1 Timothy 1
OGCBIBLE STUDY TEXTBOOK PAUL’S LETTERS TO TIMOTHY AND TITUS
Don De Welt
Professor at Ozark Bible College
Paraphrase by James MacKnight
College Press, Joplin, Missouri · Copyright 1961 Don De Welt
Permissions to quote from the following books have been obtained from the copyright owners From
Augustana Book Concern:
The Interpretation Of St. Paul’s Epistles To The Colossians, To The Thessalonians, To Timothy, To Titus And To Philemon
by R. C. H. Lenski
From
Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company:
The Pastoral Epistles by Donald Guthrie
The Pastoral Epistles by E. K. Simpson
New Testament Epistles by John H. Bratt
From
Zondervan Publishing House:
Commentary On The Pastoral Epistles by Patrick Fairbairn
From
Dr. Wilbur Smith:
Outline Of I Timothy
From
Baker Book House:
New Testament Commentary by William Hendricksen
The Epistles To Timothy by Russell Bradley Jones
New Testament Epistles by Victor E. Hoven
From
Moody Press:
Titus And Philemon by D. Edmond Hiebert
First Timothy by D. Edmond Hiebert
The Pastoral Epistles by Homer A. Kent, Jr.
From
Gospel Advocate Company:
New Testament Epistles by David Lipscomb
An Introduction To The Epistles Of Paul by Leslie G. Thomas
From
Christian Standard:
Studies In The Epistles And Revelation by W. B. Taylor
Bible Teacher And Leader article by Lewis C. Foster
PREFACE
For those who do not have a copy of a Bible Study Textbook it might be helpful to say a word as to their purpose:
Here is a series of books unique in format and content, We have but one intention in these publications: To prompt the personal study of the Word of God. We shall discuss every verse, but our discussion will be entirely subservient to our higher purpose. The constant question shall be do you understand the meaning of the divine writer? We shall lend whatever aid necessary to help you discover his meaning. It is not at all enough to simply say here is what is meant, and then in so many words state it. No personal discovery by the student has been made by a teacher’s plain statement of fact, We want a creative study of the Bible. We desire to produce the situation and the tools by which you build your beautiful temple of Bible knowledge. Here are teaching aids that truly teach The Bible Study Textbooks.
Don De Welt
PROLOGUE
My heart was made happy when brother De Welt requested that I give this prologue concerning his comments on First and Second Timothy and Titus. He is my Timothy and being such, I know him and his background, and what we can expect from him in this field.
Brother De Welt is a talented man in his presentation as well as being a deep student of the Word of God. His many books now in print give evidence of his labors and their wide acceptance. He is a man of deep convictions based on study. I expect this latest effort to surpass his former works, because this is his strongest field, evangelism.
He has had much experience in evangelism, and has had years of proving by test his ideas as he has trained young men to do the work of an evangelist. This book should be very practical. I appreciate brother De Welt because of his character. He is one of God’s scarce personalities who appreciate the efforts of others. He is quick to express gratitude for the part others have played in his life and he deserves heaven’s blessings upon his own labors. I pray God will bless the efforts put forth in this work especially planned for Evangelists.
Sincerely,
A. Word.
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
There are several very important questions to be answered before we can proceed with an exegetical study of the letter of Paul to Timothy.
Did Paul actually write this letter? Of course we know 1 Timothy 1:1 says he did, but there are those who hold a different opinion, Why would anyone deny the plain statement of the text as to the authorship? Such a conclusion is based upon a presupposition, It is presupposed by some that the books of the New Testament were not written in the first century nor by the persons whose names they bear. What shall we say to these things? It would be an easy matter to simply deny the accusation, but this would also be a presupposition. It is not the purpose of this text to give an exhaustive study of the subject. Others have done a splendid service in answering this charge, We refer you to them for the details necessary. Read: New Testament Commentary Exposition of The Pastoral Epistles by Wm. Hendriksen pp. 4-33; The Pastoral Epistles by Homer A. Kent, Jr. pp. 24-71; An Interpretation Of St. Paul’s Epistles To the Colossians, to the Thessalonians, to Timothy, to Titus and to Philemon, by R. C. H. Lenski pp. 473-484. The Pastoral Epistles by Donald Guthrie pp. 11-53.
Where was Paul when he wrote these letters? Was Paul in jail at Rome awaiting his execution? Was Paul released after his first imprisonment? These questions might not appear pertinent to our study, but they most assuredly are. Here is another question of vital importance: Does the book of Acts contain a continuous, complete record of the life of Paul? At this juncture someone is sure to ask, what difference does it make? Well, it just so happens that there are events mentioned in I and II Timothy and Titus that can not be harmonized with the account of Paul’s life in the book of Acts. There are two possibilities: (1) We do not have a record of all the events in Acts. (2) These events took place after the Acts account, and just before Paul’s death. The second position is the one most commonly accepted, A careful reading of the book of Acts will convince one that it would be almost impossible to open up areas for the inclusion of the following events:
a.
A trip to Crete. On this trip Paul was accompanied by Titus. Paul left Titus on the isle to carry on the work Paul had started. Read Titus 1:5. The only mention of Crete in Luke’s second treatise has to do with the shipwreck. Read Acts 27:27-44; Acts 28:1-11. Where was Titus? Where is indication that a group of churches was established on the island at this time?
b.
Paul’s trip into Macedonia from Ephesus. At this time Timothy was left at Ephesus to minister to the church. Read 1 Timothy 1:2. If you have read the Acts account you know of Paul’s two visits to Ephesus. The first visit is eliminated as he is going the wrong direction. Read Acts 18:19-22. Paul was going to Palestine, not Macedonia. The second visit is recorded in Acts 19:1-41; Acts 20:1. In Acts 19:22 we are told that Timothy and Erastus had been sent ahead into Macedonia. When Paul left Ephesus for Macedonia as near as we know Timothy was not at Ephesus but already in Macedonia.
c.
A visit to Timothy at Ephesus from whatever place Paul wrote. Read 1 Timothy 3:14. At what time in the Acts account did Paul visit Timothy at Ephesus? It could not have been in either of the recorded visits. In the first visit the church had not been established, and Paul arrived before Timothy. In the second visit Timothy was with him.
d.
Paul was in Nicopolis. Read Titus 3:12. Where is this place? It is not easy to answer this question. It is quite possibly on the eastern coast of Achaiaor is it on the coast of Macedonia? The important point is: Paul was there. But when was he there? Why? No mention of this is made in the Acts account. No break is made in the Acts record (unless we make one) for such a visit.
e.
Paul was at Miletus. Read 2 Timothy 4:20. Paul’s visit to Miletus on his way to Jerusalem (Acts 20:15-38) does not fit the tenor of 2 Timothy 4:20. Acts does not mention Trophimus.
f.
Paul left a cloak and parchments at Troas. Read 2 Timothy 4:13. Paul was twice at Troas as recorded in Acts 20:6-7 and 2 Corinthians 2:12-14; in neither visit can we fit the present instructions; most especially would we reject the reference in 2 Corinthians 2:12-14. The urgency of the visit mentioned in 2 Corinthians 2:12-14 precludes the circumstances of 2 Timothy 4:13. Is it at all likely, that upon the way to Jerusalem with a party of seven representatives from the churches, that Paul would have paid a leisurely visit to the house of Carpus? Perhaps so, but no mention is made of it.
g.
2 Timothy 4:20 seems to suggest that Paul was at Corinth. In this verse Paul is apparently discussing an itinerary of which we know nothing in the Acts record. This visit to Corinth could have been only on the part of Erastus, without Paul, but the context seems to suggest otherwise.
h.
Please read 2 Timothy 1:16-17; 2 Timothy 2:9; 2 Timothy 4:6. Now read Acts 28:30-31. Note the difference in the description of the imprisonments. We conclude that there were two imprisonments. The first one, described in Acts 28:30-31, from which he was released. During this period of liberty Paul wrote the letters of I Timothy and Titus. Quite possibly I Timothy was written first from somewhere in Macedonia. To say which of these letters was written first is an impossibility, but the facts fit together better when we assume I Timothy of first composition.
In answer to our original question we can say: Paul wrote I Timothy in the year 62 or 63 A.D. after release from Roman imprisonment, while he was somewhere in Macedonia. Very shortly after in the same year Paul wrote to Titus. Upon his second arrest while in the Roman prison in 64-68 A.D., probably in 67 A.D., he wrote the last of his lettersII Timothy.
For the benefit of those who read these words and do not know the background of Paul’s epistles we present a brief outline of their composition. Before he was imprisoned Paul wrote:
On his second journey he wrote from Corinth the epistles of I & II Thessalonians.
On his third journey he wrote I Corinthians from Ephesus; II Corinthians from Macedonia, possibly Philippi; Galatians and Romans from Corinth.
While in prison in Rome for two full years he wrote the following letters: Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon.
After his release he wrote I Timothy and Titus. After his second arrest he wrote II Timothy. Anyone is free to disagree with the time and place of the writings of these letters. All we say is that we have decided after two decades of study, that this is the most reasonable arrangement.
To who were these letters addressed? To Timothy and Titus to be sure but what do we know of these men? First as to Timothy:
a.
Paul first saw this young man in the city of Lystra on his first missionary journey. (Acts 16:1-2) Acts 20:4 seems to indicate Lystra as his home in contrast to Gaius of Derbe. In the strictest sense of the term this young man was a half-breed, for whereas his mother Eunice and grandmother Lois were Jewesses, his father was a Greek. (Acts 16:1; 2 Timothy 1:5). The text would seem to indicate that his father was not a believer, even in the Jewish Faith. Timothy had not been circumcised thus indicating the lack of interest on the part of the father. There was no lack of interest on the part of his mother or grandmother, for they were devout students of the Old Testament scriptures and taught Timothy from them. Although it is not so stated it is probably true that Timothy, his mother and grandmother were all converted on Paul’s first journey. Two or three things could have prepared Timothy for his acceptance of Jesus as the Messiah:
(1)
A knowledge of the Old Testament scriptures. When Paul pointed out of whom the prophets spoke he was as ready to be baptized as was the eunuch of Act 8:1-40.
(2)
The consistent though difficult life of his mother and grandmother offered a grand example to him. Did they accept their Messiah first, or was it their son who did? Timothy saw in the day by day living of Eunice and Lois that the scriptures could be translated into life; this he wanted and this he did.
(3)
He was a witness of the devotion and sufferings of the Apostle Paul. This alone without his previous knowledge and home life could have been inadequate. It undoubtedly was inadequate for many others who lived in Lystra. Timothy saw the unswerving devotion, the undying zeal, and the unselfish love of Paul among those who hated him and stoned him. Was it the tears that streamed down the face of Timothy as he stood over the broken body of Paul that Paul remembered? (Cf. 2 Timothy 1:4). What did Timothy feel when Paul arose from the place of stoning to return to speak to the very ones who sought his life? (Acts 14:20). If Timothy felt a spiritual kinship to Paul it was surely a mutual matter for Paul refers to him as: my child, Genuine child in faith, beloved child, We conclude that Timothy was one of Paul’s converts to Christ upon Paul’s first evangelistic tour.
b.
Paul took him to help upon the second visit to Lystra, (Acts 16:1-3). Because of labor for Christ on Timothy’s own initiative, Paul chose him to work with him. We wonder what program of evangelism was being followed by Timothy in the wild barbarian towns of Derbe, Iconium, and Lystra? Probably the one originated by our Lord when he said Let your light shine before men.
Timothy’s reputation for faithfulness was well established when Paul returned to Lystra, Timothy was not working for a promotion to the office of evangelist. He worked for Christ because he loved lost souls and his Lord. Kent suggests Timothy might have taken John Mark’s place who left Paul on the first journey.
Before Timothy left his mother and home to travel with Paul, he must become all things to all men, that by all means he might win some. (1 Corinthians 9:20). Paul requested that Timothy be circumcised. Paul did this that any unnecessary delay and argument with Jews might be avoided. If Timothy was to enter the synagogues with Paul and share in the services, this rite was essential.
Perhaps it was when Paul chose Timothy, that the hands of the elders of Lystra, Derbe and Iconium, along with the hands of Paul, were laid upon the head of Timothy, thus ordaining him for the work he was about to do. (1 Timothy 4:14; 2 Timothy 1:6). There were evidently two gifts given here: the gift of the office of evangelist through the hands of the presbytery or eldership, and the gift of supernatural powers by the hands of Paul.
c.
Timothy traveled with Paul and Silas upon their second evangelistic tour. (Acts 16:2-4; Acts 17:14-15; Acts 18:5; 1 Thessalonians 1:1; 1 Thessalonians 3:2-6; 2 Thessalonians 1:1). While upon this journey he was sent back to Thessalonica to help the recently established church in that city.
d.
Timothy was with Paul again on his third missionary journey. (Acts 19:22; Acts 20:4; 2 Corinthians 1:1-19). It would seem Timothy was given the special task of carrying not only the message of the gospel, but the messages of the Apostle Paul; both written and oral. He was sent by Paul to Corinth to bear the Apostle’s special instructions (1 Corinthians 4:17; 1 Corinthians 16:10). Timothy was to return to Corinth in company of Paul at a later time on the same journey (Romans 16:21). We can believe the last statement, if we believe the epistle to the Romans was written from Corinth.
e.
When Paul was imprisoned at Rome, Timothy was one of the few who visited him there. (Philippians 1:1; Colossians 1:1; Philemon 1:1). While Paul was in prison, he sent Timothy on yet another errand. (Philippians 2:19-23).
f.
Hebrews 13:23 speaks of an imprisonment for Timothy of which we have no other record.
g.
The particular concern of our study is: where was Timothy when he received Paul’s letter or letters? 1 Timothy 1:3; 2 Timothy 1:16-18; 2 Timothy 4:19 seem to leave little doubt that he was in the city of Ephesus, at work with the church in this great city. We refer you to another Bible Study Textbook for further information about this church and city. (Read from THE GLORIOUS CHURCH pp. 12-16)
h.
Timothy did not have an easy field in which to labor. A most important question has to do with the position or office held by Timothy, and whether it has any example for us. There seems to be a rather unanimous opinion among commentators, that Timothy was an apostolic representative, or one who acted for the apostle Paul in Paul’s absence. We quote from Homer A. Kent who holds this view with a number of others:
The functions which Timothy fulfilled in the early church should not be confused with the present-day pastor. Rather, in those formative days of the church, he seems to have been one of several who helped to carry out the transition from the times of the apostles to the post Apostolic era of the church. In the beginning of the church, the authority of the apostles brought into being the church, and served to guide and instruct it. Although it seems clear that from the beginning local churches were congregationally controlled, still the influence of the apostles was strong. Timothy, therefore, was an apostolic representative. He exercised the guidance and counseling ministry that Paul would have performed had he been present. Titus occupied a similar position (Titus 1:5). Thus it is probably not correct to visualize Timothy as the pastor of the local Christian church at Ephesus. Rather, he was Paul’s official delegate to assist the Ephesian church with its officials in conducting affairs in the proper manner. (The Pastoral Epistles pp. 19, 20)
What shall we say to these things? Is there an office of evangelist today? We advance four reasons for believing we do have a present day office of evangelist:
(1)
The nature of the work assigned to the evangelist makes the office a perpetual one. Their job was to convert sinners, to feed the flock of God, to teach the ignorant, While time endures, this will be necessary. Therefore the office must be perpetual,
(2)
Evangelists from the beginning received their commission from churches, and not directly from Christ, as did the apostles and prophets, This can be shown in the case of Timothy, in which the hands of the eldership or presbytery were laid upon him. (Acts 14:1-3, 1 Timothy 4:14). The imposition of the hands of the eldership (probably of Lystra and Iconium) was for the purpose of setting him aside for the work upon which he was embarking. Paul laid his hands upon Timothy (2 Timothy 1:6) to impart to him those miraculous gifts, which in that age were necessary in order to enable him to fulfill the commission which he had received from the church of Lystra and Iconium. Since we still have local churches after the order of those of that day, we have the prerogative of setting aside evangelists.
(3)
Paul told Timothy to choose certain faithful men and commit to them what Paul had committed to Timothy. (2 Timothy 2:2). This hardly needs comment; it is only necessary to ask, what was the work of Timothy, and then realize that he was to commit that work to others and then they in turn were urged to commit the work to others. If this admonition was followed by Timothy and those who succeeded him, we have the permanence of the office assured!
(4)
The office has actually been continued from the beginning to the present day. That evangelist was the name by which these servants of the church were usually designated in primitive times, seems evident from the testimony of several of the Christian fathers, Eusebius, for instance, the learned Bishop of Caesarea, A.D. 315-340, thus speaks of evangelists who lived and labored during the reign of Trajan A.D. 98-117.
What do we know of Titus? We quote from Bible Teacher and Leaderarticle by Lewis C. Foster: The parents and home community of Titus are not known. It is made clear, however, that he was a Gentile; and he was at Antioch of Syria either fourteen or seventeen years after Paul became a Christian. (See Galatians 1:18; Galatians 2:1). From this time on he was a close companion of Paul, entrusted with important tasks and held in high esteem by the apostle. It is strange that his name does not appear in the book of Acts. Since Luke omits his own name also, it has been suggested that Titus was a relative of the author, or in some way was so close to him that Luke deliberately refrained from mentioning him by name. At any rate, we can conclude that Titus was included in the company that went to Jerusalem from Antioch when the question of keeping the old law was disturbing the church. Acts makes it clear that certain other of them went up with Paul and Barnabas to Jerusalem (Acts 15:2), and then we read explicitly in Galatians 2:1 that they took Titus with them. After this occasion, Titus does not figure in the New Testament records until Paul is at Ephesus, on his third missionary journey, and is writing to the church at Corinth. Here it becomes evident that Titus, along with an unnamed brother, had been sent by Paul to Corinth to represent Paul and the gospel, perhaps to deliver Paul’s first letter to them, and to defend the right. Later Paul, failing to find him in Troas, became so anxious to know of the state of affairs in Corinth that he advanced to meet the returning Titus in Macedonia. Here, Paul’s heart was made glad when he learned from Titus that the Corinthians had accepted his rebukes and corrections in a proper way. Out of comfort and relief Paul wrote his second epistle to them. In all there are seven references to Titus in 2 Corinthians (2 Corinthians 2:13; 2 Corinthians 7:6; 2 Corinthians 7:13-14; 2 Corinthians 8:6; 2 Corinthians 8:16; 2 Corinthians 8:23; 2 Corinthians 12:18). From this we also learn that Titus had special responsibilities in making the collection for the poor in Jerusalem. Following this we know nothing of the movements of Titus until Paul addressed a letter to him in Crete. It becomes evident that after Paul’s release from his first Roman imprisonment, he did missionary work on the island of Crete and left Titus there to lead in the continuing work, even as he left Timothy at Ephesus. In this epistle Titus is asked to join Paul at Nicopolis as soon as he is contacted by Artemas Or Tychicus (Titus 3:12); but whether these plans were carried out we do not know. In his last epistle Paul states that Titus has gone to Dalmatia (2 Timothy 4:10). It seems unfair to suppose that this was against Paul’s wishes, as was the desertion by Demas (2 Timothy 4:10). Rather, Crescens had gone to Galatia and Titus to Dalmatia as Paul had directed them, Since no previous word had been given of work done in Dalmatia, this may have been a missionary enterprise into a new field. Dalmatia was northwest of Macedonia, and may have been Titus-’ next destination after a stay at Nicopolis, Some suggest that Titus was older than Timothy (compare 1 Timothy 4:12 and Titus 2:15) and was chosen for situations that demanded the stronger and more understanding character. The apostle calls Titus mine own son (Titus 1:4). He also accepts him as his brother (2 Corinthians 2:13) and his partner and fellowhelper (2 Corinthians 8:23). Although Titus is not called an overseer in the sense of an elder or bishop, nevertheless he was a capable shepherd for the Christian flock as a representative for the apostle Paul in the service of the Lord. It is impossible to measure the power of his influence in the church, but we can be sure it was great.
What was the purpose or purposes of these letters? Obviously the purpose was to prepare Timothy to do an effective work for Christ in Ephesus. The church had been established in this great city for some years before. Paul himself had labored in Ephesus for a longer period of time than at any other place. (Acts 20:31). Titus was sent or left on the isle of Crete for the same purpose. The letters are not only personal but official.
The epistle of II Timothy has less of the general instructions for the church than those of I Timothy and Titus. The student will note the sense of authority in the words of I Timothy. Timothy was expected by Paul to deliver the instructions he gave him to all the churches in Ephesus; and perchance also to the seven churches of Asia, Titus was likewise to use the letter of Paul as an authoritative document in his work among the churches in Crete.
The question has been raised as to our relationship to these letters. Are we to conclude that Timothy and Titus were special personal representatives of Paul, and therefore such instructions as found in these letters were given only and exclusively to them? No one wants to hold this position with all its implications, for there is too much in these letters applicable to present day church administration; particularly is this true of the eldership. (See 1 Timothy 3:1-11). Why hold the position at all if we are not willing to accept its implications? We are all willing to conclude that these two men had powers we do not now possess, but what work were they to do apart from the exercise of supernatural powers that we cannot fulfill today?
On what shall we base our conclusion that Timothy and Titus were to act in Paul’s place in Paul’s absence? Can we not carry out in our community what Paul told Timothy to do in the community of Ephesus? We yet have the heavenly oracles, and the same need. The letters were written as an encouragement to the men who received them; as a means of setting the churches in order. But these letters were also written as a grand means of establishing the kingdom of God in the world today!
How shall we outline this book?
Here are four examples by men who have done it:
WILBUR SMITH First Timothy Outlined
Everyone agrees that the outlining of the pastoral epistles is quite difficult, since they were not written with the idea of carrying through a logical argument, as were the letters to the Ephesians and the Romans. I have spent some time attempting to outline the First Epistle of Timothy, and have taught the pastoral epistles here at the Fuller Theological Seminary in an elective course. At last I think I have worked out, together with my students, what might be considered as satisfactory an outline as can be constructed. Some of my readers might like to have such an outline possibly to insert in the margin of this portion of the New Testament.
Salutation, 1 Timothy 1:1-2
I.
Paul’s First General Charge to Timothy, 1 Timothy 1:3-20
A charge regarding the need for constant watchfulness lest false doctrines appear, 1 Timothy 1:3-11
A word of encouragement by Paul’s review of his own experience, 1 Timothy 1:12-16
A doxology, 1 Timothy 1:17
An exhortation to be faithful to his original call to the ministry, 1 Timothy 1:18-20
II.
Certain Aspects of Life in the Christian Church, 1 Timothy 2:1, 1 Timothy 3:16
The practice of prayer, 1 Timothy 2:1-8
The place of women in the church, 1 Timothy 2:9-15
Qualifications for church officers, 1 Timothy 3:1-13
a.
for bishops, 1 Timothy 1:1-7
b.
for deacons, 1 Timothy 1:8-13
A personal exhortation to Timothy, 1 Timothy 1:14-15
A doxology, 1 Timothy 1:16
III.
A Prophecy Concerning Apostasy in the Last Days 1 Timothy 4:1-5
IV.
The Characteristics that Should be Displayed by a Good Minister of Christ, 1 Timothy 4:6-16
In general, 1 Timothy 1:6-11
In particular, 1 Timothy 1:12-16
V.
Ideals of Conduct for Certain Groups in the Church, 1 Timothy 5:1-25; 1 Timothy 6:1-2
Respect for the aged, 1 Timothy 5:1-2
The conduct of women, 1 Timothy 5:3-16
The work of the elders, 1 Timothy 5:17-22
A general exhortation, 1 Timothy 5:23-25
The relation of master and servants, 1 Timothy 6:1-2
VI.
Final Exhortation and Warnings, 1 Timothy 6:3-21
Some perils to be avoided, 1 Timothy 6:3-10
A final charge to Timothy, 1 Timothy 6:11-14
A doxology, 1 Timothy 6:15-16
A warning to the rich, 1 Timothy 6:17-19
A concluding word of warning to Timothy, 1 Timothy 6:20-21
HOMER A. KENT Outline of I Timothy Chapter One
Introductory Matters (1 Timothy 1:1-2)
I.
CHARGE CONCERNING SOUND DOCTRINE (1 Timothy 1:3-20)
A.
The Danger to Sound Doctrine In Ephesus (1 Timothy 1:3-11)
Teachers who taught another doctrine.
Teachers who failed to use God’s Law properly.
B.
The Outstanding Illustration Of The Results of Sound Doctrine (1 Timothy 1:12-17)
Paul’s former life of Lawkeeping was a life of unbelief.
Paul’s present life in the ministry was the result of mercy and grace,
Paul’s conversion was planned as a pattern to future believers.
C.
The Responsibility Of The Minister Toward Sound Doctrine (1 Timothy 1:18-20)
The responsibility expressed by formal charge.
The responsibility illustrated by two examples.
Outline of I Timothy Chapter Two
II.
CHARGE CONCERNING PUBLIC WORSHIP (1 Timothy 2:1-15)
A.
Prayer in Public Worship (1 Timothy 2:1-7)
The kinds of prayer.
The objects of prayer.
The reason for prayer.
The basis for prayer.
B.
Men and Women In Public Worship (1 Timothy 2:8-15)
Conduct of the men.
Conduct of the women.
Outline of I Timothy Chapter Three
III.
CHARGE CONCERNING CHURCH OFFICERS (1 Timothy 3:1-16)
A.
Office of the Overseer (1 Timothy 3:1-7)
Nature of the office.
Qualifications for the office.
a.
General qualification.
b.
Moral qualification.
c.
Mental qualifications.
d.
Personality qualifications.
e.
Domestic qualification.
f.
Christian experience.
g.
Reputation.
B.
Office of the Deacon (1 Timothy 3:8-13)
Nature of the office.
Qualifications for the office.
a.
Personal character.
b.
Spiritual life.
c.
Christian experience.
d.
Morality.
e.
Domestic relations.
Qualifications for women servants.
The encouragement for deacons.
C.
The Importance Of This Charge To the Church (1 Timothy 3:14-16)
Outline of I Timothy Chapter Four
IV.
CHARGE CONCERNING FALSE TEACHERS (1 Timothy 4:1-16)
A.
The appearance of False Teachers (1 Timothy 4:1-5)
The time of these teachers.
The description of these teachers.
The teaching of these teachers.
The refutation of these teachers.
B.
The Duty of the Minister Toward False Teachers (1 Timothy 4:6-10)
Constructive teaching.
Godly living.
Faithful laboring.
C.
The Encouragement of the Minister Toward a Constructive Ministry (1 Timothy 4:11-16)
In public life.
In personal life.
Outline of I Timothy Chapter Five
V.
CHARGE CONCERNING VARIOUS MEMBERS OF THE CONGREGATION (1 Timothy 5:1-25; 1 Timothy 6:1-2)
A.
The Pastoral Care of Old and Young Members (1 Timothy 5:1-2)
The persons involved.
The nature of the pastoral care.
The manner of pastoral care.
B.
The Pastoral Care of Widows (1 Timothy 5:3-16)
The kind of widows.
The treatment of widows.
C.
The Pastoral Care of Elders (1 Timothy 5:17-25)
The honoring of elders.
The discipline of elders,
The selection of elders,
D.
The Pastoral Care of Slaves (1 Timothy 6:1-2)
A slave should serve his unsaved master respectfully.
A slave should give his Christian master even more service, and not look down upon him.
Outline of I Timothy Chapter Six
VI.
CHARGE CONCERNING THE MINISTER HIMSELF (1 Timothy 6:3-21 a)
A.
The Minister is Charged to Avoid Improper Motives (1 Timothy 6:3-10)
The evidence of wrong motives.
The nature of wrong motives.
The prevention of wrong motives.
The results of a wrong motive.
B.
The Minister is Charged to Maintain a Proper Walk (1 Timothy 6:11-16).
The nature of a proper walk.
The performance of a proper walk.
The incentive for a proper walk.
C.
The Minister is Charged to Perform a Faithful Ministry (1 Timothy 6:17-21 a)
This is accomplished by directing men toward spiritual goals.
This is accomplished by guarding the deposit of the faith.
D.
Conclusion (1 Timothy 6:21 b)
D. EDMOND HIEBERT
AN OUTLINE OF I TIMOTHY
THE SALUTATION, 1 Timothy 1:1-2
The Writer, 1 Timothy 1:1
The Reader, 1 Timothy 1:2 a
The Greeting, 1 Timothy 1:2 b.
I.
THE CHARGE TO TIMOTHY CONCERNING FALSE TEACHERS, 1 Timothy 1:3-20
The Charge to Timothy to Preserve the Purity of the Gospel, 1 Timothy 1:3-11
a.
The nature of the charge, 1 Timothy 1:3-4
The impartation of the charge, 1 Timothy 1:3 a
The contents of the charge, 1 Timothy 1:3 b, 1 Timothy 1:4
b.
The aim of the charge, 1 Timothy 1:5
c.
The reason for the charge, 1 Timothy 1:6-11
The failure of the false teachers, 1 Timothy 1:6-7
The true knowledge concerning the law, 1 Timothy 1:8-11
a)
The nature of the law, 1 Timothy 1:8
b)
The purpose of the law, 1 Timothy 1:9-10
c)
The harmony of this view with the Gospel, 1 Timothy 1:11
The Apostle’s Thanksgiving for His Relation to the Gospel, 1 Timothy 1:12-17
a.
The thanksgiving for his appointment to God’s service, 1 Timothy 1:12
b.
The description of the one appointed, 1 Timothy 1:13 a
c.
The explanation of the appointment, 1 Timothy 1:13 b - 1 Timothy 1:16
The outpouring of God’s grace on him, 1 Timothy 1:13 b, 1 Timothy 1:14
The purpose of God’s grace through him, 1 Timothy 1:15-16 d. The doxology of praise, 1 Timothy 1:17
The Renewal of the Charge to Timothy, 1 Timothy 1:18-20
a.
The duty of Timothy, 1 Timothy 1:18-19 a
b.
The shipwreck of certain men, 1 Timothy 1:19 b, 1 Timothy 1:20
II.
THE INSTRUCTIONS CONCERNING CHURCH ORDER, 1 Timothy 2:1-15; 1 Timothy 3:1-16.
The Regulations Concerning Public Worship, 1 Timothy 2:1-15; 1 Timothy 3:1-16.
a.
The duty of public prayer, 1 Timothy 2:1-7
The nature of public prayer, 1 Timothy 2:1 a
The scope of public prayer, 1 Timothy 2:1 b - 1 Timothy 2:2 a
The result of such praying, 1 Timothy 2:2 b
The reasons for such prayer, 1 Timothy 2:3-7
a)
Its intrinsic nature, 1 Timothy 2:3
b)
Its accord with God’s will, 1 Timothy 2:4
c)
Its accord with Christian doctrine, 1 Timothy 2:5-6
d)
Its accord with Paul’s ministry, 1 Timothy 2:7
b.
The manner of public prayer, 1 Timothy 2:8-10
The praying of the men, 1 Timothy 2:8
The adorning of the women, 1 Timothy 2:9-10
c.
The position of the women in public worship, 1 Timothy 2:11-15
The command concerning the woman, 1 Timothy 2:11
The restriction upon the woman, 1 Timothy 2:12
The vindication of the restriction, 1 Timothy 2:13-15
a)
The vindication from the order of creation, 1 Timothy 2:13
b)
The vindication from the story of the fall, 1 Timothy 2:14-15
The Qualifications of Church Officers, 1 Timothy 3:1-13
a.
The qualifications for a bishop, 1 Timothy 3:1-7
The desirability of the office, 1 Timothy 3:1
The qualifications for the office, 1 Timothy 3:2-7
a)
The first seven qualifications, 1 Timothy 3:2
b)
The second seven qualifications, 1 Timothy 3:3-6
c)
The qualifications as to community standing, 1 Timothy 3:7
b.
The qualifications for deacons. 1 Timothy 3:8-12
The personal qualifications of the deacons, 1 Timothy 3:8-9
The testing of deacons, 1 Timothy 3:10
The qualifications of the women (deaconesses), 1 Timothy 3:11
The domestic qualifications of deacons, 1 Timothy 3:12
c.
The reward of faithful service, 1 Timothy 3:13
The Personal Word to Timothy in View of Christian Truth. 1 Timothy 3:14-16
a.
The purpose in writing to Timothy, 1 Timothy 3:14-15 a
b.
The nature of the church, 1 Timothy 3:15 b
c.
The substance of Christian truth, 1 Timothy 3:16
III.
THE ADVICE TO TIMOTHY IN VIEW OF THE CHARGE, 1 Timothy 4:1-16; 1 Timothy 5:1-25; 1 Timothy 6:1-2
His Personal Work in View of the Apostasy, 1 Timothy 4:1-16.
a.
The objective warning against false teaching, 1 Timothy 4:1-5
The prediction of the apostasy, 1 Timothy 4:1 a
The characterization of the apostates, 1 Timothy 4:1 b. 1 Timothy 4:2
The teaching of the apostates, 1 Timothy 4:3-5
a)
The nature of the teaching, 1 Timothy 4:3 a
b)
The refutation of the teaching, 1 Timothy 4:3 b - 1 Timothy 4:5
b.
The subjective fortification against error, 1 Timothy 4:6-16
The fortification through a faithful ministry, 1 Timothy 4:6-11
a)
The characteristics of a good minister, 1 Timothy 4:6
b)
The activity of a good minister, 1 Timothy 4:7-9
(1)
Neg. The refusal of myths, 1 Timothy 4:7 a
(2)
Pos. The exercising of himself unto godliness, 1 Timothy 4:7 b - 1 Timothy 4:9
c)
The motivation of the good minister, 1 Timothy 4:10
d)
The duty of the good minister, 1 Timothy 4:11
The fortification through becoming conduct as a minister, 1 Timothy 4:12-16
a)
The indication of his personal duties, 1 Timothy 4:12-14
(1)
To make his youth respected because of his example, 1 Timothy 4:12
(2)
To attend to the public services, 1 Timothy 4:13
(3)
To exercise his gift, 1 Timothy 4:14
b)
The exhortations diligently to fulfill these duties, 1 Timothy 4:15-16
His Official Work with Various Groups, 1 Timothy 5:1-25; 1 Timothy 6:1-2
a.
The attitude in dealing with individual members, 1 Timothy 5:1-2
b.
The duty in regard to widows, 1 Timothy 5:3-16
The duty of supporting widows, 1 Timothy 5:3-8
a)
The command to honor genuine widows, 1 Timothy 5:3
b)
The definitive classification of widows, 1 Timothy 5:4-6
(1)
The widow having children, 1 Timothy 5:4
(2)
The widow who is a genuine widow, 1 Timothy 5:5
(3)
The widow living in pleasure, 1 Timothy 5:6
c)
The instructions concerning parental support. 1 Timothy 5:7-8
The instructions concerning the enrollment of widows, 1 Timothy 5:9-15
a)
The qualifications of those enrolled, 1 Timothy 5:9-10
b)
The rejection of the young widows, 1 Timothy 5:11-13
(1)
The command to reject the young widows. 1 Timothy 5:11 a
(2)
The reasons for the rejection, 1 Timothy 5:11 b - 1 Timothy 4:13
c)
The apostolic directive for young widows, 1 Timothy 5:14-15
The duty of a believing woman, 1 Timothy 5:16
c.
The duty toward elders, 1 Timothy 5:17-25
The duty of honoring good elders, 1 Timothy 5:17-18
a)
The statement of the duty, 1 Timothy 5:17
b)
The substantiation of the duty, 1 Timothy 5:18
The instructions concerning the trial of an elder, 1 Timothy 5:19-21
a)
The caution in receiving an accusation against an elder, 1 Timothy 5:19
b)
The judgment upon the sinning, 1 Timothy 5:20
c)
The impartiality in the judgment, 1 Timothy 5:21
The advice concerning the ordination of elders, 1 Timothy 5:22
The suggestion concerning Timothy’s use of a little wine, 1 Timothy 5:23
The enunciation of principles for testing candidates, 1 Timothy 5:24-25
d.
The instructions concerning the slaves, 1 Timothy 6:1-2
The duty of slaves toward unbelieving masters, 1 Timothy 5:1
The duty of the slave of a believer, 1 Timothy 5:2 a
The duty of Timothy to teach these things, 1 Timothy 5:2 b
IV.
THE CONCLUDING INSTRUCTIONS AND EXHORTATIONS TO TIMOTHY, 1 Timothy 6:3-21 a
The Description of the False Teacher, 1 Timothy 6:3-5
a.
The identification of the false teacher, 1 Timothy 6:3
b.
The verdict on the false teacher, 1 Timothy 6:4-5
The Relation of Godliness and Wealth, 1 Timothy 6:6-10
a.
The gain of true godliness, 1 Timothy 6:6-8
The gain of godliness with contentment, 1 Timothy 6:6
The nature of godly contentment, 1 Timothy 6:7-8
b.
The danger to those seeking wealth, 1 Timothy 6:9-10
The nature of the danger, 1 Timothy 6:9
The reason for the danger, 1 Timothy 6:10 a
The verification of the danger, 1 Timothy 6:10 b
The Exhortation to an Active Life in View of Christ’s Return, 1 Timothy 6:11-16
a.
The characterization of the one addressed, 1 Timothy 6:11 a
b.
The statement of the specific duties, 1 Timothy 6:11 b, 1 Timothy 6:12
c.
The restatement of the charge, 1 Timothy 6:13-16
The solemnity of the charge, 1 Timothy 6:13
The contents of the charge, 1 Timothy 6:14 a
The termination of the charge, 1 Timothy 6:14 b - 1 Timothy 6:16
a)
The statement of the termination, 1 Timothy 6:14 b
b)
The explanation of the termination, 1 Timothy 6:14 b - 1 Timothy 6:16
The Charge Concerning the Rich, 1 Timothy 6:17-19
a.
The persons to be charged, 1 Timothy 6:17 a
b.
The contents of the charge, 1 Timothy 6:17 b, 1 Timothy 6:18
Neg.The dangers they are to avoid, 1 Timothy 6:17 b
Pos.The duties they are to fulfill, 1 Timothy 6:18
c.
The encouragement in carrying out the charge, 1 Timothy 6:19
The Final Appeal to Timothy, 1 Timothy 6:20-21 a
a.
The positive appeal to guard the deposit, 1 Timothy 6:20 a
b.
The safeguard in rejecting the spurious, 1 Timothy 6:20 b - 1 Timothy 6:21 a
THE BENEDICTION, 1 Timothy 6:21 b
DONALD GUTHRIE
I TIMOTHY: ANALYSIS
I.
THE APOSTLE AND TIMOTHY, 1 Timothy 1:1-20
(a)
Salutation, 1 Timothy 1:1-2
(b)
The contrast between the gospel and its counterfeits, 1 Timothy 1:3-11
(c)
The apostle’s personal experience of the gospel, 1 Timothy 1:12-17
(d)
The apostle’s charge to Timothy, 1 Timothy 1:18-20
II.
WORSHIP AND ORDER IN THE CHURCH, 1 Timothy 2:1 - 1Ti 4:16
(a)
The importance and scope of public prayer, 1 Timothy 2:1-8
(b)
The status and demeanour of Christian women, 1 Timothy 2:9-15
(c)
The qualifications of Church officials, 1 Timothy 3:1-13
(d)
The character of the Church, 1 Timothy 3:14-16
(e)
Threats to the safety of the Church, 1 Timothy 4:1-16
(i)
The approaching apostasy, 1 Timothy 4:1-5
(ii)
Methods of dealing with false teaching, 1 Timothy 4:6-16
III.
DISCIPLINE AND RESPONSIBILITY, 1 Timothy 5:1 - 1Ti 6:2
(a)
Various age groups, 1 Timothy 5:1-2
(b)
Widows, 1 Timothy 5:3-16
(i)
Widows in need, 1 Timothy 5:3-8
(ii)
Widows as Christian Workers, 1 Timothy 5:9-10
(iii) Younger widows, 1 Timothy 5:11-16
(c)
Elders, 1 Timothy 5:17-20
(d)
Timothy’s own behaviour, 1 Timothy 5:21-25
(e)
Servants and Masters, 1 Timothy 6:1-2
IV.
MISCELLANEOUS INJUNCTIONS, 1 Timothy 5:3-21
(a)
More about false teachers, 1 Timothy 6:3-5
(b)
The perils of wealth, 1 Timothy 6:6-10
(c)
A charge to a man of God, 1 Timothy 6:11-16
(d)
Advice to wealthy men, 1 Timothy 6:17-19
(e)
Final admonition to Timothy, 1 Timothy 6:20-21
How will you outline the letter? Please make up your own outline. Do this by reading the epistle no less than five times, Check the four outlines as you read the letter. If you can not agree with the partitioning of the commentators you are under no obligation to accept such, You are obligated before God to attempt a careful analysis for your own understanding; and that you might be able to teach others.
AN EXEGETICAL STUDY OF 1 TIMOTHY
We prefer a dividing of the text in the following order;
Introduction 1:1, 2
I.
Sound Doctrine 1 Timothy 1:3-20
Danger to sound doctrine. 1 Timothy 1:3-11
Example of sound doctrine. 1 Timothy 1:12-17
The preacher and sound doctrine. 1 Timothy 1:18-20
II.
Public Worship 1 Timothy 2:1-15
Prayer. 1 Timothy 2:1-7
Men and women in worship. 1 Timothy 2:8-15
III.
Church Officers. 1 Timothy 3:1-16
The elder. 1 Timothy 3:1-7
The deacon. 1 Timothy 3:8-13
Importance of instructions. 1 Timothy 3:14-16
IV.
False Teachers 1 Timothy 4:1-16
Their coming. 1 Timothy 4:1-5
The preacher and the false teachers. 1 Timothy 4:6-10
The true service of God. 1 Timothy 4:11-16
V.
Care of Members of the Church. 1 Timothy 5:1-25; 1 Timothy 6:1-2
Care of young and old. 1 Timothy 5:1-2
Care of widows. 1 Timothy 5:3-16
Care of elders. 1 Timothy 5:17-25
Care of slaves. 1 Timothy 6:1-2
VI.
The Minister Himself. 1 Timothy 6:3-21 a
Motives. 1 Timothy 6:3-10
Proper walk. 1 Timothy 6:11-16
Faithful ministry. 1 Timothy 6:17-21 a
Conclusion 1 Timothy 6:21 b
We shall follow this outline throughout the rest of our study.
EXAMINATION OVER PAUL’S FIRST LETTER TO TIMOTHY
Reproduce the outline of the letter.
Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus according to the Commandment of God our Saviour. Explain the Commandment in this verse.
… and the goal of the charge is love out of a pure heart.. Explain the charge, and the arrival at the goal, i.e. how the goal is achieved.
But we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully.. Explain the lawful use of the law.
.. but I received mercy because being ignorant I acted in unbelief. Show how ignorance relates to mercybe careful here.
.. the prophecies which led the way to you, that you might wage in them the good warfare.. Explain the prophecies, and Timothy’s use of them.
In order that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity. What is going to provide this type of life? Explain the cause of which this is a result,
I desire therefore, that men pray in every place, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and disputing. Discuss the connection between prayer, wrath and disputing.
Give the two reasons for saying: I do not permit a woman to teach.
Faithful is the Word: if someone reaches after an overseership, he desires a good work. Discuss the words: reaches after and good work.
Discuss two mental qualifications, and two personality qualifications of the bishop.
Would a man who had developed the ability to superintend well by other means than rearing a family, be excluded from the eldership? If so why? If not why not?
Explain the following phrase: And let these first be tested.
Is there room for females in the office of deacon? Discuss.
Give meaning to the following: Because every created thing of God is good, and nothing to be thrown away, being received with thanksgiving: for it is sanctified thru God’s word and petition. Explain especially the last phrase.
Explain how godliness is profitable for all things.
What gift or gifts did Timothy have? How did he get them? What was he to do with them?
Answer the following questions about the enrollment of widows: 1) What is the meaning of the term enrollment? 2) For what purpose? 3) What qualifications? (state and explain at least two) 4) Should we practice it now?
What is the double honor of the elders?
Who is the blessed and only potentate.. Please explain from the context why you answer as you do.
EXEGETICAL EXAMINATION ON I TIMOTHY CHAPTER ONE
Give from memory an outline of this chapter.
Explain the commandment of God as in 1 Timothy 1:1.
Tell why you believe what you do about Timothy’s relationship to Paul as his child.
Explain endless genealogieswhy endless?
Define: dispensation of God which is in faith.
What is: the end of the charge?
In what sense is, the law good?
Why list all the sinners of 1 Timothy 1:8-11?
Give the meaning of the phrase: contrary to the sound doctrine.
Give the meaning of the word, faithful, as in 1 Timothy 1:12.
Why would God grant mercy to someone who acted in ignorance and unbelief any more readily than He would to one who did not? Or is this the meaning of the phrase?
In what way did Paul become an example to all those who would come after him?
Explain the prophecies as in 1 Timothy 1:18. How would Timothy use them?
What was it that caused the shipwreck of some?
How would the action taken upon Hymenaeus and Alexander teach them?
1 Timothy 1:1-2
**INTRODUCTION 1:1, 2
Text 1:1, 2
1 Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus according to the commandment of God our Saviour, and Christ Jesus our hope: 2 unto Timothy, my true child in faith: Grace, mercy, peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Lord.
Thought Questions 1:1, 2**
When, and where, and why did God command Paul to be an apostle?
In what sense can God be referred to as our Saviour?
Christ is our hope in a particular sense; explain.
Is there any significance in the arrangement of the name Christ Jesus instead of Jesus Christ?
Why call Timothy a true child? Did Paul mean there were some who were not?
Show the inter-relation of the words: grace, mercy, peace. Could we arrange these words in a different order? Should we do so? Why?
Paraphrase 1:1, 2
1 I Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ, write this epistle by the commandment of God, the contriver of our salvation, and of the Lord Jesus Christ, on whose death, and not on the sacrifices of the law, our hope of eternal life is founded, 2 To Timothy, who is my genuine son in the faith, being like-minded, with myself: May gracious assistances, merciful deliverances, such as I have obtained, and inward peace from God our Father, and Christ Jesus our Lord, be multiplied to thee.
**Comment 1:1, 2
1 Timothy 1:1.** Although this is a personal letter it carries Apostolic authority, It is to be read to others and referred to, again and again for divine confirmation of these things taught by Timothy, The reference to Paul’s apostleship was not for Timothy’s benefit, but for those of Ephesus among whom Timothy was working. Is Paul stating here that God commanded him to be an apostle, or that God commanded him to write the letter? We much prefer the thought of his apostleship, It seems artificial to supply the thought that God commanded him to write. We can recall immediately when and where God called or commanded him to be an apostle. The word apostle means one sent, There were some persons designated as apostles, who were sent from the churches. (Cf. Philippians 2:25, 2 Corinthians 8:23, Acts 14:14) There were only twelve and Paul as apostles of Christ Jesus, or sent from Christ Jesus.
Why say Christ Jesus and not Jesus Christ? Remember that each name has a meaning. The writer is not using the order with no thought. The office of the Christ, i.e. the anointed one is more prominent here. In its context we can see why. Paul is one sent by the anointed one and this is in accord with the command from such,
God is here called our Saviour. The expression is found only in the Pastorals. Why? Could it be that Timothy and those of Ephesus needed to be reminded of the ultimate source of our salvation? Christ could never have provided our salvation if God had not sent Him. Paul said elsewhere in hope were we saved (Romans 8:24). It is God who saved us, but it is Christ Jesus who provides the hope in such salvation. Thus Paul is commanded by the fountain of our salvation and the embodiment of our hope to be an apostle.
**1 Timothy 1:2. **Are we to understand that Paul is addressing Timothy as his son in the faith or is he referring to the genuiness of Timothy’s Christian character? There is a division of opinion on this point. Since Timothy was a convert of Paul, and since he did refer to such relationship in other places, such would not be unusual here. The issue to decide, is whether Paul wants to relate Timothy to himself, or to what Paul has just written. Paul spoke of his own relationship to God and Christ; what is the relationship of Timothy? Is Timothy a genuine child of the faithor a genuine child of Paul’s in the faith? Which is it? Are not both true?
The divine blessing pronounced by Paul on Timothy is a most interesting one. In other epistles grace and peace are in the greetings, but nowhere do we find mercy except in the Pastorals. Why would Timothy need mercyperhaps more than others? Mercy has to do with God’s acceptance in spite of our failures. Was Timothy in some special need of such treatment? Perhaps he was. Some see an inter-relationship between these words. Grace first, to forgive our past sins, mercy to overlook our present failures, this results in peace in our hearts. How did Paul imagine such blessings would be bestowed? In obedience to the divine laws of God we shall have the divine benefits attached thereto.
Fact Questions 1:1, 2
Explain the use of the word apostle both generally and specifically.
What is the application of the word command as here used?
Specify just how God becomes our Saviour.
Jesus is our hope in what areas?
In what sense was Timothy a genuine child?
Show the inter-relationship of: grace, mercy and peace.
EXAMINATION OVER PAUL’S FIRST LETTER TO TIMOTHY
Reproduce the outline of the letter.
Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus according to the Commandment of God our Saviour. Explain the Commandment in this verse.
… and the goal of the charge is love out of a pure heart.. Explain the charge, and the arrival at the goal, i.e. how the goal is achieved.
But we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully.. Explain the lawful use of the law.
.. but I received mercy because being ignorant I acted in unbelief. Show how ignorance relates to mercybe careful here.
.. the prophecies which led the way to you, that you might wage in them the good warfare.. Explain the prophecies, and Timothy’s use of them.
In order that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity. What is going to provide this type of life? Explain the cause of which this is a result,
I desire therefore, that men pray in every place, lifting up holy hands, without wrath and disputing. Discuss the connection between prayer, wrath and disputing.
Give the two reasons for saying: I do not permit a woman to teach.
Faithful is the Word: if someone reaches after an overseership, he desires a good work. Discuss the words: reaches after and good work.
Discuss two mental qualifications, and two personality qualifications of the bishop.
Would a man who had developed the ability to superintend well by other means than rearing a family, be excluded from the eldership? If so why? If not why not?
Explain the following phrase: And let these first be tested.
Is there room for females in the office of deacon? Discuss.
Give meaning to the following: Because every created thing of God is good, and nothing to be thrown away, being received with thanksgiving: for it is sanctified thru God’s word and petition. Explain especially the last phrase.
Explain how godliness is profitable for all things.
What gift or gifts did Timothy have? How did he get them? What was he to do with them?
Answer the following questions about the enrollment of widows: 1) What is the meaning of the term enrollment? 2) For what purpose? 3) What qualifications? (state and explain at least two) 4) Should we practice it now?
What is the double honor of the elders?
Who is the blessed and only potentate.. Please explain from the context why you answer as you do.
1 Timothy 1:3-7
1. SOUND DOCTRINE 1:3-20
DANGER TO SOUND DOCTRINE 1 Timothy 1:3-11
a.
False Teachers. 1 Timothy 1:3-7
**Text 1:3-7
3 As I exhorted thee to tarry at Ephesus, When I was going into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge certain men not to teach a different doctrine, 4 neither to give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questionings, rather than a dispensation of God which is in faith; so do I now. 5 But the end of the charge is love out of a pure heart and a good conscience and faith unfeigned: 6 from which things some having swerved have turned aside unto vain talking; 7 desiring to be teachers of the law, though they understand neither what they say, nor whereof they confidently affirm.
Thought Questions 1:3-7**
What seems to be the specific purpose of this letter to Timothy?
How would Timothy know if the doctrine of certain men was false or true?
Just imagine such teachers in our churches today; how could we carry out Paul’s instructions?
Why were such persons so interested in fables and genealogies? Where did they find them?
Paul did not want questionings; he did want a dispensation of God; Explain the difference.
What is meant by saying the end of the charge? Is Paul suggesting that some of the teachers in Ephesus did not have a pure heart?
How could anyone teach that which he did not know? Explain,
What were these men confidently affirming?
Paraphrase 1:3-7
3 As I entreated thee to continue in Ephesus, when I was going into Macedonia, I now, by commandment of God, require thee so to do; that thou mayest charge the Judaizers not to teach differently from the inspired apostles of Christ. 4 Nor to inculcate fabulous traditions, invented to prove that men cannot be saved unless they obey the law of Moses; and uncertain genealogies, by which every Jew endeavors to trace his descent from Abraham, and which by their uncertainty occasion disputes, rather than the great edification which is through a right faith only. 5 Now the scope of the charge to be given by thee to these teachers is, that instead of inculcating fables and genealogies, they inculcate love to God and man proceeding from a pure heart, and directed by a good conscience, and nourished by unfeigned faith in the gospel doctrine.
6 From which things some teachers having swerved, have in their discourses turned aside to foolish talking; talking which serves no purpose but to discover their own folly, and to nourish folly in their disciples. 7 As thou mayest know by this, that they set themselves up as teachers of the law of Moses, though they understand neither what they themselves say concerning it, nor the nature of the law they establish.
**Comment 1:3-7
1 Timothy 1:3.** It is just as important to conserve the results as it is to obtain them. Paul was as concerned about the faith of the Christians in Ephesus after they became converts as he was before they accepted. The grevious wolves, and the perverse teachers from among the elders at Ephesus, had evidently arisen. (Acts 20:29-30). The purpose for Timothy’s stay in Ephesus was a doctrinal problem. He was to do a job of teaching. Paul felt it to be a very urgent matter. There was and is a norm of truth. Any deviation from this norm is serious and must be corrected. The correction is going to be authoritative. Timothy is to give orders as a superior officer in the army of God. Those in the army of God are to give heed. Any teaching, different from, or added to the one already delivered by the apostles, is to be rejected and corrected.
**1 Timothy 1:4. **The particular (although evidently not the only) difficulty in the area of teaching, had to do with a certain type of pedigree tracing. Evidently it meant a great deal to be able to show that Abraham (or some other illustrious Jewish leader) was your great-great-great grandfather. In the attempt to trace such descent, certain stories would be discovered about your relatives, which were in truth but fables, Endless questions could be asked and discussed. For an example of this practice, the Jewish Book of Jubilees would be a good source. This did not help anyone-least of all did it promote the cause of Christ in Ephesus, It must be corrected!
1 Timothy 1:5. Paul wants Timothy to know that he is not simply to authoritatively contradict such false teachers, but to, in the correction, produce pure hearts, good consciences, and unhypocritical faith. Could it be that such false teachers were teaching as they did because they had none of these virtues? It would seem then that their fine-spun name tracing was a smoke-screen for a sinful heart. How much false doctrine has moral implications, only God can know.
1 Timothy 1:6. Paul specifically states in this verse that some of the teachers (elders?) had missed the mark. How easy it is to be caught up in some side issue and miss the purpose of God. Much class discussion today is as vain and empty as that described here by Paul. It needs correction for the same reason.
1 Timothy 1:7. How could anyone confidently affirm that of which he was ignorant? It is not to be understood that these teachers were entirely ignorant of the law of Moses; indeed they professed to be specialists in the Law. They majored in minors and missed the whole purpose of the very subject they were professing to teach. Worse yet, they taught a different purpose than that intended by God. If these teachers understood the true meaning of these fables, they would never have taught them, It is sad and serious to be spiritually blind, but how tragic to observe the blind leading the blind to the ditch!
Fact Questions 1:3-7
Why did Paul leave Timothy in Ephesus?
If there was no New Testament in the day when Paul wrote to Timothy, what would Timothy use as a standard of truth?
Why the great interest of some in genealogies?
Why did the discussion about genealogies become unprofitable?
What is the meaning of the phrase: the end of the charge?
What was the mark or the target missed by these teachers?
1 Timothy 1:8-11
b.
Misuse of the Law. 1 Timothy 1:8-11
**Text 1:8-11
8 But we know the law is good, if a man use it lawfully, 9 as knowing this, that law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and unruly, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 for fornicators, for abusers of themselves with men, for menstealers, for liars, for false swearers, and if there be any other thing contrary to the sound doctrine; 11 according to the gospel of the glory of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.
Thought Questions 1:8-11**
In what sense can we say the law is good?
How could the law be used unlawfully?
How does the list of sins here given relate to the persons with whom Timothy was dealing?
Why give such an extended list? Is there some particular significance in the grouping?
Why have law at all if men are going to be unrighteous?
What is the distinction between a manslayer and a murderer of fathers?
What would be a modern name for Menstealers?; for abusers of themselves with men?
Explain 1 Timothy 1:11 in context.
Paraphrase 1:8-11
8 I acknowledge indeed that the law of Moses is an excellent institution, if one use it agreeably to the end for which it was given. 9 Now we know this, that the law is not made for justifying a righteous man, but for condemning and punishing the lawless and disorderly, namely, atheists and idolaters; persons polluted with vice and who are excluded from things sacred, murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, those who slay others unjustly; 10 Fornicators and sodomites, man-stealers, liars, those who perjure themselves; and if any other practice be opposite to the doctrine which preserves the soul in health, the law was made to restrain and punish it. 11 This view of the law I give according to the glorious gospel of the infinitely and independently blessed God, with the preaching of which I am entrusted.
**Comment 1:8-11
1 Timothy 1:8.** Paul does not wish to create the impression that he has rejected the law of Moses. Some prejudiced Jews might so conclude by what he has just said. The law does indeed have a good purpose. It is not to serve as a source of name hunting. There is a play on words in this verse: use the law lawfully. These Jewish leaders were so proud of being law teachers, and at the same time in their practice they were actually unlawful.
1 Timothy 1:9-10. The true use of the law is now to be shown. Christians do not need the law. They serve a higher law: the law of love, and as a result are not affected by the prohibitions of the law of Moses. If these false teachers were teaching the law to the Christians in Ephesus, what Paul has written would indeed contradict their work. Why this long list of persons affected by the law? Maybe the law teachers were so completely ignorant of the law that they needed this elementary information. It could have been some of these teachers were practicing some of the sins here mentioned. In this case they would be condemned by the very subject they were teaching.
Commentators see a similarity in Paul’s prohibitions here, to those of the Ten Commandments. Note this table of comparison as given by Homer Kent:
The first table of the Decalogue is covered in general terms:
Lawless and disobedient
Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
Ungodly and sinners
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image.
Unholy and profane
Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.
Remember the sabbath day to keep it holy.
By these three pairs of words the second table is covered more completely:
Father-smiters and mother-smiters
Honor thy father and thy mother.
Murderers
Thou shalt not kill.
Fornicators, Sodomites
Thou shalt not commit adultery.
Kidnappers
Thou shalt not steal,
Liars, perjurers
Thou shalt not bear false witness.
Any other thing.
Thou shalt not covet. (Ibid. pp. 87, 88)
1 Timothy 1:11. The above information as to the proper use of the law is in perfect agreement to, and a part of, the Good News entrusted to Paul. The Gospel (or the Faith) would teach that sinners are to be brought under the judgment of God by the law. When they are thus shown to be guilty and condemned before God’s righteous law, they will hear with eagerness the Good News that Christ died to save sinners. Such Good Tidings are described as being of the glory of the blessed God, or of the glorious gospel. The word glory could be understood as character; thus the Good News shows forth the character of God. Indeed it does: God is shown as one of infinite love and wisdom, that he himself might be just, and the justifier of him that hath faith in Jesus. (Romans 3:26)
Fact Questions 1:8-11
Paul has not rejected the law; others have. Show how they have.
Is the law misused in our teaching today? How? In what sense is the Christian free from the law?
Why does Paul make reference to the Ten Commandments?
Paul says the Gospel has something to say about the lawwhat is it?
In what way does the Gospel manifest the character of God?
1 Timothy 1:12-17
EXAMPLE OF SOUND DOCTRINE. 1 Timothy 1:12-17
**Text 1:12-17
12 I thank him that enabled me, even Christ Jesus our Lord, for that he counted me faithful, appointing me to his service; 13 though I was before a blasphemer and a persecutor, and injurious: Howbeit I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief; 14 and the grace of our Lord abounded exceedingly with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus. 15 Faithful is the saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief: 16 howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me as chief might Jesus Christ show forth all His longsuffering for an ensample of them that should thereafter believe on him unto eternal life. 17 Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God be honor and glory for ever and ever. Amen.
Thought Questions 1:12-17**
Please be able to relate this section with the whole chapter. -How do 1 Timothy 1:12-17 relate to what has proceeded and what follows?
In what way did Christ enable Paul to enter His service?
In what sense did Christ count Paul faithful? Refer to 1 Timothy 1:12.
Define each of the three words in 1 Timothy 1:13.
Is Paul saying in 1 Timothy 1:13 b that he was saved in his ignorance? If not, what is he saying?
Just how is the word grace to be understood as in 1 Timothy 1:14?
Show the relationship between the three words: grace, faith, and love, as in 1 Timothy 1:14.
Why refer to the statement in 1 Timothy 1:15 as a faithful saying?
Give the meaning of the word chief as here used by Paul.
Paul gives two reasons for his obtaining mercy, one in 1 Timothy 1:13, and one in 1 Timothy 1:16; explain the one in 1 Timothy 1:16.
Paul’s conversion should be a great encouragement to allWhy?
Define three characteristics of God as found in 1 Timothy 1:17.
Paraphrase 1:12-17
12 Now I thank Christ Jesus our Lord; who strengthened me for preaching it (the glorious gospel), by bestowing on me the gifts of inspiration and miracles, because he knew that I would be faithful to my trust, when he appointed me to the apostleship; 13 Who was formerly a defamer of him and of his doctrine, and a persecutor of his disciples, and an injurious person in my behaviour towards them. But I received pardon because I acted from ignorance, being in a state of unbelief, and fancying that I was doing God service. 14 And in thus pardoning me, and making me his apostle, the goodness of our Lord hath super-abounded toward me, accompanied with the faith and love which is required by Christ Jesus, but in which I was greatly deficient formerly. 15 This saying is true, and worthy of cordial and universal reception, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom, on account of my rage against Christ and his disciples, I reckon myself the chief; I mean of those who have sinned through ignorance. 16 However, though my sin was great, for this cause I received pardon, that in me, the chief of those who sin through ignorance, Jesus Christ might show forth the greatest clemency in forgiving offenders, for an example of mercy to encourage them who should in future ages repent and believe on him, in order to obtain everlasting life, 17 Now, ravished with the goodness of God, in making me an example of pardon for the encouragement of future penitents, I say, to the Ruler of the ages, who is immortal and invisible to the wise God above, be honour and glory, for ever and ever. Amen.
Comment 1:12-17
As Donald Guthrie has stated, This section appears to be a digression. but it is not. Paul has said that the end of the charge was love out of a pure heart, and a good conscience and faith unfeigned. These qualities Paul obtained from the Good News or the Sound Doctrine. Timothy can now present to these law teachers an example of the results of the right use of the Law and the Gospel. Paul is saying, If Christ can change me, and He did, then He can change anyone; preach it! Cease dabbling in law speculation.
1 Timothy 1:12. The gratitude of the Apostle is genuine. The enabling power of Christ and God are a favorite theme of Paul’s letters. He is to say: I am what I am because of the grace of God(1 Corinthians 15:10), My grace is sufficient for thee. (2 Corinthians 12:9), I can do all things through Christ who strengtheneth me. (Philippians 4:13)
As to just where and when and how Christ enabled Paul, we need but refer to the place nigh unto Damascus. There are three records of this event: (Acts 9:1-43; Acts 22:1-30; Acts 26:1-32). Perhaps the order of names in this verse is significant: Christ, which means the anointed of God, Jesus, which means Saviour, Our Lord, which means Sovereign. This is the one who is well able to enable. How could Paul be counted faithful before he was converted? We understand this word to mean trustworthy as here used. Christ knew the character of Paul from the time of his birth (Galatians 1:15). It was because of this dependable quality that he called him. Because of his sin Paul felt unworthy to be called or counted trustworthy. How wonderously precious must Christ have been to Paul that he could thank Him for calling him into a life of privation, imprisonment and death. And yet he was glad to share in this service.
1 Timothy 1:13. Here is an elaboration of the reason for the thankfulness. Paul says of himself that he was: a blasphemer i.e. one who speaks againstand this he did openly and often; a persecutorhe not only spoke against Jesus himself but in his persecution he strove to make others blaspheme (Acts 26:11). To summarize his evil work he says he was injurious or a violent, insolent man. He was the most loathsome of men. Still speaking of his appointment to the service of Christ, Paul uses the word mercy. He says he obtained mercy because he did all that he did against Christ in ignorance and unbelief. He was unlike his countrymen who had access to the knowledge of Jesus as their Messiah. He was unlike some who refused to believe in spite of the evidence. Is not Paul’s word applicable to all who obtain mercy? It is only when we are informed and believe, that we are granted mercy.
1 Timothy 1:14. What is called mercy in 1 Timothy 1:13 is called grace in 1 Timothy 1:14. Of course the emphasis in 1 Timothy 1:14 is upon the unmerited favor shown to Saul of Tarsus. In 1 Timothy 1:13 the thought of meeting the need of Saul is in the forefront with the use of the word mercy. Where sin abounded, (as in the life of Paul), so grace did abound more exceedingly (Romans 5:20). The love and confidence Christ had for Paul overflowed, and received in kind. Paul responded with faith and love for the one who so loved and trusted him. In it all was a deep awareness of his own unworthiness.
1 Timothy 1:15. It might be well to say just here that the expression: Faithful is the saying, seems to be the preface to a statement used in Paul’s day which Paul here adapts to his purpose. There are five such Faithful sayings in the Pastorals. They are found in: 1 Timothy 3:1; 1 Timothy 4:8-9; 2 Timothy 2:11-13; Titus 3:4-8 a; and here in 1 Timothy 1:15, We might refer to these five sayings as slogans or axioms. They were current and very popular in Paul’s day. Such sayings summed up The Faith, The saying in 1 Timothy 1:15 expresses the very heart of the gospel (Cf. 1 Corinthians 15:1-4). Paul calls Timothy to recall this reliable saying and relate the apostle to it, Christ came to save sinners. He saved me, and I indeed was the chief of sinners, so deeply in need of saving, There is much to be said to present day application of this grand statement. We are sorely tempted to become homiletical instead of exegetical.
1 Timothy 1:16. Here we are introduced to another reason for the mercy shown to Paul. 1 Timothy 1:13 attributes God’s grant of mercy to ignorance and unbelief on the part of Paul. 1 Timothy 1:16 attributes the purpose of mercy to the presenting of an example to the world of God’s longsuffering. Paul is saying that what happened to him is a sketch of what could happen to anyone. The power of Christ is seen in Paul. No one is too sinful, or too stubborn, or too ignorant to receive mercy. Paul was to demonstrate this in his own preaching. He came to know it was true as he saw barbarians converted to Christ and by Christ. Paul’s experience gives the bold outline of God’s Power and Mercy. The personal details will be different as each person fills them in to complete the picture of his own life experience with Christ. Paul’s Damascus encounter will ever remain the outline sketch of God’s infinite mercy.
1 Timothy 1:17. A spontaneous expression of joy and adoration is so typically Pauline. The past three verses are cumulative in their feeling; a climax is reached at the end of verse sixteen, hence the doxology of 1 Timothy 1:17 is a natural response.
God is the king of agesall ages. In the context we might say that He is also the Saviour of all men of all ages. All the qualities of God here described should be associated with the thought of His providing salvation in Christ. Notice: He is king, therefore able to save. He is ruler over all men of all ages and hence can save all of them; He is not subject to corruption; He shares His nature with man and thus gives him an eternal salvation; He is invisible to mortal eye; He is of Spirit-quality thus superseding this temporal sphere. God is the only one who could and does save; to Him we ascribe all honor and adoration without end. Amen.
Fact Questions 1:12-17
How does this section develop the purpose of the charge?
Discuss the subjective and objective aspects of Christ’s enabling power with Paul.
How are we to understand the word faithful as used in 1 Timothy 1:12?
Give the meaning of the three words used to describe Paul in 1 Timothy 1:13.
Explain the relationship of ignorance and mercy.
In what sense did grace super-abound?
In what way was Paul chief of sinners?
State five ways in which Paul is an example to all who would be saved?
1 Timothy 1:18-20
THE PREACHER AND SOUND DOCTRINE 1 Timothy 1:18-20
**Text 1:18-20
18 This charge I commit unto thee, my child Timothy, according to the prophecies which led the way to thee, that by them thou mayest war the good warfare; 19 holding faith and a good conscience; which some having thrust from them made shipwreck concerning the faith: 20 of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I delivered unto Satan that they might be taught not to blaspheme.
Thought Questions 1:18-20**
State in one sentence the charge that Paul gave to Timothy.
What were the prophecies mentioned in 1 Timothy 1:18? Cf. 1 Timothy 4:14; 2 Timothy 1:6.
Whatever these prophecies were, Timothy was going to use them to help him in the battle of the faith. Explain.
Show the great importance of sustaining the proper relationship of faith with conscience.
Show how the figure of a shipwreck is appropriate.
Two men are to be taught a lesson; how and why?
Paraphrase 1:18-20
18 This charge to the Judaizers, not to teach differently, I commit to thee, son Timothy, to deliver to them; and I do it amiably to the revelations which were before made to me concerning thee, and which I now mention, that through the recollection of these revelations and the honour which was done thee by them, thou mayest strenuously carry on the good warfare against the enemies of truth in Ephesus. 19 In carrying on this warfare, hold fast the true faith, and at the same time a good conscience, using no improper methods in spreading the gospel; which faith and good conscience some teachers having put away from worldly motives, with respect to the faith have made shipwreck; they have corrupted the gospel, and destroyed their own souls. 20 Of whom are the two Judaizing teachers Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom, for their obstinately persisting willfully to corrupt the gospel, I have delivered to Satan to be by him tormented with bodily pains that they might be taught by a chastisement miraculously inflicted on them not to revile either Christ, or his doctrine concerning the salvation of the Gentiles, Let the faithful in Ephesus avoid these wicked teachers.
**Comment 1:18-20
1 Timothy 1:18.** Please notice the reference here to the charge mentioned earlier in 1 Timothy 1:3. What Paul has said between 1 Timothy 1:3 and 1 Timothy 1:18 would prepare Timothy to deliver the charge and accomplish the purpose for which it was given. Paul is here saying that his willingness to entrust Timothy with the high responsibility of such a charge can be found in the prophecies that led the way to Timothy. There are many and varied comments about the meaning of the phrase before us. We have preferred a comparison of 1 Timothy 4:14 with this text to offer an explanation. We might also compare 2 Timothy 1:6 in this connection, The gift of prophecy was exercised when the hands of the elders were laid upon Timothy. It could have been that Paul exercised such a gift when he laid his hands upon Timothy. In either case we would say that someone looking ahead by the power of this prophetic gift saw the wonderful possibilities in this young man.
Naturally the prophetic promises were mentioned to Timothy in such a way as to impress themselves upon his heart, By recalling them he could use such encouragement to help him in warring the good warfare. Perhaps Timothy was to remember such inspired words concerning himself and take heart that, if those who were guided by the Holy Spirit believed in his ability, who was he to hesitate?
1 Timothy 1:19. It is not to be imagined that Timothy did not have faith or a good conscience. It is rather to introduce the reason for the defection of some, that Paul exhorts Timothy to hold faith and a good conscience. What God hath joined together let not man put asunderWhen faith and conscience are separated there is always shipwreck ahead. Are we to understand that these men wrecked the ship of The Faith or wrecked their own personal ship of faith? We must conclude it is a subjective matter. To discuss whether these men were lost or not in this experience surely seems to be beside the point. Such men were in deadly danger; they were in the grasp, and under the power of Satan; to remain in such a condition would result in only one end.
1 Timothy 1:20. Several were involved in the problem outlined by Paul, but only two are mentioned by name. It would seem that only when nothing more could be done are certain ones designated. It is futile to try to identify the Alexander mentioned here with the several over Alexanders mentioned in the New Testament. The Hymenaeus here mentioned can be identified with the one in 2 Timothy 2:17-18; 2 Timothy 4:14. How could Satan become a teacher against blasphemy? This is not easy to answer. Perhaps the answer is in the character of those being disciplined.
Fact Questions 1:18-20
Explain the use of the term charge as found in 1 Timothy 1:18.
Show the possible connection between 1 Timothy 4:14 and 1 Timothy 1:18.
Why are faith and conscience inseparable?
What was wrecked in the shipwreck?
Why name the two men of 1 Timothy 1:20?
How would Satan be able to teach them not to blaspheme?
