Menu

41 Sermon Illustrations on Supernatural

41 illustrations

The supernatural in Christian preaching refers to God's power and presence beyond natural laws, often evidenced by miracles, angels, and spiritual realities (Hebrews 2:4). Illustrations commonly contrast genuine divine acts with paranormal claims, using images of miracles, spiritual warfare, and skepticism toward occult or false supernatural phenomena (2 Corinthians 12:12). This subject challenges believers to discern true spiritual manifestations from cultural fascination with the mystical or unexplained.

E S P and the Paranormal

Acts 8:9

A skeptical analysis of the paranormal.

Reasons for doubt:

1. Psychic experiments cannot be repeated.

2. Spontaneous psychic experiences fail to pass scrutiny.

3. Among professional psychics, there is a long history of fraud.

(Lousy predictions of Jeanne Dixon).

4. We can understand why most people believe: Ancedotes sway more than fact.

5. According to research, the mind cannot be independent of the brain.

6. The Bible counsels us to be skeptical of those who claim god-like

abilities.

Can a skeptic believe? Stacking up the claims of the Bible against skepticism.

*

from Christianity Today magazine · David Myers via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database beliefsuperstition

Telephone Psychics: Friends Or Phonies?

Acts 8:9

The "Psychic Friends Network" is mostly a scam. "Joan Cook" (not her real name) of Broomfield, Colorado, was a counselor for six months beginning in 1991. She said she is no psychic. She was recommended for the job by her teacher in a counseling class, who said Cook would be free to do traditional counseling on the network. But she quickly discovered that her callers didn't want basic, common-sense advice. They wanted supernatural insights.

When women called to ask if they were pregnant, Cook tried to get them to contact their local chapter of Planned Parenthood for a pregnancy test. Most rejected her advice. They "weren't about to do something to cheap and common-sense UNLESS I told them I read in the cards that the cards said they should go to the doctor and get their health checked out," she said.

On January 8, 1992, she got a call from Tonia in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Tonia wanted to know whether her husband was going to beat her. Cook tried to convince her to call the emergency number 911. She also gave Tonia the names of churches that might provide counseling. The woman's reaction: "I called for a READING. I want my READING!" So, Cook says, she concocted a tarot reading to back up her recommendation. "Only when Tonia was thoroughly convinced the advice came from the cards and not just some ordinary individual did she seem inclined to access the FREE resources ALREADY available to her in her OWN community," Cook explained. Why was Tonia's husband so angry? Cook says he had discovered that Tonia had racked up a $5,000 phone bill talking to "psychic" counselors.

Psychics earn $18 to $24 an hour, while the network takes in a total of $240.00. One service said it tried to start a network of professional counselors but no one called in. Cook says although "the sort of superstition these people are promoting is dangerous beyond belief, I will have to admit one thing: I got paid better at that job than at any other job I ever had before or since. Isn't it too bad that people pay legitimate counselors so poorly, but will shovel millions of dollars into hands of quacks like that."

One of their infomericals tells story of "Giacomo," who was told by his psychic to avoid an important business meeting. "I see darkness and destruction," the commercial quotes his psychic friend as saying. "Whatever you do, don't go to this meeting." He avoided it, and that day (Feb. 26, 1993) terrorists detonated a bomb in the World Trade Center in New York City. In the commercial, Giacomo says the business meeting he was supposed to attend was held in the New York Vista Hotel in the World Trade Center. "That call," he says, "saved my life." In fact, no one in the hotel was killed or even injured; all the casualties were below the hotel.

#967

*

from Skeptical Inquirer Magazine · C. Eugene Emery, Jr. via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database supernaturalsuperstition

Signs and Wonders Theology

Acts 2:19

Review of several books on the "Signs and Wonders" theology. They believe other Christians need to be converted to the full power of God. Skepticism is explained as an over-reliance on the scientific attitude (though the reviewer notes that this attitude grew out of Christian convictions.)

Stop Looking For "Miracles"

Acts 17:16

Christians in the Third World report many miracles but Westerners do not. Coggins argues that God works differently in different cultures, as is borne out by Paul's ministry to Athens. In the West, miracles can lead to "health and wealth" error. What we need is discipleship more than miracles.

Opthlmadoulian: Visible and Spiritual

John 9:39

Are you opthlmadoulian? Excuse me for asking you a question using an Ancient Greek word, but opthlmadoulian is such a powerful word - it means a slave to the eyes. Are you one? Are you a slave to the eyes?

Consider one especially seductive form of sight enslavement: servitude to the notion that only the visible is real - the belief that all that is real is visible, and all that is invisible is unreal, or maybe just a fairy tale.

Take an example of something both invisible and real to help you demolish this false assumption that reality is exhausted by what you can see with your eyes. Consider truth - something both invisible and real. If you don't believe me, tell me where you last saw truth or, for that matter, logic. You can't because we don't see truth or logic with our eyes. We know truth as we correctly ascertain the nature of reality. Our experience of truth is an outworking of our minds interacting with the world. Matter by itself does not have truth. Mind must come along and make judgments about matter, and these judgments are true or untrue to the degree that they correspond with reality. You see, if the universe were devoid of a conscious being, even though some things would be true about that universe, it would need a mind to ask the question of truth. Without a mind, such a universe would just exist without there ever being an experience of truth. Truth requires a mind to ask truth questions, and the mind transcends the visible to make judgments.

Now ponder another invisible category: the spiritual. Hear the words of A.W. Tozer, the great Christian mystic: "Our uncorrected thinking influenced by the blindness of our natural hearts and the intrusive ubiquity of visible things, tends to draw a contrast between the spiritual and the real -but actually no such contrast exists. The antithesis lies elsewhere -between the real and the imaginary, between the spiritual and the material, between the temporal and the eternal; but between the spiritual and the real, never. The spiritual is real."[1]

Let me take you one step further than that. It is not enough to justify something by saying it is spiritual. The truly spiritual (listen carefully now) must also stand the test of truth. For that you need the mind, not just the eyes.

_______________

1. A. W. Tozer, The Pursuit of God (Camphill Penn., Christian Publications, 1982) pp. 56.

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

[Original illustration at this number was a duplicate of HolwickID #2660]

*

Does the Supernatural Exist?

Some people reject even the possibility that there is a supernatural dimension to life.

This view is reflected in the Humanist Manifesto (II), which was written in 1973.

The first paragraph of the Manifesto states:

"We find insufficient evidence for belief in the existence of the supernatural; it is either meaningless or irrelevant..."

It continues:

"We can discover no divine purpose or plan for human species. While there is much that we do not know, humans are responsible for what we are or will become. No deity will save us - we must save ourselves."

Literally thousand of scientists, educators and political leaders have put their signatures on this document.

from Old sermon by Rev. David Holwick via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database transcendenceatheism

The Brain

Partial sermon on the reality of the soul vs. materialism. Influenced by Newsweek article on the brain.

I. What are we all about?

A. "Newsweek" article on the human brain.

1) Age-old debate:

a) Are we merely a wonderful collection of neurons?

b) Or do we have a soul, a non-physical aspect of existence?

2) Consensus of scientists is that we are nothing but material.

a) There is no "ghost in the machine."

b) Our brain is nothing more than a super-computer.

c) When our brain dies, we return to dust and cease to exist.

B. The Bible says the scientists are wrong.

1) We are material beings.

2) Yet we also have a eternal soul.

a) Everyone does, believer and non-believer.

b) But their futures are quite different.

II. Philosophical differences on the essence of being a person.

A. Scientists tend to be crass materialists.

B. Greek philosophers went in the other direction.

1) The body is evil and holds us back.

2) Our goal is to leave this body and become free spirits in

eternity.

3) Hindus and Eastern religions are similar - we become a single

raindrop in the ocean of nothingness.

C. The Bible presents a different view.

1) Contrary to some, our goal is not to be a ghost-like soul

running from cloud to cloud.

a) This aspect of heaven is only temporary.

2) Our destiny is to have a resurrected body and soul and live

in a new universe, with new heavens and new earth.

3) The resurrection of Jesus from the dead is the Bible's proof

that this is our future.

III. What this means for us right now.

A. We cannot treat people like soul-less machines.

1) Euthanasia debate - their life is worthless because they

can't produce, so let them die.

2) Every human, even evil ones, have value to a Christian.

B. We cannot live just for today.

1) Today is important, but we live our lives with a view to

eternity.

C. We cannot flee from physical existence.

1) People try to flee by means of drugs, alcohol, ....

a) Only leads to disappointment and emptiness.

2) Suicide is no answer.

D. There is a supernatural aspect to life.

1) Miracles can happen.

My Sister Says I Am An Alien

A letter received at the office of the Skeptical Inquirer magazine:

Dear CSICOP [Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims

of the Paranormal]:

I was hoping you could send me some info on reports, abductions

and just facts about aliens. I am doing a project on OFO [sic]

phenomena. I believe with all my heart. I am 14 years old and

live in Louisville, KY... I was convinced that I was a [sic]

alien when I was a child. My family told me I was put in there

[sic] home by the government and they get paid to keep me.... My

sister still says I am part of some big government experiment to

see if aliens can be like humans. I guess that is why I am such

a believer...

The editor is disturbed that paranormal popularizers have so effectively spread their propaganda that alien abductions are this firmly rooted in the culture.

Penchant For the Paranormal

Acts 17:27

Suddenly, society is infatuated with things supernatural and spiritual.

What should Christians make of it? Even if the restlessness leads some to

settle for spiritual counterfeits or inflates them with spiritual pride, we

cannot ignore what drives the search. People are not just interested in

dramatic experiences, but are also more reflective and interested in prayer.

Leonard Sweet, president of United Theological Seminary in Dayton, Ohio:

"People today believe in miracles, in angels. We don't have to argue the case

for spiritual realities.... Our challenge is to help people believe the right

thing."

Implications for Christian ministry:

1. Opportunity. Angels are supporting cast - Jesus is the star.

2. Discernment. People want junk food, we must give meat.

3. Expectancy. God will use the new interest in spirituality for good.

#3100

*

A Time To Sow, A Time To Reap

Luke 8:4

Christians can learn to say the right thing at the right time when it comes to evangelism.

When someone says, "Well, I don't understand how you can say 'God loves us' when the world is in such a mess," there are six possible responses from Christians:

1. Launch into an earnest sermonette on the existence of God. [apologetics]

2. Mumble an ambivalent argument and change the subject. [mumble]

3. Zero in on the real issue: the reality of original sin. [apologetics]

4. Speak slowly and loudly on the blessing of justification,

sanctification and the glorification of the Christian.

Talk down to them. [religious language]

*5. Ask about "the mess." Where is this person's unhappiness

with the messy world? Listen for hints or confessions

of an inner, personal mess.

*6. Just keep listening as the person continues.

The last two are the best responses. Most people acknowledge the need for sensitivity, listening skills, and seek to apply the gospel to a person's need or hurt. Information is not what people usually look for first when they are hurting, vulnerable, or sharing feelings, and defending the facts of faith can actually kill the conversation. In the distrustful and skeptical hearts of people today, religious reasoning is rarely the starting point of a spiritual journey. [above used 8/24/97]

James Engel offers a summary of the process of a person's heart becoming good soil for the seed of God's Word. It can help Christians be insightful.

-10 Awareness of the supernatural.

- 9 No effective knowledge of Christianity.

- 8 Initial awareness of Christianity.

- 7 Interest in Christianity.

- 6 Awareness of the basic facts of the gospel.

- 5 Grasp of the implications of the gospel.

- 4 Positive attitude to the gospel.

- 3 Awareness of personal need.

- 2 Challenge and decision to act.

- 1 Repentance and faith.

0 A new disciple is born.

A. Grace opens the door for truth.

B. Evangelists must "know the soil."

C. Be patient.

D. People need to hear the same words in a fresh way.

Many are inoculated to the gospel and don't really listen.

Just as sitting in a garage doesn't make one a car, so sitting in

a church doesn't make one a Christian.

Questions Skeptics Pose

Luke 20:26

Here are the questions I have been asked most often. By developing a clear

response to each, we can increase our ability to talk with those who are not

Christians.

It is important to note that while these are the attacking questions, as the

conversation goes on, the questions become kinder and more personal, till one

can focus on the Cross and present the Gospel in its simplicity and beauty.

This has happened in every venue in which I have spoken.

1. Is it really possible to defend the supernatural when every scientific

theory argues for a naturalistic explanation of this universe? (The

question pertains to evolutionary theory and modern cosmology).

2. What convincing arguments can you give us for the existence of God?

3. How can Christians possibly argue for an exclusive claim to truth in Christ

when there are so many other religions in this world? There have been

and are so many good people in this world who were not and are not

Christian. If the Gospel is true, then they are destined for hell. Is

that right? [12/31/95]

4. The God of the Bible is portrayed as all-loving and all-powerful. The evil

must be of his doing. This is a contraction with his character. There

is not only moral evil but gratuitous evil. How do you justify it? What

sort of God is this, anyway?

5. We do not have the original manuscripts of the Bible. How can one possibly

argue for their authority and accuracy? (This comes quite often from

Muslims or those sympathetic with the findings of the Jesus Seminar.)

6. If the law of non-contradiction does apply as a test for falsehood, what

about the concept of the Trinity or the sovereignty of God as it relates

to the responsibility of man? Are these not contradictory concepts?

7. There is no discipline that subscribes to truth as absolute, particularly

in matters of morality. How can Christians still hold to it? (Here some

of the major moral issues of our day emerge.)

8. Religion has caused so much suffering and violence in this world. How do

you explain that?

9. Isn't religion only a political theory espoused by one who wants to impose

his or her views upon others?

#3275

*

Magic Realism Goes To the Movies

Mark 6:2

Cinema is the most holistic of art forms. It is visual, stealing from the tool chests of painters and photographers. It is text-based, drawing on the potentials of literature and drama. Finally, film is musical; filmmakers have never been bashful about ransacking the finest and most varied musical libraries for their scores and soundtracks.

Given their holistic nature, perhaps it is no surprise that movies have recently gravitated toward magic realism, a literary genre that tries to wrap itself around all dimensions of reality. It is magic in its inclusion of the transcendent and the “fantastic.” It is realism in that it is not set in a wholly fictional world, such as Tolkien’s Middle Earth. Nor do its characters move back and forth between two separate worlds, like the children in Lewis’s Narnia tales, who dwell in “our” world (wartime Britain) until they pass through a portal (the wardrobe) into another, enchanted universe. Instead, in the novels of such magic realists as Gabriel Garca Mrquez, Isabel Allende, and Alice Hoffman, the ordinary and the extraordinary are inextricably interwoven. Now filmmakers have begun to exploit the potential of these conventions.

A salient theme of magic realist films is that people have their lives transformed once they get at least one foot outside the modern, technological world. For instance, director Mike Newell’s British protaganists in Enchanted April (1992) find realistic magic at a villa overlooking the Italian Riviera. Newell’s Into the West (1993) has two Irish children discover life-giving marvels in the real world when they are borne along by the animals and folk epistemology of Gypsies who ramble the countryside in horse-drawn caravans.

Such a transformation is at the heart of Bill Forsyth’s quirky classic Local Hero (1983). Forsyth’s movie concerns a Houston oilman who is thrust out of his high-tech world into a Scottish coastal village. The character, played by Peter Riegert, is charged with buying out the entire village so a gargantuan refinery can be built on its strategic site. At first the quaint customs and slow pace of the village bemuse Riegert. Sometimes they also irritate him. Stripped of the high-tech accouterments of his trade, he can report to Houston only by phoning from a bright-red telephone booth, which he plies with pocketfuls of coins, and which produces a chancy connection with a Houston boss whose office is appointed not only with a state-of-the-art telephone but also with its very own planetarium and observatory-quality telescope.

So disencumbered, Riegert’s oilman can begin to see the village as the beautifully located and genuine community it is. (My favorite haiku springs irresistibly to mind: “His barn having burned to the ground, he could see the moon again.”) Eventually he can notice that the pretty marine biologist he comically tries to romance has webs between her toes. She is nothing less than a scuba-diving mermaid. At the last, known as something unique and far better than the site of one more oil refinery, the village is not bought out. But to his credit, Forsyth does not succumb to sentimenality and let Riegert’s character escape once for all to the Scottish village. The oilman returns to Houston. The film ends with him on the balcony of his apartment, gazing out over traffic and its rising, honky clatter. He has not abandoned his technologically overwhelmed world, but he can now see it and know it for more than he did before. Mermaids use scuba-diving gear. Who knows, there may be a mermaid driving one of those cars.

Likewise, Bille August’s The House of the Spirits (1994), with its story ranging from the late 1800s into the 1970s, shows us men and women who use technology but do not have their field of vision reduced to the merely physical and material. The heroine of House (played compellingly, as always, by Meryl Streep) is a woman of European descent, born and living in South America, and possessed of striking paranormal powers. As a girl, she demonstrates psychokinetic abilities by moving, without touching it, a vase across the table. She sees into the future, correctly predicting the outcome of political elections and-quite disturbingly-the death of a beloved family member. Arrived at adulthood she will kiss ghosts and, after her own death, deliver ghostly kisses. As her daughter later observes, she dwells in a world where “logic and the laws of physics [don’t] always apply.”

The world of modern, technological materialism is one where logic and the laws of physics (as we understand them) always apply. In its earlier days, materialism was not quite so totalitarian. It allowed that the nonmaterial might exist but strictly quarantined it to a world separate from ordinary and day-to-day “real life.” This is the uneasy limbo probably still occupied by most modern, Western Christians. The so-called supernatural might occasionally intrude on the natural, but if it does so, it is committing exactly that-an intrusion. The natural and supernatural worlds are best kept apart. The supernatural had better not occur often, and when it does, it must appear with bells and trumpets or other conspicuous warnings that mark it as clearly alien. Better yet, it might also be confined to antiquity. Thus the miraculous “really did happen” in the distant past-a Messiah, for example, really did rise from the grave-but once God knocked the cosmic pinball machine from tilt back into play, he and his ilk could return securely to heaven where they belong.

Yet this naturalistic world-view, even when modified to allow God to have acted once, is in the vast sweep of history stunningly parochial. So far as we know, it is only the modern West that has imagined that the whole of existence is restricted to that which can be physically detected or scientifically regulated. Even such significant early moderns as Columbus believed themselves to have seen mermaids (which he remarked in his ship’s log to be “not as beautiful as they are painted, for they had something masculine in the countenance”). And to this day, in places where modernity has not yet wholly triumphed, there are persistent reports of events and phenomena that defy naturalistic explanation.

This outlook, much more than the parochial modern perspective, strikes me as like the biblical world-view. Yahweh does not seem to be confined mostly to a room somewhere beyond the stage of the human drama. In fact, the Lord is quite often on that stage, if sometimes hidden in the scenery. The Israelites are constantly seeing this Supreme Character at work. When Pharaoh refuses to release the people, the Lord has hardened his heart. When Pharaoh finally relents, that act is no less of the Lord. Similarly, Jesus’ miracles are not announced with blaring trumpets and set off from everyday life. He shows the truth and character of God not by summoning legions of angels from the clouds, but by spitting in the dirt and rubbing mud in a man’s eye. In short, I suspect magic realist filmmakers such as Mike Newell or Bille August can help us imagine and live in the world as the Bible depicts it much more fittingly than could such strict modernists as Cecil B. DeMille. (DeMille’s haloed Jesus was quite reassuring. You always safely knew when you were confronted by God in the flesh, and needn’t worry about missing him in the guise of a prisoner or a beggar.)

So, besides what I take to be the considerable and often enjoyable art of these magic realist filmmakers, I think they offer practice in seeing the world as Christians ought to see it. That does not mean we must indiscriminately reassert the literal reality (whatever that highly modern category means) of mermaids and leprechauns. Nor does it mean we must uncritically endorse clairvoyance, ghost sightings, or any number of “New Age” trappings. What it does mean is that we need no longer continue being tone-deaf to the spiritual and colorblind to the wondrous. Here is the message we are getting from magic realists (and recent philosophers of science, for that matter): The world is not so small, not so easily contained and controlled as we once thought. The modern scientific vocabulary need not be our only vocabulary, nor does it necessarily and always trump competing vocabularies. There are other, and significant, and real ways to cut up and categorize the world. And some of these other categories may help us to see and reclaim things we have long missed.

A scene near the end of The House of the Spirits typifies the way magic realism can give us salutary practice in reperceiving the world, in terms less constricted than those of materialistic modernity and more appropriate to the richer terms of the Christian faith.

Meryl Streep’s character has died. Her daughter has been abducted and tortured by a military junta. Bruised and despairing, the daughter lies alone on a prison floor. The ghost of her mother comes to her, awakens her, takes her head in her lap, and exhorts her to “fight to live, for life is a miracle.” Of course, one way to hear these words is the modern, liberal way, which is to hear “miracle” reduced to the merely symbolic. As the liberal theologians put it, why hanker after multitudes fed and a Messiah bodily risen from the dead? Life itself is a miracle.

Yet in The House of Spirits, it is not a liberal theologian but a ghost speaking. Earlier in the film, ghosts have been shown capable of opening doors, of sighting by multiple witnesses. What this decidedly unmodern ghost is saying is that life is wonderful in all sorts of ways, including many that cannot be captured or comprehended by naturalistic reductionism. In the world of magic realism, the daughter revives, and lives. So may we.

________

Copyright (c) 1995 Christianity Today, Inc./BOOKS & CULTURE Review bccurrtk5B50245815

from Online Christianity Today (America Online) · Rodney Clapp via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database miraclessupernatural

Miracles

John 14

Sermon on miracles. Psalm 77:11-15

========

MIRACLES

========

I. Do miracles happen today?

II. Science and miracles.

A. Our modern reluctance about miracles stems from science.

B. Miracle: An immediate act of God, with no natural means used.

C. Few modern miracles can be attested scientifically.

III. Miracles in the Bible.

A. Three aspects of miracles in the Bible.

B. No sharp distinction God's providence and his miracles.

C. Bible miracles are not just "unnatural, unexplainable" events.

D. Why God "interferes" in this world.

IV. Miracles and revelation.

A. Miracles are intended to deepen a person's understanding of God.

B. Miracles cluster around critical periods in sacred history.

C. Problem of evil miracles. Deut 13:1-5, 2 Th 2:9

V. Modern miracles.

A. Some Christians experience miracles on a daily basis. Jn 14:12

B. Other Christians believe miracles should be very rare. Mt 12:39

C. Miracles may be rare, but they can happen.

VI. Expect God to do great things.

A. True illustration of miraculously answered prayer.

B. Don't neglect your own natural abilities.

C. The greatest miracle is God's gift of salvation.

#3482

*

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Serm96c.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database supernatural

Supernatural

Acts 8:4

Adults today vs. 1976 who say they believe "somewhat" in:

Spiritualism

1976 12%

Today 52%

Astrology

1976 17%

Today 37%

Reincarnation

1976 9%

Today 25%

Faith healing

1976 10%

Today 45%

UFOs

1976 24%

Today 30%

Fortune telling

1976 4%

Today 14%

-----------------------------

USA Today (4/20/98), research

by Yankelovich Monitor Minute

(Occult, Beliefs)

Copyright(c) 1998 by the author or Christianity Today, Inc./Leadership Journal. For reprint information call 630-260-6200 or e-mail LeaderJ@aol.com.

Fall 1998, Vol.XIX, No. 4, Page 67

*

from Online Leadership Journal ( America Online) · U S A Today via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database occult

Why I Don't Believe In Miracles

Mark 6:5

A prominent theologian with a love for science explores the contradictions of faith in divine intervention.

_____________________________

My own ruminations on miracles go back to my boyhood, when I found I couldn't pray for God to heal my sick friends, because if God was really God, he knew what needed to be done before I did. He would certainly work things out in whatever way seemed best to him. So it seemed almost presumptuous to ask.

Since then, my 40-year dialogue with scientists, as part of my study of religion and science, has not made miracles any easier to accept. I pray for my friends and loved ones regularly, because it is my way of expressing that I care for them; I rejoice when a blessing goes to them, but I have no confidence that my prayers change the course of nature.

The question, though, is not whether I believe in miracles, but what a miracle is in the first place. If a miracle is a blessing that comes in the midst of life, often in darkest times, I give thanks for it. If a miracle involves God's contravening the laws of nature to redirect the ordinary course of events, I begin to have some problems.

A good deal of talk about miracles is repugnant to me, and seems almost blasphemous. I remember some years ago watching certain TV evangelists who recounted this story: at a motel reception desk one night an intruder gunned down three clerks. It seems that one "Christian" woman didn't show up for work that night because her mother had had a vision that she should stay at home. The evangelists said that the vision was the miraculous intervention of God. I wondered why a loving God did not warn the three who were killed. That's where the blasphemy comes in -- suggesting that God had the power to save all four but chose only one.

My interest in science has deepened my appreciation of the difficulties of miracle-talk. The idea that God intervenes in the laws of nature, and then redirects their course, is problematic because it raises the specter of chaos and unpredictability. If we can't rely on the regularity of nature, most of life becomes impossible, including everything that depends on technology. Furthermore, it is almost impossible to locate the so-called causal joint, a technical term for the precise empirical sites of God's intervention. In the evangelists' story, the causal joint would be the brain processes that caused the mother's dream.

Some have said that science makes room for such a joint because of the indeterminacy of events at the quantum level. Or that the landscape has changed because of new theories about chaos and complexity, the emergence of life and the appearance of new species. Each of these describes conditions in which something new and surprising can occur, with the implication that nature provides "wiggle room," in which God can tweak ordinary events without upsetting them.

As an explanation of miracles, none of these ideas has met with a consensus among either scientists or theologians. Why is God tweaking only certain outcomes and not all? If God is active in all natural events, why don't they turn out better? The tweaking theory turns out to be selective divine determinism. That makes both nature and God unreliable.

Of course, scientists will be the first to admit that it is next to impossible to predict any single, isolated occurrence -- the movement of a single particle, the development of a cancer cell, the decision that any individual will make at a given moment. Any single natural event can prove to be a "freak" in this sense. This is small comfort to religious believers and surely does not qualify as miracle, because we hold that events take place in the hands of a loving God, not in some cosmic game of Russian roulette.

I'm not certain religious folk even need to talk about miracles. I would rather talk about blessings. We receive blessings, often quite unexpectedly, and we want to praise God for them. We know we cannot claim the credit for these blessings. Even though we cannot predict their arrival, nor understand why so much of human life involves sorrow and evil, we can be grateful and render praise.

Does this make miracles a matter of subjective perception? When someone recovers from cancer, that is objectively clear, not a figment of anyone's imagination. Whether it is to be attributed to God depends on whether you have faith in that kind of God, and that is the subjective element. But it is clearly something to be thankful for, and God is to be praised (as are the doctors and nurses and medical researchers).

I really cannot believe in miracles in any conventional sense, but I do believe in blessings. They happen every day.

__________________

Philip Hefner is professor of systematic theology at the Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago and director of the Zygon Center for Religion and Science.

The Natural As Supernatural

Mark 6:5

Miracles, do you believe that they actually happen? Did Jesus really walk on water? Did He really change the water into wine? In a day such as ours, where science triumphs and her handmaiden technology permeates our lives, can we even seriously ask such questions? Does the success of science with its cool rationality demand that we count such stories as mere hopeful tales?

You know, many of us often feel that the answer is yes, yes, we do have to give up our hope in miracles. We feel the pressure of naturalism, and we retreat hoping that we can at least maintain the religious meanings behind the miraculous events we heard about in Sunday school or from a parent.

We find ourselves in this predicament because we have unwittingly accepted the intellectual mindset of our time. Science, we believe, has stated unequivocally that nature is a self-sustained, orderly system governed by incontrovertible laws, and, furthermore, that miracles destroy this order.

But we need not accept this supposed antinomy between the natural and the supernatural. Science, if you pay close attention, does not demand it, nor does philosophy. A more helpful, and I believe truer, casting of the two can be found in the person of Jesus Christ. Jesus referred to Himself as the Son of Man. Although a technical term, it does embody the ultimate example of what it is to be human. He is the fullest expression of humanity in perfection. To put it differently: Yes, He's divine, but He's also supremely human. More correctly, He is God's expression in human features. He shows us what is possible for humans who are attuned to God and His activities in this world.

His miracles, then, do not destroy the order of nature. The mere existence of this world is a miracle - slow ones should be as impossible by sheer naturalism as immediate ones are. Jesus' miracles just more dramatically demonstrate the super-possibilities in the realm of nature and in our lives. The supernatural, then, is super-nature realized. Nature is not merely a quasi-coherent set of mathematical laws. It is richer than that. It is the arena in which God does His work that points us to His power and His grace. That miraculous work can begin in you to make you conform to the image of His Son. That transformation is in itself a miracle, for there the natural and the supernatural blend wonderfully.

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Very Superstitious: Belief In Contemporary America

Acts 16:16

Last month, the Raelians, a cult that worships UFOs, threatened to sue the federal government for interfering with their plans to clone a human being. The FDA insists that experiments such as the Raelians' must meet with its approval, which it won't give.

For their part, the Raelians claim that the FDA's refusal violates their beliefs. These beliefs teach them that human beings are the product of genetic experiments performed by extraterrestrials millions of years ago. Thus, they believe, cloning people holds the key to eternal life.

Well, while this is more than a little ridiculous, what's even more ridiculous is that the Raelians' beliefs aren't as far from the American mainstream as you might think.

Thirty-five years ago, TIME magazine asked on its cover, "Is God Dead?" The answer seemed to be that even if he wasn't, belief in the supernatural was on the way out.

Well, what a difference three decades makes. Americans have embraced "belief" in a big way. So much so, in fact, that social critics and historians are referring to our times as another "great awakening." But wait a minute. While belief is surging, you have to look at what people are believing.

Between 1976 and 1997, the number of Americans who believed in astrology grew from seventeen percent to thirty-seven percent. During the same period, the percentage of Americans who professed a belief in reincarnation nearly tripled -- from nine percent to twenty-five percent. And crystal ball makers doubtless are glad to hear that those who put stock in fortune-telling nearly quadrupled -- from four to fourteen percent.

In addition, up to half of all Americans belief in necromancy (that is, conjuring up the dead), and millions of Americans believe in lucky numbers, alien visitations, and alien abductions. And this is only a sample of America's new credulity.

Well, clearly this kind of spiritual awakening stands in marked contrast to the great awakenings of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Those spiritual movements were grounded in historic Christianity. When men and women sought "spiritual growth," they turned to the God of the Bible.

But today, it's as simple as ABC, Anything But Christianity. In their attempt to find spiritual fulfillment without Christianity, Americans have become undiscerning in what they believe. If it enables a person to feel "spiritual" without having to bother with being religious, no belief is too off the wall for some people.

This is to be expected. As G. K. Chesterton noted, when people cease believing in the biblical God, the problem isn't that they believe in nothing. It's that they believe in everything. Irrationality and even superstition become the order of the day.

This situation leaves the church with both an opportunity and a challenge. All of this misplaced belief is, in fact, a tacit acknowledgment of the "God-shaped vacuum" within each human heart. Our challenge is to help our neighbors understand that this vacuum cannot be filled with superstition. It can be only filled by a relationship with the God of history -- the one who created the vacuum within us.

Over the next few days, I'll be telling you about some other examples of beliefs commonly held in contemporary America -- beliefs that put the "super" in "superstition" -- and illustrating how short the distance from ridiculous to mainstream has become.

For further reference:

"The New Superstition in the Midst of a Knowledge Explosion; Americans Embrace Irrational Fears." Boston Globe, 2 January 2001; Pg. E1.

"Sold on Spirituality." Boston Globe Magazine. 3 December 2000; Pg. 19.

Gabler, Neal. "Culture Wars; A Victim of the Third Great Awakening." Los Angeles Times, 14 January 2001; Pg. M1.

_________________________

Copyright (c) 2001 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database new agesuperstition

What Happens When Almighty God Calls Your House?

Acts 8:9

Rev. Claunch recently heard of a survey that asked teenage girls what interested them most. "I sat smugly and said, 'I know that. It's boys,'" he recalled. He found out he was decidedly wrong. The majority of teenage girls answered that witchcraft interested them most. The fastest-growing religion among teenagers is Wicca (the religion of witchcraft).

One pro-witchcraft website said one reason interest has risen was television shows like, "Sabrina, the Teenage Witch," "Buffy, the Vampire Slayer," and "Charmed." Though none of them portray witchcraft as it truly is, the website said they at least created interest. The recent Harry Potter phenomenon is another example of this trend. The occult is shown as fun, powerful and interesting.

God's Big 'Do Not Touch' Sign

Deuteronomy 18

For several years, our offices were located on the third floor of an old factory building. An alley ran behind our building, and there was an antique elevator that was useful if you had to transport things to that third floor. Now, if you parked back there, you had to walk by this big old electrical thing that was surrounded by a chain link fence - with a sign that had these words in big print: "High voltage. Do not touch." I never knew anybody who disregarded those instructions.

Well, I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A WORD WITH YOU today about "God's Big 'Do Not Touch' Sign."

When there's something really hazardous, there's often a "do not touch" sign on it, put there by people who know how much harm it can do. God has put a sign like that on some things that may not appear harmful on the outside, but which carry deadly spiritual voltage.

One of His "do not touch" signs is in our word for today from the Word of God in Deuteronomy 18, beginning with verse 10. God says, "Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son in the fire, who practices divination." By the way, the dictionary says that divination is "attempting to foretell future events or discover hidden knowledge by supernatural means." Then God says, "There should be no one who practices sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead." Then, just in case you think God takes any of this lightly, the Bible has this sobering conclusion: "Anyone who does these things is detestable to the Lord." Strong language!

It's obvious that God hates this stuff - because all the non-God approaches to the supernatural are controlled by the devil. Now as you heard that list, you may have thought about how much those "do not touch" things are all throughout our culture, with a sign on them that says, "Touch me. I'm harmless. I'm exciting. I'm just something to do for fun."

It can be a slumber party séance, a ouija board, consulting a horoscope, or crystals. You can find sorcery and witchcraft in compelling fantasy games, in best-selling books, in popular TV shows, and in blockbuster movies that are a "must" for every child to see and every parent to take their child to. We're told it's good for the imagination and it's harmless fantasy.

Read those verses again and see if God agrees. He calls all the supernatural stuff that isn't from Him "detestable." And having dealt with a lot of young people who have ended up unwittingly trapped in occult darkness, I know some of why God hates it. He knows how Satan works. He doesn't ever tell you about what's in his deadly package - he just gets you interested in his bright and seemingly irresistible wrapping paper. The devil is simply looking for a foot in the door - and for many, that opening has been just an "innocent" curiosity about the other side, a little fantasy experience or simple experimentation that opened a door that should have always remained locked. That's why God says in Ephesians 5:10, "Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness."

The occult, the dark side, the "supernatural without God" - they're just not something to flirt with or to mess with. We have nothing to lose from avoiding them and so much to lose potentially by exposing ourselves or our children to them. It is spiritual high voltage, no matter how interesting or inviting it looks. And when God says, "Do not touch," He means it!

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. 'Practical Answers to Real Life Issues'

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #3918 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database supernatural

Fact Or Fantasy? - Resurrection, (part 2 of 8)

Job 7:8

A few years ago, a very influential philosopher named John Searle wrote a book called THE REDISCOVERY OF THE MIND. Searle is a philosophical naturalist, and as such he has no room for God or anything else supernatural. In his book, he comments on the reactions he receives when people realize that in his worldview there is no God, no soul, and no afterlife. He writes, "When we encounter people who claim to believe [in God], we may envy them for the comfort and security they claim to derive from these beliefs, but at bottom we remain convinced that either they have not heard the news or they are in the grip of faith."

Searle continues, relating a time when he lectured in India and some in the audience objected due to their belief in the afterlife. Their objections did not move him one bit, he says, because their beliefs simply were not "serious candidates for truth." In other words, once you move beyond the material, all you have are pie-in-the-sky fantasies rather than facts.

For some of you, Searle's beliefs may seem shocking. But to those of you familiar with the trends in higher education over the last few decades, this is standard fare. Many will not discuss belief in God or supernatural events because they have already decided, a priori, that things of this nature cannot exist. To put it simply, the existence of all things is due to the purely physical processes of evolution, so there cannot be anything besides matter. People can believe in God or that the moon is made of green cheese if they want to, as long as we all recognize that to be faith, rather than based on reality.

We have been discussing the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Perhaps you are wondering, what does John Searle's book have to do with the resurrection? More than you might think. This drift in academia that I have roughly outlined has incredible consequences for beliefs in events such as the resurrection. Indeed, naturalism has changed the very rules of the debate!

How? If you attend a debate on the resurrection these days, often the opponent will not even argue against the historical record, as you might expect. Instead, he almost ignores the entire topic, and argues that a supernatural belief should not even be considered a viable option for a rational person.

Can a rational person believe in a supernatural event such as the resurrection? Give it some thought, my friend, as we continue to consider this.

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

The Church of Satan

In 1966, Anton LaVey formed the CHURCH OF SATAN and in 1969 he wrote THE SATANIC BIBLE. His book became popular among many individuals and many people joined his organization. The primary principles of his “Bible” are magic and self-indulgence. Among the magical portion of his book, it includes many apologetics or explanations for possible failures of Satanic magic. Another thing to understand is that the Satanism of Anton LaVey is not what is commonly understood as Satanism. He does not believe in Satan in the Christian sense. His theological standpoint can be simplified with the term Atheist. He does not believe in a god, other than himself. However, he does believe in magical things which would presuppose supernatural forces at work.

If you wish to join the CHURCH OF SATAN, it will cost you a hefty sum of $100. In return, you will receive a plastic card. That is all. There is no actual building for the CHURCH OF SATAN. There is no temple. You simply send in the money and receive a piece of plastic. When LaVey's wife, Diane, filed for divorce, Anton had to liquidate his assets, including the Church of Satan. Journalist Alan Cabal (New York Press, 12-18 November, 1997) observed, “It was dissolved in bankruptcy court, a fitting end for an organization that never had the slightest meaning beyond shock value. Various tinpot wannabes have attempted to keep the name going, but the cognoscenti of the Satanic tradition abandoned it decades ago when it became apparent that the Church was nothing more than a cash cow.”

Shining A Light: G. P. Taylor and Shadowmancer

The Reverend G. P. Taylor had a problem. He was noticing an increasing amount of occultism in children's popular culture. For example, he quotes the following from Philip Pullman's bestselling His Dark Materials trilogy, “God is a liar, God is a cheat, God is senile.” As for popular teen shows like Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Taylor believes they're “anti-monotheistic” and that it's dangerous to try to “spiritualize” them, as some Christians do.

From his own experience, Taylor knew that the occult is not to be taken lightly. As a teenage runaway, he was involved in it himself. Years later, after turning to God and becoming a pastor, Taylor began educating people about the occult and even stood in his church's cemetery on Halloween night witnessing to thousands of hardcore fans of “Dracula,” who is supposedly buried there.

So Taylor knows what he's talking about when it comes to the occult. And it bothered him to see it sugarcoated.

When he shared his concern with his congregation, they had an idea for him: Why not provide another point of view? Why not write a book of his own?

So he did. And Taylor's fantasy novel Shadowmancer, released by a mainstream publisher, soon hit the top of the British bestseller lists. Now it's just as popular in the United States, and Universal has bought the film rights to it.

Like many other fantasy novels, Shadowmancer shows heroic children saving the world from a dastardly magician. But Taylor throws in a few twists. The villain is a priest — but not a priest who thinks he's doing God's will, like the religious villains in Philip Pullman's books. In Shadowmancer, the priest's greed has led him away from God and made him decide to do things his own way. Also, one of the heroes is an African boy who gently chides his European friends for their superstitious ways and points them toward the true God.

Because Taylor wanted to show evil for what it is, the novel is too dark for young children. But, on the other hand, unlike many other novelists, Taylor excels at showing the power of goodness. God is an active presence, under the name “Riathamus,” which means “King of Kings.” He not only intervenes when the children are in danger, but He also heals them from the emotional scars of the past. Taylor doesn't beat anyone over the head with a Bible, but neither does he leave any doubt about who Riathamus is.

Taylor's approach is an inspiring one. As Christianity Today pointed out, “Shadowmancer shows something that some of the others do not — characters relentlessly calling on God to shine His light into the shadows.” Taylor looked at a disturbing trend and realized what was behind it: Young people want to know why they're here, what happens after death, and whether there's a loving God. So he presented those issues from a Christian point of view using the medium of literature. As the old saying goes, instead of merely cursing the darkness, Taylor chose to light a candle. We all have something to learn from his example.

FOR FURTHER READING AND INFORMATION:

• P. Taylor, Shadowmancer (G. P. Putnam's Sons, 2003).

• Click here to read the first chapter of Shadowmancer.

• Dinitia Smith, “'Harry Potter' Inspires a Christian Alternative,” New York Times, 24 July 2004. (Free registration required; link courtesy of this blog.) The title of this article is misleading; Taylor says in the interview that he doesn't see his books as a “Christian alternative” to Harry Potter.

• Greg Taylor, “A Christian Harry Potter?“ Christianity Today, June 2004.

• Dick Staub, “DS Interview: G. P. Taylor, Shadowmancer,” DickStaub.com, 17 June 2004.

• “Universal Develops Shadowmancer,” SciFiWire, 20 July 2004.

• Nick Pollard, “Magic for teenagers,” CultureWatch.

• Newlyn Allison, “Real Fantasy,” Books & Culture, 17 August 2004.

• BreakPoint Commentary No. 040315, “In Tolkien's Steps?: Fantasy Films and Worldview.”

• Gina R. Dalfonzo, “The Impoverished Imagination: Why Good Fantasy Must Stem from Reality,” BreakPoint WorldView, March 2004.

• Gina R. Dalfonzo, “Buffy Fades to Black,” Boundless, 29 May 2003.

________

Copyright (c) 2004 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database supernaturalevil

Majority Believe In Ghosts, Poll Shows

Luke 24:37

This Halloween may be filled with trick-or-treaters in scary costumes, but for more than one in five Americans, some costumes might be real: they told CBS News pollsters they have seen a real-life ghost in some form. And whether or not they've seen one, even more Americans believe that ghosts actually do exist.

Nearly half of Americans say they believe in ghosts, or that the dead can return in certain places and situations.

DO YOU BELIEVE IN GHOSTS?

Yes 48% No 45%

Women are more likely to say they believe in ghosts than are men: 56 percent of women believe, while 38 percent of men do. More than half of younger Americans aged 18 to 45 believe in ghosts; those over 45 are less likely.

More than one in five Americans says they have seen a ghost themselves, or have felt themselves to be in the presence of one.

HAVE YOU PERSONALLY SEEN OR FELT THE PRESENCE OF A GHOST?

Yes 22% No 77%

On this question, too, there are age and gender differences: women are about twice as likely as men to say they've seen a ghost. More than one-quarter of younger Americans under 45 say they have encountered one; those over 45 are much less likely to say this.

DEMOGRAPHIC GROUPS: BELIEF IN AND ENCOUNTERS WITH GHOSTS

Believe in ghosts

All 48% Men 38% Women 56%

Under 45 54% 45 and over 41%

Seen a ghost

All 22% Men 14% Women 29%

Under 45 29% 45 and over 15%

On the broader question of whether there is life after death, in general, a large majority of Americans are believers in an afterlife.

DO YOU BELIEVE IN LIFE AFTER DEATH?

Yes 78% No 14%

The most religiously observant Americans are most likely to say there is an afterlife: about nine in 10 of those who attend religious services weekly or almost every week believe in it. This view is shared by seven in 10 of those who rarely or never attend services. Americans of all age groups believe in an afterlife. So do most men and most women.

But for most, views about the afterlife will remain driven by faith, not scientific facts: the overwhelming majority of Americans do not think that science will ever be able to prove whether or not an afterlife of any kind exists.

WILL SCIENCE EVER PROVE IF AN AFTERLIFE EXISTS?

Yes 8% No 87%

This poll was conducted among a nationwide random sample of 808 adults, interviewed by telephone October 3-5, 2005. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus four percentage points.

*

from CBS News Online via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Don't Mention It

Mark 1:27

Francis MacNutt quotes theologian Walter Wink in his book “Deliverance from Evil Spirits” and writes:

...if you want to bring all talk to a halt in shocked

embarrassment, every eye riveted on you, try mentioning angels,

or demons or the devil. You will quickly be appraised for signs

of pathological violence and then quietly shunned.

Angels, spirits, principalities, gods, Satan – these along with

other supernatural realities, are the unmentionables of our

culture.

________

“Deliverance from Evil Spirits” by Francis MacNutt.

from Source not recorded · Francis MacNutt via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Real and Imagined

Marjorie Taylor is a psychologist at the University of Oregon who has studied children with imaginary friends. Her study includes all kinds of interesting make-believe companions, but my favorite is “Skateboard Guy,” a “tiny, invisible 11-year-old boy who sleeps in the child's shirt pocket and performs amazing skateboard tricks the child wishes he could do.”(1) I never had an imaginary friend, but my brother did. His name was “John Matt,” and I think he made my brother feel less out-numbered by his two older sisters!

Many people assume that we cease needing our imagination when we grow up, but this assumption exemplifies a dangerous confusion of the imagination with the imaginary. Something that is imaginary is unreal (e.g., Skateboard Guy). In contrast, we use our imagination to form a mental image of something that is not present to the senses. We could not think at all if we did not have imagination. We use our imagination to make connections between theoretical ideas, to move beyond the concrete, the literal, and the obvious. Imagination drives not only art and literature, but many of our greatest scientific discoveries as well.

Christians have long been accused of belief founded in the imaginary; if God cannot be seen, the logic goes, then He must be a figment of the Christian mind. But God does not ORIGINATE in the Christian imagination; rather he is UNDERSTOOD through the exercise of our imaginations. Imagination helps us understand that we fit into God's story; the death of Jesus two millennia ago has something to do with us today. As Kevin Vanhoozer puts it, imagination takes that which is seemingly disconnected and connects it.

Christians need imagination. We need it not to escape reality, but to understand reality, to make sense of a world that includes heights of exhilaration and depths of pain. Through the exercise of an imagination directed by the light of God's revelation, we perceive purpose in suffering and promise in joy because they are ultimately part of God's grand story. As George MacDonald writes, “The end of imagination is HARMONY.”(2)

The Christian worldview is not an escape into the imaginary. Rather, it is the exercise of a mind that perceives there is more to this world than meets the eye. It sees sunlight as more than photons; it hears a symphony as more than sound waves; it believes that love means something more than the preservation of our species.

Beware the confusion between the imaginary and the imagination. The imaginary is the reverie of childhood; the imagination is the stuff of genius.

________

1. Sora Song, “The Power of Make Believe” TIME, February 14, 2005.

2. “The Imagination: Its Function and Its Culture” Leland Ryken, ed. THE CHRISTIAN IMAGINATION, (Colorado Springs: Shaw, 2002), 102.

________

Copyright © 2006 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Moons and Make-believe

1 Corinthians 15:6

My great-grandmother never believed that man had landed on the moon. She thought the whole thing was a hoax perpetrated by the U.S. government. She had lived through more technological advances in her lifetime than I ever hope to see (electric lights, telephones, automobiles, airplanes, television), but I guess there is a limit to how much one person’s idea of the world can adapt. She simply didn’t have a mental category for “moon landing,” so while the rest of the country cheered at the “giant leap for mankind,” she shook her head and went about her day’s work.

I suppose to someone who had never taken a physics class, who never went up in an airplane, the idea that a whole country could get taken in by such a hoax would be more plausible than to believe that man had -- by some sort of magic -- made it to the moon. But sustaining such an elaborate hoax would surely have been as incredible as a moon landing, considering the number of people involved and the U.S.’s very real antagonist, the Soviet Union. There is no question that if anything about the Apollo 11 mission had seemed suspicious, the Soviets would have quickly rooted out the truth.

Adversaries are notoriously effective at uncovering hidden truths. We see this all the time in the political world; if a person running for office has any secrets, they are sure to come out.

Jesus and his followers did not suffer from lack of opposition. Prior to his death, the Pharisees opposed him because he clearly had great power, yet chose to associate with those who were unclean. The Romans distrusted him because they were always wary of those who might try to rise up against them. After Jesus’s death, another Jewish group called the Sadducees actively opposed his followers, because the Sadducees’ theology was built around a disbelief in resurrection, and the word on the street was that Jesus had risen from the dead.

You can rest assured that these groups were unsettled by the many people claiming that they had seen the risen Jesus. It was not just a handful of disciples that made the claim; at one point, Jesus appeared to over 500 people at one time (1 Corinthians 15:6). If one were perpetrating a hoax, it would be difficult to get so many to agree upon a story and stick with it, especially once they began to be persecuted for it.

When some event comes along that does not fit neatly into any of our mental categories, it is natural for us to suspect that it is not real. But it is also reasonable to suspect that the mental categories we already have are not exhaustive; perhaps there IS something new under the sun. My great-grandmother could have chosen to believe that the whole world had fallen for a hoax, or she could have adjusted her thinking to include space travel in the realm of the possible.

Those confronted with the claim that Jesus had risen from the dead were faced with a choice; they could believe that this was an elaborate hoax, or they could adjust their thinking to the idea that resurrection might be possible. Thousands chose the latter option, and they became so convinced that Jesus had risen that they willingly went to their deaths for the belief.

You may not have a category for the supernatural. If not, take a moment to ask yourself WHY you rule out the possibility of the supernatural and HOW you can be so sure that it doesn’t exist. It could be that the Christian faith is based on an elaborate hoax; or it could be that, in a world where a man can overcome the pull of gravity and walk on the moon, people actually rise from the dead.

________

Copyright © 2007 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Turtles All the Way Down

In his book A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME, Stephen Hawking retells an old story that has become part of philosophic folklore:

A well-known scientist (some say it was Bertrand Russell) once

gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the Earth

orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the

centre of a vast collection of stars called our galaxy. At the

end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room got

up and said: “What you have told us is rubbish. The world is

really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise.”

The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, “What is the

tortoise standing on?” “You’re very clever, young man, very

clever,” said the old lady. “But it’s turtles all the way down!”

The popularity of this story (even Dr. Seuss picked up the theme in his book YERTLE THE TURTLE) has made the suggestion of “turtle stacking” synonymous with the idea of infinite regression. The story is funny because our minds immediately recognize that, when seeking the cause behind an effect, infinite regression is no answer at all.

Everyone from philosophers to three-year-olds has encountered a similar problem when curiosity leads them to the question, “Who Made God?” For if someone made God, then that being too would have to have a cause, and from there on out it might as well be “turtles all the way down.” Instead of suggesting that some other being made God, theists claim that, by definition, God is the uncaused cause, what Thomas Aquinas called the “First Cause.”

Those who do not believe in the supernatural are, of course, dissatisfied with this explanation. They instead believe that the universe was caused by the rapid expansion of matter, which was caused by something else, which must have been caused by something else, and on and on. This leaves us with the question, is there a difference between positing a First Cause and explaining our universe through an infinite regression? I believe that there is.

Both explanations have this in common: they rely upon the infinite. Theists believe that an infinite Being, one who had no beginning, explains our existence. Atheists believe that an infinite chain of events explains our existence. The difference between the two is that the theist acknowledges that he has looked beyond natural explanations to the supernatural. The atheist still claims to be looking for a natural, material explanation. Yet what is infinite must transcend the finite, material world. I want to suggest that in positing an infinite regression, the naturalist is unwittingly suggesting an eternal entity.

Causality is a fundamental law of nature; in this world, every finite effect has a cause. If an atheist wants to continue to work within the laws of nature, he cannot plead his case by relying on an infinite explanation. But this is exactly what he does by claiming that we are the products of an infinite regression. The theist also transcends the law of causality when he asserts a First Cause, but he does it overtly and in consistence with his worldview.

The universe must have an infinite explanation. Unless we admit the possibility of the supernatural, is our explanation really that different from turtles all the way down?

________

Copyright © 2007 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Ghosts and Goblins and Aliens -- Oh, My

It was bad enough when the TV and lights inexplicably flicked on at night, Misty Conrad says. When her daughter began talking to an unseen girl named Nicole and neighbors said children had been murdered in the house, it was time to move.

Put Conrad, a homemaker from Hampton, Va., firmly in the camp of the 34 percent of people who say they believe in ghosts, according to a pre-Halloween poll by The Associated Press and Ipsos. That’s the same proportion who believe in unidentified flying objects - exceeding the 19 percent who accept the existence of spells or witchcraft.

Forty-eight percent believe in extrasensory perception, or ESP. But nearly half of you knew we were about to tell you that, right?

Conrad, now 40, lived in Syracuse, Indiana, when her family was scared from the house they rented.

“It kind of creeped you out,” she recalled this week. “I needed to get us out.”

To put the roughly one-third who believe in ghosts and UFOs in perspective, it’s about the same as, in recent AP-Ipsos polls, the 36 percent who said they are baseball fans; the 37 percent who said the U.S. made the right decision to invade Iraq; and the 31 percent who approve of the job President Bush is doing.

A smaller but still substantial 23 percent say they have actually seen a ghost or believe they have been in one’s presence, with the most likely candidates for such visits including single people, Catholics and those who never attend religious services. By 31 percent to 18 percent, more liberals than conservatives report seeing a specter.

Those who dismissed the existence of ghosts include Morris Swadener, 66, a Navy retiree from Kingston, Washington. He says he shot one with his rifle when he was a child. “I woke up in the middle of the night and saw a white ghost in my closet,” he said. “I discovered I’d put a hole in my brand new white shirt. My mother and father were not amused.”

Three in 10 have awakened sensing a strange presence in the room. For whatever it says about matrimony, singles are more likely than married people to say so.

Fourteen percent - mostly men and lower-income people - say they have seen a UFO. Among them is Danny Eskanos, 44, an attorney in Palm Harbor, Fla., who says as a Colorado teenager he watched a bright light dart across the sky, making abrupt stops and turns.

“I knew a little about airplanes and helicopters, and it was not that,” he said. “It’s one of those things that sticks in your mind.”

Spells and witchcraft are more readily believed by urban dwellers, minorities and lower-earning people. Those who find credibility in ESP are more likely to be better educated and white - 51 percent of college graduates compared to 37 percent with a high school diploma or less, about the same proportion by which white believers outnumber minorities.

Overall, the 48 percent who accept ESP is less than the 66 percent who gave that answer to a similar 1996 Newsweek question.

One in five say they are at least somewhat superstitious, with young men, minorities, and the less educated more likely to go out of their way to seek luck. Twenty-six percent of urban residents - twice the rate of those from rural areas - said they are superstitious, while single men were more superstitious than unmarried women, 31 percent to 17 percent.

The most admitted-to superstition, by 17 percent, was finding a four-leaf clover. Thirteen percent dread walking under a ladder or the groom seeing his bride before their wedding, while slightly smaller numbers named black cats, breaking mirrors, opening umbrellas indoors, Friday the 13th or the number 13.

Generally, women were more superstitious than men about four-leaf clovers, breaking mirrors or grooms prematurely seeing brides. Democrats were more superstitious than Republicans over opening umbrellas indoors, while liberals were more superstitious than conservatives over four-leaf clovers, grooms seeing brides and umbrellas.

Then there’s Jack Van Geldern, a computer programmer from Riverside, Connecticut. Now 51, Van Geldern is among the five percent who say they have seen a monster in the closet - or in his case, a monster’s face he spotted on the wall of his room as a child. “It was so terrifying I couldn’t move,” he said. “Needless to say I survived the event and never saw it again.”

The poll, conducted Oct. 16-18, 2007, involved telephone interviews with 1,013 adults and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.

from America Online · Alan Fram & Trevor Tompson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database supernaturalsuperstition

The Easter Challenge

Mark 16:1

[A skeptical look at Easter]

HISTORICITY OF THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS CHRIST

Spring is a good time to bring people’s attention to the “Easter Challenge” popularized by Dan Barker. Although not necessarily a decisive argument against the validity and coherency of Christianity, it does serve as a pointed reminder that traditional, orthodox Christian beliefs have a lot of problems with them.

Author or “Losing Faith In Faith: From Preacher To Atheist” and PR director for the Freedom From Religion Foundation, Dan Barker is a former preacher who now spends his time promoting both freethought and the separation of church and state. In an effort to draw people’s attention to the contradictions and conflicts in traditional Christian beliefs, he has proposed a deceptively simple challenge: “tell me what happened on Easter. I am not asking for proof. My straightforward request is merely that Christians tell me exactly what happened on the day that their most important doctrine was born.”

Ostensibly it’s a simple request, but as I observed it is deceptively simple. The hard work involved is made apparent by the parameters Baker sets: “In each of the four Gospels, begin at Easter morning and read to the end of the book: Matthew 28, Mark 16, Luke 24, and John 20-21. Also read Acts 1:3-12 and Paul’s tiny version of the story in 1 Corinthians 15:3-8. These 165 verses can be read in a few moments. Then, without omitting a single detail from these separate accounts, write a simple, chronological narrative of the events between the resurrection and the ascension: what happened first, second, and so on; who said what, when; and where these things happened.”

That Christians should make use of all of the accounts of Jesus’ resurrection on the first Easter morning is perhaps obvious. What’s more significant, however, is the fact that nothing can be omitted. Not a single described event, encounter, or statement. Why is this condition so important?

According to Barker, the challenge cannot be met successfully without omitting a few things - otherwise, there will be obvious and unacceptable contradictions in the final story. Technically, omissions shouldn’t be a problem. All we need to do is conclude that what we are omitting is erroneous or spurious - that author got that particular bit of the story wrong.

This shouldn’t be a problem, but it is. For one thing, fundamentalists and inerrantists cannot make such an admission - for them, every last detail in the entire Bible is true. To admit that something must not be true, especially where it concerns the life and resurrection of Jesus Christ, would contradict one of their fundamental religious dogmas. That just isn’t going to happen.

An admission that portions of the Bible may be in error also presents a problem for more liberal Christians as well. Once it is acknowledged that some aspect of the resurrection account is mistaken, it becomes a bit more difficult to uphold the idea that any other particular aspect is necessarily true. Perhaps it is, but then again perhaps it isn’t.

No longer can a Christian simply rely upon the authority of the Bible to justify belief in the historicity of the resurrection, for now it has been accepted that the Bible is a FLAWED authority, even on such critical events as those which occurred on the first Easter. When an authority is revealed as fallible in such a way, it is justified for outsiders to expect independent validation and support for the key claims - and there doesn’t appear to be any such support for the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

According to Barker, few Christians who are willing to be skeptical of the alleged miracles of other religions have made a serious effort to validate the central miracle of their own faith - and none of them have succeeded in meeting this challenge. So what’s a Christian to do? I’d like to see someone successfully meet this challenge - but, if they are not able, it would probably be better if they stopped insisting on the historicity of Jesus’ resurrection.

Sermon: Easter Isn't Obvious

Luke 24:1

Sermon for Easter 2008. Luke 24:1-11

EASTER ISN'T OBVIOUS

====================

I. Everyone believes in Easter.

II. I don't think Easter is obvious at all.

A. The resurrection itself was done in secret.

B. The evidence is mostly negative evidence.

C. It is not something that happens every day.

III. Easter may not be obvious, but it is true.

A. The earliest Christians grew to be convinced of it.

B. The evidence is indirect, but powerful.

C. The resurrection is more believable that any other explanation.

IV. Easter cannot be separated from faith.

A. Faith requires us to accept some things that we cannot prove.

B. Faith assumes there is more to life than we can perceive.

V. Easter fits with God's style.

A. God operates quietly for ages, then smashes in.

B. God is not limited to our imagination.

C. He can still do the extraordinary!

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, East08k.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database miraclessupernatural

That's Supernatural

1 John 3:1

The X-Files. Shirley MacLaine. Aliens. Harry Potter. UFOs. Many people are fascinated and intrigued with the supernatural. Even in some churches today there are people who are looking for supernatural healing, supernatural experiences, and supernatural ways to communicate with God.

You may be going back for another semester of college, or perhaps you’re starting for the first time. You will be bombarded with new thoughts and challenges about what you believe, what truth is and how to find it, how–or if–you can know God, or maybe who or what is God to you. You may even be advised to seek out the supernatural in answer to these questions.

I too can get caught up in the sometimes-exciting world of the supernatural. But when I think about God and who He really is (as much as I can truly know), I realize that God Himself is supernatural. We’ve been reminded much throughout this past Christmas season that God sent His Son to earth as a baby who was conceived of a virgin(!) through the Holy Spirit. And if that wasn’t enough, that child became a man and died a horrible death on a Roman cross for the sins of the world, and rose from the dead 3 days later (read the gospel of Luke). Because of Jesus’ death on that cross, if I receive Him, God accepts me and calls me His child (1 John 3:1; Galatians 4:4-7). Ask and receive. It’s so simple, yet so very profound–and totally supernatural!

I’m amazed when I think about God and realize all that I take for granted. I can talk to Him–as I can with any other person–yet He is the God of the universe. Not only did He create it but He holds the earth and stars in place, and keeps it all in order (Colossians 1:17). He’s preparing a place in heaven for me and other believers. Best of all, He loves me and wants to have a relationship with me. Now, that’s supernatural!

Father, thank You for the supernatural gift of Your Son to the world. I stand in wonder and amazement when I consider who You are and all You’ve done. You are God! Thank You for including me in Your awesome plan.

from (unknown) · Peggy Willison via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database occult

Why People Believe Invisible Agents Control the World

Luke 10:17

[A skeptic’s take on souls, spirits, ghosts, gods, demons, angels, aliens and other invisible powers]

Souls, spirits, ghosts, gods, demons, angels, aliens, intelligent designers, government conspirators, and all manner of invisible agents with power and intention are believed to haunt our world and control our lives. Why?

The answer has two parts, starting with the concept of “patternicity,” which I define as the human tendency to find meaningful patterns in meaningless noise. Consider the face on Mars, the Virgin Mary on a grilled cheese sandwich, satanic messages in rock music. Of course, some patterns are real. Finding predictive patterns in changing weather, fruiting trees, migrating prey animals and hungry predators was central to the survival of Paleolithic hominids.

The problem is that we did not evolve a baloney-detection device in our brains to discriminate between true and false patterns. So we make two types of errors: a type I error, or false positive, is believing a pattern is real when it is not; a type II error, or false negative, is not believing a pattern is real when it is. If you believe that the rustle in the grass is a dangerous predator when it is just the wind (a type I error), you are more likely to survive than if you believe that the rustle in the grass is just the wind when it is a dangerous predator (a type II error). Because the cost of making a type I error is less than the cost of making a type II error and because there is no time for careful deliberation between patternicities in the split-second world of predator-prey interactions, natural selection would have favored those animals most likely to assume that all patterns are real.

But we do something other animals do not do. As large-brained hominids with a developed cortex and a theory of mind — the capacity to be aware of such mental states as desires and intentions in both ourselves and others — we infer agency behind the patterns we observe in a practice I call “agent­icity”: the tendency to believe that the world is controlled by invisible intentional agents. We believe that these intentional agents control the world, sometimes invisibly from the top down (as opposed to bottom-up causal randomness). Together patternicity and agent­icity form the cognitive basis of shamanism, paganism, animism, polytheism, monotheism, and all modes of Old and New Age spiritualisms.

Agenticity carries us far beyond the spirit world. The Intelligent Designer is said to be an invisible agent who created life from the top down. Aliens are often portrayed as powerful beings coming down from on high to warn us of our impending self-destruction. Conspiracy theories predictably include hidden agents at work behind the scenes, puppet masters pulling political and economic strings as we dance to the tune of the Bilderbergers, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers or the Illuminati. Even the belief that government can impose top-down measures to rescue the economy is a form of agenticity, with President Barack Obama being touted as “the one” with almost messianic powers who will save us.

There is now substantial evidence from cognitive neuroscience that humans readily find patterns and impart agency to them, well documented in the new book SUPERSENSE (HarperOne, 2009) by University of Bristol psychologist Bruce Hood. Examples: children believe that the sun can think and follows them around; because of such beliefs, they often add smiley faces on sketched suns. Adults typically refuse to wear a mass murderer’s sweater, believing that “evil” is a supernatural force that imparts its negative agency to the wearer (and, alternatively, that donning Mr. Rogers’s cardigan will make you a better person). A third of transplant patients believe that the donor’s personality is transplanted with the organ. Genital-shaped foods (bananas, oysters) are often believed to enhance sexual potency. Subjects watching geometric shapes with eye spots interacting on a computer screen conclude that they represent agents with moral intentions.

“Many highly educated and intelligent individuals experience a powerful sense that there are patterns, forces, energies and entities operating in the world,” Hood explains. “More important, such experiences are not substantiated by a body of reliable evidence, which is why they are supernatural and unscientific. The inclination or sense that they may be real is our supersense.”

We are natural-born supernaturalists.

________

Note: This article was originally published with the title, “Agenticity”.

A Skeptic's Guide To the Miracles of Exodus

For thousands of years, skeptics and believers alike have debated whether the events described in the Passover story — the parting of the Red Sea, the 10 plagues, and the burning bush — actually took place. Roman Jewish historian Josephus Flavius speculated that the parting of the Red Sea “might be of God’s will or of natural origin. Let everyone believe at his own discretion.” The skeptic’s skeptic, Sigmund Freud, called the Passover story “a pious myth,” contending that Moses was a rebellious Egyptian prince who worshiped the sun god Aton and made up the Jewish religion as a political ploy.* In more recent times, scientific explanations of the Passover story range from formula-laden academic papers like “Modeling the Hydrodynamic Situation of the Exodus” to more popular inquiries such as Cambridge materials scientist Colin Humphreys’ THE MIRACLES OF EXODUS. Whether or not you subscribe to these theories, they beat listening to your little cousin sing the “Four Questions.”

As anyone who has seen The Ten Commandments can attest, the parting of the Red Sea is one of, if not the most, climactic moments in the Passover story. As Exodus describes it:

And Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the Lord caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea dry land, and the waters were divided. And the children of Israel went into the midst of the sea upon the dry ground; and the waters were a wall unto them on their right hand, and on their left.

Accepting the biblical account as a “possible ‘qualitative’ description of an event,” Florida State oceanographer Doron Nof set out to investigate whether the parting of the Red Sea is “plausible from a physical point of view.” Using a common phenomenon called wind set-down effect, he found that “a northwesterly wind of 20 meters/second blowing for 10-14 hours is sufficient to cause a sea level drop of about 2.5 meters.” Such a drop in sea level, Nof speculates, might have exposed an underwater ridge, which the Israelites crossed as if it were dry land. Although the event is plausible, Nof estimated that the likelihood of such a storm occurring in that particular place and time of year is less than once every 2,400 years.

While scientists agree that wind set-down effect could have caused the Red Sea to part as described in the Bible, most biblical scholars and archeologists insist that the Israelites’ crossing did not take place at the Red Sea at all. The original Hebrew (yam suph), they contend, should be translated as Sea of Reeds, not Red Sea. So where’s the Sea of Reeds? It depends whom you ask. In the somewhat specious History Channel documentary EXODUS DECODED, Simcha Jacobovici (aka the Naked Archaeologist) places the Israelites’ crossing in the Bitter Lakes, a reedy marshland north of the Gulf of Suez that was subsumed during the construction of the Suez Canal. For his part, WALKING THE BIBLE author Bruce Feiler concludes that the Sea of Reeds is Lake Timsah, located halfway between Port Said and Suez. But THE MIRACLES OF EXODUS author Humphreys argues that while the translation of “the Red Sea” may be incorrect, the Sea of Reeds nevertheless refers to the Red Sea, concluding that “there can be little doubt that the Red Sea crossing was made possible by wind setdown at the head of the Gulf of Aqaba.”

Before he parted whatever sea it was he parted, the Bible describes Moses and his brother Aaron delivering 10 plagues on the people of Egypt. The Nile turns to blood, all the fish die, frogs are brought forth abundantly, and so on. Drawing on theology, Egyptology, and biology, epidemiologist John Marr developed a “domino theory” to explain each of the 10 plagues in order. Marr believes the plagues were a series of natural disasters and diseases triggered by a bloom of water-borne organisms called dinoflagellates. The dinoflagellates turned the Nile red and killed the frog-eating fish, which in turn caused a population explosion among frogs. The tainted water eventually killed the frogs, causing lice and flies to run rampant, which lead to a number of animal diseases (including African horse sickness) and an outbreak of boils (fancy glanders). This reign of disaster and disease continued through hail, locusts (Schistocerca gregaria, to be precise), and sandstorms until the death of the firstborn sons, which Marr thinks was caused by grain infected with mycotoxins. Others, building on Marr’s domino theory, argue that the plagues were triggered by the eruption of the Greek island of Santorini, causing a string of disasters such as those that occurred at Lake Nyos, Cameroon, in 1986.

Although not quite as impressive as the plagues or the parting of the Red Sea, Moses’ encounter with the burning bush is a pivotal moment in the Passover story and has, for a long time, been the source of much scientific speculation. As the story goes, God speaks to Moses from a burning bush and tells him, “I am come down to deliver [the Israelites] out of the hand of the Egyptians.” Most scientific explanations of the story focus not on the voice of God but on the description of the bush: “[T]he bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed.” Humphreys believes the bush continued to burn because of a natural gas or volcanic vent underneath it. Others have pointed to the work of Norwegian physicist Dag Kristian Dysthe and his article on the subsurface combustion of organic material in Mali, saying the bush could have combusted spontaneously.

As for the voice of God, Hebrew University psychology professor Benny Shanon proposes that Moses was tripping at the time on a hallucinogenic substance similar to ayahuasca. Shanon argues further that the presentation of the Ten Commandments might have been a mass hallucination. “The thunder, lightning and blaring of a trumpet which the Book of Exodus says emanated from Mount Sinai could just have been the imaginings of a people in an altered state of awareness.”

By speculating that the voice of God is a hallucination, Shanon, like Freud before him, is attempting to cast doubt on the foundations of monotheism. But not all the explanations of the Passover story are motivated by such ardent secularism. In THE MIRACLES OF EXODUS, Humphreys writes that “a natural explanation of the events of the Exodus doesn’t to my mind make them any less miraculous. ... What made certain events miraculous was their timing.”

A Real Test of Faith Requires Some Doubt

Job 19:6

Many modern Jews believe that some of the plagues of Egypt were natural disasters. But since they followed one another with such uncommon rapidity, “God’s hand was behind them”. Indeed, several Jewish commentators, ancient and modern, have pointed out that, for the plagues to be a real test of faith, they had to contain an element leading to religious doubt.

Holy Terrors: Should Christians Embrace the Horror Film?

Matthew 18:21

I found myself standing outside a Watford multiplex in the midst of spiritual turmoil. It was Halloween 1999, and as a long-term horror movie fan I was itching to buy my ticket for The Blair Witch Project. But I had a problem.

A few years before, I’d become a Christian, and since being ‘born-again’ I’d assumed that horror was one passion I would need to give up. After all, with its supposed glorification of darkness, death and the Devil, horror appears to be the very antithesis of the Christian hope. So, instead, I went to see Bowfinger, a forgettable Eddie Murphy comedy.

Over a decade later and I’m still a Christian. In fact, I’m now an ordained Baptist Minister. I tick the Reverend box on government forms, I preach sermons and carry out weddings and funerals. And yet, something else has changed too: I watch horror movies again. This isn’t some sort of act of defiance against my conscience, but rather a reappraisal of the genre. It’s a realisation that perhaps the sacred and the scary are not so incompatible after all.

I’m not alone. It’s fairly well known, for example, that film critic and Anglican Mark Kermode has described seeing The Exorcist as the moment he knew there was “something beyond this world.”

Scott Derrickson is the Christian director behind Hellraiser: Inferno (2000) and The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005). He’s argued that horror is the perfect genre for Christ­ians, since it’s one of the few popular forms willing to deal seriously with the notion of objective good and evil, or to countenance – like the Christian faith – the existence of the supernatural. Perhaps it’s no surprise, then, that some audiences discover, like Kermode, a transcendent edge to terror.

As well as high profile directors like Derrickson, there are a growing number of independent Christian horror films like Pray (2007), House (2008), The Familiar (2009) and Paranormal (2009). These are films produced by avid churchgoers, yet they tell stories of crazed killers, possessed teenagers and haunted houses. It’s not just the movies either. Christian horror author Frank Peretti has topped the New York Times best-seller list. I even spotted a Christian survival horror game available on-line, called Eternal War: Shadows of Light. Whether these spooky offerings are actually any good is beside the point. What is significant is their willingness to sit religious themes on the furniture of horror.

THE NOT-SO-GOOD BOOK

The link between the Church and horror is nothing new – in fact, it’s rather as if horror and Christianity were involved in an exchange programme, and one in which horror has always been keen to pay religion an extended visit. From spooky church graveyard locations to themes of the supernatural and demonic, horror has positively revelled in the ideas and symbols of faith. Yet this idea of the exchange working the other way – with Christians actively venturing into the genre – is perhaps neither as new or as post-modern as we might imagine: the horrific and the holy have been meeting for a long time – in the pages of the Bible itself.

The Christian scriptures are filled with vivid descriptions of violence, sex and monsters; tales of rape, dismemberment, cruelty and gore lurk between the stories of hope and inspiration [see below “Texts of Terror”]. Some might argue that this is not so much the Bible coming on like a horror movie as simply reporting reluctantly on the evil deeds of man. Yet the horror is there, and it runs deep.

Consider Jesus’s teaching. He often spoke in parables, brief stories shared to illustrate a religious or ethical point. Whether he made them up himself or heard them from others is unknown, but something about these tales seemed to resonate with him. But look at what they contain. For example, “The Parable of the Unmerciful Servant” (Matt. 18:21–35) features choking and torture, while “The Parable of the Tenants” (Luke 20:9–19) hinges on a cruel murder.

Then, of course, there’s the final book of the Bible, Revelation, as firm a favourite with horror films as with apocalyptic cultists and scripture-quoting movie serial killers. Author Will Self has described the Book of Revelation as a “sick text ... a portentous horror film.”[1] And he has a point. The book is filled with monsters pursuing and tormenting people. Beasts leave rotting corpses in the streets while others party over them (Rev. 11:7–10); a woman is drunk on the blood of the saints (Rev. 17:6); and the dead are reanimated and thrown into a lake of fire (Rev. 20:12–15). In one of the book’s most disturbing images, a demonic dragon sits between a pregnant woman’s legs, eagerly waiting to devour the baby as soon as it is born (Rev. 12:4). Things become even more sobering when we read Revelation’s first verse. It tells us that this is not the Revelation of the Apostle John, but the Revelation to him. It comes from Jesus.

Now, I’m not suggesting that God’s son is a closet psychopath – these dark and frightening stories are also lit up with threads of hope. But I do want to suggest that in the palette of narrative colours with which he chose to communicate, Jesus seems to have been quite willing to use the darker shades to make his point. The grotesque had, and still does have, the ability to become revelatory. In other words, there is theology in horror.

Yet, not all Christians embrace it. Actually, most don’t – just witness the anti-Halloween stance that many evangelicals adopt. Well-meaning believers hand out tracts and leaflets warning families against the terrible danger they believe Halloween represents: namely, that it’s a doorway to the occult. It’s even common for churches to provide alternative events on Halloween, so that communities can avoid celebrating anything disturbingly spooky. Or consider the uproar emanating from some Christian quarters against such popular entertainments as Buffy, Harry Potter and, more recently, the Twilight saga. There’s a fear that these stories of vampires and wizards might seduce innocent kids into an unhealthy interest in the dark side.

To help make their point, they may well quote Philippians 4:8, which advises believers to think about that which is true, noble, pure and lovely. Yet, this might be to misread the verse in question. While there’s clearly a benefit to contemplating the good, God can hardly be asking us simply to avoid all things unpleasant. If that were true, we’d better not watch the news and we’d certainly need to skip over many verses of the Bible itself. Also, and more crucially, the verse says we must think on that which is true. For Christians, it may well be true that God is pure and noble. Yet isn’t it equally true that, in the same worldview, the supernatural is real and the Devil exists? To not engage with these subjects through debate, study and art would be to present only a half-truth, a partial reality.

I’m not suggesting that Christians, or anyone else for that matter, should feel obliged to watch and engage with horror. Many people simply don’t get it, and that’s fine with me. Yet what about the rest of us who’ve always felt a pull towards all things spooky and macabre, who read strange magazines like Fortean Times and who, on visits to the funfair, always seem to gravit­ate toward the Ghost Train? Might it not be reasonable to suggest that the themes of horror can offer some unique spiritual insights of their own?

HORROR AND HISTORY

My argument is hardly new. Horror and Christianity have a rich, shared cultural heritage. If we look at folklore, fairytales, campfire stories and urban legends, we find they have all used frightening elements in order to articulate social fears, many of the themes of which derive from or have their basis in Judæo-Christian thought.

In the visual arts, Renaissance painters such as Hieronymus Bosch (see FT264:56–57) demonstrated the vivid connection between religious faith and the horrific imagination. The Bible and the Catholic Church were the driving inspiration behind Bosch’s art, yet many of his more surreal works, such as the right-hand panel of the triptych The Garden of Delights, offer nothing less than an all-out horror show. His paintings are a veritable ‘Where’s Wally?’ of horrific images. Men have arrows rammed into their anuses and fish-headed monsters devour people whole, only to defecate their remains into a pit filled with other people’s vomit. This is horror at its most extreme – and it is informed by religious ideals.

Indeed, as one art historian has written, the 16th century “was a period in the history of Catholic Europe when it seems that no painter’s career could move forward until some graphic scene of martyrdom had been proved as part of his repertoire”. [2] In 1563, the Council of Trent issued an ecumenical decree to artists “encouraging the deliberate depiction of horror”. [3] The hope was to rekindle religious sensibilities by stoking up fear of damnation and hell.

In the following century, Puritan American Protestants didn’t use the visual arts to depict horror for salvation’s sake. Instead, they used their preferred method of communication: the written and preached word. In 1693, the prominent Puritan minister Cotton Mather wrote On Witchcraft: Being the Wonders of the Invisible World. It described, in lurid detail, the horror of the Salem Witch Trials the year before. “Mather’s narrative was an immediate hit – in some ways, an early form of the longed-for Great American Novel; it presented a labyrinthine world of secret dangers, hidden mysteries, surreptitious delights, hapless heroines – in short, a Gothic world.” [4]

The hellfire preachers of the Great Awakening followed in Mather’s footsteps, most famously Jonathan Edwards. He can be described as one of America’s most important theologians, but he also had a predilection for the macabre. As a boy, he had a fascinated loathing for spiders, and in one of his earliest publications, On Spiders, he described them as “little collections” of “corrupting nauseousness”. In his most famous sermon, the still terrifying Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, Edwards used the image of the monstrous spider to horrific effect. “The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked: His wrath towards you burns like fire.” [5] It’s a little unnerving that Edwards seems to assume we know what it’s like to hold a spider over a flame; I can’t say I’ve ever done it myself.

With such dark themes and linguistic excess, it’s perhaps no surprise to find that the American Puritans cast an influential shadow over revered horror author HP Lovecraft. It’s tempting to suggest that Lovecraft was a sort of theologian himself. He might have been a self-declared atheist, but his Cthulhu Mythos certainly seems at pains to set human history into a cosmological context, albeit a terrifying one.

KEEP TELLING YOURSELF... IT’S NOT ‘ONLY A MOVIE’

Fast forward to 1900, and Christians were already using the new medium of cinema to share the Gospel. Soldiers of the Cross – a potent multi-media mixture of lantern slides, music and film – was directed by Herbert Booth, son of Salvation Army founder William Booth. Audiences sat in Melbourne Town Hall, Australia, watching what might be considered the first Christian horror film – a vivid depiction of the stories of the martyrs, showing St Stephen being stoned to death, Christ in the throes of agony on the cross and Christ­ian women hurling themselves into vats of lime rather than deny their allegiance to the one true God.

The trend for Christians to employ terror in films and novels continued throughout the 20th century. In 1974, Baptist evangelist Estus Pirkle created a low-budget drama-documentary called The Burning Hell (as well as its lurid title it boasted the Cormanesque tagline “20,000 Degrees Fahrenheit and not a drop of water!”). Still available today in multiple languages, the 60-minute film sought to “portray in graphic terms all of the horror of Hell and how to escape its flames”.

The Seventies also saw films like A Thief in the Night (1972) and A Distant Thunder (1978), which in turn led to the wildly successful Left Behind series of the mid-1990s. These films focused on the terrifying subject of the End Times, employing a pre-millennial eschatology where, in the last days, Christians vanish in the rapture and those who are left must take the Mark of the Beast while facing life in a terrifying society ruled by the Anti-Christ and his corrupt government. Such themes can’t help but touch the horror nerve, and come on like a cross between a sermon and a B-movie.

The current surge in Christian-based horror films, novels and Halloween events isn’t a post-modern cultural quirk. We’re not seeing the rise of Christian horror, but rather the resurgence of a largely forgotten tradition.

Yet what should we make of it all? If we have an openness to religious faith, as I do, then we might treat Christianity’s dalliance with horror as a welcome opportunity to explore spiritual ideas. Certainly, for me, growing up with no church background, horror movies became an unexpected doorway into the more hopeful themes of faith.

On the other hand, we could see it as nothing more than a manipulative scare tactic to fill pews, while attempts at modern horror by Christians may leave us more amused and annoyed than afraid. Yet, whatever the case, Christianity’s unique contributions to the literature and cinema of terror can’t help but make the truly great horror films and novels even more frightening. Religion tugs at our shoulder as we leave the cinema and makes some disturbing, important suggestions about the supernatural world, the Devil and the threat of Hell ... that maybe what you just watched is not only a movie. And if that’s true ... well, that really is scary.

________

Notes

1 Will Self: “The Revelation of St John”, in Revelations, Canongate, Edinburgh, 2005, p381.

2 Nigel Spivey: Enduring Creation – Art, Pain and Fortitude, University of California Press, 2001, p131.

3 Ibid, p113.

4 Edward J Ingebretsen: Maps of Heaven, Maps of Hell, ME Sharpe, New York, 1996, p18.

5 Jonathan Edwards: Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, Dover, NY, 1999, p228.

TEXTS OF TERROR

As well as inspiration and hope, the Bible has some truly horrific moments. Here’s a small selection...

A thousand men bludgeoned to death with a donkey’s jawbone (Judges 15:15–16).

Victims burned alive (Numbers 16:35; Joshua 7:25; Judges 9:49, 15:6; Daniel 3:22; Matthew 13:49–50).

Parents cannibalise their children (2 Kings 6:28–29).

Cutting off thumbs and toes (Judges 1:6–7).

Decapitation (1 Samuel 17: 51, 31:9; 2 Samuel 16:9, Mark 6:22–29).

Disembowelling and stabbings (Judges 3:21–22; 2 Samuel 2: 23, 3:27, 20:10; 2 Chronicles 21:19; Acts 1:18).

Dismemberment (1 Samuel 15:32–33; Daniel 2:5, 3:29; Judges 19:22–29 – includes gang rape then dismemberment!).

The Leviathan, a fire-breathing sea monster (Job 3:8, 41:1–34; Psalms 74:14, 104:25–26; Isaiah 27:1).

Gouging out of eyes (Judges 16:21).

Hanging (Joshua 10:26; Esther 9:25; Matthew 27:5).

Parents murder their children as a sacrifice (2 Kings 3:27, 16:3, 17:17+31; 21:6).

Choking and torture (Matthew 18:28–35).

Should You Believe In Ghosts?

Luke 16:29

Ghosts star in major motion pictures from “The Shining” to “Scary Movie 2.” Some ghosts are friendly (Casper) and some are frightening (Bloody Mary). Television shows like “Ghost Adventures” use the latest technologies to “prove” that spirits of the dead are all around us and want to make their presence known.

But is this true?

The short answer is no. As Christians, we must gauge all truth claims by the Bible, the ultimate and unchanging measure of reality.

Some people argue that the apostles believed in ghosts and even thought Jesus was one when He walked toward their boat on the Sea of Galilee (Matthew 14:22-33).

Later, after Christ’s resurrection, the apostles once again mistook Jesus for a ghost. He assured them that “a ghost does not have flesh and bones as you can see I have” (Luke 24:39).

Let’s be clear on two points: First, Scripture teaches that all humans possess both physical and non-physical properties -- the body and the soul/spirit, the second of which survives physical death.

Second, nowhere does the Bible support the notion that spirits of the dead (“phantasma” or “pneuma” in the Greek) are free to return to the physical realm.

In other words, the departed are just that -- departed.

The souls of the dead either are in the presence of God in heaven or separated from Him in torment in Hades.

In Jesus’ story of Lazarus and the rich man, the righteous beggar at death is carried by the angels to Abraham’s side and is comforted there while the unrighteous aristocrat finds himself in torment beyond the grave. The rich man petitions Abraham to send Lazarus to warn his brothers, but Abraham makes it clear that is not permitted. “They have Moses and the prophets; they should listen to them,” Abraham explains (Luke 16:29).

The apostle Paul reminds us that when Christians die, their souls/spirits go directly into the presence of God (2 Corinthians 5:8).

The appearances of the righteous dead on earth are brief and rare exceptions to the rule. For example, Moses and Elijah appear briefly on the Mount of Transfiguration with Jesus and His inner circle of apostles (Matthew 17:1-9).

In the Old Testament, we read the story of Samuel, who appears on earth after his death. King Saul has gone to the witch of Endor, seeking to engage her in necromancy -- communicating with the dead, a practice denounced in Scripture and banished by fiat from the land of Israel in Saul’s day. The appearance of Samuel shocks the witch as much as it surprises Saul (1 Samuel 28:7-20). As Bible teacher/broadcaster Hank Hanegraaff describes it, “When the departed Samuel appeared to the living Saul, the witch of Endor immediately recognized the occasion as a non-normative act of God -- a divine display of judgment rather than a haunting.” [1]

In other words, God called the witch’s bluff. She dabbled in deception and demonic activity to ply her trade but had no real power to bring back the spirits of the dead.

So, what are we to make of reports of modern-day hauntings?

First, understand that ghosts -- the spirits of the departed -- do not roam unseen among us; they are with the Lord in heaven or apart from Him in Hades.

Second, avoid fascination with modern-day “ghost adventures.” They rob you of your time and, worse, they draw you into demonic deception. While Satan has no power to raise the dead or create human flesh, he and his demons play on the field of superstition.

Third, stay armed. Paul exhorts us to put on the full armor of God so we can evade Satan’s fiery darts (Ephesians 6:16ff).

Finally, measure all experiences by the Scriptures, “which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Jesus Christ” (2 Timothy 3:15).

Who you gonna call? The Word of God is the ultimate ghostbuster.

________

[1] Holwick: the appearance of Samuel could have been made up by the witch; note that Saul is never said to see Samuel himself and Samuel’s communication to him could have been conducted through the witch’s mouth.

A Time To Sow, A Time To Reap

Luke 8:4

Christians can learn to say the right thing at the right time when it comes to evangelism.

When someone says, "Well, I don't understand how you can say 'God loves us' when the world is in such a mess," there are six possible responses from Christians:

1. Launch into an earnest sermonette on the existence of God. [apologetics]

2. Mumble an ambivalent argument and change the subject. [mumble]

3. Zero in on the real issue: the reality of original sin. [apologetics]

4. Speak slowly and loudly on the blessing of justification,

sanctification and the glorification of the Christian.

Talk down to them. [religious language]

*5. Ask about "the mess." Where is this person's unhappiness

with the messy world? Listen for hints or confessions

of an inner, personal mess.

*6. Just keep listening as the person continues.

The last two are the best responses. Most people acknowledge the need for sensitivity, listening skills, and seek to apply the gospel to a person's need or hurt. Information is not what people usually look for first when they are hurting, vulnerable, or sharing feelings, and defending the facts of faith can actually kill the conversation. In the distrustful and skeptical hearts of people today, religious reasoning is rarely the starting point of a spiritual journey. [above used 8/24/97]

James Engel offers a summary of the process of a person's heart becoming good soil for the seed of God's Word. It can help Christians be insightful.

-10 Awareness of the supernatural.

- 9 No effective knowledge of Christianity.

- 8 Initial awareness of Christianity.

- 7 Interest in Christianity.

- 6 Awareness of the basic facts of the gospel.

- 5 Grasp of the implications of the gospel.

- 4 Positive attitude to the gospel.

- 3 Awareness of personal need.

- 2 Challenge and decision to act.

- 1 Repentance and faith.

0 A new disciple is born.

A. Grace opens the door for truth.

B. Evangelists must "know the soil."

C. Be patient.

D. People need to hear the same words in a fresh way.

Many are inoculated to the gospel and don't really listen.

Just as sitting in a garage doesn't make one a car, so sitting in

a church doesn't make one a Christian.

Fact Or Fantasy? - Resurrection, (part 2 of 8)

Job 7:8

A few years ago, a very influential philosopher named John Searle wrote a book called THE REDISCOVERY OF THE MIND. Searle is a philosophical naturalist, and as such he has no room for God or anything else supernatural. In his book, he comments on the reactions he receives when people realize that in his worldview there is no God, no soul, and no afterlife. He writes, "When we encounter people who claim to believe [in God], we may envy them for the comfort and security they claim to derive from these beliefs, but at bottom we remain convinced that either they have not heard the news or they are in the grip of faith."

Searle continues, relating a time when he lectured in India and some in the audience objected due to their belief in the afterlife. Their objections did not move him one bit, he says, because their beliefs simply were not "serious candidates for truth." In other words, once you move beyond the material, all you have are pie-in-the-sky fantasies rather than facts.

For some of you, Searle's beliefs may seem shocking. But to those of you familiar with the trends in higher education over the last few decades, this is standard fare. Many will not discuss belief in God or supernatural events because they have already decided, a priori, that things of this nature cannot exist. To put it simply, the existence of all things is due to the purely physical processes of evolution, so there cannot be anything besides matter. People can believe in God or that the moon is made of green cheese if they want to, as long as we all recognize that to be faith, rather than based on reality.

We have been discussing the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Perhaps you are wondering, what does John Searle's book have to do with the resurrection? More than you might think. This drift in academia that I have roughly outlined has incredible consequences for beliefs in events such as the resurrection. Indeed, naturalism has changed the very rules of the debate!

How? If you attend a debate on the resurrection these days, often the opponent will not even argue against the historical record, as you might expect. Instead, he almost ignores the entire topic, and argues that a supernatural belief should not even be considered a viable option for a rational person.

Can a rational person believe in a supernatural event such as the resurrection? Give it some thought, my friend, as we continue to consider this.

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

*

Turtles All the Way Down

In his book A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME, Stephen Hawking retells an old story that has become part of philosophic folklore:

A well-known scientist (some say it was Bertrand Russell) once

gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the Earth

orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the

centre of a vast collection of stars called our galaxy. At the

end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room got

up and said: “What you have told us is rubbish. The world is

really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise.”

The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, “What is the

tortoise standing on?” “You’re very clever, young man, very

clever,” said the old lady. “But it’s turtles all the way down!”

The popularity of this story (even Dr. Seuss picked up the theme in his book YERTLE THE TURTLE) has made the suggestion of “turtle stacking” synonymous with the idea of infinite regression. The story is funny because our minds immediately recognize that, when seeking the cause behind an effect, infinite regression is no answer at all.

Everyone from philosophers to three-year-olds has encountered a similar problem when curiosity leads them to the question, “Who Made God?” For if someone made God, then that being too would have to have a cause, and from there on out it might as well be “turtles all the way down.” Instead of suggesting that some other being made God, theists claim that, by definition, God is the uncaused cause, what Thomas Aquinas called the “First Cause.”

Those who do not believe in the supernatural are, of course, dissatisfied with this explanation. They instead believe that the universe was caused by the rapid expansion of matter, which was caused by something else, which must have been caused by something else, and on and on. This leaves us with the question, is there a difference between positing a First Cause and explaining our universe through an infinite regression? I believe that there is.

Both explanations have this in common: they rely upon the infinite. Theists believe that an infinite Being, one who had no beginning, explains our existence. Atheists believe that an infinite chain of events explains our existence. The difference between the two is that the theist acknowledges that he has looked beyond natural explanations to the supernatural. The atheist still claims to be looking for a natural, material explanation. Yet what is infinite must transcend the finite, material world. I want to suggest that in positing an infinite regression, the naturalist is unwittingly suggesting an eternal entity.

Causality is a fundamental law of nature; in this world, every finite effect has a cause. If an atheist wants to continue to work within the laws of nature, he cannot plead his case by relying on an infinite explanation. But this is exactly what he does by claiming that we are the products of an infinite regression. The theist also transcends the law of causality when he asserts a First Cause, but he does it overtly and in consistence with his worldview.

The universe must have an infinite explanation. Unless we admit the possibility of the supernatural, is our explanation really that different from turtles all the way down?

________

Copyright © 2007 Ravi Zacharias International Ministries (RZIM). Reprinted with permission. "A Slice of Infinity" is a radio ministry of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.

Holy Terrors: Should Christians Embrace the Horror Film?

Matthew 18:21

I found myself standing outside a Watford multiplex in the midst of spiritual turmoil. It was Halloween 1999, and as a long-term horror movie fan I was itching to buy my ticket for The Blair Witch Project. But I had a problem.

A few years before, I’d become a Christian, and since being ‘born-again’ I’d assumed that horror was one passion I would need to give up. After all, with its supposed glorification of darkness, death and the Devil, horror appears to be the very antithesis of the Christian hope. So, instead, I went to see Bowfinger, a forgettable Eddie Murphy comedy.

Over a decade later and I’m still a Christian. In fact, I’m now an ordained Baptist Minister. I tick the Reverend box on government forms, I preach sermons and carry out weddings and funerals. And yet, something else has changed too: I watch horror movies again. This isn’t some sort of act of defiance against my conscience, but rather a reappraisal of the genre. It’s a realisation that perhaps the sacred and the scary are not so incompatible after all.

I’m not alone. It’s fairly well known, for example, that film critic and Anglican Mark Kermode has described seeing The Exorcist as the moment he knew there was “something beyond this world.”

Scott Derrickson is the Christian director behind Hellraiser: Inferno (2000) and The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005). He’s argued that horror is the perfect genre for Christ­ians, since it’s one of the few popular forms willing to deal seriously with the notion of objective good and evil, or to countenance – like the Christian faith – the existence of the supernatural. Perhaps it’s no surprise, then, that some audiences discover, like Kermode, a transcendent edge to terror.

As well as high profile directors like Derrickson, there are a growing number of independent Christian horror films like Pray (2007), House (2008), The Familiar (2009) and Paranormal (2009). These are films produced by avid churchgoers, yet they tell stories of crazed killers, possessed teenagers and haunted houses. It’s not just the movies either. Christian horror author Frank Peretti has topped the New York Times best-seller list. I even spotted a Christian survival horror game available on-line, called Eternal War: Shadows of Light. Whether these spooky offerings are actually any good is beside the point. What is significant is their willingness to sit religious themes on the furniture of horror.

THE NOT-SO-GOOD BOOK

The link between the Church and horror is nothing new – in fact, it’s rather as if horror and Christianity were involved in an exchange programme, and one in which horror has always been keen to pay religion an extended visit. From spooky church graveyard locations to themes of the supernatural and demonic, horror has positively revelled in the ideas and symbols of faith. Yet this idea of the exchange working the other way – with Christians actively venturing into the genre – is perhaps neither as new or as post-modern as we might imagine: the horrific and the holy have been meeting for a long time – in the pages of the Bible itself.

The Christian scriptures are filled with vivid descriptions of violence, sex and monsters; tales of rape, dismemberment, cruelty and gore lurk between the stories of hope and inspiration [see below “Texts of Terror”]. Some might argue that this is not so much the Bible coming on like a horror movie as simply reporting reluctantly on the evil deeds of man. Yet the horror is there, and it runs deep.

Consider Jesus’s teaching. He often spoke in parables, brief stories shared to illustrate a religious or ethical point. Whether he made them up himself or heard them from others is unknown, but something about these tales seemed to resonate with him. But look at what they contain. For example, “The Parable of the Unmerciful Servant” (Matt. 18:21–35) features choking and torture, while “The Parable of the Tenants” (Luke 20:9–19) hinges on a cruel murder.

Then, of course, there’s the final book of the Bible, Revelation, as firm a favourite with horror films as with apocalyptic cultists and scripture-quoting movie serial killers. Author Will Self has described the Book of Revelation as a “sick text ... a portentous horror film.”[1] And he has a point. The book is filled with monsters pursuing and tormenting people. Beasts leave rotting corpses in the streets while others party over them (Rev. 11:7–10); a woman is drunk on the blood of the saints (Rev. 17:6); and the dead are reanimated and thrown into a lake of fire (Rev. 20:12–15). In one of the book’s most disturbing images, a demonic dragon sits between a pregnant woman’s legs, eagerly waiting to devour the baby as soon as it is born (Rev. 12:4). Things become even more sobering when we read Revelation’s first verse. It tells us that this is not the Revelation of the Apostle John, but the Revelation to him. It comes from Jesus.

Now, I’m not suggesting that God’s son is a closet psychopath – these dark and frightening stories are also lit up with threads of hope. But I do want to suggest that in the palette of narrative colours with which he chose to communicate, Jesus seems to have been quite willing to use the darker shades to make his point. The grotesque had, and still does have, the ability to become revelatory. In other words, there is theology in horror.

Yet, not all Christians embrace it. Actually, most don’t – just witness the anti-Halloween stance that many evangelicals adopt. Well-meaning believers hand out tracts and leaflets warning families against the terrible danger they believe Halloween represents: namely, that it’s a doorway to the occult. It’s even common for churches to provide alternative events on Halloween, so that communities can avoid celebrating anything disturbingly spooky. Or consider the uproar emanating from some Christian quarters against such popular entertainments as Buffy, Harry Potter and, more recently, the Twilight saga. There’s a fear that these stories of vampires and wizards might seduce innocent kids into an unhealthy interest in the dark side.

To help make their point, they may well quote Philippians 4:8, which advises believers to think about that which is true, noble, pure and lovely. Yet, this might be to misread the verse in question. While there’s clearly a benefit to contemplating the good, God can hardly be asking us simply to avoid all things unpleasant. If that were true, we’d better not watch the news and we’d certainly need to skip over many verses of the Bible itself. Also, and more crucially, the verse says we must think on that which is true. For Christians, it may well be true that God is pure and noble. Yet isn’t it equally true that, in the same worldview, the supernatural is real and the Devil exists? To not engage with these subjects through debate, study and art would be to present only a half-truth, a partial reality.

I’m not suggesting that Christians, or anyone else for that matter, should feel obliged to watch and engage with horror. Many people simply don’t get it, and that’s fine with me. Yet what about the rest of us who’ve always felt a pull towards all things spooky and macabre, who read strange magazines like Fortean Times and who, on visits to the funfair, always seem to gravit­ate toward the Ghost Train? Might it not be reasonable to suggest that the themes of horror can offer some unique spiritual insights of their own?

HORROR AND HISTORY

My argument is hardly new. Horror and Christianity have a rich, shared cultural heritage. If we look at folklore, fairytales, campfire stories and urban legends, we find they have all used frightening elements in order to articulate social fears, many of the themes of which derive from or have their basis in Judæo-Christian thought.

In the visual arts, Renaissance painters such as Hieronymus Bosch (see FT264:56–57) demonstrated the vivid connection between religious faith and the horrific imagination. The Bible and the Catholic Church were the driving inspiration behind Bosch’s art, yet many of his more surreal works, such as the right-hand panel of the triptych The Garden of Delights, offer nothing less than an all-out horror show. His paintings are a veritable ‘Where’s Wally?’ of horrific images. Men have arrows rammed into their anuses and fish-headed monsters devour people whole, only to defecate their remains into a pit filled with other people’s vomit. This is horror at its most extreme – and it is informed by religious ideals.

Indeed, as one art historian has written, the 16th century “was a period in the history of Catholic Europe when it seems that no painter’s career could move forward until some graphic scene of martyrdom had been proved as part of his repertoire”. [2] In 1563, the Council of Trent issued an ecumenical decree to artists “encouraging the deliberate depiction of horror”. [3] The hope was to rekindle religious sensibilities by stoking up fear of damnation and hell.

In the following century, Puritan American Protestants didn’t use the visual arts to depict horror for salvation’s sake. Instead, they used their preferred method of communication: the written and preached word. In 1693, the prominent Puritan minister Cotton Mather wrote On Witchcraft: Being the Wonders of the Invisible World. It described, in lurid detail, the horror of the Salem Witch Trials the year before. “Mather’s narrative was an immediate hit – in some ways, an early form of the longed-for Great American Novel; it presented a labyrinthine world of secret dangers, hidden mysteries, surreptitious delights, hapless heroines – in short, a Gothic world.” [4]

The hellfire preachers of the Great Awakening followed in Mather’s footsteps, most famously Jonathan Edwards. He can be described as one of America’s most important theologians, but he also had a predilection for the macabre. As a boy, he had a fascinated loathing for spiders, and in one of his earliest publications, On Spiders, he described them as “little collections” of “corrupting nauseousness”. In his most famous sermon, the still terrifying Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, Edwards used the image of the monstrous spider to horrific effect. “The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked: His wrath towards you burns like fire.” [5] It’s a little unnerving that Edwards seems to assume we know what it’s like to hold a spider over a flame; I can’t say I’ve ever done it myself.

With such dark themes and linguistic excess, it’s perhaps no surprise to find that the American Puritans cast an influential shadow over revered horror author HP Lovecraft. It’s tempting to suggest that Lovecraft was a sort of theologian himself. He might have been a self-declared atheist, but his Cthulhu Mythos certainly seems at pains to set human history into a cosmological context, albeit a terrifying one.

KEEP TELLING YOURSELF... IT’S NOT ‘ONLY A MOVIE’

Fast forward to 1900, and Christians were already using the new medium of cinema to share the Gospel. Soldiers of the Cross – a potent multi-media mixture of lantern slides, music and film – was directed by Herbert Booth, son of Salvation Army founder William Booth. Audiences sat in Melbourne Town Hall, Australia, watching what might be considered the first Christian horror film – a vivid depiction of the stories of the martyrs, showing St Stephen being stoned to death, Christ in the throes of agony on the cross and Christ­ian women hurling themselves into vats of lime rather than deny their allegiance to the one true God.

The trend for Christians to employ terror in films and novels continued throughout the 20th century. In 1974, Baptist evangelist Estus Pirkle created a low-budget drama-documentary called The Burning Hell (as well as its lurid title it boasted the Cormanesque tagline “20,000 Degrees Fahrenheit and not a drop of water!”). Still available today in multiple languages, the 60-minute film sought to “portray in graphic terms all of the horror of Hell and how to escape its flames”.

The Seventies also saw films like A Thief in the Night (1972) and A Distant Thunder (1978), which in turn led to the wildly successful Left Behind series of the mid-1990s. These films focused on the terrifying subject of the End Times, employing a pre-millennial eschatology where, in the last days, Christians vanish in the rapture and those who are left must take the Mark of the Beast while facing life in a terrifying society ruled by the Anti-Christ and his corrupt government. Such themes can’t help but touch the horror nerve, and come on like a cross between a sermon and a B-movie.

The current surge in Christian-based horror films, novels and Halloween events isn’t a post-modern cultural quirk. We’re not seeing the rise of Christian horror, but rather the resurgence of a largely forgotten tradition.

Yet what should we make of it all? If we have an openness to religious faith, as I do, then we might treat Christianity’s dalliance with horror as a welcome opportunity to explore spiritual ideas. Certainly, for me, growing up with no church background, horror movies became an unexpected doorway into the more hopeful themes of faith.

On the other hand, we could see it as nothing more than a manipulative scare tactic to fill pews, while attempts at modern horror by Christians may leave us more amused and annoyed than afraid. Yet, whatever the case, Christianity’s unique contributions to the literature and cinema of terror can’t help but make the truly great horror films and novels even more frightening. Religion tugs at our shoulder as we leave the cinema and makes some disturbing, important suggestions about the supernatural world, the Devil and the threat of Hell ... that maybe what you just watched is not only a movie. And if that’s true ... well, that really is scary.

________

Notes

1 Will Self: “The Revelation of St John”, in Revelations, Canongate, Edinburgh, 2005, p381.

2 Nigel Spivey: Enduring Creation – Art, Pain and Fortitude, University of California Press, 2001, p131.

3 Ibid, p113.

4 Edward J Ingebretsen: Maps of Heaven, Maps of Hell, ME Sharpe, New York, 1996, p18.

5 Jonathan Edwards: Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, Dover, NY, 1999, p228.

TEXTS OF TERROR

As well as inspiration and hope, the Bible has some truly horrific moments. Here’s a small selection...

A thousand men bludgeoned to death with a donkey’s jawbone (Judges 15:15–16).

Victims burned alive (Numbers 16:35; Joshua 7:25; Judges 9:49, 15:6; Daniel 3:22; Matthew 13:49–50).

Parents cannibalise their children (2 Kings 6:28–29).

Cutting off thumbs and toes (Judges 1:6–7).

Decapitation (1 Samuel 17: 51, 31:9; 2 Samuel 16:9, Mark 6:22–29).

Disembowelling and stabbings (Judges 3:21–22; 2 Samuel 2: 23, 3:27, 20:10; 2 Chronicles 21:19; Acts 1:18).

Dismemberment (1 Samuel 15:32–33; Daniel 2:5, 3:29; Judges 19:22–29 – includes gang rape then dismemberment!).

The Leviathan, a fire-breathing sea monster (Job 3:8, 41:1–34; Psalms 74:14, 104:25–26; Isaiah 27:1).

Gouging out of eyes (Judges 16:21).

Hanging (Joshua 10:26; Esther 9:25; Matthew 27:5).

Parents murder their children as a sacrifice (2 Kings 3:27, 16:3, 17:17+31; 21:6).

Choking and torture (Matthew 18:28–35).

Holy Terrors: Should Christians Embrace the Horror Film?

Matthew 18:21

I found myself standing outside a Watford multiplex in the midst of spiritual turmoil. It was Halloween 1999, and as a long-term horror movie fan I was itching to buy my ticket for The Blair Witch Project. But I had a problem.

A few years before, I’d become a Christian, and since being ‘born-again’ I’d assumed that horror was one passion I would need to give up. After all, with its supposed glorification of darkness, death and the Devil, horror appears to be the very antithesis of the Christian hope. So, instead, I went to see Bowfinger, a forgettable Eddie Murphy comedy.

Over a decade later and I’m still a Christian. In fact, I’m now an ordained Baptist Minister. I tick the Reverend box on government forms, I preach sermons and carry out weddings and funerals. And yet, something else has changed too: I watch horror movies again. This isn’t some sort of act of defiance against my conscience, but rather a reappraisal of the genre. It’s a realisation that perhaps the sacred and the scary are not so incompatible after all.

I’m not alone. It’s fairly well known, for example, that film critic and Anglican Mark Kermode has described seeing The Exorcist as the moment he knew there was “something beyond this world.”

Scott Derrickson is the Christian director behind Hellraiser: Inferno (2000) and The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005). He’s argued that horror is the perfect genre for Christ­ians, since it’s one of the few popular forms willing to deal seriously with the notion of objective good and evil, or to countenance – like the Christian faith – the existence of the supernatural. Perhaps it’s no surprise, then, that some audiences discover, like Kermode, a transcendent edge to terror.

As well as high profile directors like Derrickson, there are a growing number of independent Christian horror films like Pray (2007), House (2008), The Familiar (2009) and Paranormal (2009). These are films produced by avid churchgoers, yet they tell stories of crazed killers, possessed teenagers and haunted houses. It’s not just the movies either. Christian horror author Frank Peretti has topped the New York Times best-seller list. I even spotted a Christian survival horror game available on-line, called Eternal War: Shadows of Light. Whether these spooky offerings are actually any good is beside the point. What is significant is their willingness to sit religious themes on the furniture of horror.

THE NOT-SO-GOOD BOOK

The link between the Church and horror is nothing new – in fact, it’s rather as if horror and Christianity were involved in an exchange programme, and one in which horror has always been keen to pay religion an extended visit. From spooky church graveyard locations to themes of the supernatural and demonic, horror has positively revelled in the ideas and symbols of faith. Yet this idea of the exchange working the other way – with Christians actively venturing into the genre – is perhaps neither as new or as post-modern as we might imagine: the horrific and the holy have been meeting for a long time – in the pages of the Bible itself.

The Christian scriptures are filled with vivid descriptions of violence, sex and monsters; tales of rape, dismemberment, cruelty and gore lurk between the stories of hope and inspiration [see below “Texts of Terror”]. Some might argue that this is not so much the Bible coming on like a horror movie as simply reporting reluctantly on the evil deeds of man. Yet the horror is there, and it runs deep.

Consider Jesus’s teaching. He often spoke in parables, brief stories shared to illustrate a religious or ethical point. Whether he made them up himself or heard them from others is unknown, but something about these tales seemed to resonate with him. But look at what they contain. For example, “The Parable of the Unmerciful Servant” (Matt. 18:21–35) features choking and torture, while “The Parable of the Tenants” (Luke 20:9–19) hinges on a cruel murder.

Then, of course, there’s the final book of the Bible, Revelation, as firm a favourite with horror films as with apocalyptic cultists and scripture-quoting movie serial killers. Author Will Self has described the Book of Revelation as a “sick text ... a portentous horror film.”[1] And he has a point. The book is filled with monsters pursuing and tormenting people. Beasts leave rotting corpses in the streets while others party over them (Rev. 11:7–10); a woman is drunk on the blood of the saints (Rev. 17:6); and the dead are reanimated and thrown into a lake of fire (Rev. 20:12–15). In one of the book’s most disturbing images, a demonic dragon sits between a pregnant woman’s legs, eagerly waiting to devour the baby as soon as it is born (Rev. 12:4). Things become even more sobering when we read Revelation’s first verse. It tells us that this is not the Revelation of the Apostle John, but the Revelation to him. It comes from Jesus.

Now, I’m not suggesting that God’s son is a closet psychopath – these dark and frightening stories are also lit up with threads of hope. But I do want to suggest that in the palette of narrative colours with which he chose to communicate, Jesus seems to have been quite willing to use the darker shades to make his point. The grotesque had, and still does have, the ability to become revelatory. In other words, there is theology in horror.

Yet, not all Christians embrace it. Actually, most don’t – just witness the anti-Halloween stance that many evangelicals adopt. Well-meaning believers hand out tracts and leaflets warning families against the terrible danger they believe Halloween represents: namely, that it’s a doorway to the occult. It’s even common for churches to provide alternative events on Halloween, so that communities can avoid celebrating anything disturbingly spooky. Or consider the uproar emanating from some Christian quarters against such popular entertainments as Buffy, Harry Potter and, more recently, the Twilight saga. There’s a fear that these stories of vampires and wizards might seduce innocent kids into an unhealthy interest in the dark side.

To help make their point, they may well quote Philippians 4:8, which advises believers to think about that which is true, noble, pure and lovely. Yet, this might be to misread the verse in question. While there’s clearly a benefit to contemplating the good, God can hardly be asking us simply to avoid all things unpleasant. If that were true, we’d better not watch the news and we’d certainly need to skip over many verses of the Bible itself. Also, and more crucially, the verse says we must think on that which is true. For Christians, it may well be true that God is pure and noble. Yet isn’t it equally true that, in the same worldview, the supernatural is real and the Devil exists? To not engage with these subjects through debate, study and art would be to present only a half-truth, a partial reality.

I’m not suggesting that Christians, or anyone else for that matter, should feel obliged to watch and engage with horror. Many people simply don’t get it, and that’s fine with me. Yet what about the rest of us who’ve always felt a pull towards all things spooky and macabre, who read strange magazines like Fortean Times and who, on visits to the funfair, always seem to gravit­ate toward the Ghost Train? Might it not be reasonable to suggest that the themes of horror can offer some unique spiritual insights of their own?

HORROR AND HISTORY

My argument is hardly new. Horror and Christianity have a rich, shared cultural heritage. If we look at folklore, fairytales, campfire stories and urban legends, we find they have all used frightening elements in order to articulate social fears, many of the themes of which derive from or have their basis in Judæo-Christian thought.

In the visual arts, Renaissance painters such as Hieronymus Bosch (see FT264:56–57) demonstrated the vivid connection between religious faith and the horrific imagination. The Bible and the Catholic Church were the driving inspiration behind Bosch’s art, yet many of his more surreal works, such as the right-hand panel of the triptych The Garden of Delights, offer nothing less than an all-out horror show. His paintings are a veritable ‘Where’s Wally?’ of horrific images. Men have arrows rammed into their anuses and fish-headed monsters devour people whole, only to defecate their remains into a pit filled with other people’s vomit. This is horror at its most extreme – and it is informed by religious ideals.

Indeed, as one art historian has written, the 16th century “was a period in the history of Catholic Europe when it seems that no painter’s career could move forward until some graphic scene of martyrdom had been proved as part of his repertoire”. [2] In 1563, the Council of Trent issued an ecumenical decree to artists “encouraging the deliberate depiction of horror”. [3] The hope was to rekindle religious sensibilities by stoking up fear of damnation and hell.

In the following century, Puritan American Protestants didn’t use the visual arts to depict horror for salvation’s sake. Instead, they used their preferred method of communication: the written and preached word. In 1693, the prominent Puritan minister Cotton Mather wrote On Witchcraft: Being the Wonders of the Invisible World. It described, in lurid detail, the horror of the Salem Witch Trials the year before. “Mather’s narrative was an immediate hit – in some ways, an early form of the longed-for Great American Novel; it presented a labyrinthine world of secret dangers, hidden mysteries, surreptitious delights, hapless heroines – in short, a Gothic world.” [4]

The hellfire preachers of the Great Awakening followed in Mather’s footsteps, most famously Jonathan Edwards. He can be described as one of America’s most important theologians, but he also had a predilection for the macabre. As a boy, he had a fascinated loathing for spiders, and in one of his earliest publications, On Spiders, he described them as “little collections” of “corrupting nauseousness”. In his most famous sermon, the still terrifying Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, Edwards used the image of the monstrous spider to horrific effect. “The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked: His wrath towards you burns like fire.” [5] It’s a little unnerving that Edwards seems to assume we know what it’s like to hold a spider over a flame; I can’t say I’ve ever done it myself.

With such dark themes and linguistic excess, it’s perhaps no surprise to find that the American Puritans cast an influential shadow over revered horror author HP Lovecraft. It’s tempting to suggest that Lovecraft was a sort of theologian himself. He might have been a self-declared atheist, but his Cthulhu Mythos certainly seems at pains to set human history into a cosmological context, albeit a terrifying one.

KEEP TELLING YOURSELF... IT’S NOT ‘ONLY A MOVIE’

Fast forward to 1900, and Christians were already using the new medium of cinema to share the Gospel. Soldiers of the Cross – a potent multi-media mixture of lantern slides, music and film – was directed by Herbert Booth, son of Salvation Army founder William Booth. Audiences sat in Melbourne Town Hall, Australia, watching what might be considered the first Christian horror film – a vivid depiction of the stories of the martyrs, showing St Stephen being stoned to death, Christ in the throes of agony on the cross and Christ­ian women hurling themselves into vats of lime rather than deny their allegiance to the one true God.

The trend for Christians to employ terror in films and novels continued throughout the 20th century. In 1974, Baptist evangelist Estus Pirkle created a low-budget drama-documentary called The Burning Hell (as well as its lurid title it boasted the Cormanesque tagline “20,000 Degrees Fahrenheit and not a drop of water!”). Still available today in multiple languages, the 60-minute film sought to “portray in graphic terms all of the horror of Hell and how to escape its flames”.

The Seventies also saw films like A Thief in the Night (1972) and A Distant Thunder (1978), which in turn led to the wildly successful Left Behind series of the mid-1990s. These films focused on the terrifying subject of the End Times, employing a pre-millennial eschatology where, in the last days, Christians vanish in the rapture and those who are left must take the Mark of the Beast while facing life in a terrifying society ruled by the Anti-Christ and his corrupt government. Such themes can’t help but touch the horror nerve, and come on like a cross between a sermon and a B-movie.

The current surge in Christian-based horror films, novels and Halloween events isn’t a post-modern cultural quirk. We’re not seeing the rise of Christian horror, but rather the resurgence of a largely forgotten tradition.

Yet what should we make of it all? If we have an openness to religious faith, as I do, then we might treat Christianity’s dalliance with horror as a welcome opportunity to explore spiritual ideas. Certainly, for me, growing up with no church background, horror movies became an unexpected doorway into the more hopeful themes of faith.

On the other hand, we could see it as nothing more than a manipulative scare tactic to fill pews, while attempts at modern horror by Christians may leave us more amused and annoyed than afraid. Yet, whatever the case, Christianity’s unique contributions to the literature and cinema of terror can’t help but make the truly great horror films and novels even more frightening. Religion tugs at our shoulder as we leave the cinema and makes some disturbing, important suggestions about the supernatural world, the Devil and the threat of Hell ... that maybe what you just watched is not only a movie. And if that’s true ... well, that really is scary.

________

Notes

1 Will Self: “The Revelation of St John”, in Revelations, Canongate, Edinburgh, 2005, p381.

2 Nigel Spivey: Enduring Creation – Art, Pain and Fortitude, University of California Press, 2001, p131.

3 Ibid, p113.

4 Edward J Ingebretsen: Maps of Heaven, Maps of Hell, ME Sharpe, New York, 1996, p18.

5 Jonathan Edwards: Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, Dover, NY, 1999, p228.

TEXTS OF TERROR

As well as inspiration and hope, the Bible has some truly horrific moments. Here’s a small selection...

A thousand men bludgeoned to death with a donkey’s jawbone (Judges 15:15–16).

Victims burned alive (Numbers 16:35; Joshua 7:25; Judges 9:49, 15:6; Daniel 3:22; Matthew 13:49–50).

Parents cannibalise their children (2 Kings 6:28–29).

Cutting off thumbs and toes (Judges 1:6–7).

Decapitation (1 Samuel 17: 51, 31:9; 2 Samuel 16:9, Mark 6:22–29).

Disembowelling and stabbings (Judges 3:21–22; 2 Samuel 2: 23, 3:27, 20:10; 2 Chronicles 21:19; Acts 1:18).

Dismemberment (1 Samuel 15:32–33; Daniel 2:5, 3:29; Judges 19:22–29 – includes gang rape then dismemberment!).

The Leviathan, a fire-breathing sea monster (Job 3:8, 41:1–34; Psalms 74:14, 104:25–26; Isaiah 27:1).

Gouging out of eyes (Judges 16:21).

Hanging (Joshua 10:26; Esther 9:25; Matthew 27:5).

Parents murder their children as a sacrifice (2 Kings 3:27, 16:3, 17:17+31; 21:6).

Choking and torture (Matthew 18:28–35).

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate