ὅτι [properly neut. of ὅστις], a conjunction [fr. Hom. down], (Lat. quod [ef. W. § 53,8 b.; B. § 139, 51; § 149, 87), marking I. the substance or contents (of a statement), that; 1. joined to verbs of saying and declaring (where the ace. and infin. is used in Lat.) : ἀναγγέλλειν, Acts xiv. 27; διηγεῖσθαι, Acts ix. 273; εἰπεῖν, Mt. xvi. 20; xxviii. 7,13; Jn. vii. 42; xvi. 15; 1Co.i.15; λέγειν, Mt. iii. 9; vill. 11; Mk. iii. 28; Lk. xv.7; Jn. xvi. 20; Ro. iv. 9 [T Tr WH om. L br. ὅτι}; ix. 2, and very often; προεἰρηκέναι, 2 Co. vii. 3; before the ὅτι in Acts xiv. 22 supply λέγοντες, contained in the preceding παρακαλοῦντες [ef. B. §151, 11]; ὅτι after γράφειν, 1 Co. ix.10; 1 Jn. 11. 12-14; μαρτυρεῖν, Mt. xxiii. 31; Jn. i. 34; iii. 28; iv. 44; ὁμολογεῖν, Heb. xi. 13; δεικνύειν, Mt. xvi. 21; δηλοῦν, 1 Co. i. 11; διδάσκειν, 1 Co. xi. 14. after ἐμφανίζειν. Heb. xi. 14; δῆλον (ἐστίν), 1 Co. xv.27; Gal. iii. 11; 1 Tim. vi 7 (where LT Tr WHom. δῆλον [and then ὅτι simply introduces the reason, because (B. 358 (308) to the contrary) ]); φανεροῦμαι (for φανερὸν γίνεται περὶ ἐμοῦ), 2 Co. iii. 3; 1Jn.ii.19. It is added—to verbs of swearing, and to forms of oath and affirmation: ὄμνυμι, Rev. x.63 ζῶ ἐγώ (see (aw, I. 1 p. 270*), Ro. xiv. 11; μάρτυρα τὸν θεὸν ἐπικαλοῦμαι, 2 Co. i. 23; πιστὸς ὁ θεός, 2 Co. i. 18; ἔστιν ἀλήθεια Χριστοῦ ἐν ἐμοί, 2 Co. xi. 10; ἰδοὺ ἐνώπιον τοῦ θεοῦ, Gal. i. 20; cf. Fritzsche, Ep. δα Rom. ii. p. 242 sq.; [W. § 53, 9; B. 394 (338) ];—to verbs of perceiving, knowing, remembering, etc.: ἀκούειν, Jn. xiv. 28; βλέπειν, 2 Co. vii. 8; Heb. 111. 19; Jas. ii. 22; θεᾶσθαι, In. vi.5; γινώσκειν, Mt. xxi. 45; Lk.x.11; Jn.iv.53; 2 Co. xiii. 6; 1 Jn. ii. 5, ete.; after τοῦτο, Ro. vi. 6; εἰδέναι, Mt. vi. 32; xxii. 16; Mk. ii. 10; Lk. ii. 49; Jn. iv. 42; ix. 20, 24 sq.; Ro. ii. 2; vi. 9; Phil. iv. 15 54.» and very often ; γνωστόν ἐστιν, Acts xxviil. 28; ἐπιγινώσκειν, Mk. ii. 8; Lk. i. 22; Actsiv. 13; ἐπίστασθαι, Acts xv. 7; νοεῖν, Mt. xv. 17; ὁρᾶν, Jas. ii. 24; καταλαμβάνειν, Acts iv. 13; x. 343; συνιέναι, Mt. xvi. 12; ἀγνοεῖν, Ro. i.13; ii. 4; vi. 3, ete.; ἀναγινώσκειν, Mt. xii. 5; xix. 45 μνημονεύειν, Jn. xvi. 4; μνησθῆναι, Mt. v. 23; Jn. ii. 22; ὑπομιμνήσκειν, Jude 5;—to verbs of thinking, believing, judging, hoping: λογίζεσθαι, Jn. xi.50L TTr WH; after τοῦτο, Ro. ii. 3; 2 Co. x. 113 νομίζειν, Mt. v. 17; οἶμαι, Jas. i. 7; πέπεισμαι, Ro. viii. 88; xiv. 14; xv. 14; 2'Tim. 1. ὅ, 12; πεποιθέναι, Lk. xviii. 9; 2 Co. ii. 3; Phil. ii. 24; Gal. v.10; 2 Th. iii. 4; Heb. xiii. 18; πιστεύειν, Mt. ix. 28; Mk. xi. 23; Ro.x.93 ὑπολαμβάνειν, Lk. vii. 43; δοκεῖν, Mt. vi. 7; xxvi. 53; Jn. xx. 15; ἐλπίζειν, Lk. xxiv. 21; 2 Co. xiii.6; κρίνειν τοῦτο ὅτι, 2 Co. ν. 14 (15) ;—to verbs of emotion (where in Lat. now the ace. and inf. is used, now quod): θαυμάζειν, Lk. xi. 38; χαίρειν, Jn. xiv. 28; 2 Co. vii. 9, 16 ; Phil. iv. 10; 2Jn.4; ἐν τούτῳ, ὅτι, Lk. x. 20; συγχαίρειν, Lk. xv. 6,9; μέλει μοι (σοι, αὐτῷ), Mk. iv. 38; Lk. x. 40; —to verbs of praising, thanking, blaming, (where the Lat. uses quod): ἐπαινεῖν, Lk. xvi. 8; 1 Co. xi. 2,17; ἐξομολογεῖσθαι, Mt. xi. 25; Lk. x. 213 εὐχαριστεῖν, Lk. xviii. 11; χάρις τῷ θεῷ, Ro. vi. 17; χάριν ἔχω τινί, 1 Tim. i. 12; ἔχω κατά Twos, ὅτι etc. Rev. ii. 4; ἔχω τοῦτο ὅτι, I shave this (which is praiseworthy) that, Rev. ii. 6; add, Jn. vii. 23 [but here ὅτι is causal; ef. W. § 53, 8b.]; 1 Co. vi. 7;— to the verb εἶναι, when that precedes with a demons. pron., in order to define more exactly what a thing is or wherein it may be seen: αὕτη ἐστὶν ὅτι (Lat. quod), In. iii. 19; ἐν τούτῳ ὅτι, 1 Jn. iii. 16; iv. 9 sq. 13, ete. ; περὶ τούτου ὅτι, Jn. xvi. 19; οὐχ οἷον δὲ ὅτι (see οἷος), Ro. ix. 6;—to the verbs γίνεσθαι and εἶναι with an interrog. pron., as τί γέγονεν ὅτι ete., what has come to pass that? our how comes it that? Jn. xiv. 22; τί [Lmrg. ris] ἐστιν ἄνθρωπος, ὅτι, Heb. ii. 6 fr. Ps. viii. 5. οὗτος (sc. ἐστίν), ὅτι, Lk. iv. 36; ποταπός ἐστιν οὗτος, ὅτι, Mt. viii. 27; τίς ἡ διδαχὴ αὕτη. ὅτι, Mk. i. 27 Ree.; add Mk. iv. 41. 2. in elliptical formulas (B. 358 (307); [W.585 (544) note]): τί ὅτι ete., 1. 4. τί ἐστιν ὅτι, ΓΑ. V. how is it that], wherefore? Mk. ii. 16 RG L [4]. om. τί; ef. 5 below, and see ὅστις, 4]; Lk. ii. 49; Acts v. 4, 9. οὐχ ὅτι for οὐ λέγω ὅτι, Our not that, not as though, cf. tis ὁ λύγος [4 οτι Β. 8150, 1; [W.597 (555)]; thus, Jn. νἱ. 46 ; vii. 22; 2 Co. i. 24; iii. 5; Phil. iii. 12; iv. 11. ὅτε is used for εἰς ἐκεῖνο ὅτι (in reference to the fact that [Eng. seeing that, in that]) : thus in Jn. ii. 18; [Meyer (see his note on 1 Co. i. 26) would add many other exx., among them Jn. ix. 17 (see below) ]; for ἐν τούτῳ ὅτι, Ro. v. 8; for περὶ τούτου ὅτι, concerning this, that: so after λαλεῖν, Mk. i. 84; Lk. iv. 41 [al. take ὅτε in these exx. and those after διαλογ- which follow in a causal sense; ef. W. as below (Ellicott on 2 Thess. iii. 7)]; after λέγειν, Jn. ix. 17 [see above] ; after διαλογίζεσθαι, Mt. xvi. 8; Mk. viii. 17, (after ἀποστέλλειν ἐπιστολάς, 1 Mace. xii. 7). See exx. fr. classic authors in Fritzsche on Mt. p. 248 sq.; [Meyer, u.s.; οἵ. W. § 53, 8.1. 3. Noteworthy is the attraction, not uncommon, by which the noun that would naturally be the subject of the subjoined clause, is attracted by the verb of the principal clause and becomes its object [cf. W. § 66,5; Β 8 151,1 8.7; as, οἴδατε τὴν οἰκίαν Στεφανᾶ, ὅτι ἐστὶν ἀπαρχή. for οἴδατε. ὅτι ἡ οἰκία Στ. κτὰ., 1 Co. xvi. 15; also after εἰδέναι and ἰδεῖν, Mk. xii. 34; 1 Th. ii. 1; so after other verbs of knowing, declaring, ete.: Mt. xxv. 24; Jn. ix. 8; Acts iii. 10; ix. 20; 1 Co. iii. 20; 2 Th. ii. 4; Rev. xvii. 8, ete.; ὃν ὑμεῖς λέγετε ὅτι θεὸς ὑμῶν ἐστι, for περὶ οὗ (cf. Lk. xxi. 5) ὑμεῖς λέγετε ὅτι, Jn. viii. 54. 4. As respects construction, ὅτε is joined in the N. T. a. to the indicative even where the opinion of another is introduced, and therefore according to class. usage the optative should have been used; as, διεστείλατο . . . ἵνα μηδενὶ εἴπωσιν, ὅτι αὐτός ἐστιν ὁ Χριστός, Mt. xvi. 20; add, 21; iv. 12; xx. 30, ete. b. to that subjunctive after οὐ μή which differs scarcely at all from the future (see μή, IV. 2 p. 411°; [ef. W. 508 (473)]): Mt. v. 20; xxvi. 29 [RG; al. om. ὅτε); Mk. xiv. 25; Lk. xxi. 32; Jn. xi. 56 (where before ὅτε supply δοκεῖτε, borrowed from the preceding δοκεῖ); but in Ro. iii. 8 ὅτι before ποιήσωμεν (hortatory subjune. [ef. W. § 41 a. 4a.; B. 245 (211)]) is recitative [see 5 below], depending on λέγουσι [W. 628 (583); B. § 141, 3]. c. to the infinitive, by a mingling of two constructions, common even in classic Grk., according to which the writer beginning the construction with ὅτε falls into the construction of the ace. with inf.: Acts xxvii. 10; cf. W. 339 (318) N.2; [§ 63, 2¢c.; B. 383 (328)]. On the anacoluthon found in 1 Co. xii. 2, ace. to the reading ὅτι ὅτε (which appears in cod. Sin. also [and is adopted by Lbr. T Tr WH (yet cf. their note)]), ef. B. 383 (328) sq- 5. ὅτι is placed before direct discourse (‘recitative’ ὅτι) [B.§ 139,51; W.§ 65, 8 6.; § 60,9 (and Moulton’s note) ]: Mt. ii, 23 [?]; vii. 23; xvi. 7; xxi. 16; xxvi. 72, 74; xxvii. 48; Mk. [ii. 16 T Tr WH (see 2 above); but see ὅστις, 4]; vi. 23; xii. 19 [cf. B. 237 (204)]; Lk. i. 61; ii. 23; ἵν. 48; xv. 27; Jn. i. 20; iv. 17; xv. 25; xvi. 17; Acts xv. 1; Heb. xi. 18; 1 Jn. iv. 20; Rev. iii. 17, ete.; most frequently after λέγω, q. VII. 1 a., p. 318" bot. [Noteworthy is 2 Thess. iii. 10, cf. B. § 139, 53.] II. the reason why anything is said to be or to be done, because, since, for that, for, (a causal conjune.; Lat. > ou quod, quia, quom, nam) ; [on the diff. betw. it and yap ef. Westcott, Epp. of Jn. p. 70]; a. it is added to a speaker’s words to show what ground he gives for his opinion; as, μακάριος ete. ὅτι, Mt. ν. 4-12; xiii. 16; Lk. vi. 20 sq.; xiv. 14; after οὐαί, Mt. xi. 21; xxiii. 18-15, 28, 25, 27, 29; Lk. vi. 24sq.; x. 13; xi. 42-44, 46, 52; Jude 11; ef. further, Mt. vii. 13; xvii. 15; xxv. 8; Mk. v.9; ix. 38 [ἃ Tr mrg. om. Tr txt. br. the el.]; Lk. vil. 47; xxili.40; Jn.i. 30; v.27; ἴχ. 16; xvi. 9-11, 14, 16 [Τ Tr WH om. L br. cl.]; Actsi. 5, and often ;—or is added by the narrator, to give the reason for his own opinion: Mt. ii. 18; ix. 36; Mk. iii. 30; vi. 34; Jn. il. 25; Acts i. 17;—or, in general, by a teacher, and often in such a way that it relates to his entire statement or views: Mt. v.45; 1Jn.iv.18; 2Jn.7; Rev. iii. 10. Ὅ. ὅτι makes reference to some word or words that precede or immediately follow it [cf. W. § 23, 5; § 53, 8 b.; B. § 127, 6]; as, διὰ τοῦτο, In. viii. 47; x.17; xii. 39; 1 Jn. iii. 1,ete. διὰ τί; Ro. ix. 32; 2Co. xi. 11. χάριν τίνος ; 1 Jn. iii. 12. οὕτως, Rev. iii. 16. ἐν τούτῳ, 1 Jn. iii. 20. ὅτι in the protasis, Jn. i. 50 (51); xx. 29. It is followed by διὰ τοῦτο, Jn. xv. 19. οὐχ ὅτι... - ἀλλ᾽ ὅτι, not be... but because, Jn. vi. 26; xii. 6. III. On the combination ὡς ὅτε see ὡς, I. 3. [ὅτι interrog., i. 6. 6, τε or ὅ τι, see ὅστις, 4 (and ad init.).]

ὅτι hoti 1x

originally was the neuter of ὅστις, that, Mt. 2:16, 22, 23; 6:5, 16; often used pleonastically in reciting another’s words, Mt. 9:18; Lk. 19:42; Acts 5:23; as a causal particle, for that, for, because, Mt. 2:18; 5:3, 4, 5; 13:13; because, seeing that, since, Lk. 23:40; Acts 1:17

ὅτι, conjc. (prop. neut. of ὅστις). As conjc, introducing an objective clause, that; after verbs of seeing, knowing, thinking, saying, feeling: Mt 3:9 6:32 11:25, Mk 3:28, Lk 2:49, Jo 2:22, Ac 4:13, Ro 1:13 8:38 10:9, Phl 4:15, Ja 2:24, al.; elliptically, Jo 6:46, Phl 3:12, al.

After εἶναι (γίνεσθαι): defining a demonstr. or pers. pron., Jo 3:19 16:19, Ro 9:6, I Jo 3:16 al.; c. pron. interrog., Mt 8:27, Mk 4:41, Lk 4:36, Jo 4:22 al.; id. elliptically, Lk 2:49, Ac 5:4, 9, al.;

Untranslatable, before direct discourse (ὅτι recitantis): Mt 7:23, Mk 2:16, Lk 1:61, Jo 1:20, Ac 15:1, He 11:18, al. (on the pleonastic ὡς ὅτι, v.s. ὡς).

As causal particle, for that, because: Mt 5:4-12, Lk 6:20, 21, Jo 1:30 5:27, Ac 1:5, I Jo 4:18, Re 3:10, al. mult.; διὰ τοῦτο ὅτι, Jo 8:47 10:17, al.; answering a question (διὰ τί), Ro 9:32, al.; οὐκ ὅτι . . . ἀλλ’ ὅτι, Jo 6:26 12:6.

οτι. (1) For ὅτι, ‘‘that,” introducing an objective clause after verbs of knowing, saying, etc., cf. P Tebt II. 4098 (A.D. 5) εἰδὼ[ς ὅ]τι ἐξίι)ουσίαν αὐτῶν ἔχει kal Λυσίμαχος kal σύ, ΚΕ knew that both you and Lysimachus had plenty of them” (Edd.), P Fay 109° (early i/A.D.) νομίσας ὅτι (cf. Mt 517) κιχρᾷς por αὐτούς, ““ consider that you are lending them (sc. staters) to me’’ (Edd.), BGU III. 8464* (ii/a.p.) (= Selections, p. 93) γεινώσκειν σαι θέλω, ὅτι οὐχ [HA] Lov, ὅτι ἀναβένις (1. ἀναβαίνεις) els τὴν μητρόπολιν, “1 wish you to know that I had no hope that you were coming up to the metropolis,” 74.9 αἴγραψά σοι, ὅτι γυμνός εἰμει, “1 wrote you that I am naked,” and P Tebt II. 420+ (iii/A.D.) οἴδατε ὅτι ἀπὸ ζημίας ἠμί, ‘‘ You know that I am blameless.” Ὅτι, however, is frequently omitted, e.g. BGU IIL. 8153(ii/a.p.) γεινόσκιν σε θέλω [τὴ]ν ἐπιστολήν σου ἔλαβε (corrected by another hand into ἔλαβα): similarly inthe NT. The periphrasis with ὅτι has superseded acc. c. inf. in nearly all NT writers, but the two constructions have been mixed in P Oxy II. 2377.8 (A.p. 186) δηλῶν ὅτι εἰ τὰ ἀληθῆ φανείη μηδὲ κρίσεως δεῖσθαι τὸ πρᾶγμα : cf. Ac 271° and Aristeas 125. In Mk 9!4°3 the AV rightly takes ὅτι = τί, ‘why ”’: for this use of ὅτι in zzdirect interrogation, see the exx. in Field (ores, p. 33. (2) “Ore rvecttativum, when it is practically equivalent to our quotation-marks, is seen, as in Mt 774 a/., in P Oxy IV. 7444 (B.C. 1) (= Selections, p. 33) εἴρηκας δὲ ᾿Αφροδισιᾶτι ὅτι μή pe ἐπιλάθῃς, “you told Aphrodisias ‘Do not p- 103) ἡ μήτηρ pov εἶπε ᾿Αρχελάῳ, ὅτι ἀναστατοῖ pe, ‘my mother said to Archelaus, ‘He upsets me,’’’ and 2ό. VII. 1064° (iii/A.D.) γενόμενος πρὸς ᾿Αχιλλᾶν πυνθανόμενος περὶ σοῦ ἔφη ὅτι ἐν τῇ Ψώβθει ἐστίν, “1 went to Achillas and inquired about you and he said ‘ He is αἱ Psobthis.’’’ Cf. the construction in such passages as P Oxy III. 533% 463 ou τὰς συνθήκας φρόντισον τοῦ χαλκοῦ, ‘‘tell Zoilus the cultivator from Sento that in accordance with the agreements he must look after the money” (Edd.), and P Tebt II. 4161” (iii/A.D.) petaSe(= 0)s kal ᾿Ακουτᾶτι τῷ ἀδελφῷ ὅτι ἐὰν Χρίαν τινὸς ἔχῃ ἣ γυνή μου ποίησον αὐτῆς τὴν χρίαν ἕως ἔλθω, ‘‘tell my brother Akoutas also to do anything that my wife requires until Icome” (Edd.). For the redundant ὅτι, cf. further P Oxy XIV. 16688 (iii/A.D.) πρότερον μὲν ἔλεγεν ὅτι ἢ δός μοι (ἀρτάβας) 1B, ἢ λαβὲ (ἀρτ.) LB, ““ formerly he said ‘ Either give me 12 artabae or take 12 art.’” (Edd.), zd. 1682° (iv/A.D.) ἀναγκαίως δὲ καὶ ἡμεῖν ἐπίστειλον ὅτι εἰ ἧς ἐπιδημήσασα, ‘do you by all means send word to us whether you have arrived ’’ (Edd.). (3) ὅτι, as a causal particle, ‘* because,” may be illustrated by P Par 48)" (B.c. 153) καλῶς οὖν ποιήσεις παραγίνεσθαι ἡμῖν εἰς Iloel, ὅτι καταπλεῖν μέλλομεν πρὸς τὸν βασιλέα, BGU II. 4235 (a soldier to his father—ii/a.D.) (= «δεσεξζογις, Ρ. 91) ἵνα cov προσκυνήσω τὴν Xépay, ὅτι pe ἐπαίδευσας καλῶς, ‘“‘that I may kiss your hand, because you have brought me up well,” and 24. III. 846° (ii/a.D.) (= Selections, p- 94) αἰδ[υ]φσοπο[ζύ]μην (/. ἐδυσωπούμην) δὲ ἐλθεῖν eis KapaviSav ὅτι campas παρμριπατῶ (/. περιπατῶ), “but I was ashamed to come to Karanis, because I am going about in rags.” (4) A few miscellaneous exx. may be added. P Oxy I. 37: }2 (report of a lawsuit—a.D. 49) (= Se/ections, p. 49) ὅτι δὲ ταῦτα ἀληθῆι λέγωι, ἔστιν γράμματα αὐτῆς δι᾿ ὧν ὁμολογεῖ εἰληφέναι, “᾿απὰ in proof that I am telling the truth, there are the documents in which she admits that she has received them (wages).” For the consecutive ὅτι in Jn 7° Bauer (HZNT ad/.) cites Pelagia-Legenden, p. 20, τί διδοῖς τοῖς ἀμνοῖς σου, ὅτι ζωὴν αἰώνιον ἔχουσιν ; A similar ex. is cited by Radermacher (G7. p. 160) from the “εἴα Christophort, ed. Usener 68, 18: τοιοῦτοι yap εἰσιν οἱ θεοὶ ὑμῶν, ὅτι ὑπὸ γυναικὸς ἐκινήθησαν. With the NT οὐχ ὅτι (2 Thess 3° αλ) cf. μὴ ὅτι in P Lond 4235 (B.c. 168) (= I. Ρ. 30, Selections, p. 10), μὴ ὅτι ye τοσούτου χρόνου ἐπιγεγονότος, ‘‘not to speak of so much time having gone by.” In the difficult 1 Tim 67 Parry reads οὐδ᾽ ὅτι (= nedum) with a similar meaning: see his note ad /., and for a different view Field Mofes, pp. 212, 243. In 2 Cor 519 αἱ. ὡς ὅτι is taken by Blass Gr.” Ρ. 321 f. as = Attic ὡς c. gen. abs. (Vg gwasz), but in papyri of late date ὡς ὅτι often means merely ‘‘that,” e.g. CPR I. 19% (A.D. 330) πρώην βίβλια ἐπιδέδωκα τῇ σῇ ἐπιμελείᾳ ὡς ὅτι ἐβουλήθην τινὰ ὑπάρχοντά μου ἀποδόσθαι, where Wessely (p. 58) notes “" ὡς ὅτι seem combined, where the single word would be adequate,” and cites as a further ex. Papyrus No. 6085 ὡς ὅτι χρεοστεῖται ἐξ αὐτοῦ ὁ κύρις Lavds. A superfluous ὅτι in ὡς ὅτι c. superlat. is seen in RobertsGardner 65!7 (B.c. 101-100 or 100-99) (β)οῦν ὡς ὅτι κάλλιστον παρήγαγον. The editors compare C/4 ii. 482*® (B.C. 41-30) παραστήσαντες ὡς ὅτι κάλλιστα θύματα. > Ov. In addition toits regular use with the ind., οὐ is frequently found in the papyri with the participle, due apparently to the fact that it is the proper negative for a statement of fact. Exx. are P Oxy IV. 726° (A.D. 135) οὐ δυνάμενος δι᾽ (ii/ili a.D.) εἴπατε Ζωίλῳ τῷ ἀπὸ Σεντὼ γεωργῷ ὅτ[ι] kata | alo ]@evelay πλεῦσαι, ‘since he is unable through sickness

ὅτι (hoti) — that/since: that. ὅτῐ, Epic dialect ὅττῐ (both in [Refs 8th c.BC+]: conjunction, to introduce an objective clause, that, after Verbs of seeing or knowing, thinking or saying; in [Refs 8th c.BC+] —Usage:

I. when ὅτι introduces a statement of fact:

I. a in [Refs 8th c.BC+] always with indicative, the tense following the same rules as in English, ἤγγειλ᾽ ὅττι ῥά οἱ πόσις ἔκτοθι μίμνε πυλάων [Refs 8th c.BC+]

I. b in Attic dialect, ὅτι takes indicative after primary tenses, indicative or optative after secondary tenses, e.g. ἐνδείκνυμαι ὅτι οὐκ ἔστι σοφός [Refs 5th c.BC+] news came that Megara had (literal has) revolted, [Refs 5th c.BC+]: sometimes optative and indicative are found in the same sentence, ἔλεγον, ὅτι Κῦρος μὲν τέθνηκεν, Ἀριαῖος δὲ πεφευγὼς.. εἴη [Refs 5th c.BC+].. and the accusative with infinitive are found together, [Refs 5th c.BC+]

I.2. when ὅτι introduces a conditional sentence, the Constr. after ὅτι is the same as in independent conditional sentences, εἴ τις ἔροιτο, καθ᾽ ὁποίους νόμους δεῖ πολιτεύεσθαι, δῆλον ὅτι ἀποκρίναισθ᾽ ἄν.. it is manifest that you would answer.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]

II. ὅτι is frequently inserted pleonastic in introducing a quotation (where we use no conjunction and put inverted commas), λόγον τόνδε ἐκφαίνει ὁ Πρωτεύς, λέγων ὅτι ἐγὼ εἰ μὴ περὶ πολλοῦ ἡγεύμην.. [Refs 5th c.BC+]; καὶ ἐγὼ εἶπον, ὅ. ἡ αὐτή μοι ἀρχή ἐστι.. [Refs 5th c.BC+]; even where the quotation consists of one word,[Refs]

II.2. ὅ. is also used pleonastic with the infinitive and accusative [Refs 5th c.BC+]; but ὅτι has frequently been wrongly inserted by the copyists, as if εἶπεν or λέγουσιν must be followed by it, as in [Refs 5th c.BC+]

III. ὅτι in Attic dialect frequently represents a whole sentence, especially in affirmative answers, οὐκοῦν.. τὸ ἀδικεῖν κάκιον ἂν εἴη τοῦ ἀδικεῖσθαι. Answ. δῆλον δὴ ὅτι (i.e. ὅτι κάκιον ἂν εἴη, or ὅτι ταῦτα οὕτως ἔχει) [Refs 5th c.BC+]; compare οἶδ᾽ ὅτι, ἴσθ᾽ ὅτι, οἶσθ᾽ ὅτι, [Refs 5th c.BC+] adverb

III.2. what we make the subject of the Verb which follows ὅτι frequently stands in the preceding clause, Αυκάονας δὲ καὶ αὐτοὶ εἴδομεν, ὅτι.. καρποῦνται (for εἴδομεν, ὅτι Λυκάονες καρποῦνται) [Refs 5th c.BC+]

IV. ὅτι sometimes = with regard to the fact that, ὅτι.. οὔ φησι.. ὄνομα εἶναι, ὑποπτεύω αὐτὸν σκώπτειν [Refs 5th c.BC+]

V. οὐχ ὅ..., ἀλλὰ or ἀλλὰ καὶ.., οὐχ ὅ. ὁ Κρίτων ἐν ἡσυχίᾳ ἦν, ἀλλὰ οἱ φίλοι αὐτοῦ not only [Refs 1st c.AD+].., but his friends, [Refs 5th c.BC+] not only the powers in Europe, but.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]., not followed by a second clause, means although, οὐχ ὅ. παίζει καί φησι [Refs 5th c.BC+]

V.2. for ὅτι μή, see at {ὅ τι} 11. __B as a causal Particle, for that, because, generally after Verbs of feeling, [Refs 8th c.BC+]: but without such a Verb, ὃν περὶ πάσης τῖεν ὁμηλικίης, ὅτι οἱ φρεσὶν ἄρτια ᾔδη [Refs 8th c.BC+] __B.b followed by τί, ὅτι τ; why? (literal because why?) [Refs 4th c.BC+]; ὅτι τί δ; [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ὅτι δὴ τί μάλιστ; [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ὅτι δὴ τί γ; [Refs]; compare ὁτιή. __B.2 seeing that, in giving the reason for saying what is said, γλαυκὴ δέ σε τίκτε θάλασσα.. ὅτι τοι νόος ἐστὶν ἀπηνής as is proved by the fact that.., [Refs 8th c.BC+] (ὅ τ᾽) probably always represents ὅτε (ὅ τε): there are no examples of ὅττ᾽: hiatus after ὅτι is permitted in Comedy texts, [Refs 5th c.BC+]

ὅτι (hoti) — that/since: since. ὅτῐ, Epic dialect ὅττῐ (both in [Refs 8th c.BC+]: conjunction, to introduce an objective clause, that, after Verbs of seeing or knowing, thinking or saying; in [Refs 8th c.BC+] —Usage:

I. when ὅτι introduces a statement of fact:

I. a in [Refs 8th c.BC+] always with indicative, the tense following the same rules as in English, ἤγγειλ᾽ ὅττι ῥά οἱ πόσις ἔκτοθι μίμνε πυλάων [Refs 8th c.BC+]

I. b in Attic dialect, ὅτι takes indicative after primary tenses, indicative or optative after secondary tenses, e.g. ἐνδείκνυμαι ὅτι οὐκ ἔστι σοφός [Refs 5th c.BC+] news came that Megara had (literal has) revolted, [Refs 5th c.BC+]: sometimes optative and indicative are found in the same sentence, ἔλεγον, ὅτι Κῦρος μὲν τέθνηκεν, Ἀριαῖος δὲ πεφευγὼς.. εἴη [Refs 5th c.BC+].. and the accusative with infinitive are found together, [Refs 5th c.BC+]

I.2. when ὅτι introduces a conditional sentence, the Constr. after ὅτι is the same as in independent conditional sentences, εἴ τις ἔροιτο, καθ᾽ ὁποίους νόμους δεῖ πολιτεύεσθαι, δῆλον ὅτι ἀποκρίναισθ᾽ ἄν.. it is manifest that you would answer.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]

II. ὅτι is frequently inserted pleonastic in introducing a quotation (where we use no conjunction and put inverted commas), λόγον τόνδε ἐκφαίνει ὁ Πρωτεύς, λέγων ὅτι ἐγὼ εἰ μὴ περὶ πολλοῦ ἡγεύμην.. [Refs 5th c.BC+]; καὶ ἐγὼ εἶπον, ὅ. ἡ αὐτή μοι ἀρχή ἐστι.. [Refs 5th c.BC+]; even where the quotation consists of one word,[Refs]

II.2. ὅ. is also used pleonastic with the infinitive and accusative [Refs 5th c.BC+]; but ὅτι has frequently been wrongly inserted by the copyists, as if εἶπεν or λέγουσιν must be followed by it, as in [Refs 5th c.BC+]

III. ὅτι in Attic dialect frequently represents a whole sentence, especially in affirmative answers, οὐκοῦν.. τὸ ἀδικεῖν κάκιον ἂν εἴη τοῦ ἀδικεῖσθαι. Answ. δῆλον δὴ ὅτι (i.e. ὅτι κάκιον ἂν εἴη, or ὅτι ταῦτα οὕτως ἔχει) [Refs 5th c.BC+]; compare οἶδ᾽ ὅτι, ἴσθ᾽ ὅτι, οἶσθ᾽ ὅτι, [Refs 5th c.BC+] adverb

III.2. what we make the subject of the Verb which follows ὅτι frequently stands in the preceding clause, Αυκάονας δὲ καὶ αὐτοὶ εἴδομεν, ὅτι.. καρποῦνται (for εἴδομεν, ὅτι Λυκάονες καρποῦνται) [Refs 5th c.BC+]

IV. ὅτι sometimes = with regard to the fact that, ὅτι.. οὔ φησι.. ὄνομα εἶναι, ὑποπτεύω αὐτὸν σκώπτειν [Refs 5th c.BC+]

V. οὐχ ὅ..., ἀλλὰ or ἀλλὰ καὶ.., οὐχ ὅ. ὁ Κρίτων ἐν ἡσυχίᾳ ἦν, ἀλλὰ οἱ φίλοι αὐτοῦ not only [Refs 1st c.AD+].., but his friends, [Refs 5th c.BC+] not only the powers in Europe, but.., [Refs 5th c.BC+]., not followed by a second clause, means although, οὐχ ὅ. παίζει καί φησι [Refs 5th c.BC+]

V.2. for ὅτι μή, see at {ὅ τι} 11. __B as a causal Particle, for that, because, generally after Verbs of feeling, [Refs 8th c.BC+]: but without such a Verb, ὃν περὶ πάσης τῖεν ὁμηλικίης, ὅτι οἱ φρεσὶν ἄρτια ᾔδη [Refs 8th c.BC+] __B.b followed by τί, ὅτι τ; why? (literal because why?) [Refs 4th c.BC+]; ὅτι τί δ; [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ὅτι δὴ τί μάλιστ; [Refs 5th c.BC+]; ὅτι δὴ τί γ; [Refs]; compare ὁτιή. __B.2 seeing that, in giving the reason for saying what is said, γλαυκὴ δέ σε τίκτε θάλασσα.. ὅτι τοι νόος ἐστὶν ἀπηνής as is proved by the fact that.., [Refs 8th c.BC+] (ὅ τ᾽) probably always represents ὅτε (ὅ τε): there are no examples of ὅττ᾽: hiatus after ὅτι is permitted in Comedy texts, [Refs 5th c.BC+]