Menu

102 Sermon Illustrations on Greed

102 illustrations Page 2 of 3

Greed in Christian preaching highlights the destructive desire for more than what one needs, often leading to spiritual emptiness and harm to others (Luke 12:15). Illustrations commonly use vivid images of covetousness, miserly behavior, and the futility of earthly wealth to warn against allowing material cravings to dominate the heart (1 Timothy 6:10).

They Deserved One Another

One of the old saints, according to the legend, in his

journey overtook two travelers. One was a greedy, avaricious,

covetous man; the other was of a jealous and envious nature.

When they came to the parting of the ways, the saint said he

would give them a parting gift. Whichever made a wish first

would have, his wish fulfilled, and the other man would get a

double portion of what the first had asked for.

The greedy man knew what he wanted; but he was afraid to make his

wish, because he wanted a double portion and could not bear the

thought of his companion getting twice as much as he had. But the

envious man was also unwilling to wish first, because he could not

stand the idea of his companion getting twice as much as he would get.

So each waited for the other to wish first.

At length the greedy man took his fellow by the throat and said he

would choke him to death unless he made his wish. At that the envious

man said, "Very well; I will make my wish. I wish to be made blind in

one eye." Immediately he lost the sight of his eye, and his companion

went blind in both eyes.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

We were camping in Ontario and one of the boys found an unscratched lottery ticket. We won $5. We exchanged it for five more lottery tickets -- after all, I reasoned, we hadn't spent any of our own money and we just might win $50,000. This time we won $10. We exchanged it for ten more lottery tickets and we won -- nothing! How quickly that monster called "More, More, More" filled my head with visions of paying off my mortgage and my car loan and ...

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The Toddler Property Laws

The Toddler Property Laws: 1. If I like it, it's mine. 2. If it's in my hand, it's mine. 3. If I can take it from you, it's mine. 4. If I had it a little while ago, it's mine. 5. If it's mine, it must never appear to be yours in any way. 6. If I'm doing or building something, all the pieces are mine. 7. If it looks just like mine, it's mine. 8. If I think it's mine, it's mine. 9. If it's yours and I steal it, it's mine. 10. If I ...

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database greed

Wife, Had We Owned These

Luke 12:20

In the other years, a capitalist came up to death's door. Commanded

he of his wife who stood at his bedside, "Wife, bring me the strong

box!" Obeying his behest, she brought to the dying man the safety box

in which his stocks and bonds reposed. Fumbling at the lock, he

opened the box. Clutching the stocks and bonds, with a tenacious, icy

death-grip, he exclaimed, with ghoulish glee, "Wife, had we owned

these on the day of our wedding, the State of Georgia would be ours

today!" Then, he fell back on his pillow, a lifeless corpse! The

condemning words of the rich fool's Judge need no explanation: "Thou

fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee!...So is he that

layeth up treasure for himself, and is not rich toward God"

(\reference{Lk. 12:20-21}{Luke 12:20-21}) --Dr. T. W. Callaway

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Spiteful Gifts

There's an old legend about a greedy man and an envious man

who were walking along when they were overtaken by a stranger

who got to know them. And after a bit he said, as he departed

from them, that he would give each of them a gift. Whoever made

a wish first would get what he wanted, and the other would get a

double portion of what the first had asked for. The greedy man

knew what he wanted, but he was afraid to make his wish because

he wanted the double portion for himself and didn't want the

other to get it. And the envious man felt the same way, and he

was also unwilling to wish first. After a while the stronger of

the two grabbed the other by the throat and said he would choke

him to death unless he made his wish. And at that the other man

said, "Very well. I make my wish -- I wish to be made blind in

one eye." Immediately he lost the sight of one eye, and his

companion went blind in both. In this coming year, be careful

of greed and envy.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Monkey Traps

Mark 7:22

Three versions of story:

________________________

Monkey trappers in North Africa have a clever method of catching their prey. A number of gourds are filled with nuts and firmly fastened to a branch of a tree. Each has a hole just large enough for the unwary monkey to stick his forepaw into it. When the hungry animal discovers this, he quickly grasps a handful of nuts, but the hole is too small for him to withdraw his clenched fist. And he doesn't have enough sense to open up his hand and let go in order to escape, so he is easily taken captive.

This is a picture of many Christians. The devil with his crafty devices tried to ensnare them. He appeals to the appetites of the flesh which can lead to their spiritual downfall. As long as they hold on to worldly bait, they cannot escape from Satan's trap. But he keeps on urging, "Don't let go! Enjoy the pleasure of your sin just a little bit longer!" So, listening to the tempter's alluring voice, they continue in their evil way.

Dear friend, are you caught up in sinful practices that are destroying your testimony and preventing you from growing in grace? Stop and think it over. Get out of Satan's trap now while you can.

===================================

A jungle tribe learned to trap monkeys by their own greed. Tribesman simply left bright colored beads in glass jars where the monkeys could spot them.

Curiosity and a desire for the beads led the monkeys to reach inside the small opening to grasp them. But the jar's neck was too small for them to withdraw their hands with their newly found wealth. And the jar was too large to allow them to escape with it. The monkeys face an agonizing choice: forfeit the trinkets and escape, or clasp and be captured. They usually chose capture.

They acquired their treasure, but only for a moment. Ultimately they lost their freedom and their lives. When it comes to wealth, men can be as foolish.

===================================

Native hunters in the jungles of Africa have a clever way of trapping monkeys. They slice a coconut in two, hollow it out, and in one half of the shell cut a hole just big enough for a monkey's hand to pass through. Then they place an orange in the other coconut half before fastening together the two halves of the coconut shell. Finally, they secure the coconut to a tree with a rope, retreat into the jungle, and wait. Sooner or later, an unsuspecting monkey swings by, smells the delicious orange, and discovers its location inside the coconut. The monkey then slips his hand through the small hole, grasp the orange, and tries to pull it through the hole. Of course, the orange won't come out; it's too big for the hole. To no avail the persistent monkey continues to pull and pull, never realizing the danger he is in.

While the monkey struggles with the orange, the hunters simply stroll in and capture the monkey by throwing a net over him. As long as the monkey keeps his fist wrapped around the orange, the monkey is trapped. It's too bad-the poor monkey could save its own life if it would let go of the orange. It rarely occurs to a monkey, however, that it can't have both the orange and its freedom. That delicious orange becomes a deadly trap.

The world sets traps for you that are not unlike the monkey trap. You hear constantly that if you just have enough money, enough stuff, enough power, enough prestige-then you'll be happy. Under that illusion people spend their whole lives thinking you must have it all.

The call of Christianity is unlike that of the world.

____________

www.sermoncentral.com newsletter, contributed by Doug Sanders, 10/29/02

*

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database temptation

A Youth Pastor Threatens To Kill

Luke 3:14

Long Valley Presbyterian Church (NJ) is a dynamic church of 500 members. In May 2007 they hired a new youth pastor. David Evans seemed like a good fit and was very popular with the kids. But this week [July 2007] he and his wife were arrested.

The police allege Pastor Evans and his wife tried to extort $20,000 from a local family. Evans sent the family a letter threatening to kill either a parent, a child, or both if the money wasn’t delivered. At the drop-off point they had their kids in the car, and even used their 8-year-old as a lookout while the father located the cash in a hollowed-out tree! About four different kinds of police were there to arrest them.

What would bring them to do such a thing? Desperate financial needs? A desire for a youth pastor on a modest income to have as much as everyone else? Pure evil?

It didn’t come out of the blue. If the charges are true, I suspect the Evans family spent much time in preparation. There were probably some Sunday mornings when they contemplated the plot they were brewing. Sin never “just happens” - we plan for it. As James says, “each one is tempted when, by his own evil desire, he is dragged away and enticed. Then, after desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, gives birth to death” (1:14-15).

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #14042]

from Star-Ledger newspaper of Newark, New Jersey; article: Questions Surround Extortion Arrests, by Julie · Rev. David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database crimegreed

Payroll Gets Top Honor

Matthew 23:11

Many departments share the same copier at the company where I work. When four of us from different areas converged on the machine at the same time, each gave a reason why he or she should go first. The person from accounts payable said, “We have to get our bills paid, so I should go first.”

“If we don’t get our receivables collected,” countered a staff member from that area, “you won’t have the money to pay the bills.”

As product manager, I said, “Unless I sell something, there won’t be any receivables to collect, so I should go first.”

Then the last person mentioned she was from payroll - and everyone quickly cleared her a path to the copier.

- John Anderson, {Reader’s Digest} Apr. 1997, p. 171

See Matthew 23:11

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database honor

A Loosened Drain Plug

Greed can over power nearly all elements of spiritual maturity.

That is why giving is so important. Giving should not be like an

overflow valve on our wealth, that is, giving what is excess. Rather

it should be like a loosened drain plug. You see, for wealthy people,

tithing is actually an escape from real giving, since they can easily

spare that 10 percent.

- Michael Green

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

A man was promised that he could have for his own all the land that he

could circle, around from sunrise to sunset. He began slowly enough

at sunrise, thankful for his strong legs. Then the lure of the black

soil stirred him into a faster pace, so that he could encircle more

land. The farther he went, the faster he went. He burned with

fever. Echoing in his mind was one word: {more.} Late in the

day the sun was setting in the west. His legs began to weaken.

Throwing off his shirt and shoes, and with heart beating like a

triphammer, he forced himself to the utmost. Just as the sun fell

beyond the horizon, he flung himself forward with his fingertips

touching the goal, and dropped there-dead. They took a shovel and

gave him his land: {a strip of soil six by two. }

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

The owner of a factory overheard a conversation between two of his

employees. "If only I had a hundred dollars, I would be completely

happy," said one young woman. The owner recognized her voice behind

the door. Knowing she was a conscientious and reliable worker, he

decided that she should be completely satisfied. So the next day he

handed her an envelope with a hundred dollars in it. She was

surprised and thanked him cordially.

A little while later the owner overheard her speaking to her

friend. She said, "I wish now that I had said two hundred dollars."

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

James, a good man who had never harmed anyone, was the chauffeur

for a fine Christian businessman. Many times the employer tried to

tell James that he needed the Savior, but whenever he did so, the

standard reply was, "I keep the Ten Commandments. What more do I

need?"

One day the employer said to James, "If you can keep God's law for

half an hour, I'll give you that Buick of mine - the one you like to

drive around when you don't have to use the Cadillac."

"Oh, thank you, sir," James said excitedly. "That's so good of

you. I do like that Buick. I can easily keep the Ten Commandments

for half an hour, for I always keep them."

His employer told him to go up to the rumpus room over the garage

and lock the door to keep out noise and to lessen temptation. The

half-hour soon passed. Down came James, saying, "I certainly want to

thank you for the Buick."

But his employer asked, "What did you do while you were up in the

rumpus room?"

"Oh, I was just thinking."

"And what were you thinking?" asked the businessman.

"Why to tell the truth, sir," said the chauffeur, "I was just

thinking that since you're so good as to give me the Buick, maybe

you'd let me have that set of extra new tires in the garage, because

the tires are not good on that Buick."

"Oh, James," replied the employer, "I'm sorry to say that I cannot

give you even the Buick. The Law says, 'Thou shalt not covet!' and

you were coveting while up in that rumpus room. You haven't kept the

Ten Commandments even half an hour, much less all your life!"

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

A simple cartoon appeared on the editorial pages of many newspapers

during the May 1989 pro-democracy demonstrations in China. The first

frame pictured a person wearing the Chinese symbol, thinking about the

Statue of Liberty. The second frame showed a Russian envisioning the

Statue of Liberty. The third frame recorded a American's vision: the

dollar sign!

- James Y Greene, {Spending a Life: Materialism or Sacrifice}

(Nashville: SBC, 1990), 17.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

There once was a stingy baker. He was angry at a poor man who

would stand outside the bakery every day, savoring the scent of baking

bread. The baker felt that anyone who smelled his delicious products

should have to pay for the privilege. So he took the poor man to

court.

The judge listened patiently to the baker's complaint, then asked

the poor man, "Do you have any money?" All the man could produce were

two small coins. The judge took them. The baker smiled and eagerly

held out his hand.

But the judge only jingled the coins together before returning them

to their owner. "Punishment should fit the crime," he said. "The

price for the smell of bread shall be the sound of money."

- Sharon Creeden, {Florida Magazine} the Sunday supplement of

{Orlando Sentinel, }Nov. 24, 1996.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

We are Christians. That must effect how we live with our money.

We must determine 'How much is enough?' and determine not to continue

to allow our lifestyles to escalate uninhibited. The tough part is

this: God has put His people in all strata of society. Most of us, if

we are honest with ourselves, tend to think God has put us in the next

one up from where we are presently. Watch out for greed - it is sin.

We must seek the Lord's will honestly about where we should be living

financially.

- Tim Stephenson, {Issues in Financial Planning - Lifestyle}

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

I heard of a man whose sole interest in life was playing the stock

market. He studied the financial page of the newspaper avidly every

day and it became such an obsession with him that one day as he was

engrossed in the financial columns he said aloud to himself, "What

wouldn't I give to see the paper one year from now!" The words were

no sooner out of his mouth than there was a puff of smoke in the room

and a genie handed him a newspaper and then disappeared. As soon as

he got over the shock he realized that his wish was granted. The

paper in his hand was dated one year hence. Feverishly he sought the

financial page and his eyes goggled when he saw how the market had

developed. He noted the stocks on which he hoped to reap a bonanza.

In the bus on his way to visit the stockbroker he was browsing through

the rest of the paper when suddenly staring at him from the obituary

columns was the notice of his own death and funeral arrangements!

- James A. Feehan, {Story Power!, }(San Jose, CA: Resource

Publications, Inc, 1994) 54

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Your Money Or Your Life!

An old Jack Benny skit illustrates how money can become more important to us than anything else. Jack was walking along, when suddenly an armed robber approached him and ordered, "Your money or your life!" There was a long pause, and Jack did nothing. The robber impatiently queried, "Well?" Jack replied, "Don't rush me, I'm thinking about it."

{Incidentally, in real life, Jack Benny was known as a very generous man!}

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database greedpossessions

That Old-Time Religion Can Take You To the Cleaners

A cautionary tale of how bunkum artists exploit true believers.

When swindler Clyde D. Hood went prospecting for investors, he boasted that he had something fancy that Wall Streeters didn’t: a hot line to the divine. Hood, whose pedigree included work as a pool hall manager, claimed the “Supreme Commander” had ordered him to launch a “Christian program” to help “the little people.” While he didn’t mention the pool hall, he said he’d made a pile turning big profits for corporate clients trading something called “foreign bank debentures” offshore.

Every hundred bucks invested with Hood’s Omega Trust & Trading would generate a 51-fold return in 275 days. Roll the stake over and your $100 would beget $225,000 (the arithmetic was off a bit). This joint venture of God and mammon began in 1994 and went on for six years before secular authorities rose up and smote it. By that point Hood and his Omega cronies in Mattoon, Ill. had relieved their believers -- 10,000 victims from as far afield as Australia and China -- of $20 million.

It’s an old and sad story: Investors let down their guard when they get a pitch from a self-proclaimed fellow follower of God. With help from the Internet, religious-based scams hauled in $1 billion last year, estimates Joseph Borg, president of the North American Securities Administrators Association.

In 1983 churchgoing farmers in Washington State lost $60 million to a commodities trading scam perpetrated by one Kenneth Oxborrow, who touted his Christian bona fides and displayed a crucifix on his office wall. More recently the Baptist Foundation of Arizona collapsed amid state allegations of fraud involving a real estate scheme that ensnared 13,000 people and bagged $590 million. Its auditor, Arthur Andersen, took a pre-Enron public pasting from this mess.

The Omega case came to its inglorious conclusion in January when Hood, 68, was sentenced to 14 years on federal charges of fraud and money laundering. Pleading guilty to, or convicted on, similar charges was a passel of 18 henchmen from Mattoon (pop. 18,500), a farm and factory town.

His pals weren’t creepy grifter types with slicked-back hair and pencil-thin moustaches but righteous citizens all -- including a former police officer, a deputy sheriff, a lawyer, a minister. They got a piece of the action for running Hood’s database and manning his phone lines, where they kept track of victims sedated by down-home talk about Jesus and those miraculous bank debentures.

Where did the Omega bunch park its ill-gotten gains? Not in those wonderful debentures, which didn’t exist. Hood and his pals put the money into hard assets, at least giving his victims something to turn to for partial repayment: a dozen local businesses, including a sawmill (timber acreage attached), a construction company, a computer services outfit and the Blue Bird Diner. He paid $420,000 to buy the prefab structure of the now-shuttered Blue Bird through a fake owner and five banks. The final payment to its Florida manufacturer was a hand-delivered $121,000 -- in $20 bills.

Beefy, crewcut and folksy, Hood was a “lot smarter than we took him for, but not as smart as he thought he was,” says Esteban Sanchez, the assistant U.S. attorney who put the scamster behind bars. Careful not to live large, Hood tooled around Mattoon in a 1999 Lincoln but kept his 11 antique autos (a 1907 two-cylinder Metz with a buggy top, for instance) under wraps.

Hood was a master at soothing anxious investors. He taped messages for the investor service phone line that promised “. everything is going fine.” As the years wore on with no payoff, he inveighed against mysterious “enemies.” He begged for daily prayers to help “in this battle against Satan and his disciples.” Meanwhile, he said, “Keep the Lord’s warehouse full.”

from Business - Forbes.com via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database cheatinggreed

From Riches To Rikers Island

Luke 1:53

Former Tyco International chief executive L. Dennis Kozlowski, who allegedly used company funds to buy a $15,000 umbrella stand and a $17,100 traveling toilette box. Tyco revealed it paid for a $6,000 shower curtain, a $2,200 wastebasket and many other expensive items for Kozlowski's New York City apartment. Tyco accused Kozlowski of recklessly tapping company funds, including more than $1 million for his wife's birthday party in Sardinia last year. The event's planners called for gladiators and an ice sculpture of Michelangelo's David with vodka streaming from the statue into crystal glasses, according to Tyco's filing. Other unauthorized expenses Kozlowski allegedly incurred include a $6,300 sewing basket, a $445 pin cushion, a $1,650 notebook and $5,960 for sheets. Tyco is in the process of seizing most, if not all of Kozlowski's assets, including a $17 million Fifth Avenue apartment, a $7 million Park Avenue apartment he turned over to his ex-wife, a $5 million Nantucket home and a $30 million compound in Boca Raton, Florida.

At his arraignment, the judge released Kozlowski on a $100 million personal recognizance bond that was to be secured by $10 million in personal assets. Because his assets are frozen he could not make bail. He and another company officer were ordered to come up with the necessary funds or face time at Riker's Island, one of the nation's toughest jails.

In 2000, Kozlowski had Tyco authorize nearly $96 million in unapproved bonuses for 51 employees to offset relocation loans for employees moving to Florida. "Forgiveness was offered to some people who never moved ... and people who did not even have a Tyco mortgage," Tyco said. Kozlowski and Swartz allegedly received about $50 million as part of the program, which was purportedly paid out from the proceeds of Tyco's successful initial public offering of TyCom, its undersea fiber-optic cable network, documents show. Only a few weeks after the Florida loans were improperly forgiven, Kozlowski introduced another unauthorized bonus program that cost Tyco more than $55 million, Tyco alleges. Sixteen executives, including Kozlowski and Swartz, participated, Tyco said.

[Kozlowski gets 8 to 25 years in a New York prison and is due for parole in 2014.]

from America Online News via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database moneyrich

(untitled)

Greed or Dishonesty

Police in Wheeling, Illinois, accused a Wal-Mart cashier of buying merchandise at the store using credit-card numbers she had copied from customers. Investigators admitted the cashier had made their job easier. She identified herself on the fraudulent receipts to make sure she got her employee discount. -- Roland Sweet in Syracuse, N.Y., New Times (reprinted in Reader's Digest, Jan. 00)

T.S. - Greed can make us act pretty irrational. When we throw out the commandments of God, we throw out common sense too. (submitted by Bob Hine)

from Help4su via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Jackpot Justice

According to an insurance consulting firm, lawsuit costs now represent 2.33% of U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP). That's an all-time high, and up from 1.54% in 1980. Tobacco, asbestos, and medical malpractice claims are just a few of the culprits. (By 2010 the hidden costs of lawsuits to a typical family of four could be more than the federal taxes they pay.)

The cost of lawsuits per U.S. citizen, adjusted for inflation.

Year Cost per person

1950 $ 87

1960 $ 160

1970 $ 309

1980 $ 406

1990 $ 704

2001 $ 721

2005 $ 1,000 (estimate)

Source: Tillinghast-Towers Perrin

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #18334]

from Fortune Magazine · Melanie Shanley via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

God Or Greed Or Dishonesty

God or Greed or Dishonesty

As students entered the lunch line at Asbury Theological Seminary in

Wilmore, Ky., a sign greeted them over a bowl of apples that read: "Take only

one apple. God is watching you." At the other end of the line there was a large

pan of cookies with a hastily written sign reading: "Take as many cookies as you

want. God is back watching the apples." (Reader's Digest-Contributed to "Campus

Comedy" by Gary P. Uber)

TS--How often do we leave church on Sunday and leave God there "to watch the

apples" and think that He's not watching those "cookies" that we are faced with

on Monday... By Michael Rains

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database greed

Stewardship Or Greed Or Wisdom

Stewardship or Greed or Wisdom

Tommy's house is packed with relatives for Christmas dinner. Grandpa calls

6yr. old Tommy aside and starts asking about school, girl friends, and other

stuff that he could think of. After a while grandpa notices that Tommy is

losing interest in the conversation so he pulls two bills from his wallet to see

if he can keep him interested. A ten and a twenty dollar bill. He shows both

bills to Tommy and tells him he can keep any one he chooses. Tommy reaches over

and takes the ten dollar bill.

Grandpa is pretty surprised and upset about the unwise decision his grandson

had made so he pulls out another ten dollar bill to see if it was a mistake.

Again he tells Tommy to take the one of his choice and again Tommy takes the

ten. Once again Grandpa is surprised and upset. So he takes Tommy over to one

of his uncles to show him how dumb Tommy is, and the whole process is repeated

in the exact same manner. Throughout the day Grandpa makes a point of showing

Tommy's poor decisions to everyone in the house. Finally he shows the stunt to

Tommy's father. A few hours later Tommy's father could wait no longer so he

got Tommy aside and asks if he knows the difference between a ten dollar bill

and a twenty. "Of course." answers Tommy. "So, why did you always choose the

ten instead of the twenty?" asked Dad.

Tommy smiles real big, pulls out a wad of $10 bills and replies, "Well, if

I had taken the twenty, do you think Grandpa would have played the game eight

more times?" Submitted by Paul Groves, Louisville, KY

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database greedwisdom

(untitled)

John 10:10

SATAN

There is a haunting photo by Alain Keler in the October 1993 issue of Life magazine. It is of a boy playing a flute. The boy, named Jensen, is only ten years old, but he probably can play some very sad songs. For when you took at his eyes-or where his eyes should be beneath his long, dark bangs-you see only redness, empty sockets. Jensen lives in a charitable institution in Bogotd, Colombia.

Blindness is always tragic, but the cause of blindness in this case only multiplies the sorrow. In the caption next to the photo, Robert Sullivan explains that the boy was likely the victim of "organ nappers." Eye thieves.

When Jensen was ten months old, reports his mother, she took him to the hospital with acute diarrhea. The next day when she returned, bandages covered Jensen's eyes. Dried blood was spattered on his body. Horrified, she asked the doctor what had happened.

He answered harshly, "Can't you see your child is dying?" and dismissed her.

She rushed Jensen to another hospital in Bogotd. After examining him, the doctor gave chilling news: "They've stolen his eyes."

Jensen is somewhat fortunate. He is alive. The organ traffickers usually kill their victims, excise body parts, and broker them to those willing to pay for healthy kidney or cornea transplants.

Organ thieves in Bogotd, Colombia, are not the only ones stealing eyes. There is someone who steals a person's ability to see in an even more tragic way: Satan.

Blindness, Greed, Satan, Stealing

John 10:10; 2 Cor. 4:4; 1 John 2:11

Contemporary Illustrations For Preachers, Teachers, & Writers

Editor Craig Brian Larson, Baker Books, p. 240.

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database satanstealing

Congregation Gives Away $60M Gift

ST. MARYS, Ga. (AP) - Hundreds of letters fill a small file cabinet. Handwritten requests churn out of the fax machine and curl into a pile. And the office staff at St. Marys United Methodist Church has stopped answering the phone, which never stops ringing.

The notes and messages that have swamped the coastal church, nestled in Georgia's southeastern corner, all seek the same thing - a piece of the $60 million a local telephone tycoon left the congregation to spend as it pleases.

After weeks spent wrestling with the whopping sum, church members made a decision last Sunday: Fearful that the fortune could cheapen their faith, they voted to give away all but a fraction of the money.

"You read the stories about people who have won the lottery and you follow up on them a year later and find out they're estranged from their families and broke," said the Rev. Derek McAleer. "Our church has won the lottery in some respects, and the dangers are all around us."

So are the ceaseless, mostly unsolicited, requests for cash. McAleer estimates up to 300 letters have poured in, postmarked from as far away as California.

Other churches want help building new sanctuaries. An elderly widow wants money to fix her leaky roof. Entrepreneurs want investments for their ice cream parlors and limousine services. One man even asked the church to help pay his credit card bills.

Could Warren Bailey have known his generosity would cause such a fuss?

In the decades before his death in July at age 88, Bailey and his two brothers reaped a fortune from the Camden Telephone Co.

Their father bought the company in the late 1920s, when Camden County was still a fishing community and only a few people could afford phones. Bailey took over as company president in 1941, and soon the arrival of a paper mill and a naval base boosted the population and the family business.

Bailey never flaunted his wealth. He preferred Hardee's and Wal-Mart to fine dining and designer stores. He refused to pay $7.50 a month for garbage service, toting his trash bags from home to the office garbage bin. And he was pushing 76 when he finally bought a house and left his tiny apartment at the phone company.

Long divorced and with no children, Bailey drew up a will in 1996 with his attorney, Charlie Smith Jr. He rattled off a short list of friends who were to share a total of $220,000. Then he paused.

"And give the rest to the church," Bailey told Smith, who represents the area in the Georgia Legislature.

Bailey had been a member of St. Marys United Methodist for most of his life, but hadn't attended for more than 20 years. Friends say he preferred watching Sunday services on television, where he could avoid crowds and didn't have to wear a coat and tie.

Smith, also a church member, knew Bailey had given $100,000 annually to the church for various projects since 1992. But the scope of this final gift alarmed him.

"I tried to talk him out of it," Smith said. "I told him, `Warren, this could destroy a church, this kind of money. Don't do this to the church.' But he was the kind of fellow who, once he made up his mind, that was it."

Bailey chose the church to receive the bulk of his wealth because he didn't trust the government with it and couldn't think of anyone else, said Tom Turner, a phone company employee and close friend of Bailey's.

Turner, who received $45,000 from Bailey's estate, wasn't surprised he and other friends didn't get more.

"The money he left us, it seemed like he left enough money that it didn't change your life," Turner said. "I really think he looked at it that way."

Smith kept Bailey's will a secret from church members for four years, until Bailey died July 14 of congestive heart failure. The congregation considered the money a blessing, but also a burden.

Would the church's 715 members resort to infighting over how to spend Bailey's gift? Would the collection plate dry up because people assumed the church was wealthy? Would the church become distracted from religion by riches?

McAleer turned to the Bible for guidance. A search of his computerized New Testament for the word "money" turned up 164 verses. Most of them were warnings against greed and the temptations of wealth.

"Did you know that Jesus talked more about money than prayer or any other topic?" McAleer said. "And it's all saying, `Watch out."'

The congregation decided right away that none of the money would go into the general budget, about $298,000, that pays the pastor's salary and funds day-to-day operations.

Last week, the members rejected a proposal to keep $4 million for future construction. The money was added to the amount to be given away to other churches and ministries, for a total of $16 million.

Another $40 million will go into a foundation managed by nine-member board that will award grants to nonprofit groups. The church plans to hire a money-managing firm to invest the funds.

For itself, the church will keep $2.8 million in an endowment fund named for Bailey. The church hopes the fund will generate interest of about $100,000 a year, the same as Bailey's previous donations, to be spent on service projects.

Now the church board must decide what types of projects it will award grants to.

And the pile of letters, faxes and phone messages keeps growing, yet to be answered, in the church file cabinet, filled with wish lists for a piece of Bailey's bequest.

"I really don't think he understood what would happen," Turner said. "It's either that, or he's sitting up there laughing: `You want money, here's money. See what it can do to you."

Mexican family fakes mother's death, dummy in coffin

A Mexican family faked the death of their mother and buried a coffin containing a dummy made from bags of sand in an apparent insurance scam, authorities said Thursday.

But when the family of 42-year old Perla del Carmen Sanchez Mendez in the southern state of Tabasco tried to claim one million pesos ($122,000) in life insurance, authorities smelled something fishy.

"It seemed suspicious to us that only nine months after taking out the policy the family put forward a death claim and even more so when contradictions arose surrounding the day and cause of death," Marina Dominguez, a life insurance agent with Grupo Nacional Provincia, told reporters.

The insurers alerted police and obtained an order for the grave to be exhumed.

"What we found left us shocked and stunned and confirmed the insurance fraud," said Tabasco state attorney Wilber Damian Moscoso. "Inside the coffin we found two bags of construction material and a false plastic head" he added.

Police said they suspected Tomas Gomez Sanchez, the son of the matriarch, to have mastermind the fraud. They give no information on the whereabouts of the mother.

You Don't Mess With An Inmate's Spider

Luke 12:15

An inmate in a prison in Punta Gorda, Florida, named James “Happy” Borland, 41, suffered a near-fatal concussion in December 2002 from being roughed up by inmates Lemuel “K-Money” Ware, 32, and Corey Andrews, 32. Borland had accused Ware of stealing his pet spider and renaming it “Pinky.” According to a Florida Department of Law Enforcement report, Borland had demanded his spider back, but Andrews intervened. Ware, who said he had purchased the spider fair and square, felt he had to go after Borland because Pinky (in a small box in Ware's shirt pocket) “told” him to.

___________

Port Charlotte Sun-Herald, 12/19/02

___________________________________________________________________

More complete story:

You Don't Mess With An Inmate's Spider

By MIKE WILSON, Times Staff Writer

© St. Petersburg Times

published January 3, 2003

Two Florida prison inmates are facing life sentences and a third has a cracked skull after fighting ... over a spider?

If ever a story called for further reporting, this one did.

Here, to begin with, is the press release in which the Florida Department of Law Enforcement announced the news. FDLE's Web site is www.fdle.state.fl.us. Other details of the case appear below the press release.

-- MIKE WILSON, Floridian editor

* * *

Inmates Charged With Beating Fellow Inmate Over A Spider

December 17, 2002

The Florida Department of Corrections Office of Inspector General and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) Fort Myers Regional Operations Center announce the arrests of Corey L. Andrews and Lemuel W. Ware. Both men are housed in the Charlotte Correctional Institution (in Punta Gorda). Andrews and Ware are each charged with Aggravated Battery by a Person Detained in Prison.

At approximately 11:30 a.m. on Dec. 11, 2002 Charlotte Correctional Officers found Inmate James Borland unconscious and unresponsive in the recreation yard of the facility. Borland was taken to a local hospital where he was treated for head trauma and underwent brain surgery....

The Department of Corrections requested FDLE agents to assist in the investigation. After several interviews with witnesses, it was learned that Corey Andrews and Lemuel Ware got into a fight with James Borland over a pet spider. Andrews told investigators that Borland had accused Ware of stealing his pet spider “Pinky.” Ware told investigators that the pet spider talked to him and told him to hit Borland.

During the fight witnesses stated hearing Andrews and Ware use racial slurs, therefore the charges are enhanced to a Life Felony under the Florida hate crime law.

* * *

That's it, the whole press release. We called FDLE to see what else they could tell us.

The agency got involved because it investigates homicides committed in state prisons. Borland's injuries were so severe -- his skull was fractured -- that it appeared he would not survive, special agent Steve Uebelacker said.

Ware, 32, is serving eight years for carjacking and has a prison record going back to 1991. Andrews, also 32, who first went to prison at 17, is serving five years for aggravated battery on a law enforcement officer.

Borland's sentence is two years and 10 months, for attempted sale of cocaine.

During his investigation, Uebelacker learned that prison inmates catch spiders and keep them in boxes as pets. Somehow Ware got Borland's spider away from him. It was Ware who named the spider Pinky.

“Ware only had it for a day. In the time he had it, he must have bonded with it and come up with the name,” Uebelacker said.

Ware and Andrews, who are black, are charged with hate crimes because they called Borland, who is white, a “cracker” during the assault, the agent said. They will remain incarcerated pending trial.

Borland, 41, has recovered from his injuries. He has been transferred to the South Florida Reception Center in Miami.

And where is the spider?

“You better believe I asked that question,” Uebelacker said. “Nobody seems to know. The whereabouts of Pinky are unknown.”

from Internet, Various Places via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Always Beyond Your Reach

Ecclesiastes 4:6

There is this age where a toddler just starts exploding with words they're learning and hour-by-hour discoveries they're making. Those “discoveries” quickly teach new parents a survival skill. It's called “baby proofing” - as in removing anything that little person could get their hands on that might do them harm - or vice versa. The way you discover what needs to be removed is usually by the toddler getting their hands on it. And suddenly, parents are playing defense against a strong, and suddenly very independent, toddler offense. This time-honored human drama has been acted out frequently in our son and daughter-in-law's home as our one-year-old granddaughter goes exploring each new day. When she wants something she can't reach, she makes sure they know that. Our son explained our little angel's frame of mind this way: “All she ever wants is just beyond her reach.”

Well, I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about “Always Beyond Your Reach.”

Let's face it, fellow grownup babies - that toddler's reach syndrome is not limited to little people. It's a fact of life for many of us - all we want always seems to be just beyond our reach. I call it the “as soon as” syndrome - I'll be satisfied as soon as I graduate, as soon as I get that job, get that better job, get that house, get that bigger house, get a boyfriend or girlfriend, get a little more money. I'll be content as soon as I'm married, as soon as I'm divorced, have children, have grandchildren, lose weight, get a makeover, feel better, as soon as I move, as soon as I retire.” It's life's never-ending cycle of “never enough.”

And therein, is one of life's brutal truths - more is never enough. John D. Rockefeller was asked how much money is enough money. His answer was classic: “A little bit more.” Well, in spite of its futility, many of us are driven to do whatever it takes to get more of what we think we need. But what we want is always just beyond our reach. Our “reach” syndrome condemns us to a life sentence called discontentment; never at peace, never able to rest, never satisfied.

After passionately pursuing more of almost everything in his life, King Solomon wisely concluded in Ecclesiastes 4:6, “Better one handful with tranquility than two handfuls with toil and chasing after the wind.” What a great word picture for always wanting more. It's like chasing the wind. The Bible says it's much better to settle for less; one handful and have some peace and sanity, than to constantly push for more; two handfuls with a life that's basically out of control.

Which brings us to the liberating perspective of our word for today from the Word of God in 1 Timothy 6:6 - “Godliness with contentment is great gain. For we brought nothing into the world, and we can take nothing out of it. But if we have food and clothing, we will be content with that.” In other words, I will go with whatever God gives me, trusting Him to provide what He knows I need. We're talking 23rd Psalm here - “The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.” We're talking the wisdom of Job: “The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away; may the name of the Lord be praised.” Praise is the language of contentment and the key to a peaceful heart. The Greek philosopher Plato said: “Contentment is not getting everything you always wanted to have; it's realizing how much you already have.”

For every child of God, what you already have is the wise and adequate provision of your all-loving, all-knowing, all-powerful Heavenly Father. And you don't have to be a slave to the frustrating drive for more.

Celebrate everything you do have. Focus on all the good things your Father has done for you, and let Him turn praise for Him into blessed contentment for you. Because this stubborn push to always get what we don't have - well, it's for babies.

__________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #16824]

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4462 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Quotes On Greed

Mark 7:22

"If you would abolish avarice, you must abolish its mother, luxury."

-- Cicero

"Avarice in old age is foolish; for what can be more absurd than to increase our provisions for the road the nearer we approach to our journey's end."

-- Cicero

"Avarice - generally the last passion of those lives of which the first part has been squandered in pleasure, and the second devoted to ambition."

-- Samuel Johnson

"Avarice is the vice of declining years."

-- George Bancroft

"The avaricious man is like the barren sandy ground of the desert which sucks in all the rain and dew with greediness, but yields no fruitful herbs or plants for the benefit of others."

-- Zeno

"Avarice is always poor."

-- Samuel Johnson

"Poverty wants some things, luxury many, avarice all things."

-- Abraham Cowley

"Avarice increases with the increasing pile of gold."

-- Juvenal

"Few rich men own their own property. Their property owns them."

-- Robert Ingersoll, noted atheist

from (various) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database avarice

Israeli Postmen Deliver Letters To God

Ezra 9:5

Thinking of writing a letter to God?

The address, according to those who regularly write to the Almighty, is “God, Jerusalem, Israel.” Alternatively you could try: “God, the Wailing Wall,” a reference to the Jewish holy site known as the Western Wall.

Either address will ensure your letter ends up in the sorting room of the Israeli post office's Dead Letters Department where it will be collected, placed in a velvet bag and posted to God through the cracks of the Western Wall.

Hundreds of people every year jot down their prayers, wishes or problems and mail their notes to the Holy City where the creed of the Dead Letter Department's postmen is to ensure that every piece of mail reaches its destination -- rain or shine. “We are going through a peak period at the moment,” said harried Dead Letters Department manager, Avi Yaniv.

The usual trickle of letters to God has become a torrent before Yom Kippur, the holiday where Jews atone for their sins. “Dear God...Once a long time ago I stole ashtrays from hotels and glasses with advertising logos. At the time I didn't think much about it,” wrote one woman. “Now I would like to ask for your forgiveness.”

Letters to Jesus and a greeting card celebrating the Jewish New Year addressed to “The Angels in Heaven” are also delivered to the Western Wall, one of Judaism's holiest sites, where Jews traditionally insert notes with prayers and wishes. “We squeeze the letters in between the gaps,” said Yaniv.

“DEAR GOD, HELP ME BECOME A DOZER DRIVER”

The deliveries to the Western Wall have been going on for years since the Dead Letters postmen decided that since there was no way to return the letters to the unknown senders, they might as well be delivered to the recipient - God.

The latest letters collected in a plush bag, normally used to store Jewish prayer shawls, come from as far as Australia, India, Ghana, France, Nigeria and the United States.

“Some people go to a shrink or a Rabbi and others write it down, put it in an envelope, slap on a stamp and write 'To God, Jerusalem, Israel',” said Yitzhak Rabihiya, spokesman for the Israeli postal department.

Some of the writers ask God for help sticking to a diet, beg for assistance holding a troubled marriage together, or fighting off the ravages of cancer. Others are just plain avaricious. “Dear God, Please grant me the millionaires life,” wrote one person.

Darryl from Tennessee had a slightly more humble request. “I will be happy if you employ me as one of your (bull)dozer operators in your company,” he wrote in his missive, in which he also requested “a nice job and a good wife.”

The Dead Letters Department workers were once so moved by a letter in which the author listed a litany of personal problems that they collected $1,000 of $1,200 he requested from God in his letter and sent it to him.

“Two months later they received another letter from the same man written to God,” said Rabihiya. “They thought he was probably sending his thanks. But at the end of the letter he wrote: 'Thank you for the money but please next time don't send it through the postal service. Those thieves stole 700 shekels!”

*

from America Online News · Megan Goldin, Reuters via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database ingratitudegreed

A Sears Catalog Did the Trick

Many years ago a major American company had trouble keeping employees working in their assembly plant in Panama. The laborers lived in a generally agrarian, barter economy, but the company paid them in cash. Since the average employee had more cash after a week's work than he had ever seen, he would periodically quit working, satisfied with what he had made.

What was the solution? Company executives gave all their employees a Sears catalogue. No one quit then, because they all wanted the previously undreamed-of things they saw in that book.

Give Me ...

Patrick Henry said, “Give me liberty or give me death.” But the next few generations weakened a bit, to where they shortened that statement to say, “Give me liberty.” Our materialistic generation has weakened to the point where we've shortened it to simply say, “Give me.” In a world that is bent on getting, the Christian must be bent on giving, for we know what we keep we lose, and what we give we have. Puritan Isaac Barrow said that to dispense our wealth liberally is the best way to preserve it.

*

Moving On Up

A man named Ian Fleming, 33, was arrested in September 2004 in New York City after he attempted to deposit bogus, computer-generated checks into his account at a Commerce Bank in Forest Hills, in the amounts of, respectively, $5 billion and $6 billion. Police said that the week before, Fleming had done a trial run by successfully depositing bogus checks in the amounts of $350 and $1,300 and thus probably felt he was ready to move on up.

*

from Internet · Chuck Shepherd via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database money

Unlucky In Riches

For a lot of people, winning the lottery is the American dream. But for many lottery winners, the reality is more like a nightmare.

“Winning the lottery isn't always what it's cracked up to be,” says Evelyn Adams, who won the New Jersey lottery not just once but twice (1985, 1986) to the tune of $5.4 million. Today the money is all gone and Adams lives in a trailer.

“I won the American dream but I lost it, too. It was a very hard fall. It's called rock bottom,” says Adams.

“Everybody wanted my money. Everybody had their hand out. I never learned one simple word in the English language -- 'No.’ I wish I had the chance to do it all over again. I'd be much smarter about it now,” says Adams who also lost money at the slot machines in Atlantic City.

“I was a big time gambler,” admits Adams. “I didn't drop a million dollars, but it was a lot of money. I made mistakes, some I regret, some I don't. I'm human. I can't go back now so I just go forward, one step at a time.”

LIVING ON FOOD STAMPS

William “Bud” Post won $16.2 million in the Pennsylvania lottery in 1988 but now lives on his Social Security.

“I wish it never happened. It was totally a nightmare,” says Post.

A former girlfriend successfully sued him for a share of his winnings. It wasn't his only lawsuit. A brother was arrested for hiring a hit man to kill him, hoping to inherit a share of the winnings. Other siblings pestered him until he agreed to invest in a car business and a restaurant in Sarasota, Florida, -- two ventures that brought no money back and further strained his relationship with his siblings.

Post even spent time in jail for firing a gun over the head of a bill collector.

Within a year, he was $1 million in debt.

Post admitted he was both careless and foolish, trying to please his family. He eventually declared bankruptcy.

Now he lives quietly on $450 a month and food stamps.

“I'm tired, I'm over 65 years old, and I just had a serious operation for a heart aneurysm. Lotteries don't mean [anything] to me,” says Post.

DEEPER IN DEBT

Suzanne Mullins won $4.2 million in the Virginia lottery in 1993. Now she's deeply in debt to a company that lent her money using the winnings as collateral.

She borrowed $197,746.15, which she agreed to pay back with her yearly checks from the Virginia lottery through 2006. But, when the rules changed allowing her to collect her winnings in a lump sum, she cashed in the remaining amount. But, she stopped making payments on the loan.

She blamed the debt on the lengthy illness of her uninsured son-in-law who needed $1 million for medical bills.

Mark Kidd, the Roanoke, Va., lawyer who represented the Singer Asset Finance Company who sued Mullins, confirms. He won a judgment for the company against Mullins for $154,147 last May, but they have yet to collect a nickel.

“My understanding is she has no assets,” says Kidd.

BACK TO THE BASICS

Ken Proxmire was a machinist when he won $1 million in the Michigan lottery. He moved to California, went into the car business with his brothers and within five years, Ken had filed for bankruptcy.

“He was just a poor boy who got lucky and wanted to take care of everybody,” explains Ken's son Rick.

“It was a hell of a good ride for three or four years, but now he lives more simply. There's no more talk of owning a helicopter or riding in limos. We're just everyday folk. Dad's now back to work as a machinist,” says his son.

Willie Hurt of Lansing, Mich., won $3.1 million in 1989. Two years later he was broke and charged with murder. His lawyer says Hurt spent his fortune on a divorce and crack cocaine.

Charles Riddle of Belleville, Mich., won $1 million in 1975. Afterward, he got divorced, faced several lawsuits and was indicted for selling cocaine.

Missourian Janite Lee won $18 million in 1993. Lee was generous to a variety of causes, particularly politics, education and the community. But according to published reports, eight years after winning, Lee had filed for bankruptcy with only $700 left in two bank accounts and no cash on hand.

One Southeastern family won $4.2 million in the early '90s. They bought a huge house and succumbed to repeated family requests for help in paying off debts.

The house, cars and relatives ate the whole pot. Eleven years later, the couple is divorcing, the house is sold, and they have to split what is left of the lottery proceeds. The wife got a very small house and the husband has moved in with the kids. Even the life insurance they bought ended up getting cashed in.

“It was not the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow,” says their financial advisor.

LUCK IS FLEETING

These sad-but-true tales are not uncommon, say the experts.

“For many people, sudden money can cause disaster,” says Susan Bradley, a certified financial planner in Palm Beach, Fla., and founder of the Sudden Money Institute, a resource center for new money recipients and their advisors.

“In our culture, there is a widely held belief that money solves problems. People think if they had more money, their troubles would be over. When a family receives sudden money, they frequently learn that money can cause as many problems as it solves,” she says.

Craig Wallace, a senior funding officer for a company that buys lottery annuity payments in exchange for lump sums, agrees.

“Going broke is a common malady, particularly with the smaller winners. Say you've won $1 million. What you've really won is a promise to be paid $50,000 a year. People win and they think they're millionaires. They go out and buy houses and cars and before they know it, they're in way over their heads,” he says.

ARE YOU REALLY A 'MILLIONAIRE'?

Part of the problem is that the winners buy into the hype.

“These people believe they are millionaires. They buy into the hype, but most of these people will go to their graves without ever becoming a millionaire,” says Wallace, who has been in the business for almost a decade.

“In New Jersey, they manipulate the reality of the situation to sell more tickets. Each winner takes a picture with a check that becomes a 3-foot by 5-foot stand-up card. The winner is photographed standing next to a beautiful woman and the caption reads: 'New Jersey's newest millionaire.'“

WINNING PLAYS A GAME WITH YOUR HEAD

Bradley, who authored “Sudden Money: Managing a Financial Windfall,” says winners get into trouble because they fail to address the emotional connection to the windfall.

“There are two sides to money. The interior side is the psychology of money and the family relationship to money. The exterior side is the tax codes, the money allocation, etc.”

“The goal is to integrate the two. People who can't integrate their interior relationship with money appropriately are more likely to crash and burn,” says Bradley.

“Often they can keep the money and lose family and friends -- or lose the money and keep the family and friends -- or even lose the money and lose the family and friends.”

Bill Pomeroy, a certified financial planner in Baton Rouge, La., has dealt with a number of lottery winners who went broke.

“Because the winners have a large sum of money, they make the mistake of thinking they know what they're doing. They are willing to plunk down large sums on investments they know nothing about or go in with a partner who may not know how to run a business.”

WHAT IF YOU GET SO (UN)LUCKY?

To offset some bad early-decision making and the inevitable requests of friends, relatives and strangers, Bradley recommends lottery winners start by setting up a DFZ or decision-free zone.

“Take time out from making any financial decisions,” she says. “Do this right away. For some people, it's smart to do it before you even get your hands on the money.

“People who are not used to having money are fragile and vulnerable, and there are plenty of people out there who are willing to prey on that vulnerability -- even friends and family,” she cautions.

“It's not a time to decide what stocks to buy or jump into a new house purchase or new business venture.

“It's a time to think things through, sort things out and seek an advisory team to help make those important financial choices.”

As an example, Bradley says that on a list on 12 things people who come into a windfall will spend money on, buying a house is at the top of the list while investing is number 11.

“You really don't want to buy a new house before taking the time to think about what the consequences are.

“A lot of people who don't have money don't realize how much it costs to live in a big house -- decorators, furniture, taxes, insurance, even utility costs are greater. People need a reality check before they sign the contract,” she says.

Evelyn Adams, the New Jersey lottery double-winner, learned these lessons the hard way.

“There are a lot of people out there like me who don't know how to deal with money,” laments Adams. “Hey, some people went broke in six months. At least I held on for a few years.”

*

At Least She Got Her Dvd Player

During this time of the year, doesn't it seem like more people are interested in bargains than in the baby born in Bethlehem? When we were shopping up a storm, I didn't see any reference to the Savior's birth, but that might have been because it was still dark when we started out! That's nothing like what took place at a Florida WalMart about the same time we were in the stores: A mob of shoppers rushing for a sale on DVD players trampled the first woman in line. Patricia VanLester had her eye on a $29 DVD player, but was knocked to the ground by the frenzy of shoppers behind her. “She got pushed down, and they walked over her like a herd of elephants,” said her sister. “I told them, “Stop stepping on my sister! She's on the ground.” Paramedics called to the store found the woman unconscious on top of a DVD player, surrounded by shoppers seemingly oblivious to her.

from From Sermon #19781, Faded Glory: Why Christ Had To Come, by Rev. Bill Brill via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database greedmaterialism

Only Four Gifts For Christmas

A number of years ago when my youngest child of six children was 10 or 11, I was driving myself crazy trying to buy everything on her very lengthy Christmas list. I wanted to be a good parent and give my child the desires of her heart.

In the midst of all of this, a friend told me that he and his wife buy their children four gifts for Christmas every year.

Yes, FOUR gifts!

They are:

1. Something you want

2. Something you need

3. Something to wear and

4. Something to read.

If they complain, ask them, “Whose birthday are we celebrating?”

Once I started doing this, I thought my children would be awful about it, but the opposite happened. They really appreciated every gift they got, and they made me “label” them.

Since that time, Christmas at our house has been so much more enjoyable because we could focus on the true meaning of the celebration, and I wasn't driving myself crazy trying to find and buy gifts I couldn't afford.

And yes, I still buy and label four gifts for them each year.

________

A MountainWings Original by Nola Parton-Jones, Federal Way, Washington

http://www.mountainwings.com/

*

Updating the Seven Deadlies

Mark 10:19

According to a poll, the British are tired of the Seven Deadly Sins (anger, envy, gluttony, greed, lust, sloth and pride), which were first outlined by Pope Gregory the Great in the 6th Century. The poll finds people want to replace most of them -- especially lust, though most are OK with greed being listed. The top replacement suggestions: adultery, bigotry, cruelty, dishonesty, hypocrisy and selfishness.

________

London Times

*

Two Sisters, Two Choices, Two Destinies

Years ago, when I ministered in Scotland, there were two elderly sisters in the congregation. Both of them had been members of the church all of their lives. One of them lived on a farm, which had a large acreage and in the past it had been very productive. The other sister lived in a modest condo, which she kept immaculately clean.

The sister on the farm was widowed and had lived a hard life. She was weary and very needy. She didn't go out much and as the years sped past, she almost became a recluse. Her sister, on the other hand, was very outgoing, had a wonderful husband, and a lot of joy in her life.

To look at both of them, you wouldn't think they came from the same home, but they did. In fact, they were both brought up on the same farm. When their father died, they were due to equally inherit the family farm, but one of the sisters managed to get her father sign over ownership to both her and her husband before her dad died.

The other sister was left with nothing, and so she quit the farm and went to live in public housing in the nearby town. Throughout her life, she didn't have very much financially, but the riches of her life were a loving husband, great children, and a joyful disposition.

On the other hand, her sister had all the riches of the farm, which she and her husband squandered over the years. She ended up with a bad marriage, estranged children, and a guilty conscience for the rest of her days. The beautiful thing is that in her last few years of sickness, her loving sister visited her and cared for her each day on the farm. One was rich and had lived a lie. The other was poor, but showed unfailing love.

Every day we make choices and decisions: the question we must ask ourselves is this - are we only choosing to fulfill our desires and deceive ourselves, or are we willing to share our blessings and show unfailing love?

Prayer: Lord Jesus, we all suffer injustice in our lives, and trouble never seems far away. Sometimes we bring this on ourselves because of greed, insecurity or ambition. Help us to remain true to You in all that we seek to do this day. Keep us free from guile and deception. Enable us to show compassion and care, even to those who hurt and disappoint us. In Your Holy name, we pray. Amen.

________

By John Stuart, traqair@aol.com, http://www.erinpresbyterian.org

Rev. John Stuart is a native of Scotland, he and his wife Evelyn became US citizens in the summer of 2001. Rev. Stuart grew up in Glasgow, Scotland, and served several small churches in S.W. Scotland before accepting the call to Erin Presbyterian Church.

*

Bankruptcy of Spirit: Who Would Jesus Punch For An Xbox?

Luke 11:13

The holiday season has officially begun with widespread reports of near rioting at various big-box retailers, including the Wal-Mart in Renton, where the police had to be called in to quell crowds driven to a frenzy over the chance to buy laptop computers at a deep discount.

So-called “Black Friday” — as in black ink, the day after Thanksgiving and the official start of the annual retail binge that's become Christmas — has become a rite akin to the annual running of the bulls in Pamplona, Spain. We are treated to film footage and video accounts of rabid consumers kicking, punching, goring, and trampling each other for, well, it doesn't matter what it's for. Stuff.

Forgive me if I have an Andy Rooney moment, but remember when “Black Friday” wasn't a story? Remember when Christmas wasn't used as just another economic marker, a kind of rectal temperature taking of the national well-being? Remember when shopping was either a pleasure or a private anguish, not a public spectacle, let alone a trauma? Remember when we didn't keep score, we merely did the best we could as individuals and families?

I see two distressing trends here. One is that our media have become obsessed with quantifying everything, from holiday sales figures to athletes' salaries to movie box-office receipts. For the sake of injecting a competitive or disaster angle into everything, we now track the fiscal ups and downs of every move. The meaning of everything is determined by the bottom line. We've become a bar-chart society, and we track metrics like commodities traders.

Second, both news and entertainment have begun fusing into a variant of reality TV. Our entertainment is not great films or literature about conflict, it is conflict itself, delivered by ubiquitous Minicams. It's the difference between reading Shakespeare or Dickens and watching cockfights or Survivor. Our tales of retail madness around the holidays feed our taste for turning everything into Darwinian blood sport. We're happy to watch real children and families being abused on network nanny shows or made a spectacle of on Dr. Phil's stage; we watch attention-starved anorexics duke it out to be the next top model or next year's second-rate Vegas act. We're like the Romans in the Coliseum for whom the equivalent of must-see TV was watching what a pride of lions could do to a bunch of unarmed slaves. We care little about plot; it's the abuse that exhilarates. “News” events like Black Friday mania are effectively manufactured for our entertainment.

The sad accounts of holiday shopping insanity appeal in part because we spectators can take solace in the fact that there is someone out there — maybe lots of someones — more desperate, more willing to be humiliated, more pathetic, more deserving of scorn than we are. Better to be a fan in the stands than to be struggling in the arena yourself, right?

Watching people duke it out over Christmas gifts distracts us from the fact that we're all suffering from diminishment. We can roll our eyes over their foolishness without thinking about the bigger picture, that these foolish shoppers paid $2.50 a gallon for gas to drive miles and miles to fight with their neighbors over electronic merchandise, which they'll buy on credit, that was made by foreign workers in countries where their living-wage job wound up. We're getting desperate because we're being drained.

If people thought about the real context, maybe there'd be real riots.

With this general bankruptcy of spirit, it's no wonder the religious right is up in arms over the desecration of Christmas, the turning of a sacred season into a pie chart supervised by politically correct bureaucrats and retail-industry consultants. Evangelical preacher Jerry Falwell is upset because a Christmas tree in Boston was renamed a “holiday tree,” which, he says, is part of a concerted effort to “steal” Christmas. Even as a heathen, I join Falwell in fury. A Christmas tree is a Christmas tree. Are we also going to refer to menorahs as “holiday menorahs” to disguise their association with Jews and Hanukkah? If you strip Christmas of its religious and symbolic meaning, you're left with nothing but the emptiness exemplified by the few things you can still talk about, like sales figures and shopping riots. Who would Jesus punch for an Xbox? This is a concept of Christmas that would make Scrooge, the Grinch, and Mr. Potter all happy.

The spiritual umbrella the celebration of Christmas provides in American society also shelters non-Christians, including those who celebrate Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, the pagan yule, or some solo, secular creation that allows us to exist, for a few days, nights, or weeks, in a sacred zone where the last thing on our minds or in our hearts is the latest sales figures for Wal-Mart or Target.

We seem to be living in the dystopia that Jimmy Stewart was trapped in during IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE, only there are no angels to snap their fingers and wake us from the nightmare — no angels, that is, except, as Lincoln phrased it, the better angels of our nature.

It's time for them to earn their wings.

Man Jailed For 11 Years In Bizarre Divorce Saga

Luke 12:58

H. Beatty Chadwick is doing this day what he has done for the past 4,093: He is sitting in a county jail outside Philadelphia. Chadwick is the central figure in one of the most bizarre divorce battles in American history. The courts want to force him to turn over $2.5 million to his ex-wife, money they say he hid overseas all those years ago. Except he won’t. Or can’t, depending on whom you believe. So Chadwick sits.

“He’s an anomaly,” says his lawyer, Michael Malloy. “They don’t know what to do with him.”

The case has produced an Everest of court papers - a dozen pleas to the Delaware County courts, nine to state appeals courts, nine to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, 12 to federal courts, two of those to the U.S. Supreme Court.

But before all that, there was a marriage: Chadwick, 39-year-old successful corporate lawyer, to Barbara Jean Crowther, just 22, in 1977. Not surprisingly, they disagree about the very nature of their union. He insists the marriage was placid, happy - at least until she became depressed in their later years together. She has described a home life controlled intensely by her husband, with rationed toilet paper (six sheets per bathroom visit) and sex (7:30 a.m., Tuesdays and Thursdays).

When she told him she was leaving him, he vowed she would never see a dime. He used a term unfamiliar to her, she says: Scorched earth. “It sounded so comical to me,” she says. “It’s when you burn everything so that the enemy gets nothing.”

He had made millions in careful investments, but now it is all gone. He says he put it in a complicated foreign investment and lost it all. Her lawyers say he has it stashed away in another country, or probably several. After 10 years of searching, court investigators can find none of it. One lawyer notes the irony that if he had stolen that amount of money, he would have been out of jail in a couple of years. Even if it did show up, her lawyers would get most of it.

His ex-wife likens it to days-long silent treatments she says he would give her during their marriage. “This is just Beatty to a T,” she says. “It’s the biggest tantrum you’ll ever see anyone throw. And he’s real good at throwing tantrums. He can’t - just like he couldn’t let me go - he can’t let a single penny go. It’s his.”

He says, “It took me a long time to forgive what she has done. I still have to work at that. My own religious faith says that if I expect forgiveness from others, I have to forgive.”

Told this a few days later in Maine, the former Bobbie Chadwick throws her head back and laughs, long and loud.

from America Online News, Associated Press · Erin McClam, edited by David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database divorcegreedprison

Disposable Workers: Why Capitalism Needs Christianity

Job 7:2

Last week, electronics retailer Circuit City announced that it was laying off 3400 employees.

What made these particular layoffs noteworthy was not their size but, instead, Circuit City’s stated reasons. They had “nothing to do with [employees’] skills or whether they were a good worker or not.” Instead, “it was a function of their salary relative to the market.”

In other words, Circuit City was laying them off so it could replace them with people who make less. Rotten!

To be fair, Circuit City is not alone in this practice. It is part of a “new way of controlling labor costs in the service industry.” Employers “determine the prevailing market wages for particular jobs in various geographic regions” and “then find ways to make sure that their workers’ salaries stay within that range.”

There is no consideration of an employee’s productivity or quality of work. Nor is there any claim that the company can’t afford to pay what the workers are currently making — only that it doesn’t have to.

It is hard to imagine a clearer example of how rapacious unrestrained economic power can be. With all due respect to the late Milton Friedman, corporations’ social responsibility goes beyond maximizing shareholders’ returns.

But even if you do not think that unapologetically getting rid of workers so that they can hire cheaper workers is degrading and dehumanizing, it goes against your self-interest.

That is because it undermines the moral and cultural consensus that sustains free-market capitalism. Michael Novak has written about what he calls the “three-legged stool” that makes democratic capitalism possible: economic freedom, political freedom, and moral restraint. Take away any of these three and the system collapses.

Christianity’s great contribution to this consensus was that it provided capitalism with a moral dimension that capitalism could not provide for itself. Its teachings about the necessity for moral restraint in the marketplace were rooted in the Old Testament concerns for social justice, fair wages, and care for the poor. It incorporated the consistent biblical teaching about human dignity, including the dignity of honest labor.

Thus, when poet William Blake wrote about nineteenth-century England’s “dark satanic mills,” his criticism invoked unmistakably biblical language and imagery.

Christianity provided more than a basis for criticism of capitalism — it helped forge an alternative that kept what John Paul II called “the circle of exchange” going. In the aftermath of World War II, democratic capitalism in Europe appeared to have failed, leaving communism as its likely successor — until, that is, Christian statesmen like Konrad Adenauer of Germany created an alternative to amoral capitalism and socialism. It was called Christian democracy, and it saved Western Europe from communism.

Closer to home, there are companies like ServiceMaster and Herman Miller, which are run explicitly on Christian principles and have proven that a concern for your employees’ dignity is not incompatible with making a profit.

Christianity has shown that capitalism can be the servant of justice, which is why I am so disturbed at Circuit City’s actions. It is yet another reminder of Christianity’s diminished cultural influence, which leaves people as disposable commodities and dehumanized. This is a sober reminder of why restoring Christian influence is so urgent.

________

Copyright (c) 2007 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

America's Most Sinful Cities?

Luke 15:13

What are America’s most sinful cities? How could we know? Well, give FORBES magazine credit for giving this ranking challenge a try. The magazine recently offered rankings on the traditional seven deadly sins -- and ranked America’s “top ten” on each sin.

The folks at FORBES determined a way of tracking statistics on each of the sins. As the staff explained, “For each sin we stretched our imagination to find a workable proxy -- murder rates for wrath, per capita billionaires for avarice -- then culled the available data sources to rank the cities. Some of the results were surprising: Salt Lake City as America’s Vainest City. Some were not: Detroit as America’s Most Murderous.”

Here are the sins and the top cities in each sinful category:

MOST LUSTFUL: Denver ranked first, joined by San Antonio, Portland, Seattle, Salt Lake City, Boise, Washington, DC, Cincinnati, Columbus, Baltimore and Buffalo/Rochester. The research firm of AC Nielson used sales figures for contraceptives and sex items in ranking the list.

MOST JEALOUS: Memphis tops the list, followed by Charlotte, San Antonio, Seattle, Providence, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, Columbus, Oklahoma City, Chicago. The rankings were linked to crime rates for personal property.

MOST OBESE [Gluttony]: Memphis, Birmingham, San Antonio, Riverside/San Bernardino, Detroit, Jacksonville, Nashville, Oklahoma City, Kansas City, San Diego. Health statistics drove this listing.

MOST AVARICIOUS [Greed]: San Jose, San Francisco, Seattle, Denver, Boston, New York, Dallas, Los Angeles, Washington, Miami. The rankings on this sin were determined by looking at the concentration of great wealth.

MOST MURDEROUS [Wrath]: The crime statistics are clear -- the most murderous city is Detroit, followed by Baltimore, New Orleans, Newark, St. Louis, Oakland, Washington DC, Cincinnati, Philadelphia, and Buffalo.

MOST SLOTHFUL [Sedentary]: Memphis tops this list as well, followed by New Orleans, Las Vegas, Detroit, Birmingham, Louisville, San Antonio, Jacksonville, Nashville, and Miami.

MOST VAIN [Pride]: “Pride is supposed to be a deadly sin. When it comes to their looks, however, fewer Americans are seeing it that way,” say the reporters, who used plastic surgery as the marker for this sin. Perhaps surprisingly, Salt Lake City ranked first, followed by San Francisco, San Diego, San Jose, Miami, Louisville, Nashville, Virginia Beach, New York, and Los Angeles.

Interestingly, the Bible and the Christian tradition often associate sin with cities. The concentration of human beings in cities often fuels the business of sin and presents opportunities not available elsewhere. From the “cities of the plains” to Nineveh, Babylon, and Rome, cities often became symbols of human pride, lust, and egoistic sin.

Similarly, John Bunyan’s PILGRIM’S PROGRESS -- perhaps the most influential book in English (other than the Bible) among Christians -- symbolized the sinfulness and allure of the city in its portrayal of Vanity Fair.

But what about the FORBES list? In the final analysis, it is probably not worth more than conversation points. Are the folks in Salt Lake City really more vain than those in Atlanta? Are citizens of Memphis really more jealous than those of Houston? Who can know? The statistics chosen for the report tell only part of the story.

Still, it is interesting to ponder the question of whether sins are particularly celebrated and concentrated in certain cities. It would be hard to ignore the self-advertisement of Las Vegas. Yet, it is not true that what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas. Sins spill over quite readily, and sin is a powerful contagion.

In reality, the whole world is a Genesis 3 world -- a fallen world inhabited by sinners. Sin is a universal problem and every single human being is a sinner. Put sinful humanity in close quarters, and sin inevitably multiplies.

If anything, the FORBES sin listings should remind Christians of the great challenge of evangelizing the cities -- a task that demonstrates Christian failure to date. In that sense the FORBES list is haunting, humbling, and heart-breaking. Yet, in another sense, it may also be motivating. We can hope.

Gob-smacked By Human Nature: People and the Economy

Mark 7:22

During his 18 years as chairman of the Federal Reserve, Alan Greenspan didn’t so much testify before Congress as pronounce oracles. He was held in such awe that, even when they weren’t sure of what he had said, members of Congress didn’t dare press him.

Well, times have changed. At a Congressional hearing last week, a committee chairman did press Greenspan, and exposed the biggest gap in the former Fed chairman’s understanding — not of economics, but of human nature.

Greenspan told a House committee that he had “made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of organizations,” like banks, made them “best capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms.”

When chairman Henry Waxman said to him, “in other words, you found that your view of the world ... was not right,” Greenspan replied, “Absolutely, precisely.” He then confessed to being “shocked” by this “flaw” in his thinking.

Greenspan, it seems, was shocked by the existence of something called “human nature.” He was confounded by the idea that people, instead of being utility-maximizing machines that act in accordance with an ideological script or academic theory, might act like, well, people!

It apparently didn’t occur to Greenspan, as Los Angeles Times columnist Tim Rutten writes, that “presented with a chance to make a killing,” people might put their own interests first, regardless of the consequences for others.

Greenspan was a devotee of Ayn Rand, author of ATLAS SHRUGGED, the bestselling book which is still very popular. Her worldview, called objectivism, promoted the idea that if you pursue your own self-interest, it will always be rational and help the most people. We’ve seen in recent weeks where that leads.

To be fair, Greenspan is not the only person to be surprised at how human nature intrudes on the best-laid economic plans.

For the past month or so, the financial crisis and stories about it have followed a recurring pattern: Financial markets drop, often precipitously, and government officials put in place measures designed to restore “confidence” in those markets.

After an initially positive response, markets then continue to slide, and government officials and the media scratch their heads. They seem to have forgotten the role that human emotions like fear play in decision-making and how those emotions operate independently of our most elegant theories.

It isn’t a coincidence that memorable economic downturns have been labeled “depressions” and “panics.” To imagine that the economic realm operates independently of human nature and emotions is to live in a fantasy world, as we have been painfully reminded these past months.

Greenspan, to his credit, has acknowledged his mistake. Too bad he didn’t see it earlier before he pumped up the artificial wealth which resulted in our economic collapse.

It’s hard to imagine a clearer example of how bad ideas can have a huge impact. Worldviews matter and following wrong views of reality, as we’ve seen here, is a recipe for disaster.

It’s one thing to avoid excess regulation — it’s another to assume that, left to their own devices, people will selflessly look out for the interests of others. Not so. Forget human nature and you don’t get free markets, you get the Darwinian law of the jungle — a view of the world that shouldn’t come as a shock to any Christian.

________

Copyright (c) 2008 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database selfishnessgreed

Did Evangelicals Curb the Housing Bubble?

Mark 7:22

Interested in avoiding the next financial bubble? Then evangelical Christianity could be for you.

A new study by Christopher W. Crowe, an economist for the International Monetary Fund, found that during the last two housing booms in the United States, regions with high concentrations of evangelicals saw lower gains in home prices and less volatility than similar regions with fewer evangelical residents.

The reason to consider this more than just a statistical quirk, Mr. Crowe says, is that conservative Christianity teaches followers that God owns all worldly possessions. In practice, that means that unchecked greed and speculative frenzy are seen as undesirable in the evangelical community.

Many evangelicals, who make up 7 to 25 percent of the United States population, depending on whom you ask, also believe that the end of the world and the second coming of Jesus Christ will be marked by great calamity. Putting these two views together, Mr. Crowe proposes that evangelicals are more likely to spend money when times are bad for nonbelievers. If you’re with Mr. Crowe, then it’s not a great leap to think that evangelicals interpret bad-news events as good news.

To test this theory, Mr. Crowe looked at home prices before and after 9/11 and found that they fell sharply in non-evangelical areas but actually rose in evangelical ones. He next turned to the Rapture Index, which purports to track how close the end of the world could be. Mr. Crowe investigated how changes in the index matched up with home prices and found that up to 90 percent of the difference in price changes between evangelical and non-evangelical areas could be correlated with the Rapture index.

Expectations of the end of times can also affect how much wealth evangelicals accumulate over their lifetime. Using a survey of religious beliefs and household assets, Mr. Crowe found that people who believed in Armageddon were worth about 33 percent less than the average respondent. (Mr. Crowe is not the first to show this.) If you see belief in the after-life as a type of insurance against bad events, then this outcome makes sense.

It’s important to note that the results here show correlation and don’t establish causation. But still, they do point at two things: First, that group psychology can move markets to reach unsustainable levels, which is an assertion many economists are still not comfortable with. (The dominant view, at least pre-Lehman bankruptcy, was that markets with a large number of buyers and sellers worked to filter irrationality.)

And second, that the evangelicals’ role in the market may have prevented home prices from getting even more out of whack.

________

Addendum: Some readers wrote in about some alternate explanations for this correlation, namely the fact that evangelicals may be more likely to live in more rural areas with lower population density (where there was less demand for housing) and that they might be lower-income (so they couldn’t afford to speculate on houses). To address these two issues:

• Mr. Crowe did control for whether the area was urban, commute time and population, which I believe should capture the effects of population density. Other relevant controls: Land use regulations, income, income growth and unemployment in the region.

• But as for the claim that having a low income meant you couldn’t participate in the housing bubble, we shouldn’t forget (so quickly!) that the current bust started partly because of the exact opposite: Lower income people made purchases, on credit, that they really couldn’t afford. And there’s evidence that home prices grew faster in areas where you’re more likely to find low-income residents: This paper by two University of Chicago economists finds that, on average, home prices grew faster in sub-prime areas than in prime ones.

Not All Doctrinal Disagreements Stem From 'False Doctrines'

Ephesians 4:14

If I may botch the words of Benjamin Franklin, “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death, taxes and Christians fighting over doctrine.”

Until the Lord returns, theological disagreement is an inevitability, even among evangelical Christians who affirm the same Gospel and appeal to the same inerrant authority in Scripture. Christians who disagree over doctrine do so because they are imperfect interpreters who have different interpretations of Scripture, ways of reasoning, feelings and biases. As our 175-year history bears witness, Southern Baptists are not immune to these kinds of intramural disputes.

Yet not every theological disagreement is a “false teaching” in the biblical sense, nor is everyone who disagrees with our interpretation on a doctrinal matter a “false teacher.” In the New Testament, the term “false teacher” has a connotation more specific than someone who is factually incorrect in a belief or doctrine. It speaks more about the character of the teacher than the teaching itself. “False doctrine” is not a mere disagreement about the meaning of a biblical text.

First, false teaching deceives the spiritually immature. Those who are like “little children, tossed by the waves and blown around by every wind of teaching” (Ephesians 4:14) are most susceptible to “turning away from ... the grace of Christ ... to a different gospel” (Galatians 1:6), “another Jesus” and a “different spirit” (2 Corinthians 11:4). Notice the benchmarks for false doctrine here are a “different gospel” and “another Jesus.”

Second, Peter associates false teaching with “untaught and unstable” individuals who distort the meaning of every Scripture (2 Peter 3:16). He contrasts this “unstable” personality with those who are “established in the truth” (2 Peter 1:12).

Third, biblically speaking, false teachers are more than men or women teaching mistaken ideas. They also have fatal character flaws like ungodly ambition, foolishness, greed and arrogance. According to Paul, the one who teaches false doctrine is “conceited and understands nothing.” Like many of the keyboard warriors ready to pounce on anyone who disagrees with them, the false teacher has an “unhealthy interest in disputes and arguments over words.” Their comments provoke “envy, quarreling, slander, evil suspicions and constant disagreement.” (1 Timothy 6:4–5).

Fourth, false teachers see their so-called ministries as “a way to material gain” (1 Tim. 6:5). Like modern televangelists dissatisfied with their multimillion-dollar jets, the false teachers and prophets confronted by the apostles would “market the word of God for profit” (2 Corinthians 2:17). These false teachers “exploit you in their greed with made-up stories” (2 Peter 2:3).

Fifth, false teaching can stem from and result in sexual sin. Peter warns of “destructive heresies” which lead many to “follow their depraved ways” (2 Peter 2:1–2). Jesus warns the churches in Revelation of deceptive teaching that leads to sexual immorality (Revelation 2:14, 20). Those who endorse sexual behaviors contrary to the clear teaching of Scripture are properly called “false teachers.”

Sixth, biblical authors occasionally attribute false teaching to spiritual warfare, “to deceitful spirits and the teachings of demons” (1 Timothy 4:1, Galatians 1:8). Even people who are “spiritual” in their teachings may not be under the leadership of the Holy Spirit.

But how do we know when a teacher is under the work of a demonic spirit? John gave a simple litmus test for churches battling heresy: “Every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God” (1 John 4:3). Paul adds, “No one can say, ‘Jesus is Lord,’ except by the Holy Spirit” (1 Corinthians 12:3). Biblically speaking, anyone who denies the true divinity or true humanity of Christ is a false teacher under spiritual deception.

Finally, false teaching comes from “false brothers” who infiltrate our ranks (Galatians 2:4). From this final characteristic, we must make an important clarification: someone who is a false teacher cannot be a true brother or sister in Christ. False teachers deny “the Master who bought them” (2 Peter 2:1), evidence gross sin in their behavior and dealings with others and are characterized by immorality and wickedness.

For these reasons, we must be slow to label the theological disagreements we have with others “false teaching” and especially cautious about labeling other men and women “false teachers.” Grace and patience must characterize our theological conflicts, especially those which do not rise to these extremes.

________

Rhyne Putman is associate professor of theology and culture at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, pastor of preaching and vision at First Baptist Church in Kenner, La., and the author of When Doctrine Divides the People of God: An Evangelical Approach to Theological Diversity (Crossway, 2020). [Collapse Bio]

An Example For Imperfect Parents

Luke 12:13

In May, Randy Lunsford announced he would appeal a Raleigh, N.C., judge's decision shutting him out of the estate of his 18-year-old daughter, who died tragically in 1999 but whose estate won a $100,000 wrongful death lawsuit. Court records show that Lunsford moved away from the mother around the time the daughter was born, never came back, and never paid a penny in child support. Lunsford said, however, that he felt obligated to claim "his" share of his daughter's estate because he was fighting for all the imperfect parents out there. His argument: Since the daughter had turned 18 shortly before she was killed, the "abandoned child" rule freezing him out should not apply.

[Gaston Gazette-AP, 5-30-01]

from News Of The Weird · Chuck Shepherd via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database father

Would You Choose A Zero?

Mark 8:34

How greedy are you?

Dylan Selterman teaches undergraduate psychology courses at the University of Maryland. His students always perk up when he poses this question: Do you want two extra-credit points on your term paper, or 6 points?

He tells his students that the extra-credit offer is to illustrate the interconnectedness of choices individuals make in communities. Because there is a catch to his offer - if more than 10% of the student chose 6 points, all the students get zero points.

The exercise was inspired by a talk given 50 years ago by an ecologist named Garrett Hardin. Hardin’s topic was what he called “the tragedy of the commons.” A common is a pasture that all the villagers shared. Every New England town has a vestige of one near their center. The tragedy is that if each individual only thinks of themselves and puts too many sheep in the commons, the pasture is soon destroyed and no one benefits from it.

And so Selterman offers his extra points on the final paper to see if they can control their personal greed so that everyone comes out ahead. Maybe it is too severe to call it greed - getting more points to help your grade is strategic. It makes sense. But if everyone does it, the pump runs dry.

What do the students choose? After eight years and dozens of classes, only one, a single one, got the two extra points. In all the others, more than 10% chose the six points for themselves.

For most of the students, this was very frustrating. So Selterman came up with a tweak - he added the option of choosing zero points. If someone chooses zero, they get no added points. In addition, someone who chose 6 points is canceled out. So the group is more likely to win their 2 extra points each. But since you choose the zero option, you get no points. (That six-pointer you bumped doesn’t either.) The zero-point option is self-sacrificial; students forgo points for themselves in order to help the group by restraining those who take too much.

Usually only a few of his students each semester choose the zero-point option, but sometimes that’s all it takes. About half of his classes now win the 2 extra points because a few self-sacrificers balance out enough greedy ones. If you were in that class, how many points would you choose?

Self-sacrifice is at the heart of Christianity. Jesus himself exemplified it. He was the only perfect human, so he didn’t need saving. But he sacrificed himself so we could be saved.

Here is the rub - he expects us to sacrifice as well, to deny ourselves and take up our cross every day.

_________

Adapted by Rev. David Holwick from this article in the National Geographic, June 2018:

"What a Simple Psychological Test Reveals About Climate Change: If everyone’s success depended on it, would you share — or be selfish?"

by Dylan Selterman; .

Selterman's full article:

I teach undergraduate psychology courses at the University of Maryland, and my classes draw students with diverse interests. But every one of them perks up when I pose this question: Do you want two extra-credit points on your term paper, or six points?

I tell my students that the extra-credit offer is part of an exercise illustrating the interconnectedness of choices individuals make in communities. I explain that the exercise was inspired by an ecologist named Garrett Hardin and an address that he delivered 50 years ago this summer, describing what he called “the tragedy of the commons.” Hardin said that when many individuals act in their own self-interest without regard for society, the effects can be catastrophic. Hardin used the 19th-century convention of “the commons” — a cattle-grazing pasture that villagers shared — to warn against the overexploitation of communal resources.

I’m hoping that my students will grasp the connections between the classroom exercise, Hardin’s ideas, and our planet’s most pressing problems (including climate change). I allow them to choose between two points or six points of extra credit — but there’s a catch. I stipulate that if more than 10 percent of the class members choose six points, no one gets any points. The extra-credit points are analogous to water, fuel, grazing pasture (from Hardin’s analysis), or any natural resource.

According to some free market economic theories, if everyone strives for maximum personal benefit, then societies will thrive. By this logic the student’s rational choice would be to pick six points, just as the shepherd’s rational choice would be to use as much grazing pasture as possible. And those who maximize personal consumption aren’t greedy — they’re strategic.

But when everyone chooses this path, the common resource is overtaxed, and societies end up with overharvesting, water shortages, or climate change.

A possible solution seems simple: If everyone just moderated their consumption, we’d have sustainability. As many of my students say, “If everyone chooses two points, we’ll all get the points.” And yet, for the first eight years I used this exercise, only one class — of the dozens I taught — stayed under the 10 percent threshold. All the other classes failed.

This exercise was developed more than 25 years ago. Professor Steve Drigotas of Johns Hopkins University had been using it for some time when he administered it to me and my classmates in 2005. My class failed too — and I, who had chosen two points, was incredibly frustrated with my peers who had chosen six.

In 2015 one of my students tweeted about the exercise — ”WHAT KIND OF PROFESSOR DOES THIS” — and his lament went viral. People around the globe weighed in: Does so many people choosing six points mean it’s human nature to be greedy and selfish?

TEST-TAKERS

Dylan Selterman teaches students about the tragedy of the commons with this extra-credit exercise:

Choose zero, two, or six points to be added to your final paper grade. If more than 10 percent of you choose six points, no one will receive any points. If you choose zero points, you cancel out one of the six-point choosers, who will receive no points.

Actually most people aren’t. But it’s very tricky to get people to cooperate, especially in large groups of complete strangers. After all, if someone else is taking more for themselves (running more water or choosing six points), why shouldn’t I? But if we all think this way, eventually we’ll all lose.

Hardin suggested that education might make a difference — that if we teach people about the consequences of taking too much, they might not. I’ve been skeptical about this idea. When my student’s tweet went viral, some colleagues said that I wouldn’t be able to use the exercise again (because students would already know how it works). I laughed. If it were only that easy! My suspicion was justified. Even after the exercise got wide exposure, my students still failed the challenge to get the extra-credit points.

Despite this I remain optimistic. After all, most of my students, about 80 percent, choose two points — just as most people choose to cooperate in real-world situations. Most of us want to do what’s right. But that alone won’t solve our problems, so we need to think creatively and use behavioral science to find solutions.

In 2016 I decided to change things up. In hopes of finding a way to increase cooperation, I drew from the scientific literature on social groups and introduced a third option: Students could choose two points, six points — or zero points. That’s right. Zero. Why would anyone do that? Well, for each student who chose zero points, one of the six-point choosers (selected randomly) would lose everything, reducing the total number of six-point choosers by one.

The zero-point option is self-sacrificial; students forgo points for themselves in order to help the group by restraining those who take too much. In behavioral experiments this type of action is called altruistic punishment, a term coined by economists Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter. Their research documented people willingly giving up some of their own resources in order to punish those who behave selfishly in a group context — and doing so in the belief that every individual profits from increased cooperation.

Usually a few of my students each semester choose the zero-point option, and sometimes that’s all it takes. Just a handful of people can make a huge difference — that is, a few self-sacrificing students can bring down the total number of six-point choosers to below the 10 percent threshold. This additional element has dramatically increased cooperation in my courses. Now roughly half my classes receive the extra-credit points. In my opinion this is a remarkable turnaround. And some of my classes have done this without anyone actually choosing the zero-point option; simply knowing it was available was enough to increase cooperation.

Though this type of solution may work on the small scale of a classroom, won’t we need much larger action to curb global problems like climate change? Yes, but the principle is the same–it’s about collective action and reducing overconsumption. For example, recently I started volunteering with Citizens’ Climate Lobby (CCL), an organization that advocates for a policy known as carbon fee and dividend. This plan would put a steadily rising fee on fossil fuels and distribute the money raised back to American households (to protect families against rising costs). Ultimately this would reduce fossil fuel consumption by making this type of energy more expensive to use — so reducing consumption would be better for both our wallets and the environment. At CCL, volunteers meet with lawmakers and conduct outreach to the community. Through our efforts — again, collective action — we gain allies in Congress and the public. By early this year the House’s bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus had 70 members (half Democrats and half Republicans) from states across the country.

As I write these words, I’m sitting next to my three-month-old daughter, Amelia. Though the planet faces daunting problems, I’m determined to help her have a bright future — so I have to believe that action by even a few people can make a significant difference. A few students can help an entire class of hundreds gain a leg up in the course. A few people who recycle or compost can have a contagious effect on others’ lifestyles. A few politicians’ votes can alter national and international policies that affect millions.

The challenge that Garrett Hardin described 50 years ago remains today: Our survival depends on each of us and all of us conserving the commons. I choose to remind myself of that with these wise and hopeful lines from the Beatles: “All the world is birthday cake / so take a piece / but not too much.”

________

In his class in fall semester 2017, how did students respond? Read on.

ZERO POINTS

Devin Porter, 21, sociology major

“I took the class to get something out of it, not necessarily for the grade. When we didn’t get the extra credit, I felt bad for the people who really needed it, but I wasn’t too surprised. People who chose two made the obvious choice — everyone eats. People who chose six thought they could get away with it.”

TWO POINTS

Robin Bachkosky, 19, nursing major

”I thought I made a pretty beneficial choice for the class and myself, one that wouldn’t necessarily put the class to any disadvantage but would give me some extra credit. I was a little disappointed that I didn’t get any extra credit just because some of the other kids were selfish and weren’t satisfied with two points.”

SIX POINTS

Gunleen Deol, 18, information systems and psychology major

”I thought that the majority of people would choose two and felt that the rational decision for me to make would be the one that maximizes my personal benefit, which would be six. Considering how my choice affected the rest of the class made me wish that I had chosen two instead.”

The class failed the exercise.

________

Dylan Selterman is a lecturer at the University of Maryland, College Park, and former editor in chief of the psychology magazine In-Mind. He lives in Washington, D.C.

Killing Your Neighbor's Cow: the Fruits of Envy

Job 5:2

An old Russian joke tells about a poor peasant whose better-off neighbor has just gotten a cow. In his anguish, the peasant cries out to God for relief from his distress. When God replies and asks him what he wants him to do, the peasant replies, “Kill the cow.”

The joke illustrates an important point about human nature: the line between clamoring for justice and envy can be very thin.

The subject came to mind when I read a recent column by Ross Douthat in the New York Times about the issue of income inequality and the redistribution of wealth. Douthat noted that taxing Peter more will not solve Paul’s problems. The most likely outcome of “soaking-the-rich,” he wrote, would be to “buy a little more time for our failing public institutions,” like public schools. A “public sector that has consistently done less with more” would simply have more to do less with. Listen to that. He’s right.

Despite this, many people insist on soaking the well-off because, like the Russian peasant, what they want is to see their better-off neighbors knocked down a peg. That’s how envy works.

Thomas Aquinas defined envy as “sorrow for another’s good.” It is the opposite of pity. And it is one of the defining sins of our times.

One of the most consistent findings of behavioral economics is that we gauge our own economic well-being by comparing ourselves with our neighbors. Studies have found that, given a choice between making 25 percent more than their neighbors or making 25 percent less, people will choose the former even when the latter amount is more money.

Not only is envy irrational, it’s socially and personally corrosive. In his wonderful book, The Seven Deadly Sins, the late Henry Fairlie called envy the “nastiest, the most grim, the meanest” of the seven deadly sins. Sneering, sly, vicious. According to Fairlie, “the face of envy is never lovely. It is never even faintly pleasant.”

It could hardly be otherwise. Loving your neighbor, or even working alongside him, is next to impossible when you regard his gains as a personal loss.

The most obvious scriptural injunction against envy is the Tenth Commandment. But Jesus also spoke on the subject. The parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard ends with a confrontation between the owner and those whom he hired first. After reminding them that he paid them what he had promised them, the owner adds, “Are you envious because I am generous?”

This is translated from the Greek, which refers to the “evil eye,” the curse used by the envious to inflict harm on the fortunate.

Ultimately, the kind of envy on display and all the talk today about income redistribution will do nothing to help those in need or create a more just society, it just creates a bigger government. You can’t promote a virtue like justice by encouraging people to indulge in a vice such as envy. Think of the Russian peasants: during the Russian Revolution many of them expressed their envy by looting the better-off. This didn’t help: after the Revolution, many of them wound up worse off than they were before.

OK, our system needs of reform. And I intend to discuss Christian responses to our problems in future broadcasts, which I hope you will tune into.

But for now, let’s be clear: Leave the cow alone.

________

Copyright (c) 2011 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Chuck Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database greedjealousy

Dueling Obituaries

Her sweetly smiling face appeared in the obituaries of a local newspaper. In most ways, the accompanying obituary for Josie Anello, age 93, was worded like many other death notices. She had been supportive and compassionate, she had lived for friends and family and would be missed. Then there is the stunner in the third line:

“She is survived by her Son, ‘A.J.’, who loved and cared for her; Daughter ‘Ninfa’, who betrayed her trust, and Son ‘Peter’, who broke her heart.”

The condemning language reveals a long-standing rift between Angelo “A.J.” Anello, who wrote and placed the obituary, and his two siblings — particularly his sister.

A different obituary of Mrs. Anello, this one placed by Mrs. Anello’s daughter, appeared the next day. It contained most of the same information, minus any reference to broken hearts or betrayals. But the damage had been done. Over the next week, the inflammatory obituary spread across the Web and social media. Internet bloggers posted copies of it, some with headlines like “Insanely Passive-Aggressive Obituary.”

So what happened here? As with many a family quarrel, it comes down to money. Basically, Angelo Anello, 63, and his sister, Ninfa Simpson, 65, accuse each other of stealing from their mother. Simpson says Anello drained the mother’s savings and maxed out her credit cards. Anello says Simpson and her husband used their mother’s Social Security checks to go on vacations to Branson, Mo., and Alaska. Both siblings deny the other’s allegations.

Said Simpson: “My brother is not telling the truth. He’s having his moment of revenge.” Said Anello: “They are so riddled with guilt, what they are doing is pointing fingers at me.”

The siblings agree on one thing: Peter Anello, the eldest brother, cut himself off from the family more than 25 years ago and speaks to no one.

Simpson said her family has been devastated by the public airing of dirty laundry. “I have never done anything to my brother, and I have never betrayed my mother in any way,” Simpson said. “Everybody that knows me and knows the family is furious.”

Anello said his mother died at home, in his arms, of kidney failure. He said he composed the obituary in the Tampa Tribune “not to get even with anyone, or to be vindictive or spiteful. The obituary reflected what she had said right up to the end.”

Did she really say her son broke her heart and her daughter betrayed her trust? “She didn’t put it like that,” he said, “but I being a journalist myself have a passion for the truth.”

However, the obituary placed by Angelo Anello lists his mother’s age as 94. All other records — and the obituary Simpson placed — list her age as 93.

Times researcher Carolyn Edds contributed to this report. Andrew Meacham can be reached at ameacham@tampabay.com or (727) 892-2248.

[Last modified: Feb 23, 2012 07:38 AM]

Copyright 2012 Tampa Bay Times

from Tampa Bay Times · Andrew Meacham via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The Two Million Dollar Giveaway

Luke 11:3

This Easter, Pastor Bil Cornelius of the Bay Area Fellowship, the largest church in Corpus Christi, Texas, really wanted good attendance at their Easter services. So the church sponsored what they called “The Ultimate Giveaway.” They prepared 15,000 gift bags, each with about $300 worth of goods and gift certificates inside.

But wait! There’s more! They also gave away flat-screen TVs, skateboards, electric guitars, bicycles, furniture and 15 cars. The church had to cut an opening in the chapel wall so the cars could be pulled in on Easter morning.

Can you imagine going to church and telling the pastor, “I’ll take what’s behind door number 2!” In all, they gave out about $4.5 million in the gift bags and around $2 million more in other loot.

They did put a spiritual spin on it. Pastor Cornelius told his congregation, “Imagine how great heaven is going to be if you feel that excited about a car!”

It got a lot of publicity, of course. TWENTY-THREE THOUSAND people showed up. Our Easter attendance was a little on the light side this year. Maybe we should start working on the giveaway idea.….

*

[This illustration was original numbered HolwickID #31872 but was inadvertantly dropped from the database]

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate