Menu

Numbers 31:34 — Word Study

Depth

WLCוַחֲמֹרִ֕ים אֶחָ֥ד וְשִׁשִּׁ֖ים אָֽלֶף׃

BSA61,000 {}ʼechâd donkeyschămôwr [asses, male donkeys]

Word
Listen & take awayNumbers 31
English ↓ Download MP3 The Berean Standard Bible chapter audio already hosted for the site's Bible section — verse 34 is in this chapter.
Hebrew ↓ Download MP3 The Masoretic text of this chapter, read aloud. Read by Abraham Shmuelof, courtesy of Audio Scriptures International. Chapter divisions by the Academy of Ancient Languages..
Say the word Each Hebrew word carries its transliteration ('A.lef) — no per-word recordings of the Hebrew exist to link to.
Take it away
Numbers 31:34quick helps
In a sentenceThe verse lists the number of donkeys among the spoils taken after battle.
What is countedThe total of 61,000 donkeys is specified.
Where we areThis verse is part of a larger inventory of spoils from war.
The hard wordחֲמוֹר
Take awayThe count of animals is precise, reflecting the organization of the spoils.
2 commentators on this verse Jamieson, Cambridge & more — read them › clause The sentence as the grammar sees it Open the tree ›
How rare are these words?in the Old Testament

Every word here is used elsewhere in the Old Testament.

Bars are logarithmic — אֵת, the commonest word in the Hebrew Bible, stands about 11,000 times, so a linear scale would leave everything else invisible. Click a row to open that word.

Deep Study — Numbers 31:34

Sections marked generated are written from the data on this page rather than by a named author. Everything else — the lexicon entries, the cross references, the manuscript readings, the counts — is quoted from its source unchanged.

Context — Inventory of Spoils from Wargenerated

3372,000 cattle,
3461,000 donkeys,
35and 32,000 women who had not slept with a man.
36This was the half portion for those who had gone to war: 337,500 sheep,

Numbers 31:34 lists the spoils taken after the Israelites defeated the Midianites. This verse specifically mentions the number of donkeys among the captured livestock, emphasizing the wealth acquired through victory. This inventory is part of a larger account that details the distribution of spoils among the Israelite soldiers and the community.


Cross References


The Key Word חֲמוֹר, va.cha.mo.Rimgenerated

The word חֲמוֹר (chamor) refers specifically to a male donkey. It is derived from a root meaning 'to be red' or 'dun,' which connects to the animal's reddish-brown color. In this verse, it denotes the count of donkeys taken as spoils, highlighting their value in ancient Israelite society.

This noun is in the plural form, indicating a significant number of these animals. The parsing shows it as a common noun in the plural absolute, which is appropriate for the context of counting spoils.


How Translations Differ — measured against the Berean Standard Biblegenerated

This study reads the verse in the Berean Standard Bible, so the BSB is the wording every comparison below is made against.


Sentence Structuregenerated

The finite verb is absent in this enumeration, as the structure is primarily a noun phrase followed by numeral phrases. The sentence lists the count of donkeys as part of a broader inventory of spoils, emphasizing the total quantity.

The Hebrew word order places the count of donkeys prominently, indicating its significance in the overall tally of captured goods.


Septuagint Backgroundgenerated

The Septuagint translates חֲמוֹר as ὄνοι, which also means 'donkeys.' This choice aligns closely with the Hebrew meaning, maintaining the specific reference to this type of animal.

The use of ὄνοι shows a direct correspondence to the Hebrew term, indicating the translators aimed to preserve the original context of livestock in the spoils.


In plain words — the whole versegenerated

Numbers 31:34 tells us that after a battle, the Israelites counted 61,000 donkeys among the spoils. This count is part of a larger list of animals and goods taken, showing the wealth gained from their victory.


Frequently Asked Questionsgenerated

What does the number 61,000 signify?

It represents a significant quantity of donkeys taken as spoils from the battle, indicating the wealth and resources acquired by the Israelites.

Why are donkeys included in the spoils?

Donkeys were valuable animals in ancient times, used for transportation and labor, making them important assets for the community.

How does this verse fit into the overall narrative?

This verse is part of a larger account detailing the spoils taken after the Israelites' victory over the Midianites, emphasizing the organization and distribution of resources.

What can we learn from the inventory of spoils?

The detailed listing of spoils reflects the importance of accounting for resources in ancient Israelite society and the blessings of victory.


Reflection Questionsgenerated

  1. What does the count of 61,000 donkeys tell us about the resources available to the Israelites after the battle?
  2. How can we understand the significance of livestock in ancient cultures based on this verse?
  3. In what ways can we see the importance of organization and accounting in our own lives?
  4. What lessons about stewardship can we draw from the Israelites' careful inventory of spoils?

Commentators on this verse — 2 expositors, verse by verse

Each of these wrote on Numbers 31:34 itself, not merely on the chapter around it.

Robert Jamieson1802–1880Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown's Commentary

And threescore and twelve thousand beeves, No JFB commentary on these verses.

Read Robert Jamieson on Numbers 31 →
CambridgeThe Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

25–54. The apportionment of the spoil. Those who fought and those who remained behind were to receive equal shares. This was an ancient custom, which was traced to the action of David (1 Samuel 30:24 f.). But before the appropriation by individuals, a religious tax was to be paid. The fighters were to pay from their share 1/500th to the priests, and the others 1/50th to the Levites. Such a tax is not mentioned elsewhere in the O.T., but perhaps, like the foregoing regulation, it had an ancient custom behind it. Mohammed, whose religion was ultimately based on the O.T., enjoined a similar tax of 1/5th (Koran viii. 42, cited by Gray).

Read Cambridge on Numbers 31 →

The verse in English, compared — 17 translations, and where they part company

Every translation on this page is a decision someone had to make and commit to. Read down a column and you see one translator's judgement; read across a row and you see the range the Greek actually allows. The BSB is the wording the rest of this page is measured against, so it is listed first.

Modern formal

BSBBerean Standard Bible2020

61,000 donkeys,

WEBWorld English Bible2000

sixty-one thousand donkeys,

MSBMajority Standard Bible2022

61,000 donkeys,

NETBNew English Translation2006

61,000 donkeys,

Tyndale line

KJVKing James Version1611

And threescore and one thousand asses,

ASVAmerican Standard Version1901

and threescore and one thousand asses,

RVARevised Version, American1894

and threescore and one thousand asses,

NWBWebster's Bible1833

And sixty one thousand asses,

GNVGeneva Bible1599

And three score and one thousand asses,

Strictly literal

DBYDarby Translation1890

and sixty-one thousand asses,

YLTYoung's Literal Translation1862

and of asses one and sixty thousand;

LSVLiteral Standard Version2020

and sixty-one thousand donkeys;

ILTInterlinear Literal Translation2000

And of asses, sixty and one thousand,

ULBUnlocked Literal Bible2017

sixty-one thousand donkeys,

From the Latin

DRADouay-Rheims (Challoner)1899

Sixty-one thousand asses:

Simplified

FBVFree Bible Version2020

61,000 donkeys,

BBEBible in Basic English1949

And sixty-one thousand asses;

Counted from the translations carried on this site, not from a survey of every English Bible. A rendering shared by many versions is usually inherited rather than independently arrived at — the Tyndale line in particular runs through most of them.


The sentence as the grammar sees it — from the MACULA Hebrew treebank

This is not our own analysis: it is the scholarly syntax tree for the verse, showing how the clause actually holds together.

וַandclausenoun phrase · objectחֲמֹרִ֕יםdonkeysnumeral phrasenumeral phraseאֶחָ֥דoneוְandשִׁשִּׁ֖יםsixtyאָֽלֶףthousand

Boxes are the grammarian's groupings — clause, noun phrase, prepositional phrase.


The four witnesses to this verse — Masoretic, Septuagint, Samaritan, Qumran

The Masoretic Text is supported by the Samaritan Pentateuch, which agrees word for word. The Septuagint matches all four words, while the Dead Sea Scrolls show no surviving text for this verse, indicating it was restored by an editor.

Masoretic TextLeningrad Codex, c. AD 1008 — the text this page is built on

וַחֲמֹרִ֕ים אֶחָ֥ד וְשִׁשִּׁ֖ים אָֽלֶף׃

Septuagintthe Greek the translators chose, word by word
וַחֲמֹרִ֕יםὄνοιאֶחָ֥דμίαוְשִׁשִּׁ֖יםἑχήκονταאָֽלֶף׃ξιλιάδες

4 of the 4 words are matched. This is the word-by-word correspondence, not the Septuagint's own sentence — its word order and its articles are its own.

Samaritan Pentateuchthe Torah as the Samaritan community kept it

וחמרים אחד ושׁשׁים אלף

Agrees with the Masoretic Text here, word for word.

Dead Sea Scrolls — 4Q27a copy a thousand years older than the Leningrad Codex

[וחמורים] [אחד] [וששים] [אלף]

nothing on the leather here — 4 supplied entire by an editor.

Four traditions, not one. “On the leather” means the letters physically survive on the scroll, as against letters an editor has supplied to fill a hole in it — a restoration is a scholar’s reading, not a reading of the manuscript. Words in [square brackets] are supplied; the notes count them apart from what survives.


The map of this verse — what each word keeps company with

This is a map of two things, both counted rather than judged. Company kept: which words stand within three words of each of these, anywhere in the Hebrew Bible — the thicker the line, the more often the pair meet compared with chance. Built from: the words a word is made out of, taken from its own Strong’s entry. It is not a map of meaning: nothing here claims two words mean the same thing. Click any circle to see the numbers behind it.

Numbers 31:34חֲמוֹרand donkeysand donkeysחֲמוֹראֶחָדoneoneאֶחָדשִׁשִּׁיםand sixtyand sixtyשִׁשִּׁיםאֶ֫לֶףthousandthousandאֶ֫לֶףחָמַרto aggitatto aggitateחָמַרחָדַדto go eithto go either waחָדַדשֵׁשׁsixsixשֵׁשׁאֶ֫לֶףcattlecattleאֶ֫לֶףמֵאָהhundredhundredמֵאָהחָבַשׁto saddle/to saddle/tieחָבַשׁשׁוֹרcattlecattleשׁוֹרכֶּ֫בֶשׂlamblambכֶּ֫בֶשׂאַ֫יִלramramאַ֫יִלחָמֵשׁfivefiveחָמֵשׁ
meets it a little oftener than chancemeets it far oftener than chancebuilt from the same roottwo words of the verse share ita word of this versea related word

Lexicons — every word in Numbers 31:34

One dossier per word, with every reference work grouped by kind — Hebrew lexicons, morphology, Bible dictionaries, topical chains and the English of the translators themselves. The verse sits at the head of each block with the word under study lit, so you never lose your place. The panel above gives the short answer; this is the long one, and it is the part of the page worth indexing.

Every entry below is the lexicographer's own text. On the Hebrew: Brown-Driver-Briggs entire and its gloss set, Strong's Hebrew Dictionary, and Tyndale House's Translators Brief lexicon. Where a cell says a work has no entry, that work genuinely has none for this word.

and donkeys one and sixty thousand
וַחֲמֹרִ֕יםva.cha.mo.Rim and donkeys H2543 Conjunction · noun common both plural absolute
96× in the OT scale is logarithmic — the commonest word, אֵת, appears about 11,000×
In plain English
Meaning
The Hebrew word for a male donkey, it is translated as he ass in the KJV Bible. The name comes from the animal's reddish-brown color.
Amplified meaning
asses, male donkeys
Tyndale gloss
donkey
Hebrew lexiconskeyed to Strong's numbers
Layman’s summary of all Lexicon entries.generated

חֲמוֹר (chamor) refers to a male donkey, derived from a root meaning 'to be red' or 'dun.' The term is consistently translated as 'ass' or 'donkey' across various lexicons, indicating its specific reference to this animal in the Old Testament.

Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew Lexicon (full)

חֲמוֹר n.m. (he)-ass

base

Brown-Driver-Briggs glosses

H2543 חֲמוֹר (he)-ass

Strong's Hebrew Dictionary

2543 chamowr kham-ore'

or (shortened) chamor {kham-ore}; from 2560; a male ass (from

its dun red):--(he)ass.

see HEBREW for 02560

Translators Brief Hebrew Lexicon

חֲמוֹר (cha.mor) — donkey.

(he) ass

Morphologythe parsing behind the code
Berean parsing
Conj | N-cp — Conjunction · noun common both plural absolute
HC/Ncbpa
and donkeys one and sixty thousand
אֶחָ֥ד'e.Chad one H259 Adj
971× in the OT scale is logarithmic — the commonest word, אֵת, appears about 11,000×
In plain English
Meaning
In the Bible, this Hebrew word means one or united, and is used to describe something that is single or unique. It is often translated as one, first, or alone. For example, in Genesis 1:5, God calls the light day and the darkness night, and separates them into one thing from another.
Tyndale gloss
one
Hebrew lexiconskeyed to Strong's numbers
Layman’s summary of all Lexicon entries.generated

אֶחָד (echad) means 'one' and is derived from a numeral. It encompasses meanings such as each, every, a certain, and can serve as an indefinite article. It is also used as an ordinal to denote 'first' and appears in various combinations, including eleven. The entries consistently emphasize its numerical and qualitative aspects.

Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew Lexicon (full)

אֶחָד 972 adj.num. one

one

= each, every

= a certain

= indef. art.

only, & (fem.) once

one … another, one … the other

as ordinal first

in combin.

base

Brown-Driver-Briggs glosses

H259 אֶחָד one . one

. = each, every

. = a certain

. = indef. art.

. only, & (fem.) once

. one … another, one … the other

. as ordinal first

. in combin.

Strong's Hebrew Dictionary

259 'echad ekh-awd'

a numeral from 258; properly, united, i.e. one; or (as an

ordinal) first:--a, alike, alone, altogether, and,

any(-thing), apiece, a certain, (dai-)ly, each (one), +

eleven, every, few, first, + highway, a man, once, one, only,

other, some, together,

see HEBREW for 0258

Translators Brief Hebrew Lexicon

אֶחָד (e.chad) — one.

1) one (number)

1a) one (number)

1b) each, every

1c) a certain

1d) an (indefinite article)

1e) only, once, once for all

1f) one...another, the one...the other, one after another, one by one

1g) first

1h) eleven (in combination), eleventh (ordinal)

Morphologythe parsing behind the code
Berean parsing
Adj — Adj
HAcfsa
Bible dictionarieson the English sense
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

wun.

See NUMBER.

and donkeys one and sixty thousand
וְשִׁשִּׁ֖יםve.shi.Shim and sixty H8346 Conjunction
59× in the OT scale is logarithmic — the commonest word, אֵת, appears about 11,000×
In plain English
Meaning
This Hebrew word represents the number sixty, often used to describe large quantities, like the sixty warriors who guarded King Solomon. It is also translated as three score, as seen in Psalm 90:10.
Tyndale gloss
sixty
Hebrew lexiconskeyed to Strong's numbers
Layman’s summary of all Lexicon entries.generated

שִׁשִּׁים (shishshiym) means 'sixty' in Hebrew. It is a numeral derived from the root associated with the number 8337. The term is used in various contexts in the Old Testament to denote the quantity of sixty, also referred to as 'three score.' There is an Aramaic equivalent, שִׁתִּין (shit.tin), which also means sixty.

Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew Lexicon (full)

שִׁשִּׁים 59 n.indecl. sixty

base

Brown-Driver-Briggs glosses

H8346 שִׁשִּׁים sixty

Strong's Hebrew Dictionary

8346 shishshiym shish-sheem'

multiple of 8337; sixty:--sixty, three score.

see HEBREW for 08337

Translators Brief Hebrew Lexicon

שִׁשִּׁים (shish.shim) — sixty.

sixty, three score

Aramaic equivalent: shit.tin (שִׁתִּין "sixty" H8361)

Morphologythe parsing behind the code
Berean parsing
HC/Acmpa — Conjunction
HC/Acmpa
Bible dictionarieson the English sense
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

siks'-ti (shishshim; hexekonta).

See NUMBER.

and donkeys one and sixty thousand
אָֽלֶף׃'A.lef thousand H505
506× in the OT scale is logarithmic — the commonest word, אֵת, appears about 11,000×
In plain English
Meaning
A thousand, as in Exodus 20:6 where God shows love to thousands of people. It represents a large number or a company of people under one leader, like an army or a group of soldiers.
Tyndale gloss
thousand
Hebrew lexiconskeyed to Strong's numbers
Layman’s summary of all Lexicon entries.generated

אֶ֫לֶף (eleph) means 'thousand' in Hebrew. It can refer to the numeral itself or denote a company or clan, particularly a group of men under one leader. The word is built from the concept of a thousand, and it is associated with the ox's head, which is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet.

Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew Lexicon (full)

אֶ֫לֶף n.m. thousand

base

Brown-Driver-Briggs glosses

H505 אֶ֫לֶף thousand

Strong's Hebrew Dictionary

505 'eleph eh'-lef

prop, the same as 504; hence (the ox's head being the first

letter of the alphabet, and this eventually used as a numeral)

a thousand:--thousand.

see HEBREW for 0504

Translators Brief Hebrew Lexicon

אֶ֫לֶף (e.leph) — thousand.

: thousand

1) a thousand

1a) as numeral

2) a thousand, company

2a) as a company of men under one leader, troops

אֶ֫לֶף (e.leph) — thousand: clan.

: clan

1) a thousand

1a) as numeral

2) a thousand, company

2a) as a company of men under one leader, troops

Morphologythe parsing behind the code
Berean parsing
HAcbsa
HAcbsa
Bible dictionarieson the English sense
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia

thou'-zand ('eleph; chilioi).

See NUMBER.

Sources on this page. Lexicons and dictionaries imported from the CrossWire SWORD modules — Abbott-Smith, Strong's, Dodson, the Intermediate Liddell-Scott-Jones, Robinson and Packard, Webster and Cawdrey. Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (Harper, 1889 — Grimm’s Wilke’s Clavis Novi Testamenti, translated, revised and enlarged by Joseph Henry Thayer) is public domain and is set here from the Internet Archive page scan greekenglishlex00grim; it is uncorrected OCR, marked as such on the entry itself, and the Strong’s numbers — which Thayer’s own edition does not carry — were matched by lemma against the other modules on this page. Trench’s Synonyms of the New Testament (Macmillan, 1880) and Moulton and Milligan’s Vocabulary of the Greek Testament (Hodder & Stoughton, 1930, which entered the United States public domain on 1 January 2026) are set from Internet Archive page scans synonymsofnewtes00treniala and vocabularyofgree00mouluoft, and are likewise uncorrected OCR matched to Strong’s numbers by lemma. Trench treats a group of words at once, so the same essay stands on the page of each word it compares. The Mounce Concise Greek-English Dictionary is © 1993 and is used here by permission for non-commercial use, www.teknia.com/greek-dictionary. The full Liddell-Scott-Jones and the Hebrew word data (TAHOT) come from STEPBible.org, CC BY 4.0. Brown-Driver-Briggs is the OpenScriptures digitisation, public domain. Syntax analysis is the Nestle 1904 Lowfat treebank (biblicalhumanities.org); the concordance and morphology are built from the tagged Nestle 1904 text. Septuagint occurrences use the Open Scriptures Septuagint lemma index, derived from CCAT (University of Pennsylvania) and the Rahlfs 1935 dataset by Eliran Wong, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 — used here on a non-commercial ministry site. Greek of Josephus and Barnabas from the Perseus Digital Library, CC BY-SA 4.0. Commentaries and the Ante-Nicene Fathers are public-domain texts hosted on this site. Everyday Greek from the Duke Databank of Documentary Papyri, CC BY 3.0, with dates and provenance from the Heidelberger Gesamtverzeichnis. Philo and the Apostolic Fathers from Open Greek and Latin (First1KGreek), CC BY-SA 4.0. The apparatus and the fifth Greek column are the SBL Greek New Testament, © 2010 SBL and Logos Bible Software, CC BY 4.0. The Latin is the Clementine Vulgate (public domain); the Syriac New Testament is the ETCBC edition (MIT licence). The Hebrew behind the Greek is computed here from the Septuagint index and TAHOT, not taken from any aligned edition. The translation spread and the per-word edition marks come from the Translators Amalgamated Greek NT (STEPBible, CC BY 4.0); clause roles from the Nestle 1904 Lowfat treebank (CC BY-SA 4.0); place identifications and their confidence from OpenBible.info Bible Geocoding (CC BY 4.0), with map tiles © OpenStreetMap contributors. Gospel parallels are computed here from shared uncommon vocabulary, not taken from any printed harmony. Cross references are the Treasury of Scripture Knowledge and the subject headings are Nave’s Topical Bible, both public domain. Works under Creative Commons licences are used unchanged apart from markup removal.

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate