Pippert says that Christians are not perfect and can communicate the gospel effectively through their weaknesses. People need to see that we are real and not phony. We are always growing as Christians.
EXCERPT:
In my new book, HOPE HAS ITS REASONS, I tell the story of a professor at Harvard who said to me, "I admire the fact that you are devout, but in the end it doesn't make any difference whether you believe in God or not, because life is essentially the same. Don't Christians get cancer, get divorced, long for their children to do well? Don't Christians fail, morally?"
I said yes.
"You're proving my point," he responded. "God DOESN'T make a difference."
I told him that one of the difficulties is that Christians have tried to pin the difference in the wrong place. Sometimes we try to make it seem as if we are no longer human when we follow Jesus.
What is the difference that God makes? It begins to show, I told him, in HOW WE HANDLE problems and personal failings - not in freedom from them. I have seen that there is nothing I do that does not contain some corruption, that does not have some self-serving motive. God shows us the problem of human nature and He gives us a diagnosis for the condition: sin.
"If I was that hard on myself," he interrupted, "I'd be depressed! But you seem so joyful."
So then I told him the rest of the story: "That's because I've also been given a solution. It's the forgiveness of Jesus Christ and the power of the Holy Spirit to help me overcome."
"Has the cure worked?" he asked.
"I'm not a finished product, if that's what you mean," I answered. "But I'm learning to live in recovery from sin and I'm growing in amazing grace, and that would make anyone joyful!"
Christian realism begins with the fact that we are not who we were created to be. G. K. Chesterton wrote, "I find it amazing that moderns have rejected the doctrine of original sin when it's the only Christian doctrine that can be empirically verified."[*] There is plenty of evidence to convince us of the reality of the Christian view of human nature, meaning the presence of sin in our lives.
But Christian realism is not only negative - it's extraordinarily POSITIVE. Christian realism requires us to face the mess so that we can experience the mystery and the miracle that Jesus Christ can change human beings. But to experience this miracle, we have to face the mess: the human heart. To be a Christian realist is to know the problem of the human heart and the solution that Jesus offers.
Being "realists" gets more complicated once we start growing as Christians. It's one thing to admit our sin when we first come to Jesus. But to continue acknowledging our sin may get harder, because we have more invested in our respectability. Sometimes, we feel we will lose our testimony by acknowledging a problem almost as if we fear it's a sin to admit we're sinners. So then we make stronger attempts to deny or cover any sin or flaw in our lives "for Jesus' sake."
Denial and cover-up is a problem not just with the Church, but throughout human nature. Why do we deny and cover up? Because it's painful to face the truth about ourselves. We go to elaborate lengths to say, "It's not my fault; I can explain that."
But presenting a perfect exterior is NOT biblical Christianity. Paul said, "I am the chief of sinners." When he struggled with his thorn in the flesh, Jesus told him, "I will not take this away from you because my glory is made manifest in your weakness."
Spiritual growth does not come from insisting that I have no problems. Rather, it means recognizing who it is that God calls me to be, the reality of who I presently am, learning how to overcome through the power of the Holy Spirit. That is a different kind of model from either excusing sin or being falsely spiritual.
DJ: WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF THIS KIND OF REALISM FOR EVANGELISM? HOW CLOSELY SHOULD OUR INSIDES MATCH OUR OUTSIDES BEFORE WE TALK TO ANYONE?
PIPPERT: We will always be in process. Part of the adventure of sharing our faith comes when we allow people to see what God is doing to heal our pain, to make sense out of our brokenness. They need to understand our unanswered questions as well as our victories and successes. Evangelism can't wait until we finally have it all together that won't happen until we are in Heaven.
No matter how jazzy the exterior, when you get beneath the surface, you find that most people have experienced some emptiness, some pain. What they really want to know is, "Does Jesus make a difference? Will He help me in this marriage? Will He help me communicate with this child I find so hard to reach? Does He make a difference in my job, in my relationship with my boss, in my addictions and compulsions?"
If we're able to say, "Yes - this is how Jesus has met me in my brokenness, in my weakness, and enabled me to overcome," we do such a service for the Lord. But if we feel we have to cover our problems and weakness and honest questions, we neutralize the power of the gospel.
________
[*] Reinhold Niebuhr stated it this way, while Chesterton once wrote that Original Sin "is the only part of Christian theology which can really be proved," by which he meant that the fact of sin is "a fact as practical as potatoes."