Menu

130 Sermon Illustrations on Hell

130 illustrations Page 3 of 3

Hell in Christian preaching is portrayed as the ultimate consequence of rejecting Christ, a real and dreadful place devoid of God's presence (Matthew 25:46). Illustrations often use stark contrasts between life with Christ and the eternal separation found in hell, emphasizing its reality and the urgency of salvation (2 Thessalonians 1:9).

(untitled)

Mac died at the controls of his plane and went to pilot's hell,

where he found a hideous devil and three doors. The devil was busy

escorting other pilot's to various "hell rooms." "I'll be right back

- don't go away," said the devil, and vanished.

Sneaking over to the first door, Mac peeked in and saw a cockpit

where the pilot was condemned to forever run through preflight

checks. He slammed that door and peeked into the second. There,

alarms rang and red lights flashed while a pilot had to avoid one

emergency after another. Unable to imagine a worse fate, Mac

cautiously opened the third door. He was amazed to see mant

beautiful, scantily clad flight attendants answering to a captain's

ever whim.

He quickly returned to his place seconds before the devil

reappeared. "Okay, Mac," said the devil. "Which door will it be, No.

1 or No. 2?"

"But I want No. 3," answered Mac.

"Sorry," said the devil. "You can't have door No. 3. That's

flight attendants' hell."

- {Reader's Digest, }November, 1995, p. 94

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

The Pope's Stairway to Heaven

John 14:2

In an ABC report from July 30th and August 4th, Pope John Paul apparently updated or clarified the Catholic position on Hell, Heaven and Purgatory.

The Roman Pontiff stated that "Catholics have never taught that Hell is a physical place, but a state you put yourself in by cutting yourself off from God."

Purgatory the Pope continues are for those who have led a less than perfect life and are destined to do some time in limbo after death, the stairway to heaven is easy to find.

He reiterated that, "Before we enter into God's Kingdom, every trace of sin within us must be eliminated, every imperfection in our soul must be corrected. This is exactly what takes place in purgatory."

Echoing his words on heaven and hell -- that they were a spiritual union with God or a rejection of him respectively, not a paradise in the clouds or a fiery furnace -- he added: "(Purgatory) does not indicate a place, but a condition of life. Those who, after death, live in this state of purification are already immersed in the love of Christ, which lifts them out of the residue of imperfection."

Despite the leader of the Catholic church's public statement that heaven and hell not being real physical places, the Bible clearly teaches that there is a heaven to gain and a hell to shun.

(Revelation 20:14-15 KJV And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. {15} And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

(John 14:2-3 KJV In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. {3} And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.

from Source not recorded · Rev. Shelton Cole, http://www.sermon.org via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database heavenapostasy

A Question For Those Who Object To Hell

In the long run, the answer to all those who object to the doctrine of hell is... a question: "What are you asking God to do?" To wipe out their past sins and, at all costs, to give them a fresh start, smoothing every difficulty and offering every miraculous help? But He has done so, on Calvary. To forgive them? They will not be forgiven. To leave them alone? Alas, I am afraid that that is what He does.

... C. S. Lewis, The Problem of Pain

from Christian Quotation Of The Day · C. S. Lewis via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

An Atheist Castigates Christianity's Cruelty

If Christianity were only stupid and unscientific, if its God was ignorant and kind, if it promised eternal joy to believers and if the believers practiced the kind of forgiveness they teach, I, for one, should let the faith alone ... But there is another side to Christianity. It is not only stupid, but malicious. It is not only unscientific, but it is heartless. Its god is not only ignorant, but infinitely cruel. It not only promises the faithful an eternal reward, but declares that nearly all the children of men, imprisoned in the dungeons of God, will suffer eternal pain. This is the savagery of Christianity.

-- Robert G. Ingersoll

Getting Burned

Jeremiah 1:13

Sermon based on vacation experience. Jeremiah 1:13-16

GETTING BURNED

==============

I. Burned by fire.

A. My experience in Sequoia National Park.

B. Fire hurts and can leave lasting scars.

C. Fire teaches important lessons about life and eternity.

II. Burned by people.

A. The pain of fire is a metaphor for bad relationships.

B. On fire ourselves - smoldering anger in our lives.

C. Healing from burns of others.

III. Burned by God.

A. Fire as a cleansing agent.

1) Western fires, burns away garbage and debris.

2) Unproductive "Christians" face fire. Hebrews 6:7-9

B. Fire can do more than cleanse - it can condemn. Rev 20:10, 21:8

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm01z.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database hell

(untitled)

A dying girl said to her father, "Father, why didn't you tell me there was such a place?" "What place?" "A hell!" "Jenny," he said, "there is no such place. God is merciful. There will be no future suffering."

She said, "I know better! I'm slipping into eternity this moment. I am lost! Why did you not tell me there was such a place?" We do not want to be accused one day of not having told others, for that will be a witness against us.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Where Is Hell?

A companion of a newly converted Christian said to him one day, "Can you tell me where hell is?" After a moment's hesitation the young Christian said, "Yes, it's at the end of a Christless life."

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Hell - the Choice Is Yours

John 3:16

Jesus spoke more often about hell than He did about heaven.

But no one talks much about hell to day. No one likes to think about hell. No one seems to be informed about hell. Few even believe in hell. But the Bible teaches that hell is a real place, prepared for the devil and his demons, and those who refuse God’s gracious offer of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.

Just exactly what do we know about hell, the place where people perish under the judgment of God?

Hell is a place of physical agony, mental suffering, and emotional sorrow. Jesus described it as a place where there is gnashing of teeth and weeping. (Matt. 13:50)

Hell is a place of insecurity and fear. The Bible describes it as a bottomless pit, an abyss. (Rev. 20:1) Imagine the terror of constantly falling, trying desperately to grab onto something — anything — to stop the fall. Hell is a place where one lives with the constant, conscious awareness of imminent danger.

Hell is a place of instability. It is described as a lake of fire. (Rev. 20:15) A lake changes, fluctuates, with no firm surface on which to stand. Hell is a place where every moment is lived in uncertainty.

Hell is a place of darkness. (Jude 13) It is totally devoid of light. Have you ever heard people quip that they want to go to hell to be with their friends? You might want to point out that while their friends may be in hell, they will never be seen. It’s pitch black in hell; there is nothing to distract people from their suffering, and sorrow, and fears, and insecurities and instability.

When we are sick, our suffering seems to intensify in the middle of the night. We long for the daylight to come. Somehow just the light of day makes us feel better. But in hell the dawn never comes.

Hell is a place of loneliness. Each person is there alone. He or she may be able to hear the weeping and gnashing of teeth of others. But there is no one to talk to, no one to cry with, and no one even to yell at. Each person is isolated in hate, and bitterness, and jealousy, and pride, and selfishness, and meanness.

Hell is a place of dissatisfaction. Jesus described it as a fire. (Matt. 5:22) It may be a literal fire that creates a Physical Sensation of burning or just an overwhelming yearning for God, for love, for joy, for peace, for life that will never be. It must be the equivalent if being intensely thirsty yet never having a drop of water. Intensely hungry with never a crumb to eat?

Hell is a place of eternal separation from God. (Matt. 7:23) Each person who goes to hell; will be separated forever from the source of life, the heart of love, the very One for Whom he or she was created. God doesn’t send anyone to

Hell. You send yourself there when you refuse His gracious offer Of Salvation. “For God so loved the world that He gave His One And only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but Have eternal life”. (John 3:16) But if you refuse to believe, you will perish. You will go to hell. The choice is yours. Our desperate need for eternal life is met in Jesus Christ. All you and I need to do is receive Him.

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Fatal Refusal

2 Thessalonians 1:8

It may happen to a community once in a lifetime, or even once in a century. But sometimes there are those disasters that define and redefine a town for years to come. The Johnstown, Pennsylvania, flood would be one famous historic example. Now, you've probably never heard of the flood that swept into my wife's hometown years ago, but it was a major defining event for that town. She was a teenager when, with just a brief warning from upstream, the local creek burst out of its banks into a massive flash flood. While there was major damage done to the community, thankfully, only a few lives were lost. There were some older folks who lived on the south side of town. Rescuers came by their creekside house before that wall of water hit. They offered them a place in the lifeboat. They refused to get in. They said, “We've lived a long time, we've seen a whole lot. We've been fine this far. We'll be fine this time.” They weren't. They died in that flood.

I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about “Fatal Refusal.”

It's a deadly mistake to refuse to get in a lifeboat - especially when it comes to being rescued from an eternity that none of us wants. Tragically, a whole lot of people are saying to Jesus, “No thanks. I don't think I'm going to need You. After all, I've gotten this far without You. I've been fine up to here. I'll take my chances without You.” Strong, self-reliant, doing things for yourself, and proudly refusing to put your trust in Jesus. And, according to the Bible, doomed. Because this one you can't do for yourself.

I have no right to say this unless God says it, because He is the final word on heaven and hell. And He couldn't make Himself clearer than He does in 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9, our word for today from the Word of God. It's about the flood, it's about the Lifeboat called Jesus, and it's about the choice that determines your eternity. The Bible says, “The Lord Jesus will punish those who do not know God and do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. They will be punished with everlasting destruction and shut out from the presence of the Lord and from the majesty of His power.”

When that flood hit my wife's hometown, those folks who died didn't have to die. Provision had been made for them to live; to escape what was coming. But they wouldn't get in the lifeboat. On a cross, with nails driven through His hands and feet and a spear wound in His side, God's only Son, Jesus, died to pay for every wrong thing you and I have ever done. And we've lived long enough to have a long list of times we've done things our way instead of God's way. But Jesus paid for all of them. So the only people who will pay for their own sin are those who refused to trust the One who already paid for their sin.

So, God doesn't send anyone to hell. We send ourselves by refusing to get in the Lifeboat He provided at the cost of His life. It's a mistake I beg you not to make. You may have accomplished a lot in your life. You may be religious and respected. You may have done just about everything by yourself, but there's no way you can get your sins forgiven by yourself. No way you can remove what will keep you out of heaven. Only Jesus can do that. And His lifeboat is making one more pass by you right now, and He's asking you to get in. Some time will be the last time. If you've never given yourself to the Man who gave His life for you, please abandon the pride and the excuses that have kept you from Him. Tell Him, “Jesus, the battle's over. I'm Yours.”

The lifeboat's within your reach. And God's judgment is coming. Please get in while there's time.

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4284 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database hellsalvation

Hell Under Fire (part 2)

Mark 9

The doctrine of hell has recently come under vicious attack, both from secularists and even from some evangelicals. In many ways, the assault has been a covert one. Like a slowly encroaching tide, a whole complex of inter-related cultural, theological and philosophical changes have conspired to undermine the traditional understanding of hell. Yesterday, we considered the first and perhaps most important of those changes -- a radically altered view of God. But other issues have played a part as well.

A second issue that has contributed to the modern denial of hell is a changed view of justice. Retributive justice has been the hallmark of human law since pre-modern times. This concept assumes that punishment is a natural and necessary component of justice. Nevertheless, retributive justice has been under assault for many years in western cultures, and this has led to modifications in the doctrine of hell.

The utilitarian philosophers such as John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham argued that retribution is an unacceptable form of justice. Rejecting clear and absolute moral norms, they argued that justice demands restoration rather than retribution. Criminals were no longer seen as evil and deserving of punishment, but were seen as persons in need of correction. The goal -- for all but the most egregious sinners -- was restoration and rehabilitation. The shift from the prison to the penitentiary was supposed to be a shift from a place of punishment to a place of penance, but apparently no one told the prisoners.

C. S. Lewis rejected this idea as an assault upon the very concept of justice. “We demand of a cure not whether it is just but whether it succeeds. Thus when we cease to consider what the criminal deserves and consider only what will cure him or deter others, we have tacitly removed him from the sphere of justice altogether; instead of a person, a subject of rights, we now have a mere object, a patient, a 'case.'“

Penal reforms followed, public executions ceased and the public accepted the changes in the name of humanitarianism. Dutch criminologist Pieter Spierenburg pointed to “increasing inter-human identification” as the undercurrent of this shift. Individuals began to sympathize with the criminal, often thinking of themselves in the criminal's place. The impact of this shift in the culture is apparent in a letter from one 19th century Anglican to another:

“The disbelief in the existence of retributive justice ... is now so widely spread through nearly all classes of people, especially in regard to social and political questions ... [that it] causes even men, whose theology teaches them to look upon God as a vindictive, lawless autocrat, to stigmatize as cruel and heathenish the belief that criminal law is bound to contemplate in punishment other ends beside the improvement of the offender himself and the deterring of others.”

The utilitarian concept of justice and deterrence has also given way to justice by popular opinion and cultural custom. The U.S. Constitution disallows “cruel and unusual punishment,” and the courts have offered evolving and conflicting rulings on what kind of punishment is thus excluded. At various times the death penalty has been constitutionally permitted and forbidden, and in one recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, the justice writing the majority opinion actually cited data from opinion polls.

The transformations of legal practice and culture have redefined justice for many modern persons. Retribution is out, and rehabilitation is put in its place. Some theologians have simply incorporated this new theory of justice into their doctrines of hell. For the Roman Catholics, the doctrine of purgatory functions as the penitentiary. For some evangelicals, a period of time in hell -- but not an eternity in hell -- is the remedy.

Some theologians have questioned the moral integrity of eternal punishment by arguing that an infinite punishment is an unjust penalty for finite sins. Or, to put the argument in a slightly different form, eternal torment is no fitting punishment for temporal sins. The traditional doctrine of hell argues that an infinite penalty is just punishment for sin against the infinite holiness of God. This explains why all sinners are equally deserving of hell, but for salvation through faith in Christ.

A third shift in the larger culture concerns the advent of the psychological worldview. Human behavior has been redefined by the impact of humanistic psychologies that deny or reduce personal responsibility for wrongdoing. Various theories place the blame on external influences, biological factors, behavioral determinism, genetic predispositions and the influence of the subconscious -- and these variant theories barely scratch the surface.

The autonomous self becomes the great personal project for individuals, and their various crimes and misdemeanors are excused as growth experiences or “personal issues.” Shame and guilt are banned from public discussion and dismissed as repressive. In such a culture, the finality of God's sentencing of impenitent sinners to hell is just unthinkable.

A fourth shift concerns the concept of salvation. The vast majority of men and women throughout the centuries of western civilization have awakened in the morning and gone to sleep at night with the fear of hell never far from consciousness -- until now. Sin has been redefined as a lack of self-esteem rather than as an insult to the glory of God. Salvation has been reconceived as liberation from oppression, internal or external. The Gospel becomes a means of release from bondage to bad habits rather than rescue from a sentence of eternity in hell.

The theodicy issue arises immediately when evangelicals limit salvation to those who come to conscious faith in Christ during their earthly lives and define salvation as anything akin to justification by faith. To the modern mind this seems absolutely unfair and scandalously discriminatory. Some evangelicals have thus modified the doctrine of salvation accordingly. This means that hell is either evacuated or minimized. Or, as one Catholic wit quipped, hell has been air-conditioned.

These shifts in the culture are but part of the picture. The most basic cause of controversy over the doctrine of hell is the challenge of theodicy. The traditional doctrine is just too out of step with the contemporary mind -- too harsh and eternally fixed. In virtually every aspect, the modern mind is offended by the biblical concept of hell preserved in the traditional doctrine. For some who call themselves evangelicals, this is simply too much to bear.

We should note that compromise on the doctrine of hell is not limited to those who reject the traditional formulation. The reality is that few references to hell are likely to be heard even in conservative churches that would never deny the doctrine. Once again, the cultural environment is a major influence.

In his study of “seeker sensitive” churches, researcher Kimon Howland Sargeant notes that “today's cultural pluralism fosters an under-emphasis on the 'hard sell' of Hell while contributing to an overemphasis on the 'soft sell' of personal satisfaction through Jesus Christ.” The problem is thus more complex and pervasive than the theological rejection of hell -- it also includes the avoidance of the issue in the face of cultural pressure.

The revision or rejection of the traditional doctrine of hell comes at a great cost. The entire system of theology is modified by effect, even if some revisionists refuse to take their revisions to their logical conclusions. Essentially, our very concepts of God and the Gospel are at stake. What could be more important?

The temptation to revise the doctrine of hell -- to remove the sting and scandal of everlasting conscious punishment -- is understandable. But it is also a major test of evangelical conviction. This is no theological trifle. As one observer has asked, “Could it be that the only result of attempts, however well-meaning, to air-condition Hell, is to ensure that more and more people wind up there?”

Hell demands our attention in the present, confronting evangelicals with a critical test of theological and biblical integrity. Hell may be denied, but it will not disappear.

[see HolwickID #28805 for part 1]

________

R. Albert Mohler Jr., president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Ky., is the author of a major essay published in “Hell Under Fire: Modern Scholarship Reinvents Eternal Punishment,” edited by Christopher W. Morgan and Robert A. Peterson, published by Zondervan. Mohler's essay, “Modern Theology: The Disappearance of Hell,” is the compilation's first chapter.

from Baptist Press · Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr., President of Southern Baptist Seminary via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database justicetheodicy

A Solemn Warning

Luke 16:19

Only a foolish person would ignore a siren of warning. Why, then, do we so often overlook or ignore the shocking alarms that appear in Scripture?

Jesus did not want us to be caught off guard by spiritual truths, no matter how unsettling they may be. For this reason, He honestly and meticulously revealed in Scripture obvious areas of caution for His people. One of those clear warnings was the absolute reality of a final judgment and the subsequent punishment for those not found in Christ. Simply put, He wanted us to know about hell.

Many people are uncomfortable with the notion of hell. Some even declare that hell is impossible, because it contradicts their view of God. But we must never allow emotions to color the way we interpret Scripture. God's Word is not here to make us feel better, but to reveal truth. Therefore, we cannot allow our discomfort with the issue to distract our attention.

We must never attempt to bend God's Word to fit around our human emotions. Rather, we must ask Him for the courage to read Scripture as it is, and then allow that truth to shape our emotions.

My friend, understand that God does not send anyone to hell. However, He does allow people to determine where they will spend eternity. If someone spends his whole life telling God to go away, he will find in eternity that God has granted that request. The only way to avoid this eternal anguish is to accept the loving sacrifice Christ has already made on your behalf.

from In Touch via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

God and the Tsunami (part 3) - Do Dead Children Go To Heaven?

2 Corinthians 5:10

The photographs and images are now seared into our consciousness. One of the most troubling aspects of the disaster in South Asia is the death of infants and young children. Moving at the speed of a jetliner, the walls of water fell on the young and the old alike -- and so many of the youngest were simply swept away.

The death of the little ones poses anguished questions that reach to the depth of Christian faith. What happened to these young victims after death? Did they go to heaven or to hell?

I am convinced that those who die in infancy and early childhood -- along with the severely cognitively impaired -- go to heaven when they die. That is quite a claim, but it stands within the mainstream of orthodox Christian theology throughout the centuries, and I believe it is biblically and theologically sustainable.

In fact, I am hard pressed to imagine how any other answer can be given.

This is a question of emotional urgency for grieving parents, and it is a stone of stumbling for some who jump to hasty theological conclusions. The scope of the problem is huge, for untold millions of human beings have died at the earliest ages. Infant mortality still stands at several million babies a year. In the developing world, disease, famine and abandonment take a heavy toll. Even in the most highly developed nations, armed with the latest medical technologies, thousands of infants die each year.

The best estimates out of Indonesia and Sri Lanka indicate that young children make up a disproportionate number of the victims of the tsunamis. Like Rachel in the Old Testament, anguished mothers weep for their children.

What is our answer to the question of the eternal destiny awaiting those children? My argument that these children are safe in the presence of Jesus Christ is based upon biblical evidence and theological reasoning. I cannot accept the glib and superficial assertions put forth by those who would simply offer assurance without adequate argument.

These infants are in heaven, but not because they were not sinners. The Bible teaches that we are all conceived in sin and born in sin, and each of us is a sinner from the moment we draw our first breath. The doctrines of original sin and total depravity do not spring from some speculative theological imagination, but from the clear teaching of Scripture. There is no state of innocence, and these babies cannot enter heaven unless the penalty for their sin is provided by the atonement of Jesus Christ.

These infants are in heaven, but not because everyone is in heaven. The Bible presents us with a stark picture of two destinies for humankind. Those who are in Christ, who have been redeemed by the blood of the Lamb, will be in heaven. Those who are apart from Christ will be in hell. Hell may be a despised concept -- rejected by the theological modernizers -- but it will not disappear, and its horrors await those who die without Christ. Jesus warned sinners to fear hell, and the Bible warns that we must flee the wrath that is to come. Universalism is just not an option for any Christian who believes the Bible. Those who deny hell deny the authority of Christ.

These infants are in heaven, but not because any of them were baptized. The practice of infant baptism has led to multiple theological confusions, and the death of infants is often one of the points of greatest bewilderment. Most of the early church fathers simply assumed that baptized infants who die in infancy go to heaven, while unbaptized infants do not. These significant Christian leaders and thinkers, including figures such as Ambrose of Milan and Augustine of Hippo, taught the doctrine of baptismal regeneration -- a belief still held by the Roman Catholic Church and most Eastern Orthodox churches. Among Protestants, Lutherans hold to a form of baptismal regeneration and some sacramentalists in other denominations also lean in that direction. According to this logic, infants are saved because they have been baptized and have thus received the gift of salvation. There is simply not a shred of biblical support for this argument. What these churches call infant baptism cannot help us in framing our argument. There is no biblical foundation for arguing for the salvation of infants from baptism, or for positing the existence of “Limbo” as a place of eternal suspension for unbaptized infants.

So, how can we frame an argument that is true to Scripture and consistent with the Gospel? Before turning to heaven, perhaps we should take a closer look at hell. According to the Bible, hell is a place of punishment for sins consciously committed during our earthly lives. We are told that we will be judged according to our deeds committed “in the body” (2 Corinthians 5:10). Adam's sin and guilt, imputed to every single human being, explains why we are born as sinners and why we cannot not sin, but the Bible clearly teaches that every person will be judged for his or her own sins, not for Adam's sin. The judgment of sinners that will take place at the great white throne (Revelation 20:11-12) will be “according to their deeds.” Have those who died in infancy committed such deeds? I believe not, for they have not yet developed the capacity to know good from evil. No biblical text refers to the presence of small children or infants in hell -- not one.

Theologians have long debated an “age of accountability.” The Bible does not reveal an “age” at which moral accountability arrives, but we do know by observation and experience that maturing human beings do develop a capacity for moral reasoning at some point. Dismissing the idea of an “age” of accountability, John MacArthur refers to a “condition” of accountability. I most often speak of a point or capacity of moral accountability. At this point of moral development, the maturing child knows the difference between good and evil -- and willingly chooses to sin.

The Bible offers a fascinating portrait of this truth in the first chapter of Deuteronomy. In response to Israel's sin and rebellion, God condemns that generation of adults to death in the wilderness, never to see the land of promise. “Not one of these men, this evil generation, shall see the good land which I swore to give to your fathers.” (Deuteronomy 1:35). But God specifically exempted young children and infants from this condemnation -- and He even explained why He did so: “Moreover, your little ones who you said would become prey, and your sons, who this day have no knowledge of good and evil, shall enter there, and I will give it to them and they shall possess it” (Deuteronomy 1:39). These little ones were not punished for their parents' sins, but were accepted by God into the promised land. I believe that this offers a sound basis for our confidence that God deals with young children differently than He deals with those who are capable of deliberate and conscious sin.

Based on these arguments, I believe that we can have confidence that God receives all infants into heaven.

Salvation is all of grace, and God remains forever sovereign in the entire process of our salvation. The Bible clearly teaches the doctrine of election, but it nowhere suggests that all those who die in infancy are not among the elect. Even the Westminster Confession, the most authoritative Reformed confession, states the matter only in the positive sense, affirming that all elect infants are received into heaven. It does not require belief in the existence of any non-elect infants. Those who insist that all we can say is that elect infants are saved while non-elect infants are not confuse the issue by assuming or presuming the existence of non-elect infants and leaving the matter there.

We must remember that God is both omnipotent and omniscient. He gave these little ones life, knowing before the creation of the world that they would die before reaching moral maturity and thus the ability to sin by intention and choice. Did He bring these infants -- who would never consciously sin -- into the world merely as the objects of His wrath?

The great Princeton theologians Charles Hodge and B.B. Warfield certainly did not think so. These defenders of Reformed orthodoxy taught that those who die in infancy die in Christ. Hodge pointed to the example of Jesus: “The conduct and language of our Lord in reference to children are not to be regarded as matters of sentiment, or simply expressive of kindly feeling. He evidently looked upon them as lambs of the flock for which, as the Good Shepherd, He laid down his life, and of whom He said they shall never perish, and no man could pluck them out of his hands. Of such He tells us is the kingdom of Heaven, as though Heaven was, in good measure, composed of the souls of redeemed infants.”

Charles Spurgeon, the great evangelical preacher of Victorian England, and John Newton, the author of “Amazing Grace,” added pastoral urgency to this affirmation. Spurgeon was frustrated with preachers who claimed to have no answer to this question, and he hurled judgment on anyone who would claim that infants would populate hell.

In the end, we must affirm the Gospel of Jesus Christ and the full authority of Scripture. We trust the goodness, mercy, justice and love of God. Whatever He does is right. Salvation is all of grace, and there is no salvation apart from Christ. All are born sinners, and those who reach the point of accountability and consciously sin against God will be judged and punished for their sins in hell -- unless they have come by grace to faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.

B.B. Warfield may have expressed it best when he beautifully affirmed, “If all that die in infancy are saved, it can only be through the almighty operation of Holy Spirit, who works when, and where, and how He pleases, through whose ineffable grace the Father gathers these little ones to the home He has prepared for them.”

Keep those words firmly in mind as you contemplate this great and often troubling question. The little ones are safe with Jesus.

*

from Baptist Press · Dr. R. Albert Mohler Jr., President of Southern Baptist Seminary via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

A Challenge From An Atheist

Luke 16:19

In a note to Ray Comfort an atheist wrote:

You are really convinced that you’ve got all of the answers. You’ve really got yourself tricked that you’re 100% right. Well, let me tell you just one thing. Do you consider yourself to be compassionate of other humans? If you’re right, as you say you are, and you believe that, then how can you sleep at night? When you speak with me, you are speaking with someone who you believe is walking directly into eternal damnation, into an endless onslaught of horrendous pain which your “loving” god created, yet you stand by and do nothing.

If you believed one bit that thousands every day were falling into an eternal and unchangeable fate, you should be running the streets mad with rage at their blindness. That’s equivalent to standing on a street corner and watching every person that passes you walk blindly directly into the path of a bus and dies, yet you stand idly by and do nothing. You’re just twiddling your thumbs, happy in the knowledge that one day that ‘walk’ signal will shine your way across the road.

THINK ABOUT IT. Imagine the horrors Hell must have in store if the Bible is true. You’re just going to allow that to happen and not care about saving anyone but yourself? If you’re right then you’re an uncaring, unemotional and purely selfish (expletive) that has no right to talk about subjects such as love and caring.

Natural Disasters Can Point To God's Judgment [with A Response]

Amos 4:6

Was divine retribution at work in the tsunami that struck southern Asia in late December 2004? The man whose “Experiencing God” study became an international bestseller thinks so -– a view he says is shared by some Muslim imams. Henry Blackaby, speaking at a Kentucky pastors’ conference, said he didn’t fully appreciate the significance of the widespread destruction until he saw a map published by the Voice of the Martyrs depicting the most intense regions of Christian martyrdom worldwide. Blackaby said he noticed that the tsunami hit many of those same regions.

He told a workshop audience that most Christians don’t realize that 400,000 to 450,000 believers are killed annually for their faith, and that many regions of persecution shown the map “match to the T” the tsunami’s swath of destruction.

In an interview after the session, the former director of prayer and spiritual awakening for three Southern Baptist entities noted that even imams are saying the tsunami may be Allah’s judgment on Muslims for failing to act morally and ethically.

“One imam said it’s God’s judgment on [them] because [they} let the infidel tourists come to [their] countries,” Blackaby said. “So all kinds of religious leaders are feeling they have to give an answer.

“[But] if you read the Old Testament, especially, God is very concerned how the nations treat His covenant people,” Blackaby added. “The nations that persecuted, offended and killed His people, God came down and destroyed them. And He’s the same God today. He’s just as concerned about His people.”

Blackaby acknowledged the secular world is likely to “jump all over” such statements, either condemning them or saying that they wouldn’t want to serve a God who would bring that kind of devastation. He said his response to critics would be, “You ought to see what hell is like. It’s going to be an eternal judgment of God on all people. The final judgment will be more severe than this.”

However, such warnings aren’t restricted to Asia, Blackaby said. He noted that the news media had summarized 2004 as an unprecedented year for natural disasters in this nation. Each time God sends hurricanes, floods or other calamities He is speaking to His people, Blackaby said.

While not expecting unbelievers to connect anything with God because they don’t think He exists, Blackaby said he expects God’s people to be paying attention, and for the most part they aren’t. “Many of the pastors never connected 9-11 with God’s warning to people in America -– that He’s beginning to remove the hedge of protection from America because of the sin of God’s people,” Blackaby said. “But God’s people never make the connection with their sin.”

As examples of this wrongdoing, he listed: -- Divorce.

Malachi 2 says God hates divorce; what God hates we ought to hate, Blackaby said.

Instead, there are as many or more divorces inside the church than outside: “Divorce in Oklahoma way outdoes any other state in the union. And I’d say, ‘But that’s where we have some of our strongest work.’ Is God indifferent to divorce?”

• Division among God’s people.

Churches are splitting right and left, but nothing is done about it, Blackaby said. Nor do God’s people deal with the anger and bitterness in their hearts, he added.

• Poor use of finances.

God’s people have more resources to accomplish His work than at any other time in history yet are increasingly selfish, Blackaby said.

“So we build our buildings and let the world go to hell. That’s a sin against God.”

• Lack of love.

While people generally don’t think of lack of love as a sin, when David repented of adultery he confessed that he had sinned against God alone, Blackaby noted.

Recently, Blackaby said, the director of a statewide network of abuse centers in Texas told him the majority of people coming for help are the wives and families of religious leaders.

“I said, ‘You’ve got to be kidding,’” Blackaby said. “And he said, ‘No.’”

Adultery, embezzlement and stealing occur among Christians outside church environments, too, he said.

“I look at people in government, education and you name it who are ... members of churches (and) we’re not holding them accountable for what they do,” Blackaby said. “I think we’ve lost the fear of God.

“And when you lose the fear of God, you lose the fear of sin. When you lose the fear of sin, you lose any sense of accountability. We just don’t believe God will hold us accountable.”

Blackaby said the average church is full of sin, from gossip to broken relationships –- among all denominations, not just Southern Baptists.

The situation has gotten so bad that many leaders are crying out to ask what they can do to stop sin among God’s people, he said.

As the first step, Blackaby suggested pastors return to a vital relationship with God.

“The average pastor would not be able to tell you the last time [he] heard from God,” Blackaby said. “How many pastors boast that they get their sermons off the Internet, or books of sermon outlines? But they’re not bringing a word from God.”

Pastors also need to do a better job of demonstrating unity within their families and teaching their children about the honor of serving God, Blackaby said.

Blackaby said he is astonished at the large numbers of pastors’ children who don’t want to have anything to do with church or any kind of ministry.

In addition, he lamented that many who feel called to missions don’t go through the SBC but a variety of other denominations.

“I would say we’re failing to teach them,” Blackaby said. “I think the pastors, number one, need to teach and they’re not teaching.”

For example, he has heard many pastors say that everything they do in their church must focus on evangelism.

But the Great Commission is not just about soul-winning and discipleship, it includes teaching Christ’s followers to do everything that He commanded, Blackaby said.

“If you’re not teaching your people to practice everything Christ commanded, you’re leaving off the most important part of the Great Commission,” Blackaby said. “God depends on people practicing everything Christ commanded to be the ones He sent out to the rest of the world.”

===============================

Associated Baptist Press, Jan. 27, 2005 [updated version]

“Blackaby Says Tsunamis God’s Judgment; Missions Experts Question Theology, by Ken Camp

“Experiencing God” author Henry Blackaby says the tsunamis that hit South Asia were God’s punishment of an area where Christians have experienced particularly intense persecution. But Voice of the Martyrs, which monitors Christian persecution, disagreed with Blackaby’s conclusion.

Blackaby, a popular Southern Baptist author, told a Kentucky pastors’ conference workshop he recognized God’s hand of judgment in the tsunamis after he saw a map published by Voice of the Martyrs showing areas of intense persecution of Christians worldwide.

Many of the areas highlighted on that map “match to a T” the tsunami’s impact, he said.

He later told a reporter for Baptist Press: “If you read the Old Testament especially, God is very concerned how the nations treat his covenant people. The nations that persecuted, offended and killed his people, God came down and destroyed them. And he’s the same God today. He’s just as concerned about his people.”

Tom White, spokesman for Voice of the Martyrs, expressed appreciation for Henry Blackaby’s “Experiencing God” materials, but told Associated Baptist Press, “We do not agree with Blackaby’s suggestion regarding the tsunami. We do not agree that God was behind the deaths. Our Indonesia staff is rushing to deliver material and spiritual aid to the Muslims in that region.”

Todd Johnson, director of the Center for the Study of Global Christianity at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, said the idea of God using natural disasters as instruments of punishment is “a biblical concept.” Some Christians in South Asia have expressed the idea that the tsunamis were God’s punishment for some wrongdoing, he noted. But Johnson urged caution before definitively linking any natural disaster to divine wrath, particularly without the benefit of long-range hindsight.

“It’s so difficult to know,” he said. “We don’t want to write God out of the equation, as the secular world would do. But the problem lies in interpreting an event” either as God’s judgment on evildoers or as a “wake-up call” to Christians.

Keith Parks, who served 14 years as a missionary in Indonesia before becoming president of the Southern Baptist Foreign Mission Board and later coordinator for Cooperative Baptist Fellowship Global Missions, agreed it’s risky for Christians to try to interpret natural calamities as God’s instruments for accomplishing his plan.

“My personal view is that God’s way of working is so far above us and his thoughts are so far beyond our thoughts that we’re on very uncertain biblical ground when we try to define God’s purpose in natural disasters,” Parks said.

He pointed to the New Testament account in which Jesus asked whether some Galileans who were killed by Pilate or some people on whom a tower in Siloam fell were worse sinners than anyone else.

“It’s hard for me to believe that these folks [in South Asia] were the most sinful people in the world,” he said.

Ebbie Smith, a Christian ethicist and missiologist who taught at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth, agreed the Bible teaches God has used natural disasters at times to punish wrongdoing. But he added: “Unless God says it’s so, it’s not our place to interpret it that way. Other parts of the world are likely as guilty as those that were hit, but it’s not appropriate for us to make those judgments.”

Smith expressed concern that Blackaby’s remarks would reinforce the negative ideas many people in South Asia have about Christians, and his comments could make Christian work in the region more difficult.

Blackaby needs to understand that “statements like this have consequences, and in a world of instant communication, words like this live on” and fuel conflict between Christians and other religions, said Charles Kimball, a professor of world religions and Christian mission at Wake Forest University in Winston-Salem, N.C.

Viewing the suffering caused by the tsunami as divine retribution for the persecution of Christians represents “horrifically bad theology,” said Kimball, chairman of the university’s religion department.

“We hear that kind of - I don’t know whether to call it dreadful or ridiculous - theological pronouncement every time there’s a natural disaster,” he said. “I find it difficult to square with any understanding of God I can imagine or with how the Bible portrays God.”

Kimball pointed to the Christian communities in parts of South Asia the tsunami left devastated, the continuing threat of disease and the specter of orphaned children becoming victims of sex-traffickers. “Is that how God works? For someone to suggest that God would bring about this suffering just to make a point, I find that offensive,” he said.

For some observers, the numbers just don’t add up. Even if God either caused or allowed the disaster in South Asia to accomplish some corrective purpose, Johnson pointed out that while some persecution of Christians has occurred in the region, the most intense persecution was not in the areas hit hardest by the tsunami.

“It just doesn’t make quantitative sense in that respect,” he said.

Indeed, reports on the Voice of the Martyrs website indicate there is persecution of Christians in three countries hit by the tsunamis - Indonesia, India and Sri Lanka. But ethnic strife between Muslims and Christians in Indonesia has been centered in portions of the country not greatly affected by the tsunamis, rather than in the hard-hit Aceh province, which is almost entirely Muslim.

Aceh province is the only part of Indonesia specifically authorized to implement Islamic law, but the U.S. State Department in its report on the country last year noted “no criminal sanctions for violators ... either Muslims or non-Muslims.”

The U.S. Commission on International Freedom listed only two tsunami-affected nations - India and Burma - as “countries of particular concern” regarding religious freedom abuses.

Burma suffered minor losses from the tsunami compared to other neighboring countries. And the commission was divided in its decision to name India as a country of particular concern because conditions appeared to improve there after the ruling fundamentalist Hindu party lost in the most recent national elections.

Regardless whether persecution is more intense in South Asia than in other parts of the world, Stan Parks, international liaison with the Baptist General Convention of Texas-affiliated WorldconneX missions network, said he would “categorically disagree” with Blackaby’s assessment.

“If anybody deserves judgment, it’s Christians who hoard the gospel and who lavish God’s blessings on themselves with bigger buildings and finer homes,” he said, adding if God gave people what they deserved, American Christians would have more to fear than non-Christians in South Asia.

Parks recently returned from a nine-day trip to Indonesia - where he served 10 years - to meet with Christian leaders, as well as business and governmental representatives.

He acknowledged some Christians in the region saw the tsunami as evidence of God’s wrath. But they viewed it in terms of divine judgment on themselves for not sharing the gospel more diligently with their non-Christian neighbors.

Parks noted that people around the globe who haven’t heard the gospel already are in the middle of “a spiritual tsunami, sweeping them into an eternity of separation from God,” and in some respects, the tidal waves that hit South Asia were evidence of God’s mercy rather than his wrath.

While disasters happen in a “sinful and fallen world,” it appears God has used this natural tragedy to “break down barriers,” he said. Rather than trying to discern the meaning behind disasters, Parks said Christians have a responsibility to respond to new opportunities to share God’s love with needy people who had not heard or seen a Christian witness.

________

Robert Marus contributed to this article

from Baptist Press · Ken Walker via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database hell

I Seek A Better Religion and a Nobler God

From the Autobiography of steel magnate Andrew Carnegie:

During my childhood the atmosphere around me was in a state of violent disturbance in matters theological as well as political. ... I well remember that the stern doctrines of Calvinism lay as a terrible nightmare upon me, but that state of mind was soon over, owing to the influences of which I have spoken. I grew up treasuring within me the fact that my father had risen and left the Presbyterian Church one day when the minister preached the doctrine of infant damnation. This was shortly after I had made my appearance.

Father could not stand it and said: “If that be your religion and that your God, I seek a better religion and a nobler God.”

He left the Presbyterian Church never to return, but he did not cease to attend various other churches. I saw him enter the closet every morning to pray and that impressed me. He was indeed a saint and always remained devout. All sects became to him as agencies for good. He had discovered that theologies were many, but religion was one.

I was quite satisfied that my father knew better than the minister, who pictured not the Heavenly Father, but the cruel avenger of the Old Testament — an “Eternal Torturer” as Andrew D. White ventures to call him in his autobiography. Fortunately this conception of the Unknown is now largely of the past.

Is God Worthy of This?

Acts 17:16

Upon watching ABC’s “The Ten Commandments,” I was grateful that the movie prompted me to think about some things the Bible says. For instance, there was a scene in which the faithful Israelites killed the idolatrous Israelites who refused to worship Yahweh (after the golden calf incident, see Exodus 32:25–29). As I watched these scenes, what came to my mind was the fact that not only do those who refuse to worship Yahweh meet with misery and death in this life, but they also face an eternal conscious torment.

But why do people go to hell forever?

Has this landed on you? Is it real to you that those who do not know God as He is will face His wrath forever? Have you thought about whether you think people deserve to suffer forever for not worshiping God? Can you think of any reason that would justify eternal conscious torment for a human being?

The only thing that makes this legitimate is that this God whom they had refused to honor and thank as God is of infinite worth. Do we know God in this way?

If we don’t know God in this way, we probably won’t take worshiping Him very seriously, which probably explains why so many churches don’t seem very serious about knowing and worshiping God.

• When we think of God, do we think of Him as being this worthy?

• When we speak of God, do we speak of Him in a way that reflects that He is this serious about His rights as God?

• When we sing to God, do we do so in a way that corresponds with the gravity with which He regards Himself?

To know God as He is means that we hold Him so highly that we regard eternal conscious torment as what is justly due to those who neither honor Him as God nor give thanks to Him.

• Do you worship God in a way that reflects the awful weight of a mercy that freely pardons those who trust Jesus -- forgiving us of sins for which we rightly deserve to suffer forever?

• Is the God you worship so important that those who spurn Him deserve hell? If not, your concept of God is not biblical (Exodus 34:6–7; Isaiah 66:24; Matthew 26:24).

• If the god you worship is not so significant that those who deny Him the worship he is due will suffer forever for their wrongs, is the god you serve worthy of your worship? You are hereby invited to trust the God of the Bible and receive the mercy He has shown in Jesus. This is your only hope. Call on the name of the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved (Romans 10:13).

Far more upsetting to us than the eternal punishment of the lost should be the fact that God is not glorified as God or thanked for His merciful kindness (Romans 1:21). We must pray that God will give us such an all-encompassing understanding of His infinite worth that we are more emotionally troubled when He is denied the glory and thanks He is due than we are when we contemplate hell.

The great problem in the universe for us should not be why people go to hell; rather, we should be provoked when God is not given the thanks and praise He is due -- provoked like Paul and spurred to proclamation (see Acts 17:16-17). God must enable us to perceive His own incomprehensible wealth of magnificence and mercy so that we can see beyond the apparent decency of people and stare into the truth that they owe God heartfelt, constant thanks and praise. And the fact that they do not render to Him the worship that He deserves must become for us the greatest ugliness in all creation.

If in our minds the worth of God is not this great, or if we are not confident that He will be justified in all He has done when all the evidence is brought forth, let us pray for grace to search the Scriptures and see there that the One from whom, through whom, and to whom all things are is indeed worthy of all the glory (Romans 11:36).

________

James M. Hamilton Jr serves as assistant professor of biblical studies at the Houston Campus of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.

*

from Baptist Press · James M. Hamilton Jr. via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database worship

Too Respectable for Hell

A wealthy merchant of Philadelphia, who would not listen to the gospel message in health, sent for me at his death-bed. I told him: "I have nothing now to tell you. You are a sinner, and here is a Savior. Do you feel your guilt, and will you take a Savior?" "No. There must be some better place than hell for a man of my respectability."

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database hell

Thy Will Be Done

Mark 9

For obvious reasons, the biblical doctrine of hell has never been a favorite theme for Christian people, even amongst the most fervent of puritan preachers. The very thought of an endless separation from God and his presence, where communication and community are utterly negated, is an intolerable thought to the one who loves God. It is a doctrine we do not like and often do not understand, especially since scripture identifies our moral barometer as broken.

However, the doctrine of hell does not stand alone to be rejected. It holds serious ramifications for our understanding of God and his purposes, for the moral fabric of the universe He has created -- indeed, for the very notion of salvation itself. This can be difficult to grasp, particularly given the ways in which these notions are both subtly and overtly undermined all around us. In our culture where we celebrate tolerance, God’s sending of his Son to die seems an intolerable form of child abuse. It is little wonder many struggle even more with the doctrine of hell, which seems terribly non-inclusive and even hostile to the lifestyle choices of many.

Yet Jesus speaks repeatedly and in the starkest of terms about hell (cf. Matthew 10:28, 11:23, 18:9, 23:15, Mark 9:43-47, Luke 12:5, 16:23), not to mention his many parables about a kingdom of great rewards and terrifying punishments. The rest of the New Testament is equally clear and uncompromising. Clearly, we cannot dismiss the doctrine like an inconvenient parking ticket just because we do not like it.

What is particularly interesting to me as a Christian apologist is that I am very rarely questioned about the “immorality” or “injustice” of hell by non-believers. In fact, I find a remarkable recognition amongst non-Christians that if God is real, He must punish evil. On the contrary, it is usually struggling Christians who wrestle with the notion that God will judge sin in an ultimate sense with an endless separation from God.

Central to our modern crisis regarding the notion of hell and judgment itself is the problem of abstractionism in our thinking. We tend not to think of good and evil in terms of God’s revealed law and character, but in abstract categories. In many of our minds, for instance, there is a typical lauding of “love” as good and “hate” as evil. But love and hate are not things in and of themselves. It is clearly GOOD to hate injustice, blasphemy, and bigotry, just as it is obviously evil to love lies, murder, and fornication. All manner of sin today is routinely justified on the basis of “love.” But this is putting the preference for abstractions to reality, and when we regard good and evil in this way we will view the doctrine of hell as a monstrosity.

In this we may discover that hell is not just a place; it is also a condition of heart and mind, a state of fixed rebellion against God. C.S. Lewis notes that heaven is the abode of those that say to God, “Thy will be done,” and hell is the dwelling of those to whom God will eventually turn and say, “THY will be done.” In other words, hell is the rejection of relationship and meaning, the insanity of a self-imposed isolation where “man is the measure of all things.” Having affirmed himself as his own god, man lives in hell with the full consequence of this faith.

Thus, hell assures us that there is an unbridgeable chasm between right and wrong as defined by God, and to deny it is to advocate the triumph of evil. If we refuse to believe Christ’s doctrine of hell, we are denying that God is on the throne. Hell assures us justice is real and it is God’s.

But finally and critically, hell assures us that heaven is home. We must remember that hell and salvation are related doctrines in the Christian faith. If hell is not real and Christ’s teaching is some form of subtle illusion, then there is no damnation, and if there is no damnation, then there is nothing to be saved from, and nothing to be saved to or for. Far from this, the Christian faith cries out in need for the very thing Christ offers -- forgiveness and a place within the kingdom. Heaven is indeed home to those who will have it, a place of community turned toward God with total meaning in Him, lived under his law and purposes.

________

Copyright © 2007 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Trap Coffins

Mark 9

I stood there with my wife and two other couples in silence as we read the historical account at the massive Irish Memorial Monument is Philadelphia. The monument depicts the plight of Irish immigrants to the United States during 1846-1851. In 1845 a fungus hit the potato fields of Ireland and a devastating famine occurred that took the lives of more than 1 million people.

The 1.75 acre park includes 35 life-size figures that tell the story of the forced immigration to the United States. At one of the viewing points was the following inscription in granite:

“The great hunger in Ireland led to the greatest loss of life in

Western Europe in the 100 years between the Napoleonic Wars and

World War I. Whole families fell to starvation and accompanying

disease. Cholera, deadly fevers, dysentery, scurvy and typhus

swept the population. People died in such great numbers that it

was impossible to record all the deaths and make enough coffins

for burials. “TRAP COFFINS,” which were made with a trap door in

the bottom, were used for the trip to the cemetery. Once there,

the coffin was placed over the grave and the trap door opened to

drop the body into it, leaving the coffin ready for the next

victim.”

The pastor in me causes me to see illustrations in many things. I was struck by the huge image before me and the tragic results. By thinking about “trap coffins,” I was moved deeply by the reality of hell and the multitude of people headed into a Christless eternity. My own reflection on the granite really amplified the sense of personal concern for the lostness of mankind.

I have always been an evangelist and an active witness for my Lord, but it isn’t enough.

I must witness more and you must join in. The only hope for this world is a mighty movement of God’s Spirit. We need believers who look into “trap coffins” and are moved by the reality of hell.

from Baptist Press · Thane E. Barnes, Executive Director of the Nevada Baptist Convention via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Sermon: Awakening To What?

John 5:28

Final sermon in Daniel series, #11. Daniel 12:1-4

AWAKENING TO WHAT?

==================

I. Some of us have no one to call today.

A. My last sermon on Daniel coincides with Mother's Day.

B. Not every mother is with us.

II. Everyone loves the idea of heaven.

A. Heaven and resurrection are melded together in our minds.

B. The joy of heaven has been diluted.

C. The requirements for heaven have been erased.

III. Warning -- there is more than one resurrection.

A. Daniel presents two alternatives.

B. Jesus completely agrees with Daniel. John 5:28-29 (5:24)

C. Revelation gives more details on both resurrections. 20:6,14; 21:8

IV. Wouldn't a single option be nicer?

A. Many reject the harshness of heaven vs. hell.

B. The only thing that matters is whether it is true or not.

V. You can have the good resurrection.

A. You must belong to God.

B. We have hope when there is no hope.

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm08q.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database heavenhell

Vulnerability of Love

Thomas A Kempis said it this way. “To love is to be vulnerable. Love anything, and your heart will certainly be wrung and possibly broken. If you want to be sure of keeping it intact, you must give your heart to no one, not even to an animal. Wrap it carefully around hobbies and little luxuries; avoid all entanglements; lock it up safe in a casket or coffin or your selfishness. But in that casket — safe, dark, motionless, airless — it will change. It will not be broken; it will become unbreakable, impenetrable, irredeemable … The only place outside of Heaven where you can be perfectly safe from all the dangers … of love is Hell.

from (unknown) · Thomas a Kempis via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database heavenhell

Do Pastors Believe In Hell?

Mark 9

Just when it seemed to have cooled off, the topic of hell is back on the front burner — at least for pastors learning to preach about a topic most Americans would rather not talk about.

Only 59% of Americans believe in hell, compared with 74% who believe in heaven, according to the recent surveys from the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.

“I think it’s such a difficult and important biblical topic,” said Kurt Selles, director of the Global Center at Samford University’s Beeson Divinity School. “There’s a big change that’s taken place as far as evangelicals not wanting to be as exclusive.”

At the recent annual Beeson Pastors School, Selles led two workshops to discuss “Whatever happened to hell?” He asked how many of the pastors had ever preached a sermon on hell. Nobody had, he said.

“I think it’s something people want to avoid,” he said. “I understand why. It’s a difficult topic.”

The Rev. Fred Johns, pastor of Brookview Wesleyan Church in Irondale, Alabama, said after a workshop discussion of hell that pastors do shy away from the topic of everlasting damnation.

“It’s out of fear we’ll not appear relevant,” he said. “It’s pressure from the culture to not speak anything negative. I think we’ve begun to deny hell. There’s an assumption that everybody’s going to make it to heaven somehow.”

The soft sell on hell reflects an increasingly market-conscious approach, Selles said.

“When you’re trying to market Jesus, sometimes there’s a tendency to mute traditional Christian symbols,” he said. “Difficult doctrines are left by the wayside. Hell is a morally repugnant doctrine. People wonder why God would send people to eternal punishment.”

Speakers said the seriousness of Jesus dying for man’s sins relates to the gravity of salvation vs. damnation, according to Johns. “If you don’t mention God’s judgment, you are missing a big part of the Christian gospel,” Selles said. “Without wrath, there’s no grace.”

Pope John Paul II stirred up a debate in 1999 by describing hell as “the state of those who freely and definitely separate themselves from God, the source of all life and joy.”

Although the pope was reflecting official Roman Catholic teaching, some U.S. evangelicals expressed misgivings about the implication that hell is an abstract separation from God rather than a literal lake of fire as described in the Book of Revelation.

The pope’s comments on hell stirred up the ancient debate about whether hell is a real place of burning fire or a state of mind reflecting a dark, cold emptiness and distance from God.

Evangelical Christians have traditionally offered a sterner view of salvation and damnation. A Southern Baptist Home Mission Board study in 1993 estimated that 70% of all Americans are going to hell, based on projected numbers of those who have not had a born-again experience.

Human ideas about hell were still in ferment as the Bible was being written. The theological concept of hell has a rich cultural heritage, according to historian Alan Bernstein, author of The Formation of Hell.

The ancient Hebrews focused on the afterlife following their Babylonian captivity, when they experienced the torment of ungodly enemies who seemed to have an unjustifiably good life on Earth. During the Babylonian exile, Jews were exposed to Zoroastrianism, which asserts there is an eternal struggle between good and evil, with good triumphing in the end.

The Hebrew concept of “Sheol” — the realm of the dead — may also have been influenced by the Greek mythology of Tartarus, a place of everlasting punishment for the Titans, a race of gods defeated by Zeus, Bernstein writes.

From about 300 B.C. to A.D. 300, those influences combined with Hebrew speculation about an eventual comeuppance to the worldly wicked.

In translating the Bible from Hebrew to Greek, the Greeks used the terms Tartarus, Hades and Gehenna. In Greek thought, Hades is not a place of punishment; it’s where the dead are separated from the living.

The term Gehenna referred to a ravine outside Jerusalem that was used as a garbage dump. It had once been a place of child sacrifice and became a symbol of pain and suffering, Selles said. As a garbage dump, it was probably often a place of fire as trash was burned, emphasizing the symbolism of the flames of eternal damnation, he said.

Jesus never soft-pedaled the concept of hell, Selles said. “It’s not metaphorical in Jesus’ mind; it’s a real place,” he said.

In A.D. 410, St. Augustine defined four states of afterlife: those so good they go to heaven; those so bad they go to hell; those who deserve some relief in their eternal torment; and those who deserve to be lifted out of torment after repenting for their sins. That set the stage for the doctrine of purgatory in A.D. 1237.

The Bible contains a litany of colorful images of hell as both fire and darkness, as in the Gospel of Matthew, which refers to “the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels” and “the outer darkness” where “men will weep and gnash their teeth.”

Either way, Selles said, pretending that hell doesn’t exist, or trying to preach around it, short-circuits the Bible.

“This is a doctrine, a teaching, that’s being neglected in churches,” Selles said. “It needs to be preached. It’s part of the Gospel.”

-- Greg Garrison writes for The Birmingham News.

Those Who Die Without Christ Experience Hell

Mark 9

On July 4, 1854, Charlie Peace, a well-known criminal in London, was hung. The Anglican Church, which had a ceremony for everything, even had a ceremony for hanging people. So when Charlie Peace was marched to the gallows, a priest read these words from the Prayer Book: “Those who die without Christ experience hell, which is the pain of forever dying without the release which death itself can bring.”

When these chilling words were read, Charlie Peace stopped in his tracks, turned to the priest, and shouted in his face, “Do you believe that? Do you believe that?”

The priest, taken aback by this verbal assault, stammered for a moment then said, “Well. . . I . . . suppose I do.”

“Well, I don't,” said Charlie. “But if I did, I'd get down on my hands and knees and crawl all over Great Britain, even if it were paved with pieces of broken glass, if I could rescue one person from what you just told me.”

Hell Means Sharing In Christ's Darkness

Mark 14:33

Pope Benedict XVI never shrinks from asserting the scriptural doctrines that are hardest for weak-minded moderns to accept: “No quibbling helps here: the idea of eternal damnation, which had taken ever clearer shape in the Judaism of the century or two before Christ, has a firm place in the teaching of Jesus.” But he always finds unexpected and productive ways of dealing with such doctrines -- of finding a deeper meaning in them -- in the later history of the Church. Benedict wrote:

“In the history of holiness ... and notably in the course of recent centuries, in John of the Cross, in Carmelite piety in general, and in that of Thérèse of Lisieux in particular, ‘Hell’ has taken on a completely new meaning and form. For the saints, ‘Hell’ is not so much a threat to be hurled at other people but a challenge to oneself. It is a challenge to suffer in the dark night of faith, to experience communion with Christ in solidarity with his descent into the Night. One draws near to the Lord’s radiance by sharing his darkness.”

from The New Yorker Magazine; article: Reading Ratzinger · Anthony Grafton via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Unprepared For Eternity

Job 7:6

Oh, the unbelievable horror of putting off Christ! The eternal sadness of waiting one day too long!

It’s akin to the terror of those who delayed boarding the ark in the days of Noah or those who failed to escape Sodom and Gomorrah when they had the opportunity. Think of the scoffing thief who died Christ-less within inches of Christ Himself who was -- at that very moment -- dying for him on the adjacent cross. Think of the multitudes at the Great White Throne Judgment who will frantically insist their names “must surely” be written somewhere in the Lamb’s Book of Life.

But they waited too long.

The Bible warns that every human being is subject to sudden death. No one has the promise of another day or hour. We never know when we’ll be swept into eternity by a car wreck, heart attack, an act of violence, a natural disaster or freak accident.

Thousands of people will die today, and many can’t see it coming. They woke up this morning, showered, dressed, grabbed a cup of coffee and dashed out the door never dreaming they were leaving their doorstep for the final time.

The Bible teaches that our days are swifter than a weaver’s shuttle (Job 7:6), like flowers that quickly fade (Job 14:2) and like a mist that appears for a little time then vanishes (James 4:14).

Jesus told the story (Luke 16:19-31) of a rich man who lived in affluence while a beggar named Lazarus lived nearby in squalor. The beggar was ready for eternity. When he died he was carried away to be with Abraham and the saints of all the ages. But when the rich man died, he found himself in Hades. Jesus said, “Being in torments in Hades, he lifted up his eyes and ... cried and said, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue’” (Luke 16:24).

But it wasn’t possible, and there he still is today without a whisper of hope. One of the worst things about hell is that one’s memory doesn’t die. The inhabitants of hell will remember all the opportunities they spurned. They’ll remember church services they attended, tracts they did not read, invitations they shrugged off, and Bibles they disregarded.

Are you ready to meet Christ? Or are you in danger of waiting a day too long?

A prominent judge was raised in a Christian home by godly parents but he never personally professed personal faith in Christ. He married a woman who was a radiant believer. At the time of their marriage, he gave her the promise that someday he would get saved. She frequently reminded her husband of his promise, only to be put off with the words, “Sometime I will get saved, not now.”

This continued for some time until the wife contracted a serious illness and died shortly afterward. Her final pleadings were for his salvation but he continued to put off a decision.

One night the judge had a vivid dream -- his whole life came before him as a panorama, scene after scene. He saw himself as an infant in the arms of a godly mother. He saw himself as a child listening to his mother’s prayers. He saw himself as a young man, drifting into dark company and bad habits as his mother knelt earnestly in her home, interceding for him. Then he saw his wife and heard her voice pleading with him to be saved. In his dream, he could hear himself saying, “Sometime, not now .... Sometime, not now ....” Then came a vivid scene of his own death. The judge awoke in terror.

What about you? Have you yielded your life to Christ or is your attitude the same as the procrastinating judge: “Someday I’ll get saved. Not now.”

The Bible uses the word now to express the urgency of salvation.

The Book of Isaiah says, “‘Come now, and let us reason together,’ says the LORD. ‘Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow ....’” (Isaiah 1:18).

If you’d like to trust Christ as your Savior, let me suggest a simple prayer you can sincerely offer to the Lord right now: Dear God, I confess my sins. I don’t want to delay another moment. I invite Jesus into my heart to be my Savior. Today I confess Him as my Lord. I claim His promise of eternal life. In Jesus’ Name. Amen.

Let today be your day of salvation!

I Don't Need Jesus and Neither Do You

John 14:6

An entry in the online forum "LunaticOutpost.com":

“From what I understand from Christians, I am “born in sin.” And then, every little thing that I have ever done wrong is added up and, no matter what kind of good I do in this life, this will add up to me being so irredeemably bad that I will have to burn in eternal torment forever.

And there is nothing I can do to make it okay with God. Except this one thing. Which is to have Jesus save me.

But the thing is this: Either their God is a very, very, very unloving, unkind person, or else this is [he uses a stronger word than “baloney”].

There is nothing I have ever done that a reasonable person would not, if I asked, forgive me for, and I can prove it.

I have forgiven EVERYONE. A bit more than a year ago ... I made the choice to consciously and [literally] forgive every single person that has ever directly or indirectly, consciously or unintentionally caused me any hardship or pain. It wasn’t always easy to do, but I eventually did it.

Doing this has changed my life in some amazing ways. I feel profoundly liberated. I am without the anger and hatred that used to plague me. So that was cool.

But it makes me think: I cannot be “bigger” than God. Surely! I would not send a single soul to hell, if it were up to me. I would try to show them why they should transform. Why they should learn compassion.

I would do all that and I am just a normal guy on planet earth who has had a few decades to work things out as best he can. I am not the eternal all-knowing creator of all things. Who, I would think, would be a bit more wise and loving than me.

So the bottom line is this: God is more than me. More love, more compassion, more wisdom, more understanding, more everything. If God cannot forgive more than I can, then that is not God we are talking about. So God can forgive me and I don’t need to have someone die for my sins.”

The person had given their essay this title: “I don’t need Jesus and neither do you. REALLY.”

It is an interesting argument, but does it hold up? Is my forgiving someone the same as what God does? As a mere man, can I forgive Hitler for the millions of murders he committed? Certainly I could forgive him for what he had done to me personally, but what would I be doing in that case? When I forgive, I am letting someone off the hook, but I am not really dealing with the underlying offense.

God has to do this, because he is holy. And his holiness is what human can’t really grasp. This is why we still need a savior. We need Jesus. REALLY.

Why Christians Don't Witness

Another [reason for not witnessing to people] is, a secret infidelity prevailing in men’s hearts. Alas! brethren we surely do not believe men’s misery; we surely do not believe the truth of God’s threatenings. Did we verily believe that all the unregenerate and unholy shall be eternally tormented, how could we refrain from speaking, or avoid bursting into tears, when we look them in the face, especially when they are our near and dear friends? Thus doth secret unbelief consume the vigor of each grace and duty. O Christian, if you did verily believe that your ungodly neighbors, wife, husband, or child, should certainly lie forever in hell, except they be thoroughly changed before death shall snatch them away, would not this make you address them day and night till they were persuaded? Were it not for this cursed unbelief, our own and our neighbors’ souls would gain more by us than they do.

________

Richard Baxter (English Puritan, 1615-1691) in THE SAINTS' EVERLASTING REST (PDF page 84 from the file Saints_Everlasting_Rest_Richard_Baxter.pdf). The second sentence is from a different edition, THE SAINTS' EVERLASTING REST (Abridged Edition), (Philadelphia: Presbyterian Board of Education, 1847) p.209.

from Email From Peter Hewer · Richard Baxter (1615-1691) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database witnessinghell

Unless Jesus Says Otherwise, Hell Exists

Mark 9:48

British group acknowledges differences on annihilationism, but says doctrine of hell must be preached again.

______________

Flames, worms and the gnashing of teeth may be less prominent in sermons today, but hell is still real, according to a report sponsored by the Evangelical Alliance UK (EAUK). And hell as a place of eternal punishment remains “the dominant understanding” among evangelical Christians.

But the report, THE NATURE OF HELL, produced by five experts, also acknowledges a growing belief among evangelicals in “conditionalism,” according to which, after judgment, sinners will be annihilated — something that is seen as a more merciful fate than the pit of unending torment.

THE NATURE OF HELL accepts that both options — annihilation and eternal punishment — are consistent with evangelical belief, which claims the Bible as the supreme authority. It calls, however, for greater clarity in the EAUK's Basis of Faith, from which reference to “eternal punishment” was dropped in 1970.

Joel Edwards, general director of the Evangelical Alliance UK, said: “The increasing pluralism of Western culture has made hell more of a stumbling block than ever. It would be no exaggeration to say that both within and outside the church, many now see the doctrine of hell as indefensible and obsolete.

“The church has an enormous responsibility to be sensitive to our culture, whilst remaining true to our convictions,” he said.

“Until someone better than Jesus returns from death with an assurance that hell is all a hoax, the church would fail to be loving if we didn't talk about it as a reality.”

THE NATURE OF HELL was welcomed by Roman Catholic spokesman Monsignor Kieran Conry, who told Ecumenical News International (ENI): “The report will keep an important theological debate alive. It focuses on the reality of the afterlife and the fact that our actions in this life have consequences.” He added that the Catholic Catechism described hell as a separation from God rather than physical torment.

The report has strong words for “universalism,” a belief held by some theological liberals, according to which all humans will be saved by God. Universalism “may suit the spirit of our age [but] it is inconsistent with evangelical faith,” according to THE NATURE OF HELL.

The extensively researched, 148-page report is the fruit of two years' work by ACUTE (the Alliance Commission of Unity and Truth among Evangelicals). It is in part a response to an intensifying debate in the churches about hell. (Four years ago the Church of England Doctrine Commission produced a declaration that hell was a “state of non-being.” The Anglican report, THE MYSTERY OF SALVATION, stressed the reality of the Final Judgment, with the risk of losing everlasting participation in the life of God. Although widely seen as giving a traditionalist line, the report was criticized by many evangelicals for removing the flames of hell.)

THE NATURE OF HELL accepts that physical torment represents only one form of traditionalist belief. Hell may also consist of eternal conscious spiritual torment or eternal separation from God. Spiritual torment, according to advocates of this belief, may be worse than physical torment. Another sort of hell is eternal separation from the divine, since humanity was created for communion with God.

David Hilborn, the five-member panel's convener and EAUK's theological adviser, told ENI: “Hell is part of the Christian story, although a difficult and distressing part. It should not be neglected in teaching for believers.

“In the report, we were not arguing for the traditionalist view vis-a-vis the conditionalist view. Both are evangelical positions.

“In fact, there are intriguing hints in the new physics around the science of black holes that these apparently opposite positions may ultimately be reconcilable.”

___________

Copyright © 2000 Ecumenical News International.

RELATED ELSEWHERE

Recent ChristianityToday.com articles on Hell include:

BOOKS & CULTURE CORNER: WHO IN HELL? | Theologian John Sanders considers the eternal fate of non-Christians. (Apr. 10, 2000)

CT CLASSIC: THE PERENNIAL DEBATE | Christians have never agreed on the salvation for those who have never heard of Christ. By John Sanders (Apr. 10, 2000)

IS HELL FOREVER? (Oct. 5, 1998)

CAN WE BE GOOD WITHOUT HELL? (June 16 1997)

LEADERSHIP JOURNAL offers an article for pastors, “PREACHING HELL IN A TOLERANT AGE | Brimstone for the broad-minded.”

from Christianitytoday.com · Cedric Pulford, Ecumenical News International via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Could A Militant Atheist End Up In Heaven?

Luke 23:43

Christopher Hitchens, the world’s most famously caustic atheist, is now dead.

Hitchens expected this moment, of course, but he anticipated, wrongly, a blackness, a going out of consciousness forever. Many Christians today are sadly remarking on what it is like for Christopher Hitchens to be now opening his eyes in hell.

We might be wrong.

The Christian impulse here is exactly right. After all, Jesus and his apostles assured us that there is no salvation apart from union with Christ in His death, burial and resurrection, a union entered into by faith. And Hitchens not only rejected that Gospel, he ridiculed it, along with the very notion of anything beyond the natural order. The Christian Scriptures are clear: There is a narrow window in which we must be saved, the time of this present life, and after this there is only judgment (2 Corinthians 6:1-2; Hebrews 9:27).

But I’m not sure Christopher Hitchens is in hell right now. It’s not because I believe there’s a “second chance” after death for salvation (I don’t). It’s not because I don’t believe in hell or in God’s judgment (I do). It’s because of a sermon I heard years ago that haunts me to this day, reminding me of the sometimes surprising persistence of the Gospel.

Fifteen or so years ago, I heard an old Welsh pastor preach on Jesus’ encounter with the thieves on the cross. The preacher paused to speculate about whether the penitent thief might have had any God-fearing friends or family members. If so, he said, they probably would never have known about the terrorist’s final act, his appeal to Jesus, “Remember me when you come into your kingdom” (Luke 23:42). They never would have heard Jesus pronounce, “Today you will be with me in Paradise” (Luke 23:43).

These believing family members and friends would have assumed, all their lives, that this robber was in hell, especially dying as he did under the visible judgment of God (Deuteronomy 21:22-23). They would have been shocked to meet this man in the Kingdom of God. “We thought you were in hell,” they might have said, as they danced around him in the heavenly places.

That sermon changed everything for me about the way I preach funerals for unbelievers. Now, death bed conversions are very rare. Typically, a conscience is so seared by then, so given over to the darkening of the mind, that the Gospel rarely is heard. We shouldn’t count on last-second repentance.

But, however rarely, it does happen, and who knows? Perhaps you have relatives who, in the last seconds of breath, breathed out a silent prayer of repentance and faith. You might be as surprised as the thief’s believing cohort.

And, who knows? Christopher Hitchens heard the Gospel enough, often while debating believers. Maybe the seed of the Word might have embedded in his heart somewhere and maybe, just maybe, it broke through sometime in the night, as he gasped for last breath.

Christopher Hitchens was a blasphemer, true enough, and a nasty character. Aren’t we all, in our different ways. Christ Jesus came for nasty characters like us. And the same blood of Jesus that can deliver us from wrath could do the same for Hitchens had he, if he, at any point, embraced it. It’s not likely, but it’s possible, and, if he did, then Christopher Hitchens’ past atheism would be no barrier to communion with God. It would be, like my sin, crucified with Christ, buried and remembered no more.

I don’t know about Christopher Hitchens, about what happened in those last moments, but I do know that, if he had embraced it, the Gospel would be enough for him. I know that because it’s enough for me, and I’m as deserving of hell as he is.

Hell is real and judgment is certain. The Gospel comes with a warning that it will one day be too late. But, as long as there is breath, it is not yet too late. Perhaps Christopher Hitchens, like so many before him, persisted in his rebellion to the horror of the very end. But maybe not. Maybe he stopped his polemics and cried out, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your kingdom.”

I don’t know. But I do know that the Gospel offers forgiveness and mercy right to the edge of death’s door. And I know that the Kingdom of God is made up of ex-thieves, and ex-murderers and ex-atheists like us.

Where Was Jesus For the Three Days Between His Death and Resurrection?

Acts 2:31

Question: “Where was Jesus for the three days between His death and resurrection?”

Answer: 1 Peter 3:18-19 states, “For Christ died for sins once for all, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive by the Spirit, through whom also he went and preached to the spirits in prison.” The phrase, “by the Spirit,” in verse 18 is exactly the same construction as the phrase, “in the flesh.” So it seems best to relate the word “spirit” to the same realm as the word “flesh.” The flesh and spirit are Christ’s flesh and spirit. The words “made alive by (in) the spirit” point to the fact that Christ’s sin-bearing and death brought about the separation of His human spirit from the Father (Matthew 27:46). The contrast is between flesh and spirit, as in Matthew 27:46 and Romans 1:3-4, and not between Christ’s flesh and the Holy Spirit. When Christ’s atonement for sin was completed, His spirit restored the fellowship which had been broken.

First Peter 3:18-22 describes a necessary link between Christ’s suffering (verse 18) and His glorification (verse 22). Only Peter gives specific information about what happened between these two events. The word “preached” in verse 19 is not the usual word in the New Testament to describe the preaching of the gospel. It literally means to herald a message. Jesus suffered and died on the Cross, His body being put to death, and His spirit died when He was made sin. But His spirit was made alive and He yielded it to the Father. According to Peter, sometime between His death and His resurrection Jesus made a special proclamation to “the spirits in prison.”

To begin with, Peter referred to people as “souls” and not “spirits” (3:20). In the New Testament, the word “spirits” is used to describe angels or demons, not human beings, and verse 22 seems to bear out this meaning. Also, nowhere in the Bible are we told that Jesus visited hell. Acts 2:31 says that He went to “Hades” (New American Standard Bible), but “Hades” is not hell. The word “Hades” refers to the realm of the dead, a temporary place where they await the resurrection. Revelation 20:11-15 in the NASB or the New International Version give a clear distinction between the two. Hell is the permanent and final place of judgment for the lost. Hades is a temporary place.

Our Lord yielded His spirit to the Father, died, and at some time between death and resurrection, visited the realm of the dead where He delivered a message to spirit beings (probably fallen angels; see Jude 6) who were somehow related to the period before the flood in Noah’s time. Verse 20 makes this clear. Peter did not tell us what He proclaimed to these imprisoned spirits, but it could not be a message of redemption since angels cannot be saved (Hebrews 2:16). It was probably a declaration of victory over Satan and his hosts (1 Peter 3:22; Colossians 2:15). Ephesians 4:8-10 also seems to indicate that Christ went to “paradise” (Luke 16:20; 23:43) and took to heaven all those who had believed in Him prior to His death. The passage doesn’t give a great amount of detail about what occurred, but most Bible scholars agree that this is what is meant by “led captivity captive.”

So, all that to say, the Bible isn’t entirely clear what exactly Christ did for the three days between His death and resurrection. It does seem, though, that He was preaching victory over the fallen angels and/or unbelievers. What we can know for sure is that Jesus was not giving people a second chance for salvation. The Bible tells us that we face judgment after death (Hebrews 9:27), not a second chance. There isn’t really any definitively clear answer for what Jesus was doing for the time between His death and resurrection. Perhaps this is one of the mysteries we will understand once we reach glory.

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate