Menu

325 Sermon Illustrations on Marriage

325 illustrations Page 5 of 7

Marriage in Christian preaching symbolizes the sacred union of husband and wife, reflecting God’s covenantal love and grace (Ephesians 5:25-33). Illustrations often use images of enduring bonds, heartfelt communication, and mutual care to show how love, forgiveness, and spiritual unity strengthen and preserve this lifelong commitment.

Submit To Love

Colossians 3:18

Sermon in Colossians series. Colossians 3:18-19

SUBMIT TO LOVE

==============

I. Is Afghanistan our model?

A. Famous National Geographic cover photo of young Afghan girl.

B. Controversial passage.

C. What does the Bible say?

II. Wives, submit!

A. Traditional part of marriage vow.

B. Meaning of subjection.

1) Not a synonym for servile and menial bondage.

2) God has ordered us so human relationships need authority.

C. Subordination in Christian relationships.

D. Human subjection should mirror our subjection to God.

III. Husbands, love.

A. Distinctly Christian teaching.

B. A practical test.

C. How are you serving Jesus?

*

from Condensed sermon outline (handout) by Rev. David Holwick · Rev. David Holwick, Serm02u.pco via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriagelove

The State of Marriage in America (1)

The State of Marriage in America

HERITAGE FOUNDATION CALLS FOR POLITICAL LEADERSHIP ON MARRIAGE

by Mike McManus

A million children a year see their parents divorce, the impact of which is calamitous. A new report by the Heritage Foundation "demonstrates that the devastating physical, emotional and financial effects on these children will last well into adulthood and affect future generations."

Only 42 percent of teens aged 14-18 live in a "first family," an intact, two-parent married family.

Children of divorce experience "anger, fear, sadness, worry, rejection, conflicting loyalties, lowered self-confidence, heightened anxiety, loneliness, more depressed moods, more suicidal thoughts," says the Heritage report, "The Effects of Divorce on America" by Patrick Fagan and Robert Rector. Compared to kids in intact homes children of divorce face startling risks. They are:

- 12 times more liable to be incarcerated as juveniles

- 14 times more prone to be physically abused by a single mother, and 33 times more at risk if she cohabits;

- Three times more apt to get pregnant, and males commit suicide at six-fold higher rates;

- Twice as vulnerable to drop out of school;

- Four times more likely to be in poverty.

In divorce, household income in 1993 plunged from $43,600 to $25,300, a 42 percent drop.

If the parent remarries, the children's prospects grow worse. They are more likely to be disruptive in school than children of divorce, and girls are 6-40 times more likely to be sexually abused by stepfathers than by biological fathers.

Even more chilling, Fagan and Rector cite dozens of studies showing that many children of divorce become dysfunctional adults: "Even 30 years after the divorce, negative long-term effects were clearly present in the income, health and behavior of many of the grown offspring."

They have more failed romantic relationships, a greater number of sexual partners, are 2-3 times as apt to cohabit, are less trusting of fiances, less giving to them and are twice as likely to divorce.

When both are from divorced homes their risk of divorce is as much as 620 percent higher in early years of marriage. Thus the "marital instability of one generation is passed on to the next."

One reason that children of divorce do poorly is that many lose their faith. They worship less frequently which has "serious consequences because religious practice has been found to have beneficial effects on such factors as physical and mental health, education level, income, virginity, marital stability, crime, addiction and general happiness," reports Heritage. "Church attendance is the most significant predictor of marital stability...lower crime rates, better health and longevity."

Thus, divorce "weakens relationships, communities, cities, states and the nation. The increases in the rates of child abuse and neglect, crime, behavioral and emotional problems, health problems, cohabitation, future divorce and out-of-wedlock births as well as the decrease in religious worship, educational attainment and income potential should alarm every policymaker and community leader."

Heritage's surprising conclusion is that more government is needed. Though it is a very conservative think tank that usually urges less government, Heritage notes that federal and state governments spend $150 billion per year to subsidize single parent families and only $150 million to strengthen marriage. "Thus, for every $1,000 spent to deal with the effects of family disintegration, only $1 is spent to prevent that disintegration," a "folly...evident to all."

It suggests a compelling agenda to those running for state or federal government office:

1. "Establish by resolution, a national goal of reducing divorce among families with children by one-third over the next decade. It would send a clear signal to parents that society values marriage and is concerned about the effects of divorce on children."

2. "Establish pro-marriage demonstration programs to provide training in marriage skills to provide young people, dating couples and married couples with the information and tools necessary to help them build and maintain a strong marriage including an understanding of the major reasons why marriages break up. The programs also should seek to develop skills for handling conflict, dealing with change and enhancing the marital relationship. Such pro-marriage services should be offered in a variety of venues: churches, community centers, courts, maternity and childbirth clinics, health centers, welfare offices, military bases and high schools." Heritage notes state governments have $6 billion of "surplus welfare funds" to pay for these initiatives, but virtually no money has been spent on them, though one goal of the welfare reform law is to "encourage the formation and maintenance of two-parent families."

3. States are urged to "end no-fault divorce for parents with children under 18." Divorces for parents should only be granted by "mutual consent" or if fault is proven and only if "grave harm will be visited upon the children by the continuance of the marriage."

*

from forwarded e-mail · Mike McManus via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database divorce

Children feel full effects of divorce as adults: study

Divorce affects children most severely decades after their parents separate, when they reach their 20s and 30s and struggle to create their own families, a new study has found.

In a one-of-a-kind study that took 25 years to complete, sociologist and author Judith Wallerstein found children who grew up in divorced families found forming intimate and lasting relationships of their own more difficult than the adult children whose parents remained together.

Adult children of divorced parents were found to be less likely to marry, more likely to divorce, and more likely to have children out of wedlock and to use drugs, according to the study, which was based on in-depth interviews with 100 children in a Northern California community who were followed by researchers for 25 years. The project began in 1971, soon after California liberalized its divorce laws.

The adult children of divorce tend to expect their relationships to fail and they struggle with the fear of loss, conflict, betrayal and loneliness, the study concludes.

"The delayed impact of divorce in adulthood is a revolutionary finding and a stunning surprise," writes Ms. Wallerstein, the 78-year-old senior lecturer emeritus of the University of California at Berkeley whose previous studies on divorce have gained her a large public following around the world.

"We failed to realize that living in a post-divorce family is an entirely different experience for children as opposed to adults. The story of divorce is far more complex and the impact more far-reaching than we had ever imagined," she asserts.

In The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: A 25 Year Landmark Study, published this week by Hyperion and co-authored with Julia Lewis, a professor of psychology at San Francisco State University, and Sandra Blakeslee, science writer for The New York Times, Ms. Wallerstein attacks the "trickle-down theory of divorce." If divorce is better for an unhappy parent, it is not necessarily better for the children, she argues.

Of the adult children of divorce she followed over 25 years, 60% are married, compared to 80% of those in a comparison group whose parents' marriage lasted.

Thirty-eight per cent of adult children of divorce have their own children, 17% of which were born out of wedlock. In the comparison group, 61% have children, all in the context of marriage. Children of divorce were five times as likely to marry before age 25 and had a much higher divorce rate.

From her in-depth interviews over the years with her subjects, Ms. Wallerstein concludes the key effect of divorce on children is the absence of a "couple template" on which they can model their own intimate relationships later in life. Even the best stepparents rarely replace what children lose through divorce, she concludes.

The children of divorce she followed tended to grow up highly self-reliant and professionally successful, but they were plagued by the expectation that their relationships will fail.

"They are really, really frightened. They're afraid of betrayal, of loss and of abandonment because that has been their experience at least one time," says Ms. Blakeslee.

The researchers found that nature and level of conflict in marriages were similar in families that divorced and in a comparison group of intact families from the same neighbourhoods. But children whose parents stayed together despite serious marital problems had a better sense of how to behave in their own marriages.

"They have a template of how a man and woman can co-operate and work out problems. They can also say, 'I don't want to be like my parents'," she says.

The book does not recommend that parents stay in bad marriages at all costs, but urges parents to put a higher weight on the impact of their children when considering the costs and benefits of divorce.

"All the focus has been on the immediate crisis time of the divorce, but we've had our eyes on the wrong ball. It's the long years afterward that we should be concerned about," she says.

from National Post (not sure of date) · Luiza Chwialkowska via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database divorce

Malevolent Moms vs. Deadbeat Dads

Millions of dads did not experience a good Father's Day last Sunday. They are divorced and deeply miss day-to-day contact with their kids. Contrary to conventional wisdom, they did not initiate divorce proceedings - but were pushed out of the marriage by their wives.

Did you know that 70% of divorces are initiated by women? That is the estimate by Dr. Sanford Braver, who studied 1,000 families getting divorced in Phoenix in the largest study of divorced dads ever conducted. The fathers were unwilling partners of the divorce.

Another myth is that women who initiate a divorce do so because their husband has been unfaithful or physically abusive. Not so, according to Braver. "Adultery is not a very important factor, ranking only 6th in the reasons wives seek a divorce and violence ranks 16th," he said.

The most important reason for the divorce, according to 57 percent of the mothers who shoved the fathers out, was "a gradual growing apart" which for centuries was not even a legally justifiable grounds for divorce. Passage of no-fault divorce allowed divorce for trivial reasons.

What about all those stories about deadbeat dads?

Of course, there are many of them, but most never married the mother of their children. Data compiled by Child Abuse Enforcement authorities lump together divorced dads and those who sired children out-of-wedlock to make the picture as bleak as possible.

Consequently, divorced dads have been given a largely undeserved black eye.

Braver's pioneering book on this subject, "Divorced Dads: Shattering the Myth," was praised by The Washington Post as "an important work which...adds a crucial element to the debate on fatherhood and on how we regard - and treat - divorced fathers in our society."

Braver asserts, "Fathers who are unhappy in their marriage back down from divorce. They foresee the loss of their entire family, with the children going with their mom, along with the house. So fathers step back from the brink. However, mothers don't fear losing their kids."

While some Father's Day stories noted that there has been a 50% Increase in the number of dads bringing up their kids, only 4 million are doing so compared to 14 million mothers.

In today's mail, I received a letter from James asking me if I could put him in touch with a church that would "stand with me in prayer for my lovely (but prodigal) wife Sharon's restoration as well as our marriage...God knows the longing in my heart to be reunited/reconciled with Sharon regardless of what took place in her life to change the way she sees me."

Several years ago, Floyd wrote to say, "I am one of those grieving fathers who was divorced from his children. Their mother remarried and took them to another state without notifying me, and the courts looked the other way when I contested the legality of this action. I did not see my children for a decade. These were their formative years." His daughter was molested by her stepfather.

Seven months later, he wrote again. He resented the phrase "deadbeat dads" which was hung around his neck, while no one talked about the "malevolent moms" who forced an unwanted divorce and then prevented visitation by moving far away.

A child needs both a mother and a father.

As President Bush said at the National Summit on Fatherhood, "We know that children who grow up with absent fathers can suffer lasting damage. They are more likely to end up in poverty or drop out of schools, become addicted to drugs, have a child out of wedlock or end up in prison."

The President added, "If we are serious about renewing fatherhood, we must be serious about renewing marriage."

It is time to consider reforms of the law which would honor such a perspective.

Ideally, if children are involved in a marriage, neither the mother nor the father should be allowed to force divorce on an unwilling partner and on the children, except for such serious reasons as adultery or physical abuse.

At the minimum, there should be a two year cooling off period, during which joint custody is required and the taking of classes by the parents to improve their communication and conflict resolution skills, with the hope of saving the marriage.

Bush said, "We all live, it is said, in the shelter of one another. And our urgent hope is that one of the oldest hopes of humanity... to Turn the hearts of children toward their parents, and the hearts of the parents toward their young."

*

from forwarded e-mail · Mike McManus via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

Remarkable Marriage

I am not sure if this account is factual or not. It supposedly was a part of a 1996 Oprah show, but the oprah.com archives only go back to 1999. The oprah.com site requires a good deal of personal information before accepting a request for info, so I have been reluctant to write for confirmation. The story is a remarkable one for sure.

********

On a cold day in 1942, inside a Nazi concentration camp, a lone young boy looks beyond the barbed wire and sees a young girl pass by. She too, is moved by his presence. In an effort to give expression to her feelings, she throws a red apple over the fence - a sign of life, hope, and love. The young boy bends over, picks up the apple. A ray of light has pierced his darkness.

The following day, thinking he is crazy for even entertaining the notion of seeing this young girl again, he looks out beyond the fence, hoping. On the other side of the barbed wire, the young girl yearns to see again this tragic figure who moved her so. She comes prepared with apple in hand. Despite another day of wintry blizzards and chilling air, two hearts are warmed once again as the apple passes over the barbed wire. The scene is repeated for several days. The two young spirits on opposite sides of the fence look forward to seeing each other, if only for a moment and if only to exchange a few words. The interaction is always accompanied by an exchange of inexplicably heartening feelings.

At the last of these momentary meetings, the young boy greets his sweet friend with a frown and says, "Tomorrow, don't bring me an apple, I will not be here. They are sending me to another camp." The young boy walks away, too heartbroken to look back.

From that day forward, the calming image of the sweet girl would appear to him in moments of anguish. Her eyes, her words, her thoughtfulness, her red apple, all were a recurring vision that would break his nighttime sweats. His family died in the war. The life he had known had all but vanished, but this one memory remained alive and gave him hope.

In 1957 in the United States, two adults, both immigrants, are set up on a blind date. "And where were you during the war?" inquires the woman. "I was in a concentration camp in Germany," the man replies. "I remember I used to throw apples over the fence to a boy who was in a concentration camp," she recalls. With a feeling of shock, the man speaks. "And did that boy say to you one day, 'Don't bring an apple anymore because I am being sent to another camp'?" "Why, yes," she responds, "but how could you possibly know that?" "He looks into her eyes and says, "I was that young boy."

There is a brief silence, and then he continues, "I was separated from you then, and I don't ever want to be without you again. Will you marry me?" They embrace one another as she says, "Yes."

On Valentine's Day 1996, on national telecast of the Oprah Winfrey show, this same man affirmed his enduring love to his wife of forty years. " You fed me in the concentration camp," he said, "you fed me throughout all these years; now, I remain hungry if only for your love."

-Author Unknown

Cohabiting Doesn't Lead To More Committed Marriages

Luke 20:34

Men who cohabit with the women they eventually marry are more reluctant to marry and, then, are less committed to their marriages, according to a recent study by the co-director of the Center for Marital and Family Studies at the University of Denver.

Women who are cohabiting "should be very careful about how aligned they are with a particular man if he does not show any strong sense of marriage and a future together," researcher Scott Stanley said in USA Today July 8.

Though his research reinforces the stereotype that men are more likely to move more slowly toward marriage than women, Stanley said his findings do not indicate an absence of "super men" who will be dedicated to their wives after cohabitation.

USA Today reported that more than 5 million unmarried American couples live together, and between 50 percent and 60 percent of new marriages now involve couples who have lived together first.

Many cohabiting couples say they want to live together in order to get a sense of what it would be like to be married to a particular person without the obligation of staying in the relationship if it does not work favorably. They also cite fears of divorce as reasons why they choose to live together rather than marry first.

Divorce is "just a huge issue for my generation," Rosanne Garfield, 28, of Arlington, Va., told USA Today. "My family has not had good success with marriage. I was living with my boyfriend for the last year. I told him to make a decision [about marriage], and that ended it. But it would never cross my mind not to live together with someone before marrying him."

Even so, the divorce rate among those who have cohabited is higher than that of those who have not.

From his study, Stanley also suggests that less religious men were likely to be less committed.

Stanley's study is based on a sub-sample of 207 men and women married 10 years or less and chosen from ongoing marital research on 950 adults nationwide. Standard assessments of commitment were used during telephone interviews.

=====================

Version from Dynamic Preaching on July 28, 2003:

According to Scott Stanley, co-director of the Center for Marital and Family Studies at the University of Denver, men and women who live together before getting married are much more likely to divorce than are couples who do not live together before marriage. Stanley's research shows that men who live with a woman before marriage are less likely to be committed to marriage than are men who never lived with their mate before marriage. Stanley's advice to women: “If you want someone to marry, choose someone who won't live with you.”

__________

“Cohabiting can make marriage an iffy proposition” by Karen S. Peterson USA Today July 8, 2002, p. D1.

*

For Better Or Worse ... Mostly Worse: the State of Our Marital Unions

Luke 20:34

Tina wants to get married, but her boyfriend Ted just wants to move in. Ted is an exceptionally honest young man, so here is what he says: "Tina, I'm fond of you, and I want to live with you for the following reasons. First, it will make it easier for me to enjoy regular sex. Second, I want to protect my assets -- assets I'd have to share with you if we got a divorce. Third, you already have kids, and I don't want to support them. Fourth, I'm waiting for my perfect soul mate to come along. Until I meet her, I'd like to live with you."

Sound convincing? Probably not. Tim's arguments are incredibly insulting. And yet, according to a new study, these are exactly the reasons men want to live with women -- reasons that not only insult women, but make them big losers on the domestic front.

At Rutgers University, researchers with the National Marriage Project have published a report called "Why Men Won't Commit: Exploring Young Men's Attitudes about Sex, Dating, and Marriage." The study offers the top ten reasons men are reluctant to say, "I do." Among them: They can get all the sex they want without marriage. They want to enjoy the single life as long as possible. They want to avoid the financial pitfalls of divorce. And they're afraid marriage will demand too many changes and compromises. Apparently, their live-in girlfriends can get used to their bad habits or leave.

Most galling of all is the admission by men that they don't want to marry their girlfriends because they're waiting for their "true love" to come along. Then they'll tie the knot, buy a home, and father kids. Meanwhile, their live-ins can pick up their socks and provide sex-on-demand.

Grandma was right: Men won't buy the cow if they can get the milk free.

Grandma was echoing the wisdom of the biblical writers. Read the Old Testament, and you'll get a picture of how carefully the ancient Israelites protected unmarried women: They knew how predatory, how utterly selfish, men can be. Taking on the responsibilities of a wife and children involved hard work that would last a lifetime. And men were only motivated to shoulder those responsibilities because their culture demanded it.

Modern women have far more freedom of movement than their sisters in the ancient world. But human nature is still fallen. This means that men are as predatory as ever -- and women today are paying the price for it in a culture that doesn't demand marriage.

I hope this report serves as a wake-up call to women who think men who want to cohabit have marriage on their minds. Most of them do not. Pastors ought to make this report a subject of a sermon. And if they know couples in their congregations are living together, they ought to encourage them to either marry -- or separate.

I hope you'll read the full Rutgers report. If enough women read it, maybe the day would come when men who invite women to live with them would get what they deserve: a slap in the face for that kind of insult.

FURTHER READING & INFORMATION

Armand M. Nicholi, Jr., The Question of God: C. S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life (Free Press, 2002).

Barbara Dafoe Whitehead and David Popenoe, "Why Men Won't Commit: Exploring Young Men's Attitudes about Sex, Dating, and Marriage," The State of Our Unions: The Social Health of Marriage in America, The National Marriage Project, 2002. http://marriage.rutgers.edu/TEXTSOOU2002.htm

BreakPoint commentary no. 020523, "Looking for Love (in All the Virtual Places): Hyperdating." http://www.pfmonline.net/transcripts.taf?_function=detail&ID=2497&Site=BPT

Wilberforce Forum Fellow Dr. J. Budziszewski has written two columns -- "Who's on First?" and "The Moves" -- that, in the form of a conversation with one of his students, provides sage advice on how singles should approach dating.

http://www.boundless.org/2001/regulars/office_hours/a0000591.html

http://www.boundless.org/2001/regulars/office_hours/a0000604.html

William J. Bennett, The Broken Hearth: Reversing the Moral Collapse of the American Family (Waterbrook Press, 2001).

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database divorcecommitment

Puritan Beliefs About Family Life Can Prove Helpful Today

Genesis 2

The 16th- and 17th-century Puritans stand as proof that 21st-century Christians can build their understanding of marriage and family upon the foundation of Scripture, according to Erroll Hulse. The Puritans -- often falsely maligned as long-faced killjoy Christians -- have much to teach modern believers by their biblical understanding and example in marriage and family.

Hulse is an associate pastor of Leeds Reformed Baptist Church in Yorkshire, England. He is editor of Reformation Today magazine and has authored a number of books including "An Introduction to the Puritans."

Hulse voiced credit to three generations of Puritan pastors for establishing today's understanding of Christian marriage, family and the home.

"Since about the 1960s a massive spiritual attack has been made on the Christian view of marriage and family," Hulse said. "We should follow the example of the Puritans to seek to restore the honor of marriage after the damage done to that institution by the liberal establishment.

"We must pray for leadership, that is, for contemporary reformers, and pray for and work toward a major recovery of biblical thinking about sex and marriage in our generation."

The Puritans lived in the 16th and 17th centuries first in England and later in America. They were called "Puritans" because they sought to purify the Church of England of all remaining vestiges of medieval Roman Catholicism and establish a more biblical understanding of faith, practice and worship.

While Baptists would heartily disagree with their decision to remain in a state-sanctioned church, Hulse said contemporary Baptists can learn much from both their belief and practice. The Puritans sought to be truly pious in their daily living and strong in their understanding of Scripture, bringing it to bear on every facet of life.

Puritans who are still widely read today include John Bunyan, author of "Pilgrim's Progress," John Owen, Matthew Henry and Richard Baxter.

Primary among the Puritan understanding of family was their belief that the Scriptures firmly establish both marriage and sex as gifts ordained by God. The Puritans saw sex within marriage as existing both for procreation and pleasure.

"Leland Ryken has well said the Puritan doctrine of sex was a watershed in the cultural history of the West," Hulse said. "The Puritans devalued celibacy, glorified marriage, affirmed married sex as both necessary and pure, established the ideal of wedded romantic love, and exalted the role of the wife."

With nearly 60 percent of marriages among professed believers ending in divorce today, Hulse said the Puritan teaching on marriage serves as a biblical remedy to our "quickie-divorce" culture.

Said Hulse, "The Puritan ethic of marriage was not to look for a partner whom you do love passionately at this moment, but rather for one you can love steadily as your best friend for life, and then proceed with God's help to do just that.

"Thomas Manton declared that marriages are made in heaven before they are made on earth, and Daniel Rogers, son of [Puritan preacher] John Rogers of Dedham commented on what today we call 'falling in love' like this: 'Marriage love is often a secret work of God, pitching the heart of one party upon another for no known cause; and therefore when this strong lodestone attracts each to the other, no further questions need to be made but such a man and such a woman's match were made in heaven, and God has brought them together.'"

Puritans took the stated order of matrimony found in the Church of England's "Book of Common Prayer" and reversed it. The Book of Prayer order posited that matrimony is first ordained for procreation, second as a remedy against fornication and third for "the mutual society, help and comfort that the one ought to have for the other."

The Puritans reversed this order and Baptists recognized this change in the marriage article in The Baptist Confession of Faith of 1869 which reads: "God instituted marriages for the mutual help of husband and wife, for the increase of mankind in accordance with his laws and for the prevention of immorality."

The Puritans held forth a clearly biblical foundation for the duties of husbands and wives based upon Genesis 2 and Ephesians 5, Hulse said. They saw the first duty of husbands and wives as to love each other entirely in accord with Ephesians 5:25,28 and 33. Husbands and wives also were to be helpers of each other's salvation. The article on marriage in the Baptist Faith & Message 2000 reflects this view.

Said Hulse, "They were to stir up each other to faith, love and obedience, and good works; to warn and help each other against sin and all temptations; to join in God's worship in the family and in private; to prepare each other for the approach of death and comfort each other in the hope of eternal life."

For the husband and father, the Puritans asserted the biblical doctrine of headship. That is, the husband and father is the accountable head for what takes place in the family and is the provider for and protector of his wife and children, Hulse said. The husband is responsible for the spiritual development and biblical instruction of the wife and children.

Fathers sought to equip their sons and daughters with a thorough knowledge of Scripture beginning at an early age, he said.

"The headship is not a ticket to privilege but a charge to responsibility," Hulse said. "It is not tyranny, but leadership based on love."

To the Puritans, concern for family extended to live-in servants and the elderly, who were cared for in the home until death and not relegated to retirement homes, he said.

"The Puritans esteemed the family as the basic unit of society and aimed that it be a little church in itself with the husband as its pastor and his wife as assistant," Hulse said. "Puritan pastors believed fervently that the family was the foundational unit of a godly society.

"The Puritan ethic was to train up children in the way they should go, to care for their bodies and souls together, and to educate them for sober, godly, socially useful adult living. The Puritan way of home life was based on maintaining order, courtesy and family worship."

*

I Love You - At the Finish Line

Titus 2:4

My regular routine doesn't allow me as much exercise as I'd like. So when we get a few days away, I enjoy picking up the pace a little with some biking or hiking that I don't usually get to do. Of course, I can usually feel that I haven't been doing it enough. The next morning I'm hurting in places I didn't even know I had places. I remember one time we were away at the shore, and I did this sunrise jog on the beach. I felt so healthy - and so beat. I was pounding back on the sand, all tired and sweaty and out of breath, thinking about walking the rest of the way. Suddenly, I saw my wife Karen in the distance. And suddenly my motivation was back! I picked up my pace like an Olympian. Now I had almost reached her when I saw what she had written in huge letters in the sand, "I love you, Ron." Oh! What a happy ending to a long, hard run!

Well, I'm Ron Hutchcraft and I want to have A Word With You today about "'I Love You' At The Finish Line."

Actually that's a happy ending for any man ... on any day. So there's something real special about today's word for today from the Word of God, Titus 2:4-5. Paul is speaking about the older women when he says, "They can train the younger women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands, so that no one will malign the Word of God."

Now, Paul is describing here two generations of loving wives, with the veterans teaching the rookies about that kind of love. Women whose husbands know they are really loved, end up reaping what the Proverbs 31 woman did. "Her husband", it says, "has full confidence in her and lacks nothing of value. She brings him good, not harm, all the days of her life ... Her children arise and call her blessed; her husband, also, and he praises her."

The first instruction from the older women to the younger women is to be about how to "love their husbands." Now that day when I was running on the beach is a picture of many days in the life of a man close to you - your husband, or your father, your brother. He reaches the end of his day tired from the run. And few things mean more to a man than to know he'll find an "I love you" at the finish line.

A man can handle almost any stress, any disappointment, if he's sure he'll be safe and appreciated and loved when he gets home. Because all's well that ends well. There are many men who are loved by their wife, but they don't feel loved by her because she is not loving him in his language of love. And if you don't feel loved, it's the same for you as if you aren't loved.

So, tell him you love him - tell him often, even if it's not your style. Touch him. Do the little things that reassure and restore him: that favorite meal, a card, a note, a compliment, a love letter. And as much as possible, try to provide some peace at the end of his race.

Now loving your man like this may be hard for you because you've run a long run today, too. I would encourage you to pray the kind of prayer I've had to pray so often to be the man my wife needs, "Lord, please give me Your strength to put him first when I feel like being first myself." To do that is to do what Jesus would do. In fact, it's what He did over and over. By the way, it is equally important that a wife be welcomed by a man who is putting her needs first. This kind of sacrificing love is a blessed two-way street.

When the man in your life has been pushing hard, you as a woman have a tremendous opportunity to show your love for him, to build your relationship with him, to keep him going when he feels like giving up. As a woman who goes out of her way to make him feel loved, you may well be the deciding factor in whether or not he even makes it across the finish line. That "I love you" in the sand never means more than at the finish line after a long day's run.

________________

Copyright © Ron Hutchcraft Ministries, Inc., PO Box 400, Harrison, AR 72602. Used by permission. Written by Ron Hutchcraft. "Practical Answers to Real Life Issues"

*

from A Word With You by Ron Hutchcraft #4058 · Ron Hutchcraft via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database love

Hormones First: How To Win the Culture War

For many newlyweds, seeing their wedding announcement in the pages of the NEW YORK TIMES is the ultimate seal of approval. It's synonymous with "accomplished" and "newsworthy."

That's why a recent change in the NEW YORK TIMES's policy about what kind of "wedding announcements" will be featured in the Grey Lady's pages is itself newsworthy.

The paper announced that, beginning in September, the heading "Weddings" in the Sunday Style section will be changed to "Weddings/Celebrations." The change will allow the newspaper to put same-sex unions on the same social footing as heterosexual marriages.

According to Howell Raines, the newspaper's executive editor, the change is meant to "acknowledge the newsworthiness" of what the paper calls "a growing and visible trend in society." That trend is "public celebrations of commitment by gay and lesbian couples."

To qualify for listing the same-sex couple must either enter into a legally recognized civil union or "celebrate their commitment in a public ceremony."

This decision by the TIMES is only the latest example of a larger pattern of trying to convince people that same-sex unions are essentially interchangeable with heterosexual marriage. According to this argument, insisting that there are important differences is little more than prejudice and even bigotry.

But as Peter Kreeft, professor of philosophy at Boston College, tells us, not only are the differences real, but it's gay rights advocates who have placed them at the heart of their identity.

In his new book HOW TO WIN THE CULTURE WAR, Kreeft talks about the "sex war." He recalls a conversation he had with a gay activist. When Kreeft noted the biblical distinction between loving the sinner and hating the sin, the activist rejected the idea. He said that attacking homosexuality is the same as attacking homosexuals.

Kreeft then points out that this identification between homosexuals and their sin is almost unique. Neither cowards nor adulterers would maintain that cowardice and adultery is all there is to them. It is only in the case of homosexuality and homosexuals that making a distinction between person and activity is regarded as a rejection of who they are.

Kreeft then notes that the sad irony is that this bid for equality ends up diminishing gay men and women. Instead of recognizing their inherent dignity and their capacity to rise above their urges and desires, they insist on being defined by whom they sleep with, and often nothing more. As Kreeft puts it, Christianity thinks more highly of them than they do of themselves.

This is a message our culture needs to hear. Kreeft says we can't win the culture war unless we win the "sex war." That's because erroneous thinking about sex lies at the heart of culture wars. It's reflected in the battlefields of abortion, homosexuality, and family.

Winning this sex war means changing the way we and our neighbors think about sex. That requires patience, a willingness to sacrifice and do more than say "no" to sin. We must demonstrate how God's "yes" to sex in its proper context is superior to the "growing and visible trend" the TIMES wrote about -- even if it is not what the "paper of record" would call "newsworthy."

FURTHER READING & INFORMATION

Peter Kreeft, HOW TO WIN THE CULTURE WAR: A CHRISTIAN BATTLE PLAN FOR A SOCIETY IN CRISIS (InterVarsity Press, 2002).

"Times Will Begin Reporting Gay Couples' Ceremonies," NEW YORK TIMES, 18 August 2002 (free registration required). http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/18/fashion/18PAPE.html

Roberto Rivera, "Symbols: The Commodification of Meaning," BREAKPOINT ONLINE, 19 July 2002. http://www.breakpoint.org/Breakpoint/ChannelRoot/ColumnsGroup/RobertoRivera/Symbols.htm

C. John Sommerville, HOW THE NEWS MAKES US DUMB: THE DEATH OF WISDOM IN AN INFORMATION SOCIETY (InterVarsity, 1999).

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Mark Earley via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

(untitled)

Marriage

Young Actor: "I've got a job at last, father. It's a new play and I'm a man who has been married twenty years."

Father: "Splendid. That's a start anyway, my boy. Maybe one of these days they'll give you a speaking part." (Submitted by Zoah Christian Church)

from Help4su via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

(untitled)

Marriage or Men

Jennifer watched as the cashier rang up her purchases. "Cash, check or charge?" She asked after folding the items Jennifer had bought. As she fumbled for her wallet. The cashier noticed a remote control for a television set in her purse. "Do you always carry your TV remote?" The cashier asked. "No," she replied. "But my husband Jeff, refused to come shopping with me, so I figured this was the worst thing I could do to him."

from Help4su via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Married To Satan's Sister

Before the services started, the townspeople were sitting in their pews and talking with one another when suddenly the Devil himself appeared at the front of the congregation. Everyone started screaming and running for the back door, trampling each other in an effort to get away from evil incarnate. Soon everyone had evacuated except for one elderly gentleman who sat calmly in his pew, seemingly oblivious to the enemy in front of him. The devil walked up to the man and said, "Don't you know who I am?"

The man quietly replied, "Yep, sure do." Satan asked, "Aren't you afraid of me?"

"Nope, sure ain't," said the man. A perturbed Satan, asked, "Why aren't you afraid of me?"

The man calmly replied, "Been married to your sister for over 46 years."

TS-"Greater is he that is in me, than he that is in the world.

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database satan

(untitled)

Marriage

A man walked into the police station, went to the desk sergeant and made an

unusual demand. "It's absolutely essential that I speak with the burgular who

broke into our house last night." he said.

"Why is that?" questioned the sergeant.

The man replied, "I need to know how he got into the house at three o'clock

in the morning without making a noise and waking my wife!"

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Diligence Or Marriage

A healthy, well-to-do man in his fifties was moving into a new condominium. He noticed an older lady who also lived there, watching him with unusual interest as he came in and out. After several hours of this, the man walked over to her and said, “I see you have been watching me all morning. Is there something wrong?”

Not at all, she explained, you just look very much like my fourth husband.

“Really," he said. "How many times have you been married?”

“Well," she replied coyly, “Only three.”

from Source not recorded via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

An Old Couple Holding Hands

The question is asked, "Is there anything more beautiful in life than a boy and girl clasping clean hands and pure hearts in the path of marriage?" And the answer is given, "Yes - there is a more beautiful thing; it is the spectacle of an old man and an old woman finishing their journey together on that path. Their hands are gnarled but still clasped; their faces are seamed but still radiant; their hearts are tired and bowed down but still strong. They have proved the happiness of marriage and have vindicated it from the jeers of cynics."

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriageold age

Polygamy In the Age of Same-Sex Marriage

This week, for the first time in nearly fifty years, the state of Utah is beginning the trial of a man for polygamy. If convicted, Tom Green faces twenty years in prison. What's interesting isn't Green's guilt or innocence: It's why this particular departure from the traditional family should upset us so much.

Green is a descendant of the original Mormon pioneers who settled Utah 150 years ago. Their practice of polygamy almost prevented Utah from becoming a state. That is, until 1890 when Mormon leaders banned the practice.

But banning polygamy isn't the same as eradicating it. Even after Mormon elders repudiated polygamy, some Mormon men in rural areas continued to have multiple wives. For the most part, state officials turned a blind eye to these violations of state law.

But in the lead-up to the Olympic Winter Games in Salt Lake City next February, Utah officials have begun to crack down on polygamy. In the attempt to "spruce up its image," Utah named a "polygamy czar," and law enforcement is going after polygamists like Tom Green.

Now, Green is an easy target because, unlike other polygamists, he's quite open about his family arrangements. He's been on daytime talk shows and NBC's Dateline with his five wives and twenty-nine children. What's more, several of his wives were under age -- as young as thirteen -- when he married them.

While I have no sympathy for Green or his beliefs, I find Utah's efforts to improve its image ironic. In its efforts to impress Olympic visitors, the state is working to eliminate an "embarrassing vestige(s) of [its] pioneer past" -- a past that once embraced unorthodox views about marriage and family.

But consider the folks Utah is trying to impress. The Netherlands -- home of gold-medal speed-skaters -- recently became the first nation to legalize same-sex marriage. While other European nations haven't gone that far, they have enacted domestic partnerships laws. These laws reject the traditional understanding of marriage and family every bit as much as Utah's polygamists do.

And it isn't only Europe. The winter sports center of the east, Vermont, came close to legalizing same-sex marriages. Instead, it adopted a domestic partnership law similar to those in Europe. Rights and privileges that were only available to traditional married couples are now available to any combination of two people who register with the town clerk.

But why stop at two? Why not three or six? If you explicitly reject the idea that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, why balk at polygamy? If you believe that the family can take on any form that meets the participants' needs, why exclude a family arrangement form that is as old as recorded history? And if the courts say marriage is any combination of people, say a man and a man, by what logic can they say it can't be a man and two women?

They can't! Objections are foreclosed when we abandon traditional understandings of marriage. While Utah has many reasons to crack down on polygamy, it has little reason to feel embarrassed. Given their current attitudes towards marriage, Western societies -- and many in the United States -- are in no position to pass judgment on Utah's pioneer past.

In the end, you see, it's our present -- and not Utah's past -- that really threatens marriage.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database homosexuality

Quips

Attitude

Cheerful people resist disease better than glum ones. In other words, the surly bird catches the germ.

-Hope Health Letter (4/96)

Authenticity

In Becoming a Contagious Christian, Bill Hybels and Mark Mittelberg tell this story:

A newly promoted colonel had moved into a makeshift office during the Gulf War. He was just getting unpacked when out of the corner of his eye, he noticed a private with a toolbox coming his way.

Wanting to seem important, he grabbed the phone: "Yes, General Schwarzkopf. Of course, I think that's an excellent plan." He continued: "You've got my support on it. Thanks for checking with me. Let's touch base again soon, Norm. Goodbye."

"And what can I do for you?" he asked the private.

"Uhhh, I'm just here to hook up your phone."

-Ron Willoughby

Augusta, Georgia

Marriage

A young bride complained to her friend, "My husband and I are getting along together fairly well, but he simply can't bear children."

"Oh well," a friend consoled her. "You can't expect men to do everything."

Men

In 1492, Columbus set out for the Orient and ended up in the Caribbean, thus setting a pattern that has continued for more than 500 years: Men still won't stop and ask for directions.

Patience

"Great message on patience, Pastor. I loved the way you illustrated by telling those kids to sit down and shut up."

Priorities

A woman bought a parrot to keep her company but returned it the next day. "This bird doesn't talk," she told the owner.

"Does he have a mirror in his cage?" he asked. "Parrots love mirrors. They see their reflection and start a conversation." The woman bought a mirror and left.

The next day she returned; the bird still wasn't talking. "How about a ladder? Parrots love ladders. A happy parrot is a talkative parrot." The woman bought a ladder and left.

But the next day, she was back. "Does your parrot have a swing? No? Well, that's the problem. Once he starts swinging, he'll talk up a storm." The woman reluctantly bought a swing and left.

When she walked into the store the next day, her countenance had changed. "The parrot died," she said. The pet store owner was shocked.

"I'm so sorry. Tell me, did he ever say a word?" he asked.

"Yes, right before he died," the woman replied. "In a weak voice, he asked me, 'Don't they sell any food at that pet store?'"

Sometimes people forget the main thing.

---------

Copyright(c) 1996 by Christianity Today, Inc/LEADERSHIP, journal.

Fall 1996, Vol. XVII, No. 4, Page 75

from Leadership Journal Fall 1996 via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriagepriorities

Author of the Rules Files For Divorce

Cheap Irony Of The Day -- Author Of The Rules Files For Divorce

"It seems that The Rules authors Sherrie Schneider and Ellen Fein may have reached the end of the rainbow," Bartholomew Roberts writes. "The two have made their money publishing books that advise women how to find a mate and have a happy marriage. The books have been bashed by feminists because of their decidedly 'traditional' advice. Now, shortly before the release of their third book, it turns out that co-author Ellen Fein is filing for divorce from her husband of 16 years. Not only this; but the divorce had actually been filed a year earlier and a mere three months after Fein signed a contract for a third book. As a result, Fein -- who once told a competing author on a talk show, 'We are on our first marriages, and you’re on your second' -- let the publisher send out pre-release copies of the book with glowing tributes to the author's marital bliss."

This is reminiscent of Audrey Kishline, the "Moderate Drinking" author and movement leader who ended up convicted of vehicular manslaughter after mowing down a man and his daughter while drunk driving. [see HolwickID #19431]

___________________________________

http://www.timesofindia.com/280301/28wrap5.htm

Times of India, March 28, 2001

ELLEN FEIN GETTING A DIVORCE

NEW YORK: It seems some rules are made to be broken. Ellen Fein, co-author of the "Rules" books that teach women how to snag men by playing hard to get, is getting a divorce. The announcement comes just three months before the release of the third book in the series, which Fein again co-wrote with Sherrie Schneider. AOL Time Warner is expected to release "The Rules III: Time-Tested Secrets for Making Your Marriage Work," in June 2001.

Fein, 43, has been married to pharmacist Paul Feingertz, 41, for more than 15 years, People magazine reported. The publisher will insert a paragraph into the new book's introduction, stating that Fein and her husband are divorcing.

Schneider is still married.

There are more than 2 million copies in print of the original 1996 book, "The Rules: Time-Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr Right." That number dropped to 350,000 for the sequel, "The Rules II: More Rules to Live and Love By," which came out in 1997. The third "Rules" book has a first printing of just 75,000 copies.

(AP)

____________________________________________

http://desi.excite.com/news/ap/010510/07/ellen-fein

May 10, 2001

NEW YORK (AP) - Ellen Fein still plays by "The Rules," even though she's getting a divorce.

The co-author of the "Rules" books, which teach women to snag men by playing hard to get, is splitting up with her husband of 15 years, just as "The Rules III: Time-Tested Secrets for Making Your Marriage Work," is hitting bookstores.

"I don't think it ruins my credibility at all," the 43-year-old Fein said during an interview on ABC's "PrimeTime Thursday," in which co-author Sherrie Schneider also appeared.

"I totally 100 percent believe in 'The Rules,"' Fein said. "And I believe in 'The Rules' for marriage ... and I did them all for many, many years."

The original 1996 book, "The Rules: Time-Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right," was a huge hit, with more than 2 million copies in print. The sequel, "The Rules II: More Rules to Live and Love By," came out in 1997.

Schneider said: "Those who think that Ellen's situation is going to be the end of 'The Rules' are going to be very disappointed because we have a gift for helping women with dating and marriage, and that is going to continue regardless of what happens in our personal lives."

____________________________________________

http://pub42.ezboard.com/fthehangout37293stateyourcase.showMessage?topicID=743.topic

Jim Savage

Ellen Fein made the announcement on the eve of her latest book Rules III - subtitled "Time-tested secrets for making your marriage work" - being released. Hundreds of advance copies have been sent out trumpeting the happy state of Ms. Fein's marriage and that of her co-author, Sherri Schneider.

The publisher AOL Time Warner is now rushing out a new cover. The original said: "Ellen and Sherrie, two long-time married women themselves, know that just because you've married the man of your dreams doesn't mean your work has ended; good marriages don't happen by accident." It contains a chapter on divorce that claims: "It is easier to stay married than get married."

The original Rules, published in 1996, was a social phenomenon, earning the wrath of feminists. The book argued that modern women had to relearn the art of playing hard to get and suggested using egg-timers to limit conversations with suitors to 10 minutes.

Men should be put through a series of challenges to test both their gallantry and willingness to commit to a relationship. Women were advised to be neither too funny nor too clever, but to retain an air of mystery. Plastic surgery was suggested for those with unsightly noses.

The book's popularity soared when it was reported that Princess Diana had read it. As the authors toured the talk shows, they boasted of their own happy marriages. They claimed that a woman who followed The Rules "will have one of those made-in-heaven marriages. A Rules marriage is forever".

On the Oprah Winfrey Show in 1996, Ms. Fein told a feminist critic whose first marriage had failed that, as a divorcee, she was in no position to pontificate.

In The Rules III, Ms. Fein and Ms. Schneider claim that for a marriage to succeed, women must be subservient to their husbands and not bother them with daily woes. They also recommend that wives grow their hair, as men find that more attractive.

Ms. Fein, 43, told her publishers earlier this year that she had filed for divorce from Paul Feingertz, a pharmacist to whom she had been married for 16 years, citing abandonment. She had hoped to rebuild her marriage.

from Internet: Plastic · Bartholomew Roberts; Commented On by Joey (plastic) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriagehypocrisy

Two Are Better Than One: How Marriage Protects Children

Ecclesiastes 4:9

We've been hearing for years that children raised in single-parent homes are at higher risk of poverty, drug abuse, and getting involved in crime. But for babies, a parent's marital status can literally make the difference between life and death.

In their new book, The Case for Marriage, Maggie Gallagher and Linda Waite examine hundreds of studies that cast light on how family formation affects children's health. Their conclusion? Divorce, they say, "appears to be literally making some children sick."

For example, one study tracked the health of children before and after their parents' separation. It found that divorce made it fifty percent more likely a child would have health problems, according to the authors. But for babies, marriage can make the crucial difference between life and death.

One study found that white babies born to unmarried mothers are seventy percent more likely to die in the first year of life; black infants born out of wedlock, Gallagher and Waite note, are forty percent more likely to die before their first birthday.

College-educated white mothers are the demographic group whose babies have the lowest infant-mortality rate. But even among them, they say, "being unmarried increases the risks a baby will die by fifty percent."

When babies survive infancy, their parents' marital decisions follow them into childhood and even adulthood. A New Zealand study found that children in single-parent families were more likely to be killed or hospitalized as a result of pedestrian injury than children from two-parent families.

A Swedish study found that adults raised in single-parent homes were one-third more likely to die over the sixteen-year study period than were adults from intact families.

What is it about marriage that so dramatically affects children's health? Well, part of it is likely the greater income married parents enjoy, which means they can better afford private health insurance. But Gallagher and Waite also found that "the lack of emotional support from a partner may also make it harder for a single mother to manage a child's health problems effectively."

This conclusion echoes what we read in Ecclesiastes: "Two are better than one ... for if they fall, one will lift up his fellow; but woe to him who is alone when he falls and has not another to lift him up" [Ecclesiastes 4:9-10]. And, we might add, woe to the parent -- and child -- where there is no second parent to lift them up.

It's hard to keep children safe in the modern era. But children from two-parent homes have an extra pair of eyes watching out for them -- keeping them from running into traffic, drinking household poisons, or helping them when they exhibit symptoms of illness.

Now many single moms do a heroic job. I cheer them on. But they have a tougher job. And the two-parent family is better for the kids. The empirical evidence makes an unassailable case of that fact.

If you read The Case for Marriage, you'll discover more insights on the long-term benefits of getting and staying married. Benefits enjoyed, not just by the couple who walk down the aisle, but by children who grow up in homes where one parent is always there to "lift up the other."

For further reference:

Gallagher, Maggie and Linda J. Waite. The Case for Marriage: What Married People are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially. New York: Doubleday, 2000.

_________________________

Copyright (c) 2001 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

For Better Or For Worse: How To Strengthen Marriages

"I would go days at a time without speaking a word." Even twenty-five years after her parents' divorce, twenty-eight-year-old Karen could still feel the unspeakable pain. She's one of the walking wounded; but Karen is not alone. Psychologist Judith Wallerstein found that the toll divorce takes on children can sometimes last decades.

All too often, divorcing parents who place such pressures on their kids claim they really had no choice. But as Maggie Gallagher and Linda Waite point out in their book, The Case for Marriage, "Divorce is not exactly a random event, striking some families like a bolt of lightening and leaving others miraculously untouched."

Moreover, the evidence is overwhelming: marriage is superior to any other sort of family. It's not just one of many alternatives, each of which are equally good at promoting the well-being of children and adults. Nor is marriage, as Gallagher and Waite point out, "merely a private taste or a private relation; it is an important public good." And the costs of failed marriages are borne by everyone through the costs of higher crime, welfare, education, and medical expenses.

Our fragile families are at least partly the consequence of cultural ideas, the authors write -- faulty ideas about the importance of fathers, the nature of sex and commitment, and the obligation of couples to each other and to their offspring. These ideas have arisen from our obsession, since the 1960s, with personal autonomy -- the mistaken belief that we are free of obligation to spouses, parents, children, or even God. And that we are free of all moral restraints.

What can we do to restore marriage as the normal, stable context for raising children? First, we can recover our biblical understanding of personal responsibility and help families to understand putting ourselves first always leads to disaster.

Second, Gallagher and Waite suggest that we recognize the ways that our laws often undermine marriage through tax policy and welfare legislation. And we need to push for sound policies.

We need to insist that family experts tell the truth about the importance of enduring marriages and that the government publishes information about the effects of marriage and divorce -- just as it does for unemployment and job creation.

Then, we need a tax policy that's pro-marriage. We need to restore the value of the dependent allowance for children and eliminate tax penalties on married couples. The recent tax bill takes an important step in this direction.

We can work to strengthen marriage by reforming no-fault divorce laws, especially for couples with minor children. And we can encourage judges and legislatures to hold husbands who abandon their families financially responsible.

The church has a big role to play here as well. The Marriage Saver programs, developed by my friend Mike McManus, based on solid biblical teaching, have helped to strengthen existing marriages and prevent bad ones from forming in the first place.

And I suggest you read The Case for Marriage. You'll learn about the research that confirms what the Bible teaches. If we desire enduring love and safe havens for our kids, we can do no better than the structure designed by God for that purpose: the one that urges us "to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better or for worse, in sickness and in health, till death do us part."

For further reference:

Gallagher, Maggie and Linda J. Waite. THE CASE FOR MARRIAGE: Why Married People are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially. New York: Doubleday, 2000.

_________________________

Copyright (c) 2001 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database divorce

Thinking Together

"The goal in marriage is not to think alike, but to think together."

Robert C. Dodds

Writer

Cited in Even More of the Best of...BITS & PIECES

from Internet: Bits & Pieces · Robert C. Dodds via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

You Are Still My Man

While serving aboard a gunboat in Vietnam, Dave Roever was holding a phosphorus grenade some six inches from his face when a sniper's bullet ignited the explosive. In his book, WELCOME HOME, DAVEY, he describes the first time he saw his face after the explosion: "When I looked in that mirror, I saw a monster, not a human being... My soul seemed to shrivel up and collapse in on itself, to be sucked into a black hole of despair. I was left with indescribable and terrifying emptiness. I was alone in the way the souls in hell must feel alone." Finally Roever came back to the States to meet with his young bride, Brenda. Just before Brenda arrived, Roever watched the wife of another burn victim tell her husband that she wanted a divorce. Then Brenda walked in.

"Showing not the slightest tremor of horror or shock,"Roever writes, "she bent down and kissed me on what was left of my face. Then she looked me in good eye, smiled, and said, Welcome home, Davey! I love you." To understand what that meant to Davey you have to know that what she called him when they were most intimate; she would whisper Davey, over and over in his ear... By using her term of endearment for Davey, she said, "You are my husband. You will always be my husband. You are still my man."

To understand the grace of God poured out in Jesus Christ, we must first understand our inadequacy, our imperfection, our ugliness, as it were. But the transfigured Christ in all his loveliness, in all his holiness, in all his glory still loves us. There was no need for the disciples to be terrified, and there is no reason for us to terrified either.

Researcher Has Formula To Predict Marriage Outcomes

Joel 3:9

A researcher believes he can predict the outcome of most any marriage with a few squiggles on a chart. John M. Gottman said a 20-year study involving more than 600 married couples shows that by carefully plotting how a husband and wife interact and then reducing those observations to a formula, researchers can tell which marriages will succeed and which are heading for the rocks.

In a report at the national meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Gottman said studies by his Relationship Research Institute and the University of Washington show that how couples resolve differences is a key factor in whether a marriage will last.

The methods used by couples for conflict resolution can be expressed mathematically or on a simple graphic to predict how the marriage will endure. In effect, math has now found a place in love and marriage, he said.

To gather the data, a team of researchers observed videotapes of couples in interviews by marriage counselors and noted how husbands and wives responded to each other. Gottman said his team found that there basically are three types of stable marriages.

The first is a husband and wife who routinely avoids conflict. When a difference of opinion arises, said Gottman, “they will never argue. They will listen to the other, but will not try to persuade.” Such marriages, which he calls the “avoiders,” may be unemotional and distant, but they endure.

A second type is a volatile relationship “like two lawyers in a courtroom,” said Gottman. “They can argue at the drop of a hat. They are the Bickersons,” he said. Such marriages tend to last even though there are frequent and impassioned arguments.

The third type of stable marriage Gottman calls the “validating” couple. They listen to each other, respect the other's opinion and only occasionally argue. “They pick the issues they fight about,” he said.

Trouble in marriages comes when the couples are a mix of personalities that do not mesh in resolving conflicts. For instance, a husband who is a volatile arguer married to a wife who is an “avoider”, or one who flees from disagreement, may be in marital trouble, he said.

“Couples like that are usually heading for a divorce,” he said.

Researchers mathematically chart the marriage interactions by plotting not just what is said, but also how it is said and the body language and facial expression behind it. Emotions such as anger, harshness and hostility get a negative number, while humor and an eagerness to talk lovingly about the partner get a positive rating.

When these data points are given values and plotted on a chart it produces a line that dips below a neutral point into negative territory, or a line that soars above the neutral point.

Gottman said follow-up studies have shown the system works. He said an “escalating negative affect”, or a steep descent on the chart below the neutral point, predicts a couple will divorce within 5.6 years after marriage.

A more gentle descending slope below the neutral point, suggesting an “emotional disengagement”, predicts a divorce within 16.2 years after marriage, he said.

Charts with lines rising above the neutral point plot marriages that last.

By using the charts, Gottman said it is possible to help stabilize some marriages. For instance, there's little hope for a marriage where the wife is an avoider of argument and the husband thrives on heated discussion. If she can be taught to respond to his verbal attack while he can learn to tone down his volatility, then they might find a happy middle ground of marriage.

Gottman said in marriages where this counseling has been applied, about 65 percent of couples remain together for at least one year. This research, however, is still in an early stage, he said.

__________

Copyright 2004, The Associated Press

*

from The Associated Press - America Online · Paul Recer via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database husband wifedivorce

Why Men Are Just Happier People [2 Versions]

Mark 10:2

MEN ARE JUST HAPPIER PEOPLE

NICKNAMES

• If Laura, Kate and Sarah go out for lunch, they will call each other Laura, Kate and Sarah.

• If Mike, Dave and John go out, they will affectionately refer to each other as Fat Boy, Godzilla and Four-eyes.

EATING OUT

• When the bill arrives, Mike, Dave and John will each throw in $20, even though it’s only for $32.50. None of them will have anything smaller and none will actually admit they want change back.

• When the girls get their bill, out come the pocket calculators.

MONEY

• A man will pay $2 for a $1 item he needs.

• A woman will pay $1 for a $2 item that she doesn’t need but it’s on sale.

BATHROOMS

• A man has six items in his bathroom: toothbrush and toothpaste, shaving cream, razor, a bar of soap, and a towel .

• The average number of items in the typical woman’s bathroom is 337. A man would not be able to identify more than 20 of these items.

ARGUMENTS

• A woman has the last word in any argument.

• Anything a man says after that is the beginning of a new argument.

FUTURE

• A woman worries about the future until she gets a husband.

• A man never worries about the future until he gets a wife.

SUCCESS

• A successful man is one who makes more money than his wife can spend.

• A successful woman is one who can find such a man.

MARRIAGE

• A woman marries a man expecting he will change, but he doesn’t.

• A man marries a woman expecting that she won’t change, but she does.

DRESSING UP

• A woman will dress up to go shopping, water the plants, empty the trash, answer the phone, read a book, and get the mail.

• A man will dress up for weddings and funerals.

NATURAL

• Men wake up as good-looking as they went to bed.

• Women somehow deteriorate during the night.

OFFSPRING

• Ah, children. A woman knows all about her children. She knows about dentist appointments and romances, best friends, favorite foods, secret fears and hopes and dreams.

• A man is vaguely aware of some short people living in the house.

======================

From Dynamic Preaching:

Interesting thoughts about marriage (written, I suspect, by a man):

A woman worries about the future until she gets a husband.

A man never worries about the future until he gets a wife.

A successful man is one who makes more money than his wife can spend.

A successful woman is one who can find such a man.

To be happy with a man, you must understand him a lot and love him a little.

To be happy with a woman, you must love her a lot and not try to understand her at all.

Married men live longer than single men, but married men are a lot more willing to die.

Any married man should forget his mistakes, there's no use in two people remembering the same thing.

Men wake up as good-looking as they went to bed.

Women somehow deteriorate during the night.

A woman marries a man expecting he will change, but he doesn't.

A man marries a woman expecting that she won't change, and she does.

A woman has the last word in any argument.

Anything a man says after that is the beginning of a new argument.

There are 2 times when a man doesn't understand a woman - before marriage and after marriage.

_____________________

From: DNATRAIN

(Men and women are different, but there is no relationship on earth more satisfying than a good marriage ... )

from Email · submitted by Diane Sloane, Ledgewood Baptist Church, New Jersey via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database relationships

Teen couple details abuse

SHELTON, Conn. (AP) - A teen-age couple say they've become the target of abuse ever since their parents announced they were getting married, making them stepbrother and stepsister.

It was love at first sight for Jesse Murcko, 17, and Kati Bungert, 15, who have been dating since May 2000. The connection was just a strong when Bungert's mother, Joanne Brown, met Brian Murcko a month later.

Life for the teens has been troubled after word got out in January that Brown and Brian Murcko planned to wed.

One student threatened to shoot Jesse Murcko, and another assaulted Bungert in a school hallway, Brown said.

Police arrested Kevin Giardini, 16, in April on charges of threatening to shoot Jesse Murcko in March.

Brown said harassment in Shelton schools prompted her and Brian Murcko to remove their children from the public high school and home school them.

School board Chairman Joseph Pagliaro Jr. said lawyers for the Board of Education are reviewing the transfer request.

Mayor Mark A. Lauretti said he has met with Brown to talk about the situation, but he has little control over the school board.

"Society has their own mind on what's OK and what isn't," Brown said. "We're dealing with it as a family."

"It's obviously different from most situations, but that doesn't necessarily make it a bad thing or a good thing," said Alice Colonna, child psychoanalyst at the Yale Child Study Center. "These parents, if they get along, shouldn't be stopped just because the kids are dating."

Nine Suggestions for an Ailing Marriage

1. Never consider divorce an option. It is not a solution to your problem. Divorce is not an acceptable alternative because God says it is not.

2. Do not compare your mate or your marriage to others. There is not another person on earth like you. Your mate is also unique. This means that your marriage is unique. Let God make it what He wants it to be.

He will make it perfect! 3. Forgive your mate. You are to forgive as Christ has forgiven you. You are a sinner. He or she is a sinner. You are not perfect-so be willing to forgive one another. And do it right away before any bitterness can build up.

4. Stop all criticism. Love does not criticize and find fault.

Therefore, if you are critical of your mate, you do not have a heart of love. Stop all criticism. Instead, try a little praise. It works like magic! 5. Start communicating with your mate. Communication is completely broken down in many homes and marriages. Start listening to what your mate is saying as well as to what he or she is not saying. Break down the barriers by being vulnerable. Try saying, "Honey, what is the biggest fault I have?" Then say, "Would you please help me, by the grace of God, to gain victory over that fault?"

6. Refuse any relationship outside your marriage in which affection is sought or given. This substitute could even be a relative, a friend, or a neighbor. Do not seek to make someone else a substitute for what you are not getting in your marriage. You will never solve your problem doing this.

7. Trust your mate. Trust your spouse, even if he or she is wrong -you are right in trusting. A marriage must be based on trust. It cannot survive without it.

8. Do something every day to please your mate-something that you know will bring your partner joy and happiness. This is not asking much-to do one thing-but it pays big dividends.

9. Thank God every day for the 25 best qualities in your mate. Write them down. Concentrate on them and the positive will soon outshine the negative.

from Fredericksburg Bible Illustrator Supplements via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Study Shows That Stress and Divorce Are Deadly For Men

Chronic work stress and divorce can be a deadly combination for men, a new study has found.

Researchers from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the State University of New York-Oswego studied data from 12,366 patients who participated in the seven-year Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.

The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and will be published in the February 11, 2002, issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine.

Of 10,904 men who were married a the beginning of the trial, the researchers found those who stayed married were less likely to die from a number of causes than those who divorced.

During a nine-year follow-up period starting at the end of the trial, some 1,505 of the men with work-related stress had died, including 771 patients from cardiovascular causes.

Of those who divorced during the trial, 1,332 died from various causes, including some 663 from cardiovascular causes.

Those most adversely affected in the trial were patients experiencing both work stress and divorce, the study found.

The researchers suggested "remaining married in midlife has protective effects in the face of adverse experiences at work." They recommended counseling to help overcome work and marital stress.

*

A Daily Habit of Successful Marriages: Share A Spiritual Moment

[article from a secular women's magazine]

In another University of Chicago survey, this one of married couples, 75 percent of the Americans who pray with their spouses reported that their marriages are "very happy" (compared to 57 percent of those who don't). Those who pray together are also more likely to say they respect each other, discuss their marriage together, and -- stop the presses -- rate their spouses as skilled lovers.

Not to say that prayer is a cure for all that ails you (were that the case, my beloved Oakland Raiders would have won the Super Bowl years ago). But whether they're talking about a simple grace at dinnertime or some soul-searching meditation, couples routinely say that a shared spiritual life helps keep them close. And as Doug and Beth say, even couples who are on different sides of the theological fence can benefit from praying together daily.

"We have been married for seven years, but praying together is something we didn't start doing until about a year ago," says Doug, a 32-year-old Salt Lake City biochemist. "In the past, whenever we faced big decisions, we'd have discussion after discussion about them, but we'd never really come to a resolution."

After two 1,000-mile moves, the birth of three children, and two job changes, all in the past four years, those difficult decisions had begun to take a toll. So when Beth asked Doug, a nonreligious and self-proclaimed man of science, to try praying with her, he figured they had nothing to lose.

"I soon found that praying together brings out a real sense of selflessness and humility," Doug says. "When you're praying for each other, not yourself, you're focused together and speaking from the heart on a whole different level. I would never have predicted this for us, but it really works."

"As bad as any problem may seem at that moment," agrees Beth, "prayer always helps us see beyond it. It doesn't have to be a long-drawn-out scripture reading, just a few minutes a day. When we pray, it brings another level of honesty to our conversations. I think it's the most intimate thing you can do with another person."

Now they pray together every night, once the "urchins" are in bed, which puts them in the company of the 32 percent of American married couples who say they pray together regularly. It also puts them in the company of Julie and Thom, when the other couple isn't holed up in their igloo, of course.

"It's pretty short and not at all scripted," says Julie about their giving thanks before each meal. "We just join hands and let it rip. Whether we're asking for forgiveness or giving thanks, saying it out loud holds a lot of power.

"Besides, regardless of religion or spiritual preference, I think that most marriages require a ton of faith," Julie sums up. "You've got to believe that somehow the two of you are going to make it through things. You've got to believe that you're being blessed with this person. And even if the power we feel just comes from the strength of our love, even if we don't believe that it's God who is helping us, I still think that it's good to acknowledge that there's a force between the two of us that's helping us out."

*

Where's the Remote??: the Case For Marriage

Luke 20:34

LeRoy Sullivan is the pastor of the Bread of Life Church, a small African-American congregation in Kansas City, Kansas. Sullivan learned about Mike McManus's Marriage Saver programs and thought they made a lot of sense -- especially the teachings about cohabitation.

Many couples think that living together is a good way to find out if they're really compatible. But the truth is, living together is more likely to destroy a couple's chances of a good marriage. Almost half of all couples who cohabit break up before the wedding day. And even for those who marry, the chances of divorce skyrocket. Couples who live together before marriage are fifty percent more likely to divorce.

They're also more likely to become victims of violence. The U.S. Justice Department found that women are three times more likely to be assaulted by a live-in boyfriend than by a husband. And a child living with a mother and her boyfriend is thirty-three times more likely to be abused than a child living with married parents.

If those reasons aren't enough to get married, consider this: Studies have shown that one of the best ways to eliminate childhood poverty is for parents to marry before having children.

Pastor Sullivan took a hard look at the evidence and then a hard look at his own congregation. He saw seven couples whom he knew were living together. From the pulpit, Sullivan made a strong, biblical case for marriage. Living together, he told his flock, "is not part of God's plan. You need to marry or separate."

Most of the couples listened and tied the knot. But one cohabiting couple resisted his efforts. At least, the man did. His girlfriend told Sullivan, "Sam won't marry me, and he won't move out."

Well, one night Sullivan showed up on the couple's doorstep. "Hi, pastor, what are you doing here?" Sam greeted him.

"Lucinda tells me you won't marry her and won't move out either," Sullivan responded. "Now, that's not right." Glancing around the living room, Sullivan commented, "That looks like the most comfortable chair. I'm going to sit here until you move out. Now, where's the remote?"

Dumbfounded, Sam asked, "Pastor, you're not really going to sit there all night, are you?"

"Of course not," Sullivan cheerfully responded. "At midnight, Elder Jones is relieving me!" Sam moved out that night.

Sadly, taking such a strong stand on marriage is controversial within urban communities. In our inner cities, marriage is an almost forgotten institution. According to Mike McManus, to many non-whites, promoting marriage sounds like a white man's message. But Pastor Sullivan knows that marriage is a big part of the answer to the social ills that plague America; he believes the church ought to be a force in building godly families. And that's why he's willing to go to such extremes to encourage it.

I hope you'll stay tuned for the rest of this series about Marriage Savers. We need to make sure our friends and our children have the facts about trial marriages. And read Mike McManus's book, MARRIAGE SAVERS. You'll learn why cohabitation -- so common in our culture -- sets up families for poverty, violence, and divorce.

For more information:

Michael McManus, MARRIAGE SAVERS (Zondervan Publishing, 1995).

Learn more about Mike McManus's group, Marriage Savers, by visiting .

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. 'BreakPoint with Chuck Colson' is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database divorce

Women Also Benefit From Marriage

Women, as well as men, benefit from marriage and get a mental health boost from being a couple, a new study says.

Research from Australia, which shows that about 13 percent of married men and women suffer from stress, contradicts the findings of a 1972 study by sociologist Jessie Bernard.

Her study, which looked at anxiety, depression and neurosis in married and unmarried people, found that men reaped the benefits of marriage at the expense of women.

"The idea that men benefit from being part of a couple while women suffer all the stress has taken a blow," New Scientist magazine said Wednesday.

Psychologist David de Vaus, from LaTrobe University in Melbourne, said the difference between his findings and Bernard's could be due to the definition of stress and mental disorder, which can manifest itself in men as drug and alcohol abuse.

When he studied data from a mental health poll of more than 10,000 adults from a 1996 national survey of mental health in Australia which included substance abuse as indicators of stress, he found that 25 percent of single men and women were miserable.

In the female sample, married women with children had the fewest mental health problems.

"Psychologists are now debating whether Bernard's conclusions have always been flawed, or whether women have become genuinely happier inside marriage over the past 30 years," the magazine added.

*

from America Online News · Reuters via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database happiness

How To Handle A Woman?

From the Orem, Utah, Daily Herald, 9-4-02:

"Orem police officers responded to a report of someone seeing a man dragging a woman into a residence.... The woman explained that she had been 'playing hard to get' and had been running around until her boyfriend could catch her, and he then played like a caveman and dragged her into the house, (a police) spokesman said."

from Orem, Utah, Daily Herald via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

Triumph Or Tragedy?: the "Dark Country" of Divorce

Some years ago a book came out called DIVORCE: HOW AND WHEN TO LET GO. In it, the authors wrote: "Your marriage can wear out. People change their values and lifestyles ... Getting a divorce can be a positive ... growth-oriented step ... a personal triumph."

It's a measure of America's own growth that most of us now see this advice as flawed and foolish. An avalanche of evidence has shown divorce to be, not a triumph, but a tragedy.

In his new book, THE FAMILY YOU WANT, my friend Pastor John Huffmann, Jr. writes that divorce is "one of the most painful topics one can address in contemporary America."

And it was a painful topic for ancient Israel. The rabbis haggled over how the teachings of Moses ought to be interpreted. Moses said a man could divorce his wife only if he found out something "indecent" about her. Some scholars interpreted this to mean adultery alone. But others taught a more liberal interpretation. As Huffmann says, these rabbis taught that if a wife so much as spoiled a dish of food, talked to a strange man, or spoke disrespectfully of her in-laws, her husband could divorce her. The institution of marriage had become so precarious that some women hesitated to marry at all -- a situation, sadly, we find today, as well, even within the Church.

When the Pharisees asked Jesus, "Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife?" his answer was two-fold. He acknowledged that Moses gave permission for divorce -- but he pointed out that the reason for this was the people's hardness of heart.

But Huffman points out, Jesus "seems to underscore the word 'permitted.'" Jesus makes it clear God hates divorce and does not intend for marriages to be torn apart. He reminds us of God's ideal for marriage: That which God has joined together, no man should separate.

The Lord's teachings on divorce were, Huffmann notes, "extremely sensitive to human pain and also very strong in the warning that he gives." Divorce was "a concession to human weakness," an acknowledgment of human sinfulness. Jesus "refuses to back away from the truth that divorce is a symptom of sin."

Even under the worst of circumstances -- adultery, abuse, and abandonment -- God does not command divorce. He merely permits it. And divorce is always a trauma.

Novelist Pat Conroy gives a vivid account of this when he writes about his own divorce. Conroy does not speak blithely of growth and triumph. Instead, he writes of the "extraordinary pain" marital breakdown inflicts. With divorce, he said, "two people declare war on each other, and their screams and tears infect the entire world with the bacilli of their pain." He says, "I ... entered into the dark country of divorce, and ... was one of its ruined citizens."

In this age of no-fault divorce, Christians ought to do everything possible to protect their marriages. God does not want us stumbling into the "dark country" of divorce, but living instead in the light of marital love. Today's trendy ideas about divorce no longer should apply.

For further reading:

John Huffman, THE FAMILY YOU WANT (Christian Focus Publications, 2001).

Michael McManus, MARRIAGE SAVERS (Zondervan Publishing, 1995).

_________________________

Copyright © 2002 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. 'BreakPoint with Chuck Colson' is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

Study Reveals Christians More Likely To Divorce Than Non-Christians

Pro-family groups say study reveals churches’ failure to prepare couples, preach truth.

An “alarming” report that finds Christians are more likely to divorce than non-Christians has been welcomed as a badly needed “wake-up call to the Church.” The study by the Barna Research Group (BRG) also reveals that atheists are less likely to end their marriage than born-again believers.

The sobering findings, just released, come from a survey of nearly 4,000 adults by the California-based Christian research organization. They discovered that 27 percent of born-again Christians are or have previously been divorced–compared to 24 percent of others.

President George Barna said that while the statistics may seem alarming, they confirmed a pattern that existed for some time. The study “raises questions regarding the effectiveness of how churches minister to families,” he said. “The high incidence of divorce within the Christian community challenges the idea that churches provide truly practical and life-changing support for marriages.”

Within the denominations surveyed, Baptists recorded the highest divorce rate, with 29 percent. Catholics had the lowest–21 percent. For nondenominational Christians the rate was 34 percent. The Mormon divorce rate was 24 percent, while for atheists and agnostics it was 21 percent.

The survey did not specify whether the divorces occurred before those surveyed became Christians, but BRG’s David Kinnaman said: “Approximately 90 percent of born-again Christians who have ever been divorced experienced that marital breakup since they became a Christian, not before.”

Talk radio host and national spokesperson for the Family Research Council, Janet Parshall, said that the study “breaks my heart” and should be a wake-up call. “This is a defining moment for us; it is one of the clearest hallmarks of the age in which we live. We are at the Rubicon; will we be a make or break generation?”

The high divorce rate was the result of a growing acceptance of situational ethics within churches, where Christians no longer accepted the Bible as God’s non-negotiable, absolute truth. “We practice a kind of cushy Christianity where we have much more interest in comfort than character,” she said. “What happens is we lead with our skin, we say, ‘I am uncomfortable, so I will escape.’ But God says, ‘I hate divorce.’ We don’t operate from truth but from comfort.”

The study showed that evangelicals have a lot to learn from Catholics about marriage preparation and support, said Michael McManus, founder of Marriage Savers, a program which has seen divorce rates drop in communities by encouraging church leaders to develop effective marriage preparation programs.

“Catholics require six months of marriage preparation,” he said. “A Baptist pastor might require a meeting once or twice. It’s as if a little holy water will do. This is stupid.” Nondenominational churches “seem to have the idea that because they are walking with Jesus they are immune to the ravages of the culture.”

The BRG study also discovered that while only 11 percent of the adult population is currently divorced, one out of every four adults has experienced at least one marriage breakup. More whites (27 percent) divorce than African Americans (22 percent) or Hispanics (20 percent). Only eight percent of Asians end their marriages.

Barna said that “even more disturbing, perhaps” than the Christian divorce rate was that many of those involved “feel their community of faith provides rejection rather than support and healing.”

from Baptist Press? · Andy Butcher via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

Divorcees Less Likely To Be Happy

People who divorce their spouses when marriages get rocky are less likely to find happiness than those who stay married, according to a recent study by a team of leading family scholars.

The study, the first of its kind, found no evidence that unhappily married adults who divorced were typically any happier than unhappily married people who stayed married. Researchers, led by University of Chicago sociologist Linda Waite, also determined that two-thirds of unhappily married spouses who stayed married reported that their marriages were happy five years later.

Divorce did not typically reduce symptoms of depression or raise self-esteem, the study found.

"Some divorce is necessary, but results like these suggest the benefits of divorce have been oversold," Waite said in a July 11 news release.

The authors of the study said that divorce, while eliminating some stresses and sources of potential harm, may create other problems -- such as adverse reactions of children; issues in custody, child support and visitation orders; new financial or health stresses for one or both parents; and the uncertainty of new relationships or marriages.

Researchers also concluded that many currently happily married spouses have had extended periods of marital unhappiness, often for reasons including alcoholism, infidelity, verbal abuse, emotional neglect, depression, illness and work reversals.

Three broad headings may be used to identify ways that marriages that were once unhappy got happier, according to the study.

-- The marital endurance ethic: over time, couples endured their problems and saw a resolution of such issues as financial problems, job reversals, depression, child problems and even infidelity.

-- The marital work ethic: spouses actively worked to solve problems, change behavior or improve communication within their marriages through arranging more time together, enlisting help of relatives or close friends or consulting counselors.

-- The personal happiness ethic: marriage problems don't seem to change dramatically, but individuals do. Spouses reported finding alternative ways to improve their own happiness and build a happy life despite a disappointing marriage.

Couples who stayed together and became happier invested themselves in overcoming problems, minimized the importance of difficulties they could not resolve, and actively worked to reduce the attractiveness of alternatives.

"In most cases, a strong commitment to staying married not only helps couples avoid divorce, it helps more couples achieve a happier marriage," said research team member Scott Stanley, co-director of the Center for Marital and Family Studies at the University of Denver.

The study debunks the popularly held notion that divorce is the answer to marital unhappiness.

"In popular discussion, in scholarly literature, the assumption has always been that if a marriage is unhappy, if you get a divorce, it is likely you will be happier than if you stayed married," David Blankenhorn of the Institute for American Values said in the July 11 issue of USA Today. "This is the first time this has been tested empirically, and there is no evidence to support this assumption."

The data, presented July 12 in Arlington, Va., at the "Smart Marriage" conference sponsored by the Coalition for Marriage, Families and Couples Education, was collected by the National Survey of Family and Households, a nationally representative survey that extensively measures personal and marital happiness. Of 5,232 married adults interviewed in the late 1980s, 645 reported being unhappily married. Five years later, the same adults, whether divorced, separated or still married, were interviewed again as the database for the study.

Marriage Is For White People — the Decline of Marriage Among African Americans

“Marriage is for white people.” That's what Joy Jones was told when she was teaching a career exploration class for sixth-graders at an elementary school in the nation's capital. As a matter of fact, more than one student offered Jones this retort when she spoke of marriage and parenthood.

Joy Jones is author of BETWEEN BLACK WOMEN: LISTENING WITH THE THIRD EAR. In a recent article written for THE WASHINGTON POST, Jones laments the decline of marriage among African Americans. It wasn't always this way, she insists.

“I grew up in a time when two-parent families were still the norm, in both black and white America,” Jones explains. “Then, as an adult, I saw divorce become more commonplace, then almost a rite of passage. Today it would appear that many -- particularly in the black community -- have dispensed with marriage altogether.”

This nation has been witnessing (and allowing) the undermining of its marriage culture. Throughout the culture, marriage is simply not respected or expected as it once was, and the cult of personal autonomy and the rise of postmodern worldviews have only accelerated this process. Still, the decline of marriage as an institution is not uniform across the culture. As the statistics clearly indicate, marriage is losing ground among African Americans more quickly than within the society at large.

Jones' experience at the Washington elementary school tells the story. A young black boy had expressed his belief that being a good father was a very important personal goal -- “more meaningful than making money or having a fancy title.” Jones was pleased with the boy's statement. “That's wonderful!,” she told him. “I think I'll invite some couples in to talk about being married and rearing children.”

“Oh, no,” the student objected. “We're not interested in the part about marriage. Only about how to be good fathers.” Another boy quickly offered his own analysis, “speaking as if the words left a nasty taste in his mouth,” Jones laments. “Marriage is for white people,” he said.

Considering the context, that boy's statement is a tragedy in seven syllables. How could a young black boy come to the conclusion that marriage is only for white people?

In part, he is simply observing the reality. As Joy Jones confirms, the marriage rate for African Americans has been falling since the 1960s. At present, blacks have the lowest marriage rate of any racial group in the United States. According to the 2001 U.S. census data, 43.3 percent of black men and 41.9 percent of black women have never been married. In contrast, only 27.4 percent of white men and 20.7 percent of white women have never been married.

Of all demographic groups, African American women are least likely ever to marry. While the marriage rate fell for all Americans by 17 percent in the thirty years between 1970 and 2001, the marriage rate for black Americans fell by 34 percent.

This has caught the attention of many observers. Howard University's Audrey Chapman has referred to African Americans as “the most uncoupled people in the country.” Sociologist Andrew J. Cherlin points out that a black child was more likely to grow up with two parents during the days of slavery than he or she is today.

The reference to slavery is very instructive. Jones understands the argument that slavery and its lingering effects explain today's low marriage rate among African Americans. She rejects this with solid data. Indeed, she cites historian Eugene D. Genovese, who sets the record straight. Genovese, author of ROLL, JORDAN, ROLL: THE WORLD THE SLAVES MADE, points to the incredibly strong and even sacrificial commitment to marriage that most often characterized slave families. He tells of slaves who mutilated themselves and put themselves at risk, just in order to save their marriages and to continue raising their children.

“What has shifted in African American customs, in our community, in our consciousness, that has made marriage seem unnecessary or unattainable?” Jones asks.

Her argument is that the African American world has lost sight of normal marriage. Their world has been transformed by cohabitation, out-of-wedlock births, divorce, and remarriage. “Sex, love and childbearing have become A LA CARTE choices rather than a package deal that comes with marriage,” she advises. “Moreover, in an era of brothers on the 'downlow,' the spread of sexually transmitted diseases and the decline of the stable blue-collar jobs that black men used to hold, linking one's fate to a man makes marriage a risky business for a black woman.”

Beyond this, Jones argues that African American women hold different expectations of marriage than African American men. “My observation is that black women in their twenties and early thirties want to marry and commit at a time when black men their age are more likely to enjoy playing the field. As the woman realizes that a good marriage may not be as possible or sustainable as she would like, her focus turns to having a baby, or possibly improving her job status, perhaps by returning to school or investing more energy in her career.”

In other words, marriage just doesn't look like a very attractive proposition to women who have had to learn to make it on their own, and who are concerned that men really will not bring much to the marriage partnership anyway.

In an autobiographical passage, Joy Jones admits that this has been true for herself, as well as for others. She turned down a wedding proposal when it came quite late and when the man appeared to bring more problems from previous relationships than Jones was willing to accept.

“Most single black women over the age of 30 whom I know would not mind getting married, but acknowledge that the kind of man and the quality of marriage they would like to have may not be likely, and they are not desperate enough to simply accept any situation just to have a man,” she explains. “A number of my married friends complain that taking care of their husbands feels like having an additional child to raise.”

So why would a black woman get married? Jones argues that she marries when marriage is presented as more than a business alliance. “If it weren't for the intangibles, the allure of the lovey-dovey stuff, I wouldn't have gotten married,” said one black woman. “The benefits of marriage are his character and his caring. If not for that, why bother?” That's a good question. The benefits of marriage extend to far more than character and caring, but marriage surely cannot demand less of a man as husband. The absence of character and caring, this woman is keen to suggest, reduces marriage to a matter of cost-benefit analysis.

From her analysis of the state of marriage among African Americans, Jones moves to the larger culture, pointing to what she calls “the new twist.” It seems that the rest of America is following the lead of African Americans in this regard. “Often what happens in black America is a sign of what the rest of America can eventually expect,” Jones asserts. She cites Andrew Hacker, author of MISMATCH: THE GROWING GULF BETWEEN WOMAN AND MEN, to the effect that “the structure of white families is evolving in the direction of that of black families of the 1960s.” As Hacker's research indicates, “In 1960, 67 percent of black families were headed by a husband and wife, compared to 90.9 percent for whites. By 2000, the figure for white families had dropped to 79.8 percent. Births to unwed white mothers were 22.5 percent in 2001, compared to 2.3 percent in 1960.” As Jones then observes: “So my student who thought marriage is for white people may have to rethink that in the future.”

This kind of statistical analysis -- with cold mathematical precision and veracity -- tells only part of the story. Anyone who observes American society with care must notice that marriage is becoming more and more marginalized, both in terms of how it is conceived and in terms of how it is lived.

The acceptance of easy no-fault divorce, the delay of marriage far into adult years, the remarkable rise in rates of cohabitation, and the decline of marriage as a personal and social expectation all contribute to this phenomenon.

The recovery of a marriage culture demands the attention of all Americans, not just African Americans. Respect for marriage must be rebuilt group by group, couple by couple, and individual by individual. Young people must be shown that marriage is the covenant relationship that is conducive for human happiness, well being, and satisfaction and that it is the optimal context for the raising of children and for the sustenance of society.

In order for this to happen, couples of all ages, races, and ethnicities need to live out the fullness and fulfillment of marriage before the watching world. Christians have a special stake in this, because we understand that marriage is not only a social institution, but that is also the unique arena in which the glory of God is demonstrated in the holy relationship between the husband and his wife and in the proper ordering of the household as a testimony to the grace and goodness of God. Furthermore, we are the ones who know that we will give an answer for our responsibilities in marriage -- and every single Christian has an important stake in this mission of recovering marriage. Above all, the church should be the one place where healthy marriages are nurtured, expected, supported, and lived out, not only before the congregation, but before the entire society.

Something has gone horribly wrong when a young black boy believes that marriage “is for white people.” How long will it be before children his age wonder if marriage is for anyone at all?

*

[Original illustration at this number was added to HolwickID #4297]

Are You A Manipulator?

John 15:9

”My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you.” (John 15:12)

– For reading & meditation: John 15:9-17

Yesterday we touched on what is perhaps the biggest single problem causing marital unhappiness — trying to get one’s partner to meet needs that can only be fully met through a relationship with Jesus Christ.

What happens if we do not allow God to meet our basic needs? We will try to get those needs met in some other way. Some people try to find satisfaction in achievement. This, however, fails to bring lasting satisfaction, and whenever their inner discomfort reaches the threshold of awareness, they anesthetize it with more activities, achievement, and work.

Another way is to attempt to get these needs met in marriage. But if we enter marriage as a way of getting our needs met, then we consciously or unconsciously become involved in manipulating our partner to meet our needs. Instead of following the Christian vision of marriage, which is to minister to our partners from a position of security in Christ’s love, we begin to manipulate them to meet our needs.

Thousands of marriages, perhaps millions, are caught up in this treadmill — each trying to get their partner to meet the needs that only God can fully meet. The best way to get our needs met is to depend on God to meet them. When we lock into Him and focus on how much He loves and values us, and on His purpose for our lives, then and only then are we free to minister in the way He prescribes in His Word. Without that inner security, we become exposed and vulnerable to the likes or dislikes of our partner. We become puppets — not people.

PRAYER:

O my Lord and Master, take me in Your arms today and make me so conscious of Your love that I will no longer manipulate others to love me, but will minister to them with the love I already have. For Jesus’ sake I ask it. Amen.

FURTHER STUDY:

1 Cor. 13; Rom. 5:8; 8:35; 1 John 3:16

1. List fifteen qualities of love.

2. Is their emphasis on giving or getting?

from www.gospelcom.net - Campus Journal - © R. B. C. Ministries [?] · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database reconciliation

And You Wonder Why It Didn't Last

And You Wonder Why It Didn't Last

She married him because he was such a "strong man"

She divorced him because he was such a "dominating male."

He married her because she was so "fragile and petite."

He divorced her because she was so "weak and helpless."

She married him because "he knows how to provide a good living."

She divorced him because "all he thinks about is business."

He married her because "she reminds me of my mother."

He divorced her because "she's getting more like her mother every day."

She married him because he was "happy and romantic."

She divorced him because he was "shiftless and fun-loving."

He married her because she was "steady and sensible."

He divorced her because she was "boring and dull."

She married him because he was "the life of the party."

She divorced him because "he never wants to come home from a party."

from Source not recorded · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

Marriage Is A Covenant

Mark 10:1

”But a man who commits adultery lacks judgment; whoever does so destroys himself.” (Proverbs 6:32)

– For reading & meditation: Proverbs 6:27-35

We have talked about chastity; let’s talk now about faithfulness. Chastity is purity prior to marriage; faithfulness is virtue within marriage. God wants everyone who enters into marriage to be loyal and true. When we say that God is love, we are also saying that God is faithful, because love cannot be love unless it has faithfulness in it.

Marriage is a covenant. A lot of people say, “It’s just a piece of paper and fifteen minutes of someone’s time.” But hold on a minute. If life is based on relationships, then the only ethical relationship is love, and love is faithfulness, then the marriage covenant is the most precious thing in life.

The thing that constantly comes out in both Old and New Testaments is the covenant aspect of love. And when you study the covenants of Scripture you will find this — that God keeps His covenants even though they are broken from the other side. The relationship between Jehovah and Israel is often pictured as that of a husband and a wife. Israel becomes the wayward, unfaithful wife who commits adultery. But God is still faithful to His covenant. God says, “I will never break my covenant. You can count on it. I am God.”

Young people don’t want entangling relationships today. They want to be free to love. With all the conviction of my heart, I say to you that there is no such thing as “free love.” only free exploitation. Love is commitment and when men and women indulge in fornication or adultery, they have not just broken God’s laws; they have broken His heart.

PRAYER:

O Father, in an age when anything goes, help me be an exhibition to the world around of what it means to be a follower of You. Help me keep all my relationships pure. For Your own dear Name’s sake. Amen.

FURTHER STUDY:

Mark 10:1-9; Gen. 2:24; Eph. 5:25

1. What is the principle laid down for marriage?

2. How are husbands to love their wives?

from www.gospelcom.net - Campus Journal - © R. B. C. Ministries [?] · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

A Valentine "Miss" -- My Wife!

So here I sit, in all my glory…

Lend me an ear, and I’ll tell you a story.

I once had a wife — she was such a dear;

Then came the Net, and it all disappeared!

Now there she sits, for hours on end;

Don’t care where I’m going — don’t care where I’ve been.

Could be three, or it could be nine;

She really doesn’t care, long as she’s online.

She gets out of work and rushes home;

She comes in yelling at me, “Get off the phone!”

Where is my hug? Where is my kiss?

But she’s at the computer — that’s all she missed!

Talking to cyber-friends, checking the mail–

I might as well be in a cyber-jail!

My stomach’s growling — it’s so unfair;

No clean dishes and no clean underwear!

Drink me a Coke, stare at the walls;

I’ll pick at my teeth and roam the halls.

Laughing and typing, what a sight I get to see.

Can you believe she’s there — when she could be with ME!

from Source not recorded · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

Listen To Your Mother

Mom and Dad, I publicly admit it… you were right. After twenty-seven years of pain and agony your hard-headed daughter admits that the man she chose to spend the rest of her life with was the wrong one. Period.

You guys tried to tell me. You saw his lack of character, his laziness, his tendency to be a womanizer and his low morals. I didn’t. But I should have listened to you more and paid less attention to the physical attraction. But how could I? I was 18 and knew everything. Since then, I have become increasingly dumber in my own wisdom and hopefully eons wiser in God’s wisdom. And that’s what you tried to hammer into my skull if I had had ears to hear.

I just wish you guys were still here so that I could tell you this in person. But you’ll be proud to know that as a mother, there are some things that I am telling my own children. They go something like this:

1) I still believe in God and that He loves me and takes care of me.

2) I still believe that the USA is the greatest country on earth. I will continue to salute the flag and sing the Star Spangled Banner loud and unashamed.

3) I still believe in the institution of marriage. But I also believe that you should marry for reasons of character and virtue and not for beauty and charm. (Try paying your electric bill with that!) I just read a quote from “The Book of Romance” by Tommy Nelson that I wholeheartedly agree with. It says, “Nothing is more discouraging for a woman to be married to a man whom she discovers later she would not want as a waiter.” Amen, brother!

4) I still believe that sex should be saved for marriage, no matter how many times they jump in bed in those movies we love to watch. I wish I hadn’t learned that lesson the hard way!

5) I still believe you should be respectful to your elders, which is defined as anyone over the age of twelve and a half. They have been around the block a few times.

6) I still believe that you should wear clean underwear everyday, that your eyes will stick that way and you will be sure to get worms if you eat raw cookie dough. (OK, Mom, so I borrowed a few from you!)

7) I still believe that you should always listen to your mother. (I just had to add that one!)

from Source not recorded · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database wisdomrepentance

Sonnet of Sonnet - O My Heart's Heart - [poem]

O my heart’s heart, and you who are to me

More than myself — myself, God be with you,

Keep you in strong obedience leal and true

To Him whose noble service setteth free,

Give you all good we see or can foresee,

Make your joys many and your sorrows few,

Bless you in what you bear and what you do,

Yea, perfect you as He would have you be.

So much for you; but what for me, dear friend?

To love you without stint and all I can

Today, tomorrow, world without an end;

To love you much and yet to love you more,

As Jordan at his flood sweeps either shore;

Since woman is the helpmeet made for man.

Sonnet of Sonnets — Christina Rossetti (1830-1894)

from Source not recorded · Christina Rossetti (1830-1894) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

The Mayonnaise War

Back when I was a new Christian, I used to brag that the divorce rate among active Christians was only one out of a thousand marriages.

Sadly, that argument bit the dust long ago.

In fact, as a bookseller and book reviewer, I’m noticing more and more titles on marital problems among Christians. After all, the vow was “for better or for worse,” and as I look back on my own marriage, I see how many pitfalls have come from mistaken expectations.

My wife thought she was marrying Ward Cleaver, and I assumed every new wife stepped out of a Good Housekeeping advertisement, a can of Pledge in one hand, the other busily stirring the stroganoff and a seal of approval on her forehead.

Surprise — we were both wrong. I made that discovery the first night I opened the fridge to fix a sandwich.

“Hey, Honey… where’s the Best Foods Mayonnaise?”

Silence. And then, “Darling… I don’t use Best Foods, I use Kraft Miracle Whip.”

Silence again.

Over the next several days, we discovered she liked Crest, I brushed with whatever was on sale. I liked green olives, she hated them and would only eat black ones. When I, shivering, turned up the furnace and the electric blanket, she was right behind me turning them down. Remembering her childhood, she liked to take Sunday afternoon drives — to which I would respond, “Yes, but that was when gas was twenty-nine cents a gallon. Let’s watch an old movie instead.”

The worst discovery of all was that she was a morning person, popping out of bed like a piece of toast, while I awoke with pajamas nailed to the mattress. “If God meant man to see the sunrise,” I explained, “he’d have scheduled it for much later in the day.”

The night we realized we both liked Ivory soap, we celebrated.

I guess that we discovered no disagreement is so small it can’t evolve into a major problem, and that two monologues do not equal a dialogue. But most of all, we learned we no longer belonged to the separate universes we once did as singles. Our task was now to forge a new universe, one in which we would inhabit together.

After all these years, I’m still a night person, and my wife is still a morning glory. As for Ward Clever, she simply has to face it. I’m probably always going to be more like the Beav. And I’ve come to realize she’s more likely to step out of the pages of the National Enquirer than Good Housekeeping.

But we love each other — and as a result, she’s come to like grits for breakfast (or any other time), while I finally understand that the garbage does not take itself out.

We now have separate controls for the electric blanket. I put on a sweater when I’m cold. And in the refrigerator, side by side like a pair of contented lovebirds, sits a jar each of Best Foods Mayonnaise and Kraft Miracle Whip.

from Source not recorded · Nick Harrison via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

50 Ways To Love Your Spouse

Fifty Ways to Love Your Spouse

1. Love yourself first.

2. Start each day with a hug.

3. Serve breakfast in bed.

4. Say "I love you" every time you part ways.

5. Compliment freely and often.

6. Appreciate — and celebrate — your differences.

7. Live each day as if it's your last.

8. Write unexpected love letters.

9. Plant a seed together and nurture it to maturity.

10. Go on a date once every week.

11. Send flowers for no reason.

12. Accept and love each other's family and friends.

13. Make little signs that say "I love you" and post them all over the house.

14. Stop and smell the roses.

15. Kiss unexpectedly.

16. Seek out beautiful sunsets together.

17. Apologize sincerely.

18. Be forgiving.

19. Remember the day you fell in love — and recreate it.

20. Hold hands.

21. Say "I love you" with your eyes.

22. Let her cry in your arms.

23. Tell him you understand.

24. Drink toasts of love and commitment.

25. Do something arousing.

26. Let her give you directions when you're lost.

27. Laugh at his jokes.

28. Appreciate her inner beauty.

29. Do the other person's chores for a day.

30. Encourage wonderful dreams.

31. Commit a public display of affection.

32. Give loving massages with no strings attached.

33. Start a love journal and record your special moments.

34. Calm each other's fears.

35. Walk barefoot on the beach together.

36. Ask her to marry you again.

37. Say yes.

38. Respect each other.

39. Be your partner's biggest fan.

40. Give the love your partner wants to receive.

41. Give the love you want to receive.

42. Show interest in the other's work.

43. Work on a project together.

44. Build a fort with blankets.

45. Swing as high as you can on a swing-set by moonlight.

46. Have a picnic indoors on a rainy day.

47. Never go to bed mad.

48. Put your partner first in your prayers.

49. Kiss each other goodnight.

50. Sleep like spoons.

from Source not recorded · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database marriage

Marriage Takes Three

I once thought marriage

took just two to make a go,

but now I am convinced

it takes the Lord also.

And not one marriage fails

where Christ is asked to enter

as lovers come together

with Jesus at the center.

But the marriage seldom thrives

and homes are incomplete

‘til He is welcome there,

to help avoid defeat.

In homes where Christ is first

it’s obvious to see, those

unions really work,

for marriage still takes three.

from Source not recorded · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Check-up For Wives

1 Peter 3:1

“Wives, in the same way be submissive to your husbands … “ (1 Peter 3:1)

– For reading & meditation: 1 Peter 3:1-12

Yesterday the men were asked to examine themselves using a simple questionnaire as to how they were doing as husbands. Today a similar opportunity is extended to wives.

1. Are you depending on the Lord to meet your basic needs for security, significance, and self-worth? (YES/NO)

2. Can you meet financial disasters bravely without condemning your husband for his mistakes, or comparing him unfavorably with others? (YES/NO)

3. Do you dress with an eye for your husband’s likes and dislikes in color and style? (YES/NO)

4. Do you keep up your own personal prayer life so that you may meet everything that arises with poise? (YES/NO)

5. Do you avoid daydreaming or fantasizing about other men you might have married? (YES/NO)

6. Are you sensitive to your husbandÕs moods and feelings and know when, and when not, to bring up delicate issues? (YES/NO)

7. Do you respect your husband? (YES/NO)

8. Are you careful never to criticize your husband in front of others? (YES/NO)

9. Do you keep track of the day’s news and what is happening in the world so that

you can discuss these with your husband? (YES/NO)

10. Are you a “submissive” wife? (YES/NO)

A score of 7 to 10 yes responses – excellent. Below 7 yes answers – it’s decision time.

PRAYER:

My heavenly Father, I realize the tender relationships of home can be a shrine, or they can be a snarl. Keep my inner shrine from all wrong attitudes and from all worry. Let me approach today’s challenge in the knowledge that “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me” (Phil. 4:13, NKJV). Amen.

FURTHER STUDY:

Prov. 31:10-31; 1 Tim. 3:11; Esther 1:20

1. What are the characteristics of a virtuous woman?

2. What do her children call her?

from www.gospelcom.net - Campus Journal - © R. B. C. Ministries [?] · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Accepting Your Partner

John 13:12

”… whoever accepts anyone I send accepts me … “ (John 13:20) – For reading & meditation: John 13:12-20

The third principle for healing the brokenness that arises from troubles in the home only works if the previous two are clearly established: Accept your partner or your children, and don’t just endure them. Too difficult? Look again at the verse at the top of this page, where we are instructed to accept each other just as God accepts us. And remember that when we supply the willingness, God supplies the power. There is quite a difference, of course, between accepting your partner and enjoying him or her; the former is a scriptural requirement, the latter is something that is dependent on their response and behavior.

Marriage sometimes involves living with an irritating, infuriating, and obnoxious person: how can we accept such a person, let alone enjoy him or her? Acceptance does not mean that we have to enjoy everything our partner does: it means rather that we see our partner as someone to whom God wants us to minister, and we pursue that ministry whether we feel like it or not. Many Christians stumble over this.

A lady who recently came through to victory on this point said to me, “But how can I accept my husband, who is nothing more than a loathsome, alcoholic pig?”

I said, “It’s impossible as long as you are depending on your husband to meet your need for security. Depend on God to meet that need, and then see what happens.”

She did so, and found that when she no longer depended on her husband to meet her security needs. she saw him in a completely new light. Then she had no difficulty in accepting him.

PRAYER:

O God, this sounds too good to be true. Can life’s difficulties be resolved so easily? Give me the courage not to dismiss anything until I’ve tried it, nor resist any principle that is in harmony with Your Word. Amen.

FURTHER STUDY:

Eph. 5:21-33; 1:6; Rom. 15:7

1. How should the husband show his acceptance of his wife?

2. How should the wife show her acceptance of her husband?

from www.gospelcom.net - Campus Journal - © R. B. C. Ministries [?] · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database reconciliation

Making God More Meaningful

Luke 6:38

”No one has ever seen God; but if we love one another, God lives in us and his love is made complete in us.” (1 John 4: 12)

– For reading & meditation: 1 John 4:7-21

We have been seeing over the past two days that the first principle to follow in healing the brokenness that comes through troubles in the home is to depend on the Lord to meet our basic needs. You might ask yourself: if the Lord can meet my needs for security, self-worth, and significance, why do I need a human partner at all?

The answer to that question flows out of the next principle: In the relationship with your partner or your children, focus more on what you can give than what you can get. This can be exceedingly difficult, of course, if you are not allowing God to meet your needs, but once you are secure in Him, everything He asks you to do becomes possible. Assuming our needs for security, significance, and self-worth are being met in God, we are then in a position to fulfil God’s true purpose for marriage, which is this: God, who is an invisible, intangible, eternal Being, has designed marriage to be a visible, tangible demonstration of the reality of His love as we minister love and consideration to one another.

Just think of it — in marriage we have the marvelous privilege of demonstrating God’s love to our partners in a way that they can feel, touch, and understand. Our love will not add to the fact of their security in Christ, but it will add to the degree to which they feel it. No wonder Martin Luther said that marriage was the greatest way God had of teaching us the truths about Himself. And the second greatest way? You’ve got it! The church!

PRAYER:

Father, to realize that I have the privilege of bringing the reality of Your love to others, and thus making You more real to them, is so incredible that it almost blows my mind! But I know it is true. Make me worthy of this privilege. For Jesus’ sake. Amen

FURTHER STUDY:

Matt. 10: 1-8; Luke 6:38; Prov. 11:25; Acts 20:35; 2 Cor. 9:6

1. What did Jesus teach His disciples?

2. How can you demonstrate this today?

from www.gospelcom.net - Campus Journal - © R. B. C. Ministries [?] · (unknown) via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database reconciliation

A Good Marriage Must Be Created

In the art of marriage, the little things are big things…

• It’s never being too old to hold hands.

• It’s remembering to say “I love you” at least once each day.

• It’s never going to sleep angry.

• It’s having a mutual sense of values and common objectives.

• It is standing together, facing the world.

• It is forming a circle of love that gathers in the whole family.

• It is speaking words of appreciation and demonstrating gratitude in thoughtful ways.

• It is having the capacity to forgive and forget.

• It is giving each other an atmosphere in which each can grow.

• It is finding room for the things of the spirit.

• It is a common search for the good and the beautiful.

• It is, not only, marrying the right partner,

• It is being the right partner.

from Source not recorded · Wilfred A. Peterson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database

Oh, Canada! - Marriage Gets A New Definition

The first line of yesterday’s Associated Press story says it all: “An appeals court ruled that Canada’s ban on homosexual marriage was unconstitutional, and hours later two Canadian men tied the knot in the country’s first legal same-sex wedding.”

This is the beginning of a vast social experiment initiated by judicial fiat. Canadian Justice Harry LaForme wrote in his opinion, “The restriction against same-sex marriage is an offence to the dignity of lesbians and gays because it limits the range of relationship options available to them. The result is they are denied the autonomy to choose whether they wish to marry. This in turn conveys the ominous message that they are unworthy of marriage.”

The argument, you see, is that to deny homosexuals marriage is manifestly unfair. But it’s not unfair. Gays and lesbians are not unworthy of marriage; they are INCAPABLE of marriage.

In his wonderful new book, WHAT WE CAN’T NOT KNOW, University of Texas professor J. Budziszewski states that the purpose of marriage is procreation — the begetting and rearing of children. The future of the human race depends on marriage understood as the union of one man and one woman. Relationships between two men or two women are by their very nature sterile and, thus, not marriage.

Budziszewski writes, “To call procreation the purpose of marriage is not arbitrary; alone among all forms of human union, the union of the sexes produces children..... A legislature [or a court] can no more turn sodomitical unions into marriages than it can turn dogs into cats; it can only UNRAVEL the institution of marriage by sowing confusion about its purpose.”

And that confusion is growing. Most people oppose or support homosexual marriage for sentimental reasons. Some can’t stomach the idea at all, but they don’t know why except for a feeling that it’s wrong. Others have friends, neighbors, co-workers, or family members who are involved in long-term homosexual relationships. They enjoy the couple’s company; they know that they’re in love. Since marriage is all about love, they reason, same-sex couples should be permitted to marry.

Photos of happy gay and lesbian couples getting married as a result of this ruling only reinforce this sentiment. The negative sociological consequences won’t be fully felt for years — when, by then, it will be too late.

Christians must not fall into that sentiment trap, nor can we simply quote Scripture to deny homosexual unions. We need well reasoned arguments based on a biblical worldview. And BreakPoint is committed to helping you make those arguments cogently and winsomely. Call us here (1-877-3-CALLBP); we’ll offer you some good resources.

J. Budziszewski is right: We and our neighbors can’t not know that marriage by nature is about procreation. And only a man and a woman together — two becoming one flesh — can procreate. Same-sex relationships can never be marriage.

A second issue is that those who espouse sexual liberation have defined the issues in the debate. I’ll address this on our next broadcast, so stay tuned.

What has occurred in Canada adds fuel to the same-sex marriage movement. Now more than ever, Christians must make a well reasoned defense of marriage.

For further information:

“CANADIAN COURT RULES BAN ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGES UNCONSTITUTIONAL,” MINNEAPOLIS STAR-TRIBUNE, June 11, 2003. (Free registration required.)

Tom Cohen, “APPEALS COURT DECLARES CANADA’S BAN ON GAY MARRIAGE UNCONSTITUTIONAL,” TACOMA NEWS TRIBUNE, June 10, 2003.

Ted Olsen, “WEBLOG: ONTARIO COURT THROWS OUT MARRIAGE DEFINITION,” CHRISTIANITY TODAY, June 11, 2003.

Robert p. George, “RICK SANTORUM IS RIGHT,” NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE, May 27, 2003.

J. Budziszewski, “‘LITTLE PLATOONS’: GOD’S DESIGN FOR OUR RELATIONSHIPS,” BREAKPOINT WORLDVIEW, March 2003.

J. Budziszewski, WHAT WE CAN’T NOT KNOW: A GUIDE (Spence, 2003).

BreakPoint Commentary No. 030506, “AN UNSTABLE BALANCE: WANTING IT BOTH WAYS.” (Archived commentary; free registration required.)

Roberto Rivera, “NO OTHER KIND: FOREGOING FULFILLMENT,” BREAKPOINT ONLINE, October 22, 22.

____________

Copyright (c) 2003 Prison Fellowship Ministries. Reprinted with permission. "BreakPoint with Chuck Colson" is a radio ministry of Prison Fellowship Ministries.

*

from BreakPoint Commentary · Charles Colson via Kerux Sermon and Illustration Database homosexuality

Everything we make is available for free because of a generous community of supporters.

Donate