ὅς 455 ὅς iii. 5 [RG], 6; Heb. vi. 10; ix. 20; Jas. ii. 5; 1 In. iii. 24; Jude 15; for other exx. see below; ἐν ὥρᾳ 7 οὐ γινώoxet, Mt. xxiv. 50; τῇ παραδύσει 9 παρεδώκατε, Mk. vii. 13 ; add, Lk. ii. 20; v. 9; ix. 435 xii. 46; xxiv. 25; Jn. xvii. 5; Acts ii. 22; xvii. 31; xx. 38; 2 Co. xii. 21; 2Th.i. 4; Rev. xviii. 6; ef. W. § 24,1; [B. as above]. Rarely attraction oceurs where the verb governs the dative [but see below]: thus, κατέναντι οὗ ἐπίστευσε θεοῦ for xarévavre θεοῦ, ᾧ ἐπίστευσε (See κατέναντι). Ro. iv. 17; φωνῆς, ἧς ἔκραξα (for 7 (al. ἥν, οἴ. W. 164 (154 sq.) Β. 287 (217)}7), Acts xxiv. 21, οἵ. Is. vi. 4; (7γετο δὲ καὶ τῶν ἑαυτοῦ τε πιστῶν, οἷς ἥδετο καὶ ὧν ἠπίστει πολλούς, for καὶ πολλοὺς τούτων, οἷς ἠπίστει, Xen. Cyr. ὅ, 4, 39; ὧν ἐγὼ ἐντετύχηκα οὐδείς; for οὐδεὶς τούτων, οἷς ἐντετ. Plato, Gorg. p. 509 ἃ.; Protag. p. 361 6.; derep.7 p.531e.; παρ᾽ ὧν βοηθεῖς, οὐδεμίαν λήψει χάριν, for παρὰ τούτων, οἷς κτὰ. Aeschin. f. lex. p. 48 (117); ef. Fritzsche, Ep. ad Rom. i. p. 237; [B. § 143, 11; W. 163 (154) sq.; but others refuse to recognize this rare species of attraction in the N. T.; cf. Meyer on Eph. i. 8]). The foll. expressions, however, can hardly be brought under this construction: τῆς χάριτος ἧς ἐχαρίτωσεν (as if for 7), Eph. i. 6 LT Tr WH; τῆς κλήσεως, ἧς ἐκλήθητε, Eph. iv. 1; διὰ τῆς παρακλήσεως ἧς παρακαλούμεθα, 2 Co. i. 4, but must be explained agreeably to such phrases as χάριν χαριτοῦν, κλῆσιν καλεῖν, etc., [(. e. aceus. of kindred abstract subst.; ef. W. § 32, 2; B. § 131, 5)]; ef. W.[and B.u.s.]. β. The noun to which the relative refers is so conformed to the case of the relative clause that either aa. it is itself incorporated into the relative construction, but without the article [B. §143,7; W. § 24, 2b.]: ὃν ἐγὼ ἀπεκεφάλισα ᾿Ιωάννην, οὗτος ἠγέρθη, for ᾿Ιωάννης, ὃν κτλ. Mk. vi. 16; add, Lk. xxiv. 1; Philem. 10; Ro. vi. 17; εἰς ἣν οἰκίαν, ἐκεῖ, i. 4. ἐν τῇ οἰκίᾳ, εἰς ἥν, Lk. ix. 4: or BB. it is placed before the relative clause, either with or without the article [W. § 24, 2a.; B.§ 144, 13]: τὸν ἄρτον ὃν κλῶμεν, οὐχὶ κοινωνία τοῦ σώματος, 1 Co. x. 16; λίθον ὃν ἀπεδοκίμασαν οἱ οἰκοδομοῦντες, οὗτος ἐγενήθη (for ὁ λίθος, ὃς κτλ.), Mt. xxi. 42; Mk. xii. 10; Lk-xx. 17; 1 Pet. i. 7. y- Attraction in the phrases ἄχρι ἧς ἡμέρας for ἄχρι τῆς ἡμέρας, 7 [W. § 24, 1 fin.]: Mt. xxiv. 38; Lk. i. 20; xvii. 27; Acts i. 2; ἀφ᾽ ἧς ἡμέρας for ἀπὸ τῆς ἡμέρας, 7, Col. i. 6, 9; ὃν τρόπον, as, just as, for τοῦτον τὸν τρόπον ὅν or ᾧ, Mt. xxiii. 37; Lk. xiii. 34; Acts vii. 28 ; [preceded or] foll. by οὕτως, Acts i. 11; 2 Tim. iii. 8. δ. A noun common to both the principal clause and the relative is placed in the relative clause after the relative pron. [W. 165 (156)]: ἐν ᾧ κρίματι κρίνετε, κριθήσεσθε, for κριθ. ἐν τῷ κρίματι, ἐν ᾧ κρίνετε, Mt. vii. 2; xxiv. 44; Mk. iv. 24; Lk. xii. 40, ete. 3. The Neutero a. refers to nouns of the masculine and the feminine gender, and to plurals, when that which is denoted by these nouns is regarded as a thing [οἵ. Β. § 129, 6]: λεπτὰ δύο, 6 ἐστι κοδράντης, Mk. xii. 42; ἀγάπην, 6 ἐστι σύνδεσμος, Col. iii. 14 L T Tr WH; ἄρτους, 6 ete. Mt. xii. 4 L txt. T Tr WH. b. is used in the phrases [B. u.s.]— 6 ἐστιν, which (term) signifies: Boavepyés 6 ἐστιν υἱοὶ Bp. Mk. iii. 17; add, v. 41; vii-11, 34; i. 23; Mk. xv. 34; Jn. i. 38 (39), 41 (42) sq.; ix. 7; xx. 16. c. refers to a whole sentence [B. u.s.]: τοῦτον ἀνέστησεν ὁ θεός, οὗ .. . ἐσμὲν μάρτυρες, Acts ii. 32; iii. 15; περὶ ov . .. ὁ λόγος, Heb. v. 11; ὃ καὶ ἐποίησαν (and the like), Acts xi. 30; Gal. ii. 10; Col. i. 29; 6 (which thing viz. that I write a new commandment [cf. B. § 143, 87) ἐστιν ἀληθές, 1 Jn. 11. 8; 6 (sc. to have one’s lot assigned in the lake of fire) ἐστιν ὁ θάνατος ὁ δεύτερος, Rev. xxi. 8. 4. By an idiom to be met with from Hom. down, in the second of two codrdinate clauses a pronoun of the third person takes the place of the relative (cf. Passow ii. p. 552°; [L. and S.s. v. B. 1V.1]; B.§ 143, 6; [W. 149 (141)]): ὃς ἔσται ἐπὶ τοῦ δώματος καὶ τὰ σκεύη αὐτοῦ ἐν τῇ οἰκίᾳ μὴ καταβάτω, Lk. xvii. 31; ἐξ οὗ τὰ πάντα καὶ ἡμεῖς εἰς αὐτόν, 1 Co. viii. 6. 5. Sometimes, by a usage esp. Hebraistic, an oblique case of the pronoun αὐτός is introduced into the relative clause redundantly ; as, ἧς τὸ θυγάτριον αὐτῆς, Mk. vii. 25; see αὐτός, II. 5. 6. The relative pron. very often so includes the demonstrative οὗτος or ἐκεῖνος that for the sake of perspicuity a demons. pron. must be in thought supplied, either in the clause preceding the relative clause or in that which follows it [W. § 23, 2; B. 8137, 5]. The foll. examples may suffice: a. a demons. pron. must be added in thought in the preceding clause: οἷς ἡτοίμασται, for τούτοις δοθήσεται, ois Wr. Mt. xx. 23; δεῖξαι (sc. ταῦτα), ἃ δεῖ γενέσθαι, Rev. 1.1; xxii. 6; 6 for ἐκεῖνος ᾧ, Lk. vii. 43,47; ov for τούτῳ ov, Ro. x. 14; with the attraction of ὧν for τούτων ἅ, Lk. ix. 36; Ro. χν. 18 ; ὧν for ταῦτα ὧν, Mt. vi. 8; with a prep. intervening, ἔμαθεν ἀφ᾽ ὧν (for ἀπὸ τούτων ἃ) ἔπαθεν, Heb. v. 8. Ὄ. a demons. pron. must be supplied in the subsequent clause: Mt. x. 38; Mk. ix. 40; Lk. iv.6; ix. 50; Jn. xix. 22; Ro. ii. 1,and often. 7. Sometimes the pur pose and end is expressed in the form of a relative clause (cf. the Lat. qui for ut is): ἀποστέλλω ἄγγελον, ὃς (for which Lehm. in Mt. has καί) κατασκευάσει. who shall ete. i. q. that he may ete., Mt. xi. 10; Mk. i. 2; Lk. vii. 27; [1 Co. ii. 16]; so also in Grk. auth., cf. Passow 8. v. VIII. vol. ii. p. 553; [L. and S.s.v. B. IV.4]; Matthiae § 481, d.; [Kithner ὃ 563, 3 b.; Jelf § 836, 4; B. § 139, 32];—or the cause: ὃν παραδέχεται, because he acknowledges him as his own, Heb. xii. 6 ;— or the relative stands where ὥστε might be used (cf. Matthiae § 479 a.; Kriiger § 51, 13, 10; [Kiihner § 563, 8 6.7; Passow s. v. VIII. 2, ii. p. 553°; [L. and 5. u.s.]): Lk. v. 21; vii. 49. 8. For the interrog. ris, τί, in indirect questions (ef. Ellendt, Lex. Soph. ii. 372; [ef. B. § 139, 587) : οὐκ ἔχω ὃ παραθήσω, Lk. xi. 6; by a later Grk. usage, in a direct quest. (cf. W. § 24, 4; B. § 139, 59): ἐφ᾽ ὃ (or Ree. ἐφ᾽ ᾧ) πάρει, Mt. xxvi. 50 (on which [and the more than doubtful use of és in direct quest.] see ἐπί, B. 2 a. ¢. p. 233” and C. I. 2 g. y. aa. p. 235°). 9. Joined to a preposition it forms a periphrasis for a conjunction [B. 105 (92)]: ἀνθ᾽ ὧν, for ἀντὶ τούτων ort, — because, Lk. i. 20; xix. 44; Acts xii. 23; 2 Th. ii. 10; for which reason, wherefore, Lk. xii. 3 (see dvri,2d.); ἐφ᾽ ᾧ, for that, since (see ἐπί, B. 2a. 8. p. 233°); Heb. vii. 2; 6 ἐστι μεθερμηνευόμενον, and the like: Mt. | ἀφ᾽ οὗ, (from the *ime that), when, since, Lk. xiii. 25 xxiv. 21, [see ἀπό, I. 4 b. p. 5857; ἄχρις οὗ, see ἄχρι, 1 ἃ.; ἐξ οὗ, whence, Phil. iii. 20 cf. W. 821,8; [Β.8.148,4.Δ.7; ἕως ov, until (see ἕως, 11. 1 Ὁ. a. p. 268”); also μέχρις οὗ, Mk. xiii. 30; ἐν 6, while, Mk. ii. 19; Lk. v.34; Jn. v. 7; ἐν οἷς, meanwhile, Lk. xii. 1; [οἷς ἐν, I. 8 e.]. 10. With particles: ὃς ἄν and ὃς ἐάν, whosoever, if any one ever, see ἄν, II. 2 and ἐάν, II. p. 163°; οὗ ἐάν, wheresoever (whithersoever) with subjunc., 1 Co. xvi. 6 [ef. B. 105 (92)]. ὅς ye, see γέ, 3. ὃς καί, who also, he who, (cf. Klotz ad Devar. ii. 2 p. 636): Mk. iii. 19; Lk. vi. 13 sq. ; x. 39 [here WH br. 7]; Jn. xxi. 20; Acts i.11; vii. 45; x. 39 [Rec. om. καί]; xii. 4; xiii. 225 xxiv. 6; Ro. v. 2; 1 Co. xi. 23 ; 2 Co. iii. 6; Gal. ii. 10; Heb. i. 2, ete.; ὃς καὶ αὐτός, who also himself, who as well as others: Mt. xxvii. 57. ὃς δήποτε, whosoever, Jn. v. 4 Rec.; ὅσπερ [or ὅς περ L Tr txt.], who especially, the very one who (cf. Kloiz ad Devar. ii. 2 p. 724): Mk. xv. 6 [but here T WH Tr mrg. now read ὃν παρῃτοῦντο, q. V. |. 11. The genitive οὗ, used absolutely [ef. W. 590 (549) note; Jelf § 522, Obs. 1], becomes an adverb (first so in Attic writ., cf. Passow II. p. 546"; [Meisterhans § 50, 17); a. where (Lat. ubi): Mt. ii. 9; xviii.20; Lk. iv. 16 sq.; xxiii. 53; Acts i. 135 xii. 125; xvi. 13; xx.6[T Trmrg. ὅπου]; xxv. 10; xxviii. 14; Ro. iv. 15; ix. 26; 2 Co. iii. 17; Col. iii. 1; Heb. iii. 9; Rev. xvii. 15; after verbs denoting motion (see ἐκεῖ, b.; ὅπου, 1 b.) it ean be rendered whither [cf. W. 8.54, 7; B. 71 (62)], Mt. xxviii. 16; Lk. χ. 1; xxiv. 28; 1 Co. xvi. 6. Ὁ. when (like Lat. ubi i.qg. 60 tempore quo, quom): Ro. v. 20 (Eur. Iph. Taur. 320), [but al. take οὗ in Ro. ]. 6. locally]. ὁσάκις, (ὅσος), relative adv., as often as; with the addition of ἄν, as often soever as, 1 Co. xi. 25 sq. [RG; cf. W. 8 42, 5a.; B. § 139, 34]; also of ἐάν, [LT Tr WH in 1 Co. l.e.]; Rev. xi. 6. [(Lys., Plat., al.)]

ὅς hos 1x

who, which, what, that, Mt. 1:16, 23, 25; in NT interrog. ἐφ’ ὅ, wherefore, why, Mt. 26:50; in NT ὅς μὲν ... ὅς δέ, for ὁ μὲν ... ὁ δέ, Mt. 21:35; 2 Cor. 2:16

ὅς, ἥ, ὅ, the postpositive article (ἄρθρον ὑποτακτικόν). As demonstr. pron. = οὗτος, ὅδε, this, that, also for αὐτός, chiefly in nom.: ὅς δέ, but he (cf. ἦ δὲ ὅς, freq. in Plat.), Mk 15:23, Jo 5:11; ὃς μὲν . . . ὃς δέ, the one . . . the other, Mt 21:35 22:5 25:15, Lk 23:33, Ac 27:14, Ro 14:5, I Co 11:21, II Co 2:16, Ju 22; neut., ὃ μὲν . . . ὃ δέ, the one . . . the other, some . . . some, Mt 13:8, 23, Ro 9:21; ὃς (ὃ) μὲν . . . (ἄλλος (ἄλλο)) . . . ἕτερος (-ο), Mk 4:4, Lk 8:5, I Co 12:8-10; οὓς μέν, absol., I Co 12:28; ὃς μὲν . . . ὁ δέ, Ro 14:2.

As relat. pron., who, which, what, that; agreeing in gender with its antecedent, but differently governed as to case: Mt 2:9, Lk 9:9, Ac 20:18, Ro 2:29, al. mult.

In variation from the common construction; in gender, agreeing with a noun in apposition to the antecedent: Mk 15:16, Ga 3:16, Eph 6:17, al.; constr. ad sensum: Jo 6:9, Col 2:19, I Ti 3:16, Re 13:14, al.;

in number, constr. ad sensum: Ac 15:36, II Pe 3:1;

in case, by attraction to the case of the antecedent (Bl., § 50, 2): Jo 4:18, Ac 3:21, Ro 15:18, I Co 6:19, Eph 1:8, al.

The neut. ὅ with nouns of other gender and with phrases, which thing, which term: Mk 3:17 12:42, Jo 1:39, Col 3:14, al.; with a sentence, Ac 2:32, Ga 2:10, I Jo 2:8, al.

With ellipse of a demonstrative (οὗτος or ἐκεῖνος), before or after: before, Mt 20:23, Lk 7:43, Ro 10:14, al.; after, Mt 10:38, Mk 9:40, Jo 19:22, Ro 2:1 al.

Expressing purpose, end or cause: Mt 11:10 (who = that he may), Mk 1:2, He 12:6 al.

C. prep. as periphrasis for conjc.: ἀνθ’ ὧν ( = ἀντὶ τούτων ὧν), because, Lk 1:20, al.; wherefore, Lk 12:3; ἐφ’ ᾧ, since, for that, Ro 5:12; ἀφ’ οὗ, since (temporal), Lk 13:25; ἐξ οὗ, whence, Phl 3:20; etc.

With particles: ὃς ἄν (ἐάν), v.s. ἄν, ἐάν; ὃς καί, Mk 3:19, Jo 21:20, Ro 5:2, al.; ὃς καὶ αὐτός, Mt 27:57.

Gen., οὗ, absol., as adv. (v.s. οὗ).

ος is found as a demonstrative pronoun in P Ryl II. 14415 (complaint of assault—a.D. 38) ὃς δὲ ἐκ τοῦ ἐναντίου ἄλογον ἀηδίαν μοι ἐπιχειρήσας παρεχρήσατό μοι πολλὰ καὶ ἄσχημα, ‘“whereupon he opposing me made a brutal and odious attack upon me and subjected me to much shameful mishandling” (Edd.): cf. Mk 15%, Jn 51. For ὃς μέν... ὃς δέ, “the one . . the other,” as in Mt 21° a/., see P Oxy IX. 1189? (c. A.D. 117) ἐπιστολὰς δύο ds ἔγραψα ἣν μὲν σοὶ ἣν δὲ Σαβείνῳ, and for ὃς δέ solétarium see PSI. IV. 313° (iii/iv A.D.) with the editor’s note. Ὃς ἄν (ἐάν) c. conj. = ‘‘ whosoever ” may be illustrated Ly P Par 4622 (B.c. 153) (= Witkowski*, p. 87), περὶ dv ἂν βούληι γράφε, P Grenf I. 30% (B.c. 103) ἐφ} οἷς ἂν οὖν ὑμῶν προσδέωνται, P Oxy IV. 743%% (B.C. 2) ἐν ols ἐὰν σοῦ προσδέηται, °° ὑπὲρ ὧν ἐὰν θέλῃς. For the comparative usage of ὃς ἄν and ὃς ἐάν, see Thackeray Gr. i. p. 68, cited s.v. ἄν. The relative preceding its ‘‘ antecedent ’’ is common, e.g. P Amh II. 3518 (B.c. 132) τῶν ἐκφορίων ἧς yewpγοῦσι ἱερᾶς γῆς Σοκνοπαίου θεου μεγάλου, ‘the rents of the land sacred to the great god Soknopaeus which they cultivate”’ (Edd.). Pleonastic ὅς is seen in P Ryl II. 160% (a.p. 28-9) ov G , οσακις (2. ὧν) τὰ μέτρα ὅλης τῆς οἰκίας καὶ αὐλῆς ἃ πρόγειται, ‘of which the measurements and adjacent areas of the whole house and court are as aforesaid’’ (Edd.). Cf. also P Oxy I. 117! (ΜΠ a.p.) ἐξ ὧν δώσεις τοῖς παιδίοις σου ἕν ἐξ αὐτῶν, ‘one of which please give to your children” (Edd.). A few exx. may be cited of ὅς with prepositions—P Petr II. 40 (a)? (iii/B.c.) (= III. p. 149, Witkowski’, p. 42) ag’ οὗ (cf. Lk 132) ἡ ἐλεφαντηγὸς κατεποντίσθη, BGU I. 252° (A.D. 98) ἀφ᾽ ἧς (sc. ἡμέρας, cf. the ellipsis of ὥρας in Lk 7*°) [ἐὰ]ν ἀπα[ι]τ[η]θῇ : P Petr 17. 11 (1)8(iii/B.c.) (= Selections, p. 8) γράφε δ᾽ ἡμῖν καὶ σύ, ἵνα εἰδῶμεν ἐν οἷς εἶ, P Tebt 1. 5811 (B.c. 111) (= Witkowski’, p. 104) ἐν οἷς εἰσιν (“ἴῃ quo numero comprehenduntur’’) οἱ διὰ τοῦ νομοῦ κω(μο)γρίαμματεῖς): P Oxy VII. 10278 (i/A.p.) ἐξ οὗ καὶ ἐξεχομένου μου τῆς τῶ[ν] ἠνεχυρασμένων προσβολῆς, “‘when I therefore pursued my right of entry upon the transferred property ” (Ed.): P Amh II. 3115 (B.c. 112) ἐφ᾽ ὧι (cf. Rom 515) ταξαμένη ἕξει ἐν φυτείαι τὸν τόπον φοίνιξι, ‘on the understanding that, having paid this sum, she shall retain the plot planted with palms” (Edd.), P Oxy II. 286%? (a Ὁ. 82) ἐφ᾽ ois ἄλλοις ἡ ἀσφάλεια περιέχει, “* with the other guarantees contained in the agreement” (Edd.): BGU III. 8461? (ii/A.D.) (= Selections, p. 94) παιπαίδδευμαι, καθ᾽ ὃν δῖ (= δεῖ, Wilcken) τρόπον, ‘punished I have been, as I deserve’’: and P Ryl II. 14428 (a.p. 38) ὑπὲρ οὗ ἔχω πρὸς αὐτὸν ἐνεχύρου, ‘concerning a pledge I have against him” (Edd. ). Tis is used for ὅς in BGU III. 8225 (iii/a.p.) εὗρον yeo(= w)pydv, τίς αὐτὰ ἑλκύσῃ, ἀλλὰ τὰ σπέρματα τίς διδοῖ :—a usage of which there is no instance in the NT. On the other hand Radermacher (Gy. p. 63 note) finds in Mt 265° ἑταῖρε, ἐφ᾽ ὃ πάρει the earliest ex. of ὅς in place of the interrogative τίς, and refers to Usener Der hi. Tychon, p. 50. He thus supports the AV rendering of Mt Zc.: cf. Sharp ict. p. 41 f. For another suggestion see Rendel Harris, Axp T xxxv. p. 523 f. In MGr 8s is rarely used even in writing, and has disappeared in common speech: ‘‘so simple a form ceased to satisfy the desire for emphasis” (Jebb in Vincent and Dickson, Handbook to Modern Greek, p. 302). It survives in the compound ἐνῷ, ‘‘ during,” *‘ while” (cf. ἐν @ Mk 215, Lk 5™, Jn 57).

ὅς (hos, hē) — which. ὅς, ἥ, ὅ,

genitive οὗ, ἧς, οὗ, etc.; dative plural οἷς, αἷς, οἷς, etc.: Epic dialect forms, genitive ὅου (probably replacing Οο) in the phrases ὅου κλέος οὔ ποτ᾽ ὀλεῖται [Refs 8th c.BC+]; feminine ἕης [Refs 8th c.BC+]; elsewhere only ἧς [Refs]; dative plural οἷς, οἷσι, ᾗς, ᾗσι (never αἷς or αἷσι in [Refs 8th c.BC+] — _pronoun_ used, __A as demonstrative by the side of οὗτος, ὅδε, and the Article ὁ, ἡ, τό: in post-Homeric Gr. this use survived only in a few special phrases. __B as a Relat. by the side of the Article ὅ, ἥ, τό (see. ὁ, ἡ, τό, c):—this demonstrative and Relat. pronoun must not be confounded with the Possess. ὅς, ἥ, ὅν. (With Gr. Relat. ὅς, ἥ, ὅ cf. Sanskrit Relat. yas, yā, yad, Lithuanian jis, ji (he, she), Oslav. i, ja, je (he, she, it).) __A DEMONSTR. PRON., ={οὗτος},{ὅδε}, this, that; also, he, she, it: __A.I Homeric usage: this form only occurs in the nominative masculine and neuter ὅς, ὅ, and perhaps nominative feminine ἥ and nominative plural οἵ, the other cases being supplied by ὁ, ἡ, τό (ὅ, ἡ, τό); most codices have ἥ in [Refs 8th c.BC+] before it, μηδ᾽ ὅν τινα γαστέρι μήτηρ κοῦρον ἐόντα φέροι, μηδ᾽ ὃς φύγοι [Refs 8th c.BC+]participle, εἰς ἕτερον γάρ τίς τε ἰδών.., ὃς σπεύδει (for ὅστις ἂν ἴδῃ, ὃς σπεύδει) [Refs 8th c.BC+] __A.II in later Gr. this usage remained in a few forms: __A.II.1 at the beginning of a clause, καὶ ὅς and he, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; καὶ ἥ and she, καὶ οἵ and they, [Refs 5th c.BC+] __A.II.2 ὃς καὶ ὅς such and such a person, [Refs 5th c.BC+] —here also the _Article_ supplied the oblative cases. __A.II.3 ἦ δ᾽ ὅς, ἦ δ᾽ ἥ, said he, said she, see at {ἠμί}. __A.II.4 in oppositions, where it sometimes answers to the Article, Λέριοι κακοί· οὐχ ὁ μέν, ὃς δ᾽ οὔ.. [Refs 6th c.BC+]; ὃ μὲν.., ὃ δὲ.., ὃ δὲ.. (neuter) [NT+4th c.BC+]: so in Doric dialect dative feminine as adverb, ᾇ μὲν.., ᾇ δὲ.. [Refs 4th c.BC+]: very frequently in late Prose, [Refs 2nd c.AD+]: also answering to other Prons., ἑτέρων.., ὧν δὲ.. [Refs 4th c.BC+] __B RELAT. PRON., who, which.—By the side of the simple Relat., ὅς, ἥ, ὅ (in [Refs 8th c.BC+] __A0USAGE of the Relat. pronoun (the following remarks apply to ὅς γε, ὅσπερ, ὅστε, ὅστις, as well as to ὅς, and to ὁ, ἡ, τό as relative): __A0.I in respect of CONCOR[Refs 4th c.BC+] —Prop. it agrees in gender and number with the Noun or _pronoun_ in the antecedent clause.—But this rule admits of many exceptions: __A0.I.1 the Relat. mayagree with the gender implied, not expressed, in the antecedent, φίλον θάλος, ὃν τέκον αὐτή [Refs 8th c.BC+]: so after collective Nouns, the Relat. is frequently put in plural in the gender implied in the Noun, λαόν.., οὕς.. [Refs 8th c.BC+]; στρατιάν.. τοιαύτην.., οἵ τινες.., τὸ ναυτικόν, οἵ.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]; especially after the names of countries or cities, Τηλέπυλον Λαιστρυγονίην ἀφίκανεν, οἳ.. (i. e. to Telepylos of the Laestrygonians, who.. ) [Refs 8th c.BC+] adjective, Θηβαίας ἐπισκοποῦντ᾽ ἀγυιάς, τάν.. the streets of Thebes, which.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]; τοὺς Ἡρακλείους παῖδας, ὃς.. the children of Heracles, who.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]of me whom.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]; τὸν ἥμισύν ἐστ᾽ ἀτελὴς τοῦ χρόνου· εἶθ᾽ ἧς πᾶσι μέτεστι.., where ἧς agrees with ἀτελείας implied in ἀτελής, [Refs 4th c.BC+] __A0.I.2 when the antec. Noun in singular implies a class, the Relat. is sometimes in plural, ἦ μάλα τις θεὸς ἔνδον, οἳ.. ἔχουσιν (for τις θεῶν, οἵ..) in some places, [Refs 5th c.BC+]; οὗ μέν.., οὗ δέ.. in some places.., in others.., [Refs 4th c.BC+] in what part of the earth, [Refs 5th c.BC+] __A0.I.2 in pregnant phrases, μικρὸν προϊόντες..,οὗ ἡ μάχη ἐγένετο (for ἐκεῖσε οὗ) [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ἀπιὼν ἐκ τῆς πόλεως, οὗ κατέφυγε (for οἷ κατέφυγε καὶ οὗ ἦν) [NT+5th c.BC+]: but in early writers this is falsa lectio, as in [Refs 4th c.BC+] __A0.II dative feminine ᾗ, Doric dialect ᾇ, of Place, where, or Manner, as, see at {ᾗ}. __A0.III old locative οἷ, as adverb, see at {οἷ}. __A0.III.2 old ablative (?) ὧ, in Doric dialect (compare ϝοίκω), τηνῶθε καθεῖλον, ὧ (whence) μ᾽ ἐκέλευ καθελεῖν τυ [Refs 5th c.BC+] __A0.IV accusative singular neuter ὅ, very frequently ={ὅτι}, that, how that, λεύσσετε γὰρ τό γε πάντες ὅ μοι γέρας ἔρχεται ἄλλῃ [Refs 8th c.BC+]; and so also, because, ταρβήσας ὅ οἱ ἄγχι πάγη βέλος [Refs] __A0.IV.2 in Attic dialect ὅ, for which reason, [Refs 5th c.BC+] __A0.IV.3 whereas, [NT+5th c.BC+] __A0.V ἀφ᾽ οὗπερ from the time that.., [Refs 4th c.BC+] __A0.VI ἐφ᾽ ᾧ, see at {ἐπί} [Refs 5th c.BC+]