Frog

צפרדע ; Arabic, akurrak; Greek, βατραχος; Exo 8:2-14; Psa 78:45; Psa 105:30; Rev 16:13. When God plagued Pharaoh and his people, the river Nile, which was the object of great admiration to the Egyptians, was made to contribute to their punishment. “The river brought forth frogs abundantly:” but the circumstance of their coming up into the bed chambers, and into the ovens and kneading troughs, needs explanation to us, whose domestic apartments and economy are so different from those of the ancient nations. Their lodgings were not in upper stories, but in recesses on the ground floor; and their ovens were not like ours, built on the side of a chimney, and adjacent to a fireplace, where the glowing heat would frighten away the frogs, but they dug a hole in the ground, in which they placed an earthen pot, which having sufficiently heated, they stuck their cakes to the inside to be baked. To find such places full of frogs when they came to heat them in order to bake their bread, and to see frogs in the beds where they sought repose, must have been both disgusting and distressing in the extreme. Frogs were reckoned unclean by the Hebrews.

Frog (Exo 8:2). Although the common frog is so well known that no description is needed to satisfy the reader, it may be necessary to mention that the only species recorded as existing in Palestine is the green (Rana esculenta), and that of all the authorities we have been able to consult, Dr. Richardson alone refers the species of Egypt to the green speckled gray frog (Rana punctata). But considering the immense extent of the Nile from south to north, and the amazing abundance of these animals which it contains in the state of spawn, tadpole, and complete frog, it is likely that the speckled is not the only species found in its waters, and that different species, if they do not occur in the same locality, are at least to be met with in different latitudes. The speckled species is found westward even to the north of France, but is not common in Europe. It is lively, but no strong swimmer, the webs on the hinder toes extending only half their length; hence, perhaps, it is more a terrestrial animal than the common green frog, and, like the brown species, is given to roam on land in moist weather.

Although it is very hazardous, in transactions of an absolutely miraculous nature, to attempt to point out the instruments that may have served to work out the purposes of the Almighty, we may conjecture that, in the plague of frogs, a species, the one perhaps we have just mentioned, was selected for its agility on land, and that, although the fact is not expressly mentioned, the awful visitation was rendered still more ominous by the presence of dark and rainy weather—an atmospheric condition never of long duration on the coast of Egypt, and gradually more and more rare up the course of the river. We have ourselves witnessed, during a storm of rain, frogs crowding into our cabin, in the lowlands of Guiana, till they were packed up in the corners of the apartment, and continually falling back in their attempts to ascend above their fellows; and the door could not be opened without others entering more rapidly than those within could be expelled. Now, as the temples, palaces, and cities of Egypt stood, in general, on the edge of the ever dry desert, and always above the level of the highest inundations, to be there visited by a continuation of immense number of frogs was assuredly a most distressing calamity; and as this phenomenon, in its ordinary occurrence within the tropics, is always accompanied by the storms of the monsoon or of the setting in of the rainy season, the dismay it must have caused may be judged of when we reflect that the plague occurred where rain seldom or never falls, where none of the houses are fitted to lead off the water, and that the animals appeared in localities where they had never before been found, and where, at all other times, the scorching sun would have destroyed them in a few minutes. Nor was the selection of the frog as an instrument of God’s displeasure without portentous meaning in the minds of the idolatrous Egyptians, who considered that animal a type of their creative power, and also an indication of man in embryo. The magicians, indeed, appeared to make frogs come up out of the waters; but we must not understand that to them was given also the power of producing the animals. The effect which they claimed as their own was a simple result of the continuation of the prodigy effected by Moses and Aaron; for that they had no real power is evident, not only from their inability to stop the present plague, the control which even Pharaoh discovered to be solely in the hands of Moses, but also the utter failure of their enchantments in that of lice, where their artifices were incompetent to impose upon the king and his people.

A well known amphibious animal, famous in connection with the plagues in Egypt, Exo 8:1-14 . The magicians are said to have brought up frogs upon the land by their enchantments; but as they could not remove them, it is clear that they did not actually produce them. They penetrated everywhere-to the beds of the Egyptians, which were near the ground; and to their ovens, which were cavities in the ground.\par

Frog. A well-known amphibious animal of the genus Rana. The mention of this reptile in the Old Testament is confined to the passage in Exo 8:2-7 etc., in which the plague of frogs is described, and to Psa 78:45; Psa 105:30.

In the New Testament, the word occurs once only, in Rev 16:13. There is no question as to the animal meant. The only known species of frog which occurs at present in Egypt is the Rana esculenta, the edible frog of the continent.

(צְפִרְדֵּעִ, tsepharde’a, a marsh-leaper [Gesenius, Thes. Heb. page 1184], βάτραχος; Exo 8:2 et sq.; Psalm 78:45; 105:80; Rev 16:13), the animal selected by God as an instrument for humbling the pride of Pharaoh (Exo 8:2-14; Psa 78:45; Psa 105:30; Wis 19:10). Frogs came in prodigious numbers from the canals, the rivers, and the marshes; they filled the houses, and even entered the ovens and kneading- troughs; when, at the command of Moses, the frogs died, the people gathered them in heaps, and "the land stank" from the corruption of the bodies. There can be no doubt that the whole transaction was miraculous; frogs, it is true, if allowed to increase, can easily be imagined to occur in such multitudes as marked the second plague of Egypt — indeed, similar plagues are on record as having occurred in various places, as at Poeonia and Dardania, where frogs suddenly appeared in such numbers as to cause the inhabitants to leave that region (see Eustathius on Hom. II. 1, and other quotations cited by Bochart, Hieroz. 3:575); but that the transaction was miraculous appears from the following considerations:

1. The numbers were unprecedented, and suddenly produced, and they were found in extraordinary places.

2. The time of the occurrence was in spring, when ordinarily the old frogs would be engaged in spawning, and the younger ones would be in their tadpole state, or, at any rate, not sufficiently developed to enable them to go far from the Water.

3. The frogs would not naturally have died, in such prodigious numbers as is recorded, in a single day. Amongst the Egyptians the frog was considered a symbol of an imperfect man, and was supposed to be generated from the slime of the river — ἐκ τῆς τοῦ ποταμοῦ ἰλύος (see Horapollo, 1:26). A frog sitting upon a lotus (Nelumbium) was also regarded by the ancient Egyptians as symbolical of the return of the Nile to its bed after the inundations. Hence the Egyptian word Hhrur, which was used to denote the Nile descending, was also, with the slight change of the first letter into an aspirate, Chrur, the name of a frog (Jablonski, Panth. AEgypt. 4:1, § 9).

The mention of this reptile in the O.T. is confined to the passage in Exo 8:2-7, etc., in which the plague of frogs is described, and to the two allusions to that event in Psa 78:45; Psa 105:30. The term also occurs in Wis 19:10, in reference to the same event. In the N.T. the word occurs once only in Rev 16:13, "three unclean spirits like frogs." There is no question as to the animal meant. Although the common frog is so well known that no description is needed to satisfy the reader, it may be necessary to mention that the only species recorded as existing in Palestine is the green (Rana esculenta), and that Dr. Richardson alone refers the species of Egypt to the rarer speckled gray frog (Rana punctata). The only known species of frog which occurs at present in Egypt is the Rana esculenta, of which two varieties are described, differing from Spallanzani’s species in some slight peculiarities (Descript. de l’Egypte, Hist. Natur. 1:181, fol. ed.). The Rana esculenta, the well-known edible frog of the Continent, has a wide geographical range, being found in many parts of Asia, Africa, and Europe. How the R. punctata (Pelodytes) came to be described as an Egyptian species it is difficult to say, but it is almost certain that this species is not found in Egypt, and it is almost as certain that none but the R. esculenta does occur in that country (Ginther, "On the Geographical Distribution of Batrachia," Annals N.H. 1859). It is not at all unlikely, however, that an unusual species was selected on this extraordinary occasion, in order to deepen the impression of the visitation. A species of tree-frog (Hyla) occurs in Egypt, but with this genus we have nothing to do. (See Hasselquist, Trav. pages 68, 254; Seetzen, Reise, 3:245, 350, 364, 490.) But, considering the immense extent of the Nile from south to north, and the amazing abundance of these animals which it contains in the state of spawn, tadpole, and complete frog, it is likely that different species, if they do not occur in the same locality, are at least to be met with in different latitudes. Storks and other waders, together with a multitude of various enemies, somewhat restrain their increase, which nevertheless, at the spawning season, is so enormous that a bowl can scarcely be dipped into the water without immediately containing a number of tadpoles. The speckled species is found westward even to the north of France, but is not common n Europe. It is of ash color with green spots, their feet being marked with transverse bands, and is said to change its color when alarmed. It is lively, but no strong swimmer, the webs on the hinder toes extending only half their length hence, perhaps, it is more a terrestrial animal than the common green frog, and, like the brown species, is given to roam on land in moist weather. (See Penny Cyclopaedia, s.v.).

Although it is very hazardous, in transactions of an absolutely miraculous natures, to attempt to point out the instruments that may have served to work out the purposes. of the Almighty, we may conjecture that, in the plague of frogs, a species, the one perhaps we have just mentioned, was selected for its agility on land, and that, although the fact is not expressly mentioned, the awful visitation was rendered still more ominous by the presence of dark and rainy weather — an atmospheric condition never of long duration on the coast of Egypt, and gradually more and more rare up the course of the river. Travelers have witnessed, during a storm of rain, frogs crowding into their cabin, in the low lands of Guiana, till they were packed up in the corners of the apartuent and continually falling back in their attempts to ascend above their fellows and the door could not be opened without others entering more rapidly than those within could be expelled (see Roberts, Oriental Illustrations, in hoc.). Now, as the temples, palaces, and cities of Egypt stood, in general, on the edge of the ever-dry desert, and always above the level of the highest inundations, to be there visited by a continuation of immense number of frogs was assuredly a most distressing calamity; and as this phenomenon, in its ordinary occurrence within the tropics, is always accompanied by the storms of the monsoon or of the setting in of the rainy season, the dismay it must have caused may be judged of when we reflect that the plague occurred where rain seldom or never falls, where none of the houses are fitted to lead off the water, and that the animals appeared in localities where they had never before been found, and where, at all other times, the scorching sun would have destroyed them in a few minutes. Nor was the selection of the frog as an instrument of God’s displeasure without portentous meaning in the minds of the idolatrous Egyptians, who considered that animal a type of Ptlash, their creative power (Wilkinson, Anc. Eg. 4:351 sq.), as well as an indication of man is embryo. The magicians, indeed, appeared to make frogs cone up out of the waters (Exo 8:7), but we must not understand that to them was given also the power of producing the animals. The effect which they claineed as their own was a simple result of the continuation of the prodigy effected by Moses and Aaron; for that they had no real power is evident not only from their inability to stop the present plague, the control which even Pharaoh discovered to be solely in the hands of Moses, but also the utter failure of their enchantments in that of lice, where their artifices were incompetent to impose upon the king and his people. (See Kitto’s Daily Bible: Illustrations, in loc.) SEE PLAGUES (OF EGYPT).

Frog. The original Hebrew word signifies a marsh-leaper. We find frogs mentioned only in connection with the plague inflicted upon the Egyptians. Exo 8:2-14; Psa 78:45; Psa 105:30, and for illustration, Rev 16:13. Naturalists disagree as to the species of frogs at present found in Egypt.

This well-known reptile is very numerous in Palestine. It is only referred to in the O.T. in connection with the second of the plagues in Egypt. Exo 8:2-14; Psa 78:45; Psa 105:30. In the N.T. three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouths of the dragon, the beast, and the false prophet. Rev 16:13. Frogs are remarkable for grovelling in the mire, with great noise and activity in the night.

:

By: Emil G. Hirsch, Henry Hyvernat

The Hebrew term generally occurs in the plural; twice only in the singular as collective, once with (Ex. viii. 2) and once without (Ps. lxxviii. 45) the article. Frogs are mentioned in the Bible only in connection with the plagues of Egypt (Ex. vii. 27-viii. 9; Ps. lxxviii. 45, cv. 30). The common frog of Egypt is the edible frog (Rana esculenta), essentially a water-frog. It abounds in all the streams of that land, and is quite common in Palestine also. It is probably the species which the author of the narrative of the plagues had in view. There is also in Palestine and in Egypt a small species of tree-frog (Hyla arborea), only one and a half inches long. Like the common frog of Egypt, it is edible, and its color is green, a feature common to all edible batrachians. As coming under the category of "shereẓ" (Lev. xi. 10), the frog must have been held by the Hebrews as unclean for food (see Animals; Dietary Laws). According to the Talmud, contact with frogs does not defile (Ṭoh. v. 1). On the singular with article ("ha-ẓefardea'," Ex. viii. 2) see Sanh. 67b.

Bibliography:

Tristram, Fauna and Flora of Palestine, pp. 159-161, London, 1884;

Lewysohn, Zoologie des Talmuds, pp. 231-232, 369.

FROG.—1. tsephardça‘, Exo 8:2-14, Psa 78:45; Psa 105:30—one of the plagues of Egypt. 2. batrachos (Gr.), Rev 16:13-14, a type of uncleanness. The edible frog and the little green tree-frog are both common all over the Holy Land.

E. W. G. Masterman.

(עפרדּע, c^ephardē^a‛; compare Arabic ḍafda‛ (Exo 8:2; Psa 78:45; Psa 105:30); βάτραχος, bátrachos (Rev 16:13)): The references in Psalms, as well as in Exodus, are to the plague of flogs. In Rev 16:13 we have, “And I saw coming out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet, three unclean spirits, as it were frogs.” The word c^ephardē^a‛ probably referred both to frogs and to toads, as does the Arabic ḍafda‛. In Palestine and Syria Rana esculenta, Bufo viridis and Hyla arborea are common. According to Mr. Michael J. Nicoll, assistant director of the Zoölogical Gardens at Gı̂zah, near Cairo, the commonest Egyptian species are Rana mascariensis and Bufo regularis. Rana esculenta, Bufo viridis and Bufo vittatus are also found, but are much less common.

Exo 8:2 (c) Probably this is symbolical of those wicked, filthy repugnant habits and ways which Satan brings into men’s lives for dishonorable purposes. (See also Rev 16:13).

Frog. Frogs are mentioned several times in the Bible (Exo 8:2-13; Psa 105:30; Rev 16:13). All but the passage in Revelation refer to the plague of frogs in Egypt. The ancient Egyptians connected frogs with fertility and the life cycle, so they considered frogs sacred. What dismay it must have caused when the frogs multiplied uncontrollably and then died and the Egyptians had to gather these sacred animals into stinking heaps. (Rev 16:13) speaks of frogs as the symbol of unclean spirits.

A frog is an animal that lives both in water and on land. It has smooth skin and no tail. In the Bible, frogs were part of the second plague that God sent to Egypt (Exodus 8; Psalms 78:45; 105:30; Revelation 16:13).

Frogs and toads have smooth, hairless skin and no tails as adults. Their back legs are longer and stronger than their front legs. This makes them able to jump long distances. The Bible likely refers to the edible frog (Rana ridibunda) found in Egypt and Palestine.

Female frogs lay eggs in water, which hatch into tadpoles in a week. Tadpoles then develop arms and legs and lose their tails. Frogs need moist skin to breathe, so they stay near water. They eat insects and worms.

Frogs are common in the lowlands of Palestine. You can hear them croaking in spring and summer evenings. The Israelites thought frogs were slimy and dirty. They were grouped with other creeping and swarming creatures, which were normally considered unclean (Leviticus 11:29–31). Since the frog was not listed, rabbis did not consider it an animal that made humans unclean through contact.

In Revelation 16:13, some evil spirits looked like frogs. In ancient Egypt, people thought frogs were special and connected them with new life and babies being born. They worshipped a god named Heqet, who they believed helped with childbirth. Egyptian art showed Heqet as a person with a frog's head.

When God sent the plague of frogs to Egypt (Exodus 8:1–14; Psalms 78:45; 105:30), it showed that Heqet had no real power. God used the very animal that the Egyptians worshipped to cause them trouble. The frogs in Egypt during this time were probably a common type that had spots on their skin (Rana punctata, or Rana ridibunda).

See also Plagues upon Egypt.

Aquifer Open Bible Dictionary © 2026 Mission Mutual, an adaptation of the Tyndale Open Bible Dictionary © 2023 Tyndale House Publishers. Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Animals in the Bible © United Bible Societies. Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.