Menu

85 Sermon Illustrations on Hero

85 illustrations Page 1 of 2

In Christian preaching, heroism often reflects godly courage, faith, and sacrifice, embodying Christlike character in ordinary and extraordinary lives (Hebrews 11:32-34). Illustrations use stories of historical figures, everyday saints, and modern examples of selflessness to portray how true heroes rise above trials and inspire faith and perseverance (2 Timothy 4:7).

Christian Rambo

Rev. Chris Brown, Christian “Rambo” -

Chris Brown was in Hawaii on his honeymoon. Drove their rental car through miles of sugar cane fields to swim at a deserted beach on Kauai. When they came back to the car, the windows were smashed and everything was stolen - credit cards, money.…. What Pastor Glenn Gunderson would have done is reported it to the police.

Chris is made of different stuff. He followed the tracks into the cane fields, spots two of the men, chases them down, grabs them, and twists their arms around them for 45 minutes. They finally told him where everything was - including stuff from other people - and Chris recovered it all. He’s a Christian Rambo - but dumb as a brick. Don’t do that where you live!

from Sermon - A Man After God's Own Heart · Rev. Glenn Gunderson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database hero

Magic: Hero, Yes Or No?

After basketball great Magic Johnson disclosed he was infected with the AIDS

virus, reactions differ. Hofmann says he is no hero because his promiscuous

lifestyle brought it on him, while Robbins says no one asks to get AIDS and he

has handled the disclosure with courage and tact. Johnson says he will become

a spokesman for AIDS. [1682]

*

from Daily Record · Joe Hofmann & Lenn Robbins via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Habits

In “Pulpit Digest” Williams H. Willimon used this illustration:

“Phillip Haille wrote of the little village of Le Chambon in France,a town whose people, unlike others in France, hid their Jews from the Nazis. Haille went there, wondering what sort of courageous, ethical heroes could risk all to do such extraordinary good. He interviewed people in the village and was overwhelmed by their ordinariness. They weren't heroes or smart, discerning people. Haille decided that the one factor that united them was their attendance, Sunday after Sunday, at their little church, where they heard the sermons of Pastor Trochme. Over time, they became by habit people who just knew what to do and did it. When it came time for them to be courageous, the day the Nazis came to town, they quietly did what was right. One old woman, who faked a heart attack when the Nazis came to search her house, later said, 'Pastor always taught us that there comes a time in every life when a person is asked to do something for Jesus. When our time came, we knew what to do.'“

True habits of the heart are there when they are most needed.

from Leadership · Williams H. Willimon via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database heroriskjews

The Baby Or the Window?

Mark 12:28

It was 99 degrees on a September day in San Antonio, when a 10-month-old baby girl was accidentally locked inside a parked car by her aunt. Frantically the mother and aunt ran around the auto in near hysteria, while a neighbor attempted to unlock the car with a clothes hanger. Soon the infant was turning purple and had foam on her mouth.

It had become a life-or-death situation when Fred Arriola, a wrecker driver, arrived on the scene. He grabbed a hammer and smashed the back window of the car to set her free.

Was he heralded a hero? He said, "The lady was mad at me because I broke the window. I just thought, What's more important - the baby or the window?"

Sometimes priorities get out of order, and a Fred Arriola reminds us what's important.

from Leadership · Ray Tiemann, Fredericksburg, Texas via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database hero

In Search of Heroes

Education in the past focused on exemplary lives – heroes – but modern society does all it can to debunk heroes. Biographies always find dirt on their subjects. Our children are being raised by an enemy culture interested in amusement, titillation and consumerism. Irreverence, skepticism and mockery permeate our scholarship and culture.

Sir Richard Livingstone, a 20th century educator, said, “True education is the habitual vision of greatness.”

Suggestions to correct the problem:

1. Portray old heroes as human beings, but let them remain heroic.

2. For a shabby age, find new heroes and heroines.

3. Give moral and ethical education the same importance as the

presentation of reality.

4. Be less mocking and disdainful of those in authority.

5. Hollywood and popular culture must be fought. It glorifies violence,

excitment and aberration.

6. Parents must try to make their lives exemplary for their children.

"Growing Up Is Hard To Do"

Travis Simpkins was neglected by an absent father who gave him "quality"

time instead of quantity time. Dads are always heroes in their kids' eyes;

Travis even invented stories about his dad to impress his friends. Dad rarely

sent child support and claimed birthday presents were lost in the mail. Son's

conclusion: it is better to do things right the first time around instead of

dreaming of second chances. Travis finds it hard to trust others now, and

ended up in Fulton County Jail awaiting trial armed robbery.

#2546

*

from Newsweek · Travis Simpkins via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database parentinghero

The Challenges Only Made Her Stronger

Acts 4:13

Inside each of us there is the desire to be a better person. Many of us would love to be more like Dr. Elizabeth Holland, a pediatrician from Memphis, Tennessee, who has served as a volunteer doctor for World Vision.

Once she treated patients in the middle of an African civil war, explains writer Robert Kerr. In 1985 she performed one appendectomy in which the “operating room” was a mud hut deep in the jungle of Zaire. The anesthetic was an animal tranquilizer, which ran out in the middle of the operation. Outside, MiG jets were dropping bombs. Every time a bomb hit, dirt from the mud hut fell down on them. She performed a virtual miracle considering the circumstances, and her patient lived.

During the Angolan civil war, Holland routinely saw 400 to 500 patients a day. “I frequently wrapped broken bones in magazines and used banana leafs for slings,” she said. Since food was in short supply, Holland ate a paste made from ground cassava-plant roots. “It tasted like glue,” said Dr. Holland. “The first few days, I thought I would die. But then I got to where it tasted pretty good. Sometimes when it rained we could get a few leaves from the trees to cook it in for variety.”

Across the Angolan border was a minefield that often killed or injured civilians; Holland would retrieve them. She said, “I learned if I got my nose down at ground level and crawled along on my stomach, I could see the mines. So I would make my way across, then throw the injured person over my shoulder and carry them out the same way I had come over.”

Maybe we will never be forced to persevere as Elizabeth Holland has, but each of us can grow in character.

First-person: Cal Jr. Gives Glimpse of New Kind of Hero

Luke 8:15

Willie Nelson’s heroes may have always been cowboys, but for many of us our heroes have always been baseball players. As hard as it is to admit, most of our heroes have not been lifestyle heroes. We have cheered for Mickey, Willie, and the Duke. We celebrated with Hank when he surpassed the Babe. We pulled for Pete to surpass Cobb.

Four decades ago, our heroes’ personal lives were virtually unknown to us. Our heroes were numbers on uniforms who performed on the field. We collected their cards from bubble gum packages and cereal boxes. This was as close as we were allowed to get. But this was typical of our society at large. Fifty years ago, millions of Americans hoped that Mr. Roosevelt would save us all. Yet, less than 50 percent of the American population even knew the president was paralyzed. He was not ever pictured that way.

We loved Mickey, but we didn’t realize he had a drinking problem. We loved Pete, but we had no way to know he was an addicted gambler. As teams have moved from city to city in search of bigger markets and as players have moved from team to team in search of bigger bank accounts, something seems to have been lost.

The days when Carl Yastremski belonged to Boston, Brooks Robinson to Baltimore and Willie Stargell to Pittsburgh seem to have vanished. The response of players when these questions have been asked has been, “We aren’t paid to be role models.” That’s probably true, but the reality is for many a young person in this country these players are role models.

The changes in baseball over the past four decades are indicative of changes in our country and culture at large — changes motivated by materialism, individualism and privatization. Changes that resulted in the Dodgers moving west, World Series night games, free agency, elongated contract disputes and striking players.

The future of baseball in the summer of 1995 has looked bleak — as bleak as other cultural and moral indicators around us. Yet in early September all of that seemed to stop. Cal Ripken Jr. equaled and surpassed the long-standing record of consecutive games played held by the great Lou Gehrig — a record that seemingly was unsurmountable. Yet, to everyone’s amazement Ripken played in 2,130 straight games to tie the record, and then 2,131 to break it — and he did it by dramatically hitting home runs in both games. More amazingly, he has played all of these games with the Baltimore Orioles, each day in pursuit of excellence with determined effort.

When the record was broken, the fans in Baltimore applauded spontaneously for 23 minutes. Baseball fans around the globe celebrated. Baseball players around the country, past and present, were visibly moved. Then came words of appreciation by our new hero. Surprisingly, they were words that praised his parents and teammates. There was little “I” and much “we.” Special words of appreciation were offered for Eddie Murray, an African American and a star in his own right. Then the touching tribute to his wife and children.

Before our very eyes from those whom we’ve come to expect grand self-promotion came clear testimonies to virtue, humility, loyalty, teamwork and community, family, racial harmony and dedicated hard work. What better example of the preacher’s words about faithful work, “whatever your hand finds to do, do it with all your might” (Eccl. 9:10). We offer our congratulations to Cal Ripken, Jr. Let’s hope we have seen the beginning of a new kind of hero.

====================

Dockery is vice president for academic administration and dean of the school of theology at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, Ky.

Copyright (c) 1995 Baptist Press

Why They Helped the Jews -Part 1

Job 29:12

What we can learn from the Righteous Gentiles of the Holocaust.

Michael Andre Bernstein notes that in his local video store, “There is now a shelf of films about both the Holocaust in particular and World War II in general. Its label reads, simply: ‘Videos in the Category of Schindler’s List’” (The American Scholar, August 1994).

For better or worse, it is undeniable that Steven Spielberg’s film has shaped the image of the Holocaust in the minds of millions of Americans. And in its depiction of the Nazi attempt to destroy the Jewish people, Schindler’s List has drawn attention to a group whose role in these terrible events should not be forgotten: the rescuers, those who risked their own lives to save Jews.

Most discussions of the Holocaust speak of two groups of people: Nazi perpetrators and Jewish (and other) victims. But the perpetrators and their intended victims were not, in fact, the only people on the scene during the Holocaust. Three main groups actually can be identified: killers, victims, and bystanders, a small but significant number of whom became rescuers.

Think about it in terms of the following numbers: The Holocaust was carried out by a relatively small number of German officials, in the thousands. Their task was to find and kill as many of the Jews in Europe as they could, a number they estimated at 11 million (it was actually closer to 9 million). These Jews were scattered in some two-dozen European nations, with a total population exceeding 300 million. Thus the Holocaust was a triangular affair involving several thousand Germans trying to find and kill several million Jews dispersed among approximately 300 million non-Jews. More than 90 percent of these non-Jews would have described themselves as Christians.

The behavior of this huge group of Christian bystanders was crucial. Both the perpetrators and the intended victims actively sought their help. The killers wanted collaborators, people who would help them annihilate the Jews. The victims needed rescuers, people who would help them avoid annihilation. The situation-and sometimes particular Germans and particular Jews asking for help-forced these bystanders to decide how to relate to both killers and victims. Their choices were momentous ones that both cost and saved human lives.

How did the Christian bystanders actually behave during the Holocaust? A small minority helped to destroy Jews, who were killed not only by Germans, but by people from several other nations as well. The great majority sought refuge in neutrality. The problem with this response was that while the Germans could tolerate bystanders who were “neutral” (neutrality, in effect, meant complicity), Jews almost always needed the active intervention of their non-Jewish neighbors to survive. Another small minority risked their own lives and the lives of their families to help Jews survive. Jews call these people “the Righteous Gentiles of the Holocaust” or “Christian rescuers.”

THE RIGHTEOUS GENTILES

The Righteous Gentiles are honored as heroes in Israel and everywhere Jews commemorate the Holocaust. At the Holocaust memorial and museum in Israel, Yad Vashem, thousands of evergreen carob trees have been planted in what is called the “Garden of the Righteous.” Each tree is planted in honor of a Gentile rescuer. After rigorous research to determine that a person qualifies as a rescuer, Israel’s custom has been to fly the honoree to Israel for a solemn recognition ceremony.

More than 11,000 rescuers have been officially honored. The name of each verified rescuer can be found not only in Israel but now also in the U.S. Holocaust Museum in Washington on a striking display that will be continually updated. There is a research department at Yad Vashem that works solely on the recognition of rescuers. Mordecai Paldiel, who heads this office, has told me that circumstances will make it impossible for Yad Vashem to be able to identify all who aided Jews during the war. His conservative estimate is that at least 100,000 non-Jews acted to rescue Jews during the war, and that each rescuer, on average, helped one Jew to survive. Thus, at least 100,000 Jews, and probably more, lived to see the end of World War II because of the actions of non-Jewish rescuers. Paldiel’s task is to find and honor as many of these rescuers as possible-and then to help perpetuate their memory on behalf of the nation of Israel.

RESCUERS AND THE CHURCH

But what should Christians remember about the rescuers, and what can we learn from them? While Yad Vashem continues its work, rescuer research elsewhere is also booming. Social scientists are studying rescuers, probing background, character, and motivation. Rescuers and rescued are writing their autobiographies. Newspaper stories about one rescuer or another seem to appear almost daily. There is only one problem: almost no Christians are involved in rescuer research and analysis.

The reason this is a problem is that, as many Jews have noted, the rescuers are “our” heroes. The great majority of them were self-identified Christians, which is fully to be expected of people who lived in what was once called Christian Europe. Jews call them “Christian rescuers” and for years have wondered why the church pays so little attention to them. Is it that taking notice of Christian rescuers also requires us to take notice of the many more Christians who stood by and watched or even actively participated in the killing?

Yet it is precisely this tragic mix of Christian behavior during the Holocaust that ought to attract the attention of Christian scholars and others who care about the quality of our discipleship. Spread before us is an extraordinarily well-documented case study in Christian morality. We see some Christians courageously and compassionately saving Jews; we see other Christians turning Jews away; we see still others brutally murdering Jews. We also see each kind of action done explicitly in the name of Jesus.

Questions abound. Why was there this range of Christian behavior? How were rescuers different from nonrescuing Christians? Was it something about their faith, or upbringing, or personality? The contemporary applications are obvious: What can the church do today to nurture the kinds of people who will act with compassion and courage on behalf of others rather than do nothing or participate in evil?

For several years I have been engaged in a study of the Righteous Gentiles of the Holocaust. Here are some of the major questions I have asked and some of the answers I have discovered: Who were the rescuers? Rescuers were men and women from every nation in Nazi-dominated Europe. They were rich and poor, young and old, people from all social classes and occupations. When politically affiliated, rescuers tended to be involved more with democratic and leftist groups than with rightist parties, but they could be found all across the political spectrum. Essentially, rescuers represented a cross section of European society at the time. Who would become a rescuer could not be predicted by any measure that sociologists use. This finding has often led me to wonder who the rescuers would be among my friends, students, colleagues, and family, and to know that the answer to that question would undoubtedly surprise me. Only God knows our hearts (Luke 16:15).

Were rescuers committed Christians and nonrescuers not? No such claim can be sustained. How encouraging it would be for Christians if it could be reported that rescuers were Christians, or committed Christians, or evangelicals, and nonrescuers not. But research shows that rescuers do not appear to have differed from nonrescuers on any test of religiosity, including self-identification as a Christian and level of religious commitment. The hard truth is that what Jesus seeks is believers who will live like disciples, doing what he taught us to do, such as acting on behalf of “the least of these” (Matt. 25:31-46). When people are in need, it is especially clear that it is the quality of our practice of the Christian life that is relevant, not the quantity of religious zeal that we announce. Jesus said as much: “Not every one who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven” (Matt. 7:21).

Were rescuers raised differently from nonrescuers? There is some tantalizing evidence along these lines. Several studies, notably a work by Samuel and Pearl Oliner (The Altruistic Personality, 1988), have compared the childhood socialization of rescuers and nonrescuers. In greater proportion than nonrescuers, though not universally, rescuers tended to be close to their parents and to be treated with warmth and affection. They report less physical punishment and more reasoning as a form of discipline. Many had parents who both taught and modeled caring responses to others in need, as well as outrage at social and political injustice. More rescuers than nonrescuers were taught the universal (rather than “just for my group”) applicability of moral principles such as justice and love.

All of this evidence reinforces fundamental Christian convictions about the centrality of the family and the awesome responsibilities and opportunities of Christian parents (Deut. 6:6-9; Eph. 6:4). It also says something about what exactly we should be teaching our children.

Were rescuers people of a certain kind of character or personality type? Anyone who watched Schindler’s List learned of the less-than-sterling character of the high-living and adulterous Oskar Schindler. Yet here was a man who, in the moral crucible of the Holocaust, forged a relentless commitment to rescuing innocent Jews. All of this is to say that there was no single rescuer character type, nor were rescuers uniformly paragons of virtue.

Research has revealed some interesting tendencies, however. Rescuers are more likely to have been people with a strong sense of social responsibility and capacity to empathize with suffering people. They also tend to demonstrate a consistent commitment to helping needy people, before and after the Holocaust as well as during it.

Rescuers tended to be people with a healthy self-esteem and a sense of independence and competence. Perhaps this enabled them to believe that they could actually disobey the Third Reich and live to tell about it. Some rescuers appear to have been adventuresome types, and others drew upon a sense of social marginality as a resource for compassion. Another mark of rescuer character is the nearly universal unwillingness to accept praise for their deeds. “It is what anyone would have done,” they say of behavior that almost no one did. For them, to rescue Jews was the perfectly natural and obvious course of action. People needed help, so help was offered. Such actions and attitudes, in the face of death, are an expression of marvelously well-formed character (Luke 6:43-45) and a model for the church today.

[see part 2, #3546]

Why They Helped the Jews -Part 2

Luke 10:33

[For part 1, see #3545]

What motivated the rescuers of Jews during World War II? Rescuers have given a wide variety of answers to the question of what motivated them. Here are the major reasons for rescue that have been cited:

* Personal ties with Jews. A significant number of rescuers acted, at least in part, on the basis of a personal relationship with a particular Jew in need. Rescuers were more likely to have been people who had Jewish friends before the Holocaust, not because they had greater opportunity to make such friends, but because they were more open to such friendships. These friendships then bore fruit during the Holocaust, as rescuers “laid down their lives,” sometimes literally, for their Jewish friends (John 15:13). We see the moral importance of friendship, and of Christian openness to diverse kinds of friends. Jesus was one who could be found at the home of nearly anybody, from tax collector to sinner to Pharisee (Matt. 9:10-11). Do we cross social boundary lines, including the stranger among us, the way he did?

* Group influence. Some rescuers report that they saved Jews because of the moral example or exhortation of a group that was important to them. Such groups included family, friends, church groups or subgroups, resistance networks, neighbors, or community leaders. Western ethics long has built its theories around the lone individual making moral decisions based upon rational considerations. But anyone who has lived among people rather than as a hermit knows that we are indeed profoundly influenced in our decisions by those whose opinions matter to us. Perhaps we ought to ponder who those influential people and groups are in our lives and whether each merits the place it occupies. As well, we ought to ask whether the church can recover its appropriate role as such a community of moral action and accountability.

* Patriotism and political convictions. A considerable number of rescuers acted on the basis of patriotism and various other political convictions. This occurred in Germany, where a patriotism that led to rescue was both countercultural and a capital crime. More often, it happened in lands under German occupation, such as Denmark and Holland, where the assault on the Jews was seen as an assault on a portion of that nation’s citizens as well as on national values. Those most likely to help Jews for patriotic reasons were people involved in underground resistance movements engaging in a wide range of anti-Nazi activities.

This finding helps to show the appropriateness of a life- and justice- affirming patriotism for Christians. A rightly conceived patriotism can be a powerful resource for right action. But the activities of other kinds of “patriots,” those who murdered the innocent in the name of their tribe or nation - and continue to do so today - demonstrate the extraordinary danger of an uncritical patriotism that will follow the nation’s leaders even into genocide. There are God-given limits on any appropriate Christian patriotism (Acts 5:29).

* Justice, care, and compassion. Rescue was quite often the instantaneous response of one individual to another in need. Rescuers sometimes employ the language of a principled commitment to justice and human rights when describing why they responded to the needy person as they did. Sometimes rescuers saw the outrageous mistreatment of a Jew and simply knew that they must personally redress such injustice. One hears the cry of outrage of the prophets in the voice of such rescuers. “Seek justice, rescue the oppressed, defend the orphan, plead for the widow” (Isa. 1:17).

Others talk about the moral obligation to care for people, especially those in need. These were often people who had been taught to be kind, merciful, and generous, to do something to help when help is needed. “But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds...and took care of him” (Luke 10:33-34).

A third group cannot give a reason why they helped, beyond the fact that they were simply moved to the depths of their being by the plight of a Jewish person or family desperately in trouble. They did not think about what to do; they simply acted with compassion to help those who needed help.

* Christian faith. A minority of rescuers tell researchers that they acted to rescue Jews on the basis of explicitly Christian motives. Of course, from a Christian perspective, every motive already listed has a place in the Christian life, as the biblical references show. But there were other motives that only the “religious” Christian rescuers cite.

For example, some Christians were influenced toward rescue by a sense of special religious kinship with Jews. This religious philo-Semitism particularly characterized rescuers from the theologically orthodox Reformed churches in the Netherlands and in France. This is an extraordinarily important finding for evangelicals, all of whom should be seeking to free Christian theology from the evil of anti-Semitism (Rom. 9:4-5) without compromising biblical faith in the process.

Devout Christian rescuers often cite the teachings of Jesus and other biblical texts as requiring them to rescue Jews. The most important of these for rescuers were the Golden Rule (Matt. 7:12), the story of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37), the double love command (Matt. 22:34-40), and the Great Judgment (Matt. 25:31-46). Some Christians saw that Nazism was an outbreak of the demonic that was completely irreconcilable with Christian faith. Their response was to rescue Nazism’s primary victims. A handful of Christian communities acted together to rescue Jews, such as the French Protestant village of Le Chambon. This community was especially influenced by the remembered experience of their own persecution at the hands of Catholic France, which led them to reach out to another persecuted religious community.

Once convinced that rescue was God’s will for them, Christians were sustained by the classic resources of Christian piety-prayer, worship, Bible study, and community support where that was available. Some Christians believed that they were under special providential care as they rescued, while others gained courage from the thought that if they were caught and killed for rescue, they would face God with a clear conscience. There are few forces more powerful than the faith of committed Christian men and women who know that they are doing the will of God and are empowered by God’s Spirit as they do it.

FOLLOWING JESUS CHRIST

Those of us who have pledged that Jesus Christ is our Lord must live in accordance with his teachings and conform our lives to his will and example (Matt. 7:21). This is what it means to call him Lord and to be his disciples. It was this same Lord Jesus who told his first disciples, “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me” (Matt. 16:24).

Can there be any doubt what Jesus would have done if a Jewish family came to his door and asked for his help in surviving the Holocaust? Can you imagine him turning that family away, or running off to get the Gestapo? Never. The Righteous Gentiles of the Holocaust were people who followed Jesus by the conduct of their lives. They bear witness to the church by their example. They ask us to consider whether we, too, are following Jesus Christ in the conduct of our lives.

________

David P. Gushee is assistant professor of Christian Ethics at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. This article is based on his new book, “The Righteous Gentiles of the Holocaust: A Christian Interpretation” (Fortress).

Copyright (c) 1994 Christianity Today, Inc./CHRISTIANITY TODAY Magazine

Macho Image, Sports, Parties, Degree Left Him Empty

Luke 6:46

The measure of manhood is Jesus Christ. Sound crazy? Sissy? Wimpy? That’s what I used to think. But I learned otherwise by seeking fulfillment in other ways.

Striving to find worldly acceptance, I sought to become the image of the rough, tough macho man. At the end of my quest, I felt confused and defeated. I may have looked big, but I was a weak-kneed, spineless jellyfish.

A chubby, slow, uncoordinated youngster, I grew up desperately seeking approval.

Though often jeered for my clumsy, slow-footed ways, my size worked to my advantage when I started putting my efforts into sports. But my red-letter day in elementary school came when I took on the toughest kid in class. I made this bully mad on the playground and he came running full speed at me.

Actually, I didn’t stand up to him. He scared me to death. Trembling, when he swung, I ducked. He missed and his momentum sent him flying over me.

Without realizing what I was doing, in the same motion I stood up and caught him with my shoulder. I tossed him in the air; he landed on his back, got up and slumped off, crying.

Suddenly I was the school hero. Though my success was a complete fluke, I thought, “Hey, look at the acceptance I got through fighting this guy.”

That launched my quest to become a “macho he-man” by building up my body to ultra-tough proportions. I thought being a man meant someone physically intimidating. I wanted to look so tough no one would challenge me to a fight.

It may sound simplistic to trace all my actions to a grade-school fight. But that was the turning point that set me on the path of “bigger means better.”

Years later I arrived at the University of Southern California boasting a 20-inch neck, 20-inch arms and a 54-inch chest. I used my physique to land a job as a bar bouncer, where I brawled regularly.

I amazed people with my physical stunts. Three times I wrestled bears standing as high as 7 feet, 4 inches and weighing 650 pounds. It was all a show, but my willingness to enter the ring impressed my fraternity brothers. I meant to prove I was the roughest, toughest, most fearless dude on campus. When I got drunk, I would run into 4-by-4 wooden stop signs and knock them over with a loud crack.

Even though I never started, and mainly warmed the bench, I was still one of the few walk-ons to stick with the varsity football team at USC. My willingness to mix it up with future NFL stars like Marcus Allen and Keith Van Horn earned more admiration in my social circles.

Besides persevering in football, my fraternity brought access to two of my primary dreams in life: great parties and lots of sorority sisters. In addition, I was on my way to earning a marketing degree from a dynamic business school.

Despite my physical exploits and campus status, I was bankrupt inside. There was a huge void inside — one only God could fill. My lifestyle covered up the insecurities, fear and failures gnawing at me. I wanted to be a man but didn’t know how. As time passed this void expanded through a steady diet of lust, pornography and immorality. I didn’t realize these things strip a man of purpose and responsibility. They made me feel even weaker.

Ironically, while I was partying away my college years, I called myself a Christian and belonged to a campus ministry. Finally, when USC made it to the Fiesta Bowl my senior year, things began to change. Upset over the hypocrisy and inconsistencies that plagued me, I aimlessly wandered the streets of Phoenix. Fortunately, I later wound up in a Christian gathering. The speaker was former LA Ram and Hall of Fame member Rosey Grier. Seeing through my counterfeit faith, he challenged me to get the sin out of my life.

The night he spoke I felt like laser beams were shooting out of his eyes toward me. The only way to serve God was to quit compromising, he said. The words stung with the force of a wooden stop sign against my nose.

As “fate” had it (there is no such thing, the Lord arranged it), Rosey spoke the following week at USC. He introduced me to my current pastor and an evangelist who spoke that night. As they counseled me, I saw that I had never understood what it means to be a disciple of Jesus Christ. I saw that Jesus was not in control of my life. From studies to athletics, work, social life and family, he must be “Lord of all or not at all.”

That’s when I repented and God’s power changed me. The void in my life vanished. For the very first time, I felt like a whole person. A real man.

This country is staggering through a leadership crisis. The times demand bold men of character who are not afraid to proclaim the Lord in the midst of a wicked, perverted society.

Everywhere, whether in business, politics or education, people are crying out, “Will somebody please take the lead?” Or, as Psalms 94:16b (New American Standard) asks, “Who will take his stand for me against those who do wickedness?”

Men are the foundational strength of any government. From family to workforce to public affairs, as men go, so goes the nation. As TV host Ben Kinchlow says, “Being male is a matter of birth. Being a man is a matter of choice.”

Going against peer pressure. That takes guts. Daring to be a role model by doing what is right in the sight of a holy God. That requires bravery. Courage stands out from the crowd instead of bowing to it.

God has placed in the heart of every man the deep, burning desire to be a hero, a champion and an overcomer. Men want to stand up, do what is right and achieve greatness. That is leadership by example instead of seeking out the latest polling data to make up your mind.

In recent years the world has warred against this type of thought. Critics sneer, “Oh, you just have a big ego and you want to feed it.”

But I’m here to say: God designed you with that ego. Not to exalt yourself or act like a “stud.” It is so he can provoke you to do great exploits for his glory.

Having an ego is natural, since it’s a gift from God. The ideal man is a hero. Women dream of a knight in shining armor who will appear at the right moment and whisk them off to safety.

It’s the same with young children, who are always eager to brag, “My dad can whip your dad” or “No one is as good as my dad.” In today’s divorce-filled climate, there are also the kids who cry, “I just wish I had a dad.”

Strong men, our society needs you!

================

Excerpted from “Warriors,” released this month by Broadman & Holman Publishers. Sirotnak is an evangelist based in Anaheim, Calif.; Walker is a free-lance writer in Louisville, Ky.

Copyright (c) 1995 Baptist Press — RNbp5911mrjB5911g6912

Editorial: the Burden of Celebrity

John 2:23

"I'm not an actor! I'm a movie star! I'm afraid." This declaration was made by the terrified Alan Swann, a swashbuckling Errol Flynn-like film star in Richard Benjamin's heart-warming "My Favorite Year" (1982). He had just learned moments before show time that the program he had gotten into wardrobe for was to be live television. When Benjy Stone, a long-time fan and young studio employee, tried to encourage Swann by reminding him of his previous successful films, the star replied, "Those are movies. Look at me! I'm flesh and blood. Life-size, no larger. I'm not that hero! Never was."

The dichotomy between hero and celebrity has always been with us. Ted Koppel recently noted in a baccalaureate address at Catholic University in Washington, D.C., that the dynamic role of television has caused our "false gods," or celebrities, to seem even more important than they did years ago.

We in the church -- especially those of us in the Christian music industry -- would do well to pay attention as our own celebrities struggle with their fame. The acknowledgment by two popular Christian musicians of an adulterous relationship (CT, June 20, 1994, p. 64) underscores the high stakes involved in the struggle. Regardless of whether they sought the burden of integrity that comes with fame, it fell on their shoulders the first time they performed before an audience. Fame, whether in religious or nonreligious circles, always comes with a high price tag.

All people successful in "public life" also have the public trust invested in them. The NBA's Charles Barkley may not desire to be a role model, but he is. Politicians may wish to avoid "the character issue," but they cannot. If you choose a profession that places you in the public eye, you will be measured by a higher standard. Those in Christian ministry are no different, yet they carry the added responsibility of a sacred trust -- ministering in the name of Christ. Consequently, Scripture calls for them to adhere to the highest standards of personal and professional conduct.

Nevertheless, a few people would argue that Christian musicians should have no greater standards imposed upon them than those expected of their counterparts in the pop, country, or jazz fields. The assumption behind this argument is that Christian music is essentially another form of entertainment. Such reasoning is fatally flawed. In the world of Christian music, the lyrics, the message, and the messengers themselves are founded on the higher, nobler call of spreading the gospel. We indeed entertain, but always for a greater purpose than amusement or pleasure.

Christian record companies are not churches. We do not ordain music ministries by a formal laying on of hands, and our artists are not required to attend seminary. But when Christian music is made and marketed, concerts are performed, videos made and aired, magazine ads designed, and articles published, the consumer is correct in presuming that someone, somewhere, has scrutinized the artist's life and beliefs. In the recruiting of church leaders, the pastoral epistles are clear. What is required is neither sophisticated theology, nor celibacy. Instead, what is important are words and deeds that give evidence of a life being transformed by Jesus Christ.

These expectations are not too great for our Christian musicians, and all of us in the industry need to do a better job of holding our artists and ourselves to these standards. When we begin to see and hear things that do not seem right, it is our responsibility to provide accountability, nurture, and, if necessary godly counsel and discipline.

What is not needed is more condemnation directed at those who falter and fail. All of us in the music industry must share the burden and perhaps even some of the responsibility for a fallen brother or sister. This would be a good time for every Christian music company -- indeed, any Christian organization that seeks publicity for its leaders -- to make sure it provides accountability for its "stars." Musicians who are new to the faith may need spiritual mentors. Artists may need to spend more time away from their careers in order to grow in other areas of their lives. And all who are connected with the industry need to maintain their focus on ministry. If anything, we should demand more of ourselves and raise our own expectations. To do otherwise would be to jeopardize the credibility of the Christian music industry.

It is not enough to permit fallen celebrities to disappear quietly from the stage or pull their recordings from play lists. Christians, functioning as a community of repentant sinners, must embrace the rigorous, lifelong process of redemption and restoration. Otherwise, we would have no hope this side of heaven of ever experiencing God's boundless, unmerited, and amazing grace.

At the end of "My Favorite Year," Alan Swann succeeds in making the perilous journey to becoming an authentic hero, in part because of Benjy Stone's belief in him along with his challenge to live up to those expectations. We should do no less than expect the best from each other.

***********************

Darrell A. Harris is president of Star Song Communications, a Christian recording and publishing company.

Copyright (c) 1994 Christianity Today, Inc./CHRISTIANITY TODAY Magazine

ctjul94mrw4T80195619

#3696

*

Davy Crockett's Motto

Mark 12:14

Davy Crockett's pocketwatch was found in the debris of the Alamo. The motto on the back read, "Be sure you're right, and go ahead."

[Holwick: this was quoted by California State Senator Tom McClintock in the recall election; he was a decided underdog. It could be taken two ways - a person who sticks to their guns no matter what will be considered a hero, or people who stick to their guns no matter what, end up slaughtered.]

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #6605]

from America Online News: Conservative Keeps Pledge To Stay In Recall Race via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database heroconfidencecourage

The Faithful

2 Chronicles 16:9

On any given week, three to five biographies make The New York Times list of best-selling non-fiction. Though historical biographies have changed with time, human interest in the genre is long-standing. The first known biographies were commissioned by ancient rulers to assure records of their accomplishments. The Old Testament Scriptures, detailing the lives of patriarchs, prophets, and kings, are also some of the earliest biographies in existence. Throughout the Middle Ages, such histories were largely in the hands of monks; lives of martyrs and church fathers were recorded with the intention of edifying readers for years to come. Over time and with the invention of the printing press, biographies became increasingly influential and widely read, portraying a larger array of lives and their stories.

In reading the accounts of men and women in history we find ourselves living in many places, hearing fragments of our own stories. The questions and thoughts we considered our own suddenly appear before us in the life of another. The afflictions we find wearying are given hope in the story of one who overcame much, or the life of one who found joy in the midst of loss. As Thomas Carlyle once noted, “Biography is the most universally pleasant and profitable of all reading.” We move toward it because we seem to know that life is too short to learn by our own experience.

And as Christians we are moved similarly. The most direct attempt in Scripture to define faith is done so by the writer of Hebrews. The eleventh chapter begins, “Now faith is being sure of what you hope for and certain of what you do not see” (11:1). It is a definition that has always somewhat eluded me, and I was thankful to read I'm not alone. (John Wesley once observed of the same words, “There appears to be a depth in them which I am in no wise able to fathom.”) But moving from this definition of faith, the writer of Hebrews immediately expands upon the weighty statement with a list of people who lived “sure of hope” and “certain of the unseen.” From Noah and Abraham, to Rahab and saints left unnamed, we find faith moving across the pages of history, the gift of God sparkling in the eyes of the faithful, the hope by which countless lives were guided. In this brief gathering of biographies, the writer seems to tell us that faith is better understood functionally than philosophically, that our own faith is more fully understood by looking at the lives of the faithful.

At the end of his compelling list, the writer of Hebrews concludes: “Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easily entangles, and let us run with perseverance the race marked out for us” (12:1). The lives of those who followed Christ before us urge us onward, strengthening our hearts with stories of faith, stirring our minds at the thought of God's universal sway, reminding us that He moves in our biographies and yet beyond them.

Amidst the chronicles of kings and kingdoms in some of the earliest recorded biographies, we are given this promise: “For the eyes of the LORD range throughout the earth to strengthen those whose hearts are fully committed to him” (2 Chronicles 16:9). Moved by the hearts of the faithful, may we be moved further into the arms of God.

________

Copyright © 2004 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #21983]

Star Trek and the Church: Why Media Matters

Last summer, a friend of mine visited the "Star Trek Experience" in Las Vegas. While immersing himself in all things Star Trek, he struck up a conversation with another visitor -- a truck driver from Reno.

Looking back on the experience, my friend realized that the conversation with its instant bond, common vocabulary, and vital interest in the subject was just like the experience that we as Christians call "fellowship."

This observation applies to more than just Star Trek fans. Popular culture, particularly electronic media, is increasingly the only thing that many Americans have in common -- our one binding experience -- and, as such, it has emerged as the principal shaper of American culture.

The process has been underway for nearly one hundred years. During the Battle of the Bulge, American sentries asked three questions designed to distinguish real Americans from German infiltrators. Two of the three questions were about popular culture -- an indication of the sway that sports, popular music, and movies held over the American imagination.

This hold wasn't exclusive, as seen in the results of a 1948 survey that asked Americans which figure they most wanted to emulate. Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Clara Barton topped the list with only fourteen percent of the respondents naming an entertainer.

But by 1986, every person in the top ten, save President Reagan, was a movie or television star. This survey illustrates the increasing hegemony of electronic media over American consciousness.

The emergence of this hegemony coincided with the weakening of other institutions that traditionally shaped what Americans thought and believed, like families, local communities, and especially churches.

It's not a coincidence that the institutions eclipsed by popular culture and electronic media were those that exercised moral authority and trafficked in norms and standards. Our culture had rejected both.

But rejecting these institutions isn't the same thing as rejecting what they traditionally provided -- ideas about morality and meaning. It simply means that something else, something probably ill-suited to the task, will have to take their place. That something is popular culture, especially movies, television, and music.

If the only thing electronic media did was provide Americans with shared references and experiences, it would be a cause for concern. But it does even more. It shapes our ideas about what's important and what a life worth living looks like. Stated another way, it answers the question I asked in my book: How Now Shall We Live?

Of course, it's hard to imagine someone less qualified to fulfill this function than the entertainment industry. But that's what's happened. And that's why it's imperative that Christians be concerned about more than vulgarity, sex, and violence in what we see and hear -- as important as these are. We need to understand both the messages contained in our popular culture and how media shapes our beliefs.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database televisionhero

Rediscovering Heroes: Greatness Among Us

Luke 17:10

The words hero and heroism fell into disfavor in the 1960s. Professors and students took pleasure in debunking the greats. Thomas Jefferson had a slave mistress. Ulysses S. Grant was a drunk. John Kennedy was an incorrigible womanizer. Columbus exploited native Americans.

Add to this deconstructionism, a major influence on college campuses. As Peter Gibbon writes in his recent book A CALL TO HEROISM, "Deconstructionists find the word hero meaningless. In their view, no one is selfless or noble. Behind every altruistic act is self-interest." As one observer noted, "It may be a reflection of our times that we cannot see unvarnished heroism without noticing the baseness that often lies just beneath the surface."

But just a year ago on a beautiful September morning, four teams of terrorists commandeered passenger planes turning them into weapons. "Ordinary" men and women sprang into action, and heroes emerged. To our credit, once we got over our surprise, we recognized them.

FACES OF GROUND ZERO, one of several coffee-table books about September 11, has a picture of Louie Cacchioli on the cover. Cacchioli was one of the firefighters who ran into the World Trade Center as it burned. "We were the first ones in the second tower after the plane struck," he wrote. "I was taking firefighters up the elevator to the twenty-fourth floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up, a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building." While Cacchioli was wrong about the bombs, he did rush inside and upstairs believing that there were bombs -- just a guy doing his job.

Peter Gibbon defines heroes using three criteria. Heroes accomplish something extraordinary; they show moral valor, especially in adversity; and they are "great souls" who lift us up through their high-minded, noble examples. These criteria place heroes in marked contrast with the ersatz "heroes" of the past few decades, the celebrities.

Raising money for the victims of September 11, actor and celebrity Tom Hanks reflected this: "Those of us here tonight are not heroes, or healers, or protectors of this great nation. We are merely artists ..." I couldn't agree more.

Catastrophic crimes like the attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon may not happen every day, thankfully. But every day police and fire departments answer calls that put officers and firefighters into harm's way. What changed is the condescension accorded to what are now being called "everyday heroes." Suddenly the middle-class, mostly white protectors of public safety are the kind of people Hillary Clinton wants to see on her Wheaties box -- a place of honor reserved for athletes. Heroes making sacrifices have not changed. We have changed -- we now recognize them.

Every hero, to be sure, is human and deeply marred by sin. Yet a life without heroes is an impoverished life, as the past three decades have taught us. Celebrities may hold our interest, but they have no ability to inspire us to live great lives. By contrast, heroes invite us to grow. Peter Gibbon writes, "They enlarge our imagination, teach us to think big, and expand our sense of the possible."

As we think again about the vicious attacks and the great deeds on a warm September day, we should develop renewed respect and gratitude for real heroism and for the real heroes in our midst.

FURTHER READING & INFORMATION

BreakPoint's "9/11 Worldview Resource Kit" answers questions many Americans are asking. It includes Timothy George's book IS THE FATHER OF JESUS THE GOD OF MUHAMMAD?, Chuck Colson's WHEN NIGHT FELL ON A DIFFERENT WORLD: HOW NOW SHALL WE LIVE?, and a "BreakPoint Weekend Special" CD including two interviews with Chuck Colson recorded after September 11 and a year later.

Marilyn Gardner, "Wanted: Someone to look up to," CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR, 18 July 2002 (a review of Peter Gibbon's A CALL TO HEROISM: RENEWING AMERICA'S VISION OF GREATNESS). http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0718/p19s01-bogn.html

________

Copyright © 2002 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database heroism

A Heart, A Cross, a Flag: What Arose From the Ashes

Luke 17:10

NEW YORK -- Everyone here now asks, "Where will you be?" They don't say "on Sept. 11." They don't have to. Everyone knows. Most everyone has a plan. Some people are leaving town. They just don't want to go through it again, through the nonstop TV and the weeping families and the memory of the smoke and the sound and the sight of it all. A lot of people are staying, of course. Those who are working, or going to school; those who can't leave, or won't. I'm one of the latter. I feel a kind of loyalty to that day, and those who suffered through it, and I'm not leaving.

So on Wednesday, on Sept. 11, 2002, I plan to walk across the Brooklyn Bridge before dawn. I will, as I pass under its two heavy stone towers -- the original twin towers of downtown Manhattan, and still the most beautiful -- reach out my hand and touch them lightly, as you would the arm of an old friend.

On the Manhattan side of the bridge I will make my way to Ground Zero, and watch the sun come up at dawn. I don't know why. I just want to see the new beginning of a new day at the place that was the World Trade Center. I want to see the sun rise and light the skyscrapers all around it.

I will carry in my pocket a little metal cross about two inches high, and a little metal heart the same size. They're twisted and bear burn marks, like pots left too long on the stove.

_____________________

One night after Sept. 11 I went to a church near the site. I poured coffee for construction workers and Con Ed guys on the overnight shift. A construction worker who'd been at the site since Sept. 11, first trying to find and save people, then trying to clean up, walked up to me. He was a big man in work clothes with a hardhat. He looked beat. He told me he had read my columns, and he told me he'd heard I was here, pouring coffee. He said, "I have something for you." And he pulled from a soft brown paper bag the little cross and the little heart. He had cut them from a beam that held up one of the towers.

To me they were like an old bullet pulled from the ground of Gettysburg, a treasure of history. When people come to my house and see them on the wall, they're always silent after I tell the story.

I'm going to bring them with me, back to where they came from, on Sept. 11. I'll probably look at where the towers used to be and think, "The buildings were here. A year ago today they were here. And then they became the cross and the heart."

_____________________

A year ago on Sept. 11 it was so beautiful, just the most beautiful day. The school year had just started, and kids downtown were being walked to class. They heard the first plane. They were walking on the sidewalk when the shadow of the plane passed over them.

Where would we be if the shadow hadn't come, if 8:46 a.m. that day had not happened? Where would we be if the whole day had been as peaceful as its start?

We'd be where we were on Sept. 10, 2001.

On Sept. 10, 2001 we were, a lot of us, immersed in a national culture -- a big, vivid, full-network, broadband, opens-soon-at-a-theater-near-you culture -- that allowed us to live knee deep in distraction. What's on tonight, who's pitching, when are The Sopranos back, who won, when does the sale start? There was nothing inherently wrong in this -- fun is part of life, or should be, and entertainment, art and sports are worthy endeavors. But for a lot of us our emphasis was off. We weren't paying attention to core things, essential things, first things. We were staring at the peripheral, missing the big picture.

And then Sept. 11 came. The demonic cloud chased modernity down the street. It chased businessmen down the tall and narrow pathways of downtown Manhattan, a city that lives on the periphery of the continent but is at the core of its commercial life, its art, its hedonism and hipness, its focused and full-throttled pursuit of the tangential.

Thousands died. The buildings disappeared. And were transmuted into the cross and the heart.

_____________________

The heart, to me, stands for the explosion of human sympathy, kindness, forgivingness and generosity that came from the people of our city starting at 8:46 a.m. on Sept. 11, 2001. It's been -- and here I think, oddly, not of an American word but of the highest accolade used by an old friend from New Zealand -- brilliant. Brilliant and shining. You all know the stories -- the friendliness on the streets, the helpfulness to strangers, the millions of volunteers, the money given, the hands held.

The cross stands for a renewed sense of the centrality of the spiritual in our lives. People say it was fleeting, but I don't think so, and I base this simply on my interactions with friends, family and acquaintances who are New Yorkers. Something big happened here. The spiritual was reborn. It started with the spontaneous shrines that filled the city sidewalks last September and it has continued with a greater sense of individual pondering. People are thinking about God. I believe I have witnessed from so many people an enhanced sense of the sacredness of ordinary things, and a greater ability to see grace at work in the lives of others, and ourselves.

This week Newsweek had the story of the boy in the red bandana. He was a young man in the north tower who didn't think first of his own safety after the planes hit, but tried to help strangers. He pointed them to exits in the smoky corridors, led them down the stairs, carried a woman on his back. He was last seen going up the stairs as others walked down. They found out later who he was, a 24-year-old equities trader. Life is rich and unknowable: You don't know when you'll accidentally bump into hell, you don't know what angel you might meet there.

_____________________

"He was last seen going up the stairs." Those are famous words here now. Usually we say it about the firemen. It's going to be a long time before we get used to the idea that 343 of them lost their lives that day. Or rather gave them.

Those 343 -- they were mostly tough Catholic men with soft hearts from the outer boroughs. They were Italians and Irish and Poles and Puerto Ricans, and they lined up for absolution, received a blessing and ran into the buildings lugging their gear. Their funerals were at Our Lady Queen of Peace, and St. Rose of Lima Church. And sometimes at the funerals they played an old '70s song whose title you'll never hear the same way again: "Stairway to Heaven."

The other day I got a letter from the mother of Michael Dermott Mullan, Ladder 12, Engine 3, 19th Chelsea. He was a graduate of Holy Cross High School, a registered nurse attending Hunter College School of Nursing, a captain in the U.S. Army Reserves stationed at Fort Totten, and a New York City fireman. He must have been some guy, Michael Mullen. His mother wanted all of us to know who he was. She wrote, "He was dedicated to the well being and protection of his fellow man." She wrote, "He was second generation Irish by way of County Tipperary, County Down and County Kerry." She wrote, "He loved his God, his Country, his family and his city."

Michael Mullan called from his truck on the way to the Trade Center the morning of the attacks. "He called to tell us, 'I love you. Goodbye, goodbye, goodbye.' Michael never said goodbye -- it wasn't a part of him to think goodbye, he would always say, 'See you later,' or 'Take care.' But that fateful day he said goodbye to his family." His body was found on Oct. 7. Then the Mullan family found out about his last hours. After Michael called home he bowed his head and, with a friend on the rig, prayed. Michael and his crew went to the Marriott Hotel, next to the Trade Center. It had been badly damaged, and later collapsed. They made their way to the upper floors and then were ordered out by their lieutenant. The way was blocked, but they found a path down. Then word came there were two firemen on a higher floor who couldn't find a way down. "Michael's last spoken words," his mother said, "were, 'I'll go back and get them.'"

He was probably last seen going up the stairs. He was a man of the heart and the cross.

_____________________

And the flag. For that was the other things that re-emerged, the explosion of America-love.

We had been losing it as a society, and for a long time.

The immigrants of a century ago arrived to a flag flying culture. They were told that they were investing their lives, their futures, their unseen grandchildren in something high and good and decent. Free speech was here, the free practice of religion, democracy, the ballot, free markets -- everyone, from the brilliant and altruistic to the bright and merely greedy, could get in on the great bazaar, and make his way. What a country -- all that freedom and the streets were paved with gold.

They were taught to love America by the culture all around them -- the penny newspapers, George M. Cohan, John Philip Sousa, the nascent movie industry, the stage, the schools -- taught a burly America-love.

Which was good. Because when you don't love something you lose it.

We were losing it. But now the flags are out again, and loving America isn't considered a faux pas, or evidence of limited intellect. The thing now is to see it doesn't degenerate into mere conceit: "We're No. 1, we have the best tanks." That's triumphalism. Patriotism is solid and grounded; it holds up the ideal of a nation founded on the equality of men; it has to do with founding documents, guaranteed freedoms, clear rights, stated responsibilities. That's what the flag stands for.

It's certainly how Michael Mullan must have seen it. And the boy in the red bandana, too.

And that in the end is my Sept. 11, a trauma that was transmuted into a heart and a cross and a flag. Each expressing a facet of a great and fabled people who are still, one year after, the hope of the world.

________

Ms. Noonan is a contributing editor of "The Wall Street Journal."

Patrick of Ireland: An Evangelical Hero

Acts 16:9

It has been said that everyone is Irish on St. Patrick’s Day, perhaps reflecting some mysterious urge to wear green on March 17.

St. Patrick’s Day celebrations, laden with mythology and merriment, often have little to do with the historical Patrick, a missionary and early church leader. And while “Irish” revelers overlook the man behind the myth, many Christians also fail to see the importance of Patrick’s ministry.

What are evangelicals to think of Patrick? And what can be learned from his life and ministry?

New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary professors Rex Butler and Jack Allen believe Patrick is worthy of evangelical attention. Approaching him from different disciplines, Butler and Allen see in Patrick methods and heart attitudes beneficial to today’s church.

The title of “Saint” and St. Patrick’s Day activities, unfortunately, have left Patrick with an image problem among evangelicals.

“As Baptists, we need to avoid calling any historical figure by the title of ‘Saint,’” said Butler, associate professor of church history and patristics at NOBTS. “It is clear from the Bible, especially Paul’s letters, that all believers are saints in the sense that we are sanctified and set apart for God.”

The title “Saint,” when used by Catholic and Orthodox churches, is very technical in nature, Butler said. It refers to men and women “who exhibited extraordinary holiness and performed miracles during their lives.” These churches believe that “Saints” can intercede on behalf of people living today.

“Therefore, I refer to the hero of ‘St. Patrick’s Day’ as ‘Patrick of Ireland,’” Butler said.

Patrick was born into a Christian home in Britain, the son and grandson of clergymen. Patrick, though, exhibited only nominal Christian faith in his early years. Scholars are not certain when he was born, but many place his birth around 387 A.D.

The pagan Celtic tribes of Ireland lived in primitive conditions, worshipping nature, living off the land and frequently raiding Britain to steal supplies. In short, the tribes consisted of uncivilized barbarians. During one of their raids on the British Island, Patrick was taken captive and forced into slavery at the age of 16.

After living as a slave for six years, Patrick escaped and returned to Britain. It was during his time in Ireland that Patrick’s faith in Christ began to grow, Butler said. Shortly after returning to Britain, Patrick entered church ministry.

“Patrick’s life is a great example of how God uses adversity to draw us to Himself,” Butler said.

“Over time, he begins to have this deep conviction that God wants him to go back and take the Gospel to these horrible people,” said Allen, assistant professor of church planting at NOBTS. “Patrick voluntarily goes back to Ireland and he sets about trying to convert these pagans.”

For Allen, Patrick demonstrated a number of methods that could be beneficial in reaching 21st-century Western culture, particularly the post-Christian areas of North America.

At the basic level, Patrick’s methods are similar to the current idea of “missional” living in a cross-cultural setting, Allen said. Patrick went on his mission with a “long-haul” mentality and would stay as long as it took to reach a tribe. He and his group lived among the people, learned their habits, sought to fit in without comprise and lived out their faith and ethics among the people. Gradually Patrick was able to share the Gospel.

Patrick did not immediately confront the pagans about sin and overwhelm them with scriptural instruction, Allen said, and he preferred to slowly introduce the Scriptures to develop a “picture of Jesus” and then tell them about repentance.

“Over time...people were converted,” Allen said. “This takes a very long time. It’s slow at first, but these conversions tend to stick.”

Allen believes a similar approach is needed to reach the United States and Canada. He points to the growing number of lost people in cities such as Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Seattle, Portland and even Austin. People in these areas, Allen said, often are highly resistant to the Gospel and traditional evangelistic methods.

“What is getting fantastic results in Toronto and Montreal have been methods that look an awful lot like what Patrick did,” Allen said. “Our missionary goes in, lives among the people and begins to make friends. Over time [the missionary] tries to gather people and teach them who Jesus is.”

Lost North Americans share many common traits with the people Patrick encountered on the Emerald Isle so long ago, Allen said, describing post-Christian North Americans as “neo-pagans” due to their resistance to the Gospel and their commitment to nature.

Reaching the neo-pagans of North America, Allen said, will require costly commitments. Christians must find a way to plant themselves among the lost for long periods of time, and these believers must live out a consistent, vibrant faith. Many of the successful missionaries in these resistant areas are bivocational –- working alongside the people they’re trying to reach.

“We will not see large-scale systemic conversions unless we are willing to give this; in all honesty, we probably have to give it a decade,” Allen said. “We not only have to help people find Christ, we have to give them the tools to walk with Christ.”

For Butlers from a church historian’s perspective, Patrick’s ministry and mission methods reflect two distinct heart attitudes vital to the Christian life -- forgiveness and perseverance.

“Despite the suffering he had endured in Ireland, Patrick was willing to forgive those who had held him captive,” Butler said. “He returned to evangelize Ireland.”

Forgiveness and the call of God landed Patrick in Ireland. But it was a rugged perseverance that kept him there for the long term, Butler said.

Patrick was not the first missionary to Ireland, Butler noted. Thirty years before Patrick launched his mission, a man named Palladius was commissioned as a missionary to the Emerald Isle, but Palladius soon became discouraged and moved on to Scotland.

“Patrick, however, persevered in his mission, preached the Gospel throughout Ireland ... and established churches and monasteries,” Butler said. “Furthermore, the Irish Christians, following Patrick’s example, left their homeland to spread the Gospel in Scotland, Britain and Europe.”

________

Gary Myers is director of public relations at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary.

*

[Original illustration at this number was moved to HolwickID #16445]

Pleasure At A Price

Acts 24:25

During the Vietnam War, American pilot Lance Sijan was flying his F4 Phantom fighter-bomber on his fifty-third combat mission. Suddenly a faulty fuse triggered an explosion in his aircraft, and he crashed on the border of Laos. He could have been rescued as his comrades flew near, looking for him. But Sijan lay low and did not draw them to his spot because the enemy was too close and he did not want his compatriots to risk their lives. Over the next forty-six days, he crawled three miles. He tried to survive on leaves and the bark of trees. Finally caught and put into solitary confinement, he was tortured to extract secrets.

Those who could overhear what was happening ached for him deeply but were proud beyond measure at his unbreakable will and his determination not to betray his trust. There was nothing his tormentors could do to dent his courage and his commitment to his country. We are rightly proud of such heroism.

Isn’t it astounding how a man could endure such torture, sacrificing himself for his fellow soldiers, while many of us find it seemingly "impossible" to withstand lesser pressures for even lesser causes.

Many have so surrendered their wills to such a state of weaknesses that they have lost sight of their capacity for strength. It is far better, goes the old adage, to shun the bait than to struggle in the snare. To some things we must learn to say "no" and to mean it. Not just for the sake of saying no, but because life must be lived in terms of higher purpose. Is there not more than the immediate impulse for indulgence? If we do not resist and go the easy way there will be a price to be paid someday.

An essential principle in a philosophy of pleasure arises here: all pleasure must be bought at a price. The difference between illegitimate and legitimate pleasure is this: For legitimate pleasure, the price is paid before it is enjoyed. For illegitimate pleasure, the price is paid after it is enjoyed. Turning aside from instant gratification is one of the most difficult things to do. But this is where the battle is often won or lost.

The strength of our will - and this is crucial - surrendered either to God or ourselves - reveals the character we possess, and the strength of our will determines when the price is paid. It is the submission of our will to God that protects us from illicit pleasure, so that we may fully enjoy those which are legitimate. When that distinction is made and honored, life becomes a delight.

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Above the Impact: A Survivor's Story of September 11

Brian Clark, an executive vice president at Euro Brokers, a brokerage firm that had offices on the 84th floor of 2 World Trade Center, was one of only four people to escape either tower from above the floors where the planes struck. In this interview for the NOVA program "Why the Towers Fell," assistant producer Matt Barrett simply let the camera roll as Clark told his astounding tale. Only slightly edited for clarity here, the interview reveals, in vividly recalled detail, how snap decisions, gut instinct, and a touch of luck worked together in Clark's favor and that of the man whose life he saved.

Like any normal day I arrived at about 7:15 in the morning. That particular day was more or less flawless weather -- beautiful day, blue sky. I don't remember the temperature, but we had an unseasonably warm fall, and I'm assuming that that day was equally pleasant.

I have been at Euro Brokers for over 29 years now. I started as a trainee broker in 1973, and for the last 14 or 15 years I've been in management. Most recently my title's been Executive Vice President. I've been one of several people who manage the company. One minor responsibility I had that turned out to be significant that day, however, was I was one of about eight or ten people that had volunteered to be a fire marshal.

THE FIRST PLANE

As I said, I arrived about 7:15 and got my morning coffee. I went about my normal chores. I don't really recall any extraordinary events that morning until 8:46 and change, when, sitting with my back to the west wall -- I had a private office, with my desk facing my door and my back to the window -- I heard an enormous thump. I didn't feel any vibration, but there was a noticeable sound like a boom or thump, and the lights buzzed for a second. My eyes jerked up to look at my overhead lights.

There was suddenly this glare, and my attention was immediately caught. I spun my head around, and the entire airspace behind me was filled with flame. I didn't know what it was at the time, but it was the fuel from the first jet hitting the North Tower that had gone right through that tower and out over the airspace, south of Tower One, the North Tower. That same airspace was west of the South Tower, the tower I was in on the 84th floor.

My immediate thought was there had been an explosion one or two floors above our office. That's what I thought had happened in that first instant. Being one of the fire marshals, I was equipped with a whistle and flashlight in my office. I jumped up, grabbed them, put the whistle around my neck, and more or less yelled, "Get out! Everybody get out!" This all took me five seconds. When I looked behind me out the window, the flames were all gone, and thousands of papers were just fluttering in the air, the edges of which were all on fire. It was like flaming confetti. Very strange.

I should have realized but didn't realize at the time that the area that all this was happening in was so huge. But I still wasn't computing that in my mind; still it was two floors up in my mind. So I ran out of my office, just a yard or two into an area where some accountants sit, and other people in offices, and I said, "Come on, let's go, there has been an explosion," and I started to get people off the floor.

Now, we are a trading operation. Our customers are not individuals, but large financial trading institutions around the world, like a Barclay's Bank or the Royal Bank of Canada. So we have in our trading floor many television sets tuned to financial news information. Well, all of these stations cut away to their news departments, and there were these breaking news stories that an airplane had hit the World Trade Center. The story developed literally within minutes, and we understood fairly soon, I would say within three or four minutes, that an airliner had hit One World Trade Center. At least that's my recollection of the timeframe.

Well, we knew now that the damage had been done to Tower One, not our Tower, so we relaxed a little bit about evacuation. Nonetheless, many people in the first minute had bolted for the stairs and were on their way down. Good news in retrospect, but at the time it was like, Oh boy, I guess we don't have to leave. The TV sets were telling us, and now there were photographs of One World Trade Center and the smoke coming out of the upper floors, I think the 92nd floor and above. The fire marshals like myself were content to let people go or stay. Really, in a way, it didn't matter.

I called my wife and told her, "You know, you won't believe this but Tower One has been hit. We are fine where we are. Relax, turn on the TV, there is a developing story there, find out what's happening."

THE ANNOUNCEMENT

At about five minutes to nine there was an announcement by the Port Authority within our building. First the strobe lights flashed, as they did during their normal fire drills. The alarm system gave a little bit of a whoop whoop, you know, to alert you to an announcement about to be made. Then the very familiar voice, the one we heard all the time, came over the system and said, "Building Two is secure. There is no need to evacuate Building Two. If you are in the midst of evacuation, you may return to your office by using the re-entry doors on the re-entry floors and the elevators to return to your office. Repeat, Building Two is secure...."

And they went through the whole story again. So this was reinforcement that there was no need to evacuate. I am strictly guessing but I would think we were perhaps down to about 25 people left on our floor at the time of the announcement. (I had gone for a walk through our office.) Now, as I say, the pressure was off, and there wasn't a panic, although we were greatly concerned about what was going on in Tower One.

If you went to the north wall windows, you could look up and see the flames and the smoke and regrettably people now starting to jump, because of heat, smoke, or whatever it was. I'm only telling this secondhand because I personally could not take myself to the window to view that. I just didn't want that image burned in my brain, and I'm forever grateful that I didn't go and take in that sight.

One girl in particular -- Susan her name was -- turned from the window when she noticed the first person for her jump. She hadn't noticed it before, and she spun around in tears almost frantically, ran to me, and said "Oh, Brian, it's terrible. People are dying." I said, "Susan, it's a terrible tragedy," and I put my arms around her, and I said "Come on, let's get you more composed," and we walked out of the trading floor down the hall. In the building the center core was crossed hallways. There was a north-south hallway and an east-west hallway. I walked with her from the east side through the center core to the west side, where the ladies room was, and she went into the ladies room. (Regrettably, Susan did not survive the eventual collapse of the building.)

THE SECOND PLANE

I continued on to the west side near my office. I was fairly near the windows talking with two or three people, including especially Bobby Coll. I was looking him in the eye having a conversation with him when at apparently 9:03 -- I didn't check my watch -- the second plane hit the south side of our building at approximately the 78th, 79th, and 80th floors. Our room fell apart at that moment, a complete destruction without an explosion -- very strange things. The lights went out, but we were near the window so there was daylight. Again, there was this sort of thump, this explosion without fire and flame, a very strange sensation.

There was a twist, if you like, to the building when it got hit, and therefore the plane's hitting explained some things to me later, like why the ceiling fell apart. The ceiling tiles and some of the brackets and so on fell; some air conditioning ducts, speakers, cables, and things like that that were in the ceiling fell. I seem to have a sense that some of the floor tiles even buckled a bit or were moved. Some of the walls, I recall vaguely, were actually torn in a jagged direction rather then up and down. Again perhaps explained by the torque, some of the door frames popped out of the wall and partially fell or fully fell.

For seven to ten seconds there was this enormous sway in the building. It was one way, and I just felt in my heart, Oh my gosh, we are going over. That's what it felt like. Now, on windy days prior to that there was a little bit of a sway to the building. You got used to it; you didn't notice it. The window blinds would go clack clack as they swung. As I said, for a good seven to ten seconds I thought it was over -- horrible feeling -- but then the building righted itself. It didn't sway back and forth; it just went one way, it seemed, and then back, and we were stable again.

I was looking at Bobby Coll square in the eyes, and we knew in an instant that it was terrorism. I mean, there wasn't for sure terrorism on people's minds when the first building had been hit. Was it pilot error? Was it instrument error? Or just a one-off suicide? Horrible as it was, you didn't know for certain that it was terrorism. But when the second building got hit you instantly calculated the two of them: terrorism.

THE EVACUATION

So we knew we were in a difficult situation at that point in time. I fortunately had a flashlight with me, and I'm glad I did. I switched it on, and we started out of the room. Our room was not black with smoke but sort of white with chalky construction dust. It was incredibly dusty and dirty as we made our way out of the room and over some debris that had fallen from the ceiling and so on past the ladies room where I had taken Susan maybe 10 minutes earlier, and we went to this center core, this crossroads in the middle of the building.

At that point, had we gone three or four yards straight ahead to the east, we would have come to Stairway B. I have no idea what condition it was in because we didn't know what had happened, we didn't know where this plane had hit, we didn't know if it was a plane, we didn't know anything other than suddenly we were in chaos and our building had been hit. I could have turned right three yards to Stairway C, closer to the impact point. I had no idea what condition that stairway was in. Miraculously, at random I turned left to Stairway A, which on the floor plate is the farthest from where the impact really was.

So we started down that stairway. We only went three floors. There was a group of seven of us, myself and six others. I remember some of the names. Now, I know everybody at Euro Brokers, but in my mind somehow I blanked out who those other grey shapes were; they were farther up the stairs a bit, not in the light of the flashlight. I do remember Bobby Coll, Kevin York, David Vera, and Ron DiFrancesco.

We met two people that had come up from the 80th floor, a heavy-set woman and by comparison a rather frail male companion of hers, a workmate. She was saying from the landing below, "Stop, stop you've got to go up," and she labored up to join us, moving very slowly; she was such a big woman. She said, "You've got to go up. You can't go down. There is too much smoke and flames below." I had my flashlight, and I was shining it in each face as people made comments, and an argument ensued as to what we should do.

THE RESCUE

At the same moment as this argument was going on I heard bang, bang, bang, thump, thump, thump, "Help! Help! I'm buried. I can't breathe. Is anybody there? Can you help me?," a strange voice coming from within the 81st floor. I heard this voice, and it caused me to lose concentration in this argument that was going on about whether to head up or down. I grabbed Ron by the sleeve, and I said "Come on, Ron. Let's get this fellow."

The fire escape door had blown away from the wall a bit, but we were able to push the dry wall back and step between the door frame and the dry wall, squeeze onto the 81st floor, which was in darkness, but again I had my flashlight. I scanned the room, and I said, "Who's there? Where are you?" He said, "Oh, I can see your light."

What my light beam was showing me was similar to being on a very foggy road at night, because it was white dust everywhere. He said, "No, to the right ... to the left ..." In about a minute, Ron and I located his voice. He said, "Can you see my hand?" His hand was sticking out of the wall, or not the wall but this area where he was covered and blocked by some debris. He was waving his hand frantically, and my light picked up his hand. I said, "Okay, see you now."

And at that moment my associate Ron who came down with me was overcome with smoke. He had a gym bag or a briefcase with him, and he was sort of putting it in front of his face in an attempt to filter the air. It clearly wasn't working, and Ron, with eyes shut, backed off the floor. He was almost completely overcome by the smoke.

Again, miraculously, I was in a bubble. I was breathing fine. I was squinting a bit, but I could work, and I struggled to get debris away from Stanley -- I found out later his name was Stanley Praimnath; he worked at Fuji Bank.

We got to the point I couldn't do any more work from my side, and I said, "You've got to jump. You've got to get over this last barrier." Well, he jumped once and fell back down. I said, "Come on, you've got to do this. It's the only way out." I reached in again, and Stanley jumped, and I got him by the collar or the shoulder or somewhere there. He said later that I just pulled him up like Superman. I don't remember having this extraordinary strength, but he says it really did happen that way. I pulled him out and onto me, and we fell in a heap and embraced. It was an exciting moment, it really was.

Now, Ron had gone. He had gone back to the stairway and was not there when we got back to the stairs. The other people had gone up as I left with Ron to go in on the 81st floor. I had this vision of Bobby Coll and Kevin York each with a hand under each elbow of this heavy-set woman starting to ascend the stairs, saying things like, "Come on. We are in this together. We will help you. Relax, we'll be with you." And up they went. And Dave Vera, who had a walkie-talkie, started back up the stairs as well. That's the last I saw of those people.

Now, I didn't know whether Ron had gone up or down, I assumed down because he was with me going down. I learned later that Ron went up; in fact, he went all the way up to the 91st floor. He later told me that he lay on the floor there for 10 minutes until he panicked. He told me, "I had to see my wife. I had to see my kids at all costs. I was gonna make it out." And he went to the stairway and went all the way down, following me, I guess, by five to seven minutes, because I took my time going down the stairway. It was not intentional; it was just that some events happened.

THE DESCENT

So Stanley and I went back to the stairs on the 81st floor, and we began down. The first five floors were difficult, because in certain areas dry wall had been blown off the wall and was lying propped up against the railing. We had to move it, shove it to the side. The sprinkler system had turned on and had started to do something, but it wasn't doing its job as it should, so there was water sloshing down the stairways. It was dark.

Now, the stairways didn't go straight down. There was one particular area around the 78th floor, I think, where you actually came to some strange twists. So we had to figure that out in the darkness, but we made some fortunate decisions. Around the 74th floor, I would say, we broke into what I call fresh air. The lights were on. It was normal conditions. There was not a problem breathing, and there was nobody there, not a soul, just Stanley and me. We were starting to have normal conversation. He was cut and bruised a bit, but he was fine conversing. I think he had his shirt off; he was just in his undershirt.

We continued on down. On the 68th floor, we met one man walking up. The man's name was Jose Marrero. He worked for Euro Brokers for many years. He worked in our security department, and he was also one of our fire marshals. Jose, I learned later, had been with many people of ours all the way down into the 30s and 40s on the stairway and figured, I guess, that he had done his job. Then he heard Dave Vera, who had started down with me, on his walkie-talkie saying that he needed help; he was helping people, could he get help.

So Jose, hero that he was, was walking up, perspiring, carrying his walkie-talkie. He said, "Oh, I can hear Dave above. I'm gonna help." I said, "Jose, Dave's a big boy, he can get out. We've just come through hell to get here. Come on down with us." "No, no, no," he said. "I'll be fine. I can help." Then Jose kept marching up. Jose was about 35 years old and quite fit, but when I passed him he was understandably laboring to climb the stairs. But he kept going. I don't know how high he got or what he found.

Stanley and I continued down until we got to the 44th floor -- straight shot, saw nobody. On the 44th floor we went off, because I knew that was one of the sky lobbies in the Trade Center. There were sky lobbies on the 44th and 78th floors. Conditions on the 44th floor were normal other than there was nobody there, except for one -- I'm guessing at his age -- middle 60s, maybe 70s even Port Authority security guard who was tending to a Caucasian male lying flat on the floor moaning in pain, with massive head wounds. The security guard was saying, "I need help. My phones don't work, but I need medical attention for this man. I'll stay with him, I'll tend him, but you must promise to get help as soon as you can telephone somebody." Stanley and I said "okay" and went back to the stair.

THE CONFERENCE ROOM

We went down again. Nobody on the stairway at all. Easy travel, just the two of us. Lights on, fresh air all the way down to the 31st floor, where we went in at random and got into somebody's office. I don't know whether it was an advertising agency or a lawyer's office; I don't know whose it was. We got into their conference room, and each grabbed a phone.

I called my wife to tell her here's where I am; we'll have this great celebration at home. I hadn't talked to her since about five to nine, I suppose, and this was about 20 to 10. My wife had turned on the TV, and the first thing she had seen was the second plane slam into our building. So she had no idea where I was for that 45-minute stretch. I told her I was fine. Stanley talked to his wife, told her similar news.

I then called 9-1-1 -- coincidence 9/11 -- and was put on hold. This was a disturbing thing at the time. I got ahold of them right away and told them about this fellow on the 44th floor that needed medical attention, but they put me on hold. They said, "You must tell your story to somebody higher up the chain" and clicked me off. I'd wait until somebody came on, I'd recite the story, and "Oh, just a minute. You must tell somebody else." I mean, there was something clearly odd about what was going on there. They were answering the phone in a hurry, and I understand now they were completely overwhelmed at the time.

I was asked for a third time to tell somebody else my story, and I just laid down the law. I said, "No. I have given you the details. Here they are one more time," and I wouldn't let that person off the phone. I said, "I'm gonna tell you this once, and then I'm hanging up." I went through the details about the 44th floor, man on the ground, need a medic, need a stretcher, goodbye." I put down the phone. I don't feel badly about that but it was a strange, strange event in the midst of this whole story. We were probably in that conference room for four minutes I would think, and then it was back to the stairs.

THE GROUND FLOOR

Now, bear in mind we had no idea that the building was about to fall. We were taking our time. In fact, I said to Stanley at one point, "Hey, let's not go too fast here. I'd hate to break an ankle and have to walk 30 floors or something." So we took our time getting down. We went all the way down, again with nobody on the stairs, not firemen coming up, nobody else evacuating. So all the way down to the Plaza level. We came out by what's known as the "half-price ticket booth," where they sold theater tickets for half price. This was on the north side of the South Tower facing the Plaza.

We came out and stared, awestruck. What we looked at was normally a flowing fountain, vendors with their wagons, business people coming to and from the building, tourists everywhere. It was a beautiful people place, yet this area, several acres I'm sure, was dead; it was a moonscape. It looked like it had been deserted for 100 years, and we had just discovered it.

It was surreal, the whole thing was surreal. We stared at it for 20 or 30 seconds with our jaws dropped, saying, "What is happening here, this is very strange." We went down an escalator that wasn't working -- all electricity was off, other than the emergency electricity, I guess, in the stairway -- and through some revolving doors, because the women at the bottom of the escalator said to us, "If you're gonna leave the building you have to go this way, through there, and go down to the Victoria Secret shop, turn right, and exit by the Sam Goody store."

We knew where that was, so we walked very casually down that hallway, down the second hallway, and we were passing firemen and policemen who were going about their business, walking normal speeds. I didn't sense there was panic. It looked like they were under control, doing their job. There were other evacuees like Stanley and me, but there was no running or crowds. It was more or less deserted.

THE STREET

We got out to the south exit of Four World Trade Center on the southeast corner of the complex. Firemen and policemen stood at the door. One said, "Whoa, wait a minute fellows, if you are gonna cross Liberty Street, you had better go for it. There is debris falling from above." I recall saying, "Should I look up?" He said, "Well, I wouldn't. Just go for it."

I couldn't make myself do that. I crept out under the eaves, and I cautioned a look up this way and that way, and I said, "All right, Stanley, I don't see anything coming. Are you ready?" He said, "Yup," and after one more check, I said, "All right, let's go," and we ran across Liberty Street, which is quite wide at that point, several lanes. There was nobody there. It was very much like a demilitarized zone. There was no traffic. There were some emergency vehicles around but certainly no movement and really not very many people; people were noticeably absent.

Across the road you could see some people standing in doorways protecting themselves from anything that might have been falling. We ran across the street, past the fire hall, which is on the corner, and up another block and caught our breath. There was a deli owner there. I said, "Have you got any water?" He went in and just handed us this water in bottles and said, "Here you go." I said, "Thank you." He said, "In fact, here is a breakfast platter. I don't think anybody is going to be picking that up." And he gave me this great tray with some fresh fruit on it and some sweet rolls. He was a very generous fellow at the time considering the conditions.

I carried this with me another block to the west side of Trinity Church, where we met a couple of ministers. That's when Stanley broke down. He cried to these ministers, "This man saved my life." He completely broke down. I was overcome with emotion as well, and I said, "You know, Stanley, you may think I saved your life but I think you saved my life, too. You got me out of that argument as to whether I should go up or go down. I'm here, and I'm fine, and it's because of your voice in the darkness that I made it." We embraced, and the ministers had a quick prayer, and one of them said, "You know, the church is open if you would like to go in there."

THE COLLAPSE

Stanley and I looked at each other, and we nodded and said, "All right, let's do that." So we walked to the south side of Trinity Church, which is a street that slopes up. As we walked up it we got higher and higher, and with the wall in relation to us going lower, we could now turn around and see the World Trade Center. We grabbed onto the fence railing of the cemetery and looked through the grate up at the Trade Center, and Stanley said to me, "You know, I think those buildings could go down." I said, "There is no way. Those are steel structures. That's furniture and paper and carpeting and draperies and things like that that are burning." But I didn't finish the sentence when Tower Two started to slide down.

I would say that we'd been out of the building maybe five minutes when the building collapsed. It disappeared into its own dust. What I thought had happened at that instant was only the top third or quarter of the building down to the fire line had collapsed. It was a horrible feeling. I mean, our whole escape was horrible when it was happening, but you at least thought people had a chance -- until that moment. Then I knew that certainly in the top quarter of the tower there was no chance. We just stared at it in awe, not realizing what was happening completely.

We stared, watching, with nobody running or anything initially. But then this great tsunami of dust came over the church. Everybody looked up, and, as in a disaster movie, everybody started running in fear of the debris and dust that might be in there. But I knew there was nothing solid that was going to harm me, that the building hadn't fallen over. I knew that. But you didn't want to breathe the junk that was in there, so we ran down Broadway to 42 Broadway. We went into that building as the dust and smoke was catching up to our backsides. We got into that lobby with many other people, strangers doing the same thing. The air was clean in there, and people were milling around.

I realized then that I was still carrying the silly fruit platter, so I plumped that down on the reception desk there, and people started digging into it. It was an odd thing that I didn't just chuck it aside when I was running. I wasn't even aware that I was carrying it.

We stayed for at least half an hour, I suppose. The ash settled. We went out the east side of that building, which was onto New Street. It was like a winter's day, grey sky. I suppose it was a quarter of an inch of dust and ash everywhere, but it looked like freshly fallen fine snow. We walked in amazement down the street. I was still thinking, of course, that only the top part of the tower had slid off or slid into itself or something like that. No cell phones, no land lines were working. There was no way to communicate with anybody by telephone.

We wandered over to the east side of Manhattan, the East River. Stanley gave me his business card, and thank goodness he did, because in the crowd that was walking, he and I suddenly got parted. He just disappeared into the crowd. I yelled and looked and walked back and forth but he was gone. I was very grateful I had his business card at that point, because I knew that he was real. My initial thought was, Whoa, this was an angel; this didn't happen. It was a strange feeling that slipped over me. But, hey, I had his business card, so I knew he was real.

THE FERRY

I wandered up FDR Drive on the east side of the island, thinking I was going to have to walk to mid-town to somehow get home to northern New Jersey where I live. But in this fog, in this white, wintry day, I heard someone on a bullhorn, "Next ferry for Jersey City." That's strange, I thought. I didn't even know there were ferries over here. Well, what the ferry company had done was reroute their ferries to the east side of the island; there's a pier over there, Pier 11. I thought, This is wonderful.

I jumped on that ferry. They certainly weren't charging. We sailed around the southern tip of Manhattan, up the Hudson River, and as we got parallel to the World Trade Center -- the wind was blowing from north to south that day -- it was then that I and many other people realized for the first time that both towers were completely down.

I also realized that the first hint that I'd had of the second tower, that is, Tower One, coming down was when I had gotten on that ferry 15 minutes earlier, because a black cloud had enveloped the boat as I was getting on it. It was noticeable that with the South Tower, the one that fell first, the ensuing ash was white and grey, whereas with the second tower that fell, the North Tower, it was black. Now, if that was because it burned longer or what I don't know, but it was a noticeable difference.

But as we got parallel we could look over and see that both towers were gone. It was just a surreal feeling. Disbelief. How could this happen? Of course, at the time we knew nothing about the planes being hijacked, nothing about the Pentagon, nothing about the plane going down in Pennsylvania, or the FAA getting all planes out of the air. We were completely in the dark. But we could look off to the Trade Center on our right and see that this building I had worked in for 27 years was gone. It was a staggering thought. There was silence. People just couldn't believe it.

THE HOMECOMING

We sailed in silence to Harborside in Jersey City and got off the ferry. Well, I ran to the ticket booth. I think I was the first person there. I asked the lady if I could use the phone, and she said, "Absolutely." I called my wife, and I could hear the cheers back at home. This is now about 11:15, I think, and my building came down sometime around 10 a.m. The last time I had talked to my wife was at about 20 to 10, so for over an hour and a half she had no idea where I was. Certainly for an hour and 15 minutes she had seen the tower down and was quite beside herself.

Fortunately, the house was full of people. My wife, Dianne, had some neighbors there, members of our church, our minister. My older son, his wife and three children were there, along with my older daughter and my younger son and his fiancé. My youngest daughter is at school in Toronto, so she wasn't there, but it was a house full of people. So when I called, there was a great cheer of relief and just agony relieved.

They wanted to come and get me. I said, "Well, look, I know the traffic in the area will be horrible." So I ended up, with hundreds of other people, walking about a mile north. I was pretty tired at this point, but I walked that mile to the Hoboken train terminal. As I walked into the terminal at five to noon, there was an announcement that the 11:30 train, which had been delayed, would be leaving in five minutes. "All aboard for such and such a station," which was the station I needed to go to. So there was another bit of luck. I got on the train, and it left five minutes later.

I rode all the way to my station, got in my car, and drove the next 15 minutes to my home. When I hit the driveway, I honked the horn awfully loudly many times. There was then a front lawn full of tears and a reunion, and then for days the telephone didn't stop ringing. It was friends from all over the world, media, widows. (You know, we wouldn't call them widows at the time; their husbands were missing.)

Now, Ronnie, who I told you had gone up to the 91st floor and later told me he panicked and went down, when he exited the building it was at the very time when Tower Two was starting to fall. So the moment I was watching the building from Trinity Church was exactly the moment he was coming out of the same place I did, and he was caught in an explosion. He heard the explosion, swirled around, and a fireball was rushing at him from right at the doors where he was about to leave the building.

He put his hands up in front of his face and got blown many, many yards across Liberty Street, which I'd run across earlier. He was severely burned in the arm, he had head wounds, cracked vertebrae. He doesn't remember really what happened right after that, but he ended up at St. Vincent's Hospital. They called his wife and told her he was fine, but she was unable to get to him for a couple of days because all the routes and tunnels were closed; they weren't allowing access back into Manhattan.

He didn't remember much those first several days, but he is now back at work on a part-time basis recovering and doing a great job. He's one of the heroes in my mind, because of that determination to get out.

That's my story. It was a long, horrific day, but for me it turned out all right. For many others, I'm deeply saddened that they aren't here. We lost 61 people in total, some of whom I think were either caught in elevators coming back to the office or had come back to the office. We'll never know for sure whether it was a wingtip and flames that caused their demise right on the 84th floor in the east side of the building, where a lot of our traders were, or whether it was smoke when they went higher, or whether it was the collapse of the building. Nonetheless, as I say, we lost 61 friends -- dear friends that we worked with and laughed with for years.

[see also HolwickID #19847]

*

from Public Broadcasting System: Nova Online · Matt Barrett via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database deliverancedisasterrescue

Deferring To Celebrities

Several years ago when a well-known actress made her plea for funding and awareness of a particular disease, congressional committee chambers were packed to capacity and surrounded by cameras. A stark contrast was seen when an unknown woman suffering with Parkinson’s disease made her appearance: hers was a reception of chairs left empty by legislators.

Remarked a congressman on ABC’s 20/20: "If you have the politically correct disease, the prospects of getting federal funding to help find the cure are 100 times greater than if you have some other disease, even though it may be a much more common disease."

The irrationality of this goes beyond disease, does it not. By granting the celebrity such esteem we seem unable to distinguish between a glamorous skill we admire and the entirety of the person, as though artistry empowers one to be a guru for all matters. Whether one is an actor or an athlete, we are imperiled if we forget that giftedness says absolutely nothing about a person’s integrity or wisdom.

We are now, by design, a culture steeped in manufacturing icons. Some time ago one such person, whose only act on stage was to turn the words of an alphabet and look happy while doing so, wrote her autobiography. The demand was so great that it went into a second printing very quickly. One major news anchorman marveled and wondered what prompted such fawning by the masses for a skill as childish as that. He said it was an indictment against their own profession -- that it did not take much to be a hero.

Transference of authority is a scary phenomenon in our time. Being a great entertainer is just that - a great entertainer. Let us not transfer greatness across from one point to another without scrutinizing the reasoning behind the recognizable face. Our judgements are in danger if our heroes are influential only because they are well known. Jesus’ words are striking: "Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment." He also goes on to say that we look at the outward, but God looks at the heart.

Let us not miss the responsibility of judging an idea by the test of truth and wisdom by foolishly being seduced at the altar of the popular. Life, dear friend is more than glamour and substance is more than image.

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Emotional I Q

John 10:11

In Daniel Goleman's excellent book EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE he writes about the last moments of Gary and Mary Jean Chauncey battling the swirling waters of the river into which the Amtrak train they were on had plummeted. With every bit of energy they had, both fought desperately to save the life of their young daughter Andrea, who had cerebral palsy and was bound to a wheelchair. Somehow they managed to push her out into the arms of rescuers, but sadly, they themselves drowned.

Some would like to explain such heroism as evolution's imprint. That we humans behave this way by virtue of evolutionary design for the survival of our progeny. One is hard-pressed not to ask, "Why did the healthier preserve the weaker and not themselves?" But even the author was unable to explain it all in mere Darwinistic terms. He added that "only love" could explain such an act.

In another story, you may recall the chess victory of the computer Deep Blue over the world champion Gary Kasparov, which caused many to compare the similarities of machines and humans. Yale professor David Gelertner disagrees. He writes:

The idea that Deep Blue has a mind is absurd. How can an object

that wants nothing, fears nothing, enjoys nothing, needs nothing,

and cares about nothing have a mind? It can win at chess, but

not because it wants to. It isn't happy when it wins or sad when

it loses. What are its [post]-match plans if it beats Kasparov?

Is it hoping to take Deep Pink out for a night on the town?[1]

He continues: "The gap between the human and the surrogate is permanent and will never be closed. Machines will continue to make life easier, healthier, richer, and more puzzling. And humans will continue to care, ultimately, about the same things they always have: about themselves, about one another, and many of them, about God."

What a unique capacity God has put within us - the capacity to feel. From the selfless sacrifice of loving parents to our own personal thought lives, we recognize that this ability is one aspect of the insurmountable differences between us and machines. In the words of the biblical writer, it is we - and not our PC's I might add - who have been made "a little lower than the angels." Life, feeling, and thought are His gifts to us. When we think His thoughts after Him, we feel and act in highest measure.

____________

1. David Gelertner, "How Hard Is Chess?" Time, 19 May 1997.

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

A Fire Company That Couldn't Be Stopped

When a farmer in Kansas discovered his large barn with horses and equipment was on fire, he quickly called the fire departments in surrounding townships to help put out the fire. Several fire departments arrived on the scene and were doing all they could to rescue the horses, equipment, and douse the fire - to no avail.

Then the farmer noticed an old, beat-up looking fire truck at the end of the lane with the words "Wildcat Fire Department" on the side. "Oh," he pleaded, "please help me. If you don't I'm afraid I will lose my barn and my horses."

The chief said they'd do their best to help. With that, the fire truck went sailing full speed, right into the middle of the barn where the fire was raging. The men jumped off the truck. Some grabbed hoses and began trying to douse the fire with water, and some took off their protective coats and beat the flames. Finally, they had the fire out. Then they straggled out of the barn with blackened faces and singed hair, coughing and gasping for air.

The grateful farmer ran up to them his face beaming. "Oh, I am so happy you saved my barn. I won't be in financial ruin now. Because you have saved my barn and horses and equipment, I want to give you $1,000. Tell me, will the money help?"

The chief responded, "Well, yes! Now we can get the brakes on that old rig fixed!"

Source/Attribution: Unknown author or source; SIEW

*

from Gillmartin's Sermon-illustrations-each-week (SIEW) · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database hero

Us vs. Them

Luke 1:71

In the ordinary sense of the word, Abe Zelmanowitz was no hero. A saint maybe, but not a hero: Heroes die saving other people's lives. Those two guys who, in the midst of their own hurried flight, paused at the 68th floor of the World Trade Center to carry a disabled woman 68 floors to safety -- those guys are heroes.

Abe accomplished nothing, really, except to decide on Sept. 11, 2001, as the twin towers of death and fear filled his 27th-floor office, just what kind of man he would be. We can't control death; it comes to us all in the end. But that choice, Abe's choice, we keep to the end: What kind of person will I be?

Abe, a 55-year-old computer programmer, was a devout Jew who read the Torah daily. "Why are you still in there?" his brother Jack demanded when Abe called soon after the first plane hit. Why? Because his friend Ed, a paraplegic, was also there. "You've got to get out of there," Jack said frantically. But Abe couldn't, or rather wouldn't. He couldn't save Ed's life. But he wouldn't become the kind of guy who leaves a paralyzed friend to die alone.

Death comes to us all, but not all of us get to be Abe Zelmanowitz before we die.

Now we are at war, and war is always Us vs. Them. But who is the us that is at war? Abe's question: Who are we going to choose to be? In the raw emotions unleashed by this act of war, the danger is we will lapse from our high sense of common moral purpose and lash out at each other.

I mean Muslims and Arab-Americans, of course. Americans who bully others are, as President Bush said, the worst of mankind -- not the best of America. But not just Islamic Americans. Last week I opened a file called the Not-My-Enemies list.

For example: Bill Maher made some ill-worded criticism of America's past bomb-'em-and-bail-out tactics, but when the U.S. military strikes, Bill Maher will be rooting for them. Bill Maher is not my enemy. Jerry Falwell took one traditional Christian response to national disaster -- as a call to profound repentance -- and degraded it to partisan bickering. But Jerry Falwell did not wake up on a bright September morning plotting to murder his way to paradise. Jerry Falwell is not my enemy.

The ordinary people who in their fright and shock advocate indiscriminate mass bombing are deeply in need of both comfort and leadership, a call to reasoned action -- but these Americans are not my enemy.

Susan Sontag is not my enemy. Intellectual elites conditioned to believe that violent people are always the product of injustice, ignorance or poverty, and that the habits of mind and tactics appropriate to resolve conflicts on the playground or in the counselor's office form an adequate theory of how to respond to naked evil -- I pity their moral confusion, but they are not my enemy.

And yet, even with maximum need for charity, I do not think the debate over who we are can be postponed. Our enemy hates "not what we do, but who we are," wrote Joshua Micah Marshall of the American Prospect: "They hate our crass frenzy, ... our libidinous music and the fact we've collectively decided to govern ourselves not by our privately held ideas of moral or heavenly absolutes, but by the rule of law." Diversity, materialism, secularism, tolerance -- he lists the goods we fight for. Is this who we really are?

I have two sons, one of them 18 years old. I am not willing to risk either's life for materialism, diversity, secularism or tolerance. I believe passionately in religious liberty, but not because I have agreed "to disagree about life's most profound truths," as Marshall formulates. Instead I am willing to fight and suffer and sacrifice for America's liberty, including our God-given right to individual conscience. We owe it to Him as much as to each other to defend religious and political freedom, with our lives, if necessary.

Millions for defense, not a single penny for tribute, went the 19th-century battle cry. I wouldn't ask a dog to risk its life for secularism or materialism, but everything I have for God, and country, and liberty. Do you see the difference?

©2001 Universal Press Syndicate

[For more on Abe Zelmanowitz see HolwickID #22386]

Japan's Wartime 'No Surrender' Soldier Dies of Heart Attack

A Japanese soldier who stayed in the jungles of Guam for 26 years after the end of World War II in adherence to the Imperial Army's code of never surrender has died of a heart attack, hospital officials said Tuesday.

Shoichi Yokoi, 82, became a national hero on his return to Japan in 1972 for his dramatic tale of survival.

His first words upon arriving in Tokyo -- "It is with much embarrassment that I return" -- were broadcast nationally and instantly became a popular saying.

He died Monday at a hospital in the central city of Nagoya, in his native Aichi prefecture.

Yokoi's exploits in the jungle fascinated the nation. The Japanese, in the throes of the post-war industrial boom, were intrigued by his bare diet of nuts, berries, frogs, snails and rats, and how he wove materials from tree bark.

His return triggered a search for other Japanese soldiers left from the war, and turned up another straggler in 1974, this time in the Philippines.

Unlike Yokoi, whose rifle had rusted and become useless, former Lt. Hiroo Onoda had kept a working firearm and killed several villagers before he was discovered in the Philippine jungle.

Yokoi, a former sergeant, was drafted into the army in 1941 and sent to northeastern China, and later to Guam. Japan occupied Guam during the war and most of its 22,000 troops were killed when U.S. troops recaptured the island in 1944.

Two local hunters discovered him in January 1972 in a remote Guam jungle wearing a pair of burlap pants and a shirt which he said he had made from the bark of a tree.

He was repatriated to Japan a month later where he started life over in a country and a world he hardly knew.

Japan had then become a nation without an army, just beginning to emerge as an industrialized power. Upon his return, Yokoi, who had been reported as killed in action, was dumbfounded by the changes that had occurred since he left on a military transport more than a quarter century ago.

At the first news conference since his homecoming, Yokoi, surrounded by reporters and photographers after nearly three decades in complete jungle isolation, appeared bewildered and was unable to answer questions posed to him.

He contracted an arranged marriage in November 1972, and traded his solitary cave in Guam for a home in Aichi Prefecture with his new wife Mihoko.

He became a regular commentator on television programs, where he discussed survival skills. He wrote a best-selling book on his experience in Guam and in 1974 ran unsuccessfully for a seat in Japan's upper house of parliament.

On Tuesday, friends and neighbors visited Yokoi's home in Nagoya to pay tribute to Japan's man who "never surrendered," Kyodo news agency reported.

Yokoi's wife Mihoko, 69, told reporters she felt she had lost "a treasure from my heart," Kyodo reported.

"We have had 25 years of happy life, and I told my husband 'Thank you'," Kyodo quoted her as saying.

In 1991, Yokoi had an audience with Emperor Akihito during a reception at the Imperial Palace in Tokyo. Yokoi, who had said upon his return that he regretted having failed to serve the Imperial Japanese Army well, was overcome with emotion when he met the emperor, media reports said.

^REUTER@

Split-Second Courage, Ongoing Faith

Ezra 10:4

A year after the Paducah shootings Ben Strong is still standing up for God. [see update below]

______________________

When Ben Strong and Michael Carneal arrived at school on that Monday morning more than a year ago, both of them knew exactly what they wanted to do.

Ben wanted to pray with his friends. Michael wanted to shoot them.

And so at 7:37 a.m. on December 1, 1997, Ben and about 35 other students gathered - as they did every morning before the first bell rang - in the front lobby of Heath High School in West Paducah, Kentucky.

There they stood, huddled together, holding hands, singing songs and talking to God.

While they prayed, Michael, a 14-year-old freshman, stood nearby, calmly putting in ear plugs. As soon as the students said, "Amen," Michael pulled out a pistol and started shooting.

The first bullet hit Nicole Hadley, a 14-year-old freshman who was a popular basketball player. Nicole fell to the floor and later died.

Michael pulled the trigger about 10 more times, sending more students to the floor. Three girls died in the attack-Nicole, 15-year-old Kayce Steger, and 17-year-old Jessica James. Five other students were injured, including Missy Jenkins who is paralyzed from the chest down.

The whole time Michael was shooting, Ben kept yelling, "Mike, what are you doing? Put the gun down!" But Michael ignored him and kept firing.

Then the principal, Bill Bond, who heard the shots from his office, came running into the lobby. Michael took aim at the principal. But before he could pull the trigger, Ben stepped in front of Michael and demanded that he stop the shooting.

This time, Michael listened. He put the gun down, then slouched to the floor and told Ben, "I can't believe I did that." Soon, police arrived, arrested Michael, and took him away.

The principal says Ben is a hero. "I have no doubt that Ben saved my life," says Bond. "There was one bullet left in the gun, and I know it was meant for me."

REACTING RIGHT

When people say he's a hero, Ben says, "Not me. I was just reacting to what was happening."

Just reacting? That was no ordinary reaction. There aren't many people who could do what Ben did.

"That took courage," said the principal.

Courage may have been Ben's first reaction, but in the following days, his reactions were more typical: shock, grief, confusion, pain. But never did he get angry at God.

"I guess I never thought of it that way," says Ben, whose dad is pastor of Concord Assembly of God church. "You don't know why stuff like this happens, but it does. And you can't really do anything to change that. You can change how you react to it, but you can't change the past. And you need to remember that God is always in control."

Ben says the tragedy has made his faith stronger, that he's never doubted God's love, even for a second.

"God is the only one who got us through this," he says. "God's always there for us, no matter what happens. He's our ultimate hope, and we have to stay focused on him.

"If I wasn't a Christian, I don't know how I'd react to something like this. It would be easy to just go nuts. But when you have God in your life, something like this forces you to lean on him even more."

Especially when it came to forgiveness. Ben says he forgave Michael "immediately."

"I'm not saying I wasn't mad at him, because I was," Ben says. "But I knew that forgiveness was the right thing to do. You can't hang on to bitterness, because it'll ruin the rest of your life. I forgave Mike because that's what God wants us to do."

Ben's not the only student to have forgiven Michael. Many others have publicly stated their forgiveness. Within days of the shooting, some of them had put up a huge banner in the Heath hallways that read, "We forgive you, Mike!"

None of the students has spoken with Michael since the shooting, but several, including Ben, have visited the Carneal family to express their love and forgiveness. "We've got to remember Michael's family," Ben says. "They're hurting, too."

LASTING EFFECTS

A tragedy like the one that occurred in West Paducah can affect people in drastic ways.

It can tear them apart.

Or it can bring them closer together. Which is just what happened with the prayer group at Heath, says Ben.

"We've all leaned on each other, prayed for each other, talked about it a lot," he says. "We've needed each other's support to get through this."

Other students - including many non-believers - noticed the group's solidarity. And they wanted to be a part of it.

Before the shooting, about 35 people regularly attended the morning prayer sessions. By the end of the year, that number was up to at least 100, says Ben, who was the group's leader before graduating last spring.

"All kinds of kids started coming to the prayer group," says Ben. "Now, I don't want to say that everything is peachy, because it's not. There's still some underlying stuff that a lot of people are dealing with.

"But other kids are curious. They're seeing the hope that we have in God. They're saying, 'If there's that much hope in it, there has to be something in it for me, too.' Some kids were coming to the group and getting to know God for the first time."

That's the most important thing to Ben, an evangelist at heart. Since the tragedy, Ben has been asked to speak in churches around the country. At one church service in Ohio, about 200 students approached the altar after Ben spoke, deciding to follow Jesus. That thrills Ben to the core.

"People are getting saved," says Ben, who has known since he was 12 that he wants to be a preacher, just like his dad. "To see kids get saved, to encourage kids, that's what I like to see."

Ben has had a year to reflect on what happened that tragic morning last December. He says he's learned a lot of things in the wake of it all. And he wants to tell those things to others.

"Some of the kids at my school realized this thing was so close to them," says Ben. "They realized life is real, and life can sometimes end quicker than we thought it could."

As a result, Ben wants to get the word out about getting right with God.

"I want to tell people about Jesus," he says. "I've learned it's important to stand up for God no matter what happens. God's always there for you, no matter what.

"As Christians, we have to live our lives strong, and be faithful to God. He'll always be there with us."

Just as he was for the three girls who died. Ben says the others in the prayer group have been comforted by knowing that Nicole, Kayce, and Jessica are in heaven.

"It hurts to see them go," Ben says, "but to them, there was no better way. They were praying. As soon as they said, 'Amen,' they saw the face of God."

________

Condensed from Campus Life (December 1998), © 1998 Christianity Today International.

=========

Holwick: After I preached this illustration in 2016, I googled Ben Strong to see how his life had turned out and found this article:

"When Grief Wanted a Hero, Truth Didn’t Get in the Way," by William Glaberson, New York Times, July 25, 2000; .

He was the teenage hero who turned a horrifying school shooting into a parable of good against evil. His name is Ben Strong, the gregarious son of a preacher, and he was said to have displayed remarkable courage when he disarmed Michael Carneal, the 14-year-old killer who opened fire on a prayer group at Heath High School here [Padukah, Kentucky] on Dec. 1, 1997.

In the days after the shooting, Mr. Strong, an appealing high school senior, was a regular on national television, where he was portrayed as a symbol of hope. His inspirational story of confronting the killer was repeated in newspapers across the country, including this one. Since then, he has been the subject of cover articles in magazines and has traveled the country preaching to young people. Now 20, and working at his father’s Assembly of God Church, he is often introduced as the hero of Heath High.

But as new information about the events that morning is starting to emerge because of a civil lawsuit, some people here are openly challenging the portrait of Mr. Strong as a hero who rushed up to a killer as he was firing and persuaded him to drop the gun he had used to kill three girls and injure five other students. In a brief interview recently, even Mr. Strong acknowledged for the first time to a reporter that the heroic picture of him might have been inaccurate.

“Sometimes,” he said in the interview, “people get the wrong idea.” In terse answers to questions, he agreed that he had not taken the gun away from Mr. Carneal, as he sometimes suggested after the shooting, and he agreed that he might not have influenced Mr. Carneal at all in his decision to stop shooting.

The Ben Strong story shows how chaos and panic can distort the accounts that witnesses give of the rampage killings that periodically horrify the country. It may show, too, how the stories of the killings are often shaped by the powerful desire of reporters and everyone else involved to find some good news, even signs of heroism, in horrible, inexplicable events.

A striking finding from a New York Times examination of rampage killings, published in April, is that long after the reporters depart, a different story of the events often emerges. Usually, the first accounts present inaccurate information about the killer, the crime, the victims or the roles of bystanders.

After the Columbine High School massacre in 1999, for example, one student, Cassie Bernall, was widely described as having answered “yes” when one of the two killers asked her whether she believed in God. She was killed, it was said, for her faith.

After that account put her in the realm of martyrdom and inspired a best-selling book, some news accounts last year reported that the “yes” most likely came from another student, Valeen Schnurr, who survived.

At Heath High School, the press took its lead from Bill J. Bond, the principal at the time of the shooting. Mr. Bond was the first person to tell reporters that a prayerful senior who was a football player, Benjamin Scott Strong, had probably saved lives, including Mr. Bond’s.

“The whole world wants a hero,” Mr. Bond said in a recent interview. “It is natural to look for some goodness in a tragedy, and I probably contributed to it.”

In testimony filed in McCracken County Circuit Court here this spring, which has received little public notice, Mr. Strong said he had won praise for his bravery “because of what people said, how things were portrayed” after the shooting, not what really happened.

The families of the three murdered girls sued Mr. Strong, as well as school officials, and many other people here they said could have prevented the killings. In the deposition, Mr. Strong testified this winter that the killer had discarded the gun on his own. “He just got done, and he dropped it,” Mr. Strong said.

Mr. Carneal, who is serving a life sentence after pleading guilty but mentally ill to murder, also testified in the suit. When a lawyer asked whether Mr. Strong had stopped him from shooting he replied, “No sir.”

When Mr. Bond was told in a recent interview about Mr. Strong’s newly released testimony, he said information about Mr. Strong’s actions had come from Mr. Strong initially and had always been somewhat imprecise.

“I asked him what he did,” Mr. Bond said, “and he said, ‘I told him to lay the gun down,’ and I took that at face value.”

With scores of reporters pressing around the school the afternoon of the shooting, Mr. Bond said, the story of Mr. Strong’s actions may have been exaggerated and “it probably developed a life of its own.”

Mr. Strong helped the story along. Within hours of the shooting, he was giving interviews and standing by as reporters described him as the leader of the prayer group, a title he no longer claims.

His descriptions of the shooting varied in the early interviews. But in some accounts he suggested there had been a tug of war over the gun. “And then I went for him and I grabbed him, you know,” he said on ABC’s “Good Morning America” the day after the shootings, “and he put down the gun and everything.”

Sometimes, he simply stood by or denied he was a hero, which some of his new admirers took as humility. On CNN’s “Larry King Live” a week after the killings, Mr. Strong listened silently while another guest, the Rev. Jerry Falwell, called Mr. Strong a “major hero” and repeated the widespread story. Mr. Falwell described how Mr. Strong “literally walked right up to the young man in the face of a firing gun and said, ‘Give me the gun.’ “

In Mr. Strong’s deposition, on Jan. 20, a transcript shows, the lawyer for the victims’ families, Mike Breen of Bowling Green, Ky., read him a Time magazine article published the week after the shooting.

Time, which had interviewed Mr. Strong, said that Mr. Strong “turned his eyes” on the killer “and, forcefully said, ‘Put down the gun.’” In his deposition, Mr. Strong said he could not guarantee that he had actually said any of that out loud. “Now the forcefully part,” he added, “that was written by them.”

Mr. Strong was questioned under oath by the lawyer for the victims’ families, partly because they had sued him. Mr. Strong has always acknowledged that Mr. Carneal warned him not to come to the prayer group that Monday because something was going to happen.

But Mr. Strong has denied that he had any reason to suspect that Mr. Carneal would commit murder. The judge dismissed the case against Mr. Strong and most of the other defendants.

It is clear from the deposition testimony that Mr. Strong did eventually go to Mr. Carneal while some other students ran away. He might have reached Mr. Carneal the same time as Mr. Bond.

Mr. Carneal, according to the testimony, had by then stopped shooting, discarded his gun and was slumping to the ground, perhaps in tears. It is undisputed that when Mr. Strong and Mr. Bond arrived, Mr. Carneal was distraught and asked Mr. Strong to “kill me, please kill me.”

Mr. Carneal said in his testimony that Mr. Strong did speak as he approached. He quoted Mr. Strong as saying: “What are you shooting people for?” Then, Mr. Carneal said, Mr. Strong groaned, gritted his teeth and took Mr. Carneal by the shoulders and shook him.

Mr. Strong ended two brief interviews recently by saying that he was not comfortable talking about the subject any longer. But he was accepting of the idea that the story of what happened the day of the shooting might be different from the one that is widely known. “Truth is truth,” he said very quietly. “That’s a good thing.”

In his deposition, Mr. Strong suggested that he wanted to be brave. But in shock, he said, “Your body doesn’t function like it normally does.”

After the first days, the story of Mr. Strong as a hero might have been beyond his ability to control it. In large ways and small, the story was being used by other people who wanted a hero in a tragedy, including the news media. But in West Paducah, the families of the murdered girls seethed as they said they believed Mr. Strong was profiting from their daughters’ deaths.

“I think he’s got some problems, some reason he has to think of himself as a hero,” said Joe James, whose daughter Jessica was killed in the shooting. The parents of the three girls who were killed all said they were infuriated by a Web site, bstrong.com, which advertised a CD with a song by professional artists titled “BStrong” and included remarks from Mr. Strong. In the recent interview, Mr. Strong said he had not received any proceeds from the sale of the CD. The producers of the CD have said it was a fund-raising effort for the victims’ families.

Whatever part Mr. Strong played in perpetuating his story, his public image has quietly divided people here. To some, he remains a young man who, no matter what, represents positive values in stark contrast to those of the killer.

But some here say the Ben Strong story has overshadowed the tragedy itself and they are bitter about him. In May, about 30 students from a parochial school near here, Christian Fellowship School, traveled to an intramural event at Oral Roberts University in Tulsa, Okla.

In a large meeting for all the high school students, a speaker told the assembled crowd that teenagers today should be more like Ben Strong, the student who confronted the killer in Paducah, said Cathy Davis, a parent from here who was with the group as a chaperone.

Quietly, the group from here rose and left the room, said some who were there. “Some of the kids were terribly offended,” Mrs. Davis said, “because they know Ben Strong is not the hero he was played up to be.”

Heaven's Heroes

Daniel 12:3

Part of the incredible impact of the attacks on the World Trade Center was that everyday people suddenly became national heroes. Fire trucks would roll through New York City with weary firefighters on board - and New Yorkers would erupt in spontaneous cheers. Ground Zero, the devastated area at and around the site of the collapsed towers, became known as Ground Hero. Professional athletes, who are our nation's heroes in less turbulent times, kept saying, "We're not the heroes - they're the heroes." Americans will not soon forget those firefighters, the police, the medical personnel, and the countless volunteers who gave everything they had to try to rescue those who were caught in those collapsing towers. The word "hero" may never be the same.

I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A WORD WITH YOU today about "Heaven's Heroes."

We know what a hero is - ultimately it is someone who does whatever it takes to rescue someone who will die if they don't. Apparently, that's God's definition of a "hero" as well.

Consider this exciting promise from Daniel 12:3, our word for today from the Word of God. "Those who lead many to righteousness will shine like the stars forever and ever." God seems to be reserving special reward, special recognition for those who lead people to a right relationship with Him. And heaven's applause will last "forever and ever." In other words, heaven's heroes are those who help other people get to heaven.

Proverbs 24:11 underscores the "life-or-deathness" of our spiritual rescue mission. God says, "Rescue those being led away to death." Ezekiel puts it in the context of a watchman on the city wall - "If the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet to warn the people and the sword comes and takes the life of one of them, that man will be taken away because of his sin, but I will hold the watchman accountable for his blood."

If you belong to Jesus Christ, you have a life-or-death responsibility for the folks in your world who don't belong to Jesus Christ. You have the information about what Jesus did for them on the cross and how they can begin a relationship with Him - and that message is their only hope of heaven. So you are uniquely positioned to be the spiritual rescuer of the people you know, the people you care about. You are where you are to give the people there a chance to go to heaven. Please - don't let them down. This isn't about rescuing someone so they can have 30, maybe 40 more years to live on earth - this is about whether they live or die for all eternity!

Yes, it feels risky to tell them about Jesus - but then, rescue is always risky. The reason you take those risks is because you can't stand the thought of that person dying without a chance. So you go where they are, you pray with a desperate urgency for God's open doors and God's words, and you give whatever you have to give to bring them out.

Saving lives makes a person a hero. When you lead someone to the Man who died for them, you are saving a life forever. And you become one of heaven's heroes.

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. 'Practical Answers to Real Life Issues'

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #3871 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database rescue

Quiet Heroism: and the Culture That Produces It

When I was in the White House, I came to appreciate people we called "middle Americans." This group wasn't defined by geography. Instead, its characteristics were shared values like faith, family, and the importance of hard work. President Nixon never tired of expressing his admiration for the ordinary working Americans who strove to make a better life for their families.

And that's not all that these people have done. As we have learned in these past two months, these are the people who hold our civilization together. They are the ones who make the sacrifices necessary to preserve our way of life.

Veterans Day is the time we set aside to honor those who serve our country in the armed forces. America has rediscovered the men and women of the armed forces. As Newsweek writes, after years of neglect and scorn, the ROTC is "cool" on many American campuses. Athletes and actors have dedicated their performances to the troops in Central Asia.

But these aren't the only people in uniform that we should honor this Veterans' Day. The events of September 11 remind us that fireman and policemen are just as indispensable as the armed forces. The gallantry of those firemen running into the World Trade Center can be compared to that of soldiers running into battle. That's why people are wearing hats that read "FDNY" and "NYPD."

Our firemen and policemen have something in common with our soldiers and sailors besides valor. They are products of the same group. The armed forces, like our police and fire departments, are disproportionately comprised of the Middle Americans I described earlier.

They are not the children of our elites. They come from working families. They come from all parts of the country: Irish Catholic kids from New York, black and white kids from the South, Hispanic kids from the Southwest.

What they have in common is a set of values -- values that increasingly distinguish them from the broader culture, especially our elites. They tend to be more conservative and place higher esteem on virtues like duty, honor, and sacrifice. As a study done by the Triangle Institute found, military officers "tend to take a negative view of civilian society" and view it as being "in moral crisis." Similar attitudes can be found among police and firemen, who have a higher standard of belief in the virtues of this country.

Which makes the new esteem for these people among our elites ironic. It's precisely the cultural attitudes of Middle America that earned them the scorn of our elites. Now, our elites are learning, it's the people they disdained who holds our country together. If the elites are intellectually honest, they must acknowledge that it's the values they labeled as "retrograde" that safeguard their way of life.

There's a lesson here for Christians about what I call "Christian patriotism." As C. S. Lewis wrote, we can't love the whole world. But we should remember that God has placed us in a particular community at a particular time. And we're called to love those around us. Loving them means serving them and being the best of citizens. So this Veterans Day, let us pledge to be patriots in the true sense, and let us be grateful as well not just for the sacrifice of these men and women in uniform, but also for the culture that produces them.

For further reading:

Allison Samuels, "They Know I'm About Something", Newsweek, November 12, 2001.

The Triangle Institute for Security Studies

_________________________

Copyright © 2001 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. 'BreakPoint with Chuck Colson' is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database patriotism

A Recipe For Heroes

Luke 9:23

It was probably one of the greatest adventures in American history - the Lewis and Clark Expedition. The size of the United States doubled overnight and President Thomas Jefferson picked his aide, Meriwether Lewis, to lead a group of about forty men to explore a route from St. Louis to the Pacific. The journey took more than two years, covering thousands of miles, meeting with some fifty Indian tribes, and charting a vast area, largely unexplored by anyone other than Native Americans.

One of Meriwether Lewis' first steps in his preparation was to seek out his former commanding officer, William Clark, to share the command of this historic journey into the unknown. In his letter to Clark, he asked him to "participate with me in the expedition's fatigues, its dangers, and its honors." It took a long time for the letters to make it back and forth, but William Clark's reply was worth the wait. Here's what he said: "I will cheerfully join you and partake of the dangers, difficulties, and fatigues, and I anticipate the honor and rewards." Good answer. It made him a hero.

I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about "A Recipe For Heroes."

When I read Captain Lewis' invitation to Captain Clark, I couldn't help but think how much it reminds me of the much greater invitation that Jesus Christ gives to you and me. It is not an invitation to a party or vacation - it's an invitation to join Him in a bold adventure, filled with "dangers, difficulties, and fatigues." Oh yes, and the "honor and the rewards."

Our Western idea of a faith that is cushioned pews and convenient sacrifice flies right in the face of what Jesus called us to. It's in Luke 9:23-24, our word for today from the Word of God. "Then He said to them all, 'If anyone would come after Me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow Me." To which you can almost hear someone saying, "In that case, I think I'd rather run my own life - it sounds like there's too much to lose in following Jesus." Listen to Jesus' startling equation - "For whoever wants to save his life (or hang onto his life) will lose it, but whoever loses his life for Me will save it." Hang onto your life, you lose it. Give it away and you find it.

Maybe you've tried discount Christianity. It's very popular. Of course, it's only a pale shadow of the disciple Christianity Jesus calls us to. You go to the meetings, you believe the beliefs, you give in the offerings, you sometimes read your Bible, you pray. But it's a surface commitment, a limited commitment, a commitment that still leaves you in control. My guess is that discount Christianity has left you unfulfilled and unsatisfied. It can't satisfy you. You were made to be abandoned to Jesus, taking up a cross, making choices that might cost you, building His kingdom instead of yours, and accepting assignments from Him that go way beyond your comfort zone.

And as for "the honor and the rewards"? Jesus said that no one who sacrificed for His great adventure "will fail to receive a hundred times as much in this present age ... and in the age to come, eternal life." (Mark 10:29, 30) You can't outgive Jesus. True Christianity is expensive and ultimately fulfilling ... ultimately rewarding.

Jesus is asking you to take your commitment to Him to a whole new level. And you can be sure the cost of not following Him is far greater than the cost of following Him. He's waiting for your answer to His invitation. By God's grace, your answer will be - "Jesus, I will cheerfully join You and I'll partake of the danger, difficulties, and fatigues, and I anticipate the honor and the rewards."

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

Jesus, Help Me: the Faith of Todd Beamer

Luke 1:74

"I don't think we're going to get out of this thing. I'm going to have to go out on faith."

It was the voice of Todd Beamer, the passenger -- and Wheaton College graduate -- who said "Let's roll" as he led the charge against the terrorists who had hijacked United Flight 93, the one, you will remember, that crashed in the Pennsylvania countryside.

The whole world knows how brave Beamer and his fellow passengers were on September 11. But this week we learned more fully what buttressed that bravery: Faith in Jesus Christ. Todd died as he lived, a faithful evangelical believer.

In an article titled "The Real Story of Flight 93," Newsweek reveals gripping new details from the actual transcripts of the now-recovered cockpit voice recorder. "Todd had been afraid," Newsweek relates. "More than once, he cried out for his Savior."

After passengers were herded to the back of the jet, Beamer called the GTE Customer Center in Oakbrook, Illinois. He told supervisor Lisa Jefferson about the hijacking. The passengers were planning to jump the terrorists, he said. And then he asked her to pray with him.

As Newsweek relates, "Beamer kept a Lord's Prayer bookmark in his Tom Clancy novel, but he didn't need any prompting. He began to recite the ancient litany, and Jefferson joined him: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name."

As they finished, Beamer added, "Jesus, help me." And then, Beamer and his fellow passengers prayed a prayer that has comforted millions down through the centuries -- the prayer that David wrote in a time of great anguish: The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want ... Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil.

And then the famous last words: "Are you guys ready? Let's roll."

We now know from the cockpit voice recorder that Beamer and other passengers wrestled with the hijackers and forced the plane to crash into the ground, killing themselves but foiling what was believed to have been the hijackers' plan to fly Flight 93 into the Capitol or the White House.

As Christians, we know that God can bring good out of evil. In Todd Beamer, the world witnesses a faith that held up in the extremity of fear. A faith that is even now comforting his widow and two young sons.

Lisa Beamer told NBC's Dateline, "You know, in the Lord's Prayer, it asks us to forgive our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us." As Todd prayed this prayer in the last moments of his life, in a way, Lisa said, "He was forgiving those people for what they were doing, the most horrible thing you could ever do to someone."

It wasn't Todd Beamer's job to fight terrorists. He was just a passenger who along with several others did what he didn't have to do but foiled a terrible evil that might have been done to his country.

As Flight 93 hurtled towards destruction, Todd Beamer could not have known that his quiet prayers would ultimately be heard by millions -- that the story of his last acts on earth would be a witness to the Lord he loved and served and a lasting example of true heroism.

==============

For more information: Karen Breslau, Eleanor Clift, and Evan Thomas, "The Real Story of Flight 93," Newsweek, December 3, 2001.

The Todd M. Beamer Foundation website is at .

[Editor's note: We have learned that Todd Beamer was a subscriber to the daily e-mail BreakPoint transcripts.]

_________________________

Copyright © 2001 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. 'BreakPoint with Chuck Colson' is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

Quotes On Heroes

"Everybody has a need for heroes, I think, people to mold themselves after, people they want to be like. You have to be able to dream, but those dreams should be about real people who have actually done things."

-- Dave Thomas (1932-2002), founder of Wendy's International, B&P 3/10/03

from (various) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database example

Unknown Soldiers

Luke 19:17

As Americans, we honor the Unknown Soldiers, those men who anonymously gave their lives to serve and defend our nation. In Arlington National Cemetery, “Where Valor Proudly Sleeps,” lay three soldiers who have received the highest military honors, including the Congressional Medal of Honor, while no one even knows their names.

On the Tomb of the Unknowns are the words “Here Rests In Honored Glory An American Soldier Known But To God.” The soldiers of the U.S. Army's Third Infantry Regiment who guard this tomb memorize the Sentinels' Creed, which says in part, “It is he who commands the respect I protect. His bravery that made us so proud. Surrounded by well meaning crowds by day[,] alone in the thoughtful peace of night, this soldier will in honored glory rest under my eternal vigilance.”

The American people understand that these men died for a cause, they died to defend our nation, they died to promote democracy. The Unknown Soldiers gave the ultimate sacrifice -- their own lives -- to see freedom extended to the world. While we do not know their names, we celebrate their deeds.

In God's army, the greatest works of revival and evangelism often stem from the efforts of unknown Christian soldiers. The Christian church needs more soldiers who are willing to work, to serve, to die in order to see the mission accomplished. The finest, most trustworthy soldiers are those who work not for medals, awards or recognition, but instead to protect one's brothers and finish one's missions.

While a few soldiers in the army receive acclaim and honor for their heroic deeds, the great majority of soldiers defend their country quietly, anonymously -- simply because it is their job, their duty. As Christian believers, we need more faithful, humble soldiers who serve not for awards and recognition, but simply to do their duty to serve Christ and to bring others to Him.

You know the names of a few famous soldiers who have demonstrated bravery and honor during times of harrowing danger. Each of us has read about Eisenhower and MacArthur and Pershing and Bradley. But the average citizen knows not the untold millions of American men and women who have served this nation faithfully, quietly, heroically.

In the church of Jesus Christ, we have a few famous, recognizable leaders. These well-known ministers preach on television and radio, they write best-selling books, they pastor large, prominent churches. Undoubtedly, God has a place in His Kingdom for Christians who receive acclaim and honor because of their influential status in religious circles.

I believe, however, that God would have us to know the untold millions who throughout the centuries have served in the army of God faithfully, quietly, heroically. The greatest spiritual accomplishments occur when human beings achieve extraordinary things for God, and He alone receives the credit. In Acts 20 [actually, 21:19], Luke writes that the Apostle Paul “began to relate one by one the things which God had done among the Gentiles through his ministry. And when they heard it they began glorifying God.”

Did you notice that? Did you notice who received the acclaim? God was glorified when the elders heard about the happenings within Paul's ministry. God the Father received the glory and praise, not Paul. Though he had been faithful when faced with opposition, Paul understood that spiritual successes do not prove the power of the minister, but rather demonstrate the majesty of a sovereign God.

In our churches, we need more people who would seek to glorify God and care less about getting the credit for religious accomplishments. We are not called to build buildings or write books, we are called to glorify God. If buildings and books bring praise to the Almighty, then go ahead and build and write. However, if earthly accomplishments done in the name of Christ are used to advance the name and reputation of a Christian worker, we have missed our assignment.

May we all remember the words of our Savior, who instructed us to “let your light shine before men in such a way that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven” (Matthew 5:16). God the Father wants and needs anonymous soldiers who faithfully fight the good fight and point all praise toward Calvary. The Tomb of the Unknown Soldiers announces to the world that American military personnel have a cause worth fighting and dying for. Our churches and our ministries must also demonstrate to the world that our cause, our Christ, is worth fighting and dying for.

Are you a soldier for God? Have you enlisted in His army by taking the oath of allegiance called the prayer of salvation? If you have not, may I invite you to join the only army guaranteed to win every battle, every time? If you are already a soldier of Christ, are you seeking to advance the cause of your Commander, or do you seek medals and public notoriety? May we all seek to be soldiers of God, unknown soldiers, who faithfully serve God because our duty is to glorify Him, not to make a name for ourselves.

__________

Trey Graham is senior pastor of First Baptist Church in Melissa, Texas.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #18420]

The Heart of A Hero

Esther 4:14

When that terrorist bomb ripped apart the Federal Office Building in Oklahoma City on that infamous April 19, Mark was on the scene within ten minutes. Today that scene of horrendous carnage and violence is a tranquil Memorial Site in downtown Oklahoma City. One night when I was speaking in that city, Mark -- who is a police officer -- took me there for a personal tour that was deeply moving. Gesturing toward the quiet memorial area that stands where the building once stood, he showed me where the nursery had been, from which he had carried the youngest victims of the bombing. And he pointed to the area where he had assisted in the dramatic rescue of a woman who thought she was going to die but who was brought out alive by some valiant rescuers. Mark remembers making a quick call to his wife that day, telling her and his daughters that he loved them, and not expecting to ever see them again. As he and the men around him looked at the sagging wreckage over their heads, Mark said to his supervisor, “I think we're going to die here.” They must have all thought that. But they refused to leave because lives were at stake.

I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about “The Heart Of a Hero.”

Standing next to a man who had risked his life on this very ground to save other lives, it struck me full force -- a rescuer forgets about himself. Or he'll never take the risks to go in to save a life -- someone who will die if he doesn't. And I thought about what it is that keeps most people who have been rescued by Jesus from trying to rescue other spiritually dying people. We're so focused on ourselves that either we don't care about those lives at stake or we're paralyzed by our fears of how they might react if we told them about Jesus -- who is heaven's Rescuer. In either case, we do nothing because we're all wrapped up in ourselves. The exact opposite of a rescuer, who abandons his self-interest because someone will die if he doesn't.

In a sense, all of us who know Christ are actually “Esthers.” She's the Jewish girl who became the queen of Persia without anyone ever discovering her real roots. Then came the day when a shrewd conspiracy caused the king to approve a decree for the slaughter of all Jews. Mordecai, the man who had raised Esther, sent her a message, urging her to go to the king and plead for the life of her people. She was fearful because the law of the land dictated that anyone who entered the king's presence unbidden would be executed -- unless he extended his golden scepter to them. In Esther 4:14-16, Mordecai appeals to her with this plea: “Who knows but that you have come to royal position for such a time as this?” Esther does go to the king, uttering this courageous declaration: “If I perish, I perish.” The heart of a rescuer. It doesn't matter what happens to me -- it matters what happens to the people who will die if I don't do something. And her people were saved.

Like Esther, you have been assigned where you are -- where you work, where you live, or where you go to school -- to help save the lives of the people there. People who, without a relationship with the Man who died for their sins, face an eternity in hell and no hope of heaven. And you have the life-saving information about Jesus that can rescue them. It's not about changing their religion or winning an argument. It's about whether they have a chance to know the only Person who can save them -- Jesus. You're afraid of what might happen if you went in for the rescue. It might damage your relationship, and you might mess it up. Would you think like a rescuer -- fearing more what will happen if you don't attempt the rescue than what will happen if you do?

Jesus abandoned Himself completely to rescue you. There is no rescue unless the rescuer forgets about himself or herself. Someone's eternity may depend on you doing just that. God put you where you are so they could have a chance at heaven. Don't fail them. Don't fail the Rescuer who died so you could live.

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4337 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database herorisk

Blessed Are the Merciful

Luke 7:22

James Kennedy was a mentally disabled young black man in South Carolina who didn't have much going for him.

Although he kept to himself and didn't bother anyone, he was an easy target. Kids picked on him and adults kept their distance.

But one day Kennedy -- better known as “Radio” -- was fortunate enough to meet Harold Jones, a high school football coach. Full of kindness and compassion, Jones befriended Radio and made him part of the football team.

Under Jones's care, Radio flourished. He became a welcome part of the high school and a beloved member of the community. Some didn't appreciate what Jones was doing, but he knew it was right and he wasn't going to back down. And although not all the students at the school were crazy about Radio to begin with, he gradually won them over with his loving heart and unconditional acceptance.

Now made famous on the big screen, the true story of Jones and his love for Radio is heartwarming. The word “hero” gets bandied about regularly in sports. While many athletes and sports figures don't deserve that label, Jones certainly does.

As I watched this inspirational story unfold, I thought about someone closer to home. I thought about my friend Chuck, who is one of my heroes.

Like Jones, Chuck has done something truly remarkable, something not many people would be willing to do. He has sacrificed a lot for someone very similar to Radio.

Tommy is a mentally disabled young man who was pretty much a social outcast. First, Tommy likes to talk ... a lot ... and then some more. Sometimes you can't get him to stop. He'll talk about basketball and football for hours. At times, he can be downright annoying.

Tommy also had a wretched home life. He didn't have a warm place to sleep. He didn't take showers, and he didn't brush his teeth, sometimes for weeks at a time. That alone made it difficult to be around him.

But Chuck saw past all that. Chuck saw that even with his disability, Tommy wasn't meeting his potential. And while others would show small acts of kindness toward Tommy, Chuck went all out. He welcomed Tommy into his home permanently. He has taught Tommy about basic hygiene and social graces, and in only a few months' time the changes in Tommy are noticeable.

People like Radio and Tommy are constant reminders that human life is precious. Although not as fortunate as most people, they are infinitely valuable in God's eyes -- and obviously, in the eyes of people like Chuck.

Treating the less fortunate with mercy is not always the easiest thing to do. Our lives are busy and resources are limited. We can find lots of excuses not to do what Chuck has done.

But I'd venture a guess that Chuck would resonate with one of the most memorable lines in the movie. Jones was talking about everything that Radio had accomplished, and everything he had come to mean to people in the community. While he was so busy trying to teach Radio, it was really Radio who was teaching him, Jones said.

The world needs more people like Jones, and like my friend Chuck. I wish I were more like them.

New Jersey's Hero

Ezra 10:4

In 1942, on a black October night in the steaming jungles of Guadalcanal, the Marine sergeant had single-handedly wiped out a company of Japanese trying to overrun his position on the Tenaru River. With a Colt .45 pistol and two machine guns - one cradled in his arms after the other was knocked out - he stopped a screaming banzai attack and held out until dawn, when reinforcements came up. Nearly a hundred enemy dead were sprawled around his cut-off outpost.

His name was John Basilone, an Italian American from Raritan, New Jersey. Basilone was one of the first heroes of World War II, and the first enlisted Marine to receive the Medal of Honor. He was brought back to the United States to much acclaim - rallies were held in his honor and he was given a $5,000 war bond. He was offered a promotion to second lieutenant but turned it down. I'm a plain soldier, he said, and I want to stay one. He could have remained stateside training troops and selling was bonds. Instead, he said farewell to his new wife and went back overseas.

February, 19, 1945. Iwo Jima. At the head of another machine gun squad, Basilone led his troops over the beaches of black sand. The invasion was ninety minutes old and the Marines were under a withering fire. An incoming mortar sounded its eerie warning; then a shattering blast. Basilone lunged forward in midstride, arms flung over his head. He and four comrades died in that instant. On his outstretched left arm was a tattoo: Death before Dishonor! For his leadership he was posthumously awarded the Navy Cross.

Beyond dispute, John Basilone had courage. Do you? All Christians are at war, though our weapons are not the world's weapons. We need the courage of our convictions and the armor of the Spirit.

__________

Basillone material from Bill D. Ross, “Iwo Jima - Legacy of Valor”

A Triumphant Return: Return of the King

After seven years in the making, the final film of the LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy, THE RETURN OF THE KING, opens this Wednesday. The good news is that, like the others, it was worth the wait. The better news is that, even more than the others, what we see on screen respects the Christian faith of the book's author, J. R. R. Tolkien.

Tolkien wrote that LORD OF THE RINGS is a “fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first but consciously in the revision.” Director Peter Jackson and screenwriters Philippa Boyens and Fran Walsh knew this. So they consciously honored the things that “were important to Tolkien.” Many of his beliefs, thus, come through on screen.

What sets LORD OF THE RINGS apart from other stories about good versus evil, aside from its extraordinarily imaginative treatment, is the way Christian truth is portrayed, how it confounds the wisdom of the world. While the great and powerful play a role in defeating evil, in the end, it's the humble and unremarkable hobbits who save the day.

This paradox, the weak shaming the wise and the mighty, is most prominent in THE RETURN OF THE KING, both the book and the film. At the end, the hero of the third film isn't Aragon, the king-to-be, or even Frodo, the ring-bearer. It's Samwise Gamgee, a gardener and arguably the humblest of the four hobbits.

Time after time, when it appears that the quest to destroy the Ring of Power is about to fail, Sam somehow summons up the will to go on and, most importantly, takes Frodo with him. The cinematic Sam mirrors what Tolkien wrote of in his book: “His will was set and only death would break it.”

Another instance of Tolkien's faith coming through occurs in an exchange between Pippin, one of the hobbits, and Gandalf, the wizard. Hours before a battle in which he is sure he will die, Pippin tells Gandalf that he “never thought it would end like this.”

Gandalf replies, “End? No, the journey doesn't end here. There's another path we all must take. The gray rain curtain of this world rolls back, and it will change to the silver clouds, and then you see it.” When Pippin asks, “See what?” Gandalf replies, “White shores and beyond, a far green country under a swift sunrise.” Gandalf's words, with a vivid picture of heaven, comfort Pippin as he contemplates battle and possible death.

According to screenwriters Boyens and Walsh, THE RETURN OF THE KING is ultimately about faith: faith in the need for good to oppose evil; faith in those who join you in that struggle; and faith in a higher power that ensures good's eventual triumph.

Seven years ago, bringing Tolkien's masterpiece to the screen in a way that did the story justice was considered unlikely — even less likely that it would honor Tolkien's faith. But that is what this film does. And that makes THE RETURN OF THE KING an easy one to recommend. A great book has become a great film precisely because it remembers what the author thought was “most important” — the truths of a Christian worldview.

FOR FURTHER READING AND INFORMATION:

• Michael H. Kleinschrodt, “Actor Sean Astin saw Hobbit's courage from the beginning,” The Times-Picayune (New Orleans), 12 December 2003.

• Steve Beard, “The Return of the King,” Thunderstruck.org.

• Jeffrey Overstreet, “Film Forum: Christian Critics Hail Third Rings, Harass Last Samurai,” Christianity Today, 11 December 2003.

• Monique Devereux, “The Return of the King — the international verdict,” New Zealand Herald, 9 December 2003. Read more articles on the making of the trilogy from the Herald.

• Read more about The Return of the King at HollywoodJesus.com.

• R. R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings (Houghton Mifflin, 1974).

• Kurt D. Bruner, Finding God in the Lord of the Rings (Tyndale, 2001).

• See the BreakPoint Commentaries: “Preparatio Evangelica,” “Now at a Theater Near You,” and “Defrocking Frodo and the Death of the Imagination.” (Archived commentaries; free registration required.)

• Roberto Rivera, “The Lord of the Rings,” Boundless, 20 December 2001.

• Gina Dalfonzo, “The Myth That Really Happened,” BreakPoint Online, 23 December 2002.

• Kelley Reep, “Between Two Masters,” BreakPoint Online, 24 January 2003.

• Colleen Carroll, “Tolkien, Transformer of Culture,” BreakPoint Online, 19 April 2002.

• Steven Garber, “Good Books, Bad Books,” BreakPoint WorldView, January/February 2003.

• See the “BreakPoint with Chuck Colson Recommended Films List.”

__________

Copyright (c) 2003 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database herovictory

When Fear Isn't Final

Exodus 3

It may have been the most memorable - maybe even the most defining moment in the history of our generation - the September 11th terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Most of us were marked indelibly by just watching it on television. My friend Nathan lived it. It was his first visit to New York, and his business took him high up in one of the Twin Towers. After the attacks, while there was still great confusion as to whether to evacuate or to stay in the building, Nathan disregarded the announcement to “return to your offices.” That decision saved his life. He made his way down the long stairwell until he neared the bottom. There rescuers guided him and many others with him to a safe exit, not long before the tower collapsed in those few horrific seconds. I'll never forget when Nathan told me about the firefighters he saw as he neared the main floor: he said, “I looked in their eyes and thought, 'They must be as frightened as I am.’ Except I was going down, and they were going up.” Is it any wonder we call them heroes?

I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about “When Fear isn't Final.”

When rescuers go into a deadly situation in order to save lives, are they afraid? Oh, yes, they are. Does their fear decide what they will do? No. When the Bible talks about rescue, it's not just referring to saving a person so they can live maybe thirty or forty more years on earth. When God talks rescue, He's talking about saving a person so they can live forever. Some of the spiritually dying people Jesus came to save work where you work, they live where you live, they go to school where you go to school, they participate in things you participate in. And He's placed a rescuer in their lives so they can have a chance at Jesus, and a chance at heaven. You probably looked at that rescuer in the mirror this morning.

And what is it that keeps most of us who know Christ from actually talking with the people we know about the Jesus they don't know? Isn't it pretty much fear? We're afraid of what they might think, of how it might affect our relationship, of what we might lose, of how we might mess it up. All too often, the fear decides it. We remain silent, and they remain unwarned.

In Exodus 3, beginning with verse 8, our word for today from the Word of God, the Lord is telling Moses that He is no longer going to tolerate the slavery and misery of His people. He says, “I have come down to rescue them.” I can just hear Moses saying, “Oh great!” Then the Lord says, “So now, go. I am sending you.” I can just hear Moses saying, “Oh no!” He wants the people He cares about rescued - but he's afraid to be the one to try it. Just like us, when God says, “I'm sending you to rescue the people around you.” God's answer? “I will be with you ... Go: I will help you speak and will teach you what to say.” And Moses becomes God's rescuer.

A correspondent who observed the heroism of the GI's who stormed the beaches of Normandy on D-Day knew they were afraid of those mined beaches and those German guns. But still they went in - like the rescuers of the Twin Towers. The correspondent made this challenging observation: “Courage is not the absence of fear; it is the disregard of it.” That's what will finally give the people you know their chance to belong to Jesus - God's courage in you that will not be the absence of fear. Mine has never gone away. It will be your disregard of your fear. It will no longer be the fear that decides what you do. For two reasons: one, you are simply going to be God's glove, with His hand in your life helping you do what you thought you could never do. And two, because there is a greater fear than what might happen if you do try to rescue a spiritually dying person you know - it's the fear of what might happen if you don't. Nothing could be worse than that.

The heroism of saving a life isn't reserved for those who aren't afraid - but for those who disregard their fear - because a life is at stake! And you can't just let them die.

__________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4458 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database herowitnessing

Obsession Or Inspiration?

John 13:15

At 15 years of age, Arnold Schwarzenegger decided he wanted to be the best body builder in the world. And when he saw a massive bodybuilder named Reg Park in a movie, he knew he had found his hero. In Schwarzenegger’s own words, “From that point on I was utterly dominated by Reg Park. His image was my ideal. I found out everything I could about Reg Park. I bought all the magazines that published his programs. I learned how he started training, what he ate, how he lived, and how he did his workouts. I became obsessed with Reg Park; he was the image in front of me from the time I started training.... I pasted his pictures on all the walls of my bedroom. ... I studied every photograph of him I could get my hands on – noting the size of his chest, arms, thighs, back and abdominals. This inspired me to work even harder. When I felt my lungs burning as though they would burst and my veins bulging with blood, I loved it. I knew then that I was growing, making one more step toward becoming like Reg Park.”

__________

Arnold: The Education of a Bodybuilder, by Arnold Schwarzenegger and Douglas Kent Hall, A Fireside Book, New York, pp. 18-20.

from Internet · Arnold Schwarzenegger via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database inspirationhero

The Hero, Ancient Yet Modern

Luke 17:10

Each semester in my sophomore literature course, I teach an ancient Anglo-Saxon poem, “The Dream of the Rood,” in which the narrator has a vision of the cross (a “rood” is a decorative cross used for contemplation) and describes Christ's suffering.

In the poem, the cross itself speaks, describing the “open and malicious” wounds, the “blood that poured” from Christ and the harsh spectacle of seeing the “God of Hosts grievously stretched out.” My favorite lines, though, are those that describe Christ as a “young hero” who hastens “with zeal to grapple” with the cross and death. Christ is a “warrior” who conquers death through His passion and His resurrection.

Class discussions always turn to how the poet depicts Christ. My students always remark how they had never thought about Christ as a hero. Many even observe that the idea makes them uncomfortable. There is something disconcerting about the notion of Christ as a warrior who grapples with death on our behalf.

When we finish with The Dream of the Rood, I follow it up with the words to two great hymns: “When I Survey the Wondrous Cross” and “Alas! And Did My Saviour Bleed.” The lyrics of both hymns are great poetry in their own regard, but when we read such words as, “Did e'er such love and sorrow meet, / Or thorns compose so rich a crown,” or “Was it for crimes that I have done / He groaned upon the tree?” it often becomes the most moving moment of the semester's studies. Sometimes I am moved to tears as I read those words, in spite of the fact that I've taught them in a score of classes over the last decade.

I know that the trailer for Mel Gibson's “The Passion of The Christ” makes me squirm and brings me to tears; I don't know how I will make it through the film itself. In fact, I can hardly take communion without being reduced to tears as I contemplate Christ's suffering for my sins.

Many reviewers of The Passion have wondered how the film will sit with Christians. For example, Kenneth Woodward's opening day review in The New York Times observed that “Mr. Gibson's raw images invade our religious comfort zone, which has long since been cleansed of the Gospel's harsher edges.”

Indeed, we live at ease in our American Zion. We have air-conditioned sanctuaries, padded seats and altars that bear few decorations other than the occasional satin and silk worship banner or Christian flag. For us, Jesus is the babe in the manger, depicted by a favored child each Christmas season. Sometimes Jesus wears a bathrobe at Easter season while the choir sings about the passion. Our imaginations have sanitized our images of Christ until He is less than divine and often less than manly. He is a “good guy,” like most of us, who does nice things to help make the world a better place. Such a view, though, underestimates the ineffectiveness of our good works in the face of the weight of our own sins.

Occasionally I also teach a 14th-century work, the “Gesta Romanorum,” that sums up the truth about Christ's redemptive work. In the brief story, a man has a vision of heaven where he sees a balance scale. On the one side of the balance he sees all of his sins piled up. The balance tips over as far as it will go, for there are a few good works in the opposing side but they cannot budge the weight of the sins. The man cries out in despair, “Shall it not help that thou died for me and suffered thy painful passion for me?” At that point, a great nail falls into the balance, overshadowing the weight of the sins and signifying the full gravity of Christ's redemptive act.

That redemptive act was no dream-vision; it was the ultimate act of heroism from the Creator Himself, who longed to redeem His creation from sin. As Isaiah prophesied, our Redeemer “was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed” (53:5-6, NIV).

Perhaps The Passion will challenge our thinking to move beyond our comfortable American Christianity. Perhaps we will be compelled to remember what it is like to be lost and hopeless. Perhaps we will find ourselves enabled to act on our theology and not just speak of it. Perhaps we will be motivated to act heroically in a world that is desperate for heroes who will sacrifice their lives for others, one small act of kindness at a time, in emulation of the Hero who did so for us.

I pray that Mel Gibson's Passion will help us to rediscover the forgotten Hero whom we worship, a Hero who conquered death, who released the captives, and who desires to have a personal relationship with each of us.

__________

Gene C. Fant Jr., chairs the English department at Union University in Jackson, Tennessee.

from Baptist Press · Gene C. Fant Jr. via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database cross

Giving Your Life For A Greater Cause

2 Corinthians 5

Every once in a while we get a wakeup call regarding the meaning of the word “hero.” In our culture, the word is used routinely to describe outstanding athletes. But then someone does something really heroic and we remember what the word really means. Pat Tillman, starting safety for professional football's Arizona Cardinals, gave us one of those “hero” wakeup calls. Oh, he was one that was playing on the football field, but then he shocked fans and players alike by walking away from millions of dollars to serve his country on the battlefield. He joined the Army Rangers, served on the front lines in Afghanistan, and one April day in pursuit of enemy forces, Pat Tillman was killed. He believed he was fighting for something greater than winning a game. He believed he was fighting so people could be free. And, in the eyes of millions, he gave meaning to that overused but important word - hero.

I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about “Giving Your Life for a Greater Cause.”

That was the choice Pat Tillman made. He signed on for a bigger battle than the relatively unimportant battles he had fought on a football field. He decided to give himself to fighting for lives rather than fighting for glory. That's the kind of choice Jesus may be calling you to make.

It could be that you've been feeling a little restless about your life - not because it isn't full, but because it isn't fulfilling. God's the one who's making you restless because He has something bigger for you to do. It isn't that you're not fighting battles. There are plenty of issues and challenges in your everyday life at work, at home, at school, at church. But Jesus may be calling you to join Him in the battle for which He gave His life - the battle for the ever-living, never-dying souls of men and women. It's possible we're giving ourselves for battles that ultimately don't matter all that much, and missing the greatest battle of all - one in which all too few of God's people are actively involved.

God's summons is clear in our word for today from the Word of God in 2 Corinthians 5, beginning with verse 15. “He died for all, that those who live should no longer live for themselves but for Him who died for them and rose again.” Here's a call to leave a life that's largely about me and my little world. Here's the greater cause: “God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting men's sins against them. And He has committed to us the message of reconciliation. We are therefore Christ's ambassadors, as though God were making His appeal through us. We implore you on Christ's behalf: Be reconciled to God.”

God has one plan for letting the world know about what His Son did on the cross to forgive our sins - us. We're His plan. You're His plan. And He's calling you to join Heaven's Rangers and become part of His Life-Saving Force. It will start right where you are. You'll see your school, or your workplace, or your neighborhood as much more than just a place to survive or achieve. You'll see what Jesus sees - a battlefield for lives that Jesus died to save - people who will never know that if we don't tell them. You are where you are on a life-saving assignment from heaven. You'll go where you go everyday now with a higher calling.

And God may ultimately lead you from the field you're on to serve Him in an even greater assignment in the greatest battle of all. Your mission right now is this: do what you already do for Him and for the rescuing of spiritually dying people there. Commit yourself to Jesus to make the greatest possible difference you can with the rest of your life. Get on our knees and tell Jesus, “Put me where I can do the most for You. Use me mightily wherever You put me.”

There are bigger battles than the little ones we think are so important. And there's a shortage of heroes. Heaven's calling you to give yourself to fight by Jesus' side for lives He gave His life for - to go for the only kind of glory that really matters - being one of Heaven's heroes!

________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4565 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database sacrifice

Rosa Parks, A Profile In Courage

Ezra 4:3

Hear the word “courage,” and what comes to mind? White crosses covering Arlington National Cemetery? A firefighter entering a burning building? A single mother laboring at two jobs to provide for her family?

Courage comes packaged in a variety of forms and performs on a myriad of stages. In a very real sense, courage is in the eye of the beholder.

For those who view freedom and equality as priceless ideals, courage is personified by a petite black woman whose award-winning performance occurred almost 50 years ago. And, though she died recently, her performance lives on.

Rosa Parks, the catalyst for the civil rights movement, died at her home in Detroit Oct. 24. She was 92 years old. Her courageous moment took place the afternoon of Dec. 1, 1955, on a city bus in Montgomery, Alabama.

Montgomery’s Jim Crow laws for the public bus system were, at best, humiliating. Black riders were required to pay their fare to the driver, exit and re-board through the bus’s rear door -- that is, if the bus driver let them on at all.

“[M]any times, even if you did that [paid the fare], you might not get on the bus at all,” Parks recalled. “They’d shut the door, drive off, and leave you standing there.”

In 1943, Parks was even forced off a bus because she entered through the front door and not the rear.

Although 75 percent of passengers were black, the front four rows of seats were always reserved for whites. Behind these seats was a middle section that blacks could use only if there was no white demand. However, if just one white passenger needed a seat in the middle row, all the blacks in that section had to move.

In December 1955, at the end of a day’s work as a seamstress at the Montgomery Fair department store, Parks boarded the Cleveland Avenue bus. She took a seat in the first row of the “colored section.”

After Parks was seated, the driver demanded that she and three other blacks move so that a lone white man could sit. Three of them complied, but Rosa Parks refused.

Recalling the incident for a public television series on the civil rights movement, Parks said, “When he saw me still sitting, he asked if I was going to stand up and I said, ‘No, I’m not.’”

When the bus driver told her he would call the police if she would not give up her seat, Parks replied simply, “You may do that.”

In her autobiography, “My Story,” Parks wrote: “People always say that I didn’t give up my seat because I was tired, but that isn’t true. I was not tired physically, or no more tired that I usually was at the end of a working day. I was not old, although some people have an image of me as being old. I was forty-two. No, the only tired I was, was tired of giving in.”

For Rosa Parks, being asked again to give up her seat on the bus was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

For the civil rights movement it was the tipping point -- the moment of critical mass, the threshold, the boiling point, the point when everyday things reach epidemic proportions.

Like Parks, blacks all over Montgomery –- all over the South, all over America -- were tired of giving in to unjust laws.

Parks was arrested on a Thursday. The ensuing Monday the Montgomery bus boycott began. It lasted 381 days and resulted in the desegregation of the bus system. Eventually, Parks’ case resulted in the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling that segregated bus service was unconstitutional.

On Dec. 1, 1955, Rosa Parks became the spark that ignited the torch of the civil rights movement.

“At the time I was arrested I had no idea it would turn into this,” Parks said decades after the incident. “It was just a day like any other. The only thing that made it significant was the masses of people that joined in.”

I cannot imagine the courage it took to ignore the bus driver’s demand. At the time blacks were intimidated, beaten and killed simply because of their skin color.

I cannot comprehend the courage it took to challenge the institutionalized racism of the South. Parks and her husband lost their jobs and received death threats due to her actions.

While I may not be able truly to fathom it, I can marvel and be inspired by Parks’ courageous action.

“Courage is contagious,” Billy Graham once said. “When a brave man takes a stand, the spines of others are often stiffened.”

Through the eyes of this beholder, not only does Rosa Parks epitomize the famed evangelist’s statement, she also personifies courage.

*

Some Thoughts On Rosa Parks

Ezra 4:3

As most Americans know, Rosa Parks was arrested on December 1, 1955, for not giving up a her seat to a white man on a crowded, segregated bus in Montgomery, Alabama. She had to submit to being fingerprinted and having mug shots taken. You may have seen them. There’s no smugness to them, unlike some I’ve seen lately. She is dignified and calm in appearance. She was being arrested for doing the right thing.

I think I would have been too afraid to try anything like what Mrs. Parks did back then; I believe I am too much of a coward to do anything like that even today, and even for the right reasons. Rosa Parks was 42 years old, one year younger than I am, no impulsive young woman. She was a seamstress and housewife, but she was not some meek little lady who just decided one day that she had had enough. She had known the score for a long time. Her husband, Raymond Parks, a barber, had been active in the National Committee to Defend the Scottsboro Boys, eight black youths unjustly convicted of raping two white women. She had been turned away twice when she tried to register to vote, finally succeeding in 1945. She was an adviser to the NAACP youth council, and the secretary to her local NAACP. She attended a school-integration workshop at the Highlander Folk School (now the Highlander Research and Education Center) in Monteagle, Tennessee. The school was known for training civil rights activists.

She even had had a tussle with the same bus driver, James Blake, in 1943, 12 years before the incident that would spark a full-on war for civil rights. Blake had gone apoplectic because Mrs. Parks had refused to pay her fare at the front door and then get off of to enter through the back, as was the custom in Montgomery at the time. She was no more or less afflicted by that vicious brand of openly practiced race prejudice than other blacks and minorities were in the South (and for that matter, in some other parts of the United States too). She almost didn’t get on the bus when she saw Blake was driving it. But this time she had had enough. And in many ways she was prepared for the fight that would come.

And it came. The NAACP had been looking for a case like hers to test in court. Members first thought that 15-year-old Claudette Colvin, who had been arrested on the same charge eight months earlier, would be a good subject, but the girl got pregnant, and her mother and the NAACP decided she couldn’t get on the stand (with good reason, because she would likely have been pilloried by the prosecution). Another woman, Mary Louise Smith, was arrested, but it was decided she couldn’t withstand media scrutiny. Mrs. Parks knew about both women, because as secretary of the Montgomery NAACP she had attended the meetings where these decisions were made. A white lawyer named Clifford Durr, who along with his wife Virginia is among the bravest people in civil rights history, bailed Mrs. Parks out. Her case went to trial. She was convicted of disorderly conduct and violating a local ordinance. A young minister named Martin Luther King, Jr., then led a boycott of the Montgomery buses that crippled the city. Less than a year later, in November 1956, the Supreme Court ruled that segregation on transportation in any city was unconstitutional.

According to the historian and author Douglas Brinkley, who wrote a crisp and concise biography of Rosa Parks, James Blake, the bus driver, remained unrepentant. Brinkley interviewed him for the book, and Blake used all kinds of foul language when Mrs. Parks’s name was mentioned. He died of a heart attack in 2002, at the age of 89. His story presents an argument for why we should continue to prosecute people who got away with violating the civil rights of others way back when, no matter how old and weak they are. They’re not too weak to keep spewing their bile and hatred. My one consolation is that Mrs. Parks outlived him.

Mrs. Parks moved in 1957 to Detroit, where she stayed active in the civil rights movement, and served on the staff of U.S. Representative John Conyers (D., Mich.) from 1965 until 1988. In 1987 she founded the Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development, an organization that provides scholarships and guidance for young blacks. Her death was a punch to the heart for me, because she had the kind of integrity and unimpeachable character, the kind of courage and backbone, you almost never see in public figures today. As long as she was alive I could point to her as someone who had the right stuff. But at 92 she lived as long as she could. Rather than mourning her, though, perhaps in her honor I will straighten my back and try to gain just a little of her courage myself.

*

Our Epic Hero

Mark 1:9

In verse nine of the first chapter of the book of Mark, he introduces the reader to Jesus for the first time, writing, “In those days Jesus came.” The hero steps into view.

There are some books that I enjoy re-reading. I delight in the discovery. I celebrate the battles. I am stirred over the moral caliber of the best characters. One particular series is the Chronicles of Narnia. I am as familiar with these books as I am with the book of Mark. I know what's coming. I know what is said. I know the conclusion. But I just like going there again and again.

For example, re-entering Narnia through the wardrobe with the Pevensie children is a repeated thrill. They discover the whole land has been enchanted by the White Witch. She has cast a spell so that it is always winter and never Christmas. Suddenly, thick in the woods, they encounter a talking beaver who motions to them. He makes a statement that still burns in my imagination. “Aslan's on the move,” he says. “And some say he's already landed.” My heart races. The children do not know who Aslan is yet, but they do know it is good news.

Again, in the same series, Lucy finds herself upon a voyage to the unknown Eastern Seas of Narnia. They are caught in a black mist upon the ocean and cannot find their way out. To add to the threat, they discover this is the island where the darkest of dreams come true. The crew scatters throughout the boat, rows in circles, and frantically avoids any thought of bad dreams they have had. But their dreams close in upon them. The darkness grows thicker. Lucy climbs to the top lookout and shouts, “Aslan, if ever you loved us, send us help now!” A light shines ahead; something is flying in. Suddenly, with the whirring of wings, it comes clear: an Albatross. It guides them toward the bright world. But as it circles the mast, it speaks to Lucy and breathes on her. And she knows that it is Aslan Himself.

These moments bring goose-bumps. I try to remember, when I'm beginning the book of Mark, that this is the same kind of drama. A great winter has been laid upon the earth. Darkness has closed in. The promises of God are made and the prayers of the ancients are heard. “In those days Jesus came.” The great winter is about to thaw. Light shines in the darkness. Our epic hero has landed.

________

Copyright © 2004 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

Choosing Sides

2 Kings 3:1

Though I am not, by any stretch of the imagination, a fan of video games, articles on the subject do from time to time catch my eye. I was intrigued recently by the descriptions given by one video-game creator who has developed a game that casts the player as a character in a world of choices. “What kind of hero were you?” is now his favorite question.

In the world of video games, it is fair to say that choices are usually made up front about the kind of character you want to be — villain, hero, explorer. Whether you are going to be a saint or a hooligan is decided in a vacuum — with one choice instead of many — and is largely unaffected by the environment and experiences of the character. In more ways than one, it is an escape from real life.

Setting out to create a video game in which choices are made with the same pace, intricacy, and consequences as real life, one designer is giving the escape a different twist. “I always thought as a designer, ‘Who am I to tell you what type of character you should be?’” In a plot reminiscent of Oscar Wilde’s “The Picture of Dorian Gray”, a player’s moral decisions affect the fate, and even the appearance, of the hero. They become the kind of character their choices produce, and the world around them is influenced accordingly. Moreover, the simulated world is full of the sort of temptations that lure dark sides and influence decisions. If you could get away with stealing would you? What if the money received from someone wanting you to keep a secret seemed more useful than the honor gained from refusing it?

Reading through 1 and 2 Kings recently, I found myself visualizing the world described in this game. I imagined the writer pausing as each king was introduced to ask the question, “What kind of a hero were you?” More often than not, the question is answered unfavorably.

The books read like a relentless encyclopedia of failures, providing the official documentation of the moral, political, and national collapses of Israel and Judah. “Joram son of Ahab became king of Israel in Samaria in the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat king of Judah, and he reigned twelve years. He did evil in the eyes of the LORD, but not as his father and mother had done. He got rid of the sacred stone of Baal that his father had made” (2 Kings 3:1-2). Repeatedly, the same phrase follows the name of a king: “He did what was evil in the eyes of the LORD.”

The exposition of five hundred years and more than forty kings seems to tirelessly utter disappointment. Even the kings who did what was “pleasing in the eyes of the LORD” don’t shout of success. They made steps closer to God than many of their successors but they never seem to close the gap. “[Uzziah] did what was right in the eyes of the LORD, just as his father Amaziah had done. The high places, however, were not removed; the people continued to offer sacrifices and burn incense there” (2 Kings 15:3-4).

We do not choose the kind of person we want to be in a vacuum, anymore than we make that decision only once. These kings made choices that were influenced by the kings before them, temptations and trials, and battles that shook their kingdoms and their pride. They were touched by greed and jealousy, conviction and consequence. They were shaped by the presence of God and the genuineness with which they cried out to Him.

But something about seeing a life outlined in one paragraph does wonders for rousing my own life to perspective. In our history are lives that came close to being faithful and lives that failed miserably. In our history, through flawed and sinful leaders, and years where corruption reigned, the sovereign purposes of God yet moved. The time we face today is full of choices; so it is filled with a God who is faithful though we are not.

________

Copyright © 2004 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

The Brawl At the Palace: Sports and the Coarsening of the Culture

By now, we have all seen the footage from the near-riot that broke out at a recent game between the Detroit Pistons and the Indiana Pacers in the NBA.

There have been plenty of attempts to figure out what conclusions, if any, we should draw from what happened. Some sportswriters, like Tony Kornheiser of the Washington Post, insist that it was an isolated incident. Others, like Bryan Burwell of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, see what happened as a consequence of cultural trends within the NBA, such as younger, less-mature players and the NBA's uncritical embrace of hip-hop culture.

While I tend to agree with Burwell, I think that there are other, more widespread and troubling, cultural trends that contributed to what happened on November 19, 2004. In our ministry here at Prison Fellowship, we see the results every day in the constant filling up of our prisons.

One trend is the coarseness and incivility that has permeated American culture. Friends of mine tell me that they dread taking their kids to professional sporting events. The combination of profanity, drunkenness, and boorish behavior on the part of fans makes us all uncomfortable and, worse, sets a bad example for any child.

Ten years ago unruly “fans” would have been asked to shut up or leave — now it's those who want to enjoy the game in peace who are faced with that choice. And this problem isn't limited to professional sports. A reporter for USA TODAY wrote about a fight that broke out at a co-ed slow-pitch softball game he attended. It's as if the entire country has, as we say in Virginia, forgotten its manners.

This coarseness and incivility is fueled by a belief that self-expression is always good and inhibition of any kind is always bad. The past few decades have seen the triumph of what author Rochelle Gurstein called “the party of exposure.” This “party” turned ideas such as manners, propriety, and decorum into synonyms for repression. It convinced our culture that, as Robert Bork ironically put it, “Let all be told, let all be shown, and we will be a society of well-balanced individuals.”

Of course, no such thing happened. A culture that has renounced inner restraints only has the cudgel of law to keep people from acting on their own worst impulses. If shame isn't enough to keep you from making a drunken spectacle of yourself, then the sight of a “rent-a-cop” isn't going to stop you from throwing your beer on the court — or charging into the stands swinging, only to go on talk shows the next morning to promote your new CD.

What makes this even worse is that athletes are, in many instances, the closest things kids have to heroes. The NBA and its advertisers have used this admiration to make our kids the biggest market for NBA-licensed apparel and expensive shoes and soft drinks. Whether they want to admit it or not, these guys are role models, and they failed miserably that night.

While thankfully events like the “brawl at the Palace” are the exception to the rule, the beliefs that helped make it possible are not. We see the results every day in prisons all across America. And while expulsions, suspensions, and even criminal prosecutions are in order, these won't change what most needs changing: a culture that has forgotten its manners. Only a good dose of repentance before a holy God is the necessary medicine for this cultural sickness.

FOR FURTHER READING AND INFORMATION:

• Tony Kornheiser, “A Stern Test for the NBA,” Washington Post, 23 November 2004, D01.

• Bryan Burwell, “The NBA is hip-hopping its way out of the mainstream,” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 22 November 2004.

• Jeff Zillgitt, “Fans make the world go 'round and other brawl theories,” USA Today, 29 November 2004.

• “Sell sport, not thuggery,” Palm Beach Post, 24 November 2004.

• Bill Simmons, “Tale of the tape,” ESPN, 22 November 2004.

• George Neumayr, “Rap Sheets,” American Spectator, 23 November 2004.

• Shawn Macomber, “Sporting Chance,” American Spectator, 29 November 2004.

• Ben Mathis-Lilley, “Fight! Fight! Fight!“ Slate, 23 November 2004.

• Sally Jenkins, “With Artest, a Human Quality,” Washington Post, 26 November 2004, D01.

• Mike Wise and Sally Jenkins, “An Enigma in the Hall of Infamy,” Washington Post, 28 November 2004, A01.

• Bill Littlefield, “Full Court Mess,” Washington Post, 28 November 2004, B01.

• Daniel Henninger, “From McLuhan to Artest,” Wall Street Journal, 3 December 2004.

• Todd Boyd, “Beyond black and white,” Charlotte Observer, 1 December 2004.

• Alan Drooz, “Playing the blame game: Maybe we need to blame the game,” San Diego Union-Tribune, 29 November 2004.

• Rochelle Gurstein, The Repeal of Reticence (Hill & Wang, 1996).

• Karen Santorum, Everyday Graces: A Child's Book of Good Manners (ISI Books, 2003). Bono of U2 refers to this book as “also a book of manners for rock stars.” We might add it's useful for college and professional athletes as well.

• Hugh Hewitt, In But Not Of: A Guide to Christian Ambition (Nelson, 2003). This book provides readers with valuable insights, wisdom, personal experiences, and advice on how to rise in the world and achieve the kind of radical success that honors God.

________

Copyright (c) 2004 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Mark Earley via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database ragehero

Heroes For Our Time: Service and the Power of Christ

Luke 9:23

Were there any heroes of Watergate? “Surely many unknown ones,” writes columnist Peggy Noonan, “those who did their best to be constructive and not destructive, those who didn't think it was all about their beautiful careers. I'll give you a candidate for great man of the era: Chuck Colson. Colson functioned in the Nixon White House as a genuinely bad man, went to prison and emerged a genuinely good man. He told the truth about himself in 'Born Again,' a book not fully appreciated as the great Washington classic it is, and has devoted his life to helping prisoners and their families. He paid the price, told the truth, blamed no one but himself, and turned his shame into something helpful.”

Noonan's words are an incisive summary of a conversion to Christ. Bad to Good. Born Again. Shame to Servanthood. Truth. As Chuck was interviewed by every major media market about “Deep Throat” in the last few days, no interviewer could recount his political life without reference to his new life in Christ. It's been a wonderful opportunity to remind the world of the reality of Christ's transforming power.

Ironically, Chuck's newest book is titled THE GOOD LIFE. In it, he says we know the good life only by serving others.

In some ways a bookend to his first book BORN AGAIN, THE GOOD LIFE reflects back upon his life and the truth of Jesus' words: “If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will save it” (Luke 9:23-24).

It was only when Chuck lost his life to Christ and in the service to others that he caught the eye of Peggy Noonan and others since Watergate as a new creation, a genuinely changed man — from my point of view, a hero, although Chuck would say he is no hero, one who is only trying to do his duty to Christ. And I believe Chuck's life and the ministry of Prison Fellowship are inspiring a new generation of heroes who want to live “the good life.”

Heroes like our Operation Starting Line team and Prison Fellowship staff who have been sharing the Gospel with inmates in the Colorado prison system all this last week.

Or like Erika Harold, the former Miss America who just finished her first year at law school. Instead of interning at a major law firm, she's spending her summer at Prison Fellowship: visiting prisoners and their children while learning about applying the truth of Christ to the issues confronting our culture. As I have listened to her share her faith and life with the inmates, it's clear that she wants to use her gifts to serve others. She is an example of a hero of her generation — a good life in the making.

The work of Chuck and of Prison Fellowship in the last generation has laid the groundwork for the next generation to live the good life. Heroes are begetting heroes. Good lives are inspiring a new generation of good lives.

If heroism is inspiring others to live the good life of serving others for the sake of Christ, then Peggy Noonan is right: Chuck may be one of the only heroes of Watergate. But as we know, it is not really about Chuck Colson or about Prison Fellowship or about any of us. It is all about the transforming power of Jesus Christ, and the glory goes to God.

________

Copyright (c) 2005 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Mark Earley via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database servanthood

From Traitor to Hero? Responding to “the Gospel of Judas”

Mark 12:24

Headlines around the world are announcing the publication of a “long lost” and “suppressed” ancient document, known as THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS. The National Geographic Society announced the publication at a major media event on Thursday, just in time to boost publicity for its Sunday night special on the National Geographic Channel.

The announcement led to a frenzy of media coverage, ranging from responsible reports to outrageous sensationalism. According to some commentators, the publication of this new document will force a complete reformulation of Christianity and our understanding of both Judas and Jesus. In reality, nothing of the sort is in view. The document is highly interesting, however, offering an ancient and authoritative source into the thinking of heretical groups who offered alternative understandings of Christianity.

The document purports to be written by Judas, even though it certainly was written long after Judas's death. Nevertheless, the very existence of this document, rooted in the third century after Christ, indicates something of the struggle Christian leaders confronted in defining and defending the authentic Gospel against heretical groups such as the Gnostics.

A quick look at THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS reveals the contrast between this document and the four canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. The English version, edited by Rudolphe Kasser, Marvin Meyer, and Gregor Wurst, presents an accessible and readable version of the portions of the CODEX TCHACOS now available. The most remarkable feature of this text is its thoroughly Gnostic character. The substance of this gospel bears virtually no resemblance to orthodox Christianity -- a fact which explains why the early church recognized this writing for what it is, and rejected it as neither authoritative nor authentic.

In THE LOST GOSPEL: THE QUEST FOR THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS ISCARIOT, Herbert Krosney explains how the codex was discovered and traces the events that led to its publication in English this week:

“In the mid- to late 1970s, hidden for more than fifteen hundred years, an ancient text emerged from the sands of Egypt. Near the banks of the Nile River, some Egyptian peasants, "fellahin," stumbled upon a cavern. In biblical times, such chambers had been used to bury the dead. The peasants entered the cave, seeking ancient gold or jewelry, anything of value that they could sell. Instead, among a pile of human bones, they discovered a crumbling limestone box. Inside it, they came upon an unexpected find -- a mysterious leather-bound book, a codex.”

The portion of the text that is now translated is taken from thirteen pages of papyrus, with the text written in Coptic, a language of ancient Egypt. Most scholars agree that THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS was originally written in Greek, and later translated into Coptic. This was the common history of many Gnostic texts, especially those associated with groups common to the area in which the manuscript was found.

THE LOST GOSPEL reads like a suspense thriller at times, tracing the odd and admittedly remarkable story of how the codex was preserved and eventually published. Those familiar with the story of the Dead Sea scrolls and the documents of the Nag Hammadi library will recognize significant parallels in the saga of how the texts and manuscripts were found and eventually made available for scholarly review and publication.

The Gnostic character of the text is immediately evident. In his supposed conversations with Judas, Jesus speaks in Gnostic categories such as “aeons” and an “eternal realm.” Judas is identified as the “thirteenth spirit” who was appointed by God to be the agent of releasing Jesus from the physical body in which He was trapped in the incarnation.

When Judas speaks of a vision and asks for its interpretation, Jesus answers: “Judas, your star has led you astray.” Jesus continues: “No person of mortal birth is worthy to enter the house you have seen, for that place is reserved for the holy. Neither the sun nor the moon will rule there, nor the day, but the holy will abide there always, in the eternal realm with the holy angels. Look, I have explained to you the mysteries of the kingdom and I have taught you about the error of the stars; and ... sent it ... on the twelve aeons.”

The concept of secret and mysterious knowledge was central to Gnostic sects. THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS purports to reveal conversations between Jesus and Judas that had been kept secret from the rest of humanity. The Gnostics prized their secret knowledge, and taught a profound dualism between the material and spiritual worlds. They understood the material world, including the entire cosmos, to be a trap for the spiritual world. In essence, the Gnostics sought to escape the material world and to enter the world of spirit.

Accordingly, the most revealing statement in the entire text of THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS records Jesus saying to Judas, “But you will exceed all of them. For you will sacrifice the man that clothes me.”

In other words, Judas would perform a service to Jesus by betraying Him to those who would then crucify Him, liberating Jesus from the physical body and freeing Him as spirit. As the editors of The GOSPEL OF JUDAS indicate in a footnote, “The death of Jesus, with the assistance of Judas, is taken to be the liberation of the spiritual person within.”

Needless to say, this is in direct conflict with the Christian gospel and the New Testament. The consistent witness of the New Testament is that Jesus came in order to die for sinners -- willingly accepting the cross and dying as the substitutionary sacrifice for sin.

This redemptive action is completely missing from THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS. For that reason, the text was rejected by early Christian leaders. Writing about the year 180, Irenaeus, a major figure among the early church fathers, identified the text now known as THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS as heretical. In his foreword to THE LOST GOSPEL, Bart Ehrman, a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, explains, “This gospel was about the relationship between Jesus and Judas, and indicated that Judas didn't actually betray Jesus, but did what Jesus wanted him to do, because Judas was the one who really knew the truth, as Jesus wanted it communicated.”

Ehrman, no friend to orthodox Christianity, has correctly explained the problem. Irenaeus rejected the text precisely because it was in direct conflict with the canonical gospels and with the teaching of the Apostles. Accordingly, it was his responsibility to warn the church about the heretical nature of this document. Still, the very fact that Irenaeus mentions the document with such a specific reference gives considerable credence to the claim that THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS is as old in its origin as its patrons now claim.

We now know a great deal about the Gnostic sects common to the first centuries of Christianity. The particular sect thought to be associated with the origin of THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS was known as the Cainites. The peculiar teachings of this sect included the rehabilitation of many characters presented negatively in the Bible -- starting with Cain. In essence, the Cainites attempted to take the negative figures of the Bible and present them in a heroic light. In order to do this, of course, they had to create alternative texts and an alternative rendering of the story of Jesus.

What are Christians to make of all this? The publication of THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS is a matter of genuine interest. After all, it is important for Christians to understand the context of early Christianity -- a context in which the church was required to exercise tremendous discernment in confronting heretical teachings and rejecting spurious texts.

The scholarly research behind the publication of THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS appears to be sound and responsible. The codex manuscript was submitted to the most rigorous historical process in terms of dating, chemical composition, and similar questions. In the end, it appears that the document is most likely authentic, in terms of its origin from within a heretical sect in the third century.

Nevertheless, extravagant claims about the theological significance of THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS are unwarranted, ridiculous, and driven by those who themselves call for a reformulation of Christianity.

The resurgence of interest in Gnostic texts such as THE GOSPEL OF THOMAS and THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS is driven by an effort, at least on the part of some figures, to argue that early Christianity had no essential theological core. Instead, scholars such as Elaine Pagels of Princeton University want to argue that, “These discoveries are exploding the myth of a monolithic religion, and demonstrating how diverse -- and fascinating -- the early Christian movement really was.” What Pagels and many other figures argue is that early Christianity was a cauldron of competing theologies, and that ideological and political factors explain why an “orthodox” tradition eventually won, suppressing all competing theologies. Accordingly, these same figures argue that today's Christians should be open to these variant teachings that had long been suppressed and hidden from view.

Metropolitan Bishoy, leader of the Coptic Orthodox Church, dismissed THE GOSPEL OF JUDAS as “non-Christian babbling resulting from a group of people trying to create a false 'amalgam' between the Greek mythology and Far East religions with Christianity ... They were written by a group of people who were aliens to the main Christian stream of the early Christianity. These texts are neither reliable nor accurate Christian texts, as they are historically and logically alien to the main Christian thinking and philosophy of the early and present Christians.” The Metropolitan is right, but we are better armed to face the heresies of our own day if we face with honesty the heresies of times past.

Simon Gathercole, a New Testament professor at Aberdeen University, defended the text as authentic, but relatively unimportant. “It is certainly an ancient text, but not ancient enough to tell us anything new,” Gathercole explains. “It contains themes which are alien to the first-century world of Jesus and Judas, but which became popular later.”

Indeed, those Gnostic ideas DID become popular later, and they are becoming increasingly popular now. The truth of the Gospel stands, and Christians will retain firm confidence in the authenticity of the New Testament and, in particular, of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Nevertheless, old Gnosticisms are continually repackaged and “rediscovered” even as new forms of Gnostic thought emerge in our postmodern culture.

Informed Christians will be watchful and aware when confronting churches or institutions that present spurious writings, rejected as heretical by the early church, on the same plane as the New Testament.

The verdict of Athanasius, one of the greatest leaders of the early church, still stands: “Let no man add to these, neither let him take ought from these, for concerning these the Lord put to shame the Sadducees, and said, 'Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures.’ And He reproved the Jews, saying, 'Search the Scriptures, for these are they that testify of Me.'“

*

Extraordinary Ordinary Virtue: The Subway Hero

Luke 17:10

On the day after New Year’s, 2007, Wesley Autrey, a construction worker and a Navy veteran, was waiting for the train with his two daughters at the 137th Street Station in New York.

Then, a man collapsed on the platform and began convulsing. After Autrey helped him get up, the man collapsed again and fell onto the tracks. With the lights of the Broadway Local visible down the tunnel, Autrey had to make what he later called a “split decision” — a decision that inspired a nation and taught us a powerful lesson about what it means to be human.

Autrey jumped onto the tracks, risking his own life, to save the stricken stranger. After visiting the man in the hospital, Autrey, who denied that he had done anything “spectacular,” went to work.

While Autrey didn’t think that his actions were spectacular, other people did. At a time when most of the news is disheartening, Autrey’s actions inspired millions of people. Americans have become jaundiced and skeptical. We need heroes every now and then, a role model — and that’s what Autrey has become.

Not only did he inspire us, but he also helps remind us of some important truths about being human.

One of these is that materialism can never provide a satisfactory, much less complete, account of human nature. While neo-Darwinism offers a superficial explanation for human evil, it can’t begin to account for human goodness, such as Autrey’s actions.

What we Christians call “altruism,” Neo-Darwinists call “enlightened” selfishness. Thus, a Neo-Darwinist would say that parents care for their children and siblings as a way of ensuring that their “selfish genes” get passed on to the next generation.

Even if this were true, it says nothing about why a man jumps in front of an incoming train for a TOTAL STRANGER, as Autrey did. For that, you need the capacity for self-sacrifice, an utterly un-Darwinian trait.

Autrey’s actions also reminded of what true virtue looks like. As Scott Carson, a philosophy professor at Miami of Ohio, pointed out, people like Autrey nearly always deny that what they did was “spectacular.”

This is more than modesty; it’s what C. S. Lewis meant when he wrote that virtue is “precognitive.” A soldier in a foxhole who jumps on a grenade doesn’t ponder the issues; he acts on instinct: that instinct being the product of believing the right things and living that way — what philosophers call “habituation,” or character. As Autrey himself acknowledged after the fact, his actions seemed a bit foolish. But, happily for the stricken man, virtue always doesn’t work in rational ways.

Autrey’s story reminded me of the great Christian leader of the Czech revolution in 1989, Father Václav Maly. When I met him in 1990 in Prague and told him what a hero he was to me, he stopped and said, “Oh, no, Chuck. I was just doing my duty.”

Few of us will ever have to demonstrate what Carson calls “the extraordinary virtue of ordinary people” in such spectacular ways. But all of us can aspire to live in a way that will make our “split-second decisions” just as virtuous and praiseworthy.

________

Copyright (c) 2007 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #21339]

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

A Godly Hero: William Jennings Bryan

At the turn of the century, a prominent Christian led a movement to transform American culture. He stood up for the weak and downtrodden. He pointed out the connection between Darwinism and the nastier parts of American life. And, for his trouble, he was labeled a “fanatic” and a “demagogue.”

The “turn of the century” I'm referring to is the year 1900, and the Christian is William Jennings Bryan.

Bryan, whom the CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR called “a forgotten hero,” is the subject of a new biography titled A GODLY HERO. Its author, Georgetown professor Michael Kazin, wrote the book “to gain a measure of respect for Bryan and his people.”

Given Bryan's impact on American history, this shouldn't be necessary. He was a three-time Democratic nominee for president, and he was Woodrow Wilson's Secretary of State. And these were just his OFFICIAL duties.

Unofficially, he was regarded as the greatest orator of his age — an age when people went out of their way to hear two-hour speeches, at least the good ones. And Bryan's were spellbinders. His “Cross of Gold” speech at the 1896 Democratic convention is widely regarded as the most electrifying political speech in American history.

Bryan's oratory and Christian passion made him a hero to millions of ordinary Americans, many of whom named their children after him. He articulated their concerns in unapologetically biblical and moral language.

He championed reforms that we take for granted today: women's suffrage, labor unions, and anti-trust, to name but a few. He transformed the Democratic party from a “bulwark of laissez-faire capitalism” into the party of the “little guy.”

Yet, he is a “forgotten hero.” Why? Mostly it's because of his association with the “Scopes Monkey Trial.” His participation on the anti-evolution side gave critics like H. L. Mencken, who already hated him, a chance to caricature Bryan and “his people.”

This caricature was then immortalized by the play and movie, INHERIT THE WIND. If Americans are aware of Bryan at all, their image is of a Bible-thumping blowhard whose positions couldn't withstand scrutiny.

As I've told you before, INHERIT THE WIND is a Darwinist distortion, especially in its depiction of Bryan. Bryan wasn't opposed to the teaching of evolution. His concern was for the cultural consequences of Darwinism like “Social Darwinism” and eugenics. As he put it, “[science] can perfect machinery, but it adds no moral restraints to prevent the misuse of the machine.”

As Kazin tells us, Bryan “burned only and always to see religion heal the world.” If that sounds familiar, it should — it's the vision that drives many Christians today. While our critics caricature us as being concerned with only one thing — sex — the truth is very different. Much of America's humanitarian efforts in places like Sudan and North Korea are the product of the kind of passion Bryan expressed among evangelicals of his day. If Bryan were around today, he'd be a great social conservative Christian and/or political leader. Like Bryan, the Great Communicator and Populist, our goal today is to heal, not dominate. But like him, we are often caricatured for our troubles.

Let's hope it doesn't take a century for our efforts to gain a “measure of respect,” as well.

________

Copyright (c) 2006 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

A Proud Heritage: What We Can Learn From the Marines

I was one of those fortunate enough to attend the dedication of the Marine Corps Museum at Quantico — a beautiful structure rising out of the Virginia countryside in the shape suggestive of the famous image of the Marines raising the flag at Iwo Jima. While I waited for the festivities to begin on that glorious autumn day, I was struck by the incredible camaraderie displayed by all of the Marines and former Marines.

An 85-year-old man sitting right behind me said, “I’ve been a Marine for sixty-seven years.” Once a Marine, always a Marine. He enlisted when he was 18, did his duty in the Pacific, came home, and built a life for himself. And here he was, halfway across the country, celebrating the opening of the museum.

Jim Lehrer, the PBS newscaster and a former Marine, was the day’s emcee, and he explained it well. “What’s important to understand about Marines,” he said, “is that they know that their safety depends on the person on their right and the person on their left.” You are bonded together in battle.

Then the question hit me: Why is it that the Church does not feel the way the Marines do?

Do we believe that our safety or our Christian faith depends upon the people in the pews on our left and on our right?

The story of Jason Dunham says it all. President Bush introduced Dunham’s parents, who received their son’s posthumous Congressional Medal of Honor, our nation’s highest military award.

Dunham, a corporal from upstate New York, was leading a squad of Marines in Iraq when they were ambushed by insurgents. During the hand-to-hand combat, Dunham leapt to place his helmet over a live grenade. Dunham’s bravery saved his friends — and cost him his life.

Why did he do it? To save the men serving under him. It was true heroic altruism — the one thing that Darwinian theories of natural selection can never account for. But would you or I be prepared to show what Jesus called no greater love? Would we lay down our lives for our Christian brothers?

As the various Marine battle flags were paraded in front of the dais, bearing names familiar to every Marine — Tripoli, Belleau Wood, Iwo Jima, Fallujah — I know I wasn’t the only one in the crowd with my spine tingling, my chest swelling with pride in the heritage of the Corps.

But then I wondered how many Christians really understand the proud heritage of our faith; how the martyrs in the first century gave their lives to preserve the Gospel; how Christians through the centuries have championed great causes for the benefit of mankind: the abolition of slavery, the development of hospitals and universities, care for the poor, the protection of human life. We all remember Mother Teresa, of course, and some of the great missionaries, but how about the saints of bygone years? How about the Christians in the Roman Empire who gave their lives to tend the sick during the great plagues when pagan doctors fled?

The story of human history is a great cosmic battle between good and evil, a greater struggle than any war in human history. We’re engaged in it, and we’re on God’s side. What if we Christians had the same sense of loyalty, commitment, and responsibility for OUR heritage as do these proud Marines?

A nagging question in the midst of a glorious autumn day.

________

Copyright (c) 2006 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database couragehero

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate