. It stated that her son, Clayton Carpenter, Private 1st Class, had stepped on a mine in Kuwait and was dead.

Ruth Dillow later wrote, “I can’t begin to describe my grief and shock. It was almost more than I could bear. For three days I wept. For three days I expressed anger and loss. For three days people tried to comfort me, to no avail because the loss was too great.”

But three days after she received that message, the telephone rang. The voice on the other end said, “Mom, it’s me. I’m alive.” Ruth Dillow said, “I couldn’t believe it at first. But then I recognized his voice, and he really was alive.” The message was all a mistake!

She said, “I laughed, I cried, I felt like turning cartwheels, because my son whom I had thought was dead, was really alive. I’m sure none of you can even begin to understand how I felt.”

Perhaps not, but the earliest disciples would have understood how she felt because they experienced the same emotions themselves. One day they watched their best friend and teacher being nailed to a cross. They witnessed His pain as He cried out, “I thirst!” and, “My God, my God, why have You forsaken me?” All their hopes and dreams were buried with Him.

Friday and all day Saturday they mourned, until finally, on “the first day of the week, early in the morning,” the scripture says, some women made their way along the path that led to His tomb, wondering who would roll away the stone for them.

But when they arrived, they found that the stone had already been rolled away. And an angel there told them, “You’re looking in the wrong place. You’re looking for Jesus among the dead. He is not dead. He is alive. He is risen, even as He said!”

from Sermon #27504 by Rev. Melvin M. Newland · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database deathresurrection

Jeremy's Egg

Mark 16:6

Jeremy was born with a twisted body, a slow mind and a chronic, terminal illness that had been slowly killing him all his young life. Still, his parents had tried to give him as normal a life as possible and had sent him to St. Theresa’s Elementary School.

At the age of 12, Jeremy was only in second grade, seemingly unable to learn. His teacher, Doris Miller, often became exasperated with him. He would squirm in his seat, drool and make grunting noises. At other times, he spoke clearly and distinctly, as if a spot of light had penetrated the darkness of his brain. Most of the time, however, Jeremy irritated his teacher. One day, she called his parents and asked them to come to St. Teresa’s for a consultation.

As the Forresters sat quietly in the empty classroom, Doris said to them, “Jeremy really belongs in a special school. It isn’t fair to him to be with younger children who don’t have learning problems. Why, there is a five- year gap between his age and that of the other students!”

Mrs. Forrester cried softly into a tissue while her husband spoke. “Miss Miller,” he said, “there is no school of that kind nearby. It would be a terrible shock for Jeremy if we had to take him out of this school. We know he really likes it here.”

Doris sat for a long time after they left, staring at the snow outside the window. Its coldness seemed to seep into her soul. She wanted to sympathize with the Forresters.

After all, their only child had a terminal illness. But it wasn’t fair to keep him in her class. She had 18 other youngsters to teach and Jeremy was a distraction. Furthermore, he would never learn to read or write. Why waste any more time trying?

As she pondered the situation, guilt washed over her. “Oh God,” she said aloud, “here I am complaining when my problems are nothing compared with that poor family! Please help me to be more patient with Jeremy.”

From that day on, she tried hard to ignore Jeremy’s noises and his blank stares. Then one day he limped to her desk, dragging his bad leg behind him. “I love you, Miss Miller,” he exclaimed, loudly enough for the whole class to hear. The other children snickered, and Doris’ face turned red. She stammered, “Wh-Why, that’s very nice, Jeremy. Now please take your seat.”

Spring came, and the children talked excitedly about the coming of Easter. Doris told them the story of Jesus, and then to emphasise the idea of new life springing forth, she gave each of the children a large plastic egg. “Now,” she said to them “I want you to take this home and bring it back tomorrow with something inside that shows new life. Do you understand?”

“Yes, Miss Miller!” the children responded enthusiastically – all except for Jeremy. He just listened intently, his eyes never left her face. He did not even make his usual noises. Had he understood what she had said about Jesus’ death and resurrection? Did he understand the assignment? Perhaps she should call his parents and explain the project to them.

That evening, Doris’ kitchen sink stopped up. She called the landlord and waited an hour for him to come by and unclog it. After that, she still had to shop for groceries, iron a blouse and prepare a vocabulary test for the next day. She completely forgot about phoning Jeremy’s parents.

The next morning, 19 children came to school, laughing and talking as they placed their eggs in the large wicker basket on Miss Miller’s desk. After they completed their Math lesson, it was time to open the eggs.

In the first egg, Doris found a flower. “Oh yes, a flower is certainly a sign of new life,” she said. “When plants peek through the ground we know that spring is here.” A small girl in the first row waved her arms. “That’s my egg, Miss Miller,” she called out.

The next egg contained a plastic butterfly, which looked very real. Doris held it up. “We all know that a caterpillar changes and grows into a beautiful butterfly. Yes that is new life, too” Little Judy smiled proudly and said, “Miss Miller, that one is mine.”

Next Doris found a rock with moss on it. She explained that the moss, too, showed life.

Billy spoke up from the back of the classroom. “My Daddy helped me!” he beamed.

Then Doris opened the fourth egg. She gasped. The egg was empty! Surely it must be Jeremy’s, she thought, and, of course, he did not understand her instructions. If only she had not forgotten to phone his parents. Because she did not want to embarrass him, she quietly set the egg aside and reached for another.

Suddenly Jeremy spoke up. “Miss Miller, aren’t you going to talk about my egg?”

Flustered, Doris replied, “but Jeremy – your egg is empty!”

He looked into her eyes and said softly, “Yes, but Jesus’ tomb was empty too!”

Time stopped. When she could speak again. Doris asked him, “ Do you know why the tomb was empty?”

“Oh yes!” Jeremy exclaimed. “Jesus was killed and put in there. Then his Father raised him up!”

The recess bell rang. While the children excitedly ran out to the school yard, Doris cried. The cold inside her melted completely away.

Three months later Jeremy died. Those who paid their respects at the mortuary were surprised to see 19 eggs on top of his casket, all of them empty.

from Unknown · Anon via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrection

Mortsafes

Mortsafes were contraptions designed to protect the bodies of the dead from disturbance. There had been body-snatching close to the schools of anatomy in Scotland since the early 18th century. This was due to the necessity for medical students to learn anatomy by attending dissections of human subjects, which was frustrated by the very limited allowance of dead bodies - for example the corpses of executed criminals - granted by the government, which controlled the supply.

The authorities turned a blind eye to the grave-rifling because surgeons and students were working to advance medical knowledge. They kept publicity to a minimum to prevent people from realising what was happening. The cases of grave-robbing that came to light caused riots, damage to property and even lynching. In the early 19th century, with the great increase in numbers of schools and students, there was continual rifling of lonely graveyards, fights in city burial grounds and other disturbances. Men were employed to steal bodies and transport them from place to place, even across the sea, for sale to medical schools. Revelations led to public outrage, particularly in Scotland, where there was great reverence for the dead and a literal belief in the Resurrection. Many thought that the dead could not rise in an incomplete state.

Many people were determined to protect the graves of newly deceased friends and relatives. The rich could afford heavy table tombstones, vaults, mausolea and iron cages around graves. The poor began to place flowers and pebbles on graves to detect disturbances. They dug heather and branches into the soil to make disinterment more difficult. Large stones, often coffin-shaped, sometimes the gift of a wealthy man to the parish, were placed over new graves. Friends and relatives took turns or hired men to watch graves through the hours of darkness. Watch-houses were sometimes erected to shelter the watchers. One watch-house in Edinburgh is a three-storey castellated building with windows. Watching societies were often formed in towns, one in Glasgow having 2,000 members. Many kirk session houses were used by watchers. But graves were still violated.

The mortsafe was invented in about 1816. These were iron or iron-and-stone devices of great weight, in many different designs. Often they were complex heavy iron contraptions of rods and plates, padlocked together - examples have been found close to all Scottish medical schools. A plate was placed over the coffin and rods with heads were pushed through holes in it. These rods were kept in place by locking a second plate over the first to form extremely heavy protection. It would be removed by two people with keys. They were placed over the coffins for about six weeks, then removed for further use when the body inside was sufficiently decayed. There is a model of a mortsafe of this type in Marischal Museum, Aberdeen. Sometimes a church bought them and hired them out. Societies were also formed to purchase them and control their use, with annual membership fees, and charges made to non-members.

Publicity surrounding the crimes of Burke and Hare heightened the fear felt by many people. It was about this time that vaults - repositories for dead bodies - were built by public subscription in Scotland, with their use governed by rules and regulations. Some of these were above ground while others - mainly in Aberdeenshire - were wholly or partly underground. In one village, Udny Green, in Aberdeenshire there is a unique morthouse, a circular building with a thick studded wooden door and an inner iron door. Inside there is turntable to accommodate seven coffins. A coffin would be moved round as further ones were added and by the time it reappeared the body would be of no use to the dissectionists.

Probably all communities near the Scottish schools of medicine in Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen employed some means of protecting the dead. Some used both mortsafes and watching. There are watch-houses in the remoter Scottish areas, in the Borders, and two have been found in Northumberland. There is no evidence of their use in the rest of England.

The mortsafes are mainly lying in churchyards and burial grounds; some are very broken and rusting away. One has been restored and hung in a church porch, with an explanatory note, by the East Lothian Antiquary Society. There are one or two in museums but those on display rarely have any indication of what they are or how they were used. Some documents appertaining to mortsafes and other protection devices are still in existence in libraries and record offices. There are two mortsafes in reasonable condition outside the old Aberfoyle church in Stirling, which was fully 30 miles from the nearest School of Anatomy in Glasgow. One can also be found, in a slightly rusted state, to the right of the door outside Skene Parish Church, Kirkton of Skene, Aberdeenshire.

________

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

===========================

http://www.deep-six.com/deathweb/page222.htm

EXIT STRATEGY

A Textbook on Death & Dying

Author: George D. Campbell, III

Before 1832 it was not uncommon to rob fresh graves in England. To learn human anatomy, medical students had to dissect dogs because of a lack of human cadavers. This created a market for bodies stolen from cemeteries. Although the practice was condemned and unlawful, the willingness of medical students to pay for the grim wares promoted the procedure. Freshly exhumed bodies were openly sold on medical school grounds.

The cemeteries were scouted out by the “resurrectionists.” Following a burial they would return at night to extract the body from the grave within minutes. Normally, they would dig down to the coffin, bust it open, extract the shrouded remains, remove the shroud, and take the body away. The shroud was usually returned to the grave because it was against the law to steal it! If they did get caught they were usually beat up and possibly killed.

Counter-measures were employed by the grievers to prevent theft of their loved ones. Watch towers were built at the perimeter of the cemetery so a look out could keep the area under surveillance. Large flat stone monuments were laid out on grave tops. (Today some of the graves in the United States still have these flat grave markers covering the entire top of the grave.)

The Resurrectionists, being one step ahead, became sophisticated and used diagonal tunnels. At times they would work with the cemetery caretaker during the burial. As dirt was being put in the grave the casket was raised up. In this way, the coffin was located just below the surface so body extraction would take only minutes.

Mortsafes were employed. These were essentially heavy iron cages put over the coffin prior to burial. Stone houses were employed. The coffin was placed through a small door onto a giant Lazy Susan. As each coffin was added the turntable was rotated. By the time the coffin reemerged at the small door after one revolution, the body was so decomposed it was no longer of value to the grave-robber.

All of this came to an end in 1832 because England passed an anatomical act that allowed people to will their bodies to medical schools. However, many of the monuments and features found in American cemeteries today are the direct result of grave-robbing activities in England.

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database resurrection

Why Christ's Resurrection Matters

Mark 16:1

On Pascha, Orthodox Christians everywhere sing, “Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death, and upon those in the tombs bestowing life.” We affirm boldly and with great joy our belief in Christ’s real, historical resurrection from the dead, which is the basis for our faith and hope.

Reared on happy consumerism, one might feel satisfied to view holidays such as Easter (or Pascha) in isolation, a special day that is set apart to celebrate an event that has significance for us only insofar as it appeals to our sense of convention and propriety. Even if we are moderately religious, we cannot escape the cultural fascination with secular tropes, where the “special day” adheres in our consciousness as a celebration not of an historical event that has immediate significance even now, but which appeals to us mainly from the basis of what we experienced in our own childhoods, the memory of our own individual Easter celebrations or family rituals, whether idealized or not. Even those who despise “organized religion” and treat it with contempt do not seem to mind an only somewhat disorganized religious ritualism that is signified by bunnies and eggs, dressing up for a religious service on hopefully a beautiful spring day, hidden eggs colored a variety of shades of blue and pink and yellow and red, often dyed the night before by excited children, and baskets filled with chocolate and other goodies.

In the context of the worship of the Church among those believers who participate in the fasts and feasts of the Church calendar year, the celebration of Pascha is not just one special day of revelry to commemorate a specific religious event, but it resides within the context of a much longer story, one that continues throughout the entire year, but narrows in intensity during Lent. People who pop into services once a year to celebrate Easter in the same spirit as one might go to a movie or stand on the side of the road to watch a parade may find themselves made happy by the celebration, which is a good thing in itself; but they miss so much of the substance of it that it might be compared to reading the CliffsNotes or mistaking the preview for the movie.

But that also is a bad comparison -- the difference might actually be between watching the preview and playing a role in the film as an actor, familiar with the subject, filled with the raw experience of the life of Jesus Christ, who comes not in order to entertain us, nor to judge us, nor to teach a particular branch of science or an ethical system. But he comes, we find in the icon of the Nativity, peculiarly wrapped in what appears to be graveclothes, his cradle oddly resembling a coffin, the cave in which the baby lies not just a random hole in the earth, but made by his presence into the entrance to the very heart of the earth. He comes to die, and those who follow him do not merely watch, but die with him, baptized into his death in a manner that is above all rationality.

So during Holy Week we follow the Passion, not to meditate on the violence done to Jesus nor to feel sorry for him, but to mourn our own weaknesses and sins. We do not engage in the process of reflection on our own behavior in order to try to feel pathologically guilty or to punish ourselves, but in order to turn away from the behaviors which ruin us and other people, so that we might progress to mutual healing and communion. During Lent and Holy Week we seek forgiveness from every creature for the nasty things, or perhaps just the unkind things, we have done in our lives. We seek to humble ourselves with Christ as if we too might be humbled to the point of death, in Him, not as a mere memory, but as a mystery of the unity and communion in Christ that not only breaks the barriers between the physical and immaterial worlds, but transcends space and time as well.

We do not attend for a mere memorial or to play with dead symbols in meaningless ceremonies, but we identify with Christ in his Passion, and we identify with those who killed him for whom he prays when he is held aloft on the cross that they would be forgiven. If Christ does not rise from death, thereby trampling down death by death, then we remain dead, victims of death and undone by the tragedy of death. If his resurrection is merely a myth to imbue our lives with meaning, the meaning is spoiled by its lack of veracity and it becomes as insubstantial as stories of the Easter Bunny. St. Paul writes, “...if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile.” But if it is a myth that is also true, both historically and subjectively, that Jesus died and was resurrected so that when we die in Him we may also be raised with Him, then it has the power and potential to transform all death, all separation, all tragedy, all failure and all suffering into a path that leads to resurrection, life, justice, beauty and communion with God.

As the late theologian, Fr. Alexander Schmemann writes:

All Christianity, therefore, is the experience of faith repeated again and again as if for the first time, through its incarnation in rites, words, music, and colors. To the unbeliever, it may indeed seem like a mirage; he hears only words, he sees only incomprehensible ceremonies, and he understands them only outwardly. But for believers, all of this radiates from within, and not as proof of his faith, but as its result, as its life in the world, in the soul, in history. Therefore the darkness and sadness of Holy Friday is for us something real, alive, contemporary; we can cry at the cross and experience everything that took place in that triumph of evil, treachery, cowardice, and betrayal; we can contemplate the life-bearing tomb on Holy Saturday with excitement and hope. And therefore, every year we can celebrate Easter, Pascha, the Resurrection. For Easter is not the remembrance of an event in the past. It is the real encounter in happiness and joy, with him whom our hearts long ago knew and encountered as the life and light of all light. Easter night testifies that Christ is alive and with us, and that we are alive with him. The entire celebration is an invitation to look at the world and life, and to behold the dawning of the mystical day of the Kingdom of light. “Today the scent of Spring begins,” sings the church, “and the new creation exults...” It exults in faith, in love and in hope.

*

[The original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #13290]

We Say Goodbye... But Then What Happens When We Die?

Luke 23:43

A much-loved relative had died “full of years,” as the King James Bible quaintly puts it. Family and friends gathered in the funeral home to say goodbye. Open-casket funerals are the tradition in our area. So we sat sadly before the mortal remains of our loved one. A solemn recording of a well-known hymn provided an appropriate background for the snuffles and choked-back tears of the mourners.

“That was her favorite hymn,” said someone. “She would have liked that.” And that is when the words of an old Beatles song suddenly popped into my head.

You say goodbye, but I say hello.

Hello, hello.

I don’t know why you say goodbye, I say hello.

I had to suppress a chuckle. Funerals are serious occasions, and certainly a time to keep one’s sense of humor in check. A Beatles song would not have gone down well. But, I asked myself, could those words actually reflect what was happening?

God did know why we were saying goodbye. Death seems so final. The skillfully made-up mortal remains of our loved one was not actually her. She had gone. Death is a frontier, and it is one we rightly fear to even approach, let alone cross. It is, as Paul wrote, an enemy, and we hold it at bay as long as possible. But in the end it conquers us all.

But then what? Most people have some kind of belief that death is not the end. The people who joined together to say “goodbye” came from many religious persuasions, and it was obvious, talking with them afterwards, that they had different ideas about what happened to their departed loved one.

Some were convinced she was in heaven with Jesus. Others believed she was asleep, awaiting the resurrection. Maybe some believed she was in Purgatory (but surely not for long, as she was a devout and sincere Christian.)

What is interesting is that all of us get our ideas about life after death from the Bible, or at least we think we do. Who is right? What has God told us happens to us when we die?

The answer is not what you might expect. God has not told us precisely what happens immediately after we die. He has told us enough for us not to worry about it. He tells us that through Jesus, we have victory over death. He assures us that he wants us to join him, to experience life in a way that we cannot begin to imagine, and his promise is that it will last forever. But beyond that, the Bible is vague about the details. Especially the details of what happens immediately after we die.

Many ideas

“Wait a minute! Doesn’t the Bible say in ... ?” I can hear you protesting, as you reach for a familiar scripture to reinforce your own belief. Yes, it does. But in other places the Bible tells us something that seems to contradict that, or at least modify it. It is important to be specific and dogmatic where God is specific and dogmatic. But if he is not — and on this topic he is not — we need to approach the subject with caution and humility.

You may be surprised to know that the Bible has little to say specifically about what happens immediately after we die. (I keep saying “immediately” — that’s important.) By emphasizing some texts over others, you can build a case for any of several points of views. But the result can be a theological house of cards.

Some scriptures suggest that the dead are safely “asleep,” and will know nothing until the moment of resurrection when Jesus returns. But others imply that they are in some way conscious, and experience emotions. Paul had no fear of death. He had, at some time in his eventful life, been given a “visitor’s pass” to heaven, and this had transformed his worldview. Life “here below” was difficult, and he was eager to begin the next step.

“As long as I’m alive in this body, there is good work for me to do,” he wrote to the Philippians. “If I had to choose right now, I hardly know which I’d choose. Hard choice! The desire to break camp here and be with Christ is powerful. Some days I can think of nothing better” (Philippians 1:22-23, The Message Bible).

But what did he mean by “be with Christ”? He does not elaborate. Another Bible writer with a day pass to heaven was John, the author of Revelation. He tells us:

I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. They called out in a loud voice, ‘How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?’ Then each of them was given a white robe, and they were told to wait a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and brothers who were to be killed as they had been was completed. (Revelation 6:9-11)

Leaving aside the question of how literally he saw these things, the point is that he does not describe the dead as being asleep and unconscious. He would hardly invent an analogy that he knew to be heretical. Puzzling, isn’t it?

If anyone should have known, it was Jesus. Just before he died, he asked the Father to “receive my spirit.” Shortly before that, he made a promise to the repentant thief suffering crucifixion beside him. He was the first person in history to look on the dying Savior and ask for help. That man’s belief was that when they die, good people go to “paradise.” But he had not been a good man. He realized that Jesus had, so he begged him to remember him in whatever came next.

Jesus reassured him: “Today you will be with me in paradise.”

What did he mean by that? In the English language you can juggle with the punctuation, and manipulate it to support several ideas. But the original language in which Jesus spoke these words, and those into which they were translated, had no such distinctions. Enigmatic or not, it is best to take it at face value.

Dead and gone

The Bible does not really answer the question of what happens to us immediately after we die.

We can say with confidence that from our point of view, the dead are “departed.” One phase of life is, for better or worse, definitely over. The book of Ecclesiastes reminds us to make the most of this life because, “in the grave, where you are going, there is neither working nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom” (Ecclesiastes 9:10). The point the writer is making is that your physical death is a cutoff point. One phase of your existence is definitely over. Wherever, whatever happens next is different. You don’t just pick up where you left off.

So pagans get it totally wrong when they bury food, money, bows and arrows, pots and pans, etc., with their dead. But Christians also get it wrong if they reassure themselves that the righteous dead go to heaven, and the rest to hell. The Bible does not teach it precisely that way.

The Bible does not dwell on the details of what happens in the short term to the departed. It is as if God is saying, “Don’t worry about it. Leave it to me. I have things under control. Death is an enemy, but it is the last one you will ever face.” Rather, the emphasis of Scripture about what happens when we die is on something far more exciting — the resurrection of the body — to what theologian N. T. Wright has called “the life after life after death,” in a new heavens and a new earth.

Jesus first

When Jesus died on the cross, the Father “received his spirit,” along with, a little later, that of the repentant thief. “Whatever happens next” happened to them, and it still is happening for the thief. But after three days, Jesus was resurrected.

He was resurrected with a body. A real, recognizable body, with genuine body parts — not a wispy, ethereal manifestation that could look like a body when he needed to make himself visible. This spiritual body was a new life form — an everlasting version of what he had before — a human being made eternal. No longer bound by the limitations of time and space, Jesus could move back and forth from the dimensions we experience to those that are at the moment beyond our reach, although not necessarily beyond our imagination.

With the astounding evidence we are uncovering about the nature of reality, we are perhaps better equipped to contemplate this idea than ever before. We know there are dimensions we cannot experience, sights we can’t see, and “dark matter” that lies beyond the reach of our senses and the instruments we have developed to enhance them. Theoretical physicists play with notions that would, even a generation ago, have seemed like science fiction. The more we probe, the stranger and yet more wonderful it all seems. Physicist Freeman Dyson once observed, “The Universe is not only stranger than we imagine. It is stranger than we can imagine.”

We need to revamp our ideas of “eternal rest.” There is much more to eternal life than just living forever. It will be filled with activity, experiences, projects and much more.

In an age where parallel universes, time travel and string theory are taken seriously, it no longer seems preposterous to suggest that this earth is not all there is, and that this earth is not yet all it will be. Or that there is a new creation within this one, waiting to be born. Just trying to put these ideas into words that make sense brings us, as theologian and scientist John Polkinghorne put it, to the “frontiers of language.” We can’t blame people from other times for not having words to express such things, although Paul came close in his epistle to the Romans:

The created world itself can hardly wait for what’s coming next. Everything in creation is being more or less held back. God reins it in until both creation and all the creatures are ready and can be released at the same moment into the glorious times ahead. Meanwhile, the joyful anticipation deepens.

All around us we observe a pregnant creation. The difficult times of pain throughout the world are simply birth pangs. But it’s not only around us; it’s within us. The Spirit of God is arousing us within. We’re also feeling the birth pangs. These sterile and barren bodies of ours are yearning for full deliverance” (Romans 8:19-23, The Message Bible).

The Bible tells us that what happened to Jesus will also happen to us. “We are children of God, and what we will be has not yet been made known. But we know that when he appears, we shall be like him, for we shall see him as he is” (1 John 3:2).

This is what the Bible focuses on when it tells us of life after death.

A new heaven and a new earth

There is much more to eternal life than just living forever. Eternity will not be spent in a sort of nebulous nether world, completely different to everything we have experienced and everything we enjoy. No one looks forward to an “eternal rest” of sitting on a cloud playing a harp, do they? About five days of that would be more than enough for most of us.

Fortunately, that is one of our ideas, not God’s. He offers us a destiny with a new heavens and a new earth, with animals, trees, friends, love and fun. We need to revamp our ideas of “eternal rest.” It will be a rest from anxiety, feelings of guilt and the limitations of our frail bodies. But it will be filled with activity, experiences, projects — all you could possibly want in this life — and much, much, more.

“No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him,” wrote Paul to the Corinthians (1 Corinthians 2:9). He added, “but God has revealed it to us by his Spirit” (v. 10). At least, he gives us some tantalizing glimpses. That new world will not happen in its fullness until Jesus returns, and we don’t know when that will be. But we can get foretastes of it when we experience the really wonderful things about being alive now.

Human love, hard-won accomplishment, deep friendships and acts of genuine unselfishness – those moments when we think, “I wish life was always like this” give us “flash forwards” to another kind of existence. It is the way we were meant to live, the way the world could be — and will be one day. They encourage us to join Jesus Christ in working for it with, as Paul said, “joyful anticipation.”

Could it be that the joyful anticipation continues in some way immediately after our physical death? Why not? Although we should not be dogmatic, there is enough in the Scriptures to show this is a strong possibility.

In the parking lot

Here is an analogy that might help. If you have ever visited one of the great theme parks on a holiday weekend, you’ll know that the journey to get there is the worst part — crowded freeways, hot car, fraying tempers. But finally, you get to the parking lot.

The parking lot is still not the theme park, but you do feel you have arrived. There is upbeat music coming from speakers, and helpful attendants to guide you to a parking space and the transportation to the main gate. In the mid-distance you can see the tops of some of the rides, and hear the sounds of people enjoying themselves. It is a foretaste of what you too will soon be experiencing.

You have not yet arrived at the final destination, but you are no longer outside. The hardest part of the journey is over. Perhaps you are eager to get started, and your children are tugging at you, asking, like those souls under the altar John saw in Revelation, “Can we go in now?” And the answer is “All in God’s good time.” In God’s good time, the new heavens and the new earth will be revealed. There may be some surprises, but surely no disappointments for those who have eagerly awaited the fulfillment of our destiny.

This is what was going through my mind as the funeral service progressed. We were saying goodbye to a loved one. But could it be that somewhere — in a place beyond our reach and experience, God was saying “Hello. Welcome [not to your eternal rest, but] to the rest of eternity”?

Believe It Or Not: The New York Times Has Quietly Returned To Its 'Jesus Is Dead' Theme

Perhaps you remember a 2014 piece at The Federalist by one M.Z. Hemingway that ran with the headline, “Will Someone Explain Christianity To The New York Times?”

It focused on a travel piece that, once corrected, included the following material about tourism in the tense city of Jerusalem. The crucial passage stated:

On a recent afternoon in the Old City of Jerusalem, while fighting raged in Gaza, Bilal Abu Khalaf hosted a group of Israeli tourists at his textile store in the Christian Quarter – one of Jerusalem’s tourist gems.

Dressed in a striped galabiyya and tasseled red tarbouche, Mr. Abu Khalaf showed his visitors exotic hand-loomed silks and golden-threaded garments from Syria, Morocco and Kashmir that adorn Israel’s most luxurious hotels and ambassadors’ homes. ...

Nearby, the vast Church of the Holy Sepulcher marking the site where many Christians believe that Jesus was buried, usually packed with pilgrims, was echoing and empty.

Yes, that was what the Times piece said after it was corrected. What did it say before that? Believe it or not, it said, “Nearby, the vast Church of the Holy Sepulcher marking the site where many Christians believe that Jesus is buried, usually packed with pilgrims, was echoing and empty.”

In this case, it’s easy to discern what the meaning of the word “is” is.

Hold that thought.

Did the world’s most powerful newsroom (that title would belong either to the Gray Lady or the BBC) actually publish that telltale sentence? Luckily, someone had a screenshot. [original article shows screenshot of the paragraph]

Let me pause to note that the journalism question here is slightly complex. No one is asking the editors in the college of cardinals at the Times to accept the Resurrection as a fact of secular history. In this case, the journalism question is whether “many Christians” believe that Jesus is, in fact, buried you know where.

Do many Christians believe that? I mean, there are liberal Christians (Hello Episcopal Bishop John Shelby Spong) who deny the Resurrection or attempt to redefine it. But would the folks in that unorthodox tribe actually say Jesus is buried at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher? They would not.

Back to Hemingway’s 2014 piece, before we move into the present.

M.Z. noted, logically enough, that (a) the tomb in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher is empty, (b) this historic and very complex sanctuary is also known as the Church of the Resurrection and, to wrap things up, (c) small-o orthodox Christians do not believe Jesus is dead and buried. This is not obscure stuff we are talking about.

This brings us to a recent Times arts piece that ran under this title: “Jerusalem as a Place of Desire and Death, at the Metropolitan Museum.”

This review was the subject of a First Things essay by Mark Movsesian, of the St. John’s Center for Law and Religion, with this title: “Why Do Christians Revere Jerusalem? The Times Misses a Step.” Here is the Times passage that will interest readers:

Three major faiths have laid claim to that city. For Jews, it’s the place where, at the End of Days, the Messiah will appear; rebuild the Holy Temple, twice-destroyed; and sort out the righteous from the rest. For Muslims, the city is sacred as the point from which the Prophet Muhammad, after a miraculous night flight from Mecca, began a tour of heaven. To Christians, Jerusalem is a giant walk-through reliquary of Jesus’ life and death, with every street, every stone, soaked in his aura.

Movsesian notes that we are dealing with work by a journalist who, in the past, has been awarded a Pulitzer Prize for criticism. One can assume that he chose his words with care and that his editors respected his choices.

This, Movsesian raises a question:

Jesus’s “life and death”? Actually, according to the Gospel accounts, Jesus didn’t spend a lot of time in the city, except for one or two important episodes. Most of his life he spent in Galilee. And “death”? It’s true that Jesus died in the city. But wasn’t there something else important that happened to him in Jerusalem, according to Christian belief? Think about it, I bet you know. Right – the Resurrection, the central event of the Christian faith.

The Resurrection, not Jesus’s “life and death,” explains why Christians revere Jerusalem. It explains why they built the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, the most important Christian pilgrimage site in the world, in Jerusalem, right above the place where they believe Jesus rose from the dead. It’s why Christians down the centuries have sacrificed so much to travel to Jerusalem and why all the major Christian communions have striven, often against long odds, to maintain a foothold there. The Resurrection is not a minor doctrine. To omit it is to miss the basic teaching of Christianity, one that has had a huge impact on Western history, thought, and culture – including, of course, Western art.

Ah, but should Christians expect the Times to print material about the Resurrection? After all, that is, you know, a miracle. Maybe the Gray Lady doesn’t want to write journalism about miracle stories?

Oh, wait.

It’s odd, therefore, that a Pulitzer Prize-winning art critic would miss the point, and that the Times’s culture editors wouldn’t notice the omission. It can’t be because the Times was trying to avoid offending non-Christians by referring to a miracle only Christians accept as true. The Night Journey and the expected return of the Messiah are also sectarian miracles that only believers accept (or expect). ... The Times lists them without hesitation. If one were trying to be objective, one could simply write the factual statement, “Christians believe that Christ’s Resurrection took place in Jerusalem,” and leave it at that. No one could be offended.

So what is going on here? That’s a journalism question.

It would be hard to answer that question with certainty. (Movsesian's full article is at #65811).

Three Commands From An Empty Tomb

Mark 16:15

“The angel said to the women, ‘Do not be afraid; for I know that you are looking for Jesus who has been crucified. He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the place where He was lying. Go quickly and tell His disciples that He has risen from the dead; and behold, He is going ahead of you into Galilee, there you will see Him; behold, I have told you’” (Matthew 28:5-7 NASB).

Springtime is here. Dogwoods and daffodils bloom as winter retreats and warmer days are welcomed.

Across America, churches will soon be packed on Easter Sunday.

Why?

Easter is about forgiveness and hope through a sacred death and an empty tomb. Easter is about the grimness of the grave being overcome. It is about Jesus Christ rising bodily, victoriously and eternally from the grave. Behold our resurrected Lord triumphantly displaying the keys to death, hell and the grave in His nail-scarred hands! No wonder Easter is the annual apex for all Christians.

No other religion dares to make such claims. Muslims readily admit that Muhammad is dead. Buddha and Confucius are also in the grave, as is Joseph Smith. But after Jesus died, He rose from the grave, never to die again.

The women who followed Jesus to Jerusalem from Galilee had gone to the tomb to properly anoint their Lord for burial. There they found an angel who gave them three significant commands:

The first command was “Do not be afraid” (v.5)

Those women came to the tomb wondering how they would remove the stone so they could anoint Jesus’ body (cf. Mark 16:1). But when they arrived, an angel had already rolled the stone away (cf. Matthew 28:2). Jesus was not there -- He had risen! And because He had risen, there would never again be a valid reason for fear. As Bill Gaither’s song says, “Because He lives, all fear is gone.”

The angel’s second command was “Come, see” (v.6).

There was nothing to hide. Jesus’ body had not been stolen. This was no gimmick or fabrication, as the Jewish religious leaders in Jerusalem slyly suggested (cf. Matthew 28:11f). Jesus was really alive. The angel rolled the stone away, not to allow Jesus to leave the grave, but to let the women and everyone else to look in! Jesus’ burial proved His actual death. His empty tomb proved His actual resurrection. Now everyone could “come, see” for themselves.

The third command was, “go quickly and tell” (v.7).

The good news of Jesus’ resurrection demanded sharing. The angel’s words at this point were similar to those spoken by Jesus after His resurrection and prior to His ascension: “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creation” (Mark 16:15 NASB). Jesus had risen from the grave and His disciples were commissioned to take that good news to the ends of the earth.

As they proclaimed the gospel message, people repented of their sins, believed that Jesus died and rose for their salvation, and received Jesus as Lord and Savior by calling on His name in humble prayer. The book of Acts describes how those early disciples boldly shared the gospel from Jerusalem to Rome in just three decades. They could not stop speaking of what they had “seen and heard” (cf. Acts 4:20). Today we who follow Jesus must continue to tell the world the saving message of His death, burial and resurrection (cf. 1 Corinthians 15:3-4).

No religion in the world claims anything like Jesus’ empty tomb. His vicarious death and victorious resurrection are what make the good news “good.”

The angel’s three commands echo through the centuries, calling out to us this Easter season. By faith, with spirit-ears, we still hear His commands:

“Jesus is alive! Do not be afraid!”

“Jesus is alive! Come, see!”

“Jesus is alive! Go quickly and tell!”

That is the message of Easter! That is what we must share with our lost neighbors. We must tell everyone that there is hope, healing and forgiveness for anyone who comes to Christ in repentance and faith, and that salvation comes from the bloody cross and empty tomb of Jesus.

Do not be afraid. Come and see. Go quickly and tell.

The Essential Resurrection

1 Corinthians 15:3

As a student in a Baptist college I heard in a chapel service that it wasn’t important whether Jesus literally and bodily resurrected from the dead. I was told as long as the influence of Jesus lived on in me, that was the important thing.

Denying the miraculous was not uncommon in our Baptist institutions almost a half-century ago. For those who get weary of hearing about battles for the Bible, let me remind you that eternal vigilance is necessary to preserve the truth. The battle for the Bible will never be over until Jesus returns.

The testimony of Jesus Christ is found in every book of the Bible. The Bible is our only reliable witness of the historicity of Jesus and His words. Jesus’ resurrection was clearly evident on Easter Sunday to Mary Magdalene and the women at the tomb, Peter, the eleven disciples and the two disciples traveling to the village of Emmaus.

Easter is a good time to reintroduce others to the literal, bodily resurrection of Jesus as the foundation of the Gospel (1 Corinthians 15:3,4).

Without the resurrection, the cross is a sad ending of a good man; with the resurrection, the cross is the sufficient sacrifice of the God-man. The apostle Paul put it plainly that “if Christ is not risen, your faith is in vain; you are yet in your sins!” (1 Corinthians 15:17). Without the resurrection, we have no hope; but with it, we have the assurance of eternal life.

With the resurrection’s promise of a glorious future, believers will not live in eternity as disembodied spirits but will receive resurrected bodies like Jesus. “We know that when he is revealed, we shall be like him for we shall see him as he is” (1 John 3:2). We have much to celebrate.

Christians observe the resurrection every Sunday when we gather to worship. A life-changing experience is available with the risen Lord. This is what Christianity is all about. To that end, the living Lord Jesus puts within us a desire to tell the Good News like the women on that first Easter morning.

It’s easy to find bad news; let’s be bearers of the Good News. He’s alive!

What Difference Does The Resurrection Make?

Job 14:14

"For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day." – John 6:40

What difference does the resurrection of Jesus Christ make to you and to me? It answers the all-important question that Job asked: “If a man dies, will he live again?” (Job 14:14). When I close my eyes for the last time here on earth, do I just slip into nothingness, or is there something on the other side of the grave? The resurrection of Jesus answers that. The resurrection of Jesus was not just an isolated event. The Bible says His resurrection was a prototype of the resurrection of all who trust in Him for salvation. Jesus promised that the resurrection He experienced, you and I will also experience one day if we place our faith in Him. Death will not have the final word.

We find that promise to Jesus’ followers all throughout Scripture. Jesus made a bedrock promise that those who trust in Him would have eternal life. I think of John 5:24. It was my dad’s favorite verse. He had it put on his gravestone. Jesus said, “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life.” Or John 6:40. Jesus said, “For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day.” Or John 11:25. Jesus said, “I am the resurrection and the life; he who believes in Me will live even if he dies.” Because Christ lives, one day those of us who trust in Him will live again as well. That is what the resurrection means to us.

In 1968, when Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated, many people feared that his death and the riots that would ensue afterward would undo the civil rights movement. Dr. King’s funeral was a pivotal event. That day, several people gave eulogies. One of those men was named James Bevel. When his turn came, the heavy-set Bevel mounted the podium and said, “You have heard that our leader is dead. That rumor is false. Our leader is not dead. Our leader was not Martin Luther King.” He paused and then continued, “Our leader is the one who led Moses out of Egypt. Our leader is the one who went down with Daniel into the lions’ den! Our leader is the one who walked out of the grave on that Easter Sunday morning. Our leader neither slumbers, nor sleeps. Our leader cannot be put in jail! Our leader is still on the job! Our leader is not dead!”

That is the Easter message! Our leader is not dead! He lives! Christ Jesus lives today! And because He lives, one day so shall we! God be praised for a risen Savior.

What does it mean to us that Jesus died and was raised from the dead? It means we do not have to wonder about our eternal destiny any longer. We are all going to die. We are all going to experience death, but we can experience life after death by trusting in Jesus to be our Savior.

from email submitted by Rick Swenson · Dr. Robert Jeffress via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database easter

He Launched Himself Into Space

Luke 24:51

“Mad” Mike Hughes, 62 years old, believes the world is shaped like a Frisbee. It is not a globe. He not a scientist, but a limousine driver from Apple Valley, California. Even so, he has been determined to prove the earth is pretty much flat.

In March 2018 he did this by blasting himself into space. After several months of delays, he successfully launched himself over the Mojave Desert in a home-made steam-propelled rocket. He landed hard and said he probably wouldn’t be able to get out of bed the next morning.

So, did he “prove” Earth is flat? Not exactly. “Mad” Mike only launched himself about a quarter-mile up. That’s pretty impressive for a do-it-yourself astronaut but about 61 miles short of getting into space. He plans to improve his rocket and try, try again. Like cartoon star Wile E. Coyote.

Trying to establish that what you believe is true makes a lot of sense. Some things cannot be proven because they are not true. Other things cannot be proven because they are inaccessible to us. The resurrection of Jesus is like this: it happened long ago, we ourselves were not there to witness it and all we have are mostly second-hand accounts. Nevertheless, there are compelling arguments for believing it really happened.

“Mad” Mike Hughes will eventually be disillusioned by his quest. Or, more likely, killed by it. Those who believe in Jesus will not be disappointed but amazed that it is even more glorious than they could have imagined. Christians don’t have to launch themselves into space - Jesus has already gone there and he will bring us to be with him with his own power, not ours.

________

Adapted from an article in the "This Is True" internet newsletter edited by Randy Cassingham, March 25, 2018; .

from (see notes) · Rev. David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Love That Will Not Let Go

Mark 14:50

Mary Magdalene both clung to the risen Christ and went out to bear witness.

Jesus said to her, “Mary.” She turned toward him and cried out in Aramaic, “Rabboni!” (which means “Teacher”). Jesus said, “Do not hold on to me ... Go instead to my brothers and tell them ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God.’” — John 20:16–17

The Resurrection is an unprecedented event in history. In the words of C. S. Lewis, it is a miracle of the New Creation. Something of which the world has had no previous experience at all has entered the old order and radically altered it. The great reversal has begun. The new wine has burst the old wineskins. Even familiar relations with Jesus in the old creation no longer suffice. Now, it seems he can only be recognized by those to whom he chooses to reveal himself.

The story of the Resurrection is also the story of human love at its best. When all else fails — even faith and hope — love comes through intact. It may be weak in comparison to divine love, but it is strong enough to move the heart of the Lover. Such is the love of Mary Magdalene.

What makes Mary’s devotion to Jesus unique may have begun early in his ministry when he cast seven demons out of her (Luke 8:1–3). Mary had known the terrifying power of spiritual enslavement and the exhilarating freedom of following Christ her teacher. Here was a Rabbi who treated women very differently. From that day, her admiration and love grew.

Mary followed Jesus to Jerusalem. When all the other disciples fled (Mark 14:50), she stood in solidarity with other women to witness his agonizing death on the cross (Matt. 27:55). Love refuses to be cowed. Love perseveres when hope is extinguished. Mary witnessed Jesus’ limp body being taken down from the cross. He was dead! But love will not give up.

She continued to follow Jesus to the point where she could go no further. The tomb was finally clamped shut. Sabbath was about to begin. She had to leave, but not without first taking note of where his body lay (Mark 15:47).

Mary could not wait for the Sabbath to be over. At the first streaks of dawn, she hurried to the tomb. Love drove her back. Perhaps all she wanted was to be with the Beloved — if only to run her hand over the cold, defiant rock that blocks the tomb’s entrance. But further dismay greeted her: The stone had been removed and the body was gone. Without a second thought, she hurried back and reported it to Peter and John.

John reached the tomb entrance first and hesitated, but Peter, true to form, barged in. The sight defied explanation, for they “still did not understand from Scripture that Jesus had to rise from the dead” (John 20:9). Peter and John tried to figure out what might have happened. They were practical men looking for plausible explanations, and finding none, they decided to leave.

But Mary lingered. She would not give up so easily. But where is he? Why? No, it can’t be — perhaps a jumble of foreboding thoughts filled her mind. Could it be the work of grave robbers? Perhaps anger welled up at the thought of unconscionable men desecrating Jesus’ body. Mary could take it no more; she broke down in tears.

She moved closer to the tomb and saw two angels. Their brief exchange suggests that they seemed harmless, ordinary folks. Just then Jesus appeared and asked: “Why are you crying?” But Mary could not recognize the voice. Thinking that he was the gardener, she pleaded with him to tell him where he might have carried away the body of Jesus, saying, “and I will get him” — I will carry him (John 20:15). She did not consider how she would do it. These are words of a determined woman. Whatever it took, she’d find the body and carry it back.

Was Mary so blinded by her tears that she could not recognize Jesus? Not likely. The Gospels record other instances when the resurrected Jesus was not recognized until he chose to make himself recognizable, such as the two disciples on the road to Emmaus who only recognized Jesus through the breaking of bread. For Mary, the voice of the “gardener” suddenly sounded familiar when Jesus called her by name.

Mary’s love had been stretched to breaking point — almost. But then Jesus revealed himself and spoke her name in the familiar voice that she had heard countless times before. In the depth of despair, her “teacher” had found her. She recognized his reassuring voice. She instinctively clung to him, driven by love that will not let go.

But she could not make Christ exclusively her own. Love must at some point yield to the will of the Lover: “Do not hold on to me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father. Go instead to my brothers and tell them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God’ “ (v. 17).

Following Jesus had brought Mary to the brink of despair, but love finally broke through the old order. She became the first witness of the risen Christ and the first bearer of the Good News: The Father of Jesus is now our Father and Jesus is now our brother (Heb. 2:11, 12). But Mary was not a witness in the formal sense, for in her culture a testimony was validated by at least two witnesses and among the Jews, the status of a woman as a witness was a contested issue. What Jesus did for her can only be understood as an act of pure love in response to her singular devotion.

Mary Magdalene’s relentless pursuit of her Beloved exemplifies the spiritual quest for deeper union with God. Like other contemplatives, mystics, and saints in subsequent Christian history, Mary teaches us that love never fails — even when hope fails. It sustained her through the dark night of Holy Saturday into the dawn of Easter. Even as Mary clings to Christ, she also learns to let go. The ecstasy of her reunion with the Beloved was not meant to be for her alone to enjoy. He called her to go into the world and bear witness to the Resurrection: “I have seen the Lord!” From Mary, we begin to understand why love is the greatest theological virtue (1 Cor. 13:13). From her, too, we learn that however much we relish mountain-top experiences of intimacy with God, we must also descend to bring the Good News of the living Christ to a dying world.

________

Simon Chan served as Earnest Lau Professor of Systematic Theology at Trinity Theological College, Singapore, and is now retired.

Buying Eternity, Or Just Recycling Your Grave?

Job 19:25

European nations are facing an overcrowding issue — in cemeteries. The solution has been to dig up those who have been buried for a while and put their bones in a special repository called an ossuary or cremate the bones and put them in a columbarium. Newly deceased people are put in the now-empty grave. But only for a while. In time, their grave will also be recycled. Europeans call the practice "raising the bones."

The Orthodox Church in Greece does not believe in cremation so cemeteries have filled up quickly there. Those who are buried are allowed to decompose for three to five years before being exhumed. Unfortunately, more than half the bodies have not decomposed in so short a time so they have to be reinterred for another two years. Families can lease a grave for a longer period of time but each extension gets more and more expensive. Only the truly elite can afford perpetual care. The Netherlands leases cemetery plots for 10 to 20 years, Switzerland and Sweden for 25, Italy for 10 to 30, and Germany for 15 to 30. The United Kingdom lets you rest in peace for 75 years before they come for you.

The problem will only get worse as populations age, and cities consume all the available space. Even cremated remains pose a problem if people want them placed in cemeteries for perpetuity.

It seems as if housing the dead — be they flesh or bone or ash — in the cities of the living may be turning into a privilege most people can no longer afford.

Even the United States is facing a cemetery overcrowding crisis. But we have a cultural attachment to the cemetery as a veritable open-air museum, a monument to an individual’s ancestry and personal history so Americans will be more reluctant to resort to strategies such as grave recycling. We can expect burial to become increasingly expensive.

God has a more permanent plan. It is called resurrection, the ultimate recycling. God will gather our scatterred bones and put new flesh on them and a new spirit in them. The lack of proper burial will not be a barrier, as Revelation 20:13 attests. There will be a high cost, however — the blood of God's only Son, Jesus. He paid the price in full. Every human grave, whether it is the mass grave of one million paupers on New York's Hart Island or the pyramid of a pharaoh in Egypt, will someday turn to dust. The only true eternity comes from God alone.

________

Adapted from the article "Cemetery Overcrowding is Leading Europe to Recycle Burial Plots," by Rafaela Ferraz, 18 July 2018; .

from (see notes) · David Holwick, adapting material from Rafaela Ferraz via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database eternity

Watergate and The Resurrection

Luke 24:9

Several years go Chuck Colson described how his experience in the Watergate scandal during the Nixon administration helped him believe in the resurrection. Watching the lies of a group of powerful men fall apart made him realize the disciples were, indeed, telling the truth. Here’s Chuck Colson:

I want to wish you and your families and friends a holy, blessed Easter. We celebrate because we as Christians know that our Lord is risen from the dead — and in His resurrection is our hope of everlasting life with God.

Indeed, as Paul writes in 1 Corinthians, the historical fact of Christ’s resurrection is the only basis of our hope. Without the resurrection, our faith is futile. This is why critics of Christianity often try to explain away the empty tomb. They claim that the disciples lied -- that they stole Jesus’s body themselves and conspired together to pretend He had risen. The apostles then managed somehow to recruit more than 500 other people to lie for them as well, to say they saw Jesus after He rose from the dead.

But just how plausible is this theory?

To answer that question, fast forward nearly 2,000 years, to an event I happen to know a lot about: Watergate. You see, before all the facts about Watergate were known to the public -- in March 1973 -- it was becoming clear to Nixon’s closest aides that someone had tried to cover up the Watergate break-in.

There were no more than a dozen of us. Could we maintain a cover-up -- to save the president? Consider that we were political zealots. We enjoyed enormous political power and prestige. With all that at stake, you’d expect us to be capable of maintaining a lie to protect the president.

But we couldn’t do it. The first to crack was John Dean. First, he told the president everything, and then just two weeks later he went to the prosecutors and offered to testify against the President. His reason, as he candidly admits in his memoirs, was to “save his own skin.” After that, everyone started scrambling to protect himself. What we know today as the great Watergate cover-up lasted only three weeks. Some of the most powerful politicians in the world -- and we couldn’t keep a lie for more than three weeks.

So back to the question of historicity of Christ’s resurrection. Can anyone believe that for fifty years that Jesus’ disciples were willing to be ostracized, beaten, persecuted, and all but one of them suffer a martyr’s death -- without ever renouncing their conviction that they had seen Jesus bodily resurrected? Does anyone really think the disciples could have maintained a lie all that time under that kind of pressure?

No, someone would have cracked, just as we did so easily in Watergate. Someone would have acted as John Dean did and turned state’s evidence. There would have been some kind of smoking gun, or a deathbed confession.

So why didn’t they crack? Because they had come face to face with the living God. They could not deny what they had seen. The fact is that people will give their lives for what they believe is true, but they will never give their lives for what they know is a lie. The Watergate cover-up proves that 12 powerful men in modern America couldn’t keep a lie -- and that 12 powerless men 2,000 years ago couldn’t have been telling anything but the truth.

________

Copyright (c) 2021 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Chuck Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database easter

Some Celebrated Jesus’ Resurrection - Others Started A Conspiracy Theory

Mark 13:5

In the middle of scenes of Jesus’ resurrection, the Gospel of Matthew recounts the birth of one of the oldest conspiracy theories.

On Easter morning, while the women are on their way to announce the resurrection of Jesus to the disciples, Matthew 28:11–15 highlights another movement: Some tomb guards report the weekend’s events to the chief priests. These men, in turn, then consult with the elders and decide together to conceal what has happened. At no point do they investigate what happened to Jesus’ body. They know from the start that what they might discover will not please them.

Instead, they invent what would today be called a conspiracy theory, with the “alternative facts” that support it: The disciples came to steal Jesus’ corpse. Never mind that those who had fled in fear after the arrest of their master would have needed to come at night to face a guard of several armed men. Never mind that they would have needed to loosen the seals on the tomb, roll away a massive stone, and remove the body of Jesus — all without waking anyone who could raise the alarm.

This version of the facts is absurd. Not only in and of itself, but because the disciples would later risk their lives to proclaim that Jesus had risen. If they had known it was a lie, where would they have found the courage to face the authorities threatening them? Why preach a knowingly falsified gospel? The audacity of the apostles, their courage, their zeal, their perseverance, and the whole expansion of Christianity is inexplicable without the Resurrection.

But all this, the elders do not yet know. So they try their luck and make a deal with the soldiers. The proposed lie is not without danger for them — the guards obviously weren’t supposed to fall asleep — but there is money involved, and the Jewish leaders assure them of their protection.

Thus, this version of the story, the text says, has spread among the Jews to this present day — the first century of our current era. But it is also our reality today, where theories to eschew the truth of the resurrection of Jesus continue to be propagated.

But it is probably not because of their credibility that these explanations persist. In fact, the explanation of the guards is so implausible that the apostle Matthew takes the liberty of mentioning it in his gospel, knowing full well that anyone who wanted could go and check this account.

When you want to drown out a truth, your lies or half-truths don’t have to be believable or well-founded. It is enough that your version suits what your listeners want to hear or avoids confronting them with a reality that disturbs them.

An ominous light

One might be surprised at the response of the Jewish leaders. The one announced to be the Messiah had just come back to life. An extraordinary miracle! A staggering truth! But instead of euphoria, they react with anger.

There is a certain irony in the text: After warning Pontius Pilate on Saturday that the disciples might steal the body, the chief priests and Pharisees themselves demand a seal be placed on the stone and that guards watch the tomb (Matt. 27:62–66). These precautions that they are responsible for end up confronting them with evidence they do not want to see.

Perhaps their doubt might be justified without these measures. But now they face an unsettling conclusion regarding Jesus’ body — and yet are refusing to entertain anything that might challenge their worldview.

What this attitude reveals about human hearts is terrifying, but perhaps not so surprising. Twenty-five years ago, German theologian Wolfhart Pannenberg told the magazine Prism:

The evidence for Jesus’ resurrection is so strong that nobody would question it except for two things: First, it is a very unusual event. And second, if you believe it happened, you have to change the way you live.

All of this is deeply disturbing. Imagine the discomfort of the leaders who passed as religious in front of everyone but rejected the one who now turned out to be the Messiah. Accepting this new reality would irredeemably upset their position and influence. Accepting this as true would mark the end of the life they have built for themselves. Believing in Jesus would be their death.

So they try to have it another way. The elders deny the truth and drag others into their denial. They prefer to stay in their way of thinking than to know the Way, the Truth, and the Life.

We humans often prefer the darkness that does not disturb us to the light that could set us free. The apostle John tells us:

Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God. (John 3:19–21)

Even as we may judge the religious leaders, we also ought to be able to see ourselves in them. Our actions are motivated by fears of losing relationships, status, livelihoods, communities, dignity, and control. When these feel threatened, we become incentivized to find a different, more comforting narrative that allows us to maintain our status quo. The issue, then, is not so much the search for facts as the protection of a self-justifying narrative.

In order not to see the fragility or the deceptive nature of what we have clung to, we sometimes try at all costs to hold together the pieces of a puzzle that is falling apart. No one wants to see their world collapse.

Christians vulnerable to misinformation?

Matthew’s account also offers a reason why Christians might be inclined to embrace conspiracy theories: Since Easter morning, certain forces at work in the world have attempted to obscure the most basic truth of the gospel. From the beginning, the world has been developing an alternate history in which Christ is not resurrected.

Consequently, our Christian identity has accustomed us to the idea that the truth is something not everyone will accept or follow. We become habituated to a disconnect between what we accept as the truth and what the world at large accepts as such.

For Christians, then, there may be a smaller step than for others to embrace alternative explanations on different topics. Also, for some decades now we have been living in a period of the decline of Christendom in the West, a time in which Christian culture has been increasingly pushed to the margins. Many Christians find themselves at odds with the prevailing discourse on gender, creation, or pluralism in public education or the media, often feeling these institutions are leading us astray. In these circumstances, it may be tempting to be less careful about, for instance, supposed facts supporting the idea that all Western elites are corrupt or praising the greatness of some leader presented as the protector of “Christian values.”

It can be flattering to believe we know something that others do not. However, the knowledge we have received from Jesus Christ is grace from God. It does not come from any moral or intellectual superiority that we have over our fellow humans, nor does it entitle us to believe that we know better in all things.

Further, we must not assume that our knowledge of the Bible inherently keeps us safe from deception. As the attitude of many religious leaders at the time of Jesus shows, knowledge of the Scriptures does not guarantee the acceptance of the truth.

We are told that few people will accept God’s truth. But while these words may encourage us in our faith journey when facing opposition, they can also be applied out of context to a range of beliefs that have little to do with any claims about Christ.

Taking the first step

How then can we walk with fellow Christians who we believe have lied to themselves? We are all convinced that some people live in illusion, and some people think the same of us. One thing we all share is that we live in a world where the truth is not always easy to access. And we have all, at some point, been lied to. Today, the Russian government’s propaganda impresses with its cynicism. But throughout history, even some of the most respected governments, institutions, and leaders have lied to cover their actions.

The world is complex. In Matthew’s account, the elders and guards aren’t on equal playing fields. Some know the truth fully and have a responsibility to it. The others, while willing to lie for money, are less scripturally literate and likely don’t have the same knowledge of the issues. And what about those in Jerusalem trying to make up their own mind according to the various things they’ve heard?

If we want to continue to understand each other, we also need a way to recover from our mistakes when we come to acknowledge the truth. We need cultural scripts that allow us to confess our errors, change our paths, and receive grace.

It is not up to us to change the other. However, we can model a world where our belief in the resurrection of Christ offers us the confidence to consider not only what reinforces our points of view or our status, but also what nuances them, or even challenges them.

The first followers of Jesus who received the news of the Resurrection continued to have their reality shaken. As Jews, they too had their worldview and status challenged by the integration of non-Jews into the people of God. Peter, for instance, needed to hear the same message three times in a row (Acts 10:9–16). The way is not always easy, but in their footsteps, we continue to learn how, in Jesus, we are no longer prisoners of the fear of death (Heb. 2:15).

It may seem difficult to hope that people trapped in the lies they have fabricated or promoted will come to light. The blindness of the priests denying the Resurrection is striking. How could they have walked away from the lies they had spread? If Matthew knew of this conspiracy between the leaders of the people, one has to imagine that one of the guards — not the religious leaders — tipped him off to the story.

A few years after this episode in Matthew’s gospel, a very religious Jew and fierce persecutor of the church saw his life transformed by an encounter with the risen Christ. In giving up his religious status, his privileges, and his old worldview, the apostle Paul faced many “deaths” in Christ, but he witnessed unto the end the power of the Resurrection.

In God’s hands, there is still hope that those who lead the world astray will change. Perhaps even those who cling to conspiracy theories may one day become the boldest defenders of truth.

As for us, let’s live out our Resurrection convictions in such a way that others see our lives as evidence of what lies beyond death.

________

Léo Lehmann is publications director for the Network of Evangelical Missiology for French-speaking Europe (REMEEF) as well as CT’s French language coordinator. He lives in Brussels, Belgium.

This article was originally a sermon Lehmann preached on April 4, 2021.

NT Wright: Western Christians Have Misread Heaven

Ephesians 1:10

Many Christians in the West, N. T. Wright believes, have a fundamental misunderstanding of the very goal of their faith.

Instead of seeing Christianity as the story of God renewing the whole cosmos — Heaven and Earth united — they have been taught to think of salvation primarily as a private escape plan: the soul departing for Heaven when the body dies.

The result, according to the 77-year-old New Testament scholar, Pauline theologian and Anglican bishop, is not just a skewed theology of the afterlife, but a distorted understanding of everything from End Times prophecy to spiritual warfare.

“The problem is that most Western Christians today think that the whole point of Christianity is for our souls to go to Heaven when we die, whereas the New Testament concentrates on God coming to dwell with us,” Wright said.

“The direction of travel is wrong, and the result is wrong, and the intermediate stages are wrong.”

That misdirection has shaped how generations of believers have read and misunderstood Scripture, according to Wright. In the ancient world into which Christianity emerged, the idea of the soul floating away into Heaven was already common, he said.

“These were the people we now call the middle Platonists, people like Philo of Alexandria, or Plutarch. ... They talk happily about their souls going to Heaven. The early Christians really don’t,” Wright said.

Instead, the New Testament proclaims something vastly different; not human departure to Heaven, but divine arrival on Earth.

The former bishop of Durham pointed to the final chapters of Revelation, where “the dwelling of God is with humans,” and Ephesians 1:10, where Paul says God’s eternal purpose is “to sum up in the Messiah all things in heaven and on earth.”

“But you’d have thought that God’s plan from the beginning was to enable us to leave Earth and go to a place called Heaven instead,” Wright said. “That’s simply not what Ephesians, or indeed, the rest of the New Testament, is all about.”

The misunderstanding extends even into Bible translations, he emphasized. The Greek word “psuche,” often rendered “soul,” is rooted in the Hebrew “nephesh,” which does not denote an immortal, disembodied essence but the whole living person.

“A nefesh is one’s whole self; a better translation will be ‘person,’” Wright explained. Passages that have fueled Platonic readings, such as Jesus telling the thief on the cross, “Today you will be with me in Paradise,” are frequently oversimplified.

“Jesus is going to be back in a couple of days’ time ... because He’s going to be raised from the dead,” Wright said. “There are many passages which routinely get misread.”

What has occurred, he believes, is a “Western vision” that has shrouded biblical Christianity with Greek philosophy.

“You can cash out of Platonism in different ways, but that’s basically what’s been going on for hundreds of years,” he said.

According to Wright, the assumption that the essential religious question is “How does my soul get to Heaven?” has governed Christian teaching even since the Reformation. That question, he said, Reformers answered differently than the medieval Church, but it was rarely challenged at its root.

Wright contends that Ephesians challenges the question itself. Paul’s opening prayer, Ephesians 1:3–14, he said, is steeped in Jewish creation and Exodus imagery and culminates in the declaration that God’s goal has always been the unity of Heaven and Earth under Christ.

Ephesians 1:10 gives you this sense. This is where it’s all going. This is what the purpose was from the beginning,” Wright said.

Wright sees this as the New Testament's central message: in Jesus' death, resurrection and ascension, God has already inaugurated the promised new creation.

"God has done what He said he would do, and He is doing it now until the time when Jesus does return," he said, citing 1 Corinthians 15, which describes Christ reigning until all enemies are subdued.

________

Leah M. Klett is a reporter for The Christian Post. She can be reached at: leah.klett@christianpost.com

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate